Latest / The Epstein Chronicles / Epstein Survivors Say That Lesley Groff Wasn't Honest With Congress (7/10/26)

Transcript

Epstein Survivors Say That Lesley Groff Wasn't Honest With Congress (7/10/26) · The Epstein Chronicles

0:00
Speaker 1: What's up, everyone, and welcome to another episode of the
0:03
Epstein Chronicles. CNN has a peace out and it's talking
0:08
about how the survivors are calling out Leslie Groff over
0:12
her testimony that she gave to Congress. And guess what.
0:16
The survivors are right to call her out because Leslie Groff,
0:22
in my opinion, like just about everybody else who has
0:26
given testimony, lied And if you could believe it, she
0:30
walked into Congress with the burden of history on her
0:33
shoulders and somehow tried to place that burden back on
0:36
to everyone else. She wasn't some stranger brushing against the
0:39
outer rim of Jeffrey Epstein's world. She was his longtime
0:43
executive assistant, the person tied to calendars, calls, travel appointments, logistics, routines, names, movements,
0:51
and the machinery that kept Epstein's world humming. Now that
0:55
doesn't make her automatically guilty of every evil Epstein committed,
0:59
but absolutely makes her responsible for answering hard questions with
1:03
something better than fog, self pity and selective amnesia. The
1:08
survivors are right to be furious because their lived experience
1:11
Colyde's head first with a version of events Groff tried
1:14
to sell. She asked the public to believe that she
1:19
spent nearly two decades inside the central nervous system of
1:22
Epstein's life, will somehow never absorbing the meaning of signals
1:26
flashing all around her. She wanted to be seen as deceived, used, isolated,
1:32
and manipulated. But she offered that story while still minimizing
1:36
the logistical role that she played. And I think that's
1:39
the insult. And I think that's why Congress let her
1:42
escape through that room without a full public accounting. Is
1:45
just another disgrace in a case already drowning in them.
1:49
I mean, the committee itself said her June ninth, twenty
1:52
twenty sixth interview was part of its review into Epstein
1:55
Maxwell sex trafficking operations, influence networks and government and failures.
2:01
Groff's opening posture was obvious from the first breath. Shrink herself,
2:05
soften herself, humanize herself, and turn the temperature down before
2:09
the facts could turn it back up. She told Congress
2:13
she was shy, frightened, sleepless, harassed, and damaged by the fallout.
2:17
And YO, maybe some of that is true, and no
2:20
decent person should cheer, harassment, or threats against anyone. But
2:24
none of that answers the central question. None of that
2:27
explains how a woman tasked with organizing Epstein's life managed
2:31
to miss that pattern survivor say was sitting in plain sight.
2:36
None of that squares with the record of calls, appointments, massages, travel, housing,
2:41
and access. Groff did what people in these situations so
2:45
often do. She built the wall of personal suffering in
2:48
front of institutional responsibility. She didn't walk in and say,
2:53
here is what I did, here is what I missed,
2:55
here is where I failed, Here's where the system protected him.
2:59
She walked in and told Congress, in effect, that Epstein
3:02
was Doctor Jekyl, that mister Hyde was hidden from her,
3:06
and that she was just another person fooled by the monster.
3:10
That might be emotionally convenient, but it's not morally sufficient.
3:14
In her statement, she denied knowing about Epstein's crimes, described
3:18
them as a master manipulator, and said she would never
3:22
have stayed silent had she known. The problem with Groff's
3:26
story is not simply that survivors rejected the problem is
3:30
that the contemporaneous record makes it impossible to treat her
3:33
version as clean, complete, or adequate. She admitted that she
3:38
scheduled massages for Epstein almost daily. That alone should have
3:42
triggered the kind of questioning that tears through polite phrasing
3:46
and gets to the ugly heart of the matter and
3:48
Epstein's world, massage was not just a luxury appointment. It
3:52
was the recurring cover term survivors have described for abuse, recruitment, exploitation,
3:58
and access. When UF presents massage scheduling as a mundane
4:02
administrative duty, she's not merely describing a calendar entry. She's
4:07
sanitizing the mechanism. She's taking the word that sits at
4:11
the center of Epstein's abuse pipeline and dressing it up
4:14
as a spa routine. And that's why survivors recoil. That's
4:19
why the public should recoil. Grop's own transcript records her
4:23
saying that almost daily she made massage appointments, and that
4:27
those calls could be as brief as asking whether someone
4:30
was available at a certain time. Yo, there is a
4:34
grotesque neatness to the defense that she was just scheduling.
4:38
Bureaucracies are built on that line. Nobody's ever responsible for
4:42
the whole machine because everyone claims they only touched one lever.
4:46
One person scheduled the appointment, another opened the door, another
4:50
drove the car, another book the room, another wired the money,
4:54
another filed the form, another looked away, And by the
4:58
time the victims standing in the wreckage, every adult in
5:00
the chain insists they were too small to matter. But
5:04
logistics are not neutral when logistics repeatedly serve abuse. A
5:09
calendar can be a weapon. A phone call can be
5:11
a weapon. A hotel reservation can be a weapon. Now,
5:16
Groff's defenders can say she was not in the massage room,
5:19
and that may be true, But the Epstein case has
5:22
never been only about who was in the room. It's
5:25
about who built the path to the room, who maintained
5:28
the path, who normalized the path, who kept the names flowing,
5:32
who kept the flights moving, who kept the apartments available,
5:36
and who helped make the abnormal feel routine. Epstein didn't
5:40
operate by magic. He operated through systems. He operated through staff,
5:44
He operated through professionalized convenience. He operated through people who
5:50
made the sorted look scheduled. That's why the eye never
5:53
saw anything. Defense is so inadequate. A person can avoid
5:56
seeing the final act while still helping assemble the stage.
6:00
A person can claim ignorance of the crime while still
6:03
making the crime easier to commit. A person can be
6:07
legally insulated and morally exposed at the same time. Groff's
6:12
testimony leaned heavily on the idea that Epstein kept her
6:16
outside of his secret life, but that phrase collapses under
6:19
the weight of what her job actually was. She wasn't
6:22
outside the calendar. She wasn't outside the calls. She wasn't
6:25
outside the travel arrangements. She wasn't outside the massage scheduling.
6:30
She wasn't outside the contact list. She was not outside
6:33
the daily administrative bloodstream. She may not have been inside
6:36
every room, but she was plainly inside the operation's logistics.
6:42
Epstein didn't need every employee to know everything. He needed
6:45
enough people to do enough tasks without asking enough questions.
6:49
Groff's testimony, at its most charitable, describes exactly that kind
6:53
of functional blindness. And what did Congress do with that?
6:58
It treated the moment like another transcript to be released,
7:01
another file to be posted, another box to be checked.
7:05
Congress had a witness who worked for Epstein for eighteen
7:08
years and had a direct line into his scheduling and
7:11
communications universe. Congress had survivors publicly saying the testimony did
7:16
not match their experience. Congress had documentary trails, email references,
7:22
massage lists, travel questions, housing questions, and visa related questions,
7:28
and yet the process still felt contained, managed, polite, and bloodless.
7:33
That's not accountability. A congressional interview is not just as
7:38
simply because a court reporter is in the room. If
7:42
the witness leaves with her narrative largely intact and survivors
7:45
leave feeling gas lit again, the process has failed and look.
7:50
One of the most insulting parts is that Groff wanted
7:53
the moral benefits of remorse without the burden of accountability.
7:57
She said Epstein was a monster. She said she was fooled.
8:00
She said she now believes victims. She said she would
8:03
have acted differently had she anne. But that formulation keeps
8:07
her safely positioned as someone acted upon, not someone who acted.
8:12
It turns her into another casualty of Epstein's manipulation, rather
8:16
than a participant in the environment that allowed them to continue.
8:19
That doesn't mean she must be painted as Epstein or Maxwell.
8:23
It means she does not get to borrow the language
8:25
of victimhood to avoid the harder language of responsibility. Yeah,
8:30
regret is not accountability. Sympathy for survivors is not accountability.
8:35
Calling Epstein evil is not accountability. And I think that
8:39
the survivor's anger is especially justified because many of them
8:43
have spent years watching adults around Epstein reinvent themselves. After
8:47
the fact. The same people who once treated them as powerful, glamorous, brilliant, useful, generous, connected,
8:54
or untouchable now describe them as a master deceiver who
8:58
fooled them all. Funny how that were works. When Epstein
9:01
was alive and useful, he was a gateway to money, status, planes, universities, politicians, businessmen, royalty, scientists,
9:09
and social prestige. When the walls closed in, he became
9:13
a shadowy manipulator who somehow hid everything from everyone. That
9:18
transformation is too convenient. It asked survivors to accept that
9:22
the man who made their lives hell also maintained an
9:25
invisible force field around every adult who could have intervened.
9:30
Survivors a retired of that story because it always ends
9:33
in the same place. The dead predator carries all the blame,
9:36
the living enablers carry none of the consequence, and the
9:39
record gets buried under carefully rehearsed helplessness. Now Grop's poor
9:45
recollection theme was another glaring problem. Of course, some memories
9:49
fade after twenty years. Nobody reasonable expects a witness to
9:53
recall every appointment, every call, every name, every document, or
9:57
every errand. But when the pattern of forgotten details consistently
10:01
protects the witness from sharper accountability, skepticism is not only fairer,
10:07
it's required. The transcript shows repeated moments where questions about lists, descriptors, travel, housing, visas,
10:15
or specific arrangements were met with uncertainty, lack of recall,
10:19
or narrowed explanations. That does not automatically prove intentional deception,
10:24
but it does prove why survivors are right to demand
10:27
more than I don't know. As a final public answer,
10:31
memory failure cannot become the official solvent used to dissolve responsibility.
10:36
Congress even warnder at the start that knowingly false statements
10:40
fake memory lapses have truths or omissions necessary to make
10:44
an answer truthful could carry criminal consequence. The visa and
10:48
travel material is particularly disturbing because it points to the
10:52
wider machinery around Epstein, not just the massage calendar. When
10:57
questions turn to tickets, hotels, apart, men's visas, and foreign
11:01
women entering the United States, Graff repeatedly framed her role
11:05
as narrow and directive based. She was asked to buy
11:08
a ticket, she was asked to check a hotel. She
11:11
was asked whether something was refundable. She didn't know who paid,
11:15
She didn't know the purpose. She had no idea whether
11:18
the women met Epstein. She did not know whether they
11:22
gave massages. Look, that kind of testimony might be legally cautious,
11:27
but it's morally nauseating because the question is not whether
11:31
she personally designed the entire pipeline. The question is how
11:35
many pieces of the pipeline passed across her desk while
11:39
she chose not to understand the shape of the thing
11:42
being built. In one exchange graph, acknowledge facilitating tickets and
11:47
hotel arrangements connected to a visa issue while saying she
11:51
did not know the purpose of the woman's travel or
11:53
who paid the housing question make the same point. Epstein's
11:58
apartments were not abstract assets floating in the sky. They
12:01
were physical spaces controlled by a predator, used by a
12:05
network connected to a world where young women and girls
12:08
were removed, lodged, introduced, summoned, and exploited. When Groff was
12:13
asked about arranging housing at three oh one East sixty
12:16
sixth Street, her answers again retreated into possibility, direction, uncertainty,
12:21
and lack of specificity. Maybe she arranged apartments for men
12:25
and women. Maybe a person was placed there. Maybe she
12:29
did not know what happened after that. This is the
12:32
language of administrative insulation. It's the language of a person
12:36
who wants credit for being too peripheral to know and
12:39
too busy to notice. But the survivors are not obligated
12:43
to accept that. The public is not obligated to accept that.
12:48
Congress should not have accepted that as the end of
12:50
the road. And look, there is something profoundly obscene about
12:55
the way the Epstein operation keeps producing helpers who insists
12:59
they were also some and how helpless. Everyone was intimidated,
13:03
everybody was manipulated, everybody was compartmentalized, everybody was just following instructions.
13:09
Everybody was deceived by the same dead man. Everybody had
13:13
bad memory. Everybody now supports the survivors. Everybody now wishes
13:18
that they had known. But Epstein did not run on
13:22
one person's evil alone. He ran on a culture of permission.
13:27
He ran on useful blindness. He ran on the willingness
13:29
of adults to accept obscene routines because the paycheck cleared,
13:33
the boss was powerful, the names were impressive, and the
13:37
consequences never arrived. That's the world growth worked in. That's
13:42
the world she helped keeped organized. That's the world she
13:46
now wants to describe as if it happened around her
13:48
rather than through her desk. Croft's testimony should outrage people,
13:53
not because it's the worst thing in the Epstein case,
13:56
but because it's so typical of the Epstein case. It's
14:00
another episode in the long running pageant of partial truth.
14:03
It gives enough detail to sound cooperative, enough emotion to
14:07
sound wounded, enough condemnation of Epstein to sound righteous, and
14:11
enough memory failure to avoid the deepest accountability that formula
14:16
has protected Epstein's orbit for years. It lets witnesses a
14:20
pure forthcoming while preserving the central mystery. It lets Congress
14:24
claim progress while survivors hear the same evasions in new packaging.
14:28
It lets the public receive another transcript instead of a reckoning.
14:33
And that's why Grop's testimony cannot be allowed to sit
14:36
there as some final word. It's not the final word.
14:39
It's a challenge to Congress to prove that the process
14:42
has teeth and look, the ugliest truth is that survivors
14:45
once again had to do the moral work that the
14:48
institutions refuse to do. They had to call out the contradictions.
14:53
They have to say the testimony did not match their experience.
14:56
They have to remind the country that massage was not
14:59
harmless language in Epstein's universe. They had to drag the
15:03
conversation back from Groff's discomfort to Epstein's victims. They had
15:08
to insist at claims of ignorance or not answers. They
15:11
had to demand that proximity to power not be converted
15:14
into innocence. That has been the survivor experience from the beginning.
15:18
Tell them the truth while adults with authority manage the damage.
15:23
Congress should be amplifying that truth, not cushioning the people
15:26
who helped keep Epstein's world functional. The survivors are not
15:31
being unreasonable, They're refusing to be gas lit one more time.
15:35
Leslie Groff had a chance to do something bigger than
15:38
protect herself. She had a chance to fully open the machinery.
15:41
She had a chance to say what the culture was,
15:43
how the routines worked, who called, who visited, who traveled,
15:47
who arranged, who paid, who asked questions who did not,
15:51
and how a criminal enterprise hid behind elite normalcy. Instead,
15:56
she offered a tightly controlled portrait of distance from the
15:59
very world she helped organize. And I think that's why
16:02
the survivor's anger is justified, and that's why the process
16:06
deserves contempt, because once again Epstein is dead, Maxwell is
16:10
in prison, Survivors are still carrying the weight, and the
16:14
supporting cast keeps walking into official rooms with lawyers, statements,
16:18
memory gaps, and rehears sorrow enough, If Congress cannot turn
16:23
that into real accountability, then it's not exposing the Epstein
16:26
cover up. Instead, it's becoming another chapter of it. All
16:32
of the information that goes with this episode can be
16:34
found in the description box.