Latest / Brett Keane and Eve Show / @ttor13 Show S4E5 The Relationship Between Science And Religion

Transcript

@ttor13 Show S4E5 The Relationship Between Science And Religion · Brett Keane and Eve Show

1:24
Ladies and gentlemen, may I have your attention please?
1:33
The show starts in 10987654 321. Go
2:17
the, the,
3:46
the. None.
6:55
The. The.
8:49
The. Hello there everyone, Welcome to
10:19
the TTOR show. I'm your main host TTOR.
10:24
And this, of course, is none other than the one the only the
10:28
infamous, the boogeyman of the Internet, Brett Keene.
10:32
Yeah. The fun times.
10:39
One thing I definitely need to look at here.
10:44
Oh, that's a cool T-shirt you got on.
10:46
Where'd you get that from? There's this guy in the
10:50
Internet. His name is like Brett something
10:52
rather. And he had this shirt and I was
10:55
just like, you know, I mean, it looks pretty cool.
10:58
I mean, if you can tilt it even more, you know, evolution is
11:02
magic. You got the wizard monkey.
11:04
I mean, it was pretty cool. I mean that Brett guy.
11:07
Oh, he really knows how to make shirts.
11:10
Sounds like a good guy to me. Exactly.
11:15
Couldn't possibly be someone else we're talking about now.
11:18
Something I'm not picking up. So while you're looking at that,
11:26
I hope everybody out there has been doing all right.
11:29
I hope the weather's not been hateful to you.
11:32
Yeah, what you got for is TTRM. Something on the recipe.
11:36
Yes, today's topic. If you guys watching couldn't
11:40
guess from you know the general thumbnail entitled.
11:45
The video is Today we're going to talk about the relationship
11:49
between religion and science. Because you see, we live in a
11:53
day and age where the atheists, the evolutionists, the religion
11:58
skeptics, they have seemingly convinced the world that there
12:04
is no positive relationship between religion and science.
12:08
They so wildly contradict each other that in order to believe
12:13
in religion you have to reject science, and in order to accept
12:17
science, you have to reject religion.
12:20
But as we're going to show on today's stream, that's not
12:23
actually the case. Science and religion not only
12:26
don't contradict each other, but they're actually
12:29
complementarians to each other. You'll see, especially when we
12:34
get into the Bible, how the Bible talked about a lot of
12:38
things that science later on, like way later on confirmed to
12:44
be true. But before we get into that, I
12:47
would like to talk briefly about all this horrible ice storm that
12:53
we went through in my area this past week.
12:56
Basically on Friday last week it started.
12:59
It was supposed to snow and then it started snowing and then it
13:03
started raining in the course, the temperatures down in the
13:06
20s. And so it was like great, we're
13:07
going to get snow and ice. And in the past that usually
13:11
meant, you know, layer of ice at the bottom and then snow packs
13:15
up on top. And that way you can basically
13:16
walk across the ice because you have the traction of the snow.
13:20
Not this time, no. Actually the snow and the ice
13:23
basically fused together as they hit the ground because it was so
13:26
cold out and because they were doing rain and snow at the same
13:30
time. So it just became one big solid
13:33
2 inch layer of white ice that covered everything.
13:38
And it was it took about a couple days to get up to where
13:42
he was at his worst. So like the snow comes on
13:44
Friday, Saturday it's getting bad ish.
13:48
And then Sunday it's pretty bad. But we could still drive to
13:51
church in my dad's truck because my church decided to do a
13:55
lunchtime service where we recorded it offline and then we
14:00
had a live service to whoever could make it.
14:02
But then after Sunday and that horrible drive home, oh it just
14:06
got worse. Basically the ice hit its peak
14:09
and power lines were falling down because ice was building up
14:13
around them and weighing them down until eventually they would
14:15
snap and hit the street. I even saw a live video of 1
14:19
area that was like four or five blocks away from my church where
14:22
the power lines that hit the ground, and even though it was
14:25
like, you know, 20° or lower outside and it was interacting
14:30
with ice, the power lines started a fire on solid ice.
14:36
And then let's see what else. Oh yeah, the tree branches were
14:40
experiencing the same thing. We're not talking like little
14:42
branches, We're talking like big hurricane branches that were
14:45
just snapping off because of all the ice surrounding it.
14:48
And at our church in particular, we lost power for like a couple
14:52
of days. Like early on, we had a giant
14:54
tree branch fall off a tree and literally just break off our
14:58
Internet cable line that we have from Comcast.
15:00
So we haven't had Internet at the church for like literally a
15:03
week. So that's why we couldn't stream
15:06
live on Sunday last weekend. And so yeah, we were basically
15:10
just trapped inside. I mean, this ice was so bad that
15:13
I think on Tuesday I tried to bravely go check the mailbox to
15:18
see if there was any mail, and I was holding on to this really
15:22
big Bush that was right next to our walkway covered in ice.
15:25
I took one step, slid on my butt, landed on my shoulder, and
15:31
yeah, that's done for a little bit.
15:33
And then, using all of my instinctual thinking, I crawled
15:37
back onto the porch and went back inside and didn't go out
15:40
again until 3:00 this afternoon when most of the ice had melted
15:44
and I wanted to see if it was walkable.
15:48
Oh boy, it was such a bad ice storm.
15:50
I mean, I've been through snow before when I lived in the
15:53
Portland area of Oregon. I went through a snow storm
15:55
years ago, but I've never been through an ice storm as bad as
15:59
this one. I mean, I can't recall.
16:01
It was awful something. I hope it doesn't happen again
16:05
anytime soon. And by that I mean for years.
16:09
What about you, Brett? Did you guys have snow and ice
16:11
in Missouri? Yeah, we had us some snow and
16:14
ice. It got me so bothered.
16:16
I got on Twitter and was asking people, where is that dreaded
16:20
global warming you all been promising me about?
16:23
Right. Of course.
16:25
You know, the global cooing people from like 30 years ago
16:27
were like, see, we told you, we told you.
16:32
That was originally how it started.
16:34
They told us we were going to all freeze to death and that was
16:37
the big deal. But now we're all going to burn
16:39
to death. It depends on, I guess, what
16:42
decade it is with these folks. Right.
16:44
And then this kind of stuff happens.
16:46
So they decided to just go with the generic climate change
16:49
label. So that way they can't be wrong
16:51
no matter what happens, because it just describes generic change
16:55
isn't prescribed to cooling or warming.
16:58
So that way they're never wrong because they went generic.
17:01
You hear their you hear their new deal.
17:04
You're going to love this. They call it ecocide.
17:06
Have you heard of this before? That term in particular?
17:10
No. Tell us about ecocide.
17:11
Well, as you know, cows farting and all this kind of stuff and
17:15
killing meat or animals was bad to all these folks.
17:18
Well, now it's bad to farm. It's bad to plant things because
17:23
these things plants are alive too, apparently.
17:25
The the Greenpeace people just figured out that plants are
17:29
considered living things. So now we're down to, I think
17:35
they might allow us to eat bugs and maybe regurgitated feces.
17:40
That's what they want to go with.
17:43
Interesting. Yeah.
17:45
You'll eat the bugs, you'll live in pods, you'll own nothing and
17:48
you'll be happy. Fantastic.
17:53
It's a brave new world after all.
17:56
I'm just putting the link to our room on the Twitter feed for the
18:01
Twitter stream and I see Andrea Segovia and the Rumble chat
18:05
saying happy New Year. Justin, wishing you and Brett a
18:08
good evening and a great stream. Well, I thank you, Andreas.
18:13
There's six people currently watching on Rumble and if you're
18:16
watching this on Rumble, I just put the link to our room in the
18:20
chat. So if you feel brave enough and
18:23
you got a microphone and either a webcam or an avatar of some
18:27
kind, then you can join the show too.
18:30
We just might put the danger, stranger danger, stranger danger
18:35
screen on while we talk to you. But you know, you're welcome to
18:39
join the show if you have something to contribute.
18:43
But now that you know about the horrible weather that we've been
18:46
dealing with nationwide, pretty much from what I've been hearing
18:49
in one form or another, So let's get into the subject of the
18:55
relationship between religion and science.
18:58
And in particular, I want to give you 5 examples of science
19:03
that show that the Bible is correct.
19:07
Or at the very least, that the evolutionary billions of years
19:12
worldview that we're taught in basically schools and media and
19:15
all forms and institutions is false.
19:19
So the first thing I want to look at is the fossil record.
19:23
Because the fossil record, if it looks a certain way, will mean
19:28
that a certain worldview is true.
19:31
So in order to demonstrate to you what that means and to show
19:34
you that I'm not making up the guy I'm going to quote, I'd like
19:38
to put to you. This got a quotation from
19:42
Douglas Futuyima and evolutionist who wrote a book
19:45
called Science on Trial, The Case for Evolution back in 1983.
19:50
And on page 197 Douglas Fujiyima wrote Creation and Evolution
19:56
between them exhaust the possible explanations for the
20:00
origin of living things. Organisms either appeared on the
20:04
earth fully developed or they did not.
20:07
If they did not, they must have developed from pre-existing
20:10
species by some process of modification if they did appear.
20:15
In a fully developed state, they must have been created by some
20:19
omnipotent intelligence. Now a couple things to point out
20:23
here. First of all of all he points
20:25
out that creation meaning young Earth creationism.
20:29
Because when these guys back in the 80s and the 90s and even in
20:32
our current time talk about creationism, they almost always
20:36
refer to young earth creationism.
20:38
They almost never refer to old earth creationism when they say
20:41
things like, well, creation and evolution exhaust the possible
20:45
explanations for the origin of living things.
20:48
But notice what he did. He made a prediction.
20:51
If evolution is true, then we will see in the fossil record
20:55
that existing species developed from pre-existing species by
21:00
some process of modification, which is what evolution is, you
21:04
know, simple to more complex. And basically, you know, due to
21:08
you via the zoo, that kind of thinking, that kind of saying,
21:13
it's basically what he's talking about.
21:15
Basically, we should see transitional forms for every
21:18
step of the evolutionary process.
21:21
If evolution is true, that's what we should see in the fossil
21:24
record. But he made a second prediction.
21:27
He predicted that if creationism is true, and then when we look
21:31
in the fossil record, we should see that the vast majority, if
21:35
not all of the fossils and fossil groups, when they enter
21:39
the record, they have to appear in a fully developed state the
21:43
first time that they enter the record.
21:47
Now that is quite a prediction that Douglas Futiyima made back
21:51
in the 80s, but that's what was missing.
21:56
But we don't have to wait very long to see that his prediction
22:00
actually came true. Which prediction?
22:03
The second one. Richard Dawkins, in his book The
22:06
Blind Watchmaker, which came out just three years later in 1986,
22:11
wrote the following on page 229, and we find many of them already
22:17
in an advanced state of evolution the very first time
22:20
they appeared. It is as though they were just
22:22
planted there, without any evolutionary history.
22:25
Needless to say, this appearance of sudden planting has delighted
22:29
creationists. So Richard Dawkins here is
22:32
saying, yeah, when we look at the fossil record, we see the
22:36
via the Cambrian explosion quote, UN quote, that the vast
22:39
majority of animals and animal groups, when they enter the
22:42
fossil record, the first time they enter the record fully
22:46
developed, fully intact, fully as they are today.
22:53
They entered the record fully developed without any evidence
22:56
whatsoever of any kind of evolutionary past or
23:00
transitional forms. Which is literally what his
23:03
colleague Douglas Fujiyima predicted 3 years earlier would
23:07
be the case if young earth creationism or really any form
23:11
of creationism is true. So the fossil record looks
23:15
exactly how it should, if the Bible is correct about origins,
23:19
and if you know the creation account, you know that on day 6
23:22
of creation, actually, no. I think it's day five of
23:26
creation. God made all the animals and
23:28
then day six he made man. No, no, day five is when he made
23:31
the birds and the sea animals. Day six is when he made the land
23:34
animals and then humans. So if you made all the land
23:38
animals on day six, then what we should see in the fossil record
23:42
is that the earliest fossils will be fully developed and
23:46
fully formed without any evidence of any kind of
23:49
evolutionary history. Which according to these
23:51
evolutionists, Douglas Fujiyima and Richard Dawkins, the
23:56
atheist, that's exactly what we see when we look at the fossil
24:00
record. So that is one example,
24:05
scientifically speaking, that proves that there is no negative
24:08
relationship between science and religion.
24:11
In fact, the fossil record looks exactly how it should, if the
24:15
Bible is true in its account on origins.
24:19
But that's not the only example, of course, I got more.
24:22
So another good example to look at is actually what the Bible
24:26
says regarding the flood of Noah and in particular the
24:30
floodwaters that were present on the earth during the flood of
24:35
Noah and where they went. So I'm just going to go ahead
24:38
and put on the application here. And so I actually talked a bit
24:44
about this in my recent video. Was the flood of Noah, a global
24:48
global flood, But in particular Genesis 8 one through 5 says
24:53
this. But God remembered Noah and all
24:57
the wild animals and the livestock that were with him in
25:00
the ark, and he sent a wind over the earth and the waters
25:03
receded. Now the springs of the deep and
25:06
the floodgates of the air, heavens had been closed and the
25:10
rain had stopped falling from the sky.
25:12
The water receded steadily from the earth.
25:15
At the end of the 150 days the water had gone down, and on the
25:19
17th day of the 7th month the ark came to rest on the
25:22
mountains of Ararat. The waters continued to recede
25:25
until the 10th month, and on the first day of the 10th month the
25:28
tops of the mountains became visible.
25:31
So according to this passage, after the flood of Noah had run
25:34
its course and the rain had stopped coming, God caused the
25:39
waters of the flood to recede from the earth.
25:43
So naturally you would think, well, OK, if there was all this
25:46
water on the earth and God caused it to recede from the
25:49
earth, then naturally, when we look under the crust of the
25:53
earth, we should be able to find a crap ton of water, right?
25:57
Right. And of course, ladies and
26:00
gentlemen, we do. I have here on screen if it will
26:05
let me. There we go.
26:07
Nature World News an article from 2014 titled Vast underwater
26:13
Ocean Trapped beneath Earth's crust.
26:17
Now, I came across this article when it first came out, and I
26:20
have never forgotten it since. And since it's not a terribly
26:24
long article, I'll go ahead and read the entire thing.
26:29
It says scientists have discovered evidence of a vast
26:33
water reservoir trapped hundreds of miles beneath the surface,
26:37
capable of filling Earth's oceans three times over.
26:40
Located 400 miles beneath Earth's crust, this body of
26:44
water is locked up in a blue mineral called ringwoodite that
26:47
lies in the transition zone of hot rock between Earth's surface
26:51
and core. Interestingly, this water is not
26:54
in a form familiar to us. It's neither liquid ice nor
26:57
vapor. Geophysicist Steve Jacobson from
27:00
Northwestern University suggests it means that water on Earth it
27:04
may get pushed to the surface from below, contradicting
27:07
previous beliefs that water was delivered via icy comets.
27:10
Also, if you read the whole flood account in the book of
27:13
Genesis, it says that it didn't just rain from the sky, it says
27:17
that water came up from the earth to flood the earth.
27:19
So the idea that the Earth pushes water to the surface
27:24
isn't really that far fetched if you believe the Bible.
27:28
Geological processes on the Earth's surface, such as
27:30
earthquakes or erupting volcanoes are an expression of
27:33
what is going on inside the Earth out of our sight, Jacobson
27:37
said in a press release. I think we are finally seeing
27:40
evidence for a whole Earth water cycle, which may help explain
27:44
the vast amount of liquid water on the surface of our habitable
27:47
planet. Scientists have been looking for
27:49
this missing deep water for decades.
27:51
Ringwood diet here is key. It's crystal like structure
27:55
makes it act like a sponge and draw in hydrogen and trap water.
27:59
Jacobson and his colleagues base their findings on a study of the
28:02
transition zone and underground region extending across most of
28:06
the interior of the United States.
28:08
Along with Jacobson's lab experiments on rocks and rocks
28:11
simulating the high pressures found deep underground, the
28:14
study compiled data from the US Array and Network of
28:18
seismometers across the United States.
28:20
Used to measure earthquake vibrations, it produced evidence
28:24
that melting occurs 400 miles beneath the Earth's surface.
28:27
The plus the movement of rock on the transition zone plus the
28:31
movement of rock in the transition zone leads to a
28:34
process where water can become fused and trapped within the
28:37
rock. Scientists were astounded
28:39
because most melting in the mantle was previously thought to
28:42
occur at a much shallower distance, about 50 miles below
28:46
the Earth's surface. And according to The Guardian,
28:48
Jacobson said that this trapped hidden water may explain why
28:52
Earth's oceans have stayed the same size for billions of years.
28:55
If the stored water wasn't there, it would be on the
28:58
surface of the Earth and the mountaintops would be the only
29:01
land poking out, he said. So we learn from this article
29:06
that 400 miles underneath the Earth's crust, there is enough
29:10
water on this Earth not only to fill the Earth's oceans three
29:13
times over, but if this water was up here on the surface
29:17
instead of 400 miles down below the Earth's crust, the world
29:21
would be flooded to the point where only the tops of mountains
29:24
would be sticking out of the water and all other land would
29:27
be underwater. And the reason why this water
29:31
doesn't come up to the surface of the Earth is because this
29:34
ringwidite stuff underneath the Earth's crust 400 miles down
29:38
below is keeping that water down there.
29:42
So it seems to me, Brett, that we seem to have found where all
29:45
that flood water from the flood of Noah receded to.
29:48
Seems like God put it in its own little pocket 400 miles below
29:52
the earth's crust. I mean is there any other way to
29:55
interpret that? No, the Earth is actually called
29:59
the water planet because 75 to 85% of the Earth is water on the
30:04
surface alone. And if there's three levels of
30:08
almost three oceans worth of water underneath us, and it
30:11
wouldn't be difficult whatsoever, it would literally
30:14
only take one more ocean worth of water to be able to cover
30:18
that little bit of land. I mean, it's literally like
30:20
dropping an ice cube and a cup of tea that's already filled to
30:24
the rim. It's you don't even have to be a
30:26
scientist to figure that out. It's it's simple math.
30:31
Yep, I agree with you completely on that.
30:34
Of course, we're living in a day where simple math is.
30:37
It's not so simple to most. People, if you don't mind me
30:39
pointing out just real quick, we've heard atheists argue that
30:43
it's not possible for the world to be flooded, yet they'll claim
30:46
that in the past it would. According to them, there was an
30:52
Ice Age that covered the entire earth.
30:54
Now, as far as I remember, ice and snows made out of wet.
30:58
So the earth, yeah. And then then Bill Nye, if you
31:02
remember, he was arguing with Ken Ham about the flood and he
31:06
said that it's not possible. But then he went on the news 2
31:09
weeks later on Fox News. I even got the clip where he
31:13
tells people that if they don't keep an eye on climate issues,
31:18
our ice caps could melt. And then what would happen
31:21
because of that? Oh, the horror.
31:24
Sorry for the little bit of moving around I did there, but
31:28
you're absolutely right. I do remember when he did that.
31:31
It was just remarkable. I mean literally talking out
31:35
both sides of his mouth in a two week span.
31:37
He must have given Doctor Fauci lessons back then.
31:41
That's right there. The climate change people are
31:43
claiming that. And they're not even talking
31:46
about the water under the Earth that Mister TTR is talking
31:51
about. They're talking about just the
31:52
Caps alone would overflow our entire planet.
31:55
We're literally going to be going swimming for the rest of
31:58
our life. It's me, Water World with Kevin
32:00
Costner. Yay, I just love a new water
32:04
world, said no one ever. Turns out people prefer dry land
32:10
to live on. Who knew?
32:12
So another good example of the relationship between the
32:16
religion and science being a good one is this particular
32:19
passage in Psalm 102, verses 25 through 27, which says the
32:25
following. In the beginning you laid the
32:28
foundations of the earth, and the heavens are the work of your
32:32
hands. They will perish, but you
32:34
remain. They will all wear out like a
32:36
garment, like clothing. You will change them and they
32:39
will be discarded, but you remain the same in your years
32:42
will never end. So according to this passage,
32:46
the heavens and the earth are going to perish because they're
32:50
wearing out like a garment. I wonder if science has
32:55
confirmed that the universe and the Earth are wearing out.
32:59
Oh, that's right, it has already.
33:02
It's called the Law of Entropy, which you guys know as the
33:06
second law of thermodynamics. The law of entropy is just
33:10
another name for it, the second Law of thermodynamics.
33:14
According to the second paragraph here, it establishes
33:18
the concept of entropy as a physical property of a
33:22
thermodynamic system. It predicts whether processes
33:25
are forbidden despite obeying. The requirement of conservation
33:28
of energy is expressed in the first law of thermodynamics and
33:32
provides necessary criteria for spontaneous processes.
33:35
For example, the first law allows the process of a cup
33:38
falling off the table and breaking on the floor, as well
33:41
as allowing the reverse process of the cup fragments coming back
33:43
together and jumping back onto the table, while the second law
33:47
allows the former and denies the latter.
33:50
The second law may be formulated by the observation that the
33:53
entropy of isolated systems left to spontaneous evolution cannot
33:58
decrease as they always tend toward a state of thermodynamic
34:02
equilibrium where the entropy is highest at the given interval.
34:05
Energy as increase in the combined entropy of system and
34:09
surroundings accounts for the irreversibility of natural
34:11
processes, often referred to in the concept of the arrow of
34:15
time. In other words, the basic idea
34:18
behind the law of entropy is that over time the universe, the
34:22
earth and everything in those two things, and in the sea, when
34:27
left to their own devices with no intelligent intervention
34:30
whatsoever, will increase in entropy.
34:33
Well, that sounds great, but what is entropy?
34:36
Something that evolutionist and this Wikipedia article refused
34:39
to do well. The Merriam Webster Dictionary
34:43
tells us what entropy means in relation to thermodynamics.
34:48
Definition 1A. Measure of the unavailable
34:51
energy in a closed thermodynamic system that is also usually
34:55
considered to be a measure of the system's disorder that is a
35:00
property of the system stay and that varies directly with any
35:04
reversible change in heat in the system and irreversibly with the
35:08
temperature of the Subs of the system.
35:11
Broadly, the degree of disorder or uncertainty in a system
35:15
definition to a the degradation of the matter and energy in the
35:19
universe to an ultimate state of inert uniformity definition to
35:23
be a process of degradation or running down or a trend to
35:29
disorder. So in other words, entropy means
35:33
that things are degrading, they're progressing towards
35:37
trending towards disorder, which is the opposite of evolution.
35:43
Which means that according to the second law of
35:45
thermodynamics, as the universe, the Earth, the sea and
35:49
everything in those three things continues to exist over time
35:53
without any intelligent intervention whatsoever, those
35:56
things will wear down, breakdown, fall into disorder,
36:00
which is literally confirming Psalm 100 and 225 through 27.
36:06
Go ahead, Brett. Well, I've heard atheist.
36:08
They've attempted to argue because there's a couple lines
36:12
even on Wikipedia and then the definition of closed in systems
36:16
and they don't understand what it means by the closed in
36:19
systems. We are affected humans, animals,
36:22
everything that is alive is affected.
36:24
We go into disorder and as TTR pointed out, we don't upgrade,
36:30
we downgrade. We're basically going into
36:32
disorder and and our bodies are literally being pulled apart as
36:37
the universe goes through this expansion period.
36:40
If you actually believe the universe is doing that, a
36:42
scientist claims it is the reason why things rust.
36:46
It's the reason why your favorite pet's going to die.
36:50
It's the reason why you will age all the If you ever wondered why
36:54
is that you get older, Why is it that your body seems to start
36:58
pulling towards the ground and all that, well, that's because
37:01
of that damn wonderful entropy. Yay.
37:07
So, I mean, if you've got to, if you were to think of everything
37:09
as information, like what you're pointing out, if you've got a
37:13
computer that is sitting there, no matter what kind of variables
37:16
hit it, it's actually going to wear it down, not upgrade it.
37:20
You're not going to expect to see your little Nintendo Game
37:23
Boy turn into a a Dell computer with upgraded STD hard drives,
37:28
folks. That just doesn't happen.
37:31
Yeah, that is absolutely true. And I see you all 10 of you
37:34
watching currently on the rumble stream link to the room is in
37:38
the chat box. So if you want to join the show
37:40
and you got a working mic, feel free to join.
37:44
So up next on the docket, we have another example of the
37:48
Bible predicting something, well, describing something that
37:52
was later verified by science. And that, of course, is the
37:56
stretching or the expansion of the universe itself, which I
38:01
will share those verses right now.
38:05
So in Isaiah 4022 it says He sits and thrown above the circle
38:10
of the earth and its people are like grasshoppers.
38:13
He stretches out the heavens like a canopy and spreads them
38:16
out like a tent to live in. Isaiah 42.
38:20
Five. This is what the Lord I can't
38:23
even read today, guys. This is what God the Lord says,
38:26
the Creator of the heavens, who stretches them out, who spreads
38:29
out the earth with all that springs from it, who gives
38:32
breath to its people and life to those who walk on it.
38:35
So in this verse we see that God stretches out the heavens and
38:40
He's the creator of them. Isaiah 4424 This is what the
38:45
Lord says, your Redeemer who formed you in the womb.
38:49
I am the Lord, the Maker of all things, who stretches out the
38:52
heavens, who spreads out the earth by myself.
38:57
So we have these three passages in Isaiah.
38:59
And there's two other passages in Isaiah and other parts of the
39:02
Bible that say that God stretches out the heavens.
39:05
But you can see from these three passages that God claims to be
39:08
stretching out the heavens. Now what that means is that when
39:13
we look at the universe, what we should see.
39:17
If the Bible is telling the truth about God's stretching out
39:20
the heavens, we should see the heavens stretching.
39:24
Now we know that stretch is a synonym for expand and all the
39:29
instances we quoted here in the Bible where the word heavens is
39:32
used, it definitely is describing the universe because
39:36
it can't be describing anything else at this point.
39:39
So the Bible clearly talks about here how God causes the universe
39:43
to expand. So how do we know that the
39:45
universe is actually expanding? Well, there's this little thing
39:49
called redshift that they discovered with Edwin Hubble's
39:52
telescope in the 20s, but I'm going to go ahead and read the
39:57
first paragraph here. In physics, a redshift is an
40:01
increase in the wavelength and corresponding decrease in the
40:05
frequency and photon energy of electromagnetic radiation such
40:08
as light. The opposite change, a decrease
40:11
in wavelength and increase in frequency and energy, is known
40:14
as a blue shift or negative red shift.
40:17
The terms derive from the colors red and blue which form the
40:20
extremes of the visible light spectrum.
40:22
The main causes of electromagnetic red shift in
40:25
astronomy and cosmology are the relative motions of radiation
40:28
sources which give rise to the relativistic Doppler effect and
40:33
gravitational potentials which gravitationally redshift
40:37
escaping radiation. All sufficiently distant light
40:41
sources show cosmological redshift corresponding to
40:44
recession speeds proportional to their distances from Earth, a
40:48
fact known as Hubble's law that implies the universe is
40:52
expanding. So we know from all this
40:54
redshift. We see everywhere we look that
40:57
the universe is expanding. And yet, long before Hubble
41:00
discovered this through his telescope, the Bible in multiple
41:04
instances said that the universe was expanding because God is
41:08
causing it to expand. So it seems to me at this point
41:13
that the relationship between science and religion is very
41:16
complementarian and not contrarian.
41:20
It's not just that TTOR. Besides the expansion, the Bible
41:24
does very clearly point out that the universe had a beginning and
41:27
a lot of people out there may not know this, but it was a
41:31
Christ believing priest named Georges Lammitri who actually
41:35
came up with The Big Bang. He took his mathematic and his
41:39
equations and his information, and he also admits that he got
41:42
his ideas and thoughts from the Bible directly.
41:46
Look at the Einstein. And that's the reason why we
41:48
have the popular theory of The Big Bang model today, ladies and
41:53
gentlemen. Yep.
41:57
And even though I'm someone who does not believe Big Bang Theory
42:00
at all because of the problems it has relative to the Bible, it
42:04
is a historical fact that atheists and evolutionists
42:07
didn't come up with it. It's something a theist, a
42:10
Catholic, I think came up with it.
42:12
That's correct, yeah. And A and a Christian doesn't
42:16
have to necessarily even believe it happened in the way that
42:20
they're saying and all this. I mean, the idea was simply that
42:23
there was a beginning to the universe, and it expanded and
42:27
develops like a tent, just as the Bible pointed out as you
42:30
read. That's pretty much what he put
42:33
forth. And then they came up with all
42:34
the complicated, neat words for it.
42:36
Not the atheist scientist. But also as a pro tip, if you're
42:41
watching this, you can be a Young Earth Creationist and
42:44
believe in an expanding universe being indicated by redshift.
42:48
Because that's all the redshift does.
42:51
It indicates that the universe is expanding.
42:54
Big Bang Theory adds a whole bunch of stuff to that, and they
42:57
just merely appeal to the redshift as evidence of Big Bang
43:01
cosmology, when in fact you can believe in an expanding universe
43:05
just by accepting the Bible. And you don't even have to
43:08
embrace Big Bang cosmology to accept redshift.
43:13
But the last thing I want to get into before I give Brett the
43:16
floor to talk about a whole lot of other things regarding
43:20
science and religion and the complementarian relationship
43:24
they have, as I want to talk to you about the decay rate of
43:28
Earth's magnetic field. Now, this particular issue is
43:33
something that is interesting because we have an evolution
43:37
narrative about it that if true, we shouldn't be around to talk
43:41
about it today. And yet we are.
43:44
And therefore evolution billions of years can't be true.
43:47
Creationism has to be true because it allows us to still be
43:51
alive today to talk about stuff. But let's go into the actual
43:56
articles that support what I'm saying, because I don't want you
44:00
guys to think that I'm just some Young Earth creationist making
44:03
stuff up out of the clear blue sky.
44:06
So I have here a Scientific American article from 1998
44:11
called Is it true that the strength of the Earth's magnetic
44:14
field is decreasing? What's the effect?
44:17
Short answer is yes, but there's one paragraph in particular I
44:21
want to read, which is this one. At most places there has been a
44:27
general decrease in the strength over the past century, typically
44:31
10% or so. No one can say with any
44:34
certainty whether this represents A fluctuation or
44:37
whether it is a decrease which will eventually lead to a
44:40
reversal. Past reversals have taken place
44:44
over a short period of time, geologically speaking 10,000
44:48
years or so. In order for a reversal to take
44:51
place, there must be a brief time during which the field is
44:54
non existent. So what this paragraph is saying
44:58
is that in a universe and Earth that is billions of years old,
45:03
there's been times where the magnetic field has been
45:06
decreasing and then a reversal occurs and it starts increasing
45:10
in strength and then another reversal occurs and it goes back
45:14
to decreasing and but that during the period of time which
45:17
these reversals take place and therefore the magnetic field
45:21
doesn't exist during these times, lasts about 10,000 years
45:25
or so. Now why is that a problem?
45:28
Well, I got another article for you titled Six Horrible
45:33
Consequences of Earth Losing its Magnetic Field by Futurism and
45:38
we scrolled down to point #4. It says cosmic rays could reach
45:44
Earth's surface. Our magnetic field doesn't just
45:48
give us beautiful auroras, it keeps us alive.
45:51
Cosmic rays in the solar wind are harmful to life on Earth,
45:55
and without the protection of our magnetosphere, our planet
45:58
would be constantly bombarded by a stream of deadly particles.
46:02
The effects of cosmic rays on the body can be pretty
46:04
terrifying. While on lunar missions, for
46:07
example, astronauts often reported seeing flashes of light
46:10
when they close their eyes, the direct result of cosmic rays
46:14
passing through their retinas. A few even developed cataracts
46:18
years later. Radiation and cosmic rays are a
46:21
real concern for NASA, especially when it comes to long
46:24
term Space Flight. Astronauts on a mission to Mars
46:27
could undergo up to ten, 1000 times the exposure to radiation
46:31
and cosmic rays that they would get on Earth.
46:33
If Earth's magnetic field disappear, the entire human race
46:37
and all of life in fact would be in serious danger.
46:41
Cosmic rays when bombard our bodies and could even damage our
46:44
DNA, increasing worldwide risk of cancer and other illnesses.
46:49
The flashes of light visible when we close our eyes would be
46:51
the least of our problems. So according to this secular
46:55
article, talking about the consequences of us having no
46:58
magnetic field for any period of time says that if we were to
47:03
have a period of time of 10,000 years or so where we didn't have
47:07
a magnetic field around the Earth, our planet would be
47:10
bombarded by cosmic rays. All of life would be hit with
47:13
various illnesses and cancers of all kinds.
47:17
And when you know, well let me put it this way, when you think
47:21
about cancers as we know them today and how fast acting they
47:25
can be, you're talking about a period of time 10,000 or so
47:30
years ago where there was no magnetic field around the earth
47:35
and all of life on earth including our pre human
47:38
ancestors. Essentially we're getting hit by
47:41
all these cancers and other illnesses and all these cosmic
47:44
rays. Well it stands to reason that if
47:47
this happened for 10,000 years, all life on earth would have
47:51
been eradicated. We would not be around today to
47:54
talk about this. If what we're reading in these
47:57
two articles by Scientific American and Futurism is true,
48:03
our pre human ancestors 10,000 years ago would have been or so
48:06
ago would have been completely destroyed by cancer and cosmic
48:10
rays from space and we wouldn't be here to talk about it.
48:14
But we are here today, alive and well, to talk about it.
48:19
So the fact that we're alive and well to talk about today
48:23
indicates not only that evolution and billions of years
48:26
is false, but that creationism is true.
48:30
It has to be, because that's the one where this doesn't become a
48:34
problem. You see, in the Young Earth
48:35
Creationist worldview, the Earth and universe are only 6000 years
48:40
old. So even if the magnetic field
48:42
has always been decreasing since the beginning of creation, we
48:46
haven't been around long enough for that to become a problem.
48:49
So really, the fact that we're alive today to talk about it is
48:53
strong scientific evidence that Young Earth Creationism is true.
49:01
Any thoughts on the Earth's magnetic field, Brett?
49:04
Well, I'd say it's it's a part of the whole entropy effect that
49:08
we were talking about earlier. Everything is going to die down.
49:12
Everything's going to wind down. There's several different
49:15
theories. I mean, even the Bible says
49:17
there is a beginning, but there is also an ending.
49:20
Some people would like to believe the universe is going on
49:23
forever. Scientists say that it's either
49:25
going to have a heat death, a cold death, or a crunch, or it
49:29
may even have what they call the rubber band effect.
49:32
You know what that is? Describe it for our audience,
49:35
please. It's basically whenever the
49:37
universe decides that it wants to rewind itself and go back
49:41
into what is called the Singularity.
49:44
This is why you hear some people coming up with these Star Trek
49:47
quotes, like, well, maybe the universe will regenerate itself
49:50
and then the energy will generate another universe over
49:54
and over and over. Basically a recycling effect.
49:58
Makes sense. You probably heard that.
49:59
Have that I have heard something like that, and to put it
50:03
lightly, that is some very wishful thinking.
50:06
Very wishful. No, it is.
50:08
It is, and it doesn't even matter if it were the case.
50:11
Even if we didn't even throw a theology into the mix, if the
50:15
universe were to turn backwards and go back into this, it would
50:19
basically be like an implosion in on itself.
50:22
Trust me, whoever is alive during the first processes isn't
50:26
going to be a happy camper. So put it lightly, yeah, they're
50:30
not going to be happy at all. Well, they're, you know, they're
50:33
not even going to be sad because they're just going to be dead.
50:37
There you go. I know it's isn't.
50:40
I know some people like, take this clip out of context.
50:42
Be like, see that TTOR is laughing at the thought of
50:45
people being dead. What a horrible dirt bag he is.
50:49
Context, people, context. Some of this stuff is so
50:53
laughable that you got to laugh just to cope with it because
50:56
it's so horrible and obviously false, and instead of going
51:01
insane over it, you just laugh it off.
51:05
But I've gone through everything I've wanted to go through so far
51:09
about all the things that we see in science in the Bible that
51:12
prove that science and religion do not contradict each other.
51:15
They complement each other. Now I give the floor, the Brett
51:18
to lead the way on all the things he brings to the table
51:22
about the relationship between science and religion.
51:25
And I'm excited for this part. So the floor is yours, Brett.
51:28
And folks, I'm obviously going to stop from time to time, take
51:32
a breath, 'cause I want to hear what TTOR thinks about all this.
51:36
TTO and R and I were talking about some of the different
51:40
science aspects that are in the Bible.
51:43
Whenever I was a former non believer, I went out of my way
51:46
to try to find and see if there was anything that theology and
51:50
science didn't agree with. And I thought the best bet was
51:53
to go after Genesis and the old one of the oldest books in the
51:56
Bible, which was the book of Job.
51:58
And I ended up finding some things that really knocked me on
52:01
my behind. See, I'm trying to get nicer
52:04
with my words there. OK?
52:06
So Job claimed there was a story that got to me where it it spoke
52:12
of what was happening in the ocean.
52:13
That said that it's possible for clean water to actually exist
52:17
within the saltiness of the ocean.
52:19
And right off the bat, I was saying, really, the Bible's
52:22
going to say that. And so I looked into science,
52:25
and apparently they actually made-up a term for it.
52:27
It's called the Halo effect. Like the video game, the Halo
52:31
effect, that clean rivers of water can actually run through
52:35
the ocean. I'm like, well, the Bible's
52:37
right about that. But then I got to thinking, when
52:40
did Joe get scoop of gear and could go 20,000 Leagues Under
52:43
the Sea to figure that out? That can't be possible.
52:47
So let's get into some more stuff, folks.
52:50
You can look that up. I kid you not.
52:52
It's called the Halo effect. Job 26 Seven.
52:57
The Bible tells us about gravity.
52:59
It says he spreads out the northern skies over empty space.
53:03
He suspends the Earth over nothing.
53:05
There's absolutely no way primitive men back then, because
53:09
they didn't have an Elon Musk who was firing off rockets.
53:12
There's no way that they could have known that we basically had
53:16
a planet that was levitating out in the emptiness and void of
53:21
space. But somehow the Bible knew this.
53:24
Then if you look at Job 26 eight, it tells us that we're
53:27
actually able to predict the weather and its water cycles.
53:31
It says it wraps up the waters in the clouds, yet the clouds do
53:35
not burst under their weight. And it goes into even more
53:37
descriptive terms. So it actually, before we even
53:41
had weathermen and scientists that knew anything about the
53:44
weather. Voila, there you go, the Earth's
53:46
core job 28 five. It speaks of the different
53:50
levels and layers of the planet. Now there was absolutely no way.
53:55
Even nowadays, modern man is not able to dig down into the Earth
53:59
that far to be able to see what's happening.
54:01
They can only put theories, but the Bible already knew that the
54:04
earth had a core and that there was some hot stuff going on in
54:08
there and yadda yadda yadda. So there you go.
54:11
My next section that I would probably get into is some of the
54:15
revolutionary things that Christians have done with
54:18
science. How many times, Ctr. have you
54:21
heard atheists say Christians don't know nothing about science
54:24
and they're a detriment, They cause problems and all this,
54:27
right? How many times did it?
54:30
A lot of times, and not only that, they actually make a
54:33
concerted effort to blackball Christians and creationists from
54:36
having any position in academia, at least in a science
54:40
department. And I have books in my bedroom
54:44
across the house documenting all the Christians and creationists
54:47
that got screwed out of college degrees and jobs because they
54:51
wouldn't hold to evolution in billions of years and believed
54:54
in some form of creationism. Right.
54:58
So a lot of non believers out there and skeptics might be
55:01
surprised to find out that the person who actually came up with
55:05
the scientific method, his name was Francis Bacon, he was a
55:09
philosopher. He also dealt in law and all
55:12
kinds of different fields of ideas and he actually came up
55:15
with the scientific method and he was a Christian.
55:18
Christians actually came up with the scientific method.
55:21
But I don't just want to blow your mind with the idea that
55:24
they've been revolutionary With science.
55:27
Christians have also created masterpieces of art.
55:30
They also created many different forms and genres of music and
55:35
literally the civilizations that many of us exist in today.
55:39
So Christianity's been a great benefit.
55:42
Try looking back in history and see what atheists have ever
55:45
done, and you simply will not find it It there's there's just
55:49
nothing revolutionary that they've done.
55:51
Let me let me show you somebody. A lot of you out there, you're
55:55
using computers right now to watch us and listen to us and
55:58
all that. Well, guess what?
56:00
A Christian by the name of Charles Babbage actually
56:04
conceived the first automatic digital computer.
56:07
Ladies and gentlemen, that was done in the 1830s.
56:12
That that was done. The first camera that was ever
56:14
created was created by a Christian.
56:17
A lot of these different fields of science were created by
56:21
Christians. A lot of the medical equipment,
56:23
even the symbols that you see in hospitals nowadays are religious
56:27
and symbolic in nature of Christianity.
56:30
So I don't know where they get this idea.
56:33
And I'll even go so far as to say, and even Charles Darwin
56:36
himself said in the book The Scent of Man, he's quoted for
56:40
saying that evolution cannot work unless there is a higher
56:44
power that is working, the mechanism and process.
56:47
So there's that. I could go on, but I want to
56:51
give you an opportunity to be able to respond and if you've
56:55
got anything to say out there, because I could literally go on
56:58
all day with the revolutionary great things Christians have
57:00
done. Right.
57:01
And the one thing I would add to that because you talked about
57:04
how Christians have contributed to the world in various ways,
57:07
including, you know, technologies and building
57:10
hospitals and other important things like that.
57:14
Well, I recently did a video that you can see here on screen
57:18
called Stu Peters falsely claims Israel has never done anything
57:22
good for humanity. And when you watch that video, I
57:25
talked about a variety of different things and
57:28
organizations that Jews and Israel have made that has
57:32
benefited all of humanity, which includes the creation of flash
57:37
drives. So it's actually kind of funny
57:40
when atheists and evolutionists like to claim that Christians
57:44
and creationists and to a lesser extent Jews because they believe
57:47
in God, are somehow anti science, even though it was
57:52
Christians who made the computers that ultimately became
57:55
the computers that atheists used to slam us.
57:58
And all the flash drives that they use in order to transport
58:02
media to and from devices was made by Jews.
58:07
So yeah, the very people in world views that they like to
58:11
slam on are the ones that made all this stuff, including
58:14
originally the original versions of all this wonderful technology
58:18
that we use today. That is right.
58:22
Would you be able to put my thing up there in a big way?
58:25
This is actually an atheist philosopher of science.
58:29
He's not obviously arrogant like our social media amateur
58:33
atheist. He actually credits This is a
58:36
modern day atheist philosopher of science who says modern
58:41
science owes its being to Christianity.
58:45
So I know it's shocking, right? Is it shocking that he's saying
58:48
that or is it shocking that he's an atheist?
58:50
Which one shocks you more? No, the fact that he's an
58:55
atheist who's honest enough to look at history and make an
59:00
honest assessment, That's a rare part.
59:02
Well, nowadays in our modern times, we've got a few, we've
59:06
got a handful of aggressive scientists like Richard Dawkins
59:09
and all that. But can I remind people that
59:12
Richard Dawkins and some of these guys like Neil deGrasse
59:16
Tyson, they haven't. And Bill Nye, they never have
59:19
invented anything. They never did anything.
59:22
Richard Dawkins, actually, they call him the Pitbull of Darwin
59:26
because he works off the back of a dead theist.
59:30
He hasn't ever done anything himself.
59:32
He's just basically mimicking and parroting what it is that he
59:36
heard from Darwin's work, but without God involved.
59:39
And if I remember right, I think Bill Nye is not actually a
59:43
scientist. I think he's actually like an
59:44
engineer, like the kind that works on planes and stuff.
59:49
An engineer's a credible thing for sure.
59:52
About that it is, but it's not. It's not a biologist or any of
59:56
the other fields that are prevalent for talking about
59:59
evolution over billions of years by natural selection.
1:00:03
Yeah, none of these guys, none of these atheist speakers on
1:00:06
television who run over religion and Christianity.
1:00:09
Have they ever actually created anything that you use in your
1:00:13
home or with your automobile or your vehicles, Anything but all
1:00:17
your computers, all your electronics and most of the
1:00:20
medications and drugs that you use that you get from the
1:00:23
hospital. These are all things, including
1:00:25
the hospitals, the colleges, the legacy universities.
1:00:30
We're all founded by Christians, ladies and gentlemen, so don't
1:00:33
let it Atheists aren't aren't like YouTube who haven't even
1:00:36
made it through high school. Tell you that scientists didn't
1:00:40
get contributed from religion. You got to you got to think
1:00:43
about this. Before I get into any more, like
1:00:46
quotes or scientists, I want to point this out.
1:00:50
If a person doesn't believe that there's anything going on in the
1:00:53
universe, that there's nothing to be found, that there's no
1:00:56
other life, then why would they be interested in putting their
1:00:59
life on the line to go Look, it would take somebody who believes
1:01:02
that there's more out there that would want to explore, because
1:01:07
Christians see everything in the universe as a mystery or a gift
1:01:11
from God, which actually can be found in James 17.
1:01:15
I believe they're going to be more inclined to be ambitious
1:01:19
enough to go out there because they believe that God put things
1:01:23
for us to find in truth. But what would an atheist do?
1:01:26
Atheist just looks at it as a big black void with a bunch of
1:01:29
dangerous stuff going out there. Why would they want to go out
1:01:32
there any more than they wouldn't jump out of a foxhole
1:01:35
to fight for their fellow man? Right, right.
1:01:40
I mean, after all, we got so many people on the Earth, so if
1:01:42
a whole bunch of them die in warfare, it's good for the
1:01:45
planet. So let's look at some stuff.
1:01:48
We were talking about the very title of your video, which I
1:01:50
think was beautifully put the relationship between science and
1:01:55
the concept of religion. Let's see what Lord William
1:01:59
Kelvin said, who was noted as being a theoretical worker on
1:02:03
thermodynamics. He said.
1:02:05
I believe the more thoroughly science is studied, the further
1:02:08
does it take us from anything comparable to atheism.
1:02:12
If you study science deep enough and long enough, it will force
1:02:15
you to believe in God. Then we've got Max Planck, who
1:02:20
was the founder of quantum physics.
1:02:22
He said both religion and science require a belief in God.
1:02:27
For believers, God is in the beginning, and for physicist he
1:02:30
is the end of all considerations.
1:02:32
To the former, he is a foundation to the ladder, the
1:02:35
crown and edifice of every generalized world view.
1:02:39
There can never be any real opposition between religion and
1:02:42
science, for one is the complement of the other.
1:02:45
Every serious and reflective person realizes, I think, that
1:02:50
the religious element in his nature must be recognized and
1:02:53
cultivated if all the powers of the human soul are to act
1:02:57
together in perfect balance and harmony.
1:02:59
And indeed, it was not by accident that the greatest
1:03:03
thinkers of all ages were deeply religious souls.
1:03:10
That's very interesting. It's almost like there's a
1:03:12
connection between my deep thinking and my faith.
1:03:18
Oh, there you go. Like I said, I could go on all
1:03:21
day. Almost 99% of scientists
1:03:25
throughout history have been religious.
1:03:27
They believed in some concept of God, and their belief in their
1:03:31
faith in God helped them do a lot of the intentions They did.
1:03:35
Think about this. When you're inventing something,
1:03:38
you don't know for sure. You're you don't have like some
1:03:42
kind of future sense of something's going to work.
1:03:45
You have to believe in yourself. You have to believe that if you
1:03:49
put this component with this component and put this together,
1:03:52
it's going to happen. And that's really what faith is,
1:03:55
isn't it? Believing that at the end of the
1:03:57
day, you're going to get results.
1:04:00
So every good scientist out there, every reflective one, has
1:04:04
had to use a form of faith in order to be able to create the
1:04:07
things they do. Right.
1:04:10
And evolutionists and atheists are the perfect example of the
1:04:13
exercising of faith in order to function within their worldview.
1:04:18
Because as we sit here, even on this stream, presenting all this
1:04:22
scientific evidence that proves that the Bible is true and that
1:04:26
ultimately proves that evolution in billions of years is not
1:04:29
true, the atheist who is presented with this information
1:04:33
but doesn't want to convert to this world view that we hold,
1:04:38
they will say to themselves, well, yeah, that seems to be the
1:04:41
case. But in the future, we will
1:04:46
discover things that will prove that the evolution narrative is
1:04:49
true. And then we will have our laugh
1:04:52
and have our day and get to make fun of Christians and
1:04:54
creationists for being so stupid.
1:04:57
But most atheists and evolutionists, when confronted
1:05:00
with the fact that their worldview doesn't have evidence
1:05:02
supporting it, they talk about how well, one day science will
1:05:07
prove this. Well, that's basically a faith.
1:05:10
I mean, you have faith. You believe that one day.
1:05:14
It's the worldview, the institution of.
1:05:18
Maybe I should put this another way, because science is not a
1:05:21
worldview. In this case, they have faith
1:05:23
that one day the institution of science will produce physical
1:05:28
evidence supporting their worldview that currently doesn't
1:05:31
exist. I mean, that would be no
1:05:34
different than saying as a Christian, well, we have no
1:05:37
evidence that the Jesus of the Bible was a real historical
1:05:41
person. But I I believe that one day we
1:05:44
will find evidence of Jesus as a historical person, and when that
1:05:48
day comes, you'll see. So if we do what the
1:05:51
evolutionists do and appeal to what undiscovered evidence in
1:05:55
the future as a reason to hold our worldview in spite of the
1:05:58
lack of evidence, if we were to do that, they'd mock and
1:06:02
ridicule us. But when they do it, it's
1:06:05
acceptable. It's OK.
1:06:07
Their faith is acceptable. You know, a lot of atheists out
1:06:11
there, like, they like to pretend as though they have some
1:06:13
kind of superiority whenever it comes to science, and they like
1:06:16
to claim it as their own. But the truth is, historically,
1:06:20
whenever it came to science, atheists did not respect
1:06:23
scientists back in the day. If the scientists did not agree
1:06:26
with them, Stalin was not only known for burning down churches
1:06:31
and killing priests or forcing religious people to kill people
1:06:35
and stuff, or they would die as well.
1:06:37
Kind of genocide. But he also would kill
1:06:40
scientists who wouldn't agree with him or go along with his
1:06:43
experiments. So the point is, ladies and
1:06:46
gentlemen, as if the scientists don't do what they want and they
1:06:50
are not politically driven or won't go along with the atheist
1:06:53
agenda. It's not like atheists didn't
1:06:55
have a problem with wiping them out as well.
1:06:58
I'll give you an example of something you read my book,
1:07:00
Afterlife Simulation. Well I point out in the story,
1:07:05
although my story section some of the stuff I bring up and it
1:07:09
is actually real, like the Humanzee project.
1:07:12
Stalin believed that he could actually create ape like
1:07:16
warriors that were hybrid humans.
1:07:18
If he got scientists in and did a bunch of genetic splicing,
1:07:22
which we hear about nowadays, and eugenics and all that.
1:07:25
He believed that he could take the abilities from animals and
1:07:28
put them into people due to evolution.
1:07:30
And you know his views on socialism.
1:07:33
When scientists told him that wasn't possible, we'd kill them
1:07:37
until we found the right ones that said they could.
1:07:39
So they tried. And a lot of women and a lot of
1:07:42
men were tortured under these experiments.
1:07:45
And nowadays, guess what scientists are doing?
1:07:48
A lot of people also like to look at some of bits of science
1:07:51
as something positive. But why aren't atheists?
1:07:54
You know how atheists are always going on about slavery and all
1:07:58
this, but why aren't they do? Why aren't they doing anything
1:08:01
about their ancestors that are sitting inside of cages right
1:08:04
now be an experiment that aren't with HIV and cancer and viruses?
1:08:09
Yeah, Yep. Very interesting stuff.
1:08:14
We might get a visit from Sneakcat 1776, so we'll
1:08:18
definitely be keeping an eye on that.
1:08:21
But what else do you have to talk about in regards to the
1:08:25
relationship between religion and science, Brett?
1:08:29
Well, there's always been a great deal of respect all the
1:08:32
way up throughout the ages. It started in probably towards,
1:08:37
I don't know, half into the 19th century where atheist started to
1:08:42
make their call and all that. And they've had several times
1:08:45
politically and then the scientifically scientific field
1:08:49
to be able to do something, but they ended up causing more
1:08:51
damage and harm than they. They actually did good.
1:08:55
I was telling you earlier that they haven't done anything
1:08:58
that's actually revolutionary. They've never invented anything.
1:09:01
They simply worked on the backs of giants.
1:09:05
I thought you were telling me before the show, though, that
1:09:07
they invented a lot of different kinds of ammunition.
1:09:09
Now for guns. Yeah, they did.
1:09:12
They did help with creating weaponry and all that because a
1:09:15
lot of theistic scientists, a lot of religious scientists,
1:09:18
they felt it was against their they knew that it would be used
1:09:22
to kill people and they believed in Thou Shalt Not Kill.
1:09:25
But an atheist doesn't have that hindrance.
1:09:28
An atheist will say, well let's see if we can come up with
1:09:31
something like that. Now, I'm not saying that there
1:09:34
wasn't some religious people back in the day that didn't
1:09:36
invent something happened to do with weaponry, but non believers
1:09:40
had no problem with it whatsoever.
1:09:41
There was nothing stopping them from creating weapons that would
1:09:45
absolutely destroy people. So what we're hearing is that
1:09:50
when it comes to creating things that are the backbone of
1:09:54
civilization and our importance to everyone and benefit
1:09:57
everyone, you primarily have Christians, Jews, and theists of
1:10:01
various kinds who are behind most of it.
1:10:05
But the only real thing we can point to for atheists as being
1:10:08
the originators of, or at least being pioneers and inventors of
1:10:13
his bullets for guns. Or as Marcus Phoenix would say
1:10:18
in Gears of War. Bullets.
1:10:19
Bullets. Bullets.
1:10:22
Yeah, Christians have always tried to create things that
1:10:25
would benefit humanity. They were creators as where the
1:10:28
non believers have always been acknowledged historically if
1:10:32
atheists ever do the research as the destroyers of worlds.
1:10:38
Yeah, that is the sad reality. But it makes sense.
1:10:41
I mean, they don't have a world view that says, you know, you
1:10:44
need to not murder people and you need to preserve life as
1:10:48
best as you can and take care of animals, take care of the earth
1:10:52
and take care of your house and your own.
1:10:55
You know, that kind of stuff that benefits everyone.
1:10:58
Atheists don't have a world view that teaches that.
1:11:00
And so they're free to not do any of that stuff and follow
1:11:04
their darker urges because, well, wants to stop them.
1:11:07
In their world view, nothing. Exactly.
1:11:12
And that's one of the reasons that that's one of the reasons
1:11:14
why we have a major problem in our modern day.
1:11:18
We have what we refer to as political scientists, people who
1:11:21
don't have any kind of moral foundation or framework where
1:11:25
they will simply if the government says build a weapon
1:11:29
or do this or do that, or lie on TV and make something up, bam,
1:11:33
they're right there. Yep, stock lock and barrel baby.
1:11:39
But yeah, then there's all the atheists and evolutionists who
1:11:42
are part of the 500 million club, you know, you know, the 8
1:11:45
billion people there on the planet, that's way too many.
1:11:49
So we got to reduce the population of the world down to
1:11:52
500 million people by any means necessary.
1:11:56
Those kind of people are going to be all on board with all
1:11:59
kinds of death and carnage. Because after all, as the Psalms
1:12:03
I think it is say or maybe it's the proverbs.
1:12:06
All those who hate me love death and that was God talking.
1:12:12
Oof, that's rough. And that sounds silly at 1st
1:12:17
until you, you know, observe the world around you and you realize
1:12:20
that there's a lot of people out there who, when you talk about
1:12:23
the 500 million club and reducing the population down
1:12:26
from 8 billion to 500 million, which inevitably is going to
1:12:30
involve some major genocides to accomplish, realistically those
1:12:34
people get happy about it. They salivated that it's like,
1:12:37
yeah, we're going to do humanity a service by killing 95% of
1:12:41
them. Woo.
1:12:43
That's right. And one of the major progenitors
1:12:46
behind it. Everybody knows about George
1:12:49
Soros. He is a atheist.
1:12:52
And then there's Bill Gates, who is big on the population of the
1:12:55
Earth. And we also know that a lot of
1:12:58
these, well, since we're on YouTube, let's just say some of
1:13:03
the stuff we've had to deal with for the last couple years having
1:13:06
to do with masks, come from a place where is well known for
1:13:10
being a majority atheist. Weird.
1:13:14
What a quinky dink. I I think this must be a total
1:13:17
coincidence. There's no correlation at all.
1:13:20
There, Brett. Can't be.
1:13:21
No, no, no, no. After all, it's not real
1:13:24
atheism. Real atheism hasn't been tried.
1:13:27
Wink, wink, nudge, nudge. There you go folks at later on
1:13:33
after the show is over, if you go to me and TT O Rs Twitter, I
1:13:37
will put up several quotes from different scientists who have
1:13:41
revolutionized the world that are theists.
1:13:44
And that I'm sure everyone on Twitter who comes across it will
1:13:48
benefit from it. Because after all, they're sold
1:13:52
a really bad bill these days. They are told all kinds of lies
1:13:55
about how science and religion contradict each other.
1:13:59
They're against each other. And anyone who's a real
1:14:01
scientist is going to reject religion.
1:14:04
And then of course, all the religious people who are real
1:14:06
scientists, well, you're not a real scientist because you
1:14:09
embrace your religion, so you don't count, bro.
1:14:14
But that's the way of the that's the authoritarian nature of the
1:14:17
atheistic worldview is whatever contradicts their worldview.
1:14:21
They just censor and suppress, pretend it doesn't exist, try to
1:14:24
stop other people from knowing about it.
1:14:27
And so if that they succeed in that, then people who don't know
1:14:31
better, especially when they're young, they're going to grow up
1:14:33
thinking of whatever the atheist says is true regarding science,
1:14:37
religion, and the relationship between the two of them.
1:14:40
Which is why we're doing this stream tonight.
1:14:42
It's really important that you realize that you've been lied to
1:14:46
about science and religion being at odds of each other.
1:14:49
You've been lied to about them opposing each other.
1:14:51
You've been lied to about science and religion being so
1:14:56
against each other that in order to embrace one, you have to
1:14:58
reject the other could not be further from the truth.
1:15:02
And yet that's what we're told by people who control the major
1:15:06
institutions and the academic world, the entertainment
1:15:10
industry, pretty much every industry and every into
1:15:15
institution that there is out there right now.
1:15:18
That's what they're telling you, and it's all lies.
1:15:22
I do have a little bit of a concern that I've been worried
1:15:25
about it, about the whole genetic manufacturing and
1:15:29
splicing that has been getting really, really big and they've
1:15:33
been getting funded. I have a feeling that one of
1:15:36
these days these scientists are going to end up manipulating
1:15:40
some genes of different creatures and then eventually
1:15:43
use that to try to claim that they were that these are
1:15:47
transitional creatures to evolution.
1:15:50
But the truth is, is they wouldn't be naturally made.
1:15:54
You understand what I'm saying. They were manipulated by humans.
1:15:58
And that is actually something I don't want to talk about in this
1:16:01
stream in great detail. I actually have a future video
1:16:04
coming up that's going to talk about in more detail, But
1:16:08
there's this new idea going around that evolution by natural
1:16:13
selection over billions of years is over and has been replaced by
1:16:18
evolution via intelligent design.
1:16:21
The globalists are literally because there's so much evidence
1:16:24
supporting intelligent design, they are literally taking
1:16:28
intelligent design and making it part of evolution.
1:16:32
And now they're claiming that evolution by intelligent design
1:16:36
is the current form of evolution that exists as being driven
1:16:40
primarily by companies like Microsoft with their Internet
1:16:44
clouds and the rapidly advancing technology that they claim
1:16:49
allows them to hack into humans and basically take away our free
1:16:53
will. Crazy stuff, I know, but I have
1:16:56
a more detailed video about that coming out soon that.
1:17:00
I think so. For the people out there, we got
1:17:02
bubble gum and some others who are saying, Oh no, do it now, do
1:17:06
it now listen, TTR will do a really organized good video
1:17:10
about it and after he does it, most likely we'll end up doing a
1:17:14
show and we'll discuss his video and and some of his thought
1:17:17
process are not. Absolutely.
1:17:23
Yeah, absolutely. It's actually set a topic that
1:17:26
my friend Seeking the Truth has been covering a little bit here
1:17:29
and there on like his Twitter account.
1:17:31
And I finally came across something juicy and went, Oh
1:17:35
well, that's bad, that's really bad and also problematic.
1:17:39
But yeah, when you start looking into this new thing that's
1:17:43
coming out called Evolution by Intelligent Design, and
1:17:46
basically how it's taking over evolution by natural selection
1:17:51
over deep time in terms of its supremacy and its influence over
1:17:57
everything, you'll realize that we are in a brave new world.
1:18:01
The evolutionists and atheists of old.
1:18:03
They've been debunked, they've been disproven, their time is
1:18:06
over. But they're being replaced by a
1:18:08
whole new group of evolutionists who literally try to fuse
1:18:12
evolution with intelligent design and say there's no God
1:18:15
behind it all, even though you're literally talking about
1:18:18
intelligent Design. Don't think about too hard.
1:18:23
Well, if anybody out there wants to in the comments or over on
1:18:27
Twitter after the show's over, 'cause I did point out, and I'm
1:18:31
not making an extraordinary claim here, every founder of
1:18:34
every field of science was atheist, someone who believed in
1:18:37
a higher power. And I'll give you another
1:18:40
example, We were just talking about genetics.
1:18:42
Gregor Mendel. He is the father of modern
1:18:47
genetics and he believed wholeheartedly in God and
1:18:50
actually wrote about God quite a bit in his diary.
1:18:54
So if you were to ask me any question on Twitter, say who was
1:18:58
the founder of this or who was the founder of that, I guarantee
1:19:01
that I'll be able to easily and quickly be able to associate it
1:19:05
with being a theist. And voila.
1:19:07
And it shouldn't be a much of A shocker.
1:19:09
All the way up to the 20th century, everybody on the
1:19:13
planet, a majority of people, were theists.
1:19:16
So it is what it is. Yep.
1:19:18
And here Bubble Gum points out that the unknown virus of
1:19:22
unknown origin EIO was just evolution by intelligent design.
1:19:28
And if you like the way that I got around that, you're welcome.
1:19:34
It's all good. It's not as bad as it used to be
1:19:37
on YouTube with that stuff. But elections are coming up.
1:19:40
They're going to get stuff on us.
1:19:43
Yeah, actually it was Terrance Pop who came up with that
1:19:45
alternative way of talking about it.
1:19:49
Well, believe it or not, the whole idea of intelligent design
1:19:53
with evolution, that's not really yet.
1:19:55
It's not a complete new idea, even though they're going to
1:19:58
probably throw new ideas into it.
1:20:00
This is originally what the first guys like Darwin believed,
1:20:04
that evolution simply couldn't work.
1:20:06
Because what are they suggesting exactly when you hear it?
1:20:10
That the cells and our genetics have a goal that they're
1:20:14
basically upgrading them. This information is becoming
1:20:17
more complex and somehow still able to function well.
1:20:20
In order for something like this to happen, this mathematics,
1:20:24
rationality and logic and information to do that, then
1:20:27
they're going to suggest there has to be a mind behind it,
1:20:29
which is exactly what Darwin did.
1:20:32
So it's not going to be too far from the old ideas that we're,
1:20:37
you know, done away with. Yeah, the main difference
1:20:41
between evolution by intelligent design and the and something
1:20:46
like theistic evolution, which is basically evolution billions
1:20:50
of years and all that is true but God's behind it all.
1:20:53
The primary difference between the two is who's behind it.
1:20:56
All the theistic evolutionists say that God is behind evolution
1:21:01
in billions of years. The the evolution by intelligent
1:21:05
design people are saying yeah intelligent design is true but 8
1:21:10
evolutions behind it and mankind is the one who's behind it all.
1:21:14
So I can see. It's the difference between God
1:21:17
and man as far as who's behind it all and who's the ultimate
1:21:20
authority on that. I can see the theist working
1:21:23
with some forms of micro evolution and natural selection,
1:21:28
but not macro. Not that doesn't.
1:21:30
It doesn't even come close to fitting with Genesis or the
1:21:33
creation of story. So it's some religious people
1:21:37
are going to and eventually I I suppose they're probably, and
1:21:40
you probably already noticed this, where they're going to
1:21:43
have to say that Genesis was a metaphor and perhaps it was just
1:21:47
a vision that Moses might have, you know, didn't see it all in
1:21:51
its entirety. That's the only thing they could
1:21:53
argue, but it just simply does not fit, you know?
1:21:57
And the problem with microevolution is that it's a
1:22:00
very deceptive term because the term itself is essentially
1:22:04
describing adaptation, not any kind of real evolution.
1:22:08
I mean, when you see species adapting to environments over
1:22:12
time, we all see that creation. To see that Christians see that
1:22:16
atheist see that, it's not controversial at all, but they
1:22:20
relabel that adaptation is microevolution and then tell you
1:22:23
that, well, microevolution over time leads to macroevolution.
1:22:29
Of course, the problem is that that is never, ever, ever been
1:22:33
observed. And in principle, it can never
1:22:36
be observed. Because macroevolution,
1:22:38
according to all evolutionists who've talked about it, takes so
1:22:43
long to occur that nobody can actually live long enough to see
1:22:47
it happen in action. Which means you can't record it
1:22:49
as a historical event. And you certainly can't set up
1:22:52
an experiment to verify it as a scientific fact through the
1:22:56
scientific method. So you have to have faith that
1:23:00
it's true, and you have to have faith that the people telling
1:23:03
you that it's true are telling you the truth, because you can't
1:23:06
observe it at all. Yeah, instead of people going in
1:23:11
search of some kind of common ancestor or missing link,
1:23:15
perhaps you need to think of it like this.
1:23:17
Especially if you're a theist who's kind of confused by all
1:23:21
this mess that's flying at you, perhaps you need to think of it
1:23:24
as in search of a common creator.
1:23:28
It wouldn't. It shouldn't be a surprise to
1:23:31
anyone out there to think that if God is creating things, he
1:23:35
will most likely use similarities.
1:23:37
When he's painting a picture, he's most likely going to use a
1:23:40
lot of the same paints and his design.
1:23:42
And if you think of it as a simulation, he's going to use a
1:23:46
lot of the same scripts and coding.
1:23:48
Why use some? Why?
1:23:50
You know, fix something that isn't broken.
1:23:53
Right. And then there's the whole
1:23:55
feudal science called biominetics, or basically what
1:23:58
people do when creating new technologies is they base that
1:24:02
new technologies, literal design on something in nature that has
1:24:06
the same design, but it's like way more advanced than what we
1:24:09
can make. But we base our design off of
1:24:12
it, and it functions in a similar way, though not as well
1:24:16
like that whole field of biomimetics is also a very good
1:24:20
thing to look into if you're looking for a positive
1:24:24
relationship between religion and science.
1:24:27
Doctor Thomas Kindle in particular has done a couple of
1:24:31
presentations on biomimetics that would really shock a lot of
1:24:35
people who are not aware of that information makes intelligent
1:24:39
design really plausible, which is why the evolutionists are now
1:24:44
trying to make intelligent design part of evolution.
1:24:48
There's a lot of atheists out there who claimed that Albert
1:24:51
Einstein insulted the concept of God in Jesus Christ.
1:24:55
Are you able to see that? Notice?
1:24:57
Unlike atheist memes where they put Albert Einstein's picture,
1:25:01
they never provide any resources of where they found the
1:25:03
information. That's where I always Do You
1:25:06
want me to read that to you? Absolutely, it says.
1:25:10
As a child, I received instruction both in the Bible
1:25:14
and in the Talmud. I am a Jew, but I am enthralled
1:25:18
by the luminous figure of the Nazarene.
1:25:21
No one can read the Gospels without feeling the actual
1:25:25
presence of Jesus. His personality pulsates in
1:25:29
every word. No myth is filled with such
1:25:32
life. That's Albert Einstein and.
1:25:35
That is very much true indeed, Brett.
1:25:37
I mean, when you look at the Gospels in particular and you
1:25:41
compare them to the historical with the historians in Rome who
1:25:46
wrote about Jesus like I did in that one.
1:25:49
Well, in the previous episode, the TTOR show, I went through
1:25:52
this topic. When you look at what those
1:25:54
Roman historians wrote about Jesus and you compare that to
1:25:57
what the gospel say, it's very easy to come to the conclusion
1:26:01
that Jesus was a real historical person, which should frighten a
1:26:05
lot of people because the things he said and did are the things
1:26:09
only God can say. And do you know that God, that
1:26:12
atheists and evolutionists are always telling us, doesn't
1:26:15
exist? It's just a figment of our
1:26:17
imagination? Yeah, that's who Jesus claimed
1:26:20
to be. And he really existed.
1:26:22
And then he proved it too. You.
1:26:24
Want me to tell you a funny story about Stephen Hawking?
1:26:27
Sure, I don't know if you knew this, but Stephen Hawking was
1:26:31
married to a woman basically in his early 20s, who was a devout
1:26:36
Christian all the way up until halfway through his life.
1:26:40
Well, they they made a movie called The Theory of Everything
1:26:44
where they basically dictated some of the things that happened
1:26:47
in his life and some of the things that his wife actually
1:26:49
remembers. He was sitting at a table with
1:26:52
his wife in his chair, obviously, and he was telling
1:26:56
her that he basically came up with an equation that validated
1:27:00
that the universe had a beginning, just as Einstein and
1:27:03
the priest had predicted. So for some reason a lot of
1:27:06
people think Stephen Hawking came up with that but he didn't
1:27:10
He was trying to actually see if there the information was right
1:27:14
and he proved it through redshift and all that radiation
1:27:17
stuff. Well, what he said was really
1:27:19
fascinating to his He he kind of went like that and his wife said
1:27:24
what's wrong? You seem a Little Miss
1:27:26
shivelled. What's going on?
1:27:28
And he goes, well honey, it looks like God's back in
1:27:30
business and. That's from the movie about him.
1:27:35
Yeah, the Theory of Everything. Yeah, a lot of the reasons why.
1:27:39
In case a lot of people ain't figured out, one of the reasons
1:27:42
why Stephen Hawking didn't work his way towards the concept of
1:27:46
God was he blamed his disability and he blamed a lot of the
1:27:50
limitations he had as a scientist because of his
1:27:53
physical problems, and it angered him towards God.
1:27:56
And the Theory of Everything actually shows that that's the
1:27:58
reason why you don't hear a lot of atheists talking about that
1:28:01
movie, because it's a very honest film about it's pretty
1:28:05
much anger that he had towards God.
1:28:09
Yeah, that that makes sense in light of the things he went
1:28:11
through. Yeah, I know that Thomas Kendall
1:28:14
also has some presentations on Stephen Hawking that are very
1:28:19
illuminating. And he talked about some of the
1:28:21
same stuff, too, about his wife and some of the things that he
1:28:25
dealt with in terms of his relationship with religion and
1:28:29
his struggle with it. But yeah, he is a fascinating
1:28:33
person now that he's passed on. He's a fascinating historical
1:28:36
person to look at and understand.
1:28:40
Yep. Well, you got any more for us?
1:28:44
Unfortunately I do not. But hey, we stretch that out to
1:28:48
an hour and a half. So I'd say we did pretty well in
1:28:51
that regard. Well, I am looking forward to
1:28:53
the video that you're talking about making.
1:28:55
And I'll probably end up having a lot more to say about it.
1:28:59
I'll do some more research on it as well.
1:29:01
I've looked into some of the stuff in the past, but I got to
1:29:04
kind of give myself a refresher, you know what I mean?
1:29:07
And then we'll talk about your video after you get it done.
1:29:11
So Bubblegum here said a couple of interesting things.
1:29:14
Like one. He claims that there is no such
1:29:17
thing as microevolution, and that's a bit problematic because
1:29:23
we can easily look that up. In fact, I'm going to do it
1:29:25
right now. I'm going to look up
1:29:28
microevolution on Google microevolution.
1:29:34
Then I could probably screen share my search so that way he
1:29:37
can see what I'm looking at as I search.
1:29:44
So microevolution from the website Understanding Evolution,
1:29:48
which is a University of Berkeley website and it says
1:29:54
microevolution is simply a change in gene frequency within
1:29:57
a population. Evolution at this scale can be
1:30:00
observed over short periods of time, for example between one
1:30:04
generation and the next. The frequency of a gene for
1:30:06
brown coloration and a population of beetles increases.
1:30:10
Such a change might come about because natural selection favour
1:30:13
the gene is shown below, because the population received new
1:30:17
immigrants carrying the gene because of mutation, or because
1:30:20
of random genetic drift from one generation to the next.
1:30:24
So bubble gum. When you claim that
1:30:27
microevolution is not a real thing, you are either wrong
1:30:33
because you don't know, or you're lying by omission.
1:30:36
And I'm going to bet on the first one.
1:30:38
I'm going to assume you don't know, but Understanding
1:30:41
Evolution is a pro evolution website by the University of
1:30:46
Berkeley. It's an Edu site controlled by a
1:30:49
college university, and I believe it's the same people
1:30:53
that are behind the National Center of Science Education,
1:30:56
which Kent Hovind has made many critiques of in his creation
1:31:01
seminars over the years. So these are real evolutionists.
1:31:05
Real atheists who understand evolution and microevolution is
1:31:11
a real thing according to atheists and evolutionists
1:31:15
throughout time. It's it's also something like
1:31:19
you said it is observable. Unfortunately bubblegum and I
1:31:23
don't think you're lying. I I think you've got your
1:31:25
reasons for whatever, but simply by looking at parents and then
1:31:30
looking at their children and being able to see the
1:31:33
similarities between the children and the parents that's
1:31:36
traits and their genetics being passed to the offspring.
1:31:39
So that is observable. There's there's no getting
1:31:42
around that. That's what I.
1:31:43
Pointed out earlier too. Macro's the problem.
1:31:46
It's when TTOR grows wings and turns into a flying monkey.
1:31:50
That's whenever we got our problems.
1:31:52
When they're claiming that you actually change species to
1:31:55
something else, that's where it's not observable.
1:31:59
That takes billions of years of magical time to happen.
1:32:03
And that's what I was saying earlier too, because what was
1:32:05
described as micro evolution on that website is actually
1:32:09
adaptation. We never see that kind of
1:32:13
evolution lead to macro evolution.
1:32:15
But they call this kind of adaptation micro evolution
1:32:19
because they want you to believe that that kind of adaptation, it
1:32:22
can lead to macroevolution. You know, one family of animal
1:32:27
turn into a completely different family of animal via natural
1:32:30
selection over billions of years.
1:32:32
They want you to believe that microevolution leads to that.
1:32:38
And that's one of the things that that website promotes and
1:32:41
teaches absolutely not true at all can't be done.
1:32:45
No one can even verify that scientifically, because like I
1:32:48
pointed out earlier, the process of evolution takes way too long
1:32:51
for anyone to actually, you know, layouts observe
1:32:55
macroevolution happen in action. There's also been a lot of fraud
1:33:00
committed in the science community, like with the figure.
1:33:04
The well known figure, Lucy scientist unfortunately made the
1:33:09
mistake of they didn't do a very good job of their fraud and it
1:33:12
was easily discovered that they took the very few fragments they
1:33:17
had of the supposed transition of basically ape to man, this
1:33:23
female creature. They put fake wooden feet on
1:33:27
this thing that resembled human and hands on it and all that,
1:33:30
and gave it a full body structure that was fake.
1:33:33
They literally only had a couple fragments of bones.
1:33:36
And then they decided to make their own model of the way they
1:33:40
thought it was. Well, they did the same thing
1:33:42
with dinosaurs too. They made them look like they
1:33:45
were Jurassic Park when it turns out nowadays they're claiming
1:33:48
that the T Rex didn't look like the cool thing in the Steven
1:33:51
Spielberg movie, but was actually a giant chicken.
1:33:56
Exactly. And then of course, Bubblegum
1:33:58
says in that same vein, atheist simply took Christian
1:34:02
microevolution and ran with it. And that is also wrong because
1:34:05
of the article you saw on screen a minute ago proved it was
1:34:09
evolutionists that talked about microevolution as a real thing,
1:34:13
and Christians are the one who took it and ran with it.
1:34:16
When it came to explaining adaptation and explaining how
1:34:20
microevolution can never lead to macroevolution, it was
1:34:25
evolutionist and atheist who came up with it, and Christians
1:34:28
are the one who ran with it. As a term, you got it mixed up.
1:34:34
Yeah, there. Before we we release out of here
1:34:37
though, I really encourage people.
1:34:39
We talked a little bit about the Cambrian period earlier.
1:34:43
People need to look into that. That totally blows evolution of
1:34:46
the water. Scientists hate dealing with
1:34:49
that because the claim is, is that basically life reset itself
1:34:54
and there was an explosion of diverse creatures that seem to
1:34:57
have all these advanced abilities in them already right
1:35:01
off the bat. Well, if you look at the Bible,
1:35:04
ladies and gentlemen, it describes that God created the
1:35:07
diversity of creatures that already had reproductive
1:35:11
ability. They were already programmed and
1:35:13
had a system in place, immune systems, all this.
1:35:17
So there you go. Bubblegum said to the adaptation
1:35:22
is not behavioral. Is only behavioral, not genetic.
1:35:25
You Christians are suggesting genetic adaptation, not
1:35:29
behavioral. Well, on the microevolution page
1:35:32
we just saw, it talked about genetic adaptation.
1:35:37
I mean, literally, how many times in that little paragraph
1:35:39
did I read? Did we learn about the genetics
1:35:42
and the genes that were being passed on from generation to
1:35:45
generation as a result of this microevolution that they were
1:35:48
talking about? I mean, how can you say that?
1:35:53
And to It took me one minute to find that article.
1:35:56
By the way, I literally just typed in microevolution and that
1:36:00
article was the 1st result that came up so.
1:36:04
Yeah, it's it's not controversial.
1:36:07
Our genes get passed on to our offspring and it'd be the child
1:36:11
will share some genes from the the woman, the mother as well as
1:36:15
the father. That's that's not shocking or
1:36:18
surprising. Bubblegum.
1:36:20
If you have anything you want to argue about, tomorrow at 7:00 PM
1:36:23
Central, I'll be doing hosting a live thing and you can come in
1:36:26
there and argue with me if you want to.
1:36:28
I'm not. I don't know if TTR be able to
1:36:30
find the time because he's very busy and has a lot of things.
1:36:33
I didn't say my girlfriend in a week, so I'm going to be
1:36:35
spending time. With her a week.
1:36:37
My goodness, man, what's up with that?
1:36:39
Well, when you're surrounded by two inches of ice all around the
1:36:42
outside of your house and it stretches out for miles, you
1:36:47
can't go see people. Oops, that's rough.
1:36:50
That's how it's. Pretty rough.
1:36:52
It was rough for a couple of days, but it's behind us now.
1:36:57
All right. Well, I think that this was a
1:36:58
really good show. And like I said, ladies and
1:37:01
gentlemen, in case DTR didn't have a plan to put this out
1:37:04
there, make sure you follow us on Twitter.
1:37:07
That's what we use for our hub to basically put our rumble
1:37:11
videos, YouTube stuff on everything you find, everything
1:37:14
we do on Twitter and it'll lead you to all the good stuff.
1:37:17
Yep. If you look at the banner on the
1:37:19
top of the screen, you see the handle I have on my quarter
1:37:22
channel and my rumble channel, which is one of the sites we're
1:37:25
streaming to right now. You also see my handle for my ex
1:37:28
account which is Twitter and you also see my true social and
1:37:33
getter handles. But yeah, you should definitely
1:37:35
follow me on Twitter and Rumble. You should sub to me on and you
1:37:39
should do the same to Brett because we're also restreaming
1:37:42
to his Rumble channel and we're streaming out to his Twitter
1:37:46
account. So you should definitely follow
1:37:48
Brett there and sub to him on Rumble as well because Brett
1:37:52
needs a lot more Subs and views and he's getting on Rumble.
1:37:55
He's a great rumble, kind of slow.
1:37:57
I'm suffering from entropy on that.
1:38:01
Yeah, unfortunately. Rumble rolled out a new program
1:38:06
recently to promote small creators, which I was initially
1:38:09
excited about. But then it turned out that the
1:38:12
only people who are small creators that are eligible for
1:38:15
this program are people who stream for at least two hours a
1:38:19
day, five days a week. And I was like, well, can't do
1:38:22
that. I barely have time to do this
1:38:24
one stream every week. So yeah, can't do that.
1:38:29
But now Brett does great content and he's been popular on other
1:38:34
sites before other than YouTube. So let's try and make Rumble one
1:38:38
of those other places. Let's make Rumble great again.
1:38:42
Yeah, well, I mean, Rumble's a great place to be if you're a
1:38:45
big content creator to begin with, because then you get
1:38:48
thousands of your fans following you over and they actually get
1:38:52
like thousands of live viewers on their screens.
1:38:54
So those people are loving Rumble right now.
1:38:57
It's those of us who are building from zero.
1:39:01
We're having the harder time, but we're doing good.
1:39:06
But anyway, I think that was. On Brett Keene Show on Twitter
1:39:10
and Brett Keene on YouTube. Oops, sorry.
1:39:14
On Rumble. But Brett Keene's show is his
1:39:17
Rumble handle, and Brett Keene's show is also his new Twitter
1:39:20
handle. Yay.
1:39:21
And with that I bid you guys a do farewell even though I won't
1:39:25
be at Brett's show tomorrow night.
1:39:26
You guys who watch this stream, you should go watch his show and
1:39:30
be a part of his show tomorrow night.
1:39:32
God bless everyone the.