Latest / True Crime Reactions / SERIAL KILLER: The Green River Killer | Case Reaction & Analysis

Transcript

SERIAL KILLER: The Green River Killer | Case Reaction & Analysis · True Crime Reactions

• 0:00
  Speaker 1: Usually when we talk about like a medical diagnosis, there's
• 0:02
  Speaker 1: this expectation of precision, right, like it's engineering. Oh, absolutely,
• 0:07
  Speaker 1: you break your arm. The X ray shows that jagged
• 0:10
  Speaker 1: white line, and the doctor just points at it and says,
• 0:13
  Speaker 1: you know, there, it is broken. Right.
• 0:15
  Speaker 2: It's comforting because it's binary. I mean, the pathology is visible,
• 0:19
  Speaker 2: it's categorized, and the treatment plan is just immediately obvious
• 0:22
  Speaker 2: to everyone in the room. You can map the whole
• 0:24
  Speaker 2: thing out exactly.
• 0:25
  Speaker 1: But then you step into the world of criminal psychology, right,
• 0:28
  Speaker 1: you look at these long unsolved mysteries, the absolute darkest
• 0:32
  Speaker 1: corners of human depravity, and suddenly that X ray machine
• 0:36
  Speaker 1: is just completely useless.
• 0:38
  Speaker 2: Yeah, it doesn't work at all.
• 0:39
  Speaker 1: Right, we are looking at a diagnostic landscape that is
• 0:42
  Speaker 1: entirely murky, where the symptoms of a literal monster are
• 0:46
  Speaker 1: just hiding in plain sight, a landscape.
• 0:48
  Speaker 2: Of the pathology evades detection not just for like days
• 0:52
  Speaker 2: or weeks, but for decades.
• 0:54
  Speaker 1: Yeah, decades.
• 0:55
  Speaker 2: And that is the terrifying reality of the case we're
• 0:58
  Speaker 2: unpacking today, the story of Ridgeway, notoriously known as the
• 1:02
  Speaker 2: Green River Killer. We are dealing with a man who
• 1:05
  Speaker 2: operated with almost total impunity across the Pacific Northwest, leaving
• 1:10
  Speaker 2: a trail of devastation that basically defined an entire era
• 1:14
  Speaker 2: of law enforcement.
• 1:15
  Speaker 1: And we are looking at a man who murdered at
• 1:17
  Speaker 1: least forty nine women. I mean, let that number just
• 1:20
  Speaker 1: hang in the air for a second for you listening.
• 1:22
  Speaker 1: Forty nine women.
• 1:23
  Speaker 2: It's staggering, it really is.
• 1:25
  Speaker 1: And here is the central tension we're going to be
• 1:27
  Speaker 1: wrestling with today. How does a man who was actually
• 1:30
  Speaker 1: pointed out by multiple witnesses over the years, how does
• 1:34
  Speaker 1: he manage to evade capture for two whole decades before
• 1:39
  Speaker 1: a microscopic drop of DNA finally brings him down.
• 1:42
  Speaker 2: Well, it forces us to look at the massive friction
• 1:45
  Speaker 2: between human intuition, the strict, unyielding limitations of our legal system,
• 1:51
  Speaker 2: and then the eventual triumph of forensic science.
• 1:53
  Speaker 1: Yeah, the gap between knowing someone as a predator and
• 1:56
  Speaker 1: actually proving it in a court of law. It's a
• 1:58
  Speaker 1: chasm where a lot of lives were lost, a lot
• 2:00
  Speaker 1: of lives. And what makes this deep dive so compelling
• 2:02
  Speaker 1: is the lens we're using to look back at this history,
• 2:05
  Speaker 1: because we aren't just like reading old police blotterers today,
• 2:09
  Speaker 1: we are examining how this sprawling twenty year nightmare is
• 2:12
  Speaker 1: consumed by you and me today, specifically looking at how
• 2:16
  Speaker 1: it's been immortalized by the modern true crime ecosystem, which
• 2:19
  Speaker 1: is a huge industry, now massive. We'll be breaking down
• 2:22
  Speaker 1: the mechanics of the case alongside its modern packaging. So
• 2:25
  Speaker 1: we're referencing the highly produced, globally syndicated crime junkie presentation
• 2:30
  Speaker 1: of the Green River Killer by Ashley Flowers and Britt
• 2:33
  Speaker 1: Prewatt under the Audio Check Network.
• 2:36
  Speaker 2: It creates a really fascinating, almost jarring juxtaposition, doesn't ma
• 2:39
  Speaker 2: oh totally. You take a slow, agonizing twenty year investigation
• 2:44
  Speaker 2: filled with just unimaginable grief, and it is synthesized into
• 2:49
  Speaker 2: a forty two minute audio.
• 2:50
  Speaker 1: Narrative which is wild to think about.
• 2:52
  Speaker 2: Right, and it's consumed by millions of people across dozens
• 2:55
  Speaker 2: of countries. The way we digest this trauma today tells
• 2:58
  Speaker 2: us as much about our modern societ as the crimes
• 3:01
  Speaker 2: themselves tell us about the nineteen eighties.
• 3:03
  Speaker 1: Yeah, that is such a good point. Well, let's start
• 3:05
  Speaker 1: with the reality on the ground in the nineteen eighties,
• 3:07
  Speaker 1: the geography of this terror. Yeah, because these crimes didn't
• 3:10
  Speaker 1: happen in a vacuum.
• 3:11
  Speaker 2: No, they didn't, and.
• 3:12
  Speaker 1: They didn't happen in a single contained location either. We're
• 3:17
  Speaker 1: talking about the eighties and the nineties where women in
• 3:19
  Speaker 1: the state of Washington were just turning up dead. It
• 3:22
  Speaker 1: started along the Green River, hence the moniker the press
• 3:25
  Speaker 1: gave him, but it didn't stay there.
• 3:28
  Speaker 2: Right the Green River was his initial comfort zone.
• 3:30
  Speaker 1: Yeah.
• 3:31
  Speaker 2: You see, predators, especially serial predators, they often begin their
• 3:35
  Speaker 2: cycles in environments they know intimately, like they're on backyard,
• 3:39
  Speaker 2: almost exactly. They need a tactical advantage. They need to
• 3:42
  Speaker 2: know the site lines, the access roads, the times of
• 3:46
  Speaker 2: day when isolation is guaranteed. Sure, and the river provided
• 3:50
  Speaker 2: natural concealment in a sense of psychological safety for him.
• 3:53
  Speaker 1: Okay, let's unpack this for a second. Imagine a drop
• 3:55
  Speaker 1: of ink hitting a map right at the Green River.
• 3:59
  Speaker 1: For a while, it's just a concentrated dark spot, but
• 4:02
  Speaker 1: then slowly, horrifyingly, that ink just bleeds outward. Yeah, it
• 4:08
  Speaker 1: spreads over two decades, seeping across county lines, shifting into
• 4:12
  Speaker 1: other clusters throughout Washington State, and eventually bleeding over state
• 4:16
  Speaker 1: lines entirely down into Portland, Oregon.
• 4:18
  Speaker 2: Yep, the Portland connection.
• 4:20
  Speaker 1: It becomes this creeping, just unstoppable stain on the map
• 4:24
  Speaker 1: of the Pacific Northwest.
• 4:26
  Speaker 2: And that ink doesn't just spread randomly, right, it steeps
• 4:29
  Speaker 2: across those specific borders for a highly calculated reason.
• 4:33
  Speaker 1: You think it was intentional?
• 4:34
  Speaker 2: Oh? Absolutely, Yeah. When we see a killer shift his
• 4:37
  Speaker 2: dumping grounds into new clusters, and especially when he crosses
• 4:41
  Speaker 2: a state boundary into Oregon, we are watching an active
• 4:44
  Speaker 2: predatory countermeasure. Wow, he is intentionally exploiting the logistical nightmares
• 4:49
  Speaker 2: of nineteen eighties law enforcement.
• 4:51
  Speaker 1: Oh, because if a body is discovered in Portland, Oregon,
• 4:55
  Speaker 1: the homicide detectives there aren't having daily briefings with the
• 4:58
  Speaker 1: detectives in King County, Washington.
• 5:00
  Speaker 2: They aren't even using the same radio frequencies. Geez, we
• 5:03
  Speaker 2: really have to strip away our modern understanding of connectivity here. Today,
• 5:07
  Speaker 2: an investigator types a few variables into a national database, right,
• 5:10
  Speaker 2: and an algorithm flags a similar mo three states away
• 5:13
  Speaker 2: in milliseconds.
• 5:14
  Speaker 1: Right. It's all instant now exactly.
• 5:17
  Speaker 2: But in the early nineteen eighties, police departments were heavily
• 5:19
  Speaker 2: siloed fiefdoms. I mean, information was stored in physical Manila folders,
• 5:24
  Speaker 2: inside metal filing cabinets.
• 5:26
  Speaker 1: Just rows and rows of cabinets.
• 5:28
  Speaker 2: Yeah, sharing information meant picking up a telephone, sending a teletype,
• 5:33
  Speaker 2: or you know, physically mailing crime scene photos.
• 5:36
  Speaker 1: So by moving the bodies ridgeway is essentially hitting a
• 5:39
  Speaker 1: reset button on the investigation every single time.
• 5:42
  Speaker 2: That's a great way to put it.
• 5:43
  Speaker 1: He dilutes the police resources. He forces different jurisdictions, agencies
• 5:48
  Speaker 1: with entirely different budgets, different leadership structures, and like different
• 5:52
  Speaker 1: political pressures to try and communicate across these invisible municipal lines.
• 5:57
  Speaker 2: He weaponized bureaucracy.
• 5:59
  Speaker 1: Man, that's chilling.
• 6:00
  Speaker 2: It is every time he crossed a county or state line,
• 6:03
  Speaker 2: he forced a new set of detectives to just start
• 6:06
  Speaker 2: from scratch, right. They have to learn the victimology, they
• 6:08
  Speaker 2: have to establish a timeline, all while being completely disconnected
• 6:12
  Speaker 2: from the massive accumulated knowledge of the original Green River Task.
• 6:16
  Speaker 1: Force, which is probably huge at that point.
• 6:18
  Speaker 2: Oh, it was a mountain of data. And his strategy
• 6:21
  Speaker 2: is designed to create noise and confusion.
• 6:23
  Speaker 1: Imagine walking out your front door in Washington in nineteen
• 6:26
  Speaker 1: eighty five, You go to work, You drive your kids
• 6:29
  Speaker 1: to school, you read the morning paper and you are
• 6:32
  Speaker 1: living in the shadow of a phantom whose borders just
• 6:34
  Speaker 1: keep shifting.
• 6:35
  Speaker 2: It's terrifying, it really is.
• 6:37
  Speaker 1: You don't know where the danger zone is anymore. Because
• 6:39
  Speaker 1: the ink keeps spreading. It creates this pervasive atmospheric terror.
• 6:44
  Speaker 1: It's not a localized spike in crime that fades away,
• 6:48
  Speaker 1: you know. It is an entire generation growing up with
• 6:51
  Speaker 1: a boogeyman continually altering his geographic pattern.
• 6:56
  Speaker 2: And that shifting geography makes the public feel helpless, Oh totally.
• 7:00
  Speaker 2: If the police can't predict where he will strike or
• 7:02
  Speaker 2: where he's going to leave his victims next, the illusion
• 7:04
  Speaker 2: of public safety just shatters entirely. The unpredictability is what
• 7:09
  Speaker 2: makes the terror so absolute.
• 7:10
  Speaker 1: But while the wear of the crimes was constantly shifting,
• 7:14
  Speaker 1: the how of the crimes, the methodology, the dark compulsion
• 7:17
  Speaker 1: behind closed doors that was completely static.
• 7:20
  Speaker 2: Unchanging right.
• 7:22
  Speaker 1: The geography changed, but the killer couldn't abandon his specific,
• 7:26
  Speaker 1: horrific routine. And I want to unpack the actual mechanics
• 7:30
  Speaker 1: of what he was doing here because it reveals a
• 7:32
  Speaker 1: pathology that is just difficult for a normal human brain
• 7:36
  Speaker 1: to process.
• 7:37
  Speaker 2: Yeah, it requires us to look at behavior that basically
• 7:40
  Speaker 2: defies all evolutionary survival instincts.
• 7:43
  Speaker 1: Okay, so Ridgeway didn't just murder these women and flee
• 7:46
  Speaker 1: into the night. No, The details of his MO show
• 7:49
  Speaker 1: that he would repeatedly revisit the corpses. He would return
• 7:53
  Speaker 1: to these clandestine dumping grounds and sexually assault the bodies
• 7:56
  Speaker 1: multiple times, and he would continue this cycle of returning
• 7:59
  Speaker 1: until the bodies were fully decomposed and literally consumed by maggots.
• 8:03
  Speaker 2: It is a detail that just halts you.
• 8:05
  Speaker 1: In your tracks, It really does. I mean, my stomach
• 8:08
  Speaker 1: just turns even thinking about it.
• 8:10
  Speaker 2: From a purely criminological standpoint, a perpetrator's primary instinct should
• 8:14
  Speaker 2: be self preservation. You would think you commit a crime, Yeah,
• 8:17
  Speaker 2: we'd put as much distance between yourself and the physical
• 8:19
  Speaker 2: evidence as physically possible.
• 8:21
  Speaker 1: Get as far away as you can exactly.
• 8:24
  Speaker 2: Returning to a crime scene is universally understood as the
• 8:27
  Speaker 2: highest risk behavior a killer can engage in.
• 8:30
  Speaker 1: So why do it? I mean, does the specific gruesome detail,
• 8:34
  Speaker 1: this absolute compulsion to return to a site until nature
• 8:38
  Speaker 1: forcefully intervenes with decomposition. Does that explain why it was
• 8:42
  Speaker 1: so hard for ordinary people? And maybe even investigators to
• 8:45
  Speaker 1: comprehend who they were chasing.
• 8:47
  Speaker 2: It absolutely does. What's fascinating here is that it shifts
• 8:50
  Speaker 2: the motive from simple violence to total unyielding possession.
• 8:56
  Speaker 1: Possession, Okay, what we are.
• 8:58
  Speaker 2: Looking at here is not just the act of taking
• 9:00
  Speaker 2: a life. It is about a twisted ownership. By revisiting
• 9:04
  Speaker 2: the bodies in this manner, he is treating these victims
• 9:07
  Speaker 2: not as human beings who have tragically died, but as
• 9:09
  Speaker 2: his permanent captive property. That is just so dark it's horrific.
• 9:13
  Speaker 2: He keeps returning to them until the biological breakdown of
• 9:16
  Speaker 2: the body physically takes them away from.
• 9:18
  Speaker 1: Him, treating a human being like an object in a
• 9:20
  Speaker 1: permanent collection.
• 9:21
  Speaker 2: Yes, the term often used in these extreme cases is
• 9:24
  Speaker 2: macob curation.
• 9:25
  Speaker 1: Macob curation. Wow.
• 9:27
  Speaker 2: He is essentially maintaining an outdoor rotting gallery of his crimes.
• 9:33
  Speaker 2: When he returns to these grave sites, he is re
• 9:36
  Speaker 2: experiencing the ultimate power and control he felt during the
• 9:40
  Speaker 2: initial murder.
• 9:40
  Speaker 1: So it's reliving the high basically exactly.
• 9:43
  Speaker 2: The psychology here is deeply necrophilic, but it is deeply
• 9:47
  Speaker 2: rooted in domination. You see, a living victim can fight back,
• 9:51
  Speaker 2: they can scream they can.
• 9:52
  Speaker 1: Escape, Right, they have agency.
• 9:53
  Speaker 2: Yes, a deceased victim is entirely submissive to his will.
• 9:58
  Speaker 1: It speaks to a level of air against that is
• 10:00
  Speaker 1: almost blinding, to feel so untouchable, so invisible to the
• 10:04
  Speaker 1: police patrols and the helicopters and the search dogs, that
• 10:07
  Speaker 1: you can just treat the forests of the Pacific Northwest
• 10:10
  Speaker 1: as your personal twisted museum.
• 10:12
  Speaker 2: The arrogance is the defining feature. He believed he had
• 10:15
  Speaker 2: outsmarted the system so thoroughly that he could afford to
• 10:19
  Speaker 2: indulge in this high risk behavior.
• 10:20
  Speaker 1: Unbelievable.
• 10:21
  Speaker 2: You really believe the siloed police departments and the vast
• 10:24
  Speaker 2: wilderness offered him this permanent shield.
• 10:26
  Speaker 1: But his arrogance was actually a massive liability. Right, oh yeah,
• 10:29
  Speaker 1: this need to curate. This outdoor gallery meant he was
• 10:33
  Speaker 1: constantly putting himself at the physical location of a homicide.
• 10:37
  Speaker 1: He was driving his truck back to these sites. He
• 10:39
  Speaker 1: was risking being seen, and in fact, he was seen.
• 10:42
  Speaker 1: People noticed him exactly.
• 10:44
  Speaker 2: He was not a phantom. He was a man in
• 10:46
  Speaker 2: a truck with a highly visible pattern of behavior.
• 10:50
  Speaker 1: Which brings us to the most agonizing, deeply frustrating part
• 10:55
  Speaker 1: of this entire history. Here's where it gets really interesting
• 10:58
  Speaker 1: and honestly deeply from Gary. Ridgeway had actually been pointed
• 11:02
  Speaker 1: out by a number of witnesses as being the Green
• 11:05
  Speaker 1: River killer.
• 11:05
  Speaker 2: Yes he had.
• 11:06
  Speaker 1: Let's really sit with that for a second. People saw things,
• 11:09
  Speaker 1: people pointed fingers at him, but the police were completely
• 11:13
  Speaker 1: unable to make an arrest. He eluded them for twenty years,
• 11:17
  Speaker 1: despite having a spotlight interminently hitting him.
• 11:20
  Speaker 2: It sounds like a total failure of justice on paper.
• 11:22
  Speaker 2: I mean, how can multiple citizens point at a man
• 11:25
  Speaker 2: and the police do nothing.
• 11:26
  Speaker 1: It's maddening. It's like knowing exactly who the wolf is
• 11:29
  Speaker 1: in the village. You have townsfolk pointing right at the
• 11:31
  Speaker 1: wolf saying that's him, He's the one taking the sheep,
• 11:34
  Speaker 1: But the village guards are just standing there, arms cross
• 11:37
  Speaker 1: saying sorry, our hands are tied. How does that actually
• 11:40
  Speaker 1: happen in a functioning society. Why couldn't a judge just
• 11:43
  Speaker 1: authorize a warrant, lock him up and throw away the
• 11:45
  Speaker 1: key based on those witnesses.
• 11:48
  Speaker 2: Because the legal system is intentionally designed to require more
• 11:52
  Speaker 2: than suspicion to deprive the citizen of their liberty.
• 11:55
  Speaker 1: Okay, sure.
• 11:56
  Speaker 2: The friction here is between knowing someone is guilt in
• 12:00
  Speaker 2: your gut and satisfying the burden of proof required by
• 12:03
  Speaker 2: a court.
• 12:04
  Speaker 1: Of law, which are two very different things, vastly different.
• 12:07
  Speaker 2: In the nineteen eighties, before ubiquitous CCTV, before cellular triangulation,
• 12:12
  Speaker 2: before digital footprints, investigators relied heavily on eyewitness testimony.
• 12:17
  Speaker 1: Right, which we now know is superflawed.
• 12:19
  Speaker 2: Exactly, eyewitness memory is incredibly fragile and malleable.
• 12:23
  Speaker 1: We've seen all the psychological studies on this. Right, a
• 12:25
  Speaker 1: defense attorney gets a witness on the stand and just
• 12:28
  Speaker 1: starts picking apart their memory.
• 12:29
  Speaker 2: Oh, they tear to shreds.
• 12:30
  Speaker 1: It was dark, wasn't it. You were driving past at
• 12:33
  Speaker 1: forty miles an hour. You saw a truck. But can
• 12:36
  Speaker 1: you definitively swear beyond a reasonable doubt that the driver
• 12:40
  Speaker 1: was Gary Ridgeway and not someone who looks vaguely like him.
• 12:43
  Speaker 2: And if you arrest a man on shaky eyewitness testimony
• 12:46
  Speaker 2: and circumstantial evidence, you're rolling the dice. With the Fifth
• 12:49
  Speaker 2: Amendment and the concept of double jeopardy.
• 12:51
  Speaker 1: Oh wow, yeah, you get one shot at him.
• 12:54
  Speaker 2: You get exactly one shot. If the prosecution takes Gary
• 12:57
  Speaker 2: Ridgeway to trial in nineteen eighty six, based solely on
• 13:00
  Speaker 2: a few witnesses who saw his truck near a dumping ground.
• 13:04
  Speaker 2: A skilled defense attorney will introduce reasonable doubt, and if
• 13:06
  Speaker 2: they win, if a jury acquits him double jeopardy attaches,
• 13:10
  Speaker 2: he walks free. And even if you find a videotape
• 13:13
  Speaker 2: of him committing the murders a year later, you can
• 13:15
  Speaker 2: never ever put him on trial for those specific crimes. Again.
• 13:18
  Speaker 1: Wow, So the detectives were trapped in this bureaucratic purgatory.
• 13:22
  Speaker 2: They really were.
• 13:22
  Speaker 1: They had his name, they had suspicions, but they knew
• 13:26
  Speaker 1: if they sprang the trap too early without ironclad physical evidence,
• 13:29
  Speaker 1: they might accidentally grant him legal immunity for the rest
• 13:32
  Speaker 1: of his life.
• 13:33
  Speaker 2: That is the agonizing space where the victims' families had
• 13:37
  Speaker 2: to live.
• 13:37
  Speaker 1: Oh, I can't even imagine.
• 13:38
  Speaker 2: Imagine the psychological torture of being a mother or a
• 13:41
  Speaker 2: sister to one of these victims. You hear whispers in
• 13:44
  Speaker 2: the community, you might even know if the police have
• 13:46
  Speaker 2: interviewed a guy named Gary right, But year after year,
• 13:50
  Speaker 2: decade after decade goes by and there is no arrest,
• 13:52
  Speaker 2: no trial, no justice. The law isn't about truth ultimately,
• 13:56
  Speaker 2: it's about what you can prove exactly. The law is
• 13:59
  Speaker 2: about what you can imphorically proved to a jury.
• 14:01
  Speaker 1: And what they needed to prove. It didn't even exist yet, No,
• 14:04
  Speaker 1: it didn't. The gap between public suspicion and a legal
• 14:07
  Speaker 1: conviction couldn't be bridged by a better witness or a
• 14:09
  Speaker 1: sharper detective. It required a completely unassailable biological truth.
• 14:14
  Speaker 2: It required a massive paradigm shift in forensic science.
• 14:17
  Speaker 1: So let's fast forward to the year two thousand and one,
• 14:20
  Speaker 1: two decades after the murders began. Yep, the breakthrough finally happens,
• 14:24
  Speaker 1: and it is DNA evidence that connects Gary Ridgeway to
• 14:27
  Speaker 1: four specific crime scenes. That microscopic evidence is what leads
• 14:30
  Speaker 1: to his arrest and finally ends his reign of terror.
• 14:33
  Speaker 2: If we connect this to the bigger picture. The emergence
• 14:36
  Speaker 2: of DNA profiling in the late eighties and its refinement
• 14:40
  Speaker 2: into the nineties and early two thousands is probably the
• 14:43
  Speaker 2: most significant advancement in criminal justice since the discovery of fingerprints.
• 14:47
  Speaker 1: Oh easily.
• 14:48
  Speaker 2: It completely changed the math of criminal investigations.
• 14:51
  Speaker 1: I always think of DNA like a time machine. You know,
• 14:54
  Speaker 1: witnesses move away, memories fade, the original detectives retire and
• 14:58
  Speaker 1: pass away. But is like an unblinking eye left at
• 15:01
  Speaker 1: the crime scene.
• 15:02
  Speaker 2: That's a great analogy.
• 15:03
  Speaker 1: It just sits there. It waits in a temperature controlled
• 15:06
  Speaker 1: evidence locker for twenty years, perfectly preserving a snapshot of
• 15:10
  Speaker 1: the truth, just waiting for technology to catch up so
• 15:13
  Speaker 1: it can finally point the finger. But how does that
• 15:16
  Speaker 1: biology actually survive for two decades? How do we go
• 15:20
  Speaker 1: from nineteen eighties crime scenes to a two thousand and
• 15:22
  Speaker 1: one conviction.
• 15:23
  Speaker 2: Well, in the early nineteen eighties, forensicstrology was mostly limited
• 15:27
  Speaker 2: to blood typing, like abo right, if they found biological fluid,
• 15:31
  Speaker 2: they could say, this perparparator has Type A blood, But
• 15:34
  Speaker 2: millions of people have Type A blood.
• 15:35
  Speaker 1: Yeah, that doesn't narrow it down much exactly.
• 15:38
  Speaker 2: It's an exclusionary tool, not a unique identifier. But investigators
• 15:42
  Speaker 2: in the Green River Task Force did something incredibly vital.
• 15:46
  Speaker 2: What's that they preserve the evidence? They meticulously collected swabs, semen,
• 15:51
  Speaker 2: and saliva from these victims, and they stored them properly.
• 15:55
  Speaker 1: Even though they didn't have the technology to fully analyze it.
• 15:58
  Speaker 2: Yet exactly they banked on the future. They kept these
• 16:01
  Speaker 2: samples in cold storage, which slows down the degradation of
• 16:04
  Speaker 2: the cellular material. Smarty, And by two thousand and one,
• 16:08
  Speaker 2: polymerase chain reaction or PCR DNA testing had become incredibly sophisticated.
• 16:14
  Speaker 1: PCR. Right, we've heard a lot about that lately.
• 16:17
  Speaker 2: Yeah. And PCR allows scientists to take a tiny, degraded,
• 16:20
  Speaker 2: microscopic fragment of DNA and amplify it.
• 16:23
  Speaker 1: Amplify it, how.
• 16:24
  Speaker 2: Essentially copying it millions of times over until they have
• 16:26
  Speaker 2: a large enough sample to create a unique genetic profile.
• 16:29
  Speaker 1: Wow. And there's a massive, almost cosmic irony to this breakthrough,
• 16:33
  Speaker 1: isn't there?
• 16:33
  Speaker 2: It really is.
• 16:34
  Speaker 1: The very pathology that made Ridgeway such a monster is
• 16:37
  Speaker 1: precisely what gave the scientists the material they needed.
• 16:40
  Speaker 2: His macob curation was his undoing. By continually returning to
• 16:44
  Speaker 2: the bodies, by engaging in repeated sexual assaults over an
• 16:47
  Speaker 2: extended period, he was continually depositing fresh biological material at
• 16:53
  Speaker 2: the scenes.
• 16:53
  Speaker 1: He wasn't just leaving a single hair or a drop
• 16:55
  Speaker 1: of sweat.
• 16:56
  Speaker 2: No, he was leaving an abundance of seminal fluid and
• 16:59
  Speaker 2: cellular evidence.
• 17:01
  Speaker 1: He thought he was exerting ultimate control over his victims,
• 17:04
  Speaker 1: but in reality, every time he went back, he was
• 17:07
  Speaker 1: handing the police the keys to his own jail.
• 17:09
  Speaker 2: Cell poetic justice really completely.
• 17:11
  Speaker 1: He was completely unaware that a technology was being born
• 17:15
  Speaker 1: in laboratories that would eventually learn how to read the
• 17:18
  Speaker 1: invisible signature he was leaving behind.
• 17:20
  Speaker 2: And the science didn't just connect him to one victim.
• 17:23
  Speaker 2: The DNA profiling matched his genetic material to four distinct
• 17:27
  Speaker 2: crime scenes four four. Mathematically, that is the ultimate nail
• 17:31
  Speaker 2: in the coffin for any defense strategy.
• 17:33
  Speaker 1: Because if a defense attorney is looking at one DNA match,
• 17:37
  Speaker 1: they can argue contamination right exactly. They can say a
• 17:39
  Speaker 1: lab tech sneezed on a slide, or there was a
• 17:42
  Speaker 1: mix up in the evidence.
• 17:43
  Speaker 2: Locker, or they argue circumstantial contact. You know, my client
• 17:47
  Speaker 2: hired this woman for a perfectly legal, consensual encounter earlier
• 17:50
  Speaker 2: in the evening, and someone else murdered her later.
• 17:53
  Speaker 1: Ah, yeah, that makes sense.
• 17:54
  Speaker 2: But connecting a suspect to four separate murder victims found
• 17:59
  Speaker 2: in disparate location whose bodies were disposed of in the
• 18:02
  Speaker 2: exact same ritualistic.
• 18:03
  Speaker 1: Manner You can't explain that away.
• 18:05
  Speaker 2: You really can't. The statistical probability of an innocent man's
• 18:09
  Speaker 2: DNA coincidentally ending up on four different victims of the
• 18:12
  Speaker 2: same serial killer is astronomically low. It shatters the concept
• 18:17
  Speaker 2: of reasonable doubt.
• 18:18
  Speaker 1: The science bridged the gap. It bypassed the fragile eyewitnesses.
• 18:22
  Speaker 1: It bypassed all that jurisdictional red tape we talked about.
• 18:25
  Speaker 1: It transformed a twenty year cloud of suspicion into a cold, hard,
• 18:30
  Speaker 1: empirical fact. The nightmare was finally over.
• 18:33
  Speaker 2: The physical reality of his crimes, finally caught up with
• 18:36
  Speaker 2: his arrogance.
• 18:37
  Speaker 1: So we have this sprawling, devastating history, a twenty year
• 18:42
  Speaker 1: nightmare of forty nine victims, a state completely gripped by fear,
• 18:46
  Speaker 1: a killer hiding in plain sight, and a miraculous scientific breakthrough.
• 18:50
  Speaker 2: It's a defining chapter of American criminal history, it is.
• 18:53
  Speaker 1: But what I find really fascinating about our approach today
• 18:56
  Speaker 1: is how this exact history is consumed in the modern era.
• 19:00
  Speaker 2: Yes, the media aspect the way.
• 19:01
  Speaker 1: In nineteen eighties tragedy is translated for a twenty twenties audience.
• 19:05
  Speaker 2: This is where we transition from the mechanics of the
• 19:08
  Speaker 2: crime to the mechanics of modern media. Really, how do
• 19:11
  Speaker 2: we digest this trauma today?
• 19:13
  Speaker 1: So what does this all mean for us today? Let's
• 19:16
  Speaker 1: look at the true crime media phenomenon, specifically, using the
• 19:18
  Speaker 1: Crime Junkie podcast episode as our structural lens for this
• 19:22
  Speaker 1: deep dive.
• 19:23
  Speaker 2: Okay, let's do it.
• 19:24
  Speaker 1: The Reality of Gary Ridgeway was a massive, sprawling, twenty
• 19:27
  Speaker 1: year saga that mobilized hundreds of police officers and terrorized
• 19:32
  Speaker 1: millions of citizens. But today that entire saga is neatly
• 19:36
  Speaker 1: convinced into a forty two minute episode by hosts Ashley
• 19:40
  Speaker 1: Flowers and brit pro At forty two.
• 19:42
  Speaker 2: Minutes, this raises an important question about storytelling because it
• 19:45
  Speaker 2: is a masterclass in narrative compression. For sure, they are
• 19:49
  Speaker 2: taking a case with tens of thousands of pages of
• 19:51
  Speaker 2: court documents, decades of false leads, and countless tragic subplots,
• 19:56
  Speaker 2: and they are distilling it into a highly structured, digestible format.
• 20:00
  Speaker 1: It's not just the compression, right, it's the ecosystem built
• 20:03
  Speaker 1: around it. What do you mean, Well, the Audio Check
• 20:05
  Speaker 1: Network heavily utilizes modern digital engagement to keep this story alive.
• 20:10
  Speaker 1: We aren't just talking at people passively listening to a
• 20:12
  Speaker 1: radio broadcast like back in the day.
• 20:14
  Speaker 2: Oh No, it's highly interactive, right.
• 20:17
  Speaker 1: There are text lines. You can literally text an Indiana
• 20:20
  Speaker 1: area code to interact directly with Ashley.
• 20:23
  Speaker 2: Wow.
• 20:24
  Speaker 1: There is an ad free fan club you can subscribe to.
• 20:26
  Speaker 1: There is heavy continuous cross platform social media promotion pushing
• 20:31
  Speaker 1: these narratives onto TikTok, Instagram, Twitter, and Facebook.
• 20:35
  Speaker 2: And the geographic reach is something the original detectives could never.
• 20:40
  Speaker 1: Have fathomed, oh not a million years.
• 20:42
  Speaker 2: A case that was once defined by hyper local, county
• 20:45
  Speaker 2: by county jurisdictional issues is now a global export. Right
• 20:49
  Speaker 2: when you look at the syndication of an episode like this,
• 20:52
  Speaker 2: it is available and translated in dozens of regions. Listeners
• 20:56
  Speaker 2: in Algeria, Armenia, India, Japan, Brazil, France, they are all
• 21:00
  Speaker 2: tuning in to hear about the woods of King County, Washington.
• 21:03
  Speaker 1: It's surreal to think about you have this profound localized
• 21:08
  Speaker 1: trauma forty nine American women who lost their lives in
• 21:11
  Speaker 1: the damp forests of the Pacific Northwest, and it is
• 21:14
  Speaker 1: neatly packaged, produced with high quality audio and broadcast ad
• 21:18
  Speaker 1: free to commuters in Tokyo and students in Paris.
• 21:21
  Speaker 2: It's a whole new world.
• 21:22
  Speaker 1: It really is. What does this massive true crime industrial
• 21:26
  Speaker 1: complex mean for us today, Well.
• 21:28
  Speaker 2: It fundamentally changes our relationship with crime and tragedy. Historically,
• 21:31
  Speaker 2: the details of a case like the Green River Killer
• 21:34
  Speaker 2: were confined to local newspaper archives, dense police files, or
• 21:38
  Speaker 2: incredibly dry academic true crime books.
• 21:41
  Speaker 1: Right, you had to actively seek out the darkness exactly.
• 21:44
  Speaker 2: Today, hosts like Ashley and Britt act as modern day
• 21:47
  Speaker 2: town criers, but they are broadcasting to a global digital village.
• 21:51
  Speaker 2: The algorithm brings the darkness directly to your phone.
• 21:54
  Speaker 1: And they are building a highly mobilized community around it,
• 21:56
  Speaker 1: calling their listeners crime junkies, setting up those direct texts,
• 22:00
  Speaker 1: creating fan clubs. It's a very interactive ecosystem. It turns
• 22:04
  Speaker 1: isolated listeners into an active, mobilized community of sluts.
• 22:08
  Speaker 2: A collective investigation. The strategy is to turn passive consumption
• 22:12
  Speaker 2: into active participation. Interesting, they are fostering a community of
• 22:16
  Speaker 2: amateur sleuths who feel a personal connection not just to
• 22:19
  Speaker 2: the hosts, but to the process of dissecting these cases.
• 22:23
  Speaker 1: But is this entirely a good thing. I really struggle
• 22:26
  Speaker 1: with this balance.
• 22:26
  Speaker 2: It's a tough balance when we.
• 22:28
  Speaker 1: Take these terrifying, gruesome realities for you to consume, like
• 22:33
  Speaker 1: a man returning to rotting corpses in the woods, and
• 22:36
  Speaker 1: we make them highly digestible, condensed into forty two minutes
• 22:39
  Speaker 1: with a call to action to join an ad free tier.
• 22:42
  Speaker 1: Does it make us more vigilant or does it risk
• 22:44
  Speaker 1: turning immense human tragedy into mere content.
• 22:48
  Speaker 2: Just to fill the silence in a treadmill?
• 22:49
  Speaker 1: Exactly? Does it just become background noise?
• 22:51
  Speaker 2: That is the incredibly fine tightrope the true crime genre
• 22:55
  Speaker 2: walks every single day. Yeah, on one side of the ledger.
• 22:58
  Speaker 2: Synthesizing a complex, twenty years investigation into a forty two
• 23:01
  Speaker 2: minute narrative democratizes the knowledge.
• 23:04
  Speaker 1: Sure, it gets the info out there.
• 23:06
  Speaker 2: It educates the broader public on the realities of forensic science,
• 23:10
  Speaker 2: the red flags of predatory behavior, and the historical failures
• 23:14
  Speaker 2: of the justice system.
• 23:15
  Speaker 1: It empowers that mobilized community right to perhaps recognize patterns
• 23:21
  Speaker 1: in their own neighborhoods. Today, knowledge, even dark knowledge, can
• 23:25
  Speaker 1: be a protective armor.
• 23:27
  Speaker 2: Exactly if you understand how a predator exploits jurisdiction, or
• 23:31
  Speaker 2: how they blend into a community. Maybe you are more
• 23:33
  Speaker 2: aware of your own surroundings.
• 23:35
  Speaker 1: You know what the wolf looks like precisely.
• 23:37
  Speaker 2: But the flip side of that coin is the inherent
• 23:40
  Speaker 2: risk of commodification. When a serial killer's horrific mo is
• 23:44
  Speaker 2: placed adjacent to a promotional code, or when the tragedy
• 23:47
  Speaker 2: of forty nine women is boiled down to a trending
• 23:49
  Speaker 2: fifteen second sound on TikTok, we risk profound desensitization.
• 23:54
  Speaker 1: We risk losing the humanity behind the runtime we do.
• 23:58
  Speaker 2: When trauma becomes a universal export broadcast to dozens of
• 24:01
  Speaker 2: countries as a form of global audio engagement, it can
• 24:04
  Speaker 2: divorce the listener from the physical reality of the violence.
• 24:06
  Speaker 1: It becomes just a story rather than a history.
• 24:09
  Speaker 2: Yes, the medium might be a sleek podcast app on
• 24:12
  Speaker 2: your smartphone, but the reality was blood, soil, and decades
• 24:17
  Speaker 2: of unimaginable grief for dozens.
• 24:19
  Speaker 1: Of families, which we can never forget.
• 24:21
  Speaker 2: Right, it demands that we as consumers engage with this
• 24:25
  Speaker 2: material responsibly, never forgetting the real lives at the center
• 24:29
  Speaker 2: of the narrative.
• 24:30
  Speaker 1: Okay, let's take a breath and recap the incredible heavy
• 24:33
  Speaker 1: journey we've been on today.
• 24:34
  Speaker 2: This has been a lot, it has.
• 24:35
  Speaker 1: We started by mapping out the horrifying geographic spread of
• 24:39
  Speaker 1: Gary Ridgway's crimes, that creeping inkstains spreading across Washington and
• 24:44
  Speaker 1: exploiting the fragmented police jurisdictions of the nineteen eighties. We
• 24:48
  Speaker 1: confronted his gruesome pathology, his compulsion to revisit and possess
• 24:52
  Speaker 1: his victims through what we termed macab.
• 24:55
  Speaker 2: Curation, a horrific detail but crucial to understanding him absolutely.
• 24:59
  Speaker 1: Then we examin in the agonizing decades of near misses,
• 25:02
  Speaker 1: the sheer frustration of having eyewitnesses point the finger but
• 25:05
  Speaker 1: being handcuffed by the legal realities of double jeopardy, and
• 25:08
  Speaker 1: the burden of proof.
• 25:10
  Speaker 2: Right until the unblinking eye of DNA, preserved in cold
• 25:13
  Speaker 2: storage and unlocked by modern PCR technology, provided the definitive
• 25:17
  Speaker 2: triumph of science in two thousand and.
• 25:19
  Speaker 1: One, a triumph made possible, ironically by the killer's own
• 25:23
  Speaker 1: arrogant need to return to his scenes.
• 25:25
  Speaker 2: Which is just poetic justice, it really is.
• 25:28
  Speaker 1: And finally, we examine how this entire twenty year saga
• 25:31
  Speaker 1: is immortalized and packaged today by modern podcasters like Ashley
• 25:35
  Speaker 1: Flowers and Britt Prewat turning a local, analog nightmare into
• 25:39
  Speaker 1: a highly produced, interactive, worldwide digital phenomenon.
• 25:43
  Speaker 2: It is a stark testament to how far we have
• 25:45
  Speaker 2: come technologically, both in how we utilize science to catch
• 25:48
  Speaker 2: killers and in how we utilize media to talk about them.
• 25:51
  Speaker 1: Before we go, I want to leave you, the listener
• 25:53
  Speaker 1: with one final provocative thought to mull over something that
• 25:56
  Speaker 1: connects the history we've discussed with the modern ecosystem we
• 25:59
  Speaker 1: live in today.
• 26:00
  Speaker 2: I think, given the incredibly tight knit interactive true crime
• 26:03
  Speaker 2: community we see now an ecosystem where hosts are texting
• 26:06
  Speaker 2: fans directly, where millions of people are analyzing cases in
• 26:10
  Speaker 2: real time on TikTok, where a single clue can be
• 26:13
  Speaker 2: crowdsourced and analyzed globally in an instant. Imagine if Gary
• 26:17
  Speaker 2: Ridgeway started his crimes today, wow, with the sheer, overwhelming
• 26:21
  Speaker 2: force of this crowd sourced digital attention, stop him before
• 26:26
  Speaker 2: he ever reached victim number two.
• 26:28
  Speaker 1: That's a great question.
• 26:29
  Speaker 2: Or you know, in our modern, hyperconnected world, are there
• 26:32
  Speaker 2: simply new types of shadows deep enough for monsters to
• 26:35
  Speaker 2: hide in?
• 26:36
  Speaker 1: That is a chilling thought to end on. If you
• 26:39
  Speaker 1: ever felt like that diagnostic X ray machine of truth
• 26:42
  Speaker 1: was permanently broken, just remember that sometimes it takes twenty years,
• 26:46
  Speaker 1: a microscopic drop of DNA and an entire community looking
• 26:50
  Speaker 1: closely to finally see the picture clearly so true. Thank
• 26:54
  Speaker 1: you so much for taking this deep die with us today,
• 26:56
  Speaker 1: Keep asking questions, keep looking closer, and we'll see you
• 26:59
  Speaker 1: next time.