Latest / Toadstool Sports / Sunday BEST BETS | Putting it On Ice | NHL & WNBA Playoffs & MLB Divisional Series & NFL| 10/4/26

Transcript

Sunday BEST BETS | Putting it On Ice | NHL & WNBA Playoffs & MLB Divisional Series & NFL| 10/4/26 · Toadstool Sports

0:17
Speaker 1: You got a slip in your palm and a hole
0:20
Speaker 1: in your chest.
0:21
Speaker 2: Black coffee on the felt, man.
0:23
Speaker 1: You look like a mess. Three-team parlay turned to dust
0:28
Speaker 1: in your head.
0:29
Speaker 2: Now you stare at the chips.
0:31
Speaker 1: Like they made you this mad. But don't you go quiet,
0:35
Speaker 1: don't you fade from the floor. Your name still means
0:39
Speaker 1: something to somebody for sure.
0:42
Speaker 3: Put the glass down, baby. Look at me now Hold on,
0:52
Speaker 3: hold on Not tonight, not now Hold on, hold on
1:02
Speaker 3: Let me pull you out That fella fights hard But
1:11
Speaker 3: it don't get the.
1:13
Speaker 4: Crown Hold on, hold.
1:18
Speaker 2: On, stay with me now.
1:40
Speaker 5: First three games all loss. Stanford, absolutely terrible. I have
1:44
Speaker 5: nothing else to say about that.
1:46
Speaker 2: Wrong call.
1:48
Speaker 5: The handicaps seemed right. They were just awful. Probably should
1:52
Speaker 5: have stayed off that one. Michigan State wasn't as bad
1:56
Speaker 5: as it looked, I will say. I'm not going to
1:58
Speaker 5: say they were definitely the right side because they got
2:00
Speaker 5: blown out, but they constantly were turning the ball over
2:04
Speaker 5: on downs. I don't think I've ever seen that many
2:07
Speaker 5: turnovers on downs by one team in a game.
2:10
Speaker 2: What can you do, man?
2:11
Speaker 5: They're just constantly going for it on fourth down and
2:13
Speaker 5: not getting it. And that was what happened in that game.
2:17
Speaker 5: They should have at least scored more than they.
2:19
Speaker 2: Did in the game.
2:20
Speaker 5: It should have been at least closer than it was.
2:23
Speaker 5: Auburn did what Auburn always does to me, man. Every
2:28
Speaker 5: time I play Auburn, they find a way to blow
2:30
Speaker 5: the cover as an underdog usually.
2:33
Speaker 2: Again, they did it. They were hanging around in that game.
2:36
Speaker 2: Looked like it should have been an Auburn cover. I
2:38
Speaker 2: think they were covering.
2:40
Speaker 5: pretty much the whole game and then they wind up
2:43
Speaker 5: giving up a late touchdown to not cover uh after
2:47
Speaker 5: i'm pretty sure they were within three in the fourth
2:49
Speaker 5: quarter pretty pissed about that uh i think they had
2:52
Speaker 5: chances maybe at the very end to maybe get a
2:55
Speaker 5: score back at the end too and that didn't happen
2:57
Speaker 5: uh so all of that went terribly and of course
3:00
Speaker 5: the two out of the three uh additional leans that
3:04
Speaker 5: i had that i thought were strong i believe i
3:05
Speaker 5: believe arizona covered right did they I think they did.
3:08
Speaker 2: I'd have to go back and look. TCU should have.
3:12
Speaker 2: They missed by a half point, depending on what number
3:14
Speaker 2: you got.
3:14
Speaker 5: And then Missouri was an easy cover, so that one
3:18
Speaker 5: almost made the cut for me. That was my next
3:21
Speaker 5: one in line. I should have added that one. That
3:23
Speaker 5: was in my contest entry, at least, but that still
3:26
Speaker 5: didn't go well. So I'm not happy about that. And
3:29
Speaker 5: then we did win on Washington late. They could have
3:32
Speaker 5: won that game outright. I mean, USC not very good.
3:35
Speaker 5: USC's defense not very good. Washington, wire-to-wire cover, I think,
3:39
Speaker 5: in that game for Washington. They lost, but they covered.
3:43
Speaker 5: And then we won the other two games. We had
3:45
Speaker 5: Tampa Bay in hockey. They were out to a 2-0 lead,
3:49
Speaker 5: and then it was 2-1 for a while, and they
3:51
Speaker 5: wound up covering the minus-1.5 part of the bet on
3:54
Speaker 5: the empty net, and it would have been a push otherwise.
3:57
Speaker 5: But they should have won that game more easily. I
3:59
Speaker 5: looked at the statistics. Tampa won that game correctly, rightfully,
4:05
Speaker 5: whatever you want to say. Tampa was the correct winner
4:08
Speaker 5: in that game. Yeah, they kind of dominated the game statistically,
4:12
Speaker 5: so it should have been easier. And then speaking of easy,
4:15
Speaker 5: nothing gets easier than that under in the Yankees-Rays game
4:18
Speaker 5: that I gave out. It was a 1-0 Ray win,
4:23
Speaker 5: not Robbie Ray. He definitely didn't win. Rays with the
4:28
Speaker 5: 1-0 win. Rasmussen had a no-hitter into the eighth inning,
4:32
Speaker 5: which was broken up by Austin Wells, who Doubled down
4:36
Speaker 5: the right field line. And then stupidly, he tried for
4:39
Speaker 5: third base and he got thrown out. Just terrible base running.
4:45
Speaker 5: Because the Yankees would have had a runner in scoring
4:47
Speaker 5: position with, I don't know how many outs there were
4:50
Speaker 5: at that point.
4:52
Speaker 2: Either zero or one, I think. I'm sorry, I'm losing.
4:56
Speaker 2: I'm completely losing it here. Yeah, that was stupid. But yeah,
5:00
Speaker 2: the under was the easy winner in that one.
5:03
Speaker 5: Even if it went into extra innings, I wasn't really
5:05
Speaker 5: concerned at all about that thing getting close to not
5:08
Speaker 5: going under. All right, we move on to today. You
5:11
Speaker 5: guys can check out my NFL show that I did
5:14
Speaker 5: last night. I gave out one NFL play. My opinion
5:17
Speaker 5: on the Europe game that's about to start, because it'll
5:20
Speaker 5: probably start before I'm done with this show. My lean
5:22
Speaker 5: in that game was towards Indianapolis. I believe the market
5:25
Speaker 5: is still agreeing with that, so... The numbers gone up
5:28
Speaker 5: to like four, four and a half, though, from three
5:30
Speaker 5: and a half. But my opinion on that game was
5:32
Speaker 5: to lay the points with Indianapolis. It's not a play
5:35
Speaker 5: for me or anything like that. So that was just
5:37
Speaker 5: a mild opinion for me in that game. I think
5:41
Speaker 5: Washington in the worst of the letdown spots there.
5:43
Speaker 2: All right. Hockey. I do kind of like the hockey
5:46
Speaker 2: board here.
5:46
Speaker 5: I'm going to have two hockey plays out of the
5:49
Speaker 5: five games, which seems like maybe I'm pushing it a
5:51
Speaker 5: little bit, but I like both spots. Not in the
5:55
Speaker 5: afternoon game, though. Winnipeg at Detroit. I don't know what
5:57
Speaker 5: to do with this game. I believe neither team played yesterday.
6:00
Speaker 5: There are going to be some teams that are on
6:02
Speaker 5: back-to-backs today. Detroit only has one game so far. They
6:07
Speaker 5: lost at home to the Rangers 2-0. That's a bad-looking loss, dude,
6:13
Speaker 5: getting shut out at home like that. But I think
6:15
Speaker 5: part of the reason why was it was Detroit's first
6:17
Speaker 5: game of the season. A lot of times teams come
6:19
Speaker 5: in cold. the first game of the season so I
6:22
Speaker 5: think the Rangers had a little bit of an advantage
6:24
Speaker 5: and that they'd already played one or two games prior
6:27
Speaker 5: to that so I think it was a bad spot
6:29
Speaker 5: for Detroit in a way now they're staying at home
6:32
Speaker 5: off of getting shut out at home so I think
6:33
Speaker 5: it's a decent spot for Detroit to bounce back here
6:37
Speaker 5: I'm not really sold on Winnipeg this year I don't
6:40
Speaker 5: like either team this year that much but Winnipeg went
6:43
Speaker 5: into overtime in their last game and lost to the
6:45
Speaker 5: Bruins and Now they go out on the road. I mean,
6:48
Speaker 5: it's not exactly an unfocused spot for Winnipeg. I mean,
6:50
Speaker 5: that was their first game as well. But a 4-3
6:54
Speaker 5: overtime loss looks better than a 2-0 loss to the Rangers.
6:58
Speaker 5: So I think I lean Rangers in this one, but
7:01
Speaker 5: the money completely disagrees with me on this. Or, excuse me,
7:05
Speaker 5: I think I lean Detroit in this game. Excuse me,
7:07
Speaker 5: but the money completely disagrees with me on this. 55%
7:10
Speaker 5: of tickets, 86% of the cash on Winnipeg. So the
7:13
Speaker 5: money's coming in on Winnipeg. It's basically like a pick-em
7:16
Speaker 5: price there. Detroit may be a very slight favorite. I
7:19
Speaker 5: like Detroit in that one, but it's a very mild
7:22
Speaker 5: lean for me.
7:25
Speaker 2: That's even putting it mildly, I guess.
7:27
Speaker 5: I have almost no opinion on this, but my lean
7:30
Speaker 5: would slightly be Detroit. But the money looks like it
7:32
Speaker 5: disagrees with me. Get some water here. I have something
7:37
Speaker 5: stuck in my throat, man. This is ridiculous. It's oats
7:41
Speaker 5: from oatmeal. I don't know what to tell you. But, yeah,
7:46
Speaker 5: I like Detroit in that one.
7:47
Speaker 1: All right.
7:48
Speaker 2: Utah at the Rangers.
7:51
Speaker 5: Remains to be seen if the Rangers are going to
7:52
Speaker 5: suck ass at home again like they did last year.
7:54
Speaker 5: But they're 1-0 at home so far. They're 2-1 on
7:58
Speaker 5: the season base. I think, yeah, none of these games
8:00
Speaker 5: have gone into overtime.
8:01
Speaker 2: They're 2-1.
8:04
Speaker 5: They're on a two-game win streak right now. They played
8:06
Speaker 5: two games on the road out of the first three.
8:09
Speaker 5: Now they're back home after shutting out the Red Wings.
8:12
Speaker 2: Utah has looked good so far. Utah's 2-0.
8:15
Speaker 5: I think Utah's probably the better of these two teams,
8:18
Speaker 5: although their wins look good. They've won by a combined 10-1,
8:21
Speaker 5: but they did it against teams that aren't really considered
8:23
Speaker 5: to be that good, Chicago especially and Columbus. So to me,
8:28
Speaker 5: it looks like the public is actually putting more weight
8:30
Speaker 5: into the Rangers' start to the season. Rangers are public,
8:35
Speaker 5: 63% of tickets on them, 81% of the cash on Utah, though,
8:39
Speaker 5: rangers are about a minus 130 favorite here um to
8:43
Speaker 5: me it seems a little crazy to see the rangers
8:45
Speaker 5: favored even though you got to give them a little
8:47
Speaker 5: bit for home ice of course but the odds makers
8:49
Speaker 5: are kind of telling you these teams are close to
8:51
Speaker 5: evenly matched and i'm not sure that that's accurate i
8:54
Speaker 5: think utah is the better of these two teams uh
8:56
Speaker 5: so i think maybe utah is actually getting a little
8:58
Speaker 5: bit short changed here i don't really want them after
9:01
Speaker 5: they've looked really good to start the season though they
9:03
Speaker 5: have to go to a pretty unfamiliar spot going to
9:06
Speaker 5: New York. So I don't really want that. Although the
9:08
Speaker 5: Rangers really were bad at home last year. And again,
9:11
Speaker 5: we'll see if that continues money's back in Utah in
9:14
Speaker 5: this game though. That's what I got to say on
9:17
Speaker 5: that one, man. That one is, I have like no
9:20
Speaker 5: opinion on that game. It's really difficult to figure out.
9:23
Speaker 5: Next game is going to be one of my plays. Um,
9:31
Speaker 5: We've had a play in every one of this team's
9:34
Speaker 5: games so far, and we're going to zigzag again and
9:36
Speaker 5: take the Florida Panthers again here, where I think they
9:39
Speaker 5: remain under the radar, man. Oddsmakers continue to tell you
9:42
Speaker 5: they're one of the best teams in the league. They
9:45
Speaker 5: started out with a win for us on the show,
9:47
Speaker 5: beating Carolina. Big win in overtime. Florida beating the returning
9:53
Speaker 5: champs in their banner-raising ceremony. And then the game after that,
9:57
Speaker 5: I said, well, this is a bad spot for Florida,
9:59
Speaker 5: having to go out to the west coast adjust to
10:01
Speaker 5: west coast time um having to play a San Jose
10:04
Speaker 5: team that I think is under the radar here and
10:07
Speaker 5: San Jose got up to a three nothing lead but
10:09
Speaker 5: credit to Florida for coming all the way back and
10:11
Speaker 5: tying that game and sending it into overtime. But we
10:14
Speaker 5: did get the win on the show with San Jose.
10:16
Speaker 5: They were able to win in overtime. After a loss
10:18
Speaker 5: like that for Florida, I think Florida does bounce back
10:21
Speaker 5: after that. They've had two days off now, so I'm
10:23
Speaker 5: not really worried about two overtime periods for them so far.
10:26
Speaker 5: They're now adjusted to West Coast time. Part of that
10:29
Speaker 5: handicap was I thought they might look ahead to Anaheim
10:31
Speaker 5: because Anaheim was at least a playoff team last year.
10:34
Speaker 5: So I think Florida might bounce back here. They also
10:37
Speaker 5: played better in that San Jose game than it looks
10:39
Speaker 5: like on the scoreboard. San Jose outshot them, but Florida
10:43
Speaker 5: was the way more physical team, way more hits, way
10:45
Speaker 5: more face-offs won. So Florida was not all bad in
10:49
Speaker 5: that game. And for Anaheim here, I think Anaheim's in
10:54
Speaker 5: a bad spot. Anaheim opened the season with a huge
10:57
Speaker 5: win over the Golden Knights, and that was a revenge
10:59
Speaker 5: game as the Knights were the team that ended Anaheim's
11:02
Speaker 5: season last year, so that was a monster win for Anaheim.
11:06
Speaker 2: Huge win there. Now they get Florida.
11:09
Speaker 5: It is their home opener for Anaheim, but And Anaheim,
11:12
Speaker 5: I believe is better at home typically, but still, um,
11:16
Speaker 5: this is an out of conference game after a huge win.
11:19
Speaker 5: So I think this is kind of a letdown and
11:21
Speaker 5: I think it's a sandwich spot because Anaheim is Edmonton
11:23
Speaker 5: after this. And even though that's going to be a
11:25
Speaker 5: revenge game for Edmonton, because Anaheim actually eliminated them from
11:29
Speaker 5: the playoffs last year, Anaheim is in a divisional sandwich here, uh,
11:34
Speaker 5: between Vegas and Edmonton. They're both in the same division
11:37
Speaker 5: as Anaheim. So I think this is a sandwich, um,
11:41
Speaker 5: I think Florida, because they didn't make the playoffs last year,
11:44
Speaker 5: it makes it a little bit easier to overlook them, man.
11:46
Speaker 2: And Florida is a road favorite in this game for
11:49
Speaker 2: a reason.
11:49
Speaker 5: And the public might not be totally on board with
11:51
Speaker 5: that here. Anaheim looked really good in that win over Vegas.
11:55
Speaker 5: If you dive into the box score a little bit, though,
11:58
Speaker 5: Anaheim got outplayed in this game. Vegas had 10 more
12:01
Speaker 5: shots on goal. Although part of the reason for that
12:04
Speaker 5: was that Anaheim was up 4-0. But to me, it
12:06
Speaker 5: seems like it's a little bit of a red flag
12:08
Speaker 5: that Anaheim had a 4-0 lead going into the third period,
12:11
Speaker 5: and they almost blew the game. Vegas scored three in
12:15
Speaker 5: the third. That's not good if you're Anaheim. And yes,
12:18
Speaker 5: I realize that Vegas is... amount of shots probably increased
12:21
Speaker 5: because they were way behind, so they probably got into
12:24
Speaker 5: desperation mode. But still, they outshot Anaheim in the game
12:27
Speaker 5: by quite a bit. Vegas won the face-offs as well.
12:30
Speaker 5: So that game wasn't really what it looked like on
12:32
Speaker 5: the scoreboard. So I think Florida is catching Anaheim at
12:36
Speaker 5: a good time, and I think they might actually be
12:38
Speaker 5: a little bit under the radar here, although Florida is
12:41
Speaker 5: sitting with 85% of the tickets on them here. But
12:44
Speaker 5: I would take that with a little bit of a
12:45
Speaker 5: grain of salt because I don't think the public is
12:47
Speaker 5: playing hockey here.
12:49
Speaker 2: On an NFL Sunday.
12:50
Speaker 5: I don't think the public is really getting that involved
12:52
Speaker 5: in hockey. Um, 91% of the cash on Florida as well.
12:56
Speaker 5: So it looks like some of the real money is
12:57
Speaker 5: agreeing with me on this. Uh, the line has not
13:00
Speaker 5: gone down. It doesn't look like at the very least,
13:02
Speaker 5: it's kind of gone up a little bit into the
13:05
Speaker 5: minus one 40 range, but yeah, Florida money line is
13:07
Speaker 5: going to be my play in that one. And the
13:10
Speaker 5: next game will be my other play. Uh, we get
13:13
Speaker 5: both hockey plays out of the way real quick. I
13:15
Speaker 5: only have three plays on the day. Um, Calgary on
13:19
Speaker 5: the money line is my other play here. This is
13:21
Speaker 5: a quick revenge spot for Calgary. They're playing Seattle. I
13:24
Speaker 5: think both of these teams are bad, but Calgary has
13:26
Speaker 5: looked worse to start the season.
13:28
Speaker 2: They're 0-2.
13:29
Speaker 5: They played the Kraken in the first game, and they
13:32
Speaker 5: lost horribly, 6-1. And I think the public is going
13:35
Speaker 5: to think, well, and Seattle even is going to think, well,
13:37
Speaker 5: if we could go into Calgary and beat them 6-1,
13:40
Speaker 5: of course we're going to beat them in Seattle, right?
13:43
Speaker 5: That's going to be what the sense is here about
13:45
Speaker 5: this game. I don't think that's accurate, man. I think
13:48
Speaker 5: when you get embarrassed on your home ice by a
13:51
Speaker 5: team and then you face that team again on their
13:53
Speaker 5: home ice really quickly after that, I think it becomes
13:56
Speaker 5: a zigzag spot, road reversal revenge spot, whatever you want
14:00
Speaker 5: to call it. I think that team that lost at
14:02
Speaker 5: home will be a little bit extra motivated and they'll
14:05
Speaker 5: have the adjustments to make, whereas the team that won,
14:07
Speaker 5: they have no adjustments to.
14:09
Speaker 2: Make because they know what they did.
14:11
Speaker 5: Everything worked for them, so they have nothing to change,
14:13
Speaker 5: whereas for Calgary, they could change everything. They have a
14:17
Speaker 5: lot of stuff to fix. Both these teams are on back-to-backs.
14:21
Speaker 5: I forgot to mention the back-to-backs, by the way. Utah
14:24
Speaker 5: is on a back-to-back, by the way, so that gives
14:27
Speaker 5: them a little bit of a negative against New York.
14:29
Speaker 5: Utah was in Columbus yesterday while the Rangers were off,
14:32
Speaker 5: I'm pretty sure. So Utah is at a rest disadvantage
14:35
Speaker 5: against the Rangers. I should have pointed that out. In
14:38
Speaker 5: this game, Calgary and Seattle both played yesterday. So there's
14:41
Speaker 5: no rest disadvantage for either. Well, there's a rest disadvantage
14:44
Speaker 5: for both teams if you want to look at it
14:46
Speaker 5: that way. Now, if you look at this first game, yeah,
14:48
Speaker 5: Seattle did out-shoot Calgary. Calgary was a little bit better
14:52
Speaker 5: in the physicality department, winning the hits and winning the
14:55
Speaker 5: face-offs by a little bit. Calgary just got off to
14:58
Speaker 5: a bad start in that game, and then it was
15:00
Speaker 5: just kind of over after that.
15:01
Speaker 2: So I don't know.
15:02
Speaker 5: The game was at least slightly misleading, I would say.
15:05
Speaker 5: And after that, Seattle lost their next game. But if
15:09
Speaker 5: you look at what happened in that game, they played
15:10
Speaker 5: a big game against Edmonton. And this was a one-goal
15:13
Speaker 5: game late in the game. So Seattle's coming off a
15:16
Speaker 5: big game that was tied going into the third period.
15:19
Speaker 5: And then it was tied until the last few minutes
15:23
Speaker 5: of the game when when Dreisaitl scored to break the
15:27
Speaker 5: tie with only a couple minutes left in the game,
15:29
Speaker 5: and then the last goal was an empty netter at
15:31
Speaker 5: the end. So Seattle played really tough against Edmonton, man.
15:34
Speaker 5: When you take Edmonton basically to the wire like this
15:37
Speaker 5: as a big underdog, I think Seattle's going to come
15:39
Speaker 5: up flat after this. I think it's a hangover spot
15:42
Speaker 5: for Seattle after a huge performance against Edmonton where they
15:46
Speaker 5: were close to pulling off the upset here. And they
15:49
Speaker 5: did play Edmonton reasonably well statistically, although Edmonton was the
15:52
Speaker 5: way better physical team in the game but still coming
15:56
Speaker 5: off of that I think Seattle is going to be
15:57
Speaker 5: flat the question is are they going to overlook the
16:00
Speaker 5: flames here and I think they might again because they.
16:02
Speaker 2: Already beat them easily in the home opener and oh.
16:06
Speaker 5: Yeah look at who Seattle has next by the way
16:08
Speaker 5: yeah they have to play Vegas next the team that
16:11
Speaker 5: won the conference last year huge game for Seattle Seattle
16:14
Speaker 5: is actually in a divisional sandwich as well so both
16:17
Speaker 5: teams that I'm fading are in a sandwich between the
16:20
Speaker 5: same two teams in the same division just in the
16:22
Speaker 5: reverse order Both teams are sandwiched in between Edmonton and Vegas, just.
16:28
Speaker 2: In the other order.
16:29
Speaker 5: I think it's a bad spot for Seattle here, man.
16:32
Speaker 5: This is a quick revenge angle for the Flames, and
16:35
Speaker 5: it's a divisional sandwich for Seattle, in my opinion, coming
16:38
Speaker 5: off a really tough performance against the Oilers. Now they've
16:42
Speaker 5: got to play a team they already beat. I don't
16:44
Speaker 5: really see Seattle putting that much focus into this because
16:48
Speaker 5: they already easily beat the Flames. Seattle's got Vegas on deck.
16:52
Speaker 5: Bad spot for Seattle, man. I like the Flames in
16:55
Speaker 5: this one. They're going to be in an embarrassed mood, man.
17:00
Speaker 5: Nobody's going to want them. They've been outscored 10-2 so far,
17:03
Speaker 5: and their losses are to bad teams. Seattle, I don't
17:06
Speaker 5: think Seattle's a good team, man. And Vancouver is probably
17:09
Speaker 5: even worse. So this looks bad for Calgary so far.
17:13
Speaker 5: They lost 4-1 to Vancouver yesterday. No one is going
17:16
Speaker 5: to want Calgary here. Look at the box score, though,
17:19
Speaker 5: in that game. This was a closer game than it
17:21
Speaker 5: was on the scoreboard, man. In fact, Calgary was winning
17:24
Speaker 5: the game at the beginning of the third period. They
17:28
Speaker 5: had a horrible third period, and one of the goals
17:30
Speaker 5: was an empty net goal. But the game was close statistically,
17:33
Speaker 5: and Calgary led almost the entire game. So it was
17:38
Speaker 5: not exactly what it appeared on the scoreboard there. So, yeah,
17:41
Speaker 5: we'll take Calgary.
17:42
Speaker 2: In this one.
17:43
Speaker 5: Seattle's a public side, 88% of tickets, 70% of the
17:46
Speaker 5: cash on them. They're about a minus 150 or so favorite.
17:49
Speaker 2: The number's gone down a little bit.
17:51
Speaker 5: It's not really in that range where I would recommend
17:53
Speaker 5: making like a plus one puck line or anything like
17:55
Speaker 5: that because you have to lay minus 200 or something
17:57
Speaker 5: for the plus one and a half. So I say
18:00
Speaker 5: just take the shot with the underdog. We did it
18:02
Speaker 5: with San Jose the other day. Making plays like this,
18:04
Speaker 5: you're going to lose some of them.
18:05
Speaker 2: You know what I mean?
18:06
Speaker 5: Because you're playing underdogs, so they're not expected to win, but.
18:10
Speaker 2: It's all about value, right?
18:11
Speaker 5: It's all about does this team have a better chance
18:13
Speaker 5: to win than what the oddsmakers are giving you on this?
18:15
Speaker 2: And I think the answer is yes.
18:17
Speaker 5: And like I said with the San Jose game, you
18:19
Speaker 5: don't need to win– even half of these plays to
18:22
Speaker 5: profit when you're playing a game at an underdog price
18:24
Speaker 5: like this, you only have to hit probably like 47,
18:27
Speaker 5: 48% of these.
18:28
Speaker 2: So that's what we're going to do there. Um, whatever
18:31
Speaker 2: the math works out to. All right. And then the
18:33
Speaker 2: final game is Vegas at Vancouver.
18:35
Speaker 5: Obviously Vegas is a huge favorite here.
18:38
Speaker 2: Vancouver got the win, uh, over the flames.
18:40
Speaker 5: Vancouver is actually two and one right now. Uh, they
18:43
Speaker 5: looked really good against the Oilers in the first two
18:46
Speaker 5: games really, but I think they maybe look too good, uh,
18:48
Speaker 5: in those games I'm not so sure they're going to
18:51
Speaker 5: match up too well with Vegas here Vegas also is
18:55
Speaker 5: on rest I'm pretty sure whereas Vancouver played yesterday I'm
18:57
Speaker 5: pretty sure Vegas didn't so I think Vegas actually has
19:00
Speaker 5: a rest advantage in this game the only thing about
19:03
Speaker 5: Vegas is they are kind of in a sandwich well
19:06
Speaker 5: not really a sandwich they do play two divisional teams
19:09
Speaker 5: in a row though or I mean surrounding this game
19:12
Speaker 5: they do they're coming off a big game against Anaheim
19:14
Speaker 5: though but that game is a little bit bigger to
19:16
Speaker 5: Anaheim right Anaheim looking for revenge They were able to
19:19
Speaker 5: get revenge, pull off the upset against Vegas. Vegas coming
19:23
Speaker 5: off an upset. Maybe they will actually refocus. And they're
19:26
Speaker 5: starting a quick road trip. And sometimes starting a road
19:28
Speaker 5: trip will focus you as well. So I don't really
19:30
Speaker 5: want to fade Vegas in this game. And Vancouver, they've
19:34
Speaker 5: looked better than they actually are so far at least. So, yeah,
19:38
Speaker 5: I don't really want to do it. Although Vegas is
19:39
Speaker 5: still a public side. Everybody still knows Vegas is the
19:43
Speaker 5: better team. but they're also laying minus 240 something on
19:47
Speaker 5: the road which I don't think the public is too
19:51
Speaker 5: excited about 88% of tickets 64% of the cash on
19:55
Speaker 5: Vegas so the money is fading Vegas in that one
19:59
Speaker 5: I don't have a strong opinion on it I mean
20:01
Speaker 5: I would not really want to play Vancouver in that
20:03
Speaker 5: one though I'll tell you that Vegas team total over
20:07
Speaker 5: Might make some sense in that one. I think you're
20:09
Speaker 5: looking at a Vancouver team that's not good, let's say.
20:13
Speaker 5: And I think they're not good defensively, so maybe Vegas
20:16
Speaker 5: team total over makes sense in that one.
20:19
Speaker 2: You'll probably need them to score four goals, though. All right, WNBA.
20:25
Speaker 5: This one, I'm skipping the WNBA board today. I don't
20:28
Speaker 5: have a good opinion on New York and Atlanta. This
20:31
Speaker 5: is an interesting series where I believe Atlanta... won two
20:35
Speaker 5: out of the three regular season matchups here.
20:37
Speaker 2: Let me see. Let me make sure that that's right.
20:41
Speaker 2: Let's see.
20:42
Speaker 5: Yeah, so New York won the first game in Atlanta, actually,
20:48
Speaker 5: early in the season, and then they played twice in
20:50
Speaker 5: a span of three days in September, and Atlanta won
20:54
Speaker 5: both those games in New York. So that's interesting. So
20:58
Speaker 5: the road team has actually won every single game in the.
21:01
Speaker 2: Season series here. between these two teams, which is interesting.
21:05
Speaker 5: I don't know if I would put that much weight
21:06
Speaker 5: into that here, though, because the Liberty are not actually
21:08
Speaker 5: good on the road. They're only 12-10 on the road,
21:11
Speaker 5: and Atlanta's a solid 15-7 at home. Atlanta is the
21:15
Speaker 5: better team. They're definitely going to be favored in this series. Now,
21:18
Speaker 5: the Liberty, obviously, are not pushovers, but they look pretty
21:21
Speaker 5: good in sweeping the Lynx out of the playoffs. In
21:25
Speaker 5: the eight-versus-one matchup, the Liberty were able to win both
21:29
Speaker 5: games against the.
21:31
Speaker 2: The number one seed, the best team in the league, crazy.
21:34
Speaker 2: The Liberty were able to do that.
21:35
Speaker 5: Although the Liberty gave the links some problems during the
21:38
Speaker 5: regular season, man, they look pretty good against them during
21:41
Speaker 5: the regular season. I think the dream or a little
21:43
Speaker 5: bit of a worse matchup for the Liberty here.
21:45
Speaker 2: Um, I don't know.
21:47
Speaker 5: Atlanta is just a physical defensive team, a Liberty. I mean,
21:50
Speaker 5: they're an okay team as well. I think they could
21:53
Speaker 5: definitely compete still, but I don't know, man. I don't,
21:56
Speaker 5: I don't really want the Liberty off of beating the links.
21:58
Speaker 5: You know, nobody's going to give Atlanta credit for sweeping Washington.
22:01
Speaker 3: Right.
22:02
Speaker 2: But I was somewhat impressed by that.
22:04
Speaker 5: Uh, Washington's a good defensive team and Atlanta was able
22:07
Speaker 5: to pretty much manhandle them or woman handle them. Although
22:10
Speaker 5: there were probably some men in this league anyway. Um,
22:13
Speaker 5: I think Atlanta just kind of goes under the radar
22:15
Speaker 5: here because nobody's going to care that they beat Washington.
22:18
Speaker 2: Everyone expected that.
22:19
Speaker 5: Nobody expected New York to, well, you know, I mean,
22:23
Speaker 5: basically nobody expected New York to beat Minnesota here.
22:27
Speaker 2: So I think people are going to be more impressed
22:28
Speaker 2: by that.
22:29
Speaker 5: Although the money is actually coming in on New York
22:31
Speaker 5: in this one, but I would hesitate on that. Even
22:33
Speaker 5: though they did win the one time they played in
22:35
Speaker 5: Atlanta this year. 56% of the tickets, 73% of the
22:37
Speaker 5: cash on New York. Atlanta is a three-and-a-half, four-point favorite here, basically.
22:44
Speaker 3: I don't know.
22:45
Speaker 2: I think I kind of lean Atlanta in this one.
22:47
Speaker 5: I just think an eight seed coming off upsetting the one,
22:50
Speaker 5: I tend to just think is going to be a
22:51
Speaker 5: little bit overvalued, man.
22:54
Speaker 2: I don't think I love it.
22:55
Speaker 5: And the Liberty have not been able to beat Atlanta since, like,
22:58
Speaker 5: June or whatever it was.
22:59
Speaker 2: So I don't know.
23:01
Speaker 5: It looks like a worse matchup for New York to
23:03
Speaker 5: me than Minnesota was, which sounds kind of crazy. But
23:06
Speaker 5: if you look at how they played against those teams,
23:09
Speaker 5: during the regular season that seems to be the case
23:12
Speaker 5: um and i don't like the liberty as a road
23:14
Speaker 5: team either so um yeah i'm gonna lean atlanta in
23:18
Speaker 5: that one slightly again i think nobody cares that atlanta
23:22
Speaker 5: beat washington i think everybody's kind of gonna care oh
23:25
Speaker 5: new york beat minnesota that's huge so whatever calvin what's
23:30
Speaker 5: up man I do not like the Cardinals. It is
23:35
Speaker 5: not a mismatch. I like the Giants in that game.
23:39
Speaker 5: You can watch my NFL show. I'm going against the market, though,
23:42
Speaker 5: so I have concerns about that. You can watch my
23:45
Speaker 5: NFL show from last night if you want the details
23:47
Speaker 5: on it. But basically, I think nobody's going to give
23:50
Speaker 5: the Giants any credit for beating Tennessee last week in
23:52
Speaker 5: a horrible game, ugly game, whereas for Arizona... They're having
23:57
Speaker 5: to travel cross country. They're leaving the Pacific time zone
23:59
Speaker 5: for the first time this year. And they're coming off
24:01
Speaker 5: a huge game against the 49ers where they almost came
24:04
Speaker 5: back and they almost had a chance to win that
24:07
Speaker 5: game and a huge divisional game as a big underdogs.
24:10
Speaker 5: I think it's a flat spot for Arizona. I do
24:12
Speaker 5: not like Arizona in that game. Um, Yeah, I mean,
24:15
Speaker 5: that game, I'm passing on that game, but I like
24:17
Speaker 5: the Giants in that one situationally. I don't like that
24:21
Speaker 5: the market read is against me, though.
24:23
Speaker 2: So I don't know. That game has given me some
24:25
Speaker 2: problems trying to figure it out.
24:27
Speaker 5: But my situational handicapping is telling me the Giants are
24:31
Speaker 5: the right side. The one thing I don't like about
24:32
Speaker 5: the Giants, though, is they're in the second game of
24:35
Speaker 5: the injured player theory spot. Now, our last game was
24:38
Speaker 5: the injured player theory spot. which usually a team steps
24:41
Speaker 5: up in that first game without their star quarterback. They
24:45
Speaker 5: step up their effort. But the thing was, they didn't
24:46
Speaker 5: really do that.
24:47
Speaker 2: Like, yeah, they won.
24:50
Speaker 5: So a lot of times when that team wins in
24:51
Speaker 5: a game like that, then they do take a step
24:53
Speaker 5: back in the next game. Problem was, like, they had
24:55
Speaker 5: an awful performance. Like, they barely beat Tennessee. So I
24:58
Speaker 5: don't really... See the letdown coming for the Giants there.
25:02
Speaker 5: And if anything, nobody's going to want the Giants after
25:04
Speaker 5: they look so bad against Tennessee.
25:08
Speaker 2: Looking as bad as you possibly can in a win.
25:11
Speaker 5: Whereas on the flip side, Arizona looked as good as
25:13
Speaker 5: you could possibly look in a loss.
25:15
Speaker 2: You know what I mean? So, yeah, I lean Giants
25:18
Speaker 2: in that one. All right.
25:20
Speaker 5: The other WNBA game is Vegas and Golden State. These
25:23
Speaker 5: are the conference championship series, by the way. This was
25:26
Speaker 5: pretty much the expected matchup here. Vegas and Golden State.
25:31
Speaker 2: No, these are not... What am I saying? Conference finals. No,
25:33
Speaker 2: they don't split by conference.
25:35
Speaker 5: It just feels that way because it's two East teams
25:37
Speaker 5: against two West teams. That's actually not what it is.
25:40
Speaker 5: Maybe these are the de facto conference.
25:42
Speaker 2: Finals, though, at this point.
25:44
Speaker 5: But no, yeah, I forgot. They just do an eight-team playoff,
25:47
Speaker 5: and that's it. It doesn't matter what conference each team
25:49
Speaker 5: is from. I forgot about that. Anyway, Vegas is playing
25:52
Speaker 5: Golden State here. Vegas won all three regular season matchups,
25:57
Speaker 5: so Vegas does have... what appears to be a matchup
26:00
Speaker 5: edge here. My issue with that is that everyone is
26:03
Speaker 5: picking Vegas here. Nobody's going to want Golden State. They're
26:05
Speaker 5: kind of an up-and-coming team. Vegas definitely has.
26:09
Speaker 2: More experience here.
26:10
Speaker 5: And New York and Atlanta, by the way, are both
26:12
Speaker 5: experienced teams, so I don't really think there's a huge
26:14
Speaker 5: experience edge one way or the other there. Vegas has
26:17
Speaker 5: an experience edge over Golden State, but Golden State, I
26:19
Speaker 5: believe they were in the playoffs last year for the
26:22
Speaker 5: first time, I think, so they're on the rise here. Vegas,
26:28
Speaker 5: of course, won the championship last year. Vegas is a
26:30
Speaker 5: massively experienced team, and once you get into this level
26:34
Speaker 5: of the playoffs, experience does matter.
26:37
Speaker 2: This game's on NBC and Peacock, by the way, both
26:39
Speaker 2: games in the afternoon.
26:41
Speaker 5: So what do we do with this game, man?
26:43
Speaker 2: I think the public is going to be on Vegas.
26:46
Speaker 5: Vegas, I think, is going to get credit for beating
26:49
Speaker 5: the Fever, although that series had to go three games.
26:51
Speaker 2: It was a tough series.
26:53
Speaker 5: I thought Indiana might win that series because Indiana actually
26:56
Speaker 5: gave Vegas a lot of problems during the regular season.
26:58
Speaker 5: They blew Vegas out twice in Vegas during the regular season.
27:03
Speaker 5: So I thought Indiana was actually potentially going to win
27:05
Speaker 5: that series. That didn't happen. But I think Vegas looks
27:09
Speaker 5: good in beating Indiana, right? Because everybody hypes up Indiana.
27:12
Speaker 5: They're a good offense. Kaitlin Clark, et cetera. I think
27:16
Speaker 5: that's going to make Vegas look good, whereas... Golden State
27:19
Speaker 5: did not look good, having to go three games to
27:22
Speaker 5: beat Dallas, and they almost lost in the final home
27:25
Speaker 5: game to Dallas. Golden State was like a 7-7.5 point
27:28
Speaker 5: favorite in that game, and they almost lost. Dallas was
27:31
Speaker 5: winning almost that entire game. But if you dig into
27:34
Speaker 5: that box score, Golden State had a terrible shooting performance
27:37
Speaker 5: in the game. They only shot 35% from the field.
27:41
Speaker 5: That's going to have some positive regression, man. I mean,
27:43
Speaker 5: no team... especially out of the playoff teams. No team
27:47
Speaker 5: is going to consistently shoot that poorly. Even if Golden
27:50
Speaker 5: State is a better defensive team than offensive team, Golden
27:55
Speaker 5: State's going to have some positive regression here. So I
27:57
Speaker 5: actually like Golden State in this game, but my hesitations
28:00
Speaker 5: are Vegas has experience here, and Vegas won all three
28:05
Speaker 5: regular season matchups against Golden State, so there might be
28:07
Speaker 5: a matchup problem. But because Vegas looked better in beating Indiana,
28:11
Speaker 5: the Golden State did in barely getting by Dallas.
28:15
Speaker 2: That's going to make Golden State look bad. So I
28:17
Speaker 2: think Golden State's.
28:18
Speaker 5: Undervalued here, and I think they're pretty good at home,
28:20
Speaker 5: and they're a good defense. So I actually like Golden
28:23
Speaker 5: State here. Vegas is good on the road too, but
28:26
Speaker 5: Golden State has one of the better home records in
28:28
Speaker 5: all of the WNBA as well, and we don't see
28:32
Speaker 5: any percentages on this. This is the game with the
28:34
Speaker 5: much lower total, though, and that's because Golden State's a
28:37
Speaker 5: good defense.
28:37
Speaker 2: I mean, what else can we say? They're one of
28:39
Speaker 2: the best, I believe. So I believe that's why this
28:42
Speaker 2: total is as low as it is.
28:43
Speaker 5: The total's higher in the other game Uh, basically because
28:46
Speaker 5: I think the Liberty are the worst.
28:48
Speaker 2: Of the remaining defenses here. But, um, yes.
28:52
Speaker 5: So I, I lean golden state in that one. I
28:54
Speaker 5: just don't think I can bring myself to do it.
28:57
Speaker 2: Um, well, thank you, sir. Um, yes. Matchups. Uh, yeah,
29:03
Speaker 2: I do all situational stuff.
29:04
Speaker 5: So I'm trying to figure out like, what is this
29:07
Speaker 5: team's mental state?
29:08
Speaker 2: Basically? Like, that's all I do. I only do matchup
29:10
Speaker 2: stuff in baseball pretty much. Yes, sir.
29:13
Speaker 5: Um, I only have one actual NFL play. I hate
29:17
Speaker 5: the NFL board this week, man. This week has been
29:20
Speaker 5: the most confusing NFL board for me so far.
29:24
Speaker 2: So I've had a lot of problems trying to break
29:25
Speaker 2: it down. All right. Will I be able to get
29:28
Speaker 2: this done before the Europe game kicks off? I don't
29:31
Speaker 2: think so. Although I hate these Europe games, man.
29:33
Speaker 5: As I said, I do lean to the Colts in
29:36
Speaker 5: the London game, which I think is starting in about
29:37
Speaker 5: 10 minutes. um you know do what you want with
29:40
Speaker 5: that info it's not a game I would want my
29:42
Speaker 5: money on but uh yeah I lean Colts in that
29:44
Speaker 5: game slightly uh Colts are having to lay a decent
29:47
Speaker 5: amount of points in that one though all right the
29:49
Speaker 5: NL NLDS series are continuing here, or the NLDSs are
29:55
Speaker 5: continuing here.
29:55
Speaker 2: For some reason, the AL has today off.
29:57
Speaker 5: I don't really know exactly why it's scheduled this way,
30:00
Speaker 5: but the NL continues here. We do have both home
30:04
Speaker 5: teams are up 1-0 now. Games were close yesterday, though.
30:09
Speaker 5: Both home teams are big series favorites here, but both
30:13
Speaker 5: games were close, man. First game, the afternoon game, is
30:16
Speaker 5: going to be San Diego and Milwaukee. If you saw
30:19
Speaker 5: how that game ended.
30:21
Speaker 5: Last night, it was pretty crazy, man. College has been
30:25
Speaker 5: killing me. College is doing really poorly for me right now.
30:29
Speaker 5: I'm below 500, I think, at.
30:32
Speaker 2: The very least. Not good.
30:34
Speaker 5: I think I have some good situations that I've played
30:37
Speaker 5: in college, and they have not worked out.
30:40
Speaker 2: It's not going well.
30:40
Speaker 5: Two years ago, I did not have a good college season.
30:43
Speaker 5: Last year, I was really good, but I had a huge,
30:47
Speaker 5: huge run in college last I believe it was the
30:50
Speaker 5: later part of last year. I was really, really good
30:53
Speaker 5: in the second half of the college season, so I'm
30:55
Speaker 5: hoping to be able to do that again this season
30:58
Speaker 5: and hope it just starts going well, given that I
31:03
Speaker 5: know how to situationally handicap everything. The situations need to
31:07
Speaker 5: just come around, man.
31:09
Speaker 2: That's what we need in college football.
31:11
Speaker 5: All right, but yeah, San Diego and Milwaukee, the way
31:14
Speaker 5: that that game ended yesterday was crazy, dude.
31:16
Speaker 2: It was a close game. It was 2-2. Neither starter
31:20
Speaker 2: lasted long, by the way.
31:21
Speaker 5: Robbie Ray was not good for San Diego. And San
31:24
Speaker 5: Diego's bullpen pitched the majority of the game and kind
31:27
Speaker 5: of saved the game. But that does mean San Diego's
31:30
Speaker 5: bullpen is a little bit unrested now after that. But
31:32
Speaker 5: so is Milwaukee's because Mizurowski, I think, didn't even go
31:36
Speaker 5: more than like four innings in the game yesterday. He
31:38
Speaker 5: was not at his best either. even though he was
31:40
Speaker 5: throwing 105 miles an hour out there at the beginning
31:43
Speaker 5: of the game. San Diego was able to get to
31:46
Speaker 5: him for two runs. Both starting pitchers gave up two runs.
31:49
Speaker 5: They were both out of the game earlier than expected.
31:52
Speaker 5: So the bullpens had a lot of extra work in
31:54
Speaker 5: that game yesterday. So I would not want to play
31:57
Speaker 5: an under in this game just because I liked the
31:59
Speaker 5: under in yesterday's game, but the bullpens are not rested.
32:02
Speaker 5: Now after yesterday, a lot of the better relievers had
32:05
Speaker 5: to come into that game yesterday. Um, you know, me
32:07
Speaker 5: Gil came in for more than an, I think he
32:09
Speaker 5: pitched an inning and a third for Milwaukee to, to
32:12
Speaker 5: save the game yesterday and get his first playoff save,
32:15
Speaker 5: I believe. And San Diego, I don't think they use
32:17
Speaker 5: Mason Miller, but I might be wrong about that. They,
32:19
Speaker 5: they use more a hone and, uh, I forget who
32:22
Speaker 5: else they had in there, but yeah, I think maybe
32:26
Speaker 5: San Diego's bullpen sets up a little bit better in
32:28
Speaker 5: this one out of the two good bullpens just because
32:30
Speaker 5: of who they used out of the bullpen yesterday, San
32:33
Speaker 5: Diego might have a slight bullpen edge in this one
32:35
Speaker 5: for that reason. Now, the way that the game ended yesterday,
32:41
Speaker 5: which I was about to say, is Milwaukee broke a
32:44
Speaker 5: 2-2 tie. Wilson Contreras, is that his name? No, William Contreras, right?
32:49
Speaker 5: I'm like, wait, Wilson Contreras is on the Red Sox.
32:52
Speaker 5: William Contreras hit a home run, I believe in the
32:55
Speaker 5: seventh inning, to break the 2-2 tie, make it 3-2 Milwaukee.
33:00
Speaker 5: Then what happened is in the top of the, I
33:03
Speaker 5: believe it was in the top of the ninth inning
33:04
Speaker 5: against McGill with one out San Diego had one out,
33:08
Speaker 5: one on, and runner on first, I believe. And Ty
33:12
Speaker 5: France smashed a pitch from McGill. I don't know if
33:15
Speaker 5: you guys saw this, but Milwaukee is playing with the
33:18
Speaker 5: roof closed. And I think there's a reason why they're
33:20
Speaker 5: doing that. And it's because Milwaukee, as I've mentioned, they're
33:23
Speaker 5: not a power hitting team. San Diego is more of
33:26
Speaker 5: a power hitting team. So Milwaukee, they play a lot
33:28
Speaker 5: of small ball. So I think they're doing this intentionally.
33:31
Speaker 5: Close the roof at home just in case San Diego,
33:34
Speaker 5: you know, skies something like this. Maybe it'll fuck with
33:38
Speaker 5: San Diego's power hitting, and that's exactly what happened in
33:41
Speaker 5: the game yesterday. Ty France hit what I'm pretty positive
33:45
Speaker 5: was going to be a home run, and instead, and
33:48
Speaker 5: that would have been a, it would have been to
33:49
Speaker 5: take the lead 4-3 in the top of the ninth,
33:52
Speaker 5: and instead it bounced off the rafters. It went so high,
33:56
Speaker 5: it was up off the rafters in the roof, and
33:58
Speaker 5: that slowed the ball down, and it still continued going
34:02
Speaker 5: forward a bit, but it slowed it down enough that
34:05
Speaker 5: it landed in you know, it just came down in
34:07
Speaker 5: left field and it was caught by the left fielder
34:09
Speaker 5: from Milwaukee. And by rule, if a batted ball hits
34:14
Speaker 5: some part of the ceiling or whatever, the rule is
34:17
Speaker 5: the ball is in play. So it could like take
34:19
Speaker 5: some weird ricochet and, you know, the hitter could get
34:23
Speaker 5: lucky because maybe it'll ricochet weird and, you know, and
34:27
Speaker 5: nobody will be able to get to it. And I
34:28
Speaker 5: think if it hits like part of the roof and
34:30
Speaker 5: then somehow goes, lands foul after that, I think that's actually.
34:33
Speaker 2: A ground rule defensively.
34:34
Speaker 5: Double maybe I want to I forget how or maybe
34:37
Speaker 5: it's not maybe it's a foul ball that happens.
34:39
Speaker 2: I forget but by rule It is still in play.
34:44
Speaker 5: So the the outfielder can catch it for an out
34:46
Speaker 5: and that's what happened in that one yesterday Which is
34:49
Speaker 5: the correct call.
34:49
Speaker 2: I'm not gonna complain about the call. That was correct
34:52
Speaker 2: by rule.
34:52
Speaker 5: That is correct that After it got knocked down in
34:56
Speaker 5: the rafters the outfielder caught it for an out That
34:58
Speaker 5: is what the rule says the umpires got together and
35:01
Speaker 5: discussed it. They were correct about the call and They
35:04
Speaker 5: got it right initially, and they let the call stand,
35:09
Speaker 5: which was correct. But it's just, you know, just I
35:14
Speaker 5: think the rule itself is just kind of bullshit. Or,
35:18
Speaker 5: I mean, I don't know how to fix it really, though. Like,
35:20
Speaker 5: I mean, maybe the way to fix it is just
35:22
Speaker 5: call that a ground rule double, right? Because then it's
35:24
Speaker 5: like kind of this, you know, it's like you kind of,
35:29
Speaker 5: you satisfy both teams in a way by doing that, right?
35:33
Speaker 5: Maybe it wouldn't have been a home run. Maybe it
35:35
Speaker 5: shouldn't be an out because the guy just slaughtered that ball.
35:39
Speaker 5: So if you make that a ground rule double, I
35:41
Speaker 5: think that makes more sense. Then at least it's not
35:45
Speaker 5: an out for the offense. And on the other side,
35:49
Speaker 5: it's not a home run either. So maybe that's sort
35:52
Speaker 5: of the middle ground there to satisfy both teams sort
35:56
Speaker 5: of in a way when something that crazy happens.
35:58
Speaker 2: But yeah, I think Milwaukee has.
35:59
Speaker 5: The roof closed intentionally for And they got lucky in
36:04
Speaker 5: that regard.
36:04
Speaker 2: Or maybe it's smart of them. I don't know what
36:06
Speaker 2: you want to call it. But, yeah, that's how San
36:09
Speaker 2: Diego wound up losing the game yesterday. Very, very brutal. Now,
36:15
Speaker 2: in this game.
36:16
Speaker 5: I actually like San Diego in this game, though. I
36:18
Speaker 5: like San Diego to actually even the score here. Michael
36:22
Speaker 5: King has been good in his playoff career. I believe
36:24
Speaker 5: he has like a two-career ERA in the playoffs. So
36:27
Speaker 5: Michael King has been good in the playoffs. And I believe,
36:31
Speaker 5: let me make sure, I believe I saw that he's
36:33
Speaker 5: like 5-0.
36:34
Speaker 2: Let me see. Michael King, playoff stats, 3-0. Excuse me.
36:38
Speaker 5: He's 3-0 with a 2.05 playoff ERA. that's pretty good.
36:44
Speaker 5: He's made five playoff appearances, and he has 27 strikeouts
36:48
Speaker 5: in 15 innings and a. 8 whip. So yeah, Michael
36:51
Speaker 5: King has been a good playoff pitcher, man. He also
36:54
Speaker 5: had a good season. 3.21 ERA, 1.18 whip. He's not
36:59
Speaker 5: as good on the road, which makes sense, because San
37:03
Speaker 5: Diego's ballpark is a better pitching ballpark.
37:06
Speaker 2: King's ERA was like a run higher on the road
37:08
Speaker 2: at 3.64, but.
37:11
Speaker 5: King is a playoff warrior, man, and he had a
37:13
Speaker 5: one-hit shutout against the Cubs when he pitched in that
37:16
Speaker 5: series earlier. So I think King is going to do
37:19
Speaker 5: well again here, and he's also good against Milwaukee. He's
37:22
Speaker 5: really good against them. They have 63 career at-bats against them.
37:25
Speaker 5: They have 21 strikeouts, so a third of their at-bats
37:29
Speaker 5: have resulted in strikeouts against them. Three walks, very low
37:33
Speaker 5: number there. 190 average and 465 OPS. King has basically
37:37
Speaker 5: dominated the Brewers when he's faced them. So I think
37:40
Speaker 5: King actually has a matchup edge in this one, even
37:43
Speaker 5: though I think Logan Henderson is the better pitcher.
37:47
Speaker 2: Henderson's really young, dude.
37:49
Speaker 5: He has never pitched in the postseason before. Even though
37:51
Speaker 5: he had a great season, 2.47 ERA,. 84 whip.
37:55
Speaker 2: I like Henderson.
37:56
Speaker 5: We got some wins with him on the show this year.
37:59
Speaker 5: I think he does typically fly under the radar, but
38:01
Speaker 5: in the playoffs, man, King has really good matchup numbers,
38:05
Speaker 5: and King has been a really good playoff pitcher. He's
38:07
Speaker 5: got the playoff experience here that Henderson does not have,
38:10
Speaker 5: and we saw Mizurowski. Mizurowski did pitch in the postseason
38:14
Speaker 5: last year, so he has some experience. He didn't look
38:16
Speaker 5: that good yesterday, although Milwaukee was still able to get
38:20
Speaker 5: the win. Henderson has not pitched in the postseason yet.
38:23
Speaker 5: He hasn't pitched since September, so he Might be a
38:26
Speaker 5: little bit thrown off, whereas King is going to remain
38:28
Speaker 5: on schedule here. I think that's an advantage to King
38:31
Speaker 5: as well, because these starting pitchers like to stay on schedule.
38:34
Speaker 5: So the fact that King was able to pitch basically
38:36
Speaker 5: on his normal rest in the Cubs series, that's going
38:39
Speaker 5: to help him here. Whereas Henderson might have too much
38:42
Speaker 5: time off, which might affect him a little bit here.
38:45
Speaker 5: You don't have to worry about Henderson's innings, though. He
38:47
Speaker 5: didn't throw that many innings this year. So these young guys,
38:49
Speaker 5: you've got to worry about their innings. You don't have
38:52
Speaker 5: to worry about that with him, and Henderson was really
38:54
Speaker 5: excellent at home, 1.84 home ERA. He only faced San
38:58
Speaker 5: Diego once, and he did do okay in that start.
39:01
Speaker 5: He went six and a third at San Diego, allowed
39:03
Speaker 5: three earned runs there. But if you look at his
39:05
Speaker 5: numbers that he accumulated in that start, they're not really
39:08
Speaker 5: that good. San Diego's offense has 19 at-bats against him,
39:11
Speaker 5: 263 average, 895 OPS. That is because they had two
39:15
Speaker 5: home runs against them. One was Ty France who got
39:18
Speaker 5: robbed last night as I mentioned and then the other
39:21
Speaker 5: was Jackson Merrill. They have six strikeouts, no walks against Henderson.
39:26
Speaker 2: What do we do?
39:27
Speaker 5: What do we do with this one, man? I think
39:29
Speaker 5: San Diego the side. I like San Diego.
39:32
Speaker 2: In this one.
39:32
Speaker 5: 56% of tickets, 55% of the cash on Milwaukee. Milwaukee's
39:36
Speaker 5: a public side here. Less of the money coming in
39:39
Speaker 5: on them. Milwaukee around a minus 140-something favorite. I'm tempted
39:44
Speaker 5: to do this because King has the better matchup numbers here.
39:49
Speaker 5: He's got postseason experience. He's on schedule. None of that
39:53
Speaker 5: is the case with Henderson here. The only thing Henderson
39:55
Speaker 5: does have going for him is the home road splits
39:58
Speaker 5: are in his favor here. And I do think that
40:01
Speaker 5: he might be the more talented of the two pitchers here. Yeah,
40:04
Speaker 5: I mean, I think I'm going to stay off it.
40:06
Speaker 5: That would be my hesitation here. But I like San
40:08
Speaker 5: Diego in this one. And, of course, I'm going to
40:10
Speaker 5: be pissed when they... actually win and I did not
40:13
Speaker 5: actually have a bet on it maybe you want to
40:16
Speaker 5: go first five with this I don't know I'm torn
40:18
Speaker 5: on that because the bullpens both got used yesterday so
40:22
Speaker 5: you could go first five San Diego but Milwaukee used
40:25
Speaker 5: their closer yesterday and San Diego did not use theirs
40:28
Speaker 5: so San Diego might have a little bit of a
40:30
Speaker 5: bullpen edge because of the usage yesterday like I said
40:33
Speaker 5: so there is an argument to go full game with
40:35
Speaker 5: San Diego there too yeah those are my thoughts on
40:39
Speaker 5: that I like San Diego there Atlanta and LA this
40:43
Speaker 5: one is a lot harder to figure out both games
40:45
Speaker 5: on Fox Sports won by the way Atlanta we don't
40:48
Speaker 5: know who they're pitching I don't know if it's going
40:50
Speaker 5: to be Chris Sale or if it isn't I think
40:52
Speaker 5: Sale would still be on too short of rest here
40:54
Speaker 5: so I don't think it's.
40:56
Speaker 2: Going to be him and they used him in relief.
40:58
Speaker 5: The other day too after he started game one I
41:01
Speaker 5: guess it was against Atlanta you know I mean San
41:05
Speaker 5: Diego's using their game one pitcher Kings so I guess
41:08
Speaker 5: theoretically Atlanta could I guess use Sale here But, you know,
41:14
Speaker 5: like I said, he pitched in relief.
41:15
Speaker 2: Let me see. When did Sale last pitch? When did
41:18
Speaker 2: he actually start? Let me see. Sale started on the 29th.
41:26
Speaker 5: So, yeah, I guess in theory he would be on schedule,
41:29
Speaker 5: I guess, to start again, even though he pitched in
41:30
Speaker 5: relief on the 1st. So Sale might actually start this game.
41:35
Speaker 5: It's unclear right now. We know Sale was good on
41:38
Speaker 5: the season. He had an elite season, even though he's old.
41:42
Speaker 5: He has really good numbers against the Dodgers, too, and
41:44
Speaker 5: a huge sample size. I think it matters a lot.
41:49
Speaker 5: If Sale is pitching for Atlanta, that gives Atlanta a
41:52
Speaker 5: way better chance than if anybody else pitches for them.
41:54
Speaker 5: The rest of Atlanta's starting rotation, I don't like any
41:57
Speaker 5: of them. And Tyler Molle is day-to-day. I don't think
42:00
Speaker 5: it'll be him because he pitched game two. So I
42:03
Speaker 5: think it's going to be Sale or it's going to
42:05
Speaker 5: be some semblance of a bullpen game for Atlanta here.
42:08
Speaker 5: Dodgers did win the game yesterday 5-2. Atlanta kind of
42:12
Speaker 5: went with a bullpen game yesterday. And this is what
42:14
Speaker 5: I'm saying, man. Even though Atlanta's bullpen is good, that's
42:17
Speaker 5: going to take its toll. Atlanta sort of went with
42:19
Speaker 5: a bullpen-ish game yesterday. That's going to wind up taking
42:23
Speaker 5: its toll, where Scooble went six innings, although the Dodgers
42:26
Speaker 5: still used four relief pitchers, which isn't great, but they
42:29
Speaker 5: didn't really overuse any of them.
42:31
Speaker 2: So theoretically, some of those guys could pitch again today.
42:34
Speaker 5: Atlanta has the better bullpen, but if they keep going
42:36
Speaker 5: bullpen games like this, their bullpen's going to get taxed.
42:39
Speaker 2: You know what I mean?
42:40
Speaker 5: The Dodgers have Blake Snell pitching this game. Snell is good,
42:45
Speaker 5: and he barely pitched this year, just like last year.
42:48
Speaker 5: Snell is one of their better starters. He's got a
42:50
Speaker 5: lot of experience. He's got playoff experience. He had good
42:53
Speaker 5: numbers when he did pitch this year, 1.9 ERA, 1.1 WIP.
42:58
Speaker 5: He was a little bit worse at home, but a 2.14 ERA,
43:04
Speaker 5: not exactly bad. The concern with him is he wasn't
43:07
Speaker 5: going that deep into some of his most recent outings,
43:09
Speaker 5: but the thing is I think they just kind of
43:11
Speaker 5: limited him a little bit to get ready for the playoffs.
43:13
Speaker 5: Like they were letting him go his full starts up
43:15
Speaker 5: until mid-September. So I think they just wanted to rest
43:18
Speaker 5: him a little bit to get ready for the playoffs.
43:20
Speaker 5: So I think, you know, I'd be okay with that
43:24
Speaker 5: as far as, you know, like if I'm Snell, I
43:28
Speaker 5: think that's okay with me.
43:29
Speaker 2: You know what I mean? Get a little bit rested.
43:31
Speaker 5: And Snell has good numbers against Atlanta in 96 career at-bats.
43:35
Speaker 5: They have not been able to hit him very well.
43:36
Speaker 5: 198 batting average. 637 OPS, pretty low as well. They
43:41
Speaker 5: do have a lot of walks against him. That's the
43:43
Speaker 5: one thing that Snell is not good at is he's wild.
43:46
Speaker 5: He walks too many guys, but he's also really hard
43:48
Speaker 5: to hit. 34 strikeouts, 13 walks against the Braves in
43:52
Speaker 5: his career. He is a good strikeout pitcher. Now, if
43:56
Speaker 5: it's Sale against Snell, I would say the under makes
43:59
Speaker 5: the most sense in this game, and it looks like
44:00
Speaker 5: maybe that's the case because the total is.
44:02
Speaker 2: At seven here.
44:03
Speaker 5: If it's Snell against anybody else, I think the Dodgers
44:06
Speaker 5: probably win the game again. Dodgers are at about minus
44:10
Speaker 5: 150-something here, but if it's Snell against Sale... Then I
44:13
Speaker 5: think maybe you look towards Atlanta slightly, like as a
44:17
Speaker 5: decent-sized underdog, like make a plus-one run line or something.
44:20
Speaker 2: Although I'd prefer the under. If it's Snell against Sale,
44:24
Speaker 2: the under makes a lot of sense.
44:26
Speaker 5: I think we have to watch this. If it's Snell
44:31
Speaker 5: against Sale, if you follow my Instagram, you'll see. I'd
44:36
Speaker 5: consider adding a play on the under if it's Snell
44:38
Speaker 5: against Sale. Maybe I'm not going to do it, though, anyway.
44:41
Speaker 5: The Dodgers are really public, though. 86% of tickets, 87%.
44:45
Speaker 2: Of the cash.
44:46
Speaker 5: I don't think I like that. The money is also
44:48
Speaker 5: backing the over, by the way. In both of these
44:50
Speaker 5: two games today, the money's backing the over. I'm not
44:53
Speaker 5: so sure about that. San Diego-Milwaukee looks more like at
44:56
Speaker 5: least a first five under, but with the bullpen usage,
45:00
Speaker 5: even though the bullpens are good, the bullpens might struggle
45:03
Speaker 5: a little in that game. That game is a little
45:05
Speaker 5: bit harder to figure out the total there, although the
45:07
Speaker 5: first five under... might make some sense in San Diego
45:11
Speaker 5: and Milwaukee, but you're going to be looking at probably
45:12
Speaker 5: a three on that number. Atlanta and Dodgers, again, if
45:16
Speaker 5: it's Sale, I think the under makes sense. If it's
45:19
Speaker 5: not him, then I think the Dodgers probably find a
45:22
Speaker 5: way to win the game. But yeah, that's all I
45:26
Speaker 5: got on these games, man. It's hard to figure out
45:28
Speaker 5: because Sale matters a lot. Atlanta's pitching is such that
45:32
Speaker 5: Sale is really good and they don't have any other
45:34
Speaker 5: starters that are really that good. It's just the way
45:36
Speaker 5: that it is, man, although generally Atlanta does have the
45:39
Speaker 5: better bullpen. The Dodgers have the better offense, though, and
45:42
Speaker 5: I think San Diego and Milwaukee, I think their offenses,
45:45
Speaker 5: even though Milwaukee was the better offense on the season,
45:47
Speaker 5: I think their offenses are a little bit evenly matched,
45:50
Speaker 5: to be honest, with San Diego having a much better
45:53
Speaker 5: offensive second half and being the better power hitting of
45:57
Speaker 5: the two teams. That's what I got, man. Oh, and
46:01
Speaker 5: we'll do the final NFL market read here in a second.
46:03
Speaker 5: But the plays that I have today are going to
46:04
Speaker 5: be the Jets plus three and a half. That's my
46:07
Speaker 5: only NFL play on a board that I really don't like.
46:09
Speaker 5: And I do have a Monday night play as well
46:11
Speaker 5: on the Saints, which you guys can see my analysis
46:15
Speaker 5: on both of those.
46:16
Speaker 2: Games if you watch my NFL show. But, yes, we're
46:18
Speaker 2: going to be on the Jets.
46:20
Speaker 5: And then we're on two hockey plays today, the Florida
46:22
Speaker 5: Panthers money line and the Calgary Flames money line. Those
46:26
Speaker 5: are both sandwich spots for their opponents, so I like
46:29
Speaker 5: both of those plays in hockey today. So hockey, you know,
46:32
Speaker 5: we're not going to go undefeated. We started off 3-0.
46:35
Speaker 5: I like that, but we're not going to go undefeated
46:37
Speaker 5: in hockey, man, especially when I play underdogs like this.
46:39
Speaker 5: But the goal is profit, so I'm trying to just
46:42
Speaker 5: find spots and play them. So let's keep it going
46:44
Speaker 5: with hockey. Hockey's off to a good start. Traditionally, it's
46:49
Speaker 5: been one of my better sports, so hopefully we can
46:50
Speaker 5: get the job done with hockey again here. As far
46:53
Speaker 5: as the NFL market read here, The money was heavily
46:57
Speaker 5: indicating on Indianapolis. That game just kicked off. We'll see
47:00
Speaker 5: what happens in that game. Indy went off like a 4.5,
47:02
Speaker 5: 5-point favorite in that one, so we'll see. The market
47:07
Speaker 5: read is still cash percentage on Buffalo, but I like
47:11
Speaker 5: New England in that one, as I already said. You're
47:13
Speaker 5: fading the public, at least, if you like New England
47:16
Speaker 5: in that one. Buffalo is public. It looks like they
47:18
Speaker 5: do have some of the cash percentage on them too,
47:20
Speaker 5: but I told you I don't agree with all the
47:22
Speaker 5: market reads here. That one, yeah, that one I don't
47:27
Speaker 5: have too, like I'm not wishy-washy on that particular game really.
47:30
Speaker 2: I think New England is the side in that game.
47:33
Speaker 5: Because they just look so hideous. I feel like nobody's
47:36
Speaker 5: going to want them. The Margarita is still agreeing with
47:38
Speaker 5: my play on the Jets. Chicago's the public side. They're
47:41
Speaker 5: with less of the money on them. Arizona is getting
47:44
Speaker 5: the money, although they're a public side as well, although
47:46
Speaker 5: they are getting a pretty solid cash percentage on them there.
47:50
Speaker 5: Like I said, I'm kind of disagreeing with the market
47:52
Speaker 5: on that one. The line also flipped from the Giants
47:55
Speaker 5: being a favorite all the way to potentially Arizona being
47:58
Speaker 5: like a three-point favorite. I don't think it's actually going
48:00
Speaker 5: to hit the key number three, but yeah, getting the
48:02
Speaker 5: Giants as a dog in a spot like that, I
48:04
Speaker 5: think to me it makes sense.
48:06
Speaker 2: So I'm still leaning Giants there.
48:08
Speaker 5: The market is heavily siding with Houston, which I do
48:12
Speaker 5: agree with in that game. Again, to see all my analysis,
48:15
Speaker 5: you can check out last night's show. Heavy market agreement
48:18
Speaker 5: on Cincinnati. I also do agree with that one. Green
48:22
Speaker 5: Bay is public with less of the money on them.
48:25
Speaker 5: This one was really difficult for me to figure out
48:27
Speaker 5: in my mind because I think both teams are in
48:29
Speaker 5: positive spots here, but I guess I'll agree with the
48:32
Speaker 5: lean towards Tampa getting the points there just because the
48:35
Speaker 5: injured player theory situation they're in I think gives them
48:38
Speaker 5: a little bit of extra value there in that one.
48:41
Speaker 2: Rams in Philadelphia, the Rams.
48:42
Speaker 5: Are definitely looking like a public side even though they
48:45
Speaker 5: have a slight cash percentage on them. I think I'm
48:47
Speaker 5: going to stick to leaning towards Philly in that one
48:50
Speaker 5: because they've been good at home against the Rams.
48:52
Speaker 2: They look so bad on Monday night.
48:55
Speaker 5: Even though the Rams were a lot better than they are,
48:57
Speaker 5: Philadelphia looks so bad on Monday night.
48:59
Speaker 4: The Rams.
49:00
Speaker 5: Looked good in their loss on Sunday night, although the
49:03
Speaker 5: Rams should have won that game statistically. They dominated statistically.
49:07
Speaker 5: Normally I would want to jump on a team like that,
49:09
Speaker 5: but the Rams are coming off the bigger effort game,
49:13
Speaker 5: I would say, and having to travel a lot. And
49:16
Speaker 5: Philly has been good against them at home, and getting
49:18
Speaker 5: points with Philly at home.
49:20
Speaker 2: to me, that seems to be the right way to
49:22
Speaker 2: play that game.
49:23
Speaker 5: The public is on Baltimore, and a little bit of
49:25
Speaker 5: a cash percentage on Baltimore, but I don't have too
49:27
Speaker 5: many hesitations with leaning towards Tennessee in that game. It
49:32
Speaker 5: doesn't make the cut for me as far as a play,
49:34
Speaker 5: but I would not lay the points with Baltimore in
49:36
Speaker 5: that one.
49:37
Speaker 2: Tennessee remains my.
49:40
Speaker 5: opinion in that game and it's a low total too
49:42
Speaker 5: so you want to take double digit underdogs with a
49:44
Speaker 5: low total and I don't think the spot is great
49:46
Speaker 5: for Baltimore either Minnesota the public is on them and
49:50
Speaker 5: less of the money on them so the market read
49:52
Speaker 5: is definitely saying Miami I agree with that it's a
49:55
Speaker 5: low total and you're getting a ton of points here
49:57
Speaker 5: Minnesota like I said they're the most overrated 3-0 team
50:01
Speaker 5: They've gotten out-yarded in every single game. They didn't even
50:04
Speaker 5: run a play in the red zone last week. This
50:08
Speaker 5: is not a good Minnesota team, and especially not a
50:10
Speaker 5: good offense. And you need offense to cover a double-digit
50:15
Speaker 5: number like this in the NFL. So Miami, I'm pretty sure,
50:18
Speaker 5: is the right side there. And it's a 3-0 team
50:20
Speaker 5: versus an 0-3 team, the only instance of that, where
50:23
Speaker 5: I'm always going to look towards the 0-3 team.
50:26
Speaker 2: I'm going to guess that historically.
50:28
Speaker 5: 0-3 teams against 3-0 teams do pretty well at covering.
50:32
Speaker 2: I don't agree with Denver-San Francisco.
50:34
Speaker 5: The money coming in on Denver in that game, I
50:36
Speaker 5: think the spot is better for San Francisco in that one.
50:39
Speaker 2: I don't know what else to say about that.
50:41
Speaker 5: That's probably the one where I'm disagreeing the most with
50:43
Speaker 5: the market read, and I don't like doing it, but yeah,
50:47
Speaker 5: I kind of like San Francisco in that one.
50:50
Speaker 2: Vegas does look like they've become a public underdog. Go figure.
50:54
Speaker 5: Vegas, the public wants Vegas as the underdog because they're 3-0.
50:58
Speaker 2: I like the Chiefs in that one, man.
51:00
Speaker 5: I'm going to remain with that opinion. I would lay
51:03
Speaker 5: the points with the Chiefs in that one if I
51:05
Speaker 5: was going to play it. Seattle is a public side.
51:08
Speaker 5: They do have more cash on them, and given the situation,
51:10
Speaker 5: I do lean to Seattle still in that game. And
51:13
Speaker 5: then Detroit, Carolina, I was leaning Carolina here. This is
51:18
Speaker 5: a strong market read on Detroit here, though. I still
51:22
Speaker 5: think I like Carolina, plus the points, for all the
51:25
Speaker 5: reasons I stated last night. I'm shocked that the public
51:28
Speaker 5: doesn't seem to be siding with Detroit in this one.
51:32
Speaker 5: I don't know why they wouldn't be, because even though
51:34
Speaker 5: Detroit had a close call against the Jets last week.
51:37
Speaker 2: Everybody loves Detroit's offense.
51:39
Speaker 5: Carolina losing to the browns the public's not you would
51:43
Speaker 5: not think the public would want them at all after
51:45
Speaker 5: a loss like that although it was kind of a
51:46
Speaker 5: misleading loss um you'd think the public would remain on
51:50
Speaker 5: the side of detroit here um so i don't know
51:52
Speaker 5: what's going on with that i think i still am
51:54
Speaker 5: going to lean carolina there though and then the market
51:57
Speaker 5: is kind of still agreeing with me on new orleans
51:59
Speaker 5: but we'll see about that but i do like the
52:01
Speaker 5: spot for new orleans in that one and that is
52:04
Speaker 5: uh it that is the market read there uh All right, Calvin,
52:09
Speaker 5: you're the only one in the chat today, man. I
52:10
Speaker 5: appreciate it.
52:11
Speaker 2: Thanks, man.
52:12
Speaker 5: Thanks for hanging out. Learn to Toad on Twitter. Learn
52:14
Speaker 5: to Toad on Instagram. Like, subscribe to the channel here.
52:17
Speaker 5: Give me comments, good comments if you can. Hype on mobile,
52:21
Speaker 5: whatever the hell that does. I don't know. Listen on audio, Apple, Spotify, Spreaker.
52:25
Speaker 5: We're getting some surges in the numbers there, so let's
52:29
Speaker 5: keep that going.
52:29
Speaker 2: I like that. Covered in you because my ukulele cover
52:32
Speaker 2: channel on YouTube. You can check that out.
52:34
Speaker 5: Patreon.com slash Learn to Toad if you want to support
52:37
Speaker 5: me over there.
52:39
Speaker 2: Loser cast every Tuesday night.
52:41
Speaker 5: And I'm going to be on, let me figure out
52:42
Speaker 5: what his name actually is. I'm going to be on
52:44
Speaker 5: a podcast tonight, which is Tommy. I called him Tommy Burgos,
52:49
Speaker 5: Tommy Borum. I think that's a fake name though. He
52:52
Speaker 5: bores everybody. Um, I'm going to be on his podcast
52:56
Speaker 5: and I don't know if it's going to be live
52:58
Speaker 5: or just recording it tonight, but I guess, uh, you can, uh,
53:02
Speaker 5: find that, uh, he's at Tommy Borum jokes. I'm going
53:04
Speaker 5: to be on his show tonight. Um, America Floats, I
53:08
Speaker 5: think is the name of it. I don't know, but
53:10
Speaker 5: we'll see.
53:10
Speaker 2: Let me see.
53:10
Speaker 5: Is that the name of the show? Yeah, I believe
53:14
Speaker 5: that's the name of the show. So you can find
53:16
Speaker 5: that somewhere. He's on YouTube at Tommy Borum, I guess.
53:21
Speaker 5: Whatever it is, I'm going to be on his show tonight.
53:24
Speaker 5: So be on the lookout for that. And that's going
53:26
Speaker 5: to do it.
53:27
Speaker 2: Calvin, thanks, man. Calvin Coolidge is what I really want
53:31
Speaker 2: to call you.
53:31
Speaker 5: Calvin candle uh calvin coolidge silent cow one of the
53:35
Speaker 5: least bad u.s presidents because he you know he gets
53:40
Speaker 5: he doesn't get spoken about at all uh so that's
53:42
Speaker 5: how you know he wasn't that bad because he's not
53:44
Speaker 5: considered to be a good president so that's how you
53:47
Speaker 5: know he wasn't that bad he was a uh hands-off
53:50
Speaker 5: president for um yeah more so than most as far
53:53
Speaker 5: as the economy is concerned so uh yeah he gets
53:57
Speaker 5: blamed for the depression but it was not uh it
53:59
Speaker 5: was not his fault That's going to do it.
54:02
Speaker 2: I appreciate it, guys. Peace.
54:09
Speaker 1: If the dark starts talking, hand me the phone.
54:13
Speaker 2: Let somebody answer.
54:15
Speaker 4: Let somebody know you do.
54:19
Speaker 1: Not have to lose this round alone. Hold on, not tonight,
54:32
Speaker 1: not now Hold on, hold.
54:38
Speaker 4: On Let me pull you out That bad luck bites
54:46
Speaker 4: hard But it don't get the crown Hold on.
54:54
Speaker 3: Hold on Stay with me now
55:00
Speaker 1: Hold on, hold on You're still here now guitar solo