Latest / Talk to Prince Show - Solving World's Problems / Bureaucracy should be meant to serve 'The People'

Transcript

Bureaucracy should be meant to serve 'The People' · Talk to Prince Show - Solving World's Problems

0:01
Speaker 1: The survivor of the system depends on its bureaucracy. The
0:17
Speaker 1: bureau cursy of every system is very essential for its survivor,
0:29
Speaker 1: for its longevity, and for its continuation. The bureaucratic state
0:39
Speaker 1: of a system is very essential in its functionality and
0:46
Speaker 1: its continuity and in its stability. UH. The bureaucratic state,
0:57
Speaker 1: it's natter, it's some thing that the system has learned
1:02
Speaker 1: over time and has accumulated. This bureaucratic UH as ways
1:18
Speaker 1: ways of doing business as usual for the status quo
1:27
Speaker 1: and for the vibeility and liability and trustworthiness of that system.
1:44
Speaker 1: So the bureaucrat, the bureaucracy of a system, it's not
1:50
Speaker 1: that we started the system, but it's that way. Next,
1:56
Speaker 1: the system hm to be good at what it does
2:03
Speaker 1: and to continue at what it does. So if you
2:11
Speaker 1: take away that bureaucracy, that system in itself crumbus and
2:21
Speaker 1: the bureaucratic state of a system can be their business,
2:28
Speaker 1: a person, and the country. And that's just a system.
2:37
Speaker 1: The human being is a system, and the bureaucracy of
2:40
Speaker 1: the human it becomes the character, the character, the manners,
2:45
Speaker 1: and the altitude that are predictable and that has been
2:49
Speaker 1: systematized by that human being that makes that human being
2:53
Speaker 1: to be what it tastes good or bad. But there
2:56
Speaker 1: is a system that makes that human being to be
3:00
Speaker 1: good or bad. And that system has been systematized, has
3:06
Speaker 1: been programmed, and has been tested and works, and after
3:12
Speaker 1: the good or evil or its provinced that the bureaucratic
3:16
Speaker 1: state or that system itself works, and the system of
3:23
Speaker 1: governance of a country, of a state, or a nation monarchy,
3:31
Speaker 1: that that system functions because of his bureaucracy. And some
3:38
Speaker 1: bureaucratic systems can be seen in terms of their religion,
3:43
Speaker 1: that tradition, their culture, and their ways of doing things,
3:48
Speaker 1: and that becomes the point markers or the identity or
3:57
Speaker 1: the identifiers of that system. We take for example of
4:04
Speaker 1: our great country, the United States of America. It has
4:10
Speaker 1: a huge bureaucracy, and that bureaucratic state is loved by
4:18
Speaker 1: many and hated by many. If we take away that bureaucracy,
4:25
Speaker 1: that system columbus. The system is the system because of
4:30
Speaker 1: its bureaucracy. Those institutions and establishments and unt and the
4:40
Speaker 1: flags or the symbols or the seals of those bureaucratic
4:47
Speaker 1: state within that system symbolizes the power and the strength
4:53
Speaker 1: and the viability and the liability of that system. Uh,
5:02
Speaker 1: the the bureaucracyes in some systems are like the United States,
5:09
Speaker 1: it's got the divided government and separation of powers, got
5:15
Speaker 1: the the the Executive, the Congress, and the Supreme Court,
5:22
Speaker 1: and those are the branches of the superiucractic state. And
5:25
Speaker 1: within that branches in themselves, they got so many jobs
5:34
Speaker 1: to fail. They got staffers and desk and offices and
5:39
Speaker 1: paper trail and procedures and protocols and hierarchies. And you
5:47
Speaker 1: know you can't. Once you take it. With the protocol,
5:51
Speaker 1: the prosidures and the hierarchy you take, you take away
5:55
Speaker 1: the power of that structure, of that bureaucratic the apartment,
6:02
Speaker 1: and by so doing you eliminate that bureaucratic department. That's
6:09
Speaker 1: how you collapse or condenses the system by going after
6:17
Speaker 1: its bureaucracy. Once it destroyed that bureaucracy, and the system
6:23
Speaker 1: in itself becomes very weak, ineffective, and it's disabled. How
6:32
Speaker 1: it's abolished or becomes obsolete. So therefore you must be
6:40
Speaker 1: very careful with the how you are you downsize or
6:47
Speaker 1: how you in lige the bureaucracy of a system. By
6:54
Speaker 1: downsizing and reducing the bureaucracy of a system, it's weakening
6:59
Speaker 1: that SA and within that system, you empower the elements
7:08
Speaker 1: within that system that's bent out. Downsizing the buiocracy of
7:17
Speaker 1: that system sometimes make that system effective, that it's effective
7:25
Speaker 1: to what God, to what end, for what purpose? And
7:29
Speaker 1: who benefit from that effectiveness because the slimmer of the system,
7:38
Speaker 1: the much beneficial that system becomes to a particular group
7:42
Speaker 1: of people, And it's most definitely the elite or some
7:50
Speaker 1: oligachs within that system, because most elite and oligachs don't
7:56
Speaker 1: like bureaucracy because they get to do the for and
8:00
Speaker 1: the applications and the procedures, and it's slow with a
8:12
Speaker 1: functionless system, as a bureaucracy that's a little bit slow,
8:20
Speaker 1: and the slowness of that bureaucratic state can be for
8:27
Speaker 1: good or for bad. Right in a corrupt bureaucratic state,
8:35
Speaker 1: decisions can be swift and because it's not very viable,
8:42
Speaker 1: it's not varied. It comes from one person or just
8:47
Speaker 1: a group of elite, a group of persons that actually
8:53
Speaker 1: not answerable to the people. But downsizing the bureau the
9:00
Speaker 1: state with their own benefit. And it's some some bureaucratic
9:12
Speaker 1: states are large for the good of the people, and
9:21
Speaker 1: when they're small as for the detriment of the people.
9:25
Speaker 1: And in some bureaucratic state, the smaller and the slim
9:29
Speaker 1: it is, the better it is for the people, and
9:34
Speaker 1: the largest it is, the more detrimental it is for
9:37
Speaker 1: the people. These are especially in the corrupt and tyrannical,
9:44
Speaker 1: oppressive democratic state. And there's always the emblem or the
9:52
Speaker 1: symbol of a bureaucracy that symbolizes what that system is
9:57
Speaker 1: all about. In an oppressive, tyrannical and dictatorial bureaucratic state,
10:10
Speaker 1: the symbol is corruption in the partisan and redundancy, inefficiency,
10:23
Speaker 1: the slowness of process and the waste of time and
10:33
Speaker 1: the prolongation of the procedure and all this are designed
10:41
Speaker 1: to fatigue the people and to make the people give up.
10:46
Speaker 1: And so they make that bureaucratic state to be so
10:49
Speaker 1: complicated that just a single document will take you sometimes years.
10:59
Speaker 1: It's just compassone and tiring, and they make it so
11:04
Speaker 1: boring and complex and complicated for you not to understand.
11:14
Speaker 1: You know, the system is hiding something I see and
11:20
Speaker 1: he uses corruption and ambiguity in order to drive in
11:28
Speaker 1: such dictatory and oppressive and crop systems, you know, making
11:35
Speaker 1: the bureaucracy to be such difficult to understand. Again, it's
11:48
Speaker 1: so reluctant for the people to engage in that bureaucratic process,
11:54
Speaker 1: procedures and protocols. H it's a design to make the
12:04
Speaker 1: people expect less from the system and to make them
12:11
Speaker 1: give up and just be happy. That's some tyrons or
12:18
Speaker 1: oligachs or a lad are making sure that the system continues.
12:31
Speaker 1: And that's one type of buireaucracy, the crop neapolistic, nepotistic
12:38
Speaker 1: bureaucratic state, you know, and you got the liberal or
12:47
Speaker 1: the democratic bureaucratic state. It is different from tyrannical, oppressive
12:52
Speaker 1: democratic state, and it's different from a monarchica bureaucratic state.
12:59
Speaker 1: The monarchy cam bureaucratic state that's mostly ceremonial because the
13:03
Speaker 1: power is vested in the hands of the king and
13:07
Speaker 1: the it's invested in the king of your royalty, in
13:12
Speaker 1: the prince and princesses, so it depends on their own
13:14
Speaker 1: strucular dynamics of power dynamics and in sol system, the bureaucracy,
13:20
Speaker 1: it doesn't actually exist because the the decisions are made
13:26
Speaker 1: by one person, by the king. So on the contrary,
13:33
Speaker 1: it's the bureaucracy of a monarchical system is ritualistic. Rituals
13:40
Speaker 1: are so choreographed that it's it looks so boring, the
13:45
Speaker 1: time consuming, and it's systematized and ritualized and culturalized them
13:54
Speaker 1: and religionized. You know, it's a process of the prosidure
14:02
Speaker 1: and the ceremonial becomes so complicated that in a serf
14:08
Speaker 1: make the monarchy to be so complicated, of which the
14:12
Speaker 1: decisions are actually complicated in the monarchical state, but the
14:19
Speaker 1: rituals are complicated and borring, and sometimes it's so prolonged
14:29
Speaker 1: and it takes time, so the processes and prosiduous are
14:37
Speaker 1: not based on the decisions that is made by the monarchy.
14:43
Speaker 1: And the contrary, the processes and prosiduous makes it difficult
14:48
Speaker 1: for you to get to the monarch or to get
14:52
Speaker 1: closer to royalty that its own bureaucracy. But in the
15:01
Speaker 1: liberal bureaucratic state is expected to have a sleem government
15:13
Speaker 1: and they expect for transparency and and the true faith
15:23
Speaker 1: and credit. The vibility and reliability of such liberal systems
15:29
Speaker 1: is the swiftness, the rapidity, and the efficiency and effectiveness
15:40
Speaker 1: of an unpredictability as of systems that fights again corruption
15:48
Speaker 1: and nepotisan and transparency and accountability and responsibility and an
15:56
Speaker 1: expectation and civility and real flaw and er explicit not
16:06
Speaker 1: implied legalistic or procedural protocols, you know, ah, so elaborate
16:18
Speaker 1: and so understood that it becomes less cumbersome and good
16:25
Speaker 1: for capitalism, good for sustainable development. It's so predictable that
16:33
Speaker 1: sometimes they said, even a cave person, you know, can
16:38
Speaker 1: can find their ways in and out of such freely
16:42
Speaker 1: democratic systems. To any free liberal system, a bureaucracy, you know,
16:53
Speaker 1: the bigger of the Latin buiocracy, the the incentives, the
17:02
Speaker 1: more the incentives of corruption and nepotism. And unless that's
17:11
Speaker 1: what the system wants, then that system is not a
17:14
Speaker 1: freely democratic system. In the fully democratic state, the slimmer
17:21
Speaker 1: the bureaucracy, the bureaucracy the better, and the larger the bureaucracy,
17:29
Speaker 1: the more complicated, and it becomes reflective of a tyrannical
17:38
Speaker 1: or oppressive or dictatorial state, because the the bureaucracy of
17:47
Speaker 1: a transparent system should not be that complicated, but for
17:54
Speaker 1: the survivor of that system, and it's a larger bariaocracy. Say,
18:02
Speaker 1: if we go to DC, for example, you see all
18:04
Speaker 1: these secretaries, all the secretariats and departments and offices, and
18:09
Speaker 1: you move from an office to the other, from another
18:13
Speaker 1: office to you just keep going. Sometimes the system uses
18:19
Speaker 1: its own bureaucracy as a shield to prevent dictatorship or uterion,
18:29
Speaker 1: oppression autocracy because autocrats, uh, they're like a bureaucratic states
18:39
Speaker 1: that is created by them, because that bureaucratist created an
18:45
Speaker 1: autocrat or a dictator on oppressor. It's it's a it's
18:53
Speaker 1: it's a self made bureaucracy that's not for the interest
18:57
Speaker 1: of the people or the system itself, but it makes
19:02
Speaker 1: it difficult to get to them. So they make things
19:05
Speaker 1: so complicated and so combason that people are discouraged. So
19:14
Speaker 1: within a democratic and free system of governance, the bureaucracy
19:23
Speaker 1: should be slain. But within that system, those who want
19:30
Speaker 1: to corrupt the system or use the system to their
19:34
Speaker 1: own gain, they can either make make that bureaucracy slain.
19:42
Speaker 1: And if the berocracy is slam, it's slim because they
19:46
Speaker 1: have bypassed the law by pass common practice and procedure,
19:54
Speaker 1: and they're making a slimmer to benefit their interest and
20:00
Speaker 1: expense of the system. And if they choose to make
20:07
Speaker 1: the bureaucracy larger, at the same time, those corrupt leaders
20:15
Speaker 1: are making the bureocracy larger because they want to make
20:18
Speaker 1: it so complicated and combatsone and corrupt again at the
20:26
Speaker 1: expense of the system, but to their benefit. So therefore,
20:34
Speaker 1: the natural systems that survive survives because of their prolonged
20:41
Speaker 1: bureaucracy that has been handed down from generations to generations.
20:50
Speaker 1: That is good for the system itself most of the times,
20:55
Speaker 1: good for for liberal democratic leaders, but bad for authoritarian
21:07
Speaker 1: or authoritarian sympathizing leaders. So if we take away that bureaucracy,
21:17
Speaker 1: that system collapse, the symptoms collapses. So when you see
21:23
Speaker 1: leaders who are coming in in an effective, functional democratic
21:30
Speaker 1: system and they worry about his bureaucracy, the question to us,
21:40
Speaker 1: are they worried for bureaucracy, for the bureaucracy that system
21:45
Speaker 1: for the benefit of it, or because provide checks and
21:51
Speaker 1: balances and therefore destroying that bureaucracy gives them an upper
21:58
Speaker 1: hand to turn that system to that image or to
22:03
Speaker 1: something that that system was not designed for. You must
22:10
Speaker 1: ask these questions and to be careful to those who
22:15
Speaker 1: want to get into office with the intention of this
22:19
Speaker 1: joining the bureaucracy. Is it for the good of the system.
22:27
Speaker 1: It's because the when you serve the powers of that
22:30
Speaker 1: system and turn that system into something else, an autocratic retyrant,
22:40
Speaker 1: you know, by any means if they get empower in
22:43
Speaker 1: a democratic liberal system and they're not like the bureaucracy,
22:50
Speaker 1: because the bureaucracy, you know, establishes separations of powers. And
22:58
Speaker 1: by separation of power was it means that no one
23:03
Speaker 1: person is as a powerful as a system, and no
23:08
Speaker 1: one person is above the law. It means common practices
23:11
Speaker 1: and prosidures and protocols must be followed. Following those common
23:17
Speaker 1: practices and procedure and makes that leader too to always
23:26
Speaker 1: be rest assured that they are not above the law
23:33
Speaker 1: and equal to everybody else. And so they are therefore
23:39
Speaker 1: a servant of that system and not the system serving them.
23:44
Speaker 1: Because the systemselves the common people. Why the leader of
23:50
Speaker 1: that system is a servant to the system and the
23:56
Speaker 1: people that are employed in that In that bureaucratic system
24:02
Speaker 1: or in that system, it becomes the bureaucracy of that system,
24:06
Speaker 1: and they themselves are the seventh or the sevens of
24:11
Speaker 1: the people. So the system becomes the people because the
24:16
Speaker 1: system is the people, and that bureaucracy is the structure.
24:23
Speaker 1: It's the governing structure of the people. The people is
24:28
Speaker 1: the system, and the periaucracy is a governance structure of
24:34
Speaker 1: the people. That's why they call it the government. So
24:39
Speaker 1: that government is the bureaucracy, the governance the system by
24:47
Speaker 1: the system wo meet the people, because if we take
24:53
Speaker 1: away the people, there is no barocracy, and therefore that
24:58
Speaker 1: system crumbles. So the government is not the system, but
25:12
Speaker 1: the government is the governance structure of the system, and
25:16
Speaker 1: that system is always the people, and the contribution of
25:23
Speaker 1: those people becomes the system, the contribution of that system.
25:35
Speaker 1: But that is in the liberal democratic state. But in
25:42
Speaker 1: a monarchical state, the system and the governing structure, it's
25:52
Speaker 1: the system, and the bureaucracy is the monarchy, and the
25:57
Speaker 1: monarchy creates is on bureaucracy that is a procedure and
26:01
Speaker 1: ritualistic not to be accountable or answerable to anything, but
26:08
Speaker 1: to make it difficult and make it, yeah, just to
26:14
Speaker 1: make it difficult for the people to overthrow the monarchy
26:22
Speaker 1: or the that the ruling elite system that be of
26:33
Speaker 1: the bureaucratic state. It's very complicated to understand the system.
26:41
Speaker 1: You must understand its bureaucracy, because each office or each
26:48
Speaker 1: worker in a systems periaocracy. It's it's necessary for the
27:00
Speaker 1: functionality of that system. So the effectiveness of the system
27:07
Speaker 1: depends on its bureaucracy and the offices and the designation
27:15
Speaker 1: of the job description of that system. When novel challenges arises,
27:28
Speaker 1: the bureaucracy expands, is expanded. When new things or new
27:37
Speaker 1: challenges in the come alone, the system expands, expand its
27:45
Speaker 1: bureaucracy in the gret new offices and recruiting new people
27:51
Speaker 1: and recruit new experts and buillion buildings and infrastructures to
28:00
Speaker 1: accommodate that novel than a novelty that either threatens or
28:08
Speaker 1: benefits the system, you cannot do away with the bureaucracy
28:19
Speaker 1: within a system, or the periocrissey of his system asked
28:23
Speaker 1: the system itself, it's air, it's destroyed. So the system
28:29
Speaker 1: survives depending on its bureaucracy and the intentionality. The intelligence
28:38
Speaker 1: of that bureaucracy says a lot about that system the smooth,
28:48
Speaker 1: smooth transition of power or continuity of his system. It's
28:55
Speaker 1: smooth because of the effectiveness of its bureaucracy. So which
29:07
Speaker 1: always remember that. So the larger the government, the more
29:19
Speaker 1: redundant sometimes the system, or sometimes the larger the government,
29:26
Speaker 1: the better the system. And the larger the government, the
29:33
Speaker 1: better the system because the larger the government is to
29:39
Speaker 1: fulfill a novelty or something new. Right, you can create
29:45
Speaker 1: a quantum computing department, of fusion technology department, or for example,
29:54
Speaker 1: you can you can create a department or an institution
30:00
Speaker 1: to research, you know, the beginning of life or to
30:06
Speaker 1: to to fuse AI and and android intelligence for example.
30:16
Speaker 1: So within that you need to create offices. You need
30:19
Speaker 1: to recrude people, and they need to give them functions,
30:23
Speaker 1: and somebody needs to be in charge of logistics and
30:27
Speaker 1: procurements and you know, so that's how did they the
30:33
Speaker 1: bureaucracy within the system functions. It's not that people don't
30:39
Speaker 1: like it, but they take youate that bureaucracy. There is
30:44
Speaker 1: no accountability, you know, there is no power structure of power,
30:47
Speaker 1: dynamics or expectations, responsibility, you know, commitment, applications and theory
30:55
Speaker 1: and service, so the functionality and people playing their own part,
30:59
Speaker 1: division of labor, and for the smooth or the effectiveness
31:04
Speaker 1: of that system, you need a bureaucracy so you can
31:10
Speaker 1: you cannot destroy it. You can allow a system and
31:14
Speaker 1: destroy bureaucracy. That's a travesty. And those who destroyed the
31:22
Speaker 1: barocrisy of a systems interns, in turn intend destroying that
31:27
Speaker 1: system itself. If you don't like a system, go after
31:33
Speaker 1: his bureaucracy, the bureaucrasy of a system. It's like the root.
31:39
Speaker 1: The root of a tree of a tree is so complicated,
31:44
Speaker 1: so intertwined or entangled. But without those roots rest a tree.
31:52
Speaker 1: And you don't even see the root of that tree
31:55
Speaker 1: unless it's exposed on the surface. Soureocracy. People don't see
32:01
Speaker 1: it unless you come in contact with it, and they
32:05
Speaker 1: will take it away. The bureaucracy. There is no system,
32:08
Speaker 1: there is no tree, there is no root, and there
32:11
Speaker 1: is no there is no root, there is no tree,
32:13
Speaker 1: there is no tree, there is no flowers, there are
32:16
Speaker 1: no flowers, there are no seeds, there are no fruits.
32:22
Speaker 1: So the system collapses. So there will be no system
32:28
Speaker 1: without biocracy. But the functionality of that bureaucracy to begates
32:35
Speaker 1: towards the people, how it affects the lives of the people,
32:45
Speaker 1: their security, their safety, their health, their wealth and prosperity,
32:55
Speaker 1: the unity, that peace, satisfaction, their happiness. So that there
33:04
Speaker 1: should be the purpose of a bureaucracy that it serves
33:10
Speaker 1: the system, it serves the people. So the governance structure
33:17
Speaker 1: of every system it's bureaucracy. The more transparent, the more
33:25
Speaker 1: effective a government, the better the system. And to the
33:39
Speaker 1: survival of the system sometimes may not mean the effectiveness
33:44
Speaker 1: of that system. Solout the system may not mean the
33:54
Speaker 1: effectiveness of its bureaucracy, so we must try to separate
34:04
Speaker 1: that too. A cor op system survives doesn't mean that
34:11
Speaker 1: that system is effective and efficient in helping the people.
34:26
Speaker 1: So we have thinking a bureaucracy is sometimes very confusing.
34:33
Speaker 1: But to understand the system, you must understand it's bureaucracy.
34:41
Speaker 1: To understand the bureaucracy of that system, you must understand
34:46
Speaker 1: its power, dynamics, the structure and the functionality of those
34:53
Speaker 1: various of various structures and branches within that bureaucratic system.
35:05
Speaker 1: And in terms of problems need, how effective that problem
35:15
Speaker 1: is solved, how swift and efficient depends on this bureaucracy.
35:24
Speaker 1: You take, for example, the fires that is happening in
35:26
Speaker 1: the fires that the fires in California, you can see
35:32
Speaker 1: that there's a problem with the bureaucratic structure the State
35:37
Speaker 1: of California towards fighting fires. It's not doing his job
35:47
Speaker 1: as it's intended to do. The bureaucracy was created to
35:53
Speaker 1: serve the system, and that system is the people. They
35:57
Speaker 1: can see the people are complaining, so therefore the system,
36:02
Speaker 1: it's hurting to the bureaucracy, it's hurting the system. There
36:09
Speaker 1: for hurting the people and to the system. The bureaucracy
36:18
Speaker 1: within the system must be preemptive or proactive. It must
36:26
Speaker 1: have some visionaries. It must be wise in the decision making,
36:31
Speaker 1: and it must anticipate and prepare itself for have some preparedness,
36:43
Speaker 1: you know, to to respond to crisis with rapidity. And
36:51
Speaker 1: to us, what's what's the purpose of a bureaucracy that
36:59
Speaker 1: doesn't serve the system the people. I've chose to keep
37:08
Speaker 1: repriating the fact that the bureaucracy is the government, and
37:13
Speaker 1: the government serve the system, and the system is the people.
37:18
Speaker 1: Got bureaucracy, which is the government, and you've got service
37:22
Speaker 1: and the services for the people. To the system is
37:25
Speaker 1: the bureaucracy the service and the people. So you work
37:32
Speaker 1: for the government, so you bureaucrat to serve and you're
37:40
Speaker 1: serving the people. So if you fail in serving serving
37:47
Speaker 1: the people, it means that bureaucracy has failed the system
37:58
Speaker 1: unless that bureaucracy, see, it's not for the system the people,
38:05
Speaker 1: it's for something else in the name of the people,
38:10
Speaker 1: at the expense of the people. The effectiveness of the
38:18
Speaker 1: bureauscracy is very it's very important, and so we should
38:26
Speaker 1: be very careful to make sure that we don't destroy
38:32
Speaker 1: the system from within by infecting his bureaucracy or a
38:38
Speaker 1: spireaucratic state. And for the bureaucracy to be much effective
38:45
Speaker 1: and needs to recruit people that are good in what
38:53
Speaker 1: they do. They must have experts, experience, career career officials.
39:07
Speaker 1: And you don't bring a new people and give them
39:14
Speaker 1: the realms of bureaucracy and expect them to be effective.
39:21
Speaker 1: You know, it's a The bureau bureaucracy is not applicative intelligence.
39:27
Speaker 1: You don't you must learn from the job. It's passed
39:33
Speaker 1: down to you. It's handed down to you, and you
39:38
Speaker 1: don't just get to the office and from day one
39:42
Speaker 1: and and then and start work. You know, they need
39:48
Speaker 1: they need to be brief, and you need to be
39:56
Speaker 1: to be taught, h or educated on the common practices.
40:05
Speaker 1: And because it's a continuation, you're not starting something new
40:09
Speaker 1: in the bureaucratic state, and you don't start your things.
40:13
Speaker 1: If you start something new, then you need to create offices.
40:17
Speaker 1: In the two cases on the department. And so if
40:21
Speaker 1: you take over power in the in the bureaucratic state,
40:27
Speaker 1: it's not something new. They must follow common practices and
40:32
Speaker 1: procedures and protocols of that system. And it's a culture
40:37
Speaker 1: within that system that you cannot bypass. To bypass the
40:43
Speaker 1: culture within that system, then you might be destroying the system.
40:50
Speaker 1: Unless they did a buy laws and laws and rules
40:59
Speaker 1: giving you that leeway or possibilities, you not to bypass
41:08
Speaker 1: something within the bureaucratic state to Therefore, the survival of
41:15
Speaker 1: a bureaucratic state depends on the law. You cannot with
41:21
Speaker 1: the law, everything collapses. It is that law that establishes
41:26
Speaker 1: those protocols and procedures and and and and the ways
41:30
Speaker 1: of doing things that must be followed with the with penalties,
41:37
Speaker 1: you know, and punishment and reinforcements and rewards to those
41:45
Speaker 1: who the better. The bureaucracy of that system or those
41:51
Speaker 1: who are better will govern. Ye. Good governance create effective systems.
42:02
Speaker 1: And the governance means biaucracy or his attribute government with biaucracy,
42:12
Speaker 1: and that government, that bureaucracy, it serves the people itselves
42:16
Speaker 1: the system. If it destroyed the government, he therefore destroyed
42:22
Speaker 1: the system, which means you destroyed the people, I said.
42:28
Speaker 1: The people, I don't know, see an individual bureaucracy, and
42:36
Speaker 1: the system doesn't care much about an individual, but it
42:45
Speaker 1: promotes individualism because through the individualism, that which you are
42:53
Speaker 1: good at might benefit the system. So if you excel
43:01
Speaker 1: in your individualism, then you can therefore serve the system.
43:05
Speaker 1: You can serve the people by becoming part of the government,
43:12
Speaker 1: become part of the bureaucracy of that system. The government
43:18
Speaker 1: in itself come be political, can be religious, can be
43:23
Speaker 1: clulturer you know, it can be can be an establishment
43:29
Speaker 1: for business or institution. That the government must not be
43:31
Speaker 1: a partic identity. But the governing structure, oh of everything,
43:41
Speaker 1: protects the system of that thing. How the human being
43:48
Speaker 1: carried itself, protects the being itself. So the governing structure
43:56
Speaker 1: is the bureaucracy. When this bureaucracy, it means there is
44:03
Speaker 1: a function, there's a need, and that function is to
44:09
Speaker 1: serve something. And that's something it's the people, the people,
44:21
Speaker 1: it's the system itself. Taken with the people, the business
44:26
Speaker 1: falls apart, the government falls apart, and everything falls apart.
44:35
Speaker 1: So if the bureaucracy is not serving the people, then
44:41
Speaker 1: it should be obsolete, should be abolished. If the bureaucracy
44:45
Speaker 1: is making the lives of the people much difficult, then
44:49
Speaker 1: it should be abolished. The bureaucracy is to serve the people.
44:58
Speaker 1: Shouldn't be making life difficult for the people. To make
45:04
Speaker 1: things easier for the people. And the bureaucracy must cut
45:10
Speaker 1: waste because the waste goes into the hands, in the
45:17
Speaker 1: pockets of others and it creates ineffective system. So it
45:23
Speaker 1: gets ineffective people. The people. The people is that which matters.
45:33
Speaker 1: The bureaucracy is not serving the people, and there is
45:38
Speaker 1: no need for that barreaucracy because the system needs self
45:41
Speaker 1: will collapse unless again, that bureaucracy it design not to
45:51
Speaker 1: serve the people, but will press and exploit and dictate
45:59
Speaker 1: upon the people as the authoritarian and tyrannical bureaucracy that
46:08
Speaker 1: I talk about. Liberal democratic bureaucracy is meant to serve
46:15
Speaker 1: the people. So the system is. And if they are
46:19
Speaker 1: not serving the people, they either fired or they are
46:25
Speaker 1: moved to something else that they might be more effective.
46:29
Speaker 1: Act oh, let us a change for somebody else is given.
46:35
Speaker 1: The realms of power, the reams of power, the realms
46:39
Speaker 1: of leadership. Realms of leadership. Comes with expectation, comes with responsibility,
46:48
Speaker 1: comes to commitment, an obligation, an investment in that theory
46:55
Speaker 1: of service to serve the people. Buireaucracy. Philosopher Prince ai
47:09
Speaker 1: AI philosopher Prince is reis Are January thirteen, twenty twenty five,
47:21
Speaker 1: from Las Vegas. I'm talking on and talking about reminding
47:29
Speaker 1: ourselves about bureaucracy and how it should be meant to
47:37
Speaker 1: serve the people and for us sometimes to differentiate the
47:45
Speaker 1: types of types of buireaucracy and the purposes to bureaucracy.
47:51
Speaker 1: Sometimes bureocracy is slim to serve the people better. Sometimes
47:57
Speaker 1: the democracy is larger h to sell to people better too.
48:03
Speaker 1: Sometimes the bureaucracy might be sleep and the expense of
48:08
Speaker 1: the people and the benefit of oligachs. And sometimes the
48:12
Speaker 1: bureaucracy can be large to make it so complicated that
48:16
Speaker 1: the people give up and for for dictation, for dictatorship
48:24
Speaker 1: and corruption, to to to reign and the expense of
48:30
Speaker 1: the people. So when we are creating bureaucracy, it should
48:35
Speaker 1: be for the service service of the people, and they
48:39
Speaker 1: should be for good, for the good of the people,
48:43
Speaker 1: and for nothing else. For the good of the people
48:48
Speaker 1: in their safety, the security, the prosperity. And they should
48:53
Speaker 1: be sustainable and profitable and proactive, pre emptive and doctive,
49:02
Speaker 1: unaccountable and responsible to dead people. Thank you, m m
49:12
Speaker 1: m m HM