Latest / Daniel and Kelly’s Extraordinary Universe / Why Does Time Go Forwards?
Transcript
- 0:07Speaker 1: Hey or hey, I think it's time we confronted a
- 0:10Speaker 1: really tricky topic. Do you think we have time for that?
- 0:13Speaker 1: You know, there's no time like the present. It could
- 0:16Speaker 1: be a good time. It might be a fun way
- 0:18Speaker 1: to pass some time. All right, I'll make time for it.
- 0:20Speaker 1: It's about time. That's so corny. How many time puns
- 0:28Speaker 1: can one fit into a single podcast? That's right? How
- 0:31Speaker 1: much time do you have? Um, I've got time. I
- 0:35Speaker 1: think it's a timely set of puns. Well, you use
- 0:38Speaker 1: that pun time after time, commending else. Now is the
- 0:44Speaker 1: time to start the podcast. Now is the time to
- 0:47Speaker 1: tackle this tricky topic. I am and I'm Daniel. It's
- 1:07Speaker 1: time for our podcast, Daniel and Jorge Explain the Universe,
- 1:11Speaker 1: a production of I Heart Radio in which we take
- 1:13Speaker 1: everything about the universe, the now, the future, the past,
- 1:17Speaker 1: the deep, deep, deep past and try to explain it
- 1:19Speaker 1: to you. That's worry. We take the time to take
- 1:22Speaker 1: a little bit of your time and maybe get you
- 1:25Speaker 1: to understand a little bit more about this amazing and
- 1:28Speaker 1: spacious place that we live in called the universe. That's right.
- 1:31Speaker 1: And sometimes we have to grapple with topics that are
- 1:34Speaker 1: sort of obvious. You know sort of things that are
- 1:36Speaker 1: right in front of you and understand like does physics
- 1:39Speaker 1: know how to make sense of it? Does physics have
- 1:41Speaker 1: a good definition of it? Do we understand why it's
- 1:44Speaker 1: this way and not that way? That's right? And so
- 1:46Speaker 1: today we're tackling a topic that is probably in everybody's
- 1:49Speaker 1: mind all the time. That's right. This is something you
- 1:53Speaker 1: think about every day from when your alarm clock goes
- 1:55Speaker 1: off to when it's time to go to bed. To
- 1:57Speaker 1: stay on the podcast, we will be talking about out time.
- 2:06Speaker 1: What is time anyway? Yeah? And why does it only
- 2:09Speaker 1: go forwards? Why do you remember the past and not
- 2:12Speaker 1: the future? Can you remember the future? That would be
- 2:15Speaker 1: pretty cool. Well, that's the whole question. Right on one hand,
- 2:19Speaker 1: very intuitive understanding of time. We all know what time
- 2:21Speaker 1: is right, yesterday was yesterday, tomorrow's tomorrow, right now is now,
- 2:26Speaker 1: But when you get down to it, we don't really
- 2:27Speaker 1: understand why we have it right. Why is it like that?
- 2:30Speaker 1: Why does it only go forwards? Why is the future
- 2:33Speaker 1: different from the past. Yeah, it's weird to think that
- 2:36Speaker 1: we are in the pressing right now and there's a
- 2:37Speaker 1: past going backwards in time, and there's a future going
- 2:41Speaker 1: forwards in time? But what's really the difference between those
- 2:43Speaker 1: two things? Yeah? Why can't I see or feel or
- 2:48Speaker 1: have any kind of memory about the future? Yeah? Exactly
- 2:51Speaker 1: what makes it different? Why is the past fixed? Right,
- 2:54Speaker 1: unchangeable unless you believe in crazy science fiction time travel stories,
- 2:58Speaker 1: which I don't, and the future undetermined? Right? What's the difference?
- 3:02Speaker 1: Can physics reveal that? Is there some understanding of time?
- 3:06Speaker 1: From physics? It tells us why one is different from
- 3:08Speaker 1: the other? Yeah? Why is there an arrow of time
- 3:11Speaker 1: like a one way sign in the universe, in the
- 3:14Speaker 1: highway of time of the universe? Yeah, this is one
- 3:17Speaker 1: of those wonderful questions because on the surface of it
- 3:20Speaker 1: it seems kind of dumb, Like somebody asks you what
- 3:23Speaker 1: is time? You're gonna tell him, Oh, it's three o'clock.
- 3:25Speaker 1: And if they dig deeper and ask you though, like
- 3:27Speaker 1: what does time even mean? Man? Sometimes I say it's
- 3:30Speaker 1: two o'clock. Depending on the circumstances, I always give the
- 3:34Speaker 1: same answer no matter what. That way, people stop asking.
- 3:38Speaker 1: My kids are aways what time is it? And they
- 3:40Speaker 1: have like a watch on their hand. There's like two
- 3:42Speaker 1: watches on the wall, Like why are you asking me?
- 3:44Speaker 1: So I would just say it's three o'clock no matter what,
- 3:47Speaker 1: so that they stop. It sounds like it sounds like
- 3:50Speaker 1: the same parenting strategy my my wife has when we
- 3:53Speaker 1: going road trips to always ask how long are we
- 3:55Speaker 1: do we get there? Is it? Are we there yet?
- 3:57Speaker 1: And she always answers, nope, scant twenty more hours, no
- 4:01Speaker 1: matter what. You're like pulling into the place, and she's like,
- 4:03Speaker 1: twenty more hours, yeah, no matter what, she always says
- 4:07Speaker 1: twenty It's a great strategy. You know, me and your wife,
- 4:10Speaker 1: we would really get along. It seems like we see
- 4:12Speaker 1: eye to eye about how to handle these approaches. How Tom,
- 4:17Speaker 1: you would have some very um sarcastic kids probably exactly. Um. Anyway,
- 4:23Speaker 1: I love these questions you know that are like, on
- 4:25Speaker 1: the surface so simple, when you dig deep, they reveal
- 4:28Speaker 1: like enormous gaps in our knowledge about the universe. Those
- 4:32Speaker 1: questions are the best because those are the opportunities to
- 4:35Speaker 1: reveal that the universe is different from the way we understood.
- 4:38Speaker 1: Like the way we think about the universe reflects just
- 4:41Speaker 1: our experience, the way we've lived and grown up, and
- 4:44Speaker 1: not something fundamental, something universal, right, And that's the whole
- 4:47Speaker 1: goal of physics. Yeah, it's one of those questions, like
- 4:51Speaker 1: it makes you kind of look almost inwards or look
- 4:54Speaker 1: in your like you one day you just wake up
- 4:57Speaker 1: and you don't even know where you're standing, or how
- 5:00Speaker 1: how the house that you live in was built. Who
- 5:02Speaker 1: don't lose grasp of reality there? Or or hey, we're
- 5:05Speaker 1: trying to dig deeper, trying to make you go crazy.
- 5:09Speaker 1: Doesn't it make it kind of question at like the
- 5:11Speaker 1: very nature of the universe. It does. It's sort of
- 5:14Speaker 1: like if you say a word like a hundred times,
- 5:16Speaker 1: like say the word marriage a hundred times, it starts
- 5:19Speaker 1: to turn into a really weird word. Right, you take
- 5:21Speaker 1: it apart, you look at you like, that's really strange.
- 5:24Speaker 1: It's the same thing with the concept of time, Like
- 5:27Speaker 1: you know, pick up your hand and rub your fingers together, right,
- 5:30Speaker 1: you're feeling that right now? Right? But what does now mean?
- 5:34Speaker 1: Right now? Sort of like it's always it's infinitely short,
- 5:38Speaker 1: and it's slipping constantly into the past. You can never
- 5:41Speaker 1: grasp onto it, you can never hold it, right, it's
- 5:43Speaker 1: always you're always losing it. It's a really strange concept
- 5:46Speaker 1: of concept of now. Yeah. Yeah, although I don't know
- 5:50Speaker 1: if that's what makes marriage weird. But there's lots of
- 5:55Speaker 1: things that make marriage weird. Um, saying it a hundred
- 5:58Speaker 1: times is not it. But I remember reading a book
- 6:01Speaker 1: about consciousness back when I was really interested in the
- 6:03Speaker 1: science of consciousness, which we can talk about another podcast.
- 6:06Speaker 1: But the basic idea in that book, as by Daniel
- 6:09Speaker 1: Dennit it's called Consciousness Explained, is that there is no
- 6:12Speaker 1: now that you're the consciousness is basically an illusion that
- 6:15Speaker 1: all you're ever doing is remembering the immediate past. And
- 6:20Speaker 1: I don't know if I believe that, but it really
- 6:21Speaker 1: made me think about what now is and how you
- 6:23Speaker 1: can never really grasp it. It's always just like sliding
- 6:26Speaker 1: away from you and you know, whether it really exists,
- 6:28Speaker 1: whether there is a now, right, whether there's a special
- 6:31Speaker 1: instant that that differentiates between the past and the future
- 6:35Speaker 1: right right, because sort of technically in physics of time
- 6:39Speaker 1: could go both ways right like you could in time
- 6:42Speaker 1: is kind of just like an arrow you can flip
- 6:44Speaker 1: back and forth in the equations that you guys use, right. Yeah,
- 6:47Speaker 1: time is not really very central to physics. Yeah, I mean,
- 6:49Speaker 1: on one hand, it is. On one hand, it isn't.
- 6:51Speaker 1: Tom you could write a lot of physics down without
- 6:53Speaker 1: ever thinking about time. On the other hand, time is
- 6:57Speaker 1: essential property physics because we're trying to use physics to
- 6:59Speaker 1: predict the future. So um, this time is both like
- 7:03Speaker 1: not part of physics and deeply entwined in it at
- 7:05Speaker 1: the same time. So it's, uh, it's an important topic. Yeah, no,
- 7:09Speaker 1: And it's a topic that everybody experiences right at every
- 7:12Speaker 1: second of the day, every day of the year, every
- 7:16Speaker 1: year their lives. They're experiencing time, and they're moving forwards
- 7:19Speaker 1: in it, and they feel it, right. Yeah, they think
- 7:22Speaker 1: about it, they think about the future, they remember the past,
- 7:24Speaker 1: and so it kind of makes you wonder how many
- 7:27Speaker 1: people actually think about or know what time actually is. Yeah, exactly.
- 7:35Speaker 1: So I was wondering do people know why time goes forward? Like,
- 7:39Speaker 1: I mean, physicists don't really, but it's always fun to
- 7:42Speaker 1: ask general public questions that scientists don't know the answer to,
- 7:46Speaker 1: just to see what they come up with. So I
- 7:48Speaker 1: walked around the US of Irvine campus and I asked
- 7:50Speaker 1: people why does time only go forwards? Here's what people
- 7:53Speaker 1: had to say. Do you know why time only goes forwards? Um?
- 7:58Speaker 1: Not really, honestly, I have like some sort of like
- 8:02Speaker 1: intuition why it only goes forward? But I don't think
- 8:05Speaker 1: we can't explain that. Yeah, okay, cool, I have no idea. No,
- 8:10Speaker 1: I don't any guess. If I had to go, I
- 8:12Speaker 1: just said gravity or something. Okay, No, I don't any idea,
- 8:17Speaker 1: best guess. Sorry. I think time is lack of force
- 8:22Speaker 1: dimensional right, So actually I don't know, creaky right, Okay,
- 8:29Speaker 1: I'm not sure. Okay, Well, when I think of time,
- 8:35Speaker 1: I think of it kind of almost as a linear progression,
- 8:38Speaker 1: meaning that it's a constant in the universe, and it's
- 8:42Speaker 1: always kind of moving forward, and that's something that we
- 8:44Speaker 1: accept as being a fact of the universe, at least
- 8:47Speaker 1: as we understand it now. So in that regards, I
- 8:49Speaker 1: think that's why we can only see it as moving forwards,
- 8:52Speaker 1: because it doesn't kind of make sense to us or
- 8:54Speaker 1: it's not even physically possible currently for us to move
- 8:57Speaker 1: backwards in time, so we don't consider it in that way.
- 9:00Speaker 1: I think it might be a matter of observation. So
- 9:03Speaker 1: relative to us, time moves forward, and the way that
- 9:05Speaker 1: you experienced the world biologically is designed to be in
- 9:09Speaker 1: a manner that is sort of one dimentional and a
- 9:12Speaker 1: forward mind all the time. But in reality it might
- 9:16Speaker 1: be that the fourth dimension of time in space time
- 9:20Speaker 1: might just be a way of describing the universe that
- 9:23Speaker 1: the math predicts a from physics and my option perhaps
- 9:27Speaker 1: other related science fills. Okay, cool, Yeah, so I got
- 9:30Speaker 1: a pretty good mix of answers there, right from the
- 9:33Speaker 1: standard physics, like gravity, which is you know, that's a
- 9:36Speaker 1: good answer. You never know, it might be, right, gravity.
- 9:40Speaker 1: Somebody actually said gravity. I don't know gravity, It could
- 9:44Speaker 1: be it could be. Yeah, well, gravity is like the
- 9:46Speaker 1: answer to half the questions in physics, the way like
- 9:48Speaker 1: pie is the answer to half the questions in math. Right,
- 9:50Speaker 1: so if you have no idea, you could just say
- 9:52Speaker 1: gravity and have the time. You'll be right. Not the
- 9:55Speaker 1: movie the fourth right, yeah, the fabric of space time itself.
- 10:00Speaker 1: That's right, it's gravity. Yeah. And then you know, some
- 10:02Speaker 1: other folks had some more elaborate discussions, But people had opinions.
- 10:07Speaker 1: People did have opinions. Yeah, some of them were sort
- 10:10Speaker 1: of longer word salad. Right, you know, some of them
- 10:12Speaker 1: hit on some of the scientific concepts time being a
- 10:15Speaker 1: fourth dimension, etcetera. Um, but um, yeah, a lot of
- 10:19Speaker 1: people want to ask them this question. You could just
- 10:20Speaker 1: see in their faces that they had not ever considered this.
- 10:23Speaker 1: They're not even question they had imagined, but as soon
- 10:26Speaker 1: as they thought about it, they realized they didn't know.
- 10:28Speaker 1: And that's my favorite part of this this topic is
- 10:31Speaker 1: that nobody, nobody has really thought about it in terms
- 10:34Speaker 1: of general public, but as soon as they do, they're
- 10:37Speaker 1: very curious. Right, this is the best questions. It's amazing
- 10:40Speaker 1: how little you actually kind of need to know about
- 10:43Speaker 1: the universe to live a full and happy life, you
- 10:47Speaker 1: know what I mean, that's the protective happy life. There's
- 10:51Speaker 1: so much you don't need to know. Ignorance is bliss,
- 10:53Speaker 1: you know, that does have a meeting. People have been
- 10:55Speaker 1: living in this universe for hundreds of thousands of years,
- 10:58Speaker 1: depending on how you count the beginning of humanity, and
- 11:01Speaker 1: there's been a lot of happiness and joy without really
- 11:03Speaker 1: any understanding. I mean, I would say people five years
- 11:07Speaker 1: ago basically knew nothing about the way the universe actually works.
- 11:11Speaker 1: But you know, people had birthday parties and eight cakes
- 11:15Speaker 1: and had moments of joy. So yeah, I mean like
- 11:17Speaker 1: a hundred only a hundred years ago, right in the
- 11:20Speaker 1: nine hundreds, early nineteen hundreds, people didn't know the concept
- 11:25Speaker 1: of Adams or quantum physics, right, Yeah, that was about
- 11:28Speaker 1: a hundred years old. We didn't know how long the
- 11:30Speaker 1: universe had been around, right, so pretty basic stuff about
- 11:33Speaker 1: the way the universe works is pretty modern. Right, So
- 11:36Speaker 1: we didn't know there were other galaxies, right, No, they didn't. Um,
- 11:39Speaker 1: So what's your point here? Your point is you don't
- 11:41Speaker 1: need physics to be happy? Is that what you're trying
- 11:42Speaker 1: to say is irrelevant happiness? You think of how much
- 11:46Speaker 1: of a richer life you can lead if you know physics. Okay,
- 11:50Speaker 1: I like the way you spun that back, right, using
- 11:53Speaker 1: all this technology to talk to me. That's based on physics,
- 11:56Speaker 1: not not like not like money rich, but you know,
- 11:59Speaker 1: like spiritually right right? Um? Isn't your career based on
- 12:03Speaker 1: technology that was developed with the help of physicists? Where
- 12:07Speaker 1: would you be? Isn't your science dependent on technology? Yes?
- 12:14Speaker 1: I am a tiny little mite standing on the shoulders
- 12:16Speaker 1: of giants, absolutely, But so are we all? So are
- 12:19Speaker 1: we all? Yeah? Well maybe it's time we got back
- 12:26Speaker 1: on topic here, and um, so let's break it down
- 12:28Speaker 1: for people, Daniel, what how do physicists see time? Like
- 12:31Speaker 1: if if you're at a conference and you guys are
- 12:34Speaker 1: talking and somebody said, hey, guys, what is time? What
- 12:36Speaker 1: do you think people would generally say, I think there'd
- 12:39Speaker 1: be a lot of disagreements because we don't really have
- 12:42Speaker 1: a great description of time, you know, one that really
- 12:45Speaker 1: makes sense. And you know, the way physics approaches the
- 12:47Speaker 1: problem is first you try to build like a model
- 12:50Speaker 1: of the problem. You're trying to describe it in a
- 12:52Speaker 1: way that we can grapple using the language that we're
- 12:55Speaker 1: familiar with, which is mathematics. You try to find an
- 12:58Speaker 1: equation that tells you what what's what's happening? Yeah, exactly,
- 13:03Speaker 1: you know, something's happening in the real world. Maybe it's
- 13:05Speaker 1: like a ball is being thrown the air, and we
- 13:08Speaker 1: try to understand it. So we write down a bunch
- 13:10Speaker 1: of equations to describe it um and that lets us
- 13:13Speaker 1: build that model in our heads and manipulate it and
- 13:15Speaker 1: then use information from the model to describe what's happening
- 13:18Speaker 1: in the world. Cool. How do we do that with time? Right?
- 13:21Speaker 1: How do we ask this question about like why can
- 13:24Speaker 1: I remember the past and not the future? Why does
- 13:27Speaker 1: ice melt but not unmelt? Right? These kinds of questions
- 13:31Speaker 1: about time, it's pretty hard to to wrap your mind around.
- 13:36Speaker 1: One approach is to think about the universe in terms
- 13:39Speaker 1: of a bunch of snapshots. Like you think about a movie. Right,
- 13:43Speaker 1: what is a movie? It's not really a continuous experience
- 13:46Speaker 1: in time. If you're looking at the screen, you're not
- 13:48Speaker 1: really seeing smooth motion. You're seeing a bunch of snapshots.
- 13:52Speaker 1: You're seeing like a little cells in a film, or
- 13:54Speaker 1: like a bunch of screenshots. Yeah, it's a bunch of screenshots,
- 13:58Speaker 1: and they're just packed so tightly together that you don't
- 14:00Speaker 1: notice that they're not actually smoothly varying. Right. Your brain
- 14:04Speaker 1: does the interpolation for you. It tells you a story.
- 14:06Speaker 1: So sometimes we think about the universe that way. We
- 14:10Speaker 1: think about like all the universe at this moment, and
- 14:13Speaker 1: then all the universe at the next moment, and all
- 14:15Speaker 1: the universe at the next moment, like snapshots of the universe.
- 14:19Speaker 1: By snapshots, I mean like what is every particle doing
- 14:23Speaker 1: and where is it going? Yeah, exactly and time. Then
- 14:27Speaker 1: is a way to sort of order those snapshots is
- 14:29Speaker 1: to say this one first, that one next, that one next,
- 14:33Speaker 1: um and to sort of put them together. This one
- 14:35Speaker 1: can go in front of the other one. Yes, you
- 14:37Speaker 1: know what I mean. It limits um the ordering. Yeah,
- 14:41Speaker 1: And in that sense, physics. The job of physics is
- 14:46Speaker 1: to take all the snapshots in the past and predict
- 14:48Speaker 1: the ones in the future and to say, Okay, according
- 14:51Speaker 1: to the laws of physics, the next snapshot will look
- 14:53Speaker 1: like this, or if you want to talk quantum mechanically,
- 14:56Speaker 1: there's a probability distribution of the next snapshots. These are likely,
- 15:00Speaker 1: these are unlikely, these are impossible. Right, So physics um
- 15:04Speaker 1: takes sort of that view of time, and there's a
- 15:06Speaker 1: bunch of caveats there. Like, you can't have a snapshot
- 15:09Speaker 1: of the whole universe, right because time is not universal.
- 15:12Speaker 1: It means different things for different people. You can't know
- 15:14Speaker 1: everything about the universe. But you know, you take a
- 15:17Speaker 1: small enough model or a single particle or something, you
- 15:20Speaker 1: can also have quantum and you also have quantum states,
- 15:23Speaker 1: right Like it' isn't that prevent you from getting an
- 15:25Speaker 1: exact snapshot of the universe? Yeah, exactly. So you can't
- 15:29Speaker 1: really get an exact snapshot, but you could do a
- 15:30Speaker 1: quantum mechanical version. You could say, well, what's the quantum
- 15:33Speaker 1: state of all the particles or you know, what's the
- 15:36Speaker 1: wave function. What's the state of the wave function right
- 15:38Speaker 1: now that you can talk about, and that determines probabilities.
- 15:42Speaker 1: I see, So you describe me kind of how physicists
- 15:44Speaker 1: see the universe. They don't see it as um. They
- 15:46Speaker 1: see it as as this kind of sequence of snapshots
- 15:50Speaker 1: of how things are arranged. Yeah. For example, think about
- 15:53Speaker 1: the Shortinger equation. The Shortinger equation famous equation describes how
- 15:57Speaker 1: a particles a wave function um moves through time, right,
- 16:02Speaker 1: and it tells you how it moves. It says, if
- 16:04Speaker 1: you have this wave function now and you experience this,
- 16:07Speaker 1: then your way function will be that later. Right. So
- 16:09Speaker 1: that's that's what physics tries to do, or or go
- 16:12Speaker 1: back to them making the mechanical example of a ball
- 16:14Speaker 1: going through the air right tells you, well, you you
- 16:16Speaker 1: shot your ball in this direction. Where is your ball
- 16:18Speaker 1: going to be in the future. So that's the role
- 16:21Speaker 1: of time in physics, right to predict the future snapshots. Oh,
- 16:24Speaker 1: I see. So to you guys, time is like a
- 16:27Speaker 1: like an input that tells you what the universe is
- 16:31Speaker 1: likely to do. You you know what I mean? Like
- 16:33Speaker 1: you do you It's an input. It's not like an
- 16:35Speaker 1: output or something that you can vary or that it
- 16:40Speaker 1: is affected by all the other variables. Yeah, exactly. And
- 16:43Speaker 1: so for example, you want to predict the flight of
- 16:46Speaker 1: your ball, it's an input. You can dial that knob
- 16:48Speaker 1: and say I want to know where the ball is
- 16:49Speaker 1: going to be in one second or five seconds or
- 16:51Speaker 1: eight point two nine seconds or whatever. So it's sort
- 16:54Speaker 1: of that knob. The thing we don't the thing that
- 16:57Speaker 1: that doesn't explain at all is like why it only
- 17:00Speaker 1: go forwards and who's controlling how fast that knob is turning?
- 17:03Speaker 1: Or why do we have time at all? Why don't
- 17:05Speaker 1: we just have a static universe? It's just sort of
- 17:08Speaker 1: like there, you know, it's the first step. Of course,
- 17:12Speaker 1: they just try to describe it, and then you can
- 17:14Speaker 1: build from that and try to answer some of these questions.
- 17:16Speaker 1: But you mean, like, how come we don't have a
- 17:18Speaker 1: static universe, Like, um, why do we have time at all?
- 17:21Speaker 1: Boom right, I don't know, you don't know, nobody knows, Like, well,
- 17:26Speaker 1: I know, there's this idea that time is the fourth dimensions.
- 17:29Speaker 1: We have three dimensions up, down, left and right, backwards
- 17:32Speaker 1: and forwards, and maybe time is just another direction of
- 17:36Speaker 1: the universe. And so we and I think the days
- 17:39Speaker 1: that we do sort of exist in this a state
- 17:42Speaker 1: of being still in all four dimensions, but it just
- 17:47Speaker 1: so happens that we somehow feel one of the mensitions.
- 17:51Speaker 1: Do you know what I mean? Yeah? I love the
- 17:53Speaker 1: it just so happens part of that explanation, right, Okay,
- 17:56Speaker 1: here's the hardest part. I'll just YadA, YadA, YadA over
- 17:58Speaker 1: that bit. That's that's my that's my Nobel Prize, Nobel
- 18:03Speaker 1: Prize winning paper officer. It just so happens. I was
- 18:06Speaker 1: going ninety miles an hour. Um, you know, I can't
- 18:08Speaker 1: explain it now, You're right. Um, time is sometimes thought
- 18:11Speaker 1: of as the fourth dimension. And so let's dig into
- 18:13Speaker 1: that a little bit. What does that mean? Why do
- 18:15Speaker 1: we think of it that way? We think of it
- 18:17Speaker 1: that way because it's helpful mathematically. Like when Einstein was
- 18:21Speaker 1: developing his theory of special relativity and we talked all
- 18:24Speaker 1: about time dilation and stuff like that on a previous episode,
- 18:27Speaker 1: he discovered that the equations have a certain symmetry. They
- 18:30Speaker 1: look really nice like that you can write them down
- 18:33Speaker 1: really simply and compactly if you include time as the
- 18:37Speaker 1: fourth dimension of this larger concept he called space time.
- 18:40Speaker 1: So he took three dimensions of space. He tacked on
- 18:43Speaker 1: a fourth dimension, which is time, and he constructed this
- 18:46Speaker 1: thing called space time. And because your perception of time
- 18:50Speaker 1: depends on where you are in space and how fast
- 18:53Speaker 1: you are moving through space, the equations get much simpler
- 18:57Speaker 1: if you think about all four dimensions in that way, right,
- 19:00Speaker 1: if you think about time parallel to space in that way.
- 19:03Speaker 1: And that's a clue when you write down equations, and
- 19:06Speaker 1: they become simpler if you think about them a certain way.
- 19:08Speaker 1: That's a clue from the universe that it's maybe the
- 19:10Speaker 1: right way to think about things. Okay, so that's um,
- 19:13Speaker 1: that's time is a different dimension. Let's get more into it.
- 19:16Speaker 1: Let's go down that rabbit hole. But first let's take
- 19:18Speaker 1: a quick break. So I think it's fun to think
- 19:33Speaker 1: about time as the fourth dimension. But it's also kind
- 19:36Speaker 1: of a trick, right, It's not. It doesn't really fit.
- 19:40Speaker 1: So wait, So the idea that it's a fourth dimension
- 19:42Speaker 1: you're saying, came from mathematical convenience by Einstein, do you
- 19:48Speaker 1: know what I mean? Like, it's not. It was just
- 19:51Speaker 1: easier to treat it like a dimension. Yeah, And I
- 19:54Speaker 1: wouldn't you blow that off? Mathematical convenience is not a
- 19:57Speaker 1: small thing, you know. The whole goal of physics, remember,
- 20:00Speaker 1: is to like write down an equation of the universe
- 20:02Speaker 1: in one line. And so if you can write things
- 20:05Speaker 1: more simply, that's a clue that it's probably more correct,
- 20:08Speaker 1: it's more and it's like a deeper understanding. So yeah,
- 20:12Speaker 1: he discovered that if you write things down with time
- 20:14Speaker 1: is sort of the fourth column of your vector, then
- 20:18Speaker 1: a lot of the equations are simpler to write down.
- 20:20Speaker 1: There's it's there's a connection. There's a symmetry there. Right.
- 20:22Speaker 1: We talked about symmetry in another episode. You can treat
- 20:25Speaker 1: time the same way you treat space in many ways.
- 20:29Speaker 1: And that's that's tempting because you think, oh, well, that
- 20:31Speaker 1: answers the question time is just another dimension, right, But
- 20:34Speaker 1: it doesn't answer the question because it's not just another dimension. Right.
- 20:37Speaker 1: You know time is not space? Right? Time? What does
- 20:40Speaker 1: that mean? Time is not space? Well, for money, you
- 20:44Speaker 1: can move forwards and backwards in space, right, you can
- 20:46Speaker 1: go left, you can go right, you have some control
- 20:49Speaker 1: over it. You can't do that with time. But isn't
- 20:52Speaker 1: it just sort of a matter of perspective, Like I think,
- 20:56Speaker 1: like in the grand scheme of the history of the universe, Um,
- 21:01Speaker 1: you know, I existed for this amount of time, but
- 21:03Speaker 1: while I'm living it, I can only go forward. I
- 21:06Speaker 1: kind of get the experience of moving forward in time. Yeah,
- 21:09Speaker 1: that's true. Technically, I sort of existed all throughout my
- 21:12Speaker 1: life in space time, you existed all throughout your life, Yeah,
- 21:16Speaker 1: but you don't exist all throughout time. Right, There's no
- 21:19Speaker 1: limit to where you can visit. In space, you can
- 21:21Speaker 1: go from here to there to the other places. But
- 21:24Speaker 1: in time, you can only visit between your birth and
- 21:27Speaker 1: your death, and you can only go to each time once. Right,
- 21:31Speaker 1: that's not true for space. I imagine there are lots
- 21:33Speaker 1: of places you go to many many times, like your
- 21:35Speaker 1: refrigerator or your bed. Right, Um, you visit those places
- 21:39Speaker 1: many times. So space is quite different from time. Right,
- 21:43Speaker 1: there's a special loops in space, but I can't do
- 21:45Speaker 1: loops in time exactly. And time time has this special difference.
- 21:50Speaker 1: Right then now, right, there's no now in space. I mean,
- 21:53Speaker 1: I'm here, I'm there, you're over here, but there's no
- 21:57Speaker 1: there's no special location in a what time has this
- 22:01Speaker 1: special location? This thing we call now, which exists weirdly
- 22:05Speaker 1: and slides forward weirdly. So I was saying earlier, wh
- 22:09Speaker 1: why isn't the universe static? Why is time move forwards?
- 22:11Speaker 1: Why isn't it just stuck at to equal zero? Nothing happens?
- 22:14Speaker 1: What's pushing it forward? What's turning the engine of the universe? Right?
- 22:18Speaker 1: I guess what I mean is, you know, if time
- 22:20Speaker 1: is you can treat it as a fourth dimension, then
- 22:24Speaker 1: you know, our experience of the universe is at time
- 22:27Speaker 1: is constant and the moves at a steady pace, and that, um,
- 22:34Speaker 1: you're only going forwards in it, right, whereas in space
- 22:36Speaker 1: you're saying we can go backwards. But what if I
- 22:38Speaker 1: just kind of take another dimension and use that as
- 22:41Speaker 1: my kind of ticker? Which dimension would you use as
- 22:44Speaker 1: your clock? I don't know? Up, okay, yeah, so you'd
- 22:51Speaker 1: be like, hey, let's have lunch at x equel's five
- 22:54Speaker 1: meters or something. Yeah, I don't know, or you know,
- 22:57Speaker 1: kind of mathematically, what does that mean? Different? Time and
- 23:01Speaker 1: space are not the same. You can't just swap out
- 23:03Speaker 1: time for space because you don't have the same freedom
- 23:06Speaker 1: and time as you do in space. Right, if if
- 23:09Speaker 1: space were moved always forward, the way time did, Like
- 23:12Speaker 1: you could never go back to anywhere, right, Like, oh yeah, hey,
- 23:15Speaker 1: I had lunch and now is sort of sliding slowly
- 23:18Speaker 1: away from me. You know, Um, it would be pretty weird,
- 23:21Speaker 1: but it's very natural experience. So I see you're more
- 23:23Speaker 1: limited in the time dimension exactly. There's some extra rules
- 23:27Speaker 1: that seemed to apply to the time dimension that don't
- 23:29Speaker 1: apply to the other dimensions. And that's weird. And anytime
- 23:33Speaker 1: we see symmetries where like cool. But then when those
- 23:35Speaker 1: symmetries are broken, we're like, Okay, time is like the
- 23:38Speaker 1: other dimensions, but it's different. Then we ask why is
- 23:41Speaker 1: it different? How the different? What makes it different? Because
- 23:43Speaker 1: that's the clue to solve that, not the other puzzle. Right, Okay,
- 23:47Speaker 1: so time is it is sort of a fourth dimension,
- 23:49Speaker 1: but there are special rules that apply to it that
- 23:52Speaker 1: makes us think that maybe it's not really a fourth dimension.
- 23:55Speaker 1: Maybe it's just like a mathematical um good cluage, right, yeah,
- 24:01Speaker 1: Or maybe there's two kinds of dimensions. There are space
- 24:04Speaker 1: dimensions and time dimensions, right, and yeah, and maybe there
- 24:08Speaker 1: are other people haven't imagined yet, you know. Yeah, that's
- 24:12Speaker 1: that's the kind of mind blowing, like look at the
- 24:15Speaker 1: universe in a different way, discovery that I always hope
- 24:17Speaker 1: to make in science, you know, to like crack something
- 24:19Speaker 1: open that's so deep that it like nobody gets it
- 24:22Speaker 1: but the stoner's man. Okay, so, so what are these rules?
- 24:32Speaker 1: The rules are that you can only you can't visit
- 24:34Speaker 1: two times in your you know, you can't go back
- 24:37Speaker 1: in time, you can make gloops, and it can only
- 24:40Speaker 1: go forward. Are those mainly the main restrictions here with time? Yeah, exactly,
- 24:45Speaker 1: those are the main restrictions. And I think the goal
- 24:47Speaker 1: of physics and the goal of our podcast is is
- 24:49Speaker 1: to try to understand where that comes from. Like can
- 24:52Speaker 1: we look at the laws of physics and say, oh,
- 24:54Speaker 1: that comes from this, you know, like the way we
- 24:57Speaker 1: can look at the laws of quantum mechanics and from
- 24:59Speaker 1: that understand in the way hydrogen works or whatever. We
- 25:02Speaker 1: want to look at the laws of physics and say
- 25:04Speaker 1: do they require this behavior? Is it necessary? What does
- 25:07Speaker 1: it come from? And it's the deepest level, right. The
- 25:09Speaker 1: problem is when we look at the laws of physics,
- 25:12Speaker 1: we don't get those kinds of clues. When when we
- 25:14Speaker 1: look at the laws of physics, we don't so the
- 25:17Speaker 1: equations in your model of the universe don't tell you
- 25:21Speaker 1: that there should be restriction some time. Yeah, let's go
- 25:23Speaker 1: back to those equations about like the ball moving. Right.
- 25:26Speaker 1: Imagine you throw a ball, right, you're talking about basic stuff, Right,
- 25:32Speaker 1: you throw a ball in the air, it goes up
- 25:34Speaker 1: and it comes down. Let's start with the simplest case
- 25:37Speaker 1: with there's no air resistance, Right, it's passed up and
- 25:39Speaker 1: it's passed down. Are gonna be very similar. In fact,
- 25:42Speaker 1: if somebody took a video of that and then plated backwards,
- 25:46Speaker 1: they couldn't tell whether the video is going forwards or backwards. Right,
- 25:49Speaker 1: Physicists analyzing the motion of the ball couldn't tell you
- 25:52Speaker 1: whether the video was going forwards or backwards. So if
- 25:56Speaker 1: you fed it a time, like if you gave it time,
- 26:00Speaker 1: it would give you the same oppu whether you put
- 26:02Speaker 1: negative time or positive time exactly how it breaks down
- 26:05Speaker 1: exactly because the equations work in both directions. Right. The
- 26:08Speaker 1: equations have time in them. They tell you how things
- 26:11Speaker 1: change with time, but they work the same forwards and backwards.
- 26:15Speaker 1: So they don't tell you which way the universe should run, right,
- 26:18Speaker 1: They tell you how the universe changes with time, but
- 26:21Speaker 1: they don't say why it has to go forwards and
- 26:23Speaker 1: not backwards, why it has to go anywhere at all?
- 26:25Speaker 1: Or I can't go forwards and then backwards. Right, So
- 26:29Speaker 1: if the equations of the universe really represent the universe,
- 26:32Speaker 1: then the universe would is okay with traveling backwards and time.
- 26:37Speaker 1: You're saying exactly, the equations sort of saying like, hey,
- 26:39Speaker 1: you want to go backward this time, Sure, here is
- 26:41Speaker 1: what would happen. Yeah, exactly, And it's sort of like
- 26:44Speaker 1: you were saying earlier. It's like an input. You know.
- 26:46Speaker 1: Imagine you're doing some calculation and the calculation is a
- 26:49Speaker 1: function of position and time. Right, you want to know
- 26:53Speaker 1: how many balls are at this location at this time. Right,
- 26:56Speaker 1: you you drop a thousand balls into a box and
- 26:58Speaker 1: you're wondering, like, how many balls are this location the time?
- 27:00Speaker 1: You can ask that question of any point in space,
- 27:02Speaker 1: at any point in time. Right. You can take the
- 27:05Speaker 1: concercurrent configuration and you can evolve it forwards or evolve
- 27:08Speaker 1: it backwards. The laws allow for all of that, but
- 27:11Speaker 1: for some reason that there there's a difference in the
- 27:14Speaker 1: way it actually works in the real world. Right, things
- 27:16Speaker 1: slide forwards in time, and we don't know why. But
- 27:19Speaker 1: there's no restriction on the space parts right there. The
- 27:22Speaker 1: equations are functions of space and time, but there's is
- 27:25Speaker 1: like extra restriction on the time part of it. When
- 27:28Speaker 1: it comes to like actually implementing the universe, right, it's
- 27:31Speaker 1: kind of like, um, we have them now, and if
- 27:34Speaker 1: all we had was now, the equations would let us
- 27:38Speaker 1: tell what happened before in negative time, and we would
- 27:41Speaker 1: let it tell us what happens forwards in time, right,
- 27:44Speaker 1: exactly the equations. Yeah, but but someh our experience. We
- 27:49Speaker 1: only have experience of the stuff that happened in negative time.
- 27:52Speaker 1: That's right. We only remember the past, right, that's the
- 27:55Speaker 1: weird part, right, The past we can remember, we have
- 27:58Speaker 1: access to it. Um in a affects us. The future
- 28:01Speaker 1: we can't. And and and most of the laws of
- 28:04Speaker 1: physics is an asterisk there. Most of the laws of
- 28:07Speaker 1: physics are totally symmetric. Right. They don't care whether the
- 28:10Speaker 1: universe is going forward or backwards. They're happy to do
- 28:13Speaker 1: either one. Wow. So that's the mystery is the time
- 28:18Speaker 1: would be sort of a fourth dimension, but there's some rules,
- 28:20Speaker 1: but they those worlds are sort of not in the
- 28:23Speaker 1: equations of the universe. That's the game with an asterisk,
- 28:26Speaker 1: you're saying, right, Yeah, So the game is figure out
- 28:31Speaker 1: if the laws of physics that we know of, that
- 28:33Speaker 1: we've discovered, that we've written down, if those require things
- 28:36Speaker 1: to move forwards? Um? And if so, you know, does
- 28:40Speaker 1: that give us a clues to why it's happening? Or
- 28:42Speaker 1: maybe there are other laws of physics out there that
- 28:44Speaker 1: are much more sensage to time, that are the ones
- 28:46Speaker 1: making time go forward. What do you mean, Like, so
- 28:48Speaker 1: you're looking for something in the equations that would require
- 28:51Speaker 1: time to only move forwards? What does that mean? Like
- 28:55Speaker 1: if you put negative time, you should break or or
- 28:59Speaker 1: yeah exactly, Like let's think about that. Are there is
- 29:02Speaker 1: there anything in physics that does require time to move forward?
- 29:06Speaker 1: So let's go back to that ball example. Right, I said,
- 29:08Speaker 1: if you throw a ball in the air, Um, you
- 29:10Speaker 1: can't tell whether the video of that ball in the
- 29:13Speaker 1: air goes forwards or backwards. And when we did that,
- 29:15Speaker 1: I said, ignore air resistance. And that's for an important reason, right,
- 29:18Speaker 1: because air resistance changes the flight of the ball, right,
- 29:21Speaker 1: slows it down, so that in reality, if you throw
- 29:24Speaker 1: a ball in the air, right, Um, it's going to
- 29:27Speaker 1: slow down. And so you can tell the difference between
- 29:29Speaker 1: going forwards and going backwards right, right, because there's a
- 29:33Speaker 1: there's like you lose some heat or you lose some
- 29:35Speaker 1: energy in reality, right. Yeah, it's probably similar to think
- 29:38Speaker 1: about like dropping a ball. You know, if you drop
- 29:40Speaker 1: a ball and there's no friction, it's going to come
- 29:43Speaker 1: all the way up to where where you dropped it from.
- 29:45Speaker 1: If you drop a ball, it is air resistance. It's
- 29:47Speaker 1: gonna lose some energy to bumping against all the air molecules. Right,
- 29:51Speaker 1: It's not gonna come up quite as high as you
- 29:53Speaker 1: dropped it. You just keep letting it bounce. Eventually it's
- 29:56Speaker 1: it's gonna dribble down and stop right right. And that one,
- 29:59Speaker 1: that one to you played it backwards, you would be
- 30:01Speaker 1: able to tell the difference exactly that one if you
- 30:03Speaker 1: played backwards. And that's the case for most things, right.
- 30:05Speaker 1: So where does that come from? Well, that comes from entropy, right,
- 30:09Speaker 1: that comes from heat. The heat really there is the key.
- 30:13Speaker 1: It turns out that the universe likes to go from
- 30:17Speaker 1: organized to disorganized, right, And that's this concept we call entropy. Yeah,
- 30:22Speaker 1: I've heard of this before, but before we dive in.
- 30:24Speaker 1: Let's take a short break. What do you mean when
- 30:39Speaker 1: you say that the universe likes entropy or that it
- 30:43Speaker 1: likes to go from order to disorder? What is it?
- 30:46Speaker 1: What is it liking? Me? It means that if the
- 30:47Speaker 1: universe had a bedroom, it would be a mess, right,
- 30:50Speaker 1: and it would never want to clean it up. No,
- 30:54Speaker 1: it's obviously that is our experience of it. Like, maybe
- 30:57Speaker 1: what if there are aliens out there who experienced time
- 30:59Speaker 1: backwards and they're like, why does the universe like order?
- 31:03Speaker 1: Everything we see? It seems to get ordered exactly. So
- 31:06Speaker 1: there's a big flaw in this argument. But let's put
- 31:08Speaker 1: a pin in that and come back to it once
- 31:09Speaker 1: we've done constructing the argument, then we can take it
- 31:12Speaker 1: apart um. Yeah, so you're right that the universe likes it. Well,
- 31:17Speaker 1: it just means that we've noticed, we've observed that disorder increases, right.
- 31:22Speaker 1: For example, the classic example is you have a box
- 31:25Speaker 1: and you put put a bunch of gas particles in
- 31:27Speaker 1: the corner. Right, that's very organized. It's like only one
- 31:30Speaker 1: way to arrange or a few ways to arrange gas
- 31:32Speaker 1: particles in the corner. What happens if you run the
- 31:34Speaker 1: clock forward? If you let that go, Well, if they're
- 31:37Speaker 1: not totally frozen, they're gonna spread out through the box. Right,
- 31:40Speaker 1: It's like we pour water onto a surface that spreads
- 31:43Speaker 1: out things like things tend to go from organized configurations
- 31:48Speaker 1: to disorganized. And that's just an observation. That's not a
- 31:51Speaker 1: deep insight into the universe. It says, here's what we've seen. Right.
- 31:55Speaker 1: You notice that there's a correlation between positive time and
- 32:00Speaker 1: messiness exactly, And that's called the second law of thermodynamics. Right,
- 32:04Speaker 1: it says that entropy always increases. Entropy is a measure
- 32:07Speaker 1: of disorder. Right, So things are basically always spreading out
- 32:11Speaker 1: and um and getting more diffuse, right, And that's the
- 32:14Speaker 1: whole universe is doing that, Right, The universe, like on
- 32:16Speaker 1: a grand scale, is spreading out and getting smoother and
- 32:19Speaker 1: stuff like that. Is it a law law, like an
- 32:21Speaker 1: equation or is it more like an observation, Right, It's
- 32:24Speaker 1: more like we've never seen something good un messy with
- 32:31Speaker 1: positive time. Yeah, that's that's a great question. It's a
- 32:33Speaker 1: really deep question. I love that question. I think the
- 32:36Speaker 1: answer is this, Um, The answer is that it's an observation.
- 32:39Speaker 1: It's something we've noticed and we've never really seen it broken,
- 32:42Speaker 1: and so we thought, well, this must be important, so
- 32:45Speaker 1: let's write that down. Let's call that a law because
- 32:47Speaker 1: it's something we've noticed happens all the time. Now, you
- 32:49Speaker 1: can never get broken. Why is that? Does that reveal
- 32:52Speaker 1: something deeper about the universe? Can we explain that from
- 32:55Speaker 1: something else? And if you dig into like statistical mechanics,
- 32:59Speaker 1: you can and derived the second law of thermodynamics from
- 33:02Speaker 1: simpler assumptions, like if you say every possible configuration of
- 33:07Speaker 1: the universe has equal probability, then it turns out there
- 33:11Speaker 1: are more messy probably messy configurations than unmessy ones, right,
- 33:15Speaker 1: Like there's a thousand ways to have gas particles spread
- 33:18Speaker 1: out through a box, but there's only a couple ways
- 33:20Speaker 1: to have them stuck in the corner. So it's just
- 33:23Speaker 1: more likely to end up with the messy ones because
- 33:26Speaker 1: there are more messy configurations. But that's sort of a
- 33:30Speaker 1: cop out. I mean, it's just sort of another way
- 33:32Speaker 1: to state that, is to say, well, we you can
- 33:35Speaker 1: call this a deeper understanding, but it's also just like
- 33:38Speaker 1: a posture that we came up with so that we
- 33:40Speaker 1: could derive the second law, which we've observed. Right, You're
- 33:43Speaker 1: you're basically down to the same argument you were saying.
- 33:46Speaker 1: You're basically saying that the reason we have entropy is
- 33:49Speaker 1: that when you move forward in times, you go through
- 33:52Speaker 1: the most likely scenario. But then you can ask, why
- 33:55Speaker 1: does when you go forward in time do you go
- 33:56Speaker 1: to the most like exactly, it's just a restatement. Really,
- 33:59Speaker 1: it's a sort of more fundamental statement of the same
- 34:02Speaker 1: basic observation that things go from organized to messy, right,
- 34:07Speaker 1: and um, yeah, exactly. So we were looking for, um, like,
- 34:13Speaker 1: something in the laws of phasics that told us why
- 34:16Speaker 1: going forwards in time is is preferred, And you're saying,
- 34:19Speaker 1: we have this observation that it always does and it's
- 34:21Speaker 1: somehow related to chaos and order and messiness. That's right,
- 34:25Speaker 1: And so this is like the only thing we can
- 34:27Speaker 1: really get our fingers on. You know, everything else in
- 34:29Speaker 1: physics is time symmetric. And there's another asterisk there. There
- 34:34Speaker 1: are some things in particle physics which are time asymmetric.
- 34:37Speaker 1: Those are really really small effects, and we don't really
- 34:40Speaker 1: think that that can explain the direction of time. Um,
- 34:42Speaker 1: But we can cover that in a whole other podcast
- 34:44Speaker 1: topics sometimes, but Basically, entropy is the big one. Entropy
- 34:48Speaker 1: is the only law that like clearly as you say,
- 34:50Speaker 1: has a correlation. But that's key. You made this point,
- 34:53Speaker 1: which I think is very insightful, was that there's a correlation.
- 34:55Speaker 1: It's not causation, right right, we know they're related, but
- 35:00Speaker 1: what's the connection between them. That's what you're looking for,
- 35:02Speaker 1: right exactly. That would be something that explains why time
- 35:05Speaker 1: can only go forward, right exactly. So if you just
- 35:07Speaker 1: take the second law and you add it to the
- 35:09Speaker 1: rest of physics, you can say, okay, there's a correlation
- 35:11Speaker 1: between time and messiness. So either the universe has to
- 35:15Speaker 1: go forward in time and get messier, or the universe
- 35:18Speaker 1: has to go backwards in time and get less messy. Right,
- 35:21Speaker 1: Either the second law of physics allows for both. Right.
- 35:25Speaker 1: So it doesn't actually tell you why time goes forwards.
- 35:28Speaker 1: It just says, well, if you pick forwards, then this
- 35:31Speaker 1: is going to happen. If you pick backwards, that's going
- 35:33Speaker 1: to happen. And there's a difference. So it breaks the
- 35:36Speaker 1: symmetry of forward and backwards, but it doesn't pick one.
- 35:38Speaker 1: Or or if you assume that messiness is kind of
- 35:41Speaker 1: where the universe prefers to be. Then that tells you
- 35:44Speaker 1: that forward time is the preferred thing in the universe. Yeah,
- 35:49Speaker 1: And it doesn't even tell you that entropy determines time, right,
- 35:52Speaker 1: It just tells you that they're connecting. There could be
- 35:53Speaker 1: something else, something deeper, which causes both time and entropy. Right,
- 35:58Speaker 1: that's the whole problem with like correlations. You know, you
- 36:01Speaker 1: can find correlations between between lots of things. It doesn't
- 36:04Speaker 1: explain it, right, what's some of those famous things? Like, Um,
- 36:07Speaker 1: you know global warming is correlated with the decrease in
- 36:10Speaker 1: the number of piracy events worldwide? Right? Does that mean
- 36:14Speaker 1: that pirates kept global warming at bay for hundreds of years? Certainly?
- 36:18Speaker 1: Not right? Um? So we know time and interropy are correlated.
- 36:21Speaker 1: We don't know if entropy causes time or the other way,
- 36:24Speaker 1: or something else deeper that we haven't even thought about yet. Um.
- 36:28Speaker 1: Or maybe it's just random, Like maybe it's a random
- 36:30Speaker 1: connection like pirates and global warming. I think we've observed
- 36:34Speaker 1: in grid enough detail that we know it better than
- 36:37Speaker 1: empirate than global warming. Um. But I love looking at
- 36:40Speaker 1: these correlations. You know, there's like a correlation between the
- 36:43Speaker 1: number of movies Nicolas Cage has done and the number
- 36:46Speaker 1: of people per year that die because they're twisted in
- 36:49Speaker 1: their own bedsheets. So they're correlated. When one goes up,
- 36:56Speaker 1: the other one goes up. Yeah, exactly, or they have right,
- 36:58Speaker 1: that doesn't mean they're going to continue in the few sure, right.
- 37:00Speaker 1: That's the problem with the observational correlations they don't tell
- 37:03Speaker 1: you is if you don't understand the mechanism of it,
- 37:06Speaker 1: you can't really argue that they're connected. They could just
- 37:09Speaker 1: be chance. Right, Um, I mean sometimes there are connections,
- 37:12Speaker 1: Like you know that the consumption of ice cream is
- 37:16Speaker 1: very well correlated with the number of murders. What. Yeah,
- 37:20Speaker 1: Well people kill people more in the summer, I guess
- 37:22Speaker 1: because they're grumpier and they're sweaty and hot. People also
- 37:26Speaker 1: ice cream in the summer. Right, So say some rude
- 37:29Speaker 1: cause cause is in charge of both ice cream consumption
- 37:32Speaker 1: and murder rates. Right. It doesn't mean that ice cream
- 37:35Speaker 1: causes murder, right that we know of that we know
- 37:39Speaker 1: don't understand everything. That's right, the fourth law of thermodynamics,
- 37:42Speaker 1: ice cream causes murder? Um? Okay, So entropies are only
- 37:51Speaker 1: kind of clue you're saying, And there's three possibilities. Either
- 37:55Speaker 1: time an entropy are not at all connected. They just
- 38:01Speaker 1: haven't to go in the same direction, or they are
- 38:06Speaker 1: both the result of something else deeper about the universe,
- 38:09Speaker 1: or maybe one causes the other or right, yeah, exactly
- 38:14Speaker 1: direct connect and we don't know and we don't even
- 38:16Speaker 1: know if there is much of a connection. And if
- 38:17Speaker 1: you know, there's a lot of deep questions. They're like
- 38:19Speaker 1: if time is because of entropy, then like what happens
- 38:24Speaker 1: when the universe reaches maximum entropy, because you know, if
- 38:27Speaker 1: entropy is always increasing and time is going forwards, then
- 38:30Speaker 1: there's no rewind right, the universe marches forward towards messier
- 38:34Speaker 1: and messier, and eventually you reach the heat death of
- 38:36Speaker 1: the universe when everything is perfectly spread out, right, perfectly disorganized,
- 38:40Speaker 1: there's no structures at all. Does time stop? Does time
- 38:44Speaker 1: turn around and go the other way? Like, you know,
- 38:47Speaker 1: just saying time is connected entropy doesn't answer most of
- 38:50Speaker 1: the deepest questions Time quit exactly. Some people have theories
- 38:56Speaker 1: that time stops and turns around, right, and the universe
- 39:00Speaker 1: then goes towards more organized configurations like maybe, um, I
- 39:05Speaker 1: love reading about theories of time because people really go bonkers.
- 39:07Speaker 1: One of my favorites is that is a guy who
- 39:10Speaker 1: asked the question, Okay, we have three or more dimensions
- 39:14Speaker 1: of space, why should we have only one dimension of time? Right? Like,
- 39:19Speaker 1: what if you had two dimensions of time? That's pretty
- 39:22Speaker 1: hard to think about, which is weird because it's not
- 39:25Speaker 1: so hard to think about two dimensions of space to
- 39:26Speaker 1: think about like you know, a plane instead of a line,
- 39:29Speaker 1: but it's pretty hard to think about two dimensions of time,
- 39:32Speaker 1: like I'll meet you at three o'clock in north and
- 39:35Speaker 1: you know four fifteen east west? Like what does that
- 39:38Speaker 1: even mean? What is before and after? Right? Oh? You
- 39:42Speaker 1: could have time coordinates? Yeah, yeah, you could have multiple
- 39:45Speaker 1: dimensions of time. Um, isn't that sort of like a
- 39:48Speaker 1: multiverse argument? Then, like there's maybe parallel universes besides this one.
- 39:53Speaker 1: Well that's a bit of a cop out, right saying
- 39:55Speaker 1: maybe there's every configuration and our universe just happens to
- 39:59Speaker 1: have one core a native time And that's the explanation.
- 40:02Speaker 1: I think there must be a deep reason. There must
- 40:04Speaker 1: be a um, something revealing about the structure the universe
- 40:07Speaker 1: as we've discovered it. There's it's got to be a
- 40:09Speaker 1: clue as the way the things actually work, you know,
- 40:13Speaker 1: and I suspect that it's a it's going to be
- 40:15Speaker 1: a really deep answer that when we figure it out,
- 40:17Speaker 1: it's gonna show us that the universe works really differently
- 40:20Speaker 1: from the way we imagined. That a huge parts of
- 40:23Speaker 1: our life, um, and the way we live and the
- 40:25Speaker 1: things we think are fundamental about the universe are accidents.
- 40:28Speaker 1: Are just constructs, right, they are timely accidents. Sorry, it
- 40:33Speaker 1: took a lot of time, but eventually we we created
- 40:37Speaker 1: this illusion of the universe. Yeah, alright, so then we
- 40:40Speaker 1: we haven't really answered the question. I mean, it sounds
- 40:43Speaker 1: like there is no answer, right, like why does time
- 40:45Speaker 1: only go forwards? We know it's related to entropy, but
- 40:48Speaker 1: we don't really know the connection, and that's that's kind
- 40:50Speaker 1: of as far as we know. I mean, there are
- 40:51Speaker 1: a lot of people out there thought about this much
- 40:53Speaker 1: more deeply than I have. Sean Carroll, Carlo Rovelli, these
- 40:56Speaker 1: folks have written whole books on time. But in my view,
- 40:59Speaker 1: the argument mostly boils down to, you know, either it's
- 41:02Speaker 1: connected to entropy, which I don't find that convincing an
- 41:05Speaker 1: explanation for why it goes forwards, right, or that space
- 41:09Speaker 1: and time itself are illusions and they come out of
- 41:11Speaker 1: something deeper and uh, you know, and we need to
- 41:14Speaker 1: dig deeper to understand like the string theory of the
- 41:17Speaker 1: universe or the quantum loops that make up the fabric
- 41:20Speaker 1: of space and time itself. Um, so we were pretty
- 41:24Speaker 1: pretty clueless as a field. It's a it's a definitely
- 41:27Speaker 1: an open time. Well until we figure it out. I
- 41:29Speaker 1: hope that people out there don't lose it and they
- 41:33Speaker 1: that they make the best use of it. Right. Yeah,
- 41:35Speaker 1: but it's not a waste of time to think about time.
- 41:39Speaker 1: It just takes a little bit of time, that's right.
- 41:42Speaker 1: But it's about time, and now it's time to the
- 41:44Speaker 1: end the podcast. That's right. So thanks for listening, And
- 41:47Speaker 1: if you have questions about big, basic fundamental questions of
- 41:50Speaker 1: the universe, send them to us. We love to dig
- 41:52Speaker 1: into them and explore our ignorance and the ignorance of
- 41:55Speaker 1: modern physics. So send us your questions at feedback at
- 41:59Speaker 1: Daniel and Y dot com. Yeah, thanks for listening. See
- 42:03Speaker 1: you next time or see you last time. We should say, oh,
- 42:07Speaker 1: see you last, see you, see you anything, see anytime.
- 42:13Speaker 1: That's right. Thanks for listening. If you still have a
- 42:24Speaker 1: question after listening to all these explanations. Please drop us
- 42:27Speaker 1: a line. We'd love to hear from you. You can
- 42:29Speaker 1: find us at Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram at Daniel and
- 42:33Speaker 1: Jorge That's one Word, or email us at Feedback at
- 42:36Speaker 1: Daniel and Jorge dot com. Thanks for listening, and remember
- 42:40Speaker 1: that Daniel and Jorge Explain the Universe is a production
- 42:43Speaker 1: of I Heart Radio from More podcast from my heart Radio,
- 42:46Speaker 1: visit the i heart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever
- 42:50Speaker 1: you listen to your favorite shows.