Latest / Reformed Thinking / Roman Catholicism

Transcript

Roman Catholicism · Reformed Thinking

• 0:00
  Welcome to Reformed Thinking. This is the deep dive where we
• 0:04
  work through the research and questions you send our way to
• 0:07
  find some clarity. And you came to us with a big
• 0:10
  one. You asked for a really
• 0:12
  structured point by point evaluation of the Roman Catholic
• 0:16
  theological system. Not just a list of doctrines,
• 0:19
  but the actual structure underneath it all.
• 0:22
  Right, the architecture of it, and that's our mission today.
• 0:24
  We're going to do a careful analysis, looking at the
• 0:27
  official claims, the historical mechanics of the Church of Rome,
• 0:32
  basically how it's all put together.
• 0:33
  We'll need to get into his views on authority, on salvation and
• 0:37
  the church itself, and then, you know, hold those up against a
• 0:39
  Reformed understanding. Especially against the
• 0:41
  sufficiency of Scripture and the finality of what Christ did on
• 0:44
  the cross. And we should say upfront, this
• 0:46
  isn't just an academic exercise. We're dealing with things that
• 0:49
  are at the very center of the spiritual lives of millions.
• 0:53
  So our approach is to go straight to the sources you gave
• 0:55
  us and we'll start where this modern division really got
• 0:58
  cemented, the Council of Trent. OK, so to get a handle on the
• 1:02
  Catholic structure today, you you really have to start with
• 1:04
  Trent. It met on and off between 1545
• 1:08
  and 1563. And this wasn't just a general
• 1:10
  church council, was it? It had a very specific purpose.
• 1:13
  It did. It wasn't held in a theological
• 1:16
  vacuum. It was put together for the
• 1:18
  explicit purpose of responding to, and, let's be clear,
• 1:22
  theologically refuting, the Protestant Reformation.
• 1:25
  So it's a counter Reformation council through and through.
• 1:27
  It was drawing lines in the sand.
• 1:29
  That's a perfect way to put it. The sources are very clear that
• 1:32
  Trent's main job was to codify Catholic doctrine in conscious
• 1:36
  opposition to the Reformers. And that meant condemning some
• 1:39
  key ideas. Two critical ones.
• 1:41
  The Council explicitly condemned the doctrine of justification by
• 1:44
  faith alone, Solafide right? Solafide and it also condemned
• 1:48
  the doctrine of Scriptures alone or sola scriptura.
• 1:52
  By rejecting those two pillars of the Reformation, Trent really
• 1:55
  set the legal and theological framework for everything that
• 1:59
  would become modern Catholicism. OK, so when Trent condemned Sola
• 2:02
  Scriptura, he couldn't just leave a vacuum.
• 2:04
  What structure did it put in its place to govern the faith?
• 2:08
  It established what we can call the threefold structure of
• 2:11
  authority. It's a synthesis that says
• 2:13
  Scripture isn't the sufficient final rule of faith.
• 2:17
  Instead, authority rests on three pillars.
• 2:20
  And those are. Sacred Scripture, Sacred
• 2:22
  Tradition and the Magisterium, and they're seen as working
• 2:26
  together. Let's unpack that, yeah.
• 2:28
  How did the first two pillars, Scripture and Tradition work
• 2:30
  together to form 1 body of truth?
• 2:32
  Well, the Catholic Church definitely affirms that the
• 2:35
  Bible is the inspired word of God.
• 2:37
  No one is questioning its inspiration.
• 2:40
  The key difference, though, is that the system explicitly
• 2:43
  denies its sufficiency. So the written word is just one
• 2:46
  part of the puzzle. Exactly.
• 2:48
  It's one component of divine revelation.
• 2:50
  The second component is what's called Sacred Tradition.
• 2:53
  And this isn't just, you know, customs or church history.
• 2:56
  It's seen as an active source of revelation itself, right?
• 2:59
  Precisely. Tradition is made-up of
• 3:01
  teachings, practices, doctrines, things that are believed to have
• 3:04
  been passed down orally from the apostles to the bishops.
• 3:07
  So things that aren't necessarily written down in the
• 3:10
  Bible. That's the critical part.
• 3:12
  The claim is that these oral traditions contain revelation
• 3:15
  that is not explicitly recorded in Scripture.
• 3:18
  You know, things like the specific Marian dogmas or the
• 3:21
  full doctrine of purgatory would have fallen to this category.
• 3:24
  And the Church combines them, viewing Scripture and tradition
• 3:27
  as this unified whole. They're unified into what's
• 3:30
  called the Deposit of Faith. They're seen as two equally
• 3:33
  authoritative streams flowing from the same divine source.
• 3:37
  So if a doctrine can't be clearly supported by Scripture,
• 3:41
  Rome can still claim it's part of this deposit of faith because
• 3:43
  it came through Apostolic tradition.
• 3:45
  And that changes the whole starting point for how you
• 3:47
  develop doctrine. Yes, changes everything.
• 3:49
  So if you have these two streams of equal authority, scripture
• 3:52
  and tradition, someone has to interpret them.
• 3:55
  And I guess this is where that third pillar, the Magisterium,
• 3:58
  becomes the real functional authority.
• 4:00
  Yes, that's it. The Magisterium is the official
• 4:03
  teaching office. That's the Pope and the bishops
• 4:05
  who are in communion with them. They are designated as the sole
• 4:10
  authentic interpreters of both Scripture and tradition.
• 4:13
  And they're believed to have a special spiritual gift to do
• 4:16
  this. Yes, a special assistance of the
• 4:18
  Holy Spirit which allows them to guard and define the faith
• 4:22
  without error. Which means that no individual
• 4:25
  believer, no matter how much they study the Bible, can arrive
• 4:28
  at a binding definition of truth on their own.
• 4:31
  It has to come through this office.
• 4:33
  That is the practical outcome. Since the Magisterium claims the
• 4:37
  exclusive right to say what scripture and tradition mean, it
• 4:40
  functions as the decisive interpretive authority in the
• 4:43
  whole system. The Living Teaching Office is
• 4:46
  the final arbiter. So the meaning of the Bible is
• 4:49
  normed by the church's decisions, not the other way
• 4:51
  around. Correct.
• 4:52
  And that functional supremacy means there is structurally no
• 4:56
  higher Court of Appeal for doctrine or morality than the
• 4:59
  judgment of the Church's own teaching office.
• 5:01
  And. What's the expected response
• 5:03
  from an ordinary Catholic to these teachings?
• 5:05
  The sources are clear on this. It requires a religious
• 5:08
  submission of mind and will. So it's not just, you know,
• 5:11
  listening respectfully. It's a binding intellectual
• 5:14
  obedience that is seen as necessary for faithful
• 5:17
  membership in the Church. This centralization of authority
• 5:20
  seems to build over time, and it really hits a peak, doesn't it?
• 5:24
  Centuries after Trent at the First Vatican Council.
• 5:27
  Vatican Why? Yeah, From 1869 to 1870, that
• 5:31
  council formally defined the dogma of papal infallibility.
• 5:35
  So Vatican, it was sort of the capstone on this whole structure
• 5:38
  of authority. It was the crowning event for
• 5:41
  sure. It cemented Rome's claims to
• 5:44
  supreme teaching authority by making it a dogma that the Pope
• 5:47
  himself can speak infallibly, but under very specific, very
• 5:51
  strict conditions. Right, we hear the term ex
• 5:54
  cathedra. Can you break down what that
• 5:56
  actually means? When is the Pope speaking
• 5:58
  infallibly? So to speak, ex cathedra, which
• 6:01
  literally means from the chair. The Pope has to be speaking in
• 6:04
  his official capacity as shepherd and teacher of all
• 6:07
  Christians. OK, He has to be using his full
• 6:10
  Apostolic authority and he must be defining A doctrine
• 6:13
  concerning faith or morals that is to be held by the entire
• 6:16
  Church. If all his conditions are met,
• 6:18
  he's believed to be preserved from error by God.
• 6:21
  Now, how often does this actually happen?
• 6:22
  It seems like it would be a very rare event.
• 6:24
  It's extremely rare. In fact, since it was defined in
• 6:27
  1870, it's only been formally invoked once.
• 6:30
  Just once. Yeah, to define the Assumption
• 6:32
  of Mary in 1950. But the real significance of
• 6:35
  Vatican I wasn't just about those rare formal moments.
• 6:39
  So what was the broader impact then?
• 6:41
  The declaration makes any such pronouncement an irreformable
• 6:45
  standard of truth. It's binding on the consciences
• 6:48
  of all Catholics forever. But more broadly, it solidified
• 6:51
  the Pope's overall role as Christ's vicar and the visible
• 6:55
  head of the Church on earth. So he possesses this supreme
• 6:58
  authority all the time, not just in those infallible moments.
• 7:01
  Supreme, full, immediate and universal authority over the
• 7:04
  whole Church. That means he can intervene
• 7:06
  directly in any diocese, any parish, on any doctrinal matter,
• 7:11
  anywhere in the world without needing local permission.
• 7:13
  So from a Reformed perspective, this is the heart of the issue,
• 7:16
  isn't it? This structure challenges the
• 7:18
  unique headship of Christ over His church.
• 7:20
  It does. The claim that you must be in
• 7:23
  communion with the Bishop of Rome for the fullness of the
• 7:25
  Church is seen in the Reformed tradition as a usurpation of
• 7:29
  Christ's glory. Christ is the head.
• 7:32
  His headship isn't transferable. So the structure itself binds
• 7:36
  the conscience to a human office rather than directly and only to
• 7:40
  the Word of God. That's the core critique, and if
• 7:43
  the authority of the Church is structured this way, it just
• 7:45
  follows that the path to salvation will also be
• 7:48
  structured and mediated by that same institution.
• 7:50
  Right, the one logically flows from the other.
• 7:52
  That link is absolutely essential.
• 7:55
  The structure of authority determines the structure of
• 7:57
  salvation. Because Trent rejected sola
• 7:59
  scriptura, it kept the authority to define salvation for itself.
• 8:03
  And because it condemned solified, it had to completely
• 8:06
  redefine what justification is. OK, so.
• 8:08
  Let's get into that. In the Reform view,
• 8:10
  justification is a legal or forensic declaration.
• 8:13
  It's God declaring A Sinner righteous because of Christ.
• 8:17
  How does the Catholic system define it?
• 8:19
  It's not primarily a legal declaration based on something
• 8:22
  outside the believer. Instead, justification is seen
• 8:26
  as an ongoing process of inner transformation.
• 8:29
  A process of becoming righteous, not just being declared
• 8:32
  righteous. Exactly, it's the process of God
• 8:34
  making a person actually inherently righteous over time.
• 8:37
  And the mechanism for this is something called infused grace.
• 8:41
  Yes, justification involves God infusing grace into the soul.
• 8:45
  You can think of grace as a kind of supernatural quality that
• 8:48
  makes the soul holy, and this process starts chiefly at
• 8:52
  baptism. That's seen as the moment the
• 8:55
  grace of justification is first received.
• 8:57
  And if justification is this internal process of becoming
• 9:00
  righteous, then of course faith could never stand alone as the
• 9:03
  instrument. It's the necessary conclusion.
• 9:05
  The canons from Trent explicitly reject faith alone.
• 9:09
  Justifying faith has to be, in their terms, formed by love.
• 9:13
  Meaning faith plus other things. Faith plus charity, good works
• 9:16
  and obedience, these things are all seen as necessary for
• 9:20
  justification to continue and to increase throughout a person's
• 9:23
  life. And this brings us to the
• 9:25
  concept of merit, which is a huge point of division.
• 9:28
  A massive 1 in the system. Good works done by a believer
• 9:32
  who is in a state of grace are considered truly meritorious.
• 9:37
  They aren't just thank you notes to God for salvation.
• 9:39
  They are actions that actually contribute to your final
• 9:41
  justification and your title to eternal life.
• 9:44
  So your own works, your cooperation, actually earn
• 9:47
  something towards your salvation.
• 9:49
  That's what the doctrine of merit teaches.
• 9:51
  The system even has different kinds of merit, but the key one
• 9:55
  is called condign merit, which is merit earned as a matter of
• 9:58
  justice for works performed with God's grace.
• 10:01
  This elevates human cooperative action to a level that, from a
• 10:04
  Reformed view, is just staggering.
• 10:07
  If grace is something infused and merit is something that has
• 10:09
  to be earned, then the status of a believer can't be secure, It
• 10:14
  has to be conditional. That is the primary structural
• 10:16
  difference and it has a huge impact on the question of
• 10:19
  assurance since justification is this increasing status based on
• 10:22
  your cooperation. It's not a once for all secured
• 10:25
  status. And the logical conclusion of
• 10:27
  that is that salvation can be lost.
• 10:29
  Absolutely. The system makes a distinction
• 10:32
  between venial sins, which weaken your state of grace, and
• 10:35
  mortal sins. A mortal sin is one that
• 10:38
  completely destroys the grace of justification and forfeits your
• 10:42
  title to heaven. So if you commit a mortal sin,
• 10:44
  you lose your justification. You're no longer in a state of
• 10:47
  salvation, correct? And it has to be regained
• 10:50
  through a process that's mediated by the Church.
• 10:52
  This brings it right back to the institution.
• 10:54
  Yes, if justification is lost, it must be restored through the
• 10:59
  sacrament of penance, which you might know as confession or
• 11:02
  reconciliation. And that involves specific
• 11:04
  steps. Three of them contrition or
• 11:07
  sorrow for your sin, confession of that sin to a priest, and
• 11:10
  satisfaction doing the penance the priest assigns.
• 11:14
  The priest then, acting in persona Christian in the person
• 11:17
  of Christ, pronounces absolution.
• 11:20
  So the Church, through its Sacramento system, is the
• 11:22
  essential way back after grace is lost.
• 11:25
  The sources you sent used a great analogy to capture this
• 11:28
  difference, comparing a doctor's declaration to a long course of
• 11:31
  physical therapy. Right.
• 11:32
  In the Reformed view, justification is like a doctor
• 11:35
  declaring a patient completely cured.
• 11:37
  That declaration is based on the perfect health, the perfect
• 11:40
  righteousness of Christ, which is credited or imputed to the
• 11:44
  believer. The patient is declared well,
• 11:47
  immediately and fully. A.
• 11:48
  Forensic Act. A forensic act.
• 11:51
  The Catholic structure, on the other hand, is like that
• 11:53
  continuous physical therapy regimen.
• 11:55
  The patient is given the ability to walk.
• 11:58
  That's the infused grace at Baptism.
• 12:00
  But recovery depends entirely on the patient's ongoing
• 12:03
  cooperation, the merit they earn, and constant check UPS.
• 12:07
  The sacraments. The sacraments to monitor their
• 12:09
  status. The cure is internal, it's
• 12:13
  gradual, and it's conditional on them sticking to the.
• 12:15
  Program This conditional nature then requires another piece of
• 12:19
  the structure to deal with what happens after death for people
• 12:22
  who die in a state of grace but aren't yet perfect.
• 12:25
  And that's where the doctrine of purgatory becomes a logical
• 12:27
  necessity. Because in this system you have
• 12:29
  to be actually perfect to enter heaven.
• 12:31
  Right. If justification is about
• 12:33
  inherent righteousness and you die with any stain of sin left,
• 12:37
  you can't enter heaven, so you need a place of temporary post
• 12:41
  mortem purging to finish the job.
• 12:43
  And this connects to the idea of indulgences.
• 12:46
  It does. An indulgence is a remission of
• 12:49
  the temporal punishment that's still due for sins even after
• 12:51
  they've been forgiven, and this remission is drawn from what's
• 12:54
  called the Treasury of the Church.
• 12:56
  Which is what exactly? It's the infinite merits of
• 12:58
  Christ, but also includes the Super abundant merits of the
• 13:01
  Saints. The Magisterium claims the
• 13:03
  authority to dispense these merits to help souls on Earth
• 13:07
  and in purgatory. So the good works of the Saints
• 13:09
  can be applied to other people. That's the idea, and it shows
• 13:12
  how the entire system is interconnected.
• 13:14
  Authority, salvation, merit, the afterlife, it's all one coherent
• 13:19
  structure. And it's also where the reformed
• 13:21
  critique is sharpest. This whole system of merit,
• 13:24
  purgatory, indulgences, it seems to add so much to the work of
• 13:29
  Christ. The critique is that by adding
• 13:31
  all these extra biblical authorities and teachings, the
• 13:33
  system denies the sufficiency and the finality of Christ's
• 13:37
  once for all atoning work on the cross.
• 13:39
  If the cross dealt with the guilt of sin, the stain of sin,
• 13:43
  and the punishment for sin, and if Christ's perfect
• 13:45
  righteousness is imputed to us by faith, then there's simply no
• 13:49
  need for a process of becoming inherently righteous, no need
• 13:52
  for purgatory, and no need for additional merit.
• 13:55
  The core concern is that it shifts the object of your trust.
• 13:59
  It's no longer just on Christ's finished work, but on a
• 14:02
  combination of Christ's grace and your own continuous merit
• 14:06
  earning cooperation, all mediated through an institution.
• 14:09
  And that has a profound effect on assurance.
• 14:11
  It moves from resting on God's objective promise to looking at
• 14:15
  the subjective status of your own soul.
• 14:17
  OK, so this necessity of Sacramento channels to receive
• 14:20
  and restore grace, that brings us right to the center of
• 14:23
  Catholic worship life, doesn't it?
• 14:24
  The Mass and the Eucharist. The source is called The Source
• 14:27
  and Summit of the Christian Life.
• 14:28
  It's absolutely paramount. If the goal is union with Christ
• 14:33
  through this infused grace, then the Eucharist is the primary way
• 14:38
  that spiritual nourishment is delivered.
• 14:40
  The entire rhythm of Catholic piety just orbits around the
• 14:43
  sacrament. And the whole meaning of the
• 14:45
  Mass rests on the doctrine of transubstantiation.
• 14:49
  This is something we need to explain carefully.
• 14:50
  We do. The doctrine states that during
• 14:52
  the Mass, at the moment of consecration by the priest, the
• 14:56
  actual substance of the bread and wine is changed into the
• 14:59
  very substance of the body and blood of Christ.
• 15:01
  But it still looks and tastes like bread and wine.
• 15:04
  Right. And that's the key theological
• 15:06
  distinction. The accidents, the outward
• 15:07
  appearances like taste, texture, color, they remain unchanged,
• 15:11
  but the underlying reality, the essence of The thing, is now the
• 15:14
  body, blood, soul and divinity of Christ.
• 15:17
  So it's not a symbol, it is Christ.
• 15:19
  It is believed to be truly and substantially present and this
• 15:22
  has a massive practical impact on how worship is conducted.
• 15:26
  It leads directly to the practice of adoration.
• 15:28
  Of course, if the consecrated host is Christ himself, then
• 15:33
  Catholics adore it as Christ himself.
• 15:35
  This is the highest form of worship called Latria, which is
• 15:38
  due to God alone. And This is why you'll see
• 15:40
  practices like Eucharistic Adoration where the host is
• 15:43
  displayed outside of Mass for people to come and venerate.
• 15:46
  Exactly. And from a Reformed perspective,
• 15:50
  this physical adoration of the elements is one of the clearest
• 15:53
  signs of the deep difference in understanding what's going on
• 15:56
  with Christ's presence now. But the mass isn't just for
• 15:58
  communion or adoration. It's also defined as an action,
• 16:01
  right? A sacrifice.
• 16:03
  Yes, it's defined as a sacrificial representation of
• 16:06
  Christ's one sacrifice on the cross.
• 16:09
  Now, Rome is very careful to stress this isn't a new
• 16:11
  sacrifice. It's the same sacrifice, just
• 16:14
  offered in a different unbloody manner on the altar.
• 16:17
  OK, but why does it need to be represented over and over again?
• 16:20
  What's the function of this continuous offering?
• 16:22
  Through the action of the Mass, grace is applied to the living
• 16:25
  and the dead. It's seen as propitiatory.
• 16:29
  It brings about divine favor and makes satisfaction for sin.
• 16:33
  So participating in the Mass is the supreme act of worship and
• 16:37
  the main way you get spiritual nourishment.
• 16:39
  And this is where it directly clashes with the argument in the
• 16:41
  book of Hebrews. It does.
• 16:43
  Hebrews insists that Christ was offered once for all, and that
• 16:46
  his one sacrifice made all subsequent sacrifices obsolete.
• 16:51
  The need for a continuous representation raises serious
• 16:54
  questions from that standpoint. So structurally, where the
• 16:57
  Reformed see the finished work of Christ giving us immediate
• 17:00
  access to God, the Catholic system sees that one work being
• 17:04
  continuously applied through the mechanism of the priesthood and
• 17:07
  the Mass. That's a great summary of the
• 17:09
  difference. The Church's structure of
• 17:10
  authority and salvation requires its function as a continuous
• 17:13
  mediator. And this mediation extends
• 17:15
  beyond the Eucharist, doesn't it?
• 17:17
  There's a whole devotional system around Mary and the
• 17:20
  Saints that creates A dense framework around Christ.
• 17:23
  It does, and this is often one of the most visible differences
• 17:26
  you'll see in popular piety. Mary is honored with specific
• 17:30
  dogmas, the Immaculate Conception, that she was
• 17:33
  conceived without original sin, and the assumption that she was
• 17:37
  taken bodily into heaven. She's called the Queen of Heaven
• 17:40
  and is invoked as a powerful intercessor.
• 17:43
  How does the church theologically defend this
• 17:45
  veneration from the charge that it's actually worshipped?
• 17:49
  Well, the sources explained that Catholic theology makes some
• 17:51
  very strict technical distinctions.
• 17:54
  There's latria, which is worship for God alone.
• 17:57
  Then the veneration given to Mary is called hyperdulia, the
• 18:00
  highest veneration, and the veneration for the Saints is
• 18:03
  dulia. In theory, these are completely
• 18:05
  distinct from worship. But the reformed concern has
• 18:07
  always been that this distinction often dissolves in
• 18:10
  practice. That is a very serious concern.
• 18:13
  While the theology might be distinct in the daily lives of
• 18:16
  many believers, the system surrounds Christ with this dense
• 18:19
  network of mediators and devotions.
• 18:21
  Marian and saintly intercession can in practice obscure his
• 18:25
  unique sufficiency. So a believer might pray to
• 18:28
  Mary, asking her to intercede with Christ for them, which
• 18:31
  places another figure between the believer and their head.
• 18:35
  That's right, and the Reformed position holds firm to what
• 18:38
  Scripture teaches. There is one mediator between
• 18:41
  God and man, the man Christ Jesus.
• 18:43
  Prayer is directed to God alone, through Christ alone.
• 18:47
  His intercession is immediate, and it's sufficient.
• 18:50
  So introducing this whole hierarchy of intercession seems
• 18:54
  to diminish the unique glory of the one Mediator.
• 18:56
  Which brings us back full circle to that final structural issue,
• 19:00
  the role of the Pope and the headship of Christ.
• 19:03
  The claims made about the visible structure of the Church
• 19:05
  just stand in complete opposition to the Reformed view.
• 19:08
  The structure is absolute. The Pope claims the titles of
• 19:11
  Christ's vicar and the visible head of the Church on earth.
• 19:14
  He holds supreme, full, immediate and universal
• 19:17
  authority, and this makes communion with the Bishop of
• 19:20
  Rome a necessary mark of the true Church.
• 19:22
  And for confessional Protestants that claim that belonging to the
• 19:26
  visible institution under Rome is necessary, that's a severe
• 19:29
  structural problem. It's seen as a usurpation of
• 19:32
  Christ's glory. Christ alone is the head of the
• 19:35
  Church. His rule is immediate through
• 19:37
  His Word and Spirit, but the Catholic system, by its own
• 19:41
  internal logic, makes his rule mediate through an infallible
• 19:45
  human head and a defining magisterium that can bind
• 19:48
  consciences to doctrines that aren't found in Scripture.
• 19:51
  So the question for you, the listener really becomes does
• 19:54
  Christ rule his church immediately through his Word and
• 19:57
  Spirit, or immediately through an infallible human head and
• 20:00
  magisterium? The answer to that changes
• 20:02
  everything. We've gone through the
• 20:04
  structural blueprints you asked us to look at, and Roman
• 20:07
  Catholicism is a serious, very integrated system.
• 20:10
  It retains essential truths about God, but it establishes 2
• 20:14
  fundamentally different structures than what you find in
• 20:16
  the Reformed tradition. Right one is the structure of
• 20:18
  authority which moves from the soul sufficiency of Scripture to
• 20:21
  the triad of Scripture, tradition and the Magisterium.
• 20:24
  And that establishes ecclesiastical decision as the
• 20:27
  final Court of Appeal for truth. And the other is the structure
• 20:30
  of salvation. It moves from imputed
• 20:33
  righteousness received through faith alone, a declaration that
• 20:36
  secures you, to infused grace and merit, which is an ongoing
• 20:41
  conditional process of transformation.
• 20:43
  A process that requires continuous Sacramento mediation
• 20:46
  and human cooperation. So we come back to that central
• 20:49
  question that stands between these two structures, the cone
• 20:51
  of sufficiency. If Christ's sacrifice was truly
• 20:55
  finished on the cross and it resulted in a perfect imputed
• 20:59
  righteousness that covers all sin and secures A believer
• 21:02
  standing forever, then what theological necessity is there
• 21:06
  for a continuous unbloody representation of that sacrifice
• 21:09
  in the Mass, or for human merit, or for post mortem penance in
• 21:13
  purgatory? That is the core point of
• 21:15
  contention and it shapes everything else.
• 21:17
  And you should consider the ramifications for the individual
• 21:20
  believer, the necessity of belonging to the visible
• 21:22
  institution, plus the possibility of losing your
• 21:25
  justification through mortal sin.
• 21:27
  It means your assurance has to shift.
• 21:28
  It can no longer rest on the once for all irreformable
• 21:31
  forensic declaration of God. Instead, it has to rely on your
• 21:34
  current state of infuse grace and the efficacy of the
• 21:37
  sacraments. And that difference between
• 21:40
  resting in God's declaration based on Christ's work versus
• 21:44
  participating in an ongoing process based on infused grace
• 21:48
  that shapes every prayer, every act of deviation, and the entire
• 21:51
  feeling of the Christian life. Thank you for providing the
• 21:54
  sources for this critical deep dive.
• 21:56
  We invite you to continue studying and to test every
• 21:58
  teaching against the inspired sufficient Word of God.
• 22:01
  Until next time.