Latest / Talk to Prince Show - Solving World's Problems / Prince Israel Zaar on: You Don't Need a War and a Bomb, What About the Children?

Transcript

Prince Israel Zaar on: You Don't Need a War and a Bomb, What About the Children? · Talk to Prince Show - Solving World's Problems

• 0:01
  Speaker 1: Modern war can be described as the domain of politicians
• 0:16
  Speaker 1: imposing their will on the people. War shall come, wars
• 0:28
  Speaker 1: shall be fat, people shall die, infrastructures shall be destroyed.
• 0:41
  Speaker 1: Humans panic shall continue, running under bomb shelters, fleeing the cities,
• 0:54
  Speaker 1: stocking traffic with nowhere to go. With the airspace close,
• 1:04
  Speaker 1: the shipping hout, restricted borders, clothes and humans are left
• 1:13
  Speaker 1: wandering whiteter car women and children are innocent by standards.
• 1:26
  Speaker 1: The modern war today is a war of politicians, proper counder, misinformation, disinformation, miseducation,
• 1:46
  Speaker 1: all in the nine of geopolitical maneuverine, fighting for physical space,
• 2:00
  Speaker 1: h fighting for dominance and control, fighting fighting for power,
• 2:10
  Speaker 1: Who dominates, who leads, Who is in charge? Who pull
• 2:18
  Speaker 1: oppose the shocks? Who is in control. In the days
• 2:27
  Speaker 1: of all, wars were fought for different reasons as compacted today.
• 2:41
  Speaker 1: In those days of all, science and technology was still primitive.
• 2:51
  Speaker 1: But in today's war, the drone war, the hypersonic, the
• 3:03
  Speaker 1: B bomans, the B bombers were It's a different one,
• 3:10
  Speaker 1: very different war.
• 3:14
  Speaker 2: But the people.
• 3:16
  Speaker 1: And humanity suffers. We must not resolve conflicts through war.
• 3:35
  Speaker 1: That nations must not be allowed to threaten matters with
• 3:40
  Speaker 1: nuclear weapons, and nations which already have nuclear weapons should
• 3:56
  Speaker 1: do their best to prevent other nations from having such
• 3:59
  Speaker 1: a death lay in nuclear weapons, and those who don't
• 4:05
  Speaker 1: have nuclear weapons should not intimidate as articlar war of
• 4:13
  Speaker 1: the countries that have elected not to have nuclear weapons.
• 4:23
  Speaker 1: The wars of today are the wars of politicians who
• 4:28
  Speaker 1: they have political ambitions, their ego and the nacissism their
• 4:35
  Speaker 1: ambitions and an expense of the people. Some politicians who
• 4:44
  Speaker 1: want to stay in power and they use war for
• 4:48
  Speaker 1: coloratory damages. They will use war to hide their shortcomings,
• 5:00
  Speaker 1: use or to project power, ignoring the devastation that war brings.
• 5:09
  Speaker 1: Some politicians we use war for geopolitical terf Some politicians
• 5:19
  Speaker 1: we choose to go to war because they are not
• 5:22
  Speaker 1: popular at Horme just to go to water stay in power.
• 5:30
  Speaker 1: They changed the laws and and the rules because student
• 5:36
  Speaker 1: war politicians legally they have a lot of powers martial law,
• 5:47
  Speaker 1: war time effort. We get to see the world that
• 5:53
  Speaker 1: we have today. Just one politician can can lead the
• 5:57
  Speaker 1: war into a nuclear war. Just one ambitious politicians for
• 6:02
  Speaker 1: some whatever reasons where they click off unintelligent or uninformed
• 6:10
  Speaker 1: of Bella coustas, a war mongering or Hockey's mindset. They
• 6:20
  Speaker 1: can sit in their bankers.
• 6:22
  Speaker 2: Or whatever war.
• 6:24
  Speaker 1: Room that is, to decide the fate of humanity. Eight
• 6:31
  Speaker 1: point five plus billion people. People's lives can be can
• 6:38
  Speaker 1: hardly be decided in a war room or in a banker.
• 6:45
  Speaker 1: The politicians to fear for their lives. The height beneath
• 6:50
  Speaker 1: the girls, those who declared the war terrorists who want
• 7:03
  Speaker 1: people to die on their behalf, on their behalf, hide.
• 7:08
  Speaker 2: In bunkers, hide from the world.
• 7:13
  Speaker 1: Go back to the war of terror, the war on terror.
• 7:18
  Speaker 1: She better London hiding well, send innocent people to go
• 7:22
  Speaker 1: die with religious and fanantical proper can promise them Heaven
• 7:32
  Speaker 1: promised them paradise. Why he hides. Look at the war
• 7:40
  Speaker 1: and Ghaza Hamas and the leaders hiding in bunkers but
• 7:49
  Speaker 1: encouraging innocent humans to die.
• 7:53
  Speaker 2: On their behalf.
• 7:57
  Speaker 1: Look at the wars of today. The politicians we see
• 8:01
  Speaker 1: them on TV with the hiding the bunkers while deciding
• 8:07
  Speaker 1: the fate of humanity because they know that the weapons
• 8:10
  Speaker 1: to produce, they know the weapons they use is deadly,
• 8:16
  Speaker 1: deadly kills humans. It destroys cities. That's why they hide
• 8:22
  Speaker 1: the bakers. I they destroy the world from the outside
• 8:29
  Speaker 1: toward gain to what end, for what goal? For what purpose?
• 8:39
  Speaker 1: Humans must have evolved today? Do not see wars the way.
• 8:49
  Speaker 1: The wars of today will not actually help humanity. Humans
• 9:01
  Speaker 1: must choose not to go to war in order to
• 9:04
  Speaker 1: seek peace or consensus concerted differences. Wars are expensive, the
• 9:12
  Speaker 1: crue the are brutal, their savage. It bleeds the coffers
• 9:19
  Speaker 1: cure humans, destroys series. Wars are not permanent, but temporarily destructive.
• 9:28
  Speaker 1: It creates instability, affects the academy. It destroys hospitals and
• 9:36
  Speaker 1: roads and dreams, destroys infractstructures critical or not. But to
• 9:47
  Speaker 1: the politician it look tough. At what expense our insecution
• 9:57
  Speaker 1: will be that destroying this is the way to protest.
• 10:06
  Speaker 2: Are dominants.
• 10:09
  Speaker 1: You cannot kill the weak, killingno saying women and children.
• 10:16
  Speaker 1: I said to yourself that you're tough, you strong. But
• 10:21
  Speaker 1: at the same time, it should be difficult to allow
• 10:29
  Speaker 1: of friendlations terrorists states to process nuclear weapons. Stopping that
• 10:41
  Speaker 1: might be painful. They cannot know to your course that
• 10:48
  Speaker 1: start terrorists, nations of fanantical nations from having nuclear weapons.
• 11:07
  Speaker 1: Why would the nation want to have a nuclear weapon.
• 11:11
  Speaker 1: You can choose the course of peace. You can choose
• 11:13
  Speaker 1: the course of development. If it's fear of one nation
• 11:20
  Speaker 1: dominating the other, you can dominate with science and technology.
• 11:26
  Speaker 1: You can advance your science and technology, your AI system,
• 11:30
  Speaker 1: robotic system, you know, new material technologies, industrial based technologies.
• 11:43
  Speaker 1: You can use that nuclear energy for positive use, for
• 11:47
  Speaker 1: good use. That meddle is it can be peaceful. If
• 11:58
  Speaker 1: the people in the region wanted to a peaceful they
• 12:04
  Speaker 1: don't need a nuclear weapon to be great. North Korea
• 12:10
  Speaker 1: has a nuclear weapon. I don't see the difference it
• 12:14
  Speaker 1: makes to the lives of the ordinary people in North Korea.
• 12:20
  Speaker 1: Pakistan has a nuclear weapon. I don't see the difference
• 12:23
  Speaker 1: it makes to the ordinary people Pakistan. Many countries have
• 12:31
  Speaker 1: two care weapons. You might need nuclear energy, they don't
• 12:38
  Speaker 1: need a nuclear weapon, and its science and technology. You
• 12:45
  Speaker 1: need to create IP minds, inventors minds, creative creative mind engineer,
• 12:49
  Speaker 1: engineering minds.
• 12:51
  Speaker 2: You need to develop your.
• 12:52
  Speaker 1: Country, save your country from mayhare. Don't whole onto a
• 13:00
  Speaker 1: weapon that is self destructive in itself. If you're nuclear
• 13:14
  Speaker 1: program is peaceful for the sake of energy to develop
• 13:18
  Speaker 1: your system. Yeah, then then your rhetorics and what you
• 13:25
  Speaker 1: do in the neighborhood should should reflect the plomacy, peace, negotiation,
• 13:30
  Speaker 1: understanding and modernization of your politics, of your structure, of
• 13:36
  Speaker 1: your people, not this fanatical nationalist which others hang and
• 13:47
  Speaker 1: doom and death and destruction. And you should reorient your
• 13:54
  Speaker 1: system should you should remodernize you system to the flight
• 14:06
  Speaker 1: the multipolar system of development, of positive humanity, of peacefulness
• 14:22
  Speaker 1: and freedom and safety and security and happiness. The choice
• 14:29
  Speaker 1: is if you give up that fanatica war games and
• 14:41
  Speaker 1: and rhetorica overspeak, and that oppressive military militancy with brain
• 14:55
  Speaker 1: to watch humans of science and or sell their faith
• 15:05
  Speaker 1: through the various militancy called called of death. It is
• 15:15
  Speaker 1: small to humanity, not war. Countries should say place said development.
• 15:26
  Speaker 1: You must not have a nuclear weapons to be respected.
• 15:32
  Speaker 1: Many countries don't. Many countries do. Fewer countries though, And
• 15:39
  Speaker 1: even those countries with nuclear weapons, they're not great because
• 15:44
  Speaker 1: of the nuclear weapons. They still fid wars, there's still
• 15:52
  Speaker 1: lots of people to war. They are still unstable. That
• 15:59
  Speaker 1: details extin effect. Well, look at countries who don't. We
• 16:05
  Speaker 1: don't care about having nuclear weapons, high development and peaceful.
• 16:13
  Speaker 1: They are her advance in science and technologists.
• 16:17
  Speaker 2: They are.
• 16:20
  Speaker 1: Singapore doesn't have a nuclear weapon. See how grade it is.
• 16:26
  Speaker 1: Most of European countries don't. Hong Kong doesn't look at
• 16:34
  Speaker 1: great it is Luxembourg Downway. They don't. Finland, they don't Sweden, Sweden,
• 16:42
  Speaker 1: they don't, Straet Salem, they don't Egypt, they don't. South
• 16:52
  Speaker 1: Africa they don't Southern liber Oh, my ue, they do
• 17:04
  Speaker 1: not have nuclear weapons. I see our advance they are.
• 17:11
  Speaker 1: You don't need a nuclear weapon to be a great country.
• 17:16
  Speaker 1: You need peace, peace stability in order to harnaze your
• 17:24
  Speaker 1: science and technology, to develop yourself, to develop your natural
• 17:30
  Speaker 1: resources and develop your people. To have a system either
• 17:39
  Speaker 1: a monarchy a democracy that it's sustainable, developmental, and peaceful.
• 17:54
  Speaker 1: You must not have a nuclear weapon to be those
• 17:59
  Speaker 1: days are God. Weakness doesn't meaning myself in nuclear weapon.
• 18:11
  Speaker 1: Fear doesn't mean myself in nuclear weapon. Devell help yourself,
• 18:18
  Speaker 1: open your markets, develop your people. China is not reliveled
• 18:25
  Speaker 1: today because of in nuclear weapon. China is relevant today
• 18:30
  Speaker 1: because the world needs China for their science, technology and humanity. Science, technology,
• 18:44
  Speaker 1: and humanity. Let be said to get science, technological, advanced
• 18:53
  Speaker 1: mind and humanity, being a good neighbor, mutual understanding, which
• 19:03
  Speaker 1: are peace, which are trust, which mutual self developed mind,
• 19:11
  Speaker 1: receiprocal positive relationship. You must not seek war. He must
• 19:19
  Speaker 1: not threaten other nations. He must not seek to destroy
• 19:24
  Speaker 1: other nations or wipe them off the map. That that
• 19:31
  Speaker 1: way of speaking is primitive, it's all and repugnant, it's crue,
• 19:37
  Speaker 1: it's barbaric, it's on civilized. Seek to work with other nations,
• 19:47
  Speaker 1: accept offers when given circumsensus. You must you must not
• 19:52
  Speaker 1: create a nuclear weapon. He must not have a nuclear weapon.
• 20:00
  Speaker 1: Be there's an old core colonial state mentality that to
• 20:14
  Speaker 1: be myself in nuclear weapon to do what with that weapon?
• 20:18
  Speaker 1: What if there is a lak? What if you're science
• 20:21
  Speaker 1: and technology is a lot of science, it's easy to
• 20:24
  Speaker 1: get the bar it's difficult to sustain a leak, even
• 20:33
  Speaker 1: a nuclear energy for civilian purposes, so that it's difficult
• 20:39
  Speaker 1: to contain a lak. Remember what happened to Japan? What
• 20:46
  Speaker 1: if that happened in North Korea? Wouldever that science and
• 20:49
  Speaker 1: technology to stop that link, or to take control of it,
• 20:54
  Speaker 1: or to prevent it from spilling into the oceans or
• 20:56
  Speaker 1: the water. So join maryan life or humanity. Why must
• 21:05
  Speaker 1: you have a weapon that destroys humanity? Why must you
• 21:10
  Speaker 1: hold onto that? What's the key of that? In the
• 21:18
  Speaker 1: history of your civilization, you didn't have that weapon. I
• 21:21
  Speaker 1: must you need it now, I must do it now.
• 21:34
  Speaker 1: The peace of the world depends on politicians. And if
• 21:39
  Speaker 1: you don't want a nation to have a deadly weapon,
• 21:44
  Speaker 1: you should treat that nation with dignity, not threats. I
• 21:50
  Speaker 1: should bring that nation to the negotiation, to the negotiating table, issue,
• 21:58
  Speaker 1: offer carrots and stacks. When necessary, we go for carrots
• 22:07
  Speaker 1: every nation, no matters more. Is a sovereign state, the
• 22:11
  Speaker 1: declared state. And we talk to leaders of countries, respect them,
• 22:20
  Speaker 1: give them respect. Respect will bring people to the table,
• 22:27
  Speaker 1: not war, not threats, not bombardments. When thirteen nations and
• 22:37
  Speaker 1: destroyed the cities to force them to the table, even
• 22:41
  Speaker 1: to humiliate them, and to pursue the deadly weapon, we
• 22:45
  Speaker 1: do harm to surface. What is lack in this international diploma? Say,
• 22:57
  Speaker 1: most leaders today did not go to diplomatic school. They
• 23:01
  Speaker 1: did not study political science. It didn't study the science
• 23:06
  Speaker 1: of politics, the science of human relationship. That's what it's lacking.
• 23:11
  Speaker 1: You don't know how to talk, you don't know to negotiate.
• 23:18
  Speaker 1: You're through words that means nothing, just to be on TV,
• 23:22
  Speaker 1: just to be relevant. There's nothing that cannot be negotiated.
• 23:30
  Speaker 1: If you want peace, you get peace. If you want war,
• 23:35
  Speaker 1: you get war. You want chaos, you get chaos. You
• 23:39
  Speaker 1: want stability, gets stability. Want instability and stability, want anarchy.
• 23:44
  Speaker 2: You get anarchy.
• 23:46
  Speaker 1: But if you want regime change, to change the regime
• 23:51
  Speaker 1: of a tyrannical system, must you signed this peel over
• 23:59
  Speaker 1: might do montage rus than a few hours of glory
• 24:05
  Speaker 1: of toppling that regime. We have tried. Region changed time
• 24:09
  Speaker 1: and again. It's as if we are oblivious to the
• 24:14
  Speaker 1: consequences of regime change.
• 24:16
  Speaker 2: Regime changes.
• 24:18
  Speaker 1: It's as if Iraq told us nothing of Afghanistan or Libya.
• 24:26
  Speaker 1: We should be students of history. A midiature, a region,
• 24:33
  Speaker 1: A region. Change in the Middle East. It's a ticking
• 24:37
  Speaker 1: time bone, it's a powder cake, it's the it's the
• 24:40
  Speaker 1: mushroom cloud that cannot be stopped. There is more to lose,
• 24:48
  Speaker 1: more to lose to try under the region. Change in
• 24:53
  Speaker 1: the Middle is bring people to the table, offer them carots,
• 25:02
  Speaker 1: give them promises that promises that can be kept, reassure
• 25:07
  Speaker 1: them after peaceful nuclear energy development with very few other
• 25:20
  Speaker 1: controls and treaties and treaties. Bringing countries to the table
• 25:31
  Speaker 1: like Russia, like China, and the EU and the United States,
• 25:38
  Speaker 1: and some media Eastern countries that have sticks in it,
• 25:41
  Speaker 1: like Egypt, like South araa ware living Qatar.
• 25:48
  Speaker 2: You bring them.
• 25:51
  Speaker 1: To the table.
• 25:54
  Speaker 2: To talk about.
• 25:57
  Speaker 1: The middle is hm hm. I let the promise a country,
• 26:05
  Speaker 1: if you don't have a nuclear weapon, we're gonna embrace
• 26:10
  Speaker 1: you when I work together for the development of your country,
• 26:16
  Speaker 1: for the peacefulness of it. We're gonna include you into
• 26:22
  Speaker 1: the clubs of economic nations and advise man the free
• 26:27
  Speaker 1: world of ideas they come to us if you don't
• 26:34
  Speaker 1: have to bound, I give up the bound.
• 26:39
  Speaker 2: All of us.
• 26:40
  Speaker 1: You're protecting all of us, your guarantee, your development, the
• 26:47
  Speaker 1: advanced man and medicine, science, technology, infrastructure, safety, no technology,
• 26:58
  Speaker 1: semi conductors. Yeah, I fant man. But you're bringing into
• 27:04
  Speaker 1: the club of the AI. If it's robotics, quantum comparing
• 27:11
  Speaker 1: hsion technologies, new margine that technologists come to the world,
• 27:18
  Speaker 1: abandoned it your weapon. If that be the fear of
• 27:26
  Speaker 1: what happened to South Africa or what happened to UHH
• 27:35
  Speaker 1: silent side that once they give up, oh, they got
• 27:45
  Speaker 1: destroyed like UK, that they give up the nuclear ambitions,
• 27:52
  Speaker 1: the nuclear weapons ambitions or warheads and they got destroyed.
• 27:59
  Speaker 1: If that be the case, the beguarities by the world
• 28:05
  Speaker 1: powers that our culture will be left to develop, to develop.
• 28:14
  Speaker 1: It's a win win type of thing. There are many
• 28:18
  Speaker 1: ways to resolve a crisis if we want to. But
• 28:21
  Speaker 1: some politicians are not interested.
• 28:25
  Speaker 2: All.
• 28:25
  Speaker 1: Some politicians want this war more war.
• 28:30
  Speaker 2: War is that thing.
• 28:33
  Speaker 1: They don't want negotiations, They don't want people coming to
• 28:35
  Speaker 1: the table. They just want to bomb, bom and killed
• 28:38
  Speaker 1: and bound people. The happy saying cities destroy forgetting to
• 28:45
  Speaker 1: know that those cities can rebuild again. You destroy concrete,
• 28:51
  Speaker 1: you destroy cement, you destroy oood, they can be bound again.
• 29:00
  Speaker 1: H With the reputation of of having augusm and disjoying cities,
• 29:08
  Speaker 1: it's not a way, it's not a way. It's not
• 29:12
  Speaker 1: a way to nthy. We just disrupt the lives of
• 29:17
  Speaker 1: the ordinary people, forcing them into bomba bomb shelters or
• 29:26
  Speaker 1: forcing them to flee their cities or to escape their countries.
• 29:32
  Speaker 1: Leading to bisery, poverty, starvation, hunger, famine and death. Bombing
• 29:41
  Speaker 1: is not a wire as well as having a nuclear weapons,
• 29:48
  Speaker 1: it's not a why we don't need that again today
• 29:52
  Speaker 1: forever geopolitical reasons that countries must have nuclear weapons. The
• 29:57
  Speaker 1: future does don't need that. The great a new war
• 30:03
  Speaker 1: doesn't need that. We don't need weapons of massive destructions
• 30:09
  Speaker 1: in the hand of anybody. We don't need that, and
• 30:17
  Speaker 1: the world doesn't need war need.
• 30:21
  Speaker 2: Reader.
• 30:23
  Speaker 1: But you have leaders there are intelligent enough in all
• 30:28
  Speaker 1: in world history, in geobraltical history, and in war history.
• 30:39
  Speaker 1: Ignorance you're not late. Let intelligence late. In humanity, you're
• 30:43
  Speaker 1: not late. Let humanity late. Peacefulness you lead to war.
• 30:51
  Speaker 1: Countries should be able to coexist. Do not i innal
• 30:56
  Speaker 1: it or not to ask for the destruction of others.
• 31:01
  Speaker 1: Such language should not be the vocabulary of politicians. We
• 31:07
  Speaker 1: shouldn't wipe other countries of the math. That's not good,
• 31:13
  Speaker 1: that's not politically wise. Until the proxies and terrorists organizations,
• 31:26
  Speaker 1: we should disarm those institutions or those There are networks
• 31:29
  Speaker 1: that are are meant to destabilize that must be disarmed
• 31:37
  Speaker 1: by the sake of humanity. Before you want to live
• 31:41
  Speaker 1: their lives, take kill of their families, enjoy their daily bread,
• 31:48
  Speaker 1: good places, say places, look for their grandchildren and great
• 31:55
  Speaker 1: generation and wealth, have a happy time, and pass on
• 32:01
  Speaker 1: what they've made and move on with the young to
• 32:05
  Speaker 1: continue the journey of the all. That's why humans work.
• 32:12
  Speaker 1: They don't want war every day. I don't have bomb
• 32:15
  Speaker 1: shelters every door, run from the city, so being bombed
• 32:19
  Speaker 1: and killed, and bodies silver and limbs following apart in
• 32:23
  Speaker 1: the streets, and fire and noise and chaos and devastation.
• 32:29
  Speaker 1: He mustn't want that. Humans will not bond for that.
• 32:36
  Speaker 1: It's upon the leaders, no matter how popular, no matter
• 32:40
  Speaker 1: how just your course, don't exaggerate. You cannot keep going
• 32:49
  Speaker 1: until destroy the whole war, to destroy yourself. And what
• 32:55
  Speaker 1: is my fear. My fear is that we'll put push
• 33:00
  Speaker 1: a country so much to the war, to the war
• 33:03
  Speaker 1: to the wall. We pushed that country so much that
• 33:09
  Speaker 1: we develop a suicide state. What we should be fair
• 33:14
  Speaker 1: about to the fear of today is developing a suicide state. Remember,
• 33:19
  Speaker 1: you got a suicide of person, you got a terrorist organization,
• 33:24
  Speaker 1: and then you can push a country to the limit
• 33:26
  Speaker 1: that you develop a suicide state that the whole state
• 33:30
  Speaker 1: would prefer to destroy itself and destroy the war. Be
• 33:34
  Speaker 1: careful of pushing a country to become suicide to itself
• 33:43
  Speaker 1: or to the whole world, and MISTA choose to destroy
• 33:47
  Speaker 1: themselves and destroy the war. Should be careful. I should
• 34:01
  Speaker 1: remember the second ward war. Don't caredding suicide and state
• 34:10
  Speaker 1: to save face, we choose to destroy the whole world.
• 34:15
  Speaker 1: Stop pushing, Stop pushing. Have diplomats, we can negotiate the
• 34:28
  Speaker 1: what what words take nations to war? Words bring nations
• 34:34
  Speaker 1: back to the decosition, table words bring peace, wild words
• 34:41
  Speaker 1: bring war. We must not seek war. The question always asked,
• 34:54
  Speaker 1: why do we keep fighting? Do we keep fighting to
• 34:59
  Speaker 1: sur face? Do we keep firing to surface by ignoring.
• 35:11
  Speaker 2: The danger.
• 35:14
  Speaker 1: That war can inflict? Didn't we again a nice to
• 35:26
  Speaker 1: make the enemy? Didn't we again under prepared? Can't you
• 35:40
  Speaker 1: see the devastation that the war is inflicted in the
• 35:45
  Speaker 1: cities and threatening the shutter bunkers. Don't you remember hm
• 36:00
  Speaker 1: this enemy wanting us that they were ready to retardate.
• 36:11
  Speaker 1: Don't you acknowledge the damage they can do, the damage
• 36:19
  Speaker 1: they have done, and the damage that's the capable of doing.
• 36:30
  Speaker 1: If a word strategy young formula, it's shaky. Do you
• 36:36
  Speaker 1: expect a positive outcome, a decisive outcome, or a serials
• 36:44
  Speaker 1: devastating damage to the enemy. A series of blows to
• 36:55
  Speaker 1: the enemy might not accumulate to a decisive blow on
• 37:05
  Speaker 1: the enemy. You know the weapons of the enemy are
• 37:13
  Speaker 1: deadly and threatening. Please threat carefully. Hawkishness sometimes forgets reality.
• 37:31
  Speaker 1: Having a nuclear weapon or not having a nuclear weapon
• 37:43
  Speaker 1: can sometimes not only be decisive true or or but
• 37:48
  Speaker 1: to feel victress this im in a nation from the
• 37:54
  Speaker 1: nuclear weapon and need something more m.
• 38:04
  Speaker 2: Done.
• 38:05
  Speaker 1: Take for tad the clock is taken to prevent the
• 38:14
  Speaker 1: bonb intelligently or to risk the bone through blunders, Lass,
• 38:24
  Speaker 1: ego clashes, bella couster mindedness or lack of a sustintive,
• 38:35
  Speaker 1: workable and sustenable strategy. Voice easy, positive peace or passive
• 38:50
  Speaker 1: or positive, peaceful and makable or acceptable. Solution isn't voice
• 38:58
  Speaker 1: easy resolution isn't. If negotiation and diplomacy is seen as
• 39:14
  Speaker 1: a weakness to artists, then keep on the war and
• 39:20
  Speaker 1: see where it takes you. Who goes to war and
• 39:28
  Speaker 1: comes out clan take it out. Something that can be
• 39:42
  Speaker 1: that explosive must take into constellation. The che make a leaks,
• 39:56
  Speaker 1: and the damage and might cost of humanity. Humans must
• 40:03
  Speaker 1: talk to humans despite their mortal differences, in order to
• 40:08
  Speaker 1: resolve war crisis. War begets more war. As a way
• 40:18
  Speaker 1: of thinking, we must be conscious of our intentions to
• 40:34
  Speaker 1: keep fighting. We must self reflect about the cost of war.
• 40:48
  Speaker 1: We must remember the immense danger the war inflicts, both
• 40:53
  Speaker 1: on physical infrastructure and human lives. Are we keeping the
• 41:02
  Speaker 1: war because we are pursuing a phase saving justification now
• 41:13
  Speaker 1: lid to the destruction of others and suffering? Sometimes we
• 41:24
  Speaker 1: are at war due to underesturbation of the enemy. The
• 41:37
  Speaker 1: let's say, to underestimate the enemy can leads to failures
• 41:45
  Speaker 1: to properly prepare and acknowledge the capacities or capabilities of
• 41:50
  Speaker 1: your enemy. The dangers of arrogance and the lack of
• 41:58
  Speaker 1: the critical thinking militive preparedness or milative planning, and no
• 42:05
  Speaker 1: need to victory shaky strategies. The effectiveness of war strategies.
• 42:20
  Speaker 1: It's very important, but if this strategy is flawed, it's
• 42:27
  Speaker 1: unlikely to put these positive results. So we are thinking.
• 42:41
  Speaker 1: You must remember war is inherently unpredictable and it often
• 42:50
  Speaker 1: leads to unintended consequences lead to the cycle of violence
• 42:57
  Speaker 1: or because begets more war. So we are thinking you
• 43:06
  Speaker 1: need diplomacy to inguish it as an intended to talk
• 43:13
  Speaker 1: war even though he's seen us weakness. It's essential. Diplomacy
• 43:24
  Speaker 1: is essential for resolving conflicts and avoiding future of further bloodsheds.
• 43:34
  Speaker 1: We must play and play for a more rational and
• 43:37
  Speaker 1: human approach to international relationships. We must consider the devastating
• 43:46
  Speaker 1: custom quite sis of war and seek peaceful resolution to
• 43:52
  Speaker 1: dialogue and understanding. War does not have anybody, but the
• 44:04
  Speaker 1: wars are the wars of politicians. Politicians are the people
• 44:09
  Speaker 1: that take humanity to war. I would remind thee and
• 44:15
  Speaker 1: mind you, I got three types of leaders. Three types
• 44:22
  Speaker 1: of leaders when it comes to one piece, when it
• 44:27
  Speaker 1: comes to negotiation, diplomacy, truths or end of wars or
• 44:35
  Speaker 1: are just three types of leaders. There are those who
• 44:40
  Speaker 1: want war, there are those who don't want war, and
• 44:45
  Speaker 1: then are those who are on defense. The question becomes
• 44:49
  Speaker 1: which are you? There are three types of leaders in
• 44:55
  Speaker 1: the world, those who one piece diplomas, say and negotiations,
• 45:03
  Speaker 1: those who don't, and those who are on the fence.
• 45:07
  Speaker 1: Which are you? We cannot keep fighting until all of
• 45:14
  Speaker 1: us are dead. How wise and suicide? I could that be?
• 45:24
  Speaker 1: Humans should be led by their intellect rather than they
• 45:33
  Speaker 1: are fast or eagerness to trigger what's to come to
• 45:40
  Speaker 1: an end.
• 45:42
  Speaker 2: Sick.
• 45:43
  Speaker 1: Peace not just a truth. Truth sometimes is not peace.
• 45:54
  Speaker 1: It's not the end of the world, but the man's
• 45:58
  Speaker 1: strategy to refair.
• 46:01
  Speaker 2: And a war.
• 46:03
  Speaker 1: Don't choose it. We should stop the truth diplomacy and
• 46:10
  Speaker 1: embrace the end of war diplomacy. Human intellect and humanity
• 46:20
  Speaker 1: must have evolved past the truth intelligence. Quotion Min said
• 46:29
  Speaker 1: we must say to end wars. So I was thinking,
• 46:35
  Speaker 1: because you cannot win the war by continuing it.
• 46:44
  Speaker 2: Truth.
• 46:44
  Speaker 1: I just truth, don't fix anything. It's like your feet.
• 46:52
  Speaker 1: The souldiers were better and more better than more. Find
• 46:59
  Speaker 1: wars are the wars of politicians. They often always underestimate
• 47:05
  Speaker 1: their enemies. You can only win the war by underestimating
• 47:11
  Speaker 1: my enemies. And once humans with deadly weapons are falls
• 47:24
  Speaker 1: to the corner, they can see survivor suicide or death.
• 47:34
  Speaker 1: That's the only way of their existence. They must be
• 47:41
  Speaker 1: careful not to create or instigate a suicide state. Strategic
• 47:51
  Speaker 1: under extremation of the enemy mainly to mistaken intelligence, miscommunitions, miscommunication,
• 48:01
  Speaker 1: misplaced targeting, and waste of lives. A strategic resources. Once
• 48:11
  Speaker 1: you try to humulate a weapon's creed nation in the
• 48:19
  Speaker 1: presence of their people in my little life, devastating consequences.
• 48:30
  Speaker 1: It's a property damage, resources, a destruction of series. When
• 48:40
  Speaker 1: you go to war, you must remember the day after,
• 48:45
  Speaker 1: because that day after a number what you're wishing for,
• 48:48
  Speaker 1: what you're clamoring to attain. A blaten power. We do
• 48:56
  Speaker 1: everything on the imaginable to stay afloat. If you're hurt
• 49:04
  Speaker 1: a nucleass states so much, don't be surprised with the
• 49:11
  Speaker 1: eventuality of its. Usage of the weapon, or the leak
• 49:17
  Speaker 1: of it, or the proliferation of it. Humans should know
• 49:25
  Speaker 1: better not to have weapons of mass destruction, and they
• 49:36
  Speaker 1: should know better to think about the humanitarian consequences of leak,
• 49:45
  Speaker 1: usage of proliferation. Having the bomb is in the solution
• 49:54
  Speaker 1: which wiser any positive intelligence to develop your people, use
• 50:04
  Speaker 1: your nasion's intelligence for good. Quick to war, quick to
• 50:17
  Speaker 1: be destructive, punitive, erratic, unstable, or destabilized. War is the
• 50:25
  Speaker 1: manifestation of the inability to listen, to be mindful, or
• 50:31
  Speaker 1: take into consideration the wrongs of it. I mean the
• 50:36
  Speaker 1: wrongs of war, the destructive power of war, the causalities
• 50:41
  Speaker 1: of war, the cause of war, the tools of war,
• 50:45
  Speaker 1: the fall out of it, the basery and instability, or
• 50:50
  Speaker 1: the disharmony of our comfortability that war breaks. Whos are
• 50:59
  Speaker 1: sometimes fought for point they can leaders and the expense
• 51:03
  Speaker 1: of lives, resources, or against the will of the people,
• 51:12
  Speaker 1: or against the dide stability or peacefulness of the citizens.
• 51:21
  Speaker 1: Those who know war better, they know the wars are winnable.
• 51:30
  Speaker 1: Distrust is all the war breaks. I ask you the question,
• 51:37
  Speaker 1: whoever won the war? Nobody has lives lost.
• 51:44
  Speaker 2: The wars.
• 51:46
  Speaker 1: Cannot be resurrected. At the end, the wars we end,
• 51:54
  Speaker 1: Negotisions will start be, concessions will be made, satilements will
• 52:01
  Speaker 1: be rich. Truth of peace or temporary peace will be rich,
• 52:11
  Speaker 1: and world parties or allies, we'll live to fight another day.
• 52:18
  Speaker 1: But to that effect their lives last will not come
• 52:22
  Speaker 1: back to live again. The people are always the casualties
• 52:30
  Speaker 1: or collateral damages of war. Those same people, unfortunately, are
• 52:38
  Speaker 1: the same people who beat the drums.
• 52:40
  Speaker 2: Of war.
• 52:42
  Speaker 1: And chant the chorus of war pomp in their chest.
• 52:49
  Speaker 1: I'm fine for avirege greatness, mosom come from the destruction
• 52:57
  Speaker 1: of others. Greatness mustn't come from the destruction of others.
• 53:07
  Speaker 1: War mustn't be a negotiation too. Gambling with the well
• 53:13
  Speaker 1: being of humanity to achieve a political goal or your
• 53:16
  Speaker 1: political objective can end up destroying the whole world itself.
• 53:25
  Speaker 1: If diplomasm means nothing and international loss are tools rather
• 53:34
  Speaker 1: than instruments of meaningful deityians. The humanity is of for
• 53:44
  Speaker 1: and for the rule of the strong, the might of
• 53:48
  Speaker 1: the powerful to be strong without wit, common sense, or humanity.
• 54:01
  Speaker 1: It's not a thing. War is just a death called
• 54:10
  Speaker 1: rap in nationalism and the flag. Say it again, war,
• 54:16
  Speaker 1: It's just a death called rapped in nationalism and the
• 54:22
  Speaker 1: flag was a thought out of wrongful or corrupted intelligence.
• 54:32
  Speaker 1: Sound intelligence diffusist.
• 54:34
  Speaker 2: War was not start.
• 54:35
  Speaker 1: There was a bond from misleading intelligence.
• 54:46
  Speaker 2: Who goes to war?
• 54:47
  Speaker 1: Nothinking? Soldiers with die? Why should they die? Why should
• 54:55
  Speaker 1: soler just die? Should humans be sacrificed for political ambitions?
• 55:07
  Speaker 1: Respect thy soldiers waste not their lives. They are parents too,
• 55:17
  Speaker 1: They're to have a life after service. Soldiers are not weapons,
• 55:23
  Speaker 1: but humans. Respect soldiers. When shall war be old fashioned?
• 55:36
  Speaker 1: When shall humans evolved not to see war as a
• 55:39
  Speaker 1: solution to their problems of crisis. There are three types
• 55:46
  Speaker 1: of humans. Those who create wars they cannot resolve, those
• 55:55
  Speaker 1: who resolve the wars they create, and those who resolve
• 55:59
  Speaker 1: wars they didn't create. Which are you? Whatever you do,
• 56:16
  Speaker 1: please prioritize the future. I'm wellbeing of the children. Whatever
• 56:25
  Speaker 1: she MutS do here on this earth, that should remember
• 56:31
  Speaker 1: to prioritize the children. The children of the future should
• 56:37
  Speaker 1: come first. This world is a world of children. The
• 56:48
  Speaker 1: future is the future of children. Whatever you do, I
• 56:55
  Speaker 1: should do it in the interests in the well being.
• 56:58
  Speaker 1: I'm the future of all children. Children are innocent until
• 57:06
  Speaker 1: they are grown. Job and does not their livelihood. If
• 57:13
  Speaker 1: yours a car, it should be too safe. The children
• 57:20
  Speaker 1: not killed or have them when the storm, fire, or
• 57:28
  Speaker 1: rain comes. Keep the children safe, Make sure they are fat,
• 57:36
  Speaker 1: cat from, nurtured, raised, educated, trained, liberated, independent, self determined
• 57:47
  Speaker 1: and free. The future of tomorrow cannot be true, But
• 57:57
  Speaker 1: are the children of to die. The dreams of a
• 58:03
  Speaker 1: better life, a better world, a better ecology, a better environment,
• 58:14
  Speaker 1: or investment shall pass through the children of today. A
• 58:30
  Speaker 1: herd of a kid anywhere, it's a herd of a
• 58:37
  Speaker 1: kid everywhere. And if the heart of a kid and
• 58:43
  Speaker 1: nowhere isn't your heart, or the cry of a kid
• 58:48
  Speaker 1: anywhere is in your kids, then shame on here, shaman dear.
• 58:58
  Speaker 1: If it is ward should be or could be with
• 59:03
  Speaker 1: our children, then what war.
• 59:08
  Speaker 2: Is it?
• 59:11
  Speaker 1: If a child can be bombed, if a child can't
• 59:15
  Speaker 1: be kicked out, if a chide can be raped, traffic,
• 59:19
  Speaker 1: abuse and abandoned or killed in the world of promise
• 59:28
  Speaker 1: and hope, or prayers and godliness, or law and order,
• 59:36
  Speaker 1: or civility and the promise of care and safety, then
• 59:44
  Speaker 1: what war is it? If a child is not safe,
• 59:49
  Speaker 1: even in the bunker, hiding for life, then what world
• 59:56
  Speaker 1: are we building? Is a about the children? The future?
• 1:00:03
  Speaker 1: Then are we destry in the future today while we
• 1:00:08
  Speaker 1: destry in the future of tomorrow's children at fighting the
• 1:00:12
  Speaker 1: wars of today? Whre we making difficult for the kids?
• 1:00:18
  Speaker 1: They cannot go to school, they cannot play on the playground,
• 1:00:22
  Speaker 1: they cannot do what children do best. Old men, with
• 1:00:30
  Speaker 1: all brands, all ambitions, our self distraining the world. Children
• 1:00:44
  Speaker 1: shall not be the the Then children shall not be
• 1:00:47
  Speaker 1: the endangered species of a planet that they are bound
• 1:00:54
  Speaker 1: to late and populate. Children shouldn't be the colteral damages
• 1:01:01
  Speaker 1: of the wars of their parents. A child killed and
• 1:01:07
  Speaker 1: pattern a child killed From the poem, what wrong did
• 1:01:13
  Speaker 1: they do? I should a child deserve that. The children
• 1:01:23
  Speaker 1: of today are here to solve the problems of tomorrow.
• 1:01:28
  Speaker 1: The children are here to help us at our future
• 1:01:34
  Speaker 1: to be, we shouldn't go to war without decade into
• 1:01:39
  Speaker 1: constellation the pain, the heart, the death, the devastations, and
• 1:01:45
  Speaker 1: it breaks to children, the children of today. At the
• 1:01:55
  Speaker 1: future of tomorrow, we have the obligation, the expectation, the responsibility,
• 1:02:07
  Speaker 1: and the investment and the duty.
• 1:02:13
  Speaker 2: But to love.
• 1:02:16
  Speaker 1: Children, to help children, to teach children, to protect children,
• 1:02:23
  Speaker 1: and to invest in there without discombination, we should burther
• 1:02:33
  Speaker 1: not the children of tomorrow, the ai of tomorrow shall
• 1:02:43
  Speaker 1: make better by the children of today. That to which
• 1:02:47
  Speaker 1: intelligence is for tomorrow shall be better about the children
• 1:02:50
  Speaker 1: of today. And I'm at which intelligence is for tomorrow
• 1:02:55
  Speaker 1: must not be weapons right, must not be weapon nice
• 1:03:00
  Speaker 1: to destroy the same children that we are giving butter
• 1:03:02
  Speaker 1: today we have self destroying the Jenkod of the future
• 1:03:09
  Speaker 1: by waging the wars of today. Remember, children are the
• 1:03:21
  Speaker 1: bright spots of the future. There are the reasons while
• 1:03:26
  Speaker 1: we live there, the reasons while we try. Children are
• 1:03:33
  Speaker 1: the reasons why we build all these cities or this
• 1:03:36
  Speaker 1: advancement and technology. It's for the sake of children. War
• 1:03:44
  Speaker 1: kills children. We must not let that be. So we
• 1:03:55
  Speaker 1: have thinking. So we have thinking. Our job is to
• 1:04:06
  Speaker 1: create a pieceful war. We know her life is smarter.
• 1:04:12
  Speaker 1: We come, we go, and the human menace here with
• 1:04:16
  Speaker 1: its own cave, with their own quantum energy, where the
• 1:04:23
  Speaker 1: shared shared humanitarian space. Each time we go to war,
• 1:04:32
  Speaker 1: the creatain stability. It takes humanity back. It shows how
• 1:04:39
  Speaker 1: savage humans can't be her brutal, her crow, her barbaric.
• 1:04:44
  Speaker 2: We can be.
• 1:04:47
  Speaker 1: The worst of it today is that we see it
• 1:04:49
  Speaker 1: on TV. But when you do those wars that you want,
• 1:04:55
  Speaker 1: you can see innocent children die because is struggling to
• 1:05:00
  Speaker 1: take innocent children to safety. Those innocent children are the
• 1:05:05
  Speaker 1: niccola tesla at the armstein of tomorrow, at the making
• 1:05:10
  Speaker 1: of tomorrow, That the tesla, that the lad mask of tomorrow,
• 1:05:16
  Speaker 1: that the soccer box of tomorrow, at the basis of tomorrow,
• 1:05:21
  Speaker 1: that the diepsake of tomorrow, that the open e eyes
• 1:05:23
  Speaker 1: of tomorrow, at the child jipity of tomorrow at the
• 1:05:28
  Speaker 1: clock or the matter or the NVIDIA or the Germanis
• 1:05:37
  Speaker 1: of tomorrow, and will fight these wars for temporary political ambitions.
• 1:05:47
  Speaker 1: We are destroying the future of tomorrow. For humans to
• 1:05:53
  Speaker 1: fight their war, they should make sure that every child
• 1:05:57
  Speaker 1: is safe. Children must not keep being the colacteral damages
• 1:06:03
  Speaker 1: of the worlds. Afterday a choice bomb and the choice bombed,
• 1:06:11
  Speaker 1: and I chose bomb, the choice bombed, infrastructure destroyed.
• 1:06:20
  Speaker 2: Or a sha.
• 1:06:22
  Speaker 1: What a shin. I can't be talking about activists. I
• 1:06:28
  Speaker 1: can't be talking about di whisial intelligence. I can be
• 1:06:32
  Speaker 1: talking about advancing a new world, taken myself to space,
• 1:06:36
  Speaker 1: going to the moon, going to Mars, or this quantum
• 1:06:42
  Speaker 1: info or the vision technologies and simple conductoralization, all these
• 1:06:46
  Speaker 1: new technologies and new medical pneumatic magical development. I can't
• 1:06:52
  Speaker 1: be talking about all these better world health carey, cancercurity, diseases,
• 1:06:57
  Speaker 1: prolonging lies HM. Why at the same times weaponizing activicial intelligences,
• 1:07:07
  Speaker 1: creating the drones of war, the hypersonic weapons of war.
• 1:07:15
  Speaker 2: Or a shay.
• 1:07:18
  Speaker 1: If you want to fight your war, make sure our
• 1:07:23
  Speaker 1: children are the children of the war. Are the children
• 1:07:28
  Speaker 1: of these universe?
• 1:07:29
  Speaker 2: As safe.
• 1:07:32
  Speaker 1: Shame on you for keep fighting the wars and killing
• 1:07:35
  Speaker 1: in the same children. You are killing the future. You're
• 1:07:42
  Speaker 1: killing the future. Philosopher Prince, they are intelligences. Philosopher Prince Israsa,
• 1:07:57
  Speaker 1: June eighteenth, twenty twenty five from the great city of
• 1:08:05
  Speaker 1: Las Vegas, USA, appeling upon humans to always remember the
• 1:08:13
  Speaker 1: consequences of war, to protect the lives of our children,
• 1:08:19
  Speaker 1: and to seek negotiations when always necessary. To remind them
• 1:08:28
  Speaker 1: of war is not always the way that humans get
• 1:08:32
  Speaker 1: exhausted and tired.
• 1:08:36
  Speaker 2: The rush to war.
• 1:08:38
  Speaker 1: It's not a ruge to anything, distortion, devastation. Humans can't
• 1:08:49
  Speaker 1: be better. I pray upon day to remember our children,
• 1:08:57
  Speaker 1: the children of the earth, when the goad to war