Latest / Talk to Prince Show - Solving World's Problems / Prince Israel Zaar on: Conflict Resolution 080625

Transcript

Prince Israel Zaar on: Conflict Resolution 080625 · Talk to Prince Show - Solving World's Problems

0:01
Speaker 1: Conflict resolution. Conflict resolution might be what is missing today
0:19
Speaker 1: in the classroom, in the ballroom, and the kitchen table
0:32
Speaker 1: in the war room, or something that is gradually been
0:42
Speaker 1: missing in the minds of in the minds of humans,
0:47
Speaker 1: or in the lexicon of language. Conflict resolution is something
0:58
Speaker 1: that must again be the pinnacle of studies, especially in
1:10
Speaker 1: political science, in good governance, in leadership and enjoy politics.
1:26
Speaker 1: Conflict resolution is something that is needed today in our homes,
1:32
Speaker 1: between spouses or parents and children, in peer groups, in associations,
1:40
Speaker 1: in organization, and in friendship relations. The human being needs
1:53
Speaker 1: to understand and to know more about conflict resolution. We
2:05
Speaker 1: must teach these things for the better men of humanity.
2:13
Speaker 1: In today's society, it's not much about conflict resolution, but
2:21
Speaker 1: much about conflict escalation. Escalation not the escalation. Conflicts are escalated,
2:33
Speaker 1: threats are escalated, and conflicts are resolved through more escalation.
2:41
Speaker 1: To more escalation, humans must be taught to solve their
2:48
Speaker 1: own problems in the realms of conflict resolution. I was
2:57
Speaker 1: started by defining three types of people, three types of governments,
3:04
Speaker 1: three types of entities all in one. There are three
3:11
Speaker 1: types of people or systems. Those who create problems they
3:18
Speaker 1: cannot solve. Those who solve the problems they create, and
3:25
Speaker 1: those who solve problems they didn't create. In conflict resolutions,
3:35
Speaker 1: you need those who can solve problems that they didn't create.
3:42
Speaker 1: Once humans are implicated in something, they don'tsolved that thing
3:47
Speaker 1: in which they are implicated, and they try to cover up,
3:52
Speaker 1: They try to mess thems up, and they try to
3:55
Speaker 1: cause more problem. They try to point the thing guess
4:01
Speaker 1: and everybody that model the water bloody lines between fact, fiction, conspiracy,
4:10
Speaker 1: misinformation and disinformation. Society bus create through education, through naturing,
4:27
Speaker 1: to mentoring. Staty must create a class or a group
4:33
Speaker 1: of problem service humans who can reserve conflicts. You can
4:41
Speaker 1: see into this war. There are so many wars, so
4:45
Speaker 1: many conflicts, and the devastation of the devastating power of
4:52
Speaker 1: war today is enormous. The damage human lives, the property,
4:59
Speaker 1: the infrastructure, to resources, the wealth, the well being, and
5:06
Speaker 1: the future. It's unspeakable or despeakable. Humans can create more
5:16
Speaker 1: problems than they can solve. Humans have been inculturated in
5:23
Speaker 1: a society of laziness, entitlement, and victim hurt. Humans are
5:31
Speaker 1: entitled to be victims. They create a problem, they rare
5:38
Speaker 1: challenge themselves to solve the problem, to blame somebody, als,
5:42
Speaker 1: or something else. The humanity of the human beings being lost.
5:50
Speaker 1: Humans must have soul. Youmans must have consciousness, and conscious
5:58
Speaker 1: humans must be able to reflect on what they do.
6:03
Speaker 1: Humans must be able to have some guilt when they
6:05
Speaker 1: do things wrong. Actualization or severalization. At the point in
6:12
Speaker 1: time that human being knows that what they're doing it
6:14
Speaker 1: is not right, it's not correct, it's not moral, it's
6:18
Speaker 1: not just, it's not fair, and it's just wrong. The
6:26
Speaker 1: consciousness of the human being must be able to come
6:28
Speaker 1: to this severalization that something is wrong that needs to
6:32
Speaker 1: be fixed. You cannot resolve a conflict when there is
6:38
Speaker 1: no conflict. You can only resolve a conflict when the
6:43
Speaker 1: parties to the conflict does describe it as a conflict.
6:49
Speaker 1: If everybody is right, then everybody is wrong. They cannot
6:56
Speaker 1: be right or wrong at the same time on an
7:01
Speaker 1: issue of conflict. Those who start wars hardly in the wars.
7:11
Speaker 1: The war is a failure in conflict resolution. The conflict
7:16
Speaker 1: in yourself is a failure in conflict resolution. The quarter
7:21
Speaker 1: is a failure in conflict resolution. The fact it's a
7:26
Speaker 1: failure in conflict resolution. It's stability, it's a failure in
7:32
Speaker 1: conflict dessumbition, a coold are it's a failure in conflict resolution.
7:41
Speaker 1: And I can't chaos and terror. All this a failure
7:46
Speaker 1: and conflict resolutions. Then are those who create conflicts, and
7:52
Speaker 1: then are those who soften There those who create conflict.
7:58
Speaker 1: There are three types of those who create conflict, innocent, purposeful,
8:08
Speaker 1: and reckless. Three types of people who create conflict. The
8:17
Speaker 1: first group of people that create conflict unknowingly out of ignorance,
8:23
Speaker 1: placeful ignorance. They don't know better. They're not talk better,
8:30
Speaker 1: they don't think through, they have no malicious intent, or
8:36
Speaker 1: they have no intention Those I call them on intentional
8:41
Speaker 1: conflict creators. On intentional conflict creators, they don't know any better,
8:49
Speaker 1: and they should therefore be taught better. Unintentional conflict creators
8:56
Speaker 1: are those who always expect others to solve their problems.
9:02
Speaker 1: They're depending on others to solve their problems. They will
9:06
Speaker 1: not talk better on how to solve their own problems.
9:11
Speaker 1: The thing you do when you have a child is
9:14
Speaker 1: start to teach the child and conflict resolution how to
9:17
Speaker 1: solve problems. Parents start by telling the kids that when
9:21
Speaker 1: you create a mess, you clean your mess, say I'm sorry,
9:27
Speaker 1: and go back to solve the problems you have created.
9:32
Speaker 1: That'd be quick to say something wrong. Parents start to
9:35
Speaker 1: tascht the kids that won do something wrong, don't lie
9:38
Speaker 1: about it. Only lie when it's necessary fair survivor, fair
9:43
Speaker 1: survivor of the wellbeing of others. You don't lie when
9:48
Speaker 1: a lie in itself is destructive to your own well
9:50
Speaker 1: being and to your own growth. Parents start to teach
9:56
Speaker 1: their kids are to play with others, how to work
10:02
Speaker 1: as certain, how to understand others. Parents start to teach
10:08
Speaker 1: case about the cosmos reality of things, the ecological realities
10:14
Speaker 1: of things, the humanity reality of things, or the society
10:21
Speaker 1: reality of things. That humans are not isolational beings, believe
10:27
Speaker 1: in a collective society, that humans need one another, that
10:32
Speaker 1: the group will not accept you if you don't behave well.
10:38
Speaker 1: That a human being is the character, the mannerism, and
10:43
Speaker 1: the attitude, and that the human being can be judged
10:47
Speaker 1: by its intelligence, it's intentionality, and its intensity. That the
10:59
Speaker 1: human being can be charged through the understanding of being
11:05
Speaker 1: of goodness, intelligence, and contribution. Parents teach kids that the
11:23
Speaker 1: human being is not just in the physicality of itself,
11:27
Speaker 1: That the human being is not just it's ego, That
11:32
Speaker 1: the human being is not always right. That we'll find
11:36
Speaker 1: yourself proving yourself all the times. It makes you're hiding
11:38
Speaker 1: something and we're always right, and makes you're always wrong.
11:46
Speaker 1: Because human being learned from one another. You learn from
11:51
Speaker 1: your mistakes. I always accept that sometimes you're wrong. Conflict
12:00
Speaker 1: comes sometimes out of narcissistic arrogance, the inability to admit fault,
12:11
Speaker 1: the honeliness of self. I am the God of myself
12:16
Speaker 1: and no more than everybody. As and kids are taught
12:22
Speaker 1: as a child, I cannot do what you want unless
12:27
Speaker 1: it is what is right, right, action and goodness and lawfulness.
12:36
Speaker 1: He must are taught at an early age that you
12:43
Speaker 1: are respected for your contribution, that if everybody does what
12:50
Speaker 1: they want, society will self destroy. As a child, the
12:59
Speaker 1: kid learned how to listen, how to speak, how to
13:05
Speaker 1: carry themselves, how to use reason and rationality after have
13:17
Speaker 1: some compassion and sympathy, how to know when too much
13:22
Speaker 1: is too much. Kids are taught how to know when
13:27
Speaker 1: to stop you fight on the playground. The kids knows
13:36
Speaker 1: when to stop, when to ask for help, when two
13:42
Speaker 1: people are fighting, the purpose of the fight is that
13:46
Speaker 1: one person must win, So fight in itself betrays conflict resolution,
13:56
Speaker 1: and there is conflict resolution because people fight. The first
14:08
Speaker 1: part of conflict resolution are people who unintentionally fight like children,
14:21
Speaker 1: then need an adult in the room and need somebody
14:25
Speaker 1: to tell them to stop, as they killed themselves or
14:30
Speaker 1: everybody else, as they hand theirselves or everybody else, as
14:36
Speaker 1: they're hurting themselves and everybody else. The second group of
14:48
Speaker 1: people in the fields of conflict resolution are those who
14:56
Speaker 1: intentionally create conflict. Intentionally, it means they have something to gain.
15:07
Speaker 1: They will push the conflict to the limit. They will
15:11
Speaker 1: stretch everybody. They will stretch the conscience of humanity. They
15:17
Speaker 1: will be crue a brutal, in humane, and savage, will
15:23
Speaker 1: be barbaric. They'll do everything they need to achieve a
15:31
Speaker 1: particular girl. They will not stop. They'll prefer to destroy
15:37
Speaker 1: the world with them. They'll use nuclear weapon if they can.
15:45
Speaker 1: They don't care about the well being of others, but
15:50
Speaker 1: all they care about is attaining their goal. The conflict
15:57
Speaker 1: is purposeful. Conflict is premeditated, The conflict is planned, the
16:05
Speaker 1: conflict is re has and the conflict is executed at
16:13
Speaker 1: varial stages. Intentional conflict creators ICC. Intentional conflict creators, their
16:33
Speaker 1: conflict becomes the burden of the world. The whole world
16:39
Speaker 1: plays the price for their conflict. If two ICC system
16:52
Speaker 1: of people or entity or groups are in conflict, the
16:57
Speaker 1: conflict will prolong itself. If two intentional conflict creators are
17:05
Speaker 1: in conflict, that conflict with will continue, if not into perpetuity.
17:16
Speaker 1: Because board parties are intentions on what they are doing.
17:22
Speaker 1: They don't give up because giving up will be seeing
17:25
Speaker 1: as weakness, as capitulation, and they will not want to
17:31
Speaker 1: pay the price for that capitulation. They don't want to
17:36
Speaker 1: pay the press of surrendering. They don't want to pay
17:40
Speaker 1: the press of query. They'll prefer to fight to the end.
17:47
Speaker 1: They don't care how much blood, how much resources. They
17:58
Speaker 1: don't care how much is lost. They do not care,
18:04
Speaker 1: but they care for their goal. A goal is often surfaced,
18:11
Speaker 1: self centered, and always come with the assumption of superiority,
18:19
Speaker 1: the assumption of power and dominance of control. I say
18:30
Speaker 1: say intentional conflict creators individuality or in through an individualistic lens,
18:44
Speaker 1: I see seek conflict creators. Intentional conflict creators are responsive
18:53
Speaker 1: for most of the crimes in society, premeditative crimes. A
18:59
Speaker 1: person not that if they kill. If they kill the person,
19:02
Speaker 1: the person will die. They have calculated that pace of
19:09
Speaker 1: cheminology studies, the way they couse benefit analysis. They know
19:17
Speaker 1: they will profit from the crime. I know the punishment
19:21
Speaker 1: doesn't matter, or don't know how to get away from
19:24
Speaker 1: the punishment, to get out of it. They not to
19:29
Speaker 1: play the system, or they not to play public opinion.
19:36
Speaker 1: I see say a money polative. I believe they have
19:41
Speaker 1: the power that only them have. They believe they can
19:46
Speaker 1: come in the crime and go free. They're good appr
19:54
Speaker 1: always assume the world is on their side. They play
20:00
Speaker 1: the best spinners to buy the media. They lobby them,
20:07
Speaker 1: buy politicians. Everybody is on their payroll. Everybody can be
20:16
Speaker 1: punished by them. They can blackmail them. So ICC conflic creators.
20:27
Speaker 1: They plan what they do and people pay the price
20:31
Speaker 1: for it. If you go against them, it'll be black
20:35
Speaker 1: mail or be ambushed. You can't even be eliminated. You'll
20:41
Speaker 1: be fired from your job. There is always a consequence
20:45
Speaker 1: to pay when you go against ICC conflic creators. If
20:55
Speaker 1: a bully in the neighborhood, bully somebody else. If that
21:02
Speaker 1: is an ICC conflict creator, every other kid will fall
21:07
Speaker 1: in line. They know what the bully is doing is wrong,
21:12
Speaker 1: but that they did not stand against that bullet, because
21:15
Speaker 1: they now the bullice should in revenge, in vignitativeness, that
21:24
Speaker 1: blue will come after you will creep her, you destroy.
21:34
Speaker 1: Such conflicts become difficult or challenging the resolve, because then
21:39
Speaker 1: the intent of that conflict is not very resolved. It's capitulation.
21:45
Speaker 1: Winning means somebody must bow winning. I mean somebody must
21:52
Speaker 1: surrender themselves, their wealth, their resources, they are technical, their territory,
22:03
Speaker 1: or even sometimes they will accepted to be taking captives
22:06
Speaker 1: of ours lives or abuse and disabuse, or denigrated or disrespected,
22:16
Speaker 1: or discriminated upon or devalued. So I see say conflict creators,
22:26
Speaker 1: it's like a business to them. They're good at it.
22:32
Speaker 1: That's who they are. They live to conflict. They create
22:37
Speaker 1: conflict from and conflict the profit from conflict. If it
22:41
Speaker 1: resolve all the conflicts in the world, then I see
22:45
Speaker 1: the type of person will go out of business. There
22:50
Speaker 1: that the essence of their being is to create conflict.
22:57
Speaker 1: The essence of their being is to create conflict. They
23:01
Speaker 1: like a fight, they're quick to claim victim, and they
23:06
Speaker 1: are entitled to do what they want. They count the
23:09
Speaker 1: blame others because they lobby and the bye people to
23:15
Speaker 1: be by themselves. A bullying in the neighborhood will may
23:21
Speaker 1: be still to bribe, still to bribe. They were rap
23:32
Speaker 1: the convenian star to bribe people to be on their side.
23:39
Speaker 1: A bully in the neighborhood who beat the enemies of
23:45
Speaker 1: their friends to win favor. And I see the type
23:57
Speaker 1: of person hm becoming violence or terror. A terrorist is
24:07
Speaker 1: an icy ce type of person. A terror does not
24:11
Speaker 1: seek resolution. They just want to get something and they
24:14
Speaker 1: don't mind if they die in the process of that.
24:20
Speaker 1: The question becomes how was a human being raised like that?
24:24
Speaker 1: What went wrong? What the society failed to do? Human
24:32
Speaker 1: being must be taught conscience. A human being must be
24:37
Speaker 1: taught the value the human life. The human being must
24:43
Speaker 1: be thought the dignity of itself. The human being must
24:48
Speaker 1: be thought the essence of living in peace and harmony,
24:54
Speaker 1: in tranquility and stability. The human being must be taught
25:01
Speaker 1: to love life, to like life, to like itself. The
25:05
Speaker 1: human being must be taught to like society, to tolerate humans.
25:14
Speaker 1: That's a failure that start from childhood. Parents will never
25:20
Speaker 1: tell the child you're wrong, what you're doing is not right.
25:27
Speaker 1: Parents will always find favor in whatever their kids do.
25:35
Speaker 1: Parents will fight to protect the kid when the kid
25:38
Speaker 1: is wrong. The parents I will lie on behod the
25:41
Speaker 1: kid when when that time was the time to teach
25:45
Speaker 1: the kid and moral lesson parents who failed to shape
25:49
Speaker 1: the character of their children for the better men of society.
25:55
Speaker 1: When kids cruel not to like society, When kids grow
26:01
Speaker 1: with discombination, we hate, with picqetry, with racism and sexism.
26:07
Speaker 1: When kids grow knowing that they are better than others
26:11
Speaker 1: or that they are less than others. When kids grow
26:17
Speaker 1: in that toxic relationship of parents constant in fighting and
26:21
Speaker 1: hialing one another. When kids crow being abused and seeing
26:27
Speaker 1: the family of brothers sister being apbused, when they keep
26:31
Speaker 1: grow watching his parents being killed. When kids grow in
26:37
Speaker 1: a society that is constant on violence, constantly on lying
26:43
Speaker 1: and cheering and disinformation, misinformation and proper ganda and conspiracy,
26:50
Speaker 1: when they keep growing a society that truth does not matter,
26:53
Speaker 1: the facts doesn't matter, That being civilized is in that weakness,
26:58
Speaker 1: seeking forgiveness it's fibility or cowardice. When the kid growing
27:04
Speaker 1: the society knowing that to be it's just to be strong,
27:13
Speaker 1: it's to take from others, it's to exploit others. It's
27:20
Speaker 1: my way or the highway. When the kids grow in
27:25
Speaker 1: the society that they don't see their parents have problems,
27:29
Speaker 1: they constantly divorce, and the kid is left to grow
27:33
Speaker 1: by itself, to friend for itself. When the kid growing
27:38
Speaker 1: the society that the kids see that there's nobody the
27:40
Speaker 1: kids can trust. Everybody the kids trusts abuses the kid.
27:46
Speaker 1: Everybody takes advantage of the kid, and the kids get
27:51
Speaker 1: to think it doesn't matter, nobody cares, and the kids
27:58
Speaker 1: grow to be hated, to be to be shown upon,
28:05
Speaker 1: to be ignored, to disrespect it, to be explocted, to
28:12
Speaker 1: be shamed, to be insorted constantly. When the kid grew
28:18
Speaker 1: to make to feel less, to know that they don't matter,
28:23
Speaker 1: that alive means nothing, that they're not valued. The kids
28:31
Speaker 1: grow in the conflict, seeing their home destroyed, seeing their
28:39
Speaker 1: parents being killed, the brother or sister killed, the limbs severed.
28:45
Speaker 1: When the kids grew asking for help, asking for help,
28:52
Speaker 1: begging for food, starving for no fault of the ass.
28:59
Speaker 1: When the kid grow they stay on TV to see
29:03
Speaker 1: the bombardment of cities, the destruction of homes, the ruining
29:09
Speaker 1: of lives, and the killing, the constant killing of humans.
29:15
Speaker 1: When the kid turned onto the TV, there's always a
29:19
Speaker 1: crime somewhere. Somebody shot somebody, somebody killed somebody, somebody stole
29:25
Speaker 1: from somebody, somebody is abusing somebody. They were always in
29:29
Speaker 1: court a lie of the facts that are obvious. And
29:36
Speaker 1: the kid grows in a society that is disconnected from
29:40
Speaker 1: itself that it's a hypocritic at the white side, it says,
29:48
Speaker 1: when they keep growing a society seeing grown ups or
29:54
Speaker 1: carry they kid growing a society seeing leaders using division, racism,
30:03
Speaker 1: sexism and bigotry and violence of our abuse of power
30:09
Speaker 1: a piece of the law as to get their way.
30:14
Speaker 1: The kids consume all this and they become that kids
30:21
Speaker 1: grove to be better than their parents as a perpetual
30:26
Speaker 1: cycle of the ICC type of humans intentional conflict creators
30:36
Speaker 1: who justify what they do that's on the history of
30:40
Speaker 1: their day and in the realities in the community in
30:44
Speaker 1: which they're living. Because that is second type of conflict creators.
30:52
Speaker 1: The third type, it's reckless, carefree, conflict creators, accidental conflict creators,
31:10
Speaker 1: acc accidental conflict creators, it can go reckless conflict creators.
31:20
Speaker 1: This group of conflict creators, they don't know what they're doing.
31:28
Speaker 1: Most of times they are being used by others. Acc
31:35
Speaker 1: Accidental conflict creators are being used by ICC intentional conflict creators.
31:41
Speaker 1: Sometimes they are doing the building of the ICC acc
31:47
Speaker 1: sometimes are doing the building of ICC. Or sometimes it's
31:54
Speaker 1: just reckless. You create an accident as a conflict of creating.
32:03
Speaker 1: Through accidents, people fight and people care. There's some humans
32:10
Speaker 1: that they care not what they are doing. Accordn't the
32:16
Speaker 1: care freeness of life, the care freeness of life. They
32:23
Speaker 1: don't care what they're doing. They don't care how that
32:28
Speaker 1: action affects others. It's not that they're bad people. They
32:33
Speaker 1: were just thought not to care, or they didn't learn
32:37
Speaker 1: how to care. Again failure in childhood. They must teach
32:44
Speaker 1: a kid to care, to care for themselves, and to
32:49
Speaker 1: care for the white being of others. I talk about
32:56
Speaker 1: this to resolve days. I talk about positive causality intentionalities
33:10
Speaker 1: or acts of positive causality intentionalities, the absence of which
33:16
Speaker 1: is negative causality intentionalities or unintentionalities or because sometimes law
33:27
Speaker 1: the vicarious liabilities. So reckless humans create negative causalities. Reckless
33:41
Speaker 1: humans create negative causalities. Recklessness hardly create positive causalities. Positive
33:55
Speaker 1: causality in a reckless act, it's unintentional. It's a byproduct
34:02
Speaker 1: of it. So let's humans. They can most of the
34:13
Speaker 1: conflicts in the world, and the even now at their
34:19
Speaker 1: part of the conflict, they cannot connect what they do
34:23
Speaker 1: to themselves. Some they don't have the ability to do that.
34:28
Speaker 1: Some is an IQ issue, it's an intellectual issue, it's
34:31
Speaker 1: an intelligence issue, it's a moral conscience issue. It becomes
34:36
Speaker 1: a humanities issue. Humans must be taught to care. To
34:43
Speaker 1: reward and punishment, humans must be taught to care. And
34:50
Speaker 1: if humans are punished for not caring, that punishment should
34:55
Speaker 1: be sure has a deterrent effect, a deterance effect. If
35:00
Speaker 1: you deter what their crimes from happening for that punishment
35:04
Speaker 1: should be meant to teach a lesson. The punishment must
35:09
Speaker 1: not be used at vengeance. It's not about the pinitiveness
35:13
Speaker 1: of that punishment. It's about the restorative value or the
35:22
Speaker 1: redemption value perhaps other humans to learn from it. So
35:30
Speaker 1: reckless humans, they create conflict every day. They don't care,
35:42
Speaker 1: They do not care what they do her action aface others.
35:50
Speaker 1: They will not tell conscience, so they don't have one.
35:57
Speaker 1: They will not taught education, so they don't have Some
36:02
Speaker 1: of these are true, and says abandoned children. They didn't
36:08
Speaker 1: go to school, parents went in jail. Mum was not
36:12
Speaker 1: wrong if mum was home, Mum was changing boyfriends or
36:17
Speaker 1: husband as we change your address in a dressing room,
36:23
Speaker 1: and nobody cares about that. This type of conflict creators
36:35
Speaker 1: and not to be a psychopath or antisocial behavior. They
36:42
Speaker 1: might tend to be the most dangerous equality accidental conflict
36:47
Speaker 1: creators or reckless endangered humans. If you don't care about humans,
36:55
Speaker 1: they don't care about what happens to others, then you
36:59
Speaker 1: have developed yourself to a psychopart. The self is dangerous society.
37:05
Speaker 1: And if this type of people have power, they'll go
37:09
Speaker 1: to wars and they will not care about the consequences
37:13
Speaker 1: of those wars. The reasons for going to work might
37:17
Speaker 1: not doing the logical or intelligent. They might assume they
37:22
Speaker 1: have purpose or intention. It's wrong, they don't. They will
37:29
Speaker 1: be fighting things. They're fighting for yours course. It is
37:33
Speaker 1: not yours, and there is no clause. They're just doing
37:37
Speaker 1: by instincts, by emotions, sentiments. They just act because they
37:45
Speaker 1: don't care what happened for society to develop those humans?
37:54
Speaker 1: What went wrong? What can we do done better? The
38:03
Speaker 1: conflict resolution, you must go to the genesis of the
38:06
Speaker 1: conflict first. I must equalisic to know the people in
38:12
Speaker 1: charge and the people creating the conflict and what to
38:17
Speaker 1: gain out of it. You must underline these things and
38:24
Speaker 1: tackle them one by one. Who is the person creating
38:28
Speaker 1: the conflict or on whose behalf is the person creating
38:32
Speaker 1: the conflict? Is it intentional? Is it innocent or unintentional?
38:43
Speaker 1: Or is it reckless? On negligence, I must go to
38:52
Speaker 1: the roots of it. You resolve a conflict solving the
39:00
Speaker 1: key beneficial problem, the key beneficial problem. Who benefits from
39:10
Speaker 1: this conflict? If you don't seek to solve the key
39:18
Speaker 1: beneficial con andru or the lemma, then you cannot resolve
39:25
Speaker 1: the conflict. Because if people have a feeling that something
39:33
Speaker 1: has been taken away from them, you cannot tell them
39:36
Speaker 1: it's okay, let they be paid. Just let those people
39:40
Speaker 1: take what you assume it's yes or it's right. Yes,
39:45
Speaker 1: So the key beneficial. It's the core issue that must
39:53
Speaker 1: be resolved in the conflict if at all you want
39:58
Speaker 1: to solve the problem the conflict, escalate who benefits the
40:07
Speaker 1: key benefits is like a ball. How the ball is rolling,
40:13
Speaker 1: It's not different from the interests of people in the
40:16
Speaker 1: conflict are rolling. It must not the key interest in
40:21
Speaker 1: that conflict. It must not the key interests of both sides.
40:29
Speaker 1: That you can seek a compromise, and you cannot have
40:33
Speaker 1: that compromise unless we appeal to the childhood of bringing
40:39
Speaker 1: the psychology of those people sit on the table. Their
40:44
Speaker 1: history is that who brings them to the table. Their
40:49
Speaker 1: history is that which led to the conflict. Understanding their history,
40:55
Speaker 1: we hope to reserve the conflict before I go to war. Unnecessary,
41:09
Speaker 1: maybe just because of their childhood eager and might sound
41:14
Speaker 1: so irrelevant if you make them figure about themselves the
41:21
Speaker 1: marris of the conflict. In conflict resolution, you don't beat
41:29
Speaker 1: down on end of the paris. You elevate thought paris.
41:37
Speaker 1: You acknowledge their claims. He recognized their claims. You seek
41:45
Speaker 1: to validate their claims. Are you gradually to persuasive understanding
41:57
Speaker 1: dissuade them from their claims it's not a carrot and
42:01
Speaker 1: sticks type of time. Carroll and stick create more conflict.
42:05
Speaker 1: It is of no conflict. You beat somebody or you
42:09
Speaker 1: give them somethime, just create. That's conflict in itself, that's
42:14
Speaker 1: causing more problems. A carrot and stack is in it
42:18
Speaker 1: self a conflict creator, just kicking the can down the road.
42:23
Speaker 1: It's inability to listen to both sides. It's my way
42:26
Speaker 1: or the highway. My way or the highway always lead
42:30
Speaker 1: to a rack. In conflict resolution, my way or the
42:35
Speaker 1: highway always leads to a wreck does not solve any problems. Actually,
42:44
Speaker 1: a bond I'm gonna explode and cost more heart. In
42:52
Speaker 1: conflict resolution, he must try for both sides to accept
42:58
Speaker 1: that there is a conflict, intention and acceptance and acknowledgement.
43:06
Speaker 1: Because poths I would deny that there is no conflict,
43:12
Speaker 1: and what I would say that right? So the right
43:16
Speaker 1: issue might not be the dictionary type of right. It
43:23
Speaker 1: might not be a moral right, it might not be
43:27
Speaker 1: a judicial or a legal right. The right it is
43:31
Speaker 1: interest based is a key beneficial factor. I am right
43:36
Speaker 1: to have what I need from you? Are you are
43:41
Speaker 1: supposed to give it to me? And because you say now,
43:47
Speaker 1: that's why I would take it with force. I am
43:51
Speaker 1: a right to care. And because you resist and I
43:56
Speaker 1: will cary, I am right to rap you. And because
44:01
Speaker 1: you say now, I'll hurt you and austell at you,
44:07
Speaker 1: I am right to exploit you. And because you say now,
44:13
Speaker 1: I'll exploit to more or create constructs in a racism
44:17
Speaker 1: or sexism. Oh, I will call an I heah, I
44:23
Speaker 1: would denigree you, or I would the value you. I
44:27
Speaker 1: will get what I want. I'm right, You're wrong. See
44:35
Speaker 1: all what I'm saying here cannot do with morality, cannot
44:38
Speaker 1: end with legality. It's just getting what others, getting what
44:47
Speaker 1: people need at the expense of artists. See the key
44:50
Speaker 1: beneficial part in comfort of music. That's very important. You
44:55
Speaker 1: must accept the legitimate concents. A board party m appealing
45:00
Speaker 1: to morality or legality creates guilt, sometimes create hypocrisy and
45:09
Speaker 1: pointing the other fingers, and the water bowerism comes up?
45:13
Speaker 1: What about you and those in conflict and the contraries
45:21
Speaker 1: start to be victims or create that moral equivalency that
45:26
Speaker 1: if you can do it, so I can do it too.
45:30
Speaker 1: So don't don't fall into that trap of trying to
45:34
Speaker 1: be the good one on your solving problems, see yourself
45:39
Speaker 1: sometimes as part of the problems, and sometimes assume that
45:45
Speaker 1: you have done that too, and I knowledge what it
45:49
Speaker 1: like you and use an adults cat stories, just wisdom
45:57
Speaker 1: and common sense. The waters intelligently approach the situation, not
46:05
Speaker 1: as a judge, not as if you know better, not
46:11
Speaker 1: as if they must listen to you. You must recognize
46:15
Speaker 1: that people are fighting, somebody is hurry, somebody in needs help.
46:22
Speaker 1: And sometimes when people fight so much, even the perpetrator
46:26
Speaker 1: or the aggressor, they want the way out. They want
46:31
Speaker 1: somebody to have them get out. You don't fight into perpetuity,
46:38
Speaker 1: as you don't enjoy the gains of the fight. You
46:41
Speaker 1: don't stay in war forever, as you know, I enjoy
46:45
Speaker 1: the gains of the war of the war. At the
46:48
Speaker 1: point in time in the conflict, everybody want to get
46:50
Speaker 1: out on a safe face. They don't come in with
46:55
Speaker 1: cart out on stakes. You don't come in as a judge,
47:00
Speaker 1: you don't come in as a good one. You're coming
47:04
Speaker 1: as part of them. You start by acknowledging your own
47:09
Speaker 1: contribution to that conflict, the own contribution to the conflict.
47:16
Speaker 1: You create one if there is none to make the
47:21
Speaker 1: party's fear is you must acknowledge what each party wants.
47:29
Speaker 1: If I don't fight for nothing and it's time to
47:33
Speaker 1: reus of the conflict, You're not a judge, you're not
47:38
Speaker 1: the court, you're not God, and no mom and dad,
47:47
Speaker 1: or you're solving the problem, you become part of the problem.
47:55
Speaker 1: Are you part of the problem? Because I just studied
48:01
Speaker 1: by side that there are three types of people. Those
48:05
Speaker 1: who create problems they didn't solve, those who solve the
48:09
Speaker 1: problems they create, and those who solve problems they didn't create.
48:15
Speaker 1: So you are in the problem to solve a problem
48:19
Speaker 1: you didn't create, and those who solve problems they didn't create.
48:27
Speaker 1: Those are pulary solve conflicts. They have no interest in
48:31
Speaker 1: that conflict, but assume the responsibility of revers of resolving
48:39
Speaker 1: the conflict an auction, there cannot be the buyer. You
48:44
Speaker 1: cannot solve a conflict. We are having an interest in it.
48:50
Speaker 1: And if you have an interest in the conflict I
48:51
Speaker 1: want to solve, you must put that interest on the table.
48:56
Speaker 1: You must make the other party understand your interests. It
49:04
Speaker 1: becomes a give and take. You cannot solve the problems
49:10
Speaker 1: between a pro between two people who can accept to
49:16
Speaker 1: lose something, there must be a compromise, there must be
49:23
Speaker 1: a concession. They must be give and take. Measurement, proportionality
49:31
Speaker 1: and balance, it's very necessary and conflict resolution. In a
49:36
Speaker 1: conflict resolution, measurement proportionality and balance might till the scale
49:44
Speaker 1: of what that is. It might till the scale of
49:48
Speaker 1: what that is when they applies here based on the
49:52
Speaker 1: interests of the party in a conflict. For example, if
49:57
Speaker 1: a person see territory, maybe if the person says this
50:04
Speaker 1: five provinces from from another country, five provinces of another country,
50:12
Speaker 1: the MPBA might not be that it is a give away.
50:18
Speaker 1: He those five territories to give back those five territories.
50:21
Speaker 1: That will not create balance. So the balance in conflict
50:24
Speaker 1: resolutions a different type of balance. Measurement in conflict resolution
50:28
Speaker 1: is a different type of measurement, and proportionality in conflict
50:32
Speaker 1: resolution might sometimes be different from what that work in
50:36
Speaker 1: itself means. So balance in conflict resolution might be creating
50:45
Speaker 1: an imbalance that creates a balance in the long run.
50:51
Speaker 1: Proportionality in the comfort conflict resolution might be creating this
50:56
Speaker 1: proportionality that creates proportionality in the long run. Measurement in
51:03
Speaker 1: a conflict resolution and not be one equal to one
51:08
Speaker 1: one plus one quarter wan one plus one equal to
51:14
Speaker 1: measurement I actually create. It is equilibrium. To create equilibrium
51:24
Speaker 1: in the long run, it's a different type of thinking,
51:30
Speaker 1: and the person resolving the issue must be free from arrogance.
51:36
Speaker 1: Narcissism dictates even a little child when they're fighting one another.
51:47
Speaker 1: They don't like to be dictated to. People fight because
51:51
Speaker 1: they are injured. People fight because they feel disrespected. People
51:58
Speaker 1: fight because they feel accumulated upon. People fight because they
52:03
Speaker 1: feel cheated. People fight because they feel ignored. It must
52:10
Speaker 1: address all these issues, the psychological issues, before those parties
52:20
Speaker 1: can listen to you. To resolve a conflict, it must
52:27
Speaker 1: not have beef in that conflict. If we have beef
52:30
Speaker 1: in the conflict, be quick to offer concessions I mean
52:37
Speaker 1: what you say or else. Let those who didn't create
52:44
Speaker 1: the problem solve the problem. That's what they're gonna the
52:51
Speaker 1: call philosophy of triangulism, multiversalism, answer realism. It's a problem
52:59
Speaker 1: solving is to teach humans to be the tech realm
53:06
Speaker 1: of humans, the superminds. Those minds are solved problems, they
53:14
Speaker 1: didn't create the I PM the positive, I p mind
53:19
Speaker 1: the positive causality, mine with humility, with humanity, with respect, humility, humanity, respect.
53:34
Speaker 1: Using intellect not to create conflict, but to be self conflict.
53:42
Speaker 1: It must acknowledge what the party wants. If I seize
53:46
Speaker 1: five provinces from a state, I got the five provinces already.
53:54
Speaker 1: I've lost blood and capital to that those five provinces.
54:00
Speaker 1: So it's not a moral issue any more. Because if
54:03
Speaker 1: I'm a moral person, I will not cease five territory
54:06
Speaker 1: from another country or five promises from another country. It's
54:12
Speaker 1: not morality, it's not legality. If I follow the law,
54:17
Speaker 1: I will not do that because of a broken society.
54:23
Speaker 1: Because of the broken moral code, a broken legal code,
54:28
Speaker 1: and a broken power structure. It gives me that power
54:33
Speaker 1: to seize those five territory. So society, a broken society,
54:39
Speaker 1: is power the problem. You cannot, therefore use the moral
54:42
Speaker 1: code to tell me I'm wrong, You're right. Thou will
54:44
Speaker 1: not solve the problem. Thou we fume the problem. Thou
54:48
Speaker 1: will escalate the problem and dis escalate the problem. Broken
54:54
Speaker 1: society is the conflict things being equal. People want not
55:00
Speaker 1: fight one another. People fight because of this. Because of
55:06
Speaker 1: this equilium, the society are created for itself. Institutions create
55:13
Speaker 1: injustice the case systemic discrimination, these systemic favoritism. That's what happens.
55:23
Speaker 1: So humans act out of the system. Humans act out
55:28
Speaker 1: of the systems that are created them. So they know
55:32
Speaker 1: the system and they're just gaining and gaming or explocting
55:39
Speaker 1: the system to get what they want. From broken systems,
55:45
Speaker 1: come broken humans without any moral code or legual code
55:52
Speaker 1: or humanity is code. When people are at war, the
55:58
Speaker 1: society itself failed preparetuators. A terrorist did not come, did
56:05
Speaker 1: not far from heaven or from far from disguise. Society
56:11
Speaker 1: build their terrorists. Humans make their own bombs that destroy them.
56:20
Speaker 1: And they see a human being weighing five hundred pounds,
56:27
Speaker 1: they gain the weight based on what they act or
56:30
Speaker 1: based on their habits. So humans are their own problems.
56:37
Speaker 1: That's why I cannot judge. Because we're all connected. We
56:45
Speaker 1: have a collective responsibility to anything that goes wrong in
56:49
Speaker 1: our society. Humans have a collective responsibility to everything that
56:55
Speaker 1: goes wrong in their society, and therefore they have a
56:58
Speaker 1: collective obligation to solve those problems. Without throwing the moral card,
57:09
Speaker 1: or more equivalent saying, he must be very humble, humane
57:23
Speaker 1: and realistic, manufactual and acknowledging in solving the crisis. It
57:37
Speaker 1: must have that thing without within you. There's no arrogant narcissistic.
57:42
Speaker 1: It must be humble and self reflective. He must acknowledge
57:50
Speaker 1: that it is an issue. When people come to the table,
57:59
Speaker 1: they did them self abuse, omanipulated that system that brought
58:05
Speaker 1: them to the table. So put on the table. They're
58:12
Speaker 1: narcissistic in themselves, they're arrogant in themselves. They cannot judge
58:19
Speaker 1: them based on that. So might be being psychopathic, but
58:24
Speaker 1: you cannot judge them based on that. That doesn't matter anymore.
58:29
Speaker 1: There's a problem to solve. They don't solve problems by
58:32
Speaker 1: judging people. Solve problems by recognizing their awaknesses and their
58:38
Speaker 1: strength and second compromise. It solve a problem by convincing
58:47
Speaker 1: those on the table that there is more to life
58:51
Speaker 1: than perpetual conflict. It doesn't know that they're connected to
58:56
Speaker 1: the to the whole, that they cannot be ostracized. You
59:03
Speaker 1: bring them to the table, you bring them in, not out.
59:10
Speaker 1: You don't chase them. They don't isolate them. You don't
59:17
Speaker 1: punish them. You don't excomplicate them, you don't brand them,
59:27
Speaker 1: you don't sanction them into perpetuate it. Don't make them
59:33
Speaker 1: the effort that's judge men. Judgement does not sofen the problem.
59:44
Speaker 1: It escalates the problem. People, some people get what they want,
59:50
Speaker 1: no matter what the sad intentional conflict creators. And when
59:57
Speaker 1: they do, h just tell them to stop somewhere. Plead
1:00:05
Speaker 1: with them, see with them, Give them more a conscience,
1:00:14
Speaker 1: give them empathy and sympathy, give them compassion, make them
1:00:25
Speaker 1: to be human. Give their humanity back to them, because
1:00:31
Speaker 1: when people in conflicts so much and for kill one
1:00:35
Speaker 1: another so much, they have lost their humanity. Bring them
1:00:40
Speaker 1: home to themselves and start from there. Let them know
1:00:47
Speaker 1: that they occurred, ignact occurring them. Make them realize how
1:00:54
Speaker 1: far they have gone. Bring them back to themselves. Let
1:01:00
Speaker 1: them know that they are part of the human community.
1:01:05
Speaker 1: Are their roots. It's in the human community, that they
1:01:09
Speaker 1: are part of the society that don't live in this world.
1:01:14
Speaker 1: The children will live in this world, that great great
1:01:18
Speaker 1: grand children live in this world. That is why we
1:01:21
Speaker 1: write their history. That humans love there, not every human
1:01:28
Speaker 1: hates every human. Give them a moral conscience. Don't charge
1:01:35
Speaker 1: them bas on it. Give them the code to humanity,
1:01:41
Speaker 1: don't change them, pass on that the softy conflict. Don't charge,
1:01:48
Speaker 1: don't conclude we open minded, we open hearted and the
1:01:56
Speaker 1: open handed approchation, perception and perspective not the church, and
1:02:03
Speaker 1: conclude think darn ask questions not the church, and conclude
1:02:11
Speaker 1: use measurement, proportionalizy and balance not the church, and conclude
1:02:16
Speaker 1: bring them in. They didn't realize her father have gone.
1:02:24
Speaker 1: Let then't realize the true damage that they are causing
1:02:30
Speaker 1: and then't know that they're bleading human lives? Are those
1:02:35
Speaker 1: lives too. There's essences of the universe not different from
1:02:40
Speaker 1: their own essence, that each life last has a story,
1:02:46
Speaker 1: an untold story. Let them know that even people would
1:02:51
Speaker 1: love them, people will support them. Are dying too, and
1:02:57
Speaker 1: those people dying when not come back to live again.
1:03:01
Speaker 1: Property gain is property lost. Life lost can never be gay,
1:03:12
Speaker 1: a property lost can be gay. Let people now the
1:03:18
Speaker 1: futility of life, the purposefulness of it. An empty life
1:03:26
Speaker 1: can be, and how wholesome it can be, how unhappy
1:03:31
Speaker 1: this life can be, and how happy it can be
1:03:38
Speaker 1: if we all work together to solve a probably. Make
1:03:44
Speaker 1: the person to be power the solution, make the problem
1:03:49
Speaker 1: to be part of the solution, make the person to
1:03:55
Speaker 1: be the solution. It's a give and take wing wing
1:04:01
Speaker 1: type of thing. Just catch my back has culture back
1:04:05
Speaker 1: type of thing. Nothing is difficult unless humans says so.
1:04:14
Speaker 1: There was never a conflict on the humans created. Which
1:04:19
Speaker 1: is made of humans can whisper fixed. There is no
1:04:24
Speaker 1: problem without a solution. In the triangleism of things. In
1:04:31
Speaker 1: the triangalism of things, a little bright spot can't be exponentiated.
1:04:42
Speaker 1: The reprice pole can be expronunciated. It's just the positive
1:04:47
Speaker 1: and exponentiate the positives. Positive exponentiation of our whims. The
1:04:56
Speaker 1: negative gives sative attributes. Encourage to speaker, Motivate them from
1:05:06
Speaker 1: the heart, not flattery the inspirational. Be positive. Let them
1:05:14
Speaker 1: see the world that they are missing, Let them see
1:05:17
Speaker 1: the world that they destroyed. Give them the middle ground
1:05:24
Speaker 1: between the completely contrary and completely obitrary. There is always
1:05:29
Speaker 1: a way when there is no way, there is a way.
1:05:37
Speaker 1: In the darkness of dark, there's always light. That gleam
1:05:43
Speaker 1: of hope can only be exponentiated for the sake of
1:05:48
Speaker 1: this humanity. Make humans feel humans, Make humans love humans.
1:05:58
Speaker 1: When it teach humans to be raisive, to be sexist,
1:06:02
Speaker 1: to be pigot, to discriminate. You saw that said of
1:06:07
Speaker 1: psychopathy or anti social behavior, of destructive nacissism or destructive nationalism.
1:06:21
Speaker 1: When you teach people that they don't belong, they soon
1:06:27
Speaker 1: become criminals to destroy those who belong. That's a gangsters.
1:06:36
Speaker 1: When teach people that they don't belong, they soon destroy
1:06:44
Speaker 1: those who belong. That's a beginning of terror gangs. When
1:06:55
Speaker 1: in tay people the inferior, they soon come after disuperior.
1:07:01
Speaker 1: When you sow seeds of division, they call them. Metasticize
1:07:08
Speaker 1: and be careful about the negative mutation of value of
1:07:16
Speaker 1: things and m the be careful of the negative mutational
1:07:28
Speaker 1: values of things. When you saw a bad said and
1:07:33
Speaker 1: negative said, a cruse said, a hateful said, you don't
1:07:38
Speaker 1: know how you metasticize. Those who want to destroy this
1:07:45
Speaker 1: world were once discriminated from this world. This courage discrimination,
1:07:55
Speaker 1: discourage hate, this college hate, raise sism, discourage sexism, discourage
1:08:05
Speaker 1: bigotry or the phobias. Hatred for this, discourage them against us.
1:08:14
Speaker 1: Because within these cracks, very dangerous humans are born, and
1:08:20
Speaker 1: they come up to be able to manipulate the system
1:08:26
Speaker 1: into power. Once they get this power, it's not for
1:08:30
Speaker 1: the get of humanity. That which destroys humanity was made
1:08:37
Speaker 1: by humanity itself. We should be careful or with teacher
1:08:44
Speaker 1: our children because this world that we are living in
1:08:47
Speaker 1: today was passed on to us by our parents. Some
1:08:52
Speaker 1: humans are just doing when their parents start them. Some
1:08:56
Speaker 1: people have parents at all. Some were taught by terrorists.
1:09:02
Speaker 1: Some were taught by gunsters because they were abandoned by
1:09:07
Speaker 1: the society that was supposed to love them. Don't George,
1:09:14
Speaker 1: don't conclude, we'll be by in conflict. Appeal to the humanity.
1:09:21
Speaker 1: Appeal to the good and them, not to their worse angels.
1:09:26
Speaker 1: Don't tell them how bad they are, how dangerous they are.
1:09:32
Speaker 1: Make them to become part of the solution. Give them laugh.
1:09:38
Speaker 1: They don't feel important, they didn't feel respected. Shouldn't care,
1:09:45
Speaker 1: should don't care. Listen to them, Listen to their story.
1:09:54
Speaker 1: Every human being has a story. Most of the most
1:10:00
Speaker 1: brutal and cruise humans on planning Earth their stories were
1:10:04
Speaker 1: not being listened. They are don't baldy to listen to
1:10:08
Speaker 1: their story, and I'd like to punish humanity with their story.
1:10:14
Speaker 1: Parents should learnt to love their children. Some of the
1:10:20
Speaker 1: dangerous humans we have today, we're not giving parent a laugh,
1:10:27
Speaker 1: but should learn not to abuse children, not to abuse
1:10:31
Speaker 1: the weak and vulnerable. We should learn not to abandon humans,
1:10:40
Speaker 1: not to isolate humans, not to confine humans, not to
1:10:45
Speaker 1: keep punishing humans. At a part in time, the punishment
1:10:50
Speaker 1: means nothing. Nothing. That's a psychopartist band, that's a psychopartist bar.
1:11:01
Speaker 1: A child is not born as psychopath. Society make their psychopaths,
1:11:07
Speaker 1: and when that be we should try to discourage it.
1:11:13
Speaker 1: Make humans still love humanity by cheating human fairly. When
1:11:18
Speaker 1: you discriminate, you hurt yourself in the long run. When
1:11:24
Speaker 1: you discriminate against others, you hurd yourself in the long run.
1:11:30
Speaker 1: When you oppress orthers, you hurd yourself in the long run.
1:11:35
Speaker 1: When you exploit others, you hurt yourself in the long run.
1:11:42
Speaker 1: When you believe others, you hurt yourself in the long run.
1:11:49
Speaker 1: In the negative causalities of things, things come to bead.
1:11:59
Speaker 1: We should learn how to procreate and exponentiate positive causalities.
1:12:07
Speaker 1: One good deed can exponentiate to make this wid a
1:12:12
Speaker 1: better place. We should teach people values. We should teach
1:12:18
Speaker 1: people ethics. We should teach people for philosophy and wisdom.
1:12:25
Speaker 1: We shoul seek to enlighten humans when we educate. We
1:12:32
Speaker 1: should educate humans how to be positively creative. We should
1:12:40
Speaker 1: educate humans how to be positive contributors. We should aid
1:12:45
Speaker 1: to keep humans on positive in their nobility. We should
1:12:49
Speaker 1: not teach humans that they don't belong, because they soon
1:12:54
Speaker 1: destroy that which they don't belong. We should teach humans
1:12:57
Speaker 1: that they belong. Every human being is worth something. The
1:13:04
Speaker 1: being of the bean is the being itself and nothing else.
1:13:09
Speaker 1: Every human being has come here with a good with
1:13:11
Speaker 1: something good to offer. We should not ostracize humans with classism, categorization, discrimination, favoritism,
1:13:24
Speaker 1: or nepotism. A meritocratic society creates good humans. A meritocratic
1:13:36
Speaker 1: society create positive, cauciety humans. A meritocratic society creates judicious humans.
1:13:47
Speaker 1: A meritocratic society create intelligent humans. America, a meritocratic society
1:13:55
Speaker 1: creates mindful humans to cut the society greets enlightened humans
1:14:04
Speaker 1: enlightened intelligence. It's what society needs to promote enlightened intelligence.
1:14:15
Speaker 1: Positive intelligence will lead to positive AI intelligences. Enlightened intelligence
1:14:25
Speaker 1: will lead to enlightened AI intelligences positive intelligent human being.
1:14:36
Speaker 1: We crep positive intelligence sciences. An enlightened human we create
1:14:41
Speaker 1: an enlightened society. Peace comes from within. Intelligence come from
1:14:47
Speaker 1: from within. Humanity is born with them and express without
1:14:56
Speaker 1: Happiness comes from within. That's why they call it an expression.
1:15:03
Speaker 1: Internality and externality. Internalization leads to externalization. What you teach
1:15:11
Speaker 1: the kid is what the kid practice says they will
1:15:18
Speaker 1: raise Our children. Can make them do the assets of society,
1:15:24
Speaker 1: or can make them do the leakages liability, or put
1:15:27
Speaker 1: them to society. You cannot give what you don't have.
1:15:33
Speaker 1: We expect more from humans. We should teach them more.
1:15:37
Speaker 1: We don't want conflicts. We should not teach conflict. We
1:15:41
Speaker 1: shall not promote conflict. We shall no profit from conflict.
1:15:45
Speaker 1: Those are the lessons that our children learn, and they
1:15:49
Speaker 1: shall teach their own children. If we want a better war,
1:15:55
Speaker 1: we need to create the better world. Now very simple.
1:15:58
Speaker 1: To create the better warm create a meritocateic society. That's
1:16:04
Speaker 1: the call. That's my philosophy. With merit, people can only
1:16:10
Speaker 1: be the best of themselves and they'll know when then
1:16:13
Speaker 1: go wrong. Do not to fix things. Create an ip
1:16:19
Speaker 1: mind society create society of problem solvers. When you create
1:16:27
Speaker 1: a society of those who create problems they cannot solve,
1:16:31
Speaker 1: that society will self destroy. When you create society who
1:16:35
Speaker 1: can list solve the problems that they create in that society,
1:16:40
Speaker 1: who don't know not to solve the problems that they
1:16:41
Speaker 1: didn't create. If you teach or create a society that
1:16:46
Speaker 1: solve problems that they didn't create in that society, will
1:16:50
Speaker 1: solve the problems of others who cannot solve the problems
1:16:54
Speaker 1: their own problems, and solve the problems of others who
1:16:56
Speaker 1: can't solve their own problems when they create problems that
1:16:59
Speaker 1: they cannot solve. Philosopher Prince Aer Intelligences. Philosopher Prince Is
1:17:07
Speaker 1: Resore on conflict resolution Augus sixth, twenty twenty five, from
1:17:17
Speaker 1: the Philosophical Sire of Las Vegas. Thank you