Latest / Cultural Wars | America Out Loud News / Trump delivers on aliens, Iran firestorm & deep state indictments

Transcript

Trump delivers on aliens, Iran firestorm & deep state indictments · Cultural Wars | America Out Loud News

• 0:04
  In this political coliseum, we slay the rising beast with the fateful sword of truth that transcends hypocrisy and censorship.
• 0:16
  It's time to unleash yourself from the tyrants of media propaganda on the America Out Loud Talk Radio Devil.
• 0:27
  It's unleashed the political news hour.
• 0:32
  Welcome to Unleash the Political News Hour.
• 0:34
  I'm Nate Kane, your host, and you know, there is a topic that I want to open up this first segment with that to be honest with you, I never thought I would ever be talking about this on a show about politics, but yet here we are.
• 0:53
  And that is the topic of UFOs and alien disclosure.
• 1:02
  We are now living in what many are calling an age of disclosure, whether it is the final you know, release of information related to the JFK files or the release of information related to UFOs, UAPs, USOs, um underwater submerse, or I should say unidentified submersible objects.
• 1:32
  And there's been some news, you know, that uh has been coming out.
• 1:36
  And you know, there are I think most political news outlets probably briefly touch on this, but don't really want to go there.
• 1:48
  But I think things have risen to the level of needing to talk about this because I think we are going to see some form of disclosure Trump keeps talking about it.
• 2:04
  And uh, you know, based on just on the last month uh from April, uh, you know, up until yesterday, even uh there have been many statements by U.S.
• 2:18
  politicians with direct involvement in or access to classified UAP, which stands for unidentified anomalous phenomena, uh, formerly called UFOs, uh, but they have access to this classified data, and it has really centered on representatives uh Tim Burchett or Burkett and Anna Apaulina Luna, along with actions and comments uh from President Donald Trump himself.
• 2:55
  And of course, uh there was also a a disclosure documentary that had uh some other people in it, like our uh Secretary of State Marco Rubio giving their opinions.
• 3:08
  Uh, we've heard JD Vance uh talk about his opinion that you know aliens are essentially demons.
• 3:18
  Uh you've had Anna Paulina Luna tell people that they need to read the book Enoch.
• 3:26
  You've had former members of Congress like Matt Gates uh say some what would appear to be extremely outrageous comments about when he was in Congress being briefed by somebody in the military, uh and he was briefed in an unclassified setting, but basically told things from somebody who was essentially probably using whistleblower protection and sharing about our government's involvement with hybrid breeding programs.
• 4:06
  Now, to what extent do we take this stuff serious?
• 4:12
  Well, I'll tell you, when they finally disclose stuff, uh, I think it'll be time to take it serious.
• 4:19
  But what is interesting is some of these people, I believe Representative uh Tim Burkett to be a man of good moral conscience.
• 4:33
  Uh, I believe the same about um Anna Luna or Anna Paulina Luna, and uh I certainly believe that you know, if Trump says there's information that is interesting and that they're going to disclose uh it there's probably a level of truth that needs to be taken serious by you know by the public.
• 5:01
  So let me get into some of the comments that have been made.
• 5:04
  Uh right now, you know, the government maintains classified briefings and visual materials, including videos and photographs depicting phenomena that defy conventional scientific or technological explanations.
• 5:21
  Now, I will tell you I had a top secret clearance for 29 years.
• 5:28
  And in all those years, I only ever once came across anything having to do with unidentified aerial phenomenon or UFOs.
• 5:40
  And it was interesting.
• 5:48
  We had visual evidence of something, and in this particular case, it was a uh thermal um imagery.
• 5:58
  And uh it was something that you know now I've never talked about it, but now obviously with all the disclosures that are going on, uh it was this was in a military context, and I can understand why something like this would have been kept classified, because it would give away information that would indicate how we essentially you know we're having circles run around us by this technology.
• 6:41
  And what has come out by a lot of folks that are involved in these discussions is that uh a lot of statements have been made about how the government really doesn't know much about what these things are.
• 6:54
  But then you hear other things where you hear people make comments that they do know, or that there might be some sort of reverse engineering program for captured craft, or that they're you know, you you hear things that, like I said, all the way to the outrageous of where our government is involved or in league, you know, with aliens, uh, you know, in and allowing people to be abducted and allowing for uh you know human hybrid breeding programs and stuff like that.
• 7:00
  Might be some sort of reverse engineering program for captured craft, or that there, you know, you you hear things that, like I said, all the way to the outrageous of where our government is involved or in league, you know, with aliens, uh, you know, in and allowing people to be abducted and allowing for uh you know human hybrid breeding programs and stuff like that.
• 7:27
  So I don't take
• 7:27
  So I don't take a lot of that serious, but as far as like the technological challenge and our ability to, you know, to be able to defend our national security interests against a craft like this.
• 7:49
  I think that's probably the real reason why this stuff has been so highly classified, is that and this is just my belief, and and you know, I'm not speaking to any knowledge of anything classified at this moment, but I believe that what is likely going to come out is that yes, we've known about these things, yes, we've had interactions with these things, and no, we have no technology that can stop it.
• 8:21
  That uh it is more advanced than anything that we have, and I can tell you, I believe we are way more advanced than most countries on the face of the planet, if not all of them.
• 8:34
  So this is some sort of otherworldly technology.
• 8:40
  Uh, whether it is interdimensional, whether it's from another planet or another galaxy, or whether it is uh, you know, demon craft, whatever you want to call it, I do believe that this is not human-made technology.
• 8:56
  Uh now there are interesting comments that have been made by people in hearings on Capitol Hill talking about uh that crashed craft have been found.
• 9:07
  Uh I have no reason to not believe that.
• 9:10
  Uh I also you know have heard people say under oath that biologics have been found, and I would assume that means the bodies of whatever creatures were controlling these vehicles.
• 9:29
  Uh, you know, I've believed for a very long time that you know, you just read through scripture, read uh Ezekiel, and the opening chapter, chapter one, uh talks about four living creatures and about a wheel intersecting a wheel, and it gets into you know, these uh basically what sounds like he's describing a UFO.
• 9:59
  I mean, if you were thinking about how somebody back in that time would describe something that's flying around, uh, you know, he says it's a basically a wheel intersecting a wheel with portals all around it.
• 10:10
  Uh, this is in Ezekiel chapter one.
• 10:12
  So this is not surprising to me, but what is surprising to me is the silence within the church about this subject.
• 10:23
  And that concerns me because if they do disclose something, and there have been some comments about that one of the the comments that I've heard talked about by some people who are either connected with politics or who uh you know are politicians themselves, is that part of the reason why they've not disclosed this stuff is because of this the disruption it would do to the psyche of religious belief, I guess you could say in America, or uh what it would do to you know culturally to those people that it would cause you know major pandomy uh uh pandemonium and and all of that.
• 11:09
  I I don't know if I buy that entirely.
• 11:11
  I do think that certainly maybe 50 years ago it might have had an impact.
• 11:18
  I think today the likelihood is that um there's probably already a lot of people to believe in these things, and maybe it doesn't square with their religious views, but I think that's really on the church.
• 11:34
  I think the church has in many ways failed to um address these issues, and I think it's an important one uh that does need to be addressed.
• 11:44
  But uh Representative Burkett uh referenced a briefing uh that he received approximately two weeks ago, um, prior to early April 2026 that in his words, quote, would have set the earth on fire, close quote.
• 12:02
  That if revealed publicly, reinforcing his longstanding advocacy for full disclosure, uh while noting that the public would demand answers.
• 12:14
  Uh, he also alluded to possible suppression or warner warnings directed at individuals with relevant expertise.
• 12:24
  And then there's the issue of these scientists that have gone missing or have you know been found dead that have been dealing with various programs or various scientific topics that could be related.
• 12:37
  I don't know if that's entirely 100% true, or if it's a coincidence, but apparently it's enough, there's enough interest in it that the FBI is actually investigating it now.
• 12:50
  Um, the bottom line is uh I I think Representative Burke is correct in how he has repeatedly urged President Trump to release it all, uh, arguing that Americans are ready to handle the information and that secrecy really serves no legitimate ongoing purpose beyond you know bureaucratic control.
• 13:13
  Um the bottom line is that the American taxpayers are paying for these types of programs, and we have a right to know.
• 13:23
  So I do hope that we see disclosure of Pete Heggseth has affirmed that he will comply uh with the president's order to release it all.
• 13:31
  So hopefully we will see that soon.
• 13:33
  Well, that's all I have time for in this first segment.
• 13:36
  Uh I think it's one that's uh you know interesting uh to say the least, and we're gonna get into more topics though in the second and third segments.
• 13:43
  Uh so I will be right back after a short break.
• 13:46
  Oral hygiene hasn't changed in 50 years, but our diet and the way we eat has creating an environment in your mouth for bacteria to wreck havoc on your teeth and gums for better oral health, get spray, dental defense, and oral care line designed to combat acid-creating bacteria.
• 14:00
  Oral care line designed to combat acid-creating bacteria.
• 14:03
  The toothpaste, mouthwash, mints, and gum all contain xylitol, and natural ingredients shown to dramatically improve oral health.
• 14:03
  The toothpaste, mouthwash, mints, and gum all contain xylitol and natural ingredients shown to dramatically improve oral health.
• 14:12
  Sprite can be found online and at all fine natural retailers.
• 14:12
  Sprite can be found online and at all fine natural retailers.
• 14:16
  Have you been looking for a healthy snack for on the go?
• 14:16
  Have you been looking for a healthy snack for on the go?
• 14:20
  Well, not all energy bars are soft and sugary.
• 14:20
  Well, not all energy bars are soft and sugary.
• 14:23
  Bear bars or a crunchy savory bar made from just six simple natural ingredients.
• 14:23
  Bear bars or a crunchy savory bar made from just six simple natural and growth.
• 14:30
  Bear bars are plant-based, organic gluten-free, contain six grams of protein and are low temperature dried for unique crunch.
• 14:39
  Most energy bars are based on chocolate or fruit and are held together with syrups or sweeteners.
• 14:46
  To learn more, just visit barebar.com slash out loud.
• 14:51
  Are you struggling with thinning hair?
• 14:53
  Try roots from the wellness company.
• 14:54
  The stacker formulated non-oily hydrogel uses seven powerful peptides and key nutrients to nourish your scalp and support visibly thicker, healthier hair.
• 15:04
  Visit TWC.
• 15:17
  Well, did you see Google quietly updated its AI principles removing its pledge not to use AI for weapons or surveillance?
• 15:26
  A promise they agreed to in 2018.
• 15:29
  Well, the American people have seen Google's track record.
• 15:33
  Is Google an untrustworthy player in the AI race?
• 15:42
  Now is our time, my fellow Americans.
• 15:45
  America outloud dot news.
• 15:48
  Liberty and justice for all.
• 17:09
  And that is not the case.
• 17:14
  But the one thing that Trump has been very careful about is stating clearly what the objectives were from the very get-go.
• 17:25
  Which was primarily massively degrading their nuclear weapons development capability and their ICBM capabilities as well as degrading their overall missile development because they they've been the concern was that they would get to a point of overwhelming power that we would not be able to take out their um their nukes.
• 17:55
  So we needed to degrade their air defenses and other systems that would prevent us from being able to do that.
• 18:01
  In that regard, I think they were pretty much successful, mission accomplished.
• 18:06
  But the problem is you still have the issue of nuclear fissile material that is now buried underground, but could be dug back out, and it's not like this stuff goes away.
• 18:20
  The half-life on it is quite some time, so literally they could dig it out and be right back where you know we left them.
• 18:30
  So we need to essentially get an agreement, and I think this is what Trump's trying to do to get this nuclear fissile material out of the country and to take possession of it.
• 18:44
  Remember, Trump moved, I think it was the 82nd Airborne, you know, into bases within the region.
• 18:53
  And the plan was that they were looking at the possibility of sending in the 82nd Airborne.
• 19:02
  And there's only a handful of, you know, of those units that actually have the capability and know-how to handle nuclear material, but the idea was that they would land, build a runway, um, then dig, you know, to get to the material and uh and and remove it.
• 19:26
  But Trump found, I think, a more successful method of putting pressure on the Iranian government.
• 19:35
  And I think you know, that is where we find ourselves now, uh, which is with the blockade on the Straits of Hormuz.
• 19:48
  So, you know, as with any war, uh, there are going to be things that shift and change as new information, you know, comes in.
• 20:00
  I'm sure they had a full attack plan that would have involved the 82nd Airborne, uh, maybe other special forces divisions landing in country to kind of deal with some of these problems, but they've thus far found that the blockade has been a very effective tool at financially crippling the IRGC.
• 20:23
  So the ceasefire that was agreed to has not restored normal maritime operations in the Straits of Hormuz.
• 20:36
  Uh, of course, it's a vital waterway that carries approximately 20% of the world's oil supply.
• 20:44
  And Iran's initial closure of the strait, I think, severely backfired.
• 20:52
  It basically, I think it it put into perspective something that maybe our defense planners hadn't really thought through, which is that you know, I think Trump saw what the Iranians were doing and said, you know, that's not a bad idea.
• 21:00
  Through, which is that, you know, I think Trump saw what the Iranians were doing and said, you know, that's not a bad idea.
• 21:10
  Uh, you guys want to close the Straits of Hormuz?
• 21:11
  You guys want to close the Straits of Hormuz?
• 21:13
  Fine.
• 21:13
  Fine.
• 21:13
  We're going to let you close the Straits.
• 21:13
  We're gonna let you close the Straits of Fat.
• 21:15
  In fact, we'll help you.
• 21:15
  We'll help you.
• 21:16
  We're gonna close the straits, and we're gonna blockade any of your ghost ships that are trying to get oil uh from being able to leave the straits and any of those ships that were coming to get oil from you.
• 21:16
  We're going to close the straits, and we're going to blockade any of your ghost ships that are trying to get oil from being able to leave the straits and any of those ships that were coming to get oil from you, we're not going to let them in.
• 21:32
  In fact, we soon discovered that there were other ships bringing supposedly aid and other things, you know, just shipping cargo and whatnot, that you'll remember, I think it was maybe a couple two or three weeks ago.
• 21:50
  We opened fire on one of these ships putting around through their control room and basically stopping the boat that was planning on drop-off goods, supposedly.
• 22:06
  Well, there were IRGC members that were on board.
• 22:10
  And turns out that when we landed, we found contraband on the ship.
• 22:17
  And so it's interesting because there has been, you know, we found this to be a very effective way.
• 22:24
  You've got leadership within Iran that has already talked about how this, you know, they're weeks away from a complete economic collapse.
• 22:36
  And so here, without having to fire a single round, without having to put any Americans' lives really at any major risk, Trump has found an effective way of having leverage to bring the Iranians to the negotiating table.
• 22:54
  The problem is that what drives the IRGC is an ideology that is inconsistent with any sense of logic or any sense of self-preservation.
• 23:15
  And that is a problem.
• 23:17
  This is the same problem that we have in, you know, with jihadis, right, with terrorists because they're willing to die for their cause.
• 23:29
  So the, of course, what has happened now is this blockade uh has prevented Iranian resupply.
• 23:39
  It's directly contributed to the elevated global energy prices, though, uh, which is a concern.
• 23:47
  Uh, in the United States, uh, gasoline now averages uh 445 a gallon, uh, which is a burden that is felt by American families and businesses alike.
• 23:57
  So, you know, it's something that Trump has to pay attention to, clearly.
• 24:01
  While it's an effective measure in fighting this war with Iran, which I do believe and agree, we must fight, because the one thing that is nothing else has become clear through all of this, it is that we should never allow this country run by insane uh theocratic lunatics, we should never allow them the ability to develop nuclear weapons.
• 24:32
  Certainly should not allow them to develop intercontinental ballistic missiles where they could arm with nukes and reach our bases and possibly even reach our territories and um you know, and maybe even our continental United States.
• 24:53
  Uh, that would, without a doubt, uh, lead to a nuclear holocaust.
• 25:00
  Because if they launch something like that, you could be assured uh we would be forced to fire nukes at them.
• 25:09
  That is built into our doctrine, and that's left over from the cold war and you know, uh a doctrine of mutually assured destruction, which has kept Russia and China and North Korea at bay because they do have a desire for self-preservation, and so they're not going to launch nukes at us so that we don't in turn launch nukes at them.
• 25:35
  But see, that kind of thinking, that kind of mentality, it doesn't work with the Ayatollahs.
• 25:41
  It does not work with the IRGC zealots, because in their ideology, they want to bring about the apocalypse because ultimately it will lead to the return of their uh 13th Imam or you know, the El Mahdi, their Messiah, if you will.
• 26:05
  So they're ideologically driven in a way that is really hard to fight against.
• 26:12
  And ultimately, what may end up happening is uh the pressure from economic collapse uh I think is I think what Trump is hoping is that that will eventually lead to a further fracturing within the Iranian forces.
• 26:33
  What a lot of people don't understand is that the Iranian military, uh their their regular army, if you will, they are separate and apart from the IRGC revolutionary guard.
• 26:47
  The IRGC revolutionary guard and the even the the uh the besiege groups, which basically are like the secret police that go after people and force you know sharia law.
• 27:01
  They are all their allegiances to the IRGC and to the Ayatollah, but the Iranian military, they are they are not necessarily um ideologically aligned with the IRGC.
• 27:21
  Um they are more aligned with the government, which for all intents and purposes is a puppet government, but nonetheless, uh they they are a completely different military.
• 27:35
  And I think what Trump is hoping is that this fracture between IRGC military leadership, uh the revolutionary guard uh leadership will fracture from the parliament and the president of Iran, and eventually what you will have is you will have a Iranian military that will rise up and essentially fight against the IRGC uh in some sort of coup, you know, to remove the IRGC and uh re-establish uh civilian-led government.
• 28:01
  And essentially fight against the IRGC in some sort of coup, you know, to remove the IRGC and re-establish uh civilian-led government.
• 28:15
  Now, if this were to happen, I think what we would, what it would result in, it was a it would result in a more moderate government.
• 28:16
  Now, uh if this were to happen, I think what we would what it would result in, it was a it would result in a more moderate government.
• 28:24
  It would still not be a free government.
• 28:24
  It would still not be a free government, it would still be probably an anti-American government.
• 28:27
  It would still be probably an anti-American government, but it would not be these insane lunatics that are unwilling to budge.
• 28:41
  The president and the parliament have already come out and made public comments that they were willing to negotiate.
• 28:50
  Now they've walked those back and they've you know said things and then come out and said that they didn't say things, and I think what's going on is uh these guys are afraid for their lives because they're they are being threatened.
• 29:00
  There's videos that have been published that have been taken internally that show uh there is infighting going on, and in fact, the their very lives have been threatened by high-ranking officials within the IRGC.
• 29:16
  So it's interesting what's going on right now, and I I think you know, Trump is basically kind of sitting and waiting to see what happens.
• 29:24
  In the meantime, buying us time is not a bad thing because certainly the Mossad, our CIA, uh maybe even other groups are supplying arms secretly, I think, uh, to various groups within Iran.
• 29:47
  There are those that are loyal to the crown prince and uh, you know, and who are anti IRGC, and the problem is they don't have a lot of organization and training, and they certainly don't have military arms.
• 30:11
  This is, you know, by the way, if there were ever an example of why the second amendment is so critically important, uh, this is a perfect example.
• 30:24
  You have a group of people that probably make up 80% of the population that are completely opposed to these radical ideologies that are being pushed and enforced within the country of Iran by the IRGC and the Ayatollahs.
• 30:45
  And yet, when the people tried to rise up, you know, back in what was it, uh January, February, uh, the IRGC went out and basically killed you know 30 to 40,000 of them.
• 30:59
  Might even be more than that.
• 31:01
  We don't really know.
• 31:02
  But they shot dead in the streets, protesters that just wanted some freedom.
• 31:09
  So this is why our founders saw the wisdom and the importance of the American people needing to be armed.
• 31:21
  Because if they ever needed to take back their government, they would need to be able to form militias and form a resistance against tyrants.
• 31:32
  They knew that from their own experience, you know, in England, when we were, you know, British colonies, and they had the redcoats here, basically violating our human rights.
• 31:47
  Uh, if you don't know about this, go read the Declaration of Independence.
• 31:52
  It basically lays out a treatise against the British government against the king, and it it details a list of grievances and what they were doing to violate, you know, our rights, our inalienable rights, rights that are not afforded to us by the government, but are afforded to us by God, and that we have the right to defend.
• 32:18
  And so that was the reason why our founders ensured that we had the right to bear arms.
• 32:27
  Now, you know, it wasn't so that we could hunt.
• 32:29
  It really even wasn't so that we could defend ourselves against invaders in our homes.
• 32:33
  I mean, that it had more to do with the right of the people to defend themselves against a tyrannical government, should that ever happen again.
• 32:44
  And as a side bonus, uh, there's been some very interesting videos that have done some analysis of why the United States is a nation that will never be invaded.
• 33:00
  And one of the biggest reasons, uh, you know, obviously we've got oceans, you know, that that protect us, right?
• 33:07
  Um, it would be very hard to get a landing party anywhere near us.
• 33:12
  Um, but also I think a bigger problem is the fact that, you know, even if they did land, uh, even if they were able to wipe out our military bases, which both of those would be damn near next to impossible, uh, they'd be fighting a long drawn-out war of attrition with every armed American citizen and every militia group that I guarantee you would form because the I think the number of guns, there's more guns in America in the hands of the citizens than there are citizens.
• 33:54
  Uh it is a just ridiculous number, which is why it's so absurd every time a leftist brings up the notion of gun control, uh, even if they changed, you know, even if we had a completely liberal Congress and they decided to pass a second amendment, or sorry, take away the second amendment, pass a amendment to the Constitution to remove the second amendment from the Bill of Rights, I guarantee you it would lead to a civil war, and you would have uh people who would who are armed, uh, who would form militias, uh, who would state, you know, basically come and get them, and uh you can take them from my cold dead fingers.
• 34:40
  This is the attitude of many Americans, uh, myself included.
• 34:48
  I'm very proud of the fact that I live in a country that believes in the right to bear arms, and I would be one of the first to stand up to defend that right.
• 35:00
  It is an oath that I swore uh to defend.
• 35:00
  It is an oath that I swore to defend.
• 35:06
  So I think this is a problem that you know the people of Iran, while I hope for them to have freedom.
• 35:06
  So I think uh this is a a problem uh that you know the the people of Iran, uh, while I hope for them to have freedom, the real challenge is going to be how do they defend and how do they fight?
• 35:15
  The real challenge is going to be how do they defend and how do they fight?
• 35:20
  There has to be something to drive the military, the Iranian military to stand up and fight because they do have military arms.
• 35:20
  There has to be something to drive the military, the Iranian military to stand up and fight because they do have military arms.
• 35:30
  They do have the now.
• 35:31
  We've degraded a lot of these IRGC bases and stuff like that.
• 35:37
  But those that are still in the regular army, they do have weapons.
• 35:40
  And if they turn to support the people, uh, which I think that's likely to happen, especially as the economy is uh going so badly they don't have money to even pay, you know, their soldiers, the many of them are going to walk away and they're gonna take their guns with them.
• 35:59
  So I think we're looking at a probably a uh a little bit of a prolonged period that we are going to have to sit there and continue to block aid, but I think in the end, we will win.
• 36:10
  I don't see any possibility of the Iranians winning in this.
• 36:16
  And I do believe that we will win and there will be regime change, uh, whether they like it or not.
• 36:25
  Uh to what degree that regime change leads Iran back to a free and independent country that is friends with the U.S., that I don't know.
• 36:35
  But I do believe we will see regime change and that the IRGC at this point, I think is done.
• 36:42
  Well, folks, that's all I got time for in this second segment, but stick with me.
• 36:46
  Um I've got more to talk about in the third and final segment.
• 36:50
  We'll be right back after a short break.
• 36:52
  During COVID, we got educated on the power of natural virus protection and immune boosting using vitamins A, C, D, Zinc, and Quircetin.
• 37:01
  The problem, getting them at the right dosage from truly natural sources that doesn't cost an arm and a leg.
• 37:08
  Enter the daily V stack using breakthrough cellular absorption technology.
• 37:12
  We put those vitamins together and supercharge them with a complete multi-mineral complex.
• 37:18
  The daily V stack is basically an oral IV of six products all in one at an affordable price.
• 37:24
  Go to Chemicalfree Body.com forward slash out loud today.
• 37:29
  Get the daily V stack, protect yourself, boost your immune system, and save 20% on your first order.
• 37:36
  I'm Doug Evans, author of the Sprout Book.
• 37:39
  And I've devoted my life to helping people reconnect with food at its most alive stage, the sprout.
• 37:47
  When you germinate a seed, you're not just growing food, you're activating potential.
• 37:52
  Sprouts grow without soil, sunshine, or fertilizer right on your kitchen countertop.
• 37:58
  They're organic, fresh, and cost less than a dollar a serving.
• 38:02
  It's nature's fastest form of farming, accessible to anyone anywhere.
• 38:07
  Discover the joy of growing your own food and the power of living nutrition.
• 38:12
  Visit the Sprouting Company.com and use the code Out Loud for an exclusive off.
• 38:18
  Feeling run down, foggy, or constantly drained, your body might be lacking the support it needs at the cellular level.
• 38:25
  Recharge from the wellness company is a doctor formulated supplement designed to restore your energy, focus, and immune function.
• 38:32
  It features the first ever combination of methylene blue and urolithin A.
• 38:37
  Clinically studied ingredients that support mitochondrial health, boosts cellular repair, and enhance cognitive performance.
• 38:44
  With added NAD3, COQ10 and PQQ, recharge is the daily solution for deep lasting energy, not just a temporary boost.
• 38:54
  Visit TWC.
• 39:02
  Power up your body and mind with recharge.
• 39:07
  Welcome back, listeners, to the third and final segment of our program.
• 39:12
  And this concluding portion, I want to examine some recent developments in federal accountability, where indictments and criminal referrals underscore the imperative of upholding the rule of law and restoring public trust in our institutions following years of misconduct under the Biden administration, but also the Obama administration in regards to the FBI and DOJ.
• 39:45
  A lot of good things have been being talked about recently.
• 39:51
  And I do think that we are about to see finally some justice.
• 39:58
  Of course, uh one of the stories that broke just recently was a story that broke about the acting attorney general Todd Blanch appeared on NBC's Meet the Press on this was on May 3rd.
• 40:16
  Um he was defending the April 28th two-count felony indictment against former FBI director James Comey.
• 40:26
  The charges stemmed from a May 2025 Instagram post depicting seashells arranged to spell 8647.
• 40:39
  Now, look, everybody knows what that means.
• 40:43
  So it doesn't take uh somebody with a degree and in uh you know criminal history or anything like that.
• 40:51
  I mean, we all know what that means.
• 40:54
  And, you know, 86, of course, denoting elimination and 47, referring to the 47th presidency.
• 41:01
  Uh Blanche emphasized that the case investigated over 11 months by career assistant U.S.
• 41:10
  attorneys in North Carolina, FBI agents, Secret Service personnel, and it rests on a comprehensive body of evidence.
• 41:19
  This is important.
• 41:21
  Uh it includes witnesses, documents, and materials.
• 41:25
  This is not about somebody's frivolous post, you know, in uh on Instagram.
• 41:32
  This is about much more.
• 41:35
  Uh it also uh he presented uh this was presented to a grand jury uh rather than a you know a single this was not just about a single post alone, okay.
• 41:49
  Uh he noted that the grand jury and not the Department of Justice or any individual returned the indictment and a public trial will disclose the full evidence.
• 42:00
  Disclose the full evidence.
• 42:02
  This action, it aligns with dozens of similar prosecutions for threats against the president.
• 42:02
  This action, it aligns with dozens of similar prosecutions for threats against the president, and that's important because there's precedent.
• 42:09
  And that's important because there's precedent.
• 42:13
  This is not a, you know, a um a targeted attack against Comey.
• 42:13
  This is not a you know a um a targeted attack against Comey.
• 42:19
  In fact, I would argue the exact opposite that if they didn't bring these charges, it would show that certain people are above the law.
• 42:19
  In fact, I would argue the exact opposite, that if they didn't bring these charges, it would show that certain people are above the law.
• 42:29
  In fact,
• 42:29
  In fact, this is the very thing I blew the whistle on against the FBI back in 2017, 2018.
• 42:38
  And most of you probably know my story as the FBI whistleblower that exposed the FBI's cover-up of uranium one, uh, the investigations into Hillary Clinton, uh, into the Clinton Foundation and all of that.
• 42:56
  Now the there's some other things that the uh acting attorney general Todd Blanch made clear.
• 43:10
  Uh he made clear that the indictment of James Comey is not predicated solely on a provocative Instagram image, but on an exhaustive 11 month investigation.
• 43:22
  I think that is critically important.
• 43:25
  I'm I'm reiterating that because a lot of people have been saying, oh, this is just you know a waste of time.
• 43:31
  This is just uh, you know, they're just uh basically trying to hurt Comey financially.
• 43:37
  And I've even thought that at first, but hearing this information, uh it shares it provides some insights that there's more to this than just uh you know, going after him about you know, a tweet or an Instagram post.
• 43:54
  Now the uh this isn't just the FBI or the DOJ talking.
• 44:03
  There's been some other movements that have been going on too.
• 44:06
  Our director of national intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard, who I absolutely love.
• 44:12
  I think she's been doing an outstanding job, and I'm glad to see that uh that she is still in her position.
• 44:20
  Um she has come forward or has I should say has forwarded several criminal referrals to the Department of Justice, including one concerning the alleged manipulation of intelligence during the 2016 election cycle by Obama era officials.
• 44:49
  Now, former attorney general Pam Bondi had responded by you know directing the initiation of grand jury investigations into these matters, uh and they encompass the handling of the Trump Russia collusion narrative and related activities tied to the 2019 impeachment uh whistleblower process.
• 45:13
  Now, this is important because this is something that again, a lot of people who know my story know that one of the people who I named in my whistleblowing documents was a man by the name of Michael Atkinson.
• 45:29
  Now, why is that important?
• 45:32
  Michael Atkinson was at the time of the uranium one and uh investigation that was going on by the FBI, he was the one who was running the FBI's department of public corruption.
• 45:49
  He was running the public corruption unit.
• 45:52
  And so he was directly involved in investigating uh these matters and basically did nothing.
• 45:59
  So he was one of the people I named.
• 46:01
  Incidentally, at the time that I blew the whistle, he was the acting or not acting, he was the intelligence community inspector general.
• 46:13
  Now, why does that matter?
• 46:15
  One, it made it very difficult for me to blow the whistle because he was somebody I was blowing the whistle on, and he was in that direct chain of command for me to blow the whistle.
• 46:25
  So I had to kind of do things and go about things in a very roundabout way and reach out directly to members of Congress, um, which was very difficult because I knew that there was a lot of surveillance that was going on against members of Congress.
• 46:45
  In fact, against the very committees that are supposed to be monitoring the misuse of things like FISA and whatnot.
• 46:54
  And that is the House Intelligence Committee and the Senate Intelligence Committee.
• 47:04
  Now, what's interesting is that Michael Atkinson was also involved in something else.
• 47:11
  He was, like I said, he was the inspector general.
• 47:15
  He was directly involved in the case that brought about the impeachment charges against Trump over the Ukraine phone call.
• 47:24
  And what was so bad about that situation was that you had this guy, Eric Charmella, who basically was the one who supposedly saw or read the transcripts of that Trump phone call.
• 47:40
  And he essentially, you know, told his buddy, another Democrat operative within the uh, you know, within the National Security Council.
• 47:51
  And so he ends up going forward and ends up bringing this before the IG.
• 48:00
  Well, the problem with that is that at the time, the way the rules stayed is you could not blow the whistle on something that you didn't have direct, you know, contact with the evidence.
• 48:11
  In other words, you you couldn't be secondhand information, had to be firsthand.
• 48:15
  When I blew the whistle, I had to bring the documents out.
• 48:18
  I had to bring them directly.
• 48:19
  I couldn't give it to somebody else and have them bring it.
• 48:22
  But this guy makes a change to the rules, and it appears that Eric Charmella, the man who initially brought the information to this other fella.
• 48:37
  His name is escaping me at the moment, but um, he's got direct communications with Barack Obama, which indicates that there was a grand conspiracy to try and frame Trump in this Ukraine phone call Trump Russia collusion narrative.
• 49:00
  Narrative.
• 49:02
  So believe me, uh this is going to get investigated, and they are going to dig into it, and hopefully uh there will be enough information there with matters that uh have not passed the the statute of limitations to where they can go after some of these people.
• 49:02
  So believe me, uh, this is going to get investigated, and they are going to dig into it, and hopefully there will be enough information there with matters that uh have not passed the the statute of limitations to where they can go after some of these people.
• 49:25
  That's always been my concern, is that they, you know.
• 49:25
  That's always been my concern is that they you know things get drawn out and they they wait to act or do anything, and then next thing you know, you've passed the statute of limitations, you can't do anything about it.
• 49:38
  And so nobody sees justice.
• 49:40
  Now, maybe maybe they will, even if that happens, at least there's some good in that this stuff gets exposed.
• 49:49
  But to be honest with you, I don't think you're going to change a whole lot of minds just through exposure.
• 49:55
  I think that you could, you know, you could paint the walls red and tell a Democrat that the walls are red, but if they knew that Trump had anything to do with it, they'll disagree with you.
• 50:10
  I don't think that any amount of evidence is going to change the minds of any Democrats that are still left in the party, because I think those that had any semblance of critical thinking have already left.
• 50:24
  Now, I do think some of these people going to prison would be a good thing because I think that would send a signal.
• 50:33
  You do these kinds of things, and you're likely to get arrested, go to jail, lose your law license, whatever.
• 50:41
  You know, but you'll you'll there will be consequences, and that is likely to have an impact on preventing people from doing that sort of thing again.
• 50:51
  Now, you know, these domestic uh referrals, they're a I think it's interesting because there are their parallel in allegations of international financial impropriety that was detailed in a recent investigative report uh that was put out by John Solomon.
• 51:16
  I want to talk about this for a minute too, because I think this is where things are leading.
• 51:21
  I think ultimately it's all tied together.
• 51:23
  Investigative journalist John Solomon had reported on a newly declassified NSA intercepts from late 2022, revealing discussions between Ukrainian government officials and U.S.
• 51:40
  personnel at USAID's Kiv office regarding a proposed scheme.
• 51:50
  The plan allegedly involved routing approximately 200 to 300 million in U.S.
• 51:59
  taxpayer funded clean energy grants through Ukraine as a conduit with the intent to redirect roughly 90% back to the Democrat National Committee and President Biden's 2024 reelection campaign.
• 52:20
  And I guarantee you if they find that there's truth to these allegations, they're going to find that this was done previously too.
• 52:29
  And that this wasn't just a one-time deal.
• 52:33
  That it probably involved Obama's election as well.
• 52:40
  There is, or I should say his second, you know, his uh re-election.
• 52:47
  So this is pretty important.
• 52:50
  Uh Director Gabbard has directed USAID audit, uh, a USAID audit to determine whether the plot advanced and whether a formal, you know, whether a formal criminal referral uh to the FBI FBI is warranted.
• 53:06
  Uh so the question really boils down to this.
• 53:08
  You know, these intercepts, was it just people bantering about and talking about, hey, wouldn't it be nice if we could figure out a way to you know commit a federal crime?
• 53:19
  Or did they actually do it?
• 53:23
  I'm thinking they probably did it because there was so much stuff that was going on, and I think a lot of the reason why all of the Trump Russia collusion stuff was happening was I felt like they were trying to basically cover up other crimes that have been committed.
• 53:46
  And so they needed to basically keep you know the media talking about Trump Russia rather than focusing in the criminal activity that they were up to and doing.
• 54:01
  Uh, and I feel like uh USAID had a big part of it.
• 54:03
  And I think Trump, I think they knew this.
• 54:06
  I think this is why USAID was gutted at the very beginning, because they already had those intercepts.
• 54:15
  Remember, uh, you know, they were from 2022.
• 54:19
  So somebody inside the NSA must have talked to Trump about it.
• 54:25
  And um, you know, and so as soon as he got in there, they they probably informed me, hey, uh, we need to show you something that uh, you know, we tried to show Biden and they did nothing about it.
• 54:38
  And um, I'll bet you that has a lot to do with why USAID was gutted.
• 54:47
  And I think we're gonna find out more about that.
• 54:51
  Now there's you know, concerns over institutional transparency extend further into the domain of public health policy, where recent prosecutorial actions have renewed focus on the origins of COVID-19 pandemic.
• 55:14
  Um, folks, this topic uh I believe that you know this is like the tip of the iceberg, right?
• 55:24
  Um, the Department of Justice has indicted uh Dr.
• 55:29
  David Morrins, a former top advisor to Dr.
• 55:33
  Anthony Fauci on charges including conspiracy against the United States and the concealment destruction or falsification of federal records.
• 55:45
  These allegations pertain to efforts to obscure communications regarding COVID-19 origins, gain of function research and grants to Eco Health Alliance.
• 55:58
  Well, folks, as we conclude today's program, it's evident that these investigations and referrals represent principled efforts to address long standing questions of governance and integrity.
• 56:01
  Conclude today's program.
• 56:02
  It's evident that these investigations and referrals represent principled efforts to address longstanding questions of governance and integrity.
• 56:12
  And it's about time.
• 56:12
  And it's about time.
• 56:14
  I remain committed to providing thorough fact-based analysis on these matters in the days ahead.
• 56:22
  I look forward to it.
• 56:23
  I'm actually, I feel it's a sense of promise that you know we actually may see some justice within this administration's term.
• 56:34
  So I want to thank you for joining us.
• 56:36
  And may this news, I think, hopefully will strengthen uh, you know, strengthen our republic and reaffirm the foundational principles of justice and accountability.
• 56:50
  This is uh all for today.
• 56:53
  Uh stay informed and stay engaged.
• 56:56
  I'm Nate Kane signing off.