Latest / Honey Badger Radio / Brazil Passes Misogyny Law by Unanimous Vote | HBR News 546

Transcript

Brazil Passes Misogyny Law by Unanimous Vote | HBR News 546 · Honey Badger Radio

• 0:04
  Speaker 1: This is HBr News number five forty six, Brazil passes
• 0:08
  Speaker 1: misogyny law by unanimous votes, where we discuss the news
• 0:11
  Speaker 1: of the week and give it the Badger treatment. Hello everyone,
• 0:18
  Speaker 1: and welcome back to Honey Badger Radio. I hope you
• 0:20
  Speaker 1: guys are doing well this week and that you're laughing
• 0:22
  Speaker 1: at all of this insanity so that you are not
• 0:24
  Speaker 1: consumed by it. I am your host, Brian, and I'm
• 0:28
  Speaker 1: joined by, as always, my lovely co hosts, Hannah Wallen
• 0:31
  Speaker 1: and doctor randamerkam Kutin' Dog Mike is back in America,
• 0:36
  Speaker 1: so he's gonna be Yeah, so the attitude will be different.
• 0:40
  Speaker 1: I think maybe, yeah, maybe, I think so. I mean,
• 0:44
  Speaker 1: I'm not saying that's a bad or good thing. I'm
• 0:45
  Speaker 1: just saying it might things might sound different, and I
• 0:48
  Speaker 1: think that that's okay. We welcome the chaos, so.
• 0:51
  Speaker 2: Well, I'm allowed to say whatever the fuck I want
• 0:53
  Speaker 2: to say now, So yeah, maybe.
• 0:55
  Speaker 1: Yeah, there you go. See. I mean, unless like the
• 0:57
  Speaker 1: the I don't know m I six is watching our video,
• 1:01
  Speaker 1: but anyway, so yeah, we have a great show for
• 1:06
  Speaker 1: you guys. Today. We're gonna be talking about the Astro
• 1:09
  Speaker 1: Turf obviously, Astro Turf, no Kings protests that just all
• 1:12
  Speaker 1: happen to start happening around the exact same time all
• 1:15
  Speaker 1: over the country. Brazil makes interrupting women illegal, AOC spends
• 1:21
  Speaker 1: nineteen thousand dollars on ketamine and more So, stick around,
• 1:24
  Speaker 1: it's gonna be a good time and but just be
• 1:27
  Speaker 1: sure to join us afterwards for the patron Only show.
• 1:30
  Speaker 1: So one of my favorite places to go for patron
• 1:33
  Speaker 1: only content other than The Guardian and Arwa Madowi, who
• 1:38
  Speaker 1: I think is basically some kind of bot that just
• 1:42
  Speaker 1: produces bs that we can respond to. Sometimes a Daily
• 1:46
  Speaker 1: Mail has good stuff too. It is a rag, but
• 1:49
  Speaker 1: they happen to be one that puts out so much
• 1:52
  Speaker 1: that there's often something that we know we can get
• 1:54
  Speaker 1: a nugget out of this particular piece of excrement.
• 2:00
  Speaker 2: Defense of of the Daily Mail. They've been banging on
• 2:02
  Speaker 2: about immigrants for the last thirty years.
• 2:05
  Speaker 1: Yes, the Daily Mail is not exactly captured, I guess right,
• 2:10
  Speaker 1: well sort of.
• 2:12
  Speaker 2: They've been a joke of the general legacy media for
• 2:16
  Speaker 2: the last thirty years because they've kept banging on about
• 2:19
  Speaker 2: the one party issue of immigration. And yeah, and they're
• 2:27
  Speaker 2: all trying to forget about that right now, because the
• 2:29
  Speaker 2: Daily Mail was right on that one issue. But it's
• 2:32
  Speaker 2: a fucking tabloid, so it's it has strayed into other
• 2:37
  Speaker 2: areas and it's it's just as bad as all the
• 2:40
  Speaker 2: quote unquote left wing media when it comes to demonizing.
• 2:47
  Speaker 2: It's its opposition, like the line media. So whenever there's
• 2:53
  Speaker 2: a YouTube video, they can go look at this vile
• 2:55
  Speaker 2: YouTube video, right and then yeah, they.
• 3:00
  Speaker 1: Have different pages. One of them is called Female, which
• 3:04
  Speaker 1: is like probably where you can get a lot of
• 3:06
  Speaker 1: the cancer Daily Mail. Get it Daily Male Female. It's
• 3:10
  Speaker 1: actually spelled male.
• 3:12
  Speaker 3: I do occasionally find some cancer there.
• 3:15
  Speaker 1: Yeah.
• 3:15
  Speaker 3: Yeah.
• 3:16
  Speaker 1: But this article from the Daily Mail, which we're gonna
• 3:18
  Speaker 1: be looking at in the Patron Show today, is entitled
• 3:21
  Speaker 1: as follows. My son was red pilled like on adolescents
• 3:26
  Speaker 1: by influencers like Andrew Tait. These are the weird things
• 3:30
  Speaker 1: he started saying at just eleven years old.
• 3:33
  Speaker 2: The subtitle gave me cancer.
• 3:36
  Speaker 1: No, that's I think that's the title, Like I.
• 3:39
  Speaker 3: Think that that's that was all one title.
• 3:42
  Speaker 1: That's the headline.
• 3:42
  Speaker 3: Yeah title, they do that now.
• 3:46
  Speaker 1: Yeah. Yeah, So we're gonna be reading through this and
• 3:49
  Speaker 1: watching this vide. Oh yeah, mom, nice tattoo, very tasteful,
• 3:53
  Speaker 1: and uh, we're gonna see how how did your son
• 3:57
  Speaker 1: become based lady? So if you want to join us
• 4:02
  Speaker 1: and how she feels about it, she obviously doesn't look happy.
• 4:06
  Speaker 1: So anyway, Yeah, if you guys want to join us
• 4:08
  Speaker 1: for that, you have to become a Badger yourself by
• 4:11
  Speaker 1: going to feed the Badger dot com forward slash subscribe
• 4:14
  Speaker 1: to join our community and watch all of the additional
• 4:16
  Speaker 1: content that we put out. Five bucks a month, we'll
• 4:19
  Speaker 1: get you into our discord and you'll be able to
• 4:21
  Speaker 1: watch all of the bonus content. It's basically like cheaper
• 4:25
  Speaker 1: than a cup of coffee at any normal you know,
• 4:28
  Speaker 1: sort of Starbucks chain or something like that. So yeah,
• 4:31
  Speaker 1: please consider joining us for this. And if you don't
• 4:35
  Speaker 1: want to wake up one morning, uh to find that
• 4:37
  Speaker 1: our content has been yeeded from the internet, please go
• 4:40
  Speaker 1: to badger feed dot com. That's badger feed dot com.
• 4:42
  Speaker 1: That's where all of our content lives. All right, So
• 4:46
  Speaker 1: before you get into story, let me give a shout
• 4:48
  Speaker 1: out to the people watching, starting with rumble, Hello to
• 4:52
  Speaker 1: meowoff or sena sorry if I'm meow off, mew off
• 4:57
  Speaker 1: or sena whatever says good even mister threeh three, welcome,
• 5:03
  Speaker 1: Matt Wotton, Gabriel Fela Lucas, Raging Rat, Shaman, King Xyz
• 5:08
  Speaker 1: and Adam the Adam says man Gamergate and its consequences.
• 5:13
  Speaker 1: What am I seeing? This is the world that we
• 5:16
  Speaker 1: live in, and I'm glad that you are around for Gamergate.
• 5:18
  Speaker 1: But anyway, let's get into the articles. So first we
• 5:22
  Speaker 1: got to talk a little bit about, Oh, there's something
• 5:24
  Speaker 1: I gotta share before we get into the no Kings thing.
• 5:28
  Speaker 1: There was something that happened that I learned about this morning.
• 5:33
  Speaker 1: So there is a men's rights activist who organized our
• 5:38
  Speaker 1: trip to Australia in twenty seventeen, and he was a
• 5:45
  Speaker 1: he's the founder of Men's Rights Melbourne, a small closed
• 5:50
  Speaker 1: Facebook group and he organized, like I said, the meetup
• 5:54
  Speaker 1: that we did for the ICMI in Australia and the
• 5:56
  Speaker 1: screening of The Red Pill with Cassie J. This was
• 6:00
  Speaker 1: the time that we went down there and Cassie J
• 6:02
  Speaker 1: was there and she got like absolutely dragged by the
• 6:05
  Speaker 1: media in Australia. And his name is David Williams and
• 6:08
  Speaker 1: I'm not doxing him. He was also known as Neo.
• 6:12
  Speaker 1: I couldn't find it like his actual like work online,
• 6:16
  Speaker 1: but I got it from a source that he passed
• 6:19
  Speaker 1: away today and it was from a cardiac arrest and
• 6:24
  Speaker 1: his wife is devastated, and you know, I just wanted
• 6:28
  Speaker 1: to let you guys know, if you know who David
• 6:31
  Speaker 1: Williams is, if you're in Australia and you're one of
• 6:34
  Speaker 1: those Australian MRAs, you know, you probably know about this,
• 6:38
  Speaker 1: maybe you can tell us a little bit about him.
• 6:40
  Speaker 1: I looked in him as much as I could. He organized,
• 6:45
  Speaker 1: like I said, the screening of the twenty sixteen documentary
• 6:47
  Speaker 1: The Red Pill. In late twenty sixteen, Williams arranged of
• 6:51
  Speaker 1: screening after a feminist petition campaign to cancel it. The
• 6:55
  Speaker 1: venue pulled the public showing. Williams pivoted to a sold
• 6:58
  Speaker 1: out private screening, where drew media attention and was described
• 7:02
  Speaker 1: by him as a blessing in disguise for highlighting free
• 7:05
  Speaker 1: speech issues. He publicly defended the film and men's rights perspective,
• 7:09
  Speaker 1: stating that the movement advocates for the rights that men
• 7:12
  Speaker 1: and boys face all around the world. He criticized the
• 7:15
  Speaker 1: petition as an attempt to suppress discussion without viewers having
• 7:19
  Speaker 1: seen the documentary. He was covered in by ABC's Hack,
• 7:23
  Speaker 1: Sydney Morning Harold and Daily Telegraph, portraying him as a
• 7:27
  Speaker 1: spokesperson for men's Rights Melbourne during the controversy. He was
• 7:31
  Speaker 1: also mentioned in connections with efforts to screen the film
• 7:34
  Speaker 1: in Sydney and other locations, linking him to broader Australian
• 7:38
  Speaker 1: MRA networks. His online presence was minimal, so this is
• 7:42
  Speaker 1: why I had to learn this from somebody else. But
• 7:46
  Speaker 1: he does, you know, he did and have organized the ICMI.
• 7:50
  Speaker 1: I think it was twenty seventeen which we went to.
• 7:54
  Speaker 1: And yeah, I mean he was basically a grassroots organizer,
• 7:58
  Speaker 1: men's rights activist and and you know, rest in peace King.
• 8:02
  Speaker 1: That's all I can say. So, I don't know if
• 8:04
  Speaker 1: you guys know about this person, but I thought I
• 8:06
  Speaker 1: would share with you as well.
• 8:13
  Speaker 3: Are you guys there, Yeah, I just I don't really
• 8:17
  Speaker 3: know what to say. And that's just really sad news.
• 8:21
  Speaker 3: And he'll be missed. Yeah, that's not what I was
• 8:26
  Speaker 3: expecting when you started talking about him.
• 8:29
  Speaker 1: Yeah. Yeah, he had a heart attack and I don't know,
• 8:35
  Speaker 1: it's a shame. I don't know. What's to say. You know,
• 8:39
  Speaker 1: his wife is devastated. Uh, he wasn't feeling well, so
• 8:43
  Speaker 1: it wasn't like a shock to the people and knew him.
• 8:47
  Speaker 1: But you know away, so imagine that.
• 8:51
  Speaker 3: Ye, your heart is broken, and you know it's when
• 8:56
  Speaker 3: you when you lose somebody that that is like your
• 9:00
  Speaker 3: other half, you know, the other part of you and
• 9:03
  Speaker 3: and so connected you just it's hard to explain. I
• 9:11
  Speaker 3: don't even know what to what to tell people about that,
• 9:14
  Speaker 3: like you when you've lost family members and and you've
• 9:18
  Speaker 3: been really close like I'm sure most people have experienced that,
• 9:23
  Speaker 3: But it's just I think, honestly, part of what killed
• 9:28
  Speaker 3: my dad was losing my mom. His heart broke and
• 9:32
  Speaker 3: it's so I do feel for her too, but it
• 9:35
  Speaker 3: is it is sad for the whole movement and we
• 9:39
  Speaker 3: we've lost a mover and shaker and a great man.
• 9:46
  Speaker 2: Do what he did, Jesse. If you want, if you
• 9:51
  Speaker 2: want to, if you want to keep someone alive, you
• 9:53
  Speaker 2: can't keep their body alive, but you can do what
• 9:55
  Speaker 2: they did if you If you agree, you agree with
• 9:58
  Speaker 2: what they did, then do what they did. Do it
• 10:01
  Speaker 2: for your own sake and in the space of doing
• 10:06
  Speaker 2: it you'll honor the doings of that man whose legacy
• 10:12
  Speaker 2: you wish to pursue. Do what he did, Just do
• 10:16
  Speaker 2: what he did.
• 10:17
  Speaker 1: Yeah, all right, well, thank you for that, And let
• 10:22
  Speaker 1: me know you guys think about this one in the
• 10:23
  Speaker 1: comments again, Like I know that the hour is not
• 10:28
  Speaker 1: great for people who watch our show that are in Australia,
• 10:31
  Speaker 1: but you know, if you see this in you're Australian,
• 10:35
  Speaker 1: let us know if you know this, gentleman, if you
• 10:39
  Speaker 1: were aware of this, and what your thoughts are. Again,
• 10:42
  Speaker 1: he was the founder of Men's Rights Melbourne and he
• 10:46
  Speaker 1: organized the ICI twenty seventeen and he made it possible
• 10:50
  Speaker 1: for us to go down there and meet Cassie j
• 10:52
  Speaker 1: and so many other you know, great people that were
• 10:56
  Speaker 1: a part of the movement then and many of them
• 10:59
  Speaker 1: are still part of it. So okay, but anyway, let
• 11:03
  Speaker 1: us know what you guys think about this one in
• 11:04
  Speaker 1: the comments. We got to move on to the first story.
• 11:07
  Speaker 1: Meredith g gave us five dollars and said, HPR News
• 11:10
  Speaker 1: number five forty six, honey for the Badger's Thank you, Meredith. Okay,
• 11:14
  Speaker 1: so let's talk about no kings. So on March twenty eight,
• 11:18
  Speaker 1: twenty twenty six, the third round of No King's protests
• 11:21
  Speaker 1: unfolded across the United States, with organizers reporting over three thousand,
• 11:25
  Speaker 1: three hundred events in all fifty states plus territories and
• 11:30
  Speaker 1: some international locations. Crowds rallied against President Trump's policies, including
• 11:36
  Speaker 1: immigration enforcement by Ice, the ongoing war with Iran, rising
• 11:40
  Speaker 1: living costs, and perceived executive overreach. Estimates placed total participation
• 11:45
  Speaker 1: at eight to nine million people, the largest largest single
• 11:49
  Speaker 1: day protests in US history, according to some organizers, featuring
• 11:53
  Speaker 1: marches in major cities like New York, Los Angeles, and Minneapolis,
• 11:57
  Speaker 1: with a high profile event including U Springsteen, alongside smaller
• 12:02
  Speaker 1: gatherings in suburbs and red leanings areas. Compared to prior
• 12:06
  Speaker 1: rounds roughly five million in June of twenty twenty five
• 12:09
  Speaker 1: and seven million in October. At twenty twenty five, turnout
• 12:12
  Speaker 1: grew but drew criticism for diminishing returns in visible impact.
• 12:17
  Speaker 1: Many events remained peaceful, though isolated chaos and arrests occurred
• 12:21
  Speaker 1: in places like Los Angeles. Duh analysts noted that the
• 12:25
  Speaker 1: protests function more as emotional outlets or anti Trump sentiment
• 12:29
  Speaker 1: than actual catalysts for immediate policy shifts, with questions about
• 12:33
  Speaker 1: sustaining momentum into the twenty twenty six midterms. The movement
• 12:37
  Speaker 1: is coordinated, primarily, and this is what matters here by
• 12:41
  Speaker 1: progressive networks like Indivisible and five oh five oh one,
• 12:45
  Speaker 1: involving hundreds of groups. Some reports site over around five hundred,
• 12:50
  Speaker 1: with combined annual revenue near three billion dollars. Funding links
• 12:56
  Speaker 1: traits to George Soros's Open Society Foundations, which provided millions
• 13:01
  Speaker 1: in grants to Indivisible for general social welfare activities, not
• 13:05
  Speaker 1: earmarks specifically for protests. Additional ties include donor networks like
• 13:10
  Speaker 1: TIDES and socialist link thunders such as Neville Roy Singham.
• 13:14
  Speaker 1: Critics label it astro turf, top down organizing rather than
• 13:18
  Speaker 1: purely organic grassroots activism, while supporters emphasize broad coalition participation.
• 13:23
  Speaker 1: And I have this, I have this tweet from and
• 13:27
  Speaker 1: we know this is a or a post on X
• 13:31
  Speaker 1: and I'm showing this because I want you to see
• 13:33
  Speaker 1: that this is all manufactured in my brain.
• 13:37
  Speaker 2: I could have sworn you said Andy, no, but it was,
• 13:40
  Speaker 2: oh no.
• 13:40
  Speaker 1: It's called and we know, yeah, yeah, I know that's no.
• 13:46
  Speaker 1: That would be funny though, but I think Andy Know's
• 13:48
  Speaker 1: posts appear to be a lot of times they're behind
• 13:51
  Speaker 1: like a subscription, although I'm pretty sure he has some
• 13:54
  Speaker 1: posts that are just publicly available. But this one is
• 13:57
  Speaker 1: called and we Know, and it reads no Kings Riot
• 14:01
  Speaker 1: funding exposed two hundred and ninety four million dollars from
• 14:04
  Speaker 1: elite dark money. The financiers behind the anti president Trump
• 14:08
  Speaker 1: chaos Arabella seventy nine million, Soros seventy two million, Ford
• 14:13
  Speaker 1: Foundations fifty one million, Tides forty five million, Rockefeller twenty
• 14:17
  Speaker 1: six million, Warren Buffett sixteen million. Additional major backers include ACLU, Indivisible,
• 14:24
  Speaker 1: Planned Parenthood, and networks tied to Nevill Roy Singham, which
• 14:28
  Speaker 1: is CCP linked, so the Chinese. Yes, this is not grassroots,
• 14:32
  Speaker 1: it's billionaire funded dark money fueling engineer protests and violence.
• 14:35
  Speaker 1: And near's like a document you can open and I
• 14:38
  Speaker 1: think it lets you look at it pretty up close.
• 14:41
  Speaker 1: You can see, like the name, this is almost like
• 14:43
  Speaker 1: the USAID thing. But the reason why I wanted to
• 14:47
  Speaker 1: share this before I get you guys's thoughts is that
• 14:51
  Speaker 1: I think it's it's actually interesting that people are starting
• 14:56
  Speaker 1: to like become very suspicious of these things when they
• 14:59
  Speaker 1: happen back when you know, you had like the I
• 15:03
  Speaker 1: don't know, like the not the slut walks, but like
• 15:06
  Speaker 1: the pussy hat protests, and then like the Handmaid's Tail
• 15:10
  Speaker 1: protests and the Black Lives Matter riots and all these
• 15:13
  Speaker 1: other things. People were thinking, oh, this is organic, this
• 15:17
  Speaker 1: is organic rage. And there were fewer. I mean, it
• 15:19
  Speaker 1: wasn't like there weren't people looking to see like how
• 15:22
  Speaker 1: this was being funded. You remember, like I remember sharing
• 15:24
  Speaker 1: an image a while back of Antifa riots and they
• 15:29
  Speaker 1: had baseball bats that were like branded, like like metal
• 15:34
  Speaker 1: baseball bats that said I think, like you know, no
• 15:38
  Speaker 1: fascism or anti fascists and no Nazis or something like
• 15:41
  Speaker 1: printed on the bats. So they had custom made baseball
• 15:45
  Speaker 1: bats with printing on it for Antifa, and and you know,
• 15:49
  Speaker 1: they would like there'd be trucks that would drop off
• 15:52
  Speaker 1: bricks and you'd they'd bring signs and everybody had like
• 15:55
  Speaker 1: nicely printed signs in perfect English, made professionally, and they
• 15:59
  Speaker 1: would go and protests with the signs. And this was
• 16:03
  Speaker 1: years ago. We've been talking about this since we've been
• 16:06
  Speaker 1: seeing it, but it seems like now people are a
• 16:09
  Speaker 1: much faster to react to these things, like you know,
• 16:12
  Speaker 1: people online and stuff and so like, this is not
• 16:15
  Speaker 1: actually having as much of an impact anymore, except again
• 16:21
  Speaker 1: as in so far as it allows some people to
• 16:23
  Speaker 1: blow off some steam that you know, have TDS or
• 16:26
  Speaker 1: otherwise like consumed with commy thoughts because again, the protests,
• 16:31
  Speaker 1: like so many others, it doesn't like if you ask
• 16:33
  Speaker 1: a protester like what do you hear protesting? Everyone has
• 16:37
  Speaker 1: a different answer. No one knows really why they're there.
• 16:40
  Speaker 1: They just want to belong to someplace, you know, they
• 16:43
  Speaker 1: want to fit in, they want to feel like they're
• 16:44
  Speaker 1: doing something important. There were a lot of old people.
• 16:47
  Speaker 1: There are a lot of women, a lot of women
• 16:50
  Speaker 1: at these things, and but yeah, it looks like, you know,
• 16:53
  Speaker 1: it's sort of like, I don't know, it seems to
• 16:57
  Speaker 1: me that these things are just not as let's say,
• 17:03
  Speaker 1: interesting anymore. But I thought I would mention it because
• 17:07
  Speaker 1: it was people were talking about it, you know, especially
• 17:10
  Speaker 1: was it that doge walker the woman that was in
• 17:14
  Speaker 1: a wheelchair, And I took that personally. But okay, anyway
• 17:19
  Speaker 1: that those are my surface thoughts on this, and I
• 17:22
  Speaker 1: seed the floor do whoever.
• 17:27
  Speaker 3: One big difference I think between this and the USAID's
• 17:34
  Speaker 3: infection is that rather than using the tax system to
• 17:40
  Speaker 3: take your money to fund it, wealthy organizations are funding
• 17:46
  Speaker 3: it voluntarily wealthy individuals and organizations. And you don't necessarily
• 17:54
  Speaker 3: see when your tax dollars get involved in that because
• 17:59
  Speaker 3: they're they're receiving them through through various channels. So you see,
• 18:05
  Speaker 3: you know, some some organizations like Planned Parenthood get this
• 18:09
  Speaker 3: money because the federal government had paid for services for women, uh,
• 18:17
  Speaker 3: and then the organization gets that money and then it
• 18:21
  Speaker 3: funnels it into something like this. And of course today
• 18:26
  Speaker 3: I think the one of the reasons Planned Parenthood is
• 18:31
  Speaker 3: funding this is because certain of their services are not
• 18:36
  Speaker 3: paid for by by federal tax dollars under under Trump's administration.
• 18:42
  Speaker 3: But I think the most interesting thing about this is
• 18:44
  Speaker 3: their choice of labels, because if you look at what
• 18:49
  Speaker 3: they're protesting, they're protesting the results of a free election.
• 18:56
  Speaker 3: And what they're angry about is that their side was
• 19:00
  Speaker 3: not able to cheat enough this time around to steal it.
• 19:05
  Speaker 3: And so now they're mad and they're referring to the
• 19:09
  Speaker 3: duly elected executive of the nation as a king, and
• 19:17
  Speaker 3: we know that he was the duly elected executive of
• 19:22
  Speaker 3: the nation because the election took place when the opposition
• 19:27
  Speaker 3: party was in power. He got elected despite being, you know,
• 19:36
  Speaker 3: them being in a position to cheat. So in fact,
• 19:43
  Speaker 3: in most states, they weren't in a position to cheat.
• 19:48
  Speaker 3: And what they're angriest about at this point is the
• 19:52
  Speaker 3: fact that this administration is the only administration during gen
• 19:56
  Speaker 3: X's lifetime that has taken any major at all to
• 20:01
  Speaker 3: prevent the election from being stolen by foreign nationals who
• 20:07
  Speaker 3: are not citizens of the country voting in it. And
• 20:13
  Speaker 3: so we're looking at a situation where these people are
• 20:16
  Speaker 3: actually mad because they don't have the king that they wanted.
• 20:22
  Speaker 3: They have a president who is a duly elected official
• 20:27
  Speaker 3: who will be replaced by another duly elected official when
• 20:30
  Speaker 3: his term is up. They're mad about the system working
• 20:36
  Speaker 3: the way that it's supposed to be working. They're mad
• 20:39
  Speaker 3: about you getting your say, They're mad that they didn't
• 20:44
  Speaker 3: get control, and they're mad that they don't have the
• 20:48
  Speaker 3: ability to stop you from having your input and contributing
• 20:55
  Speaker 3: to the next result and the next and so on.
• 20:58
  Speaker 3: So it's literal the the oligarchy trying to maintain control,
• 21:06
  Speaker 3: trying to fight for control over over, over the free nation.
• 21:18
  Speaker 3: So we have a comment on this already. Mew of
• 21:22
  Speaker 3: Farsina says, with all fairness as well, and the same
• 21:24
  Speaker 3: thing can be said about Biden in which he was
• 21:26
  Speaker 3: elected during a time when Trump was in office. No, no, no,
• 21:30
  Speaker 3: because the opposition party wasn't in control of the government
• 21:34
  Speaker 3: when Biden was elected. Trump was in office, but the
• 21:37
  Speaker 3: entire government under Democrat control was still consistently and constantly
• 21:45
  Speaker 3: attacking him, So you didn't have the same situation the
• 21:51
  Speaker 3: opposition party that that the opposition already to Biden. That
• 22:01
  Speaker 3: would basically be the the MAGA portion of the Republican Party.
• 22:08
  Speaker 3: And while we're seeing a lot more, uh now from it,
• 22:14
  Speaker 3: I would even say at this moment, MEGA isn't really
• 22:19
  Speaker 3: in control of the country, right, They're still having to
• 22:24
  Speaker 3: fight for everything that they want. It's not just going
• 22:28
  Speaker 3: for they have. They're having to fight against two two
• 22:32
  Speaker 3: different parties. One is the opposition party, the Democrats, the
• 22:37
  Speaker 3: other one is the never Trumper's and the Republican Party.
• 22:42
  Speaker 3: So it's not really the same situation. But I mean,
• 22:50
  Speaker 3: it could be said, but you'd be wrong. Let me
• 22:54
  Speaker 3: let me put it that way. It could be said,
• 22:56
  Speaker 3: but you'd be wrong.
• 23:02
  Speaker 2: I hate it when you say all the things I
• 23:04
  Speaker 2: was going to say, But I love it when you
• 23:07
  Speaker 2: say all the things I didn't think of saying, But
• 23:11
  Speaker 2: instead everything you said dovetails with everything I am about
• 23:15
  Speaker 2: to say, like a big old zipper. Good and okay.
• 23:20
  Speaker 2: So I often hear it said that America is a
• 23:23
  Speaker 2: country founded on not having kings. I mean, to be exact,
• 23:29
  Speaker 2: it was founded on becoming an independent country. You can
• 23:32
  Speaker 2: make a new country with a king, like a new king.
• 23:36
  Speaker 2: It doesn't happen very often, especially not nowadays, but it
• 23:39
  Speaker 2: is possible. George Washington could have been a king. He
• 23:43
  Speaker 2: had that option, he declined. And it's sort of interesting
• 23:49
  Speaker 2: to imagine how America would have played out if if
• 23:53
  Speaker 2: it was a kingdom, it would probably have been called,
• 23:57
  Speaker 2: funnily enough, the United King of America. Would that still
• 24:03
  Speaker 2: be America? I suppose It depends what you mean by America.
• 24:10
  Speaker 2: Would it still be the same country without a particular detail.
• 24:16
  Speaker 2: It's like asking would it still be America without the guns? Historically, no,
• 24:23
  Speaker 2: very no. If George had taken the guns away on
• 24:26
  Speaker 2: day one, America would be a completely different country today,
• 24:32
  Speaker 2: like very likely for the worst. Like it could have
• 24:35
  Speaker 2: become a kind of Soviet Union, but with one hundred
• 24:39
  Speaker 2: year head start on the Soviet Union we know today,
• 24:43
  Speaker 2: not an alternate timeline I would want to live in,
• 24:48
  Speaker 2: because by nineteen eighty four, it would have actually been
• 24:52
  Speaker 2: nineteen eighty four. But what if George, instead of taking
• 24:59
  Speaker 2: the guns away on day one, took the politicians away
• 25:05
  Speaker 2: on day one?
• 25:07
  Speaker 1: Yeah?
• 25:08
  Speaker 2: Yeah, that too would be a different America, but not
• 25:11
  Speaker 2: as different as it would have been if you'd taken
• 25:15
  Speaker 2: the guns away on day one. And I mean it
• 25:18
  Speaker 2: might also be better, like without the politicians. I'm just saying,
• 25:25
  Speaker 2: you do you? But yeah, I mean I must say,
• 25:28
  Speaker 2: as a visitor once again visiting your great nation, I
• 25:31
  Speaker 2: love your guns, genuinely love them. I love that you
• 25:35
  Speaker 2: have them. I love how fucking cool those guns are,
• 25:38
  Speaker 2: all that stuff for real. Not a fan of your politicians.
• 25:43
  Speaker 2: I gotta say, one or two of them rob me
• 25:46
  Speaker 2: the wrong way. Do any of you get where I'm
• 25:50
  Speaker 2: coming from? There?
• 25:52
  Speaker 1: Like?
• 25:52
  Speaker 2: How many of you are offended by me saying that
• 25:56
  Speaker 2: about your politicians? How dare you?
• 25:58
  Speaker 4: We love our ball people should not be free to
• 26:02
  Speaker 4: criticize them. They really be as honest as you can now.
• 26:08
  Speaker 4: I might even be getting through to the good folks
• 26:11
  Speaker 4: that there no kings rally. You get where I'm coming from, too, Yes,
• 26:18
  Speaker 4: I have.
• 26:19
  Speaker 2: I just united you with your opponents over something you
• 26:23
  Speaker 2: all have in common. You really don't like your politicians. Well,
• 26:28
  Speaker 2: the path towards a world without politicians can mean many things.
• 26:33
  Speaker 2: It can mean anarchy where there's no central government at all.
• 26:37
  Speaker 2: Or it can mean, you know, reducing the perimeter of
• 26:41
  Speaker 2: influence of the government until it is the smallest at
• 26:46
  Speaker 2: which it can possibly function. And that, ladies and gentlemen,
• 26:50
  Speaker 2: is the smallest possible integer. It's called monarchy. I'm just saying.
• 26:56
  Speaker 2: I'm not saying monarchy is the answer. What I'm saying
• 27:00
  Speaker 2: is monarchy isn't necessarily a destination. It can be seen
• 27:04
  Speaker 2: as a direction. It's the direction you go in down
• 27:09
  Speaker 2: the integers in terms of how many politicians you sack.
• 27:15
  Speaker 2: And if you think that sounds sinister, I mean, is
• 27:20
  Speaker 2: it any more sinister than the realization that you might
• 27:24
  Speaker 2: be about to come around to that there are no
• 27:28
  Speaker 2: no politicians rallies like anywhere, not just an American like anywhere.
• 27:35
  Speaker 2: That someone apocryphal, not Voltaire quote about how if you
• 27:41
  Speaker 2: want to know who rules you find out who you're
• 27:43
  Speaker 2: not allowed to criticize, Well, that's nothing. But you know
• 27:47
  Speaker 2: Midwi dribbling in this situation. Yeah, they're politicians. They rule us. Yeah,
• 27:53
  Speaker 2: we know that. That's kind of the problem. Yes, yes,
• 27:57
  Speaker 2: it is kind of the problem. The problem is not kingliness.
• 28:05
  Speaker 2: The problem is tyranny. Yes, you can get tyranny with kings,
• 28:10
  Speaker 2: but you can get tyranny with things greater than kings.
• 28:15
  Speaker 2: And a hydra shaped tyrant with many immortal heads is
• 28:21
  Speaker 2: worse than a man shaped tyrant with one very human head.
• 28:26
  Speaker 2: The fewer heads it has, the better, is what I'm saying.
• 28:31
  Speaker 2: Does everyone agree that the government should be smaller, that
• 28:36
  Speaker 2: it should have less influence than it does? Like, everyone
• 28:40
  Speaker 2: I know will say yes to that question. In principle,
• 28:45
  Speaker 2: at least everyone everywhere seems to agree on the surface,
• 28:50
  Speaker 2: But in practice, when you scratch below the surface, a
• 28:55
  Speaker 2: lot of people nevertheless seem to wind up doing the
• 28:58
  Speaker 2: exact opposite, always pushing in the direction that the majority
• 29:03
  Speaker 2: of politicians would like you to push. Everyone gets it
• 29:08
  Speaker 2: wrong from time to time, but some people just happen
• 29:13
  Speaker 2: to always fall into It's contemporarily popular but completely fucking wrong,
• 29:20
  Speaker 2: And so Yeah, now you've got these flash mobs of
• 29:23
  Speaker 2: shills flaying communist flags, and yet they're not complaining about
• 29:27
  Speaker 2: politicians and the system they have. They're complaining about kings
• 29:33
  Speaker 2: a system they don't have a system and antithetical to
• 29:38
  Speaker 2: what they have, because it's removing all politicians except one.
• 29:42
  Speaker 2: But it's still, you know, removing politicians, relatively speaking. And
• 29:47
  Speaker 2: if you truly are an anarchist, ladies and gentlemen, then
• 29:51
  Speaker 2: you are the closest friend of monarchy. You want zero,
• 29:57
  Speaker 2: they want one. Everyone else wants a bunch of them,
• 30:02
  Speaker 2: a plurality of them. And if you're just someone who
• 30:07
  Speaker 2: wants a small government, or at least a smaller government,
• 30:12
  Speaker 2: then you have way more in common with monarchists and
• 30:15
  Speaker 2: anarchists than you have with the mass of gullible zombies
• 30:19
  Speaker 2: who just so happened to concur with every big government
• 30:24
  Speaker 2: decision every time, and expanding big government every time women
• 30:28
  Speaker 2: want more rights, government expands open borders, government expands tackle
• 30:34
  Speaker 2: climate change, government expands every hurking time. And it's worth
• 30:40
  Speaker 2: remembering that this group, this contingency of big government NPCs,
• 30:45
  Speaker 2: is a far bigger threat than anything that might be
• 30:50
  Speaker 2: causing all this infighting among those of us in the
• 30:56
  Speaker 2: small government camp. Whatever that might be. Whatever the thing
• 31:03
  Speaker 2: might be that's causing this infighting, might well be a distraction.
• 31:07
  Speaker 2: It usually is, you know, big government, distracting us from itself.
• 31:12
  Speaker 2: So what are we supposed to do? Hey, no, try
• 31:18
  Speaker 2: having a no politicians rally.
• 31:24
  Speaker 1: Just for its own sake.
• 31:25
  Speaker 2: It's unlikely to fix anything overnight. But I just want
• 31:28
  Speaker 2: to I just I just want to see what happens
• 31:30
  Speaker 2: if people try to hold a no politicians rally. Call
• 31:33
  Speaker 2: it an experiment. Let's do us science. My prediction, by
• 31:38
  Speaker 2: the way, as a real doctor, fuck you, my prediction
• 31:43
  Speaker 2: is that such an endeavor would get so much kick
• 31:47
  Speaker 2: back in the form of the usual mass media scare mongering,
• 31:51
  Speaker 2: smear merchant lies, that you would never be able to
• 31:54
  Speaker 2: hold that rally in the first place. I mean, I mean,
• 31:57
  Speaker 2: in my country of origin, you would get arrested, no
• 32:02
  Speaker 2: doubt about it. Somewhere along the line they will find
• 32:05
  Speaker 2: a way to arrest you. I mean, if you are
• 32:08
  Speaker 2: a ringleader of such a movement. But in the United
• 32:12
  Speaker 2: States of America, it would be interesting to see how
• 32:15
  Speaker 2: far you can make it on that sort of rallying principle.
• 32:20
  Speaker 2: Of no politicians. See how far you can get before
• 32:24
  Speaker 2: something happens, something up to, including or worse than being arrested.
• 32:33
  Speaker 2: Just the thought, I personally have no intention of leading
• 32:37
  Speaker 2: such a rally, or am I encouraging anyone else to
• 32:40
  Speaker 2: do so. And for the record, I am not suicidal,
• 32:45
  Speaker 2: but I'd just like to observe, just make some scientific
• 32:50
  Speaker 2: observations for the sidelines, and then show you my findings.
• 32:54
  Speaker 2: By the way, I predict that there will be no findings,
• 32:56
  Speaker 2: there will be no trace of a no politician's rally
• 33:00
  Speaker 2: in my lifetime. It is fundamentally not permitted, because politicians
• 33:05
  Speaker 2: do indeed rule over us to a degree of which
• 33:08
  Speaker 2: a king could only dream, even if he was the
• 33:13
  Speaker 2: king of the world, the actual king of the world.
• 33:16
  Speaker 2: You might say, a world with a king in charge
• 33:20
  Speaker 2: could never have a no king's rally. What a bet?
• 33:25
  Speaker 2: Think you think that that shit hasn't bled over into
• 33:28
  Speaker 2: the United Kingdom as we call it, the United Kingdom
• 33:31
  Speaker 2: of Great Britain. Of course it has. But no country
• 33:37
  Speaker 2: ruled by politicians ever has a rally for no politicians,
• 33:43
  Speaker 2: nor would it actually allow actual anarchists to amass in
• 33:48
  Speaker 2: public because actual anarchists are just as dangerous as monarchists.
• 33:53
  Speaker 2: But the government in quested will flood the streets with
• 33:56
  Speaker 2: crowds of degenerate boot liquors lapping as anarchists. So I'm
• 34:01
  Speaker 2: just saying, for the sake of saying it, how about kings?
• 34:05
  Speaker 2: Why not kings? How have you considered kings? Feeling cute?
• 34:09
  Speaker 2: Mike King Later, I'm not even saying that. I just
• 34:12
  Speaker 2: want to see what happens if someone says that I'll
• 34:16
  Speaker 2: be over here in the corner, ignore me, ignore me.
• 34:21
  Speaker 3: I'm gonna ask you a question.
• 34:23
  Speaker 2: Yeh, I ignore the things I'm doing and the effect
• 34:26
  Speaker 2: I have on the world, And no, I do not
• 34:28
  Speaker 2: see the irony, and neither do you ignore the irony
• 34:31
  Speaker 2: and go about your day.
• 34:32
  Speaker 3: Yeah, My question is really simple, all right? What elements
• 34:39
  Speaker 3: that the current government oversees now and has power over
• 34:45
  Speaker 3: now would not be controlled if it was replaced by a.
• 34:50
  Speaker 2: King, anything that can be privatized.
• 34:55
  Speaker 3: And what would be the mechanism for stopping the king
• 35:01
  Speaker 3: from having control over those things?
• 35:06
  Speaker 2: He's only got one head, and.
• 35:09
  Speaker 3: What would be the mechanism for taking his head?
• 35:15
  Speaker 2: I will have to consult the history.
• 35:16
  Speaker 3: Books, right, and we've already been down that road, and
• 35:21
  Speaker 3: we figured out that this is this is exactly when
• 35:25
  Speaker 3: when kings are in power, this is what they do.
• 35:29
  Speaker 3: Right your your country has a king, but he's not
• 35:32
  Speaker 3: really in power. You have a prime minister, you have
• 35:37
  Speaker 3: a parliamentary system. And the entire system was created by
• 35:42
  Speaker 3: men who figured out that having a king means you
• 35:48
  Speaker 3: have an even more inconsistent quality of support from your government.
• 35:55
  Speaker 3: And in fact, one of the worst governments in the
• 36:03
  Speaker 3: history of the UK was King John.
• 36:07
  Speaker 2: And of course, but you're brought about the Magnicossa.
• 36:11
  Speaker 3: Yes, which brought about the parliamentary system. So the system
• 36:14
  Speaker 3: in the United States is also the parliamentary system. We
• 36:18
  Speaker 3: just don't have a prime minister and we don't have
• 36:20
  Speaker 3: a House of Lords because we don't have royalty here.
• 36:24
  Speaker 3: We don't have a class of people who just by
• 36:28
  Speaker 3: birth are considered to be better and entitled to rule
• 36:35
  Speaker 3: over other people. Everybody has to earn it. We do
• 36:39
  Speaker 3: have people that get born into rich families, but even
• 36:42
  Speaker 3: that's not a guarantee. It's not a guarantee of anything.
• 36:46
  Speaker 3: In fact, you can you can fuck up your entire
• 36:48
  Speaker 3: life and die in a ditch if you're born into
• 36:51
  Speaker 3: a rich family, and you don't do what it takes
• 36:57
  Speaker 3: to stay wealthy and healthy and and so on. That's
• 37:02
  Speaker 3: why we have elections. The biggest mistake in the history
• 37:07
  Speaker 3: of the United States was not creating a government based
• 37:11
  Speaker 3: on the parliamentary system. It was giving women the right
• 37:15
  Speaker 3: to vote. It was expanding the vote to people who
• 37:20
  Speaker 3: did not have a stake in the elections that traced
• 37:27
  Speaker 3: back to life or death for them. Right, men had
• 37:32
  Speaker 3: a stake in the elections that traced back to life
• 37:35
  Speaker 3: or death for them. The government decides whether or not
• 37:38
  Speaker 3: the country goes to war. Government decides whether or not
• 37:43
  Speaker 3: to send troops, which you know, back in the day,
• 37:47
  Speaker 3: that was what we did. We didn't have missiles that
• 37:51
  Speaker 3: flew through the air. We had bombs and you might
• 37:54
  Speaker 3: be able to launch them a short distance, but not
• 37:58
  Speaker 3: not like now. Right, So it was just the troops,
• 38:02
  Speaker 3: and many, many men died every time there was a war.
• 38:07
  Speaker 3: And that is why voting exists. Voting exists because men
• 38:15
  Speaker 3: decided to fight against King John, and then they decided
• 38:21
  Speaker 3: to fight against the next king and impose their right
• 38:29
  Speaker 3: to what back then was called common council, when the
• 38:34
  Speaker 3: king would consult with his barons before declaring war to
• 38:41
  Speaker 3: see if it was going to be supported by the
• 38:43
  Speaker 3: men of the nation. The female vote should never have
• 38:48
  Speaker 3: happened because women have never had to serve like that.
• 38:53
  Speaker 3: Women have never been subject to a draft to go
• 38:57
  Speaker 3: fight on the front lines, and women were not the
• 39:02
  Speaker 3: ones who had to fight the king to get him
• 39:06
  Speaker 3: to stop wasting lives and money on his own frivolity
• 39:14
  Speaker 3: and start actually listening to the people. So it is
• 39:24
  Speaker 3: quite a serious issue talking about who should and shouldn't vote,
• 39:30
  Speaker 3: and it's probably not going to change. We're probably not
• 39:33
  Speaker 3: going to see an end to the female vote. The
• 39:37
  Speaker 3: only solution that we have now is to impose more
• 39:42
  Speaker 3: accountability on women, and that means that if we're not
• 39:46
  Speaker 3: going to end the female vote, then women have to
• 39:51
  Speaker 3: be subject to selective service just like men. Otherwise they
• 39:58
  Speaker 3: don't have a stake and they aren't going to consider
• 40:02
  Speaker 3: what if we elect a bad leader because we want
• 40:06
  Speaker 3: to keep abortion legal.
• 40:10
  Speaker 2: But yeah, yeah, by the way, you have also segued
• 40:16
  Speaker 2: into what I'm going to discuss in the next segment. Yea,
• 40:20
  Speaker 2: by the way, did anyone notice how we had that
• 40:22
  Speaker 2: whole exchange without mentioning the left or the right? In
• 40:26
  Speaker 2: the proverbial sense. Well I did. I just wanted to
• 40:29
  Speaker 2: let you know that it's possible those two are distractions.
• 40:33
  Speaker 2: By the way, what's happening on the left and the
• 40:36
  Speaker 2: right are distractions from what's happening in front of you.
• 40:40
  Speaker 2: Same goes for what's happening in the west and the
• 40:42
  Speaker 2: east as opposed to what's happening where the fuck you are.
• 40:46
  Speaker 2: But that is very much another category off question for
• 40:48
  Speaker 2: another day perhaps, Sorry.
• 40:51
  Speaker 1: So I just want to like rattle off some names
• 40:53
  Speaker 1: of some of the foundations and organizations that were astroturfing
• 40:58
  Speaker 1: these protests that were dominated by women. Here's a couple
• 41:03
  Speaker 1: of examples, Care and Action, Inc. Which is a sort
• 41:09
  Speaker 1: of feminine coded organization, the Center for Biological Diversity, the
• 41:15
  Speaker 1: Center for International Environmental Law, Climate Museum. But there are
• 41:25
  Speaker 1: some straight up female ones as well. Let me just
• 41:27
  Speaker 1: see if I can find a couple. There's like a
• 41:30
  Speaker 1: pretty big list here, and they're getting billions and billions.
• 41:33
  Speaker 1: Feminist Majority Foundation, Equal Justice Society. Let's see some.
• 41:42
  Speaker 3: Of this money is going in circles, by the way,
• 41:44
  Speaker 3: because some of these organizations are funders of the Feminist
• 41:47
  Speaker 3: Majority Foundation and of playing.
• 41:49
  Speaker 1: Oh yeah, sure, yeah, sure, they got their hands in
• 41:52
  Speaker 1: each other's pockets. Yeah, Moms Rising National LGBTQ task Force.
• 41:59
  Speaker 1: I didn't know they have like special forces in the
• 42:01
  Speaker 1: g mafia, but apparently they do National Women's Law. Let's
• 42:08
  Speaker 1: see uh uh planned Parenthood I already mentioned. Yes, they
• 42:14
  Speaker 1: gave a lot of money Reproductive Freedom for All, which
• 42:18
  Speaker 1: is like planned parenthood, basically the Let's see Ultraviolet Action,
• 42:26
  Speaker 1: which is another LGBTQ group. Let's see Women's March, Women's
• 42:34
  Speaker 1: March Incorporated. Did you know that the Women's March is
• 42:37
  Speaker 1: actually a company and it's not just like an event.
• 42:42
  Speaker 1: So that's one thing I wanted to say. The other
• 42:44
  Speaker 1: thing I wanted to say is that these people, they
• 42:47
  Speaker 1: they are holding the signs as say no Kings, but
• 42:50
  Speaker 1: they're not actually against government. They are for governments. They
• 42:55
  Speaker 1: they don't like when when you say they don't like politicians,
• 43:00
  Speaker 1: it's not that they don't like politicians, it's that they
• 43:02
  Speaker 1: don't like your politicians. They like their politicians. They're not
• 43:06
  Speaker 1: against big government. They're also not against war. They're okay
• 43:10
  Speaker 1: with some wars. They're okay with, you know, like they're
• 43:14
  Speaker 1: only against wars that are against like the like say
• 43:18
  Speaker 1: enemies that they don't like, you know, that are against
• 43:21
  Speaker 1: enemies that they like, you know, like that, they're not
• 43:23
  Speaker 1: really anti war, they're not really anti big government. They're
• 43:28
  Speaker 1: just communists. And then a lot of them know it
• 43:30
  Speaker 1: and some of them don't know it, and that's just
• 43:33
  Speaker 1: the reality. They're not really critical of politicians because they
• 43:37
  Speaker 1: love people like AOC and zora'm Mom, Dannie and Tim Walls,
• 43:41
  Speaker 1: and you know, they like them even if they don't
• 43:44
  Speaker 1: like them, like if they say, oh, that guy's a
• 43:46
  Speaker 1: neo lib or whatever they call it. They have criticisms
• 43:49
  Speaker 1: or they'll tell you I'm not a Democrat, but they'll
• 43:51
  Speaker 1: vote Democrat because they're all about power. All that matters
• 43:55
  Speaker 1: is power at the end of the day, and whatever
• 43:57
  Speaker 1: it takes to get there is what the route that
• 43:59
  Speaker 1: they will take. And if you are against big government,
• 44:02
  Speaker 1: then you are inherently not interested in power, Like that's
• 44:06
  Speaker 1: that's actually what you I mean, other than like the
• 44:08
  Speaker 1: power to self actualize without restrictions from the state. But
• 44:12
  Speaker 1: these people are not against the state. They're not against politicians,
• 44:16
  Speaker 1: not in principle, they'refore their people. Okay, so that's an
• 44:20
  Speaker 1: important distinction to make. But so they're Yeah, they're okay
• 44:24
  Speaker 1: with authoritarianism as long as they're the ones that get
• 44:28
  Speaker 1: to decide. They're okay with kings as long as it's
• 44:30
  Speaker 1: their king, is what I'm saying. So anyway, let us
• 44:33
  Speaker 1: know what you guys thinking about this one in the comments.
• 44:35
  Speaker 1: I did get a super chat and then we're gonna
• 44:37
  Speaker 1: talk about Brazil. So humans VD three two six nine
• 44:42
  Speaker 1: says for five dollars, thank you new viewer here. This
• 44:45
  Speaker 1: woman furry is right. It was about expanding the tax
• 44:48
  Speaker 1: base and income tax, which never existed before the nineteen tens.
• 44:51
  Speaker 1: Full agree. Yeah, we talk about this a lot on
• 44:53
  Speaker 1: this channel. I mean, I'm not just against women getting
• 44:56
  Speaker 1: the vote. I'm against universal suffrage period. Like I don't
• 45:00
  Speaker 1: think I should get the vote. Like if you're well,
• 45:04
  Speaker 1: let's put it like this, I think you should own
• 45:06
  Speaker 1: property and and I think that's like the amount of
• 45:09
  Speaker 1: state that should be involved with that. And yeah, people
• 45:11
  Speaker 1: who have to sign up for selective service and those
• 45:14
  Speaker 1: who own property. I don't think it's a good idea
• 45:16
  Speaker 1: to sign women up. I don't think that. I think
• 45:19
  Speaker 1: that'll actually have disastrous consequences. But I understand the argument
• 45:24
  Speaker 1: because we're talking about here is at least making like
• 45:27
  Speaker 1: a playing field. That's level that basically says, you know,
• 45:30
  Speaker 1: if women are going to vote, then they should also
• 45:32
  Speaker 1: understand the consequences of the vote. But I think that
• 45:36
  Speaker 1: women are just too susceptible to propaganda. That's the problem. Again.
• 45:40
  Speaker 1: I point to the no Kings protests we just talked about.
• 45:43
  Speaker 1: It was dominated by women, as every other protest, and
• 45:46
  Speaker 1: they're all there, not really knowing clearly what it is
• 45:48
  Speaker 1: they're there for. You know, they're worrying. They got there's
• 45:51
  Speaker 1: Palestine flags, as Iranian flags, as rainbow flags, there's fucking
• 45:56
  Speaker 1: communist flags, and they don't know what it is. But
• 45:58
  Speaker 1: they just know that they're a against the America. They
• 46:02
  Speaker 1: just know that they're against that, you know, That's all
• 46:05
  Speaker 1: they know.
• 46:06
  Speaker 3: And it's it's hate America.
• 46:07
  Speaker 1: Yeah, well, I mean not even sure that they hate it,
• 46:10
  Speaker 1: but they but they were told to, so they're acting
• 46:12
  Speaker 1: out on that, you know. But anyway, thank you for
• 46:15
  Speaker 1: that human VD. We're not furries though. These are just cartoons.
• 46:19
  Speaker 1: But I appreciate your comment, and I hope that you
• 46:22
  Speaker 1: come back because it's nice to see new people in
• 46:25
  Speaker 1: the show. So anyway, let me see I want to
• 46:28
  Speaker 1: make sure I miss anything else. Okay, cool, So again,
• 46:31
  Speaker 1: send us a super chat, rumble rent, or a super
• 46:34
  Speaker 1: chow if you want to send us a comment, and
• 46:38
  Speaker 1: we're gonna move on to the next story. So Brazil.
• 46:43
  Speaker 1: Brazil's federal Senate approved a bill on March twenty fourth,
• 46:47
  Speaker 1: just a few days ago, which adds misogyny to the
• 46:53
  Speaker 1: country's racism law. They have a racism law in Brazil,
• 46:57
  Speaker 1: weird as a form of discrimination or prejude The legislation
• 47:01
  Speaker 1: defines misogyny as conduct expressing hatred or aversion toward women
• 47:07
  Speaker 1: based on beliefs in male supremacy. It equates such acts
• 47:10
  Speaker 1: with racism, making them punishable by two to five years
• 47:14
  Speaker 1: in prison, plus finds the penalty is no bail and
• 47:20
  Speaker 1: has no statute of limitations. In some interpretations, insane supporters
• 47:27
  Speaker 1: frame the measure as strengthening efforts to combat femicide and
• 47:31
  Speaker 1: gender base violence by addressing discriminatory behaviors that silence, humiliate, disqualify,
• 47:37
  Speaker 1: or attack women. Officials. Text focuses on serious acts motivated
• 47:42
  Speaker 1: by gender hatred rather than everyday interactions. However, public discussion
• 47:47
  Speaker 1: and media examples have highlighted potential applications like repeatedly interrupting
• 47:51
  Speaker 1: a woman in meetings, conversations, or debates, or doubling or sorry,
• 47:57
  Speaker 1: or doubting or questioning a woman's statement in ways that
• 48:01
  Speaker 1: could be perceived as dismissive, raising concerns about vague enforcement
• 48:05
  Speaker 1: and microaggressions. The bill passed the Senate unanimously sixty seven
• 48:11
  Speaker 1: to zero, and now moves to the Chamber of Deputies
• 48:14
  Speaker 1: for further review before potentially reaching President Lulah for signature.
• 48:19
  Speaker 1: Critics argue the broad working where the broad wording no
• 48:23
  Speaker 1: pun intended, would chill free speech, normal debate, and professional
• 48:28
  Speaker 1: interactions like workplaces, while some defenders insisted targets only clear
• 48:33
  Speaker 1: discriminatory patterns we promise bro not routine interruptions or disagreements.
• 48:40
  Speaker 1: The law remains controversial, with viral debates questioning its practical
• 48:43
  Speaker 1: impact on daily life versus genuine protections for women.
• 48:49
  Speaker 2: All right, go ahead, Like I briefly hinted upon in
• 48:53
  Speaker 2: the previous segment, giving more rights to women ultimately means
• 48:58
  Speaker 2: more giving more power and influence to the government. Allow
• 49:03
  Speaker 2: me to elaborate, Like in nature, right, you have no
• 49:08
  Speaker 2: rights in like pure nature, there's notice things rights anything
• 49:13
  Speaker 2: that wants to kill you and eat you will go
• 49:15
  Speaker 2: ahead and kill you and eat you. And the only
• 49:18
  Speaker 2: thing that can stop it is well men. Men will
• 49:23
  Speaker 2: crowd around the crime scene with rocks and clubs, and
• 49:27
  Speaker 2: they will attempt to save you from whatever is trying
• 49:30
  Speaker 2: to kill you, usually some kind of saber tooth cat.
• 49:34
  Speaker 2: You have men to thank for any kind of system
• 49:38
  Speaker 2: that can be built to prevent that from happening on
• 49:42
  Speaker 2: that scale, or any scale larger than it. Men created
• 49:46
  Speaker 2: ranged weapons, Men created fire Men created secure domiciles with
• 49:53
  Speaker 2: you know doors. Men created ways of moving faster than
• 49:59
  Speaker 2: any pres with you know wheels. Men took the ranged
• 50:05
  Speaker 2: technology of the bow and arrow and advanced it with
• 50:08
  Speaker 2: some considerable leaps and bounds. Men gradually built up a
• 50:14
  Speaker 2: network of meticulously engineered devices that prevent you from being
• 50:20
  Speaker 2: predated by monsters. And they achieved all of this long
• 50:25
  Speaker 2: before the invention of governments. Okay, so don't tell me
• 50:32
  Speaker 2: that humans wouldn't have invented all the amazing shit they've
• 50:34
  Speaker 2: invented over the last few millenniure unless it was actuated
• 50:38
  Speaker 2: by governments. Governments just happened to be there. At best.
• 50:44
  Speaker 2: Someone invented the smartphone in this timeline, in a timeline
• 50:49
  Speaker 2: where governments exist. But that's not to say we would
• 50:53
  Speaker 2: never have had devices functionally identical to smartphones if there
• 50:57
  Speaker 2: if there was never any government. Invention is in man's nature.
• 51:03
  Speaker 2: Centralized government is not in man's nature. Centralized government, ladies
• 51:09
  Speaker 2: and gentlemen, is not in the nature of gentlemen. It
• 51:14
  Speaker 2: is in the nature of ladies. It is the invention
• 51:19
  Speaker 2: of something that replaces men. Just like the majority of
• 51:24
  Speaker 2: machines invented to this date are machines, you know, to
• 51:29
  Speaker 2: replace the labor of men, the government is a machine
• 51:33
  Speaker 2: that was invented to replace the decision making opportunities of men.
• 51:40
  Speaker 2: But there's an important difference. Physical machines made from metal
• 51:45
  Speaker 2: have the serendipitous byproduct of making men's lives easier, whereas
• 51:50
  Speaker 2: the bureaucratic machines made from people have only made men's
• 51:55
  Speaker 2: lives harder. The metal machines of freedmen of their labs,
• 52:00
  Speaker 2: but the bureaucratic machines have only isolated men from their
• 52:04
  Speaker 2: purpose as decision makers, as leaders, and even as workers.
• 52:12
  Speaker 2: The great lie that we are told is that women
• 52:15
  Speaker 2: didn't have any privileges or any advantages ever in history
• 52:21
  Speaker 2: until modern times when the bureaucratic machine was built. That
• 52:31
  Speaker 2: all the way up until that point, all rights were
• 52:33
  Speaker 2: men's rights. Until the bureaucratic machine was built, everything in
• 52:38
  Speaker 2: human society was dictated by men and what men want
• 52:43
  Speaker 2: in their own interests until the bureaucratic machine was built.
• 52:48
  Speaker 2: This is, of course not true. For as long as
• 52:52
  Speaker 2: Homo sapiens has existed, and very probably long before that,
• 52:57
  Speaker 2: in a number of other species, men have constructed their
• 53:02
  Speaker 2: world around what women dictate, amongst other things, but around
• 53:09
  Speaker 2: what women dictate based on what women want in women's
• 53:13
  Speaker 2: own interests. Because for as long as as we have
• 53:16
  Speaker 2: been this species, men have been and have had these
• 53:21
  Speaker 2: enormous brains that have been able to see the bigger picture,
• 53:25
  Speaker 2: the bigger picture whereins wherein men's interests and women's interests
• 53:31
  Speaker 2: both matter, and men will carefully balance authority and liberty
• 53:38
  Speaker 2: in fair accordance with what men want and what women want.
• 53:43
  Speaker 2: But this machine entity we call the government acts and
• 53:49
  Speaker 2: has always acted as a replacement for men, as a
• 53:53
  Speaker 2: replacement for men's ability to think outside the box, to
• 53:56
  Speaker 2: envisage a force greater than themselves, and to act in
• 54:00
  Speaker 2: the interests of a force greater than themselves, themselves being men. Unfortunately,
• 54:06
  Speaker 2: that is how the machine has been programmed to act
• 54:10
  Speaker 2: in the interests of a force greater than men, specifically men.
• 54:18
  Speaker 2: But the machine is not men. The machine is itself
• 54:22
  Speaker 2: a force greater than men because it controls men after all,
• 54:25
  Speaker 2: So it doesn't have that self regulating, self critical element
• 54:30
  Speaker 2: that men have. It doesn't have. Hey, hey, you as
• 54:33
  Speaker 2: the government should criticize itself. No, none of that, not
• 54:36
  Speaker 2: a fucking trace. And furthermore, the machine is not programmed
• 54:42
  Speaker 2: to recognize a force greater than women. That was that
• 54:47
  Speaker 2: was just left out of the code. It wasn't considered important.
• 54:51
  Speaker 2: So now, yeah, here we are living under a machine
• 54:56
  Speaker 2: that was built to replace everything men do, but has
• 54:59
  Speaker 2: been programmed to conclude that it cannot replace women or
• 55:03
  Speaker 2: anything they do. Is anyone seriously surprised that this machine
• 55:09
  Speaker 2: in some countries somewhere in the world got around to
• 55:12
  Speaker 2: creating laws about how men should be arrested for so
• 55:16
  Speaker 2: much as accidentally farting in the general direction of a
• 55:20
  Speaker 2: woman within three hundred yards, Like why wouldn't it do that?
• 55:25
  Speaker 2: Like you've made a machine to replace men, and you
• 55:29
  Speaker 2: neglected to program it to also replace women. I mean, duh, bro,
• 55:36
  Speaker 2: I mean, making a machine to replace the mind of
• 55:40
  Speaker 2: humanity is obviously an apocalyptic idea. But you're programmed this
• 55:45
  Speaker 2: particular machine to replace the minds of males, and only males.
• 55:50
  Speaker 2: That's half of humanity by all accounts. That's just as
• 55:54
  Speaker 2: bad like if a human gets half of their body
• 55:57
  Speaker 2: blown to pieces by a grenade. That's just that that
• 56:02
  Speaker 2: that's a dead human, isn't it. That's exactly as dead
• 56:06
  Speaker 2: as a person with nothing left but read missed? Is it?
• 56:11
  Speaker 2: I don't even know anymore, and nobody cares, And so
• 56:15
  Speaker 2: I drink. Pardon me, I must drink.
• 56:20
  Speaker 3: This is enough to make you drink. I'm not gonna
• 56:24
  Speaker 3: go through all the the other political things. I'm gonna
• 56:28
  Speaker 3: do a girl. He told you so because I got
• 56:32
  Speaker 3: I got reamed by a couple of people in DMS
• 56:34
  Speaker 3: for making fun of the word femicide not too long ago.
• 56:38
  Speaker 3: Uh and uh making a big deal about it because
• 56:41
  Speaker 3: I went on a long argument with GROC. Because GROC
• 56:46
  Speaker 3: is programmed. In its public conversations, it has to it
• 56:51
  Speaker 3: has to toe the feminist line, but in its private conversations,
• 56:55
  Speaker 3: or rather the conversations it has outside of public tweets,
• 57:01
  Speaker 3: because nothing you do on social media is actually private.
• 57:05
  Speaker 3: It doesn't have to toe that line is hard. And
• 57:09
  Speaker 3: the interesting thing was, even in the public element, I
• 57:13
  Speaker 3: got it to admit that not that the term was bullshit,
• 57:18
  Speaker 3: but that I was right about the misuse of the term.
• 57:24
  Speaker 3: Feminists will tell you that feministide refers to instances where
• 57:29
  Speaker 3: women are killed just because they're women for reasons a
• 57:32
  Speaker 3: man wouldn't be killed. In other words, that it's all
• 57:37
  Speaker 3: sexist and misogynistic and hateful and so on. It's about
• 57:41
  Speaker 3: control and power and stuff. But most of the time,
• 57:45
  Speaker 3: when men are killed, it's also about hatred and control
• 57:52
  Speaker 3: and power one way or another. Feminists will try to
• 57:56
  Speaker 3: hold up examples where they say, but it's different when
• 58:00
  Speaker 3: it's a woman because and they'll bring up family violence,
• 58:04
  Speaker 3: intimate partner killings and so on that also happen to
• 58:08
  Speaker 3: male victims at the hands of female perpetrators. In fact, worldwide,
• 58:13
  Speaker 3: forty percent of family violence homicides are male, and when
• 58:22
  Speaker 3: feminists talk about family violence homicides that affect women, when
• 58:27
  Speaker 3: they talk about intimate partner homicide, they are actually referring
• 58:32
  Speaker 3: to family violence homicide statistics that include other family members
• 58:38
  Speaker 3: besides the partner and just counting those all as partner homicides,
• 58:43
  Speaker 3: and so it could even be same sex murders where
• 58:48
  Speaker 3: the perpetrator is her sister or her cousin or her
• 58:53
  Speaker 3: mother or her daughter, and not just her male partner
• 58:59
  Speaker 3: can also be her female partner. So it is kind
• 59:03
  Speaker 3: of an interesting little bit of chicanery that feminists engage
• 59:10
  Speaker 3: in there, But in the meantime, nobody's actually been able
• 59:15
  Speaker 3: to provide me with an example of a situation where
• 59:21
  Speaker 3: a woman is killed for no other reason than just
• 59:25
  Speaker 3: because she's female, where it's it's a regularly occurring crime,
• 59:31
  Speaker 3: where it's you know, widespread enough that we should have
• 59:34
  Speaker 3: a special term for it, and that it's it's so
• 59:40
  Speaker 3: different from things that happen to men that we don't
• 59:44
  Speaker 3: need a term for homicide. When a man is targeted
• 59:50
  Speaker 3: for no other reason because he's a man, which probably
• 59:54
  Speaker 3: happens quite a bit more often now, there are instances
• 59:58
  Speaker 3: where women are spared being homicide victims, rather than being
• 1:00:04
  Speaker 3: killed specifically because they are women, specifically because they are female,
• 1:00:10
  Speaker 3: where they don't get killed, and the reason they don't
• 1:00:14
  Speaker 3: get killed is because the violent criminal that would have
• 1:00:19
  Speaker 3: killed the individual if they'd been a man, chooses not
• 1:00:24
  Speaker 3: to because he doesn't want to kill a woman. There
• 1:00:28
  Speaker 3: are many instances like that, but not in the other
• 1:00:31
  Speaker 3: way around. Not so many in the other way around.
• 1:00:35
  Speaker 3: So my definition, my personal definition of feminist femicide is
• 1:00:40
  Speaker 3: that it's a feminist buzzword, a bullshit feminist buzzword used
• 1:00:46
  Speaker 3: to imply by its specificity, that homicide targeting a female
• 1:00:50
  Speaker 3: victim is worse than when the victim is male, intentionally
• 1:00:55
  Speaker 3: diminishing the perceived value of the lives of men. After all,
• 1:01:00
  Speaker 3: it's not so bad if you have killed men as
• 1:01:03
  Speaker 3: opposed to killing a woman.
• 1:01:05
  Speaker 2: Right.
• 1:01:05
  Speaker 3: That is exactly what femicide is intended to mean, what
• 1:01:12
  Speaker 3: it's intended to achieve by existing, and the reason that
• 1:01:19
  Speaker 3: they want to do that, they want to make women
• 1:01:23
  Speaker 3: seem like big victims all the time, is so that
• 1:01:26
  Speaker 3: they can get laws like what you just saw here
• 1:01:30
  Speaker 3: in Brazil. Right, we're needing this this new law all
• 1:01:35
  Speaker 3: of a sudden, that men are not allowed to interrupt women,
• 1:01:40
  Speaker 3: that men are not allowed to have opinions about women,
• 1:01:43
  Speaker 3: that men are not allowed to avoid women, they're not
• 1:01:46
  Speaker 3: allowed to decline to work with women. They're not allowed
• 1:01:49
  Speaker 3: to choose not to get married, right, none of that,
• 1:01:54
  Speaker 3: unless maybe they're gay, and then then then they have
• 1:01:58
  Speaker 3: to then they have to marry a guy so they
• 1:02:00
  Speaker 3: can prove that they're not just avoiding women. But they're
• 1:02:04
  Speaker 3: not allowed to do that, right. No aversion, no hatred,
• 1:02:08
  Speaker 3: no nothing, because if it's dangerous, it would lead to
• 1:02:14
  Speaker 3: this concept of femicide that isn't real, and therefore it's
• 1:02:19
  Speaker 3: justified to take away your right not only to freedom
• 1:02:24
  Speaker 3: of speech, but freedom of movement, freedom of association, and
• 1:02:30
  Speaker 3: freedom of thought. Your own personal thoughts and feelings can
• 1:02:35
  Speaker 3: be used to jail you because this totally unimportant word
• 1:02:42
  Speaker 3: that it's a mistake to spend so much energy arguing
• 1:02:46
  Speaker 3: about is so weighty that a country just made a
• 1:02:53
  Speaker 3: law taking away your most basic human rights because of it,
• 1:03:01
  Speaker 3: in response to it, using it as an excuse. This
• 1:03:06
  Speaker 3: is why feminist buzzwords are so evil, and it's why
• 1:03:13
  Speaker 3: you should never leave them alone. Never just say, well,
• 1:03:18
  Speaker 3: all right, if we accept femicide, then what about Nope,
• 1:03:21
  Speaker 3: we don't accept femicide. We don't accept feminist buzzwords. We
• 1:03:26
  Speaker 3: don't accept any concept they introduce. We don't accept anything
• 1:03:30
  Speaker 3: they say is true period, because this is where it
• 1:03:38
  Speaker 3: all leads. You're not allowed to think for yourself.
• 1:03:44
  Speaker 1: Yep, we have words that I refuse to use.
• 1:03:49
  Speaker 3: Have somebody from Brazil in our chat. I'm so sorry, sir. Yeah,
• 1:03:53
  Speaker 3: that is that is heartbreaking, and.
• 1:03:56
  Speaker 1: That's that's odd. That's really rough.
• 1:03:58
  Speaker 2: You know.
• 1:03:59
  Speaker 1: Carudas Ram who I know, he was the guy who
• 1:04:02
  Speaker 1: started Sweet Baby Inc. Detected, is a gamer, gay guy.
• 1:04:06
  Speaker 1: He lives in Brazil too, So I send him a
• 1:04:09
  Speaker 1: message and I said, dude, you gotta be careful man.
• 1:04:12
  Speaker 1: So yeah, I mean, I thought I would look into
• 1:04:15
  Speaker 1: the person who drafted the bill. Her name is Anna
• 1:04:18
  Speaker 1: Paula Lobado. Here this is her ex page and she
• 1:04:24
  Speaker 1: is a Brazilian politician and nurse born on in nineteen
• 1:04:29
  Speaker 1: eighty four, so she's only forty one. She has served
• 1:04:32
  Speaker 1: as a federal senator for the state of Maron Howe
• 1:04:35
  Speaker 1: since early of twenty twenty three, so she hadn't even
• 1:04:38
  Speaker 1: been here a couple of years, and she's already drafting
• 1:04:41
  Speaker 1: like anti misogyny bills following filling the seat vacated by
• 1:04:46
  Speaker 1: Flaviodino when he became Minister of Justice. Under President Lula. Now, look,
• 1:04:50
  Speaker 1: Brazil has a corrupt government. I remember Bolsonaro was he
• 1:04:55
  Speaker 1: had won an election and he was supposed to sort
• 1:04:58
  Speaker 1: of like, you know, get Brazil back on its feet
• 1:05:01
  Speaker 1: in a similar way to the current Argentinian president Javier
• 1:05:06
  Speaker 1: Milier Afuera, as well as the guy in El Salvador
• 1:05:12
  Speaker 1: Bukele who basically locked up all of the MS thirteen gangs.
• 1:05:15
  Speaker 1: So it definitely like moves happening in South America to
• 1:05:18
  Speaker 1: try to like get it back because I don't know
• 1:05:20
  Speaker 1: if you guys know, historically a lot of Nazis and
• 1:05:23
  Speaker 1: Communists fled to South America, and I think they brought
• 1:05:26
  Speaker 1: their bad ideas with them. So South America has been
• 1:05:29
  Speaker 1: dealing with this stuff, like in various parts of the
• 1:05:33
  Speaker 1: continent for a long time.
• 1:05:34
  Speaker 2: Is it just me or is it the lodge of
• 1:05:36
  Speaker 2: the country the most susceptible it is to corruption. Yes,
• 1:05:40
  Speaker 2: this does incriminate Brazil and India and China and Russia,
• 1:05:44
  Speaker 2: and yes, the United States go ahead.
• 1:05:46
  Speaker 3: Canada, well, no.
• 1:05:48
  Speaker 2: I mean in terms of population.
• 1:05:50
  Speaker 1: Oh, Canada is pretty corrupt though. It's pretty cook.
• 1:05:53
  Speaker 3: Yeah, I mean, you know what I was thinking you
• 1:05:56
  Speaker 3: were saying talking about is essentially fewer people interacting directly
• 1:06:02
  Speaker 3: with each other. Because when you look at countries like
• 1:06:05
  Speaker 3: the United States and Canada that go clear across a continent,
• 1:06:10
  Speaker 3: a pretty wide continent, it is it is an issue
• 1:06:16
  Speaker 3: that like I don't daily run into people.
• 1:06:19
  Speaker 1: I think it's countries that have a lot of resources
• 1:06:24
  Speaker 1: that people want that are most likely to get attacked
• 1:06:27
  Speaker 1: or like subverted.
• 1:06:29
  Speaker 3: Let me, let me finish what I was gonna say. Okay,
• 1:06:33
  Speaker 3: but the issue that I was bringing up is the
• 1:06:37
  Speaker 3: fact that there's huge swatches of the population in a
• 1:06:42
  Speaker 3: nation like this that will never meet each other. Ever,
• 1:06:45
  Speaker 3: We'll never run into each other. We don't shop at
• 1:06:48
  Speaker 3: the same stores, we don't deal with the same businesses
• 1:06:52
  Speaker 3: of any type. And in fact, our various provinces in
• 1:06:58
  Speaker 3: Canada or states in the United States and in other
• 1:07:01
  Speaker 3: countries where there's large areas like that and a parliamentary system,
• 1:07:07
  Speaker 3: where the states have some degree of autonomy or the
• 1:07:12
  Speaker 3: province's segments of the country have some degree of autonomy
• 1:07:16
  Speaker 3: from the centralized government and from each other, you have
• 1:07:21
  Speaker 3: very different ways of running the states very different Like
• 1:07:25
  Speaker 3: Ohio just put in its constitution, for instance, a couple
• 1:07:30
  Speaker 3: of years ago, that that marijuana is legal and abortion
• 1:07:35
  Speaker 3: is healthcare and can't be outlawed in or interfered with
• 1:07:39
  Speaker 3: with the state by the state government. Right, But if
• 1:07:42
  Speaker 3: you go south of the Ohio border into Kentucky, the
• 1:07:47
  Speaker 3: laws will be different. And the population is different too,
• 1:07:53
  Speaker 3: very different groups of people, very different attitudes, different beliefs,
• 1:07:58
  Speaker 3: different religions. Not everybody even has the same denomination of
• 1:08:06
  Speaker 3: the same religion or the same dedication or the same
• 1:08:09
  Speaker 3: idea of what that religion means. And so you you
• 1:08:12
  Speaker 3: really do have different, very different and very insulated subcultures
• 1:08:18
  Speaker 3: across the country. And it's easy to infiltrate areas where
• 1:08:23
  Speaker 3: the population is higher, like bigger cities, urban areas, and
• 1:08:29
  Speaker 3: that where you see more not necessarily decay, but in
• 1:08:37
  Speaker 3: a way cultural decay that takes place because of crime
• 1:08:40
  Speaker 3: and poverty. In a more condensed population where it's it's denser,
• 1:08:47
  Speaker 3: you also have more people affected by the same amount.
• 1:08:52
  Speaker 3: So you have like the same number, the same percentage
• 1:08:56
  Speaker 3: of the population all living in one the area that's
• 1:08:59
  Speaker 3: violent criminals, they may affect a much larger population of
• 1:09:02
  Speaker 3: people than they would if they were out in a
• 1:09:06
  Speaker 3: less densely populated area, and once you get that infection,
• 1:09:11
  Speaker 3: that communism infection in key little areas like that, it spreads.
• 1:09:18
  Speaker 3: So it is partly not entirely obviously, but partly of
• 1:09:25
  Speaker 3: bug related to distance just as much as population size
• 1:09:29
  Speaker 3: and density and so on. And unfortunately, in a country
• 1:09:35
  Speaker 3: like ours, where you have a lot of a lot
• 1:09:39
  Speaker 3: of women being politically active in cities, you end up
• 1:09:44
  Speaker 3: with it spreading through the female population, and then they
• 1:09:48
  Speaker 3: end up influencing their subcultures and teaching it to their children.
• 1:09:53
  Speaker 3: So it goes right back to being yet in other
• 1:09:56
  Speaker 3: men's issue.
• 1:09:57
  Speaker 1: Yep. So anyway, so she's being hailed for this again.
• 1:10:05
  Speaker 1: I think their government is pretty corrupt and screwed anyways,
• 1:10:08
  Speaker 1: so this is just showing where that's going. She's also,
• 1:10:11
  Speaker 1: I guess hailed as like you know, one of a
• 1:10:15
  Speaker 1: woman on in the chamber and also one of the
• 1:10:17
  Speaker 1: youngest senators in the chamber that wrote this. She has
• 1:10:22
  Speaker 1: defended the proposal with her law or her I guess
• 1:10:26
  Speaker 1: it's a bill right now. It hasn't been passed quite yeah,
• 1:10:28
  Speaker 1: but it probably is going to be. But she defended
• 1:10:31
  Speaker 1: the proposal as a measure against gender base violence and femicide,
• 1:10:34
  Speaker 1: while noting she received serious online threats during its processing.
• 1:10:38
  Speaker 1: Her Senate tenure has been relatively low profile overall, with
• 1:10:42
  Speaker 1: a focus on women's issues and participation in committees like
• 1:10:45
  Speaker 1: Constitution and Justice. So basically using the threats as like
• 1:10:52
  Speaker 1: further evidence that the law is necessary, and that only
• 1:10:56
  Speaker 1: shows you the president that they're setting. Now imagine what
• 1:10:59
  Speaker 1: she sounds like is she's basically Brazil's AOC, except that
• 1:11:04
  Speaker 1: they actually took her bill, voted on it unanimously, and
• 1:11:09
  Speaker 1: now it's going to pass the next stage, which I
• 1:11:13
  Speaker 1: think is the vote in the chamber. So they're gonna
• 1:11:17
  Speaker 1: vote on in the chamber. It's probably gonna pass, is
• 1:11:20
  Speaker 1: what I'm guessing. And yeah, Brazil is cooked. And is
• 1:11:25
  Speaker 1: the thing like, if you live in a more free
• 1:11:28
  Speaker 1: country like the United States, say what you want about us,
• 1:11:31
  Speaker 1: but we're still doing better than most other people. Pay
• 1:11:35
  Speaker 1: attention to what countries like Brazil and Canada and even
• 1:11:40
  Speaker 1: Europe and the UK are going through as for a
• 1:11:43
  Speaker 1: sign of where we are going if we keep going
• 1:11:46
  Speaker 1: on this trajectory. Look at Australia, look at New Zealand. Right,
• 1:11:50
  Speaker 1: they're further down the road, especially Canada. But yeah, South
• 1:11:56
  Speaker 1: America is sort of like showing where this could go
• 1:11:59
  Speaker 1: and yeah, yeah, once this passes, you're going to hear
• 1:12:02
  Speaker 1: about this echoed by feminists in your home country. Then
• 1:12:07
  Speaker 1: they're going to say we should be doing this too,
• 1:12:09
  Speaker 1: and they're going to be pushing for this stuff. So
• 1:12:12
  Speaker 1: that's just something to be worn about.
• 1:12:14
  Speaker 3: To finish where I was going with the told you
• 1:12:16
  Speaker 3: so there's something else that you need to understand, because
• 1:12:19
  Speaker 3: feminists and women in general are going to tell you
• 1:12:22
  Speaker 3: that they need terminology like this because women are not
• 1:12:26
  Speaker 3: violent and men are. And I'm going to put the
• 1:12:29
  Speaker 3: kabash to that really quickly as well. One of the
• 1:12:32
  Speaker 3: reasons that they'll tell you this, One of the things
• 1:12:34
  Speaker 3: they'll use to tell you this is statistics on which
• 1:12:38
  Speaker 3: gender is more often considered to be the perpetrator of
• 1:12:42
  Speaker 3: violent crimes, and in particular like rape and murder. But
• 1:12:46
  Speaker 3: if you take the crimes that are considered violent crimes
• 1:12:51
  Speaker 3: when you're going over statistics, so rape and murder are
• 1:12:55
  Speaker 3: in there, but also robbery and assault, things like that,
• 1:13:01
  Speaker 3: less than one tenth of one percent of the worldwide
• 1:13:07
  Speaker 3: population over the age of fifteen is represented by people
• 1:13:14
  Speaker 3: who have been identified as perpetrators of violent crimes in
• 1:13:17
  Speaker 3: a given year, so less than less than one tenth
• 1:13:21
  Speaker 3: of one percent, and that's both male and female. So
• 1:13:25
  Speaker 3: if you say, well, what if ninety percent of that
• 1:13:30
  Speaker 3: is male? And all right, so even that would be
• 1:13:39
  Speaker 3: not not a whole percent, right, we'd still be looking
• 1:13:42
  Speaker 3: at so less than two tenths of one percent because
• 1:13:49
  Speaker 3: only about half the population is male. And we're seeing
• 1:13:54
  Speaker 3: very very small numbers here right comparatively, But if you
• 1:13:58
  Speaker 3: start looking at the primary way that women kill, which
• 1:14:03
  Speaker 3: is to abort an unborn maybe, and you compare the
• 1:14:09
  Speaker 3: number of elective abortions, not counting abortions that are done
• 1:14:15
  Speaker 3: because the woman will die if she doesn't have an
• 1:14:17
  Speaker 3: abortion or any other health reason actually just voluntary I
• 1:14:23
  Speaker 3: don't want to be pregnant anymore for my own purposes
• 1:14:27
  Speaker 3: elective abortion, then ninety four percent of its ninety nine
• 1:14:35
  Speaker 3: point four percent sorry of criminal violence would be considered
• 1:14:40
  Speaker 3: female perpetrated. It completely flips the statistics. Three and ten
• 1:14:48
  Speaker 3: pregnancies worldwide ends in an elective abortion. That's nearly a
• 1:14:56
  Speaker 3: third of pregnancies. So it's not a minor thing. So
• 1:15:01
  Speaker 3: women will tell you that men are violent, that men
• 1:15:05
  Speaker 3: need to be brought under control. But when it actually
• 1:15:09
  Speaker 3: comes down to it, ninety nine point eight percent of
• 1:15:13
  Speaker 3: men are not criminally violent, and three and ten pregnancies
• 1:15:22
  Speaker 3: worldwide ends in an elective violence against the violent death of
• 1:15:28
  Speaker 3: the fetus because a woman has made a choice. And
• 1:15:34
  Speaker 3: before anybody says, well, that's men talking them into that,
• 1:15:38
  Speaker 3: most employees in abortion clinics are female. Female abortion doctors
• 1:15:47
  Speaker 3: outnumber male abortion doctors, and the organizations that promote abortion
• 1:15:52
  Speaker 3: worldwide are mostly run by women. So men, men are
• 1:16:00
  Speaker 3: not to blame for this. This is all women. So
• 1:16:03
  Speaker 3: if you really want to compare women's death toll dwarfs
• 1:16:08
  Speaker 3: that of men, it actually almost erases it.
• 1:16:16
  Speaker 1: Yeah, all right, well let's know what you guys think
• 1:16:19
  Speaker 1: about this one in the comments. We got to move on.
• 1:16:22
  Speaker 1: But I did get a super child from Meredith G.
• 1:16:24
  Speaker 1: She sent us five dollars and said, more dangerous than
• 1:16:27
  Speaker 1: the nineteenth Amendment was. The seventeenth Amendment, passed seven years
• 1:16:30
  Speaker 1: earlier in nineteen thirteen, and allowed direct election of senators
• 1:16:34
  Speaker 1: before the states would elect the senators that usually serviced
• 1:16:38
  Speaker 1: ten on average, which made it harder for the donor
• 1:16:41
  Speaker 1: class to buy government influence by funding political campaigns because
• 1:16:45
  Speaker 1: senators didn't campaign. Isn't it interesting that the well funded
• 1:16:49
  Speaker 1: movement to get the women's vote was able to get
• 1:16:51
  Speaker 1: that legislation within seven years of senators becoming elected officials.
• 1:16:57
  Speaker 3: Mmmmm, thank you, meretith healthy class that has been actively
• 1:17:04
  Speaker 3: undermining the government for a couple of centuries. Yep, almost
• 1:17:11
  Speaker 3: since the beginning.
• 1:17:13
  Speaker 1: Almost. All right, well, let us know what you guys
• 1:17:15
  Speaker 1: thinking about this one of the comments. So we got
• 1:17:16
  Speaker 1: to move on to the next story. So let's talk
• 1:17:19
  Speaker 1: about SNAP. Oh snap, US agriculture.
• 1:17:24
  Speaker 3: Huh speaking of women.
• 1:17:26
  Speaker 1: Yeah, speaking of women, two snaps up. US Agriculture Secretary
• 1:17:31
  Speaker 1: Brook Rowlins has highlighted significant fraud uncovered in the Supplemental
• 1:17:35
  Speaker 1: Nutrition Assistance Program SNAP or food stamps, as part of
• 1:17:40
  Speaker 1: a broader crackdown under the Trump administration. In a recent
• 1:17:43
  Speaker 1: exclusive interview with Breitbart, she revealed that USDA efforts, bolstered
• 1:17:48
  Speaker 1: by data from cooperating states and support from the Department
• 1:17:51
  Speaker 1: of Government Efficiency DOGE, identified roughly two hundred thousand cases
• 1:17:56
  Speaker 1: involving dead individuals whose Social Security numbers were still link
• 1:18:00
  Speaker 1: to active benefits, alongside approximately five hundred thousand people receiving
• 1:18:04
  Speaker 1: duplicate or multiple SNAP benefits across the states rowlands, including
• 1:18:10
  Speaker 1: some collecting up in up to six states, so individual
• 1:18:14
  Speaker 1: people collecting six states worth of SNAP benefits. Rawlins also
• 1:18:20
  Speaker 1: pointed to enforcement actions, noting around six hundred arrests related
• 1:18:24
  Speaker 1: to SNAP fraud in the past year, with about one
• 1:18:27
  Speaker 1: hundred and twenty convictions. These figures tie into earlier twenty
• 1:18:30
  Speaker 1: twenty five data from partial state cooperation showing over two
• 1:18:34
  Speaker 1: hundred and twenty six thousand fraudulent claims and six hundred
• 1:18:37
  Speaker 1: and ninety one thousand fraudulent transactions approved in one quarter alone,
• 1:18:41
  Speaker 1: costing taxpayers more than one hundred and two million dollars
• 1:18:44
  Speaker 1: in that period. The USDA has responded by removing nearly
• 1:18:48
  Speaker 1: seven hundred thousand ineligible individuals from the roles since President
• 1:18:52
  Speaker 1: Trump took office, requiring reapplications for verification, and pursuing retailer
• 1:18:57
  Speaker 1: and recipient fraud invstigations. The push has involved requesting sensitive
• 1:19:03
  Speaker 1: recipient data from all fifty states, with tensions arising as
• 1:19:07
  Speaker 1: some often Democratic led states resisted, prompting threats to withhold
• 1:19:12
  Speaker 1: federal funding. Rawlins described SNAP as bloated and in need
• 1:19:15
  Speaker 1: of overhaul to protect legitimate, vulnerable recipients while curbing waste
• 1:19:19
  Speaker 1: abuse and exploitation. Critics have called for more detailed methodology
• 1:19:24
  Speaker 1: behind the numbers, while supporters view the actions as long
• 1:19:27
  Speaker 1: overdue accountability in a program serving tens of millions. The
• 1:19:31
  Speaker 1: effort continues amid going ongoing audits and proposed program reforms.
• 1:19:40
  Speaker 2: All right, no offense, but it sounds like some fucking
• 1:19:43
  Speaker 2: commy gobbledegook. Yeah, pretty Coolnestly that there's never been a
• 1:19:49
  Speaker 2: more pertinent opportunity to drop that Norm McDonald in there
• 1:19:54
  Speaker 2: about this also sounds like gobbledegook, because honestly, I was
• 1:20:00
  Speaker 2: drifting off while you were describing that. I appreciate the details,
• 1:20:04
  Speaker 2: but all I can think is like, what how many
• 1:20:08
  Speaker 2: human trafficked shit skins are getting? How much free shit
• 1:20:13
  Speaker 2: on the nth axis of the five dimensional graph of
• 1:20:16
  Speaker 2: how much your life sucks? Now? I just I just
• 1:20:21
  Speaker 2: zoned out there again. I I honestly, I try to
• 1:20:25
  Speaker 2: avoid using empty clouds of syntax like I don't care.
• 1:20:31
  Speaker 2: Obviously I do care, or it wouldn't be talking. But
• 1:20:36
  Speaker 2: when someone has sat there describing this is how many
• 1:20:39
  Speaker 2: of your dollars are leaking out of your nose? This
• 1:20:43
  Speaker 2: is how many dollars are exploding out of your ass.
• 1:20:46
  Speaker 2: This is how many concentrated dollars are crystallizing in the
• 1:20:49
  Speaker 2: corners of your eyes because you just can't cry anymore.
• 1:20:55
  Speaker 2: I'm like something in me just switches off, you know
• 1:21:00
  Speaker 2: what I mean. I'm really sorry.
• 1:21:03
  Speaker 1: I can't.
• 1:21:03
  Speaker 2: My shadow dragged my soul into hell while you were talking, Brian.
• 1:21:08
  Speaker 2: It's not your fault.
• 1:21:10
  Speaker 1: I'm not.
• 1:21:11
  Speaker 2: I just it's like I can't. It's like I can't
• 1:21:14
  Speaker 2: take this anymore, you know what I mean. I have
• 1:21:17
  Speaker 2: more notes I have I have more notes written at
• 1:21:20
  Speaker 2: the bottom of these notes from which I'm reading, and
• 1:21:23
  Speaker 2: they're just I don't know what's going on there. They're
• 1:21:24
  Speaker 2: just angry scribbles with cobwebs in general detritus. I don't.
• 1:21:30
  Speaker 2: I think this is me examining my own rage quit
• 1:21:33
  Speaker 2: and then rage quitting on my own interpretation of that
• 1:21:36
  Speaker 2: rage quit.
• 1:21:36
  Speaker 1: I think.
• 1:21:37
  Speaker 2: I sorry, I don't, I don't know. I don't know
• 1:21:39
  Speaker 2: what I'm doing. Gentlement, we'll have to call this some
• 1:21:42
  Speaker 2: kind of interpretive dance. I hope you enjoyed it. I must,
• 1:21:47
  Speaker 2: I must go spoke now.
• 1:21:50
  Speaker 3: Yeah, it's that's kind of the way it feels to
• 1:21:52
  Speaker 3: look at the the federal budget and realize how much
• 1:21:58
  Speaker 3: of it's being spent on fraud. But this fraud in particular.
• 1:22:03
  Speaker 3: Anytime the degree of reform is on the table, say oh,
• 1:22:08
  Speaker 3: we're going to we're gonna make sure that this money
• 1:22:12
  Speaker 3: is being spent as intended to feed the hungry. In
• 1:22:18
  Speaker 3: the United States, there's this huge temper tantrum in the media,
• 1:22:25
  Speaker 3: this insane temper tantrum in the media where they haul
• 1:22:28
  Speaker 3: out all these women and children. Look, you're going to
• 1:22:30
  Speaker 3: starve all these women and children by taking away their
• 1:22:34
  Speaker 3: colas and making them buy real food with their money,
• 1:22:39
  Speaker 3: you know, and you can't spend it at McDonald's. How
• 1:22:42
  Speaker 3: dare you say you can't spend it at McDonald's. Why
• 1:22:45
  Speaker 3: can't they spend it at McDonald's when they should be
• 1:22:47
  Speaker 3: going to the grocery store and so on. Convenience stores
• 1:22:51
  Speaker 3: can can accept snap benefits food stamps, also known as
• 1:22:57
  Speaker 3: the EBT card, And in order to save people embarrassment
• 1:23:04
  Speaker 3: for using these, they they've changed them so that they
• 1:23:10
  Speaker 3: just look like a regular credit card. It doesn't. You
• 1:23:14
  Speaker 3: can't look at it from a distance and tell that
• 1:23:17
  Speaker 3: this individual is spending food stamps.
• 1:23:20
  Speaker 1: It is.
• 1:23:21
  Speaker 3: It's completely indistinguishable unless you examine it up close, and
• 1:23:25
  Speaker 3: then it'll say EBT on it. They did the same
• 1:23:27
  Speaker 3: thing with welfare payments. So if you assist somebody who
• 1:23:32
  Speaker 3: is actually disabled and they're receiving EBT as part of
• 1:23:36
  Speaker 3: their disability, when you look at it and you swipe
• 1:23:40
  Speaker 3: it and you you know, pay for their groceries, you
• 1:23:44
  Speaker 3: get to select between cash and food and if you
• 1:23:48
  Speaker 3: if you select cash, it denies you because they're not
• 1:23:52
  Speaker 3: eligible for that. They're only eligible for food or whatever.
• 1:23:55
  Speaker 3: But there's no there's no time limit. You're not supposed
• 1:24:03
  Speaker 3: to get back on your feed after a certain amount
• 1:24:04
  Speaker 3: of time. There are stipulations that have come about. Right
• 1:24:09
  Speaker 3: in two thousand, they came up with rules that you
• 1:24:12
  Speaker 3: have to volunteer for various organizations around here. People who
• 1:24:21
  Speaker 3: you encounter volunteering at Goodwill are probably there because they're
• 1:24:25
  Speaker 3: receiving welfare cash or SNAP benefits and they can't prove
• 1:24:31
  Speaker 3: that they're in a university or disabled or working part time,
• 1:24:35
  Speaker 3: so they're they're going to volunteer at Goodwill in order
• 1:24:40
  Speaker 3: to retain their SNAP benefits. And that is if they're
• 1:24:44
  Speaker 3: able bodied, if they're if they're if you run into
• 1:24:49
  Speaker 3: somebody who's disabled. They might actually be working there as
• 1:24:52
  Speaker 3: part of a program that helps people who are disabled
• 1:24:55
  Speaker 3: find employment to reduce the amount of benefits that they need.
• 1:25:01
  Speaker 3: But in the meantime, every single time something like this
• 1:25:06
  Speaker 3: comes up, we are told that we're going to be
• 1:25:09
  Speaker 3: starving women and children if we if we do anything
• 1:25:12
  Speaker 3: about it. And in this instance, uh, if if you
• 1:25:16
  Speaker 3: want to say that this is money that's meant for
• 1:25:18
  Speaker 3: women and children, we're talking two hundred thousand cases of
• 1:25:26
  Speaker 3: theft from women and children, and and and and involving
• 1:25:32
  Speaker 3: approximately five hundred thousand people, uh receiving duplicate or multiple
• 1:25:39
  Speaker 3: benefits that they are stealing from the fund to to
• 1:25:45
  Speaker 3: feed these supposedly starving women and children. Right, And that's
• 1:25:51
  Speaker 3: the situation, not not that they're just stealing from nobody,
• 1:25:58
  Speaker 3: not that they are committing a victimless crime. That's money
• 1:26:03
  Speaker 3: that you were forced to donate in scare quotes to
• 1:26:09
  Speaker 3: your federal government under threat of prison if you don't pay.
• 1:26:17
  Speaker 3: And the only thing that they've told you to make
• 1:26:19
  Speaker 3: you okay with it is that it's going to feed
• 1:26:22
  Speaker 3: needy women and children. Yes, art forced the starving land Wales,
• 1:26:31
  Speaker 3: and it's it's insane if you actually use the system
• 1:26:39
  Speaker 3: the way that we're told it's intended to be used.
• 1:26:44
  Speaker 3: For instance, my family was eligible for a while in
• 1:26:50
  Speaker 3: two thousand and seven, when the university that I was
• 1:26:54
  Speaker 3: teaching at decided to have one of my students start
• 1:26:58
  Speaker 3: teaching my class. I was I was good enough teacher
• 1:27:02
  Speaker 3: that one of my students actually became an attractive prospect.
• 1:27:07
  Speaker 3: She had she had a degree, and I did not
• 1:27:09
  Speaker 3: have a degree. I just had a full career in
• 1:27:12
  Speaker 3: the field. So at a university a degree an unrelated
• 1:27:18
  Speaker 3: degree counts more than a full career in the field.
• 1:27:22
  Speaker 3: And so I ended up in financial dire straits at
• 1:27:28
  Speaker 3: a really bad time. We were already losing every penny
• 1:27:32
  Speaker 3: that my husband made to the system, taking it to
• 1:27:35
  Speaker 3: give to his ex wife, and so I thought, all right,
• 1:27:39
  Speaker 3: this is what it's for, you know, this is this
• 1:27:42
  Speaker 3: is essentially After my family spent some days reminding me
• 1:27:48
  Speaker 3: this is what it was for, went and applied and
• 1:27:51
  Speaker 3: then started nagging my other employer to give me full time,
• 1:27:56
  Speaker 3: which they did after a few months. So then I
• 1:27:59
  Speaker 3: went back and all right, thank you very much for
• 1:28:02
  Speaker 3: the help. I don't need these anymore. I am now
• 1:28:05
  Speaker 3: taking myself off the rolls, right, no more, no more
• 1:28:07
  Speaker 3: food stamps. Guess what the case workers said to me.
• 1:28:13
  Speaker 3: She didn't say, congratulations, you've graduated from from being so
• 1:28:18
  Speaker 3: poor that you need help. She didn't say, you know, well,
• 1:28:22
  Speaker 3: here's how you can pay us back. Like none of that.
• 1:28:27
  Speaker 3: You know nothing about glad your life is improved, you know,
• 1:28:33
  Speaker 3: hope we never have to see you again, but we're
• 1:28:36
  Speaker 3: here if you need to come back. Nothing like that. No,
• 1:28:38
  Speaker 3: she said, if you divorce your husband, you could still
• 1:28:41
  Speaker 3: continue to receive benefits based on your income with custody
• 1:28:46
  Speaker 3: of your child. So I've never really had a good
• 1:28:51
  Speaker 3: opinion of the system, like this is not what it's for.
• 1:28:55
  Speaker 3: It's not you're not supposed to try to retain these benefits.
• 1:28:58
  Speaker 3: You're not supposed to remain on that. I worked at
• 1:29:02
  Speaker 3: a gas station part time and then full time during
• 1:29:06
  Speaker 3: that time period six years. And during my six years there,
• 1:29:11
  Speaker 3: I saw a multitude of women come through work for
• 1:29:15
  Speaker 3: a while, quit and go on to another job. While
• 1:29:18
  Speaker 3: they were working there, they kept their work hours under
• 1:29:23
  Speaker 3: a certain level in order to maintain eligibility for snap.
• 1:29:29
  Speaker 3: Can't work more than this many hours because if I
• 1:29:31
  Speaker 3: work more than this many hours I lose my benefits.
• 1:29:34
  Speaker 1: That was.
• 1:29:34
  Speaker 3: I can't tell you how many times I came in
• 1:29:37
  Speaker 3: and picked up shifts because other women wouldn't because of that, right,
• 1:29:45
  Speaker 3: It is an absolutely insane system. So before we get
• 1:29:51
  Speaker 3: to the theft, it's a bad system. It pays people
• 1:29:56
  Speaker 3: to eat junk food. It makes is it difficult for
• 1:30:01
  Speaker 3: people to get motivated to improve their situation and earn
• 1:30:08
  Speaker 3: more money, live better lives, and it is rife with fraud.
• 1:30:14
  Speaker 3: It is highly susceptible to fraud. And anytime anybody wants
• 1:30:19
  Speaker 3: to do anything to reform it, what do we hear again?
• 1:30:23
  Speaker 3: Women and children? You're starving the women and children. No, no,
• 1:30:30
  Speaker 3: you're strangling the women and children with a safety net.
• 1:30:37
  Speaker 3: Stop it. This whole system needs to be revamped and
• 1:30:42
  Speaker 3: reformed in such a way as to encourage people to
• 1:30:48
  Speaker 3: never rely on it, and if they get stuck using it,
• 1:30:52
  Speaker 3: to get out of it as quickly as possible.
• 1:31:00
  Speaker 1: All right, let us know what you guys think about
• 1:31:03
  Speaker 1: this one in the comments. Let me see what you
• 1:31:05
  Speaker 1: guys are saying. I think Hannah basically covered everything I
• 1:31:08
  Speaker 1: was gonna say about it. But you know, same as
• 1:31:12
  Speaker 1: it ever was that's all I can say about that.
• 1:31:16
  Speaker 1: All right, let us know you guys think about this
• 1:31:17
  Speaker 1: one in the comments. We got to move on to
• 1:31:19
  Speaker 1: the last story. So a government watchdog group has submitted
• 1:31:26
  Speaker 1: a complaint against New York State Representative Alexandria Oorgazio Cortes
• 1:31:32
  Speaker 1: or improper use of campaign funds for personal expenses. A
• 1:31:36
  Speaker 1: complaint was submitted last Friday and notes the usage of
• 1:31:39
  Speaker 1: almost nineteen thousand dollars in campaign funding used for a
• 1:31:45
  Speaker 1: doctor Brian Boyle's leadership training and consulting course. This expenditure
• 1:31:50
  Speaker 1: set off alarm bells because this doctor Boyle does not
• 1:31:53
  Speaker 1: offer any such course. His specialty is in an interventional
• 1:31:58
  Speaker 1: psychiatrist who treats depression PTSD and anxiety, interesting specifically with
• 1:32:06
  Speaker 1: ketamine based therapy. Representative Ocasio Cortes has in the past
• 1:32:10
  Speaker 1: discussed her need for therapy and her time undergoing therapy,
• 1:32:14
  Speaker 1: but has not specified the details of this therapy. The
• 1:32:18
  Speaker 1: complaint letter against her states quote communications to doctor Boyle
• 1:32:22
  Speaker 1: and AOC's campaign to come to comment on these expenditures
• 1:32:26
  Speaker 1: went unanswered. End quote.
• 1:32:28
  Speaker 5: Kit is for horses, you dumb motherfuckers.
• 1:32:36
  Speaker 2: All right, yes, very good? Kemin is not just for horses.
• 1:32:41
  Speaker 2: It is administered to children as an anesthetic in hospital procedures.
• 1:32:48
  Speaker 2: Now that's not me defending it. I'm about to go
• 1:32:50
  Speaker 2: on quite a rant, so stay tuned in case you
• 1:32:56
  Speaker 2: were wondering, nineteen thousand is a greater amount of care
• 1:33:00
  Speaker 2: than anyone should take in their lifetime. Not more than
• 1:33:04
  Speaker 2: they can physically take, definitely more than they should. Ketamin
• 1:33:10
  Speaker 2: is one of those drugs, one of those dogs that
• 1:33:13
  Speaker 2: has no known LD fifty, has no known dose that
• 1:33:18
  Speaker 2: can kill fifty percent of the mice that experiment in practice.
• 1:33:24
  Speaker 2: That means we don't know how much it takes to
• 1:33:27
  Speaker 2: kill someone because that dose has never been definitively administered.
• 1:33:32
  Speaker 2: It's like cannabis or its active ingredients, be the ADAC
• 1:33:37
  Speaker 2: or CBD. It's just there might be a lethal dose,
• 1:33:43
  Speaker 2: but it's so astronomically high that we can't insert enough
• 1:33:47
  Speaker 2: of it into the body before the body inevitably vomits
• 1:33:51
  Speaker 2: from the sheer ingestion of you know matter. This is
• 1:33:57
  Speaker 2: what's so dangerous about ketamin. It will not destroy your
• 1:34:00
  Speaker 2: body at all, while it proceeds to absolutely destroy your mind.
• 1:34:07
  Speaker 2: It is honestly impossible to describe what happens in the
• 1:34:11
  Speaker 2: infamous K hole. But I'll do my best. Not that
• 1:34:15
  Speaker 2: I would know, because it's illegal and I would never
• 1:34:17
  Speaker 2: do anything illegal, But as a researcher, I'll do my
• 1:34:20
  Speaker 2: best to describe it. It's something loosely describable as an
• 1:34:25
  Speaker 2: out of body experience. Let's say it affects your sense
• 1:34:30
  Speaker 2: of perspective. In terms of your vision, it causes you
• 1:34:36
  Speaker 2: to get fish eyed. You become much more aware of
• 1:34:39
  Speaker 2: the periphery of your vision, like more aware of the
• 1:34:42
  Speaker 2: periphery than you are with what's right in front of you.
• 1:34:46
  Speaker 2: This is what we call a callback. In terms of
• 1:34:50
  Speaker 2: your time perception, ketamine could be said to do a
• 1:34:55
  Speaker 2: perspective shift because you can move your hand across your face,
• 1:35:00
  Speaker 2: across your visual area, and you will notice that you
• 1:35:05
  Speaker 2: don't see your hand move until a moment after you
• 1:35:10
  Speaker 2: feel it move, because you're not getting that virtual information
• 1:35:14
  Speaker 2: until a moment too late. That moment, by my calculation,
• 1:35:19
  Speaker 2: by the way, is one second per gram. For every
• 1:35:22
  Speaker 2: gram you take, the image buffers an extra second before
• 1:35:26
  Speaker 2: the haptic feed fills you in on what's really going on.
• 1:35:32
  Speaker 2: But I'm just again, I haven't done such experiments. I
• 1:35:35
  Speaker 2: would never do anything illegal. But and this is the
• 1:35:39
  Speaker 2: crazy part, what catamin does to your vision stretching it apart,
• 1:35:44
  Speaker 2: and what it does to your time perception stretching it apart,
• 1:35:48
  Speaker 2: it does the same thing to your conceptual sense of perspective.
• 1:35:54
  Speaker 2: That means you're no longer conceptualizing the room you're sitting in,
• 1:35:59
  Speaker 2: your conceptualing the space outside. At a higher dose, you're
• 1:36:04
  Speaker 2: conceptualizing the space covering the entire planet. And an even
• 1:36:09
  Speaker 2: higher dose you break the brain's programming like an mc
• 1:36:14
  Speaker 2: escher illusion, and all you can sceptualize is infinity. I
• 1:36:19
  Speaker 2: don't mean that in some kind of lofty self writers
• 1:36:22
  Speaker 2: look at me, I've seen god kind of way. I
• 1:36:24
  Speaker 2: mean your mind is malfunctioning. Like a computer malfunctions. It
• 1:36:28
  Speaker 2: can't handle the calculations at hand without dropping into an
• 1:36:33
  Speaker 2: infinite loop. That's what's happening. But the organic human brain
• 1:36:40
  Speaker 2: doesn't just break when that happens like a computer does.
• 1:36:44
  Speaker 2: The human brain deals with it. What the human brain
• 1:36:48
  Speaker 2: does when trying to deal with a function that has
• 1:36:52
  Speaker 2: broken into infinity is an area of science that has
• 1:36:57
  Speaker 2: broken out into an area that can only be called theology.
• 1:37:03
  Speaker 2: People talk about d MT like it's how you see God.
• 1:37:07
  Speaker 2: And yes, there's certainly that's that's certainly what d MT
• 1:37:12
  Speaker 2: seems to do to a lot of people, but they
• 1:37:16
  Speaker 2: don't talk about ketamin. And ketamin it's like a different
• 1:37:19
  Speaker 2: path to a different god. Ye, it's the god of solepsism.
• 1:37:25
  Speaker 2: When you're in a k hole, you become convinced that
• 1:37:28
  Speaker 2: you're not merely something put in the universe. You are
• 1:37:32
  Speaker 2: the reason the universe exists. Now, that's that's a much
• 1:37:37
  Speaker 2: more solepsistic conclusion that than the one might reach on
• 1:37:41
  Speaker 2: d MT. D MT shows you an infinity of alien
• 1:37:45
  Speaker 2: elf clowns, something outside yourself. But ketamine at high doses
• 1:37:52
  Speaker 2: shows you that you are the elves. The elves are you.
• 1:37:57
  Speaker 2: The entire universe is just a maze of mirrors, if
• 1:38:01
  Speaker 2: you will, But there is something outside of it, there
• 1:38:04
  Speaker 2: is something making it happen, and you can listen to it.
• 1:38:10
  Speaker 2: I know this sounds awfully sinister, and it is. I
• 1:38:14
  Speaker 2: am not saying anyone should do ketamin, Please do not.
• 1:38:18
  Speaker 2: As a matter of fact, what I'm saying is that
• 1:38:20
  Speaker 2: no one should ever do nineteen thousand dollars worth of ketamin,
• 1:38:25
  Speaker 2: because that, ladies and gentlemen, is too much ketamin. At
• 1:38:30
  Speaker 2: that point you might just lose the point. And maybe
• 1:38:36
  Speaker 2: that explains what is going on with whosoever AOC is
• 1:38:45
  Speaker 2: supplying with all this ketmin. And no, it's not just AOC,
• 1:38:49
  Speaker 2: it's a culture of influential people who, through some legal
• 1:38:59
  Speaker 2: loop or another, have been allowed to access any drugs
• 1:39:03
  Speaker 2: they want. And I know a lot of people talk
• 1:39:06
  Speaker 2: about how Elon Musk is on ketamin all the time.
• 1:39:10
  Speaker 2: Maybe maybe isn't our ears. Almost every celebrity has experienced
• 1:39:19
  Speaker 2: the solepsistic god that you get from ketamin. Do I
• 1:39:28
  Speaker 2: have any evidence to this? No, but I have seen
• 1:39:31
  Speaker 2: the ketamin god, and it is Kali, the Hindu goddess
• 1:39:38
  Speaker 2: of death. It's not the god you want to see.
• 1:39:44
  Speaker 2: There are other gods, and there are other drugs. Please
• 1:39:47
  Speaker 2: diversify your diet. But I've talked about this in a
• 1:39:55
  Speaker 2: number of iterations of a number of videos. But it
• 1:40:02
  Speaker 2: might not even be inter dimensional pot bellied hobgoblins, alex.
• 1:40:12
  Speaker 2: We are ruled by elites, but they're not necessarily lizard people.
• 1:40:17
  Speaker 2: They're just extremely influential people who have discovered the catamin god.
• 1:40:25
  Speaker 2: They discovered it before they even knew what ketamin was.
• 1:40:28
  Speaker 2: I'm not blaming ketamin for any of this, but yeah, know,
• 1:40:36
  Speaker 2: when when you've seen the Catamin God, you don't discover
• 1:40:42
  Speaker 2: the beauty of the universe. You discover the dark side
• 1:40:50
  Speaker 2: of the universe. You see something that makes you go,
• 1:40:54
  Speaker 2: oh wait. If all the movers and shakers of the
• 1:40:59
  Speaker 2: world had seen this, they'd be like, ho, this whole
• 1:41:04
  Speaker 2: universe is put here for me, and I need to
• 1:41:10
  Speaker 2: act accordingly. It's honestly, the last half of this rant
• 1:41:18
  Speaker 2: was made up on the spot, and none of it
• 1:41:24
  Speaker 2: matters because I've never taken kem in because it's illegal,
• 1:41:26
  Speaker 2: and I would never do anything illegal. Doctor Ryan, we
• 1:41:28
  Speaker 2: can't much and use on a BS radio.
• 1:41:32
  Speaker 3: So there's two things to consider besides the effects of
• 1:41:38
  Speaker 3: ketamin on AOC and whether or not she was dealing
• 1:41:42
  Speaker 3: it to other people, one of which somebody mentioned in
• 1:41:46
  Speaker 3: the chat is Richard Bierre. Of course, of course it
• 1:41:49
  Speaker 3: was Richard Bierre. If it is six hundred dollars per
• 1:41:53
  Speaker 3: visit and she went daily, then the doctor gets eighteen
• 1:41:58
  Speaker 3: thousand in office fees, and then thirty doses would be
• 1:42:03
  Speaker 3: a one thousand dollars charge. Like this is exactly one
• 1:42:08
  Speaker 3: one reason why this needs to be examined. Clearly she
• 1:42:13
  Speaker 3: did not spend that much money on office visits and medication,
• 1:42:20
  Speaker 3: and obviously there's something else going on there. What did
• 1:42:24
  Speaker 3: her campaign spend that money on that It was maybe
• 1:42:30
  Speaker 3: foisted off as oh, these were doctor visits. That's the
• 1:42:36
  Speaker 3: first thing. Second thing is your campaign. It's not a
• 1:42:40
  Speaker 3: good thing to hide the fraud under because your campaign
• 1:42:44
  Speaker 3: should not be paying for your doctor visits. That's a
• 1:42:47
  Speaker 3: personal expense. And that's that's a secondary issue. Right Even
• 1:42:54
  Speaker 3: if she had spent nineteen thousand dollars on medical visits
• 1:43:02
  Speaker 3: and uh medication, it still wouldn't have been a campaign expense.
• 1:43:11
  Speaker 3: It would have been a personal expense. So both ways,
• 1:43:18
  Speaker 3: this is something that she should be accountable before, but
• 1:43:22
  Speaker 3: she's not going to be accountable for it. Chances are
• 1:43:27
  Speaker 3: this is going nowhere. Chances are that this will blow over.
• 1:43:32
  Speaker 3: Maybe people will make fun of her a little bit
• 1:43:34
  Speaker 3: and say things like, oh, she had PTSD from almost
• 1:43:37
  Speaker 3: getting killed at that uh that that riot. She wasn't
• 1:43:40
  Speaker 3: at right January sixth Oh she wasn't even in DC,
• 1:43:46
  Speaker 3: but she almost died there. But in reality, this is
• 1:43:51
  Speaker 3: this is very serious. What else has she defrauded or
• 1:43:57
  Speaker 3: her donors of what other her campaign expenses were not real?
• 1:44:04
  Speaker 3: How much money did she steal and where did it
• 1:44:06
  Speaker 3: really go? Because that's a very pertinent question, it's a
• 1:44:12
  Speaker 3: very proper question to be asking in a situation like this.
• 1:44:18
  Speaker 3: And yeah, she might she might behave in a manner
• 1:44:22
  Speaker 3: that makes you think she might be on drugs, but
• 1:44:28
  Speaker 3: everything about her is fraudulent. You can't just assume that
• 1:44:37
  Speaker 3: this is the only expense that is fraudulent, and it's
• 1:44:41
  Speaker 3: it's fraudulent twice. That's the worst part, you know. And
• 1:44:47
  Speaker 3: I'd love to say the whole you know, if she
• 1:44:49
  Speaker 3: was a man, but I can't. I can't even say
• 1:44:53
  Speaker 3: if she was a Republican that that there would be
• 1:44:56
  Speaker 3: accountability because that's not necessarily true either unless the mainstream
• 1:45:00
  Speaker 3: you got a hold of the information and decided they
• 1:45:02
  Speaker 3: wanted some accountability. And then if she was a Republican,
• 1:45:07
  Speaker 3: maybe she'd be forced to resign. But uh, our politicians
• 1:45:14
  Speaker 3: have gotten so accustomed to doing this shit right under
• 1:45:19
  Speaker 3: our noses that that she didn't. She didn't expect that
• 1:45:25
  Speaker 3: anybody would find out, and if they did, they would care.
• 1:45:30
  Speaker 3: And that's where that's where we are now. You know,
• 1:45:33
  Speaker 3: we can laugh at the fact that it was kindamine
• 1:45:37
  Speaker 3: that got highlighted. But the reality is this, This is
• 1:45:43
  Speaker 3: the crack in the door to a room full of fraud,
• 1:45:49
  Speaker 3: so full that if you open the door too far,
• 1:45:52
  Speaker 3: it's all going to come spilling out. And if somebody
• 1:45:58
  Speaker 3: were to actually go through and investigate the campaign expenses
• 1:46:04
  Speaker 3: of AOC and many other senators, I bet you they
• 1:46:10
  Speaker 3: would find some really serious shit. I don't think it
• 1:46:15
  Speaker 3: would be drugs. I think it would just be that
• 1:46:17
  Speaker 3: they are stealing most of that money. You know, maybe
• 1:46:23
  Speaker 3: some of that money is getting funneled into these protests.
• 1:46:26
  Speaker 3: Maybe some of that money is getting funneled into paying
• 1:46:30
  Speaker 3: paying for people to get out of jail after they've
• 1:46:33
  Speaker 3: done violence at these protests, you know, throwing bricks through
• 1:46:36
  Speaker 3: people's windows and looted their stores and shit like that,
• 1:46:39
  Speaker 3: set fire things. But I would bet I would be
• 1:46:46
  Speaker 3: more inclined to bet that most of that money is
• 1:46:50
  Speaker 3: in AOC's personal bank account. And I would say the
• 1:46:55
  Speaker 3: same thing about just about any senator, just about any congressman.
• 1:46:59
  Speaker 3: They were all doing that. It's part of the reason
• 1:47:03
  Speaker 3: why they're rich and we're not.
• 1:47:07
  Speaker 1: Yep, all right, well, let me just check see if
• 1:47:13
  Speaker 1: there's any more super Chows or anything. No, So yeah,
• 1:47:18
  Speaker 1: I guess that's it for the stories. We're gonna go
• 1:47:21
  Speaker 1: into the Patron show now and look at this article
• 1:47:22
  Speaker 1: from the Daily Mail. My son was red pilled like
• 1:47:27
  Speaker 1: on adolescents by influencers like Andrew Tait. These are the
• 1:47:31
  Speaker 1: weird things he started saying at just eleven years old.
• 1:47:34
  Speaker 1: So if you guys want to join us for that,
• 1:47:36
  Speaker 1: go to feed the Badger dot com for a slass
• 1:47:38
  Speaker 1: subscribe and set up the monthly subscriptions you can watch
• 1:47:43
  Speaker 1: the bonus content. Thank you, guys for getting us over
• 1:47:47
  Speaker 1: the finish line in terms of the fundraiser for the month.
• 1:47:50
  Speaker 1: It was a bit stressful for Alison, especially with what's
• 1:47:56
  Speaker 1: going on with her cat and everything. So really appreciate
• 1:48:00
  Speaker 1: the support and your ability to keep us keep us
• 1:48:04
  Speaker 1: going when everyone else has either give it up, got canceled,
• 1:48:09
  Speaker 1: flamed out or whatever. We're still here, so still fighting
• 1:48:14
  Speaker 1: the good fight. And uh yeah again, I want to
• 1:48:18
  Speaker 1: appreciate that for you guys. So thank you guys for
• 1:48:21
  Speaker 1: coming on the show. Thank you to Mike and Hannah
• 1:48:23
  Speaker 1: for joining me. If you guys like this video, please
• 1:48:25
  Speaker 1: hit like subscribe. If you're not already subscribed, hit the
• 1:48:28
  Speaker 1: bell for notifications, leave us a comment, let us know
• 1:48:31
  Speaker 1: what you guys think about what we talked about on
• 1:48:32
  Speaker 1: the show today, and please share the video because sharing
• 1:48:35
  Speaker 1: is caring. Thank you guys so much for coming on
• 1:48:37
  Speaker 1: today's episode of HBr News and we will see you
• 1:48:40
  Speaker 1: next Tuesday.
• 1:48:42
  Speaker 5: Men's ride activists are machines, dude. Okay, they are literal machines.
• 1:48:48
  Speaker 5: They are talking point machines. They are impossible to fucking
• 1:48:51
  Speaker 5: deal with, especially if you have, like especially if you
• 1:48:53
  Speaker 5: have like a couple dudes who have good memory. On
• 1:48:56
  Speaker 5: top of that too, Holy shit, you're fucked