Latest / Inside Politics / Barnaby Joyce opens up on his defection to Pauline Hanson's One Nation
Transcript
- 0:01S1: One Nation is having a bit of a moment. Pauline
- 0:05S1: Hanson's outfit, accused by both major parties of exploiting racial
- 0:08S1: anxiety over the years, has faded into irrelevance at points
- 0:11S1: since she burst onto the scene in the late 90s.
- 0:14S1: But two new polls have recorded record high primary votes
- 0:16S1: for One Nation. One of them saw One Nation's vote
- 0:19S1: rise above the coalition, which split in spectacular fashion this
- 0:23S1: week over new hate crime legislation in the wake of
- 0:26S1: the Bondi massacre. The break up of the coalition and
- 0:29S1: the rise of One Nation may point to a tectonic
- 0:32S1: change in conservative politics. At the same time, the attack
- 0:36S1: at Bondi further sapped trust in our political system as
- 0:39S1: politicians have brawled in the wake of the tragedy. Amid
- 0:42S1: the confusion over what led up to the attack and
- 0:44S1: what the country needs to do next, One Nation's message
- 0:47S1: has been simple Islam's extreme fringe needs more attention and
- 0:52S1: guns are not a problem. I'm Paul Circle and you're
- 0:55S1: listening to Inside Politics from the Age and the Sydney
- 0:57S1: Morning Herald from Parliament House this week we recorded an
- 1:01S1: interview before the coalition split with One Nation's newest recruit.
- 1:05S1: Nationals defector and former Deputy Prime minister Barnaby Joyce. Welcome, Barnaby.
- 1:14S2: Latest recruit.
- 1:17S1: Do you like that term?
- 1:18S2: Newest recruit? My mother would always pick him up. She
- 1:20S2: was a peasant and all that sort of stuff.
- 1:22S1: Well, there's apparently some recruits on the way.
- 1:24S2: Ah, well, I don't know. We'll we'll find. I honestly,
- 1:27S2: I never. People say other discussions. Of course there's discussions.
- 1:31S2: But it's like everything else I always say to people,
- 1:34S2: it's it's something I deliberated on over about a year. Mhm.
- 1:39S2: Um it's a, it's a choice. That's yours. I'll be
- 1:42S2: really honest Pauline never put any pressure on me to
- 1:44S2: do it. She said you go exactly at your pace
- 1:47S2: what you do, whether you don't, that's up to you. Um, but, uh, well,
- 1:50S2: for me, it's self-evident that, um, I was wasting my
- 1:54S2: time sitting in the back corner. Um, basically being asked
- 1:58S2: to leave Parliament and and that's what I would have
- 2:01S2: had to do, was I had to hang around. But
- 2:04S2: I don't encourage other people. I say it's your choice.
- 2:06S2: It's your life. It's your political career. You do what
- 2:08S2: you think is best.
- 2:09S1: And they nats the conversations.
- 2:11S2: I'm not going to give. That narrows it down a bit.
- 2:13S2: I'm not going to give that away. Yeah.
- 2:15S1: Well I remember when you left in when you quit
- 2:17S1: the Nats in November after months of speculation. You said
- 2:20S1: in your speech in the chamber, which I was sitting
- 2:23S1: in the press gallery watching, that you felt in some
- 2:26S1: ways irrelevant. You used that word and not even two
- 2:28S1: months later, you're back here in Parliament and you're called
- 2:31S1: by Murray Watt on Monday morning, the the opposition leader.
- 2:35S3: At such a high level that you can't deliver homes,
- 2:37S3: but you've got to have the skilled workers to deliver
- 2:39S3: those homes.
- 2:40S4: What are you saying?
- 2:41S5: It's an alternative. This is all the alternate universe of
- 2:44S5: Murray Watt. It's in the paper today. Murray. There's only
- 2:46S5: a couple of hundred of tradies that came into Queensland
- 2:49S5: where they actually are needing to build their houses. You're
- 2:52S5: not actually bringing in.
- 2:54S3: People that are helping. I think that you have to
- 2:56S3: hang on. You've got to let.
- 2:57S5: Me have a say what you've got, what you've.
- 2:59S2: Got.
- 2:59S1: So you look like you're having fun.
- 3:01S2: Yeah, well, it's like, you know, as I said as well,
- 3:04S2: I like when I played football, I liked to be
- 3:06S2: on the front row. You know, I liked to be
- 3:07S2: in the middle of it. And, uh, I feel I
- 3:09S2: give my best to my nation when I'm playing on
- 3:11S2: the balls of my toes. Um, and it's just in
- 3:14S2: my nature to to sit in the back corner. It
- 3:17S2: frustrates me because we only got one life. This is not.
- 3:20S2: This is not a dress rehearsal. This is it. And
- 3:22S2: so if you got an opportunity to do the very
- 3:24S2: best you can, you find your place. The position that
- 3:27S2: you can play your best game. And that's precisely what
- 3:29S2: I'm doing.
- 3:29S1: You've been the Deputy Prime Minister three times. 3 or 2?
- 3:33S2: Three. I remember either side of the section 44 case.
- 3:36S1: Congratulations on the third one, which I was unaware of. You.
- 3:39S1: You've had a big career. Yep. Giant in the National Party?
- 3:42S2: Yep.
- 3:43S1: You've taken a huge step. That's, uh, prompted accusations of
- 3:47S1: your being a rat being disloyal. Uh, all of which
- 3:50S1: are credible allegations in some ways, if you're a national.
- 3:53S2: Yeah.
- 3:53S1: Well, what's what's what's driving you? Well, what makes you
- 3:57S1: get up in the morning? Want to be an at.
- 3:58S2: Let's look at those allegations. First of all, I think
- 4:01S2: nobody can deny that. They did say generational change. They
- 4:04S2: wanted me to leave. That's correct.
- 4:06S1: That happens to older MPs who've had their guy.
- 4:07S2: But they did say that for me.
- 4:09S1: They did. But what's wrong about me?
- 4:11S2: Well, saying they want you to go.
- 4:12S1: But you've had your time.
- 4:14S2: Well, obviously I haven't. That's not what the Australian people think.
- 4:16S1: Is it because of the polls this week? Of course.
- 4:19S1: Let's go into the polls, resolve. Our poll has you
- 4:22S1: at 18.
- 4:22S2: It's such a negative, horrible thing. You've had your time.
- 4:25S2: I mean, you know.
- 4:27S1: That's how your colleagues say I'm reflecting.
- 4:29S2: That. Well, they're wrong. I mean, it's obvious it's a
- 4:31S2: very that is a selfish thing to wander around and
- 4:34S2: say to someone who's 58, oh, you've had your time.
- 4:37S2: It's is that that's kind of rude, don't you think?
- 4:40S2: Just a little bit rude.
- 4:41S1: Well, the polls point in your favour, so resolve. Our
- 4:44S1: poll this week has One nation, 18%. The Newspoll in
- 4:47S1: The Australian. A highly watched poll has you at 22,
- 4:50S1: which is 11. over the coalition first time in history.
- 4:54S1: It's not clear yet how much of that is solid
- 4:56S1: and permanent, and how much is a protest vote early
- 4:58S1: in the term against a broken liberal party? Tough economy.
- 5:01S1: People are feeling disaffected and, to a lesser extent, maybe
- 5:03S1: now a government that's losing some pain. What do you
- 5:06S1: think is driving the One Nation vote? Where is this
- 5:08S1: coming from? Because it happened before.
- 5:10S2: I looked on the fact that you've got some colleagues
- 5:12S2: said you've had your time, you've got to go, but
- 5:14S2: let's move that.
- 5:14S1: Let's make the deputy prime minister three times.
- 5:16S2: You can't do that. Obviously, that is such a the
- 5:20S2: worst reason of all to give to people. I think
- 5:23S2: what's happened, I think the polls are an indicator, not
- 5:26S2: locked in vote. Okay. I'm not naive. I've been around
- 5:28S2: this game for a fair while, but they are an indicator.
- 5:31S2: They're 100% an indicator. And what it says is people
- 5:34S2: are now prepared. They feel they have license to say,
- 5:36S2: I'm prepared to vote for one nation. We're in the past. Um,
- 5:40S2: you know, there might have been some hesitancy about that.
- 5:43S2: I think the complexion and the tenor of One Nation
- 5:46S2: has changed, and and that's a good thing. And, and
- 5:51S2: that's giving more people the capacity to say, well, yeah,
- 5:54S2: you know, implied a company. No, I vote for One
- 5:56S2: Nation and they don't have to say, I vote for
- 5:58S2: one nation and then leave the dinner party. Say no.
- 6:00S2: I vote for one nation. That's my choice. I want
- 6:02S2: a more deliberate, I want greater clarity. Um, I have
- 6:05S2: philosophical principles, and I want them abided by with the
- 6:09S2: politicians that I elect. And if they are not going
- 6:11S2: to abide by those philosophical principles, then I will find
- 6:14S2: another politician to vote for.
- 6:16S1: What's created, that kind of permission structure for one nation.
- 6:19S5: Yeah, there's.
- 6:20S2: Sort of a, well, a conceit that the, the major parties,
- 6:24S2: the major blocs believed that they owned the votes. They
- 6:26S2: didn't have to earn the votes, they owned the votes.
- 6:29S2: And people would, you know, and they'd even say, you know,
- 6:31S2: you'll always be a you'll only be a protest party. And,
- 6:34S2: you know, all these things are sort of, sort of
- 6:36S2: re-endowed the conceit factor which people who enjoy their liberty
- 6:42S2: enjoy their freedom, hate being told that we've got you
- 6:45S2: in a box and you'll only do what we tell
- 6:46S2: you to. They don't like that. And so people say,
- 6:49S2: I express my freedom by the car I drive. I
- 6:51S2: express my freedom with the house I have. I express
- 6:53S2: my freedom with the clothes and the tie I wear.
- 6:55S2: And I express my freedom in where I choose to vote. Um,
- 6:58S2: and I think that, um, what happened is you had
- 7:03S2: tangential issues and sectional interests that started having too much
- 7:08S2: sway in the major parties. And I'll give you a
- 7:10S2: classic one. We've got to win back teal seats. You
- 7:12S2: must have heard that so many times. I presume at
- 7:14S2: times even you would have said that, you know, what
- 7:17S2: are you going to do about winning back TLC? For sure.
- 7:19S2: That's how you really infuriate people if they're not in
- 7:21S2: the teal seat, they said. So I am penance and
- 7:25S2: payment for you to win back that seat. Right? Okay.
- 7:28S2: You go off and win the teal seat, but I'm
- 7:30S2: gone by and that's what's happened. And here comes One nation.
- 7:34S1: Pauline Hanson said yesterday in a press conference that this
- 7:37S1: term for One Nation is about becoming a viable opposition,
- 7:40S1: that she wants to form government. You know, some listeners
- 7:42S1: at home might, might laugh at that suggestion, given her
- 7:46S1: track record, but many people would have said the same
- 7:48S1: thing about Nigel Farage, who's now crushing both parties in
- 7:51S1: the polls.
- 7:52S2: Milano pan maga movement, Donald Trump.
- 7:57S1: What do you what do you think the aim is
- 7:59S1: for one nation? This term is to replace the National party,
- 8:03S1: to compete with Labour, to hold the balance of power
- 8:05S1: next term. What are the what are the right.
- 8:06S2: Not to be defined by? What another party is, is
- 8:08S2: to have purpose and sort of and philosophical structure and
- 8:13S2: a sort of a clarity in who you are yourself.
- 8:16S2: I don't define who I am by saying, now I'm
- 8:19S2: going to talk about Paul, and now we're going to
- 8:21S2: work out who I am. Now I'm going to tell
- 8:22S2: you who I am and who you are as your business.
- 8:25S2: And so I think that one nation doesn't have to
- 8:28S2: go chasing or removing or replacing. It just has got
- 8:32S2: to define what it believes in itself. And other people
- 8:34S2: will make the choice. You have to earn the votes.
- 8:36S2: You don't own the votes. And what do they believe?
- 8:39S2: And they believe in a clarity of view that says,
- 8:42S2: for instance, on issues such as intermittent power that is garbage,
- 8:44S2: that the primary purpose of a power policy is to
- 8:47S2: look after pensioners and poor people, not look after the,
- 8:51S2: you know, the the nuances of Paris agreements and such
- 8:54S2: other things which are unattainable, terribly expensive, and cause massive hurt.
- 8:59S2: It's to say things as they are, not as you
- 9:01S2: might wish them to be. The terrorist attack was Islamic fundamentalism,
- 9:05S2: inspired and under the guise of terrorism, Islamic State. That's
- 9:10S2: how it was. It wasn't radical Anglicanism. It wasn't radical Copts.
- 9:16S2: It wasn't radical.
- 9:17S1: I just want to jump in just super quickly. I
- 9:18S1: would just say that the government has, at various points,
- 9:21S1: pointed to radical Islam as the root cause of the
- 9:24S1: terror attacks.
- 9:24S2: No, they sort of. Well, I know. Okay. We've just
- 9:28S2: had a piece of legislation we voted for just then
- 9:31S2: that could have been so succinct, so clean, talking about, um, anti-Semitism,
- 9:37S2: which is the people who really are paying the price
- 9:40S2: for this. I'm not Jewish, but Jewish people without a
- 9:42S2: shadow of a doubt, are the ones who are who
- 9:44S2: are in the focus of the sites of those who
- 9:47S2: wish them harm. And the ones who predominantly are pursuing
- 9:50S2: that course are radical Islamists. That's these things are two truths,
- 9:55S2: but people say, I can't say that because, you know.
- 9:57S2: So we've got to we've got to say it's wider.
- 9:59S2: We've got to bring in all these other things. You know,
- 10:01S2: it's Islamophobia. No, it's not, it's, uh, it's whatever. It's, uh, homophobia.
- 10:09S2: Definitely not. You know, it's a whole range of other things.
- 10:12S2: It's it's anti-Semitism and it's inspired by Israel. Uh, you know,
- 10:19S2: it's sort of a jihadist, a form of militant, radical Islam.
- 10:24S2: That's what it is. And unless you have the courage
- 10:27S2: to define a problem, you have no credibility or process
- 10:32S2: on how to fix it and what we've just. And
- 10:34S2: then now we've got this thing where something as a
- 10:38S2: backbencher in One Nation, I brought to the attention of
- 10:41S2: the chamber a fatal flaw in the bill, which they
- 10:45S2: all then ignored. The floor voted for the bill, and
- 10:47S2: now they're over in the Senate, recognizing what I'd brought
- 10:50S2: to their attention and trying to fix it.
- 10:52S1: The government It strikes me just on your your points
- 10:56S1: about clarity of message, that something that's driving the One
- 11:00S1: Nation voters is the simplicity of the rhetoric. Pauline Hanson's
- 11:04S1: not necessarily the most sophisticated political operator, but you're not
- 11:07S1: trying to straddle different parts of the political spectrum. You're
- 11:09S1: speaking very directly to one part of the community, and
- 11:11S1: the Liberal Party might be looking at different communities. What
- 11:14S1: are the limits, do you think, on that straight talk,
- 11:17S1: particularly from your Senate leader or party leader, Pauline Hanson,
- 11:21S1: in terms of rhetoric that might alienate big chunks of
- 11:24S1: the community, don't allow you to become a viable opposition.
- 11:27S1: I mean, the burqa stunt a couple of months ago
- 11:29S1: that raised up in people's minds, even when she was
- 11:33S1: polling really well, all of the accusations about racism that
- 11:36S1: have plagued her career can can she continue on speaking about,
- 11:41S1: you know, racial anxiety in our community in the same
- 11:43S1: way she always has? If you want to grow, is
- 11:46S1: that your job to to kind of civilize one nation?
- 11:49S2: Well, Pauline is who.
- 11:50S1: Paul, Pauline.
- 11:52S2: Pauline is who Pauline is. and I am who I am.
- 11:54S2: And one of the things we've always discussed is I'll
- 11:57S2: remain who I am and Pauline will remain who she is.
- 12:00S2: And we actually do get along well and we work together.
- 12:02S2: There is a chemistry there. And, um, and that's the
- 12:05S2: way it is, I feel, to be quite frank, a
- 12:08S2: lot more comfortable now, a lot more liberated now, and
- 12:10S2: a lot more purposeful now than I did sitting in
- 12:12S2: the back corner of the backbench of the coalition. Um.
- 12:16S1: But I'm talking about whether you're comfortable with.
- 12:18S2: With.
- 12:18S1: One thing.
- 12:19S2: I think that things evolve over time. And I think
- 12:22S2: the Pauline Hanson that originally came into Parliament is, um,
- 12:28S2: has matured immensely from that person to where she is now.
- 12:31S2: I think. I think everybody would say now that is
- 12:33S2: a lot more streetwise, a lot more wily. I don't
- 12:35S2: think she's become less authentic, but she's become more aware. And, um,
- 12:40S2: and that's, that's a good thing.
- 12:42S1: If your primary remains where it is now, let's just
- 12:45S1: say hypothetically, it does.
- 12:46S2: Yeah. That's probably why I'm not going. Yeah. I'm not
- 12:49S2: I'm not going to start saying that that's, you know,
- 12:50S2: that I'm not getting carried away with this I understand
- 12:54S2: that is an incredible it's an incredible reflection of people's
- 12:57S2: willingness to trust. But anybody who says, oh, that's your vote. No, no, no,
- 13:00S2: the vote comes in an election.
- 13:02S1: Which is why I think Hanson's claim yesterday that she
- 13:04S1: wants to come into government was was a bit of overreach.
- 13:07S1: But even in a low 20s primary vote, if it
- 13:09S1: remains there, that's extraordinary.
- 13:11S2: Um, I'll tell you what that definitely would mean. It
- 13:13S2: would definitely mean that any person on the let's call
- 13:15S2: them what they're supposed to be conservative. The conservative side
- 13:18S2: will definitely need, um, One Nation support if they've got
- 13:21S2: any chance whatsoever of going to see the governor general
- 13:24S2: to be the Prime Minister.
- 13:25S1: Well, this is the point I was going to make.
- 13:26S1: So at a low 20s primary vote, given labor will
- 13:28S1: preference coalition ahead of One Nation if they stick with
- 13:32S1: their standard across the country.
- 13:33S2: Even on that. Let's just slow down on that one,
- 13:36S2: because I do talk to Labor Party people as well.
- 13:39S2: You know, let's the world's changed, right? Let's just say
- 13:43S2: the world's changed there. Remember there are marginal Labor Party
- 13:47S2: seats too. So thinking that you completely own the vote
- 13:51S2: is a dangerous place to be.
- 13:54S1: So if you remain at that level, which you in
- 13:57S1: all likelihood won't, you probably won't win any lower house
- 14:00S1: seats because of the preference situation. But if you remain
- 14:03S1: anywhere near that level, you almost you go a long
- 14:06S1: way to wiping out the coalition in the Senate, because
- 14:08S1: to win a number two spot in most states, you
- 14:10S1: need your primary vote up above 2,829%. So I wonder
- 14:14S1: where will you where do you feel like at this
- 14:15S1: point in the cycle, which is early, I acknowledge where
- 14:18S1: do you think you'll be spending your electoral energy? Will
- 14:21S1: it be in lower house seats, Senate seats? Where can
- 14:24S1: you win?
- 14:25S2: No, I definitely think the lower house seats to win.
- 14:26S2: I think it's just look, well, I'm trying to work
- 14:31S2: out the I know I'm trying to work out whether
- 14:34S2: it's worthwhile saying it because then it says you're not.
- 14:36S2: Why do I not select ones? Because it says you're
- 14:39S2: not nominating others, right? But let's talk about where one
- 14:42S2: nation has a strong vote in the Hunter Valley, okay.
- 14:45S2: And the funny thing about that is you're dragging votes
- 14:46S2: from the Labour Party, not the coalition. Um, and places
- 14:49S2: like Blair. Same deal. It's your dragon votes from the
- 14:52S2: Labour Party, not from the coalition. Ah, new England will
- 14:55S2: have a strong one nation vote. How do I know that?
- 14:58S2: Before I'd even announced or told anybody I was leaving
- 15:02S2: to join my nation. The vast majority of my town
- 15:05S2: was branch, unbeknownst to me, had walked out and started
- 15:07S2: the One Nation branch. And so it's organic. It was
- 15:10S2: happening everywhere. And when I walk around New England now,
- 15:13S2: you get people literally like, it's really, um, humbling. You
- 15:18S2: walk in and they start clapping. It's a, there's a
- 15:20S2: real sort of sense of frustration out there in the
- 15:23S2: community with politics, and they want to see some clarity.
- 15:27S2: The Bondi thing had a lot to do with it,
- 15:29S2: a lot to do with it.
- 15:30S1: Do you think that's changed politics in this country?
- 15:32S2: Yep. You bet. Because it wasn't. It's yeah, anti-Semitic was
- 15:36S2: absolutely a big part of it. But there was also
- 15:38S2: a lot of people just fell to front like. So
- 15:41S2: two people went and like, had a turkey shoot on
- 15:45S2: Australian people on a beach on a Sunday in the
- 15:47S2: middle of Sydney. And they just went. Wow. That's that's
- 15:53S2: that's that's not bad. And all of a sudden and
- 15:56S2: they haven't got over it. They're still in their forefront
- 15:59S2: of their mind like okay, you know, you think we've
- 16:03S2: you found our tipping point. You've got there. You've reached it.
- 16:05S2: And we're going to demand. Demand that that does not
- 16:09S2: happen again. And we are going to we want you
- 16:12S2: to be brave enough to define the problem and deal
- 16:14S2: with it.
- 16:15S1: Has it changed the way. A a white politician can
- 16:21S1: talk about multiculturalism in the mainstream of Australian politics in
- 16:24S1: the same way as The Voice changed the way you
- 16:26S1: were able to talk about indigenous affairs, arguably to the
- 16:28S1: detriment of Indigenous Australians?
- 16:29S2: I don't know. Well, okay, I disagree with you on
- 16:32S2: you know, I disagree with you fervently that.
- 16:34S1: Arguably.
- 16:35S2: Argue. Yeah. Well, whatever the in my area, I get
- 16:38S2: the majority of the Aboriginal vote in in my area
- 16:40S2: they call themselves Aboriginals and I grew up in a
- 16:43S2: black white town. I know it very, very well. My
- 16:44S2: kids go to a black white school. They go to
- 16:46S2: a local state school, and it's one of the poorest
- 16:48S2: schools in New South Wales. Um, so I don't talk.
- 16:52S2: I'm not Aboriginal. Of course I'm a white fella. Um,
- 16:55S2: but I do speak with some authority, as I know
- 16:58S2: it vastly better than most people. And I can assure you,
- 17:00S2: there are areas around me in one of my biggest
- 17:02S2: Aboriginal communities, Tinga, only 15% voted for the voice. It
- 17:07S2: was a belief more of to, to be quite frank,
- 17:11S2: of maybe where you reside, that you had a perception
- 17:14S2: of how we saw things, which was not the reality
- 17:16S2: of how we did for them. They they saw through
- 17:19S2: the parochialism of certain people in certain, uh, you know,
- 17:24S2: positions would get a further laurel and a further crown
- 17:28S2: and get a further pay cheque, and their lives would
- 17:31S2: remain basically where they were. So, um, now to to
- 17:35S2: go on to the next issue, uh, where you say,
- 17:37S2: does this give us authority to talk about racial? I
- 17:39S2: don't find that the people who come up to me
- 17:42S2: are all white Caucasians from Mossman who are really saying,
- 17:48S2: rah rah, one nation. Actually, to the contrary. That's probably
- 17:52S2: where I'd find the most pushback. Where I find a
- 17:55S2: lot of support is in the Filipino community, uh, in
- 17:59S2: the Indian community, um, in certainly in sections of the
- 18:04S2: Lebanese community, um, there, you know, this is that's it's
- 18:09S2: another assertion made by people because they want the world.
- 18:12S2: They want the world to see it the way they
- 18:14S2: see it from their front veranda, which is not the
- 18:16S2: way other people see it from theirs.
- 18:18S1: Or conservative social culture in migrant Australia is definitely something
- 18:24S1: the progressive side of politics.
- 18:25S2: If you'd said that, if you frame the question in
- 18:27S2: that form, I would say you're probably you're correct.
- 18:41S1: Just going back to your colleagues, uh, I get I
- 18:43S1: got the sense when you left the show that you
- 18:46S1: felt that there was a group in the National Party,
- 18:49S1: probably those aligned to your former boss David Littleproud, who
- 18:53S1: were happy to see you go and who celebrated it.
- 18:55S2: No no no no. Not who I felt who were
- 18:58S2: on television celebrating, remember?
- 19:00S1: Have you seen the clip of them allegedly hugging? No.
- 19:03S1: Have you actually seen it? Because there's conjecture about whether
- 19:05S1: it occurred.
- 19:06S2: It happened right in front of me.
- 19:07S1: So you saw it?
- 19:08S2: Yeah, I was I was in the chamber.
- 19:09S1: Explain to listeners what you heard.
- 19:11S2: I was just shaking hands and slapping each other on
- 19:14S2: the back. And, you know, the wicked, the wicked wizards
- 19:17S2: dead and sort of thing. That's fine.
- 19:19S1: And who were they?
- 19:20S2: Well, I'll let them talk about themselves. Right. But it's
- 19:25S2: I just find it becomes sort of like. But it's
- 19:28S2: not like it's kind of. It sort of happened. It
- 19:30S2: did happen. It happened right in front of me.
- 19:32S1: Well, there's a lot of chatter around the National Party
- 19:35S1: that you will personally campaign in the lower house seats
- 19:37S1: of Darren Chester, David Littleproud, Pat Monahan to I'm not
- 19:42S1: going to say it's revenge. I don't want to put
- 19:44S1: that motive on you, but is that something you intend
- 19:47S1: to do?
- 19:48S2: Um, I'm certainly going to campaign for, uh, the New
- 19:52S2: South Wales Senate seat. Um, definitely. And that means after
- 19:56S2: campaign where the the voters of New South Wales are because,
- 19:59S2: you know, that's the seat I'm standing for. Um, I'll
- 20:02S2: do other jobs as required. But there's I, I'm going
- 20:06S2: I'm going to campaign on issues, not on people. Okay.
- 20:09S2: I'm going to campaign on issues, not on people. So
- 20:11S2: to give more clarity to that, I have absolutely no
- 20:13S2: plan to pick on a certain area or a certain person.
- 20:17S2: There is nothing in that remit. Um, if if you're
- 20:20S2: going through an area, then you're going through an area
- 20:21S2: on a policy issue, you're really minimising yourself. You say,
- 20:24S2: If I'm going to campaign against a person, person A,
- 20:28S2: then why didn't this go stand in their lower house seat, mate,
- 20:32S2: if that's all you got worried about, go Senate seat
- 20:34S2: against them.
- 20:35S1: Well if you if you if your party truly believe
- 20:37S1: that you're an alternative government, you probably would have stood
- 20:40S1: in New England again rather than running for the Senate.
- 20:43S2: Um, yeah. Look, it's, uh.
- 20:45S1: Why didn't you do that when I.
- 20:48S2: I look, when I left the National Party, I was
- 20:51S2: really torn. It was like leaving a it was like
- 20:52S2: leaving a marriage. It really tears you to pieces. And
- 20:56S2: I just, I knew the I knew the political marriage
- 21:00S2: was over, I knew I was out. Um, and I just,
- 21:04S2: I just didn't want to go to court over the.
- 21:07S2: I just said basically the house, the jewelry, the. It's
- 21:09S2: all yours. Okay. I'm. I'm gone.
- 21:11S1: And there would have been a sense that there was
- 21:13S1: an illegitimacy about rating.
- 21:15S2: Basically they say, well, look, there's a seat. Yeah. And
- 21:17S2: also knowing that I brought in a heap of money
- 21:19S2: which I left in their account.
- 21:20S1: Do you could you reconsider that and run in New England?
- 21:23S2: Uh. It's not. Look, I've said I'm standing for the Senate,
- 21:27S2: and I just I just I'm just going to focus
- 21:30S2: on the Senate. Like, you know.
- 21:31S1: But you seem like you're conflicted about this.
- 21:33S2: No, I just think that I want. Okay. My confliction
- 21:37S2: is I certainly want the the the one nation to
- 21:43S2: have good lower house candidates. Right.
- 21:46S1: And they struggle with quality candidates.
- 21:48S2: And I don't want to, you know, I don't want
- 21:50S2: to send a message out on the water. The only
- 21:54S2: way you're ever going to get anywhere in one nation
- 21:56S2: is to be in the Senate. I want people to
- 21:58S2: move on from that. And I'm going to say, I
- 22:00S2: want you to understand you can get somewhere in the
- 22:02S2: House of Representatives as well. And so I don't want
- 22:05S2: to sort of harp on. Well, you know, it'd sort
- 22:08S2: of be like, oh, I'll be fine in the Senate because,
- 22:11S2: you know, I've gone well, but you just jump over the,
- 22:13S2: you know, jump out of the trenches in the lower
- 22:15S2: house and get shot.
- 22:16S1: So any chance you go in New England?
- 22:18S2: No, no I haven't. I've made I've made my I
- 22:22S2: made my mind up to stand for the for the
- 22:25S2: for the Senate.
- 22:26S1: Yeah. I think you probably underestimated what the primary vote
- 22:28S1: would be in polling though, right?
- 22:30S2: Even I thought that wasn't going to be as good
- 22:33S2: as what it was, but it's, um. And I'm usually
- 22:37S2: but it's that's, you know, that's a reflection, a great
- 22:40S2: reflection on Pauline, a great reflection on the One Nation team,
- 22:43S2: but it's also a reflection on the malaise that people
- 22:46S2: see in what the alternative is.
- 22:49S1: I've heard people say that when Pauline Hanson goes off
- 22:52S1: TV for a few weeks, the One Nation primary rises,
- 22:54S1: so it might be have the opposite effect.
- 22:56S2: Well, that would make us the government.
- 23:01S1: So you talked about political marriages? Yeah. Um, do you
- 23:04S1: think it'd be fair to say that Ron Boswell, who
- 23:06S1: just passed away, was in some way a political father?
- 23:09S2: He's a great man. And he heard, like Ron saw
- 23:13S2: everything through. I've known Ron since 2002, been multiple campaigns
- 23:19S2: with him. Ron saw things through those eyes of that time.
- 23:23S1: Well, you were getting ahead of my question.
- 23:25S2: Yeah.
- 23:26S1: So for listeners at home, particularly for those who are
- 23:28S1: not from Queensland, who may not know Ron Boswell, he
- 23:30S1: was the national Senate leader for a long time.
- 23:32S2: 17.
- 23:32S1: Years really influential thinker in the National Party, died at
- 23:35S1: the age of 85 last.
- 23:36S2: Week, 31 years in.
- 23:37S1: Politics. Prime Minister attended his funeral, as did Peter Dutton
- 23:39S1: and Barnaby Joyce. I want to read to him to
- 23:42S1: you a quote from his Australian article from December. Do
- 23:44S1: you mind if I do that?
- 23:45S2: It wouldn't be endearing to me, but here we go.
- 23:46S1: You've, uh. He been you has left the political home
- 23:51S1: that raised him, shaped him and supported him. But as
- 23:54S1: with any family, the door remains open when he remembers
- 23:56S1: where he truly belongs. His choice does not alter the
- 23:58S1: truth about one nation. It is not a party of government.
- 24:01S1: It has no record of delivery. It fuels resentment rather
- 24:03S1: than responsibility, and threatens to fracture the centre right in
- 24:06S1: a way that benefits only Labour and the Greens.
- 24:09S2: Yes, I love Ron, okay, and I'm never going to
- 24:13S2: speak de mortuis nil nisi bonum, as my good Jesuit uh,
- 24:17S2: friends would remind me of speak nothing but good of
- 24:19S2: the dead.
- 24:20S1: Go on. The argument's not the man, though.
- 24:22S2: Well, yeah, the arguments are correct if you're talking about, um, history,
- 24:27S2: but they're not correct as to where we are today. Okay.
- 24:30S2: Ron's been out of politics now for a fair while,
- 24:32S2: and he's a he was he is with our Lord.
- 24:36S2: But and he remains a person I'll always hold in
- 24:40S2: high esteem. But he doesn't see the politics as we see.
- 24:44S2: In fact, I was a regular visitor to Ron at
- 24:47S2: his house, where he would be frustrated and demanding that
- 24:52S2: I do something about getting rid of net zero. And
- 24:55S2: I had to lead, and I had to do this,
- 24:57S2: and I had to do that. And, you know, I did.
- 25:00S2: I went about constructing a process where the coalition ditched
- 25:06S2: its net zero commitment, but I kept on explaining to him.
- 25:09S2: I said, Ron, you've got to understand that's not the
- 25:11S2: position of the coalition. He goes, oh, well, you've just
- 25:13S2: got to change it. And I go, well, Ron, you're
- 25:16S2: you're asking me to change the coalition. I can't just
- 25:21S2: change the coalition. And and in the end, he was frustrated.
- 25:26S2: I said, Ron, you know what? I've realized? The changes
- 25:29S2: that you want, I can only bring about by being
- 25:31S2: in one nation because they're actually closer to your political
- 25:34S2: beliefs than where the coalition is. You have you have
- 25:39S2: this filial connection. It's your totem. You you have a
- 25:44S2: whole range of affections, even though they went after you.
- 25:48S2: But if I was to give you complete amnesia about
- 25:52S2: all your. I didn't say this, but this is me
- 25:55S2: paraphrasing my discussions. Um, if he was to have total
- 25:59S2: amnesia about all his past political affiliations, had his philosophy
- 26:04S2: arrived down here and he said, now, quick, run to
- 26:06S2: the party that most best, that most closely reflects your
- 26:10S2: belief structure. Ron Boswell, you'd end up in one nation.
- 26:13S1: You were in the coalition government, obviously, in very senior roles,
- 26:16S1: for nine years. Yes. That was the government that, uh,
- 26:19S1: continued on with the immigration program that's been bipartisan. It
- 26:23S1: thrust Australia into the global net zero movement. It did
- 26:26S1: very little to break out of Center-right kind of policy orthodoxy.
- 26:30S1: Why didn't you change things from inside?
- 26:32S2: Well, I did try to change things from inside.
- 26:35S1: And the Deputy Prime Minister, when you signed up to
- 26:36S1: net zero.
- 26:37S2: Now everyone brings it up. But can we just go
- 26:38S2: through that?
- 26:39S1: Let's not go through the whole.
- 26:39S2: No no no no no, you you've got to give
- 26:41S2: me the space to to correct the statement. Okay.
- 26:46S1: That's quick.
- 26:48S2: That's better, Mr. Joyce. The. You don't have to say that, but, um, the, uh.
- 26:52S2: So I've voted within the National Party room against supporting
- 26:56S2: net zero. After I'd cut the deal from heaven, I
- 26:59S2: believe it was ridiculous. The things that were getting any
- 27:01S2: in the end. You know what? We never got any
- 27:03S2: of them. Because the liberals welshed on the deal. So
- 27:07S2: why then that's still involved with it in Paris? You
- 27:10S2: haven't got a deal. There are no bridges, there's no dams,
- 27:13S2: there's there's none. All the stuff that I bargained for,
- 27:17S2: some of it they're going forward with. But most of
- 27:19S2: it they dropped off. So you don't have to honour
- 27:22S2: anything because they haven't honoured the deal.
- 27:25S1: Okay. The Australian political system is vastly different to that
- 27:29S1: of the UK and the US, where you're seeing these
- 27:31S1: Anglosphere populist rises, how do we know that a one
- 27:36S1: nation that mimics the US and UK populist movements will
- 27:39S1: work here? How do we know this?
- 27:40S2: Well it won't.
- 27:41S1: Are you confident.
- 27:42S2: That. No, it won't if it mimics Australia is Australia,
- 27:44S2: it's a different place.
- 27:45S1: How do how does One Nation differ from the Farage
- 27:47S1: MAGA movement?
- 27:48S2: Are vastly I think that they're Australian. It's very ethos,
- 27:51S2: it's very nature. I hopefully I'm a reflection of myself.
- 27:55S2: We're a more egalitarian or easygoing, um, we call BS
- 27:59S2: on stuff a lot. Even the relationship with the media
- 28:02S2: is more, um, it's not it's not, you know, it's
- 28:06S2: not deferential, it's very robust. And, and, uh, and matter
- 28:11S2: of fact, um, we walk down the street, we don't
- 28:14S2: have bodyguards. It's a completely different approach in Australia. And
- 28:18S2: I don't think if you if you start mimicking the
- 28:20S2: United States of America or for the class system in
- 28:24S2: England or anything like that, you're going to come unstuck
- 28:26S2: because you're in the wrong country.
- 28:27S1: Is there do we do we share the general level
- 28:30S1: of dissatisfaction, economic malaise, and lack of trust in our
- 28:34S1: institutions for a movement like this to thrive?
- 28:35S2: Yeah, I think people where it is that there's a
- 28:37S2: commonality is people are sick of butterfly chasing crazy ideas
- 28:43S2: no matter where you are. Paris agreement net zero. Um.
- 28:47S2: You know, the belief that the whole world is sort of,
- 28:50S2: sort of a utopian splendor when you've got the rise
- 28:53S2: of China, which is quite obviously a totalitarian regime, which
- 28:56S2: is going to rip your throat out. Um, these are,
- 28:59S2: you know, this is this is the reality. And people
- 29:01S2: want to hear they know the truth. They want to
- 29:04S2: hear it from their politicians. They don't want to hear
- 29:06S2: the politicians sort of pitching and pivoting to a sectional
- 29:10S2: interest and just thinking that they've got their vote in
- 29:13S2: their back pocket, that, that that is the commonality across
- 29:16S2: the world.
- 29:17S1: I want to ask about Gina Rinehart, and I don't
- 29:20S1: come at this question from a position of, uh, assuming
- 29:23S1: that the relationship is inherently corrupt because powerful people.
- 29:26S2: Means he's assuming the relationship.
- 29:28S1: Because I.
- 29:28S2: Know that's.
- 29:29S1: Corrupt. That is where a lot of the questioning comes from.
- 29:31S1: A wealthy person has a right to back a movement
- 29:32S1: that they believe 100%. I firmly believe that. But I
- 29:36S1: think if you're trying to turn into a more mainstream
- 29:39S1: political force, it's also fair to ask that that relationship
- 29:43S1: be explained a little bit more than we understand.
- 29:46S2: That's interesting, because why don't people explain Simon Holmes, the
- 29:49S2: court's relationship with the teals?
- 29:50S1: We think it should be.
- 29:51S2: Why do we.
- 29:51S1: Put we put a spotlight.
- 29:52S2: On it. Why didn't explain, um, Andrew Forrest's relationship with
- 29:56S2: the Labor Party? I mean, everybody, all people. Just because
- 30:00S2: they have money doesn't mean they don't have political views.
- 30:02S2: People do have political views. Andrew Forrest has a strong
- 30:04S2: political view that's aligned with the Labor Party. Um, Simon Holmes,
- 30:08S2: a court has a strong political view that's aligned with
- 30:10S2: the teals. Um, Gina Rinehart has a strong political view.
- 30:13S2: That's that's not aligned with any party, but it's conservative.
- 30:16S1: I agree with you, conservative.
- 30:17S2: And that's that's their right. And you know what? If
- 30:20S2: you didn't have big backers at times, it makes life very,
- 30:24S2: very difficult because you ultimately you guys you guys want
- 30:28S2: advertising revenue. You do. You don't put any of our
- 30:30S2: ads on for free. You make us pay. And so
- 30:32S2: we've got to have money to, to, for, for to
- 30:35S2: be paid. And people aren't we don't change. We are
- 30:38S2: who we are. People decide to align with us. We
- 30:40S2: don't go aligned to to them, they align to us.
- 30:44S2: And many times people also got to have you got
- 30:47S2: to understand there are times where I'll fervently disagree with
- 30:50S2: Gina Rinehart. Well, we're not we're not. Just because they
- 30:53S2: turn up doesn't mean you agree with everything you say. Look,
- 30:55S2: sorry on that one. I disagree with.
- 30:56S1: You. I take all your points there. Our newspapers have
- 30:58S1: long put a spotlight on the relationship between donors and
- 31:00S1: political parties, and that's left and right. Yeah. The Gina
- 31:04S1: Rinehart relationship with One Nation is fascinating because she's previously
- 31:07S1: been a big donor to the LNP. That relationship might have.
- 31:09S2: Been donated to the Labor Party, too, just quietly.
- 31:11S1: Probably not for a long time.
- 31:12S2: No, no. You've been go back and check your declarations
- 31:15S2: and look at Hancock Coles, donate to the Labor Party.
- 31:17S1: You've been wearing Kidman clothes. She's been providing steak for
- 31:19S1: your meetings with Pauline Hanson. Has she donated a plane
- 31:22S1: or are you just using the plane?
- 31:24S2: She hasn't donated a plane to me. Um, I've used
- 31:27S2: her plane.
- 31:28S1: She's donated plane to Pauline Hanson.
- 31:29S2: Yeah. Uh, look, even that I'm talking out of school,
- 31:33S2: that is. I don't know the answer to that.
- 31:34S1: Is that a recent thing or.
- 31:36S2: Well, if it is, it's a recent thing, right? But
- 31:38S2: I certainly have been on her A jet. Now, what
- 31:42S2: was funny about that is I'm on a jet to
- 31:44S2: go to Mount Isa. What would you have preferred that
- 31:46S2: I was on the taxpayer's jet and the taxpayer paid
- 31:48S2: for it. I mean, what's wrong with an Australian taxpayer
- 31:53S2: saying rather than use the getting other taxpayers to pay
- 31:56S2: for this, remember we're going to look at people, visit
- 31:58S2: people dealing with the flood. This is not going to
- 32:00S2: a wedding or a funeral or or, you know, a
- 32:02S2: game of bridge. It's to see people during the flood.
- 32:05S2: And a person who is blessed with wealth says, rather
- 32:09S2: than you charge this to the taxpayer, why don't you
- 32:11S2: use mine and fly up there on that?
- 32:12S1: What are the limits or potential upsides of the relationship? What?
- 32:17S1: And also what policies she interested on your side? How
- 32:20S1: much of.
- 32:20S2: Your.
- 32:21S1: Election campaign she'll bankroll?
- 32:22S2: I think it's really important. I've never been told by
- 32:27S2: Gina Rinehart to you must do this. You mustn't do anything.
- 32:29S2: It's always been in conversation. I'll give you a tip.
- 32:33S2: People who have gone a long way in life and
- 32:36S2: business are generally not so naive as to start telling
- 32:39S2: politicians what to do. They'll have discussions. They'll have views.
- 32:43S2: But they don't have instructions. And I'll have to say
- 32:46S2: that would be the same with Andrew Forrest. And it
- 32:47S2: would be, I don't know. I know Simon, but I
- 32:49S2: don't know Simon as well. Right. But even Andrew Forrest,
- 32:53S2: he's never that dopiest to tell you how you got
- 32:55S2: to go. And neither is Gina Rinehart. And, um, if
- 33:00S2: you do, if you do tell a politician what to do,
- 33:04S2: they can get themselves in an awful lot of trouble
- 33:06S2: because you can say, are you trying to affect a
- 33:08S2: public office? Are you are you offering me something in
- 33:10S2: a public office to do something? You know, be really
- 33:13S2: careful or or as has happened? Or are you trying
- 33:17S2: to get me to remove myself from a public office?
- 33:19S2: Are you. Did you offer me some money to remove
- 33:21S2: myself from a public office? Because I think that's punishable
- 33:23S2: by 15 years in jail. I'm pretty sure about that.
- 33:24S2: Commonwealth Crimes Act.
- 33:26S1: Does been heavily funded by, I think, the richest woman
- 33:30S1: in Australia. I think that's definitely.
- 33:33S2: Definitely the richest.
- 33:33S1: Woman in question, whether she's the richest person in Australia.
- 33:36S1: Does that clash with the idea that One Nation is, um,
- 33:39S1: in it for the battler.
- 33:41S2: No, no, I think you would find that most people
- 33:44S2: don't determine their view of your policy by your your friends,
- 33:48S2: but actually what your policies are. You know, they say,
- 33:51S2: are you in here to look after pensioners who can't
- 33:53S2: afford their power bills? Yep. Okay, I like you. Are
- 33:56S2: you here to make sure that we develop regional Australia? Yep.
- 33:59S2: I like you. Are you here to make sure that
- 34:02S2: I don't get murdered if I go to the beach?
- 34:06S2: I like you. Do I need to know who your
- 34:09S2: friends are? Not really. Do I need to like you
- 34:11S2: as a politician? Not really. Do I need to like
- 34:14S2: the friends of the politician? Not really.
- 34:17S1: What does 2026 hold? What do you want to prosecute?
- 34:19S1: And what policies might One Nation release?
- 34:21S2: Now, this one's going to come from the biggest issue
- 34:23S2: for 2026 is next year's 2027. Isn't it.
- 34:27S1: Election year?
- 34:27S2: No, no. That's when XI Jinping is going to take Taiwan.
- 34:32S2: Where in the year is that by 2027? We're in 2026.
- 34:36S2: This world could be about to be turned completely and
- 34:40S2: utterly upside down. Now let's go away from the horrific
- 34:43S2: side of a war which, if it's hot and we're
- 34:47S2: involved with tens of thousands of Australians will die, will
- 34:50S2: be like the First World War and Second World War.
- 34:52S2: Please God, pray that it never, ever happens. But let's
- 34:55S2: look at the economic consequences.
- 34:56S1: Do you think Australia should be involved?
- 34:58S2: No, just let's hear the economic consequences. Iron ore exports
- 35:02S2: are finished. Your coal exports are finished. Your gas exports
- 35:06S2: are finished. Large section. Your beef exports are finished. Your
- 35:09S2: cotton exports are finished. Your tourism all that's finished. Your
- 35:13S2: dollar is going to be worth nothing. Nothing. Inflation will
- 35:18S2: go through the roof. The only way to get any
- 35:22S2: value back in the dollar is to come some crazy
- 35:24S2: jack up interest rates as high as they can possibly go.
- 35:27S2: We will be an economic basket case, and I don't
- 35:30S2: see anything happening down there that's preparing us for it.
- 35:34S2: They should have every senior minister and shadow minister on
- 35:38S2: their pegs saying what their plan is. And you guys
- 35:41S2: in the Fourth Estate haven't questioned them on that either.
- 35:44S1: What should we do with military spending?
- 35:47S2: You've got to you've got to make Australia as powerful
- 35:50S2: as possible, as quickly as possible. You've got to raise it,
- 35:52S2: but you can't raise it unless you can pay for
- 35:54S2: it and you can't pay for it. If you're going
- 35:55S2: to chase these other crazy butterflies of net zero Paris agreements.
- 35:59S2: We're not, you know, we're going to you know, we're
- 36:01S2: not going to build dams. We're you know, we're you
- 36:04S2: just you opening yourself up to be knocked out cold,
- 36:08S2: if not militarily, economically. And there is nobody in this
- 36:12S2: building who seems to be aware of that and preparing
- 36:15S2: for it. Isn't that funny? You ask me what the
- 36:17S2: big thing about 2026 was, and I said you'd be surprised.
- 36:20S2: I was waiting to see if Q2 you'd pick it up.
- 36:24S2: Even the fourth estate's not on this.
- 36:26S1: Andrew Hastie is in a similar terrain to Pauline Hanson
- 36:30S1: and yourself in terms of the issues he's talking about.
- 36:33S1: If he was to lead the Liberal Party and there's
- 36:35S1: a significant chance that happening this year. How do you
- 36:39S1: how do you lead the Liberal Party?
- 36:41S2: He did.
- 36:41S1: Leave. No. Um, how do you think that would. What
- 36:44S1: do you think the dynamic would be between a hasty
- 36:46S1: led Liberal party and One Nation?
- 36:48S2: I think that, um, that's to be determined by the voters.
- 36:52S2: You know, that's. That would be, you know, that's a c.
- 36:56S2: I really open a can of worms because as soon
- 36:58S2: as I go into that part, you're going to have,
- 36:59S2: you know, what about Angus Taylor? What about this? What
- 37:01S2: about that? What about something else?
- 37:02S1: I don't think Taylor is is, um, in the same
- 37:05S1: part of the political spectrum as you.
- 37:07S2: I let's see, let's see. Let's see what happens. I
- 37:11S2: do want the best for my nation. And going back
- 37:14S2: to your previous question is why? If we get this
- 37:17S2: wrong in 2026, we get this wrong. We have done
- 37:22S2: something really evil because we've really we've had this incredible gift,
- 37:27S2: which is Australia, and we just blew it. And when
- 37:32S2: you say, oh, that's excessive. No, it's not either. XI
- 37:35S2: Jinping is a joker having a little pulling our leg,
- 37:39S2: a bit of a bullshit artist, or he's a man
- 37:42S2: who's telling the truth. And if he's a man who's
- 37:44S2: telling the truth, we've got a big, big problem coming
- 37:47S2: our way.
- 37:48S1: Barnaby, thank you for joining us.
- 37:50S2: You're welcome.
- 38:00S1: You can read this story and all our political news
- 38:02S1: on our websites, theage.com.au or the Smh.com.au. Today's episode was
- 38:08S1: produced by Kai Wong with help from Debbie Harrington. Our
- 38:11S1: executive producer is Tammy Mills, and our podcasts are overseen
- 38:14S1: by Lisa Muxworthy and Tom McKendrick. And if you're wondering
- 38:17S1: where our esteemed host, Jacqueline Maley, is, she'll be back
- 38:20S1: next week. Before you go, follow Inside Politics and leave
- 38:23S1: a review for us on Apple or Spotify. I'm Paul Circle,
- 38:26S1: and thank you for listening.