Latest / The Bill Handel Show / San Andreas and Cascadia Faults | Vaccine Court

Transcript

San Andreas and Cascadia Faults | Vaccine Court · The Bill Handel Show

0:00
Speaker 1: You're listening to Bill Handle on demand from KFI AM
0:04
Speaker 1: six forty.
0:07
Speaker 2: KFI AM six forty handle here on a Wednesday morning,
0:12
Speaker 2: October eighth. We're waiting school, waiting for Hamas to come
0:16
Speaker 2: back and accept or not accept the latest peace proposal.
0:20
Speaker 2: And yesterday Pambondy and the Senate the subcommittee investigating well
0:26
Speaker 2: the weaponization of the Department of Justice.
0:29
Speaker 1: Oh, they got into it.
0:30
Speaker 2: Okay, Now we are moving ahead with earthquakes. Now, earthquakes
0:37
Speaker 2: are sort of part and parcel of southern California and
0:41
Speaker 2: northern California and as a matter of fact, the entire
0:44
Speaker 2: West Coast, Washington, Oregon, into British Columbia because there are.
0:48
Speaker 1: Two major faults.
0:50
Speaker 2: One the San Andreas fault, which is here in southern California,
0:53
Speaker 2: Palmdale bulge, and the other one is the Cascadia subduction zone.
1:00
Speaker 1: Have no idea what a subduction.
1:02
Speaker 2: Zone is, but I'm assuming it's a fault, and that's
1:04
Speaker 2: along the North coast and then Oregon, Washington and BC.
1:08
Speaker 2: As I said, now, we always thought they were separate.
1:12
Speaker 2: Scientists always thought they were two separate entities. But the
1:16
Speaker 2: question is what if they were back to back one
1:20
Speaker 2: goes and then the other goes almost simultaneously.
1:25
Speaker 1: Wow.
1:26
Speaker 2: Well, there's a new study that was published in the
1:28
Speaker 2: journal Geosphere and the authors are suggesting that for thousands
1:33
Speaker 2: of years, large earthquakes on the Cascadia Zone quickly followed
1:38
Speaker 2: by large earthquakes on the San Andreas Fault.
1:43
Speaker 1: Not good.
1:45
Speaker 2: So they're going through and they're doing the research and
1:49
Speaker 2: they're looking at the dates in which this happened, and
1:51
Speaker 2: the research is fascinating. First of all, the dates the
1:55
Speaker 2: Cascadia subduction Zone earthquake of seventeen hundred. They figure it
2:01
Speaker 2: was around a magnitude nine and based on archaeological evidence
2:05
Speaker 2: that villages.
2:05
Speaker 1: Sank had to be abandoned.
2:08
Speaker 2: This earthquake was so powerful the entire sections of the
2:12
Speaker 2: Pacific coastline dropped as much as five.
2:15
Speaker 1: Feet on the coast of both.
2:18
Speaker 2: Those of you that have spend fourteen million dollars on
2:20
Speaker 2: a home in Malibu on the water, congratulations, the big
2:23
Speaker 2: mazeletow to you when it comes, because you're going to
2:26
Speaker 2: be underwater. Native American stories in the Pacific Northwest told
2:31
Speaker 2: of how the prairie became ocean and canoes were flung
2:35
Speaker 2: onto trees. So the study suggests that the Cascadia earthquake
2:43
Speaker 2: was about it, excuse me, about a nine. And then
2:47
Speaker 2: you had the Sandrea's fault, San Andrea's fault following that
2:50
Speaker 2: literally within minutes maybe a day two, And that was
2:54
Speaker 2: around seven point nine, which in and of itself is
2:57
Speaker 2: a big, big quake. A nine is monstrous because if
3:04
Speaker 2: you look at the Richter scale, it is not seven
3:08
Speaker 2: goes to eight. This is geometric eight is one hundred
3:13
Speaker 2: times more powerful than seven.
3:15
Speaker 1: I mean, it's a little crazy.
3:17
Speaker 2: So that was around seven point nine is what they
3:20
Speaker 2: figure all these studies, these studies. So the hypothesis, and
3:27
Speaker 2: this is the study's lead lead author said this that
3:31
Speaker 2: this one two punch of earthquake was probably not just
3:34
Speaker 2: a one in a million chance. It's most of the time.
3:39
Speaker 2: And the only exception to this in the last twenty
3:45
Speaker 2: five hundred years was nineteen oh six. That's when both
3:50
Speaker 2: didn't go and the nineteen oh six quake, the tsunami,
3:58
Speaker 2: if you will, the earth quake wave went away from
4:02
Speaker 2: the city as opposed to coming into the city, which
4:04
Speaker 2: would have just been far worse. So let's go to
4:09
Speaker 2: the Cascadia earthquake followed by the San Andreas Fault. That
4:14
Speaker 2: earthquake happened between fourteen twenty five and fourteen seventy five,
4:21
Speaker 2: and then between eleven seventy five and twelve twenty five.
4:25
Speaker 1: It was a while ago, and.
4:26
Speaker 2: Then happened around the years ada twenty five and four
4:29
Speaker 2: to seventy five BC. Hmm, now a repeat of just
4:36
Speaker 2: the nineteen oh six earthquake. Just that, thousands of deaths,
4:41
Speaker 2: hundreds of billions dollars in property, A magnitude nine earthquake
4:46
Speaker 2: up in Cascadia. We're talking about tsunami wave heights that
4:52
Speaker 2: would wash away entire coastal towns, Highway one oh one,
4:57
Speaker 2: gone billion dollars, ten seventy billillion dollars in damage along
5:01
Speaker 2: the coast, one hundred bridges, lost power lines, toppled, coastal
5:04
Speaker 2: towns isolated, and people would have as little as fifteen
5:08
Speaker 2: minutes notice to go to higher ground. And they figured
5:11
Speaker 2: ten thousand deaths. See, this is all good news for you.
5:15
Speaker 2: This is when you want to pick up and go
5:17
Speaker 2: to Florida and get hit by hurricanes. And South Florida
5:23
Speaker 2: is a terrific place to live. It's full of either
5:26
Speaker 2: Cubans or my mother old Jewish jentas who do nothing
5:32
Speaker 2: but complain. That's South Florida and it's hurricanes and we
5:38
Speaker 2: are are you going to move? I'd rather have a
5:40
Speaker 2: I'd rather have an earthquake than a hurricane because it's done.
5:44
Speaker 1: I mean, you're done.
5:45
Speaker 2: Well, you get the aftershocks too, but it's okay, we
5:49
Speaker 2: got it now, hurricane. You're sitting there for days now.
5:53
Speaker 2: Scientists won't know for sure. And this is the part
5:58
Speaker 2: of the study that I find the most fascinating, because
6:02
Speaker 2: this is archaeological evidence, this is written evidence that this
6:07
Speaker 2: happened this way. This is oral stories that come down
6:11
Speaker 2: among for example, Indian tribes. The hypothesis is we won't
6:17
Speaker 2: know for sure until it happens. Thank you very much.
6:22
Speaker 2: Doctor's good for you. How's that for ending this study.
6:29
Speaker 2: It won't happen till it happens. It won't happen till
6:32
Speaker 2: the old lady was it the old lady sings or
6:35
Speaker 2: the fat lady things? Let's see fat lady age. Oh yeah, okay,
6:40
Speaker 2: she's just fat. Interesting stuff. Very depressing right now. Let
6:46
Speaker 2: me get into another story. Oh this is depressing day,
6:48
Speaker 2: it really is. This is a fun day for me. Okay,
6:52
Speaker 2: I get calls on handle on the lall all the
6:54
Speaker 2: time about folks, especially elderly folks who are dead broke,
7:00
Speaker 2: used credit cards and max them out, and ask me
7:02
Speaker 2: about lawsuits. Bill, Am I going to get sued for
7:06
Speaker 2: the twelve thousand dollars? I own no idea, but I'll
7:09
Speaker 2: tell you they can't collect your social Security And I
7:11
Speaker 2: assume that's all you live on, is social Security?
7:13
Speaker 1: Right? Yeah?
7:16
Speaker 2: Fifteen hundred dollars a month, eighteen hundred dollars a month,
7:19
Speaker 2: one thousand dollars a month here living in southern California.
7:22
Speaker 1: Can you imagine that? So this one is a heartbreaker.
7:25
Speaker 2: This is one of those I joke, but in reality
7:28
Speaker 2: it really is heartbreaking. Wealth has been tied to longevity
7:34
Speaker 2: in the US and other countries too. And here's an
7:37
Speaker 2: analysis just came out, and that is how long low
7:41
Speaker 2: income older Americans live or don't live, and the more
7:47
Speaker 2: affluent people, how much longer they live average nine years
7:53
Speaker 2: nine years of life. If you're rich and old, you're
7:58
Speaker 2: going to live on average nine years longer than if
8:02
Speaker 2: you're poor and old.
8:05
Speaker 1: That is a real problem.
8:07
Speaker 2: Now, I want to make a social point here, sociological point.
8:12
Speaker 1: I'm not an exceptionalist.
8:14
Speaker 2: You know, Americans, a lot of people say we're the
8:16
Speaker 2: greatest country in the world. And in many ways we
8:18
Speaker 2: are the greatest country in the world. However, there's some issues.
8:22
Speaker 2: There are some places where we're not the greatest country
8:25
Speaker 2: in the world. Talk to someone who's on Social Security
8:28
Speaker 2: that can't afford food. Hey, we're the greatest country in
8:33
Speaker 2: the world. Go to Europe and people don't starve. Go
8:39
Speaker 2: to other cultures and people don't starve when they're old
8:42
Speaker 2: because our culture is very different in other cultures. Old
8:47
Speaker 2: people move in with their kids. That's it, you know,
8:50
Speaker 2: you take care of your parents. That's the way it
8:52
Speaker 2: works here. No, not so much. You have your own life.
8:57
Speaker 2: You have your family, and as your parents ad or
9:00
Speaker 2: as a u age, you're on your own. And what
9:04
Speaker 2: it costs to stay alive if you're not earning money
9:08
Speaker 2: and living on Social Security and whatever pension, which of
9:11
Speaker 2: course don't exist anymore.
9:13
Speaker 1: That is a tough one that is not easy.
9:18
Speaker 2: About fifteen percent this research, it just came out a
9:21
Speaker 2: new study from the National Council on Aging. Generally, middle
9:26
Speaker 2: income older Americans are also dying younger than wealthier people.
9:31
Speaker 2: The secret to living a nice long life is to
9:34
Speaker 2: have money. Now that doesn't automatically translate, but what ends
9:38
Speaker 2: up happening, Well, you have better healthcare.
9:41
Speaker 1: Nutritionally, you have better nutrition.
9:46
Speaker 2: The stress of whether you're going to pay your rent
9:48
Speaker 2: or eat doesn't exist. And the kind of stress that
9:53
Speaker 2: does happen when you're in that position that leads to
9:57
Speaker 2: dying because we know how stress affects health. And this
10:02
Speaker 2: is the first time wealth and health have been tied together.
10:06
Speaker 2: This is a study from twenty eighteen to twenty twenty
10:08
Speaker 2: two University of Michigan did. There's ten thousand households, so
10:12
Speaker 2: we're talking about a serious study and it has all
10:15
Speaker 2: kinds of implications for an aging society. We have widening
10:19
Speaker 2: economic inequality. The rich are getting richer, the poor are
10:25
Speaker 2: getting poorer.
10:27
Speaker 1: And it now.
10:28
Speaker 2: Translates into they've got some figures nine years difference, and
10:34
Speaker 2: the US population is aging and how many of us
10:37
Speaker 2: and we've done these We do this with Joe Larsgard
10:40
Speaker 2: all the time. How much you think it's going to
10:42
Speaker 2: cost to literally you have to have in savings to
10:46
Speaker 2: get for example, fifty thousand dollars a year, okay, which
10:50
Speaker 2: is not a huge amount of money. Income fifty thousand
10:54
Speaker 2: dollars a year, you need a million dollars in the bank.
10:57
Speaker 1: How many of us.
10:58
Speaker 2: Have a million dollars in the bank or invested? That
11:04
Speaker 2: is throwing off five percent, four or five percent?
11:08
Speaker 1: That keeps you alive. Very few people.
11:11
Speaker 2: We don't plan for the future, and we don't have
11:16
Speaker 2: a society where we move in with our kids and
11:20
Speaker 2: the entire extended family takes care of grandma grandpa, because
11:24
Speaker 2: that's the way it works in Europe, that's the way
11:26
Speaker 2: it works in Asia, but it doesn't work that way here.
11:29
Speaker 1: So we have elderly people on.
11:31
Speaker 2: Their own literally living in dumpsters or living in maybe
11:35
Speaker 2: not dumpsters, but living in a very tough life and
11:38
Speaker 2: making very tough decisions.
11:41
Speaker 1: And what I.
11:41
Speaker 2: Tell folks is, if you're only living on social Security,
11:44
Speaker 2: doesn't matter if you're going to get sued, no one's
11:46
Speaker 2: going to be able to collect because social Security as exempt.
11:49
Speaker 2: But that is one of the one of the worst
11:53
Speaker 2: parts of the US. We're the best country in the
11:56
Speaker 2: world really infant mortality, we're number twenty something. When it
12:02
Speaker 2: comes to literacy, we're maybe in the teens. When it
12:07
Speaker 2: comes to healthcare, we're way way down, and we all
12:11
Speaker 2: know the healthcare system is broken. When it comes to opportunity,
12:15
Speaker 2: we're the best, if not one of the best.
12:19
Speaker 1: When it comes to lifestyle.
12:22
Speaker 2: Other than if you live in Finland and you happen
12:24
Speaker 2: to like snow that's nineteen feet deep, we're in pretty
12:28
Speaker 2: good shape here in America gun violence.
12:31
Speaker 1: Are we the greatest country in the world to live in? No?
12:36
Speaker 2: And the rough part is when it comes to elderly people,
12:40
Speaker 2: it is very tough to be old in this country.
12:43
Speaker 1: It's very tough to be poor in this country.
12:46
Speaker 2: You want to be poor, I'm going to suggest you
12:48
Speaker 2: move to the Scandinavian countries where you're not going to
12:52
Speaker 2: live on the street. You're not going to starve. There
12:55
Speaker 2: is a social safety net there that we don't have here.
12:59
Speaker 2: So yeah, I mean, that's that's tough. So what's the answer?
13:04
Speaker 1: Get rich? How's that for an answer? Huh?
13:08
Speaker 2: Or die trying or die Well, you will die trying,
13:11
Speaker 2: that's for sure.
13:12
Speaker 1: Nine years earlier. I mean that that's a stunning figure.
13:17
Speaker 1: That really is.
13:20
Speaker 2: Kno, will I be invited to your funeral next week? No?
13:26
Speaker 1: You won't, Okay, just you No? No, okay?
13:33
Speaker 2: Moving on a crazy time in the Trump administration really
13:38
Speaker 2: as in every day And one of the crazier people
13:42
Speaker 2: in the administration is Robert Kennedy Junior, who is a
13:47
Speaker 2: head of Health and Human Services, who is head of
13:50
Speaker 2: the CDC and controls what the CDC tells us about vaccines.
13:55
Speaker 2: And he is a vaccine skeptic to some degree. He
13:59
Speaker 2: used to be a lot more He's calmed that down
14:01
Speaker 2: a little bit. And I'll tell you what is going on.
14:04
Speaker 2: It's a little complicated, but I want to unwonk this.
14:08
Speaker 2: When you see a commercial on TV about any drug,
14:13
Speaker 2: the disclaimer will read in very rare circumstances, this could
14:17
Speaker 2: lead to loss of an erection for the rest of
14:20
Speaker 2: your life, oily stools. You may die in very rare instances.
14:27
Speaker 2: And what is it one in one hundred thousand. I
14:30
Speaker 2: mean the studies have shown because frankly, the FDA won't
14:34
Speaker 2: approve drugs that at least have some eacy, efficacy and
14:39
Speaker 2: don't kill people. So what happens in those very rare
14:43
Speaker 2: instances where vaccines do give people those side effects? When
14:50
Speaker 2: you have one hundred million kids over the course of
14:55
Speaker 2: decades getting vaccinations, well, frankly, all of us have gotten
14:58
Speaker 2: vaccinations for the most part. I mean, I don't know
15:03
Speaker 2: many people who have not been vaccinated really quickly. Neil vaccinated, Yes, sir,
15:08
Speaker 2: Amy vaccinated or what. It doesn't matter in general for
15:13
Speaker 2: MMR and polio and all of the diseases. Yeah, so
15:18
Speaker 2: does Kno, and so does everybody, Which means we have
15:23
Speaker 2: three hundred and forty million Americans of which the vast,
15:25
Speaker 2: vast majority, and you've been vaccinated, I ask you already.
15:28
Speaker 1: Absolutely just got my flushaw last week. Okay, good for you,
15:32
Speaker 1: and be I did too a few weeks ago. So
15:35
Speaker 1: you have three.
15:35
Speaker 2: Hundred and forty million Americans, of which the vast majority,
15:41
Speaker 2: and I'm going to speculate here, I would say three
15:43
Speaker 2: hundred and thirty million of them have been vaccinated. Now,
15:48
Speaker 2: if you have one in let's say fifty thousand having
15:51
Speaker 2: a severe reaction to the vaccine and maybe it kills them,
15:55
Speaker 2: maybe it causes some very serious serious disease or react,
16:00
Speaker 2: you still have a lot of people. So what ended
16:04
Speaker 2: up happening was there was a documentary film, a quasi
16:09
Speaker 2: documentary film, and it caused a lot of feur. It
16:14
Speaker 2: basically connected these vaccines to autism.
16:19
Speaker 1: And is this where.
16:22
Speaker 2: Robert Kennedy got his great view of vaccines. And then
16:27
Speaker 2: there was one study by this guy Wakefield in the
16:30
Speaker 2: late nineteen nineties and early two thousand Andrew Wakefield, he
16:34
Speaker 2: wrote a paper which is now retracted, alleging that link
16:38
Speaker 2: between MMR vaccine, that young people vaccine and autism all
16:44
Speaker 2: of a sudden, that fuels a surge of claims. And
16:49
Speaker 2: where did people go. They went to vaccine court. They
16:54
Speaker 2: didn't sue the manufacture because frankly, you're not going to
16:58
Speaker 2: win against the manufactur. Sure, the chances and the connection
17:03
Speaker 2: are so tenuous that it's not a win. However, if
17:08
Speaker 2: you have ten million people suing a manufacturer, you know
17:12
Speaker 2: what ends up happening. They're out of the vaccine business.
17:15
Speaker 2: They don't want to deal with it anymore. So what
17:18
Speaker 2: happened was that by law, vaccine Court was created, and
17:25
Speaker 2: this came out of the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act
17:28
Speaker 2: of nineteen eighty six, creating a no fault system families
17:33
Speaker 2: who believed a vaccine caused harm, and in many cases
17:37
Speaker 2: did or one in a zillion cases did, but it's
17:40
Speaker 2: still real.
17:42
Speaker 1: There were kids.
17:42
Speaker 2: Who got back to who were vaccinated who did react
17:47
Speaker 2: and became very seriously ill to the point where they
17:51
Speaker 2: need lifetime care. And so this Injury Act of nineteen
17:57
Speaker 2: eighty six created this no fault syts if a family
18:01
Speaker 2: believes that a vaccine caused harm to the child, if
18:05
Speaker 2: the injury appeared within a table set within a time frame.
18:10
Speaker 2: In other words, that's one of the requirements. Kid is
18:12
Speaker 2: vaccinated and within a time frame in fact got this illness.
18:20
Speaker 2: Was the argument was the vaccine was connected to whatever syndrome,
18:25
Speaker 2: whatever horrific illness. And by the way, it was probably
18:29
Speaker 2: why because one in fifty thousand and one in twenty
18:33
Speaker 2: thousand and one and one hundred thousand are in fact affected.
18:37
Speaker 2: Because there's no such thing as a one hundred percent
18:39
Speaker 2: of everything. So what do what does that family do? Well,
18:45
Speaker 2: they go to vaccine court, not the actual name, and
18:50
Speaker 2: compensation is automatic. They don't have to prove the connection.
18:57
Speaker 2: All they have to prove is the kid got vacated
19:01
Speaker 2: within this timeframe in some cases thirty days and some
19:05
Speaker 2: cases a year. Then compensation occurred. You don't sue the
19:09
Speaker 2: manufacture of the vaccine. You simply go to court and
19:14
Speaker 2: the government pays for the compensation, which every manufacturer puts
19:21
Speaker 2: in a little bit of money per vaccine.
19:24
Speaker 1: So it's a small hit and it works. It works.
19:30
Speaker 1: Claimants could present medical evidence.
19:33
Speaker 2: If the vaccine court says there is no connection, then
19:36
Speaker 2: the claimant can go forward and present evidence and try
19:38
Speaker 2: to overrule vaccine court. Which has happened the Vaccine Injury
19:44
Speaker 2: Compensation program, and it is a court of sort of
19:48
Speaker 2: a court. It's an administrative court. It's not in front of
19:51
Speaker 2: a judge. You're in front of what it's called a
19:53
Speaker 2: special master, who is an expert on this and the
19:58
Speaker 2: way it works. If you are or if your child,
20:00
Speaker 2: for example, is one of the very very rare number
20:04
Speaker 2: of children that react to vaccines, and it does happen,
20:09
Speaker 2: we know that that's a given and hear you'll see
20:13
Speaker 2: the disclaimer on TV commercials. Half the commercial is these
20:17
Speaker 2: are the side effects. Now the side effects what very
20:21
Speaker 2: rare cases. I mean I'm talking about rare.
20:23
Speaker 1: But it does happen.
20:24
Speaker 2: So what ended up happening is lawsuits would hit these
20:30
Speaker 2: vaccine manufacturers and enough of the hit, you're done. And
20:34
Speaker 2: when that first study came out in the late nineties,
20:37
Speaker 2: Wakefield wrote that paper Connection between Autism and Vaccines, which
20:42
Speaker 2: by the way, there is no connection.
20:45
Speaker 1: His numbers were flawed.
20:47
Speaker 2: He made up the numbers and it was debunked and
20:52
Speaker 2: he lost his license. But that's the basis of Robert
20:55
Speaker 2: Kennedy's autism is connected to vaccines. So you have this
21:01
Speaker 2: court vaccine injury compensation program, and it's a no fall program,
21:05
Speaker 2: as I said, And what happens if a child does
21:08
Speaker 2: react and gets seriously seriously ill or reacts incredibly negatively,
21:13
Speaker 2: simply goes to the vaccine compensation court and the court
21:17
Speaker 2: the master looks at it. Yes, there is a connection.
21:19
Speaker 2: How is there a connection? There may not be a
21:21
Speaker 2: connection at all. But the way it is designed is
21:25
Speaker 2: within a certain timeframe, this particular disease or syndrome happens
21:31
Speaker 2: or effect things like encephaly and a few others, there's
21:35
Speaker 2: about ten of them. Then compensation is awarded, no fault.
21:39
Speaker 2: It's automatic. You don't have to prove anything. The only
21:41
Speaker 2: have to prove is you got the vaccine, this happened
21:44
Speaker 2: within the timeframe. And these are the diseases that are
21:48
Speaker 2: covered period.
21:49
Speaker 1: Easy.
21:50
Speaker 2: Now, what Kennedy wants to do is add autism to
21:56
Speaker 2: that table.
21:57
Speaker 1: The problem is there are year, years and years.
22:01
Speaker 2: Of study that have proven conclusively autism is not connected
22:11
Speaker 2: to vaccine. Now autism is being diagnosed to half of
22:17
Speaker 2: the kids in the country now, I mean, autism is
22:21
Speaker 2: out there and it's like French fries at McDonald's. It's
22:24
Speaker 2: amazing how many people now have autism. What Kennedy wants
22:28
Speaker 2: to do is add to that table of diseases autism,
22:33
Speaker 2: which means it's going to blow open the number of.
22:37
Speaker 1: Claims that are being made.
22:39
Speaker 2: Because everybody gets vaccinated, the number of kids that are
22:44
Speaker 2: diagnosed with autism has exploded. And if they go to
22:48
Speaker 2: this autism court, it's going to be overwhelmed. There are
22:51
Speaker 2: only eight masters and we're talking millions of claims. And
22:58
Speaker 2: if the autism is accepted by the vaccine Court, and
23:03
Speaker 2: by the way, the Department of Health and Human Services
23:05
Speaker 2: makes the determination of which of these diseases are in
23:09
Speaker 2: fact connected to those vaccines, the one in a million connection,
23:14
Speaker 2: and doctors make this decision. But we know what the
23:16
Speaker 2: Department of Health and Human Services says, screw the doctors.
23:19
Speaker 2: We've made this decision. We're going to go forward and
23:23
Speaker 2: it's simply going to break the system. And this vaccine
23:28
Speaker 2: Court is a wonderful idea. This is where the government
23:32
Speaker 2: did a terrific thing because it number one saves the
23:38
Speaker 2: manufacturer from being sued.
23:41
Speaker 1: It's no fault.
23:43
Speaker 2: The compensation is automatic, so the manufacture of the vaccine
23:48
Speaker 2: is not going to get hit and the patient is
23:51
Speaker 2: still going to get paid. And the trust fund that
23:57
Speaker 2: pays these is actually paid by the many, by the
24:00
Speaker 2: manufacturer of the vaccine. But I think it's twelve cents
24:05
Speaker 2: per vaccine or whatever it is. It's a very low figure.
24:08
Speaker 2: But if you add all the vaccines up, there's a
24:10
Speaker 2: ton of money. There's four billion dollars in that trust fund,
24:14
Speaker 2: which at this.
24:14
Speaker 1: Point is you know, it's working. It's working.
24:21
Speaker 2: Since nineteen eighty eight, the federal data shows that twenty
24:25
Speaker 2: five thousand petitions have been made to Vaccine Court and
24:29
Speaker 2: have been adjudicated. Of those, twelve thousand were granted compensation.
24:34
Speaker 2: Thirteen thousand were dismissed, saying what you have is not
24:40
Speaker 2: in our table of diseases. You didn't meet the timeline.
24:43
Speaker 2: Certain timelines or a year. Certain timelines are thirty days
24:47
Speaker 2: because some react immediately and you didn't make it. So
24:51
Speaker 2: over half have been been denied saying nope, you didn't
24:55
Speaker 2: make it.
24:56
Speaker 1: So this helps people.
24:59
Speaker 2: So you have kids who families who get the compensation
25:01
Speaker 2: they needing taking care of the kids for the rest
25:04
Speaker 2: of their lives.
25:05
Speaker 1: Millions of dollars of compensation are given.
25:08
Speaker 2: So it helps these kids, it helps keep the vaccine
25:12
Speaker 2: manufacturers in the market, and it's sort of a win
25:17
Speaker 2: win for everybody.
25:19
Speaker 1: Now, can this be blown up?
25:21
Speaker 2: Yeah, as soon as you add autism to that table,
25:26
Speaker 2: to that number of syndromes or reactions in opposition to
25:34
Speaker 2: all of the evidence over decades and decades. So during
25:39
Speaker 2: this time that whatever number of kids have autism and
25:45
Speaker 2: we're vaccinated with something, hundreds of millions of vaccinations have
25:51
Speaker 2: occurred around the world and how many how many people
25:55
Speaker 2: were saved? Millions and millions. So Kennedy may get his
26:03
Speaker 2: wish and do an end around on this and not
26:08
Speaker 2: officially say and have the government say yes autism or
26:13
Speaker 2: vaccines cause cause autism.
26:17
Speaker 1: What he is going to do, what he could do is.
26:19
Speaker 2: Simply add to that table of diseases that react to
26:24
Speaker 2: vaccines and will break the system.
26:26
Speaker 1: It'll just break the system.
26:28
Speaker 2: It'll blow up, and he gets his wish, Ye vaccines
26:33
Speaker 2: cause autism. Crazy isn't it just completely crazy?
26:39
Speaker 1: Okay, a lot going on now.
26:41
Speaker 2: This is the week of Nobel Prizes, and we've already
26:45
Speaker 2: had I think the Physics Prize and the Price for Medicine,
26:50
Speaker 2: and these Nobel Prizes now are really obscure stuff. I
26:54
Speaker 2: mean they're minute scientific discoveries, proteins and within the body.
27:02
Speaker 2: I mean it used to be where you could understand
27:05
Speaker 2: Nobel Prizes. For example, whoever invented flying that got the
27:08
Speaker 2: Nobel Prize. That's easy to understand, right X rays where
27:13
Speaker 2: Marie Currey got the Nobel Prize at the show in
27:17
Speaker 2: the last century. She received two. By the way, very
27:19
Speaker 2: very few people have ever received two, and she certainly
27:23
Speaker 2: was the only woman to ever do that. So we're
27:26
Speaker 2: gonna the big one is coming up on Friday, the
27:28
Speaker 2: Nobel Peace Prize. This is what everybody looks at. And
27:32
Speaker 2: there's been some weird ones on that one too. Now,
27:36
Speaker 2: the Nobel Prizes are awarded in Stockholm or is it Oslo?
27:41
Speaker 2: And then the Peace Prize awarded in Stockholm is one
27:43
Speaker 2: or the other. It's on it's very different. It's on itself.
27:47
Speaker 1: Okay.
27:48
Speaker 2: So you've got the Nobel Prizes and they're extraordinary discoveries,
27:54
Speaker 2: and they're given well once a year and sometimes not
27:59
Speaker 2: at all, to very important findings and usually issues that
28:05
Speaker 2: affect mankind in a positive way. Well, there's also called
28:09
Speaker 2: the Ignobel Prizes, and they've been going on for thirty
28:13
Speaker 2: five years.
28:15
Speaker 1: And what they do is.
28:19
Speaker 2: They celebrate science's more unusual contributions. They honor the imaginative,
28:26
Speaker 2: maybe spur people's interests in science, medicine, technology. Now, these
28:30
Speaker 2: are real studies done by real researchers, as crazy as
28:35
Speaker 2: it may sound. So let's go through this year's winners
28:41
Speaker 2: of the Ignobel Prizes.
28:45
Speaker 1: Okay, let's do it.
28:48
Speaker 2: For the Nutrition Prize, which the Ignobil Prize is awarded,
28:54
Speaker 2: not the Nobel Prize, but the Ignobel Prize. This is
29:00
Speaker 2: a study that was done by I can't even go
29:03
Speaker 2: through the names Daniellie Dandy, Gabriel, Seganatia Betto and it
29:08
Speaker 2: goes on and on, and they were awarded the Nutrition
29:11
Speaker 2: Prize for studying the extent to which a certain kind
29:15
Speaker 2: of lizard chooses to eat certain kinds of pizza.
29:20
Speaker 1: Real study.
29:21
Speaker 2: So the team spotted a rainbow lizard stealing a slice
29:24
Speaker 2: of pizza at a resort. And then the scientist said
29:28
Speaker 2: they wanted to know if the rainbow lizards, who usually
29:31
Speaker 2: eat insects, had a taste for pizza hm. And they
29:37
Speaker 2: had a do they do the lizers have a preferred topping.
29:41
Speaker 2: So they followed nine lizards who had a choice between
29:45
Speaker 2: the four cheese pizza and a plate of four Seasons
29:50
Speaker 2: pizza a lot of meat on it, you know, pepperoni and.
29:53
Speaker 1: Sausage, etc.
29:55
Speaker 2: Now, the lizards found the pizza and ate it, but
29:58
Speaker 2: only the four cheese pizza.
30:01
Speaker 1: They didn't eat the rest of them.
30:03
Speaker 2: Why because it could be easier for them to digest
30:06
Speaker 2: the cheese pizza. It could be some cues attract them
30:10
Speaker 2: to the cheesier pizza. So they discovered why Well, we
30:18
Speaker 2: really don't know, but it was one of the winners.
30:21
Speaker 1: Then another winner of.
30:24
Speaker 2: This was the Physics Prize and went to a bunch
30:28
Speaker 2: of people Italian people, and it honors and basically studies
30:33
Speaker 2: pasta sauce hmm. So they were given the Ignobel Prize
30:39
Speaker 2: for discoveries about the physics of pasta sauce, especially the
30:43
Speaker 2: phase transition that can lead to clumping, which can cause
30:48
Speaker 2: unpleasantness because so many of us suffer from pasta sauce
30:52
Speaker 2: that clumps. So if you're making caccio epeppi, I think
30:57
Speaker 2: that's one of the sauces.
30:59
Speaker 1: If the water is.
30:59
Speaker 2: Too hot or you don't have the right ratio of
31:03
Speaker 2: cheese to starch, the sauce turns into a thin liquid
31:06
Speaker 2: filled with these congealed globs of kurds. And earlier this
31:10
Speaker 2: year these physicists developed a way to prevent clumping. You
31:14
Speaker 2: use corn starch in the cheese and pepper sauce instead
31:17
Speaker 2: of just relying on how much starch gets into the
31:20
Speaker 2: boiling water while the pasta cooks. And while why they
31:24
Speaker 2: got that prize is because pasta sauce is so important
31:29
Speaker 2: to those of us who eat pasta. And that's around
31:33
Speaker 2: the world, and there was and there is physics to it.
31:39
Speaker 2: Oh there's more. There's more big Nobel prizes coming. Diseases
31:46
Speaker 2: that react to vaccines and will break the system. It'll
31:49
Speaker 2: just break the system, it'll blow up. And he gets
31:52
Speaker 2: his wish. Yeah, vaccines cause autism.
31:57
Speaker 1: Crazy.
31:57
Speaker 2: Isn't it just completely crazy?
32:01
Speaker 1: KF I am six point forty. You've been listening to
32:04
Speaker 1: the Bill Handle show.
32:05
Speaker 2: Catch my show Monday through Friday six am to nine am,
32:09
Speaker 2: and anytime on demand on the iHeartRadio app.