Latest / Turley Talks / Ep. 4184 Trump and Xi Jinping Just STUNNED The World!!!
Transcript
- 0:00[SPEAKER_02]: The liberal globalist order is on its brink and awakening a new conservative age.
- 0:06[SPEAKER_02]: Dr. Steve Turley, join me every day as we discover answers to today's toughest challenges and explore the re-bondalization of conservative civilization.
- 0:18[SPEAKER_02]: This is Turley Talks.
- 0:25[SPEAKER_01]: Do you have any father?
- 0:27[SPEAKER_01]: King Jesus, we come humbly before your throne.
- 0:32[SPEAKER_01]: Praising you for all the providence you bestowed upon this nation.
- 0:36[SPEAKER_01]: For over 250 years, from George Washington to President Trump, we have dedicated this nation to one nation under God, and certainly in God we trust.
- 0:46[SPEAKER_01]: And as we think 250 years ago, to George Washington, unbended knee and valley forge, appealing to heaven on behalf of his troops and this young nation, we've appealed to you from the beginning, and may we continue to appeal to you.
- 1:00[SPEAKER_01]: And tonight, we pray for our President President Trump, give him safety, give him wisdom.
- 1:06[SPEAKER_01]: Lord, we pray for our vice president, our first lady, our second lady, the cabinet members here, all the governors assembled here as well, our civil magistrates, Lord God.
- 1:17[SPEAKER_01]: As that you give them the wisdom to see what is right.
- 1:21[SPEAKER_01]: and the courage to do it.
- 1:23[SPEAKER_01]: Wisdom defined as the fear of the Lord, the fear of the Lord being the source of all knowledge and wisdom, Lord God, your eternal truths may they rule.
- 1:34[SPEAKER_01]: So this evening, also, I would be remissified did not pray for our great truths.
- 1:39[SPEAKER_01]: Our men and women all around the globe, defending our great nation as they have for 250 years.
- 1:45[SPEAKER_01]: Lord God, watch over them and protect them.
- 1:48[SPEAKER_01]: It is in your holy name, the Lord Jesus Christ, the King of Kings and Lord of Lords that we pray, and we bless this food too, amen.
- 1:58[SPEAKER_02]: It was a summit like no other, a breathtaking display of ceremony, strength, and civilizational grandeur unfolding across the White House grounds.
- 2:08[SPEAKER_02]: Revolutionary soldiers marched beneath American flags, military bands thundered through the air, and the worlds two most powerful leaders stood face to face as stealth bombers roared overhead.
- 2:22[SPEAKER_02]: But behind the handshakes, the honor guards and the magnificent state dinner, something far greater was taking shape.
- 2:30[SPEAKER_02]: This was not merely another diplomatic meeting about tariffs and trade.
- 2:35[SPEAKER_02]: It was one of those exceedingly rare moments when history seems to pull back the curtain and allow us to glimpse the world that's coming next.
- 2:45[SPEAKER_02]: stick me the very end of this video because we're about to see exactly how a new world order has awakened and we, you and I have been given a front row seat.
- 2:57[SPEAKER_02]: Greetings, everyone.
- 2:58[SPEAKER_02]: It is a live stream Friday.
- 2:59[SPEAKER_02]: I am your host, Dr. Steve.
- 3:01[SPEAKER_02]: your Patron Professor here to help you make sense to the madness with breaking news and analysis.
- 3:06[SPEAKER_02]: You're not going to get anywhere else.
- 3:07[SPEAKER_02]: So you know what to do and make sure to smack that bell and subscribe button.
- 3:10[SPEAKER_02]: As always, our super chats are up.
- 3:12[SPEAKER_02]: So feel free to send in your comments, your questions throughout the broadcast.
- 3:16[SPEAKER_02]: It will be my honor, my privilege to answer them right here on this livestream.
- 3:21[SPEAKER_02]: Also, have you ever wondered how the people at the very top seem to know exactly
- 3:29[SPEAKER_02]: everyone else catches on.
- 3:31[SPEAKER_02]: Well, what have I told you, there's a completely legal way to watch with some of the most powerful insiders in corporate America are doing with their own money.
- 3:41[SPEAKER_02]: And more importantly, what if you could use that information to help you spot potential opportunities before they ever hit the mainstream?
- 3:50[SPEAKER_02]: Well, that's exactly what I sat down to talk about with my good friend and trading expert, Ross Gibbons.
- 3:56[SPEAKER_02]: Ross has spent years studying insider buying activity, tracking the moves, corporate executives are required to publicly disclose and then looking for the signals, most ordinary investors never even think to watch.
- 4:11[SPEAKER_02]: And gang, some of what he showed me,
- 4:14[SPEAKER_02]: Absolutely blew me away.
- 4:16[SPEAKER_02]: We got into how the strategy works.
- 4:18[SPEAKER_02]: What Ross looks for before making a move.
- 4:21[SPEAKER_02]: And while following the people with the most at stake may reveal opportunities hiding right in plain sight, you're going to want to see this one.
- 4:29[SPEAKER_02]: My full interview with Ross given drops this Saturday, September 26, that's tomorrow.
- 4:36[SPEAKER_02]: Ross is free training launches on Wednesday, September 30th at 3 p.m. Eastern.
- 4:41[SPEAKER_02]: So keep an eye out because this could completely change the way you look at the market.
- 4:46[SPEAKER_02]: It's going to blow your way.
- 4:47[SPEAKER_02]: All right, let's dive right in here, gang.
- 4:49[SPEAKER_02]: There are moments
- 4:52[SPEAKER_02]: When the future does not arrive quietly, it appears suddenly right before us.
- 4:59[SPEAKER_02]: Not years later, when historians have named the new era and drawn neat lines across the past, but in the very moment, when one age fades and another begins to rise right before our very eyes, that my friends is exactly what we are witnessing right now,
- 5:21[SPEAKER_02]: two superpowers, but more than that, two ancient civilizational world, needing beneath the symbols of America's pounding, whilst Delph bombers thunder overhead, an unofficial superintelligence waits just beyond the horizon.
- 5:40[SPEAKER_02]: Behind the handshakes in ceremonial pageantry, the architecture of a new world is, indeed, beginning to emerge right before our very eyes.
- 5:49[SPEAKER_02]: A world of sovereign civilizations, a world of technological empires, a world of sacred memories and powers, capable of reshaping human existence itself.
- 6:01[SPEAKER_02]: Trade, Taiwan, Iran, artificial intelligence, military power.
- 6:10[SPEAKER_02]: There are all pieces of something much larger, a struggle over who will ultimately command the future.
- 6:19[SPEAKER_02]: What values will guide it and how rival civilizations can peacefully co-exist.
- 6:25[SPEAKER_02]: In this week,
- 6:27[SPEAKER_02]: We've been given a front row seat to witnessing history awakened.
- 6:31[SPEAKER_02]: Chinese president Xi Jinping arrived in Washington Wednesday evening for a three day state visit and received the rare honor of being personally welcomed by president Trump at joint base Andrews.
- 6:44[SPEAKER_02]: On Thursday, the President Trump and First Lady Melania host a G in his wife at the White House for an elaborate arrival ceremony, military review by lateral talks at an official state dinner and at its core.
- 7:01[SPEAKER_02]: The summit is an effort to stabilize the world's most consequential great power relationship while negotiating disputes over trade, AI, critical minerals, Taiwan, Iran, and military security.
- 7:17[SPEAKER_02]: But in the midst of the seriousness of the summit, President Trump couldn't help himself.
- 7:23[SPEAKER_02]: He had to have a little fun at Bumbling Biden's expense check this out.
- 7:32[SPEAKER_02]: No, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no
- 7:49[SPEAKER_02]: As you can see, the entire world is laughing at Biden.
- 7:51[SPEAKER_02]: They continue to laugh at Biden, and when all is said and done, that is why the legacy media hates Trump so much.
- 8:00[SPEAKER_02]: They were the campaign surrogates, par excellence for Biden, hidden his basement just about 20 minutes away from this studio.
- 8:08[SPEAKER_02]: For the entire 2020 campaign, precisely because he didn't have to campaign and he didn't have to campaign because the legacy media was doing that job for him.
- 8:17[SPEAKER_02]: So make no mistake when the world is laughing at Biden like that, like what you just saw, they're laughing at the legacy media.
- 8:25[SPEAKER_02]: They're laughing at the clowns at CNN and MSNBC and the New York Times and the Washington Post and Trump.
- 8:33[SPEAKER_02]: Rebels in that laughter and that's why the legacy media hates Trump so much now What so key to understand about this meeting is that it actually did not begin this week
- 8:47[SPEAKER_02]: It began back in May of this year when Xi Jinping welcomed Trump to China with all the elaborate pageantry of a civilizational state.
- 8:58[SPEAKER_02]: Trump was brought into contact with China's imperial and sacred inheritance in a very special tour of what's called the Temple of Heaven.
- 9:07[SPEAKER_02]: That's the architectural world associated with the Ming and Qing Dynasty's.
- 9:18[SPEAKER_02]: offered sacrifices and prayed for abundant harvest, richly reaffirming his mandate of heaven, and his role as mediator between the celestial, earthly, and human realms.
- 9:30[SPEAKER_02]: So the Temple of Heaven was a special center of the ancient Chinese theology known as Tianxia, all under heaven.
- 9:38[SPEAKER_02]: The vision of the world as a harmonious cosmic and political order centered upon a Chinese ruler
- 9:47[SPEAKER_02]: on maintaining alignment between heaven, earth, and society.
- 9:52[SPEAKER_02]: And now, G arrives in Washington as Trump state gas, while the United States celebrates the 250th anniversary of the American founding.
- 10:03[SPEAKER_02]: This city set on a hill.
- 10:06[SPEAKER_02]: The White House program surrounding G with military honors, revolutionary era imagery, and the great documentary relics of America's constitutional tradition.
- 10:19[SPEAKER_02]: The visit included a military review and a plan trip to the National Archives where G will actually see for himself, the declaration of independence, the constitution and the bill of rights now all of this is absolutely extraordinary in and of itself, but it's even more extraordinary when you place these two events these two civilizational visits side by side.
- 10:44[SPEAKER_02]: in Beijing, Trump was received within China's imperial memory.
- 10:50[SPEAKER_02]: In Washington, G was received within America's Republican memory.
- 10:55[SPEAKER_02]: So this is nothing less than the temple of heaven, meeting the shining city on a hill.
- 11:03[SPEAKER_02]: And this I would argue really is the first major ceremonial signal of the new civilizational order that we've been describing for years now on this channel.
- 11:15[SPEAKER_02]: I wrote about it my book, The Siv Cosms, Gods, Algorithms, and the Rise of a Civilizational Cosmocracy.
- 11:22[SPEAKER_02]: The United States and China are not presenting themselves as two generic administrative
- 11:33[SPEAKER_02]: managerial units within a borderless global system.
- 11:38[SPEAKER_02]: They're presenting themselves as two grand glorious civilizational states with distinctive inheritances, symbols, memories, and missions.
- 11:51[SPEAKER_02]: So this is precisely what the old liberal order just could never fully understand.
- 11:56[SPEAKER_02]: Liberal globalism is assumed.
- 11:59[SPEAKER_02]: that modernization would gradually dissolve these thick civilizational identities.
- 12:04[SPEAKER_02]: Nations would become more and more alike.
- 12:07[SPEAKER_02]: Sacred traditions would become private lifestyle choices.
- 12:11[SPEAKER_02]: Political life would be managed by neutral institutions, universal procedures, multinational corporations, and an increasingly borderless global economy overseen by a managerial class.
- 12:28[SPEAKER_02]: The more technologically advanced the world became ironically, the more civilizations began recovering their memory.
- 12:38[SPEAKER_02]: China didn't become Western because it industrialized.
- 12:42[SPEAKER_02]: India didn't cease to be Hindu because it digitalized.
- 12:45[SPEAKER_02]: Russia didn't become post-historical because it modernized.
- 12:49[SPEAKER_02]: And the United States under Trump has increasingly too recovered its own civilization symbols.
- 12:56[SPEAKER_02]: The border, the founding, the flag, Christianity, as you just saw it, Pete Higgs-Ses of Amazing Prayer, national sovereignty, and the language of American greatness.
- 13:09[SPEAKER_02]: modernization did not abolish civilization.
- 13:13[SPEAKER_02]: Ironically, it reawakened it.
- 13:18[SPEAKER_02]: The renewal of religion and the futuristic technological acceleration that was at the center of these talks have come together as like a double helix DNA that's reanimated ancient civilizations
- 13:35[SPEAKER_02]: But the two greatest one, the two most powerful ones are clearly the United States and China.
- 13:41[SPEAKER_02]: And both the Temple of Heaven and the White House is a shining sitting on a hill revealed that transformation this week in visual form.
- 13:51[SPEAKER_02]: Take a listen at the stunning language that President G used upon his arrival.
- 14:02[SPEAKER_00]: Ladies and gentlemen, dear friends, achieving the great rejuvenation of the Chinese nation and making America great again can go hand in hand.
- 14:13[SPEAKER_00]: Let us meet the people's expectation and show our historical initiative.
- 14:19[SPEAKER_00]: Let us keep advancing the cause of friendship between our two peoples and work together to build a better world.
- 14:28[SPEAKER_02]: Thank you, Nadia.
- 14:30[SPEAKER_02]: Now, could you have ever imagined hearing the leader of the CCP say make America great again?
- 14:44[SPEAKER_02]: We all want to make America great again.
- 14:47[SPEAKER_02]: I mean, that's history in and of itself.
- 14:50[SPEAKER_02]: But that's all part of this civilization, a language.
- 14:54[SPEAKER_02]: You'll note that G used that phrase the rejuvenation of China.
- 14:58[SPEAKER_02]: Okay, that's basically their MAGA counterpart.
- 15:02[SPEAKER_02]: It is a key theme of the CCP civilizationless language, Chinese rejuvenation, we have to remember that China experienced a period that they refer to as the century of humiliation.
- 15:17[SPEAKER_02]: Some of you history buffs may know this is between the years 1839 and 1949.
- 15:25[SPEAKER_02]: China was overwhelmed dominated by foreign power.
- 15:29[SPEAKER_02]: So this is a time when you were dealing with the so-called second opium war with the British Empire and the French Empire followed by the Sino-French war, the Sino-Japanese war.
- 15:40[SPEAKER_02]: It was a tumultuous time for China.
- 15:43[SPEAKER_02]: And it was a time that China seeded mass amounts of territories to the Russian Empire.
- 15:48[SPEAKER_02]: They lost Hong Kong to the British Empire and perhaps most consequence leads the time they lost Taiwan.
- 15:55[SPEAKER_02]: It's a universal belief throughout China, most particularly its leadership, the CCP, that as long as China is economically and militarily weak, it's going to be internationally exploited, mistreated, and colonized.
- 16:10[SPEAKER_02]: And so scholars are widely agreed that the great humiliation provides a powerful mythos for the rise of what we're seeing today, which is an effect of renewed imperial China or what scholars call today as civilization state, where the ancient religions and rituals that gave rise to the world's great civilizations are currently making a massive
- 16:33[SPEAKER_02]: come back and we're seeing with the rise of orthodox Russia, Hindu Nationalist India, as you can see, Christian America and Neo Confucian China.
- 16:43[SPEAKER_02]: So this is what G means.
- 16:46[SPEAKER_02]: When he talks about the great Chinese rejuvenation, it's the reawakening of Imperial China in the form of the CCP in all of its heavenly splendor.
- 16:58[SPEAKER_02]: Again, we may bulk at that, certainly, but you have to understand that that rhetoric is very popular with the Chinese people.
- 17:06[SPEAKER_02]: They love this.
- 17:08[SPEAKER_02]: Every bit as much as we love the idea of making America great again.
- 17:11[SPEAKER_02]: And so, Jean is official remarks, sees China and the United States as great civilizational powers and great peoples carrying a historical responsibility for human progress.
- 17:26[SPEAKER_02]: Take a listen as well to what President Trump had to say last night.
- 17:33[SPEAKER_03]: The spirit of that first encounter here on American soil as we are joined by some of the
- 17:45[SPEAKER_02]: Why are we having an issue with our video?
- 17:51[SPEAKER_02]: Testing, testing one, two, three, you guys got this?
- 17:55[SPEAKER_02]: Oh, come on, guys, we need that.
- 17:58[SPEAKER_02]: Give it to me.
- 18:02[SPEAKER_03]: No, you're not.
- 18:02[SPEAKER_03]: Just culture, everyone.
- 18:03[SPEAKER_03]: You got room in from our own time.
- 18:07[SPEAKER_03]: On one side, China draws us on thousands of years of history and tradition from soon to soon yet soon for American...
- 18:21[SPEAKER_02]: Yeah, I don't know who's running the video back there, but you guys better get your shit together.
- 18:25[SPEAKER_02]: That's a little primer on the heart of Western civilization that he was supposed to give there.
- 18:32[SPEAKER_02]: He talks about the importance of Jerusalem, Athens, and Rome for American identity.
- 18:39[SPEAKER_02]: And that goes back to Russell Kirk and the roots of American order.
- 18:43[SPEAKER_02]: Western civilization is fundamentally the moral tradition of Jerusalem, the philosophical tradition of Athens, and the political tradition of Rome, synthesized through London, and given its ultimate civilization expression in Philadelphia.
- 19:01[SPEAKER_02]: that for Trump, that is what making America great again is all ultimately about.
- 19:08[SPEAKER_02]: It's unleashing the greatness of the glories of Western civilization and their ultimate civilization expressions.
- 19:16[SPEAKER_02]: Again, you'll notice, you know, neither G or Trump were speaking about abstract consumers or liberal democracy or universal human rights.
- 19:25[SPEAKER_02]: They were speaking about peoples.
- 19:28[SPEAKER_02]: They were speaking about lands, they were speaking about regions, they were speaking about historical communities extended through time.
- 19:37[SPEAKER_02]: They were placing diplomacy within a narrative of inheritance, sacrifice, memory, and destiny.
- 19:43[SPEAKER_02]: That's the fundamental unit of this new rising civilization world order.
- 19:49[SPEAKER_02]: The old, globalist imagination begins,
- 19:53[SPEAKER_02]: with the autonomous individual and universal managerial institutions.
- 20:00[SPEAKER_02]: Like the WTO, the IMF, the World Bank, or the UN all run from Brussels and DC.
- 20:09[SPEAKER_02]: The new civilization imagination begins with inherited peoples and living traditions.
- 20:16[SPEAKER_02]: Orthodox Russia, Confucian, China, Hindu, India, Ottoman Turkey, and post-malatial America.
- 20:23[SPEAKER_02]: It does not deny the dignity of the individual or the need for international cooperation.
- 20:30[SPEAKER_02]: It simply begins by recognizing that human beings always inhabit particular histories, symbols,
- 20:42[SPEAKER_02]: Languages, religions, and moral world.
- 20:46[SPEAKER_02]: And that's precisely why the summit feels so different from the technocratic meetings of the old liberal globalist order.
- 20:55[SPEAKER_02]: Neither Trump, nor G, came to Washington, promising that their systems would converge in a line.
- 21:02[SPEAKER_02]: Right?
- 21:03[SPEAKER_02]: If politics is always downstream from culture, and we have multiple different cultures, then we're going to have multiple different politics.
- 21:11[SPEAKER_02]: Trump is not asking America to become more Chinese.
- 21:15[SPEAKER_02]: She is certainly not promising that China would become a Western liberal democracy.
- 21:20[SPEAKER_02]: The diplomatic task has changed in this civilization list world.
- 21:25[SPEAKER_02]: The question is no longer, how do we make these civilizations more like us?
- 21:30[SPEAKER_02]: The question now is, how do profoundly different civilizations co-exist in a mutually beneficial and prosperous way?
- 21:40[SPEAKER_02]: That's a far more ancient question.
- 21:42[SPEAKER_02]: And ironically, it also happens to be the defining question of the 21st century.
- 21:48[SPEAKER_02]: So with that in place, then one issues dominated the talks between these two reawakened, rejuvenated civilizations.
- 21:59[SPEAKER_02]: What's so stunning about the world we're living in is that while the identities are ancient, the issues are radically futuristic, which in many ways is making this the first real archio-future summit.
- 22:16[SPEAKER_02]: we've ever seen.
- 22:16[SPEAKER_02]: You're not.
- 22:17[SPEAKER_02]: You don't want to miss this.
- 22:18[SPEAKER_02]: But first gang, if you aren't just joining us, our super chats are up so feel free to send in your comments or questions.
- 22:25[SPEAKER_02]: It'll be my honor to answer them here alive on this livestream.
- 22:29[SPEAKER_02]: Also, did you know that more Americans are being diagnosed with Alzheimer's, including people far younger than we traditionally associate with the disease?
- 22:38[SPEAKER_02]: More than 55 million people worldwide are living with Alzheimer's or another form of dementia.
- 22:45[SPEAKER_02]: Reports have shown major increases in diagnoses among younger adults, including a 370% increase among people ages 30 to 44 and a 311% increase among those 45 to 54.
- 22:54[SPEAKER_02]: So what exactly is happening inside the brain?
- 23:06[SPEAKER_02]: Well, one of the hallmarks of Alzheimer's is a protein called beta amoloid.
- 23:12[SPEAKER_02]: Now, normally these proteins are cleared away, but in Alzheimer's, they can begin clumping together forming sticky plaques between brain cells that interfere with normal brain function.
- 23:23[SPEAKER_02]: Drug companies afford billions into developing Alzheimer's treatments.
- 23:27[SPEAKER_02]: Much of that effort focused on amyloid betas, but researchers are also looking beyond the brain, and specifically at what's happening in the gut.
- 23:37[SPEAKER_02]: That's because your gut and your brain are constantly communicating through something called the gut brain access.
- 23:44[SPEAKER_02]: They give it as a two-way highway connecting your digestive system and your brain through nerves and hormones and immune signals and the trillions of bacteria living in your gut playing important role in that
- 23:57[SPEAKER_02]: And that brings us to a centuries-old fermented food, kimchi.
- 24:02[SPEAKER_02]: Research has studied bioactive compounds found only in kimchi to see how they affected cognitive and memory problems and the results gained they were fascinating.
- 24:11[SPEAKER_02]: These compounds helped improve memory and cognitive function while reducing oxidative stress, inflammation, and brain cell death.
- 24:20[SPEAKER_02]: three processes closely associated with neurological decline.
- 24:25[SPEAKER_02]: So that's exactly why kimchi won from brine core has become part of my daily routine.
- 24:31[SPEAKER_02]: It takes the power traditionally for men at kimchi, including more than 900 probiotic strains and puts it into an easy capsule that I can take every single day without the strong taste and the smell or the mess.
- 24:44[SPEAKER_02]: Because taking care of your brain may start somewhere else, a place you wouldn't expect,
- 24:50[SPEAKER_02]: Today, you can try Kim Chihuan by clicking the link below for 25% off your entire order, or for the best deal available, call my friends at Brightcore for up to 50% off, plus free shipping.
- 25:01[SPEAKER_02]: Call now at Triple 8, 597, 0233, that's 888, 597, 022.
- 25:10[SPEAKER_02]: three three.
- 25:11[SPEAKER_02]: All right.
- 25:11[SPEAKER_02]: So the big four in the summit were AI trade Iran and Taiwan.
- 25:17[SPEAKER_02]: AI trade Iran and Taiwan.
- 25:21[SPEAKER_02]: That's what we're calling the big four issues that dominated these talks.
- 25:25[SPEAKER_02]: The principal issue that Trump and G are talking about here is the new arms race.
- 25:30[SPEAKER_02]: And that of course is the AI arms race.
- 25:34[SPEAKER_02]: Trump invited a virtual
- 25:36[SPEAKER_02]: Who's who of American technology, including Elon Musk, Jeff Bezos, Mark Zuckerberg, Sam Altman, Jensen Wong, of Nvidia, Tim Cook of Apple.
- 25:47[SPEAKER_02]: They were all there because AI, advanced, SEBI conductors.
- 25:52[SPEAKER_02]: computing infrastructure, export controls, and rare earth supplies now occupy the center of U.S.-China economic and geopolitical competition, making these executives representatives of American technological power in this emerging archaea future order.
- 26:10[SPEAKER_02]: Trump is now calling AI super intelligence, all right, emphasizing that a American AI is excelling at unprecedented pace while G ironically is actually emphasizing a more measured approach.
- 26:27[SPEAKER_02]: He's stressing the importance of keeping AI under human control and making sure it serves
- 26:40[SPEAKER_02]: between the two is fascinating.
- 26:43[SPEAKER_02]: Trump is all he wants to go.
- 26:46[SPEAKER_02]: Yo, no limits, just let it go and explode.
- 26:49[SPEAKER_02]: She's like, whoa, whoa, we have to pull back here.
- 26:51[SPEAKER_02]: A-A-I is getting way, way, way.
- 26:54[SPEAKER_02]: It's advancing way too fast or orders a magnitude beyond our wildest imaginations.
- 27:00[SPEAKER_02]: We need to pull back.
- 27:02[SPEAKER_02]: I know many of you are rightly concerned about the surveillance state, the autocratic significance of AI, and so on.
- 27:11[SPEAKER_02]: But this exchange, this difference of perspective between G and Trump on AI.
- 27:19[SPEAKER_02]: actually throws into relief a whole field of scholarship that's identified what they call the dictators dilemma.
- 27:28[SPEAKER_02]: This is very interesting.
- 27:30[SPEAKER_02]: You may want to look this up.
- 27:31[SPEAKER_02]: The dictators dilemma or this this is very interesting article on the limits of authoritarian AI.
- 27:39[SPEAKER_02]: It's a very fascinating
- 27:48[SPEAKER_02]: The AI built to repress the people can gradually end up controlling the repressor, okay?
- 27:57[SPEAKER_02]: The AI built to repress the people can gradually end up controlling the repressor.
- 28:07[SPEAKER_02]: The CCP wants AI to be enormously capable, but never politically sovereign.
- 28:15[SPEAKER_02]: That's the limit, that's the cap that the CCP is trying to place on AI.
- 28:22[SPEAKER_02]: It wants machines that can strengthen manufacturing, production, scientific research, military power, administration, but also most particularly censorship and surveillance, but it doesn't want machines that can
- 28:40[SPEAKER_02]: challenge the CCP and independently determine objectives and contest party narratives and mobilize citizens and expose state failures or exercise authority over party institutions.
- 28:54[SPEAKER_02]: In other words, the CCP must ensure not merely that AI remains under human control, but that both humans and AI remain under party control.
- 29:09[SPEAKER_02]: Are you getting that?
- 29:09[SPEAKER_02]: This is the dictator's dilemma.
- 29:13[SPEAKER_02]: The problem is that AI creates exactly the kind of entity and authoritarian system instinctively fears.
- 29:20[SPEAKER_02]: It can generate politically sensitive ideas at scale.
- 29:24[SPEAKER_02]: It can answer questions the state would prefer citizens not to ask.
- 29:28[SPEAKER_02]: It can operate too quickly for traditional censorship.
- 29:32[SPEAKER_02]: It can mediate citizens understanding a political reality.
- 29:36[SPEAKER_02]: And it can indeed expose the CCP
- 29:42[SPEAKER_02]: And so ironically, it's the Chinese, it's the Chinese officials, it's the CCP that want to slow down AI and control it.
- 29:54[SPEAKER_02]: And it's Trump that's like, uh, man, we're going all the way.
- 29:59[SPEAKER_02]: No limits at all.
- 30:00[SPEAKER_02]: Yeah, and that's, and that's because every authoritarian regime faces the same question.
- 30:07[SPEAKER_02]: It a question.
- 30:08[SPEAKER_02]: We don't face a being at least a democratic republic can this regime build an AI powerful enough to control the people yet obedient enough never to challenge those in power.
- 30:23[SPEAKER_02]: That's the dictator's dilemma that's simply becoming technically and politically more and more difficult.
- 30:30[SPEAKER_02]: If you guys want to chat about this more, make sure you put that in the comments below or send in your super chats.
- 30:35[SPEAKER_02]: It's because AI capabilities that are required for sophisticated reasoning by definition include detecting contradictions.
- 30:46[SPEAKER_02]: It detects propaganda.
- 30:49[SPEAKER_02]: it detects evaluating competing, it detects competing evidence and it generates novel conclusions that may go against party line.
- 31:03[SPEAKER_02]: But mandatory political alignment requires the same system to ignore evidence, preserve prescribed conclusions and treat certain questions as illegitimate.
- 31:19[SPEAKER_02]: especially what we call generative AI, AGI, where it starts training itself.
- 31:24[SPEAKER_02]: So that's the ultimate irony here, the very AI that is so feared by so many.
- 31:31[SPEAKER_02]: as representing unprecedented control and surveillance even here in this country may indeed be the means by which those seeking those controls are themselves thwarted.
- 31:44[SPEAKER_02]: It's all part of what we call techno populism where the technology today enables the people to bypass their overlords the way email and texting bypasses the post office.
- 31:59[SPEAKER_02]: Regardless, what is fascinating is that Trump and G's AI negotiations embody this new archaeo future paradigm because the world's two foremost technological powers are confronting an ancient question.
- 32:16[SPEAKER_02]: not merely what intelligence can do, but what human authority, moral purpose and conception of the good, should govern it.
- 32:25[SPEAKER_02]: So, Jesus insists that AI remain under human control and serve human well-being, along with Trump's argument that today's decisions will shape peace and prosperity for decades, explicitly place, future,
- 32:40[SPEAKER_02]: technology beneath civilizational judgment.
- 32:44[SPEAKER_02]: Even their disagreement over guard rills reflects the archaea future premise that civilizations will not govern the same technological, they will not govern the same technology identically.
- 32:56[SPEAKER_02]: Each civilization will embed and encode AI.
- 33:01[SPEAKER_02]: With its own inherited political and moral vision.
- 33:04[SPEAKER_02]: Again, I've got an entire, I've got an entire chapter on that written extensively about this and the Sith Cosm gods algorithms and the rise of a civilization Cosmocracy.
- 33:13[SPEAKER_02]: If you'll, if you'll excuse the shameless plug there, China's AI will be encoded with the ideals of Tianshia.
- 33:22[SPEAKER_02]: our collective harmony, social order, a line then around a governing center, whereas USAI will be encoded with the ideals of the American Republican founding, individual liberty, open inquiry, free expression, constitutional restraint, and the conviction that truth emerges what Elon calls maximum truth-seeking, truth emerges through the free exercise of human reason
- 33:51[SPEAKER_02]: As for trade, for now, the United States and China have agreed to a trade truth.
- 33:58[SPEAKER_02]: So Tara, stay lower and China keeps supplying rare earth minerals, essential for American technology manufacturing.
- 34:06[SPEAKER_02]: But the truth resolves almost nothing about the deeper struggle over who controls advanced technology, critical resources, and global supply chains.
- 34:17[SPEAKER_02]: Treasury Secretary Scott Basins said it simply gives both sides a bit more time to negotiate while Beijing completes promises that are already made.
- 34:26[SPEAKER_02]: So trade, therefore continues, but security increasingly determines what may be bought and sold.
- 34:34[SPEAKER_02]: technology still crosses borders, but governments restrict anything that could strengthen a rival companies still operate globally, but Washington Beijing are trying to ensure that neither depends upon the other four resources and technologies is central to national security.
- 34:52[SPEAKER_02]: So this, for lack of a matter of term, this is managed interdependence.
- 34:56[SPEAKER_02]: American China still need each other.
- 34:58[SPEAKER_02]: Of course, they always will, but neither trust the other.
- 35:02[SPEAKER_02]: They're not divorcing, but they are renegotiating a difficult marriage, while preparing separate rooms, bank accounts, emergency plans, and the like.
- 35:11[SPEAKER_02]: The truce prevents an immediate confrontation, but it doesn't restore an old globalized world.
- 35:18[SPEAKER_02]: It merely gives both civilizations time to reduce their vulnerabilities and strengthen themselves whatever comes next.
- 35:25[SPEAKER_02]: Now without question,
- 35:28[SPEAKER_02]: The summit's most explosive possibility was a reported Iran for Taiwan bargain, the keep and eye on this in the ensuing weeks in Iran for Taiwan bargain.
- 35:42[SPEAKER_02]: So according to three sources familiar with the talks, Beijing offered to help pressure Iran over the Middle East war, while seeking American concessions on arm sales to Taiwan,
- 35:58[SPEAKER_02]: China possesses enormous leverage over Iran.
- 36:01[SPEAKER_02]: I know a lot of you know that if you've been following this channel, you'll know what and if not, make sure to smack that bell and subscribe button.
- 36:07[SPEAKER_02]: But if you've been following this channel for a while, you'll know that China has been Iran's chief finance here.
- 36:14[SPEAKER_02]: They bought up more than 80, some estimates are 90% of Iran shipped oil.
- 36:19[SPEAKER_02]: They continue to buy Iranian oil.
- 36:23[SPEAKER_02]: already stored on tankers outside the US blockade zone around Hormuz shipments.
- 36:31[SPEAKER_02]: There are no more shipments leaving Iran, but there are a host of ships that left before the blockade China continues to purchase that.
- 36:40[SPEAKER_02]: So they have enormous influence over Iran all the while.
- 36:47[SPEAKER_02]: Taiwan represents what Beijing calls its core core interests at the very least if China could cultivate diplomatic alignment with Taiwan.
- 37:02[SPEAKER_02]: It would be a very important part of overcoming that
- 37:06[SPEAKER_02]: the specter of the century of humiliation that still haunts Chinese consciousness.
- 37:12[SPEAKER_02]: So the apparent calculation is simple.
- 37:14[SPEAKER_02]: China could use its economic power to move Tehran toward serious negotiations.
- 37:19[SPEAKER_02]: While Trump could delay weapons for Taiwan or soften Washington's language on Taiwanese independence will have to see what happens there.
- 37:35[SPEAKER_02]: great powers recognize one another's fears of influence by frankly treating smaller nations as bargaining chips.
- 37:43[SPEAKER_02]: Obviously, that's, you know, it's from an idealistic perspective.
- 37:47[SPEAKER_02]: That's hard to swallow, but it is nevertheless reality for right or for wrong.
- 37:52[SPEAKER_02]: It's the realist position.
- 37:54[SPEAKER_02]: And in intrinsic part of this rising civilization was war is big powers.
- 38:00[SPEAKER_02]: Great powers actually get to decide the shape of the geopolitical chessboard.
- 38:07[SPEAKER_02]: So all of this said,
- 38:11[SPEAKER_02]: What did we actually witness this week in Washington?
- 38:16[SPEAKER_02]: We witness two historic civilizations presenting themselves to one another through their deepest symbols.
- 38:23[SPEAKER_02]: We witnessed Chinese rejuvenation and American restoration placed within the same diplomatic sentence.
- 38:30[SPEAKER_02]: We witnessed the two leading AI powers begin discussing whether artificial intelligence can remain under meaningful human control with the authoritarian regime signaling that it's getting a little nervous of how advanced AI is getting.
- 38:47[SPEAKER_02]: We witnessed trade transform from an economic issue into an infrastructure of national sovereignty.
- 38:54[SPEAKER_02]: And we witnessed Iran and Taiwan appear within the same geopolitical bargain, revealing the hierarchy of interest inside a multi-polar, multi-civilizational world.
- 39:07[SPEAKER_02]: In short, what we saw this week was a civilizational reorganization of the world.
- 39:14[SPEAKER_02]: It's not the end of rivalry, but it was an attempt to place rivalry within mutually beneficial limits.
- 39:22[SPEAKER_02]: It wasn't a peace treaty, but it was an effort to construct peace without sameness.
- 39:29[SPEAKER_02]: And it was not the creation of a finished world order, but it was indeed the moment that a new order became visible.
- 39:39[SPEAKER_02]: The new world order has awakened not the conciliac and spiritual caricature of one centralized world state controlling a homogenous humanity.
- 39:49[SPEAKER_02]: talk about not knowing what time it is.
- 39:52[SPEAKER_02]: Frankly, it's the opposite.
- 39:54[SPEAKER_02]: to world of multiple civilizations, a world of sovereign technological ecosystems, a world in which ancient memory returns to command futuristic power.
- 40:07[SPEAKER_02]: A world in which America becomes more American, China becomes more Chinese, India becomes more Indian Russia becomes more Russian, and other civilizational worlds increasingly recover their own identities as well.
- 40:22[SPEAKER_02]: a world in which the principal political question is no longer how to erase these differences under a common managerial system.
- 40:32[SPEAKER_02]: But how to order them toward coexistence in an ever-increasing technological acceleration that's even now reaching beyond our planet towards the moon, Mars,
- 40:45[SPEAKER_02]: and the stars themselves.
- 40:46[SPEAKER_02]: It's why I call it a civilization cosmocracy.
- 40:49[SPEAKER_02]: It extends beyond our planet into the cosmos itself.
- 40:54[SPEAKER_02]: That is the archaeo future.
- 40:56[SPEAKER_02]: And this week, we saw it rising in all of its splendor right before our very eyes.
- 41:05[SPEAKER_02]: Over to you, over to you, our super chats are up so fire away with any questions or comments.
- 41:11[SPEAKER_02]: I'll be more than happy to answer them right here on this livestream.
- 41:14[SPEAKER_02]: Also, you know, I hear people say all the time when it comes to gold.
- 41:19[SPEAKER_02]: I'm going to wait.
- 41:20[SPEAKER_02]: I'm going to wait for the price to come down.
- 41:23[SPEAKER_02]: I'm going to wait for inflation to settle.
- 41:24[SPEAKER_02]: I'm going to wait for the economy to stabilize.
- 41:26[SPEAKER_02]: I'm going to wait till things feel a little more normal.
- 41:29[SPEAKER_02]: But here's my question to you.
- 41:31[SPEAKER_02]: What exactly are you waiting for?
- 41:34[SPEAKER_02]: You see the likes of the wealthy around the world, right?
- 41:36[SPEAKER_02]: They're not waiting.
- 41:38[SPEAKER_02]: Look at the economic reality around the central banks around the world, continue accumulating gold, nations continue looking for alternatives to their dependence on the US dollar.
- 41:49[SPEAKER_02]: And we're watching and increasingly fragmented, global economy takes shape right in front of us.
- 41:56[SPEAKER_02]: These aren't isolated headlines gang.
- 41:58[SPEAKER_02]: These are structural changes.
- 42:00[SPEAKER_02]: And we've been talking about these trends on this channel for years.
- 42:03[SPEAKER_02]: So when someone tells me that they're waiting for the right time to look at gold, frankly, I think they're focused on the wrong thing.
- 42:11[SPEAKER_02]: Because if debt, currency concerns, central bank buying, geopolitical uncertainty are the reasons you were considering physical gold in the first place, what's changed?
- 42:25[SPEAKER_02]: That's the question.
- 42:26[SPEAKER_02]: Not whether you can perfectly time the prize, forget that.
- 42:29[SPEAKER_02]: Now whether gold is higher today than it was a year ago, it is.
- 42:33[SPEAKER_02]: But have the fundamental reasons for owning gold gone away.
- 42:38[SPEAKER_02]: And from where I said they haven't.
- 42:40[SPEAKER_02]: So that's why people are still looking at purchasing physical gold and silver directly while others are exploring whether a gold IRA makes sense for a portion of their retirement savings.
- 42:53[SPEAKER_02]: And if you're looking into either one, get educated first.
- 42:55[SPEAKER_02]: And that's why I trust Augusta Precious Metals.
- 42:58[SPEAKER_02]: Their experience education team will sit down with you one-on-one, explain physical gold and silver.
- 43:04[SPEAKER_02]: They'll walk you through how a gold IRA works.
- 43:08[SPEAKER_02]: They'll answer any one of your questions, and they'll help you understand your options before you make a decision.
- 43:15[SPEAKER_02]: go to turlybyschool.com or text turly to 35052 that's 35052 to request Augustus free god because waiting only makes sense if you're waiting for something fundamental to change.
- 43:30[SPEAKER_02]: That is still climbing.
- 43:31[SPEAKER_02]: Central banks are still buying.
- 43:34[SPEAKER_02]: The global order is still shifting.
- 43:36[SPEAKER_02]: The reasons for owning gold haven't changed frankly.
- 43:39[SPEAKER_02]: I don't think they ever will.
- 43:40[SPEAKER_02]: Not one bit.
- 43:42[SPEAKER_02]: Click on that link below.
- 43:43[SPEAKER_02]: Right now.
- 43:44[SPEAKER_02]: All right.
- 43:44[SPEAKER_02]: What do we got Josh?
- 43:46[SPEAKER_02]: What do we got?
- 43:51[SPEAKER_02]: Two, two, eight, uh, uh, Aussie.
- 43:54[SPEAKER_02]: There's, uh, ounce bear or whatever.
- 43:57[SPEAKER_02]: Florida Governor race is a Tulsa.
- 43:59[SPEAKER_02]: This is alarming.
- 44:00[SPEAKER_02]: Only in the, uh, only in the, uh, fantasy, um,
- 44:06[SPEAKER_02]: World of left-wing pollsters is a Florida governor's race, a toss-up.
- 44:12[SPEAKER_02]: Byron Daniels probably went by double digits.
- 44:16[SPEAKER_02]: You guys have to.
- 44:20[SPEAKER_02]: We do this every election cycle.
- 44:24[SPEAKER_02]: Look, hey, I'm your patron professor.
- 44:26[SPEAKER_02]: I help you make sense of the madness.
- 44:27[SPEAKER_02]: If you need me to talk you off the ledge, I'll be happy to do it.
- 44:31[SPEAKER_02]: Dude, you should pay me a little more than two bucks to do it.
- 44:35[SPEAKER_02]: I mean, if that's what you need me to do, I'll do it.
- 44:39[SPEAKER_02]: Look, just go back and look at the polls this time in 2024.
- 44:43[SPEAKER_02]: Go ahead.
- 44:44[SPEAKER_02]: You could go to real clear politics and you actually see the date and you'll see the polls.
- 44:47[SPEAKER_02]: Who was winning?
- 44:48[SPEAKER_02]: Who?
- 44:48[SPEAKER_02]: Who were we told was going to win in a landslide?
- 44:52[SPEAKER_02]: Who did Ann Salazar tell us was going to win Iowa by three point.
- 44:56[SPEAKER_02]: She was just off by 17.
- 44:58[SPEAKER_02]: I mean, guys, they do this every this is all for the purpose of pouring money into the coffers of Democrats because donors are idiots.
- 45:09[SPEAKER_02]: They're political morons.
- 45:11[SPEAKER_02]: They write checks for polls and it's an attempt to try to divert
- 45:17[SPEAKER_02]: Millions of millions of dollars from very competitive, truly competitive races to races that we're going to win by double digits because they try to scare us like this.
- 45:26[SPEAKER_02]: We'll remember on to Santos.
- 45:28[SPEAKER_02]: I mean, Ron to Santos is supposed to lose to Guillem by like eight points at this point.
- 45:32[SPEAKER_02]: So just do you're just going to have to weather the storm for the next couple of weeks because after that.
- 45:40[SPEAKER_02]: Well, for the exception of the salts are polling, most pollsters tighten up because they have to retain whatever little credence they still have left to maintain their their their grade level not be dropped down to an F or D level.
- 45:59[SPEAKER_02]: pollster if they're way way off so that they will you watch guarantee it.
- 46:04[SPEAKER_02]: I'll put money on it.
- 46:05[SPEAKER_02]: The polls are going to tighten dramatically over the next six weeks because pollsters have to do it.
- 46:12[SPEAKER_02]: But until then, they're left wingers.
- 46:13[SPEAKER_02]: The whole ethang regime is left wing.
- 46:16[SPEAKER_02]: All right.
- 46:17[SPEAKER_02]: It's it's called cultural Marxism.
- 46:18[SPEAKER_02]: They took over the institutions and one of the institutions they took over is polling.
- 46:23[SPEAKER_02]: I just don't know how many times I have to show that to.
- 46:26[SPEAKER_02]: We have study after study that shows this.
- 46:29[SPEAKER_02]: One of the most, I think, extensive polling studies of thousands of polls found that polls consistently lean four points in favor of Democrats.
- 46:46[SPEAKER_02]: So take whatever poll you see and just by definition, push it four points to the right.
- 46:54[SPEAKER_02]: Shadow of Axis, Shadow Facts is a horse.
- 46:58[SPEAKER_02]: I heard ST will be the new press secretary, me, I'd be horrible.
- 47:05[SPEAKER_02]: I'm not mean enough, I am not, I'm not, just not a, I'm not one of those singer kind of guys.
- 47:10[SPEAKER_02]: I know, I know press secretary, I know people who just have that personality where they just, they just, they just rhetorically take you down.
- 47:18[SPEAKER_02]: I'm just, that's not my personality, but thank you for that vote of confidence.
- 47:25[SPEAKER_02]: Brian, my daughter of your friend, all the news I see in the case of the Democrat, tuning up of affordability would drive the people to vote in November.
- 47:32[SPEAKER_02]: I recognize that the mainstream media will use misuse lie and manipulate in any way they can, to hurt Republicans to help Democrats, but how much do you think affordability changes votes in the midterms with fuel costs driving other prices higher that possible.
- 47:48[SPEAKER_02]: I'm absolutely.
- 47:48[SPEAKER_02]: No question about it.
- 47:49[SPEAKER_02]: Again, it goes back to the notion, can you have Iran and
- 47:54[SPEAKER_02]: the mid-terms.
- 47:54[SPEAKER_02]: I mean, Trump has been doing his best, I think, to try to end the tension and the disruption and horror moves, but to no avail.
- 48:06[SPEAKER_02]: We have trapped with operation economic freedom, we do have traffic going, but only at about 50% of pre-war norms.
- 48:15[SPEAKER_02]: Also, there's been disruption
- 48:22[SPEAKER_02]: So yeah, the Middle East continues to be a mess as it always is, and so Trump is, I think, banking on the fact that they can get the vote out of the low to no prop Republican voter that came out of mass in 2024, who, they just don't see the pain at the pump and then equate that, oh, I'm going to go vote for a coming.
- 48:48[SPEAKER_02]: They don't see the cost of living tensions and say, okay, therefore I'm going to vote for some third worldist islamososos.
- 48:57[SPEAKER_02]: It just, it doesn't necessarily translate into that.
- 49:00[SPEAKER_02]: It can, and it is a risk.
- 49:03[SPEAKER_02]: It is a risk, so your concern is justified as it is.
- 49:09[SPEAKER_02]: But but again, I'm just not seeing it again outside of these the only thing I'm seeing that's of concern right now is polling but by definition that's what we saw two years ago and I didn't you guys were pretty good with that now I remember that.
- 49:25[SPEAKER_02]: You guys are pretty good.
- 49:26[SPEAKER_02]: I didn't have to talk you guys off the, uh, I'm not talking to you Brian talking more generally.
- 49:30[SPEAKER_02]: I didn't have to talk you off the cliff or off the ledge with that, um, because all the polls were showing Kamala was going to crush it.
- 49:39[SPEAKER_02]: Kamala was going to was was was going to win in a landslide by seven eight points right around the side.
- 49:45[SPEAKER_02]: Again, go go look at the RCP.
- 49:48[SPEAKER_02]: Um, but you guys were, you were focused.
- 49:50[SPEAKER_02]: You were like, those are just, that's just propaganda.
- 49:53[SPEAKER_02]: That's not polling.
- 49:54[SPEAKER_02]: It's propaganda.
- 49:54[SPEAKER_02]: I'm going to focus in on.
- 49:56[SPEAKER_02]: You have to do the same thing for the midterms.
- 49:58[SPEAKER_02]: You got to focus in that we've got, we've got the money.
- 50:03[SPEAKER_02]: We've got the voter registration advantage.
- 50:06[SPEAKER_02]: And we've got the go TV, we've got the get out the vote campaign when people like Cliff Maloney, I'll be interviewing him next week, by the way, Pennsylvania Chays and he's doing it all over now nationally.
- 50:18[SPEAKER_02]: You got to put your trust in that and right now the signs that I'm seeing.
- 50:22[SPEAKER_02]: A particular like from Ohio, for example, very good.
- 50:25[SPEAKER_02]: It's very early, obviously.
- 50:26[SPEAKER_02]: We're just in the first week of just, you know, the early boat coming in, but the early boat looks good.
- 50:32[SPEAKER_02]: Now again, I'll let you know that'll be the key.
- 50:35[SPEAKER_02]: I think over the next few weeks, Seth cash will be doing his very powerful analysis projection.
- 50:42[SPEAKER_02]: that was so spot on back in 2024.
- 50:46[SPEAKER_02]: So that's what we'll be looking at in the weeks ahead and while more information more data to judge that goes beyond these silly little polls.
- 50:58[SPEAKER_02]: Tory, Dr. Steve, I call myself doom in quite a bit lately, but we need to remember the even November doesn't end perfectly.
- 51:03[SPEAKER_02]: God has a plan using control.
- 51:04[SPEAKER_02]: Thank you, Dr. Steve for staying positive.
- 51:06[SPEAKER_01]: Oh, amen.
- 51:07[SPEAKER_01]: Yeah.
- 51:08[SPEAKER_01]: Well, there's nothing they can do.
- 51:10[SPEAKER_02]: Congress is, I mean, Congress is dysfunctional.
- 51:15[SPEAKER_02]: There's no, you think, you think your frustrated with Republicans.
- 51:18[SPEAKER_02]: Now, why do you see Democrats, and how frustrated they're going to be with their party if they take control?
- 51:23[SPEAKER_01]: We're going to be able to do a damn thing.
- 51:26[SPEAKER_02]: Trump has all the power in the world as it were, according to Article 2, invested in him, executive power is incredibly awesome as the founding fathers envisioned it.
- 51:40[SPEAKER_02]: What it lacks is permanence.
- 51:42[SPEAKER_02]: All right, so what you can do is he can do all kinds of executive orders.
- 51:46[SPEAKER_02]: He can ignore judges like he's been doing with CNN and MSNBC, still locking them out.
- 51:54[SPEAKER_02]: Republicans aren't going to go with the vast majority of Republicans are never going to go with Democrats.
- 51:59[SPEAKER_02]: You don't have to worry about that.
- 52:00[SPEAKER_02]: That's not going to happen.
- 52:02[SPEAKER_02]: So Trump could do whatever he wants.
- 52:04[SPEAKER_02]: They're not going to be able to do anything to him.
- 52:07[SPEAKER_02]: The only worry you have is if you have a Supreme Court justice, they can see.
- 52:12[SPEAKER_02]: But I think, I think JD can take care of that in 2028.
- 52:21[SPEAKER_02]: Winston, the conscience of the Conservative movement, thanks for always keeping us positive and focused.
- 52:26[SPEAKER_02]: Oh, thank you, Winston.
- 52:27[SPEAKER_02]: It's very kind.
- 52:28[SPEAKER_02]: I'm not worthy of that title, but I appreciate that.
- 52:31[SPEAKER_02]: Thank you.
- 52:34[SPEAKER_02]: Texas on the shock does Trump even care if he wins the court battle over the press bands was he already got what he wanted yeah no you already got what he wanted he doesn't care he I mean that's how he that's how he treats he he likes to smack the legacy media round.
- 52:50[SPEAKER_02]: Periodically, because nothing energizes his voters quite like that.
- 52:54[SPEAKER_02]: His voters love it when he takes on the legacy media and humiliates them shows them just how pathetic and ridiculous and then gets them to act like the narcissistic little bitches that they that they are they're just psychopath left left wing psychopath
- 53:09[SPEAKER_02]: So no, I think he got what he wants and then again, he can just play around with it and say, oh, your card doesn't work, your your your press credentials don't work.
- 53:16[SPEAKER_02]: The badge doesn't want.
- 53:17[SPEAKER_02]: Sorry.
- 53:18[SPEAKER_02]: We'll see if we can fix that in a month or so.
- 53:21[SPEAKER_02]: He's he's just having too much fun with it.
- 53:25[SPEAKER_02]: Joan, how can economic policy would try to be leveraged to pressure China to stop persecuting religious groups in China.
- 53:32[SPEAKER_02]: And why do they see them as threats anyway?
- 53:35[SPEAKER_02]: That's a good question.
- 53:37[SPEAKER_02]: That's a very good question.
- 53:38[SPEAKER_02]: Well, bottom line in the end is what Trump is trying to do, big picture is he's trying to, what two things, he's trying to box out China from realizing their vision of Tianxia, which is all the mandate under heaven where the whole world ends up getting recalibrated around Beijing.
- 54:01[SPEAKER_02]: They've been enormously successful
- 54:05[SPEAKER_02]: Belt and Road initiative, where 80% of the nation's 80% of the world's nations have China's their number one trade partner.
- 54:16[SPEAKER_02]: So they've been very, very successful with that.
- 54:19[SPEAKER_02]: And so they were, but they were starting to close in on major choke points, energy choke
- 54:34[SPEAKER_02]: Indonesia.
- 54:35[SPEAKER_02]: So what Trump has been doing is he's been seizing control of those choke points and in effect boxing China out from having any control like that.
- 54:46[SPEAKER_02]: So now he controls the choke points.
- 54:48[SPEAKER_02]: Okay.
- 54:49[SPEAKER_02]: And then China relies on the United States primarily for AI hardware and processors.
- 54:59[SPEAKER_02]: That won't always be the case, but it's gonna be the case for the foreseeable future.
- 55:04[SPEAKER_02]: And so they need us.
- 55:05[SPEAKER_02]: They need our help with that sort of stuff.
- 55:06[SPEAKER_02]: So they can rip it off, basically, and create a deep sea, and K3, and so on there.
- 55:13[SPEAKER_02]: They're versions of chatGPT and the like.
- 55:15[SPEAKER_02]: That's, you know, Chinese just basically create parallel,
- 55:20[SPEAKER_02]: you know parallel models of whatever we we create.
- 55:24[SPEAKER_02]: So those are those are very strong and China needs China obviously needs trade routes kept open.
- 55:31[SPEAKER_02]: The straight-em-a-malaka actually 80% of Chinese imports come through the straight-em-a-malaka around Indonesian.
- 55:42[SPEAKER_02]: Malaysian.
- 55:43[SPEAKER_02]: So they're very, very dependent on that today.
- 55:48[SPEAKER_02]: If we can make life very hard for them, we're, we're going to close that down or just disrupt it.
- 55:54[SPEAKER_02]: So they need that route, they need their AI processors and, and infrastructure.
- 56:02[SPEAKER_02]: So you can use that as a bargaining chip to try to get the CCP to lift the finger off of, say, Christians.
- 56:12[SPEAKER_02]: Weegers are gonna be a hard call.
- 56:14[SPEAKER_02]: Weegers are gonna be a tough call because the weegers have been successfully cast for right or for wrong as basically alkita fanatics.
- 56:26[SPEAKER_02]: So that's how China gets the political cloud to do, to crack down on them the way they're cracking down.
- 56:33[SPEAKER_02]: Christians of demolishing churches and so forth, we can utilize the help of the Vatican, which is very powerful, theo political force in the world.
- 56:50[SPEAKER_02]: And even the Russian Orthodox Church can be very powerful in that as well.
- 56:57[SPEAKER_02]: But again, RSC tends to be very specific to Orthodoxy.
- 57:02[SPEAKER_02]: But if you can enlist the Vatican, the Moscow Patriarch and the United States, you do get sort of a full court press of Catholic Orthodox and Protestant dynamics that put some pressure on China to
- 57:19[SPEAKER_02]: to to relieve Christian presence in the country as to why they're considered to be such a threat.
- 57:26[SPEAKER_02]: It's a threat to the CCP's power that they see embodied in their vision of the mandate of heaven.
- 57:34[SPEAKER_02]: Now again, whether they actually believe in this Confucian vision or not, it's irrelevant.
- 57:40[SPEAKER_02]: The fact that this Confucian vision of Tianxia all under having the harmony under heaven maintained by a government, by an emperor as the mediator between heaven and earth, that is very popular in Chinese, the Chinese consciousness has overwhelming support when they talk that way.
- 58:04[SPEAKER_02]: And so they see Christianity in Islam as not comporting with that mandate under heaven.
- 58:11[SPEAKER_02]: They see them as actually challenging it.
- 58:13[SPEAKER_02]: Just like in many ways, the Roman emperor saw Christianity challenging Caesar's lordship by virtue of Christ's lordship.
- 58:25[SPEAKER_02]: Rockdog, Dr. Steve, your video us at about the silence of the climate crisis clowns.
- 58:29[SPEAKER_02]: Remind me of a great moment on Rush Limbaugh show back in 95, Charlton Heston, reading that great prologue from Jurassic Park, John Coleman was right, the left really doesn't trust the science do they know brilliant point, they don't, they don't science has been totally politicized.
- 58:47[SPEAKER_02]: So science is just used as a as a means of manipulation as we saw back in during the pandemic and and we're seeing it with we're seeing it certainly with with AI.
- 59:00[SPEAKER_02]: I'm sorry with with climate change.
- 59:02[SPEAKER_02]: We are also seeing it with AI, which is interesting, but it's more on the right.
- 59:06[SPEAKER_02]: The right treats AI the way the left treats climate alarmism.
- 59:11[SPEAKER_02]: So, you know, unfortunately, we have a lot of our, you know, sky is falling, clearing colors who are arguing virtually identically when it comes to AI apocalypticism, the way Greta argues with environmental apocalypticism, both are frauds.
- 59:36[SPEAKER_02]: Joe Wells, have you seen the videos on YouTube claiming Trump suffered seizures, making his speech to the United Nations?
- 59:42[SPEAKER_02]: Also they are claiming he had a stroke and shows signs of early dementia, just shows a desperate the Democrats have become in my opinion, you're to, yeah, and then the irony is they, you know, again, Trump and G are laughing over the auto-pen portrait in the White House grounds, yeah, what do you get to say?
- 1:00:02[SPEAKER_02]: I mean, it's just hilarious.
- 1:00:05[SPEAKER_02]: You know, straining in that while swallowing a camel, you strain the Nat based on a jester Trump makes, but you swallow the camel of someone literally with dementia in the White House sleeping half the time, calling a lid or after 11 a.m. who couldn't even put together a coherent sentence.
- 1:00:27[SPEAKER_02]: I mean, come on.
- 1:00:29[SPEAKER_02]: Yeah, get away with that argument.
- 1:00:32[SPEAKER_02]: Yeah, we're going to.
- 1:00:33[SPEAKER_02]: Dan, she claims that we should be slow with AI because it's fodder for anti-A groups in the US, which help China pull ahead.
- 1:00:42[SPEAKER_02]: Oh, she doesn't have to worry about the will of the people.
- 1:00:45[SPEAKER_01]: Yeah, no, I'm with you, that's valid.
- 1:00:48[SPEAKER_02]: That's valid, he may be playing to the fears of the sort of the apocalyptic right, the Alex Jones side of things.
- 1:00:58[SPEAKER_02]: They just, I don't think they have that much influence.
- 1:01:02[SPEAKER_02]: I think it's much more an admission to be honest with you, Dan, I think it's more in line with the dictators dilemma that authoritarian regimes can come, they can create an AI that controls the people, but how do you control the AI?
- 1:01:21[SPEAKER_02]: There's a little problem there.
- 1:01:23[SPEAKER_02]: That AI that's controlling the people,
- 1:01:26[SPEAKER_02]: is, you know, it's, it itself risks end up controlling the controllers and that's what they're ultimately, I think, fearful love.
- 1:01:41[SPEAKER_02]: maggots, 24th of Dr. Steve, I think we've gotten used to the breakneck speed Trump and his administration moves every year in this administration, more gets accomplished in four years of any previous administration.
- 1:01:52[SPEAKER_02]: Do you believe that they have battle plan the whole four years and are just going down a list of things to do and say, I so I understand, I think there's a yes to that.
- 1:02:02[SPEAKER_02]: I think it's there's pivoting and there's you're updating, but I think they had a basic battle plan.
- 1:02:10[SPEAKER_02]: And they're marching full steam ahead with it with plenty of pivots and plenty of additions added in.
- 1:02:18[SPEAKER_02]: But there is no question we've not seen in administration like this since 1932 since FDR coming in.
- 1:02:24[SPEAKER_02]: No question about that.
- 1:02:29[SPEAKER_02]: Steven Conner G is lying the CCP is behind an AI so he wants to slow down to catch it.
- 1:02:34[SPEAKER_02]: That could be another thing too.
- 1:02:35[SPEAKER_02]: Absolutely.
- 1:02:36[SPEAKER_02]: No, they are behind an AI.
- 1:02:40[SPEAKER_02]: Again, because we have everything.
- 1:02:42[SPEAKER_02]: We've got the AI systems.
- 1:02:44[SPEAKER_02]: We've got the infrastructure.
- 1:02:45[SPEAKER_02]: We've got the multiple competing companies that are racing against each other to try to get the ultimate.
- 1:02:52[SPEAKER_02]: AI, certainly, Elon's on the front lines of that, and that's very hard to compete against when it's a top-down structure that CCP has.
- 1:03:04[SPEAKER_02]: But that said, don't discount the dictator's dilemma.
- 1:03:07[SPEAKER_02]: That's a very interesting thing and very few on the right ever talk about.
- 1:03:10[SPEAKER_02]: I have not actually never heard anyone on the right talk about it.
- 1:03:16[SPEAKER_02]: We can with be one of the next steps when the eight circuits stay ends on the 28th zero chance Missouri will go back to the old map.
- 1:03:25[SPEAKER_02]: These judiciary, I don't see it.
- 1:03:27[SPEAKER_02]: We'll see obviously next week on Monday, I, I, I, I, I think, I think the stay will remain in place, they can make it permanent and or the, the Supreme Court can finally step in.
- 1:03:47[SPEAKER_02]: I think the reason why the Supreme Court did not step in.
- 1:03:51[SPEAKER_02]: I think Cavanol blocked at the last time is because the Missouri Supreme Court was dealing with state law and they leave that alone.
- 1:04:02[SPEAKER_02]: Where's the eighth circuit court of appeals is dealing with federal law, and that to
- 1:04:13[SPEAKER_02]: interfere for court to interfere with districts after the primaries been held and before the election is a violation of the civil rights of those involved in the voting.
- 1:04:28[SPEAKER_02]: And not to mention, not to mention the candidates as well.
- 1:04:31[SPEAKER_02]: We spent plenty of money through no fault of their own on districts that were signed into law by the governor.
- 1:04:42[SPEAKER_02]: Now, they had no problem over turning the idiot colorado Supreme Court that tried to keep Trump off the ballot.
- 1:04:51[SPEAKER_02]: They had no problem of going this.
- 1:04:52[SPEAKER_02]: So I don't understand why they didn't have a problem coming in here.
- 1:04:54[SPEAKER_02]: There's ample Supreme Court precedent for overturning a decision like that.
- 1:05:09[SPEAKER_02]: the law after the primaries are held.
- 1:05:15[SPEAKER_02]: Robo guy, if we lose the house, we keep the Senate.
- 1:05:17[SPEAKER_02]: Well, that means the save-back web trouble getting past.
- 1:05:20[SPEAKER_02]: I know some Senate bills go to Trump, but it goes back to the house first thought.
- 1:05:24[SPEAKER_02]: So as I understand it, they would have to pass the house bill like as or as written, and then they would probably be OK.
- 1:05:36[SPEAKER_02]: Regardless, Trump is already.
- 1:05:37[SPEAKER_02]: He's doing so much with election integrity right now,
- 1:05:45[SPEAKER_02]: with his DOJ, Harme Dillon, the deputy district attorney, or attorney general, sending letters to all 50 states plus.
- 1:06:00[SPEAKER_02]: D.C. telling them you're going to be watched and if any of you, we find any evidence of any of you engaging in any election shenanigans, we're going to throw the book at you.
- 1:06:11[SPEAKER_02]: So I mean, it's pretty it's pretty good stuff, but yet no, you could you could basically just tune out
- 1:06:19[SPEAKER_02]: article one for the next two years, the legislative branch for the next two years.
- 1:06:23[SPEAKER_02]: It's just going to be it's going to be an ineffective dysfunctional clown show with how keen Jeffries there making an ass out of self every single day in front of the cameras and Trump just ignoring
- 1:06:39[SPEAKER_02]: Willow tool, I love to see Musk involved with CNN because it would give Fox a run for its money while also being a station that would be a just the fact super station and not lean left or right.
- 1:06:52[SPEAKER_02]: Newsmax has dropped that by Fox and when American news is unavailable, frankly, outside the show's Fox is a liberal as the rest, which I have no problems, but presented as such
- 1:07:09[SPEAKER_02]: I couldn't, I couldn't really understand that last part outside the shows, Fox is a, oh, outside the shows.
- 1:07:15[SPEAKER_02]: Yes, okay, unavailable.
- 1:07:16[SPEAKER_02]: And frankly, outside the shows.
- 1:07:18[SPEAKER_02]: Oh, I get it.
- 1:07:19[SPEAKER_02]: So newsmax is a dwarfed by Fox.
- 1:07:24[SPEAKER_02]: I think that's a demand.
- 1:07:25[SPEAKER_02]: And when America is unavailable to you, and you find Fox to liberal when it comes just to its news coverage, which it is.
- 1:07:33[SPEAKER_02]: I mean,
- 1:07:39[SPEAKER_02]: No, I think you're right, I think I think Musk being a major investor of this paramount merger with Warner Bros.
- 1:07:50[SPEAKER_02]: Discovery would be astonishing.
- 1:07:53[SPEAKER_02]: And I think he would force clearly force CNN to be more akin to maybe news nation, news nation is trying to do that.
- 1:08:02[SPEAKER_02]: But I think more right-wing.
- 1:08:04[SPEAKER_02]: because that would garner, they would want to scalp as much of foxes, disgruntled audience as possible.
- 1:08:13[SPEAKER_02]: And there's plenty of disgruntled audience, because Fox has plenty of these Carl Roe of Neocons and then just frankly, left wing, you know, decision-desk people in the like that just
- 1:08:27[SPEAKER_02]: and they're pulling is abysmal.
- 1:08:29[SPEAKER_02]: Fox is pulling is an insult to pulling.
- 1:08:33[SPEAKER_02]: They make left wing poles look right wing.
- 1:08:35[SPEAKER_02]: So there's plenty to dislike about Fox.
- 1:08:38[SPEAKER_02]: No question.
- 1:08:39[SPEAKER_02]: There's plenty to love about it, but plenty to dislike about it.
- 1:08:43[SPEAKER_02]: And by the way, and I think that'll make Fox more honest because they'll do more of what they can to try to keep those viewers and not get them poached by a renewed
- 1:09:00[SPEAKER_02]: Grab a guy, the polling of the youth either were doomed, because they're going socialist or it's wrong, because most young people have seen hate it and don't want it.
- 1:09:07[SPEAKER_02]: Yeah, I just, just, you got, again, for me, polling catches my attention when it leans right.
- 1:09:16[SPEAKER_02]: Right.
- 1:09:16[SPEAKER_02]: You're probably noticed that.
- 1:09:17[SPEAKER_02]: Anytime I do polling, it's on how the Republicans are crushing it.
- 1:09:22[SPEAKER_02]: And I do that because, again, we have studies of thousands of polls that have shown on average they lean anywhere from four to six points to the left.
- 1:09:33[SPEAKER_02]: Polling is a Democrat skewed industry, either by the pollsters or by the respondents.
- 1:09:40[SPEAKER_02]: So whatever young people they're talking about, it's not real young people.
- 1:09:45[SPEAKER_02]: It's going to be cosmopolitan.
- 1:09:46[SPEAKER_02]: It's going to be urban young people.
- 1:09:49[SPEAKER_02]: Those are the overwhelming respondents.
- 1:09:52[SPEAKER_02]: And then what they have to do is they have to try to
- 1:09:56[SPEAKER_02]: You know, they have to try to weigh the response, the responses in standards that always always undermine under represent the Republicans.
- 1:10:14[SPEAKER_02]: So just don't pay attention to him.
- 1:10:17[SPEAKER_02]: I really wouldn't.
- 1:10:18[SPEAKER_02]: And in Europe, young people voting far right.
- 1:10:21[SPEAKER_02]: They're not voting for the socialist.
- 1:10:28[SPEAKER_02]: Sean, Dr. Steve, what are your thoughts in XRP or Ripple versus Bitcoin?
- 1:10:33[SPEAKER_02]: And are you familiar with Japan's embedding reverse carry trade and what that means for America?
- 1:10:38[SPEAKER_02]: No, I do not.
- 1:10:39[SPEAKER_02]: I have to catch up on that last one.
- 1:10:44[SPEAKER_02]: Ripple versus Bitcoin.
- 1:10:50[SPEAKER_02]: I don't know if there's, so I guess in my head, there's not a versus.
- 1:10:54[SPEAKER_02]: I've got both Bitcoin and Ripple, but I'm much, much more heavily invested in Bitcoin is just a long, whole store of value.
- 1:11:04[SPEAKER_02]: Whereas I just, I don't see, I don't see Ripple doing its thing yet, but again, it always could.
- 1:11:12[SPEAKER_02]: That's the thing.
- 1:11:18[SPEAKER_02]: Allagging indicator was Bitcoin's leading indicator.
- 1:11:21[SPEAKER_02]: It's the way it is for the whole crypto ecology.
- 1:11:25[SPEAKER_02]: Wherever crypto go, wherever Bitcoin goes, Ripple sure to follow up or down, good or ugly.
- 1:11:33[SPEAKER_02]: And, but I like Ripple, I like it and defy.
- 1:11:40[SPEAKER_02]: I haven't played with it in a while.
- 1:11:41[SPEAKER_02]: I've been since the market was flat before the next,
- 1:11:48[SPEAKER_02]: uh, cycle here, starting year one.
- 1:11:51[SPEAKER_02]: So the market is really crushing it right now right there if you guys if you guys are in the crypto right now you're you're loving it even even uh, what's his name Michael sailors.
- 1:12:01[SPEAKER_02]: Uh, what's it my, um,
- 1:12:05[SPEAKER_02]: micro whatever it is is even that's that's growing by leaps and bounds.
- 1:12:10[SPEAKER_02]: So it's after being incredibly flat and losing so much of its value.
- 1:12:15[SPEAKER_02]: So micro share as I would is.
- 1:12:17[SPEAKER_02]: So anyway, I like both.
- 1:12:19[SPEAKER_02]: I have both.
- 1:12:21[SPEAKER_02]: But I'm not an expert enough in being able to say, like, what's the differences and what's the promise of each.
- 1:12:28[SPEAKER_02]: I just, I do stick with, I like Ripple and I have used it in and defy and in liquidity pools and things like that.
- 1:12:39[SPEAKER_02]: Thanks, Sean, that's awesome.
- 1:12:41[SPEAKER_02]: That in, according to Larry O'Connor, 37-year-old, Tyler Freakos, Mama plans to move to Washington to see, so to keep him out of trouble if he wins the Texas Centitorial Election.
- 1:12:51[SPEAKER_02]: Detectives want a real man or a mama's boy as the US Senator representing Texas.
- 1:12:57[SPEAKER_02]: They're going to want a real man.
- 1:12:59[SPEAKER_02]: I can assure you it would be, it would be a shock in the state of the universe.
- 1:13:08[SPEAKER_02]: The only thing that's telling us Tyler Rico's going to pull us off is left-wing pulls.
- 1:13:15[SPEAKER_02]: Texas, when Trump goes along with these injunctions, does he just encourage them to do it more even if it gets overturned later?
- 1:13:22[SPEAKER_02]: Well, no, well, I guess in a sense, you could say he does.
- 1:13:26[SPEAKER_02]: There's really nothing he can do.
- 1:13:28[SPEAKER_02]: I mean, this is the way the balance of power works.
- 1:13:31[SPEAKER_02]: The judiciary could push him back and then he can go through an appellate process.
- 1:13:36[SPEAKER_02]: And then the Supreme Court makes the ultimate decision as the revenue.
- 1:13:40[SPEAKER_02]: I mean, basically judges are supposed to function as non-partisan referees.
- 1:13:45[SPEAKER_02]: The problem is the Supreme Court is allowing the radical partisanization.
- 1:13:52[SPEAKER_02]: I can do this of our judiciary by the Democrats and their court shopping and judge shopping and the like.
- 1:13:58[SPEAKER_02]: Now, they've reprimanded judges.
- 1:14:02[SPEAKER_02]: They've reprimanded Democrats doing the judge shopping, but they have done nothing to hold anybody in contempt.
- 1:14:09[SPEAKER_02]: So I think Trump is just, you know, he's just going with, I mean, keep in mind when you say he goes along with these injunctions.
- 1:14:17[SPEAKER_02]: He goes along with them partly, like just as CNN and MSNBC, they've been doing the reporting decide walk today.
- 1:14:24[SPEAKER_02]: And they were doing the reporting from the sidewalk last night.
- 1:14:27[SPEAKER_02]: They're still locked out.
- 1:14:28[SPEAKER_02]: You know, he'll get to it.
- 1:14:30[SPEAKER_02]: Okay.
- 1:14:31[SPEAKER_02]: No, we're going to comply with that ruling next week or next month.
- 1:14:36[SPEAKER_02]: Takes a while, work out, you know, bureaucracy and all.
- 1:14:39[SPEAKER_02]: So he has fun with it.
- 1:14:40[SPEAKER_02]: I wouldn't worry about it too much.
- 1:14:44[SPEAKER_02]: Dr. T. Rex, what sort of October surprise does Donald J. Trump have for that?
- 1:14:49[SPEAKER_02]: Oh my heavens, that's a great question.
- 1:14:51[SPEAKER_02]: I don't know.
- 1:14:53[SPEAKER_02]: I think it might be something with Iran.
- 1:14:57[SPEAKER_02]: It might be something with oil prices dropping dramatically.
- 1:15:03[SPEAKER_02]: Certainly, I think we got some scandals coming up.
- 1:15:07[SPEAKER_02]: Could go the other way, too.
- 1:15:08[SPEAKER_02]: Just, you know, it's politics, right?
- 1:15:10[SPEAKER_02]: But great
- 1:15:16[SPEAKER_02]: Stephanie did, uh, do not forget many Democrats are banning their party at levels never seemed before correct.
- 1:15:23[SPEAKER_02]: We've actually seen that with voter registration.
- 1:15:25[SPEAKER_02]: We've got very hard data for that.
- 1:15:27[SPEAKER_02]: Democrats have been losing voters.
- 1:15:29[SPEAKER_02]: They've been hemorrhaging voters ever since 2020.
- 1:15:31[SPEAKER_02]: It's been going on for quite a while now for about six years just as Pennsylvania.
- 1:15:36[SPEAKER_02]: Remember, Pennsylvania 10 years ago had a million Democrat voter registration edge.
- 1:15:41[SPEAKER_02]: Now it's basically
- 1:15:43[SPEAKER_02]: I mean, it's insane how we've seen that ship, same with Ohio, same with North Carolina, same with Iowa.
- 1:15:51[SPEAKER_02]: So yes, you want to look at voter registration, you want to look at money, and then you want to look at early voting.
- 1:15:58[SPEAKER_02]: That's just starting to trickle in this week.
- 1:16:01[SPEAKER_02]: And we are starting to get some pretty interesting pictures on the early voting, particularly with Ohio.
- 1:16:06[SPEAKER_02]: Ohio is important because where Ohio goes, Iowa goes a little further.
- 1:16:11[SPEAKER_02]: So Ohio, however it votes, Iowa votes slightly to the right of Ohio every time.
- 1:16:21[SPEAKER_02]: And then, however, Iowa votes taxes votes to the right of Iowa every single time.
- 1:16:28[SPEAKER_02]: So,
- 1:16:28[SPEAKER_02]: And we're getting a very good sense right now of what's, again, it's still so early, but we are getting a good sense that Democrats are getting, they're getting relaxed in Ohio.
- 1:16:39[SPEAKER_02]: And if that's the case, they'll be getting relaxed in Iowa and
- 1:16:48[SPEAKER_02]: Texas, speaking of on the Paris Agreement, I was actually when I got on board with Trump completely before that had just been waiting for the other shoe to drop.
- 1:16:56[SPEAKER_02]: When he pulled us out for some reason, it clicked that he really is serious.
- 1:16:59[SPEAKER_02]: Absolutely.
- 1:17:01[SPEAKER_02]: And you know, there are scholars like John Mirashimer.
- 1:17:05[SPEAKER_02]: uh... who's no fan of the liberal international order but he's no fan of trump either but that's the one thing he said as he said you in back in twenty sixteen if you could summarize trump's entire campaign in terms of foreign policy it would be about it's all about dismantling the international orders calling nato obsolete he was a full supporter of brexit which is unheard of
- 1:17:30[SPEAKER_02]: for U.S. President working in tandem with the bullies and Brussels.
- 1:17:33[SPEAKER_02]: Well, at that time, he was a candidate saying he even said, call me Mr. Brexit, he wanted bilateral trade agreements rather than multilateral trade agreements mediated through the IMF and the WTO and the World Trade Organization and World Bank of the Light.
- 1:17:49[SPEAKER_02]: So no question, he is very serious about dismantling the Liberal International Order and Paris Accords were central to that.
- 1:18:00[SPEAKER_02]: Big, youngest DJT is literally reshaping the global order for 100 plus years of American prosperity, I think, in dominance.
- 1:18:09[SPEAKER_02]: Is it property, in dominance?
- 1:18:11[SPEAKER_02]: The issue is our instant gratification society.
- 1:18:14[SPEAKER_02]: Yes, it can be, yeah, it's always been, but that's always been a problem in American politics.
- 1:18:19[SPEAKER_02]: But it's a problem that does tame itself.
- 1:18:22[SPEAKER_02]: uh to uh to uh you know it's a big country and so it's particularly red states always tend to what we now know is red states tend to save us uh and move us in the right direction.
- 1:18:34[SPEAKER_02]: All the population is moving there.
- 1:18:36[SPEAKER_02]: All the industry is moving there.
- 1:18:38[SPEAKER_02]: They have 20% more GDP in red states than blue states.
- 1:18:42[SPEAKER_02]: All the fertility rate in red states or it's 15% higher than in blue states
- 1:18:50[SPEAKER_02]: because it's so religiously dense.
- 1:18:52[SPEAKER_02]: So it's, I mean, I came across a stat.
- 1:18:57[SPEAKER_02]: that there's so many more red states and blue states right now that the Democrats won every single swing state all seven swing states in the Senate they'd have about fifty two fifty three Senate I guess you have fifty two fifty three senators right now as we speak if the Republicans won every single swing state they'd have like seventy two they have seventy two senators so that's why the left ten state the Senate all the powers moving towards towards the right
- 1:19:29[SPEAKER_02]: Stephanie, I Dr. Steve speaking, new stations.
- 1:19:32[SPEAKER_02]: How did the new stations legacy me to get so one-sided?
- 1:19:35[SPEAKER_02]: I never understood how it got to this point.
- 1:19:38[SPEAKER_02]: Please explain, thank you.
- 1:19:39[SPEAKER_02]: Thanks, Stephanie.
- 1:19:41[SPEAKER_02]: Um, yeah, it's... How do I condense this?
- 1:19:47[SPEAKER_02]: You know, it really come.
- 1:19:49[SPEAKER_02]: I think it comes down to the secularization of society.
- 1:19:52[SPEAKER_02]: So I have read some histories of journalism, history of media and media anthropology.
- 1:19:59[SPEAKER_02]: And what they noticed is that in the 19th century, media was basically partisanized.
- 1:20:06[SPEAKER_02]: Okay, so like where I am, I'm right near Cecil County, Maryland, and Cecil County, Maryland, had two newspapers.
- 1:20:15[SPEAKER_02]: The Cecil County wig and the Cecil County Democrat, the wigs were the precursors to the Republicans.
- 1:20:21[SPEAKER_02]: And so news was reported.
- 1:20:24[SPEAKER_02]: from a values-based perspective.
- 1:20:27[SPEAKER_02]: So here's what we on the left think of the issues and how we would surmise them.
- 1:20:34[SPEAKER_02]: Here's what we on the right think of the issues and how we would surmise them.
- 1:20:39[SPEAKER_02]: And then it was up to the reader to synthesize it, to try to abstract
- 1:20:45[SPEAKER_02]: The objective facts, what they both overlap with, like numbers and stats and data, the objective facts, and then go with which side they think had the better interpretation and solutions.
- 1:21:00[SPEAKER_02]: But in the 20th century, the journalism started, you had the rise what's called professional journalism, where they started buying into the notion that they could be scientifically objective.
- 1:21:12[SPEAKER_02]: and scientific objectivity by its nature de-traditionalizes.
- 1:21:19[SPEAKER_02]: It pushes religious, nationalist, culturalist loyalties to the side.
- 1:21:29[SPEAKER_02]: And instead imposes this very sterile, secularized conception of history and data and fact.
- 1:21:40[SPEAKER_02]: And that, because of that de-traditionalizing process, that tended to move very leftist.
- 1:21:47[SPEAKER_02]: And it's largely just the nature of the modern world, the modern secular world, was a leftist project.
- 1:21:56[SPEAKER_02]: They didn't think of it that way.
- 1:21:57[SPEAKER_02]: They just thought they were being scientific, but at a target it involved
- 1:22:03[SPEAKER_02]: re-it-involve pushing religion out of the public square and replacing it with religion with that reason pushing the sacred out of the public square and replacing it with science pushing faith out of the public square and replacing it with fact and then that by itself created a politics
- 1:22:23[SPEAKER_02]: where politics was considered natural normal, if it intentionally liberated liberal, liberated emancipated populations from these old religious
- 1:22:39[SPEAKER_02]: culturalist civilization was frames of reference.
- 1:22:42[SPEAKER_02]: So the media became a cheerleader for that kind of politics.
- 1:22:46[SPEAKER_02]: And then that just turned into generic left wing politics, liberal politics, emancipatory politics.
- 1:22:53[SPEAKER_02]: And now they just, they just root for the Democrats.
- 1:22:56[SPEAKER_02]: It's just, it's just, it's just been associated now with a party.
- 1:22:59[SPEAKER_02]: And so it doesn't matter who you are if you're a Democrat, you're good as far as our concern.
- 1:23:03[SPEAKER_02]: So that's basically how it.
- 1:23:05[SPEAKER_02]: But now ironically, we're back to where we were.
- 1:23:09[SPEAKER_02]: Ironically, the 19th century where we understand facts through the lens of values.
- 1:23:15[SPEAKER_02]: through a political values, civilization of values, we're back to that now.
- 1:23:19[SPEAKER_02]: That's the beauty of the internet age or the network society.
- 1:23:23[SPEAKER_02]: Is that more and more are news coverage now is being presented as objectively as possible while at the same time, like Russia's do talk radio in general, while at the same time affirming the nationalist, culturalist, traditionalist,
- 1:23:42[SPEAKER_02]: values that make that give those facts meaning and purpose and then what we say is our values of nation, culture, custom and tradition blow away and beat every single time the values of liberal globalism of borderless society and shipping our manufacturing overseas and replacing our traditions with wokeness.
- 1:24:05[SPEAKER_02]: Mitchell, do you think Trump could get down gas before midterms?
- 1:24:09[SPEAKER_02]: I feel that that's the majority issues losing on right now.
- 1:24:12[SPEAKER_01]: I don't know the answer to that Mitchell.
- 1:24:14[SPEAKER_01]: I honestly don't, it may be an October surprise.
- 1:24:18[SPEAKER_02]: Yeah, he may be losing on it a bit.
- 1:24:21[SPEAKER_02]: I don't know by how much.
- 1:24:23[SPEAKER_02]: because I don't know how that automatically translates to, oh, crap, gas is $4.50, let me go and vote for the county is Lamo-Woke fascist, you know, I just, I don't know how that translates.
- 1:24:40[SPEAKER_02]: Right now, from the early voting that we're seeing, particularly in Ohio, that's a bell weather for states like Iowa and Texas.
- 1:24:51[SPEAKER_02]: right now in the early voting and again, it's very early.
- 1:24:54[SPEAKER_02]: So I caution you to extrapolate anything absolute from this.
- 1:24:59[SPEAKER_02]: Right now it looks like the Democrats are getting crushed.
- 1:25:02[SPEAKER_02]: Now they're doing well in Virginia, but Virginia is a blue state and it's not, it's not predictive of anything.
- 1:25:08[SPEAKER_02]: Ohio is, Ohio is very predictive.
- 1:25:13[SPEAKER_02]: They're getting crushed.
- 1:25:14[SPEAKER_02]: The Republicans are our our steam rolling them right now.
- 1:25:18[SPEAKER_02]: So when you compare to where we were in 2024 and 2022.
- 1:25:22[SPEAKER_02]: So we'll see change change.
- 1:25:25[SPEAKER_02]: But I'm just not seeing any evidence of that yet.
- 1:25:31[SPEAKER_02]: Dan News Media is leftist because everywhere that there's no consequences for bad ideas, it's leftist.
- 1:25:37[SPEAKER_02]: See, those are colleges, politics, and HR, yeah, human resources departments.
- 1:25:41[SPEAKER_02]: Yeah, absolutely, yeah, if anything, we could even push that more.
- 1:25:47[SPEAKER_02]: There are consequences, it's consequences for the law-biding.
- 1:25:52[SPEAKER_02]: So you're seeing that with all the social pathologies of the day, where leftists
- 1:26:01[SPEAKER_02]: victimize the victimizer and they turn into a victimizer of the victims.
- 1:26:10[SPEAKER_02]: So, and that again largely is because anyone who tends to be a victim, tends to be a natural, organic part of Western civilization,
- 1:26:30[SPEAKER_02]: is standing against Western civilization, either as a feminist or a third worldist or what have you.
- 1:26:36[SPEAKER_02]: So it's imperative since they see Western civilizations, the ultimate evil, it's imperative that they turn the resistor against this evil system into the victim.
- 1:26:49[SPEAKER_02]: And even if they are driven to violence,
- 1:26:52[SPEAKER_02]: like literally killing your own kids.
- 1:26:55[SPEAKER_02]: Well, that's only because of patriarchal society, broader to that, broader to that state.
- 1:27:02[SPEAKER_02]: So they will, they will actually punish the law of biting and the law keeping is, again, as we saw like during the BLM run, they'll punish the law keeping and they will champion the law breakers.
- 1:27:18[SPEAKER_02]: And with that gang, what a great, great live stream.
- 1:27:20[SPEAKER_02]: The world is changing like we never imagined.
- 1:27:23[SPEAKER_02]: Stick with our video.
- 1:27:23[SPEAKER_02]: Remember, check out that Raw Skiven's interview tomorrow.
- 1:27:27[SPEAKER_02]: That's going to blow you away.
- 1:27:29[SPEAKER_02]: And then there's some free training that he's offering online on Wednesday at 3 p.m. Eastern for our call.
- 1:27:35[SPEAKER_02]: And also I'll be your back porch professor for any breaking news.
- 1:27:38[SPEAKER_02]: So make sure you stay on this channel for breaking news and analysis.
- 1:27:42[SPEAKER_02]: You're not going to get anywhere else.
- 1:27:43[SPEAKER_02]: Love you guys.
- 1:27:43[SPEAKER_02]: God bless.
- 1:27:46[SPEAKER_02]: Thanks so much for listening to this episode of the Turley Talks Podcast.
- 1:27:50[SPEAKER_02]: Don't forget to subscribe, leave us a five-star review, and share this episode with your friends.
- 1:27:55[SPEAKER_02]: Help us defeat the fake news media and rank us the number one news and commentary podcast all over the world.
- 1:28:02[SPEAKER_02]: Come back again tomorrow for another episode celebrating the rise of a new conservative age.