Latest / Roast the Post Podcast / Layoff Limbo: When Job-Cut Warnings Become a Trap | Grounds for Discussion
Transcript
- 0:14SPEAKER_01: okay, so I was looking through workplace headlines as one does
- 0:19SPEAKER_01: when they co-host podcasts about workplace stuff.
- 0:25SPEAKER_01: And one, I mean a few stood out to me, but this one in particular.
- 0:31SPEAKER_01: I really want to know your opinions on it because this one feels a little bit
- 0:35SPEAKER_01: closer to me, and I'll explain why when we get to the discussion point.
- 0:40SPEAKER_01: But here's the headline.
- 0:42SPEAKER_01: Corporate America is putting its staff in layoff limbo.
- 0:47SPEAKER_01: And this comes from Business Insider like October 6th of this year.
- 0:53SPEAKER_01: A little bit of context.
- 0:55SPEAKER_01: A layoff practice is emerging where companies announce that job cuts are coming,
- 1:00SPEAKER_01: but don't immediately tell employees who will be affected.
- 1:03SPEAKER_01: Where the cuts will land, or even exactly when they'll happen.
- 1:07SPEAKER_01: Nike and Meta and GitLab have reportedly used versions of this approach.
- 1:12SPEAKER_01: The charitable argument is that advance warning gives employees time to prepare.
- 1:18SPEAKER_01: The less charitable interpretation is that prolonged uncertainty may encourage
- 1:22SPEAKER_01: people to
- 1:23SPEAKER_01: leave voluntarily, potentially reducing the number of formal terminations an
- 1:27SPEAKER_01: employer
- 1:28SPEAKER_01: ultimately has to make.
- 1:32SPEAKER_01: My question for you is, is it actually more humane to give employees months of
- 1:36SPEAKER_01: warning
- 1:37SPEAKER_01: that layoffs are coming or is uncertainty worse than a clean, immediate decision?
- 1:44SPEAKER_00: Well if this is actually a thing where it's a strategy that they're
- 1:50SPEAKER_00: employing
- 1:51SPEAKER_00: to reduce the the number of payoffs, the amount of payouts that they have to do.
- 1:58SPEAKER_00: I get it.
- 1:59SPEAKER_00: That's kind of cold and calculating and callous.
- 2:01SPEAKER_00: It's also bullsh*t.
- 2:03SPEAKER_00: this is another, if that's a thing, this is another example of uncaptured costs that
- 2:10SPEAKER_00: fall between the things that you know.
- 2:12SPEAKER_00: So
- 2:13SPEAKER_00: The two pathways here, pathway number one, let people know right away and then you
- 2:19SPEAKER_00: have to pay your severance pay and terminations and all of those costs.
- 2:23SPEAKER_00: Okay, fine.
- 2:25SPEAKER_00: you know, that number might be higher than the other pathway.
- 2:28SPEAKER_00: But pathway number two, if you have months and months and months where employees
- 2:33SPEAKER_00: are just
- 2:34SPEAKER_00: kind of chilling out and they're fearful for their jobs, they don't really know
- 2:38SPEAKER_00: what's
- 2:38SPEAKER_00: happening, what's that doing to productivity in the meantime?
- 2:44SPEAKER_00: Right, especially over a large workforce.
- 2:46SPEAKER_00: if you take the impact of productivity and multiply it over four thousand, five
- 2:51SPEAKER_00: thousand
- 2:52SPEAKER_00: positions, I would be pretty darn sure that the amount of money that you're losing
- 2:58SPEAKER_00: and
- 2:58SPEAKER_00: lost productivity because of like low morale and people being freaked out and
- 3:03SPEAKER_00: whatnot is
- 3:03SPEAKER_00: greater than what you're saving with some people who leave, especially in a down
- 3:08SPEAKER_00: economy.
- 3:09SPEAKER_00: Right.
- 3:09SPEAKER_00: Like, I don't think that makes a whole heck of a lot of sense.
- 3:13SPEAKER_00: And altogether, this thing kind of hints at why people are rating things like
- 3:18SPEAKER_00: being
- 3:20SPEAKER_00: treated like a human being as factors for engagement, like we talked about not too
- 3:24SPEAKER_00: long
- 3:24SPEAKER_00: ago.
- 3:25SPEAKER_00: You know, if this is the backdrop where all this stuff is happening, it kind of
- 3:29SPEAKER_00: becomes
- 3:29SPEAKER_00: clearer why people are like, yeah, treat me like a human being and I'm there for it,
- 3:33SPEAKER_00: boss.
- 3:34SPEAKER_00: Like, let's go.
- 3:35SPEAKER_00: You know, I will love my job and be all in.
- 3:37SPEAKER_00: What does that say about our society?
- 3:39SPEAKER_00: This is another case of what does this say about society?
- 3:44SPEAKER_00: I don't dig it.
- 3:45SPEAKER_00: The better way to do this, in my opinion, is to don't announce layoffs ahead of
- 3:50SPEAKER_00: time if you have to do layoffs.
- 3:52SPEAKER_00: Like, don't.
- 3:53SPEAKER_00: Just tell people when it's time to go, you know, lay them off,
- 3:57SPEAKER_00: come to
- 3:58SPEAKER_00: terms whether it's they leave immediately, whether it's, you know, there's a working
- 4:02SPEAKER_00: notice.
- 4:04SPEAKER_00: but combine that with generous severance packages.
- 4:08SPEAKER_00: Don't cheap out.
- 4:09SPEAKER_00: Right.
- 4:10SPEAKER_00: If people know that if they're going to get laid off and if the package is going to
- 4:15SPEAKER_00: be
- 4:15SPEAKER_00: generous, at least you can mitigate some of the downside fallout of all of this
- 4:20SPEAKER_00: stuff.
- 4:20SPEAKER_00: So I don't think that the two options that are presented by the
- 4:26SPEAKER_00: article are good options.
- 4:27SPEAKER_00: I think there's a third option that we really should pursue.
- 4:32SPEAKER_01: I agree.
- 4:32SPEAKER_01: So on on the one hand, I prefer transparency.
- 4:36SPEAKER_01: I would be the type of person who would like to know.
- 4:39SPEAKER_01: and then I would make an informed decision.
- 4:43SPEAKER_01: I could potentially just wait it out and not quit, see what's out there in the
- 4:48SPEAKER_01: market, and then collect my severance when the time comes.
- 4:52SPEAKER_01: so
- 4:53SPEAKER_01: to me, it's not the end of the day.
- 4:55SPEAKER_01: It is how it's presented though, the idea of forcing people to kind of make a
- 5:00SPEAKER_01: decision.
- 5:01SPEAKER_01: And then they quit, and then the company
- 5:03SPEAKER_01: doesn't have to pay as much in severance or
- 5:06SPEAKER_01: termination.
- 5:06SPEAKER_01: Like, sure, that's an assumption, it's probably correct.
- 5:10SPEAKER_01: For maybe they're interviewing the people who have experienced this themselves.
- 5:16SPEAKER_01: my preference is companies that are very transparent with their runway.
- 5:23SPEAKER_01: Very transparent
- 5:24SPEAKER_01: because they're basically... they're telling you right there, we have this much
- 5:28SPEAKER_01: runway left, and if we don't raise another fund.
- 5:31SPEAKER_01: Or if we don't get some more, signed contracts or sales or whatever, then we might
- 5:38SPEAKER_01: have to consider it.
- 5:39SPEAKER_01: And this is a constant and a continuous conversation.
- 5:43SPEAKER_01: Because quite frankly, more companies than we realize, and I'd argue that all of
- 5:49SPEAKER_01: them are in this situation constantly.
- 5:51SPEAKER_01: It's a very fragile balance of whether or not the company survives.
- 5:56SPEAKER_01: And so that information is always there.
- 5:58SPEAKER_01: That reality exists.
- 6:00SPEAKER_01: all the time.
- 6:01SPEAKER_01: it's just not usually public and known to the employees.
- 6:05SPEAKER_01: And so I would say that, during your town halls, just have very clear, maybe
- 6:10SPEAKER_01: quarterly financial updates and people are... they feel respected.
- 6:15SPEAKER_01: They have the information they need to make
- 6:17SPEAKER_01: informed decisions about whether or not
- 6:20SPEAKER_01: that's enough for them.
- 6:21SPEAKER_01: Do they feel secure and safe enough to stay in the role or should they leave and
- 6:24SPEAKER_01: look for something else?
- 6:26SPEAKER_01: Even though, like I said, this is what happens at every company anyway.
- 6:30SPEAKER_01: It's the idea that they tell you months in advance that cuts may be coming don't
- 6:36SPEAKER_01: know when, don't know who.
- 6:37SPEAKER_01: That feels iffy and that does feel like they're doing it to try to get people out.
- 6:42SPEAKER_01: The risk there is that you might lose, say, your top performers.
- 6:45SPEAKER_01: But if companies are doing sketchy things like that, then they're probably saying
- 6:49SPEAKER_01: to their high performers, you don't have to worry about it.
- 6:53SPEAKER_01: that's it's not just they're
- 6:54SPEAKER_01: doing one sketchy practice.
- 6:56SPEAKER_01: It's happening all over in ways that we
- 6:59SPEAKER_01: Can't even imagine.
- 7:00SPEAKER_01: So yeah, I agree.
- 7:03SPEAKER_01: I don't care
- 7:03SPEAKER_01: for it.
- 7:04SPEAKER_01: There are better ways to do this.
- 7:06SPEAKER_00: Yeah, there are there are novel things too.
- 7:08SPEAKER_00: if a company is truly in dire straits and they value their employees and they still
- 7:13SPEAKER_00: value
- 7:15SPEAKER_00: the mission, they still want to try and figure out a way to carry on, you know,
- 7:18SPEAKER_00: there are
- 7:19SPEAKER_00: things that you can do that are transparent that are another way as well.
- 7:24SPEAKER_00: You know, you can talk to employees about temporary voluntary pay cuts, you can
- 7:28SPEAKER_00: talk about rolling back other things and have open conversations.
- 7:32SPEAKER_00: it's a little challenging when you get into pay cut territory,
- 7:37SPEAKER_00: rolling back wages or whatever.
- 7:39SPEAKER_00: It's something that you shouldn't just take for granted and you shouldn't just do.
- 7:42SPEAKER_00: Like you have to have the conversation and it has to be voluntary.
- 7:47SPEAKER_00: And if I feel that if you go down that road, it has to be very temporary in nature
- 7:51SPEAKER_00: with very clear signs of when it will end.
- 7:54SPEAKER_00: You know, stuff like that you can kind of look at.
- 7:58SPEAKER_00: Doesn't work really well or at all for Fortune 500's, for large companies,
- 8:03SPEAKER_00: but for smaller companies that are ten to fifty employees, could be an option.
- 8:07SPEAKER_00: You know, and it might be a better option than just saying, hey, in a year we might
- 8:12SPEAKER_00: or might not lay people off.