Latest / Talk to Prince Show - Solving World's Problems / Avoid Data Colonization and Data Slavery 52224

Transcript

Avoid Data Colonization and Data Slavery 52224 · Talk to Prince Show - Solving World's Problems

• 0:01
  And I said to the brothers and sisters that laziness, entitlement, and victim
• 0:09
  heard shall soon consume the Silicon Valley. And all these AI tech companies are
• 0:18
  generative ais. They shall want, they choose not to work, but they
• 0:25
  shall be lazy in creating content, or creating or inventing new things. And
• 0:34
  all I said to your brothers and sisters, they that they shall do.
• 0:39
  That they shall still the hard work and creative works of other Americans, and
• 0:46
  they shall look for ways to copy it. And they shall look for ways
• 0:51
  to plagiarize the hard work of others. And they shall fit all these in
• 0:56
  their systems of autonomy agency control, and they shall have dominion ourdays creative inventive
• 1:07
  works of others, and that shall not be fair. They shall steal from
• 1:15
  others, and I shall be against the law. They are infringed on the
• 1:21
  copyrights of others, I shall be against the law. There's a manipulic the
• 1:27
  content and creativities of others, and I shall be against the law. They
• 1:36
  shall not be creators. There are not be inventors. They are not being
• 1:45
  novators. But they shall be corrupt in their malicious intent. How to steal
• 1:53
  by tricks stealing by tricks shall not be accepted. It shall be upon the
• 2:06
  Silicon Valley and new generative AI industries to pay for the content that they use.
• 2:21
  Because we need to think about ethics, the ethics behind the generative AIS.
• 2:32
  We need to think. We need to ask all those questions and answer
• 2:38
  these questions. The data, where does it come from? Who owns that
• 2:50
  data? Is a ditror owned by the web. Because it's in the open
• 2:57
  web. Doesn't mean that if you can Google something, then googles that,
• 3:04
  then Google owns that content. Doesn't make if he pays something on you Tube,
• 3:09
  or pay something on Facebook or Instagra, or if there's something out there
• 3:15
  in the cloud in your name or your email, does it mean that some
• 3:22
  one else has the right to that because they're on the Southwest that let you
• 3:29
  post your stuff, or because he used the un medium she there therefore only
• 3:37
  your content. The laws shall be clear on that. Give to Caesar what
• 3:46
  belongs to Caesar, to God what belongs to God. It takes time to
• 3:51
  create, It takes no time to steal. What is worse than stealing,
• 4:00
  it's refusing to give the rights to somebody authorship or creatorship when it's there.
• 4:14
  We need to know those laws and rules and ethics binding and governing content creation,
• 4:23
  content ownership, content usage, and content transfers. The more theater that
• 4:41
  people collect, the higher the propensity of abuse. If you're that smart and
• 4:49
  are intelligent, don't steal from others. Just pay people for what they make.
• 5:02
  Reward people for their creativity. You can create yours, but if you
• 5:10
  can create place, give honor or respect, or create a way to do
• 5:24
  the generative. AIS must state where the content is coming from. The generative
• 5:33
  They don't generate content, the copy content. They don't create content. They
• 5:47
  do create content. So we must very keen about that. It takes a
• 5:57
  human mind to be creative. I'm like human. Mine is passed onto a
• 6:02
  machine, on AI device or generative device. We should respect the creator,
• 6:15
  the artists, the makers of those content. You cannot ignore that. You
• 6:30
  cannot use some types of laws or some manipulative systems to steal from people.
• 6:39
  If content is not yours, it means you didn't create a content. You
• 6:45
  cannot steal what you didn't have, or you cannot take what you don't.
• 6:48
  You didn't keep if you didn't make it, if you don't own it,
• 6:56
  if somebody has made it give them the right. It's the way of thinking.
• 7:09
  The digital world is changing, the media landscape is changing. The airole
• 7:16
  is upon us. One thing that you declear the IP intellect. Your property
• 7:29
  rights must be respected companition of be allowed to manipulate the law or the lobby,
• 7:41
  the Congress, or the courts to take away from the common person their
• 7:49
  creativity, their talent. It's a shameful thing to minimize the people that you're
• 8:03
  stealing from. It's a shameful thing to say you're that intelligent and steal from
• 8:13
  the people that you did not worthy. The ethics on AI should be mindful
• 8:28
  and consider it and honest and transparent with data. Who made the data,
• 8:39
  where the data is coming from, who owns it, Who has the right
• 8:46
  to it. We write the paper inside the suce. So when you accume
• 9:01
  data I want to use it, just respectfully say where it's coming from,
• 9:07
  who owns it, You respect why it's deal. You cannot disrespect me,
• 9:16
  and then by using my data you cannot get it both ways. If I
• 9:22
  have what you don't have, if I have what you need that you can't
• 9:26
  have, you need to come to me, come to the front door with
• 9:33
  respect and dignity and negotiations, and let's have a deal, respectful deal.
• 9:48
  The why west of the AIH and the digital age so to help humanity and
• 10:00
  will not bring the best out of humanity if it's all about stealing by tricks.
• 10:09
  Stealing by tricks is using someone else's data or data or content without due
• 10:20
  acknowledgement or in disrespect of intellectual property rights, or without appreciating the owner of
• 10:33
  that data. You can know own what it didn't make. Because I post
• 10:41
  my writings on my art or my creativity on my music on your platform doesn't
• 10:48
  give you the right to that music or art beyond me posting it there and
• 10:54
  the limited rights right of assets of access they have to it. Gonna have
• 11:00
  to write an authorship or makership because you didn't make it, or creatorship because
• 11:07
  you didn't create it. So if you're regenerating content that's already made, you
• 11:16
  should know you didn't create the content. The word generative in itself means it's
• 11:24
  generating something that's already there. Unless it'll be creating, it'll be creating content,
• 11:33
  not generating content. It will be creative AI. My generative AI.
• 11:41
  The generative AI means is generating content that's already there. Creative AI means is
• 11:46
  creating something that is not there. Creativity and generativity are two different words.
• 12:01
  Creativity it's original, authentic, and organic. Generative it's inauthentic, not in
• 12:11
  original, and a copy of something that already exists. So generative AI it's
• 12:20
  not different from data copying AI or data imitation AI. So the generative AI
• 12:31
  needs to use something that's already naturally or digitally or creatively or authentically or organically
• 12:37
  or originally already there to generate something that's from it. You need a voice
• 12:45
  to generate the voice, you need something to create something, and if that
• 12:54
  thing is not there, that thing will not be created, that copy of
• 12:58
  it will be created. You need sperm and egg to generate a baby in
• 13:07
  that generative sense, so you need a mom and dad to give birth to
• 13:11
  a child, and that child has the DNA of the mom and dad.
• 13:18
  So therefore, generative AI it's copying something that already exists. We must be
• 13:28
  willing to make this very clear. You're not inventing anything. You are reinventing
• 13:37
  something. You're not creating anything. You're recreating something. You're not engineering anything.
• 13:52
  You're re engineering something they're not establishing anything. You are re establishing something,
• 14:00
  and you are not making anything. You are remaking something. That prefix
• 14:07
  re are she be attached to a generative as regenerate would be a stretch generate
• 14:24
  in the servement's aids copying from something. You can use data that is in
• 14:31
  the cloud. You can use the data in the search engines. You can
• 14:37
  use the data or the data start somewhere, serve somewhere on the server.
• 14:41
  That data almost exists, that silicon valley sells or manipolts for the good of
• 14:54
  society. That's the best I can put it. But we must learn to
• 15:03
  give credit where it's deal. The ethics of data of a IDEAA management.
• 15:13
  An AIDEAA usage should not take away from the creator, the maker, the
• 15:22
  producer, the owner of that content or data. If there's money to be
• 15:33
  made, the owner of the data should get a piece of it. Don't
• 15:39
  you think the only other data should get the most share of it. Don't
• 15:43
  you think? Couse without a data, that thing is not made. If
• 15:50
  he used a book to get a movie, right, you cannot forget the
• 16:02
  author, the writer, or the producer or the publisher. So always channel
• 16:11
  events that I cannot forget. That makes your worked about tentic if the source
• 16:18
  is stated unrespected. The usage of data, we should be very careful.
• 16:36
  We should be careful with data colonization. N me's say it again. We
• 16:44
  should be careful with data colonization, and we should be careful with data neil
• 16:52
  colonization. We should promote data capital when when where everybody benefits, or when
• 17:07
  everybody benefits. We should not click create data plantations. We should not create
• 17:18
  data slaves. Should be careful with that. Because the fear is that history
• 17:29
  is to preening itself. We should not let history repeat itself. The guard
• 17:36
  between the rich and the poor is so wide that we don't want to bring
• 17:41
  them into the digital space. In the physical world. The physical world is
• 17:48
  unfair. Those who owned the farms in most in most developing countries are the
• 17:56
  poorest. H African own of Africans on the diamond, the goal, the
• 18:07
  timber, the box side or the natural resources, but they are poor in
• 18:15
  the data sense. Africa owns the data, but they are poor in the
• 18:26
  digital In the digital sense, they have all the content, but they are
• 18:33
  poor. We should not let this happen. In the age and the digit
• 18:40
  and the digital age, Please remember. Prevent data colonialism. Prevent data neo
• 18:49
  colonialization. Prevent data expectations m HM. Prevent data slavery. Prevent data sweatshops.
• 19:11
  Prevent data imperialism. Prevent data discrimination. Prevent data racism. Prevent data
• 19:26
  sexism. Prevent data bigotry. Prevent data nepotism. Prevent data cruelty. Prevent
• 19:41
  data in humanity. Prevent data walls. Prevent data domination. Prevent data corruption.
• 20:08
  Prevent data immorality. Prevent data criminalization. Prevent the misuse of data.
• 20:27
  Prevent data trafficking. Prevent data weaponization. Do not make data to be the
• 20:41
  weapons of master destruction. You must remember others. Humans are kin to keep
• 20:53
  new systems and just transfer all practices into new systems. So at the end
• 21:02
  of the day, they don't create new systems, they just apply new stuff
• 21:11
  to all repugnant systems. We should be very careful. We should be careful
• 21:21
  with data injustices, data inequality, data iniquity, data on fairness. We
• 21:34
  should be careful with data demonization, data demonization, data dehumanization. There are
• 21:48
  disinformation that are propaganda. Should be careful. All those things dad are mis
• 21:56
  education that are misinformation should be careful about this because of world gonna be data
• 22:06
  driven and all this data or data gonna be input into the AI, This
• 22:18
  data gonna be inputed into the AI, and the output might not go work.
• 22:26
  Humanity wants the input should reflect the output. You cannot plant apples and
• 22:37
  expect oranges, and when you plant rotten apples, don't expect something different.
• 22:52
  Which must be careful with data that's not howerful to the human planet, human
• 23:03
  ecology. We should be careful with data that doesn't make the world a better
• 23:08
  place, that make us worse. To be able to purify our souls,
• 23:18
  our minds, our intelligence, our humanity. To have good data safe there,
• 23:27
  human data moral there, ethical dare law abiding, the compassionate data and
• 23:41
  pathetic data intelligent positive causality. There. We should be mindful because the world
• 23:53
  of our kids and the future going to be data driven. If the data
• 24:00
  should be good, there is money to be made. There's always money to
• 24:07
  be made and whatever humans do, so making money is not an issue because
• 24:15
  there is money to make. People make money doing good people make money doing
• 24:19
  ever. People make money doing bad things. People make money doing cruel things,
• 24:26
  people make money doing inhumane things. People make money by slavery. People
• 24:34
  make money by colonization, people make money by killing, by meming. Humans
• 24:45
  will make money by trafficking true criminality. So there's always money to be made
• 24:52
  in whatever humans do. Because money is an incentive, Money motivates, money
• 25:03
  is surprised. At the end of the day, we can still make that
• 25:08
  money and make this world a better place. It's not a trade off.
• 25:17
  You can be wealthy and healthy at the same time. Wealth and health is
• 25:25
  synonymous arrogance and ignorance. Synonymous arrogance and ignorance is too, is too naziicism
• 25:42
  as wealth and health is to humans wealth and health arrogance and nacissism, or
• 25:57
  arrogance and ignorance by the confliction. Because this conflation we end up in the
• 26:08
  data, in the AI and in the New world. Remember these five things
• 26:14
  ignorance, arrogance, nacissism, wealth health. As a choice. If arrogance,
• 26:26
  nacissism, and ignorance laid who create negative AI negative causality, AI weth
• 26:36
  a world there is more crew using AI and more hateful using AI. So
• 26:48
  so very careful the issues that A lour money. I say it again and
• 26:55
  again, because humans will make money no matter what it's good to make money,
• 27:03
  it's good to have wealth in what you do. But on money and
• 27:07
  wealth should be healthy. She creately healthy, sustainable, positive causality, and
• 27:17
  positive humanitarian or futuristic society. And that is that what it's all about.
• 27:27
  When we think about the future or future generations to come, it's passing on
• 27:34
  good values. Good values. We can do the same way AI. The
• 27:44
  ethics behind AI or generative AI, or the ectics behind the data that's been
• 27:53
  collected. That data collected. She reflects what the war wants, not what
• 28:03
  a particular country wants, not what a particular race of people want, or
• 28:07
  not what a particular geopolitical blocks or block wants. Know what a particular ideology,
• 28:15
  a particular religion wants, not what the particular political party wants. Know
• 28:25
  what a particular school, a particular thing, tank of school or thoughts wants.
• 28:33
  What know what a particular business, a particular capital wants, but what
• 28:41
  will help humanity and the future generations. What we do today shouldn't be a
• 28:48
  burdon to the future generations. And remember, we are moving into the data
• 28:55
  civilization AI data civilization, and as we edge towards that data civilization, we
• 29:04
  should start thinking about respecting people on content. We should reward them and give
• 29:12
  their copyright. Why it's still and we should always remember that generative AI or
• 29:19
  generative intelligence is not creative AI. It's not creative intelligence. It's copied intelligence.
• 29:29
  And because we are copying these things, which we're responsible, which you
• 29:34
  have expectations, responsibility, obligations, commitment, an interest in what we invest
• 29:49
  in should be for the future, and we should be careful not to make
• 29:57
  Silicon Valley. She become to become the new source of laziness, entitlement and
• 30:04
  victim hurt. Well, they are lazy to create, we'll kick the copy
• 30:11
  and they become entitled to it and they become the victim. If this happened,
• 30:18
  she managed to a crumble. The future will no be better because if
• 30:26
  you have this entitled and lazy or privilege type victim of humans designing the world.
• 30:38
  She very careful that world because the world is made up of heart working,
• 30:45
  striving, struggling individuals. That's how panniered a new war. It was
• 30:53
  partnered by people who work hard, seek to discover inventive, creative a pivolca
• 31:03
  endeavor can sacrifice who are real people. The reward should be created by real
• 31:12
  people. And if ARTI visualization should take home, it should be well made
• 31:21
  by real people, real humans, with real intelligence, with real responsibility,
• 31:30
  expectations, cognit men, obligation and investment an interest. She designed, they
• 31:40
  a out the future, and she used the data that they collect with obligation
• 31:48
  to the law, to good conscience and morality and moral clarity. More erectitate.
• 32:00
  We always think about that the ethics of data shall soon apply to the
• 32:10
  ethics of AI. Remember that that everybody be wealthy in the system that creates
• 32:24
  the innov it that in fact the asprius that dreams stifle not capital. The
• 32:36
  AI needs capital to developed. The data collected needs capital. Whish you reward
• 32:43
  hard work, which you reward, innovation, which you reward. Ingenuity was
• 32:52
  your reward. Creativity WI yourard makeers and the engineers that make the worldly better
• 33:00
  place. But we should know those who seek to destroy it, or those
• 33:06
  who said the manipulate the data or generative intelligences to do us harm, to
• 33:14
  do the war harm, to destroy the ecosystem, or to destroy the universe,
• 33:22
  or to destroy the future of younger generations. We should not let that
• 33:27
  happen. The digital ward and the data driven war should learn from the mistakes
• 33:35
  of the Old War and an old world that was unjust on fire, that
• 33:42
  was discriminatory with racism, sexism, and bakotry. We used the new war,
• 33:50
  the data and AI new War, to change the practices of all.
• 33:57
  She's very careful not to transplant or to infuse, and in fact, the
• 34:07
  data of the new world, of the generative AI, of the new world
• 34:14
  with the ills, with the crueties, in humanities and the prognancies or the
• 34:22
  old world. The greater new world gonna be led by data and antificial intelligence,
• 34:34
  and that data and antificial intelligence shall be purified from the saints and crueties
• 34:43
  or immorality or repugnances of the Old war. The new testament of the Old
• 34:52
  War is the data, digitarized driven artificial intelligence or with a new ways,
• 35:07
  the new done. It must first respect those who create content, use them
• 35:15
  as a pioneer to the new world. And if the middleman at the don't
• 35:23
  make the middle men to be the inventors and the creator, they don't invent
• 35:27
  anything. Silicon Valley hardly invent anything. They use data. The blessings of
• 35:36
  Silicon Valley comes from capital capitalism, We should thank capitalism for Silicon Valley.
• 35:44
  That people invest capital to make great ideas meaningful in the capital to put good
• 35:52
  ideas to use. The wall is invented by capital. So Silicon Valley,
• 35:59
  Silicon Valley becase of capital and they should respect that. And when the capital
• 36:07
  is giving to that for the sake of the great than you are, they
• 36:12
  should be mindful with the data, mindful of the input, because the input
• 36:20
  and the data will determine the output. It takes years to fix a thing,
• 36:27
  it takes seconds to destroy it. Remember that. I remember that whatever
• 36:32
  we're building today, the AI world that were envisage, we're not going to
• 36:40
  be the humans that are gonna live in it. Those those who are gonna
• 36:45
  live in that world that we're thinking and creating should be generations on board.
• 36:51
  We can't then make it better for them, not worse. Remember that H
• 37:00
  A I. Philosopher Prince Prince Israel Zir