Latest / I Believe / Do We Trust Every Future President?
Transcript
- 0:03SPEAKER_03: Welcome to I Believe, where we talk about governance and philosophy in America.
- 0:07SPEAKER_03: I'm Joel Douglas, and I believe in America.
- 0:10SPEAKER_03: Thanks for joining me.
- 0:48SPEAKER_00: June eighteenth, 1787, Philadelphia.
- 0:52SPEAKER_00: The temperature in the Pennsylvania State House had already hit 85 degrees.
- 0:57SPEAKER_00: Fifty-five men in wool coats and powdered wigs sat trapped in a room with the windows nailed shut and doors guarded for secrecy.
- 1:06SPEAKER_00: The delegates chose privacy over performance so they could speak freely.
- 1:10SPEAKER_00: They had been arguing openly for three weeks about how to build a government.
- 1:15SPEAKER_00: Nothing was working.
- 1:16SPEAKER_00: Alexander Hamilton finally stood.
- 1:19SPEAKER_00: Brilliant, abrasive, born a bastard in the Caribbean.
- 1:24SPEAKER_00: He'd watched the Continental Congress dither while soldiers froze at Valley Forge.
- 1:29SPEAKER_00: He'd seen New York burn while thirteen states bickered over tax policy.
- 1:34SPEAKER_00: He had been quiet, boxed in by his own New York colleagues.
- 1:39SPEAKER_00: Then he said the hard part out loud.
- 1:43SPEAKER_02: I have well considered the subject, he began, and am convinced that no amendment of the Confederation can answer the purpose of a good government so long as state sovereignties do in any shape exist.
- 1:56SPEAKER_00: In short, there could be no fix to the Articles of Confederation, the governing document that existed before the Constitution.
- 2:04SPEAKER_00: Maybe it was the heat, or frustration from the gridlock.
- 2:09SPEAKER_00: But Hamilton was done with democracy's inefficiency.
- 2:12SPEAKER_00: State sovereignty would always gridlock national purpose.
- 2:16SPEAKER_00: He rejected the proposals on the table from Virginia and New Jersey, and aimed higher.
- 2:22SPEAKER_00: He spoke for six hours.
- 2:24SPEAKER_00: All day.
- 2:27SPEAKER_00: The room heard a full design for a national government.
- 2:31SPEAKER_00: What Hamilton wanted?
- 2:32SPEAKER_00: A president elected for life.
- 2:38SPEAKER_00: Power to appoint every governor of every state, senators serving for life, a government that Madison judged to be suspiciously like the monarchy we had just defeated in a prolonged war.
- 2:52SPEAKER_02: Madison noted, give all power to the many, they will oppress the few.
- 2:58SPEAKER_02: Give all power to the few, they will oppress the many.
- 3:03SPEAKER_00: In the end, America would owe allegiance to no king.
- 3:06SPEAKER_00: Hamilton's model pushed far past what most men in the room would accept.
- 3:11SPEAKER_00: Delegates from Connecticut started whispering to each other.
- 3:15SPEAKER_00: The Virginians exchanged glances.
- 3:18SPEAKER_00: By hour three, some walked out.
- 3:20SPEAKER_00: By hour five, even his allies from New York looked uncomfortable.
- 3:25SPEAKER_00: Benjamin Franklin, 81 years old and sitting near the back, closed his eyes, unclear whether from boredom or horror.
- 3:33SPEAKER_00: No one took it up for a vote.
- 3:35SPEAKER_00: The plan was never seriously considered.
- 3:38SPEAKER_00: His audacity branded him a monarchist to some.
- 3:42SPEAKER_00: The day after the convention went back to the real fight over representation.
- 3:47SPEAKER_00: But something had shifted.
- 3:48SPEAKER_00: The center of gravity slid toward Madison's national vision because Hamilton had stretched the frame.
- 3:55SPEAKER_00: What happened next tells you how the room felt.
- 3:58SPEAKER_00: Hamilton left Philadelphia on June 29th.
- 4:02SPEAKER_00: He drifted in and out.
- 4:04SPEAKER_00: He returned briefly in mid-August and early September.
- 4:08SPEAKER_00: Fleeting presence meant little influence.
- 4:12SPEAKER_03: In the end, Hamilton signed anyway.
- 4:15SPEAKER_03: He was the only New Yorker who did.
- 4:17SPEAKER_03: On signing day, he told the other delegates, sign it even if it's not perfect.
- 4:21SPEAKER_03: The country needs this.
- 4:23SPEAKER_03: Then he went home and did something remarkable.
- 4:26SPEAKER_03: New York wouldn't ratify the Constitution.
- 4:28SPEAKER_03: The state legislature hated it.
- 4:31SPEAKER_03: Too much federal power, they said.
- 4:33SPEAKER_03: Too much risk of tyranny.
- 4:35SPEAKER_03: So Hamilton spent seven months writing essays in New York newspapers under the pen name Publius.
- 4:41SPEAKER_03: He wrote 51 of them.
- 4:43SPEAKER_03: Madison and John Jay wrote the rest.
- 4:45SPEAKER_03: These became the Federalist Papers, the most important commentary on the Constitution ever written.
- 4:51SPEAKER_03: Hamilton's task was to convince New Yorkers that a strong executive wasn't a king.
- 4:56SPEAKER_03: That energy in government didn't mean tyranny.
- 4:59SPEAKER_03: That the constitution he'd argued against in private was actually the best hope for the Republic.
- 5:05SPEAKER_03: He lost the room in Philadelphia, but he won the argument in the newspapers, New York ratified, barely.
- 5:12SPEAKER_03: By three votes, Hamilton defended a constitution that rejected his vision because he understood something crucial.
- 5:19SPEAKER_03: A flawed republic beats no republic at all.
- 5:22SPEAKER_03: Read Madison's notes closely, and you see he understood the logic of the six-hour speech, even though he disagreed.
- 5:29SPEAKER_03: Hamilton believed human passion would wreck any loose Confederacy.
- 5:33SPEAKER_03: He feared both gridlocked democracy and entrenched kings.
- 5:37SPEAKER_03: His cure was durability.
- 5:39SPEAKER_03: Long terms, firm vetoes, national supremacy over state mischief.
- 5:44SPEAKER_03: He said the British Constitution best united strength with security.
- 5:50SPEAKER_03: Now the decisive matter.
- 5:52SPEAKER_03: America's founders did not fear a British king.
- 5:55SPEAKER_03: They feared an American one.
- 5:57SPEAKER_03: They feared what would happen when blind ambition gathered enough levers to bend the entire machine.
- 6:02SPEAKER_03: They wrote a constitution that mixes energy with friction, so no single person or group could run away with the Republic.
- 6:10SPEAKER_03: The secrecy and sealed windows were tools to make that compromise possible, not symbols of elitism.
- 6:16SPEAKER_03: Hamilton lost the day but not the argument.
- 6:19SPEAKER_03: His extreme plan made the moderate path possible.
- 6:22SPEAKER_03: But ideas never really die.
- 6:24SPEAKER_03: His left a permanent temptation on the table.
- 6:27SPEAKER_03: Trade our Republic's checks and balances for speed.
- 6:30SPEAKER_03: Trade gridlock for efficiency, trade debate for decisiveness.
- 6:35SPEAKER_03: The room said no in 1787.
- 6:39SPEAKER_03: That decision created the Republic of the United States of America.
- 6:44SPEAKER_03: Hamilton lost, but his argument never died.
- 6:47SPEAKER_03: It waits for every moment when efficiency and allegiance sound better than divided power.
- 6:52SPEAKER_03: That moment is now.
- 8:31SPEAKER_01: This week we're watching what happens when Congress gives up.
- 8:35SPEAKER_01: The shutdown impacts real people.
- 8:38SPEAKER_01: But the crux of the matter is not the impacted programs.
- 8:42SPEAKER_01: It's not whether the EPA should exist or the CDC deserves its budget.
- 8:49SPEAKER_01: It's not even whether these firings save money or waste it.
- 8:53SPEAKER_01: The crux is Hamilton and Madison.
- 8:57SPEAKER_01: Hamilton wanted a king, or close enough, a president who could veto laws or congressional policies they found distasteful, not just unconstitutional laws, not just illegal spending.
- 9:11SPEAKER_01: Policies the executive simply disagreed with.
- 9:14SPEAKER_01: Madison said no.
- 9:16SPEAKER_01: He built a system where congressional power over spending was sacred, where the president couldn't just refuse to execute laws because he thought they were bad policy, where gridlock wasn't a bug.
- 9:30SPEAKER_01: It was the entire point.
- 9:33SPEAKER_01: The question in 1787.
- 9:36SPEAKER_01: What happens when the legislature passes something the executive hates?
- 9:41SPEAKER_01: Does the executive get to ignore it?
- 9:44SPEAKER_01: Does one person's judgment override the people's representatives?
- 9:49SPEAKER_01: The Convention answered, No.
- 9:51SPEAKER_01: The President executes the laws.
- 9:56SPEAKER_01: If you don't like what Congress funds, you veto the bill before it becomes law.
- 10:02SPEAKER_01: Once it's law, you follow it.
- 10:05SPEAKER_01: But what we're watching now is Hamilton's vision, two hundred and thirty eight years late, a shutdown that becomes a veto, an executive using congressional paralysis as permission to act, not just managing the crisis, reshaping government during it.
- 10:26SPEAKER_01: This isn't about President Trump.
- 10:28SPEAKER_01: It's about whether America still believes what Madison wrote in 1787.
- 10:34SPEAKER_01: That ambition must check ambition, that we must divide power to limit power, that even good policy imposed by one person is tyranny.
- 10:45SPEAKER_01: Hamilton lost that argument.
- 10:48SPEAKER_01: But his idea never died.
- 10:51SPEAKER_01: It keeps popping up, waiting for the right moment.
- 10:57SPEAKER_00: Nixon's impoundment crisis, when a president tried to be his own Congress.
- 11:04SPEAKER_00: Richard Nixon looked at the federal budget in 1972 and saw waste, not illegal spending, just programs he thought were stupid.
- 11:14SPEAKER_00: He blamed the Democratic-led party for excess spending, water treatment plants in Democratic districts, rural development funds, clean water grants.
- 11:25SPEAKER_00: Congress had passed these appropriations.
- 11:28SPEAKER_00: Nixon had even signed some of the bills.
- 11:30SPEAKER_00: But he decided, I'm just not going to spend this money.
- 11:35SPEAKER_00: He called it impoundment.
- 11:37SPEAKER_00: What it meant, the president can refuse to spend money Congress allocated if he thinks it's a bad idea.
- 11:44SPEAKER_00: By 1973, Nixon had impounded over$18 billion, about 20% of controllable federal spending, Clean Water Act funds, highway construction, housing assistance, food stamps.
- 11:59SPEAKER_00: When Congress asked why, his answer was simple.
- 12:04SPEAKER_00: I'm protecting the economy.
- 12:06SPEAKER_00: Nixon's position was that the president has inherent constitutional authority to refuse to spend money he deems unnecessary, regardless of what Congress wants.
- 12:17SPEAKER_00: Congress sued.
- 12:19SPEAKER_00: The Supreme Court unanimously ruled against Nixon in Train vs City of New York.
- 12:25SPEAKER_00: The law said money shall be allotted, not maybe, or at the president's discretion, shall meant shall.
- 12:34SPEAKER_00: The courts said clearly, the president cannot refuse to spend appropriated funds based on policy disagreement.
- 12:41SPEAKER_00: Congress passed the Impoundment Control Act of 1974.
- 12:46SPEAKER_00: The law was simple.
- 12:47SPEAKER_00: The president cannot permanently cancel spending that Congress appropriated.
- 12:53SPEAKER_00: To rescind funds, the president had to ask Congress.
- 12:56SPEAKER_00: Both chambers must approve within 45 days.
- 13:00SPEAKER_00: If they didn't, the money must be spent.
- 13:02SPEAKER_00: The president can temporarily delay spending, but must notify Congress.
- 13:07SPEAKER_00: Congress can force immediate release anytime.
- 13:11SPEAKER_00: The law was bipartisan.
- 13:13SPEAKER_00: Senate Republicans joined Democrats, because they understood, if a Republican can do this, so can the next Democrat.
- 13:21SPEAKER_00: This guts Congress's power permanently.
- 13:24SPEAKER_00: America need not fear a British king.
- 13:27SPEAKER_00: We should fear an American one.
- 13:29SPEAKER_00: The power of the purse is the power of the people.
- 13:33SPEAKER_00: If we surrender it to the executive, we surrender the Republic itself.
- 13:38SPEAKER_00: Nixon resigned in August 1974.
- 13:42SPEAKER_00: Every president since has operated under the Impoundment Control Act.
- 13:47SPEAKER_00: They've all chafed against it.
- 13:48SPEAKER_00: But they generally followed the process.
- 13:51SPEAKER_00: Propose rescisions, let Congress vote, spend the money if Congress says.
- 13:57SPEAKER_00: Until now.
- 13:58SPEAKER_00: We've seen this before.
- 14:00SPEAKER_00: Canceling foreign aid, withholding domestic spending, using shutdown authority to cut programs.
- 14:06SPEAKER_00: It's Nixon's playbook.
- 14:08SPEAKER_00: The argument is similar.
- 14:10SPEAKER_00: These programs are wasteful.
- 14:12SPEAKER_00: The president has inherent authority to manage the executive branch.
- 14:16SPEAKER_00: The impoundment control act itself might be unconstitutional.
- 14:21SPEAKER_00: The question is the same question from 1787.
- 14:24SPEAKER_00: Does the president execute the laws Congress passes?
- 14:28SPEAKER_00: Or does the president decide which laws are worth executing?
- 14:33SPEAKER_00: Hamilton said the executive should have that discretion.
- 14:36SPEAKER_00: Madison said no, that's monarchy.
- 14:39SPEAKER_00: Nixon tried to claim it.
- 14:41SPEAKER_00: Congress and the courts said no.
- 14:44SPEAKER_00: Now we're asking again.
- 14:50SPEAKER_01: Congress built this trap.
- 14:54SPEAKER_01: Here's the uncomfortable truth.
- 14:56SPEAKER_01: Congress created this problem.
- 14:59SPEAKER_01: Not President Trump.
- 15:01SPEAKER_01: Not Russell Vaught.
- 15:04SPEAKER_01: Congress did this by refusing to do their job.
- 15:09SPEAKER_01: The Constitution gives Congress one primary measure against executive overreach.
- 15:14SPEAKER_01: The power of the purse.
- 15:16SPEAKER_01: Article one, section nine.
- 15:19SPEAKER_01: Every dollar spent must be in consequence of appropriations made by law.
- 15:24SPEAKER_01: Congress decides what gets funded.
- 15:27SPEAKER_01: The President executes those decisions.
- 15:31SPEAKER_01: For decades, Congress has punted.
- 15:34SPEAKER_01: They pass continuing resolutions instead of budgets.
- 15:37SPEAKER_01: They kick hard choices down the road.
- 15:40SPEAKER_01: They let government lurch from crisis to crisis because making actual spending decisions requires something they can't muster.
- 15:49SPEAKER_01: Consensus.
- 15:50SPEAKER_01: And when Congress won't decide, someone else will.
- 15:55SPEAKER_01: When the legislature abdicates, the executive fills a space.
- 15:59SPEAKER_01: Not because presidents are tyrants, because someone has to keep the lights on.
- 16:05SPEAKER_01: Obama used executive orders when Congress wouldn't act on immigration.
- 16:11SPEAKER_01: Bush claimed war powers when Congress wouldn't debate authorization.
- 16:16SPEAKER_01: Every modern president pushes boundaries because Congress left the boundaries undefended.
- 16:22SPEAKER_01: Both sides have constitutional arguments.
- 16:26SPEAKER_01: Advocates for presidential power claim the unitary executive position.
- 16:31SPEAKER_01: Article II vests the executive power in the president.
- 16:36SPEAKER_01: Executing laws includes discretion over how and when to spend.
- 16:41SPEAKER_01: The president has inherent authority to decline spending he deems wasteful.
- 16:47SPEAKER_01: Advocates for congressional power claim the congressional supremacy position.
- 16:53SPEAKER_01: Article I gives Congress the power of the purse.
- 16:57SPEAKER_01: Appropriations are laws.
- 16:59SPEAKER_01: The President's duty is to take care that the laws be faithfully executed.
- 17:06SPEAKER_01: The framers rejected a presidential line item veto by design.
- 17:11SPEAKER_01: Both can cite founders.
- 17:14SPEAKER_01: Both can find judges who agree.
- 17:17SPEAKER_01: This debate only happens because Congress stopped defending its own power.
- 17:22SPEAKER_01: The framers created friction deliberately.
- 17:25SPEAKER_01: Madison designed it that way, ambition to check ambition.
- 17:30SPEAKER_01: The government grinds to a halt when consensus breaks down because gridlock is the price of divided power.
- 17:38SPEAKER_01: Here's the originalist paradox.
- 17:41SPEAKER_01: If this executive power existed all along, why didn't presidents use it for 184 years?
- 17:49SPEAKER_01: From Washington to Nixon, presidents generally spent what Congress appropriated.
- 17:55SPEAKER_01: Not because they lacked ambition, but because they understood the constitutional bargain.
- 18:02SPEAKER_01: When Nixon broke that norm, both parties slapped him down.
- 18:07SPEAKER_01: Republicans joined Democrats on the Impoundment Control Act because they understood, if Nixon can do this, so can the next Democrat.
- 18:16SPEAKER_01: That's the test.
- 18:18SPEAKER_01: Not do I trust this president, but do I trust every future president?
- 18:25SPEAKER_01: We can't complain about executive overreach if Congress won't exercise legislative power.
- 18:36SPEAKER_03: Do we trust every future president?
- 18:40SPEAKER_03: Hamilton wanted a king.
- 18:41SPEAKER_03: The room said no.
- 18:43SPEAKER_03: They built a system where Congress could check the executive through the power of the purse.
- 18:47SPEAKER_03: But that check only works if Congress pulls the lever.
- 18:51SPEAKER_03: Madison's design assumed ambition would check ambition.
- 18:54SPEAKER_03: That Congress would jealously guard its powers.
- 18:57SPEAKER_03: He didn't account for a Congress that would rather avoid hard votes than defend its constitutional role.
- 19:04SPEAKER_03: What's happening now looks like Hamilton's vision, but Madison's system didn't fail.
- 19:09SPEAKER_03: Congress is failing Madison's system.
- 19:12SPEAKER_03: The founders gave us the tools, Congress just refuses to use them.
- 19:17SPEAKER_03: So, again, do we trust every future president?
- 19:22SPEAKER_03: May God bless the United States of America.