Latest / The Late Debate / The Late Debate | 20 May

Transcript

The Late Debate | 20 May · The Late Debate

• 0:02
  Speaker 1: Welcome the late base. Thanks for joining us.
• 0:07
  Speaker 2: I'm James McPherson with Caleb Bond and pretty in pink
• 0:10
  Speaker 2: Danika did Georgia.
• 0:11
  Speaker 3: Oh thank you.
• 0:12
  Speaker 4: We actually we're all nicely nice palette tonight.
• 0:14
  Speaker 3: It was quite well done.
• 0:16
  Speaker 5: But i'd call that more purple byself jacks.
• 0:19
  Speaker 3: But still we're nice.
• 0:20
  Speaker 1: Are the shoes pink or purple?
• 0:21
  Speaker 3: The shoes of purple? Shoes of purple?
• 0:23
  Speaker 4: But I appreciate that we've all made a little efforts
• 0:26
  Speaker 4: to be matchy MATCHI team.
• 0:28
  Speaker 2: All right, that's a nice moment. Here's what's coming up
• 0:31
  Speaker 2: on the program tonight. One Nation's South Australian branch is
• 0:35
  Speaker 2: at odds with its federal office over fracking. Is this
• 0:38
  Speaker 2: a sign of trouble or is it a sign that
• 0:40
  Speaker 2: Pauline Hanson's party has matured. Complaints that the human rights
• 0:44
  Speaker 2: of illegal migrants were breached after they were served the
• 0:47
  Speaker 2: wrong kind of sausages on their deportation flight back to Pakistan,
• 0:52
  Speaker 2: And why restaurants increasingly hitting diners with a ten percent
• 0:55
  Speaker 2: surcharge for group bookings.
• 0:57
  Speaker 1: We'll talk about all of that.
• 0:58
  Speaker 2: And more shortly, but first, the Institute of Public Affairs
• 1:01
  Speaker 2: is calling for climate education in primary schools to be scrapped,
• 1:05
  Speaker 2: saying it only serves to create unnecessary anxiety in children.
• 1:10
  Speaker 2: Researcher and psychologist Claire Rowe told The Daily Telegraph she'd
• 1:14
  Speaker 2: seen a ten year old who is compulsively checking weather forecasts,
• 1:18
  Speaker 2: terrified that rain would lead to flooding and to rising
• 1:21
  Speaker 2: sea levels. A mother told The Daily Telegraph how her
• 1:24
  Speaker 2: child was distraught, having been told in grade four the
• 1:28
  Speaker 2: sun would explode if there wasn't drastic changes to human behavior.
• 1:32
  Speaker 2: But here's what I found most concerning about these reports
• 1:36
  Speaker 2: published today. Psychologists are said to be typically validating the
• 1:40
  Speaker 2: children's fear as the right way to feel and suggesting
• 1:44
  Speaker 2: activism as a way of coping. Now, no matter what
• 1:47
  Speaker 2: your views on climate change, I think we should all
• 1:50
  Speaker 2: agree the last thing we should be doing Danika is
• 1:53
  Speaker 2: robbing our children of their innocence and their optimism.
• 1:57
  Speaker 4: Absolutely, And as this report says that they're finding increasing
• 2:01
  Speaker 4: moments where it's these life or death scenarios that are
• 2:05
  Speaker 4: being painted to children and they're using quite graphic imagery.
• 2:09
  Speaker 4: Do we really need a whole new generation of Greta
• 2:12
  Speaker 4: Thunbergs for goodness sake? How dare you every five minutes,
• 2:17
  Speaker 4: and I think this is a real worry. You might
• 2:18
  Speaker 4: remember a couple of years ago, there were all those
• 2:20
  Speaker 4: children who skipped school, do you remember, in the middle
• 2:22
  Speaker 4: of the day, and they went and protested in capital
• 2:25
  Speaker 4: cities across the country as a strike for climate literal teenagers,
• 2:30
  Speaker 4: kids skipping school.
• 2:31
  Speaker 3: And then you had kids on camera balling their eyes out.
• 2:35
  Speaker 4: They were crying because they had been so brainwashed into
• 2:38
  Speaker 4: thinking that there was going to be this big climate
• 2:40
  Speaker 4: armageddon and this big doomsday moment.
• 2:42
  Speaker 3: They had genuinely scared for their lives.
• 2:45
  Speaker 4: But also, what does that say about the teachers, the
• 2:48
  Speaker 4: teachers that are bringing up this next generation.
• 2:51
  Speaker 3: We have a whole new cohort of activists.
• 2:56
  Speaker 4: They're not teachers, they're activists, and children, when they're young,
• 3:00
  Speaker 4: they should be taught the basics English and matts, very
• 3:03
  Speaker 4: very basic. Instead they're being taught about the climate alarmism.
• 3:07
  Speaker 4: And I really really worry for children these days because
• 3:11
  Speaker 4: clearly it's messing them up.
• 3:12
  Speaker 5: Well, as you were talking about this, James Chester received
• 3:15
  Speaker 5: an email from a mob called covering Climate Now inviting
• 3:19
  Speaker 5: me to go to some special discussion about the hurricane season.
• 3:22
  Speaker 5: Obviously over in America and talks about El Nino and
• 3:25
  Speaker 5: this stuff, but it says this is just one force
• 3:28
  Speaker 5: at play with climate change's role in fueling stronger storms
• 3:32
  Speaker 5: likely not to be mentioned in the official forecast. Ah,
• 3:36
  Speaker 5: so you know this is what's right. Oh, you're not
• 3:39
  Speaker 5: talking enough about climate change. The problem evidently here is
• 3:42
  Speaker 5: that we're talking too much about climate change. And so
• 3:45
  Speaker 5: you've got one of the issues, as mentioned in this report,
• 3:47
  Speaker 5: is that the kiddies are having their minds filled with.
• 3:49
  Speaker 6: This scary stuff at school.
• 3:51
  Speaker 5: So the kids then have issues with that to develop
• 3:54
  Speaker 5: anxiety or other concerns. They're worried about the future of
• 3:58
  Speaker 5: the world and how they hell they're going to live
• 3:59
  Speaker 5: in a world and whatever. And you're talking to little
• 4:02
  Speaker 5: primary school kids about this, you can understand how such
• 4:05
  Speaker 5: complex ideas confuse their young minds. Same as transgender stuff, right,
• 4:11
  Speaker 5: So they then have problems, and Mum and dad say, Jesus,
• 4:15
  Speaker 5: we need to get little Johnny checked out. So little
• 4:17
  Speaker 5: Johnny is sent off to the psychologist. And psychology is
• 4:22
  Speaker 5: you're not a doctor if you're a psychologist, and it's
• 4:24
  Speaker 5: an allied health profession, and so many people in allied
• 4:28
  Speaker 5: health these days themselves seem to be captured by ideology,
• 4:33
  Speaker 5: and so what this report is saying from the IPA
• 4:36
  Speaker 5: that these kids go off to seek help for what
• 4:39
  Speaker 5: has been inflicted upon them by the school, and then
• 4:42
  Speaker 5: the psychologists, instead of trying to work out how to
• 4:45
  Speaker 5: cope with the emotions they are experiencing, are basically saying, well, yeah,
• 4:48
  Speaker 5: you should feel like that because things are bad. Well,
• 4:52
  Speaker 5: that's not why you've gone to a psychologist, and they're
• 4:55
  Speaker 5: going to the transgender I think it's exactly the same.
• 4:57
  Speaker 5: I mean, we've seen, you know, people like Andrew Amos
• 4:59
  Speaker 5: and others who've spoken up about gender ideology in psychology
• 5:04
  Speaker 5: and psychiatry, and they are held down by their colleagues
• 5:08
  Speaker 5: for doing so, they come after by the professional bodies
• 5:12
  Speaker 5: for doing so, and seemingly it's exactly the same with
• 5:15
  Speaker 5: climate change. Surely your first job as a psychologist is
• 5:18
  Speaker 5: to go, I have a patient in front of me
• 5:20
  Speaker 5: who needs help for distress that they are experiencing. How
• 5:23
  Speaker 5: do I alleviate their distress? And instead they're saying, well, actually,
• 5:27
  Speaker 5: this is just a normal human experience. There are plenty
• 5:31
  Speaker 5: of things that I would say are being pathologized these
• 5:34
  Speaker 5: days that don't need to be.
• 5:37
  Speaker 6: This is not one of them.
• 5:38
  Speaker 5: We are actually inflicting something upon kids that they don't
• 5:42
  Speaker 5: need to experience.
• 5:43
  Speaker 2: And as anyone thought about the long term implications of
• 5:46
  Speaker 2: preaching doom and gloom to children, Aside from loss of innocence,
• 5:51
  Speaker 2: they become radicalized, they also become incredibly distrusting of institutions.
• 5:56
  Speaker 2: And I know it's kind of cool to not have
• 5:58
  Speaker 2: trust in institutions.
• 6:00
  Speaker 1: Society falls apart if there's.
• 6:01
  Speaker 2: Not at least a little bit of trust and faith
• 6:04
  Speaker 2: in our institutions. And then we talk often on this
• 6:06
  Speaker 2: program about declining birth rates.
• 6:09
  Speaker 1: Well, you've got a whole generation who form.
• 6:11
  Speaker 2: The opinion that there's no point pursuing family formation if
• 6:15
  Speaker 2: the earth is not going to be around. The irony
• 6:18
  Speaker 2: of course in this is while we've got teachers preaching
• 6:21
  Speaker 2: doom and gloom regarding the climate report's just come out
• 6:24
  Speaker 2: this last week saying that the IPCC, the UN body
• 6:28
  Speaker 2: that puts out the annual climate reports, they've decided the
• 6:32
  Speaker 2: next climate report needs to tone down the retric a
• 6:35
  Speaker 2: little bit because quote unquote, the worst case scenarios they've
• 6:39
  Speaker 2: been publishing are implausible. Now all of those scenarios are
• 6:43
  Speaker 2: based on computer modeling, right, so the scenarios are as
• 6:47
  Speaker 2: good or as bad as whatever they feed into their
• 6:50
  Speaker 2: computer model. And of course none of the scenarios have
• 6:53
  Speaker 2: come true. Despite the UN Secretary General, remember recently he
• 6:57
  Speaker 2: talked about we're on.
• 6:58
  Speaker 1: A highway to climate hell.
• 7:00
  Speaker 2: And all of the predictions by el Gore and so
• 7:03
  Speaker 2: many others we could name, none of them come true.
• 7:06
  Speaker 2: They've decided, you know what, maybe we better just tone
• 7:09
  Speaker 2: down the retric because people are tuning out. Not everybody, clearly,
• 7:13
  Speaker 2: school teacher ret is not. But I mean that's the irony. Right,
• 7:18
  Speaker 2: So in school classes you've got doom and gloom. Well,
• 7:21
  Speaker 2: at the same time you've got the UN saying, you
• 7:23
  Speaker 2: know what, we need to just dial back the retric
• 7:25
  Speaker 2: a little bit because A we're scaring everybody and b
• 7:28
  Speaker 2: no one's really paying attention.
• 7:30
  Speaker 1: Was the boy who cried wo.
• 7:31
  Speaker 4: The bunker of doom list. Let me just tell you
• 7:33
  Speaker 4: what was actually included in that list?
• 7:35
  Speaker 3: I mean seriously.
• 7:36
  Speaker 4: So it plotted scenarios, as James said, including significant global
• 7:40
  Speaker 4: temperature increases and sea level rises, global crop failures. But
• 7:45
  Speaker 4: here was my favorite, even potential extinction events on the
• 7:48
  Speaker 4: scale of dinosaurs. So we're talking the most extreme of extreme.
• 7:55
  Speaker 4: And when I first heard this story, my first thought
• 7:57
  Speaker 4: was Donald Trump has been saying this four years now,
• 8:01
  Speaker 4: and he has been truly vindicated by the UN because
• 8:05
  Speaker 4: last year he actually stood at the UN and said
• 8:08
  Speaker 4: to their faces that this climate scam is destroying nations.
• 8:13
  Speaker 3: And he is right.
• 8:14
  Speaker 4: I mean, you look across the world right now, it's
• 8:16
  Speaker 4: happening here in Australia. We are going broke and backwards
• 8:19
  Speaker 4: on this renewables only experiment. The UK, it's the same thing.
• 8:23
  Speaker 4: Their electricity prices, their energy bills are going through the
• 8:26
  Speaker 4: roof because they want to phase out their their fossil
• 8:30
  Speaker 4: fuels as well. Donald Trump has been vindicated by this,
• 8:34
  Speaker 4: and he actually put out a statement the other day
• 8:37
  Speaker 4: and he was very very critical of the Democrats' decisions
• 8:40
  Speaker 4: because you know, people like Joe Biden, they were so
• 8:42
  Speaker 4: heavily invested in all of this, and he called them
• 8:45
  Speaker 4: the Democrats. He said, after fifteen years of Democrats promising
• 8:49
  Speaker 4: that climate change is going to destroy the planet, the
• 8:52
  Speaker 4: United Nations top Climate Committee just admitted that its own projections.
• 8:55
  Speaker 3: Were wrong, wrong, wrong, in capital letters.
• 9:00
  Speaker 4: I actually take this as sheer of vindication for Donald Trump,
• 9:04
  Speaker 4: who's been talking about this for years.
• 9:06
  Speaker 5: Well, someone needs to tell the teachers and psychologists that
• 9:09
  Speaker 5: we're not heading.
• 9:10
  Speaker 6: Towards global boiling a.
• 9:11
  Speaker 5: And props to the IP and CLARO for pointing this
• 9:13
  Speaker 5: stuff out because it is so important. And I would
• 9:17
  Speaker 5: implore you to have a chat with your children or
• 9:21
  Speaker 5: anyone you know in your life that has kids, particularly
• 9:23
  Speaker 5: primary school kids going to school, and flag this stuff
• 9:26
  Speaker 5: with them and start to talk to their kids about
• 9:29
  Speaker 5: what they may or may not be hearing at school
• 9:31
  Speaker 5: because a lot of this stuff flies under the radar
• 9:33
  Speaker 5: and parents are not aware of exactly what their kids
• 9:37
  Speaker 5: are being taught. But spare a thought for the decent teachers, though,
• 9:41
  Speaker 5: simply trying to battle away and do their jobs properly.
• 9:45
  Speaker 5: I mean, they have to bear the brunt of all
• 9:47
  Speaker 5: of this crap as well. I mean they're just trying
• 9:49
  Speaker 5: to teach kids and meanwhile they're being told by their
• 9:52
  Speaker 5: colleagues they've got a parrot on about climate change all
• 9:54
  Speaker 5: the time, and they're also facing rampant abuse, not from
• 9:58
  Speaker 5: students but from parents.
• 10:00
  Speaker 6: Now we've talked about this.
• 10:01
  Speaker 5: Before, there was a recent report here in Australia about
• 10:04
  Speaker 5: the number of teachers and principles in particular, who were
• 10:07
  Speaker 5: facing abuse from parents having to lock themselves in their offices,
• 10:12
  Speaker 5: pick up times and all sorts of stuff because they're
• 10:15
  Speaker 5: being abused. But Australia's not the only country facing this.
• 10:18
  Speaker 5: Over in the UK, the UK Telegraph is reporting that
• 10:21
  Speaker 5: the Association of School and College Leaders held a meeting
• 10:25
  Speaker 5: recently at which they said that ninety percent of head
• 10:28
  Speaker 5: teachers and other senior leaders in a recent survey said
• 10:32
  Speaker 5: they had been on the receiving end of quote challenging
• 10:35
  Speaker 5: behavior not from pupils, but from teachers that included rudeness
• 10:40
  Speaker 5: and disrespect.
• 10:41
  Speaker 6: Sixty percent of them said.
• 10:43
  Speaker 5: They'd had verbal abuse and threats from parents within the
• 10:47
  Speaker 5: past year. I mean, how ridiculous is that. But to
• 10:50
  Speaker 5: make it even worse, these parents now fancy themselves as
• 10:54
  Speaker 5: bush lawyers because they've discovered AI and so they reckon
• 10:59
  Speaker 5: they put some a hodgepodge legal argument into CHAT, GPT
• 11:03
  Speaker 5: or some other system, it will tell them chapter and
• 11:06
  Speaker 5: verse what teachers can and cannot do.
• 11:09
  Speaker 6: Yes, these parents are trying to.
• 11:11
  Speaker 5: Usurp the authority of the teachers in the classroom. You
• 11:14
  Speaker 5: wonder why teachers can't discipline children anymore, but to burnish
• 11:18
  Speaker 5: with a few examples. This is from the UK Telegraph.
• 11:21
  Speaker 5: They quote one teacher so that one parent sent in
• 11:24
  Speaker 5: a long and very strange note about human rights after
• 11:28
  Speaker 5: her seven year old was made to line up outside
• 11:31
  Speaker 5: in the rain when the bell rang. Another teacher said,
• 11:34
  Speaker 5: I've had another parent send a letter which quoted various
• 11:37
  Speaker 5: legal precedents, all because their child was sent out of
• 11:41
  Speaker 5: lessons for being disruptive. When we invited the parents to
• 11:44
  Speaker 5: school to have a conversation about what happened, they printed
• 11:47
  Speaker 5: out rings of AI generated information and kept referring to
• 11:52
  Speaker 5: their print out. Apparently there's also been threats of legal
• 11:55
  Speaker 5: action because a school gave a kid a cold lunch.
• 11:59
  Speaker 5: I mean, goodness, sacuriously, it's not bad enough that we
• 12:02
  Speaker 5: have entitled parents thinking they know better about you know,
• 12:05
  Speaker 5: little Johnny and how he should be disciplined at all.
• 12:08
  Speaker 6: This sort of stuff.
• 12:09
  Speaker 5: Now they reckon they can go to AI and find
• 12:12
  Speaker 5: out exactly how the world works. If I understand why
• 12:16
  Speaker 5: the churn rate in teaching is so high, Because if
• 12:20
  Speaker 5: you're a decent teacher and all you want to do
• 12:22
  Speaker 5: is actually teach kids, you have to deal with idiots
• 12:26
  Speaker 5: in your own profession who want to divert you from
• 12:28
  Speaker 5: that to ideological things, and then you have to deal
• 12:31
  Speaker 5: with idiot parents who think they know better than you
• 12:33
  Speaker 5: are doing your own jobs.
• 12:35
  Speaker 4: If you know anything about AI or even like chat
• 12:38
  Speaker 4: GPT for example, it actually reinforces whatever you put in there.
• 12:41
  Speaker 4: It tells you that you're right and yes, you know
• 12:44
  Speaker 4: do it in this matter.
• 12:44
  Speaker 3: So I can just.
• 12:46
  Speaker 4: Imagine when chat GPT writes up this legal letter and
• 12:50
  Speaker 4: it probably says at the end, this is a very
• 12:52
  Speaker 4: calm and considered way to handle the situation. Well done,
• 12:56
  Speaker 4: and congratulations to you. The parents are probably like, yes,
• 12:59
  Speaker 4: look at me, go this is terrific. So what does
• 13:02
  Speaker 4: this tell us Well, basically, it is bringing up the
• 13:05
  Speaker 4: next generation to be an absolute bunch of snowflakes. And
• 13:08
  Speaker 4: once it's supported to one day, these children are going
• 13:11
  Speaker 4: to be entering the workforce right and they're going to
• 13:14
  Speaker 4: realize pretty quickly that mummy and daddy are not going
• 13:18
  Speaker 4: to be there to save your backside and write in
• 13:20
  Speaker 4: these AI generated legal letters. You're actually going to have
• 13:23
  Speaker 4: to do some work and stand up on your own
• 13:25
  Speaker 4: two feet. But none of these kids will be able
• 13:26
  Speaker 4: to because they are upset that they have to stand
• 13:29
  Speaker 4: in the rain for a couple of minutes when the
• 13:31
  Speaker 4: bell rings, or that their lunch was cold not hot boo.
• 13:35
  Speaker 4: Who we are bringing up the next generation to be
• 13:38
  Speaker 4: absolute WIMPs, and I despair over this. Secondly, what are
• 13:43
  Speaker 4: parents actually teaching their children? Are basically saying, it's okay,
• 13:46
  Speaker 4: little Johnny, if you don't know what to write, just
• 13:48
  Speaker 4: plug it into chat, GPT or any sort of AI
• 13:51
  Speaker 4: software and it will tell you what to write. You
• 13:53
  Speaker 4: don't have to use your brain. You'll have to use
• 13:55
  Speaker 4: the writing skills that you should be learning in the classroom.
• 13:57
  Speaker 4: Instead of worrying about all this sort of ridict things,
• 14:01
  Speaker 4: just use AI to deal with things.
• 14:03
  Speaker 3: I just I despair.
• 14:04
  Speaker 4: And these are the teachers who actually want to teach.
• 14:07
  Speaker 4: They're not activists, They're just trying to do their job, James,
• 14:10
  Speaker 4: for goodness sake.
• 14:11
  Speaker 2: I agree with what you're saying about snowflakes, but I
• 14:13
  Speaker 2: think it's much worse than that.
• 14:15
  Speaker 1: What we're doing is we're raising a generation who have
• 14:18
  Speaker 1: zero respect for authority totally.
• 14:20
  Speaker 2: Remember when you were a little kid and your parents
• 14:22
  Speaker 2: you'd say, but why, and your mum or dad would
• 14:24
  Speaker 2: say because I said so yes, And it would drive
• 14:27
  Speaker 2: you nuts as a kid, because you expect an explanation,
• 14:30
  Speaker 2: you expect reason. So it's not good enough for your
• 14:32
  Speaker 2: parent to simply say I'm the parent, you're not, so
• 14:35
  Speaker 2: you don't get an explanation.
• 14:36
  Speaker 1: I'm the boss.
• 14:37
  Speaker 2: And I've realized raising our kid, that's a very important
• 14:42
  Speaker 2: lesson to learn.
• 14:43
  Speaker 1: And then when the kids would get in trouble.
• 14:44
  Speaker 2: At school, and often you know what, it was touch
• 14:47
  Speaker 2: and go, whether the teacher was being unfair or not.
• 14:50
  Speaker 2: But as a parent, you've got to decide what's more
• 14:52
  Speaker 2: important stopping little Johnny from standing out in the rain
• 14:55
  Speaker 2: or teaching little Johnny. You know what, At home, you're
• 14:58
  Speaker 2: under my authority. When you're at school, you're under the
• 15:00
  Speaker 2: teachers authority. And I'm not going to undermine the teacher's
• 15:03
  Speaker 2: authority because if I do that, I'm teaching you to
• 15:06
  Speaker 2: never respect authority.
• 15:07
  Speaker 1: And you'll always be under authority. I said to my kids.
• 15:10
  Speaker 2: When you get your driver's license, you under the policeman's authority.
• 15:13
  Speaker 2: When you get a job, you're under your employer's authority.
• 15:16
  Speaker 2: And if ever you become Elon Musk or Donald Trump,
• 15:19
  Speaker 2: God pray you believe you're under God's authority and not
• 15:21
  Speaker 2: a law unto yourself. If you don't teach kids to
• 15:25
  Speaker 2: respect authority and early, they never will and so much
• 15:28
  Speaker 2: worse than snowflakes.
• 15:30
  Speaker 1: Though you're right about that.
• 15:31
  Speaker 2: You end up with kids who don't respect any authority,
• 15:34
  Speaker 2: are a law unto themselves, and you get anarchy in society.
• 15:37
  Speaker 2: So these parents are not doing their kids any favors
• 15:41
  Speaker 2: at all by arguing every little point about their kids
• 15:44
  Speaker 2: in the principal's office and letting their kids see that.
• 15:47
  Speaker 3: But also you've got to learn to toughen up a
• 15:50
  Speaker 3: little bit.
• 15:50
  Speaker 4: If your sangwiches cold one day or your food's called
• 15:53
  Speaker 4: who cares?
• 15:54
  Speaker 3: For goodness? Human rights?
• 15:58
  Speaker 4: Shouldn't that be a lesson to your child to say,
• 16:00
  Speaker 4: you know what, han, be grateful that you've got a meal,
• 16:03
  Speaker 4: Be grateful that you actually have lunch, and that we
• 16:06
  Speaker 4: can afford to send you to school, because there are
• 16:07
  Speaker 4: children out there who can't eat today and who would
• 16:10
  Speaker 4: love an opportunity to go to school and they simply can't.
• 16:13
  Speaker 3: It should be a lesson for children.
• 16:15
  Speaker 4: Not a letter written by AI as a legal threat
• 16:18
  Speaker 4: to oh, well, you know his lunch was cold?
• 16:20
  Speaker 1: You I've heard teachers say.
• 16:21
  Speaker 2: I always wondered, why is this kid so bad in class?
• 16:25
  Speaker 2: So I thought I'll catch up with the parents and
• 16:26
  Speaker 2: have a chat with them. And within thirty seconds of
• 16:28
  Speaker 2: meeting the parents, I realized why little Johnny's such a
• 16:31
  Speaker 2: mungoling class?
• 16:32
  Speaker 4: Exactly. Yeah, I completely agree. Well, let's stay home now.
• 16:36
  Speaker 4: Corey Bernardi, who is One Nation South Australian leader, he
• 16:40
  Speaker 4: has gone against Pauline Hanson when it comes to fracking
• 16:44
  Speaker 4: in his state of South Australia. Now, Pauline Hanson has
• 16:48
  Speaker 4: been very big on the notion of drill baby drill,
• 16:50
  Speaker 4: and it's been something that she has been pushing quite well,
• 16:54
  Speaker 4: I would say, given that we are in a fuel.
• 16:56
  Speaker 3: Crisis right now.
• 16:57
  Speaker 4: But Cory Bernardi has voted against lifting the ban on
• 17:00
  Speaker 4: fracking for oil and gas in that state as well
• 17:03
  Speaker 4: as the Liberal Party both have gone against that. This
• 17:06
  Speaker 4: was a joint decision by the two Conservatives. Now One
• 17:11
  Speaker 4: Nation's decision has drawn the ire of a number of
• 17:15
  Speaker 4: parties and producers, including the Australian Energy Producer Chief Samantha McCulloch.
• 17:20
  Speaker 4: She says it beggars belief when we urgently need more
• 17:23
  Speaker 4: gas in the market, but Pauline Hanson is washing her
• 17:27
  Speaker 4: hands of this. She was asked to comment about it,
• 17:30
  Speaker 4: given that she's actually going to be making a major
• 17:32
  Speaker 4: speech in Adelaide tomorrow about the gas industry, and she said, no,
• 17:37
  Speaker 4: it's got nothing to do with me. I'm going to
• 17:39
  Speaker 4: leave it to my South Australian colleagues. Senator Hanson tomorrow
• 17:43
  Speaker 4: will reveal One Nation's offshore gas policy at the AEP conference,
• 17:47
  Speaker 4: but asked for comment on the state decision, said through
• 17:49
  Speaker 4: a spokesman, this was for the state leader and his
• 17:52
  Speaker 4: team to determine. Now this is where it gets interesting
• 17:56
  Speaker 4: to me, because you've got the labor Premier over there,
• 17:59
  Speaker 4: Peter maleyawscus he wants to lift the ten year ban
• 18:03
  Speaker 4: on the fracking that was actually imposed by the Liberal
• 18:06
  Speaker 4: Party back in twenty eighteen. And so Peter Malanowskis has
• 18:09
  Speaker 4: come out now accusing One Nation of continuing the same
• 18:12
  Speaker 4: policy madness that are left South Australia facing the gas
• 18:15
  Speaker 4: supply gaps.
• 18:17
  Speaker 3: I'm actually quite stunned by this move.
• 18:20
  Speaker 4: I've got to say, because you've got a labor government,
• 18:24
  Speaker 4: labor government, let's put that into perspective. Labor in that
• 18:28
  Speaker 4: state is calling for fracking, and you've got two conservative
• 18:31
  Speaker 4: parties saying they don't want it.
• 18:33
  Speaker 3: Now. Cory Bnardi has said that he has spoken to
• 18:35
  Speaker 3: a number.
• 18:36
  Speaker 4: Of locals that it would be an absolute disaster for
• 18:38
  Speaker 4: South Australia fight I do respect the fact that he
• 18:41
  Speaker 4: knows the state better than others, but we're talking about
• 18:44
  Speaker 4: energy policy here, at policy that One Nation has been
• 18:48
  Speaker 4: really the only party that's been pretty straight down the
• 18:50
  Speaker 4: line on Pauline Hansen's the only one saying we've got
• 18:53
  Speaker 4: to pull out of the Paris Agreement. We've got a drill,
• 18:56
  Speaker 4: baby drill. I mean, she has been fair dicome on this.
• 18:59
  Speaker 4: I just find it bizarre that the South Australian branch
• 19:03
  Speaker 4: would go against what I would say is a pretty
• 19:07
  Speaker 4: straightforward policy.
• 19:09
  Speaker 2: I think that you can support fracking without supporting absolutely
• 19:12
  Speaker 2: every fracking project that is suggested. And I also think
• 19:17
  Speaker 2: that there was a lot of talk how was Pauline
• 19:20
  Speaker 2: Hanson going to be able to bring big personalities and
• 19:25
  Speaker 2: sharp minds into the One Nation tent and give them
• 19:29
  Speaker 2: enough space to be their own man or be their
• 19:31
  Speaker 2: own woman, and not dominate and have things spin out
• 19:34
  Speaker 2: of control. And I think this is proof that one
• 19:38
  Speaker 2: Nation has matured. I don't think this is a problem
• 19:40
  Speaker 2: for one nation. I note that Melanowskis is not criticizing
• 19:44
  Speaker 2: the coalition. He's come after one Nation, which I would
• 19:47
  Speaker 2: take as a compliment if I was Pauline Hanson, that
• 19:50
  Speaker 2: the South Australian premier thinks the party is worth criticizing.
• 19:55
  Speaker 2: So I don't have a problem with this. And like
• 19:56
  Speaker 2: I said, it's horses for courses. They don't support this
• 19:59
  Speaker 2: project because, as you pointed out, the locals say it
• 20:02
  Speaker 2: would be a disaster for that area. But I don't
• 20:05
  Speaker 2: believe the South Australian One Nation organization is saying we're
• 20:09
  Speaker 2: against fracking per se, but in this instance they don't
• 20:12
  Speaker 2: believe it's the best thing for the environment.
• 20:14
  Speaker 5: The reason the Lives Institute of that ban in twenty
• 20:16
  Speaker 5: eighteen is because the Southeast is sort of traditional liberal territory.
• 20:21
  Speaker 5: It's the idea of cracking down there is deeply unpopular
• 20:24
  Speaker 5: with the farming communities, and so they said, well, we'll
• 20:26
  Speaker 5: exclude the Southeast from any fracking. And of course One
• 20:29
  Speaker 5: Nation is going after fundamentally the same voters, and so
• 20:33
  Speaker 5: they have decided to back in what the community wants.
• 20:35
  Speaker 5: That is their decision, and they're allowed to make that.
• 20:38
  Speaker 5: And I'm glad that Paul Hnson allows a state movement
• 20:42
  Speaker 5: of one nation to make its own decisions, because that
• 20:45
  Speaker 5: would otherwise spell the downfall. I think of one nation
• 20:49
  Speaker 5: as a state power. If the federal branch starts interfering
• 20:54
  Speaker 5: in the business of state branches and doesn't let let
• 20:57
  Speaker 5: them do their own thing, then it will all fall apart.
• 21:01
  Speaker 5: I mean the fact that Paul in Hanson is even
• 21:03
  Speaker 5: being asked to make comment about these things. I mean,
• 21:06
  Speaker 5: does anyone go and ask the Prime Minister to make
• 21:09
  Speaker 5: comment about what, you know, labor in New South Wales
• 21:11
  Speaker 5: is doing with state legislation or what labor in w
• 21:14
  Speaker 5: A is doing with state legislation. No, because we go, well,
• 21:17
  Speaker 5: he's the leader of the Federal party, and you know
• 21:20
  Speaker 5: Roger Cook is the leader of the State Party in
• 21:23
  Speaker 5: w A and Peter Malanarskus is the leader of the
• 21:26
  Speaker 5: State Party in South Australia. Chris Min's is the leader
• 21:29
  Speaker 5: of the State party in New South Wales. They run
• 21:31
  Speaker 5: their own races, they're allowed to have different opinions and
• 21:35
  Speaker 5: as we see quite often these days with Chris Mins
• 21:37
  Speaker 5: the premier of New South Wales. He's frequently at odds
• 21:40
  Speaker 5: with the federal Labor Party and.
• 21:42
  Speaker 6: Isn't afraid to say so.
• 21:44
  Speaker 5: You need to be able to have the state branches
• 21:47
  Speaker 5: saying what they want and doing what is good for
• 21:50
  Speaker 5: their state, what they believe is in the interest of
• 21:52
  Speaker 5: their states. And so I think it's a good thing
• 21:55
  Speaker 5: that Paul and Hanson steps back from this and says, no,
• 21:58
  Speaker 5: I'm not getting involved in this.
• 21:59
  Speaker 6: It's not business.
• 22:00
  Speaker 5: One nation essay has to be one nation essay and
• 22:03
  Speaker 5: do its own thing, even if it's policies are at
• 22:06
  Speaker 5: odds with the National part.
• 22:07
  Speaker 4: I guess it just opens you up to ridicule, right though,
• 22:09
  Speaker 4: that would be my only argument. Peter Malanawskis has as
• 22:12
  Speaker 4: you said, he's come out and slammed One Nation over this,
• 22:14
  Speaker 4: because it's very rare to get a Labor premier wanting
• 22:17
  Speaker 4: a policy like this and to almost have One Nation
• 22:19
  Speaker 4: and the Liberal Party for that matter, siding.
• 22:21
  Speaker 3: With Greenies on this.
• 22:23
  Speaker 4: But we criticize Anthony Alberenesi, for example, when Chris Mins
• 22:28
  Speaker 4: is at odds with him, because I mean, one recent
• 22:31
  Speaker 4: example was the anti Semitism Royal Commission it's something that
• 22:34
  Speaker 4: Chris Mins wanted and Anthony Albanesi didn't want. In the
• 22:38
  Speaker 4: last week, just an example I can think of, even
• 22:40
  Speaker 4: within the Liberal Party, you had that South Australian Senator
• 22:42
  Speaker 4: Andrew McLaughlin come out and that bizarre rant about the
• 22:46
  Speaker 4: negative connotations of the Liberal Party's migration plan. So I
• 22:50
  Speaker 4: understand that you've got people at odds with each other,
• 22:52
  Speaker 4: but it does then open you up to ridicule and
• 22:55
  Speaker 4: people go, well, there's fractures within the party, how are
• 22:57
  Speaker 4: they going to handle this?
• 22:58
  Speaker 5: Well, then the answer to that is to be like
• 23:00
  Speaker 5: the ALP And again this doesn't apply between state and federal.
• 23:03
  Speaker 5: But the answer to that is to just force everyone to.
• 23:05
  Speaker 6: Think the same way.
• 23:06
  Speaker 5: And ultimately I don't think that's a great thing either,
• 23:09
  Speaker 5: Like you don't get a conscious vote in the Labor Party,
• 23:11
  Speaker 5: you just do what you're told.
• 23:12
  Speaker 6: Is that what we want all parties to know.
• 23:14
  Speaker 4: I don't disagree with it, as I said, I just
• 23:17
  Speaker 4: think that I am just quite surprised, given that fuel
• 23:22
  Speaker 4: is at the forefront right now and we have an
• 23:25
  Speaker 4: energy and gas debate going on in this country. I
• 23:29
  Speaker 4: would have thought that the conservative side of politics would
• 23:32
  Speaker 4: have been more on the same page about what needs
• 23:36
  Speaker 4: to be done pretty quickly and urgently to.
• 23:38
  Speaker 1: Try it, but don't.
• 23:39
  Speaker 2: While most nights against ideology and ideologically driven electricians, I
• 23:44
  Speaker 2: think it's okay if they say, you know what, we're
• 23:46
  Speaker 2: not going to be driven by and you can be
• 23:48
  Speaker 2: driven by renewables ideology or you can be driven by
• 23:51
  Speaker 2: a what do you want to call it?
• 23:52
  Speaker 1: A free for all when it comes to energy ideology.
• 23:54
  Speaker 2: If they're saying, you know what, we're going to take
• 23:56
  Speaker 2: a common sense approach on a case by case base,
• 24:01
  Speaker 2: I wouldn't be critical of that.
• 24:02
  Speaker 3: Yeah, no, again, I understand.
• 24:05
  Speaker 4: Look, they know their local community is better than anyone,
• 24:07
  Speaker 4: so I don't disregard that what Corey Bernardi is doing.
• 24:10
  Speaker 4: I'm just saying that on something so critical right now
• 24:13
  Speaker 4: when we're literally in the middle of a crisis and
• 24:15
  Speaker 4: people do want to see the pole suggests. It was
• 24:18
  Speaker 4: even in the Sky News Polse poll we had about
• 24:20
  Speaker 4: two months ago that a lot of Australians do want
• 24:22
  Speaker 4: to see a notion of drill, baby drill.
• 24:24
  Speaker 2: So okay, if you're eating out, you'd be pretty familiar
• 24:27
  Speaker 2: with surcharges. I mean, if you eat out on a
• 24:29
  Speaker 2: weekend at a restaurant, they'll typically charge you what ten
• 24:32
  Speaker 2: percent surcharge because it's a weekend. I guess they have
• 24:35
  Speaker 2: to pay penalty rates for staff. If it's a public holiday,
• 24:38
  Speaker 2: you're normally paying about fifteen percent surcharge.
• 24:41
  Speaker 1: I had not realized that if you go out with
• 24:44
  Speaker 1: a group of friends, say ten or more people.
• 24:47
  Speaker 2: As a group booking here in Sydney and now in Melbourne,
• 24:50
  Speaker 2: increasingly in other places.
• 24:51
  Speaker 1: They charge you a booking surcharge.
• 24:55
  Speaker 2: As I said, there's a number of restaurants in Sydney
• 24:57
  Speaker 2: that have already been doing this, but it's just started
• 24:59
  Speaker 2: happening in Melbourne, where if you've got a group of
• 25:02
  Speaker 2: ten or more they charge you a ten percent surcharge
• 25:05
  Speaker 2: on the total meal to pay for more staff in
• 25:10
  Speaker 2: the kitchen and on the floor, for the extra organization
• 25:13
  Speaker 2: that goes into joining tables together and making sure meals
• 25:16
  Speaker 2: all come out at the same time. I think this
• 25:20
  Speaker 2: is an absolute colm. There's no way I would agree
• 25:23
  Speaker 2: to pay ten percent on top of the meal just
• 25:26
  Speaker 2: because we bought more customers to a restaurant. They complain
• 25:31
  Speaker 2: they don't get enough custom. Now they're complaining we're doing
• 25:34
  Speaker 2: so much custom.
• 25:35
  Speaker 1: We need to charge you more. This is an absolute rot.
• 25:38
  Speaker 1: Don't you think it.
• 25:39
  Speaker 5: Does seem oder And you're notwithstanding the fact that it's
• 25:42
  Speaker 5: a pretty hard slog in hospitality these days, agreed.
• 25:46
  Speaker 6: I just don't get.
• 25:47
  Speaker 5: Why having more people in your restaurant is a bad thing.
• 25:50
  Speaker 5: I would have thought, you know, if you've got ten
• 25:52
  Speaker 5: people as opposed to do well, that means they're ordering
• 25:55
  Speaker 5: ten meals as opposed to two, so already spending more money.
• 25:58
  Speaker 5: They're probably more likely to d more grog because you know,
• 26:01
  Speaker 5: they've come along as a group, so they're probably if
• 26:03
  Speaker 5: someone's birthday or a party, some sort of celebration or something,
• 26:06
  Speaker 5: so the wine's flowing and then they have a few
• 26:08
  Speaker 5: and then they go, ah, bugger, it will get the
• 26:10
  Speaker 5: expensive bottle and whatever. I just would have thought it
• 26:12
  Speaker 5: would be good for business. And you know, if you
• 26:14
  Speaker 5: walk past a restaurant you see the place is full
• 26:16
  Speaker 5: and they've got a table of ten in there, you go, oh, gee,
• 26:18
  Speaker 5: that place must be right. I might go in there
• 26:20
  Speaker 5: and have a meal one day, et cetera, et cetera.
• 26:23
  Speaker 5: I just don't get why you would be penalized effectively
• 26:27
  Speaker 5: for having more people come into the restaurant. I mean,
• 26:30
  Speaker 5: whether you've got five tables of two or one table
• 26:33
  Speaker 5: of ten, you're still serving the same number of people,
• 26:36
  Speaker 5: aren't you.
• 26:36
  Speaker 3: I completely agree.
• 26:37
  Speaker 4: And I was having a look actually at the menu
• 26:39
  Speaker 4: of the restaurant that you had just mentioned, just out
• 26:42
  Speaker 4: of curiosity to see what, on average would a person
• 26:46
  Speaker 4: be paying. So they've got a chef's menu and they've
• 26:48
  Speaker 4: got a signature menu. So if you want the chef's menu,
• 26:51
  Speaker 4: it's one hundred and seventy five dollars per person. If
• 26:53
  Speaker 4: you want the signature menu, it's two hundred and twenty
• 26:56
  Speaker 4: five dollars per person. So say you've got a table
• 26:58
  Speaker 4: of ten of you and you're going for the more
• 27:00
  Speaker 4: expensive option two hundred and twenty five dollars ahead.
• 27:03
  Speaker 3: Then you add alcohol on top.
• 27:05
  Speaker 4: Of that, and you're getting one bottle after another because
• 27:07
  Speaker 4: you've got ten of you there, so there's multiple bottles,
• 27:10
  Speaker 4: and it may be maybe the most expensive you could
• 27:12
  Speaker 4: end up paying. I reckon upuods of five hundred dollars
• 27:15
  Speaker 4: per person, even it wouldn't put it part. I've been
• 27:18
  Speaker 4: to some expensive restaurants in Sydney. Well, you do end
• 27:20
  Speaker 4: up paying about five hundred dollars per person at the
• 27:23
  Speaker 4: end of the night, and I think five grand that's
• 27:26
  Speaker 4: a pretty good night out. That's it for the For
• 27:29
  Speaker 4: the owners, you'd be thinking, well, that's that is a
• 27:32
  Speaker 4: good deal. That's what we want out of a table.
• 27:35
  Speaker 4: That's a good amount of money. So why would you
• 27:38
  Speaker 4: want to add surcharges on top of that?
• 27:40
  Speaker 1: Is there a way around this?
• 27:41
  Speaker 2: Like if we're going to do a late debate dinner
• 27:44
  Speaker 2: with our producers and so and we take ten of
• 27:46
  Speaker 2: us out, do we.
• 27:46
  Speaker 1: Get Caleb to book a table of five?
• 27:48
  Speaker 3: Yeah?
• 27:49
  Speaker 2: I know, and then you book a table of five
• 27:50
  Speaker 2: and we are just close together.
• 27:52
  Speaker 4: A good idea. There could be ways to get around it.
• 27:55
  Speaker 4: And a lot of these places aren't cheap. Some of
• 27:57
  Speaker 4: the list includes places like rock Pool, for example. Those
• 28:00
  Speaker 4: steaks are very very expensive as it is. And don't
• 28:04
  Speaker 4: get me wrong, they're absolutely amazing.
• 28:06
  Speaker 3: They're very very good. It's very good quality.
• 28:09
  Speaker 4: But come on, people are spending money at your restaurant.
• 28:12
  Speaker 4: Don't penalize them any more than you have to.
• 28:15
  Speaker 5: Surely, I have to say that jameson a bit. Our
• 28:18
  Speaker 5: producer Mill was rolling her eyes when you said we
• 28:20
  Speaker 5: could wrestle up a team.
• 28:21
  Speaker 6: Of ten working on this show. You know she's pulling
• 28:25
  Speaker 6: the whole thing together.
• 28:26
  Speaker 1: Doesn't work ten of everyone with us.
• 28:31
  Speaker 5: While we're talking about food, So you go to a
• 28:34
  Speaker 5: restaurant you've got too many of you there.
• 28:35
  Speaker 6: They'll charge you a ten percent surcharge.
• 28:38
  Speaker 5: But what about if you get deported from Ireland and
• 28:41
  Speaker 5: they put you on a plane and they serve your food. Now,
• 28:44
  Speaker 5: airline food in general is just going downhill at a
• 28:47
  Speaker 5: rate of knots, even on a quantus domestic flat.
• 28:50
  Speaker 6: These days.
• 28:51
  Speaker 5: You used to get a hot meal if you flew
• 28:54
  Speaker 5: at lunchtime or in the evening, just as part of
• 28:56
  Speaker 5: your standard fee, and now you're lucky to get a
• 28:59
  Speaker 5: sandwich or even a snack. But if you happen to
• 29:02
  Speaker 5: be deported from Ireland as a group of twenty four.
• 29:06
  Speaker 2: Love the way you say if you happen to be deported, well,
• 29:08
  Speaker 2: you know, like as if people watching.
• 29:09
  Speaker 1: May well find themselves being deported.
• 29:11
  Speaker 6: Well, look, I don't know.
• 29:12
  Speaker 5: All I'm saying is that if you're an illegal Pakistani
• 29:15
  Speaker 5: in Ireland watching this program for that you.
• 29:18
  Speaker 6: Are going to be forewarned because twenty.
• 29:20
  Speaker 5: Four blokes who went through this process, by the way,
• 29:23
  Speaker 5: in Ireland, they offer you ten thousand euro to bugger
• 29:27
  Speaker 5: off of your own volition. That's sixteen thousand Australian dollars
• 29:31
  Speaker 5: before they even look at deporting you. So these are
• 29:33
  Speaker 5: twenty four men who were too stupid to take the
• 29:35
  Speaker 5: ten thousand euro and bugger off back to Pakistan. They
• 29:39
  Speaker 5: decided they'd wait forister government to come in and do
• 29:42
  Speaker 5: it for them.
• 29:42
  Speaker 6: So they'd load them all up onto a plane.
• 29:45
  Speaker 5: Now, this flight from Ireland to Pakistan, chartered flight with
• 29:49
  Speaker 5: twenty four men on it cost four hundred and seventy
• 29:53
  Speaker 5: three thousand Euro. That converts to seven hundred and seventy
• 29:57
  Speaker 5: thousand Australian dollars. And they were offered good food right
• 30:03
  Speaker 5: so per head this is thirty two grand in Australian
• 30:06
  Speaker 5: money twenty k euro, so you'd expect some decent food
• 30:09
  Speaker 5: for that. They were offered a full Irish breakfast.
• 30:13
  Speaker 6: But what would be wrong.
• 30:15
  Speaker 5: With a full Irish breakfast, you ask, Well, this is
• 30:18
  Speaker 5: in the UK Telegraph. Its is according to the flight's
• 30:22
  Speaker 5: human rights monitor, appointed by the Irish government. So the
• 30:25
  Speaker 5: government has appointed a human rights monitor to monitor a
• 30:29
  Speaker 5: flight of twenty four men who were in the country
• 30:30
  Speaker 5: illegally being sent back to Pakistan. They said the quality
• 30:34
  Speaker 5: of food was a low standard welcome to flying and
• 30:37
  Speaker 5: the serving of quote pork sausages as part of a
• 30:41
  Speaker 5: full Irish breakfast was inappropriate because of course Pakistan is
• 30:46
  Speaker 5: a Muslim majority country. I mean, these poor buggers they
• 30:50
  Speaker 5: were in Ireland illegally and then they had to go
• 30:54
  Speaker 5: through the indignation they had to deal with the human
• 30:58
  Speaker 5: rights abuse of being offered a pork sausage. Now, if
• 31:02
  Speaker 5: you didn't want the pork sausage on your full Irish breakfast,
• 31:07
  Speaker 5: wouldn't you just put it to one side and not
• 31:10
  Speaker 5: not eat it.
• 31:10
  Speaker 1: But you're saying they weren't like forced at gunpoint to
• 31:13
  Speaker 1: eat it.
• 31:13
  Speaker 6: Well, I wouldn't have thought so.
• 31:14
  Speaker 5: I mean, the Human Rights Monitor didn't write that in
• 31:17
  Speaker 5: the report, so I'm going to assume they weren't forced
• 31:19
  Speaker 5: at gunpoint. But I mean, this is ridiculous, isn't it.
• 31:22
  Speaker 5: You paid thirty two grand ahead to send these people
• 31:25
  Speaker 5: back home, and the Human rights head Honchow tells you
• 31:28
  Speaker 5: you bag it up because you offered them a pork sausage.
• 31:30
  Speaker 3: Oh my goingness.
• 31:31
  Speaker 4: Seriously, when I first read this, I thought, wow, breaking news.
• 31:34
  Speaker 4: A full Irish breakfast served on a flight from Dublin,
• 31:37
  Speaker 4: I would have thought. I mean, if we were on
• 31:39
  Speaker 4: any of these sort of Middle Eastern character carriers, you
• 31:42
  Speaker 4: would be fed hellal food and you either take it
• 31:46
  Speaker 4: or you leave it.
• 31:47
  Speaker 3: And to your point, move the sausage to the side,
• 31:50
  Speaker 3: have the rest of it.
• 31:51
  Speaker 6: For goodness, to get the beans and the pudding and
• 31:53
  Speaker 6: all that.
• 31:54
  Speaker 3: You still get everything else.
• 31:55
  Speaker 4: I mean, a full Irish breakfast sounds absolutely delicious to me,
• 31:58
  Speaker 4: but it just goes to show this the entitlement that
• 32:02
  Speaker 4: is on display when you've got illegal migrants who are
• 32:06
  Speaker 4: cared for and respected more than everyday citizens of the
• 32:11
  Speaker 4: country in which they are legally migrated to. For goodness sake,
• 32:15
  Speaker 4: this is where we're at in society right now, and
• 32:19
  Speaker 4: I just I really despair for the UK in particular
• 32:22
  Speaker 4: at the moment, because they are in such a crisis
• 32:25
  Speaker 4: where taxpayers are having to fork out four hundred and
• 32:28
  Speaker 4: ten thousand pounds to suit these migrants.
• 32:34
  Speaker 5: Should note, this is the Republic of Ireland. It's not
• 32:37
  Speaker 5: Northern Ireland, so the UK isn't punting up the money.
• 32:40
  Speaker 5: It's Ireland itself. But you mentioned still, you mentioned the
• 32:43
  Speaker 5: UK though, because apparently the Prime Minister Sukiyatama is now
• 32:49
  Speaker 5: considering the provision of a full English breakfast with pork
• 32:52
  Speaker 5: sausages on deportation flats.
• 32:56
  Speaker 6: The return of the sashages. Yes, they will be which
• 33:01
  Speaker 6: they came with, the pork sausages, James.
• 33:03
  Speaker 2: Could I just say, don't these Pakistani gentlemen prove the
• 33:07
  Speaker 2: point that they should never have been allowed to stay
• 33:10
  Speaker 2: in Ireland by complaining about the food on the aircraft
• 33:14
  Speaker 2: as they get punted back to Pakistan.
• 33:16
  Speaker 1: You mentioned the word entitlement.
• 33:17
  Speaker 2: Could you imagine if they'd become citizens of Ireland the
• 33:20
  Speaker 2: sort of attitude, no gratitude, no thanks, no appreciating, just
• 33:24
  Speaker 2: whining and winging.
• 33:25
  Speaker 3: Just whining about their sausages.
• 33:27
  Speaker 2: Go back to where you came from. Enjoy Pakistan, Enjoy Pakistan.
• 33:31
  Speaker 3: Off you go, boys, back to Pakistan exactly.
• 33:34
  Speaker 4: All right, ladies and gentlemen, it is now time for
• 33:37
  Speaker 4: the latest installment of the Gruesome Twosome. Yes, I am
• 33:41
  Speaker 4: talking about Harry and Meghan. I know they are truly, truly,
• 33:46
  Speaker 4: truly gasping straws. Right now they're celebrating their eight year
• 33:52
  Speaker 4: wedding anniversary.
• 33:53
  Speaker 3: Congratulations, happy anniversary.
• 33:55
  Speaker 4: And Meghan of course has released these images unreleased images of.
• 33:59
  Speaker 3: The day eight years ago. There they are in love.
• 34:03
  Speaker 1: Wow.
• 34:04
  Speaker 4: And when we know that Meghan only does this sort
• 34:06
  Speaker 4: of thing when the brand's not looking too good and
• 34:09
  Speaker 4: they need some good publicity.
• 34:10
  Speaker 3: She just went to Switzerland this week to.
• 34:13
  Speaker 4: Talk about children in the digital world and the dangers
• 34:16
  Speaker 4: of that, off the back of their disastrous Australia tour
• 34:19
  Speaker 4: where she was involved in a cash for were scheme.
• 34:22
  Speaker 4: So look, things haven't been going as well for the
• 34:24
  Speaker 4: Duke and Duchess and naturally they need.
• 34:26
  Speaker 3: Some good publicity.
• 34:27
  Speaker 4: But really the highlight was Prince Harry's wedding gift. Now look,
• 34:32
  Speaker 4: please you be the judge. He has bought Meghan a
• 34:36
  Speaker 4: bronze penguin.
• 34:37
  Speaker 3: Here it is, Yeah, I love you.
• 34:49
  Speaker 4: Oh my god.
• 34:56
  Speaker 2: When Mama and Papa, when we.
• 35:01
  Speaker 4: When we got engaged, kind of party with all of
• 35:03
  Speaker 4: our friends and we said everyone, we were an audible
• 35:05
  Speaker 4: ononesie and we were penguins.
• 35:08
  Speaker 5: We were penguins because they're.
• 35:10
  Speaker 1: Together for la.
• 35:18
  Speaker 3: Has anyone got a spew bucket? Handy SIUs?
• 35:21
  Speaker 4: Is that not the most diabolical looking gift you've ever
• 35:23
  Speaker 4: seen in your life? That is hideous to me. That
• 35:26
  Speaker 4: is so ugly, A big bronze penguin. Where does one
• 35:29
  Speaker 4: put that in the house?
• 35:30
  Speaker 1: So stick it.
• 35:31
  Speaker 6: Up your clacker, I reckon.
• 35:32
  Speaker 3: Well, oh it's pretty big, isn't it. Oh?
• 35:37
  Speaker 5: God, Caleb deservedly.
• 35:40
  Speaker 4: So there you go, the latest installment of The Gruesome too,
• 35:43
  Speaker 4: and they just keep getting more gruesome.
• 35:45
  Speaker 2: So you're upset that they released some wedding photos on
• 35:49
  Speaker 2: their anniversary, No.
• 35:51
  Speaker 4: I'm just annoying that they've done it because they want privacy,
• 35:53
  Speaker 4: but they don't want privacy at the same time they
• 35:55
  Speaker 4: want atten gent.
• 35:57
  Speaker 3: Are you actually standing up for Megan and Harry?
• 35:59
  Speaker 2: I'm reluctant too, because last time I stood up for
• 36:01
  Speaker 2: Megan and Harry on this program, social media went mental,
• 36:04
  Speaker 2: with everyone saying I should be kicked off the show.
• 36:06
  Speaker 2: Such is the hate for these people. But that's my problem.
• 36:09
  Speaker 2: Do we really have to hate on them for ever?
• 36:11
  Speaker 2: Even on their wedding anniversary they can't put out some
• 36:14
  Speaker 2: nice wedding picks without ours sake?
• 36:15
  Speaker 1: See, they're grifters, just.
• 36:17
  Speaker 4: They are James. They want they are privacy.
• 36:19
  Speaker 2: They are grifters and they do want privacy, but it
• 36:21
  Speaker 2: is their wedding anniversary. You're allowed to release a few
• 36:23
  Speaker 2: wedding pictures without everybody jumping on their back and saying,
• 36:27
  Speaker 2: you know, see, this is an example of their what
• 36:30
  Speaker 2: they are nice.
• 36:31
  Speaker 6: It's the self indulgent exactly. Go and the kids. What
• 36:35
  Speaker 6: the hell was that laugh from Harry brother.
• 36:38
  Speaker 5: In the background, Buddy, hell mate up behind me.
• 36:42
  Speaker 1: It was kind of a nice family.
• 36:45
  Speaker 6: Here's the big bronze penguin.
• 36:47
  Speaker 2: We've never seen the faces of the kids, but it
• 36:49
  Speaker 2: was nice to hear kids laughing and having fun, and
• 36:52
  Speaker 2: they seem.
• 36:53
  Speaker 1: To have a happy house. We don't like them, but
• 36:55
  Speaker 1: why would we wish ill for them?
• 36:57
  Speaker 3: Well, they should have stayed Montecito and stop.
• 36:59
  Speaker 6: Talking anything to turn a dollar, I suppose.
• 37:02
  Speaker 2: Exactly, very quickly before we go to a break, if
• 37:05
  Speaker 2: we've got time to do this real quick. The Victorian
• 37:07
  Speaker 2: government spending a million dollars trialing thirty kilometer an hour
• 37:11
  Speaker 2: speed sections in four councils from Chapel Street in the
• 37:16
  Speaker 2: city to Phillip Island, sort of on the outskirts of Melbourne.
• 37:21
  Speaker 2: They're saying that this will potentially reduce fatalities on the
• 37:25
  Speaker 2: roads substantially. It'll substantially increase emissions on the road frustration
• 37:31
  Speaker 2: on the road. If the Victorian government's going to slow
• 37:33
  Speaker 2: down anything, it shouldn't be traffic, it should be government spending.
• 37:36
  Speaker 5: Geez, I hope you don't have to go thirty k
• 37:37
  Speaker 5: an hour all the way from Chapel Street to Phillip Island, because.
• 37:40
  Speaker 6: That'll be a hell of a slog.
• 37:42
  Speaker 5: Next to it'll be walking pace everywhere will just be
• 37:45
  Speaker 5: just ban the cars. Actually everyone has to ride a buck.
• 37:47
  Speaker 1: And someone walking in front of the car with a
• 37:49
  Speaker 1: red flat.
• 37:50
  Speaker 4: Good to see money that should be spent being spent
• 37:52
  Speaker 4: on crime being spent towards lowering speed limits. There you go.
• 37:55
  Speaker 1: All right, we're going to go to a break when
• 37:57
  Speaker 1: we come back.
• 37:57
  Speaker 2: We're talking earlier about federal and state branch is disagreeing. Well,
• 38:01
  Speaker 2: I'll tell you what Chris Min's is giving it to
• 38:03
  Speaker 2: the Prime Minister at the moment. That and more when
• 38:05
  Speaker 2: we look at the papers after this. Okay, let's take
• 38:15
  Speaker 2: a look at what's making headlines in tomorrow's papers. Start
• 38:18
  Speaker 2: with the Australian calib It's got a few good stories tomorrow.
• 38:21
  Speaker 5: Deed, the splash says men's input max pay. New South
• 38:25
  Speaker 5: Wales Premier Chris Mins has thrown a bomb into the
• 38:28
  Speaker 5: Albanesi government's post budget sales pitch by calling for quote
• 38:32
  Speaker 5: urgent action to reduce the tax burden on workers, including
• 38:35
  Speaker 5: the forty seven percent rate paid by those earning more
• 38:38
  Speaker 5: than one hundred and ninety thousand dollars. The rare intervention
• 38:41
  Speaker 5: by the labor premier highlights the growing pressure Jim Chalmers
• 38:44
  Speaker 5: faces over a budget that increases taxes by eighty billion
• 38:48
  Speaker 5: dollars on investors while only returning part of the proceeds
• 38:52
  Speaker 5: through a flat five dollars a week I should say
• 38:54
  Speaker 5: rebate for workers, as former Prime Minister Paul keating into
• 38:58
  Speaker 5: the debate with a strong defeat of the treasure's contentious
• 39:01
  Speaker 5: changes to capital gains tax. Some federal labor MPs privately
• 39:05
  Speaker 5: raised concerns over the budget sales pitch, with one labeling
• 39:08
  Speaker 5: it a quote shit show.
• 39:10
  Speaker 6: That's probably quite right.
• 39:12
  Speaker 5: It goes on in the story to talk about this
• 39:15
  Speaker 5: biff that Mins and Charmers are currently having. Mins said
• 39:21
  Speaker 5: that he was worried that those on one hundred and
• 39:23
  Speaker 5: ninety grand or more were spending half the week working
• 39:26
  Speaker 5: for the government because they're paying forty seven percent tax,
• 39:31
  Speaker 5: and Dr Chalmers has hit back and said that the
• 39:35
  Speaker 5: Premier doesn't understand.
• 39:36
  Speaker 6: The tax system.
• 39:38
  Speaker 5: This is quite an extraordinary little tetar te the two
• 39:41
  Speaker 5: have it.
• 39:42
  Speaker 4: It is, But you know what, I also think it's unsurprising,
• 39:45
  Speaker 4: to be honest, because Chris Mens is credit to him,
• 39:49
  Speaker 4: He's looking after business owners, entrepreneurs within his own state
• 39:54
  Speaker 4: and he can see what a disaster this budget is.
• 39:58
  Speaker 1: Is Chris Men's auditioning, Well, he might be.
• 40:02
  Speaker 2: I mean, you know, he distinguished himself in the way
• 40:05
  Speaker 2: he dealt with the Bondai massacre and a call for
• 40:08
  Speaker 2: a Royal commission. Now he's distinguishing himself in standing up
• 40:12
  Speaker 2: for Australians and advocating that they should pay less tax.
• 40:18
  Speaker 2: I can most people would prefer Chris Mins to Anthony
• 40:20
  Speaker 2: or the easiest prime minister. I'm trying to Is there
• 40:22
  Speaker 2: anyone in Canberra that you'd prefer to Chris Mins in
• 40:25
  Speaker 2: the Labor Party?
• 40:26
  Speaker 6: No?
• 40:26
  Speaker 5: No, And I can think of two people else whore
• 40:29
  Speaker 5: in the Labor Party that had do the job much better,
• 40:31
  Speaker 5: Chris Mins and Peter Malanowskis you.
• 40:32
  Speaker 1: Know and do you think either of those have got
• 40:35
  Speaker 1: their eye on Well?
• 40:36
  Speaker 5: Maley always says no, he's not interested, and to be honest,
• 40:40
  Speaker 5: he doesn't have two because you know, he could be
• 40:42
  Speaker 5: premier for forever as long as he wants down there basically.
• 40:45
  Speaker 5: But you then you do wonder after a while whether
• 40:47
  Speaker 5: that gets old hat and you go, well, can I
• 40:48
  Speaker 5: put my hat in the ring?
• 40:49
  Speaker 6: But who knows? Who knows?
• 40:51
  Speaker 3: Just wonder how Chrismins ended up in the Labor Party.
• 40:55
  Speaker 1: Well, you know, Jesus, we wonder how Malcolm turn Will
• 40:57
  Speaker 1: ended up in the LIB.
• 41:00
  Speaker 5: This solid labor right, you know, and most of the
• 41:02
  Speaker 5: labor right aren't bad blocks. It's when the labor left
• 41:05
  Speaker 5: get in charge you've got problems. Speaking of PM's vow
• 41:09
  Speaker 5: on town camps, Anthony Alberizi has flown to Alice Springs
• 41:13
  Speaker 5: to meet with the family of the five year old
• 41:15
  Speaker 5: girl allegedly abducted and murdered from a town camp, admitting
• 41:18
  Speaker 5: their quote clearly is a need to ensure living conditions
• 41:21
  Speaker 5: in remote communities and camps improve. The Prime Minister and
• 41:25
  Speaker 5: Indigenous Affairs Minister Melandery McCarthy met with the family of
• 41:30
  Speaker 5: Kumanjai little Baby. I mean, it is one thing to
• 41:33
  Speaker 5: say that the conditions in town camps need to improve.
• 41:37
  Speaker 5: I think we need to go further than that and
• 41:39
  Speaker 5: say the town camps need to be shut down. I mean,
• 41:42
  Speaker 5: there a disgrace and to really think that you can
• 41:45
  Speaker 5: improve the living conditions. You're not going to improve the
• 41:48
  Speaker 5: living conditions. They just need to go all together.
• 41:51
  Speaker 2: He went thirteen days after the tragic events.
• 41:56
  Speaker 1: That's okay. He was there for three hours, that's okay.
• 41:59
  Speaker 1: We don't expect him to stay there for weeks. But
• 42:01
  Speaker 1: he went there without a plan. That's the thing that
• 42:03
  Speaker 1: surprises me.
• 42:04
  Speaker 2: You would have thought if they really cared about this,
• 42:07
  Speaker 2: they would have for the last couple of weeks been
• 42:09
  Speaker 2: working on what do we do about this and had
• 42:12
  Speaker 2: some sort of announcement rather than a pat sort of
• 42:15
  Speaker 2: you know motherhood's statement, this is not good.
• 42:18
  Speaker 1: We must see change.
• 42:20
  Speaker 3: Well, it's not his first five Fix visit, is it.
• 42:22
  Speaker 4: A couple of years ago he did the exact same
• 42:24
  Speaker 4: thing during the right five Fox visits. Are not going
• 42:26
  Speaker 4: to do anything. Talking is not going to do anything.
• 42:28
  Speaker 4: You actually need action. But let's be honest, Labor have
• 42:30
  Speaker 4: been weak and weasel worded on this issue for many
• 42:33
  Speaker 4: years now, and they're more entrenched in ideology than actually
• 42:36
  Speaker 4: doing something about it.
• 42:37
  Speaker 1: Yep, let's go.
• 42:38
  Speaker 2: The front page of The Herald's sun Shock weight Gain
• 42:41
  Speaker 2: reads the headline Victoria's surgery weight list has ballooned by
• 42:45
  Speaker 2: more than four thousand in just three months, prompting warnings
• 42:49
  Speaker 2: of a return to COVID era levels, with the state
• 42:52
  Speaker 2: struggling health system set to be central to November's election campaign.
• 42:55
  Speaker 2: The most recent Cordly Victorian Agency for Health Information data
• 42:58
  Speaker 2: showed critical surgery waitlists had ballooned to more than sixty
• 43:01
  Speaker 2: eight thousand in the three months to March, staggering four
• 43:06
  Speaker 2: one hundred and three more than the previous quarter. The
• 43:09
  Speaker 2: article continues to talk about ambulance weight times. The goal
• 43:14
  Speaker 2: was to have in code one cases, which are the
• 43:16
  Speaker 2: most critical ambulances, arrived within fifteen minutes eighty five percent
• 43:21
  Speaker 2: of the time. They've only been able to achieve that
• 43:24
  Speaker 2: sixty six percent of the time, So failing on all
• 43:28
  Speaker 2: counts when it comes to the health system.
• 43:30
  Speaker 5: These are basic things like if you can't trust the
• 43:33
  Speaker 5: state government to get through the surgeries that need to
• 43:37
  Speaker 5: be done healthcare, how do you trust them to do
• 43:39
  Speaker 5: anything else?
• 43:40
  Speaker 4: Well, don't forget you sinto Allen's got bigger priorities like
• 43:43
  Speaker 4: lowering speed limits.
• 43:44
  Speaker 5: Well, that's right, and putting stuff on social media.
• 43:48
  Speaker 3: For making people want to like it exactly.
• 43:51
  Speaker 2: The other article on the front page of the Herald
• 43:52
  Speaker 2: Sun tomorrow, it's interesting twenty thousand dollars fire bomb fee.
• 43:57
  Speaker 2: Teen thugs are pocketing twenty grand for fire bombing venues
• 44:01
  Speaker 2: as Melbourne's war bars escalate, bar wars escalate, with a
• 44:05
  Speaker 2: court told one accused arsonist ordered his mother to collect
• 44:09
  Speaker 2: his bounty because he was in jail. Details of the
• 44:13
  Speaker 2: brazen demand recorded on prison phones were revealed in the
• 44:16
  Speaker 2: Children's Court, where magistrate flagged an explosion in cases of
• 44:19
  Speaker 2: criminal gangs recruiting Melbourne teens.
• 44:21
  Speaker 1: To do their dirty work.
• 44:24
  Speaker 2: So you've got kids fifteen and sixteen year olds being
• 44:27
  Speaker 2: contacted online. They haven't been able to catch the perpetrators
• 44:30
  Speaker 2: because they've disguised themselves quite well. But that's a worry
• 44:33
  Speaker 2: when you've got kids doing arson crime for twenty thousand.
• 44:38
  Speaker 6: Dollars grands on a bad payday, is it.
• 44:41
  Speaker 1: No fifteen years old?
• 44:42
  Speaker 3: Yeah, exactly.
• 44:43
  Speaker 4: Let's have a look now at the Mercury over in Tasmania.
• 44:47
  Speaker 4: AIRB and B fees is the headline to ease the
• 44:50
  Speaker 4: housing and homelessness christis in Hobart. Two counselors want to
• 44:54
  Speaker 4: double the current property rate for whole home short stay
• 44:58
  Speaker 4: accommodation properties. Emotion from the two councilors there on the
• 45:02
  Speaker 4: front page will be discussed at Monday night's Hobart City
• 45:05
  Speaker 4: Council meeting. I don't agree with this at all, to
• 45:09
  Speaker 4: be honest, what about genuine tourists who want to come
• 45:12
  Speaker 4: for a short stay? I don't think that's very very
• 45:14
  Speaker 4: fair to slog people. How about you try and solve
• 45:16
  Speaker 4: the crisis with supply before you slog every day people
• 45:20
  Speaker 4: who genuinely want to stay in short term accommodation.
• 45:23
  Speaker 5: Taxing property seems to be a very popular thing to
• 45:26
  Speaker 5: do at the moment, doesn't it. And on the front
• 45:28
  Speaker 5: of the advertiser tomorrow Lyddy loose ex magistrate Peter Liddy
• 45:32
  Speaker 5: will be released from prison into home detention until a
• 45:35
  Speaker 5: court determines if the monstrous pedophile can control his sexual desires. Lyddy,
• 45:40
  Speaker 5: who is there on the front page, will enter house
• 45:43
  Speaker 5: arrest in fifteen days with an electronic monitoring tag. So
• 45:47
  Speaker 5: you're a pedophile and an ex magistrate of all people.
• 45:52
  Speaker 5: It's a well known case in Adelaide. How do you
• 45:54
  Speaker 5: end up on home detention while they try to determine
• 45:58
  Speaker 5: whether or not.
• 45:59
  Speaker 6: You ought to be released?
• 46:00
  Speaker 5: It asks about, isn't it surely if they've not yet
• 46:04
  Speaker 5: worked out if your sexual proclivities and desires can be suppressed,
• 46:10
  Speaker 5: which I would argue for Peter Files they can't be.
• 46:13
  Speaker 6: And oh, we'll just let you stay at home while
• 46:15
  Speaker 6: we worked it out. Surely you should still be in prison.
• 46:18
  Speaker 3: What's the threshold? Well, exact like, how do you know.
• 46:21
  Speaker 1: That person.
• 46:24
  Speaker 2: Interviews with psychologists who will determine.
• 46:27
  Speaker 1: But it's all very subjective, isn't it?
• 46:29
  Speaker 3: Yes, exactly?
• 46:30
  Speaker 1: All right, we're going to go to a break.
• 46:31
  Speaker 2: When we come back, our wine aficionado Caleb is going
• 46:34
  Speaker 2: to tell us a story about an incredible wine heist
• 46:37
  Speaker 2: place in the US.
• 46:38
  Speaker 1: It's quite unbelievable. That's coming up next. All right.
• 46:44
  Speaker 2: No one on the Late Debate loves a drink more
• 46:46
  Speaker 2: than Caleb Bond, So Caleb take it away.
• 46:50
  Speaker 5: Yes, indeed, Well, this person apparently loved to drink so
• 46:52
  Speaker 5: much they thought they just steal mountains and mountains of
• 46:55
  Speaker 5: expensive wine. So let's go over to the United States
• 46:59
  Speaker 5: to tell this story where and it takes a bit
• 47:01
  Speaker 5: of telling it.
• 47:02
  Speaker 6: It should be said.
• 47:03
  Speaker 5: These two numpties who will show you here on the screen,
• 47:07
  Speaker 5: decided that they would don all sorts of disguise as wigs, coats,
• 47:11
  Speaker 5: two pays, glasses, all sorts of stuff. Right, They've gone
• 47:15
  Speaker 5: to this expensive restaurant and said that they were working
• 47:19
  Speaker 5: for a rich man who wanted to host a business
• 47:21
  Speaker 5: dinner there, but they wanted to check that the seller
• 47:24
  Speaker 5: was temperature controlled before they committed to having any dinner there.
• 47:29
  Speaker 5: So they've been allowed into the cellar and they've distracted
• 47:32
  Speaker 5: the wine director. Then they have shoved bottles with tens
• 47:36
  Speaker 5: of thousands of dollars into the coats and tried to
• 47:39
  Speaker 5: make off with them. But thankfully one of the waiters
• 47:44
  Speaker 5: noticed what was going on and alerted staff members. And
• 47:48
  Speaker 5: then the woman was tackled by the waiter while they
• 47:52
  Speaker 5: were trying to get into the getaway car. What a
• 47:56
  Speaker 5: bizarre chain of events has apparently been there, competed in
• 47:59
  Speaker 5: the US to an episode of Scooby Doo. In the
• 48:01
  Speaker 5: way they tried to pull it off, who would have thought, oh, yeah,
• 48:05
  Speaker 5: I know what will work is I'll pretend to be
• 48:08
  Speaker 5: someone else and working for someone else, and I'll get
• 48:10
  Speaker 5: into the cellar and I'll.
• 48:11
  Speaker 6: Just load up my coat. Who's going to notice that.
• 48:14
  Speaker 2: I've got a question, just really quick, because one of
• 48:15
  Speaker 2: these bottles was worth twenty four thousand dollars, right, but
• 48:18
  Speaker 2: I read that because it was taken out of the
• 48:21
  Speaker 2: temperature controlled cellar. Even though they got it back, it's
• 48:24
  Speaker 2: pretty much worse worthless.
• 48:25
  Speaker 5: Now, Well, yeah, it's probably true because they won't be
• 48:28
  Speaker 5: able to say that it's being kept that the wreck
• 48:30
  Speaker 5: was a temperature for all that time, so who knows that.
• 48:32
  Speaker 5: You know, it would have been in the jacket being
• 48:34
  Speaker 5: shaken up and all sorts of stuff, and that can
• 48:36
  Speaker 5: affect the quality of the wine.
• 48:38
  Speaker 6: So yeah, it would have flicked.
• 48:39
  Speaker 3: Affect get up is hilarious. The way they dressed themselves up.
• 48:42
  Speaker 3: That was so funny because when you look at their
• 48:44
  Speaker 3: mugshots and it looked very bright, the.
• 48:48
  Speaker 5: Coat and the Wigan stuff, it's like inspected, you know,
• 48:51
  Speaker 5: they as inspect the ganget or something.
• 48:54
  Speaker 1: It was a lot of a couple of wine, all right.
• 48:58
  Speaker 2: Staying in the United States, a couple of in Washington
• 49:01
  Speaker 2: bought a cyber truck. One of the features of a
• 49:04
  Speaker 2: cyber truck is it has wade mode, which means you
• 49:06
  Speaker 2: can drive it through rivers and creeks up to a
• 49:09
  Speaker 2: depth of eighty one centimeters. That's quite something. Well, this
• 49:13
  Speaker 2: guy and his cyber truck decided he needed to check
• 49:16
  Speaker 2: it out, so he just drove straight into a lake.
• 49:25
  Speaker 1: Sir, you can't work over there.
• 49:29
  Speaker 2: He actually got stuck there because before you use wade mode,
• 49:32
  Speaker 2: you have to give the car some time to lift
• 49:34
  Speaker 2: the suspension, adjust the pressure around the battery. It required
• 49:38
  Speaker 2: a crane to get him out. He was charged not
• 49:41
  Speaker 2: just with illegally entering a lake, but with not having
• 49:44
  Speaker 2: a valid boat license.
• 49:47
  Speaker 3: You can't make this stuff up. Seriously, this is extraordinary.
• 49:50
  Speaker 4: Now, look, we all know this nineteen ninety eight banger
• 49:53
  Speaker 4: by Share.
• 50:00
  Speaker 3: How can you.
• 50:01
  Speaker 6: Feel something, sir?
• 50:04
  Speaker 1: I really daring strong.
• 50:09
  Speaker 4: Well Cher can't believe how unlucky she is because she
• 50:12
  Speaker 4: actually co wrote one of the verses, would you believe?
• 50:14
  Speaker 4: But she never put her name to that verse, and
• 50:17
  Speaker 4: so it's now been revealed that she never got the
• 50:18
  Speaker 4: royalties for that song and it was a multi million.
• 50:21
  Speaker 1: BELLI bad mistake. That's it from us. Stick around. Coming
• 50:24
  Speaker 1: up is the reader Penny, So we'll see you tomorrow
• 50:26
  Speaker 1: night night,