Latest / Reformed Thinking / שָׁמַ֫יִם (Shamayim): The Heavens That Declare God’s Majesty

Transcript

שָׁמַ֫יִם (Shamayim): The Heavens That Declare God’s Majesty · Reformed Thinking

• 0:00
  Welcome to Reformed Thinking. We're glad you're with us for
• 0:02
  this installment of the Deep Dive.
• 0:04
  Today we're going to be doing a close analysis of a single Old
• 0:08
  Testament Hebrew word, but one that is, well, huge in its
• 0:13
  significance. Shamim.
• 0:15
  Right, that's the word we usually see in our English
• 0:17
  Bibles as heaven or sometimes sky.
• 0:21
  And it is everywhere. I mean the source materials.
• 0:24
  Note it appears around 420 times in the Old Testament alone.
• 0:27
  It's one of the most foundational words for
• 0:29
  understanding the biblical cosmos.
• 0:31
  And what struck me right away is that this one word is doing a
• 0:33
  lot of work. It covers everything from, you
• 0:36
  know, the visible atmosphere where you see clouds, all the
• 0:39
  way to the transcendent dwelling place of God.
• 0:41
  That dual function is really the key.
• 0:43
  Our mission here is to move past the simple English word sky and
• 0:47
  really get a feel for the physical, the cosmological and
• 0:50
  the theological weight that Shamayim carried in its original
• 0:53
  context. This is the space where birds
• 0:55
  fly and rain falls. And it's the exalted invisible
• 0:57
  realm of God's throne. It's a complete definition of
• 1:00
  the non earthly part of the created universe.
• 1:03
  OK, so let's start where a good deep dive should with the word
• 1:06
  itself, the linguistics, because there's a little surprise hidden
• 1:10
  right in its form. There is when you look at the
• 1:13
  Hebrew Shamim that ending the aim suffix usually signifies a
• 1:18
  duel. It means 2 of something.
• 1:20
  Like yadim for two hands or an aim for two eyes.
• 1:24
  So your first instinct is to think, OK, two heavens, maybe an
• 1:27
  upper and lower heaven or something like that, that.
• 1:29
  Would be the logical assumption, but the grammatical analysis in
• 1:32
  all the sources confirms that this is misleading.
• 1:35
  While it looks dual, it's actually treated as a plural
• 1:38
  noun. So not 2 but many or just big?
• 1:43
  Big is the right idea. It's what grammarians call a
• 1:45
  plural of spatial extension. Think of the Hebrew word for
• 1:48
  water, mayhem. It's also a plural, but it
• 1:51
  doesn't mean 2 waters refers to a large, undifferentiated mass
• 1:55
  of water. OK, so it's not counting units
• 1:57
  of sky. It's a way of expressing the
• 1:59
  vast, continuous expanse over our heads, the totality of that
• 2:03
  upper region. That's it.
• 2:05
  It communicates bound homelessness scope magnitude.
• 2:08
  And this isn't just a quirk of Hebrew, is it?
• 2:10
  The root itself is all over the ancient world.
• 2:13
  That's right, and that gives us some really helpful context.
• 2:16
  The sources list its cognates and other Semitic languages.
• 2:19
  You've got Acadian, Shamu, Ugaritic, sham, Arabic, Sama.
• 2:23
  You see it in later dialects to the Dead Sea Scrolls, Samaritan
• 2:26
  texts, mini inscriptions. So this idea of a vast celestial
• 2:30
  realm captured by this specific linguistic root was a core
• 2:35
  concept across the ancient Near East long before the Israelites.
• 2:39
  A very widespread and ancient idea.
• 2:41
  And you mentioned the Phoenician inscriptions.
• 2:43
  That's a great example because it's tied to the deity by
• 2:46
  Alamum, the Lord of Heaven. That immediately frames the
• 2:49
  theological context for Israel's use of the term.
• 2:52
  It's not happening in a vacuum. Not at all.
• 2:54
  It's part of a larger conversation and often a
• 2:56
  confrontation. And Speaking of context, we
• 2:58
  should probably address a common theory about the words origin.
• 3:02
  It's etymology which is pretty popular, but has mostly been set
• 3:06
  aside by modern scholarship. This would be the idea that
• 3:08
  shamayim is a compound word. Yes, the theory that it's
• 3:12
  made-up of Shah, which is a pronoun that can mean that which
• 3:15
  and mayu, meaning water. So if you put them together, so
• 3:18
  you get that which is of the waters or maybe the place for
• 3:22
  water and. You can see why that's so
• 3:23
  attractive, can't you? Oh.
• 3:24
  Absolutely. I mean you read Genesis 1 and
• 3:27
  the rookie of the Firmament is created specifically to separate
• 3:30
  the waters below from the waters above.
• 3:33
  If heaven is the place where God stores those cosmic waters, the
• 3:37
  place for water is a perfect description.
• 3:39
  It seems to link the word itself directly to the creation
• 3:42
  narrative. It's a very neat internal Hebrew
• 3:45
  explanation, a kind of popular etymology.
• 3:49
  So why don't linguists generally accept it anymore?
• 3:51
  Well, the main reason given in the sources is that it feels a
• 3:54
  bit too focused on an inner Hebrew explanation.
• 3:57
  It doesn't find strong support when you look at those cognate
• 3:59
  languages we just talked about. Yeah, the Akkadian or Ugaritic
• 4:03
  forms don't really breakdown that way, so.
• 4:05
  It's more likely a case of a convenient sound alike the
• 4:08
  Israelites heard Shamim and heard the echo of Mayim water
• 4:12
  and used that association theologically.
• 4:14
  That's the general consensus. They likely noticed and used
• 4:18
  that phonetic likeness to reinforce the function of the
• 4:21
  firmament as this great water holder, but it probably wasn't
• 4:24
  the historical origin of the word itself.
• 4:27
  OK. That gives us a really solid
• 4:28
  linguistic foundation. It's a plural of extension,
• 4:32
  meaning the entire expanse above, and its connection to
• 4:35
  water is more theological than etymological.
• 4:38
  So let's pivot from the word to the world.
• 4:41
  It describes the physical, structural heaven and.
• 4:44
  The first thing to get our heads around is that the biblical
• 4:46
  worldview doesn't see shamayim as empty space.
• 4:50
  It's not a vacuum. It's presented as a definable,
• 4:53
  established, and often a seemingly solid structure, a
• 4:56
  created Dome or vault. And the key technical term for
• 4:59
  that is rakia, which we often translate as firmament.
• 5:02
  Genesis 1.8 says God called the Rakia Shamayim, so it directly
• 5:05
  equates the sky with this firm, solid thing.
• 5:08
  And the idea of it being a fixed structure is backed up by the
• 5:11
  verbs used to describe its creation.
• 5:13
  The sources point out how often the verb not is used, which
• 5:16
  means to stretch out or to spread out like.
• 5:18
  Spreading a tent canvas. That's the image.
• 5:21
  It's used nine times with heaven as the object, especially in
• 5:24
  Isaiah, God stretching out the heavens like a tent to live in,
• 5:27
  or like a curtain. It's an active, powerful act of
• 5:30
  construction. And the sources show that the
• 5:33
  imagery goes even further than a tent.
• 5:35
  They describe actual architectural supports for this
• 5:39
  thing. The ancient cosmos is a built
• 5:42
  environment. It is we move from a tent to a
• 5:45
  building. Job 26.11 gives one of the
• 5:48
  clearest pictures describing heaven as resting on columns,
• 5:53
  the AMU de amayim. These pillars are what give it
• 5:56
  stability. Pillars holding up the sky.
• 5:58
  It suggests that if those were to shake, the whole sky would
• 6:01
  collapse. That's a fundamentally different
• 6:03
  way of thinking about the cosmos than our modern understanding of
• 6:06
  gravity. A.
• 6:07
  Completely different model and we also see references to the
• 6:09
  foundations of heaven Mosado Hashmim in 6C Samuel 22.8 and.
• 6:14
  What's interesting there is the source material points out is
• 6:17
  that the parallel passage in Psalm 18 attributes the shaking
• 6:20
  foundations to the mountains. Right, which shows this language
• 6:23
  is being used poetically and analogically.
• 6:26
  The point isn't a literal blueprint.
• 6:28
  The point is to communicate maximum stability.
• 6:31
  Whether it's the Sky's foundations or the Earth's, the
• 6:34
  structure is fixed and ordered unless God himself intervenes
• 6:38
  so. If it's a fixed, stretched out
• 6:40
  structure, it has to have edges and openings.
• 6:43
  What are the texts say about its shape and boundaries?
• 6:46
  They mentioned the Ugzameyeman job 22.14.
• 6:50
  The Dome or circle of Heaven, which describes that curved
• 6:55
  vault like shape and its sheer extent, is described with
• 6:58
  phrases like from the edge of the sky to the edge of the sky,
• 7:01
  defining the absolute limit of the visible world and.
• 7:04
  A solid Dome needs a way for things to pass through.
• 7:06
  This is where you get the mechanisms for weather and
• 7:08
  divine provision. Absolutely.
• 7:10
  The openings are crucial for explaining how God interacts
• 7:13
  with the world. Below.
• 7:14
  Genesis 7 talks about the Aruba Hashemiyam, the apertures or
• 7:17
  windows of heaven opening up to let the floodwaters pour
• 7:20
  through. Windows that can be opened and
• 7:22
  closed by God. It's a very direct image of
• 7:24
  sovereign control. And it's not just for judgment,
• 7:27
  it's also for provision. Psalm 78 speaks of God opening
• 7:31
  the Dalte Shimei and the doors of heaven to rain down mana.
• 7:34
  So these aren't just holes, they're architectural features
• 7:37
  that regulate what passes from the realm above to the world
• 7:40
  below. The heavens are a mechanism.
• 7:42
  OK, so we have this solid structural layer, the Rakia,
• 7:47
  held up by columns and fitted with doors and windows.
• 7:50
  Now let's talk about the space below that structure, the
• 7:52
  atmospheric realm where everyday life happens.
• 7:55
  Right. The sources are clear that
• 7:57
  shamim also functions as the word for the higher atmosphere,
• 8:00
  the air below the firmament, even though Hebrew doesn't have
• 8:03
  a specific word for air in the way we think of it.
• 8:06
  And the easiest way to see that is with the creatures that live
• 8:09
  there, the birds of the sky, O Pashame.
• 8:11
  That phrase shows up 38 times, Genesis, Jeremiah, all over the
• 8:15
  place. It confirms that the aerial
• 8:16
  realm is part of the shamaine. And it's a source of weather.
• 8:19
  All the things that sustain life on earth.
• 8:22
  Rain, whether it's the gentle mirror or the heavy garage room,
• 8:24
  comes from the heavens. As does dew, snow shelling,
• 8:28
  frost to go for. All these meteorological
• 8:30
  phenomena are sourced specifically from the SHWAIM, so
• 8:34
  it's an active part of the created order necessary for
• 8:37
  life. But that points to the dual
• 8:39
  nature of God's action through the heavens.
• 8:41
  It's the source of life giving water, but it can also be the
• 8:44
  conduit for destruction, right? The heavens under God's control
• 8:48
  can unleash some pretty devastating things.
• 8:51
  The sources mentioned fire and brimstone in Genesis 19.
• 8:54
  Or the hailstones in Joshua 10. Even things like sand and dust
• 8:59
  are described in Deuteronomy 28 as a curse descending from the
• 9:02
  sky. The heavens can become a weapon
• 9:05
  in God's hand. So.
• 9:06
  We've got the solid structure, the rakia, and the atmospheric
• 9:09
  space below it. Now let's move even higher to
• 9:11
  the things in that structure, the celestial bodies.
• 9:13
  This is where the physical sky connects to cosmic order and
• 9:17
  knowledge. This is the upper layer, which
• 9:19
  contains the Kokobe Hajimeim, the stars of heaven, and they're
• 9:22
  often used as a metaphor for an uncountable number right,
• 9:26
  reflecting the covenant promise to Abraham that his descendants
• 9:29
  would be as countless as the stars.
• 9:31
  And they're also called the ABBA Hajimeim, the host of heaven.
• 9:36
  That's a fascinating term. It suggests something organized,
• 9:39
  almost military. It does.
• 9:40
  It's usually used for the sun, moon and stars, but in some
• 9:43
  places it can overlap and refer to the angelic host as well.
• 9:47
  It defines a whole created order of non earthly beings, but the
• 9:50
  key is that they are an organized host created and
• 9:53
  commanded by God, not autonomous powers.
• 9:56
  And their regularity and visibility naturally LED ancient
• 10:00
  peoples to study them often for divination.
• 10:03
  But the Old Testament is very strong and it's warning against
• 10:05
  that. This is a critical theological
• 10:07
  boundary. Israel's neighbors deified the
• 10:10
  celestial bodies, so the sources are explicit in condemning those
• 10:13
  who are astrologers. That she bury a meme in Isaiah
• 10:17
  47. It's linked to seeking guidance
• 10:19
  outside of God's revealed Word. And Jeremiah warns the people
• 10:22
  not to be terrified by the signs of heaven.
• 10:25
  The OTO Hashanahim, The stars are created things.
• 10:27
  They're signs of God's creative work, but they are not sources
• 10:30
  of secret knowledge or faith themselves.
• 10:32
  That distinction is central. They are part of the created
• 10:35
  structure, but they are subservient to the Creator.
• 10:38
  No part of creation, however magnificent, gets to have divine
• 10:42
  status. That's a core reformed view of
• 10:45
  creation. That makes perfect sense.
• 10:47
  OK, we've established the structure, the contents, the
• 10:50
  proper theological boundaries. Now let's zoom out a bit and
• 10:53
  look at how showing him is used with other words to define the
• 10:56
  whole universe. This brings us to probably the
• 10:59
  most common pairing in the Bible, Heaven and Earth.
• 11:02
  When you see Xiaomi impaired with Airy or Earth, it's
• 11:06
  functioning as a merism A. Merism being where you name 2
• 11:09
  opposites to signify the totality of everything in
• 11:12
  between. That's.
• 11:12
  It so Heaven and Earth means the entire created cosmos, the
• 11:15
  Mundus universes as the sources call it, and we.
• 11:18
  See it right from the beginning, Genesis 1.1.
• 11:20
  In the beginning, God created the heaven and the earth.
• 11:22
  The sources note that specific order heaven first appears 17
• 11:26
  times. And sometimes the order is
• 11:28
  flipped, like in Genesis 2 Earth and Heaven, but the function is
• 11:31
  the same. It's defining the whole scope of
• 11:33
  reality. But this pairing isn't just a
• 11:35
  list of ingredients for creation.
• 11:37
  It's used rhetorically, too. Oh.
• 11:38
  Absolutely. It's used to give weight to
• 11:40
  statements. For example, they are called
• 11:42
  upon as witnesses. Isaiah 1 here.
• 11:45
  Oh heavens and listen, oh earth. There are the ultimate stable
• 11:49
  reference points for God's covenant dealings.
• 11:51
  This contrast of heightened depth also extends to other
• 11:54
  pairings, setting up the full vertical axis of the cosmos.
• 11:57
  Right to define the absolute boundaries of reality so.
• 12:00
  At the deepest watery level, you have shame contrasted with the
• 12:04
  deep, the Tohum. Yes, in places like Genesis 49
• 12:07
  and Proverbs 8, it's a contrast between the height of God's
• 12:10
  created order and the depth of the unorganized, chaotic waters
• 12:14
  that existed before creation was finished.
• 12:17
  It's order versus chaos and. Then, even deeper than the
• 12:20
  watery deep, you have the the contrast with the realm of the
• 12:22
  dead, the Underworld shuffle. And this is the most extreme
• 12:26
  contrast. Amos 9 and Psalm 139 use this
• 12:29
  pairing from the height of heaven to the depths of Shoal to
• 12:33
  show that there is nowhere to escape God's presence or His
• 12:35
  reach. His sovereignty covers the
• 12:37
  absolute highest and lowest points of existence.
• 12:40
  So before we move into the purely theological, there's one
• 12:43
  more special term we need to look at that deals with this
• 12:46
  idea of scope. Shema Hashemayim, the heaven of
• 12:50
  heavens, Yes. And this is a phrase you find in
• 12:52
  some very elevated contexts. Deuteronomy 10, Solomon's Prayer
• 12:56
  and 1st Kings 8. Psalm 148.
• 12:59
  And given that some ancient cultures had ideas about, you
• 13:02
  know, multiple stacked heavens, you might think this resorts to
• 13:05
  the very highest layer in a literal stack, this 7th heaven
• 13:10
  or something like that. That's the intuitive reading,
• 13:12
  but the sources suggest that's not quite what's going on with
• 13:15
  the Hebrew it's. More of a grammatical device it.
• 13:17
  Seems to be it's an intensive or a superlative expression.
• 13:21
  Just like Holy of Holies means the Most Holy place or King of
• 13:24
  Kings means the Supreme King. So heaven of heavens just means
• 13:28
  the highest possible heaven, that heaven in its greatest,
• 13:32
  most expansive totality, the absolute zenith of creation,
• 13:35
  right? It's a rhetorical way of
• 13:37
  expressing maximum majesty and scale.
• 13:40
  It emphasizes the greatness of the setting for God's throne.
• 13:43
  That entire framework, the structure, the contents, the
• 13:46
  scope, brings us to the main point.
• 13:49
  All of this exists for one reason, the Creator.
• 13:53
  So let's get into the theological heaven.
• 13:56
  This is where we see God's sovereignty defined most
• 13:58
  clearly. The heavens are not some eternal
• 14:01
  uncreated realm. They are not a deity.
• 14:04
  They are emphatically made by God.
• 14:06
  And the sources list a whole inventory of verbs driving this
• 14:10
  point home. God made them hohia.
• 14:13
  He created them Bhatia. He stretched them out naya, He
• 14:16
  established them. Conan even built them Bhana.
• 14:19
  That repetition is so intentional it hammers home the
• 14:22
  point that the heavens are a creature, not the Creator.
• 14:24
  They're called the work of your hands in Psalm 102, and most
• 14:27
  significantly, they were created by the word of Yahweh in Psalm
• 14:31
  33, which. Lines up perfectly with the
• 14:33
  Reformed understanding of creation by divine Fiat.
• 14:36
  God speaks, and it is and. Because He created them, they
• 14:39
  become his proper dwelling place, His throne room.
• 14:42
  So the show may become synonymous with where God's
• 14:45
  authority is centered. It's called your holy dwelling
• 14:48
  loan Korsha or the place of your throne.
• 14:51
  And often it's just simplified to God's throne itself, His
• 14:54
  kissy. These are spatial metaphors that
• 14:57
  help us grasp His exalted nature and His absolute authority.
• 15:01
  And we also see God described as the Roukep Jamayim, the one who
• 15:04
  rides on heaven. Yes, which is probably a very
• 15:07
  ancient expression, but it's still communicates his complete
• 15:11
  dominion over the celestial sphere.
• 15:14
  The heavens are his domain, his property, his vehicle.
• 15:17
  He is in control of it all, the. Sources even described the
• 15:20
  heavens as God's own and as his holy heaven, setting that realm
• 15:25
  apart as pure and belonging only to Him.
• 15:28
  Now this very strong connection between heaven and God's
• 15:31
  dwelling sets up what might be the most critical theological
• 15:34
  statement in the sources, a necessary counterbalance.
• 15:37
  This is the declaration of God's transcendence, even though
• 15:40
  heaven is his throne. The sources state very clearly
• 15:43
  that even the heaven of heavens cannot encompass God.
• 15:46
  That's from First Kings 8, Solomon's prayer at the
• 15:48
  dedication of the temple. He uses that superlative term we
• 15:51
  just talked about, heaven of heavens, to describe the
• 15:53
  absolute maximum extent of creation and then immediately
• 15:56
  says it's not big enough. It's a massive theological
• 15:59
  corrective. It prevents us from thinking of
• 16:01
  God as a physical being contained inside a celestial
• 16:04
  palace. The structure, even at its most
• 16:07
  grand, is insufficient to hold the Creator.
• 16:10
  Because, as Jeremiah 23 says, God fills the heaven and the
• 16:13
  earth. He's omnipresent.
• 16:15
  So he simultaneously dwells in heaven as the center of His
• 16:19
  manifest glory and governmental authority, but he is also
• 16:22
  transcendently unbound by it. He acts from heaven, but he
• 16:26
  isn't contained in heaven. And.
• 16:28
  That ability to act from heaven shows his direct sovereign
• 16:31
  engagement with the world. That's right, Amayim is the
• 16:34
  stage for his governance. When people pray, God listens
• 16:37
  From heaven. He speaks his law from heaven.
• 16:39
  He announces his judgments from heaven.
• 16:41
  The line of communication is from the exalted sphere
• 16:43
  downward. And it's not just verbal.
• 16:45
  He physically controls the mechanisms of the heavens we
• 16:48
  talked about earlier. He.
• 16:49
  Does he can close up the skies so there's no rain?
• 16:52
  As Deuteronomy says, this shows his control over both blessing
• 16:55
  and cursing over the very means of life on Earth.
• 16:58
  We also see more dramatic physical action.
• 17:00
  Yeah. He thunders in the heavens.
• 17:02
  He shakes the heavens. The prophets even call on him to
• 17:05
  RIP open the heavens and come down.
• 17:07
  His movement between the heavenly and earthly realms is
• 17:10
  direct and powerful, and his oversight is constant.
• 17:14
  He looks down from heaven and observes everything.
• 17:16
  And he can send his agents from there as well.
• 17:18
  Correct. The Angel of the Lord calls from
• 17:20
  heaven to Abraham in Genesis 22. So heaven isn't a barrier, it's
• 17:25
  the platform from which an omnipotent God governs and
• 17:28
  interacts with his creation. This whole analysis of God is
• 17:32
  the creator and ruler from heaven brings us to our last
• 17:35
  section, how human culture and language then relate to this
• 17:38
  celestial dwelling a. Good place to start is with that
• 17:41
  specific title for Yahweh, God of Heaven.
• 17:44
  It becomes very common in the post exilic period.
• 17:46
  We. See it all over OSHA Hashimaim
• 17:48
  shows up in Ezra, Nehemiah, Jonah, and the related phrase
• 17:52
  hol Hashemeim is in Psalm 136 and its.
• 17:55
  Prevalence in that later period is telling.
• 17:57
  It was a deliberate statement being made in a cosmopolitan
• 18:00
  gentile world. As we mentioned earlier, other
• 18:02
  cultures use that title for their own deities, like
• 18:05
  Balameem. So by the Israelites insisting
• 18:07
  that Yahweh is the one true God of heaven, they were making a
• 18:10
  polemical statement. They were declaring his
• 18:13
  supremacy over all rival gods and astral cults.
• 18:16
  It's an identity marker. And for all that shamayim is
• 18:19
  used as a metaphor for stability and permanence, the sources make
• 18:23
  a striking counterpoint. The heavens are not eternal.
• 18:26
  Right. They are created so they have a
• 18:28
  beginning, and they will also have an end.
• 18:32
  This is key to preventing any deification of the cosmos
• 18:35
  itself. Job speaks of things lasting
• 18:38
  until heaven is no more. And Isaiah gives us that vivid
• 18:41
  image of the heavens being rolled up like a scroll, like a
• 18:44
  worn out piece of clothing that's being put away because
• 18:46
  it's job is done. Because God has plans for a
• 18:48
  replacement, Isaiah looks forward to new heavens and a new
• 18:52
  earth. This shows that the current
• 18:54
  configuration of creation is finite and completely subject to
• 18:57
  the eternal will of the Creator. And that transitoriness sets the
• 19:00
  stage for how humans interact with this majestic but temporary
• 19:04
  celestial realm. There are physical acts that
• 19:07
  acknowledge the authority there, the sources mentioned swearing
• 19:11
  an oath by lifting one's hand up to heaven, physically pointing
• 19:14
  to the seat of ultimate authority as your witness.
• 19:17
  And there's also the theme of human aspiration to reach that
• 19:21
  realm. The accounts of someone trying
• 19:23
  to climb up to heaven or Elijah being taken up are often
• 19:26
  contrasted with God's effortless action of descending, like at
• 19:29
  the. Tower of Babel humanity strives
• 19:31
  to build its way up. While God sovereignly and easily
• 19:34
  comes down, it defines that vertical separation between the
• 19:38
  finite creature and the infinite Creator.
• 19:40
  Lastly, there's that interesting linguistic development,
• 19:42
  especially in the Aramaic tradition, where show Me him
• 19:46
  becomes a substitute word for God himself.
• 19:49
  A circumlocution. It comes from a place of deep
• 19:51
  reverence for the divine name. So in Daniel you see the phrase
• 19:55
  that Nebuchadnezzar will be restored when he recognizes that
• 19:57
  heaven has the power heaven. There just stands in for God.
• 20:01
  The dwelling place becomes synonymous with the one who
• 20:03
  dwells there. It shows how tightly the
• 20:05
  concepts became linked. By referring to the setting, you
• 20:09
  are inherently referring to the sovereign who rules from it.
• 20:12
  We have certainly covered a lot of ground here.
• 20:14
  With shame, we went from its plural form to its physical
• 20:17
  structure with columns and windows, to the way it defines
• 20:20
  the entire cosmos. And most critically, we've seen
• 20:23
  its theological significance. It's created by God.
• 20:27
  It serves as his throne room. It's the platform for his
• 20:30
  action. And yet it is utterly
• 20:32
  insufficient to contain the transcendent God who fills all
• 20:35
  things. The sheer scope of this one
• 20:38
  word, from the simple domain of birds and rain to the majestic
• 20:42
  setting of the divine throne, is just incredible.
• 20:45
  But the sources give us one final, deep insight about God's
• 20:49
  own character that I think is a good place for us to end it.
• 20:51
  Connects God's very nature to this vast created expanse.
• 20:55
  The Psalms in particular, say that God's essential covenant
• 20:58
  attributes his essay His covenant love, His IEC, His
• 21:01
  righteousness, and his muna, His faithfulness, are all fixed in
• 21:05
  the heavens, but. Wait, that creates a bit of
• 21:07
  attention, doesn't it? It does.
• 21:08
  It creates A fascinating theological paradox for us to
• 21:11
  think about. We just established that the
• 21:14
  physical heavens are finite. They're going to be rolled up
• 21:16
  and replaced. They're temporary.
• 21:18
  Yet the biblical writers use this temporary object to
• 21:22
  describe God's most stable, eternal attributes.
• 21:26
  The very things that guarantee his relationship with his people
• 21:30
  are compared to the sky. So the final thought for you to
• 21:33
  consider is this. What does it mean when the
• 21:36
  faithfulness and righteousness of the eternal Creator are
• 21:39
  measured against a created object that is by its very
• 21:42
  nature transient I. Think the answer has to be in
• 21:45
  the rhetorical force of it. It's using the biggest, most
• 21:48
  stable thing within creation to give us a picture of something
• 21:51
  that is, in reality, infinitely beyond creation.
• 21:53
  The heavens are the best analogy our finite minds can grasp, but
• 21:57
  the. Scope and security of God's
• 21:58
  character are vastly greater. The temporary nature of the
• 22:01
  created shamim ends up pointing to the infinite security of the
• 22:04
  God who made it. You're asked to consider how the
• 22:07
  limits of creation help us understand the limitlessness of
• 22:10
  the covenant making God. A really powerful thought to end
• 22:13
  on for this deep dive into Shamayim.
• 22:15
  Thank you for listening.