Latest / The Matt Walsh Show / New Evidence in the Cornell 7 Case Completely Blows The Accuser's Story

Transcript

New Evidence in the Cornell 7 Case Completely Blows The Accuser's Story · The Matt Walsh Show

0:00
Speaker 1: A slew of text messages from the Cornell accuser have
0:03
Speaker 1: now been released and they erase all doubt about what happened.
0:07
Speaker 1: This woman, according to her own contemporaneous statements, consented to
0:12
Speaker 1: deviant sexual activity in a frat house. And after the fact,
0:15
Speaker 1: she firmly believed that no crime had been committed. She
0:19
Speaker 1: even stated that, quote, everyone needs to grow up because
0:23
Speaker 1: sexuality and sex is changing. meaning that she saw her
0:27
Speaker 1: behavior as enlightened, as a feminist expression of her own
0:30
Speaker 1: freedom and empowerment. And then not long afterwards, she began
0:33
Speaker 1: experiencing shame and humiliation when the entire campus found out about.
0:37
Speaker 2: What she did.
0:38
Speaker 1: She stated her reputation was destroyed and accused a fraternity
0:42
Speaker 1: member of telling everyone what she had done. And the
0:46
Speaker 1: breaking point came, apparently, when the fraternity disinvited her from
0:50
Speaker 1: their big Halloween party. This was the single most important
0:54
Speaker 1: social event of the semester. There's nothing more important to
0:58
Speaker 1: a college girl than the Halloween party. And they made
1:02
Speaker 1: it very clear that they didn't want her to attend.
1:05
Speaker 1: And she, you know, suddenly hearing this, she decided that
1:08
Speaker 1: she had been assaulted, retroactively withdrawing her consent long after
1:13
Speaker 1: the fact. That was the moment when she decided that
1:15
Speaker 1: she would go scorched earth. The second she was barred
1:19
Speaker 1: from a party at the very fraternity house, where she
1:22
Speaker 1: supposedly was abused. So think about that for a second.
1:26
Speaker 1: She was bitterly disappointed that she couldn't return to the
1:30
Speaker 1: place where she was supposedly subjected to a brutal gang rape. Now,
1:36
Speaker 1: the very notion is farcical, of course, but she understood
1:39
Speaker 1: that at a left-wing, female-dominated campus like Cornell, she could
1:44
Speaker 1: immediately regain the moral high ground if she lied about
1:47
Speaker 1: what happened, even if her story made no sense.
1:51
Speaker 2: And she was right.
1:53
Speaker 1: We'll go into the text messages and the whole timeline
1:57
Speaker 1: in just a moment. This is a case where facts matter,
1:59
Speaker 1: as they always do. And we're going to show all
2:03
Speaker 1: the text messages in context to demonstrate that this woman
2:07
Speaker 1: is a liar.
2:08
Speaker 2: The evidence is not a dispute.
2:11
Speaker 1: No one can seriously take issue with any of it.
2:14
Speaker 1: But first, it's important to establish at the outset that
2:16
Speaker 1: this case is not about one trashy woman at Cornell
2:20
Speaker 1: or the male students who also engaged in depraved sex acts.
2:25
Speaker 2: And drug use.
2:26
Speaker 1: And it's not simply about due process and the seemingly
2:29
Speaker 1: non-existent rights of the accused, although that's obviously a really
2:33
Speaker 1: important part of the story. This woman is almost certainly
2:36
Speaker 1: going to be paid millions of dollars as a result
2:39
Speaker 1: of the con her lawyers are running. The male students'
2:42
Speaker 1: lives will be destroyed, and we can expect a host
2:44
Speaker 1: of false allegations in the coming months and years as
2:47
Speaker 1: a result. That's the expected outcome at this point. And
2:51
Speaker 1: we shouldn't pretend otherwise. Everybody knows it. The more interesting
2:54
Speaker 1: question is why this woman's story, as fantastical and self-contradictory
2:59
Speaker 1: as it is, has resonated to such a great extent
3:03
Speaker 1: on the left with so many women all over the country.
3:06
Speaker 1: Democrat politicians are falling over themselves to make this case
3:08
Speaker 1: into a campaign issue, not because they have any principles,
3:11
Speaker 1: but because they're responding to the frenzy that their female
3:15
Speaker 1: constituents in the Democrat Party are participating in.
3:18
Speaker 2: It's supply and demand.
3:20
Speaker 1: There's a whole TikTok trend right now where women claim
3:23
Speaker 1: to have been the victims of some horrible crime many
3:26
Speaker 1: years after it supposedly happened. And why is this happening?
3:30
Speaker 1: Why did the accuser abruptly decide that she had been assaulted?
3:33
Speaker 1: And why are so many women defending her, even after
3:37
Speaker 1: it's clear that she's lying?
3:39
Speaker 2: What we're seeing here.
3:42
Speaker 1: Is, among other things, the failure of the left's consent-based morality.
3:47
Speaker 1: So they've chipped away at all sexual morals for decades.
3:51
Speaker 1: They've systematically eliminated every moral rule and standard governing, well,
3:57
Speaker 1: governing human behavior in general, but especially governing human sexuality.
4:02
Speaker 1: And they have left consent as the only remaining rule,
4:07
Speaker 1: the only remaining principle. But, you know, it turns out
4:10
Speaker 1: that sex can be degrading and bad even when it's consensual.
4:17
Speaker 1: And when that happens, when a woman feels gross and
4:20
Speaker 1: sad and embarrassed after a sexual encounter, even when it
4:25
Speaker 1: was fully consensual, they have no moral language to even
4:29
Speaker 1: understand or talk about how they feel except through consent.
4:35
Speaker 1: They can't say that sex outside of marriage is bad
4:38
Speaker 1: or that degrading group sex is bad or that drunkenness
4:42
Speaker 1: and intoxication are bad and that's why they feel bad.
4:47
Speaker 1: They can't say any of that stuff on the left
4:50
Speaker 1: because on the left you're supposed to celebrate all of that.
4:53
Speaker 1: The only moral framework they have, the only line that
4:57
Speaker 1: can be crossed on the leftist mindset revolves around consent.
5:02
Speaker 1: And therefore, any sex that makes a woman feel bad
5:05
Speaker 1: after the fact must have been ipso facto non-consensual. The
5:10
Speaker 1: concept of sex that was wrong yet consensual is foreign.
5:16
Speaker 2: To a woman like this.
5:16
Speaker 1: She has been told and has believed that wrong yet
5:20
Speaker 1: consensual is a category that cannot exist. Now, this is
5:26
Speaker 1: not meant to be an excuse for the accuser. It's
5:30
Speaker 1: not an excuse, but an explanation about the worldview that
5:33
Speaker 1: feeds into these kinds of false rape allegations. And we've
5:37
Speaker 1: seen this many times. If you're a rational person with
5:42
Speaker 1: a more robust and coherent moral framework, then it can
5:46
Speaker 1: be kind of difficult to wrap your mind around this.
5:48
Speaker 1: But the fact is that a lot of people in
5:50
Speaker 1: this country today, especially those on the left politically, truly
5:54
Speaker 1: believe that the only moral rule that obtains in any situation,
6:00
Speaker 1: not just sexual, is consent. The only thing that matters morally,
6:05
Speaker 1: they think, ever, is whether everybody involved in a particular
6:10
Speaker 1: act chose to be involved. Now, in reality, however, consent
6:15
Speaker 1: is merely the first step. It's the first box to
6:20
Speaker 1: check on your way to making sure that what you're
6:24
Speaker 1: doing is moral. Obviously, sex must be consensual, but it
6:28
Speaker 1: also must respect the dignity and humanity of the other
6:32
Speaker 1: person involved and of yourself. So what happened at Cornell
6:37
Speaker 1: was undignified, unhuman, animalistic.
6:41
Speaker 2: It's not even human behavior.
6:43
Speaker 1: You have eight people in a room doing this.
6:46
Speaker 2: This is not human. This is animalistic. It's savage. But
6:52
Speaker 2: it was consensual.
6:54
Speaker 1: It checked that box, but it didn't check the second
6:58
Speaker 1: box or any of the other boxes beyond that. But
7:01
Speaker 1: the left, again, has no moral language to describe bad, gross, undignified,
7:08
Speaker 1: consensual sex. And they have no way in their moral philosophy,
7:12
Speaker 1: such as it is, to account for the possibility that
7:15
Speaker 1: a person, especially a woman, might feel really bad about
7:18
Speaker 1: something she actively chose to do.
7:22
Speaker 2: So if she feels.
7:23
Speaker 1: Bad, it must have been non-consensual. That is the way
7:28
Speaker 1: they frame it. That's the way they see it. And
7:31
Speaker 1: this is how millions of women, particularly on the left,
7:34
Speaker 1: have been told to think about sex. They've heard this
7:36
Speaker 1: message from the media, from schools, from university administrators, and
7:42
Speaker 1: in many cases from their own parents. It's the same
7:45
Speaker 1: perspective that's shared by Democrat politicians at all levels of government,
7:48
Speaker 1: up to and including the governor of New York, Kathy Hochul,
7:50
Speaker 1: and her staff. All of these people know that the
7:53
Speaker 1: Cornell incident was lurid and repulsive and that everybody involved,
7:57
Speaker 1: the men and the woman, bear culpability for it. But
8:02
Speaker 1: if they were to condemn the debauchery They'd be undoing
8:06
Speaker 1: generations of work by feminists and sexual revolutionaries who have
8:09
Speaker 1: decided that, you know, who have dedicated their lives and
8:12
Speaker 1: a lot of political capital to the hedonistic maxim that
8:16
Speaker 1: sex is merely, you know, one more way for people
8:19
Speaker 1: to enjoy themselves without the need for any deeper purpose
8:21
Speaker 1: or commitment or respect or anything like that. They can't
8:26
Speaker 1: bring themselves to do that under any circumstances. So instead,
8:29
Speaker 1: we're treated to this charade on a national scale, to
8:33
Speaker 1: this absurd idea that a woman can retroactively revoke her
8:36
Speaker 1: consent to sexual activity to avoid confronting her shame about
8:41
Speaker 1: what she chose to do. The charade reached the point
8:45
Speaker 1: of absurdity a couple of days ago. Well, it's been
8:47
Speaker 1: absurd this whole time, but it reached a fever pitch,
8:49
Speaker 1: I suppose, when Kathy Ockel appointed a special prosecutor to
8:53
Speaker 1: investigate the case.
8:55
Speaker 2: Even though, again, the alleged victim.
8:57
Speaker 1: Has admitted in writing that that no crime occurred, has
9:02
Speaker 1: actually said that explicitly in writing.
9:06
Speaker 2: Nobody committed a crime. But this is what Hochul did.
9:10
Speaker 1: And the special prosecutor that has been appointed is none
9:13
Speaker 1: other than Letitia James, who's best known for engineering a
9:16
Speaker 1: fake civil case against Donald Trump, which ultimately fell apart.
9:20
Speaker 2: She prejudged that case.
9:22
Speaker 1: She actually ran for office on a pledge to investigate
9:25
Speaker 1: and convict Donald Trump. And she's done exactly the same
9:28
Speaker 1: thing here. So this was a video posted by Letitia
9:31
Speaker 1: James just one day before she was appointed as a
9:34
Speaker 1: special prosecutor.
9:35
Speaker 2: Listen.
9:37
Speaker 3: So let me just say my heart goes out to
9:41
Speaker 3: the victim, the survivor, and I stand with her and
9:45
Speaker 3: all individuals who unfortunately have been the victims of sexual assault.
9:50
Speaker 3: And my job is to ensure that the rights of
9:53
Speaker 3: students and that the rights of survivors and that all
9:55
Speaker 3: individuals on campuses all throughout the state of New York
9:58
Speaker 3: are safe. And that Cornell University and other universities, SUNY universities,
10:05
Speaker 3: CUNY universities, private universities, all have protocols in place that
10:09
Speaker 3: they are in compliance with Title IX and that they
10:12
Speaker 3: ensure that all of the students are safe on their campus.
10:15
Speaker 3: In addition to that, the Tompkins County District Attorney has
10:18
Speaker 3: reopened this case He's presenting this case to the grand jury.
10:23
Speaker 3: And there have been a lot of comments with respect
10:26
Speaker 3: to his handling of the case. And we look forward
10:28
Speaker 3: to the outcome and to ensure that, in fact, justice
10:31
Speaker 3: is served and there's accountability for the survivor.
10:36
Speaker 1: So, again, the word we keep coming back to is farcical.
10:41
Speaker 1: That's what all of this is. No credible person can
10:45
Speaker 1: claim that this has any credibility at this point. I mean,
10:49
Speaker 1: The whole point of a special prosecutor is supposed to
10:53
Speaker 1: be to avoid conflicts of interest, to avoid bias. That's
10:58
Speaker 1: the whole reason you bring in a special prosecutor. And
11:01
Speaker 1: here you have the special prosecutor on camera before anything's
11:06
Speaker 1: been investigated, already declaring what the results of the investigation
11:09
Speaker 1: will be. In a sane society, this wouldn't just simply
11:13
Speaker 1: disqualify Letitia James from serving as a special.
11:16
Speaker 2: Prosecutor in this case.
11:18
Speaker 1: This would lead to her impeachment and removal as Attorney
11:21
Speaker 1: General of New York. It would also lead to lawsuits
11:24
Speaker 1: that would bankrupt her for life. I mean, that's what
11:26
Speaker 1: she deserves. She's repeatedly talking about a victim and a
11:30
Speaker 1: survivor and outright stating that this woman was the victim
11:34
Speaker 1: of a sexual assault, all of which contradicts what the
11:37
Speaker 1: alleged victim herself has stated, as well as all the
11:41
Speaker 1: available evidence. If anything, by the standards of consent set
11:45
Speaker 1: by the left anyway, some of these men are the victims.
11:48
Speaker 1: Several of them never even touched this woman, and at
11:50
Speaker 1: least two of them, based on the woman's statement, were
11:53
Speaker 1: more intoxicated than she was. So this would be inexcusable
11:58
Speaker 1: coming from a random online podcaster, but this is coming
12:01
Speaker 1: from the attorney general who, under the law, isn't supposed
12:04
Speaker 1: to prosecute any cases where she has an obvious bias.
12:09
Speaker 1: And in this case, she's been tapped as a special prosecutor,
12:12
Speaker 1: which is a position that, by definition, requires, again, that
12:16
Speaker 1: she doesn't have any conflict of interest, that she doesn't
12:17
Speaker 1: have a bias.
12:18
Speaker 2: That's the whole point of that position. But she clearly
12:22
Speaker 2: has one.
12:24
Speaker 1: And when she and the governor were asked about this,
12:26
Speaker 1: neither one of them had a coherent reply. James didn't
12:29
Speaker 1: even bother to attempt to answer the question.
12:32
Speaker 2: Watch.
12:34
Speaker 4: Attorney General, on your Facebook page three days ago, you wrote,
12:37
Speaker 4: what this young woman has been forced to endure.
12:39
Speaker 2: Is horrific and unacceptable.
12:41
Speaker 4: I'm holding her in my heart and in my prayers
12:43
Speaker 4: to her. And to all survivors, you're not alone.
12:45
Speaker 5: We stand with you.
12:47
Speaker 4: Why did you affirm her allegations as fact without doing
12:51
Speaker 4: your own fact-finding investigation into the governor? Why did you
12:54
Speaker 4: appoint an official who made a public statement affirming those allegations.
13:00
Speaker 2: As fact as someone who's supposed to be doing an investigation?
13:03
Speaker 6: I will answer that. I have every confidence in our
13:06
Speaker 6: Attorney General to do what she has always done. Look
13:09
Speaker 6: at the facts, examine the record. and draw the proper conclusions.
13:13
Speaker 6: That's exactly what's going to happen in this case.
13:16
Speaker 3: I will not comment on a Facebook post.
13:21
Speaker 1: So no answer there. And we all know what the
13:23
Speaker 1: conclusion of this investigation will be. Not only are they
13:27
Speaker 1: going to prosecute the seven, but it's going to be
13:31
Speaker 1: full Derek Chauvin. You know, they're going to find people
13:35
Speaker 1: that weren't even involved, that weren't even there, and they're
13:37
Speaker 1: going to prosecute them too. I mean, it's not just
13:40
Speaker 1: going to be, it's not a question of, whether all
13:42
Speaker 1: seven of the quote unquote Cornell seven are prosecuted. It's
13:46
Speaker 1: how many additional young men are they going to pull
13:49
Speaker 1: into this? In some cases who had nothing to do
13:52
Speaker 1: with it whatsoever, because that will happen. You know, you
13:56
Speaker 1: hear people like Barack Obama say, as he said recently,
13:59
Speaker 1: that if women ran the world, everything would be peaceful
14:03
Speaker 1: and run smoothly.
14:04
Speaker 2: And then you.
14:05
Speaker 1: Look at what actually happens when you have women like
14:08
Speaker 1: this running things and, uh, you know, and well, here's
14:11
Speaker 1: what it looks like. Their top priority is the highest
14:15
Speaker 1: ranking officials in New York is to launch a criminal
14:17
Speaker 1: investigation into a two-year-old booty call.
14:20
Speaker 2: At a frat house.
14:23
Speaker 1: Where nobody was killed or suffered any significant physical injuries,
14:26
Speaker 1: which involves no criminal activity, even according to the written
14:30
Speaker 1: statements of the alleged victim at the time.
14:34
Speaker 2: And which didn't even.
14:35
Speaker 1: Bother her, uh, enough to get her to withdraw from
14:41
Speaker 1: the Halloween party. She had to be disinvited from a
14:44
Speaker 1: Halloween party. A Halloween party she desperately wanted to attend
14:47
Speaker 1: at the very same place where she later claimed she
14:49
Speaker 1: was raped. And with the very same people who she
14:52
Speaker 1: now says raped her. You get the sense that at
14:56
Speaker 1: some level, these women realize they have no case. That's
14:58
Speaker 1: why the governor is trying to change the law.
15:00
Speaker 2: So here's what she posted.
15:04
Speaker 1: Quote, choosing to have a drink is not consent and
15:06
Speaker 1: it's never a license for sexual assault. New York law
15:09
Speaker 1: should reflect that. I support closing the voluntary intoxication loophole
15:14
Speaker 1: and will work with the legislature to get it done.
15:19
Speaker 1: So apparently she thinks there's a loophole in the law
15:21
Speaker 1: where if you have a drink of alcohol, you're consenting
15:23
Speaker 1: to get sexually assaulted. But rest assured, I looked this
15:28
Speaker 1: up and just, you know, I mean, common sense tells
15:30
Speaker 1: you that's not the case, but looked it up anyway
15:32
Speaker 1: just to make sure. And there is, in fact, no
15:35
Speaker 1: such loophole. This is very much like when Biden passed
15:40
Speaker 1: a law, the Democrats passed a law, making lynching a crime.
15:46
Speaker 1: We've got to close the lynching loophole.
15:49
Speaker 2: There's no loophole. It was already a crime 50 times over.
15:54
Speaker 2: And this is already a crime.
15:56
Speaker 1: To actually rape someone, man or woman, who is intoxicated or.
16:01
Speaker 2: Is not intoxicated, is against the law. It's already a crime.
16:04
Speaker 2: Rape is already a crime in New York.
16:08
Speaker 1: Under the current law in New York, choosing to have
16:09
Speaker 1: a drink is not in fact consent in and of itself, obviously. However,
16:15
Speaker 1: it is true that if you have a couple of drinks,
16:18
Speaker 1: then as long as you're not unconscious or disabled in
16:21
Speaker 1: some way, you're still allowed to legally consent to sexual activity.
16:26
Speaker 1: And that makes sense because what's the other option here?
16:31
Speaker 1: What she's trying to do is change the law so
16:33
Speaker 1: that I guess if you have a few drinks, then
16:35
Speaker 1: for all intents and purposes, you can't consent to anything. Now, overnight,
16:41
Speaker 1: of course, this would classify about, what, like 90% of
16:44
Speaker 1: people living in New York as rapists right away. I mean,
16:50
Speaker 1: if you've ever had any sexual encounter with anyone who
16:53
Speaker 1: had a few drinks, even if you also had a
16:55
Speaker 1: few drinks, and even if nobody was inebriated, well, then
16:58
Speaker 1: you're a rapist in New York. If that's how they
17:01
Speaker 1: changed the law, It would also have a host of
17:05
Speaker 1: other consequences that these women obviously haven't thought through because
17:08
Speaker 1: the process of thinking through anything requires a level of
17:10
Speaker 1: self-awareness and IQ that exceeds the grasp of Kathy Hochul
17:15
Speaker 1: and her henchwoman. According to Hochul's proposal, the moment you're
17:18
Speaker 1: voluntarily intoxicated, you simply can't be held responsible for your actions. So, okay,
17:25
Speaker 1: if somebody gets drunk and then decides to get behind
17:28
Speaker 1: the wheel of a car, how can we hold them
17:31
Speaker 1: responsible for DUI? If they run over a family of five,
17:35
Speaker 1: I mean, how can you charge them with any crime?
17:36
Speaker 1: After all, once you're voluntarily intoxicated, you bear no responsibility
17:40
Speaker 1: for anything, according to Kathy Hochul. As I've brought up
17:42
Speaker 1: several times now, under the current law in like every
17:46
Speaker 1: state in the union, actually, not only are you held
17:49
Speaker 1: responsible if you get into an accident while you're drunk,
17:51
Speaker 1: you're held more responsible. The law says, and as it should, well, no,
17:57
Speaker 1: I mean, if you kill someone in your car, you're
17:59
Speaker 1: already in trouble. But if you got drunk ahead of time,
18:01
Speaker 1: that just makes you even more, you behaved even more irresponsibly.
18:06
Speaker 1: That's just another layer of negligence on your side.
18:10
Speaker 2: And so you're going to be in even more trouble.
18:15
Speaker 1: So in that way, we ascribe even greater volition to
18:19
Speaker 1: the drunk person in some ways when it comes to
18:22
Speaker 1: a car accident. Well, how does that work with this
18:26
Speaker 1: change to the law they want to make?
18:28
Speaker 5: Well, who knows?
18:28
Speaker 2: They haven't thought about it.
18:30
Speaker 1: It's all totally incoherent, but it tracks with how women
18:33
Speaker 1: are being told to think about sexual assault. Let's take
18:36
Speaker 1: a look at this extraordinary report from ABC News, for example.
18:38
Speaker 1: This is designed to shock us into thinking that sexual
18:41
Speaker 1: assault is an epidemic on campuses. But it manages to
18:46
Speaker 1: highlight another problem entirely, kind of the opposite problem, if anything. Quote,
18:51
Speaker 1: a state-mandated survey of undergraduate students at Cornell revealed that
18:54
Speaker 1: more than one-third of undergraduate women said they experienced sexual
18:58
Speaker 1: assault during their time at the Ivy League University. According
19:01
Speaker 1: to the school's 2025 survey of sexual assault and related misconduct,
19:06
Speaker 1: 35% of the undergraduate women at the Ithaca New York
19:09
Speaker 1: School report experiencing non-consensual sexual contact involving force or incapacitation
19:15
Speaker 1: since entering Cornell. In 50% of cases, respondents reported being
19:20
Speaker 1: conscious but incapacitated by alcohol or drugs during all or
19:23
Speaker 1: part of the incident, according to the report, with 90%
19:26
Speaker 1: saying they were passed out or unconscious for some or
19:29
Speaker 1: all of the time. Well, all this report demonstrates, if anything.
19:33
Speaker 2: Is that the crisis of fake sexual assault.
19:35
Speaker 1: Claims is far worse than we imagined. Again, unless you're
19:42
Speaker 1: willing to believe the 35% figure, which you're retarded if
19:45
Speaker 1: you are, I mean, they're saying that 35% percent of
19:48
Speaker 1: undergraduate women at Cornell have been sexually assaulted.
19:51
Speaker 2: 35 percent.
19:52
Speaker 1: Just for comparison, according to a study of refugees at
19:55
Speaker 1: a camp in Mogadishu, 19 percent of women had experienced
19:59
Speaker 1: gender based violence, quote unquote, in the preceding 12 months.
20:02
Speaker 1: That includes all forms of violence, not just sexual violence.
20:07
Speaker 1: I think this fact puts the Cornell claim and maybe
20:10
Speaker 1: into even sharper relief. During the decade-long civil war in
20:13
Speaker 1: Sierra Leone, 13% of households reported sexual violence and 9%
20:19
Speaker 1: of individual women. So think about that for a moment.
20:24
Speaker 1: We're supposed to believe that at an Ivy League campus
20:27
Speaker 1: in the United States of America, women are being sexually
20:30
Speaker 1: assaulted at far higher rates than women in third world
20:34
Speaker 1: refugee camps. We're supposed to believe they're being assaulted at
20:38
Speaker 1: triple the rate of women in war-torn African hellholes. According
20:44
Speaker 1: to this, if you're a woman, you're more likely to
20:45
Speaker 1: be raped on an Ivy League college campus than if
20:50
Speaker 1: you are airdropped into the middle of an African civil
20:53
Speaker 1: war for 10 years.
20:57
Speaker 2: Does any thinking person believe that? Of course not. So
21:04
Speaker 2: I decided to look into this survey because it gets
21:05
Speaker 2: at the root of the problem, which is that.
21:07
Speaker 1: Women are being trained to recast unpleasant sexual experiences as assault,
21:14
Speaker 1: which is a pretty big problem. And the first thing
21:17
Speaker 1: I noticed, which the media doesn't tell you, is that
21:19
Speaker 1: this survey had a response rate of 15%. Quote, a
21:22
Speaker 1: total of 926 students participated in the 2025 survey, resulting
21:26
Speaker 1: in an overall response rate of 15%. Graduate and professional
21:30
Speaker 1: women had the highest participation rate at approximately 19%, while
21:34
Speaker 1: undergraduate students responded at a lower rate of around 13%.
21:39
Speaker 1: So already this debunks the ABC report and all of
21:41
Speaker 1: the media reporting on the survey. If only 15% of
21:45
Speaker 1: undergraduates reply to your survey and 35% of the respondents
21:48
Speaker 1: say that they were sexually assaulted, that obviously does not
21:51
Speaker 1: mean that 35% of undergraduates say they were assaulted. The
21:56
Speaker 1: people who are going to respond to a survey like
21:58
Speaker 1: this are far more likely to have a complaint and
22:00
Speaker 1: the sample size, therefore, is not statistically useful. It's a
22:04
Speaker 1: pretty big issue, and the media is pretending not to
22:06
Speaker 1: understand it. The survey itself states that these issues, quote,
22:10
Speaker 1: limit confidence in the accuracy of these estimates, you think?
22:14
Speaker 1: But we're supposed to take it seriously with these absurd headlines.
22:18
Speaker 1: And when you look closer, you realize that the 35%
22:21
Speaker 1: number is fake, too. Specifically, the survey notes that, quote,
22:24
Speaker 1: this is the first administration of the survey where respondents
22:27
Speaker 1: were asked specifically about their experience With unwanted choking or strangulation,
22:31
Speaker 1: the survey asked separately about incidents involving four different tactics,
22:35
Speaker 1: the use or threatened use of physical force, incapacitation due
22:37
Speaker 1: to drugs or alcohol, the use of coercion, i.e. threats
22:40
Speaker 1: or non-physical harm of promises of rewards, or promises of rewards,
22:45
Speaker 1: and the absence of affirmative consent, i.e. contact that occurred
22:48
Speaker 1: without the student's knowing, voluntary, and ongoing agreement. So to
22:53
Speaker 1: be clear about this, That means that they're including in
22:58
Speaker 1: their definition of sexual assault some stuff that obviously would
23:01
Speaker 1: be sexual assault and other stuff that wouldn't be. And
23:05
Speaker 1: all of this is self-reported data. And so, you know,
23:09
Speaker 1: what you're taking from this is that this number of
23:12
Speaker 1: women made this claim on a survey. And it's totally
23:17
Speaker 1: up to them. It's totally up to them how they
23:20
Speaker 1: define retroactively sexual assault. But the whole issue we're having
23:24
Speaker 1: here is that the definition is wildly ridiculous at this point.
23:31
Speaker 1: And to be clear about this, according to the ridiculous
23:33
Speaker 1: concept of affirmative consent as it's preached on college campuses,
23:39
Speaker 1: if someone in a sexual encounter, it's supposed to be someone,
23:43
Speaker 1: but really this in practice only applies to the woman,
23:47
Speaker 1: doesn't verbally and affirmatively consent to each specific act, within
23:54
Speaker 1: one sexual encounter, even an encounter that has already been
23:58
Speaker 1: consented to, then potentially that can become rape after the fact.
24:05
Speaker 1: This is how they inflate the sexual assault statistics to
24:07
Speaker 1: absurd proportions. Along with reference to incapacitation to drugs or alcohol,
24:13
Speaker 1: in context, they're not talking about women who are so
24:16
Speaker 1: incapacitated that they can't consent. They're talking about a very
24:18
Speaker 1: large category of women who voluntarily get drunk and high
24:24
Speaker 1: and or high, and then later regret their actions.
24:28
Speaker 2: Listen up.
24:28
Speaker 1: There are enough people listening to the show right now
24:31
Speaker 1: that if they don't vote, it could swing key states
24:35
Speaker 1: in the 2026 election to the Democrats. And everybody listening
24:39
Speaker 1: knows every single ultra far left democratic socialist will be
24:42
Speaker 1: showing up to vote this fall. Democrats are fired up
24:45
Speaker 1: and we can't let them win because if we lose,
24:47
Speaker 1: they'll undo everything our movement has fought for I need
24:50
Speaker 1: you to vote early so that you can bank your
24:52
Speaker 1: vote and fight back against the left's turnout machine. If
24:56
Speaker 1: you live in the critical Senate battleground states of Maine
24:59
Speaker 1: or Ohio, early voting is already underway starting this week.
25:03
Speaker 1: Go to GOPvotes.org right now and find out when you
25:06
Speaker 1: can vote. Making your voice heard is easier than ever.
25:09
Speaker 1: Get election reminders. Look up your polling location and pick
25:12
Speaker 1: a date to vote early. Go to GOPvotes.org today. Paid
25:15
Speaker 1: for by SLF PAC. Not authorized by any candidate or
25:19
Speaker 1: candidates committee. People will spend six months researching which television
25:23
Speaker 1: to buy, compare 47 different models, read 900 reviews and
25:28
Speaker 1: save themselves 30 bucks. So meanwhile, they've been paying the
25:31
Speaker 1: same wireless company too much money every single month for
25:35
Speaker 1: 12 years. Perhaps we're allocating our research time incorrectly. But,
25:39
Speaker 1: you know, I have a pure talk line. The reason
25:41
Speaker 1: I keep telling you about them is pretty simple. The
25:44
Speaker 1: coverage is phenomenal. I use the unlimited data constantly, and
25:47
Speaker 1: their unlimited high-speed.
25:48
Speaker 2: Data is just $ 34. 99 a month.
25:51
Speaker 1: So it turns out you don't actually have to choose.
25:54
Speaker 1: And don't just take my word for it. In a
25:55
Speaker 1: recent industry survey of more than 120,000 wireless customers, PureTalk
26:00
Speaker 1: was the only wireless company to receive five out of
26:02
Speaker 1: five stars in every category, coverage, support, value, and data,
26:07
Speaker 1: at some point paying more for worse service. stops being
26:11
Speaker 1: unfortunate and starts becoming a decision that you're making voluntarily.
26:15
Speaker 2: So stop doing that.
26:17
Speaker 1: Go to puretalk.com slash Walsh and save 50% off your
26:20
Speaker 1: first month. That's puretalk.com slash Walsh. The survey doesn't even define,
26:26
Speaker 1: by the way, incapacitation. It's just sort of like if
26:28
Speaker 1: you feel afterwards that you were incapacitated, even if at
26:31
Speaker 1: the time you voluntarily got drunk, you gave verbal consent,
26:35
Speaker 1: just like in the Cornell case, all that stuff, check
26:38
Speaker 1: all those boxes. Later on, a week later, a year later,
26:41
Speaker 1: two years later, if you decide, looking back on it, that,
26:43
Speaker 1: you know what, I feel like I was incapacitated.
26:46
Speaker 2: And even if the other person.
26:47
Speaker 1: Involved or people were also, quote unquote, incapacitated, still, you
26:52
Speaker 1: can qualify that as sexual assault. And that's what the
26:54
Speaker 1: survey reflects. There's another contributing factor here, which is that
26:58
Speaker 1: in general, women have much lower alcohol tolerance than men.
27:02
Speaker 1: And when you combine alcohol with the SSRIs that millions
27:04
Speaker 1: of women are taking, the effect is magnified even further.
27:08
Speaker 1: According to a study out of England, pretty much every
27:10
Speaker 1: woman who says that she was drugged was actually drunk voluntarily.
27:16
Speaker 1: They looked at 1,014 cases of claimed drug-facilitated sexual assault,
27:22
Speaker 1: and they found that only 21 cases, or 2%, involved
27:27
Speaker 1: a sedative or disinhibiting drug that the woman didn't admit
27:31
Speaker 1: to taking. And that includes three cases where the woman
27:34
Speaker 1: were allegedly given ecstasy without their knowledge.
27:36
Speaker 2: That obviously counts as being drugged.
27:39
Speaker 1: But in general, according to statistics, when women claim that
27:42
Speaker 1: they were drugged, often they took the drugs themselves. We're
27:45
Speaker 1: seeing this right now in the Cornell case. We're hearing claims.
27:49
Speaker 1: AOC said this. We played the clip last week. She
27:55
Speaker 1: said the woman was drugged, yet by the woman's own testimony,
28:01
Speaker 1: she took the drugs herself because she wanted to. So
28:05
Speaker 1: that's what it means to be drugged now. Even that
28:08
Speaker 1: phrase now has no meaning. That's an important point because
28:12
Speaker 1: the New York Times reporting on the Cornell accuser's behavior
28:14
Speaker 1: in the days following this alleged assault in the frat
28:17
Speaker 1: house makes it very clear that she falls into this
28:20
Speaker 1: category of someone who voluntarily drugged themselves. Quote, in October 2024,
28:26
Speaker 1: about a week after the fraternity party at Cornell University,
28:30
Speaker 1: the sophomore who would come to be known as Jane
28:32
Speaker 1: Doe was milling around an online forum about Greek life
28:35
Speaker 1: when she encountered a post that stopped her cold. Our
28:40
Speaker 1: Chi Phi brothers, Crips or Bloods, because I hear that
28:44
Speaker 1: they've been doing hell gangbanging, someone had written. They do
28:48
Speaker 1: drugs and gang ramp to sophomore, another user wrote.
28:51
Speaker 2: Report them.
28:52
Speaker 1: Since the evening that began on October 19th, 2024, Jane
28:55
Speaker 1: Doe had recounted the night's events to her roommates without
28:58
Speaker 1: identifying herself as a rape victim. She'd exchanged friendly text
29:01
Speaker 1: messages with men she would later accuse of assault. She'd
29:03
Speaker 1: heard uncharitable appraisals of herself from undergraduate gossip. Then she
29:07
Speaker 1: read the words. That's the first time I'd ever heard
29:09
Speaker 1: the narrative change that I wasn't a whore and that
29:12
Speaker 1: I was assaulted, Jane Doe told investigators. Okay, so first
29:17
Speaker 1: of all, reading this, it sounds a lot like maybe
29:21
Speaker 1: this woman was the one leaving anonymous messages on the forum.
29:24
Speaker 1: But even if she's not, that paragraph is still extremely
29:27
Speaker 1: revealing and troubling. She's telling investigators that until she saw
29:32
Speaker 1: someone else say that she was assaulted.
29:36
Speaker 2: She did not think that she was assaulted.
29:40
Speaker 1: So someone had to come along a week after the
29:42
Speaker 1: incident in her version of events and tell her what
29:47
Speaker 1: happened to her.
29:48
Speaker 2: This is someone who wasn't there. Until that point, in every.
29:52
Speaker 1: Conversation she had, she affirmed that she was not assaulted. Quote,
29:56
Speaker 1: on October 21st, Jane Doe went to her big sister,
29:59
Speaker 1: a woman designated as a mentor at Cornell's Tri-Delta sorority,
30:05
Speaker 1: and told her that there were rumors circulating that she
30:08
Speaker 1: was a slut. The big sister, a junior at Cornell,
30:11
Speaker 1: told investigators that Jane Doe added with a laugh that, unfortunately,
30:15
Speaker 1: they are true. The same day, she also wrote to
30:18
Speaker 1: one of her alleged attackers in a text message saying, quote,
30:21
Speaker 1: At the end of the day, none of the sexual
30:23
Speaker 1: stuff was illegal. And honestly, I really liked being with
30:28
Speaker 1: you and.
30:28
Speaker 2: The other guy.
30:31
Speaker 1: So this was her position, which she established in writing
30:33
Speaker 1: repeatedly two days after the alleged attack. But things began
30:36
Speaker 1: to change a couple of days later as word began
30:39
Speaker 1: to spread. Quote, on October 23rd, Jane Doe texted Mr. Ingalls, bro,
30:44
Speaker 1: she wrote, everyone knows. She said the episode was ruining
30:47
Speaker 1: my life temporarily. and that her reputation has been destroyed.
30:51
Speaker 1: She said all she could do was sleep and cry
30:53
Speaker 1: all day. In the meantime, Jane Doe had delivered strict
30:56
Speaker 1: instructions to one of her roommates. If anyone asks about this,
30:58
Speaker 1: she said, according to roommate's testimony, say it didn't happen.
31:01
Speaker 1: The roommate was plainly concerned. Initially, she said Jane Doe
31:04
Speaker 1: was kind of recounting it as this sort of crazy
31:07
Speaker 1: thing that she had done.
31:11
Speaker 2: That she had done. As you look through these documents, there.
31:15
Speaker 1: Are indeed many indications that members of the frat and
31:18
Speaker 1: everyone else on campus was mocking this woman. They were
31:22
Speaker 1: shaming her for her behavior, which will naturally happen when
31:26
Speaker 1: you behave in a way that's disgusting, just as the
31:29
Speaker 1: men behaved in a disgusting way.
31:31
Speaker 2: They all did.
31:33
Speaker 1: But the turning point came when the fraternity decided, as
31:35
Speaker 1: a matter of official policy, to stop associating with her. Quote,
31:40
Speaker 1: the fraternity was preparing for a Halloween party and Jane
31:43
Speaker 1: Doe was eager to attend. Text messages included in the
31:46
Speaker 1: investigation show Mr. Ingalls assuring Jane Doe that he and
31:50
Speaker 1: the other fraternity members wanted her to be there. Shy-fy
31:54
Speaker 1: is your house and you are welcome here, he wrote,
31:57
Speaker 1: relaying the views of the attorney's president, who was not
32:00
Speaker 1: among those accused of sexual assault.
32:02
Speaker 2: Thank you.
32:02
Speaker 1: I really appreciate that. Jane Doe responded, I'll bring my
32:07
Speaker 1: cigs tomorrow with a little heart.
32:10
Speaker 2: Symbol.
32:10
Speaker 1: But then Jane Doe received a phone call from the
32:12
Speaker 1: fraternity's president. According to the text messages, she was disinvited
32:15
Speaker 1: from the party. It was for her own good, he said.
32:18
Speaker 1: Jane Doe sent a biting text to Mr.
32:20
Speaker 2: Ingalls.
32:21
Speaker 1: I knew this was going to happen. She wrote, the
32:22
Speaker 1: woman will always get the short end of the stick.
32:25
Speaker 1: Y'all aren't my friends. Y'all are covering your asses. By
32:28
Speaker 1: November 3rd, Jane Doe appears to have concluded that she
32:31
Speaker 1: was assaulted at the October party.
32:32
Speaker 2: She sent a text to Mr.
32:33
Speaker 3: Newell.
32:34
Speaker 1: Let's be clear that 90% of what happened that night
32:36
Speaker 1: was not consensual. I was given More key than I
32:39
Speaker 1: can remember, she said, using a shorthand for ketamine. And
32:42
Speaker 1: I know that I told you I felt uncomfortable and
32:44
Speaker 1: I didn't know anyone in the room. Four days later,
32:46
Speaker 1: on November 7th, according to the documents, Jane Doe went
32:49
Speaker 1: to an emergency room in Ithaca and requested a rape kit. Yes, again,
32:54
Speaker 1: she concluded that she was assaulted only after she was
32:57
Speaker 1: disinvited from a Halloween party that she desperately wanted to
33:02
Speaker 1: attend at a place where she supposedly was raped with
33:05
Speaker 1: people who had assaulted her, supposedly.
33:08
Speaker 2: That was her aha moment.
33:10
Speaker 1: Once she realized that the men had used her and
33:13
Speaker 1: didn't actually care about her, on top of the fact
33:15
Speaker 1: that everyone on campus knew she was a degenerate, she
33:18
Speaker 1: came to see the supposed truth about what actually happened.
33:20
Speaker 2: She told the campus police that she was assaulted.
33:23
Speaker 1: She gave a big statement to campus police, complete with
33:25
Speaker 1: 20 handwritten edits, which, upon a thorough review of the facts,
33:28
Speaker 1: did not actually allege a crime.
33:30
Speaker 2: And two years later, she files a lawsuit.
33:33
Speaker 1: Now, if you read between the lines here, it's possible
33:36
Speaker 1: that the woman's sorority was so embarrassed by her behavior
33:38
Speaker 1: that they contacted the fraternity and told them to cut
33:41
Speaker 1: her off to avoid any future incidents and embarrassment. That's speculation,
33:45
Speaker 1: but it makes sense considering the campus politics here. This
33:48
Speaker 1: woman was becoming a campus-wide embarrassment for everyone associated with her,
33:52
Speaker 1: and the reputation of her sorority was taking a hit.
33:56
Speaker 2: Her reputation was destroyed, she says.
33:57
Speaker 1: So in a move that's very common in left-wing circles,
34:00
Speaker 1: she decided that she was actually a victim.
34:03
Speaker 2: And it would seem to save face.
34:06
Speaker 1: At the same time, based on some of the texts
34:07
Speaker 1: from the members of the fraternity, this woman was indeed
34:10
Speaker 1: treated like garbage and they took full advantage of her
34:13
Speaker 1: willingness to participate in something like this.
34:16
Speaker 2: And as you read their texts, it becomes.
34:17
Speaker 1: Clear why the school expelled the man who she came
34:21
Speaker 1: to see as well as one of the men who
34:23
Speaker 1: texted everyone else in the group chat.
34:26
Speaker 5: Watch.
34:27
Speaker 7: Tonight, images from inside the room at the Chi Phi
34:30
Speaker 7: fraternity house where a former Cornell University student alleges she
34:33
Speaker 7: was gang raped two years ago. The room strewn with garbage,
34:37
Speaker 7: discarded furniture, and there on the windowsill, a poster of
34:40
Speaker 7: a sorority class and a fentanyl test strip. The video
34:43
Speaker 7: obtained by ABC News was taken after Cornell suspended the frat.
34:47
Speaker 7: Campus police showed up. And knocked at the door three
34:52
Speaker 7: days after an officer logged that a female undergraduate student
34:55
Speaker 7: reported that she was recently raped by eight to ten
34:58
Speaker 7: men at the Chi Phi fraternity house. And this campus
35:01
Speaker 7: alert went out to students about a report of a
35:03
Speaker 7: sexual assault. Tonight, ABC News obtained more of the vulgar
35:07
Speaker 7: Snapchat messages shared among more than 50 fraternity members during
35:11
Speaker 7: the alleged assault. The friend Jane Doe went to see
35:14
Speaker 7: that night, sent the group a photo that appears to
35:16
Speaker 7: show her in the bedroom. One brother then asking, shop
35:20
Speaker 7: still open? Another saying, LFG. Then Jane Doe's friend invited
35:25
Speaker 7: all of them to the room. Boys, come whip it out.
35:28
Speaker 7: Three weeks later, Jane Doe recorded her phone call to
35:31
Speaker 7: that same friend, asking him, do you remember how any
35:34
Speaker 7: of these guys walked in? He made no mention of
35:37
Speaker 7: his crude invitation on the group chat, instead explaining it
35:40
Speaker 7: this way. The door was just unlocked. The party was
35:42
Speaker 7: sort of like crowded. There was nowhere else to go.
35:45
Speaker 7: Jane Doe telling him, if I wanted to take this somewhere,
35:48
Speaker 7: what y'all did would be classified as gang rape, claiming
35:51
Speaker 7: the alleged attack left her body physically damaged. In phone
35:55
Speaker 7: calls and messages reviewed by ABC News, other alleged attackers
35:59
Speaker 7: telling Jane Doe, I'm so sorry, I feel so bad
36:02
Speaker 7: for you, dude. Another saying, I just wanted to apologize
36:05
Speaker 7: for how things went down the other night. As the
36:07
Speaker 7: weeks went by, Jane Doe became more convinced about what happened. Texting,
36:12
Speaker 7: let's be clear that 90% of what happened that night
36:15
Speaker 7: was not consensual. All I remember after that was you
36:18
Speaker 7: giving me ketamine. She said it made her feel like
36:21
Speaker 7: a sex doll slash worker.
36:26
Speaker 1: So notice how they include the text where the guy says,
36:29
Speaker 1: I'm sorry for how things went down, but they omit
36:30
Speaker 1: her response, which I'll read one more time. And her
36:34
Speaker 1: response was, quote, at the end of the day, none
36:36
Speaker 1: of the sexual stuff was illegal. And honestly, I really
36:40
Speaker 1: liked being with you and Matt. I guess ABC didn't
36:44
Speaker 1: find her response relevant for the report, which they broadcast
36:47
Speaker 1: to millions of people. Now, regardless, these texts obviously reveal
36:51
Speaker 1: very low moral character. But they don't prove or even
36:54
Speaker 1: suggest this woman didn't consent to everything that happened. They
37:00
Speaker 1: don't prove or even suggest that she was forced to
37:02
Speaker 1: be in that room, forced to have continued to have
37:06
Speaker 1: sexual intercourse. Encounters with whoever came in or that she
37:11
Speaker 1: was threatened or coerced.
37:13
Speaker 2: In any way.
37:15
Speaker 1: And she's not even accusing them of that, which is
37:18
Speaker 1: why charges weren't filed the first time.
37:24
Speaker 2: And that's the fact.
37:25
Speaker 1: And they don't contradict the narrative events that the men
37:28
Speaker 1: provided to the police. Indeed, there's no principled reason whatsoever
37:31
Speaker 1: for the left to embrace the woman's narrative while disregarding
37:35
Speaker 1: the version of events provided by members of the fraternity.
37:38
Speaker 1: This is also from the Times. When asked about his
37:40
Speaker 1: involvement with Jane Doe, Mr. Lopez said that she initiated
37:43
Speaker 1: their sexual contact and did not ask for his consent,
37:46
Speaker 1: a statement flatly at odds with her account of the night.
37:48
Speaker 2: Mr.
37:48
Speaker 1: Lopez left around 2 a.m., he said, after he said
37:51
Speaker 1: he became uncomfortable and went with three friends to McDonald's.
37:55
Speaker 1: He said he didn't tell them about what had transpired,
37:57
Speaker 1: in part because he was admittedly a bit embarrassed.
37:59
Speaker 2: About what happened, according to the interview records. Mr.
38:02
Speaker 1: Lee also said that Jane Doe initiated sexual activity without asking.
38:06
Speaker 1: He said he snorted a line of, ketamine off her
38:08
Speaker 1: body and she tried to initiate sex. I kind of
38:11
Speaker 1: took a step back because I didn't want to engage
38:12
Speaker 1: in anything like.
38:13
Speaker 2: That, like sex, Mr. Lee said. I thought it wasn't
38:16
Speaker 2: the time for that. But later that night, Mr.
38:18
Speaker 1: Lee said he asked for Jane Doe's consent before engaging
38:21
Speaker 1: in a threesome with her. He recalled telling Jane Doe
38:23
Speaker 1: that if you're uncomfortable with any of this or you
38:25
Speaker 1: don't want to do this, that's perfectly fine.
38:27
Speaker 2: We can call it a night.
38:29
Speaker 1: He said Jane Doe replied, we're all consenting adults here.
38:34
Speaker 1: So this is by the left's definition, affirmative consent. According
38:40
Speaker 1: to the left, they did everything right. Because remember, on
38:42
Speaker 1: the left, you can't say there's anything inherently immoral about
38:45
Speaker 1: this kind of sexual activity. There is, even if it's consensual,
38:50
Speaker 1: but if you're on the left, you can't say that.
38:54
Speaker 1: So on the left, they did everything right. They repeatedly
38:57
Speaker 1: asked her for verbal consent. And then after the fact,
38:59
Speaker 1: in writing, she confirmed consent. what they say she said
39:04
Speaker 1: at the time, which is that nothing illegal had occurred.
39:07
Speaker 1: So they crossed all the T's and dotted all the I's,
39:09
Speaker 1: and yet here we are. We're supposed to ignore all
39:11
Speaker 1: the evidence and all the contemporaneous statements from both the
39:14
Speaker 1: men and their accuser. We're supposed to focus entirely on
39:17
Speaker 1: the accusations she made weeks after the fact. It's also
39:21
Speaker 1: remarkable that of the seven men named in this woman's lawsuit,
39:24
Speaker 1: it appears that several of them never even made any
39:27
Speaker 1: physical contact with her at all. Two of them apparently
39:30
Speaker 1: went to the room when they saw the group text
39:32
Speaker 1: advertising free access to the woman, but they did so
39:35
Speaker 1: according to these statements simply to ensure that everything was consensual. Quote,
39:39
Speaker 1: in her interview with the police, Jane Doe said that Mr.
39:42
Speaker 1: Kretschmar and Mr. Norris were more like voyeurs.
39:45
Speaker 2: Than anything the record show.
39:47
Speaker 1: Diego Sarabia said he entered the room after 2.30 a.m.
39:50
Speaker 1: and was shocked by the scene before him. Several frat
39:53
Speaker 1: brothers were there and one was standing behind Jane Doe,
39:55
Speaker 1: although Mr. Sarabia refused to say whether the person was
39:59
Speaker 1: naked or dressed. I was immensely concerned since I've never
40:01
Speaker 1: seen anything like this in my four years at the house,
40:03
Speaker 1: he said, according to the records. But he said his
40:05
Speaker 1: concerns were laid when all the people in the room
40:07
Speaker 1: told him to come in. I remember the girl in
40:09
Speaker 1: specific saying something along the lines of, this was normal
40:12
Speaker 1: in the medieval times, he said. Yes, according to the statement,
40:16
Speaker 1: she said this was normal in the medieval times. This
40:19
Speaker 1: is the cutting edge of progressive thinking at Ivy League universities, apparently.
40:23
Speaker 1: The new progressive pitch is to take us back to
40:25
Speaker 1: medieval times, which actually, you know, OK, as long as
40:30
Speaker 1: we bring back medieval punishments. You know what they do
40:34
Speaker 1: if you committed perjury? They make sure you never tell
40:37
Speaker 1: another lie again. I'll leave it to your imagination as
40:41
Speaker 1: to how they would achieve that. Never mind that alcohol-fueled
40:45
Speaker 1: sex orgies with seven men and one woman were not,
40:48
Speaker 1: in fact, normal in medieval times. This Ivy League student
40:53
Speaker 1: has clearly received her education on medieval culture from Game
40:57
Speaker 1: of Thrones or something. I mean, that's not even a joke.
41:01
Speaker 1: That's literally where she got that idea from, because that's
41:04
Speaker 1: not true. Fall leaves have one of the best marketing
41:08
Speaker 1: campaigns in nature. When they're attached to trees, people drive
41:12
Speaker 1: for hours to look at them and take pictures. The
41:15
Speaker 1: moment those same leaves land in your gutter, though, they
41:16
Speaker 1: become wet garbage, threatening your foundation. Same leaf, dramatically worse location.
41:22
Speaker 1: This is where seasonal charm starts to turn into home maintenance.
41:26
Speaker 1: Claw gutters can send rainwater spilling over the sides onto
41:29
Speaker 1: your landscaping and around your foundation. Waiting for a storm
41:32
Speaker 1: to expose the problem is a very expensive way to
41:35
Speaker 1: remember that your gutters exist. LeafFilter helps protect your home
41:39
Speaker 1: before that happens. Their local pros inspect and clean out
41:42
Speaker 1: your gutters, then repair or replace them if necessary before
41:45
Speaker 1: installing LeafFilter. Its surgical grade stainless steel micro mesh keeps
41:50
Speaker 1: common debris out while directing water away from your foundation
41:54
Speaker 1: where it belongs. Every installation comes with a no clog
41:57
Speaker 1: guarantee and a lifetime transferable warranty. So enjoy the leaves
42:01
Speaker 1: while they're on the trees. Once they reach your roof,
42:04
Speaker 1: the admiration period is over. Protect your home before issues
42:07
Speaker 1: arise with Leaf Filter, America's number one rated gutter protection system.
42:11
Speaker 1: Schedule an inspection for free by visiting leaffilter.com slash Walsh
42:15
Speaker 1: to secure an estimate locked in for a full year.
42:18
Speaker 1: Take advantage of saving up to 35% off when going
42:21
Speaker 1: to leaffilter.com slash Walsh. Requires minimum purchase. Certain restrictions apply.
42:27
Speaker 1: Contact representative regarding warranty. and promotional details. And to be clear,
42:32
Speaker 1: she's named these men in the lawsuit, the two guys
42:34
Speaker 1: who just walked in after receiving that text and were
42:36
Speaker 1: more like voyeurs than anything, according to her. To all appearances,
42:39
Speaker 1: they wanted to make sure that everything was okay and
42:41
Speaker 1: that everyone was consenting. And for that, the identities of
42:45
Speaker 1: these men have been plastered all over the internet. Here's
42:48
Speaker 1: a video on TikTok with more than 4 million views
42:50
Speaker 1: where someone calls for them.
42:51
Speaker 2: To be executed.
42:53
Speaker 8: Put all seven of them to death.
42:56
Speaker 2: Publicly. I'm not kidding.
42:58
Speaker 8: The Cornell seven? Not a f * * * ing essay.
43:00
Speaker 8: How about you explain to me why you should live?
43:03
Speaker 8: Why you should continue to be on the earth? Seven
43:06
Speaker 8: Cornell inhuman scum. Seven Cornell men. Drugged and raped a
43:10
Speaker 8: woman for seven.
43:11
Speaker 7: F * * * ing hours.
43:12
Speaker 8: Advertising it to an entire group chat. The seven that
43:15
Speaker 8: committed the act?
43:16
Speaker 9: Death.
43:17
Speaker 8: The entire fraternity who got the advertisement and decided to
43:21
Speaker 8: do nothing with that information? To just ignore it? To
43:24
Speaker 8: just let it happen? Knowing that it was happening? They
43:26
Speaker 8: got text messages telling them, like, hey, come on up.
43:29
Speaker 8: Every single person that got that message and did nothing, prison.
43:34
Speaker 8: Expelled and prison. The university, Cornell University, made those seven
43:41
Speaker 8: men write an essay as punishment. They received punishment for
43:46
Speaker 8: doing that crime, for drugging and raping a woman for
43:49
Speaker 8: seven hours. And the punishment was writing an essay. How
43:56
Speaker 8: about they all explain to the public why they should
43:58
Speaker 8: keep their breath in their lungs.
44:02
Speaker 1: So it's obviously defamatory. What he's saying here is not true,
44:06
Speaker 1: but millions of people believe it. There's an obvious incentive
44:09
Speaker 1: to produce videos like this because women demand it, just
44:12
Speaker 1: like we saw with Lindsay Clancy, Karen Reid, and many
44:14
Speaker 1: other cases. Feminists simply don't care about the truth at all. Now,
44:19
Speaker 1: along the same lines, someone named Amy Siskind is calling
44:22
Speaker 1: for Letitia James to round everybody up in the group chat,
44:25
Speaker 1: 57 people. and investigate every single one of those people.
44:31
Speaker 1: And as unhinged as this is, if you pulled Cornell's
44:34
Speaker 1: student body, you know, probably close to like 100% of
44:37
Speaker 1: them would agree with this or say they do. The
44:40
Speaker 1: campus is in a frenzy of performative outrage right now.
44:44
Speaker 9: Watch. I don't know Jane Doe, but I know plenty
44:47
Speaker 9: of women like Jane Doe who do feel unsafe at
44:50
Speaker 9: Pratt House.
44:50
Speaker 8: And have you talked to any of your girlfriends about
44:54
Speaker 8: this issue and what are they saying?
44:56
Speaker 9: They're saying the same thing.
44:57
Speaker 7: They're just scared. We're all scared.
45:00
Speaker 9: We're more mad as well at the administration. When women
45:05
Speaker 9: report issues to cops around the world, they are either
45:08
Speaker 9: not acted upon or they're simply ignored. It should not
45:11
Speaker 9: be protect your daughter. It should be educate your son.
45:15
Speaker 9: And I will die on this hill.
45:17
Speaker 2: I've spoken with many, many other male students here. We
45:20
Speaker 2: are outraged. We're pissed. We're shocked.
45:22
Speaker 3: And it's disgusting what happened.
45:24
Speaker 5: And we want to call out behavior like this and
45:27
Speaker 5: say it's not okay.
45:28
Speaker 2: It's terrifying.
45:29
Speaker 9: It's absolutely terrifying to hear that that's happening.
45:33
Speaker 2: And then also that begs the question of what if
45:36
Speaker 2: this happened to me? What if this happened to my
45:38
Speaker 2: best friend?
45:39
Speaker 9: What if this happened to someone and I didn't get
45:44
Speaker 9: my day in court and I have to go to
45:46
Speaker 9: a mass media campaign just to be heard.
45:49
Speaker 10: Everyone deserves to know exactly what happened in 2024, who
45:53
Speaker 10: was responsible of relaying that information to the DA's office
45:57
Speaker 10: and why exactly did that case now just get reopened.
46:00
Speaker 10: In terms of what the student government is asking for
46:03
Speaker 10: here today, it's transparency, accountability, and reform.
46:07
Speaker 2: It's as simple as that.
46:08
Speaker 10: We want to know exactly what happened that night to
46:10
Speaker 10: the best of the university's ability, obviously complying under federal law.
46:17
Speaker 1: We heard there, it should not be protect your daughter.
46:20
Speaker 1: It should be educate your son. And this is something
46:22
Speaker 1: that we hear a lot from leftists. They come up
46:25
Speaker 1: with these dumb sayings in lieu of saying anything that
46:30
Speaker 1: actually makes sense.
46:31
Speaker 2: Or has any real content to it.
46:33
Speaker 1: This is a case where a woman made the decision
46:35
Speaker 1: to get high and drunk and walk into a frat
46:37
Speaker 1: house where she consented to sexual activity with multiple men
46:41
Speaker 1: who were so intoxicated they were vomiting. And it's only
46:45
Speaker 1: the men who need to be educated in this scenario.
46:49
Speaker 1: And meanwhile, we're told that the woman, you know, that
46:52
Speaker 1: women don't feel safe as if they're being forced to
46:54
Speaker 1: attend orgies at frat houses and then to text everyone
46:58
Speaker 1: how much they can't wait to go back to that
47:00
Speaker 1: same frat house. Apparently, according to this, a woman is
47:07
Speaker 1: thrilled to return to her alleged rape dungeon, and yet
47:12
Speaker 1: we take from that she doesn't feel safe. It doesn't
47:15
Speaker 1: make any sense. As for the student council president and
47:18
Speaker 1: his demand for a thorough investigation into what exactly happened, well,
47:22
Speaker 1: that's already been done. We have contemporaneous text messages and
47:26
Speaker 1: written statements documenting the event and its aftermath. There's clear
47:29
Speaker 1: evidence from the accuser herself that several of the men
47:32
Speaker 1: were intoxicated even more than she was. In fact, just
47:35
Speaker 1: this morning, ABC News published a phone recording between the
47:38
Speaker 1: accuser and one of the accused. And in the conversation,
47:42
Speaker 1: three weeks after the incident, the man claims that the
47:45
Speaker 1: accuser told the guys when she came to the party
47:49
Speaker 1: that she was sober.
47:51
Speaker 2: And there are a few other important details here. Listen.
47:55
Speaker 5: ABC News has obtained a recording of a phone call
47:58
Speaker 5: between Jane Doe and the fraternity brother she went to
48:01
Speaker 5: see the night she was allegedly attacked. The call appears
48:04
Speaker 5: to show that he was trying to convince her he
48:06
Speaker 5: meant no harm and she consented.
48:10
Speaker 11: Want me to give my recollection of the entire night?
48:13
Speaker 5: Three weeks after her traumatic night at the Chi Phi house,
48:16
Speaker 5: a then Cornell student now known as Jane Doe called
48:18
Speaker 5: Matthew Ingalls, the friend who invited her to the fraternity
48:22
Speaker 5: that night, recording the entire conversation. She told him she
48:25
Speaker 5: spent time in the emergency room and in therapy because
48:28
Speaker 5: there's so much damage on my body and my brain.
48:31
Speaker 5: She said, if I wanted to take this somewhere, what
48:33
Speaker 5: y'all did would be classified as gang rape. You already
48:36
Speaker 5: knew when I came in, I was 10 shots deep.
48:39
Speaker 5: Ingalls responded with a different recollection.
48:41
Speaker 11: You did tell me you were sober, by the way.
48:43
Speaker 5: You did.
48:44
Speaker 2: You said you hadn't been anywhere.
48:45
Speaker 5: Jane Doe said she was 100% sure she told him
48:48
Speaker 5: she had been at a bar for a sorority event.
48:51
Speaker 7: And I never lie.
48:52
Speaker 5: She asked him how they ended up in a threesome
48:54
Speaker 5: with one of his frat brothers.
48:56
Speaker 11: So you come in, say hi. We start dancing for.
49:01
Speaker 2: Like maybe three to five minutes.
49:03
Speaker 11: And then I pop the question. You say yes, then
49:07
Speaker 11: I remember like we didn't know who else to bring,
49:10
Speaker 11: so I go to who was on the dance floor
49:12
Speaker 11: too and I pop the question and he's like yeah
49:16
Speaker 11: and then we go upstairs.
49:18
Speaker 5: Jane Doe then asking for his help to identify all
49:20
Speaker 5: of the men, saying she remembered four in the bed
49:23
Speaker 5: and more standing around the room. Ingalls seemed to suggest
49:26
Speaker 5: both of their memories may not be accurate.
49:28
Speaker 11: I have racked my brain for this question. You know,
49:33
Speaker 11: it's possible that both of us, like, remember this, and
49:35
Speaker 11: it's not true.
49:36
Speaker 5: Jane Doe pushed back, saying, no, because I remember looking
49:40
Speaker 5: up and being like, that is too many people. She
49:42
Speaker 5: then asked, do you remember how any of these guys
49:44
Speaker 5: walked in?
49:45
Speaker 11: The party was sort of, like, crowded, so people started, like, um.
49:52
Speaker 11: Filling up the balcony just because there was nowhere else
49:54
Speaker 11: to go.
49:55
Speaker 5: Ingalls did not mention that during the incident, he posted
49:57
Speaker 5: to a group on Snapchat a photo of her in
50:00
Speaker 5: bed and an invitation to his fraternity brothers saying, boys,
50:04
Speaker 5: come whip it out. Cornell expelled Ingalls and another student
50:07
Speaker 5: and suspended two others. In this video obtained by ABC News,
50:11
Speaker 5: Cornell police inform one of the suspended students he is
50:14
Speaker 5: unwelcome on campus.
50:15
Speaker 11: Take a look at that. Per the temporary suspension, he
50:20
Speaker 11: is barred from any of the grounds owned, operated, or
50:22
Speaker 11: maintained by Cornell University.
50:23
Speaker 5: All seven fraternity brothers have denied wrongdoing. Ingalls has not
50:27
Speaker 5: responded to Jane Doe's lawsuit, but during Cornell's internal investigation,
50:31
Speaker 5: he said he was too intoxicated to consent and suggested
50:34
Speaker 5: Jane Doe assaulted him. This week, Cornell will announce which
50:39
Speaker 5: outside law firm will evaluate how the university handled Jane
50:42
Speaker 5: Doe's allegations and how it could improve its response to
50:45
Speaker 5: accusations of sexual violence on campus. And the New York
50:48
Speaker 5: Attorney General's office is already reaching out to Jane Doe
50:51
Speaker 5: as part of the reopened criminal investigation.
50:54
Speaker 2: Georgia.
50:57
Speaker 1: Well, yes, again, by the very same standards that would
50:59
Speaker 1: make her a victim in a sexual encounter she willfully
51:01
Speaker 1: participated in, at least some of these men would also
51:04
Speaker 1: be victims because they, too, were inebriated. There's just no
51:07
Speaker 1: escaping that point. She willfully engaged in all this activity.
51:11
Speaker 1: At no point did they prevent her from leaving or
51:13
Speaker 1: use any physical force or threats of any kind, and
51:15
Speaker 1: she doesn't even claim they did. The whole case rests
51:18
Speaker 1: on the fact that she was really drunk at the time,
51:20
Speaker 1: but so were they, not to mention... She claims she
51:22
Speaker 1: was 10 shots deep, so drunk that she couldn't help
51:25
Speaker 1: but have an orgy. And yet she also claims her
51:27
Speaker 1: memory of the incident is more reliable than the men
51:30
Speaker 1: who she says were more sober than her. So that
51:32
Speaker 1: doesn't make a lot of sense either. And all we're
51:35
Speaker 1: left with is the confused and confusing picture of a disgusting, gross,
51:40
Speaker 1: debauched sexual act willingly committed by a number of people,
51:47
Speaker 1: a woman and several men, who all now obviously regret
51:49
Speaker 1: having played any part in it, as they should. So
51:53
Speaker 1: it's unfortunate for all involved, but it's not rape. And
51:57
Speaker 1: none of this is stopping any of the authority figures
51:59
Speaker 1: surrounding this case from convicting the man right out of
52:01
Speaker 1: the gate. So this is the president of Cornell University
52:04
Speaker 1: in one of the most disgraceful videos we've seen from
52:06
Speaker 1: a college campus, which is saying something.
52:08
Speaker 2: Watch.
52:10
Speaker 12: What happened to Jane Doe in 2024 is deeply disturbing
52:15
Speaker 12: and will weigh heavily on our community for years to come.
52:20
Speaker 12: My heart aches when I think of what she experienced.
52:24
Speaker 12: It raises heartbreaking and troubling issues about sexual assault, dehumanization,
52:31
Speaker 12: and aspects of party culture, alcohol, and drug use. It
52:36
Speaker 12: also raises questions around the investigations conducted after the allegations
52:41
Speaker 12: were reported.
52:45
Speaker 1: So he's flat out accusing the men of sexual assault,
52:48
Speaker 1: prejudging their guilt. The university should be sued immediately, along
52:52
Speaker 1: with the student newspaper, which published an editorial that essentially
52:55
Speaker 1: accused all seven men of.
52:56
Speaker 2: Being rapists by name.
52:57
Speaker 1: Now, if this president actually had some integrity, if he
53:01
Speaker 1: deserved the job he has, he would have delivered a
53:03
Speaker 1: very different statement. There's one important takeaway from this Cornell
53:07
Speaker 1: case and every case like it, one lesson, but it's
53:10
Speaker 1: the lesson that the left refuses to learn. The lesson
53:13
Speaker 1: is that feminism and the sexual revolution have utterly and
53:18
Speaker 1: completely failed. Actually, it's funny the accuser brought up what's
53:23
Speaker 1: allegedly normal in medieval times, because contrary to her HBO
53:27
Speaker 1: education and European history, boozy sex orgies were not normal.
53:33
Speaker 1: But I'll tell you what was normal, not just in
53:36
Speaker 1: medieval times, but at any point, at all points in
53:40
Speaker 1: the history of Western civilization up until about 14 seconds ago,
53:44
Speaker 1: what was normal was strict sex segregation in schools and
53:49
Speaker 1: most other institutions. clear rules governing how the sexes relate
53:54
Speaker 1: and connect and court each other, codes of chivalry, the patriarchy,
54:01
Speaker 1: quote unquote. Every Western society for centuries had versions of
54:05
Speaker 1: these kinds of rules.
54:08
Speaker 2: We did away with them.
54:11
Speaker 1: And as a situation that Cornell clearly demonstrates, society is
54:15
Speaker 1: not functioning better as a result. The education system has
54:20
Speaker 1: not improved. Male-female relations have not improved. Our politics have
54:26
Speaker 1: not improved. Nothing has improved. People are not happier in general.
54:30
Speaker 1: There's a lot of chaos and moral confusion. And one
54:38
Speaker 1: way to avoid a situation like what we had at Cornell,
54:42
Speaker 1: which is a consensual but really horrible, disgusting, for everybody
54:48
Speaker 1: involved is if you weren't allowing men and students, male
54:55
Speaker 1: and female students, to mix that way in the first place.
55:00
Speaker 2: But of course, the left's not going to suggest that.
55:05
Speaker 1: I mean, a lot of what they're saying, it's like
55:07
Speaker 1: they're coming very close to sort of accidentally saying that
55:11
Speaker 1: the whole thing should have just been illegal, like to
55:14
Speaker 1: have a boozy sex orgy on a college campus should
55:17
Speaker 1: just be illegal. They're sort of accidentally making that case,
55:23
Speaker 1: which if they want to make that case, they should
55:24
Speaker 1: just come out and make it.
55:25
Speaker 2: Because guess what? If they made that case, I'd agree
55:27
Speaker 2: with them. Yeah, it shouldn't be legal to behave that way.
55:32
Speaker 1: But they're not going to come out and say that
55:34
Speaker 1: because that would mean that everybody involved would be criminally culpable,
55:38
Speaker 1: including the woman.
55:39
Speaker 2: And they're not going to go that far. They never will.
55:43
Speaker 1: You know, if Cornell's president had delivered a speech like that, though,
55:46
Speaker 1: he would have lost a job. The mob would have
55:48
Speaker 1: destroyed his house. Someone would probably come forward to accuse
55:51
Speaker 1: him of sexual assault. They'd throw him in prison. But
55:55
Speaker 1: at least he'd have accomplished something that no one at
55:57
Speaker 1: a major university seems capable of doing anymore, which is
56:02
Speaker 1: to tell feminists who make up the majority of Cornell's
56:04
Speaker 1: student body and the majority of every college campus in
56:07
Speaker 1: the country that they should be held accountable for their
56:09
Speaker 1: own actions. And if they can't function in our society
56:13
Speaker 1: without guardrails, which is what they're saying, then maybe we
56:17
Speaker 1: should talk about those guardrails again. You know, just the
56:21
Speaker 1: past few months, we've been told that women can't be
56:24
Speaker 1: held responsible for systematically killing their own children. They can't
56:27
Speaker 1: be held responsible for butchering their friends and carving pentagrams
56:31
Speaker 1: into their bodies. And now they can't be held responsible
56:35
Speaker 1: for getting drunk and voluntarily participating in group sex at
56:38
Speaker 1: a frat house. Put it all together and it sounds
56:42
Speaker 1: like after a century of feminist victories, both political and cultural,
56:48
Speaker 1: they no longer want the responsibilities and the privileges of
56:51
Speaker 1: full citizenship. They're saying they simply cannot take ownership of
56:56
Speaker 1: their own actions. And they need adult supervision at all times.
57:02
Speaker 1: And what they don't seem to realize is that outside
57:04
Speaker 1: of their sheltered Ivy League campuses and the newsrooms on
57:07
Speaker 1: the East Coast, That message is being received loud and clear.
57:13
Speaker 2: That'll do it for the show today. Thanks for watching.
57:16
Speaker 2: Thanks for listening. Talk to you tomorrow. Have a great day. Godspeed.
57:25
Speaker 11: Every significant movement in history has started with protesting.
57:28
Speaker 5: You're a traitor!
57:29
Speaker 2: Uncle Tom!
57:29
Speaker 7: This is our generation's civil rights!
57:31
Speaker 2: I have no idea what the protest is about. Bingo!
57:34
Speaker 4: Given the current climate, should a figure as polarizing as
57:37
Speaker 4: Clay Saunders even be allowed on campus?
57:39
Speaker 2: Uh, can you hear me okay? Saunders is a close
57:41
Speaker 2: personal friend of Chancellor Freeman. This is a decision I
57:44
Speaker 2: cannot fight. Islam will conquer the West. As-salamu alaykum. Are
57:51
Speaker 2: we paying attention? They've taken over the building. They're downstairs
57:55
Speaker 2: and they've blocked the doors.
57:58
Speaker 8: I seek forgiveness from Allah the Almighty.
58:02
Speaker 2: You cannot run and hide.
58:03
Speaker 7: Muhammad is the messenger of God. There is no God
58:08
Speaker 7: but Allah.
58:10
Speaker 2: What do you say we turn those SOBs into a
58:14
Speaker 2: fine red mist?
58:16
Speaker 12: As we move, one man will cover while the other
58:19
Speaker 12: guys go.
58:19
Speaker 2: They call that leap project. Stretch your mouth and listen.
58:24
Speaker 2: You need a course in safe weapons handling.