Latest / Honey Badger Radio / She Told Us What She Did and Everyone Clapped

Transcript

She Told Us What She Did and Everyone Clapped · Honey Badger Radio

• 0:00
  Speaker 1: Hello everybody, and welcome to Honey Badger Radio. My name
• 0:03
  Speaker 1: is Brian. I'm here with Alison and this is maintaining frame.
• 0:08
  Speaker 2: Uh.
• 0:08
  Speaker 1: We are going to be looking at an article from
• 0:12
  Speaker 1: a website called hercampus dot com entitled miss inry justified
• 0:18
  Speaker 1: harmful or maybe even necessary by Avery Pitdock. Should be
• 0:25
  Speaker 1: really educational, and I'm sure that we are going to
• 0:28
  Speaker 1: lear something out of it. H Lear. Yeah, if that's
• 0:33
  Speaker 1: the new word we're using. We don't say learn anymore.
• 0:36
  Speaker 1: So yeah, lear, We're gonna lead something.
• 0:41
  Speaker 2: Is that a slang? Well, I guess obviously it is.
• 0:46
  Speaker 2: We're gonna lear something.
• 0:48
  Speaker 1: It's just a new way of saying learn.
• 0:50
  Speaker 2: This sounds so lazy, Okay, sorry.
• 0:53
  Speaker 1: All right, No, it's okay. Do the things.
• 0:55
  Speaker 2: Yeah, all right. So if you want to send us
• 0:57
  Speaker 2: a message, if you want us to a lieer something,
• 1:02
  Speaker 2: you can do so at feed the Badger dot com
• 1:04
  Speaker 2: slash just the tip. That's feed Thebadger dot com slash
• 1:07
  Speaker 2: just the tip, very best way for you to send
• 1:09
  Speaker 2: a tip and a message with that tip. And I
• 1:12
  Speaker 2: do have to beseech you all. We are in the
• 1:15
  Speaker 2: final hour of the eleventh hour of the fundraiser and
• 1:18
  Speaker 2: we have a ways to go. We have like four
• 1:20
  Speaker 2: hundred and four nine fifteen dollars, So if you are
• 1:25
  Speaker 2: going to support us, please go and put some funds
• 1:29
  Speaker 2: in the hat so that we can continue to bring
• 1:31
  Speaker 2: you this content and have a you know, make sure
• 1:36
  Speaker 2: that this voice doesn't die out. So I think we're
• 1:39
  Speaker 2: what we talk about is needed now more than ever.
• 1:42
  Speaker 2: And so once again, feed the Badger dot com slash
• 1:46
  Speaker 2: support to support the show. And I guess I could
• 1:49
  Speaker 2: try to do some some shilling at some point just
• 1:53
  Speaker 2: to encourage you guys to help out. And if you
• 1:56
  Speaker 2: want to join our community, that's Badger Nation dot online.
• 2:00
  Speaker 2: All right, so let's let's just get started started. All right,
• 2:03
  Speaker 2: it's gonna be our new way of saying started studded.
• 2:06
  Speaker 1: No, that's fair.
• 2:07
  Speaker 2: Uh, okay, leared and studied, let's get studied.
• 2:11
  Speaker 1: Let's let's let's get into it. Okay, So this article
• 2:15
  Speaker 1: comes from her campus dot com and uh it is
• 2:21
  Speaker 1: a I guess it's a campus website. I mean that's
• 2:25
  Speaker 1: my guess. So uh but okay, let's let's get into it.
• 2:29
  Speaker 1: I guess miss injury or miss andrey, I don't know
• 2:32
  Speaker 1: which is the correct pronunciation. Probably miss andry justified, harmful
• 2:36
  Speaker 1: or maybe even necessary. A few weeks ago, while aimlessly
• 2:42
  Speaker 1: scrolling through TikTok videos, I was grabbed by an unusual caption.
• 2:47
  Speaker 1: The video, posted by a woman simply known as at
• 2:50
  Speaker 1: LTP eight two three, features the unique tagline teaching my
• 2:55
  Speaker 1: five year old daughter to be a misinterst. LTP remains
• 3:01
  Speaker 1: semi anonymous on her TikTok account, refraining from sharing her
• 3:06
  Speaker 1: name beyond those three initials and a brief bio describing
• 3:10
  Speaker 1: her as a divorced mom and book lover from Washington,
• 3:14
  Speaker 1: d C. Miss indry is commonly known as a strong
• 3:18
  Speaker 1: dislike or hatred towards men. Its definition, according to Miriam Webster,
• 3:23
  Speaker 1: is simply a hatred of men. All right, so that's
• 3:27
  Speaker 1: the opening paragraph. I don't say anything about that.
• 3:29
  Speaker 2: Yeah. It's a national online magazine written by college women,
• 3:33
  Speaker 2: with student run chapters at over three hundred and eighty campuses.
• 3:38
  Speaker 2: It was founded by three Harvard undergraduates in two thousand
• 3:41
  Speaker 2: and nine after winning Harvord's business plan competition. It describes
• 3:47
  Speaker 2: itself as the number one media brand for the empowered
• 3:50
  Speaker 2: college woman, and also operates as marketing and PR firm
• 3:54
  Speaker 2: with clients like new balance and juicy Kashore hoteur hoteur
• 4:00
  Speaker 2: cochure is the new word, the new way of pronounce
• 4:02
  Speaker 2: you see.
• 4:03
  Speaker 3: You see.
• 4:03
  Speaker 2: The thing is that I'm not missed. Yeah, I'm not
• 4:06
  Speaker 2: mispronounced guys, I'm not mispronouncing words regularly. I'm creating new
• 4:11
  Speaker 2: slang and you guys need to take notes and start
• 4:13
  Speaker 2: speaking like me. So now it's no longer chasm. It's
• 4:17
  Speaker 2: chasm the chasm.
• 4:21
  Speaker 1: Yeah, and that's not hyper bowl.
• 4:23
  Speaker 3: No, it's not.
• 4:27
  Speaker 2: The key structural detail. Content from individual campuses chapters is
• 4:32
  Speaker 2: vetted by each chapter student leaders and is not edited
• 4:35
  Speaker 2: by the national team. So the USB man Missy, miss
• 4:39
  Speaker 2: Andrey article went through whatever editorial process a group of
• 4:43
  Speaker 2: undergraduates at one campus decided to run with no adult review. Well, okay,
• 4:48
  Speaker 2: I'm getting claude to give this punished claude to give
• 4:52
  Speaker 2: this summary. I think that if you're in a college,
• 4:58
  Speaker 2: presumably you're an adult. So I'm guessing there's some progressive
• 5:05
  Speaker 2: framework that you know, makes it so that people in
• 5:11
  Speaker 2: college are no longer considered adults.
• 5:12
  Speaker 4: But I think they are, and uh so the So
• 5:20
  Speaker 4: basically that's where this is coming from.
• 5:22
  Speaker 2: It is a student paper, but it is. Uh, we're
• 5:28
  Speaker 2: still looking at a national online magazine founded by Harvard undergraduates.
• 5:37
  Speaker 2: I don't know if they ended up being graduates, and
• 5:41
  Speaker 2: it is. It operates marketing and pr for firms and
• 5:47
  Speaker 2: apparently doesn't care that it's publishing hate speech towards men
• 5:53
  Speaker 2: or Oh, I guess we're not allowed to say that,
• 5:56
  Speaker 2: as we're not allowed to point that out. It actually
• 5:59
  Speaker 2: gets worse, it gets more astoundingly worse. But let's continue,
• 6:03
  Speaker 2: all right.
• 6:03
  Speaker 1: Well, I just want to say, on the upside, Miriam
• 6:06
  Speaker 1: Webster recognizes miss andres, so they're like, I think that, Like,
• 6:12
  Speaker 1: that's even despite how insane this article is probably gonna get.
• 6:17
  Speaker 1: That is a massive win all by itself. We're actually
• 6:21
  Speaker 1: acknowledging this exists. Right, Yeah, that's a big that's a
• 6:26
  Speaker 1: big thing. All right. The missandrest method immediately intrigued. I
• 6:32
  Speaker 1: went from aimlessly scrolling to being intently focused on the video.
• 6:37
  Speaker 1: LTP explains that her daughter will inevitably be subjected to
• 6:40
  Speaker 1: growing up in a patriarchal society, and that she wants
• 6:44
  Speaker 1: her daughter to go into the world with an inflated
• 6:47
  Speaker 1: sense of self. Oh that's a self report LTP has
• 6:52
  Speaker 1: deliberately selected female providers to be part of her young
• 6:56
  Speaker 1: daughter's life, whether as her doctor, dentist, or other professional.
• 7:02
  Speaker 1: You're gonna open this in another tab. I kind of
• 7:04
  Speaker 1: want to know what this is.
• 7:05
  Speaker 5: What this article is.
• 7:06
  Speaker 1: Here is a stock photo of a female doctor giving
• 7:10
  Speaker 1: a female student the vax I'm kidding, I don't know,
• 7:15
  Speaker 1: a jab of some kind, probably probably an mRNA vaccine.
• 7:22
  Speaker 1: This so far seemed effective. LTP then goes on to
• 7:26
  Speaker 1: say that her daughter recently asked her if men could
• 7:29
  Speaker 1: also be singers. On a more serious note, she states
• 7:33
  Speaker 1: that she quote knows the world is going to beat
• 7:36
  Speaker 1: her daughter down end quote, and so she wants to
• 7:39
  Speaker 1: make sure that her daughter won't stand for it.
• 7:42
  Speaker 2: Okay, all right, So this is a mother who's basically
• 7:46
  Speaker 2: teaching her daughter that she's a victim of the world,
• 7:50
  Speaker 2: and the solution is narcissistic supply from her mother.
• 7:55
  Speaker 1: You want to see the Do you want to see
• 7:57
  Speaker 1: the TikTok video where she says this.
• 8:00
  Speaker 2: We can go right to the mom Oh my god,
• 8:04
  Speaker 2: you realize you're opening up the door for extreme cattiness, right.
• 8:08
  Speaker 1: Yes, I do you guys want you guys? Do you
• 8:11
  Speaker 1: guys want to see the video. I'm gonna ask the
• 8:15
  Speaker 1: chat if they want to see the actual video that
• 8:17
  Speaker 1: this thing is referencing.
• 8:20
  Speaker 2: Do you want to see this video?
• 8:21
  Speaker 1: Yeah, it's not long, it's TikTok. TikTok videos are usually short, right,
• 8:26
  Speaker 1: they're like for for short attention spans.
• 8:30
  Speaker 2: Yeah, well they're not. They're not excessively long.
• 8:32
  Speaker 1: That's well, I mean it's cancer, but like, well, I
• 8:36
  Speaker 1: don't even know. I haven't watched it. I just I
• 8:38
  Speaker 1: just saw that when I clicked on the link, it
• 8:41
  Speaker 1: opened her TikTok. So, yeah, we're gonna do it. We're
• 8:45
  Speaker 1: gonna do it. We're doing it, all right, I'm gonna
• 8:49
  Speaker 1: do it. All right, here we go. Let's take a listen.
• 8:51
  Speaker 1: This is short. Let let's just let the whole thing play.
• 8:55
  Speaker 5: If you didn't scroll after I said that, then let me.
• 8:59
  Speaker 2: Tell you why I'm doing this and how all the music. Okay, Well,
• 9:03
  Speaker 2: first of all, she starts off with crazy eye. Did
• 9:05
  Speaker 2: you notice that very very beginning?
• 9:10
  Speaker 1: Oh yeah, right, my daughter. Okay, I'm gonna play it
• 9:14
  Speaker 1: to be in the standdress.
• 9:17
  Speaker 5: If you didn't scroll after as.
• 9:19
  Speaker 2: There you go, then let me tell you why I'm
• 9:21
  Speaker 2: the little little flash of like psychotic and anger is
• 9:26
  Speaker 2: going to grow up in a patriarchal society see inculcating
• 9:31
  Speaker 2: with victim, And I'm.
• 9:36
  Speaker 1: Okay, there's there.
• 9:40
  Speaker 2: No, there's no legal double standards that do not that
• 9:46
  Speaker 2: that do not affect men in this point. There's a
• 9:49
  Speaker 2: whole corpus of legal protections for women that are women exclusive.
• 9:55
  Speaker 2: But there is no double standard affecting women in law.
• 9:59
  Speaker 2: There there is no bubble standard affecting women in college administrations.
• 10:03
  Speaker 2: There is no double standard affecting women in terms of employment.
• 10:08
  Speaker 1: Right.
• 10:09
  Speaker 2: There is no way ever that women will shut up
• 10:16
  Speaker 2: about being oppressed by society. It gives them too much
• 10:21
  Speaker 2: stuff somehow. Telling men that their men are not giving
• 10:26
  Speaker 2: them enough gets men who are not interested in giving
• 10:29
  Speaker 2: women anything more stuff. So this is just it's it's
• 10:36
  Speaker 2: it's a I want to say damaged person, but I
• 10:39
  Speaker 2: think I'm being generous. She is probably a narcissist or
• 10:43
  Speaker 2: she's an ASPD so antisocial personality disorder. But yeah, this
• 10:51
  Speaker 2: is this is not healthy anyway.
• 10:54
  Speaker 1: Yeah, I think she is, like, well, she's on TikTok,
• 10:56
  Speaker 1: so she's making videos to get engagement. Ah, but let okay,
• 11:00
  Speaker 1: let's learer the rest of.
• 11:01
  Speaker 6: It her to go into the world with an inflated
• 11:05
  Speaker 6: sense of self, her doctors, her dentist, any sort of
• 11:12
  Speaker 6: healthcare provider that we go to. I always make sure,
• 11:15
  Speaker 6: as a woman, I mostly listen to female artists out
• 11:19
  Speaker 6: of preference. And the other day she asked me if
• 11:24
  Speaker 6: men could be singers too, and I said yes.
• 11:28
  Speaker 5: And I know the world is going to beat her down,
• 11:32
  Speaker 5: and I want to make sure.
• 11:35
  Speaker 2: That the world is going to beat her down in yeah.
• 11:41
  Speaker 2: So essentially, she's creating this situation where she is the
• 11:47
  Speaker 2: only one who has access to her child's sense of
• 11:55
  Speaker 2: self worth and everybody else. So you see what I'm saying,
• 11:58
  Speaker 2: she's doing the abuser thing.
• 12:00
  Speaker 1: Mm hmm.
• 12:01
  Speaker 2: You will never get love from anyone but me, You'll
• 12:06
  Speaker 2: never get value from anyone but me. You'll never get
• 12:09
  Speaker 2: appreciation from anybody but me. And there are women, no
• 12:13
  Speaker 2: doubt in these comments lauding her for this, celebrating her
• 12:18
  Speaker 2: for this, clapping at what she is.
• 12:21
  Speaker 1: Eight thousand likes.
• 12:23
  Speaker 2: Likes, one hundred and eight thousand likes.
• 12:27
  Speaker 1: Right, and a thousand people have bookmarked it, which I've
• 12:31
  Speaker 1: got that. I guess that's what that means.
• 12:32
  Speaker 2: Like their favorite people say people say that the minisphere
• 12:36
  Speaker 2: is a problem. This is this is what's insane. You
• 12:42
  Speaker 2: are watching child abuse right in front of you, and
• 12:46
  Speaker 2: everybody is. There's a whole bunch of women liking it
• 12:49
  Speaker 2: and bookmarking it and applauding it and taking notes. This
• 12:54
  Speaker 2: is child abuse, and we're all just watching always that's wonderful. Oh,
• 13:03
  Speaker 2: it's so beautiful. This is and it's being enabled by feminism.
• 13:08
  Speaker 2: And I'm guessing if we go through the comments, there
• 13:10
  Speaker 2: will be a distinct lack of anybody calling this shit
• 13:14
  Speaker 2: out for what it is. She's crippling her daughter for
• 13:20
  Speaker 2: what reason, Probably because she hates her father. She probably
• 13:25
  Speaker 2: thinks she hates her father. So what we're seeing is
• 13:28
  Speaker 2: a mother who's crippling her daughter. She is abusing her daughter,
• 13:34
  Speaker 2: she's turning her making it dependent. She's telling her daughter,
• 13:39
  Speaker 2: no one will ever love you. Your dad doesn't love you,
• 13:41
  Speaker 2: the world doesn't love you.
• 13:43
  Speaker 4: Only I can love you.
• 13:45
  Speaker 2: And she's doing it, probably because she hates the father.
• 13:50
  Speaker 2: What part of this is something we should celebrate? What
• 13:54
  Speaker 2: part of it? How about the fact she's using her
• 13:58
  Speaker 2: daughter as a pawn in a power struggle with the dad,
• 14:04
  Speaker 2: And that's obvious. How About she's breaking her daughter's trust
• 14:10
  Speaker 2: in the world around her. How About she's forcing her
• 14:14
  Speaker 2: daughter into a codependent and no doubt parentified role with her,
• 14:20
  Speaker 2: So she is engaging in emotional abuse. What part of
• 14:24
  Speaker 2: this is something we should you shout to the hills. Oh,
• 14:27
  Speaker 2: we should celebrate this. This is wonderful, it's maternal, it's beautiful.
• 14:32
  Speaker 2: Look at the bond between mother and child. This is disgusting.
• 14:38
  Speaker 2: And the fact that our society produces this and he
• 14:41
  Speaker 2: gets upvoted and people write articles and they celebrate it.
• 14:44
  Speaker 2: It really, it really disturbs me. And you know what,
• 14:52
  Speaker 2: there's nothing Andrew Tay could do that disturbs me as
• 14:57
  Speaker 2: much as this, And the fact that the me you
• 15:00
  Speaker 2: focus on that instead of this, because this is a
• 15:04
  Speaker 2: woman with a child, she is destroying, and nobody stands
• 15:10
  Speaker 2: up and says that's wrong. Well, nobody with any clout.
• 15:16
  Speaker 2: I'm sorry, off, Yeah.
• 15:21
  Speaker 1: I know, I get it. I just figured since the
• 15:24
  Speaker 1: article is mostly got to regurgitate what she's saying and
• 15:29
  Speaker 1: it's shorter, we might as well get it right from
• 15:31
  Speaker 1: the horse's mouth, sure, or the moon man's mouth. Okay,
• 15:35
  Speaker 1: let's play the rest.
• 15:37
  Speaker 6: Right, So I've told her that women are smarter than men,
• 15:43
  Speaker 6: that men take power, but women have innate power inside
• 15:47
  Speaker 6: of us.
• 15:48
  Speaker 5: But in society we don't always have power.
• 15:53
  Speaker 2: And women have innate power.
• 15:56
  Speaker 1: Yes, of course she watched she watched a movie about it.
• 16:00
  Speaker 2: It's women are smarter than men. Okay, where does that
• 16:06
  Speaker 2: come from? Where does that innate power come from? You
• 16:08
  Speaker 2: dead eyed psychopath? Fine? Oh good lord is creepiest. Where
• 16:15
  Speaker 2: does it come from? This innate power?
• 16:19
  Speaker 3: Can you?
• 16:20
  Speaker 2: Is it part of the bile? Does it come from
• 16:21
  Speaker 2: the tits? Is that where it's situated? Does it come lower? Like?
• 16:26
  Speaker 2: Where does the unique power of women come from?
• 16:32
  Speaker 1: Wild?
• 16:33
  Speaker 2: Yeah, it is.
• 16:34
  Speaker 3: It is.
• 16:36
  Speaker 1: Women are better leaders.
• 16:37
  Speaker 2: You can't even parent a child, like we're watching a
• 16:42
  Speaker 2: fucking oxytocin poisoned macrophage consume a child. And she has
• 16:50
  Speaker 2: the audacity to say women are better leaders. Well, you
• 16:55
  Speaker 2: are a case study that that is not true. Macrophage
• 17:00
  Speaker 2: or should I say matrophage.
• 17:02
  Speaker 1: That's kind of a classy insult, you macrophage slapper with
• 17:10
  Speaker 1: a glove, take fat, you're devouring macrophage.
• 17:18
  Speaker 2: She did tell me that, oh God, can you stop
• 17:23
  Speaker 2: for Oh?
• 17:24
  Speaker 1: So so there you go. The dad's not there, So
• 17:28
  Speaker 1: this is they knew it?
• 17:30
  Speaker 2: Can I do my victory lap? Now, guys, do you
• 17:33
  Speaker 2: see this? Do you see what this is really about?
• 17:38
  Speaker 2: Do you see what this is? You? Can you imagine
• 17:40
  Speaker 2: being this creature's father, sorry, the not the creature, sorry,
• 17:44
  Speaker 2: this creature's partner, the man who inseminated this like monster
• 17:51
  Speaker 2: from the freaking black lagoon? Like, could you imagine that?
• 17:56
  Speaker 2: How do you?
• 17:57
  Speaker 3: Guys?
• 17:57
  Speaker 2: You really need to br up your standards because these
• 18:00
  Speaker 2: women do not need to get pregnant. But you know,
• 18:07
  Speaker 2: who the hell knows what happened there? Right? Who? Maybe
• 18:12
  Speaker 2: maybe he didn't even consent. I wouldn't be surprised. But
• 18:16
  Speaker 2: do you see, like the expressions she's making, they're repulsive,
• 18:24
  Speaker 2: like they just oh.
• 18:28
  Speaker 4: Like, oh oh no, I'm.
• 18:32
  Speaker 2: Sorry, I'm just viscerally disgusted. But but you see what happened?
• 18:36
  Speaker 2: I said that It has nothing to do with the girl.
• 18:40
  Speaker 2: It has everything to do with the father.
• 18:43
  Speaker 4: She is trying.
• 18:44
  Speaker 2: She is torturing her child in order to torture the father. Right,
• 18:49
  Speaker 2: She's turning her child into a weapon in order to
• 18:53
  Speaker 2: get at the father. And there are people, there are people.
• 18:57
  Speaker 4: In these components.
• 18:59
  Speaker 2: How how do you not lose faith in women.
• 19:05
  Speaker 1: I'm sorry, No, it's fine.
• 19:09
  Speaker 2: How I'm like sitting here, I'm like, you know, glad
• 19:14
  Speaker 2: I'm not a man m because I can have a husband.
• 19:19
  Speaker 2: You're stuck with this. Well, not all of you, of course,
• 19:22
  Speaker 2: there's I guess some get lucky, but holy shit, let's
• 19:27
  Speaker 2: keep going, all right.
• 19:28
  Speaker 1: Let's keep going.
• 19:30
  Speaker 6: She told her dad that women are smarter than men,
• 19:34
  Speaker 6: that girls are smarter than boys. And she told me, well, dad,
• 19:38
  Speaker 6: how smart I'm divorced. If you can't tell.
• 19:41
  Speaker 2: Oh, and yeah, I can tell you discuss.
• 19:44
  Speaker 1: Yeah, I know. Right. So are you just like gonna raise,
• 19:49
  Speaker 1: like basically ruin your daughter's life by telling her lies
• 19:52
  Speaker 1: about reality because you're mad at your ex who hurt you?
• 19:58
  Speaker 1: Who hurt you?
• 20:00
  Speaker 2: She's tearning her. She's telling her daughter that reality, that
• 20:04
  Speaker 2: people and that men are the most important thing is
• 20:08
  Speaker 2: the status competition. Well, and also she's probably giving off
• 20:14
  Speaker 2: the feeling like to her daughter. The only reason why
• 20:20
  Speaker 2: she's she's doing this is to get at the father.
• 20:25
  Speaker 2: And and I get the sense that she told the
• 20:30
  Speaker 2: father this, but then she's like sort of pushing back
• 20:34
  Speaker 2: on the mother. I think we'll have to listen to
• 20:35
  Speaker 2: this again. I want to make sure I get this right,
• 20:38
  Speaker 2: because she thinks her dad is smart, and you know what,
• 20:41
  Speaker 2: I really hope there were. They would be a lovely
• 20:44
  Speaker 2: happy ending. Here is if this will probably only exists
• 20:49
  Speaker 2: in my in my utopia, but Family Protective Services saw
• 20:53
  Speaker 2: this and gave them full custody. Of course that'll never
• 20:57
  Speaker 2: happen because they're they don't know they're ass from their elbow.
• 21:01
  Speaker 2: But really, at this point, she shouldn't be having access
• 21:04
  Speaker 2: to this child. Yeah right, unless unless the father. And
• 21:11
  Speaker 2: I don't think it doesn't sound like the father is worse.
• 21:14
  Speaker 2: But let's go back and hear that again, like the interaction,
• 21:18
  Speaker 2: only a few.
• 21:21
  Speaker 1: Like before, like his dad, Yeah when the daughter.
• 21:26
  Speaker 2: Yeah right there, when are smarter than men?
• 21:30
  Speaker 6: That girls are smarter than boys? And she told me,
• 21:33
  Speaker 6: well dad, how smart? And divorced if you can't tell?
• 21:38
  Speaker 2: And dad as smart? Okay, so that's not actually dad
• 21:42
  Speaker 2: is smart.
• 21:43
  Speaker 1: I think she meant to say.
• 21:45
  Speaker 2: Yeah, so the girl is pushing back. Yeah, the girl
• 21:49
  Speaker 2: is pushing back. She's not relaying. She says. The girl
• 21:57
  Speaker 2: said something to her father. So the implication is that
• 21:59
  Speaker 2: the far said something about I don't think the father's
• 22:02
  Speaker 2: engaging with it. The girl is pushing back. M M,
• 22:07
  Speaker 2: that sounds like it. She's saying, no, my father is smart.
• 22:11
  Speaker 2: Dad is smart. Right, She's pushing back against the wicked witch. Right.
• 22:21
  Speaker 2: So what does she do in that case when her
• 22:25
  Speaker 2: own daughter as opposed, her five year old daughter is saying, no, Mom,
• 22:30
  Speaker 2: you're wrong, your myss injury is wrong. What does she do?
• 22:33
  Speaker 2: Do you think that she just takes that lying down.
• 22:37
  Speaker 2: Let's hear. Let's see what she says next, like.
• 22:40
  Speaker 5: Why are you teaching your kids us? But to me,
• 22:44
  Speaker 5: this is a lesson that I wish that I had had.
• 22:47
  Speaker 2: I you don't need to be told you're smart because
• 22:52
  Speaker 2: it is false. Yeah, it is one false.
• 23:00
  Speaker 1: Okay, let's uh, she's gonna tell us like how this
• 23:03
  Speaker 1: is because she grew up. I guess yeah, yeah, she's
• 23:07
  Speaker 1: gonna tell us how this is God's fault.
• 23:08
  Speaker 6: So in the Deep South, and it took me so
• 23:14
  Speaker 6: long to unlearn all of these things as a woman.
• 23:18
  Speaker 6: It took me so long to step into my power.
• 23:21
  Speaker 6: I am thirty eight, and I feel like I've just
• 23:24
  Speaker 6: done that in the past.
• 23:25
  Speaker 2: Thirty eight and I don't want her shit.
• 23:29
  Speaker 1: You know, It's funny, she just said I grew up
• 23:31
  Speaker 1: Christian of the Deep South. She didn't say anything negative, like, oh,
• 23:35
  Speaker 1: this is what I was taught, this is what I learned.
• 23:38
  Speaker 1: It's just like it's assumed I'm in the South and
• 23:42
  Speaker 1: I was raised Christian automatically, that just comes with a
• 23:45
  Speaker 1: bunch of baggage. She's just people are just supposed to assume.
• 23:48
  Speaker 1: Oh my god, I know what that's like. No details,
• 23:52
  Speaker 1: no specifics, no arguments, just hmm, just like a knowing
• 23:57
  Speaker 1: eye and that and and then we're supposed to just
• 23:59
  Speaker 1: get and so that keeps you license to act like
• 24:01
  Speaker 1: this your daughter, that's insane. Okay, but anyway, she's got
• 24:05
  Speaker 1: s S R eyes. All right, let's uh, let's finish
• 24:09
  Speaker 1: this up.
• 24:11
  Speaker 5: Consent about boundaries?
• 24:13
  Speaker 2: Five what?
• 24:15
  Speaker 3: Wait?
• 24:16
  Speaker 2: What?
• 24:16
  Speaker 1: Because yeah, five year olds need to learn about consent? Yeah,
• 24:20
  Speaker 1: how do you.
• 24:22
  Speaker 3: No?
• 24:23
  Speaker 2: But seriously, this this needs a question here. Now. I
• 24:26
  Speaker 2: guess you could frame it in a way that doesn't
• 24:30
  Speaker 2: feel predatory or grooming, like maybe you know, don't you
• 24:34
  Speaker 2: know there are certain places that adults shouldn't touch you,
• 24:37
  Speaker 2: stuff like that, But taught about consent that I don't
• 24:43
  Speaker 2: know that.
• 24:44
  Speaker 1: Like, yeah, that's weird. If you're gonna let a boy
• 24:47
  Speaker 1: touch you then, or a girl for that matter.
• 24:54
  Speaker 2: Uh, it's taught about consent, right, Okay, well, when you're live, right,
• 25:02
  Speaker 2: the conversation about how consent assumes that you are sexually active?
• 25:09
  Speaker 1: No, yes, I mean I think that feminists would say
• 25:14
  Speaker 1: that there could be conversations about consent before sexual awareness
• 25:22
  Speaker 1: even arises. Those are yeah, but a feminist would say
• 25:25
  Speaker 1: that because they're about trying to control you know, that
• 25:29
  Speaker 1: environment from as early as possible.
• 25:32
  Speaker 2: But here's.
• 25:35
  Speaker 1: No I know, go ahead, go ahead.
• 25:37
  Speaker 2: Here's my problem with the framing. Consent assumes that you
• 25:42
  Speaker 2: that it's okay to say yes to the activity. It's like,
• 25:45
  Speaker 2: why are you teaching your five year old about sexual consent?
• 25:50
  Speaker 2: You should be teaching them adults don't touch you there ever,
• 25:54
  Speaker 2: period and if they do, tell me, right, you get
• 25:57
  Speaker 2: what I'm saying. Not this is the this is the
• 26:01
  Speaker 2: situation in which you you know, Lolita, you you give
• 26:06
  Speaker 2: enthusiastic consent to Humberdgg. You know that you don't teach
• 26:10
  Speaker 2: a child that because there's no situation in which yes
• 26:14
  Speaker 2: is acceptable and consent is about situation.
• 26:17
  Speaker 4: You see what I'm saying?
• 26:19
  Speaker 1: Yes, yes, that this shouldn't be a.
• 26:22
  Speaker 2: Conversation about consent, It should be a conversation about boundaries.
• 26:26
  Speaker 2: And so I don't know, maybe you're saying that this
• 26:30
  Speaker 2: is this is how they would frame a conversation about boundaries.
• 26:34
  Speaker 2: But even so, like they're thinking, is sloppy in a
• 26:38
  Speaker 2: way that makes me uncomfortable. I'll just put it that way, all.
• 26:42
  Speaker 6: Right, Preparing my daughter for battle, okay, because that is
• 26:49
  Speaker 6: what the world is, what.
• 26:51
  Speaker 5: Her, especially if what we are looking at in this
• 26:56
  Speaker 5: administration beca this.
• 26:57
  Speaker 2: Woman is insane. Okay, Yeah, well, what do you think
• 27:04
  Speaker 2: your your daughter is going to be drafted to go
• 27:06
  Speaker 2: to Iran?
• 27:08
  Speaker 1: Like no, I know she you know, like they're it's
• 27:14
  Speaker 1: obvious that it's just your.
• 27:16
  Speaker 2: Daughter's going to be eight eight okay when the next
• 27:20
  Speaker 2: president is installed. Yeah, right, Like I think that. And
• 27:25
  Speaker 2: what the hell battle?
• 27:26
  Speaker 4: You mean the battle of uh oh oh, little Julie.
• 27:30
  Speaker 4: You see, mommy.
• 27:33
  Speaker 2: Could have had aborted you, like, but the Trump administration
• 27:40
  Speaker 2: forced me to give birth to you, and you are
• 27:44
  Speaker 2: part of the patriarchal oppression.
• 27:46
  Speaker 4: That mommy experienced.
• 27:47
  Speaker 2: What the what? Because that's the that's the battle they're
• 27:50
  Speaker 2: talking about, right, Why the hell would you bring your
• 27:53
  Speaker 2: child into a conversation like that. Mm hmmm, mm hmm.
• 28:01
  Speaker 2: I think there's there's something wrong with this individual.
• 28:04
  Speaker 1: Yeah, I think it left.
• 28:08
  Speaker 5: I don't want her to grow up in that world.
• 28:10
  Speaker 3: But that is.
• 28:12
  Speaker 5: No, it's my daughter to be a misanddressed.
• 28:17
  Speaker 2: You're using your child as a tool and a weapon.
• 28:21
  Speaker 2: You're teaching her that the only source of value is
• 28:24
  Speaker 2: you and that the world is against her. And then
• 28:28
  Speaker 2: you're doing that because you want to get back at
• 28:30
  Speaker 2: her father, presumably for divorcing your psychotic ass. Like I mean,
• 28:37
  Speaker 2: if there was ever a TikTok video that was like,
• 28:41
  Speaker 2: you know, a man just shows and I mean he's like,
• 28:43
  Speaker 2: why'd you get divorced?
• 28:44
  Speaker 4: And he just shows this.
• 28:47
  Speaker 2: And everybody's like, oh, well that explains it.
• 28:52
  Speaker 1: Mm hmmm.
• 28:54
  Speaker 2: You she just did a TikTok on how and why
• 28:58
  Speaker 2: she got divorced, why she was divorced, if she was
• 29:02
  Speaker 2: the one who he was the one who was divorcing her,
• 29:04
  Speaker 2: which I hope, I hope he woke up one day
• 29:07
  Speaker 2: and said, you are not human. You crawled out of
• 29:12
  Speaker 2: a pit at some point, like you just emerged from
• 29:18
  Speaker 2: a sess pit and then formed into a human. And
• 29:22
  Speaker 2: I just didn't realize it till this moment. I know
• 29:27
  Speaker 2: this is like really aggressive, but I fucking hate this.
• 29:32
  Speaker 2: I hate that people are cheering this, this woman destroying
• 29:36
  Speaker 2: her child and turning her into a weapon against the father. Okay,
• 29:42
  Speaker 2: you want to finish the article.
• 29:43
  Speaker 1: Yeah, let's go back to the article. I just wanted
• 29:45
  Speaker 1: to show that. Okay, So where was I She explained
• 29:53
  Speaker 1: that as a girl growing up in the Deep South
• 29:55
  Speaker 1: in a Christian and conservative family, it took her a
• 29:57
  Speaker 1: long time to unlearn the very thing she is now
• 30:00
  Speaker 1: telling her daughter the opposite of Ultimately, LTP describes what
• 30:03
  Speaker 1: she is doing as preparing her daughter for battle, especially
• 30:07
  Speaker 1: under America's current administration. Public reactions the comments under ltp's
• 30:16
  Speaker 1: posts were generally supportive. One woman, who had clearly taken
• 30:20
  Speaker 1: a similar approach to parenting, said that her son thinks
• 30:23
  Speaker 1: all doctors and dentists are women. So there's somebody in
• 30:27
  Speaker 1: the comments raising a son under this same ideology. Another
• 30:32
  Speaker 1: commenter emphasized the importance of monitoring the role religion can
• 30:36
  Speaker 1: play in young children's lives by saying she needs to
• 30:40
  Speaker 1: make sure her daughter never feels that quote Eve is
• 30:43
  Speaker 1: the reason for a bad world, because that's where it
• 30:46
  Speaker 1: starts for many end quote. Other commenters pushed the discussion further,
• 30:53
  Speaker 1: asking things like is it an inflated sense of self
• 30:57
  Speaker 1: or proper self worth? Or even tell LTP that what
• 31:01
  Speaker 1: she's doing isn't encouraging miss inery, but rather a necessary
• 31:05
  Speaker 1: measure called over correcting, which is needed in our currently
• 31:10
  Speaker 1: damaged society.
• 31:12
  Speaker 2: Nobody cares. Nobody cares that what is actually happening, which
• 31:16
  Speaker 2: is she's weaponizing her daughter against the daughter's father.
• 31:21
  Speaker 1: Yep, yep, uh yeah, there's some really angry women in
• 31:29
  Speaker 1: these comments. I'm looking at the comments on the original
• 31:32
  Speaker 1: TikTok video. There is a lot of anger. Okay, what
• 31:37
  Speaker 1: were you gonna say?
• 31:38
  Speaker 2: Well, the person who talks about her son, I think
• 31:41
  Speaker 2: this is this is what I'm referencing in the thumbnail,
• 31:43
  Speaker 2: and we're gonna have to cover it if you can
• 31:47
  Speaker 2: find it.
• 31:47
  Speaker 1: But okay, I will look when I did ye finish
• 31:53
  Speaker 1: the first All right? There was, as there always is,
• 32:00
  Speaker 1: an online discourse, a small percentage of viewers whose feathers
• 32:03
  Speaker 1: were ruffled by the term miss andry. One person, while
• 32:08
  Speaker 1: still agreeing by saying the creator's message is one hundred
• 32:10
  Speaker 1: percent correct, did say that words matter and that miss
• 32:14
  Speaker 1: andry and misogyny are two sides of the same hateful coin.
• 32:20
  Speaker 1: So basically a limp dick response probably from a maybe
• 32:23
  Speaker 1: a man, maybe a man, that was like, you go girl,
• 32:26
  Speaker 1: but uh, that's wrong, which is kind of stupid in
• 32:31
  Speaker 1: wishy washing under that commish Yeah, I.
• 32:35
  Speaker 2: Wish that the human race's future wasn't in the hands
• 32:39
  Speaker 2: of these creatures.
• 32:42
  Speaker 1: Yeah right, I like civilization. I'd like it to keep going.
• 32:47
  Speaker 2: Yeah, yeah, that was that was. That was a big
• 32:51
  Speaker 2: fucking mistake. Guys, we made it. We made a big mistake.
• 32:56
  Speaker 2: And somehow, somehow the fact that women's collective choices are
• 33:05
  Speaker 2: gonna end us.
• 33:06
  Speaker 4: I mean, we're probably not gonna end the human race.
• 33:08
  Speaker 2: We may continue on as a hunter gatherers of some
• 33:10
  Speaker 2: kind of description, but going to end this social project
• 33:14
  Speaker 2: that got this far because why because not all men
• 33:22
  Speaker 2: can be in the top five percent of men, right,
• 33:26
  Speaker 2: and if they were, we'd need another five earths plus
• 33:29
  Speaker 2: to be able to handle the material wants of women.
• 33:34
  Speaker 2: Like it's we're we're not We're gonna hold the future
• 33:38
  Speaker 2: of the human race hostage until every man is in
• 33:41
  Speaker 2: the top five percent of men. Okay, Well, everything we've
• 33:48
  Speaker 2: sacrificed for everything. Our grandfathers and grandmothers sacrifice for uh,
• 33:52
  Speaker 2: the future girls that will have to live in the
• 33:55
  Speaker 2: disaster you produce. I know you don't care about the boys,
• 33:57
  Speaker 2: but do you care about the girls? No? None of that, No,
• 34:00
  Speaker 2: none of that matters, none of it, because these women
• 34:04
  Speaker 2: can apparently can never get enough. They need another five
• 34:08
  Speaker 2: earths of shit in order to have children. But of
• 34:11
  Speaker 2: course if you give them another five earths of shit,
• 34:14
  Speaker 2: they probably still won't have children.
• 34:18
  Speaker 3: Like, what, what.
• 34:21
  Speaker 2: Do you I mean? I actually, I think I've figured
• 34:24
  Speaker 2: out what's wrong. I could tell you it's it's actually
• 34:29
  Speaker 2: and it's actually very it's it's something. It's basically the
• 34:33
  Speaker 2: endocrine explanation of something I've observed and told you guys
• 34:36
  Speaker 2: for years. Women in the past, we were more likely
• 34:44
  Speaker 2: to have children, and they're in harsher circumstances. And I
• 34:50
  Speaker 2: thought it was because you know, they would be working,
• 34:52
  Speaker 2: they would have they would be doing they would be
• 34:55
  Speaker 2: in farms, you know, the maids, whatever else they were doing.
• 34:59
  Speaker 2: But they had the traditional belief that they were contributing
• 35:05
  Speaker 2: to a family, and so they had developed that kind
• 35:09
  Speaker 2: of an adult relationship to other people. You're not just
• 35:13
  Speaker 2: a node in a web passively receiving the tidal resources.
• 35:17
  Speaker 2: You are a person who has a family who you
• 35:20
  Speaker 2: invest in and is a specific family. And I didn't
• 35:23
  Speaker 2: even realize, but what I was talking about was that
• 35:28
  Speaker 2: under survival pressure or stress, existential threat, whatever, women's v
• 35:35
  Speaker 2: one a it looks like this is what happened, what
• 35:37
  Speaker 2: was happening in the past, V one A activated so
• 35:41
  Speaker 2: that they could pair bond, that they could develop what
• 35:44
  Speaker 2: men do naturally, which is specificity targets for your custodial protection, right,
• 35:52
  Speaker 2: that kind of thing. And now that there's women are
• 35:55
  Speaker 2: so comfortable they live in an oxytocin soop that demands
• 36:01
  Speaker 2: nothing of them, so they never get their vwe A
• 36:04
  Speaker 2: activated and develop the specificity the para the necessary to
• 36:10
  Speaker 2: create a pair bond. And I'm starting to think that
• 36:14
  Speaker 2: women do not want to have children until after they've
• 36:19
  Speaker 2: pair bonded, which makes perfect sense evolutionarily. So if you
• 36:24
  Speaker 2: do not get women para bonded to men, you will
• 36:28
  Speaker 2: not get children. And this this follows with single mothers.
• 36:32
  Speaker 2: Single mothers are the US the least reproductive. Like if
• 36:37
  Speaker 2: you just have a a community of single mothers, they
• 36:43
  Speaker 2: have the lowest reproduction reproduction reproduction rate, even though it
• 36:47
  Speaker 2: seems like it's high, it's not. The highest reproduction rate
• 36:53
  Speaker 2: is in families with a mother and father. Right, So
• 37:00
  Speaker 2: the first step for women to become maternal is to
• 37:04
  Speaker 2: get them pair bonded.
• 37:06
  Speaker 7: And if they do not have V.
• 37:07
  Speaker 2: One activation through some form of survival stress, they don't
• 37:11
  Speaker 2: have the architecture to pair bond. So it seems like
• 37:17
  Speaker 2: what happens, guys, is a civilization reaches a critical mass
• 37:22
  Speaker 2: of comfort, it's women don't develop the ability to pair bond,
• 37:27
  Speaker 2: it implodes, and then we have a dark age that
• 37:33
  Speaker 2: seems to be what's happening, you know, because and the
• 37:37
  Speaker 2: reason why and why is that because the comfortable situation
• 37:42
  Speaker 2: has to disappear in order for the V one A
• 37:45
  Speaker 2: activation to start up again and then start pair bonding again.
• 37:50
  Speaker 2: And I'm saying this because I'm getting a new piece
• 37:53
  Speaker 2: of the puzzle. There's this this the study that's actually
• 37:59
  Speaker 2: showing the connection between the increase and comfort and gender equality,
• 38:04
  Speaker 2: which I think gender equality is probably just a manifestation
• 38:07
  Speaker 2: of people having nothing better to do. And so there's
• 38:15
  Speaker 2: this connection and there's a paper going around showing it.
• 38:19
  Speaker 3: And it just.
• 38:22
  Speaker 2: It just occurs to me that that's that's sort of
• 38:26
  Speaker 2: the way it goes, and now we are going in
• 38:28
  Speaker 2: the same path unless we can figure that out. And
• 38:31
  Speaker 2: one of the interesting things is the paper covers all
• 38:35
  Speaker 2: of this and looks at Scandinavia, Europe and all the
• 38:40
  Speaker 2: Western places that have had this massive increase in physical comfort,
• 38:44
  Speaker 2: but it doesn't mention Israel. Now I'm not talking about politics, okay, guys,
• 38:52
  Speaker 2: but there is one thing interesting about Israel. Israel is breeding.
• 39:00
  Speaker 2: Like the birth rate in Israel, despite it being effectively
• 39:04
  Speaker 2: a Western country, is I think now at three point two.
• 39:10
  Speaker 2: And what's really interesting.
• 39:12
  Speaker 1: Is that.
• 39:14
  Speaker 2: One of the highest even if you take out the
• 39:17
  Speaker 2: Orthodox Jewish women and you look at non orthodox, their
• 39:25
  Speaker 2: rate of having children is two point two, which is
• 39:29
  Speaker 2: which is now completely unheard of in Western culture, like
• 39:33
  Speaker 2: Western countries. Two point two is literally where everybody wants
• 39:38
  Speaker 2: to be and isn't for the West, right. And what's
• 39:43
  Speaker 2: interesting about that is that group, these the more secular
• 39:49
  Speaker 2: Jewish women are also the group that tends to go
• 39:54
  Speaker 2: into the army more. And my hypothesis that is actually
• 40:01
  Speaker 2: increasing the rate that that is the source of their
• 40:04
  Speaker 2: v one A activation and why they are para bonding
• 40:07
  Speaker 2: and why they're subsequently having children. And I'm in the
• 40:11
  Speaker 2: past again, it probably would have been things like having
• 40:14
  Speaker 2: to run a farm, knowing if you don't get the
• 40:17
  Speaker 2: harvest in you might all starve. Stuff like that. Would
• 40:21
  Speaker 2: that kind of stress would have activated it. And it
• 40:24
  Speaker 2: makes sense, right because what do you do when you
• 40:27
  Speaker 2: have stress? You want to have a partner to deal
• 40:30
  Speaker 2: with it. And that's the way it goes. And it
• 40:35
  Speaker 2: explains why Israel is the outlier because they are under
• 40:39
  Speaker 2: a constant existential threat again not talking about the politics,
• 40:43
  Speaker 2: just talking about endocrine realities. They're on constant existential threat
• 40:48
  Speaker 2: and they have a large population of women who are
• 40:51
  Speaker 2: putting themselves close to the threat. That could be explaining it,
• 40:58
  Speaker 2: which would explain why civilizations have to collapse back into
• 41:03
  Speaker 2: a state of survival threat before they start breeding again.
• 41:09
  Speaker 2: There you go, the history of humanity be great if
• 41:13
  Speaker 2: we could just figure out a better way. But the
• 41:17
  Speaker 2: problem is that the uh, these women who are oxytocin generalists,
• 41:23
  Speaker 2: they don't know what they're missing because they've never had
• 41:26
  Speaker 2: it activated. They're just they're they're they're warm and affiliative
• 41:31
  Speaker 2: and they don't give a fuck about anybody.
• 41:35
  Speaker 1: Yep, all right, all right, I got a super chat
• 41:38
  Speaker 1: from Senior Styx and he gives us two dollars and says,
• 41:42
  Speaker 1: what if all lady feminists just marry themselves? Well, I
• 41:45
  Speaker 1: mean they kind of, they kind of are doing that,
• 41:48
  Speaker 1: and you could say it's a self correcting problem, except
• 41:51
  Speaker 1: some of them have kids and they pass it on
• 41:53
  Speaker 1: to them and then those kids go on to grow
• 41:56
  Speaker 1: up and hurt the people in their life. So it's
• 41:59
  Speaker 1: it's uh, it's it's not a self correcting problem without
• 42:02
  Speaker 1: some collateral damage along the way. So all right, thank
• 42:06
  Speaker 1: you for the super chat, and we're gonna get back
• 42:10
  Speaker 1: to this. All right. Well, I personally don't know if
• 42:16
  Speaker 1: the true definition of miss Andrea aligns with what LTP preaches.
• 42:20
  Speaker 1: I understand why she headlined the video the way she did.
• 42:24
  Speaker 1: Not only does it draw immedia attention to the video,
• 42:26
  Speaker 1: which I deem important to be seen, but it also
• 42:29
  Speaker 1: opens the door to a discourse about the weight of words.
• 42:34
  Speaker 1: And I think attention was like one of the primary
• 42:37
  Speaker 1: reasons she made the video. Because we don't we underestimate
• 42:41
  Speaker 1: how much women use social media purely to get attention
• 42:46
  Speaker 1: of any kind, Like if she could show her asshole
• 42:49
  Speaker 1: online and get a bunch of clicks, she would, but
• 42:51
  Speaker 1: she can't because she's getting up there and she's not
• 42:54
  Speaker 1: the best looking person, So instead she posts rage bait online,
• 42:58
  Speaker 1: or at least what you know, it's rage bait in
• 43:00
  Speaker 1: so far as there will be some people who be like,
• 43:02
  Speaker 1: I don't think that's cool, and she'd be like victory,
• 43:05
  Speaker 1: and all of her subscribers will be like, yeah, you know.
• 43:09
  Speaker 1: So it's just like, well, anyway, I'm not gonna get
• 43:12
  Speaker 1: too much into it, but I think there's also some
• 43:14
  Speaker 1: mate suppression going on too, Like she's basically gonna kill
• 43:17
  Speaker 1: her daughter's chances of finding a man if her daughter
• 43:20
  Speaker 1: picks up her lessons and runs with it, and also
• 43:24
  Speaker 1: probably alienate her from her father, because that's what looks
• 43:27
  Speaker 1: like is going on because of a divorce. But anyway, as.
• 43:33
  Speaker 2: Yeah, if the daughter is already pushing back, i'd be
• 43:36
  Speaker 2: more worried.
• 43:37
  Speaker 1: Yeah for now, but she's only five, so like, think
• 43:40
  Speaker 1: about it, Like, the tactics are only gonna get dirtier
• 43:43
  Speaker 1: from here. You know, there'll probably be like tactics to
• 43:47
  Speaker 1: alienate her from her biological father constantly shit talking him.
• 43:52
  Speaker 1: Anytime he makes a mistake, it'll probably be like hyper amplified.
• 43:56
  Speaker 1: Anytime she makes a mistake, it'll be because of him.
• 43:59
  Speaker 2: You know.
• 44:00
  Speaker 1: It's I'm saying that this kind of thing is very pernicious,
• 44:04
  Speaker 1: especially again when you're five years old. Yeah, she's she's
• 44:08
  Speaker 1: got questions, but I think that it's there's still a
• 44:12
  Speaker 1: plenty of room for mom to really like, you know,
• 44:16
  Speaker 1: propagandize her daughter.
• 44:17
  Speaker 2: I mean, well, of course, yeah, yeah, there's also plenty
• 44:21
  Speaker 2: of room for mom to actively abuse her daughter too,
• 44:25
  Speaker 2: because she says, oh, you're taking your dad's side. This
• 44:30
  Speaker 2: is disgusting behavior, even if it's rage bait, even if
• 44:34
  Speaker 2: she's just like I'm gonna do this just to make
• 44:36
  Speaker 2: people pest. First of all, I'm not convinced she doesn't
• 44:39
  Speaker 2: believe it genuinely. But also she's turning this personal situation
• 44:46
  Speaker 2: and her daughter, she's using her daughter as a public
• 44:48
  Speaker 2: weapon for attention. Like it's.
• 44:53
  Speaker 7: This is this behavior is so repulsive, and I I resist.
• 45:00
  Speaker 2: I know that sounds weird. I resist being like, Okay,
• 45:04
  Speaker 2: this is women, this is what women are. Like, I'm
• 45:09
  Speaker 2: trying to resist it. But when I look at the architecture, well,
• 45:14
  Speaker 2: What do.
• 45:14
  Speaker 1: We encourage is really what it is, right, What do
• 45:18
  Speaker 1: we encourage? What kind of behavioring women is what is encouraged.
• 45:23
  Speaker 2: But also, yes, this is what is encouraged. But also
• 45:28
  Speaker 2: this is the behavior of putting women in this artificial
• 45:31
  Speaker 2: situation where they never have parts of their brain activated
• 45:38
  Speaker 2: in a way that makes them realize that this is horrible,
• 45:42
  Speaker 2: that to treat your child as a weapon or a
• 45:46
  Speaker 2: signal and your social social web is horrible because your
• 45:52
  Speaker 2: child is a person. You said, this is what's really
• 45:55
  Speaker 2: ironic about this whole messaging. It's men vas oppressing and
• 46:02
  Speaker 2: women's v one a activation that makes them realize that
• 46:07
  Speaker 2: other people are individuals, you know, with their own wants
• 46:12
  Speaker 2: and needs, That there's specificity there. So she doesn't even
• 46:19
  Speaker 2: see her daughter as someone separate from herself. And that
• 46:23
  Speaker 2: is a big failure mode for women when they're oxytosein dominant,
• 46:29
  Speaker 2: because they don't see other people as people. They see
• 46:32
  Speaker 2: them as nodes in a web and resources to exploit, right,
• 46:37
  Speaker 2: and in order to have that specificity in order to say, Okay,
• 46:40
  Speaker 2: this is a person with her own wants and needs,
• 46:43
  Speaker 2: that my daughter is a person, and what I am
• 46:46
  Speaker 2: doing is wrong because I am violating her as a
• 46:48
  Speaker 2: person by using her as a resource. She'd have to
• 46:52
  Speaker 2: have V one A activation and she doesn't, so it
• 46:55
  Speaker 2: makes perfect sense to her to use her daughter as
• 46:57
  Speaker 2: a resource.
• 47:00
  Speaker 7: And it's sick like, it's repulsive behavior.
• 47:06
  Speaker 2: And I'm just like I and it is what women
• 47:12
  Speaker 2: do if they don't have survival threat activating their V
• 47:16
  Speaker 2: one A. Yeah, I mean it could also be the
• 47:21
  Speaker 2: incentives as well, of course, But then who's creating the
• 47:24
  Speaker 2: incentives for this behavior other women in the social web
• 47:30
  Speaker 2: More and more thinking that the only thing that matters
• 47:33
  Speaker 2: is signaling, positioning, determining who's in and out using each
• 47:39
  Speaker 2: other as resources being seen, and that actually there is
• 47:45
  Speaker 2: no actual people here. There's no people, just the web
• 47:51
  Speaker 2: puppeting everyone. Okay, sorry, let's keep it right.
• 47:56
  Speaker 1: As some commenters argued, putting miss andrey on the same
• 48:00
  Speaker 1: plane as misogyny devalues miss andrey in its sense as
• 48:05
  Speaker 1: used by LTP miss Andrey as a tool, I believe
• 48:09
  Speaker 1: that miss Andrey can be used more flexibly as an idea.
• 48:14
  Speaker 1: Not only do I believe that in general, miss andry
• 48:16
  Speaker 1: in its true definition is a valid prejudice. Due to
• 48:20
  Speaker 1: the billions of distasteful actions committed by men every second,
• 48:25
  Speaker 1: but that it can be used as a conceptual vessel
• 48:27
  Speaker 1: for feminist projects, such as that of LTP.
• 48:31
  Speaker 2: On a video in which a woman is using her daughter, abusing,
• 48:37
  Speaker 2: emotionally abusing her daughter, and turning her daughter into a
• 48:40
  Speaker 2: social resource and a weapon. We're talking about how it's
• 48:45
  Speaker 2: justified because men, blah, men do things. You say, Men
• 48:49
  Speaker 2: are criminals, but they're also the police, the prosecutors, the jailers,
• 48:55
  Speaker 2: and the other criminals who enforce at least certain amounts
• 48:59
  Speaker 2: of norms on each other. Because criminals still punish rapists
• 49:04
  Speaker 2: and child molesters. Right, So even criminals enforce the basic
• 49:10
  Speaker 2: norms on other criminals. Right, So we have all of
• 49:13
  Speaker 2: those men, yep. Like, Like, the thing is that we
• 49:17
  Speaker 2: talk about antisocial personality disordered men being sexually aggressive or
• 49:23
  Speaker 2: sexually violent, but the truth is that most of them
• 49:25
  Speaker 2: do nonviolent property crimes or robbery, you know, Like it's
• 49:31
  Speaker 2: not the most even most asp D men, most anti
• 49:35
  Speaker 2: social personality disordered men do not engage in the most
• 49:39
  Speaker 2: stigmatized and repulsive forms of crime, which is child molestation
• 49:44
  Speaker 2: and rape. Even they don't. Even they will actually punish
• 49:48
  Speaker 2: men who do, and they are on the outlier of
• 49:51
  Speaker 2: not caring about people. Okay, and this, this woman is
• 49:56
  Speaker 2: using that the the man who treats other people. Get this,
• 50:04
  Speaker 2: listen to this, the rare man who treats other people
• 50:09
  Speaker 2: as resources in his social web to extract from. They
• 50:16
  Speaker 2: are treating the existence of that man, ignoring all of
• 50:20
  Speaker 2: the other men who bear down on him to stop
• 50:23
  Speaker 2: and punish him, which is the vast majority of men.
• 50:27
  Speaker 2: And they're using the existence of that man to justify
• 50:30
  Speaker 2: this woman crushing her daughter, turning her daughter into a weapon,
• 50:37
  Speaker 2: into a resource, extracting use out of her daughter for
• 50:42
  Speaker 2: her own malevolent ends. That's what they're fucking doing. Yeah,
• 50:52
  Speaker 2: I think we're looking at evil.
• 50:54
  Speaker 1: Yeah you might say that, but wait, there is no
• 51:00
  Speaker 1: such thing as objective evil, all right, anyway, No there is,
• 51:03
  Speaker 1: And I think that's what it is. Yes, it starts
• 51:05
  Speaker 1: with the worship of the self. It's self idolatry. But
• 51:09
  Speaker 1: I digress. I did get a super chow.
• 51:12
  Speaker 2: Oh, so maybe it is working.
• 51:14
  Speaker 1: I'll read that from Konoko's evil twin who gives us
• 51:17
  Speaker 1: five dollars and says, Alison, any chance you could point
• 51:20
  Speaker 1: Karl and the lotus Eaters to the Research Women's end
• 51:23
  Speaker 1: of chronology. I think Josh Fern, formerly of Lotus Eaters
• 51:27
  Speaker 1: might have the best background for it. Well, I don't
• 51:30
  Speaker 1: know why you guys think we have like the direct
• 51:33
  Speaker 1: line to Karl and the Lotus Heaters, but I'm flattered.
• 51:36
  Speaker 1: We used to get sargun On sometimes, but he's not
• 51:39
  Speaker 1: as easy to reach as he used to be, so,
• 51:42
  Speaker 1: you know, but I don't know if Alison you wanted
• 51:45
  Speaker 1: to say anything about that.
• 51:49
  Speaker 2: So essentially, take the thing that I've discovered and tell him, Yeah,
• 51:54
  Speaker 2: to what end? Really, I guess. I mean, if he
• 52:00
  Speaker 2: ever takes an interest in the stuff that we do,
• 52:02
  Speaker 2: he'll find it. And again, I'm not going to send
• 52:05
  Speaker 2: an email to this guy saying, hey, I found this,
• 52:08
  Speaker 2: I have discovered this this hypothesis. Are you interested in that?
• 52:18
  Speaker 2: He might be, but it'd probably be better if I
• 52:20
  Speaker 2: just laid it out in an essay and he just
• 52:23
  Speaker 2: came upon it.
• 52:23
  Speaker 1: Well, I mean, look, I think the way these things
• 52:27
  Speaker 1: usually work is people are talking in the space. Eventually
• 52:32
  Speaker 1: someone will see this and share it with someone will
• 52:34
  Speaker 1: share it with someone who will share it with someone,
• 52:36
  Speaker 1: and then maybe he'll get it, and then what they
• 52:38
  Speaker 1: do with it is up to them. I mean, like,
• 52:40
  Speaker 1: we're just we're not We're not like an organization or yeah,
• 52:46
  Speaker 1: or or a community or anything like that, right, so
• 52:50
  Speaker 1: it I mean, I don't know what else to tell you, Like, yeah, yeah,
• 52:56
  Speaker 1: if I were to.
• 52:57
  Speaker 2: Tell him, I'd probably want to put it into an
• 52:58
  Speaker 2: essay and explain where it's coming from. Because the connections
• 53:02
  Speaker 2: that I'm making from V one A activation to the
• 53:09
  Speaker 2: destruction of the birth rate, I don't know what else
• 53:13
  Speaker 2: to call it, the inclosion of the birth rate. Nobody
• 53:16
  Speaker 2: else is making this this connection. We're all making the
• 53:20
  Speaker 2: connection with gender quality feminism, which you know that is
• 53:25
  Speaker 2: although I'm starting to think it's an emergent property of
• 53:27
  Speaker 2: comfort and everybody just eating their own brains. But but
• 53:31
  Speaker 2: and also other stuff that I can get into. But
• 53:34
  Speaker 2: as far as I know, nobody's making this connection, and
• 53:37
  Speaker 2: what I would want to do is probably lay it
• 53:39
  Speaker 2: out in an essay explaining the logic and where it's
• 53:43
  Speaker 2: coming from.
• 53:47
  Speaker 1: Because sorry, no, no, no, it's okay. I was going
• 53:51
  Speaker 1: to go say something else.
• 53:54
  Speaker 2: This is a this is a study that needs a
• 53:55
  Speaker 2: lot more work in terms of human beings and endo chronology.
• 54:02
  Speaker 1: Yeah, yeah, I know people would be interested in it
• 54:04
  Speaker 1: like I, but I think that this is the thing,
• 54:07
  Speaker 1: like everybody in the space, they they we don't all
• 54:11
  Speaker 1: have the exact same goals, and we're not all working
• 54:14
  Speaker 1: with the exact same information, and we don't actually have
• 54:16
  Speaker 1: the exact same opinions on things. So like we can
• 54:21
  Speaker 1: you can bring a horse to water, but you can't
• 54:23
  Speaker 1: make it drink. Now, somebody in the chat, says doctor
• 54:27
  Speaker 1: Rhandermick Camp probably has him on speed dial. I know
• 54:29
  Speaker 1: that that's hyperbolic, but I don't think Mike can reach
• 54:33
  Speaker 1: Sargon that easily, even though yes, they know each other.
• 54:37
  Speaker 1: He knows me, he knows Alison. He's been on our
• 54:39
  Speaker 1: show back in the day, But like there, he's doing
• 54:42
  Speaker 1: other things right now. They're concerned about what's happening to
• 54:45
  Speaker 1: the UK with immigration and this and the whole like
• 54:48
  Speaker 1: climate there. And yes he's talking about pro natalist things,
• 54:51
  Speaker 1: and so I'm sure that at some point it will
• 54:53
  Speaker 1: come around, but it's we can't make that happen. Like
• 54:57
  Speaker 1: I can probably tell if Alice and did give me
• 55:01
  Speaker 1: something of a document, I can probably give it to
• 55:03
  Speaker 1: Simone and Malcolm Collins and they probably look at it
• 55:06
  Speaker 1: because they're very much interested in this too, and they're
• 55:09
  Speaker 1: kind of like nerdy autists, so but they might take
• 55:12
  Speaker 1: away something different and we have to be okay with
• 55:15
  Speaker 1: that because it's an ever expanding conversation. I mean, I
• 55:18
  Speaker 1: don't know how else to look at it. We just can't,
• 55:21
  Speaker 1: you know. So that's why I don't really see the
• 55:24
  Speaker 1: point in getting upset that not everyone lines up exactly
• 55:27
  Speaker 1: with us. I don't think that that we're absolutely right.
• 55:31
  Speaker 1: I think that we're spitballing and figuring things out and no,
• 55:34
  Speaker 1: I know, but I'm just saying like, it's a conversation,
• 55:37
  Speaker 1: you know.
• 55:39
  Speaker 2: I'm just saying that if I were to talk to
• 55:40
  Speaker 2: this Josh Ferney and just say, oh, have you looked
• 55:43
  Speaker 2: into V one a activation as, I think that it
• 55:46
  Speaker 2: would just be like, oh, it's that's a thing. I
• 55:50
  Speaker 2: think it needs to be laid out. And well, I
• 55:52
  Speaker 2: mean I'm laying it out as an argument with you guys,
• 55:54
  Speaker 2: but yeah, you don't have to be laid out in
• 55:57
  Speaker 2: like an essay or something.
• 55:58
  Speaker 1: Yeah. Okay, well, yeah, I do have a thank.
• 56:04
  Speaker 2: You to give to Richard Pierre put in a thousand bucks.
• 56:08
  Speaker 1: Thank you, Richard, Thank you, Richard. I will eat your
• 56:12
  Speaker 1: ash Oh that was no, No, Brian, not literally. I
• 56:20
  Speaker 1: will eat my neighbors, my superpowerful, honest, I will eat
• 56:24
  Speaker 1: my neighbors, all right, if it gets down to it,
• 56:29
  Speaker 1: if everything collapses ed Love, says Sargon's last couple of
• 56:32
  Speaker 1: videos have been mra ad Jason. I don't know, some
• 56:35
  Speaker 1: people in the chat would probably disagree with you very
• 56:37
  Speaker 1: harshly on this, But yes, I get that he's moving
• 56:40
  Speaker 1: in that direction, and he's always been sympathetic to men's
• 56:43
  Speaker 1: rights issues. He's always been sympathetic to them. He just doesn't.
• 56:47
  Speaker 1: I think what his issue is is with the more
• 56:49
  Speaker 1: like red pill manisphere guys, because they're not red pill guys,
• 56:52
  Speaker 1: even though they describe themselves as such. They're just they're
• 56:56
  Speaker 1: just bluepill guys. You'll find out Paul Elam has a
• 56:59
  Speaker 1: series coming up pretty soon. He's going to destroy them.
• 57:01
  Speaker 1: But anyway, Alison, go.
• 57:03
  Speaker 2: Ahead, Oh maybe maybe it'll uh, it'll take the form
• 57:08
  Speaker 2: of what I was the reason why Rollo blocked me
• 57:14
  Speaker 2: when I pointed out that if you judge men by
• 57:17
  Speaker 2: performing for women, that you are sent centering men's identities
• 57:22
  Speaker 2: around women.
• 57:23
  Speaker 1: Yes, women's approval, specifically.
• 57:25
  Speaker 2: Women's approval blocked. I just I still find that amusing.
• 57:32
  Speaker 1: Yeah, yeah, we got blocked by the but the guy
• 57:34
  Speaker 1: who created us created us. We became the monster rose
• 57:39
  Speaker 1: up and attacked its creator. The man who created everything
• 57:43
  Speaker 1: the red Pill is Doc mister Rollo Tamasi himself. He
• 57:48
  Speaker 1: had to block Alison because the monster turned on her creator.
• 57:51
  Speaker 2: So yeah, something.
• 57:55
  Speaker 1: Something something.
• 57:57
  Speaker 2: Yeah, yeah, I still find that hilarious. I'm sure I'm
• 58:00
  Speaker 2: offending somebody out there. There's a there's like Rollo shills
• 58:03
  Speaker 2: in our comments right.
• 58:06
  Speaker 1: Now or no, no, no, no, there have been sure, sure, yeah,
• 58:10
  Speaker 1: for sure. Yeah that's okay, they can hang out. But
• 58:12
  Speaker 1: this is what I'm saying, Like Rollo has been around
• 58:14
  Speaker 1: for a long time, and I'm not saying that he's
• 58:16
  Speaker 1: not smart, but like we're not We're not lined up
• 58:20
  Speaker 1: on it at all, right, not the same.
• 58:25
  Speaker 2: But yeah, no, I mean, like I said, if if
• 58:27
  Speaker 2: I were to give this to someone, I'd want to
• 58:29
  Speaker 2: have it as an essay.
• 58:31
  Speaker 1: So that it's the Well, if you do get something together,
• 58:34
  Speaker 1: send it to me and I'll give it to some
• 58:35
  Speaker 1: Malcolm and Simone, I think I think they'd be They
• 58:38
  Speaker 1: have a lot of reach and I think they could
• 58:40
  Speaker 1: make something with it. Those people I know I can
• 58:42
  Speaker 1: get in contact with Sargon. I don't know so well.
• 58:45
  Speaker 2: We probably could, honestly.
• 58:46
  Speaker 1: Yeah, we probably could have really wanted to, sure, But I.
• 58:49
  Speaker 2: Don't really want to bug him. Oh that's the thing, Like, you.
• 58:53
  Speaker 1: Know, I don't want to unless you have something substantial.
• 58:56
  Speaker 2: Yeah, with something substantial. I don't want to bug him
• 58:58
  Speaker 2: with a half formed thought. I don't think it's half form,
• 59:01
  Speaker 2: but it would, you know, like you put it in,
• 59:03
  Speaker 2: it needs a little bit more refinement, Yes, exactly.
• 59:06
  Speaker 1: Yeah, he's put it back in the oven for a
• 59:08
  Speaker 1: little while longer. I get you.
• 59:10
  Speaker 2: But but yeah, we're I want to talk a bit
• 59:12
  Speaker 2: more about this topic on Friday and that particular that
• 59:20
  Speaker 2: particular paper. But yeah, let's uh, let's finish the article off.
• 59:26
  Speaker 1: All right, let's do the article. Yeah, let's try.
• 59:29
  Speaker 2: Oh.
• 59:30
  Speaker 1: I believe that miss andrey can be used more flexibly
• 59:32
  Speaker 1: as an idea. Not only do I believe that in
• 59:35
  Speaker 1: general miss andry in its true definition is a valid
• 59:38
  Speaker 1: prejudice due to the billions of distasteful actions committed by
• 59:41
  Speaker 1: men every second, but that it can be used as
• 59:44
  Speaker 1: a concept that but that it can be used as
• 59:47
  Speaker 1: a conceptual vessel for feminist projects such as that of
• 59:51
  Speaker 1: LTP feminist project of Indoctrinating your child. Okay. In addition,
• 59:55
  Speaker 1: miss andre as a concept can allow women the opportunity
• 59:58
  Speaker 1: to share their experience is with men many negative. In
• 1:00:02
  Speaker 1: my experience, this kind of chatter can range from meaningful
• 1:00:05
  Speaker 1: to hilarious to even impactful. My roommate's Piper's TikTok account
• 1:00:12
  Speaker 1: as on TikTok account, so silly. My roommate Piper's TikTok
• 1:00:16
  Speaker 1: account resides under the handle at Recovering Missandras. However, she
• 1:00:20
  Speaker 1: recently informed me that due to a bad encounter, she
• 1:00:23
  Speaker 1: now considers herself to have relapsed in this journey. Sounds
• 1:00:27
  Speaker 1: like she has bad tastes and men. As for myself,
• 1:00:30
  Speaker 1: I was lucky enough to live the kind of life
• 1:00:32
  Speaker 1: that LTP hopes for her child. I spent my early
• 1:00:36
  Speaker 1: childhood with my dad working from home, and he did
• 1:00:39
  Speaker 1: more traditionally feminine tasks than any mom who had long
• 1:00:43
  Speaker 1: workdays and a rougher commute Other than my mom.
• 1:00:46
  Speaker 2: She's saying, Okay, long work days in a rougher commute,
• 1:00:50
  Speaker 2: Huh is there some.
• 1:00:54
  Speaker 1: So?
• 1:00:55
  Speaker 2: But are you trying to say that staying home is
• 1:00:59
  Speaker 2: not feminine, is not the most difficult job in the
• 1:01:02
  Speaker 2: world that a man is doing.
• 1:01:05
  Speaker 1: It was your dad bending over at the waist putting
• 1:01:07
  Speaker 1: DVDs in a DVD players.
• 1:01:10
  Speaker 4: Okay, so let's let's hear this.
• 1:01:11
  Speaker 2: Okay. So she had she had more paternal direct paternal
• 1:01:17
  Speaker 2: investment in her, her youth and her in her and
• 1:01:22
  Speaker 2: and she credits that as being better than Southern Christian upbringing. Okay,
• 1:01:33
  Speaker 2: except that feminists are trying to make it so that
• 1:01:36
  Speaker 2: fathers have no right to their children.
• 1:01:41
  Speaker 1: I grew up with my dad doing lots of cleaning,
• 1:01:44
  Speaker 1: making my lunches, and making me breakfast every morning, and
• 1:01:46
  Speaker 1: often making our family dinners. Yeah, because men don't cook
• 1:01:49
  Speaker 1: anything ever. Uh you know I make breakfast for Lindsay
• 1:01:53
  Speaker 1: every morning before she goes to work, and she makes
• 1:01:56
  Speaker 1: dinner when she comes home. Am I feminine? Now? Is that?
• 1:02:00
  Speaker 1: Like if Lindsay like like left and I had to
• 1:02:03
  Speaker 1: cook my own food, would I just become a woman?
• 1:02:07
  Speaker 1: Aren't men make the best chefs? Okay? Anyway, I do
• 1:02:13
  Speaker 1: think growing up. That's why I'm like, what bugs me
• 1:02:15
  Speaker 1: about it is it's so arbitrary, Like they're just like
• 1:02:17
  Speaker 1: these are these are feminine things and these are masculine things,
• 1:02:21
  Speaker 1: are they? I don't think that. I don't think that's true.
• 1:02:24
  Speaker 1: I think there's just things. I mean, I don't know,
• 1:02:27
  Speaker 1: but anyway, I do think growing up in the liberal
• 1:02:29
  Speaker 1: bubble of Portland, Oregon must have had an impact on
• 1:02:32
  Speaker 1: my confidence as a young girl. And I can even
• 1:02:35
  Speaker 1: remember being confused when your dad books.
• 1:02:38
  Speaker 2: No, not not not having a dad who was very involved. No,
• 1:02:46
  Speaker 2: it was your No, you know what, I can actually
• 1:02:49
  Speaker 2: tell you from the statistics. It was because you had
• 1:02:52
  Speaker 2: an involved dad, that's it.
• 1:02:55
  Speaker 1: No, it was Portland, Allison.
• 1:02:57
  Speaker 3: No, it.
• 1:02:58
  Speaker 1: Was Portland. It was Shortland that did this. Not a
• 1:03:02
  Speaker 1: father that was involved in life all the time and
• 1:03:05
  Speaker 1: helped raise her. No, No, no, it was just the
• 1:03:07
  Speaker 1: city she was in. Ridiculous people, Okay, for example, where
• 1:03:18
  Speaker 1: someone makes a crack at the female protagonist bravery or intelligent, Oh,
• 1:03:22
  Speaker 1: it's being confused with reading dated books whatever. I remember
• 1:03:25
  Speaker 1: being puzzled because, as far as I've been told, women
• 1:03:28
  Speaker 1: were braver, more curious, and more intelligent. The difference here
• 1:03:32
  Speaker 1: is that as a woman, I never thrust this viewpoint
• 1:03:35
  Speaker 1: upon others negatively. I never felt the urge to tell boys.
• 1:03:39
  Speaker 1: I knew that I felt better than them, because although
• 1:03:43
  Speaker 1: I was raised in a way that normalized women in power,
• 1:03:46
  Speaker 1: I was still raised to believe equality in every sense. Well,
• 1:03:49
  Speaker 1: before I get to that last paragraph, what if her
• 1:03:52
  Speaker 1: dad treated her like a princess and like kind of
• 1:03:56
  Speaker 1: gassed her up as a father? I mean, like men
• 1:04:00
  Speaker 1: men with children love their children, and they will instill
• 1:04:04
  Speaker 1: things in their boys and their girls. But you could
• 1:04:07
  Speaker 1: take that too far with girls, especially if they were
• 1:04:10
  Speaker 1: living in Portland and he had those kind of values.
• 1:04:13
  Speaker 1: So what if that is I mean, it's obviously because yes,
• 1:04:16
  Speaker 1: involved dad, but what if he like made her feel
• 1:04:19
  Speaker 1: a little bit too self important?
• 1:04:22
  Speaker 2: Like that's entirely possible. But I want to also point
• 1:04:27
  Speaker 2: something out. These people constantly talk about how they're all
• 1:04:31
  Speaker 2: about equality, and yet I felt that I was superior
• 1:04:37
  Speaker 2: as a woman, and this woman teaching her daughter superiority.
• 1:04:43
  Speaker 2: This is an equality, right? Can we finally just admit
• 1:04:48
  Speaker 2: that these people have no interest in equality? Because every
• 1:04:53
  Speaker 2: time you catch them doing something, it's inequality. You see
• 1:04:58
  Speaker 2: what I'm saying. It's like, what's women's empowerment? Feeling like
• 1:05:03
  Speaker 2: they're better than men? Okay, that's not equality. Every like
• 1:05:09
  Speaker 2: every time you shine the flashlight on them, you catch
• 1:05:12
  Speaker 2: their hands in the in the inequality cookie jar. You
• 1:05:17
  Speaker 2: see what I'm saying, Brian, they once again, I see
• 1:05:22
  Speaker 2: you are once again with your hand in the inequality
• 1:05:24
  Speaker 2: put cookie jar, and the women are superior cookie jar.
• 1:05:28
  Speaker 2: I'm starting to believe that your intent and your goals
• 1:05:33
  Speaker 2: have nothing to do with actual equality. Okay, all right,
• 1:05:38
  Speaker 2: and I know that equality is also ridiculous. But even
• 1:05:41
  Speaker 2: if it was, let's just assume it wasn't. They're lying
• 1:05:45
  Speaker 2: about what they're doing.
• 1:05:48
  Speaker 1: The comment on ltp's post about over correcting resonates with
• 1:05:52
  Speaker 1: me in relation to my upbringing in a world where
• 1:05:55
  Speaker 1: men were centralized, no matter how sneakily or subtly, a
• 1:05:59
  Speaker 1: message is sent out to our brains about power dynamics.
• 1:06:04
  Speaker 1: This is why a little aggression or miss injury, if
• 1:06:07
  Speaker 1: you will, is necessary when it comes to reclaiming and
• 1:06:11
  Speaker 1: recentering female power.
• 1:06:14
  Speaker 2: How are men centralized? They never racialize that, They never
• 1:06:23
  Speaker 2: explain yourself, madam?
• 1:06:25
  Speaker 1: Are there comments in this article? I thought you said
• 1:06:28
  Speaker 1: there were comments.
• 1:06:29
  Speaker 2: I think it's not comments on the TikTok oh on.
• 1:06:31
  Speaker 1: The TikTok Yeah, yeah, no, I don't know there are
• 1:06:33
  Speaker 1: comments on the TikTok. I was just looking to see
• 1:06:35
  Speaker 1: if those comments here. All right, let me go go ahead. No,
• 1:06:39
  Speaker 1: I'm gonna look for the comments. Uh, you go ahead,
• 1:06:41
  Speaker 1: and uh, don't finish your your thought about that while
• 1:06:46
  Speaker 1: I look for it.
• 1:06:47
  Speaker 2: Well, actually my thought is finished, so I'm all I
• 1:06:50
  Speaker 2: can offer is awkward silence. At this point, there is
• 1:06:55
  Speaker 2: a woman.
• 1:06:56
  Speaker 1: Okay, let's go back to this. Then there is a
• 1:06:58
  Speaker 1: woman here named Jessica who says, I have two boys.
• 1:07:01
  Speaker 1: I'm trying to teach them to be good humans. Male,
• 1:07:05
  Speaker 1: Missandris matter this. It's our lofty responsibility as boy moms
• 1:07:10
  Speaker 1: to teach our sons to dismantle the patriarchy. We must
• 1:07:14
  Speaker 1: raise compassionate, emotionally intelligent, capable men who value and respect femininity.
• 1:07:20
  Speaker 1: I teach my son that a man's role is to
• 1:07:22
  Speaker 1: support women and is to support women's His role is
• 1:07:26
  Speaker 1: anything that needs to be done to uplift, support and
• 1:07:28
  Speaker 1: help women. Because we are the creators. Wow, wow, one
• 1:07:35
  Speaker 1: boy and doing the same. We have to take the
• 1:07:37
  Speaker 1: power back and show them how to be good, kind,
• 1:07:39
  Speaker 1: empathetic people. Dude, the egos on display here are staggering,
• 1:07:47
  Speaker 1: like you're oh, I am. I am the only person
• 1:07:49
  Speaker 1: that can show anyone how to be decent, because that's
• 1:07:53
  Speaker 1: how decent I am. Holy cow.
• 1:07:57
  Speaker 2: And they're just not even they're not even bothering this.
• 1:08:00
  Speaker 2: Just stop saying the silent part out loud, you know,
• 1:08:03
  Speaker 2: like saying it silently. They're just right out there. Yeah.
• 1:08:06
  Speaker 2: A man's place, hey, little timmy, A man's place is
• 1:08:10
  Speaker 2: to serve women because they create life.
• 1:08:14
  Speaker 1: Oh here's something though, Suddenly a wild dissenter appears. Will
• 1:08:19
  Speaker 1: you teach him that if a grown woman rapes him
• 1:08:21
  Speaker 1: as a teenager who have to play child support? Let
• 1:08:26
  Speaker 1: me see, is anyone gonna reply to that? Looks like
• 1:08:31
  Speaker 1: they ignored him? What does that mean? Good humans? Nope,
• 1:08:38
  Speaker 1: nobody even replied to it. This is how you break
• 1:08:41
  Speaker 1: generational curses? What as a man? This is fine, sim
• 1:08:50
  Speaker 1: They're the worst man. Those guys really piss me. Dative, right,
• 1:08:57
  Speaker 1: I know, it's ridiculous, it's but it's weak, it's not
• 1:09:00
  Speaker 1: it's not substantial. There's no substance to it.
• 1:09:03
  Speaker 2: Well, yes, because it's performative, it's not actual actions, which on.
• 1:09:08
  Speaker 1: And men who say that stuff, you know, they're kind
• 1:09:10
  Speaker 1: of also saying I know that ultimately you're really weak
• 1:09:13
  Speaker 1: and you're just like being loud online. So I'm just
• 1:09:15
  Speaker 1: gonna agree with you because I really am not threatened
• 1:09:18
  Speaker 1: by you at all. That's kind of what they're doing,
• 1:09:21
  Speaker 1: you know.
• 1:09:21
  Speaker 2: Well, they're also like I said, it's it's it's words, right,
• 1:09:25
  Speaker 2: these are words. They are actually probably the least expensive
• 1:09:29
  Speaker 2: thing they could do. And here's the issue, right, Like
• 1:09:34
  Speaker 2: from my research, men's protective behaviors is are subcortical, like
• 1:09:39
  Speaker 2: they exist beneath words. So if you have a man
• 1:09:44
  Speaker 2: beaking off like this about you know, all women should
• 1:09:49
  Speaker 2: be served, women are, women should be protected, he's making
• 1:09:53
  Speaker 2: a performance. And if he's making a performance, odds are
• 1:09:56
  Speaker 2: he doesn't have the architecture underneath it, right, if he
• 1:10:02
  Speaker 2: is able to translate it into a performance, he is
• 1:10:06
  Speaker 2: dividing his cognitive energy away from the actual action. And
• 1:10:12
  Speaker 2: it's I guess this might be a little bit complicated,
• 1:10:15
  Speaker 2: but men don't necessary that don't necessarily have verbal access
• 1:10:20
  Speaker 2: to these kinds of architectural behaviors. So if he's able
• 1:10:24
  Speaker 2: to talk about it, he probably doesn't have them. Or
• 1:10:29
  Speaker 2: it's just everything that he's saying is performative and it
• 1:10:32
  Speaker 2: doesn't fucking matter because what matters is the action, right,
• 1:10:38
  Speaker 2: I'm maybe I'm mulching this up. I apologize, guys. Basically,
• 1:10:41
  Speaker 2: what matters is the action. If you think that it's weak,
• 1:10:44
  Speaker 2: it's because it is weak. All he's doing is performing.
• 1:10:47
  Speaker 2: He's performing to a social web, right, which is indicating
• 1:10:51
  Speaker 2: that he sees himself as a node in a social
• 1:10:54
  Speaker 2: web in sending out signals. Well, guess what, that's what's sociopaszity.
• 1:11:01
  Speaker 2: They also see themselves as well. They probably see themselves
• 1:11:05
  Speaker 2: as a center of a web and everybody else is
• 1:11:07
  Speaker 2: a node for resource extraction within it, and that they
• 1:11:11
  Speaker 2: send out signals and they're not their signals are you know,
• 1:11:15
  Speaker 2: when they're verbal, you know, they have more fluidity with
• 1:11:19
  Speaker 2: that because they don't have the architecture. They don't have
• 1:11:22
  Speaker 2: they don't have to send cognitive resources down to giving
• 1:11:25
  Speaker 2: as ship about anybody, so they can spend more with
• 1:11:29
  Speaker 2: verbally signaling how wonderful they are and how much they
• 1:11:33
  Speaker 2: approve of all of the web's pet projects and utopias.
• 1:11:41
  Speaker 2: You get what I'm saying. It's like yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, okay, good, okay, good, Yes.
• 1:11:47
  Speaker 1: It's it's signaling. It's a very easy thing to do.
• 1:11:51
  Speaker 1: There's no and there's also no risk at all. You
• 1:11:54
  Speaker 1: just say the right thing and then you move on.
• 1:11:56
  Speaker 1: It doesn't cost you any energy. No, you know it doesn't.
• 1:11:59
  Speaker 2: It doesn't energy.
• 1:12:00
  Speaker 1: Yeah, that's the thing.
• 1:12:02
  Speaker 2: Like if it cost you energy, you wouldn't necessarily be
• 1:12:06
  Speaker 2: signaling it.
• 1:12:07
  Speaker 1: No, you'd be you'd you use it wisely at least, yeah, no,
• 1:12:12
  Speaker 1: you'd consider it. But this doesn't cost anything. You just
• 1:12:14
  Speaker 1: get to And here's another thing too, that's funny about this,
• 1:12:17
  Speaker 1: And this is what I'm saying, Like simps don't get rewarded.
• 1:12:20
  Speaker 1: He posted that as a man, this is fine, but
• 1:12:23
  Speaker 1: they gave him shit. Anyways, I'm glad you got approval, wink.
• 1:12:29
  Speaker 1: And then somebody says, who so relieved a man decided
• 1:12:32
  Speaker 1: to give approval? So like they're they're basically saying, oh,
• 1:12:35
  Speaker 1: you're a man, huh, And you say this is okay,
• 1:12:37
  Speaker 1: Well thanks for thanks for telling us it's okay to
• 1:12:41
  Speaker 1: feel this way. So like even then, you don't, you
• 1:12:43
  Speaker 1: just you still get shit. Well there's no point because
• 1:12:47
  Speaker 1: they they also they also take no risk in clapping back,
• 1:12:52
  Speaker 1: So how dare.
• 1:12:53
  Speaker 2: You consider yourself valid as a man?
• 1:12:56
  Speaker 1: Supremacist ideology is never fine, we don't need your permission.
• 1:13:02
  Speaker 1: They not gonna let you hit buddy.
• 1:13:05
  Speaker 2: You know, guys, are these these women are parasites. M
• 1:13:13
  Speaker 2: They they are the reason why the human race can't
• 1:13:16
  Speaker 2: have nice things like a class one civilization. They're the
• 1:13:20
  Speaker 2: reason why we we can't capture the full energy of
• 1:13:24
  Speaker 2: the sun right or the earth. They're the reason why
• 1:13:30
  Speaker 2: right we don't we don't have the Federation. These freaking
• 1:13:33
  Speaker 2: parasites and their social webs and how and being able
• 1:13:39
  Speaker 2: to block any understanding of operative reality.
• 1:13:44
  Speaker 1: Oh okay, I got a couple of super chats. Albatross
• 1:13:50
  Speaker 1: gave or a super chat and a rumbo rant. Albatross
• 1:13:52
  Speaker 1: gave us five dollars and says so much of their
• 1:13:55
  Speaker 1: rhetoric is anti hetero and anti relationships, and yet they
• 1:13:58
  Speaker 1: keep getting married and have kids with men for five dollars.
• 1:14:03
  Speaker 1: Thank you well again, because their rhetoric costs them nothing,
• 1:14:08
  Speaker 1: but it does get them attention, which is what they want.
• 1:14:12
  Speaker 1: And it reminds me. It's like Briarny Claire. Briarty Claire
• 1:14:16
  Speaker 1: will make videos endlessly telling women it's probably not a
• 1:14:20
  Speaker 1: good idea to get married while she is married, it's
• 1:14:24
  Speaker 1: a way to compete to essentially eliminate the competition by
• 1:14:28
  Speaker 1: telling her audience, you don't want any of this stuff
• 1:14:31
  Speaker 1: that I'm doing right now. And even if there's no
• 1:14:35
  Speaker 1: way that those women could be a threat to her status,
• 1:14:39
  Speaker 1: it doesn't matter because she gets to knock them down
• 1:14:41
  Speaker 1: a peg and look really good doing it, and it
• 1:14:44
  Speaker 1: costs her nothing. So I think that's what this is too.
• 1:14:48
  Speaker 1: This woman is not someone who is happy alone, because
• 1:14:52
  Speaker 1: I looked at her other videos and she's got videos
• 1:14:54
  Speaker 1: of her going on first dates with guys and apparently
• 1:14:57
  Speaker 1: it didn't work out. Somebody dodged a bullet, and she's
• 1:15:02
  Speaker 1: lamenting it and of course continuing to blame all.
• 1:15:05
  Speaker 3: Men for it.
• 1:15:06
  Speaker 1: It's like, well, maybe you're a cunt. Maybe I don't know. Well, okay,
• 1:15:11
  Speaker 1: Nova Fan twenty one gave us a dollar on Rumble,
• 1:15:14
  Speaker 1: Thank you, Noba Fan and says, twenty first century feminists,
• 1:15:18
  Speaker 1: the Old Testament is anti women propaganda made to slander women.
• 1:15:22
  Speaker 1: Twenty second century feminists, those TikTok feminist videos are anti
• 1:15:27
  Speaker 1: women propaganda made to slander women. Uh yeah, I guess
• 1:15:33
  Speaker 1: so who's saying that, uh, Noba Fan. He's yeah, he's
• 1:15:39
  Speaker 1: saying that these TikTok feminist videos are anti women propaganda
• 1:15:43
  Speaker 1: may to slender women.
• 1:15:45
  Speaker 2: I I honestly, that would be a nice interpretation. But yeah,
• 1:15:51
  Speaker 2: the problem is that this is what happens when women
• 1:15:56
  Speaker 2: don't have any relationship with reality, like none, none, whatsoever.
• 1:16:03
  Speaker 2: So it's I don't think that anybody's doing this to
• 1:16:07
  Speaker 2: slander women. I think this is women just who just
• 1:16:10
  Speaker 2: think that this is appropriate behavior. And again, like, the
• 1:16:14
  Speaker 2: thing that really raised my eye are the women in
• 1:16:17
  Speaker 2: the comments who are teaching their sons that men aren't
• 1:16:21
  Speaker 2: competent and teaching them to serve women. You think about that, like,
• 1:16:28
  Speaker 2: you got the daughter, she's getting an inflated sense of self,
• 1:16:31
  Speaker 2: except it's at the expense of somebody she cares about,
• 1:16:34
  Speaker 2: which is her dad. I mean, let's look at that.
• 1:16:37
  Speaker 1: That well he got Oh I'm sorry, go ahead.
• 1:16:41
  Speaker 2: The daughter obviously cares about her father because she is
• 1:16:45
  Speaker 2: defending him, even if it's just five years old, and
• 1:16:48
  Speaker 2: we know that the mother is going to do whatever
• 1:16:51
  Speaker 2: she can to destroy her daughter.
• 1:16:55
  Speaker 4: The daughter is defending her father, that means.
• 1:16:57
  Speaker 2: That she has a connection to him, and her mother
• 1:17:02
  Speaker 2: is insulting someone who her daughter has a connection to,
• 1:17:07
  Speaker 2: who cares about she cares about her father. That's destructive
• 1:17:14
  Speaker 2: in and of itself.
• 1:17:15
  Speaker 4: Okay, so I just wanted to point that out.
• 1:17:17
  Speaker 1: Go ahead, Brian, all Right, I was gonna read one
• 1:17:21
  Speaker 1: of the other comments on the TikTok video. I think
• 1:17:23
  Speaker 1: this might be the one you wanted me to find.
• 1:17:26
  Speaker 1: So there's a post by someone named fur Fer and
• 1:17:32
  Speaker 1: they say, or she says, hey, I'm so definitely a
• 1:17:36
  Speaker 1: missandress lol. But I've raised my son with so much
• 1:17:39
  Speaker 1: love and respect and also information about feminism, and he
• 1:17:43
  Speaker 1: just doesn't understand why girls hate him so much with
• 1:17:47
  Speaker 1: no apparent reason. Cry emoji. That breaks my heart. And
• 1:17:52
  Speaker 1: then the creator of the pursuer made the video says,
• 1:17:54
  Speaker 1: bless him. Two of my daughter's besties are boys, so
• 1:17:58
  Speaker 1: I don't think I've gone to And then first says, yes,
• 1:18:02
  Speaker 1: I actually love the points you're showing, and I think
• 1:18:05
  Speaker 1: it's very important that girls grow up with a completely
• 1:18:07
  Speaker 1: different mindset from the one that we grew up with.
• 1:18:10
  Speaker 1: But then I find my son telling me how these
• 1:18:12
  Speaker 1: girls reject boys in any context, and it also troubles
• 1:18:16
  Speaker 1: me a bit. But anyway, and then some and it
• 1:18:19
  Speaker 1: goes on from there. Somebody says, have you got any sons,
• 1:18:22
  Speaker 1: and I guess they haven't really responded to that. So
• 1:18:24
  Speaker 1: there's a woman saying, I'm definitely a missandress and my
• 1:18:28
  Speaker 1: son thinks that girls hate him. He does. They don't
• 1:18:31
  Speaker 1: get it. But I'm not gonna reconsider my position at all.
• 1:18:36
  Speaker 2: Do you understand what missingry means, lady? It means you
• 1:18:40
  Speaker 2: hate your son? Yes, Like, what what is this nonsense?
• 1:18:47
  Speaker 2: I'm a mis interest, but only I get to hate my.
• 1:18:50
  Speaker 4: Son, not just random girls.
• 1:18:57
  Speaker 2: What why is it the th you can just go
• 1:19:00
  Speaker 2: out in public and say this stuff. Could you imagine
• 1:19:03
  Speaker 2: a bunch of fathers saying stuff like this, I'm teaching
• 1:19:05
  Speaker 2: my daughter that boys are superior. I mean, this didn't
• 1:19:09
  Speaker 2: never even happen with the Christians in the past. And
• 1:19:12
  Speaker 2: you know what, I even shouldn't even say even right
• 1:19:16
  Speaker 2: complimentary sphares respect for women. There was like Christianity has
• 1:19:22
  Speaker 2: that people. I don't know where they got the idea
• 1:19:26
  Speaker 2: that Christianity is anti woman or really, honestly, let's be frank,
• 1:19:31
  Speaker 2: there's there's no religion that lasted any amount of time
• 1:19:36
  Speaker 2: that women weren't willing to teach their children and didn't
• 1:19:39
  Speaker 2: benefit them somehow, Okay, So there's anti woman is the
• 1:19:44
  Speaker 2: failure state of humanity up to this point until we
• 1:19:48
  Speaker 2: get like, you know, artificial wombs. So to say that
• 1:19:53
  Speaker 2: Christianity was anti woman, it wasn't. Okay. So there's never
• 1:19:58
  Speaker 2: been a point in time where fathers did shit like
• 1:20:02
  Speaker 2: this to their daughters.
• 1:20:04
  Speaker 1: Never.
• 1:20:05
  Speaker 8: Ever, there has never been a group of men who
• 1:20:10
  Speaker 8: had daughters and they didn't feel like they were custodial
• 1:20:14
  Speaker 8: response called custodially responsible for protecting and providing for their
• 1:20:18
  Speaker 8: daughters until they found a husband for them.
• 1:20:21
  Speaker 2: Okay, There's never been a time where that wasn't the case,
• 1:20:24
  Speaker 2: where men didn't define themselves in terms of protecting and
• 1:20:27
  Speaker 2: providing for women. I'm sorry, I know there's there's like
• 1:20:31
  Speaker 2: another sub thread where you can't talk about this otherwise
• 1:20:34
  Speaker 2: you're encouraging ginocentrism. But I'm looking directly at the architecture
• 1:20:39
  Speaker 2: of men and looking at every like what I can
• 1:20:43
  Speaker 2: see in terms of how men describe their own thinking
• 1:20:45
  Speaker 2: in literature, right, there's there's a huge amount of custodial
• 1:20:50
  Speaker 2: protection directed towards women and girls, particularly their wives and daughters.
• 1:20:56
  Speaker 4: You would never see this ever in human history.
• 1:21:00
  Speaker 2: A bunch of men talking to each other's each other
• 1:21:04
  Speaker 2: about how they subjugate their daughters, make their daughters feel
• 1:21:07
  Speaker 2: lesser than their sons, not different with different abilities, but lesser. Right,
• 1:21:16
  Speaker 2: they might say something like you are why we are
• 1:21:19
  Speaker 2: warriors and providers. They wouldn't say something like you're stupid
• 1:21:23
  Speaker 2: or less fundamentally worthless, that you exist only to serve,
• 1:21:31
  Speaker 2: which is not what Christianity says about men and women.
• 1:21:35
  Speaker 2: These women are lying about this, and they're promoting something
• 1:21:40
  Speaker 2: that has never existed, This kind of hatred directed towards
• 1:21:45
  Speaker 2: boys versus girls. Well, it's sort of existed against boys,
• 1:21:50
  Speaker 2: it's never existed against girls.
• 1:21:52
  Speaker 4: There's never Okay, let me put it this way.
• 1:21:54
  Speaker 2: There's never a situation where girls are considered lesser and
• 1:22:00
  Speaker 2: boys aren't considered obligated. Right, So that doesn't make the
• 1:22:05
  Speaker 2: girls lesser. They may have less ability, but that puts
• 1:22:09
  Speaker 2: a greater obligation on the boys for the girls. And
• 1:22:14
  Speaker 2: what are they constructing here? Boys are lesser and they're obligated.
• 1:22:20
  Speaker 2: That's what they're making. That's never existed except.
• 1:22:23
  Speaker 4: In them right here, right now.
• 1:22:25
  Speaker 2: This level of abusive, chauvinistic bigotry against their own children
• 1:22:35
  Speaker 2: is never existed so they can't stand up and say, oh,
• 1:22:38
  Speaker 2: we're just need to turn about is fair play that
• 1:22:41
  Speaker 2: has never existed. There has never been a social a
• 1:22:44
  Speaker 2: cultural narrative that said that girls are weaker but obligated. Right,
• 1:22:52
  Speaker 2: it's always girls, and it usually doesn't girls. Girls are
• 1:22:56
  Speaker 2: different and boys are obligated. You see, I mean to
• 1:23:00
  Speaker 2: those whatever weaknesses that women have to protect and provide
• 1:23:05
  Speaker 2: because that maps exactly onto the architecture. Women are vulnerable
• 1:23:11
  Speaker 2: when they get pregnant, when they lactate, when they're feeding
• 1:23:14
  Speaker 2: their children, they're vulnerable. So men exist to protect and
• 1:23:18
  Speaker 2: provide for them. Hell, even fathers are vulnerable when they
• 1:23:22
  Speaker 2: go through that process. So the male coalition exists to
• 1:23:26
  Speaker 2: protect and provide for them. So it's like this is
• 1:23:29
  Speaker 2: this is part is baked right into male architecture. And
• 1:23:34
  Speaker 2: so it's like it's it is looking into hell when
• 1:23:41
  Speaker 2: you see these circles of these women doing this, it's
• 1:23:44
  Speaker 2: like looking into demons torturing the vulnerable. Yeah, for no reason,
• 1:23:51
  Speaker 2: like no, there's no excuse for this. And they and
• 1:23:54
  Speaker 2: what's astounding is if you say, okay, well they're misinformed, right,
• 1:24:01
  Speaker 2: they just got a bad you know, got bad information.
• 1:24:05
  Speaker 4: They think they're doing the right thing. How do you
• 1:24:08
  Speaker 4: not know that this is harming your kid? How don't
• 1:24:14
  Speaker 4: you know that?
• 1:24:16
  Speaker 2: How does this woman not know that when her daughter
• 1:24:20
  Speaker 2: defends her father to her, that forcing her daughter to
• 1:24:25
  Speaker 2: defend her father is wrong, that forcing her making her
• 1:24:29
  Speaker 2: daughter into a weapon.
• 1:24:30
  Speaker 4: Or social signaling is wrong.
• 1:24:32
  Speaker 2: How do they not know this? How is that not
• 1:24:36
  Speaker 2: an instinct? What is wrong with them? Okay?
• 1:24:46
  Speaker 1: I think that it's well anyway, they're in a circle
• 1:24:48
  Speaker 1: jerk online and they're just trying to top each other. Okay,
• 1:24:53
  Speaker 1: So I did get one more comment that I thought
• 1:24:55
  Speaker 1: was the most telling, and uh it showed a shows
• 1:25:00
  Speaker 1: because Okay, at the beginning of the show. At the
• 1:25:02
  Speaker 1: top of the show, I said, it is good that
• 1:25:04
  Speaker 1: the word miss andry is basically in the lexicon like
• 1:25:08
  Speaker 1: people use it. It's in Miriam Webster. You can search
• 1:25:12
  Speaker 1: for it online. When when I started doing this, if
• 1:25:15
  Speaker 1: you type the word miss injury into a document, it
• 1:25:18
  Speaker 1: would come up as a misspelled word because it wasn't
• 1:25:21
  Speaker 1: seen as real. Even though it's not complete, it's not
• 1:25:24
  Speaker 1: made up whole cloth, and it does exist. Right, So
• 1:25:28
  Speaker 1: now it is in the conversation and it cannot be ignored.
• 1:25:33
  Speaker 1: So what are feminists doing now? Well, here's a comment
• 1:25:37
  Speaker 1: from Vixen Wiggs on this TikTok video, and she says,
• 1:25:42
  Speaker 1: for those of you trying to say that miss andry
• 1:25:44
  Speaker 1: does not exist and that it is red pill rhetoric,
• 1:25:47
  Speaker 1: you need to think up step past that. I guess
• 1:25:50
  Speaker 1: she means to say, one step past that. We are
• 1:25:53
  Speaker 1: fully aware of that. We have taken the word back.
• 1:25:57
  Speaker 1: We are owning it, just like the Pagans do. The
• 1:26:00
  Speaker 1: word pagan was negative when it was created. No one
• 1:26:03
  Speaker 1: called themselves a pagan. Then the ones who fought for
• 1:26:06
  Speaker 1: themselves chose to own the word and to use it
• 1:26:09
  Speaker 1: in defiance. This is what we have done with miss indry.
• 1:26:14
  Speaker 1: So there you go. They're basically trying to recapture. They're
• 1:26:19
  Speaker 1: trying to well not that they ever had it, but
• 1:26:21
  Speaker 1: they're basically claiming, we're we have to use the word
• 1:26:24
  Speaker 1: now because you can't pretend like it doesn't exist. So
• 1:26:27
  Speaker 1: instead we're going to reclaim it, which is why they're
• 1:26:29
  Speaker 1: basically saying, yeah, I'm a misinterest And the creator of
• 1:26:33
  Speaker 1: the video says and replies and says, that's not true.
• 1:26:36
  Speaker 1: Patriarchy is built on dominance and patriarchy is about power
• 1:26:40
  Speaker 1: sharing and mutuality. There are several other differences as well.
• 1:26:44
  Speaker 1: I recommend you do some reading on it. I don't know.
• 1:26:46
  Speaker 1: I guess there's a comment that's missing here where somebody
• 1:26:49
  Speaker 1: disagreed with them, and they probably deleted the comment because
• 1:26:52
  Speaker 1: I see missing context. So there you go. There. They
• 1:26:56
  Speaker 1: can't ignore the term missan, so they're going to try
• 1:27:00
  Speaker 1: and reclaim it.
• 1:27:03
  Speaker 2: So I think they're going to fail.
• 1:27:08
  Speaker 1: Yep, But I don't know what were you going to say?
• 1:27:15
  Speaker 4: I just, uh, I knew this was going to make
• 1:27:18
  Speaker 4: me angry.
• 1:27:23
  Speaker 2: Because it's you know, it's child abuse's just be clear.
• 1:27:28
  Speaker 1: Yeah, all right, absolutely absolutely, it's it's monstrous. Okay, yeah, So.
• 1:27:45
  Speaker 2: Do you have any other comments on the on the
• 1:27:48
  Speaker 2: article that you want to take a look at.
• 1:27:50
  Speaker 1: No, No, you can do your your analysis if you want.
• 1:27:54
  Speaker 2: Oh yeah, that's right. I can do my analysis. All right.
• 1:28:00
  Speaker 2: So where to begin?
• 1:28:05
  Speaker 7: Okay?
• 1:28:09
  Speaker 2: So the core finding of the vasappress and architecture. So
• 1:28:14
  Speaker 2: I'm going to analyze what we just read from the
• 1:28:16
  Speaker 2: architectural frameworks that I've developed is that normal men are
• 1:28:20
  Speaker 2: already running at custodial monitoring levels. Adding vasappressing to ASPD
• 1:28:30
  Speaker 2: men produces empathy, but it produces no measurable change in
• 1:28:34
  Speaker 2: normal men because there's no deficit to fill. The system
• 1:28:38
  Speaker 2: runs ambient custodial monitoring, scanning for threats to anybody nearby,
• 1:28:42
  Speaker 2: checking whether the man himself is a source of harm,
• 1:28:45
  Speaker 2: calibrating to the most vulnerable person in proximity. Across forty
• 1:28:49
  Speaker 2: four male authors tested the self monitoring substrate am I,
• 1:28:53
  Speaker 2: A threat to her appeared in every text during sequences
• 1:28:59
  Speaker 2: of an intimate nature. The provisional finding is that functional
• 1:29:03
  Speaker 2: men have constant monitoring built into their operating systems. The
• 1:29:09
  Speaker 2: monitoring separating them requires specific damage conditions developmental impairment plus
• 1:29:14
  Speaker 2: severe trauma, producing the ASPD pattern. The article this thing
• 1:29:21
  Speaker 2: that we just read operates from an inverted model. It
• 1:29:25
  Speaker 2: treats the antisocial personality disorder failure mode men without monitoring
• 1:29:32
  Speaker 2: male presence without custodial orientation as the male baseline. When
• 1:29:38
  Speaker 2: Pittock writes that miss injury in its true definition is
• 1:29:41
  Speaker 2: a valid prejudice due to the billions of distasteful actions
• 1:29:44
  Speaker 2: committed by men every second, she is taking the architecture's
• 1:29:49
  Speaker 2: breakdown state as the architecture's normal operation vasipressin research says
• 1:29:55
  Speaker 2: the opposite. The breakdown requires specific, identifiable damage, which the
• 1:30:00
  Speaker 2: functional system is biased towards overcaution, not predation. That's the
• 1:30:05
  Speaker 2: real critical thing. Men Men's failure mode is over monitoring themselves,
• 1:30:12
  Speaker 2: not undermonitoring themselves. Well, I mean, yes, there's a failure mode,
• 1:30:16
  Speaker 2: but that actually is interesting because antisocial personality disordered men
• 1:30:20
  Speaker 2: lack vas suppress and they lack a component of what
• 1:30:25
  Speaker 2: makes men men, and the disordered ones are actually oxytocin dominant. Now,
• 1:30:31
  Speaker 2: the non disordered ones may not be, they may not
• 1:30:33
  Speaker 2: have any bonding component whatsoever. But the key finding is
• 1:30:36
  Speaker 2: that men who are sociopathic are not fully male. They
• 1:30:43
  Speaker 2: are neuter or more female. They have more female dominant
• 1:30:47
  Speaker 2: emotions are hormones. The mad Max comment misogyny kills women,
• 1:30:56
  Speaker 2: miss injury makes men upset assumes that hostility directs that
• 1:31:00
  Speaker 2: men has no operational cost. Because men occupy a power
• 1:31:04
  Speaker 2: position that buffers the impact vasippress and framework identifies a
• 1:31:10
  Speaker 2: specific cost. The system is already biased towards over monitoring.
• 1:31:14
  Speaker 2: The failure mode of functional vas oppress and architecture.
• 1:31:16
  Speaker 4: Is over monitoring, not under monitoring.
• 1:31:19
  Speaker 2: Categorical hostility loads additional ideological weight into a system already
• 1:31:23
  Speaker 2: producing approach paralysis. The culture has taken an architecture biased
• 1:31:29
  Speaker 2: towards overcaution and pushed it further in the same direction.
• 1:31:32
  Speaker 2: That's what we're seeing right when we talk about the
• 1:31:35
  Speaker 2: birth rate declining. Men have been pushed into a state
• 1:31:39
  Speaker 2: of over monitoring. They're not approaching because they're over monitoring,
• 1:31:43
  Speaker 2: and this is predictable based on what the architecture produces.
• 1:31:49
  Speaker 2: Lpt's parenting post telling her daughter that women are smarter
• 1:31:53
  Speaker 2: than men, that men are women are better leaders is
• 1:31:56
  Speaker 2: a specific intervention in how her daughter will evaluate men.
• 1:32:00
  Speaker 2: It trains the daughter to be unable to read custodial
• 1:32:03
  Speaker 2: monitoring when she encounters it. If a man's monitoring function
• 1:32:06
  Speaker 2: is running, if he's tracking, whether he's a threat, whether
• 1:32:09
  Speaker 2: she needs something, whether his presence is harming her, that
• 1:32:11
  Speaker 2: behavior will be invisible to someone to train to read
• 1:32:15
  Speaker 2: all male behavior as dominance. The monitoring function becomes illegible
• 1:32:19
  Speaker 2: precisely because the interpretive framework has no category for it.
• 1:32:23
  Speaker 2: So she's not just teaching her daughter to so called
• 1:32:28
  Speaker 2: be superior. She's teaching her daughter the inability to recognize
• 1:32:33
  Speaker 2: when men are safe yeah, now I have an anecdote
• 1:32:39
  Speaker 2: about that. I think you guys know deadpool, Russian deadpool.
• 1:32:45
  Speaker 2: All the feminists he was with, the two feminists he
• 1:32:48
  Speaker 2: lived with, and the feminist he talked to, never noticed
• 1:32:52
  Speaker 2: that he completely lacked any custodial function. Okay, the okay,
• 1:33:02
  Speaker 2: I'm moving through here. The article is unimodal reading. It's
• 1:33:10
  Speaker 2: basically relational modality. Every claim is processed through relational topographical channels.
• 1:33:15
  Speaker 2: Who has power over whom, what the web of gender
• 1:33:18
  Speaker 2: relations looks like, what signals are being sent about status?
• 1:33:22
  Speaker 2: By the way, guys, relational thinkers obsessed with status, obsessed
• 1:33:29
  Speaker 2: with dominance. There's no operative content anywhere in the piece.
• 1:33:37
  Speaker 2: Means the article will be consumed and endorsed by social readers,
• 1:33:40
  Speaker 2: and will be relational readers, and will be invisible or
• 1:33:43
  Speaker 2: irritating to operational readers. I think I think we are
• 1:33:47
  Speaker 2: an object lesson to that. All right, Okay. So the author, Piddock,
• 1:33:54
  Speaker 2: is a second year anthropology student. She describes growing up
• 1:33:57
  Speaker 2: in Portland with a father who cooked clean and made lunches.
• 1:34:00
  Speaker 2: Her own experience is evidence against her article's thesis. She
• 1:34:03
  Speaker 2: was raised by a man writing custodial monitoring at high
• 1:34:06
  Speaker 2: resolution expressed through operative behavior making breakfast, packing lunches, managing
• 1:34:10
  Speaker 2: the household. And yes, Brian, if you do these things,
• 1:34:13
  Speaker 2: then it's a man doing these things. It's not femininity,
• 1:34:17
  Speaker 2: she names. It's so funny because feminists are like, oh,
• 1:34:24
  Speaker 2: he's being feminists. No, he's a man doing these things.
• 1:34:26
  Speaker 2: I guarantee he does them differently than a woman would.
• 1:34:30
  Speaker 2: She names these behaviors, but for once, for one thing,
• 1:34:33
  Speaker 2: men are more likely to teach their kids how to
• 1:34:36
  Speaker 2: do these things in terms of chores, it seems, because
• 1:34:40
  Speaker 2: they're more likely to want to instill competencies in their children.
• 1:34:43
  Speaker 2: She names these behaviors but processes them as a relational
• 1:34:46
  Speaker 2: signal about Portland's liberalism rather than evidence of an individual
• 1:34:50
  Speaker 2: man's custodial monitoring. The operative content what her father actually
• 1:34:54
  Speaker 2: did passes through the reading modality and arrives as a
• 1:34:57
  Speaker 2: statement about the social web up in the liberal bubble
• 1:35:01
  Speaker 2: of Portland. Who wasn't a man. It wasn't my father
• 1:35:04
  Speaker 2: who took care of me. It was the liberal bubble
• 1:35:07
  Speaker 2: of Portland acting through him.
• 1:35:10
  Speaker 4: He was simply a symbol of it.
• 1:35:14
  Speaker 2: Oh, anyway, treatment of equals the LPT tells her daughter
• 1:35:19
  Speaker 2: women are smarter than men, and men are better or
• 1:35:21
  Speaker 2: women are better leaders. This is the exact inverse of
• 1:35:25
  Speaker 2: treatment of equals. Well, yeah, duh, her daughter's be trained
• 1:35:30
  Speaker 2: not to see equality, but its opposite, category based assessment
• 1:35:34
  Speaker 2: that values group membership over individual competence. The Frameswork definition
• 1:35:38
  Speaker 2: of te equality is specifically that treating all members of
• 1:35:42
  Speaker 2: a category identically is the inverse of treating people as equals,
• 1:35:46
  Speaker 2: because it substitutes category membership for individual evaluation. And that's
• 1:35:50
  Speaker 2: what the social web does, friends, It treats people as categories, obviously,
• 1:35:57
  Speaker 2: because that's what they're doing. So when a social web
• 1:36:02
  Speaker 2: gets a hold of a category like left handed children
• 1:36:05
  Speaker 2: and it says left handed children are of the devil
• 1:36:08
  Speaker 2: or whatever they said, you know, it makes sense to
• 1:36:11
  Speaker 2: beat them. And when and when somebody with objective morality
• 1:36:16
  Speaker 2: looks at that, they say, how does this make sense?
• 1:36:22
  Speaker 2: Does it produce good outcomes? Is it consistent with a
• 1:36:28
  Speaker 2: moral framework of I don't know, not doing harm? If
• 1:36:32
  Speaker 2: it doesn't produce any good outcomes? And they that objective morality.
• 1:36:39
  Speaker 2: A person appealing to objective morality changes the social consensus,
• 1:36:44
  Speaker 2: usually at considerable cost to themselves. That is the trajectory
• 1:36:47
  Speaker 2: throughout all of human history. You know, when I when
• 1:36:52
  Speaker 2: I figure out, if I ever figure out that that
• 1:36:57
  Speaker 2: there is something worthwhile in the existence of social relational
• 1:37:03
  Speaker 2: webs like this one, a relational web like this one,
• 1:37:08
  Speaker 2: or relational webs generally, I will tell you, guys, I
• 1:37:13
  Speaker 2: will inform you that there's anything of worth in relational webs.
• 1:37:17
  Speaker 2: So far, still still looking for that that holy grail.
• 1:37:24
  Speaker 2: But yeah, so what we what we've just seen is
• 1:37:27
  Speaker 2: a relational web eating its own ass and celebrating child abuse.
• 1:37:34
  Speaker 1: Yeah, okay, absolutely.
• 1:37:39
  Speaker 2: Yes it is. It is disgusting and it's astounding to
• 1:37:43
  Speaker 2: me that these women don't can't tell what they're doing. Like,
• 1:37:48
  Speaker 2: we talk a big game about maternal love, but you'd
• 1:37:51
  Speaker 2: think it would be operating on some instinctive level that
• 1:37:56
  Speaker 2: you know, you don't do this to your child, right,
• 1:38:00
  Speaker 2: But no, apparently not. Okay, So there was there was
• 1:38:05
  Speaker 2: another video that I wanted to cover. It'd be really quick.
• 1:38:10
  Speaker 1: Okay, you got to send it to me, then.
• 1:38:14
  Speaker 2: I have to find it, be really quick. Okay, did
• 1:38:25
  Speaker 2: you have anything to add or did anybody send any messages?
• 1:38:28
  Speaker 1: I got one from Richard Bierre gives us five dollars,
• 1:38:31
  Speaker 1: and says Alison, the hated has always existed, it just
• 1:38:35
  Speaker 1: had a different targets. The same hatred led to people
• 1:38:38
  Speaker 1: having a revolution which resulted in the demise of landowners
• 1:38:42
  Speaker 1: who were farmers producing the food supply. And the justification
• 1:38:45
  Speaker 1: for ending the farmers was that the farmers had unearned
• 1:38:48
  Speaker 1: privilege and were oppressing everyone else. Of course, look at
• 1:38:52
  Speaker 1: how that turned out for everyone else when they eliminated
• 1:38:54
  Speaker 1: those who produced the food supply.
• 1:38:57
  Speaker 2: All right, yeah, condition, isn't it When when the relational
• 1:39:02
  Speaker 2: web gets a hold of the operative layer, it's just
• 1:39:05
  Speaker 2: like it. It just chews through it and spits it
• 1:39:08
  Speaker 2: out and then destroys itself. And and then we have
• 1:39:11
  Speaker 2: to re initialize human bonding and deprecation, creation of resources,
• 1:39:16
  Speaker 2: and a new civilization and creates. And then then we
• 1:39:19
  Speaker 2: have a relational web again, and it parasitizes everything and again.
• 1:39:24
  Speaker 2: If I ever figure out what's good about the relational web,
• 1:39:29
  Speaker 2: I'll tell you, guys. I'll you'll be guys will be
• 1:39:31
  Speaker 2: the first. Well, all right, so I sent you a yeah,
• 1:39:38
  Speaker 2: all right with something slightly amusing. This is, guys, this
• 1:39:42
  Speaker 2: is the relational web in action.
• 1:39:45
  Speaker 1: Okay, I'm just going to play the whole thing NonStop. Yeah. Yeah,
• 1:39:48
  Speaker 1: well it's a minute long. I don't think we're gonna
• 1:39:51
  Speaker 1: get dinged.
• 1:39:51
  Speaker 2: That's on X so it's it has no it has
• 1:39:54
  Speaker 2: no no actual conversation. But we might want to pause
• 1:40:01
  Speaker 2: it and just and just interpret some of it. It
• 1:40:03
  Speaker 2: won't take long even if we do interpret it.
• 1:40:07
  Speaker 3: Go ahead, Jesus, Okay, stop. Do you guys see this?
• 1:40:31
  Speaker 3: Do you guys see this?
• 1:40:35
  Speaker 2: Oh my god? Okay, so we probably should explain what's
• 1:40:38
  Speaker 2: happening to anybody who's who's just who's listening?
• 1:40:42
  Speaker 1: Ahead.
• 1:40:43
  Speaker 2: So a man is on a ladder, obviously trying to
• 1:40:49
  Speaker 2: fix something, and there's a been a seasoning on a
• 1:40:53
  Speaker 2: balcony and the ladder collapses under him and he catches
• 1:40:58
  Speaker 2: himself on the ledge and he has about three women
• 1:41:02
  Speaker 2: below him. And what happens is one woman picks up
• 1:41:07
  Speaker 2: the ladder and puts it against his feet like he does.
• 1:41:12
  Speaker 2: She doesn't brace it on anything.
• 1:41:14
  Speaker 3: She just touches it to his.
• 1:41:16
  Speaker 2: Feet as if that's going to do something. And of
• 1:41:20
  Speaker 2: course he's suspended there. And you know why he's suspended there,
• 1:41:23
  Speaker 2: because he's waiting for them to get the ladder out
• 1:41:25
  Speaker 2: of the way so he can jump down without hurting himself.
• 1:41:28
  Speaker 2: And she picks up the ladder, touches it to his feet,
• 1:41:31
  Speaker 2: and then throws the ladder off. Okay, let's keep going.
• 1:41:33
  Speaker 2: I'll exp as it goes on.
• 1:41:35
  Speaker 1: But all right, let's keep going.
• 1:41:38
  Speaker 2: Yeah, all right. And they don't get the ladder out
• 1:41:42
  Speaker 2: of the way. Now they're putting another obstacle in his way,
• 1:41:45
  Speaker 2: a series of very unstabable They.
• 1:41:50
  Speaker 1: Trying to guide him down from the ceiling.
• 1:41:54
  Speaker 2: Okay, okay, well, look he's five feet from the seat
• 1:41:58
  Speaker 2: from the ground.
• 1:41:59
  Speaker 1: I know, I know, I know, But I mean, like
• 1:42:00
  Speaker 1: they think they can just pull him down, like he
• 1:42:03
  Speaker 1: won't fall, like there's no like he can just it's
• 1:42:07
  Speaker 1: gonna down on top of the chair.
• 1:42:09
  Speaker 2: Yeah, somehow, But the chair is not. The chair isn't
• 1:42:13
  Speaker 2: the kind of chair that that would work. It's it
• 1:42:18
  Speaker 2: is a flimsy chair, and it's it is tippy, and
• 1:42:22
  Speaker 2: he knows that. So he's still suspended there. But here's
• 1:42:26
  Speaker 2: the thing. They don't need to do anything. They need
• 1:42:28
  Speaker 2: to move everything out of his way and let him
• 1:42:30
  Speaker 2: jump down. You see what I'm saying, Brian, Yes, they
• 1:42:34
  Speaker 2: want to help, but they don't understand the physics of
• 1:42:36
  Speaker 2: what's happening. He's five feet from the floor. He's not
• 1:42:40
  Speaker 2: gonna hurt himself by jumping down, So they keep bringing
• 1:42:44
  Speaker 2: objects to put underneath him for no reason, objects that
• 1:42:48
  Speaker 2: will hurt him if he jumps down, which is why
• 1:42:51
  Speaker 2: he's suspended from the ledge. And this, this, friends, is
• 1:42:55
  Speaker 2: is how relational readers solve a problem. Keep going, finish
• 1:43:01
  Speaker 2: it off. Just get everything out from under him. Just
• 1:43:07
  Speaker 2: just move everything, get rid of it. Okay, finally, finally
• 1:43:14
  Speaker 2: they've gotten it. Well, and there he goes, well they
• 1:43:18
  Speaker 2: finally they're finally moving the stuff. He's probably told him,
• 1:43:22
  Speaker 2: get get the stuff out. I can jump down, like no,
• 1:43:28
  Speaker 2: I don't need a box full of broken glass to
• 1:43:31
  Speaker 2: break my fall.
• 1:43:32
  Speaker 4: I just need you to get everything out of the
• 1:43:33
  Speaker 4: way so I can jump down.
• 1:43:36
  Speaker 2: Yes, okay, here you go, all right, and he jumps out.
• 1:43:46
  Speaker 2: I just thought that was hilarious because they couldn't figure
• 1:43:49
  Speaker 2: it out. This is this is the one woman touching
• 1:43:53
  Speaker 2: the the ladder to his feet. What the hell was she.
• 1:43:56
  Speaker 4: Thinking that was going to do. She didn't race it
• 1:44:00
  Speaker 4: on anything.
• 1:44:01
  Speaker 2: She just touched it to his feet as if it
• 1:44:02
  Speaker 2: would magically like it was like some kind of wizard staff. Yeah,
• 1:44:07
  Speaker 2: by some magic, this is gonna work. And then they're
• 1:44:11
  Speaker 2: bringing bringing obstacles that we will damage himself on if
• 1:44:15
  Speaker 2: he dumps. Just like, wow, how does how can we
• 1:44:21
  Speaker 2: expect these creatures to run a society? Am I being
• 1:44:31
  Speaker 2: an asshole? No?
• 1:44:33
  Speaker 1: No, no, I I don't have an answer to that question.
• 1:44:36
  Speaker 1: I I don't. Yeah, it was pain painful.
• 1:44:43
  Speaker 2: It's they're not bad.
• 1:44:45
  Speaker 1: No, they're trying to help, but they just don't know.
• 1:44:47
  Speaker 1: They they don't know how the physical world works.
• 1:44:50
  Speaker 2: Like he's just five feet from the ground. He doesn't
• 1:44:55
  Speaker 2: need anything except to get everything out of the way.
• 1:44:58
  Speaker 1: Yes, yes, he'll be okay, I mean the Yeah, he'll
• 1:45:03
  Speaker 1: be okay. Well, there's I mean, there's not much else
• 1:45:05
  Speaker 1: you can do.
• 1:45:06
  Speaker 2: You know, Yeah, I mean he does well. I guess
• 1:45:09
  Speaker 2: you could call the fire department and get a whole
• 1:45:11
  Speaker 2: bunch of men to get a yeah. Yeah, I don't know,
• 1:45:13
  Speaker 2: one of those those things those nets you fall into, yeah.
• 1:45:18
  Speaker 1: Right, trampoline or a giant like inflatable balloon thing like
• 1:45:24
  Speaker 1: a bouncy castle out.
• 1:45:26
  Speaker 4: Of bouncy castle.
• 1:45:27
  Speaker 2: Yeah, get a castle. Yeah wait wait there, wait there, dear,
• 1:45:31
  Speaker 2: let me get the ball pit.
• 1:45:33
  Speaker 1: Go rent a ball pit and have it shipped here
• 1:45:39
  Speaker 1: so you can land safely in it. Anyway.
• 1:45:42
  Speaker 2: Okay, if anybody ever says that women don't need men,
• 1:45:46
  Speaker 2: just show them this.
• 1:45:50
  Speaker 4: Okay, there you go.
• 1:45:51
  Speaker 2: And I don't know if this is something that just
• 1:45:54
  Speaker 2: happens to women when they aren't they don't get like
• 1:45:58
  Speaker 2: enough engagement with reality, Like I assume that a woman
• 1:46:03
  Speaker 2: on a farm wouldn't make these kinds of mistakes, but yeah,
• 1:46:08
  Speaker 2: or they just live in their little oxytocin web and
• 1:46:11
  Speaker 2: they don't realize that reality isn't a series of symbols,
• 1:46:15
  Speaker 2: you know, like the Internet's a series of tubes. Reality
• 1:46:18
  Speaker 2: is just a series of symbols, right, Yeah. The latter
• 1:46:22
  Speaker 2: is just a symbol. So if you touch the symbol
• 1:46:24
  Speaker 2: to the thing that you want the symbol to interact with,
• 1:46:28
  Speaker 2: that's all you need to do. There's no physics.
• 1:46:31
  Speaker 3: Okay, that's what it is.
• 1:46:33
  Speaker 2: These women live in a game with no physics.
• 1:46:37
  Speaker 1: Mm hmm.
• 1:46:38
  Speaker 2: Okay, all right, okay, all right, so yes, that's it.
• 1:46:45
  Speaker 1: Okay, all right, I guess we're.
• 1:46:47
  Speaker 2: Done anything interesting Through the comments, I think.
• 1:46:51
  Speaker 1: I read the one, I mean, Sinfinity said, well, women
• 1:46:56
  Speaker 1: could be like men if they really wanted to. Most
• 1:46:58
  Speaker 1: are children practically, I don't know. With a vern Slot
• 1:47:03
  Speaker 1: says women used to be a lot more badass, uh,
• 1:47:07
  Speaker 1: I mean, there's always been exceptional people, But I don't
• 1:47:10
  Speaker 1: think women and men have changed all that much.
• 1:47:14
  Speaker 2: I think women have changed, I would have to agree with.
• 1:47:18
  Speaker 2: I think when women actually have to deal with reality
• 1:47:24
  Speaker 2: as it is, I think that they are capable of
• 1:47:29
  Speaker 2: at least getting better or more a greater understanding it made.
• 1:47:35
  Speaker 2: It made. There may be a certain amount of limitation
• 1:47:37
  Speaker 2: to it. But if you go back to peasant societies,
• 1:47:41
  Speaker 2: they're always dealing with survival, threat and other aspects of
• 1:47:45
  Speaker 2: operative reality. And if the women didn't make at least
• 1:47:50
  Speaker 2: reasonably sensible decisions, they would have probably not survived. And
• 1:47:54
  Speaker 2: that probably holds true for our ancestral environment as well. Okay,
• 1:47:59
  Speaker 2: there was we didn't have welfare and avocado toast jobs
• 1:48:05
  Speaker 2: to just sort of like average out the meat hook
• 1:48:09
  Speaker 2: realities of reality in the past. So I think women
• 1:48:15
  Speaker 2: probably learned that you just get stuff out of the
• 1:48:20
  Speaker 2: way and let them jump down. But anyway, but again,
• 1:48:25
  Speaker 2: at least they were helpful, you know, at least you
• 1:48:28
  Speaker 2: have that they weren't helping, but they were helpful. Okay,
• 1:48:32
  Speaker 2: So if you would like to support the show, it's
• 1:48:36
  Speaker 2: Feed the Badger dot com slash support. Very much appreciated.
• 1:48:39
  Speaker 2: We are in the last hour, last day and we
• 1:48:44
  Speaker 2: have about three hundred and ninety three and fifteen to go,
• 1:48:50
  Speaker 2: so very appreciated if you help out Feed the Badger
• 1:48:53
  Speaker 2: dot calm slash support, and if you would if you
• 1:48:56
  Speaker 2: want to send us a message anytime after the show
• 1:48:59
  Speaker 2: is over, feed the Badger dot com slash.
• 1:49:01
  Speaker 3: Did you guys?
• 1:49:02
  Speaker 2: Did we actually do? I just realized did we do
• 1:49:06
  Speaker 2: what we We may have missed one of Noel's one
• 1:49:12
  Speaker 2: a comment from a while back we should have done
• 1:49:16
  Speaker 2: on Monday. Let me see if I can find it.
• 1:49:20
  Speaker 2: Sorry about this, Just give me a second. It's yeah,
• 1:49:22
  Speaker 2: it's from Okay no Gary Thomas Hannah just described the
• 1:49:27
  Speaker 2: plot of why No it was from Nikki Nikki Dark
• 1:49:31
  Speaker 2: Kiki Mora. Do you remember that? Yeah we did. We
• 1:49:36
  Speaker 2: get all of dark Kiky Mora's comments because oh yeah,
• 1:49:38
  Speaker 2: here we go Dark Kiky.
• 1:49:39
  Speaker 1: Mora before yea from oh yeah yeah, No, I forgot
• 1:49:43
  Speaker 1: about it.
• 1:49:44
  Speaker 2: You go back in the super Chow if you want
• 1:49:46
  Speaker 2: to read it. It's it's April twentieth. Sorry dark keky Mora,
• 1:49:53
  Speaker 2: this might be relevant. He was talking about Byrony's trad
• 1:49:57
  Speaker 2: Husbands Resent their Wives? Do you want me to read it?
• 1:49:59
  Speaker 2: Or can you?
• 1:50:00
  Speaker 1: Yeah? I can read it. Let me just go back
• 1:50:03
  Speaker 1: and find it's up here. Sure, yeah, Darkiymoor gave us
• 1:50:07
  Speaker 1: fifteen dollars thank you and said I know I'm late
• 1:50:11
  Speaker 1: and have extra for a long one. I was arguing
• 1:50:14
  Speaker 1: when this traad Husband's Resent their Wives study was being
• 1:50:18
  Speaker 1: pushed on Reddit a week ago, where the pedo mods
• 1:50:21
  Speaker 1: removed half my comments. You can go to Google and
• 1:50:24
  Speaker 1: pull up like five polls at least showing that women
• 1:50:28
  Speaker 1: view stay at home fathers more negatively than men do.
• 1:50:31
  Speaker 1: How about the fact that when it's a reverse setup
• 1:50:34
  Speaker 1: of s AHD and a FB, the wife resents the
• 1:50:40
  Speaker 1: man so much stay at home dad's and FB. I
• 1:50:43
  Speaker 1: don't know what the FB stands for. The wife resents
• 1:50:47
  Speaker 1: the man so much she demonstrats I have no idea.
• 1:50:55
  Speaker 1: I have no idea. The wife resents the man so
• 1:50:57
  Speaker 1: much she demonstrates it by divorcing him, and that maybe
• 1:51:00
  Speaker 1: distorts the statistics, even if they weren't orphan statistics in
• 1:51:04
  Speaker 1: the first place. If once they killed slaves more, they
• 1:51:07
  Speaker 1: would technically keep fewer slaves by virtue of slaves being dead. Duh. Also,
• 1:51:13
  Speaker 1: would you recommend reading the book Men on Strike or
• 1:51:16
  Speaker 1: do you have negative opinions on it? I want to
• 1:51:19
  Speaker 1: understand miktow better as someone trying to connect and fuse
• 1:51:22
  Speaker 1: miketaw ideas with role reversed relationships. If you can believe
• 1:51:26
  Speaker 1: it in a sort of blog I'm doing, Yes.
• 1:51:31
  Speaker 2: Go read Men on Strike. Also, I discussed extensively on
• 1:51:34
  Speaker 2: Monday the trad Husbands Resent their Wives study. First of all,
• 1:51:40
  Speaker 2: it wasn't trad husbands. It was a bunch of young men,
• 1:51:44
  Speaker 2: I think eighteen to twenty nine, seventy percent of which
• 1:51:47
  Speaker 2: did not know what they were talking about when they
• 1:51:49
  Speaker 2: said trad wives. And they handed them a summary of
• 1:51:54
  Speaker 2: what tradwives were. And those men, many of them didn't
• 1:51:58
  Speaker 2: even really complete the hire survey, made their opinions. The
• 1:52:03
  Speaker 2: seventy percent who had no idea what they were talking
• 1:52:05
  Speaker 2: about before they the researchers handed them a study, they
• 1:52:10
  Speaker 2: gave their opinions on what trad wives were. There was
• 1:52:16
  Speaker 2: I think eight percent of the men thought that trad
• 1:52:22
  Speaker 2: wives might be easier than going to work. Or at
• 1:52:27
  Speaker 2: least described them that way. And then there were men
• 1:52:33
  Speaker 2: who were hostile sexists. So they found a population of
• 1:52:38
  Speaker 2: men who thought that the trad wife lifestyle was easier
• 1:52:43
  Speaker 2: for women, and another population of men who were hostile sexists.
• 1:52:48
  Speaker 2: And they said that the hostile and apparently the hostile
• 1:52:52
  Speaker 2: sexists were more likely to endorse the trad wife lifestyle.
• 1:52:56
  Speaker 4: Than the other men.
• 1:52:58
  Speaker 2: But there were some men who thought that tradwivese were lazy.
• 1:53:01
  Speaker 2: So they put those two together and said, and I
• 1:53:04
  Speaker 2: think the amount of men who were willing to endorse
• 1:53:06
  Speaker 2: it was like forty nine percent or forty nine out
• 1:53:11
  Speaker 2: of five hundred and eighty five like this. Let me
• 1:53:15
  Speaker 2: be honest, the study is worthless, right, It's just it
• 1:53:22
  Speaker 2: is worthless. It is a worthless study, right. They got
• 1:53:26
  Speaker 2: their headline that they wanted based on an absolutely worthless study.
• 1:53:33
  Speaker 2: And nobody. I don't know why they're spending money on
• 1:53:37
  Speaker 2: crap like this instead of spending money on researching human endocrinology.
• 1:53:43
  Speaker 2: And I actually I know why, because if you researched
• 1:53:46
  Speaker 2: human endocrinology and how it's different in terms of men
• 1:53:52
  Speaker 2: and women, you would have inconvertible, incontrovertible proof that men
• 1:53:59
  Speaker 2: and women are different m and they can't handle that
• 1:54:05
  Speaker 2: because men and women can only be different in the
• 1:54:07
  Speaker 2: ways that they say they're different, which is not consistent
• 1:54:12
  Speaker 2: with reality. But you know, we can't have biotruth We
• 1:54:15
  Speaker 2: just you know, men always oppress women. But no biotruths, right,
• 1:54:19
  Speaker 2: we can't. We can't be bio essentialists describing categories to
• 1:54:23
  Speaker 2: groups of people. But men are the ones who rape,
• 1:54:27
  Speaker 2: Men are the ones with the disgusting behaviors. Men are
• 1:54:29
  Speaker 2: the ones who need to be controlled. Always men, you know, no,
• 1:54:34
  Speaker 2: no biosentialism. Feminism doesn't do biosentialism, but it's always men. Like, okay,
• 1:54:42
  Speaker 2: I'm good. Feed the Badger dot com slash support support
• 1:54:46
  Speaker 2: the show. Let me say that again without the stumbling.
• 1:54:51
  Speaker 2: Feed the Badger dot com slash support to support the show,
• 1:54:57
  Speaker 2: right Okay, yeah, yeah, that I did it and badger
• 1:55:04
  Speaker 2: dot com slash just the tip if you want to
• 1:55:06
  Speaker 2: send us a message, and badger nation dot online if
• 1:55:08
  Speaker 2: you want to read more about my work on Endercrine
• 1:55:12
  Speaker 2: architecture modalities, and well a lot of other stuff like
• 1:55:20
  Speaker 2: the BP Deepwater Horizon disaster, how human beings, ah, the
• 1:55:30
  Speaker 2: the the the circumstances and environments in which human beings
• 1:55:34
  Speaker 2: actually express para bonds other stuff like that. If you're interested,
• 1:55:37
  Speaker 2: Badger Nation dot online, come in and that's where I
• 1:55:41
  Speaker 2: put up my stuff because I prefer to write it
• 1:55:43
  Speaker 2: in a community because I am myself probably a relational
• 1:55:47
  Speaker 2: web thinker. All right, So anyway, that's that's it. Back
• 1:55:51
  Speaker 2: to you both.
• 1:55:51
  Speaker 1: Okay, all right, Well, if you guys like this video,
• 1:55:55
  Speaker 1: please hit like guys can hear me? Okay, okay, subscribe
• 1:55:59
  Speaker 1: If I'm just no, I just for some reason, my
• 1:56:02
  Speaker 1: name wasn't moving. Subscribe. If you're not already subscribe, hit
• 1:56:05
  Speaker 1: the belt Notifications, leave us a comment, let us know
• 1:56:08
  Speaker 1: what you guys think about what we talked about on
• 1:56:10
  Speaker 1: the show today, and share the video because sharing is caring.
• 1:56:13
  Speaker 1: Thank you guys so much for coming on this episode
• 1:56:15
  Speaker 1: of Maintaining Frame and we would talk to you guys
• 1:56:18
  Speaker 1: in the next oneco.
• 1:56:21
  Speaker 5: For Rati Pedo to the Jugular.
• 1:56:23
  Speaker 6: This is Honey Badger Radio Radio f