Latest / The Joe Rogan Recap / Bjorn Lomborg (2022) - Addressing Climate Change Smartly

Transcript

Bjorn Lomborg (2022) - Addressing Climate Change Smartly · The Joe Rogan Recap

• 0:00
  Welcome to the Joe Rogan recap. You tuned in because, well, you
• 0:03
  were looking for a clear fact based perspective on some of
• 0:07
  these big environmental issues, societal challenges too, maybe
• 0:11
  without all the constant negativity.
• 0:12
  Exactly. So let's just jump right into
• 0:15
  our deep dive. This is from a recent Joe Rogan
• 0:18
  Experience episode with Bjorn Lomberg.
• 0:21
  We want to unpack some key insights, maybe some surprising
• 0:24
  points. Yeah, Our goal here really is to
• 0:27
  get into the nuances. We're talking plastic recycling,
• 0:29
  climate change impacts. How effective are these
• 0:32
  solutions people talk about and even some, you know, unexpected
• 0:35
  takes on global health progress that sort of.
• 0:40
  Thing we'll try to sift through it, separate the the real
• 0:43
  concerns from maybe the overblown alarmism.
• 0:45
  Yeah, see what the data actually suggests.
• 0:47
  OK, so the conversation kicked off with something that
• 0:49
  honestly, it made me rethink things.
• 0:51
  Plastic recycling, like I think many of us.
• 0:54
  You put your bottles in the blue bin.
• 0:55
  You feel like, OK, I'm doing my part being a good person.
• 0:58
  Sure. The feel good factor.
• 1:00
  But the statistic that hit me was only about 5% of single use
• 1:04
  plastics actually get recycled. 5% that's well, it really
• 1:08
  changes your perspective doesn't.
• 1:09
  It it absolutely does. And that super low rate, it's
• 1:12
  not really just about people sorting wrong at home.
• 1:15
  You know, it actually points to bigger things like the basic
• 1:18
  economics, the technical limits of recycling some plastics.
• 1:22
  I mean, the cost to collect it, sort it, clean it, then
• 1:24
  reprocess it. A lot of the time it's just more
• 1:27
  expensive than the value of the recycled plastic you get out.
• 1:31
  So it's just not worth it, financially speaking.
• 1:33
  Pretty much for a lot of it, and that's a key insight, right,
• 1:36
  because it reframes the problem. It's not just about individual
• 1:39
  effort, though that matters, but maybe the bigger challenges are
• 1:42
  systemic waste management, materials science, that kind of
• 1:47
  stuff. And then, OK, this was the part
• 1:49
  I didn't expect, Lumberg brought up burning plastic.
• 1:52
  But like with special scrubbers on the smokestacks as maybe a
• 1:56
  better solution for disposal, even getting energy back, my
• 2:00
  first thought was wait, burning plastic isn't that way worse?
• 2:04
  It sounds counterintuitive, definitely, but do you think
• 2:07
  about the sheer amount of waste we make?
• 2:09
  Yeah. It makes you ask what's the
• 2:10
  overall environmental hit? These scrubbers, they're
• 2:14
  basically really advanced filters, OK?
• 2:16
  Use chemical reactions, filtration, stuff like that to
• 2:19
  grab most of the nasty emissions before they get out, potentially
• 2:23
  down to levels. You know, maybe even better than
• 2:26
  some older incineration methods. So cleaner than just dumping it
• 2:29
  in a landfill maybe? Potentially, yeah, Yeah.
• 2:32
  And given how little actually gets recycled, it's an
• 2:35
  alternative that maybe needs looking at right for disposal
• 2:39
  and energy. He mentioned a project, I think
• 2:41
  in Dhaka, Bangladesh, where the first step wasn't fancy
• 2:45
  recycling, it was just getting good trash collection going,
• 2:48
  Basic stuff. It's such a good point.
• 2:50
  Makes you wonder if sometimes we jump ahead, you know?
• 2:52
  It really highlights that basic need doesn't it?
• 2:55
  Good reliable waste collection before you even get to the high
• 2:58
  tech recycling. Just getting the trash picked up
• 3:00
  is huge for health for stopping plastic getting into rivers and
• 3:04
  oceans. Right.
• 3:05
  That's fundamental, Absolutely. Of course, the worry about
• 3:07
  microplastics that's still out there, potential health impacts,
• 3:11
  what it's doing to us, it feels like something we definitely
• 3:13
  need to investigate more and become so reliant on plastic.
• 3:16
  It's incredibly useful. But are there long term effects
• 3:19
  we haven't grasped yet? And that brings up the
• 3:22
  trade-offs. You know, plastic is amazing for
• 3:24
  packaging, hygiene, healthcare. Think about COVID, how vital it
• 3:29
  was. True.
• 3:30
  So we're balancing this usefulness against potential
• 3:33
  risks from it breaking down into microplastics.
• 3:36
  It's a tricky 1. Needs study.
• 3:38
  Needs innovation. OK, shifting years a bit, the
• 3:41
  conversation moved to something surprisingly positive, actually,
• 3:45
  the overall progress of civilization, right?
• 3:48
  The average life expectancy increase.
• 3:51
  This is wild. From about 32 years in 1900 to
• 3:54
  74 years today. Staggering, isn't it?
• 3:57
  It really puts current worries into a much bigger context.
• 4:00
  It really does that one number life expectancy.
• 4:04
  It captures so much lower infant mortality, way better nutrition,
• 4:09
  massive medical advances, better quality of life overall.
• 4:13
  It's proof we've made huge strides against really basic
• 4:17
  human problems. And it's not just history, it's
• 4:19
  still happening. Even in rich countries, life
• 4:21
  expectancy keeps ticking up like three more months for every year
• 4:25
  you live. That's incredible when you think
• 4:27
  about it. So yeah, it's right to worry
• 4:29
  about new problems like plastics or climate.
• 4:32
  Maybe we should also remember this overall upward trend.
• 4:35
  Absolutely. It shows our capacity to
• 4:37
  innovate to solve problems. New challenges pop up, sure, but
• 4:41
  history suggests we tend to find ways to deal with them over
• 4:43
  time. Which led to this this
• 4:45
  fascinating kind of scary story leading gasoline.
• 4:49
  Oh yeah, the lead story. Apparently adding lead made
• 4:52
  engines run smoother. Great idea, right?
• 4:53
  Yeah, but the massive unintended side effect was lowering average
• 4:57
  IQ, like across whole populations.
• 4:59
  Maybe about three to five points.
• 5:00
  That just seems bananas. It's a powerful cautionary tale,
• 5:04
  isn't it, about really thinking through the consequences when we
• 5:07
  roll out new tech or chemicals everywhere?
• 5:11
  Definitely what looks like a good innovation can have these
• 5:14
  really severe hidden health impacts.
• 5:17
  But then here's the twist in that story, which is also wild.
• 5:20
  Despite that IQ drop from lead, overall IQ scores have actually
• 5:24
  gone up dramatically over the last century, like, maybe 30
• 5:28
  points by some estimates. Yeah.
• 5:30
  They think it's down to stuff like better nutrition, healthier
• 5:33
  childhoods, more education, more stimulation, you know?
• 5:36
  So it's like lead pulled us back, but other improvements
• 5:40
  pushed us even further forward. Kind of seems that way.
• 5:42
  It's complex, right? Removing bad stuff like lead
• 5:45
  let's the good stuff have an even bigger positive effect.
• 5:48
  That makes sense. It shows how interconnected all
• 5:50
  these factors are for well-being, even cognitive
• 5:53
  ability. OK, so let's dive into the
• 5:55
  climate change part of the discussion.
• 5:57
  Rogan and Lomberg did acknowledge, You know, Earth's
• 6:00
  history. Massive natural climate shifts,
• 6:03
  right? Asteroid impacts.
• 6:04
  Ice ages. Huge sea level changes, like 400
• 6:07
  feet, sometimes it makes you ask, OK, what's our specific
• 6:09
  impact now? And that historical context is
• 6:12
  key. Yeah, climate change isn't new
• 6:14
  for the planet. Earth's climate has always
• 6:16
  fluctuated. What?
• 6:17
  But the overwhelming scientific consensus, like from the UN
• 6:21
  climate panel, the IPCC, is that most of the warming we've seen
• 6:26
  in the last, say, hundred, 150 years, that is down to human
• 6:30
  activity. Primarily.
• 6:32
  Primarily burning fossil fuels, releasing CO2 and also methane
• 6:36
  from things like agriculture. They mentioned the warming is
• 6:38
  about what, 2°F over that time roughly.
• 6:42
  Yeah. And while they accepted the
• 6:43
  science on human cause, the angle seemed to be OK.
• 6:47
  It's a problem needs attention, but maybe not an immediate
• 6:50
  existential threat. The big worries seem to be the
• 6:53
  impact on our cities, our infrastructure, stuff built for
• 6:56
  the climate we used to have. And that's a really crucial
• 6:58
  vulnerability. Our cities, our roads, our
• 7:00
  societies, they're all set up for a relatively stable climate.
• 7:05
  Even small average changes can cause big problems.
• 7:07
  Like more extreme weather? Yeah, more frequent or intense
• 7:11
  heat waves, storms plus sea level rise.
• 7:13
  Big risks, especially for coastal cities.
• 7:16
  OK, now this next bit really got me thinking.
• 7:18
  The idea that climate change is causing a surge in heart
• 7:21
  attacks. Right, you hear that sometimes.
• 7:23
  They looked at that pretty critically and yeah, extreme
• 7:26
  heat can correlate with more heart issues.
• 7:28
  Sure, stress on the body. But the overall data Heart
• 7:31
  disease rates have actually plummeted in the industrialized
• 7:34
  world for decades because of better prevention, better
• 7:38
  treatments. That's a really important
• 7:40
  distinction, isn't it? Correlation versus direct cause.
• 7:43
  Climate change might make some existing health risks worse,
• 7:47
  Maybe. But the big drivers of heart
• 7:49
  disease trends probably still lifestyle, diet, healthcare
• 7:54
  access. Yeah, they pointed to things
• 7:55
  like obesity, metabolic syndrome, you know, high blood
• 7:59
  pressure, blood sugar, cholesterol, belly fat, the.
• 8:01
  Cluster of issues. Right.
• 8:03
  And type 2 diabetes, those seem to be bigger factors if the
• 8:07
  decline in heart disease has slowed down recently.
• 8:10
  So maybe focusing on healthy lifestyles is a more direct way
• 8:14
  to boost heart health than just focusing on climate change.
• 8:17
  It definitely raises questions about where we focus our efforts
• 8:20
  or resources for the best public health results.
• 8:23
  Tackling known risk factors often gives you more immediate
• 8:27
  bang for your buck. Then came the statistic that I
• 8:29
  mean, it really surprised me. A Lancet study from 2015
• 8:33
  apparently showed rising global temperatures actually save
• 8:36
  lives. Oh, houses are around 166,000
• 8:40
  lives a year globally, mostly because fewer people are dying
• 8:44
  from the cold. Wow, OK, that's not the
• 8:46
  narrative you usually hear. Not at all.
• 8:48
  We focus so much on the dangers of heat right, But this suggests
• 8:51
  there's a big counter effect from fewer cold related deaths.
• 8:54
  Historically, cold has killed far more people worldwide.
• 8:58
  That's interesting. And get this, in the US
• 9:00
  specifically, way more people die from cold than heat each
• 9:03
  year. Something like 170,000 deaths
• 9:06
  linked to cold. Really.
• 9:07
  That many? Yeah.
• 9:08
  It shows how vital adequate heating is in winter, and maybe
• 9:12
  preventing heat deaths with AC is well, simpler or cheaper than
• 9:16
  making sure everyone stays warm in cold climates.
• 9:18
  That makes sense. It points to the importance of,
• 9:21
  you know, regional differences, socioeconomic factors, access to
• 9:25
  heating and cooling really matters for how vulnerable
• 9:28
  people are. So the conversation then kind of
• 9:30
  tackled the whole vibe around climate change, the end of the
• 9:34
  world narrative, the hysteria, the fear, especially.
• 9:37
  You see it in younger generations.
• 9:39
  The perspective offered was OK, global warming.
• 9:41
  It's a real problem, needs addressing, but maybe it's
• 9:44
  slowing down progress in a world that's otherwise getting better
• 9:48
  in many ways. It's aiming for a more balanced
• 9:50
  perspective, I guess. Yeah, avoid the kind of alarmism
• 9:53
  that leads to anxiety, but maybe not productive action.
• 9:57
  Right. Acknowledge it's serious, but
• 9:59
  also recognize the huge progress we've made.
• 10:01
  Elsewhere keeps things in proportion.
• 10:03
  They even shared data showing deaths from climate related
• 10:06
  events. Floods, droughts, storms,
• 10:08
  wildfires have dropped dramatically over the last
• 10:10
  century. Which is striking, isn't it?
• 10:12
  Totally stark contrast to the idea of impending doom.
• 10:15
  You know, people gluing themselves to paintings.
• 10:18
  Yeah, that long term trend, it shows how much better we've
• 10:23
  gotten at predicting storms, preparing for them, responding
• 10:26
  effectively. Better forecasting warnings.
• 10:29
  Exactly. Better infrastructure, better
• 10:31
  disaster plans, it all adds up. So the focus shifted then to
• 10:36
  more, I don't know, practical solutions, Maybe less dramatic
• 10:40
  ones like what? Like simple things?
• 10:42
  Better building codes? Example putting roof clamps on
• 10:45
  houses in hurricane zones. Simple engineering fixes.
• 10:50
  Could drastically cut storm damage, but may be overlooked
• 10:53
  when everyone's focused on huge global climate policies.
• 10:57
  It shows the value of focusing on concrete, cost effective
• 11:00
  adaptation measures. Local stuff, regional stuff.
• 11:03
  Sometimes those smaller things give you big immediate benefits.
• 11:06
  They talked about malaria too, predictions that global warming
• 11:09
  might increase malaria deaths, OK, but they framed it against
• 11:12
  the massive drop in malaria deaths that's already happened
• 11:15
  historically. Right.
• 11:16
  Huge progress there. And the point was look focusing
• 11:18
  only on cutting carbon to solve malaria.
• 11:21
  It misses the direct proven things like medicine and bed
• 11:24
  Nets. Yeah, targeted intervention.
• 11:26
  We can and should tackle multiple problems at once using
• 11:30
  the right tools for each job, right?
• 11:32
  Makes sense? Use direct public health
• 11:34
  measures for public health problems.
• 11:36
  They often work faster and better.
• 11:38
  OK, let's touch on the controversial stuff.
• 11:40
  Yeah, nuclear and fracking. Always lively topics.
• 11:43
  Nuclear power was presented, as you know, potentially safe,
• 11:46
  effective part of the solution despite public fear, citing data
• 11:51
  that shows way fewer deaths linked to nuclear power compared
• 11:54
  to coal per unit of energy. That's the interesting gap,
• 11:58
  isn't it? Public perception versus the
• 12:00
  statistical safety record of nuclear accidents are bad,
• 12:03
  obviously, but overall life cycle deaths per MW hour nuclear
• 12:07
  looks pretty good compared to fossil fuels.
• 12:09
  And then fracking, right? Game changer for US Natural gas.
• 12:13
  Cut carbon emissions by replacing coal.
• 12:15
  Big deal. Definitely shifted the energy
• 12:17
  landscape. But of course, environmental
• 12:19
  costs acknowledged air pollution mainly estimated around what,
• 12:23
  $25 billion a year? Yeah, local impacts are a real
• 12:27
  concern. But the economic benefits
• 12:29
  estimated at $180 billion. So it's this massive trade off.
• 12:33
  Absolutely. Energy, policy, economy,
• 12:35
  environment all tangled up. Fracking helped cut CO2, brought
• 12:39
  economic growth, but definitely has local environmental
• 12:42
  downsides that need tight regulation.
• 12:44
  And the kicker? Apparently RuPaul leases mineral
• 12:47
  rights for fracking. Get out.
• 12:49
  Really. Yeah, surprising real world
• 12:51
  example of these complex choices.
• 12:53
  OK. Then the cost of getting to net
• 12:55
  0 emissions just a huge number. Trillions.
• 12:59
  Yeah, trillions annually. One estimate was $6 trillion a
• 13:02
  year globally, like 2/3 of all taxes collected worldwide.
• 13:06
  Another study, $11,000 per person per year in the US just
• 13:10
  for an 80% reduction it. Highlights the sheer scale of
• 13:13
  the challenge financially. So the argument was maybe a
• 13:16
  smarter long term play is massive investment in green
• 13:19
  energy R&D. Yeah, focus on innovation.
• 13:21
  Make clean energy cheaper and better.
• 13:23
  They even mentioned growing algae to make CO2 neutral oil.
• 13:26
  Cool idea. It really emphasis is that
• 13:28
  technology breakthroughs are probably essential.
• 13:30
  We need innovation to make the transition affordable and
• 13:33
  scalable. The talk then widened out again.
• 13:35
  Beyond climate, other big global priorities that maybe get less
• 13:38
  airtime. Like what?
• 13:40
  Like tuberculosis, Still a massive infectious killer, but
• 13:44
  we have treatments, education, especially in the developing
• 13:47
  world, malnutrition. Fundamental issues.
• 13:50
  They mentioned simple cheap solutions having big impacts
• 13:53
  like teaching at the right level, using tablets in schools,
• 13:57
  huge improvement in learning outcomes.
• 13:59
  It's a good reminder, right? Climate is one challenge, but
• 14:03
  poverty, disease, lack of education?
• 14:06
  Tackling those has massive positive effects and makes
• 14:10
  communities more resilient to everything, including climate
• 14:13
  change. They mentioned a list like
• 14:15
  Smartest targets for the world based on cost benefit analysis.
• 14:18
  Oh yeah, things like boosting free trade, universal access to
• 14:21
  contraception, apparently huge bang for your buck in terms of
• 14:25
  positive impact. Interesting.
• 14:26
  And underlying it all, poverty. Being poor makes you way more
• 14:30
  vulnerable to climate change, to everything else.
• 14:32
  Absolutely. Reducing poverty improves lives
• 14:35
  directly, and it builds capacity to cope with environmental
• 14:38
  stress, health issues, you name it, it's interconnected.
• 14:41
  The hurricane discussion was interesting too, how much better
• 14:44
  satellite tech is now since the 80s.
• 14:46
  Yeah, we just see them much better.
• 14:47
  Which makes comparing data tricky before and after O saying
• 14:52
  definitively climate change caused this increase or decrease
• 14:55
  in frequency or intensity. It's hard.
• 14:58
  Natural variability is a huge factor, right?
• 15:01
  Attributing single events or short term trends is really
• 15:04
  complex. Natural cycles play a big role,
• 15:07
  making it hard to isolate the climate change signal sometimes.
• 15:10
  And while some data might hint at stronger storms potentially,
• 15:13
  maybe there's no clear proof they're happening more often.
• 15:16
  And, interestingly, hurricane damage as a percentage of GDP
• 15:20
  actually going down. Because we're better prepared.
• 15:22
  Seems so better. Forecasts, warnings, building
• 15:25
  codes, preparedness, adaptation works.
• 15:28
  That shows the power of proactive measures, doesn't it?
• 15:31
  Investing in resilience pays off.
• 15:33
  Finally, they touched on maybe why climate change gets framed
• 15:36
  so catastrophically sometimes. The motivations behind the
• 15:38
  narrative. Yeah, like maybe our natural
• 15:40
  human tendency to worry Media liking dramatic stories,
• 15:45
  political incentives, politicians promising to solve a
• 15:47
  huge crisis. Could be a mix of things,
• 15:50
  genuine concern plus other factors shaping how it's talked
• 15:53
  about. And the danger is if panic leads
• 15:56
  to bad, ineffective policies or just more polarization where
• 16:01
  nobody can talk reasonably. Yeah, that's a real risk.
• 16:04
  Be careful thought, not just reaction.
• 16:06
  So the wrap up was basically a strong cleave for balance.
• 16:10
  Nuance, acknowledge climate change is real, needs
• 16:13
  innovation, but it's not the only problem, maybe not even the
• 16:17
  most urgent, for many people globally.
• 16:20
  Right. Don't lose sight of poverty,
• 16:21
  disease, education. Exactly.
• 16:24
  Those are critical for improving lives.
• 16:26
  The idea that civilization is about to end because of climate
• 16:30
  challenge that directly offered a more optimistic view if we're
• 16:33
  smart about resources and innovation.
• 16:35
  It comes back to that holistic view, doesn't it?
• 16:37
  Tackle multiple challenges, focus on sustainable
• 16:40
  development, trust and innovation.
• 16:41
  That seems like the most promising path.
• 16:43
  Yeah. So hopefully this deep dive into
• 16:46
  that Rogan Lomberg conversation give you a fuller picture, maybe
• 16:49
  a less overwhelming one of some really critical global issues.
• 16:53
  It's clear challenges like climate change real need
• 16:57
  attention. But that balanced view,
• 17:01
  acknowledging progress, looking at a wide range of solutions,
• 17:06
  that seems essential. Definitely.
• 17:07
  The key things seem to be look at data critically, see the
• 17:10
  complexity, prioritize solutions that work environmentally but
• 17:13
  also economically and socially. And innovation seems like that's
• 17:16
  the real game changer, yeah. Feels that way.
• 17:18
  We really do encourage you. If you're interested, check out
• 17:21
  Bjorn Lomberg's work books like False Alarm, Prioritizing
• 17:24
  Development, Go deeper for sure. What stood out most to you from
• 17:27
  this? Any other questions these
• 17:29
  complex topics bring up? We genuinely love to hear your
• 17:32
  thoughts.