Latest / Politix / Golden Sour
Transcript
- 0:00SPEAKER_00: A lot of polycules, apparently, too.
- 0:01SPEAKER_00: A lot of polycules.
- 0:02SPEAKER_02: I think that polycule thing is overstated.
- 0:04SPEAKER_02: Because these are ugly nerds.
- 0:06SPEAKER_02: I think in particular, it's a very, very cosmopolitan movement.
- 0:10SPEAKER_02: You know, EA is, in a sense, the diametric opposite of America First.
- 0:15SPEAKER_01: They're such rootless cosmopolitans that they're thinking about future societies
- 0:18SPEAKER_01: on other planets and stuff.
- 0:24SPEAKER_01: Hey, everyone.
- 0:25SPEAKER_01: You're listening to a free preview of the Politics Podcast.
- 0:28SPEAKER_01: Donald Trump and the GOP are in deep shit.
- 0:31SPEAKER_01: His polls are terrible,
- 0:33SPEAKER_01: theirs are following his, and suddenly they're starting to break from him.
- 0:37SPEAKER_01: If not by name, then by deed.
- 0:40SPEAKER_01: They're opposing the Iran war,
- 0:41SPEAKER_01: calling for investigations of his family, and criticizing his immigration policy.
- 0:47SPEAKER_01: Democrats are poised to benefit, but they also seem to hate each other.
- 0:52SPEAKER_01: And it's exposing cracks in the united front.
- 0:54SPEAKER_01: Can they snatch defeat from the jaws of victory?
- 0:57SPEAKER_01: Then, as the artificial intelligence reckoning continues,
- 1:01SPEAKER_01: the people most hostile to AI safety advocates are homing in on one of
- 1:04SPEAKER_01: the field's little-known subcultures, effective altruism.
- 1:08SPEAKER_01: We'll talk about EA,
- 1:09SPEAKER_01: what it is,
- 1:10SPEAKER_01: whether it's a cult,
- 1:12SPEAKER_01: whether EA tech people deserve the scrutiny, or whether it's all just a witch hunt.
- 1:17SPEAKER_01: If you want to hear the whole conversation, you can upgrade to paid at politics.fm.
- 1:25SPEAKER_01: Hello and welcome to the Politics Podcast.
- 1:27SPEAKER_01: I'm Brian Boyler.
- 1:28SPEAKER_01: I'm Matthew Iglesias.
- 1:30SPEAKER_01: Matt, I want to rattle off a few observations and then kick it over to you for your response.
- 1:37SPEAKER_01: Are you ready?
- 1:37SPEAKER_02: Let's do it.
- 1:38SPEAKER_02: Okay.
- 1:39SPEAKER_01: America's greatest polling outfit,
- 1:42SPEAKER_01: a longtime favorite of mine,
- 1:44SPEAKER_01: ARG, American Research Group, clocked Donald Trump at an approval rating of 29%.
- 1:48SPEAKER_01: In Florida...
- 1:53SPEAKER_01: Maria Elvira Salazar cut an ad warning Donald Trump,
- 1:57SPEAKER_01: be careful what your advisors are telling you about immigration policy.
- 2:01SPEAKER_01: The same Hispanics who helped you get to the White House in 2024 feel betrayed today.
- 2:07SPEAKER_01: Also in Florida,
- 2:08SPEAKER_01: Byron Donalds,
- 2:09SPEAKER_01: the party's gubernatorial nominee,
- 2:11SPEAKER_01: the Republican Party's gubernatorial nominee,
- 2:13SPEAKER_01: has taken Donald Trump off of his campaign page.
- 2:17SPEAKER_01: In Utah,
- 2:18SPEAKER_01: Senator John Curtis,
- 2:19SPEAKER_01: who's not in cycle,
- 2:21SPEAKER_01: But who may be trying to be helpful,
- 2:24SPEAKER_01: called on the GOP Congress to investigate Donald Trump Jr.
- 2:29SPEAKER_01: for accepting money from a Vladimir Putin-aligned oligarch.
- 2:34SPEAKER_01: And then in Michigan and Iowa,
- 2:37SPEAKER_01: Republicans at the top of the ticket have called on Donald Trump to end
- 2:42SPEAKER_01: the Iran War.
- 2:43SPEAKER_01: I guess I should specifically say they have called on the Iran War to end
- 2:46SPEAKER_01: by some mystical means, but it's clear that they want it over.
- 2:50SPEAKER_01: So my question to you is, how good of news is this for John McCain?
- 2:56SPEAKER_02: John McCain, he's doing great.
- 2:59SPEAKER_02: I would bracket the Curtis thing a little bit because he was kind of slotted
- 3:03SPEAKER_02: in there by Mitt Romney.
- 3:07SPEAKER_02: You know,
- 3:07SPEAKER_02: to like deliberately orchestrate a like reasonable Republican
- 3:12SPEAKER_02: with honor Mormon guy out there.
- 3:15SPEAKER_02: So he's always been a little bit of a plant.
- 3:17SPEAKER_02: And also, what's her name?
- 3:18SPEAKER_02: The Florida rep, Salazar.
- 3:21SPEAKER_02: You know, she distanced herself from Trump on immigration in the 2024s.
- 3:30SPEAKER_02: She represents a very idiosyncratic district
- 3:33SPEAKER_02: that is super duper duper heavily Latino, but also quite Republican leaning.
- 3:39SPEAKER_02: There's a lot of Cubans there.
- 3:43SPEAKER_02: I'm really right wing,
- 3:45SPEAKER_02: but also concerned about racial profiling of Hispanics is like her sort
- 3:49SPEAKER_02: of wheelhouse.
- 3:50SPEAKER_02: But the Iran stuff, you know, that's the real signal in the noise.
- 3:56SPEAKER_02: Right.
- 3:56SPEAKER_02: I mean, people like Ashley Hinson and Mike Rogers, who, you know.
- 4:03SPEAKER_02: Not just supported this war when it started,
- 4:06SPEAKER_02: but like Mike Rogers has been a supporter of this whole policy trajectory over
- 4:11SPEAKER_02: a 10-year arc, right?
- 4:12SPEAKER_02: Because the war is the war.
- 4:15SPEAKER_02: It's a particular kind of disaster.
- 4:18SPEAKER_02: But the war isn't just something Trump dreamed up one day.
- 4:22SPEAKER_02: This is what going back to when Republicans opposed the Joint Comprehensive Plan
- 4:29SPEAKER_02: of Action, this was the alternative policy.
- 4:33SPEAKER_02: That they've been pushing for for a decade.
- 4:34SPEAKER_02: And Rodgers has been there the whole time.
- 4:38SPEAKER_02: And it's killing them.
- 4:40SPEAKER_02: You know, I mean,
- 4:41SPEAKER_02: I don't know how much voters actually understand that this increase in gas
- 4:49SPEAKER_02: and diesel prices is specifically due
- 4:52SPEAKER_02: to Trump's foreign policy versus something else Trump is doing.
- 4:56SPEAKER_01: But it is, you know, and it's a real puzzle there for them to solve.
- 5:01SPEAKER_01: Do you think that members of the public should be intelligent enough
- 5:03SPEAKER_01: if they're voting to know that the astronomical increase
- 5:08SPEAKER_01: in diesel prices has something to do with things happening in the world?
- 5:12SPEAKER_02: Well, I mean, we don't know.
- 5:13SPEAKER_02: I mean, because I think we know that, like,
- 5:15SPEAKER_02: people in the past have gotten very upset about gas price spikes that weren't
- 5:20SPEAKER_02: the fault of the incumbent president.
- 5:23SPEAKER_02: This one, like, it is.
- 5:24SPEAKER_01: Well, I think that there's a—
- 5:28SPEAKER_01: Maybe this election will help us suss this out, but there's always this question.
- 5:33SPEAKER_01: If gas prices are high,
- 5:35SPEAKER_01: if this economic metric is bad,
- 5:36SPEAKER_01: if the stock market's in a tumble,
- 5:38SPEAKER_01: whatever,
- 5:40SPEAKER_00: smart people usually say the president has little control over all that
- 5:44SPEAKER_01: and has
- 5:45SPEAKER_01: to rely on the public being intelligent enough about what a president does
- 5:50SPEAKER_01: and doesn't do to not make wild political swings as a result of these fluctuations,
- 5:57SPEAKER_01: right?
- 5:57SPEAKER_01: Yeah.
- 5:58SPEAKER_01: And sometimes that happens,
- 6:00SPEAKER_01: like Barack Obama was reelected when gas prices were fairly high for the time.
- 6:05SPEAKER_01: But now we have a situation where these problems are extant
- 6:11SPEAKER_01: and they've been around now for a while entirely because
- 6:15SPEAKER_01: of actions Donald Trump has taken unilaterally.
- 6:18SPEAKER_01: And it's obvious to all the people who normally say,
- 6:22SPEAKER_01: hey, you shouldn't be so quick to blame this on the president.
- 6:26SPEAKER_01: And so I feel like it's out there a lot.
- 6:28SPEAKER_01: And I would like to think that citizens of a great republic would be attuned to it
- 6:37SPEAKER_01: as well and would take it into account as they make their decisions about who
- 6:41SPEAKER_01: to vote for.
- 6:41SPEAKER_01: And it kind of looks like that's what's happening.
- 6:43SPEAKER_02: Maybe.
- 6:44SPEAKER_02: I mean, I think at a minimum what's happening is that Republicans
- 6:47SPEAKER_02: in swing races are telling Trump that they know that That
- 6:52SPEAKER_02: the war is what's driving up the cost of energy and they need the cost of energy
- 6:57SPEAKER_02: to go down like fast before the bottom falls out on their races.
- 7:04SPEAKER_02: I mean, the Florida thing is most telling
- 7:06SPEAKER_02: because like I don't think anyone really thinks Democrats are making a big run
- 7:10SPEAKER_02: at Florida governor this year.
- 7:13SPEAKER_02: It's just like there's not.
- 7:17SPEAKER_02: There's not much money in it.
- 7:18SPEAKER_02: You know,
- 7:18SPEAKER_02: it's like the Democratic Party kind of like left Florida for dead,
- 7:22SPEAKER_02: even though, I mean, I wrote about this, I think, six months ago.
- 7:26SPEAKER_02: By the numbers, Florida is a stretch, but it's not more of a stretch than Iowa.
- 7:34SPEAKER_02: And the whole time,
- 7:35SPEAKER_02: you know,
- 7:35SPEAKER_02: Rob Sand has been really in the hunt in Iowa and Josh Turek increasingly may be in
- 7:40SPEAKER_02: the hunt in Iowa.
- 7:42SPEAKER_02: So in principle...
- 7:44SPEAKER_02: There's no reason David Jolly couldn't win a gubernatorial election in Florida.
- 7:48SPEAKER_02: If anything,
- 7:49SPEAKER_02: it's easier to win a governor's race in a state with a huge Republican legislature,
- 7:55SPEAKER_02: right?
- 7:55SPEAKER_02: Because there's no legitimate basis to worry that public policy in Florida is going
- 8:02SPEAKER_02: to go off the rails to the left.
- 8:04SPEAKER_02: If you have some problem...
- 8:07SPEAKER_02: It'll be interesting to see how much the Republican cash advantage ends up mattering
- 8:12SPEAKER_02: in those kind of races.
- 8:13SPEAKER_02: Because like Florida,
- 8:15SPEAKER_02: there's just,
- 8:15SPEAKER_02: these are states that have not been targeted,
- 8:17SPEAKER_02: you know, like,
- 8:18SPEAKER_02: and Democrats are not,
- 8:19SPEAKER_02: I think,
- 8:20SPEAKER_02: going to pour last minute money into them the way they did in 2020
- 8:25SPEAKER_02: when they had more cash.
- 8:28SPEAKER_02: But, you know...
- 8:31SPEAKER_02: People are quite upset.
- 8:32SPEAKER_01: I think the only thing I want to take issue with is your framing at the top where,
- 8:38SPEAKER_01: you know,
- 8:39SPEAKER_01: I agree that the biggest issue because it's national and because it has to do
- 8:43SPEAKER_01: with war and so on is the Iran war and the knock-on effects on energy costs.
- 8:51SPEAKER_01: But I think that these are all telling the same story, right?
- 8:55SPEAKER_01: Like, Trump's numbers are bad everywhere.
- 8:58SPEAKER_01: Republicans' numbers are bad everywhere,
- 9:00SPEAKER_01: which means that where they normally expect to be strong, they're weak.
- 9:04SPEAKER_01: And so the fact that Salazar is speaking up to say something different because
- 9:12SPEAKER_01: the issues in her district are different is of a piece with the slide
- 9:17SPEAKER_01: that is universal across issues, right?
- 9:20SPEAKER_01: And...
- 9:22SPEAKER_01: I could have added more to the list.
- 9:26SPEAKER_01: In Nebraska, I keep screwing up.
- 9:31SPEAKER_01: No, it's Kansas,
- 9:33SPEAKER_01: where Adam Hamilton is mounting a really,
- 9:35SPEAKER_01: really strong underdog Senate race against the incumbent Senator Roger Marshall.
- 9:40SPEAKER_01: There is a big story that our friend Sarah Cliff broke for the New York Times
- 9:46SPEAKER_01: a couple of weeks ago about how Marshall,
- 9:49SPEAKER_01: as a doctor,
- 9:51SPEAKER_01: he's an OBGYN,
- 9:52SPEAKER_01: I think,
- 9:53SPEAKER_01: has
- 9:56SPEAKER_01: referred scores and scores and scores of patients to law enforcement for failure
- 10:04SPEAKER_01: to pay Their medical bills.
- 10:07SPEAKER_01: And in many cases, these are like highly sympathetic stories.
- 10:10SPEAKER_01: People who needed emergency C-sections.
- 10:13SPEAKER_01: They
- 10:17SPEAKER_01: couldn't afford some remnant of their bill.
- 10:23SPEAKER_01: He tried to take them to court over it.
- 10:24SPEAKER_01: They missed a court date.
- 10:25SPEAKER_01: They ended up in jail.
- 10:27SPEAKER_01: Like crazy stuff.
- 10:29SPEAKER_01: And so...
- 10:32SPEAKER_01: This guy is suddenly getting scrutiny that he's never gotten before
- 10:36SPEAKER_01: because it's Kansas and who scrutinizes Republican senators from Kansas.
- 10:43SPEAKER_01: But you have a different story also out of Florida about the DeSantis political machine.
- 10:51SPEAKER_01: Stealing a big chunk of a Medicaid settlement and directing it into
- 10:56SPEAKER_01: the Republican Party's coffers.
- 10:59SPEAKER_01: And so I think you also have this nationwide awakening
- 11:02SPEAKER_01: That admittedly should have happened in the first term about rampant corruption
- 11:07SPEAKER_01: in Republican politics.
- 11:09SPEAKER_01: And so when somebody like John Curtis,
- 11:11SPEAKER_01: who is not like necessarily a friend of Donald Trump,
- 11:14SPEAKER_01: but he's here to help the party,
- 11:15SPEAKER_01: ideally, starts talking about how we need to investigate corruption.
- 11:19SPEAKER_01: I don't think he's trying to be the fly in the Chardonnay.
- 11:22SPEAKER_01: I think he is making a statement to the Republican Party is that the public is on
- 11:27SPEAKER_01: to us about how how complicit we are in all this,
- 11:31SPEAKER_01: how in some cases directly involved we are in all this.
- 11:35SPEAKER_01: And if we are going to survive this election,
- 11:38SPEAKER_01: we need to convince at least some of those people that they're wrong.
- 11:42SPEAKER_01: And we can do that by like whipping up a last minute investigation of Don Jr.,
- 11:46SPEAKER_01: you know, just like we can, you know, maybe.
- 11:51SPEAKER_01: Salvage a point or two here or there in Michigan and Iowa if we ban exports
- 11:57SPEAKER_01: of diesel or if we get the Iran war over lickety split,
- 12:01SPEAKER_01: prices will drop just enough to save us.
- 12:05SPEAKER_01: It's a pan-election mindset,
- 12:09SPEAKER_01: even though it manifests in different ways where the issues that are salient differ.
- 12:15SPEAKER_02: Okay, so my interpretation of that is a little bit different.
- 12:19SPEAKER_02: I think that we are...
- 12:22SPEAKER_02: Starting to see, you know, Trump
- 12:27SPEAKER_02: as a lame duck coming into focus, right?
- 12:32SPEAKER_02: And part of the deal for,
- 12:34SPEAKER_02: you know,
- 12:34SPEAKER_02: if you're,
- 12:36SPEAKER_02: there's this block of sort of quiet internal resistance inside the Republican Party,
- 12:42SPEAKER_02: like people who have not gone,
- 12:45SPEAKER_02: you know,
- 12:45SPEAKER_02: bulwark or whatever,
- 12:47SPEAKER_02: but who would prefer it If the 2028 Republican Party nominee is a significant change
- 12:56SPEAKER_02: of direction from Donald Trump.
- 12:58SPEAKER_02: Right.
- 12:58SPEAKER_02: Like people who wish they could wave a magic wand and slot Mike DeWine in there.
- 13:04SPEAKER_02: Right.
- 13:05SPEAKER_00: And and that's Curtis.
- 13:07SPEAKER_02: That's right.
- 13:08SPEAKER_02: And I think that's Curtis and it's probably Todd Young
- 13:11SPEAKER_02: and probably several other senators who you just like don't see very much
- 13:16SPEAKER_02: on television.
- 13:20SPEAKER_02: We're chattering a little bit after January 6th and then really sort of went quiet,
- 13:26SPEAKER_02: you know, as Trump picked up steam again.
- 13:30SPEAKER_02: And, you know,
- 13:30SPEAKER_02: the question is,
- 13:31SPEAKER_02: is if Republicans take a big midterm thumping,
- 13:35SPEAKER_02: as it seems like they are going to, does that become a new...
- 13:39SPEAKER_02: Perestroika moment,
- 13:41SPEAKER_02: not even necessarily to say it's time to throw Trump overboard because it's sort
- 13:45SPEAKER_02: of too late.
- 13:46SPEAKER_02: It's too baked into the cake, but to, you know, let's open up some possibilities for 2028.
- 13:54SPEAKER_02: You know,
- 13:54SPEAKER_02: that like Trump has been dragging
- 13:59SPEAKER_02: the Republican Trump has been spending political capital.
- 14:04SPEAKER_02: Among other things,
- 14:06SPEAKER_02: like his son's Russian oligarch bribes,
- 14:10SPEAKER_02: you know, things that are not ideological goals of the conservative movement.
- 14:15SPEAKER_02: So, I mean, I'll be interested to see what happens there after it comes.
- 14:18SPEAKER_02: Something I've been trying to look at today is,
- 14:20SPEAKER_02: you know,
- 14:21SPEAKER_02: if you do like a really naive projection,
- 14:25SPEAKER_02: right, you assume a uniform swing, which is wrong, but it's an okay approximation.
- 14:31SPEAKER_02: Democrats could win a trifecta in Arizona.
- 14:34SPEAKER_02: As well as winning back the trifectas in Michigan and Minnesota.
- 14:41SPEAKER_02: They have an outside chance of winning the trifecta in Pennsylvania, although it's hard there.
- 14:47SPEAKER_02: They will break the Republican supermajority in North Carolina so
- 14:51SPEAKER_02: that Josh Stein's veto will hold up against everything.
- 14:55SPEAKER_02: They'll probably flip the House in Georgia as well as win the governor's election there.
- 15:02SPEAKER_02: So there's like a lot in the mix that's a little bit,
- 15:06SPEAKER_02: you know,
- 15:06SPEAKER_02: it's flying below the radar because,
- 15:07SPEAKER_02: of course, people are mostly focused on these sort of marquee Senate races.
- 15:12SPEAKER_02: But the deeper you go, the more you get into –
- 15:17SPEAKER_02: Deep shit for sort of random Republicans who thought they were safe,
- 15:21SPEAKER_02: you know,
- 15:22SPEAKER_02: because even if you're not,
- 15:23SPEAKER_02: very few members of the Arizona state legislature are going to lose their seats.
- 15:29SPEAKER_02: But if you're in that Republican caucus and throwing...
- 15:32SPEAKER_02: I mean, I think the predominant view on the right is still...
- 15:49SPEAKER_02: You know,
- 15:50SPEAKER_02: that the polls are skewed,
- 15:51SPEAKER_02: that this is 2020 all over again,
- 15:53SPEAKER_02: that it's going to be okay,
- 15:55SPEAKER_02: that MAGA Inc. Is going to bail us out with its $400 million of spending.
- 16:01SPEAKER_02: But you're beginning to see, you know, the potential indicators of a panic.
- 16:06SPEAKER_01: Yeah.
- 16:07SPEAKER_01: I mean, I think it's – my expectation is that there will be,
- 16:11SPEAKER_01: much like there was in 2024,
- 16:14SPEAKER_01: a unified national swing – That is different in highly contested
- 16:22SPEAKER_00: states than
- 16:22SPEAKER_00: in not highly contested states.
- 16:26SPEAKER_00: And I don't actually know which way that cuts.
- 16:29SPEAKER_01: Presumably where Republicans are campaigning most heavily,
- 16:33SPEAKER_01: you'll get more Republican turnout to offset what I think of as baked in mass,
- 16:39SPEAKER_01: like Democratic and independent revulsion at Donald Trump.
- 16:47SPEAKER_01: You know, some correlates, right?
- 16:50SPEAKER_01: Like, you mentioned Florida and Iowa in the same breath a few minutes ago.
- 16:55SPEAKER_01: And like, I actually don't view those states as having too much in common.
- 17:00SPEAKER_01: But like the Sun Belt politics tend to resemble one another,
- 17:05SPEAKER_01: just like the Upper Midwest politics tend to resemble one another.
- 17:08SPEAKER_01: And...
- 17:14SPEAKER_01: Anyway,
- 17:17SPEAKER_01: my sense is that the way that washes is like 2018,
- 17:23SPEAKER_01: but instead of Trump being at 40%, he'll be several points below that.
- 17:27SPEAKER_01: Instead of the public being like, okay,
- 17:29SPEAKER_01: this is working out all right,
- 17:30SPEAKER_01: because even though he's boorish and maybe a little bit ignorant,
- 17:35SPEAKER_01: like he's doing a decent job, the economy is good.
- 17:39SPEAKER_01: It was in that climate that they gave Democrats- An eight to nine percent,
- 17:43SPEAKER_01: I think, national popular vote victory for the House of Representatives.
- 17:51SPEAKER_01: I do think the big difference- But everyone hates him now.
- 17:54SPEAKER_02: Well, but also,
- 17:55SPEAKER_02: you know,
- 17:55SPEAKER_02: in 2018, I think Democrats felt great about the 2018 result at the time it occurred.
- 18:04SPEAKER_02: But I think Republicans,
- 18:06SPEAKER_02: after, you know, they dusted themselves off- Decided that they felt okay about it.
- 18:14SPEAKER_02: Like they gained Senate seats in 2018.
- 18:19SPEAKER_02: You know, and some of that was the map and so on and so forth.
- 18:21SPEAKER_02: But it was like, okay, well, we passed our big law, big reconciliation bill.
- 18:27SPEAKER_02: And we confirmed our Supreme Court justice.
- 18:30SPEAKER_02: And we gain Senate seats so we can actually just keep filling the judiciary
- 18:36SPEAKER_02: and we're going to just fight on to the reelection because it's normal.
- 18:38SPEAKER_02: Like almost every presidency takes a step back in the midterms.
- 18:43SPEAKER_02: And so I think it was actually reasonable of them to say that they absorbed
- 18:48SPEAKER_02: the 2018 backlash in a reasonably healthy position.
- 18:53SPEAKER_02: And here we are looking potentially at something quite different from that,
- 18:59SPEAKER_02: where they blow a lot of favorable Senate and governor's races, right?
- 19:05SPEAKER_02: Like I think Amy Acton is now favored in the Ohio governor's race.
- 19:10SPEAKER_02: Rob Sand is definitely favored in the Iowa governor's race, right?
- 19:17SPEAKER_02: I don't think there is like a big backlash against the Republican governor
- 19:20SPEAKER_02: in Nevada,
- 19:21SPEAKER_02: but there's a very good chance that he's going to lose anyway because it's a it's
- 19:25SPEAKER_02: a blue state and Republicans are super unpopular.
- 19:28SPEAKER_02: And he hasn't been like a Phil Scott mode,
- 19:30SPEAKER_02: you know, super heterodox Republican and stuff like that.
- 19:33SPEAKER_02: So we're going to see if this polling holds up a lot of people.
- 19:39SPEAKER_02: I mean, a broad range of stakeholders in conservative politics.
- 19:44SPEAKER_02: You know,
- 19:45SPEAKER_02: paying the cost here and not being able to get what they want over
- 19:49SPEAKER_02: the next two years.
- 19:50SPEAKER_01: So I think it was I think it was what you said.
- 19:53SPEAKER_01: They because the map was bad.
- 19:56SPEAKER_01: It was you know, it was two cycles on from from the big Democratic sweep in 2006.
- 20:03SPEAKER_01: So you just had a lot of Democrats representing states that they.
- 20:09SPEAKER_01: Probably had no business winning, some of which they kept when Barack Obama was reelected.
- 20:13SPEAKER_01: And so all that got washed away.
- 20:14SPEAKER_01: And so Republicans won two Senate seats, which gave Trump something to hang.
- 20:18SPEAKER_01: He never admits defeat.
- 20:20SPEAKER_01: And if he loses big this time,
- 20:21SPEAKER_01: he will just blame it on fraud and Republicans not doing what he told him to and
- 20:26SPEAKER_01: the Supreme Court betraying him and all that.
- 20:28SPEAKER_01: But he was able to come out in 2018 and say, this was great.
- 20:30SPEAKER_01: It was almost a perfect victory.
- 20:32SPEAKER_01: I think it's like a direct quote from him.
- 20:35SPEAKER_01: And then the third aspect of it,
- 20:37SPEAKER_01: and this will happen this year too, because it's almost mechanical.
- 20:42SPEAKER_01: It's that in a wipeout, the people who are left over tend to be the most ideologically extreme.
- 20:47SPEAKER_01: And in the Republican Party, that means the most closely aligned with Trump.
- 20:50SPEAKER_01: So you get this like really hardened...
- 20:53SPEAKER_01: Rump.
- 20:54SPEAKER_01: And, uh, in 2018, that was what was left over in the house.
- 20:58SPEAKER_01: So instead of being like, whoops, we should detach from this guy.
- 21:01SPEAKER_01: He just cost us a lot of, you know, our, our, our majority in the house.
- 21:06SPEAKER_01: Um, he's dead weight.
- 21:07SPEAKER_01: They were like, you know, full, full steam ahead.
- 21:10SPEAKER_01: Um, I do want to talk about the money though,
- 21:12SPEAKER_01: because, um,
- 21:15SPEAKER_01: money's coming, uh,
- 21:17SPEAKER_00: coming in hot and, um,
- 21:20SPEAKER_00: I feel like the national environment
- 21:23SPEAKER_01: is so good that it should,
- 21:27SPEAKER_01: in some sense,
- 21:28SPEAKER_01: be this unifying force,
- 21:32SPEAKER_01: this almost like a tailwind that gives Democrats an internal sense
- 21:41SPEAKER_01: of forward momentum so that they're projecting strength and confidence.
- 21:47SPEAKER_01: In practice, they are at best, I think, trying not to upset the apple cart.
- 21:51SPEAKER_01: And then there was a Politico story late last week about how in frontline races,
- 21:59SPEAKER_01: they talked to three frontline race consultants,
- 22:03SPEAKER_01: but I think it's more widespread than that.
- 22:06SPEAKER_01: The guidance is don't...
- 22:12SPEAKER_01: Don't go too hot on AI stuff because then the money is going to come after you and
- 22:17SPEAKER_01: then we don't know if we can see you through to victory even though
- 22:23SPEAKER_01: the national environment is so favorable.
- 22:26SPEAKER_01: And then in addition to all this fear of the money, you have typical factional stuff.
- 22:33SPEAKER_01: You have Jared Golden,
- 22:34SPEAKER_01: who's retiring,
- 22:36SPEAKER_01: going out by trying to get his Republican friend Mike Lawler reelected,
- 22:40SPEAKER_01: endorsing an endangered House Republican.
- 22:44SPEAKER_00: And I don't know if there's anything new on the John Fetterman front,
- 22:47SPEAKER_00: but we threw him into our, does that say I'm sorry?
- 22:50SPEAKER_02: It says fuck Jared Golden.
- 22:53SPEAKER_02: No, so this is, the Golden and Fetterman stories in my mind are linked, right?
- 22:59SPEAKER_02: Because the problem is, right,
- 23:02SPEAKER_02: like Jared Golden last cycle when Joe Biden was still on the ticket
- 23:09SPEAKER_02: and looked like he was staying there stubbornly and it seemed like it was going
- 23:12SPEAKER_02: to be borderline impossible for a guy in a district like Golden's to hold out.
- 23:18SPEAKER_02: He did the thing that I think is unforgivable to normie Democrats, even in a really tough race.
- 23:27SPEAKER_02: And he was like, I don't think Donald Trump is a threat to democracy, right?
- 23:32SPEAKER_02: Which in a way is a really smart moderation.
- 23:37SPEAKER_02: You know,
- 23:38SPEAKER_02: it has a lot of impact with the crossover voters who Jared Golden is trying to get
- 23:42SPEAKER_02: and also has no like concrete meaning.
- 23:47SPEAKER_02: At any rate, Biden left the ticket, was replaced by Harris.
- 23:51SPEAKER_02: Biden won Golden's district very handily.
- 23:54SPEAKER_02: Golden won re-election narrowly.
- 23:56SPEAKER_01: Wait, Trump won.
- 23:59SPEAKER_02: Trump, Trump, rather.
- 24:01SPEAKER_02: Golden then returns to Congress and he's like a quite loyal Democrat.
- 24:07SPEAKER_02: Like he voted with the party on the Protect Women's Sports Act.
- 24:12SPEAKER_02: You know what I mean?
- 24:13SPEAKER_02: Like he was not defecting on the big...
- 24:16SPEAKER_02: Policy issues.
- 24:18SPEAKER_02: He had kind of threaded this moderation but not on a vote thing, you know, sort of just right.
- 24:26SPEAKER_02: But people were really mad at him over that.
- 24:29SPEAKER_02: He was getting a lot of shit at town halls and stuff from Indivisible.
- 24:34SPEAKER_02: And the state auditor was going to hop into a primary and run against him from the left.
- 24:40SPEAKER_02: And then Golden decides that he's going to take his marbles and go home.
- 24:44SPEAKER_02: And so it's like, you can't fire me, I quit.
- 24:49SPEAKER_02: And ever since stepping aside,
- 24:53SPEAKER_02: it's not like Golden has been, well,
- 24:56SPEAKER_02: now I can vote whatever and I'm not concerned about my re-election,
- 25:01SPEAKER_02: I'm going to live out.
- 25:02SPEAKER_02: It's been more like Golden is mad.
- 25:05SPEAKER_02: And so...
- 25:07SPEAKER_02: He's just beefing with people about different stuff.
- 25:09SPEAKER_02: Then this guy,
- 25:09SPEAKER_02: Baldacci,
- 25:10SPEAKER_02: who Golden wanted to win the nomination to run to replace him,
- 25:15SPEAKER_02: lost the primary to the state auditor, Matt Dunlap.
- 25:19SPEAKER_02: And then Golden broke party discipline on a rule vote in order
- 25:24SPEAKER_02: to get this lobster regulation thing done.
- 25:28SPEAKER_01: Just so listeners know, before any vote on a bill in the House...
- 25:34SPEAKER_01: They typically pass a rule, right?
- 25:37SPEAKER_01: And it just like establishes what the procedure is going to be for the final passage vote.
- 25:43SPEAKER_01: And the standard thing and really in both parties is that you don't.
- 25:49SPEAKER_01: Don't break with the party on the rule vote.
- 25:52SPEAKER_00: I want some nuance though,
- 25:53SPEAKER_00: because- I just want to,
- 25:56SPEAKER_00: this is me like establishing terms for listeners because it's arcane Congress shit.
- 26:01SPEAKER_00: And like one way to gauge party unity
- 26:05SPEAKER_01: is to see how well
- 26:09SPEAKER_01: the leadership can enforce unity on those votes.
- 26:12SPEAKER_01: And in recent weeks,
- 26:14SPEAKER_01: Jared Golden and Marie Klusenkamp Perez have- Seemingly
- 26:19SPEAKER_01: without like giving anyone heads up, just defected on the rule vote.
- 26:24SPEAKER_01: And in doing so,
- 26:27SPEAKER_01: helping salvage a rule that would have failed,
- 26:30SPEAKER_01: thus derailing all of Republicans' plans.
- 26:33SPEAKER_02: Okay, that's the news.
- 26:35SPEAKER_02: So, you know, progressives defected from the rule en masse twice during the Biden presidency.
- 26:44SPEAKER_02: Once about a crime bill and once about...
- 26:48SPEAKER_02: A Ukraine aid package.
- 26:50SPEAKER_02: So it's not like this never happens.
- 26:54SPEAKER_02: Those were, though, bipartisan rules, which passed easily.
- 27:01SPEAKER_02: The difference with this rule vote on a package that included the lobsters,
- 27:07SPEAKER_02: but was mostly about the Russia sanctions, is that Jared and Marie...
- 27:14SPEAKER_02: Really just Jared,
- 27:15SPEAKER_02: because it seems like Glusenkamparas was doing it as a favor to him,
- 27:21SPEAKER_02: could have sunk the whole thing in a way that would have been, I mean,
- 27:26SPEAKER_02: Republicans would have gotten it done one way or the other,
- 27:28SPEAKER_02: but it would have been embarrassing.
- 27:30SPEAKER_02: And it's just like good partisan politics fun.
- 27:33SPEAKER_02: And so you see like two guys who are the opposite of gold in this sense,
- 27:37SPEAKER_02: like Henry Cuellar and They've just voted with Republicans, but they...
- 27:57SPEAKER_02: Upheld party discipline on these process votes because they intend
- 28:01SPEAKER_02: to win re-election in November and continue to be members of the party
- 28:05SPEAKER_02: in good standing.
- 28:07SPEAKER_02: And, you know, so it's Golden is saying, fuck you on his way out the door.
- 28:13SPEAKER_02: And then the real fuck you is he...
- 28:17SPEAKER_02: Wrote an op-ed for a local newspaper in Westchester to endorse Mike Lawler,
- 28:23SPEAKER_02: vouch for his bona fides.
- 28:25SPEAKER_02: When Lawler is running against Kate Conley,
- 28:28SPEAKER_02: who's like a pretty good moderate recruit, Lawler's very vulnerable.
- 28:33SPEAKER_02: And, you know.
- 28:35SPEAKER_02: He's a piece of shit, too.
- 28:37SPEAKER_02: Like, he sucks.
- 28:38SPEAKER_02: Yeah.
- 28:38SPEAKER_02: Yeah.
- 28:40SPEAKER_02: I wouldn't endorse him.
- 28:42SPEAKER_02: I like his beard, you know.
- 28:44SPEAKER_02: I mean.
- 28:44SPEAKER_02: He's got some good stuff
- 28:45SPEAKER_00: going on.
- 28:45SPEAKER_00: No, it's just.
- 28:46SPEAKER_00: Ask your buddy.
- 28:47SPEAKER_00: I mean, she's my buddy too, I guess, in some, you know, whatever.
- 28:51SPEAKER_00: Ask Liz Smith what she thinks of Mike Lawler.
- 28:52SPEAKER_02: Yeah, she doesn't like him.
- 28:54SPEAKER_02: Not a fan.
- 28:54SPEAKER_02: She's working for Kate Conley.
- 28:56SPEAKER_02: But this is what I mean.
- 28:58SPEAKER_02: There's a lot of things Golden could do with his waning days in Congress.
- 29:03SPEAKER_02: Blue Dog Pack has a bunch of challengers who they're endorsing.
- 29:08SPEAKER_02: Golden could be trying to help them.
- 29:11SPEAKER_02: He could be doing anything, and this is what he's choosing to do.
- 29:16SPEAKER_02: He'll be gone and it sort of doesn't matter.
- 29:19SPEAKER_02: But I think we're going to have this same problem with Fetterman,
- 29:23SPEAKER_02: who people have gotten increasingly mad at over different things that he's said
- 29:28SPEAKER_02: and done,
- 29:31SPEAKER_02: and who couldn't possibly win a Democratic primary under these conditions,
- 29:36SPEAKER_02: but who has that seat until 2028.
- 29:40SPEAKER_02: And I think if Democrats,
- 29:41SPEAKER_02: you know,
- 29:43SPEAKER_02: do really well,
- 29:45SPEAKER_02: And end up with 51 Senate seats that the odds are really high that Fetterman's going
- 29:51SPEAKER_02: to flip because nobody has known,
- 29:54SPEAKER_02: you know,
- 29:55SPEAKER_02: not just over the past week,
- 29:56SPEAKER_02: but over the past year,
- 29:58SPEAKER_02: how to like get out of this spiral of Fetterman has antagonized the base.
- 30:05SPEAKER_02: The base wants to say antagonistic things about Fetterman.
- 30:09SPEAKER_02: And so nobody wants to be like the Fetterman defender,
- 30:12SPEAKER_02: but then,
- 30:13SPEAKER_02: you know,
- 30:14SPEAKER_02: he's like,
- 30:15SPEAKER_02: Angry and there's no leverage because he's not within a million light years
- 30:23SPEAKER_02: of winning re-election as a Democrat in that state.
- 30:26SPEAKER_02: And so we may just be totally fucked on that front.
- 30:29SPEAKER_02: Now, Nate Silver's latest model says he thinks Democrats will get 52 Senate seats.
- 30:35SPEAKER_02: I can't even contemplate that level of optimism about the Senate map.
- 30:39SPEAKER_02: That's a I mean, you know, he's got a lot of math.
- 30:43SPEAKER_02: 52 is a lot.
- 30:45SPEAKER_02: So I'm concerned.
- 30:46SPEAKER_02: You know,
- 30:46SPEAKER_02: it's like who who amongst us would run a kiss John Fetterman's ass initiative
- 30:52SPEAKER_02: at this point in time?
- 30:53SPEAKER_02: And yet it could be urgently needed come winter.
- 30:56SPEAKER_00: Why do these moderate men just like why are their egos so fragile?
- 31:01SPEAKER_00: Why can't they just be be men?
- 31:04SPEAKER_02: Well, you know, I mean, John Fennerman's not really a, not really a moderate man.
- 31:09SPEAKER_02: He was the, he was the left's champion, the alternative to Conor Lamb.
- 31:13SPEAKER_00: I mean, but,
- 31:13SPEAKER_00: but like,
- 31:13SPEAKER_00: there's been this whole,
- 31:15SPEAKER_00: like, where, where do I go to give Conor Lamb his apology or whatever?
- 31:19SPEAKER_00: Yeah.
- 31:20SPEAKER_01: Like, like the, the progressives who,
- 31:24SPEAKER_01: Supported Fetterman over Lamb have been pretty abject in their regret.
- 31:29SPEAKER_00: But like what I want to say in their defense and everyone's defense, really,
- 31:33SPEAKER_00: including Fetterman's,
- 31:35SPEAKER_00: is that he had a horrible stroke and then a major depressive episode.
- 31:38SPEAKER_00: Yeah, it has
- 31:39SPEAKER_00: not really been his old
- 31:40SPEAKER_01: self for a single day since those things.
- 31:43SPEAKER_00: And Republicans, because they're.
- 31:46SPEAKER_00: You know, they're like they're they're.
- 31:49SPEAKER_00: Ends justify the mean sort of people.
- 31:51SPEAKER_00: They're going around pretending that he's the bee's knees,
- 31:53SPEAKER_00: that he's just like their favorite guy.
- 31:55SPEAKER_00: Yeah.
- 31:56SPEAKER_00: And like they're,
- 31:57SPEAKER_00: you know,
- 31:57SPEAKER_00: they're exploiting this
- 32:02SPEAKER_01: unwell person in the hope that he does what,
- 32:06SPEAKER_01: you know,
- 32:06SPEAKER_01: it seems like he might do with a 51 vote Democratic majority is like steal
- 32:12SPEAKER_01: the majority back for Republicans.
- 32:15SPEAKER_00: But like.
- 32:17SPEAKER_00: Nobody had that on their bingo card.
- 32:20SPEAKER_00: Golden is like a young guy, good looking, accomplished.
- 32:25SPEAKER_00: I don't agree with his politics.
- 32:26SPEAKER_01: I didn't think it was smart of him to write that story or give that quote.
- 32:31SPEAKER_01: I forget what it was about how- He did it as an op-ed.
- 32:35SPEAKER_00: Yeah.
- 32:35SPEAKER_00: And then what he could have done is Trump could have- Showed his ass in early 2025.
- 32:41SPEAKER_00: And Jared Golden could have said, you know what?
- 32:43SPEAKER_00: I was basing what I wrote in that op-ed on what Trump did in his first term.
- 32:47SPEAKER_00: And things have changed.
- 32:48SPEAKER_00: And now I no longer believe that.
- 32:50SPEAKER_01: And I see the threat clearly.
- 32:52SPEAKER_00: He didn't do that.
- 32:53SPEAKER_00: All he's doing is just being a petty little bitch.
- 32:57SPEAKER_00: And I don't.
- 32:58SPEAKER_00: But here's the other thing.
- 32:59SPEAKER_02: We're going through all of this.
- 33:02SPEAKER_02: Why didn't the Biden administration just do what he wanted on the fucking lobster regulations?
- 33:11SPEAKER_01: I don't know enough to say, honestly.
- 33:13SPEAKER_02: No, no, no.
- 33:13SPEAKER_02: But I mean,
- 33:14SPEAKER_02: but like,
- 33:14SPEAKER_02: but this is what I mean,
- 33:15SPEAKER_02: you know, like,
- 33:16SPEAKER_02: because it's like,
- 33:17SPEAKER_02: I'm here and I'm like,
- 33:18SPEAKER_02: I had my post-it and, you know, like, I don't think Golden should have done this.
- 33:23SPEAKER_02: But like,
- 33:24SPEAKER_02: there was a time years ago when Golden was not in this level of fight
- 33:31SPEAKER_02: with leadership and But he was saying,
- 33:34SPEAKER_02: not uniquely,
- 33:36SPEAKER_02: he was saying the same thing as the governor of Maine,
- 33:40SPEAKER_02: as Angus King, as what's her name with the safer house district.
- 33:44SPEAKER_02: Every Maine politician was saying,
- 33:46SPEAKER_02: this lobster regulation that you guys want to put in, like it's no good.
- 33:52SPEAKER_02: And for the Democrats in safe seats,
- 33:54SPEAKER_02: it was just kind of a press release that they put out and it was their thing.
- 33:58SPEAKER_02: But for Golden, who was there in a Republican seat, It became a big deal.
- 34:04SPEAKER_02: You know, he was fighting for the Maine lobsterman.
- 34:07SPEAKER_02: He was showing independence from Joe Biden on a question of substance
- 34:11SPEAKER_02: that had nothing to do with the future of American democracy, right?
- 34:15SPEAKER_02: Like the preservation of right whales,
- 34:18SPEAKER_02: if you took only hardcore environmentalists and you asked them,
- 34:23SPEAKER_02: how important is this on your stack rank?
- 34:26SPEAKER_02: Like, it's not a top five thing.
- 34:28SPEAKER_02: And they just, they wouldn't give it to him.
- 34:31SPEAKER_02: And then it became an issue that the way to get this bill about the lobster thing
- 34:40SPEAKER_02: over the hill was to break on this rule.
- 34:44SPEAKER_02: And nobody came to him and was like,
- 34:47SPEAKER_02: here's our plan and we're going to fix this lobster thing for you.
- 34:50SPEAKER_02: And I get it.
- 34:51SPEAKER_02: It's like mainstream Democrats think this is petty bullshit and they don't care.
- 34:57SPEAKER_02: And the way they handle issues that they don't care about is Is they just kind
- 35:01SPEAKER_02: of defer to this advocacy group infrastructure.
- 35:04SPEAKER_02: The advocacy group infrastructure has decided that we need
- 35:07SPEAKER_02: to impose tougher regulations on Maine lobster people.
- 35:10SPEAKER_02: And normal Democrats think it's unreasonable for anyone to care or engage about this.
- 35:17SPEAKER_02: But the fact is, is like, you need to kiss the asses of your pivotal people.
- 35:27SPEAKER_02: And this Fetterman thing is, I just think, the clearest example of that that can be imagined.
- 35:34SPEAKER_02: That, as you say,
- 35:35SPEAKER_02: Republicans believe that the ends are important here,
- 35:39SPEAKER_02: and so they're trying to be nice to him.
- 35:41SPEAKER_02: And I think there's some wisdom to that.
- 35:44SPEAKER_01: Well, I don't actually think that these two things are – like,
- 35:48SPEAKER_00: they bear a family resemblance because you're talking about two
- 35:52SPEAKER_01: guys who are on
- 35:54SPEAKER_01: the – Like right wing of the party at this point and acting out in sort
- 36:00SPEAKER_01: of similar ways.
- 36:01SPEAKER_01: But the point you're making about how you might have appeased Golden is a point
- 36:07SPEAKER_01: about like basically like how you
- 36:13SPEAKER_01: attend to the needs
- 36:14SPEAKER_01: of your frontline members given how precarious They talk about what a great guy is.
- 36:20SPEAKER_01: And there's no concession that he's asking Democrats to make
- 36:22SPEAKER_00: other than,
- 36:22SPEAKER_00: I don't know,
- 36:23SPEAKER_00: like don't elect Abdul El-Sayed in Michigan, which is not really up to them.
- 36:46SPEAKER_01: And so you can't, I mean, sure,
- 36:48SPEAKER_01: go ahead,
- 36:49SPEAKER_01: like appoint somebody to go on TV and talk about how nice a guy Fetterman is,
- 36:55SPEAKER_01: if you think it'll help.
- 36:56SPEAKER_01: But you're talking about mental illness in his case.
- 37:00SPEAKER_00: In Golden's case,
- 37:01SPEAKER_00: it's like,
- 37:03SPEAKER_00: it's about like the party's psychology about frontline members is,
- 37:07SPEAKER_00: I think, a little bit misguided.
- 37:10SPEAKER_01: And without having any comment about The whales or the lobsters?
- 37:14SPEAKER_01: Because I just don't know.
- 37:15SPEAKER_01: Like the way you phrase it makes me think, sure, they should have just handed this one to him.
- 37:20SPEAKER_00: But in general,
- 37:22SPEAKER_00: the way I see Republicans deal with their frontline members is they basically say,
- 37:28SPEAKER_00: like, join
- 37:29SPEAKER_01: our all-in fight against the Democrats, keep them toxically unpopular.
- 37:33SPEAKER_01: And you might have a fighting shot of winning your re-election,
- 37:37SPEAKER_01: but that means you're going to have to vote with us on a lot of shit.
- 37:40SPEAKER_01: You're going to have to cave.
- 37:40SPEAKER_01: You're going to have to put up fake stands and then cave.
- 37:44SPEAKER_00: And the way Democrats think
- 37:47SPEAKER_00: about frontline members is these are magical political creatures who figured out how
- 37:52SPEAKER_00: to win in very tough territory.
- 37:54SPEAKER_01: And so we need to cater to their needs so that we don't lose those seats.
- 37:58SPEAKER_00: I'm not going to do that.
- 38:00SPEAKER_00: Hang on.
- 38:02SPEAKER_00: And I think a little bit less of that and a little bit more understanding
- 38:05SPEAKER_00: that waves wash these people in and then another wave is going
- 38:08SPEAKER_00: to come sweep them out would be a little bit healthier.
- 38:11SPEAKER_00: And for Golden to understand his own circumstance is I'm not going
- 38:17SPEAKER_00: to be around forever because of my district.
- 38:20SPEAKER_02: I can't get past it.
- 38:24SPEAKER_02: Yes, you have this whole worldview.
- 38:26SPEAKER_02: And what I'm trying to do is to introduce a dissonant piece of information.
- 38:30SPEAKER_02: There was one issue,
- 38:31SPEAKER_02: one policy issue that Jared Golden was saying was And
- 38:36SPEAKER_02: that everyone agrees is not important.
- 38:39SPEAKER_02: But the way the Democratic Party operates,
- 38:41SPEAKER_02: it's just it doesn't operate the way that you think it operates.
- 38:44SPEAKER_02: It is asymmetrical for the Republicans in the opposite direction.
- 38:47SPEAKER_02: It is this massive borg of policy demands that is relentless and all consuming and crushing.
- 38:55SPEAKER_02: Right.
- 38:55SPEAKER_02: So that like you just they don't let anything go ever.
- 38:59SPEAKER_00: But do you think are like.
- 39:01SPEAKER_00: Is your take on this that if Biden had
- 39:04SPEAKER_01: done the lobster thing,
- 39:06SPEAKER_01: that Golden would have either run for reelection or
- 39:09SPEAKER_01: at least not endorsed some random Republican on his way out?
- 39:12SPEAKER_01: Like, I don't get what.
- 39:14SPEAKER_02: I think it would just be a whole different universe.
- 39:16SPEAKER_02: I think like if the thing that you say Democrats do was in any way it made contact
- 39:23SPEAKER_02: with reality, then we would have a totally different dynamic.
- 39:26SPEAKER_02: But it's just not true.
- 39:30SPEAKER_00: What aspect of it is not—I guess I'm asking,
- 39:34SPEAKER_00: what is the connection between Biden deferring to the environment?
- 39:38SPEAKER_02: The Biden administration,
- 39:39SPEAKER_02: congressional leadership,
- 39:41SPEAKER_02: and the entire progressive movement just spent years treating Joe Manchin,
- 39:45SPEAKER_02: treating Jared Golden, treating other frontline members like garbage.
- 39:49SPEAKER_02: They let Joe Manchin write the whole fucking Biden agenda.
- 39:53SPEAKER_02: It just didn't.
- 39:56SPEAKER_02: Anyway, I can't debate.
- 39:58SPEAKER_02: To me, this whale thing is a crux.
- 40:00SPEAKER_02: It did not matter.
- 40:02SPEAKER_02: There were no stakes.
- 40:03SPEAKER_02: Nobody in the left was asking for this or cared about it at all.
- 40:08SPEAKER_02: And they wouldn't let Jared Golden get a win.
- 40:10SPEAKER_00: Well, I think you should go back to putting the post-it on your forehead
- 40:14SPEAKER_00: because it sounds like you want to,
- 40:16SPEAKER_00: like say that that is like merits everything that's happened since then.
- 40:20SPEAKER_02: I don't say it merits it.
- 40:21SPEAKER_02: It doesn't merit it at all.
- 40:23SPEAKER_02: Everybody,
- 40:23SPEAKER_02: like if they just,
- 40:25SPEAKER_02: Jared Golden comes in and people just treat him like shit day in,
- 40:28SPEAKER_02: day out,
- 40:28SPEAKER_02: give him nothing, grind him down, it is still his obligation to do the right thing.
- 40:34SPEAKER_02: But I'm just saying that like your characterization of how
- 40:37SPEAKER_02: the Democratic Party operates is not true.
- 40:40SPEAKER_02: It is true.
- 40:41SPEAKER_02: And then Democrats spend all this time recruiting this great class
- 40:45SPEAKER_02: of new Senate people to come in, Peltola, Tallarico, et cetera.
- 40:49SPEAKER_02: But like if they win,
- 40:50SPEAKER_02: they are going to be relentless in saying,
- 40:53SPEAKER_02: I know you ran and won like as a moderate,
- 40:56SPEAKER_02: but like now here's this giant laundry list.
- 40:59SPEAKER_00: Okay.
- 41:00SPEAKER_00: I think I understand what you're saying.
- 41:01SPEAKER_00: Okay.
- 41:02SPEAKER_00: Let me put it – You take issue with me saying
- 41:06SPEAKER_01: that the leadership is attendant to
- 41:09SPEAKER_01: the needs of the frontline members because there are these niche issues that when
- 41:15SPEAKER_01: the groups don't support the frontline members,
- 41:19SPEAKER_01: the leadership or the president, whoever it happens to be, go with the groups.
- 41:22SPEAKER_02: But it's the groups themselves.
- 41:24SPEAKER_00: It's like that they exist.
- 41:27SPEAKER_00: I know that, but the way that the Democratic Party...
- 41:33SPEAKER_00: AI constructs a national policy agenda or votes on this or that,
- 41:39SPEAKER_00: the question of impeachment,
- 41:41SPEAKER_00: the big moral issues of our time, what to say about AI in the current context.
- 41:47SPEAKER_00: They do all that by like, hey, we need to protect our frontliners.
- 41:52SPEAKER_00: But they don't.
- 41:53SPEAKER_00: They do.
- 41:55SPEAKER_02: This AI thing, to me, is bizarre, right?
- 41:57SPEAKER_02: So, like,
- 41:57SPEAKER_02: what happened was is Chuck Schumer and Hakeem Jeffries and Barack Obama all came out
- 42:03SPEAKER_02: with, like, we got to regulate AI.
- 42:05SPEAKER_02: And then Politico was like some consultant said Democrats change.
- 42:10SPEAKER_02: And then every fucking lib and progressive on social media was like,
- 42:14SPEAKER_02: this is why nobody likes the Democrats.
- 42:16SPEAKER_02: And it's like,
- 42:18SPEAKER_02: all the party leaders had,
- 42:19SPEAKER_02: before the story was published,
- 42:21SPEAKER_02: had already done the thing that you guys wanted them to do.
- 42:24SPEAKER_02: Like, it's, I don't know.
- 42:26SPEAKER_00: But so what do you think that when,
- 42:29SPEAKER_00: like assuming Democrats win the House,
- 42:31SPEAKER_01: do you think that when they put forward an AI bill,
- 42:35SPEAKER_01: they're going to do it on the basis of Barack Obama's articulation of the problem,
- 42:41SPEAKER_01: or are they going to do it on the basis of like what spares the frontliners from
- 42:45SPEAKER_01: the money?
- 42:46SPEAKER_02: I think they're torn between Barack Obama's ideas and the brain poisoned leftists
- 42:51SPEAKER_02: who we talked about last week,
- 42:54SPEAKER_02: who have like just insane ideas about this and who ran economic regulation policy
- 42:59SPEAKER_02: under Joe Biden.
- 43:01SPEAKER_00: I think that they're going to be unwilling to Take the 70% side of a 70-20 issue
- 43:07SPEAKER_00: or whatever it is because they're scared about the money.
- 43:10SPEAKER_02: What issue are we talking about?
- 43:11SPEAKER_00: I'm talking about AI still.
- 43:13SPEAKER_02: But what aspect of AI?
- 43:15SPEAKER_02: What are they going to be unwilling to do?
- 43:16SPEAKER_02: They're all running against data centers.
- 43:19SPEAKER_02: They're doing it.
- 43:20SPEAKER_00: No, what's happening right now is a little bit weird because Trump has staked out
- 43:27SPEAKER_00: a maximalist pro-AI position.
- 43:31SPEAKER_00: And I think that right now,
- 43:34SPEAKER_00: Democrats just want to
- 43:34SPEAKER_01: get through the election without taking the 70% chunk
- 43:39SPEAKER_01: and being like, no, we need to do the pause.
- 43:41SPEAKER_01: We need to stop this until we figure out what We as citizens
- 43:46SPEAKER_00: like get to do.
- 43:47SPEAKER_00: But I mean, what do you want
- 43:48SPEAKER_02: them to come up
- 43:49SPEAKER_00: with?
- 43:49SPEAKER_00: Well, I am like more and more partial to something like the Sanders bill, but personally.
- 43:56SPEAKER_00: But I think that and it's like this is a problem for popularism,
- 44:01SPEAKER_00: as like you articulated,
- 44:04SPEAKER_00: that with Trump taking the 20 percent side,
- 44:08SPEAKER_00: instead of Democrats being like, We're going to take the 70% side.
- 44:12SPEAKER_00: They say we can't afford to take the popular position.
- 44:15SPEAKER_02: But I don't understand.
- 44:16SPEAKER_02: I literally don't understand what your complaint is.
- 44:19SPEAKER_02: It seems to me that they just literally are doing it.
- 44:24SPEAKER_02: That's Chuck Schumer today.
- 44:48SPEAKER_02: Yeah, on the Senate floor.
- 44:51SPEAKER_02: This is just like,
- 44:52SPEAKER_02: there's this bizarre rug pull tendency where like when the Democratic Party,
- 44:58SPEAKER_02: which is like super left wing.
- 45:00SPEAKER_00: What bill do you want him to do?
- 45:02SPEAKER_00: I want him to say,
- 45:03SPEAKER_00: I want him to take,
- 45:04SPEAKER_00: either say like Bernie Sanders has gotten us off to a great start and we need
- 45:07SPEAKER_00: to make some tweaks to that so that it's administrable, whatever.
- 45:12SPEAKER_00: But we're going to pause and there's going to be liability and we
- 45:16SPEAKER_00: as Americans are going to chart our own course here,
- 45:18SPEAKER_00: unlike the president who wants to turn it all over to them.
- 45:21SPEAKER_02: But that's what he's saying.
- 45:22SPEAKER_02: There's a Klobuchar bill.
- 45:26SPEAKER_00: I mean, Donald Trump, to his credit, took a position.
- 45:27SPEAKER_02: Uh-huh.
- 45:46SPEAKER_00: And it's like a policy position.
- 45:49SPEAKER_02: But like you're saying it's a 70-30 issue.
- 45:52SPEAKER_02: It's an 80-20 issue, right?
- 45:53SPEAKER_02: And it is.
- 45:54SPEAKER_02: But like the way that it's an 80-20 issue is characterized as should we slow AI
- 46:01SPEAKER_02: or should we speed AI, right?
- 46:03SPEAKER_02: So it's a little bit vague.
- 46:05SPEAKER_02: And so what Democrat,
- 46:06SPEAKER_02: what Trump is doing is like vague position taking on the super unpopular side of
- 46:10SPEAKER_02: the issue.
- 46:11SPEAKER_02: And all the Democrats have taken the opposite.
- 46:13SPEAKER_02: It's quite specific.
- 46:15SPEAKER_02: The Democrats have taken the opposite side of the issue.
- 46:19SPEAKER_02: They have positioned themselves as the party that wants to restrain and slow down AI.
- 46:23SPEAKER_02: But then what happens whenever you try to do anything is like
- 46:26SPEAKER_02: the Bernie people are like,
- 46:28SPEAKER_02: nope, you got to sign up for the most extreme possible version of this.
- 46:31SPEAKER_02: And then people get, it's just, I don't know.
- 46:34SPEAKER_00: It's a pretty good plan.
- 46:35SPEAKER_02: Like Democrats are fucking winning the election as we were just talking about.
- 46:40SPEAKER_02: Like, what do you want from them?
- 46:42SPEAKER_00: Well, I,
- 46:43SPEAKER_00: I guess I'm curious about if Hakeem
- 46:48SPEAKER_01: Jeffries is going to issue this
- 46:51SPEAKER_01: contract
- 46:52SPEAKER_01: with America 2.0 thing that he's been teasing and what it will say about AI and
- 46:56SPEAKER_01: whether that will contradict the story that Politico reported,
- 46:59SPEAKER_00: which I think is revelatory, right?
- 47:05SPEAKER_02: No, like Politico did a fake story.
- 47:08SPEAKER_02: And then because the thesis of the story was Democrats are bad
- 47:11SPEAKER_02: because they're not left wing enough.
- 47:13SPEAKER_02: I just like I read what was in the article.
- 47:17SPEAKER_02: None of the reporting supported the headline.
- 47:20SPEAKER_02: It's just like.
- 47:21SPEAKER_02: It
- 47:22SPEAKER_00: was straightforward.
- 47:24SPEAKER_02: It's chum in a sea of sharks.
- 47:28SPEAKER_02: Like I could just write tomorrow and be like, oh man, Dems, they're not left-wing enough.
- 47:33SPEAKER_02: And everyone would be like, he finally admits it.
- 47:35SPEAKER_02: It's like, it's stupid.
- 47:36SPEAKER_01: They said they talked to consultants for three
- 47:41SPEAKER_00: frontline members and that
- 47:42SPEAKER_00: the advice was- Take it easy on AI because you don't want the money to come
- 47:48SPEAKER_00: after them.
- 47:49SPEAKER_00: And if that is the advice that they're getting,
- 47:51SPEAKER_00: and I don't believe Politico is lying about that,
- 47:54SPEAKER_00: then it's a real question because if what the politically optimal thing
- 48:00SPEAKER_00: for Democrats to do is talk about – take the popular side of issues and talk
- 48:04SPEAKER_00: about them a lot.
- 48:05SPEAKER_02: Mm-hmm.
- 48:06SPEAKER_00: Yeah, that's what I think.
- 48:22SPEAKER_02: Well, that's not my opinion.
- 48:24SPEAKER_00: But that's the advice that they are getting.
- 48:27SPEAKER_00: And I feel like you ought to be mad about that instead of mad at me for pointing it out.
- 48:31SPEAKER_02: To be clear, it's just like what I'm mad about now is like that story was fake.
- 48:34SPEAKER_02: Now, I completely agree.
- 48:36SPEAKER_02: Democrats care way too much.
- 48:37SPEAKER_02: Way too much.
- 48:38SPEAKER_02: Way too much.
- 48:40SPEAKER_02: So much too much about campaign fundraising, right?
- 48:43SPEAKER_02: Caring about campaign fundraising is why Democrats are so left-wing on environmental issues.
- 48:47SPEAKER_02: It would be worth a billion dollars to just tell the climate people,
- 48:51SPEAKER_02: fuck you, I don't give a shit.
- 48:53SPEAKER_02: And it would be great, right?
- 48:55SPEAKER_02: And the LGBT donors, I don't give a shit.
- 48:58SPEAKER_02: I'm taking the popular stance on this issue.
- 49:00SPEAKER_02: This gets invoked very selectively by people.
- 49:03SPEAKER_02: There's just a...
- 49:04SPEAKER_02: Okay.
- 49:21SPEAKER_02: Headline, Hakeem Jeffries, colon, Congress must act immediately to rein in AI.
- 49:27SPEAKER_02: The House Democratic leader said Republicans have abandoned their responsibility
- 49:30SPEAKER_02: on AI and called for the House to stay in session.
- 49:33SPEAKER_02: Quote,
- 49:37SPEAKER_02: That's not a hoax.
- 49:39SPEAKER_02: It's very real, despite what Donald Trump has to say about this issue.
- 49:42SPEAKER_02: And it requires decisive congressional action immediately in a manner consistent
- 49:46SPEAKER_02: with what the leading AI voices in this country are saying needs to happen.
- 49:49SPEAKER_02: Slow it down to protect the health, safety, and well-being of the American people.
- 49:53SPEAKER_02: And nobody fucking gave a shit because they're just addicted to being angry
- 49:58SPEAKER_02: at Democratic leaders.
- 50:00SPEAKER_00: I mean, I didn't, I did not say anything about Democratic leaders.
- 50:03SPEAKER_00: I'm talking about the consultants in,
- 50:07SPEAKER_00: that Politico talked to,
- 50:09SPEAKER_00: as the guidance that they are giving to people,
- 50:11SPEAKER_00: not literally Jared Golden,
- 50:13SPEAKER_00: because he's out,
- 50:14SPEAKER_00: but to people in districts like that,
- 50:16SPEAKER_00: reinforcing to them that they shouldn't ever do any, like,
- 50:20SPEAKER_00: even if it's popular because,
- 50:21SPEAKER_00: and does this not strike you as like,
- 50:25SPEAKER_00: like a crippling way of,
- 50:28SPEAKER_00: If, if,
- 50:31SPEAKER_02: if, if, if we could apply this consistently, then yes, yes, yes.
- 50:37SPEAKER_02: Democrats should ignore the donors across the board,
- 50:41SPEAKER_02: which on net means being much, much, much more moderate.
- 50:45SPEAKER_00: Okay, fine, fine.
- 50:46SPEAKER_02: But you can't ignore the donors
- 50:49SPEAKER_00: selectively and just be left on everything.
- 50:53SPEAKER_00: Now that we've established that like,
- 50:55SPEAKER_00: if the kind of advice of frontline members is like this advice,
- 51:00SPEAKER_00: like always,
- 51:01SPEAKER_01: always, always be in a defensive crouch, even when the issues are on your side.
- 51:05SPEAKER_00: But who is it?
- 51:06SPEAKER_00: Hang on, hang on, hang on.
- 51:08SPEAKER_00: And then the party as a whole constructs itself around like, we got to protect our frontliners.
- 51:16SPEAKER_00: Then you have a whole party-wide problem of just like, I
- 51:23SPEAKER_02: think this is fundamentally false.
- 51:25SPEAKER_02: The impact of donor influence on net viewed holistically in the Democratic Party is
- 51:32SPEAKER_02: to push members to the left.
- 51:35SPEAKER_02: What party leaders do
- 51:37SPEAKER_00: all the time.
- 51:37SPEAKER_00: But we're talking about donors who are going to run attack ads against them,
- 51:40SPEAKER_00: not give to their campaigns.
- 51:42SPEAKER_00: And they're taking a dive in defense against that threat.
- 51:47SPEAKER_02: Right, but they are also taking tons of,
- 51:51SPEAKER_02: I don't know,
- 51:51SPEAKER_02: like I've said what I said about this,
- 51:52SPEAKER_02: like they're not protecting the frontline members,
- 51:55SPEAKER_02: they're protecting the fucking whale donors.
- 51:58SPEAKER_02: Like they're not telling people, It's just like it's not what's happening.
- 52:03SPEAKER_02: And there's a very selective reading of journalism that occurs
- 52:08SPEAKER_02: where it's like anything that has a whiff of like, ah, those bad consultants.
- 52:13SPEAKER_00: Because Nancy Pelosi spent years talking about the frontline members
- 52:17SPEAKER_00: as her majority makers,
- 52:18SPEAKER_00: like being rude to the most progressive members of her caucus.
- 52:23SPEAKER_00: She like altering legislation to make it so that they will vote for it.
- 52:28SPEAKER_02: Yes, a decade ago when the Democratic Party was different, things were
- 52:32SPEAKER_00: different.
- 52:33SPEAKER_00: And then Joe Biden comes in and he has his whole agenda and Joe Manchin says, uh-uh.
- 52:37SPEAKER_00: And so they bring Joe Manchin to the White House over and over and over again
- 52:41SPEAKER_00: so he can write
- 52:42SPEAKER_02: the legislation.
- 52:44SPEAKER_02: I can't give a deal.
- 52:45SPEAKER_02: It's like you're not making any contact with reality.
- 52:49SPEAKER_02: In this depiction of the relationship between the Biden administration and Joe Manchin.
- 52:53SPEAKER_00: I mean, they didn't, they started as friends.
- 52:55SPEAKER_00: By the end, I guess Joe Manchin decided he hated.
- 52:58SPEAKER_02: But it's the whole progressive movement.
- 53:00SPEAKER_02: Just like from day one was like Joe Manchin's a criminal, not Joe Manchin's our greatest hero.
- 53:04SPEAKER_00: But like you said about Golden, his job is as like- And I think, to
- 53:09SPEAKER_02: be clear, this is different.
- 53:10SPEAKER_02: Like on the merits, Joe Manchin was correct.
- 53:13SPEAKER_02: And the ideas that the left was trying to push on him were bad.
- 53:18SPEAKER_02: Like Joe Manchin was right about inflation.
- 53:20SPEAKER_02: He was right about the House's Build Back Better bill.
- 53:22SPEAKER_02: Like they should thank their lucky stars.
- 53:25SPEAKER_00: But whatever you think about it,
- 53:27SPEAKER_00: he did get to write those- Yes, because
- 53:30SPEAKER_02: he objectively has the leverage, you know?
- 53:32SPEAKER_02: And like the whole left is just very immature and can't like grapple with this stuff.
- 53:39SPEAKER_02: I don't even have that much battery left on my laptop.
- 53:41SPEAKER_02: We gotta wrap things up.
- 53:43SPEAKER_02: But like, it's just like-
- 53:47SPEAKER_02: I mean, like,
- 53:48SPEAKER_02: if you're right,
- 53:49SPEAKER_02: then like- Like,
- 53:50SPEAKER_02: why is it that the Democratic Party as a whole is so far to the left of
- 53:54SPEAKER_02: the median voter, like all the time, constantly?
- 53:57SPEAKER_00: I mean, we should have a different conversation about that if you want.
- 54:01SPEAKER_00: Okay.
- 54:01SPEAKER_00: Not on this episode.
- 54:02SPEAKER_00: Okay.
- 54:04SPEAKER_00: But, like,
- 54:05SPEAKER_00: if I'm wrong about my model of the Democratic Party,
- 54:09SPEAKER_00: then you'd expect to see some surprising stuff happen next year.
- 54:13SPEAKER_00: You'd expect to see,
- 54:15SPEAKER_00: like, more, like, aggressive efforts to check Donald Trump to bring— No, no, no.
- 54:20SPEAKER_02: To be clear, I am always agreeing with you about this.
- 54:22SPEAKER_02: The Democrats don't care about checking Donald Trump.
- 54:25SPEAKER_02: They care about having very left-wing positions on public
- 54:28SPEAKER_00: policy issues.
- 54:29SPEAKER_00: No, like— If their concern is not,
- 54:35SPEAKER_00: as I hold,
- 54:36SPEAKER_00: to make sure that the frontline members never encounter friction in their lives,
- 54:42SPEAKER_00: then that would open a lot of doors.
- 54:46SPEAKER_00: You'd be able to do things like, hey,
- 54:48SPEAKER_00: we will shut the government down unless you end the trade war,
- 54:51SPEAKER_00: or we will shut the government down unless you end the Iran war,
- 54:54SPEAKER_00: or we are going to impeach all of your cabinet secretaries.
- 54:58SPEAKER_00: And it's just like none of that's going to happen,
- 55:00SPEAKER_00: and it's not going to happen because They're worried about MGP's next race.
- 55:05SPEAKER_02: I just feel like – I'm repeating myself on this all the time.
- 55:08SPEAKER_02: They don't care about that stuff.
- 55:09SPEAKER_02: Democrats don't care about that stuff.
- 55:11SPEAKER_02: What they care about is catering to the very left-wing public policy
- 55:16SPEAKER_00: views of their base.
- 55:17SPEAKER_02: And so this is what they come up with, right?
- 55:19SPEAKER_02: They will not give Jared what he wants on the whaling regulations, right?
- 55:25SPEAKER_02: They will, sure, cater – Because it's a small ball.
- 55:27SPEAKER_00: It's just so small.
- 55:28SPEAKER_02: Like for – They're fanatical zealots.
- 55:33SPEAKER_00: There's a whole world of shit out there that they give all that stuff to the frontliners.
- 55:38SPEAKER_00: And you're right.
- 55:38SPEAKER_00: They should do it the other way around.
- 55:40SPEAKER_00: They should give him the whale regulation,
- 55:42SPEAKER_00: the lobster regulation, but then say you're with us on impeachment or whatever.
- 55:46SPEAKER_00: But like they won't do it.
- 55:47SPEAKER_00: Right.
- 55:48SPEAKER_00: Yes, I agree.
- 55:49SPEAKER_00: They won't do that.
- 55:50SPEAKER_00: Because they think the politics is the other way around.
- 55:53SPEAKER_00: No, it's just because they're very
- 55:55SPEAKER_02: left wing.
- 55:57SPEAKER_00: Put a pin in that.
- 55:58SPEAKER_00: We will talk about that another time.
- 55:59SPEAKER_00: We promised in the intro to talk about effective altruism.
- 56:03SPEAKER_02: Fucking A, man.
- 56:04SPEAKER_02: All right.
- 56:06SPEAKER_02: Effective altruism.
- 56:07SPEAKER_00: Quick break, and I will let you define effective altruism for people.
- 56:11SPEAKER_00: We'll do this fast, all right?
- 56:12SPEAKER_02: Yeah, we'll figure it out.
- 56:13SPEAKER_00: All right.
- 56:15SPEAKER_00: If you want to hear me rant about another cult, go to politics.fm and upgrade your subscription.