Latest / Brian Thomas / 55KRC Tuesday Show - Tom Z, Breitbart, Deep Dive, OHC

Transcript

55KRC Tuesday Show - Tom Z, Breitbart, Deep Dive, OHC · Brian Thomas

0:03
Speaker 1: Five o five at thirty five KRC, the talk station
0:09
Speaker 1: have Tuesday. Some say will vucation the way it is. Indeed,
0:29
Speaker 1: Brian Thomas right here, glad to be hosting of the
0:30
Speaker 1: fifty five KRC Morning Show and blessed to have Joseph Strucker,
0:34
Speaker 1: executive producer Internet Research grewer. All are a great guy
0:36
Speaker 1: producing the program, does a great job. And another plug
0:39
Speaker 1: for Joe podcasts. Have him do your podcast. Uh and
0:42
Speaker 1: again a shout out prayers. Please please please my prayer
0:45
Speaker 1: for all audience, but you please direct some prayers to
0:48
Speaker 1: Joe Strecker's father, who is still struggling mightily with some
0:51
Speaker 1: serious health consequences. Joe, hope you don't mind me asking
0:54
Speaker 1: for prayers for your father. I personally am engaging in
0:56
Speaker 1: some myself and wish you and your family all the best.
1:00
Speaker 1: So I certainly invite you to call with thy five
1:02
Speaker 1: Carsey Morning Show. It's hit. It's already here. We say.
1:06
Speaker 1: Gas prices jump because of the strikes in Iran. Why
1:09
Speaker 1: is the supply already interrupted? Not yet? Fear is driven
1:14
Speaker 1: the prices up. This is an excuse I think by
1:17
Speaker 1: the gas companies to simply just raise it. Look war
1:20
Speaker 1: let's raise the price, and it's gone up pretty substantially.
1:23
Speaker 1: Gas Buddy hasn't reflected the increase, not necessarily yet. I
1:26
Speaker 1: saw local reporting from a WCPO saying we've already gone
1:30
Speaker 1: north of three dollars, many people complaining they paid like
1:33
Speaker 1: three dollars and nineteen cents a gallon was a speedway
1:35
Speaker 1: off I seventy one that was specifically referenced in nor
1:38
Speaker 1: would a couple other state references Butler County above three
1:43
Speaker 1: dollars described as a sixty cent jump in Butler County
1:48
Speaker 1: in a day. Gas Buddy currently saying Ohio gas price
1:52
Speaker 1: stats for the entire state between two eleven and two
1:55
Speaker 1: eighty nine, last updated twenty two hours ago, the best
1:58
Speaker 1: I can figure. So you look for revision today on
2:01
Speaker 1: gasbuddy dot com. That's where you get your gasoline prices.
2:05
Speaker 1: Question is it worth it or we're gonna find out?
2:07
Speaker 1: And more on that topic because it kind of transcends
2:11
Speaker 1: just the immediate increase in gasoline prices, and people are
2:14
Speaker 1: starting to reflect on not just the war and its
2:17
Speaker 1: impact on the price of the fuel, but even in
2:20
Speaker 1: the bluest state like New York, they're starting to turn
2:22
Speaker 1: their back on Yes, thank God, the green religion that
2:26
Speaker 1: is carbon dioxide, plant food killing us or something. Coming
2:31
Speaker 1: up at fifty five caresee Morning Show Tom's Awastowski Wether
2:33
Speaker 1: People Convention dot Org question what will happen when no
2:37
Speaker 1: more property tax grew? Or what happened rather when no
2:39
Speaker 1: more property tax? Group met with Vivik Ramaswami. Where's Vvik
2:43
Speaker 1: on the vote? I think Tom's gonna let us know it.
2:46
Speaker 1: Coming up at seven thirty, we're also going to talk
2:48
Speaker 1: about pulling on the Ohio property tax. Where do people sit?
2:51
Speaker 1: I see a lot of posts on social media for
2:55
Speaker 1: the group that's pushing to eradicate property taxes in Ohio.
2:58
Speaker 1: I expect, at some point, and I'm not sure where
3:00
Speaker 1: it's going to come from, there will be a well
3:03
Speaker 1: organized money back campaign to get you to decide that
3:07
Speaker 1: eliminating property tax in Ohio is a really, really bad idea. Yes,
3:11
Speaker 1: the war of marketing on that is fast approaching. Look
3:14
Speaker 1: you can see it down the road there. Coming up
3:16
Speaker 1: an eight oh five, the return of London Bureau Chief
3:19
Speaker 1: Oliver Lane to talk about the United Kingdom's response to
3:22
Speaker 1: the United States and Israel's launching an attack on Iran.
3:25
Speaker 1: It seemed to be all over the place but not
3:27
Speaker 1: really committed to doing anything. London Bureau Chief Oliver Lane
3:30
Speaker 1: on that the inside Scoop with Breitbart every Tuesday at
3:33
Speaker 1: eight oh five, and of course should be rather interesting.
3:36
Speaker 1: I think it always is retired Lieutenant Colonel Daniel Davis
3:38
Speaker 1: with a Daniel Davis Deep Dive, which we do every
3:41
Speaker 1: Tuesday at eight thirty. Today no exception of that. We
3:44
Speaker 1: will definitely be talking about Iran and a lot of
3:47
Speaker 1: concerns articulated this morning in various media outlets about running
3:52
Speaker 1: out of the interceptor missiles. So you've got thousands of
3:56
Speaker 1: Iranian rockets, not sure how many have been destroyed. I
3:59
Speaker 1: saw one talking head yesterday, someone in the know, a
4:02
Speaker 1: noted notable expert. You know, he put a label expert
4:04
Speaker 1: after someone. I guess they are saying that, you know,
4:07
Speaker 1: it sounded like a great thing, and he was praising
4:09
Speaker 1: it as a great thing that we've knocked out fifty
4:10
Speaker 1: percent of the Iranian missile capacity. Now I don't know
4:14
Speaker 1: how that translates. There are drones, are there are are
4:17
Speaker 1: long range missiles, medium range missiles. The Shah he eats
4:20
Speaker 1: all this kind of different military hardware. I wasn't really
4:23
Speaker 1: quite clear based on his comments fifty percent of what,
4:28
Speaker 1: but we are making some men rows and that's going
4:29
Speaker 1: to be the continued pressure from the United States well
4:32
Speaker 1: in Israel and find the missiles and blow them up,
4:35
Speaker 1: find the manufacturing facilities and blow them up. By understanding
4:38
Speaker 1: one drone launching facility and maybe even manufacturing facility was
4:42
Speaker 1: eliminated yesterday, perhaps the day before with the initial strikes.
4:46
Speaker 1: One can only hope that this this air action, this
4:50
Speaker 1: air campaign, will be more successful and rapidly so in
4:54
Speaker 1: eliminating Iran's ability to launch and they seem to be
4:57
Speaker 1: very indiscriminate launching missiles in to the various regional countries.
5:01
Speaker 1: Of course, our military bases and Israel generally speaking c
5:05
Speaker 1: to be the of course focus of the Iranian response.
5:09
Speaker 1: More on that coming up, and we'll have our ask
5:12
Speaker 1: the Expert today. You know me, I love talking about
5:14
Speaker 1: cancer because every time I have OHC and one of
5:16
Speaker 1: their great doctors on the program gives me some great
5:19
Speaker 1: optimism that someday, someday we will have a cure. Well,
5:22
Speaker 1: today we're going to have ohc's doctor, A G. Golah.
5:25
Speaker 1: He's a medical oncologist and hematologist and director of stem
5:28
Speaker 1: cell transplant and cellular Therapy discussing clinical trials and why
5:33
Speaker 1: they are a vital part of treating cancer and how
5:36
Speaker 1: cancer research provides cancer patients with one of the most
5:38
Speaker 1: important aspects of care. That's hope, but cancer clinical trials
5:42
Speaker 1: being on the forefront, that they are the starting place
5:46
Speaker 1: in helping you get relief and of course maybe bringing
5:48
Speaker 1: in about better relief or others that are struggling with cancer.
5:51
Speaker 1: Cancer sucks. Let's finally have something to embrace without a
5:56
Speaker 1: political stripe, something we can all agree on. Cancer sucks.
6:01
Speaker 1: That's the Morning Show today five one, three, seven, four,
6:03
Speaker 1: nine fifty five, eight hundred eight two to three Talk
6:05
Speaker 1: found five fifty on AT and T phones. Okay, we
6:09
Speaker 1: have got gas prices going up, of course, to the
6:11
Speaker 1: consequence of the war in the Middle East. Understand that
6:14
Speaker 1: that's going to happen. Ripple effect, the shutting down to
6:17
Speaker 1: the strait of horn Mouse, which I have read multiple
6:20
Speaker 1: places now may very well impact China and Russia to
6:24
Speaker 1: the negative sort of a Is it a corollary benefit
6:28
Speaker 1: or is it one of the primary benefits. I don't know,
6:30
Speaker 1: but it's harming our two greatest enemies, China and Russia.
6:34
Speaker 1: But insofar as let us let us go to a
6:36
Speaker 1: little a little dose of reality for all those green
6:40
Speaker 1: religion fans out there, New York Governor Kathy Hokeel among them.
6:44
Speaker 1: Until oh, that's right the other day, hmm, what's going
6:48
Speaker 1: on with New York screen policies. Well, remember the price
6:53
Speaker 1: of gas will necessarily increase. Barack Obama toljia ahead of time.
6:56
Speaker 1: That was a long time ago. And what has happened
6:59
Speaker 1: with the implementation of the green policies and billions and
7:02
Speaker 1: billions of taxpayer dollars rerouted to supplement the manufacturer of
7:06
Speaker 1: windmills and solar panels, giving the Chinese the upper hand
7:10
Speaker 1: and something that doesn't generate electricity very reliably. Yes, we
7:14
Speaker 1: all know that Governor Hathi Kathy Hokals administration is now
7:17
Speaker 1: warning that gas prices could soar two dollars and twenty
7:22
Speaker 1: three cents over the next few years. She's getting ready
7:25
Speaker 1: to launch a fight with her fellow Democrats to delay
7:28
Speaker 1: their green energy mandates that were implemented in twenty nineteen.
7:32
Speaker 1: The twenty nineteen Climate Change Law is now coming home
7:35
Speaker 1: to roost and the chickens are not happy. Memo leak
7:38
Speaker 1: by hocals Camp details what is described as a stunning
7:42
Speaker 1: projected fuel cost at the pump and for households. If
7:46
Speaker 1: this stupid cap and invest initiative kicks in as planned,
7:52
Speaker 1: they say, New York households could pay another twenty three
7:54
Speaker 1: hundred dollars a year in natural gas costs. Notice the
7:58
Speaker 1: emphasis on natural gas. This on top of some other
8:01
Speaker 1: massive rate increases. New York State Energy and Research Development
8:05
Speaker 1: Authority has issued a memo saying exactly that upstate households
8:10
Speaker 1: even more forty three hundred dollars per year more lokl
8:18
Speaker 1: arguing yesterday for us to meet the goals on the
8:21
Speaker 1: timeframe that was set by the legislature, which pulled a
8:24
Speaker 1: number out of their sphincter, there's going to be enormous
8:27
Speaker 1: cost of families. Right, the price of gas will necessarily
8:31
Speaker 1: increased because you think windmills and solar panels are the answer,
8:34
Speaker 1: and not building any more natural gas pipelines was seen
8:37
Speaker 1: to be the real problem for New York and most
8:39
Speaker 1: people in the Northeast region of the country. The climate
8:42
Speaker 1: law that they enacted mandates in New York electricity degenerated
8:45
Speaker 1: seventy percent zero missions by twenty thirty, one hundred percent
8:50
Speaker 1: zero missions by twenty forty. What a lofty, impossible to
8:55
Speaker 1: achieve goal. And she admitted that is unachievable as large
9:02
Speaker 1: renewable energy projects are failing. And of course, the elimination
9:06
Speaker 1: of subsidies for green initiatives by the Trump administration. In
9:10
Speaker 1: other words, that would be your tax the taxpayer dollars
9:13
Speaker 1: going to mask the actual cost of the creation of
9:18
Speaker 1: these various green facilities local planet and negotiate changes to
9:23
Speaker 1: the climate mandates. Pushing back on those deadlines. Hmmm, and
9:29
Speaker 1: I love this. I'll give credit to the New York
9:31
Speaker 1: Post reporting how the battle plays out. Could have reverberations
9:35
Speaker 1: in November when Hochel's up for re election. Ah, with
9:37
Speaker 1: New York skitty cities, sky high cost of living, expect
9:41
Speaker 1: to be in the front and center during the campaign. Affordability.
9:46
Speaker 1: Who's screaming and running around talking about affordability, affordability, affordability,
9:49
Speaker 1: right the Democrats. This is their campaign platform. And you know, honestly,
9:52
Speaker 1: if I was a Democrat to make the same argument,
9:54
Speaker 1: well as transparent as it is. Giving Joe Biden's infusion
9:59
Speaker 1: of literally trillions of dollars into this green new energy
10:02
Speaker 1: crap that is driving our energy prices up. Guess what
10:07
Speaker 1: people are waking up even without the additional squeeze con
10:13
Speaker 1: ad also independent of anything else going on, hikeder electricity
10:19
Speaker 1: bills in New York City by three point nine percent
10:21
Speaker 1: this year, and they have another improved increase for next
10:24
Speaker 1: year at three point three percent, and another one at
10:26
Speaker 1: three point two percent twenty twenty eight. Add it all up,
10:32
Speaker 1: so I'm looking at about a fourteen to fifteen percent
10:34
Speaker 1: increase in the electricity prices. I guess, all things being equal,
10:38
Speaker 1: and even if you get rid of these stupid climbate mandates,
10:43
Speaker 1: UH electricity prices fifty percent higher than the national average
10:48
Speaker 1: in New York City and the eighth highest in the
10:51
Speaker 1: United States because of the policies. Doesn't have to be
10:55
Speaker 1: that way. Memo league by Hocheal's office cover the potential
11:01
Speaker 1: cost of this cap and trade program or captain invest program.
11:05
Speaker 1: I like that, invest invest in what something that doesn't work.
11:09
Speaker 1: We charge fossil fuel companies based upon the amount of
11:12
Speaker 1: carbon emissions they spew. There we go, You exhale carbon
11:18
Speaker 1: dioxide to the benefit of plants, and it is not
11:20
Speaker 1: a pollutant, something naturally occurring. It exists in the atmosphere
11:23
Speaker 1: to a certain percentage. It varies year after year and
11:26
Speaker 1: decade after decade, and of course century after century, millennia
11:29
Speaker 1: after millennia carbon carbon dioxide. When will people quit believing
11:36
Speaker 1: that that is dangerous? Gasoline prices in New York going
11:38
Speaker 1: to be climbing above the average highest in the United States.
11:44
Speaker 1: California currently has the highest gas price. Governor Newsom talked
11:48
Speaker 1: about the end of the day. He stepped at at
11:49
Speaker 1: what he did. Now the Republican challenger in the election
11:54
Speaker 1: coming up for New York Nasau County Executive, Bruce Blakeman,
12:00
Speaker 1: he will make you tilt it cost an election issue affordability, Hey,
12:03
Speaker 1: a Republican, make that issue too. He promised to repeal
12:07
Speaker 1: this stupid climate law. This is driving the New Yorkers
12:09
Speaker 1: to the point of where they can't afford anything. Of course,
12:13
Speaker 1: on the other side, the leftists are screaming about how
12:15
Speaker 1: the planet is going to die within the next hundred
12:18
Speaker 1: years or something like that. Yeah, okay, sure, somebody go
12:23
Speaker 1: back and watch Al Gore's movie and see if anything
12:26
Speaker 1: he said came true. Five eighteen, fifty five Kcity the
12:30
Speaker 1: talk station. Bobby, hang on to get you call in
12:32
Speaker 1: a second. Got to take a quick break. He'll be
12:33
Speaker 1: right back. This is fifty five karc An iHeartRadio station.
12:38
Speaker 1: H'm Tuesday, and of course on Wednesday it'll be thirty
12:41
Speaker 1: or something like that. Bobby. Welcome the morning show and
12:43
Speaker 1: a very happy Tuesday to you, sir.
12:46
Speaker 2: Happy holiday, my brother saith flag family, and a good spotter.
12:50
Speaker 2: When you have those, you will always be able to
12:52
Speaker 2: keep your freedom.
12:53
Speaker 1: A good spotter what looking for drones flying in to
12:57
Speaker 1: deliver payloads or something, Bobby.
13:00
Speaker 2: But when you're fifteen hundred out, it's always good to
13:02
Speaker 2: have an extra set of eyes.
13:04
Speaker 1: That is true. You had someone with someone standing over
13:09
Speaker 1: your shoulder with the dope sheet.
13:12
Speaker 2: No, just right next to me on the right hand side.
13:15
Speaker 1: Okay, those not to know the dop The dope sheet
13:18
Speaker 1: is what your spoder will use to tell you what
13:20
Speaker 1: your elevation and your windage and everything else is when
13:22
Speaker 1: you're hit shooting targets long range. Anyway, Bobby, what's on
13:25
Speaker 1: your mind today?
13:26
Speaker 2: Well, I'll tell you what. We got two people that
13:30
Speaker 2: suspects in the mass shooting. I think they apprehend.
13:33
Speaker 1: I saw that young men too, twenty four year old
13:36
Speaker 1: Frenique Cobb and twenty nine year old Derek Long.
13:41
Speaker 2: How long you think it'll be before they're out walking
13:44
Speaker 2: the streets again.
13:45
Speaker 1: Oh, they may be already. They're probably in front of
13:47
Speaker 1: Judge Silverstein this yesterday afternoon. Yeah, slap, slap on the hand.
13:51
Speaker 1: You know you'd be a good boy on recognizance. Don't
13:53
Speaker 1: go anywhere, oh, and said Joe said, along with a
13:57
Speaker 1: cup of juice and a cookie.
14:00
Speaker 3: Yeah, I'll tell you what.
14:01
Speaker 2: I hope they don't come in our neighborhood.
14:03
Speaker 1: Well, if I was them, I know you, Bobby, I
14:06
Speaker 1: wouldn't be going into your neighborhood either. I live in
14:11
Speaker 1: a neighborhood like your neighborhood. I think I feel very
14:14
Speaker 1: safe in my neighborhood. Bobby, Great, Oh my, at the
14:22
Speaker 1: risk Oh hell, I was going to say, at the
14:25
Speaker 1: risk of running long, Joe, But I'm looking at the
14:28
Speaker 1: rundown this morning, and I may not be to go
14:30
Speaker 1: along with this USL and Gxport article, which was really fantastic. Anyhow,
14:35
Speaker 1: I'll just give you Governor Newsom's effort to try to
14:38
Speaker 1: troll Donald Trump on the price of gasoline at gasoline
14:41
Speaker 1: which is close to five dollars a gallon in California
14:44
Speaker 1: because of well, their own climate policies. They're shutting down
14:48
Speaker 1: of oil refineries and the refusal to drill into the
14:50
Speaker 1: two billion barrels of oil that they've got underneath the
14:54
Speaker 1: surface of the state of California. Let us see here,
14:59
Speaker 1: what did he have to say say bragging about California
15:01
Speaker 1: is declining gas prices. Quote says Governor news Average gas
15:06
Speaker 1: prices in California have stayed below five dollars for nearly
15:09
Speaker 1: two years. Joe, you know, we were paying about two
15:12
Speaker 1: dollars and thirteen to twenty cents just the other day,
15:15
Speaker 1: and generally in the state of Ohio. He's bragging about
15:18
Speaker 1: keeping it under five. Meanwhile, people locally lamenting the fact
15:23
Speaker 1: that the price of gasoline now is a little over
15:25
Speaker 1: three dollars. Thank god, you're not in California, where the
15:29
Speaker 1: price of course will go up there too because of
15:31
Speaker 1: global realities. Right, they're not immune from it. In fact,
15:35
Speaker 1: they're even worse off. Here's why Newsom concluded average gas
15:39
Speaker 1: price stay below fin us for two years. Trump's new
15:42
Speaker 1: war already rattling markets We're watching this space closely. Enter
15:47
Speaker 1: the US Oil and Gas Association, shooting down Governor Newsom's
15:51
Speaker 1: endeavors to beat up on Trump. California imports five eighths
15:57
Speaker 1: of its oil from abroad, again in spite of the
16:01
Speaker 1: fact they have two billion barrels of oil beneath the
16:04
Speaker 1: surface of their own state. US Oil and Gas went
16:08
Speaker 1: on to explain how each the countries from which the
16:11
Speaker 1: Golden State imports its oil. Are you ready? Here's what
16:13
Speaker 1: they said. Time to school pajama boy who runs this
16:16
Speaker 1: account for the governor, because this isn't the flex on
16:20
Speaker 1: Trump he thinks it is. California imports sixty three percent
16:23
Speaker 1: of its group from foreign countries, despite sitting on at
16:26
Speaker 1: least one point seven billion barrels of proven reserves, according
16:29
Speaker 1: to the California Energy Commission. Here's the breakdown. Twenty one
16:33
Speaker 1: percent comes from Iraq, twenty percent from Brazil, sixteen from Guyana,
16:38
Speaker 1: fourteen from Ecuador, six percent of Colombia, four percent from Canada,
16:42
Speaker 1: four from Mexico. United Arab admirates supply two percent, maybe
16:46
Speaker 1: not for long. Saudi Arabia and other countries provide the
16:49
Speaker 1: rest of the foreign share. The only state worried about
16:55
Speaker 1: rattling foreign markets is California because you have let yourselves
16:59
Speaker 1: be dependent on foreign supplies. You've done this to yourselves. Amen.
17:07
Speaker 1: It's amazing how that is. It's the policies, folks. It's
17:10
Speaker 1: not supply and demand, although yes, supplying demand is what's
17:14
Speaker 1: impacting markets today. But if you got rid of your
17:16
Speaker 1: stupid green agenda, you wouldn't be reeling with five dollar
17:19
Speaker 1: approaching north of five dollar gasoline. Stick around more to
17:23
Speaker 1: talk about coming up local stories. I of course prefer
17:26
Speaker 1: phone calls. If you want to give me a call,
17:27
Speaker 1: I'd love to hear from fifty on HGMG phones before
17:29
Speaker 1: I get to the phones. Remind you that we did
17:31
Speaker 1: money money with Brian James yesterday Energy Policy, looking forward
17:35
Speaker 1: to having bring McGowan and sue you for an hour.
17:36
Speaker 1: At some point. He was on for a couple of
17:37
Speaker 1: segments yesterday regarding, of course energy in the war with
17:40
Speaker 1: a run and its impact the Smith event episode one eight,
17:44
Speaker 1: and he was ranting on fire with this Smith event yesterday.
17:49
Speaker 1: Tonight's Tonight seven PM. Dan Reaganold reminded us yesterday with
17:52
Speaker 1: a brief rundown of what he's going to be talking
17:54
Speaker 1: about tonight. Empower you America dot org. Log in from home.
17:57
Speaker 1: It's a virtual class on ten Eddie Roosevelt. I think
18:01
Speaker 1: I learned more yesterday in about five or eight minutes
18:03
Speaker 1: with Dan reganold than I knew about Teddy Roosevelt. And
18:06
Speaker 1: there is so much to know about that guy described
18:08
Speaker 1: it as larger than life and perhaps one of our
18:11
Speaker 1: greatest presidents. Find out why he's on Mount Rushmore tonight,
18:14
Speaker 1: seven pm. Over to the phones, Tom, thanks for calling
18:16
Speaker 1: this morning. Happy Tuesday.
18:19
Speaker 4: Hey, Hey, good morning.
18:21
Speaker 3: I'm just saying I don't have a two inches of
18:23
Speaker 3: snow out here to deal with, so that's good. That is, hopefully,
18:26
Speaker 3: hopefully all that snow stuff behind us.
18:28
Speaker 1: Did drive buy any gas stations?
18:31
Speaker 3: I actually did. I was going to bring that up.
18:33
Speaker 3: So when I when I got off work yesterday, I
18:36
Speaker 3: went to a restaurant and on my way there I
18:39
Speaker 3: saw two fifty five, you know, somewhere in that range,
18:43
Speaker 3: I did see. Some of the bigger truck stops out
18:45
Speaker 3: on the highway were already over three dollars account, you know,
18:50
Speaker 3: like whatever big truck stops on sixty five. So I
18:54
Speaker 3: come out of the restaurant and those those gas stations
18:58
Speaker 3: that were in the two fifties jumped up. So there's
19:01
Speaker 3: a particular gas station up here in the northwest part
19:04
Speaker 3: of Indianapolis. It's actually out in front of it's a
19:07
Speaker 3: Walmart gas station and it's up on eighty sixth Street.
19:12
Speaker 3: If for all those listeners are out here in Indianapolis
19:16
Speaker 3: and you never know, you got people in Florida and
19:18
Speaker 3: where else. You got people all over the world listening
19:21
Speaker 3: to you, don't you. So there might be something in Indy.
19:24
Speaker 3: But by the time I got down there, it was
19:28
Speaker 3: still low. It's always the lowest gas station around this area.
19:32
Speaker 3: And I got gas for two thirty nine yesterday, So
19:36
Speaker 3: I don't know what's happened to it since I don't
19:38
Speaker 3: know if it's gone up yet, but I'll check before
19:40
Speaker 3: the end of the week when I when I have
19:42
Speaker 3: to go home, so to see if I guess up again. So, yeah,
19:46
Speaker 3: a gas prices were jumping up, And like you said,
19:48
Speaker 3: I understand some extent supply and demand. But yeah, Newsom
19:54
Speaker 3: is an idiot to in most most democrats. Most Democrats,
19:59
Speaker 3: when they get up on their soapbox, they prove how
20:01
Speaker 3: much they're idiots, and especially the people who have some
20:05
Speaker 3: common sense and realize, hey, what you're doing is taking
20:09
Speaker 3: more money out of my pocket. You're already taking money
20:12
Speaker 3: out of my pocket to just run the government in general.
20:16
Speaker 3: And I get some of it's necessary, but your ridiculous
20:20
Speaker 3: ideas that you come up with, you know. And the
20:23
Speaker 3: funny thing is is when they say we are going
20:27
Speaker 3: like at we the government, we're gonna put money into
20:30
Speaker 3: this to make it more affordable for you, the money
20:34
Speaker 3: that you're putting into it is coming out of my pocket.
20:37
Speaker 3: Use supple ahead, so you're not making it cheaper for me.
20:41
Speaker 3: You're making you're trying to make it look like you're
20:45
Speaker 3: doing something to help me, when all the while you're
20:47
Speaker 3: taking more money out of my pocket. Leave my pocket alone. Okay,
20:52
Speaker 3: you get what you need to run your government, but
20:55
Speaker 3: otherwise anything else, you're just stealing from me unnecessarily. And
20:59
Speaker 3: it's out of stop and that, and that's the bottom
21:02
Speaker 3: line for everybody. All the people out there that think,
21:05
Speaker 3: oh raw rod Democrats and they're the ones out there
21:08
Speaker 3: that care and help us, No they're not. They're the
21:11
Speaker 3: ones out there doing more of taking your money and
21:14
Speaker 3: using it for stupid stuff. And then and and everything
21:18
Speaker 3: they do makes things more expensive for you, not not
21:21
Speaker 3: to mention more dangerous for you. I mean, so it's
21:24
Speaker 3: it's dumb. It's dumb to vote for Democrats. People don't
21:28
Speaker 3: vote Democrats. Have a great day, Ran.
21:31
Speaker 1: Thank you Tom very much. Appreciate that.
21:34
Speaker 2: Who can argue with.
21:35
Speaker 1: That requested SoundBite by me? Thank you Joe Strecker for
21:38
Speaker 1: making good on my request. There five thirty five I
21:41
Speaker 1: fifty five kr CD talk station stack is stupid coming
21:44
Speaker 1: up five forty if if you have KRCD talk station
21:49
Speaker 1: stacka stupid late updated the stack of stupid. They get
21:53
Speaker 1: to Joe's tracker for shooting me over the photograph of
21:56
Speaker 1: Cincinnati or SINSI rather on track your railroad dollars at work.
22:00
Speaker 1: They're putting up signage to tout the projects they're doing so.
22:03
Speaker 1: In this particular post from the City of Cincinnati, City
22:05
Speaker 1: on Track signage is popping up and East probably still
22:09
Speaker 1: receive the first batch of signage, which showcases projects funded
22:13
Speaker 1: by the proceeds from the cell of the Cincinnati Southern Railroad.
22:15
Speaker 1: More are coming soon to highlight how the city is
22:17
Speaker 1: delivering visible improvements across the city. Well, they're delivering visible signage.
22:24
Speaker 1: This particular project, the Warsaw Avenue Safety project. It even
22:29
Speaker 1: has the project cost right there, ten nine hundred and
22:32
Speaker 1: seventy six thousand, four hundred and sixty dollars and five cents.
22:38
Speaker 1: That little rounding era on the end. You think they'd
22:40
Speaker 1: rounded it up or down anyway. Question. This is a
22:43
Speaker 1: this I suppose if they're playing by the rules, this
22:46
Speaker 1: particular Warsaw Avenue safety project, and I don't know what
22:49
Speaker 1: it entails. Joe thinks maybe it's speed bumps, assuming and
22:54
Speaker 1: that's a big assumption, or presuming its related existing infrastructure.
23:01
Speaker 1: Are the signs, which obviously have to be paid for
23:04
Speaker 1: considered existing infrastructure? Yeah, I know they're Definitionally they wouldn't be,
23:10
Speaker 1: but at least she get a sign, Thanks dad, Love
23:13
Speaker 1: you man. Let's go here to it looks like Arizona,
23:18
Speaker 1: where a woman stabbed a train rider more than a
23:20
Speaker 1: dozen times after the victim allegedly started fighting with her.
23:24
Speaker 1: Why are you doing that, Alante Wallace? She's thirty four.
23:28
Speaker 1: She's charged with aggravated assault with a deadly weapon for
23:30
Speaker 1: a stabbing that took place on February twelfth, accord to
23:34
Speaker 1: the probable cause off at Affidavid rather, Wallace plunged a
23:38
Speaker 1: steak knife into forty two year old woman at least
23:41
Speaker 1: fourteen times, then returned to her seat, picked up a
23:46
Speaker 1: pizza pizza box. She was carrying her Dexter's Laboratory cartoon
23:51
Speaker 1: backpack and left incident. You know What's coming caught on
23:57
Speaker 1: interior surveillance video. Affi David said Wallace seen leaving the
24:04
Speaker 1: light railcar, hold of the knife in a right hand,
24:05
Speaker 1: pizza box in the left, and carrying a white backpack. Backpack,
24:09
Speaker 1: of course, depicted the cartoon character Dexter's Laboratory. She's thirty four,
24:14
Speaker 1: okay what anyway? Apparently, she and the victim were observed
24:18
Speaker 1: by witnesses engaging in a verbal confrontation that escalated into
24:21
Speaker 1: a physical fight. According to the police, One witness reported
24:24
Speaker 1: hearing the victim confront the suspect verbally before us the
24:27
Speaker 1: assault a cord of the affidavit. During the physical struggle,
24:30
Speaker 1: witnesses observed the suspect retrieving knife described as a stake knife,
24:34
Speaker 1: and stabbed the victim repeatedly at close range. They say
24:38
Speaker 1: Wallace stabbed the woman several times in her left thigh,
24:40
Speaker 1: once in the right thigh, once in the left breast, twice,
24:43
Speaker 1: in the left forearm, once in the right abdomen, once
24:45
Speaker 1: in the left armpit twice in her jaw, described as
24:48
Speaker 1: life threatening injuries. Several of the several of the stabs
24:52
Speaker 1: were when the suspect was standing over the victim, who
24:54
Speaker 1: was laying on her back in a defensive posture, with
24:57
Speaker 1: the suspect using an overhead to downward stabbing motion. I
25:03
Speaker 1: think you've resisted any attack that you might have perceived, ma'am.
25:07
Speaker 1: You cannot continue using deadly violence when the attack has
25:10
Speaker 1: been stopped. After the fight and fleeing, Wallace contacted a
25:17
Speaker 1: defense attorney and then agree to turn herself in. Her
25:19
Speaker 1: attorney stated that his client was in the was at
25:22
Speaker 1: the light rail and was attacked, in which she defended
25:26
Speaker 1: herself and then left the right light rail in shock
25:31
Speaker 1: and apparently didn't want to provide any further statements peered
25:34
Speaker 1: in court. Her lawyer again claims she committed the stabbing
25:36
Speaker 1: attack and self defense, draw your own conclusions. Wasn't in
25:42
Speaker 1: front of Judge Silverstein and here in Hamilton County. She
25:44
Speaker 1: was order held on three hundred and fifty thousand dollars bond.
25:49
Speaker 1: Here y'all day, Welcome to the morning show. Happy Tuesday
25:54
Speaker 1: to you, Dave.
25:57
Speaker 5: I I was just going to say the money that
26:00
Speaker 5: they're using the railroad funds for is give the people
26:04
Speaker 5: Cincinnati something to shoot at instead of each other, or.
26:11
Speaker 1: To spray paint with graffiti. Right, Dave, there's that option
26:13
Speaker 1: with a sign, right.
26:15
Speaker 4: Are it's important art?
26:18
Speaker 1: Maybe they'll get a grant.
26:20
Speaker 5: Okay, well there you go thinking outside the box.
26:23
Speaker 1: You you know what, Well done, Dave good Man.
26:26
Speaker 5: You know don't don't vote Democrat.
26:29
Speaker 1: I like that. Thank you, Dave. I have a great day, brother,
26:32
Speaker 1: five forty five if you five car se DE talk
26:33
Speaker 1: station od O r XIT otor exit doc station five
26:42
Speaker 1: fifty fifty five kr CD talk station. Very happy Tuesday
26:46
Speaker 1: to you. Returning to the sack of stupid the absence
26:49
Speaker 1: of phone calls, which our absent right now five one
26:52
Speaker 1: three seven fifty five eight hundred two three talk. When
26:55
Speaker 1: are you gonna learn? You're doing something illegal, immoral and
26:59
Speaker 1: unethical and some would describe as rather disgusting. We shouldn't
27:02
Speaker 1: probably document it with a whole bunch of text messages.
27:04
Speaker 1: And here we got to form a son, the son
27:07
Speaker 1: of a former small town mayor, claiming he caught his
27:09
Speaker 1: mom having sex with his sixteen year old friend at
27:12
Speaker 1: a late night pool party. What forty three year old
27:17
Speaker 1: Misty Roberts, former important Word mayor of Deritter, Louisiana, out
27:21
Speaker 1: charge with a third degree rate contributing to the delinquency
27:24
Speaker 1: of juveniles over a twenty twenty four gathering at her home.
27:27
Speaker 1: She pleaded not guilty and involved with a second trial.
27:30
Speaker 1: The first one was a mistrial. Jurors heard from Robert's
27:33
Speaker 1: own children in this trial. Her ex husband, longtime friend,
27:35
Speaker 1: a door dash driver, and multiple teenagers were all there
27:38
Speaker 1: for the pool party. One of the most emotional moments,
27:41
Speaker 1: the interview of Robert's son that was recorded prior year,
27:46
Speaker 1: played entirely for the jury, where her son said he
27:48
Speaker 1: saw his mom having sex with his friend through a
27:51
Speaker 1: crack in the window. His text message between mom and
27:55
Speaker 1: her son displayed in court. In one he warned her
27:59
Speaker 1: he's seventy authorities that have pointed out no, he was
28:01
Speaker 1: actually sixteen. Her son testified he was not certain that
28:05
Speaker 1: he saw Roberts, although the testimony that was recorded said
28:09
Speaker 1: he definitely saw her through the crack in the door.
28:12
Speaker 1: He was trying to backpedal a little bit in court.
28:14
Speaker 1: Other texts warning shown to jurors included exchanges about what
28:19
Speaker 1: alcohol they wanted for the party. Messages from that night
28:22
Speaker 1: also showed the son telling his mom that what was
28:25
Speaker 1: happening was crazy and that his younger sister was crying
28:29
Speaker 1: about it. Juror showed it because they're idiots. Great parenting
28:35
Speaker 1: going on there. Jurors also showing photographs from the party,
28:37
Speaker 1: including images of miners holding drinks near the pool. Prosecuted
28:41
Speaker 1: to describe what are the images of Roberts in a
28:43
Speaker 1: bikini standing near the teen who appeared to be smiling
28:46
Speaker 1: and looking up her and looking up at her as
28:49
Speaker 1: lewde Court also heard that after the legend kund of
28:53
Speaker 1: the teams, the teen's mother, the abused sixteen year old
28:57
Speaker 1: teen's mother texted Roberts to end sure that she was
29:01
Speaker 1: not pregnant. Prosecutor said Roberts reply that she was on
29:05
Speaker 1: birth control and that later she shared a screenshot of
29:07
Speaker 1: an exchange in the group chat suggesting she would also
29:10
Speaker 1: take a plan be enter the door dash driver who
29:14
Speaker 1: testified that he accepted a request from Misty C to
29:19
Speaker 1: purchase emergency contraception and leave it at Robert's front door.
29:23
Speaker 1: As this tradition, Robert's ex husband told jurors she confessed
29:27
Speaker 1: to him directly. She resigned his mayor days before her
29:31
Speaker 1: twenty twenty four arrest bond conditions. Illstenally initially limited her
29:34
Speaker 1: contact with her children without her ex husband present and
29:39
Speaker 1: revoked child support. On so many levels, Joe, so many levels.
29:49
Speaker 1: Toledo got a Toledo man involved in an alleged skiing
29:51
Speaker 1: to poses a law enforcement to protect his girlfriend's bar job.
29:55
Speaker 1: Who's now accused of attempted murder? Wh Why are you
29:58
Speaker 1: doing that? Let's find out together. Kenneth Upchurch and Amanda Lancaster,
30:02
Speaker 1: both forty one indicted, Both charged with the impersonation of
30:05
Speaker 1: a peace officer and telecommunications fraud. Cord to the documents,
30:08
Speaker 1: the couple sent several text messages in an email to
30:10
Speaker 1: Lancaster's boss at the Old Bag of Nails restaurant, posing
30:16
Speaker 1: as the woman's probation officer and asking her supervisor to
30:19
Speaker 1: excuse her for being late to work. Officers said the
30:22
Speaker 1: couple sent the fraudulent messages because they were worried the
30:25
Speaker 1: Lancaster would be fired for not showing up on time.
30:28
Speaker 1: Up Church also facing charges of attempted murder and felonius
30:31
Speaker 1: assault for an alleged incident that happened at the Old
30:34
Speaker 1: Bag of Nales parking lot a week later, November sixteenth,
30:37
Speaker 1: The manager of the restaurant reportedly seeing Upchurch using a
30:40
Speaker 1: tool to cut the brake line of the motorcycle she
30:43
Speaker 1: had driven to work that day. Multiple other employees Thomson
30:47
Speaker 1: what Old officers they also saw up Church cut the
30:50
Speaker 1: brake line. Records show the manager reported having multiple issues
30:54
Speaker 1: with Lancaster and Upton, causing issues with staff at the
30:58
Speaker 1: at the restaurant. Idiots doing idiot things because they're idiots. Yes,
31:05
Speaker 1: And finally, here in Ohio, specifically Summit County, women arrested
31:09
Speaker 1: after she allegedly stolen ambulance from an Acron scene. Akron
31:13
Speaker 1: firefighters and crews called out to a medical call. When
31:18
Speaker 1: they were there evaluated the patient, the suspect jumped into
31:21
Speaker 1: the ambulance and drove away. Another ambulance immediately sent to
31:24
Speaker 1: the scene, and of course, the police were called. Shortly
31:27
Speaker 1: after two am, police found the stolen ambulance a couple
31:29
Speaker 1: of blocks away in the parking lot of a former
31:32
Speaker 1: chapel Hill mall woman taking it to custody without incident,
31:34
Speaker 1: charge with grand theft, misconduct and an emergency and disrupting
31:38
Speaker 1: public service. Her name yet to be released, You moron,
31:43
Speaker 1: you know, and that's one of those things. Why five
31:48
Speaker 1: and five five k see the talk station. A lot
31:51
Speaker 1: more coming up in the six o'clock hour. If you
31:53
Speaker 1: want to steer the direction. There's like nine billion places
31:55
Speaker 1: we could go this morning. I've selected one or two,
31:58
Speaker 1: but you may have a better idea five one, three, seven,
32:01
Speaker 1: fifty eight hundred eighty two to three talk pound five
32:04
Speaker 1: fifty on AT and T phones to be right back.
32:06
Speaker 1: We put the app in Happening the talk station to
32:13
Speaker 1: fifty five KRC, the talk station, Happy Tuesday. My name
32:17
Speaker 1: is Brian Thomas, host to the fifty five KRC Morning Show,
32:19
Speaker 1: Executive producer. This show is Joe Strecker. Without him, there
32:22
Speaker 1: wouldn't be one and got some great topics coming up
32:25
Speaker 1: this morning. I was talking about the price of gasoline
32:27
Speaker 1: has already gone up in our area thanks to the
32:29
Speaker 1: Gulf War that's going on right now. Of course that
32:32
Speaker 1: was expected for a lot of reasons, but the energy
32:34
Speaker 1: policies of the Democrats are coming home to roost on them.
32:37
Speaker 1: As I pointed out, even New York's mayor, our governor
32:39
Speaker 1: is now trying to roll back their green agenda because
32:42
Speaker 1: it's going to send the price of fuel and gasoline
32:46
Speaker 1: and natural gas in their state through the roof ah
32:49
Speaker 1: and November elections coming up. Why would she back off
32:52
Speaker 1: green policies. That's because there's election coming up. Democrats running
32:55
Speaker 1: almost exclusively on affordability. It isn't affordable there and the
33:00
Speaker 1: primary reason because they think carbon dioxide is killing the world. Okay,
33:06
Speaker 1: but when elections are coming up and your constituents starts
33:09
Speaker 1: screaming about the price, you want to do something that
33:13
Speaker 1: will immediately have an impact, and that is, of course,
33:16
Speaker 1: stop pursuing your religion, your false religion, and roll back
33:21
Speaker 1: the dumb idea of trying to get rid of carbon
33:23
Speaker 1: dioxide completely within the next decade or so. That's them, Okay. Anyway,
33:27
Speaker 1: moving forward, Coming up at seven thirty, Tom z Awastowski
33:30
Speaker 1: we the People Conventions. Tom's going to talk about what
33:32
Speaker 1: happened when No More Property Tax group met with Vveke Ramaswami.
33:37
Speaker 1: Don't know the answer to that question. We'll see a
33:39
Speaker 1: VvE VVIS on board or not also property tax, the
33:43
Speaker 1: polling in Ohio and which direction the Ohiolands seem to
33:46
Speaker 1: be leaning in terms of getting rid of property tax.
33:49
Speaker 1: Remember that's a constitutional amendment, so lots of challenges in
33:52
Speaker 1: the aftermath of that, as we've talked about many times
33:54
Speaker 1: on the Morning show. And going to have a good
33:56
Speaker 1: conversation with Tom at seven thirty he'll enlighten all of us.
33:59
Speaker 1: Eight to five, the return of the Inside Scoop with
34:01
Speaker 1: bright Barton News London Bureau chief Oliver Lane. What's with
34:05
Speaker 1: the United Kingdom's response to the situation in the Middle
34:08
Speaker 1: East and finally actually not finally apologized Daniel Davis Deep
34:12
Speaker 1: Dive every Tuesday at eight thirty. Of course, we're going
34:14
Speaker 1: to be talking about Iran and a big worry right
34:17
Speaker 1: now as has been reported, given the number of interceptors
34:21
Speaker 1: that they're going through that will be Israel, all of
34:24
Speaker 1: the Arab countries surrounding it that have been suppried with
34:27
Speaker 1: interceptors that are also being attacked oddly by the Iranians.
34:31
Speaker 1: Of course, the military bases all have their interceptors, as
34:34
Speaker 1: a finite number of those going around and the barrage
34:37
Speaker 1: of rockets coming from the Iranians is pretty overwhelming. I mean,
34:41
Speaker 1: the United Arab Emirates alone said yesterday that it has
34:45
Speaker 1: been targeted by one hundred and seventy four Iranian ballistic missiles,
34:50
Speaker 1: eight cruise missiles, and count them, six hundred and eighty
34:54
Speaker 1: nine drones over the course of just three days. No
34:58
Speaker 1: missiles and only forty four drones hit their country. But
35:00
Speaker 1: the no missiles hit because they have the interceptors, and
35:03
Speaker 1: now we're worried that they're going to run out of them.
35:05
Speaker 1: How many missiles do the Iranians have? How many drones
35:07
Speaker 1: do the Iranian have? Do the Iranians have? Good question.
35:11
Speaker 1: Some are saying they had more than two thousand missiles,
35:14
Speaker 1: many of which may have been blown up over the
35:16
Speaker 1: course of the last several days. I don't think anybody
35:18
Speaker 1: knows the number of that, and how many drones do
35:20
Speaker 1: they have. Those are inexpensive, and the interceptors that we
35:23
Speaker 1: are shooting them down with are really, really expensive, and
35:27
Speaker 1: of course the manufacturers of those interceptors cannot keep up
35:30
Speaker 1: with global demand. Think of every single base and country
35:36
Speaker 1: just within that conflict is going to need those interceptors,
35:39
Speaker 1: and we can't afford to take all of interceptors out
35:41
Speaker 1: of circulation around the globe and send them there because
35:43
Speaker 1: it leaves everybody else vulnerable. Very complicated, and I'm looking
35:47
Speaker 1: forward to hearing what Daniel Davis has to say about that,
35:49
Speaker 1: and also whether he has any optimism, notwithstanding the fact
35:52
Speaker 1: that some are still suggesting this is a I mean
35:55
Speaker 1: war powers act of course, the declaration of war vested
35:59
Speaker 1: in Congress. What's going to happen if they do a
36:01
Speaker 1: war powers resolution? Are they going to pull the plug immediately?
36:06
Speaker 1: Difficult situation. But the other thing I want, I just
36:11
Speaker 1: wanted to where is that here? It is go back
36:14
Speaker 1: to energy policy, and I thought this was this is
36:16
Speaker 1: great as a foil to the crazy Democrats. The drill, Baby, drill.
36:21
Speaker 1: All the above energy strategy has actually not only helped us,
36:23
Speaker 1: but has also helped the globe, most notably in dealing
36:27
Speaker 1: with our foreign adversaries China and Russia. As they point out,
36:30
Speaker 1: Cutters shut down its national gas export production yesterday, this
36:34
Speaker 1: after a drone attack from Iran. Global prices for LNG
36:37
Speaker 1: Looqua natural gas shot up as a consequence, but not
36:41
Speaker 1: nearly as much as they might have thanks to America's
36:44
Speaker 1: LNG export boom over the past decade. They're right, success
36:49
Speaker 1: that deserves more publicity, which is why I'm pointing this out,
36:52
Speaker 1: especially since the progressive left wants to literally shut down
36:55
Speaker 1: exports of LNG. For decades, we were a importer of
37:01
Speaker 1: natural gas. The boom and shelle and fracking that began
37:04
Speaker 1: back in the mid two thousands unleashed cheap and abundant
37:07
Speaker 1: natural gas. There's one company out there called Cheneray. I
37:09
Speaker 1: think it's a pronouncing it right. They took the risk
37:12
Speaker 1: of converting what had been an LNG import facility into
37:15
Speaker 1: an export facility in twenty sixteen. They started exporting from
37:19
Speaker 1: the lower forty eight States to foreign countries in February
37:23
Speaker 1: of that year, and more companies have joined in the fun.
37:26
Speaker 1: Now we have eight LNG export terminals which ship roughly
37:31
Speaker 1: roughly fifteen billion cubic feet a day, described as enough
37:36
Speaker 1: gas to heat eighteen million homes during the winter daily.
37:41
Speaker 1: We've surpassed Australia, Connor and Russia and have now become
37:45
Speaker 1: the world's top LNG exporter, to great financial gain. I
37:49
Speaker 1: might point out to get to that in a minute.
37:51
Speaker 1: The Biden administration last year or in twenty twenty four
37:54
Speaker 1: sought to appease the climate left with an LNG export
37:57
Speaker 1: permitting pause, obviously creating uncertainty and slow the development of
38:02
Speaker 1: new projects. See actions have consequences. Their policies result in
38:07
Speaker 1: oh look, slowing down this process. Trump lifted the ban
38:12
Speaker 1: Energy Department rapidly approving new terminals and expansions, including one
38:16
Speaker 1: last week in Corpus Christi, Texas. USLNG exports surged forty
38:21
Speaker 1: percent last year, capacity projected to be doubled by twenty
38:25
Speaker 1: thirty one. Boy, we got a lot of natural gas,
38:29
Speaker 1: don't we. USLNG exports now total about one hundred and
38:33
Speaker 1: fifty million dollars in sales every single day, which of
38:37
Speaker 1: course is an economic boost that's benefited businesses across the
38:40
Speaker 1: United States supply chain. It's also helped here you go
38:43
Speaker 1: the help Europe wean itself from Russian gas after Vladimir
38:46
Speaker 1: Putin's invasion of Ukraine. You want to deal with the
38:50
Speaker 1: war in Ukraine. Cut off the source of funding. We
38:54
Speaker 1: help Europe wean itself off Russian natural gas. Well, Europe
38:57
Speaker 1: screens bloody murder about we need to do something about
38:59
Speaker 1: the Russian invasion of Ukraine. Yeah, we'll quit funding it
39:03
Speaker 1: entered the United States of America. Europe's share of USLNG
39:08
Speaker 1: exports have doubled his sixty eight percents sixty eight percent
39:12
Speaker 1: since the war began. Now US exports about as much
39:16
Speaker 1: gas to Europe as Russia did before the war. Increasing
39:20
Speaker 1: exports has helped US ease global prices that spiked when
39:23
Speaker 1: the war began. Lower prices have in turn given European
39:26
Speaker 1: leaders political running room to toughened sanctions on Russia. Huh
39:33
Speaker 1: without US, they couldn't, because Russia has a stranglehold on Europe.
39:38
Speaker 1: Because Europe a bunch of idiots that think they don't
39:40
Speaker 1: can't drill their own Sorry, had to interject Wall Street
39:44
Speaker 1: Journal editorial board. Russian oil revenues last year fell to
39:49
Speaker 1: the lowest level since twenty twenty, when prices plunged during
39:52
Speaker 1: the pandemic. Sales have fallen by half during the first
39:55
Speaker 1: two months of this year compared to last year, amid
39:57
Speaker 1: tougher sanctions enforcement reduced exports thanks to US and lower prices.
40:03
Speaker 1: All this is squeezing Rush's economy and budget forty percent,
40:09
Speaker 1: which funds its military, hitting them right in the growing there.
40:14
Speaker 1: US exports and employees to mitigate supply disruptions caused by
40:17
Speaker 1: the war with Iran. Twenty percent of the world's LNG
40:20
Speaker 1: transits through the straits of horn Mews, which yesterday the
40:23
Speaker 1: Iranians say they shut down completely, and much of that
40:26
Speaker 1: gas comes from cutter American exports have reduced Europeans Europe's
40:30
Speaker 1: vulnerability to Middle East supply shocks. You're welcome, Europe. Despite
40:36
Speaker 1: these economic and strategic benefits, progressives continue to oppose US
40:41
Speaker 1: LNG exports. Turned to ten Democratic senators that wrote to
40:45
Speaker 1: the Energy Secretary Chris Right last week calling for a
40:48
Speaker 1: halt to LNG exports. The Trump administration's LNG export policies
40:55
Speaker 1: are not putting America first. They have jacked up utility
40:57
Speaker 1: prices for families, leaving many amata and struggling with the
41:00
Speaker 1: cost of heating their homes this winter. Whoa really exports?
41:04
Speaker 1: Did that? Huh? Turning back to Governor Hokeel turning her
41:09
Speaker 1: back on a twenty nineteen piece of legislation that demanded
41:12
Speaker 1: they get to zero carbon emissions by relying on solar
41:14
Speaker 1: and wind i guess which are causing the New York
41:17
Speaker 1: and the general Northeast regions gas prices to go through
41:20
Speaker 1: the bloody roof. Maybe we shouldn't go down that road.
41:23
Speaker 1: Maybe it's not our export policies. Maybe it's us We
41:27
Speaker 1: won't even build a pipeline. Also pointed out by the
41:30
Speaker 1: General here in a minute, The reality is prices rose
41:35
Speaker 1: last year from a near record low in twenty twenty four.
41:38
Speaker 1: Prices last week thirteen three dollars and thirteen three dollars
41:43
Speaker 1: and thirteen cents per million BTUs, about the same as
41:46
Speaker 1: twenty seventeen, and generally ranging between two and three dollars
41:50
Speaker 1: per million BTUs over the entire last decade, aside from
41:55
Speaker 1: one spike in twenty twenty two when Ukraine War disrupted
41:58
Speaker 1: global supply, US gas production since increased by twenty percent,
42:01
Speaker 1: which has curbed prices while feeding increased exports. Nine of
42:07
Speaker 1: the ten letters signers notably held from the Northeast, where
42:10
Speaker 1: gas prices are higher during the winter because of shortages
42:14
Speaker 1: caused by constraints on natural gas pipelines. Thank you to
42:17
Speaker 1: the green energy policies. The culprit isn't LNG exports. It's
42:23
Speaker 1: the anti fossil fuel policies of Democrat governors who block
42:27
Speaker 1: pipelines that could transport cheap gas from Appalachia's Shelle deposits.
42:32
Speaker 1: In the Northeast, They're sitting on billions and billions of
42:36
Speaker 1: cubic feed of natural gas. It's right next to them,
42:39
Speaker 1: Pennsylvania's great source of natural gas. They've been drilling it
42:42
Speaker 1: for years. What the Northeast states don't want it now?
42:47
Speaker 1: Apparently they don't. Why Well, because it's fossil fuel and
42:50
Speaker 1: that is bad or something limiting lergy exports won't reduce
42:58
Speaker 1: domestic energy prices, though it could press natural gas production
43:02
Speaker 1: is what the left really wants. American leg is writing
43:05
Speaker 1: to the Rescue of the World at COMME in today
43:08
Speaker 1: and it's another example of why political choices matter. Yep.
43:11
Speaker 1: And in November they have a choice. In New York
43:13
Speaker 1: you want to stick with Hochel and her crazy policies.
43:15
Speaker 1: Do you believe her when she wants to roll back
43:17
Speaker 1: that twenty nineteen law they passed there? I wouldn't how
43:23
Speaker 1: many years has she been talking about We're all gonna
43:25
Speaker 1: die because of carbon dioxide only to just now pivot
43:30
Speaker 1: because I think her constituents are expressing a bit of
43:34
Speaker 1: anger about what's going on now and the thousands of
43:38
Speaker 1: dollars they are facing in increases in gas as well
43:41
Speaker 1: as gasoline in the near term. Six eighteen fifty five
43:46
Speaker 1: K see the talk station Gate of Heaven's Cemetery. What
43:49
Speaker 1: a beautiful place they've been serving the Cincinnti Christian community
43:51
Speaker 1: for I guess seventy eight years.
43:54
Speaker 6: The talk station.
43:58
Speaker 1: Fifty five Karsite talks very Happy Tuesday or Tuesday to
44:01
Speaker 1: you fifty eight two to three talk found five fifty
44:06
Speaker 1: on AT and T phones. Ask some good news from
44:08
Speaker 1: the Supreme Court yesterday. It was a split decision, but
44:11
Speaker 1: parents likely it's not over yet, likely have a constitutional
44:15
Speaker 1: right to be informed of their children if they adopt
44:17
Speaker 1: new pronouns, use a different name, or take steps to
44:21
Speaker 1: transition to a new gender identity while at school. You
44:23
Speaker 1: have a right to know. Unsigned seven page opinion decided
44:28
Speaker 1: on its emergency doc It said you know when a
44:31
Speaker 1: child exhibits symptoms of gendertice for you at school. California
44:33
Speaker 1: policies conceal the information from parents and facilitated degree of
44:37
Speaker 1: gender transitioning during school hours. These policies likely violate the
44:41
Speaker 1: parent's right to direct the upbringing and education of their children.
44:46
Speaker 1: Likely first, the two rulings on the emergency dock at
44:51
Speaker 1: the Court dealt with yesterday Separate one Congratulations Republicans in
44:55
Speaker 1: New York. They halted an effort to redraw the congressional
44:58
Speaker 1: district in New York after a judge found that the
45:00
Speaker 1: existing boundaries dilute the power of black and Latino voters.
45:05
Speaker 1: That decision reverse. Now, this California case was a state
45:08
Speaker 1: policy that allowed transgender students to socially transition in school
45:13
Speaker 1: without the parents being automatically notified. Supreme Court ruling yesterday
45:18
Speaker 1: bars the state from enforcing the policy while the litigation
45:21
Speaker 1: over its legality is it continues. So again, Fat Lady
45:25
Speaker 1: hasn't sung on the overall issue. But I think the
45:27
Speaker 1: Supreme Court in addressing this in their emergency docket, which
45:31
Speaker 1: did get Justice Kagan a little upset, you know the
45:36
Speaker 1: direction they're going to go when it's finally adjudicated in
45:38
Speaker 1: front of the Supreme Court. Kagan said in her dissent
45:41
Speaker 1: that the majority is using shortcut procedures on the emergency
45:45
Speaker 1: docket to resolve complex legal questions without full briefing or arguments.
45:51
Speaker 1: That may be the case, but you know, there is
45:55
Speaker 1: a thing called likelihood of success on the merits, which
45:58
Speaker 1: is used when dealing with preliminary and junct will, the
46:01
Speaker 1: judge determines whether or not the person seeking the injunction
46:04
Speaker 1: is likely to win. That's telegraphing what the ultimate outcome is,
46:08
Speaker 1: and that sounds to me exactly what the Supreme Court
46:11
Speaker 1: did yesterday on it's emergency docket. Parents, you have the
46:15
Speaker 1: right in California. Can't take that right away from you, Amen,
46:20
Speaker 1: and making that another argument for school choice. I imagine
46:25
Speaker 1: there are a lot of schools out there beyond the
46:27
Speaker 1: public schools, which have a policy which requires teachers to
46:31
Speaker 1: identify two parents when their children start claiming there's someone
46:35
Speaker 1: of the opposite sex, recognizing that you cannot change your
46:39
Speaker 1: chromosomal reality, and surgery won't do it either. Six twenty five.
46:43
Speaker 1: Right now, if you five k see the talk station.
46:46
Speaker 1: What a great, great product, Rhinoshield is.
46:49
Speaker 6: Here the talk station.
46:54
Speaker 1: Thirty fifty five KRCD talk station. Ain't it be Tuesday?
46:58
Speaker 1: Five three eighty two to three talks special request from Streker.
47:02
Speaker 1: Hey get a couple of these local stories and Jay's
47:04
Speaker 1: on the phone. Jay, hang on real quick here because
47:06
Speaker 1: reparations may be coming too. The city of Cincinnati made
47:09
Speaker 1: national headlines this time Fox News National Reporting, and I
47:12
Speaker 1: saw this in the I believe The enquire the other
47:13
Speaker 1: day as well. It matters not since a city council
47:16
Speaker 1: will consider a reparations housing program Cincinnati real Property Reparations program,
47:25
Speaker 1: that's the name of it, proposal from Vice Mayor Jehn
47:27
Speaker 1: michel lemon Kearney and Scottie Johnson, councilman. Program allegedly will
47:32
Speaker 1: offer assistance to what they describe as low to moderate
47:35
Speaker 1: income residents and any individual or family member of an
47:39
Speaker 1: individual who was prevented from buying a home due to
47:42
Speaker 1: discriminatory practices. Well, this apparently relates to a housing policy
47:49
Speaker 1: that this is the way it's reported from the nineteen twenties,
47:51
Speaker 1: a discrimination We did have those those zones that it's
47:57
Speaker 1: apparently the city's real estate board forbid agents from selling
48:01
Speaker 1: or renting homes to black residents in white or suburban
48:04
Speaker 1: neighborhoods at the time. Which is why I say, I'm
48:07
Speaker 1: going back to the language and the verbiage of the
48:09
Speaker 1: reparation statute that it means it's for individuals who were
48:14
Speaker 1: prevented from buying a home. And I don't think anybody's
48:17
Speaker 1: been around more than one hundred years that might have
48:19
Speaker 1: to have dealt with the nineteen twenties discrimination policy. I
48:22
Speaker 1: don't know though, But then again, or family member of
48:26
Speaker 1: one of those, Now, how far down the generational change
48:29
Speaker 1: does that go? I don't know that either. Anyway, They
48:32
Speaker 1: claim it's initial investment, if you want to use that word,
48:38
Speaker 1: of five million dollars using proceeds from the marijuana tax
48:42
Speaker 1: revenue and the city's capital budget, because I guess the
48:44
Speaker 1: marijuana proceeds aren't enough that accorded reporting from the enquire
48:50
Speaker 1: the program allegedly will be targeting residents in fifteen of
48:54
Speaker 1: the city's fifty two neighborhoods. Wait for that to expand,
48:58
Speaker 1: because remember this is an initial investment. So we'll get
49:01
Speaker 1: to the other two the rest of the neighborhoods later.
49:03
Speaker 1: We're going to start with the fifteen that I suppose
49:05
Speaker 1: we randomly selected, would allow recipients to use the money
49:09
Speaker 1: for a down payment paid the link when property taxes
49:12
Speaker 1: or emergency home repairs are we a wash in cash, Joe.
49:19
Speaker 1: This is a new development for me. All right, Jay,
49:23
Speaker 1: welcome to the Morning Show. Thanks for calling this morning.
49:26
Speaker 1: Always good to hear from you.
49:27
Speaker 7: Okay, good morning, Brian. Hey, speaking of being a wash
49:30
Speaker 7: in cash, My my question is, and what I've been
49:33
Speaker 7: listening for, is are we going to get reimbursed we
49:36
Speaker 7: us in the American people finally for fixing the world's problems.
49:41
Speaker 7: And let's start with the three F fifteen fighter jets
49:45
Speaker 7: that got shot down by cash rich KUWAITI yeah, frankly
49:50
Speaker 7: for the yeah, yes, unacceptable. So I want the jets
49:56
Speaker 7: paid for more importantly any anything, but those pilo its
50:00
Speaker 7: need to rest in their families the rest of their lives.
50:03
Speaker 7: They pay for it. The five casualties were up to
50:06
Speaker 7: this point. I want those cash rich countries around Iran
50:10
Speaker 7: to pay for it, and maybe Iran itself. Well, I
50:13
Speaker 7: did some quick research. They have eighteen million men of
50:17
Speaker 7: fighting age that could have got up off their ass
50:19
Speaker 7: at any point and taken this on a country. Let's
50:22
Speaker 7: say there's one thousand leaders and eighteen million people that
50:26
Speaker 7: could have solved their own problems. But Europe, the Middle East,
50:31
Speaker 7: all these interceptor missiles. If we pay for every dollar
50:35
Speaker 7: we paid Lockheed Martin, I want one hundred dollars back
50:37
Speaker 7: to pay off this thirty six trillion dollar debt, and
50:40
Speaker 7: I would say that that's a pretty good deal because
50:42
Speaker 7: we paid for all the R and D, all the
50:45
Speaker 7: engineering development programs to go on for years and years
50:48
Speaker 7: and years and years before there's things go on to
50:51
Speaker 7: market and we buy from them. So I'm hoping that
50:54
Speaker 7: for the for one time, just once, we the American
50:58
Speaker 7: people and the American military and everybody that takes a
51:02
Speaker 7: loss of life here gets reimbursed richly from these countries
51:06
Speaker 7: that made poor decisions resulting in US happened to go
51:10
Speaker 7: in yet again and take care of the world's problems.
51:14
Speaker 1: Well, I guess one may argue is that a two
51:16
Speaker 1: way street because our military interventions, bombing and killing people
51:20
Speaker 1: and that kind of thing haven't always worked out to
51:22
Speaker 1: our advantage, like for example, and ignoring the predicate that
51:26
Speaker 1: got us in there. But we did spend a lot
51:28
Speaker 1: of money in a lot of years and killed a
51:29
Speaker 1: lot of people, and pick a country, Afghanistan. We have
51:32
Speaker 1: to pay back for the bombs and the missiles and
51:34
Speaker 1: the loss of life that we inflicted upon them and
51:36
Speaker 1: then turned tail and cowardly ran away or Vietnam.
51:41
Speaker 3: I think that's a fair point.
51:42
Speaker 1: Yeah, that's my point. That's fair point that maybe why
51:44
Speaker 1: we don't do it, And I'll pivot over to just
51:46
Speaker 1: suggest and I know the terriff reality and our ultimate
51:49
Speaker 1: relationship with the NATO countries who rebuilt Europe after World
51:54
Speaker 1: War Two. We spent a ton of money helping them out.
51:58
Speaker 1: Why well was devastated, But we built trading partners. We
52:02
Speaker 1: built an economic seemingly at least on some level of
52:06
Speaker 1: free market, a system of countries over there that played
52:10
Speaker 1: nicely with us for a long period of time and
52:12
Speaker 1: also served as a wonderful foil for the threat posed
52:15
Speaker 1: by the Soviet Union. So we got to benefit out
52:18
Speaker 1: of that as well. So you got to look beyond
52:20
Speaker 1: just mere dollars and cents and look at the long
52:22
Speaker 1: term future. Now, thinking about the Middle East Abraham Accords,
52:26
Speaker 1: those were done to secure economic cooperation and improvement of
52:30
Speaker 1: the lives and cooperation among a bunch of countries in
52:33
Speaker 1: the Middle East, this seems like a next step toward it.
52:36
Speaker 1: You get rid of the crazy Iranians, you have created
52:38
Speaker 1: a much more stable environment that's going to inure to
52:41
Speaker 1: a lot of people's benefits, and I would think very
52:43
Speaker 1: mightily financially for United States as well, since we're the
52:46
Speaker 1: ones that helped out along the way.
52:48
Speaker 7: Just the thought, Well, yeah, I would hope so. But
52:51
Speaker 7: take a look at how grateful great Britain is for
52:54
Speaker 7: us today.
52:54
Speaker 1: Well, no, today, today we're generations from conquering the Germans
53:00
Speaker 1: in the Japanese and World War Two. They'd remember it
53:03
Speaker 1: if it was that generation, they'd remembered it. Now they're
53:05
Speaker 1: a bunch of socialists, and don't forget they've been overrun
53:08
Speaker 1: by a bunch of Middle Eastern fundamentalists who do not
53:11
Speaker 1: have a witsworth of concern for British culture or the
53:14
Speaker 1: fact that British culture owes the American people a lot
53:17
Speaker 1: for World War Two. You know, it's a complicated world.
53:21
Speaker 1: Opinions change, attitudes change. They weren't full on socialists when
53:25
Speaker 1: we liberated them, and they weren't full on socialist after
53:28
Speaker 1: we rebuilt them. They ended up going that direction, and
53:30
Speaker 1: I would argue, to their peril, appreciate it. I would agree,
53:34
Speaker 1: appreciate it. Jay, It's a good point, but it's a
53:37
Speaker 1: lot more complicated than that. And those are the complications
53:39
Speaker 1: they just pulled out of my sphincter here in the
53:41
Speaker 1: last couple of seconds six point thirty seven fifty five
53:44
Speaker 1: cares six forty two fifty five KRC detalk station Happy
53:50
Speaker 1: Tuesday five one three seven fifty five hundred, eight hundred
53:55
Speaker 1: eighty two to three talks pound five fifty on eight
53:57
Speaker 1: T and T phones pivoting away from well lng to
54:00
Speaker 1: the rescue price of gas going through the roof. Who's doing?
54:03
Speaker 1: What about it? And what else are the Democrats proposing?
54:06
Speaker 1: They Tom brought this up a little bit. I alluded
54:10
Speaker 1: to it a little bit. I have just been so
54:13
Speaker 1: beyond my beyond my understanding, kind of like the peace
54:16
Speaker 1: of God, that we generally at least accept the idea
54:20
Speaker 1: that it's acceptable to take money from people, most notably
54:24
Speaker 1: the rich. This class warfare thing. Of course, it is
54:26
Speaker 1: the foundation for socialism and Marxism. They've got more than you,
54:30
Speaker 1: tapping into whatever God given reality we have that we
54:34
Speaker 1: typically are born with some measure of covetousness and greed
54:38
Speaker 1: and envy. Why is that part of the human condition?
54:41
Speaker 1: Maybe it's part of our survival mechanism. If you are
54:43
Speaker 1: greedy or envious, maybe you don't steal from somebody else
54:46
Speaker 1: because that's a violation of society's rules, and maybe a
54:49
Speaker 1: commandment or two. It means you got to do it yourself. Whatever.
54:53
Speaker 1: I don't know what our genetic disposition is that call
54:55
Speaker 1: it God's creation, but we do have to struggle with that.
54:58
Speaker 1: And no one taps into that more than the socialists
55:00
Speaker 1: and Marxist and no one more than socialists and Marxists
55:03
Speaker 1: used your, maybe your Judeo Christian ethic to justify government
55:08
Speaker 1: policies that reach into your pocket and literally steal from you.
55:14
Speaker 1: But when you have a choice, you flee that. See California,
55:19
Speaker 1: New York, and Illinois over the COVID nineteen thing. Obviously
55:22
Speaker 1: I do I need to go back over the history
55:23
Speaker 1: that they have literally lost hundreds of thousands of wealthy
55:26
Speaker 1: people who can afford to move. I'll point that out
55:31
Speaker 1: billions and billions of dollars in tax revenue. And here's
55:34
Speaker 1: an interesting and almost comical one. California Padres were hoping
55:41
Speaker 1: to secure Arizona Diamondbacks pitcher Merrill Kelly. They offered him
55:45
Speaker 1: forty million dollars for two years. Now, the Diamondbacks offered
55:52
Speaker 1: him forty million dollars over three years.
55:57
Speaker 4: Now.
55:57
Speaker 1: Who did Merrill Kelly choose to go with? Yeah, he
56:01
Speaker 1: took the three year option. When he explained his decision
56:07
Speaker 1: he was speaking with me, he said, quote, I don't
56:09
Speaker 1: think it's an easy any secret on how much money
56:13
Speaker 1: you get taken out of your pocket when you go
56:15
Speaker 1: to California. So apparently he did the math on this,
56:18
Speaker 1: and given the onerous reality and the tax burden there
56:20
Speaker 1: prus the fact that everything else is so much more
56:23
Speaker 1: damn expensive in California, he figured working an extra year
56:27
Speaker 1: for the same paycheck would work out to his advantage.
56:29
Speaker 1: Probably living in Arizona's a hell of a lot more
56:31
Speaker 1: fun than California too, but whatever, that's a subjective thing.
56:35
Speaker 1: So there's one who decided he has an option, and wealth,
56:41
Speaker 1: like the wealthy, is mobile, and both the wealth and
56:45
Speaker 1: the wealthy are leaving California for the obvious reasons, pivoting
56:49
Speaker 1: over now if you can't flee, Do you remember it
56:54
Speaker 1: wasn't that long ago the United Nations wanted to impose
56:57
Speaker 1: a global minimum tax on corporates. Talk about globalism. Everybody's
57:03
Speaker 1: going to pay the same now, why do you think
57:05
Speaker 1: they might want to do that? That's because corporations, like
57:08
Speaker 1: individuals here in the United States, have freedom of movement.
57:10
Speaker 1: They can go away someplace else. But if you have
57:14
Speaker 1: a global tax structure that flattens it or levels it
57:17
Speaker 1: out and makes it the same everywhere you go, that
57:19
Speaker 1: prevents countries from competing against each other. One of the
57:21
Speaker 1: reasons we are so damned successful in the United States
57:24
Speaker 1: of America is because you here in the state of Ohio,
57:26
Speaker 1: my friends in the Commonwealth, my friends in Indiana, my
57:29
Speaker 1: friends everywhere else, Iowa, New York, and California are all
57:32
Speaker 1: competing against each other. I know I'm stating the obvious,
57:36
Speaker 1: and don't accuse me of man splinning. I'm just trying
57:38
Speaker 1: to drive a solid point home before I launch into
57:41
Speaker 1: Bernie Sanders, who appreciates that reality and is now proposing
57:46
Speaker 1: a five percent billionaire wealth tax. Right, Senator Bernie Sanders,
57:51
Speaker 1: this is a proposal nationally, a federal national tax which
57:56
Speaker 1: we events billionaires from. Well, they could leave the country maybe,
57:58
Speaker 1: but they couldn't leave for differ state. This tax will
58:01
Speaker 1: follow them. And why does he want to do it?
58:04
Speaker 1: He wants to buy votes. He and Representative Rocanna California
58:09
Speaker 1: launched the bill yesterday, five percent annually on America's billionaire
58:14
Speaker 1: Sanders claims there are nine hundred and thirty eight people
58:16
Speaker 1: that will be impacted by this. Look at them, those
58:18
Speaker 1: evil billionaires. You're never going to be one of them.
58:20
Speaker 1: We should take what they've got in spite of the
58:23
Speaker 1: fact they employ a lot of people. They claim it
58:26
Speaker 1: would raise four point four trillion dollars over ten years. Well,
58:33
Speaker 1: at least that's what University of California, Berkeley says. Now
58:36
Speaker 1: here's the big question. What's he going to do with it?
58:39
Speaker 1: Business insider letting us know flashyest proposal ready buying votes
58:44
Speaker 1: at one time three thousand dollars direct payment to each
58:48
Speaker 1: American singular in households making one hundred and fifty grand
58:52
Speaker 1: or less annually. That will be twelve thousand dollars for
58:55
Speaker 1: a family of four. Stealing from one group and handing
58:59
Speaker 1: it to another. Well, because the one group's got more
59:02
Speaker 1: than the other. That's not fair, it's sinful. Now get
59:07
Speaker 1: a load of tod It's not just that. Here's what
59:11
Speaker 1: else they want to fund with this. The recently expired
59:14
Speaker 1: Affordable Care Act tax credits. Also to reverse cuts in
59:18
Speaker 1: Medicaid made by the One Big Beautiful Bill Act passed
59:20
Speaker 1: by Congress and acted into law. Expand Medicare to cover
59:23
Speaker 1: dental vision and hearing for seniors, build, rehabilitate, and preserve
59:30
Speaker 1: over seven million affordable homes, and sure families don't spend
59:36
Speaker 1: more than seven percent of their income on childcare. If
59:38
Speaker 1: you do, I guess you're gonna be eligible for a
59:40
Speaker 1: slice of the billionaire's money. I think it's quickly running
59:42
Speaker 1: out as I moved through this list. Establish a sixty
59:46
Speaker 1: thousand dollars minimum annual salary for public school teachers. Oh
59:50
Speaker 1: my god, is that not socialism? And everybody makes the
59:53
Speaker 1: same minimum, doesn't matter if you live in an inexpensive city.
59:59
Speaker 1: I mean, compare the price living for a teacher in
1:00:00
Speaker 1: San Francisco versus one in pick A City, Poughkeepsie, Iowa.
1:00:05
Speaker 1: I bet it's cheaper in Iowa. Everybody that is going
1:00:08
Speaker 1: to get a sixty thousand dollar minimum salary. It's like
1:00:09
Speaker 1: a national minimum wage cap. You know, it's twenty two
1:00:13
Speaker 1: dollars across this great land. Yeah, twenty two dollars doesn't
1:00:15
Speaker 1: go as far in New York City as it does
1:00:17
Speaker 1: here in Cincinnati, for example. Expand mediciate home healthcare for
1:00:21
Speaker 1: seniors and people with disabilities. You know how many retired
1:00:24
Speaker 1: seniors there are out there now? It's a growing population.
1:00:27
Speaker 1: You know how many are going to need home health care.
1:00:30
Speaker 1: I don't think the four trillion dollars would even cover that.
1:00:37
Speaker 1: And of course he took a shot at Elon Musk.
1:00:40
Speaker 1: He's like the evil Orange man among the wealthy because
1:00:43
Speaker 1: he well is now a Republican and is fighting for
1:00:45
Speaker 1: conservative or maybe even libertarian policies. He's the world's richest man,
1:00:50
Speaker 1: so of course he's an easy target. Let's go after
1:00:52
Speaker 1: Elon Musk. He would owe forty two billion dollars in
1:00:55
Speaker 1: taxes in the first year, so you can't run from
1:01:02
Speaker 1: Bernie Sanders and Rokana. How about that six forty nine
1:01:07
Speaker 1: fifty five KRC the talk station. Yeah, more to talk
1:01:11
Speaker 1: about coming up. I got Bob on the phone, Bob,
1:01:13
Speaker 1: and take your call right out of the go. Bob,
1:01:14
Speaker 1: Thanks for holding over the break there. Welcome to the
1:01:16
Speaker 1: fifty five KRC Morning Show.
1:01:19
Speaker 2: Martin.
1:01:20
Speaker 1: How's it going gone good? Bob's on your mind?
1:01:23
Speaker 3: Well, it's You.
1:01:25
Speaker 8: Talked about the Democrats and that kind of threw me
1:01:27
Speaker 8: off a little bit, but Democrats would be Democrats. But
1:01:29
Speaker 8: I was just wanting to talk about the Iran and
1:01:32
Speaker 8: Ward We're not in right now because I'm trying to
1:01:33
Speaker 8: make sense of it. I'm not against it, Don't get
1:01:35
Speaker 8: me wrong. They killed a lot of people over there
1:01:37
Speaker 8: for no reasons. My question is this Trump was on
1:01:41
Speaker 8: the news after the first attack that he took care
1:01:43
Speaker 8: of all the pendicular problems over in Iran. Now here
1:01:47
Speaker 8: we are yet again saying the same thing. So it
1:01:51
Speaker 8: was the first one to lie or did the mission
1:01:54
Speaker 8: tell and now we're doing this again? Or is this
1:01:57
Speaker 8: more directed towards China and Russia and they don't want
1:01:59
Speaker 8: to come out.
1:02:00
Speaker 1: Well maybe a little bit mixed bag of all the above.
1:02:03
Speaker 1: I think the argument from the Trump administration and I'm
1:02:05
Speaker 1: just putting words in their mouth. Yeah, we destroyed the
1:02:09
Speaker 1: enrichment facilities and their ability to enrich uranium to a
1:02:13
Speaker 1: nuclear grade power in the first strike. The second level
1:02:17
Speaker 1: is they're rebuilding it. We had evidence that they're rebuilding
1:02:21
Speaker 1: their nuclear weapons program. So we've got to stop them
1:02:24
Speaker 1: from doing that and basically prevent them from doing anything
1:02:27
Speaker 1: along those lines on into the future. And that's where
1:02:30
Speaker 1: the regime change part comes in. Now they'll argue that, no,
1:02:33
Speaker 1: we're not necessarily about regime change, but if they completely
1:02:36
Speaker 1: emasculate the Iranian army, they blow up all the navy
1:02:39
Speaker 1: and they try to get rid of as many of
1:02:41
Speaker 1: them with missiles and weapons. They've effectively rendered Iran well impossible,
1:02:47
Speaker 1: incapable of defending itself, and of course financially devastated. And
1:02:52
Speaker 1: if you don't have any money flowing into your country,
1:02:54
Speaker 1: you might want nuclear weapons all day long, and the
1:02:56
Speaker 1: ashes and the aftermath of this bombing, you might still
1:03:00
Speaker 1: have aspirations to do it, but it's going to be
1:03:03
Speaker 1: really hard when your citizenry is starving and you have
1:03:06
Speaker 1: no resources by way of an economy that would make
1:03:09
Speaker 1: a new nuclear weapons program a little challenging. So that's
1:03:13
Speaker 1: my quick take on it, Bob. But I hear where
1:03:15
Speaker 1: you're coming from, and I get it there's a lot
1:03:17
Speaker 1: of folks out there this morning and that they have
1:03:19
Speaker 1: been and I have been included. Was it really an
1:03:22
Speaker 1: immediate threat that needed to be dealt with? That goes
1:03:25
Speaker 1: back to the constitution, declaration of war, getting some sort
1:03:27
Speaker 1: of approval from Congress, even if it's through the War
1:03:30
Speaker 1: Powers Act, which mean many like me think is not
1:03:32
Speaker 1: constitutional in and of itself because it's an unconstitutional delegation
1:03:36
Speaker 1: or congressional powers. But here we are, so the genies
1:03:40
Speaker 1: out of the bottle, as I like to say, but yeah,
1:03:42
Speaker 1: you're onto something there. I do not argue that five
1:03:44
Speaker 1: fifty six to fifty six right now if you have
1:03:46
Speaker 1: k City talk station, more calls are welcome. After the
1:03:49
Speaker 1: top of the our news than we're geting to Tom
1:03:51
Speaker 1: Zawastowski at seven point thirty what happened with the No
1:03:54
Speaker 1: More Property Tax group when they met with v Vague Ramaswami.
1:03:57
Speaker 1: And we'll also find out where the polling numbers show
1:03:59
Speaker 1: that No Property Tax in Ohio group is. That's coming
1:04:02
Speaker 1: up at seven thirty of who you can stick around
1:04:04
Speaker 1: for the whole.
1:04:04
Speaker 9: Hour Today's top headlines coming up at the top of
1:04:09
Speaker 9: the talk station.
1:04:27
Speaker 1: Seven oh six here, if do you have KARCD talk station,
1:04:31
Speaker 1: Bryan Thomas wishing your own a very happy Tuesday, and
1:04:33
Speaker 1: invitation to stick around the rest of the morning. Got time.
1:04:35
Speaker 1: Between now and the bottom of the hour, we hear
1:04:37
Speaker 1: from Tom Zawastowski on no Property taxes. Apparently the no
1:04:40
Speaker 1: Property Tax group here in the state of Ohio met
1:04:42
Speaker 1: with viv Ramaswami. We'll get to find out what Vivi's
1:04:44
Speaker 1: reaction to that is and what his proposal might be
1:04:47
Speaker 1: to the extent he has one. We'll also find out
1:04:50
Speaker 1: what the polling shows on elimination of the IHIO property tax.
1:04:53
Speaker 1: I suspect there's going to be a large campaign waged
1:04:56
Speaker 1: against the no property tax folks. At some point it
1:05:00
Speaker 1: seems to me kind of silent. We've got a lot
1:05:02
Speaker 1: of politicians talking about how complicated it would be, and
1:05:04
Speaker 1: oh my god, how high our income tax or are
1:05:06
Speaker 1: well maybe income tax or maybe sales tax might have
1:05:09
Speaker 1: to be to replace that, if it in fact has
1:05:11
Speaker 1: to be replaced. But are there more creative ideas or
1:05:13
Speaker 1: alternatives out there to eliminating it? I don't know. That's
1:05:16
Speaker 1: why we have Tom Zawastowski we the People Convention dot
1:05:19
Speaker 1: or joining us at the bottom of the hour. Fast
1:05:21
Speaker 1: forward one hour The Inside Scoop with bright Bart News
1:05:23
Speaker 1: today the return of London Bureau Chief Oliver Lane talking
1:05:26
Speaker 1: about the United Kingdom's response to the we'll call it
1:05:30
Speaker 1: war between Israel, United States and the Iranians and what's
1:05:35
Speaker 1: the story with the UK. Daniel Davis Deep Dive Tire
1:05:37
Speaker 1: Lieutenant Colonel Daniel Davis with the war analysis. Of course,
1:05:40
Speaker 1: today we are going to be focusing I think exclusively
1:05:43
Speaker 1: on what's going on in Iran. And yes, I am
1:05:45
Speaker 1: going to press him on this concern that's been raised
1:05:48
Speaker 1: about our air defense interceptors. We only have a fine
1:05:52
Speaker 1: item out how many we have total remains to be
1:05:55
Speaker 1: We don't really know. I suppose that's some sort of
1:05:57
Speaker 1: military secret, and I understand the reason why that might be.
1:06:00
Speaker 1: But we are using and we and collectively we that's
1:06:03
Speaker 1: everybody who's been given the air defense interceptors. All the countries,
1:06:06
Speaker 1: all the military bases, and in fact all over the globe.
1:06:09
Speaker 1: They need these and they're going through them like well,
1:06:12
Speaker 1: even more so than changes of underwear. Yeah, I changed
1:06:14
Speaker 1: mind once a day. They have been shooting thousands of
1:06:19
Speaker 1: these interceptors into the skies too well, knock down the
1:06:22
Speaker 1: thousands of rockets that are on is firing seemingly indiscriminately.
1:06:26
Speaker 1: And that's one of the more interesting components of this.
1:06:29
Speaker 1: What in the hell was our on thinking when it
1:06:31
Speaker 1: started dropping bombs on all those Arab countries. It's got
1:06:33
Speaker 1: a bunch of new well friends made out of that,
1:06:37
Speaker 1: and I think maybe they just see a future down
1:06:39
Speaker 1: the road talking about the common of May to day earlier.
1:06:41
Speaker 1: If you can just get rid of the Iranian threat.
1:06:43
Speaker 1: And I realize we've got a constitution, we've got politicians
1:06:46
Speaker 1: need to chime in and all this. That's the legal component.
1:06:49
Speaker 1: But might this activity result in some semblance of peace
1:06:53
Speaker 1: for the entire region, allowing them to trade together and
1:06:55
Speaker 1: create a better world like post World War II Europe?
1:06:59
Speaker 1: A huge financial benefit that we might inure to that
1:07:02
Speaker 1: if we can just bring about some stability, not to mention,
1:07:05
Speaker 1: can you imagine improving everyone there's quality of life, just
1:07:09
Speaker 1: recognizing that at any given moment, some crazy terrorist organization
1:07:13
Speaker 1: is not going to start lobbing missiles into your backyard. Yeah,
1:07:17
Speaker 1: and that's a beautiful thing about this. The Iranian economy
1:07:21
Speaker 1: is going to be devastated by this. And how likely
1:07:24
Speaker 1: is it that they will be able to continue fundingly
1:07:27
Speaker 1: or providing missiles and weaponry to terrorist organizations if they
1:07:31
Speaker 1: can't even fend for themselves. You know, the supply chains
1:07:35
Speaker 1: have been radically disrupted by all of this. And I
1:07:38
Speaker 1: guess the other thing is Hasbala. For whatever reason, there
1:07:42
Speaker 1: was a ceasefire between Israel and Hasbala, and that's occasionally
1:07:45
Speaker 1: kind of been well ignored. But they started launching rockets
1:07:49
Speaker 1: into Israel the other day, which provided a predicate for
1:07:51
Speaker 1: Israel to just go in and start beating the living
1:07:53
Speaker 1: crap out of Hasbala. Again, they were kind of restrained
1:07:55
Speaker 1: by the prior peace arrangements, So why would you do that?
1:07:59
Speaker 1: A lot of people asking that question as well, but
1:08:03
Speaker 1: moving away from the legal realities and the impending war
1:08:06
Speaker 1: powers authorization vote and how that might go the case
1:08:11
Speaker 1: for cautious optimism about Trump's war with the Iran. I'll
1:08:14
Speaker 1: give credit to Gerard Baker, and I'll stand on the
1:08:16
Speaker 1: shoulder of giants, as I quite regularly do, because sometimes
1:08:18
Speaker 1: people put it a hell of a lot better than
1:08:20
Speaker 1: I'm capable of doing on my best day. Despite assurances
1:08:24
Speaker 1: to the contrary, the disinclination toward high risk military action,
1:08:28
Speaker 1: and the disappointing record of similar actions by American endeavors,
1:08:33
Speaker 1: Donald Trump has become the fourth consecutive Republican president to
1:08:35
Speaker 1: find himself immersed in a major conflict in the Middle least.
1:08:38
Speaker 1: Only George H. W. Bush's war to expel Saddam Hussein
1:08:41
Speaker 1: from Kuwait ninety one can be counted as a clear success,
1:08:46
Speaker 1: and then only because its objective was tightly circumscribed get
1:08:52
Speaker 1: him out of Kuwait. Ronald Reagan's effort to stabilize Lebanon
1:08:56
Speaker 1: in the early nineteen eighties ended in the bombing of
1:08:58
Speaker 1: the Beroot Marine Barrick, while his later efforts to extricate
1:09:02
Speaker 1: US hostages resulting the self inflicted wound of Iran Contra
1:09:05
Speaker 1: and George W. Bush's war with Iraq in two thousand
1:09:08
Speaker 1: and three cost intolerable loss of life and untold damage
1:09:12
Speaker 1: to America's strategic capabilities and stature. Democratic presidents, less ambitious
1:09:17
Speaker 1: efforts have fared no better. Remember Bill Clinton, his standoff
1:09:21
Speaker 1: bombing campaign if failed to arrest the rise of al
1:09:24
Speaker 1: Qaeda and led to more or less directly to the
1:09:26
Speaker 1: September eleventh attacks. Barack Obama led from behind, unleashing chaos
1:09:31
Speaker 1: in Libya and permitted Syria across his chemical weapons red line.
1:09:36
Speaker 1: Joe Biden's catastrophic exit from Afghanistan, part of the Greater
1:09:40
Speaker 1: Middle East for these purposes, was a humiliation. Does Operation
1:09:45
Speaker 1: Epic Fury have better prospects a few days into the conflict.
1:09:48
Speaker 1: There's no definitive answer, but a cautiously optimistic case can
1:09:52
Speaker 1: be made that this Middle Eastern entanglement will end better
1:09:56
Speaker 1: than most of the others. Two questions must be answered
1:10:00
Speaker 1: pondering whether any military action of this sort is to
1:10:03
Speaker 1: be undertaken. One is it justified? Two is it wise?
1:10:11
Speaker 1: Critics at home had brought a sale Trump for the
1:10:13
Speaker 1: supposed lawlessness of this campaign. It's important to address the
1:10:17
Speaker 1: moral and legal case for the action first, and to
1:10:20
Speaker 1: note Iran's government has been responsible for the deaths of
1:10:23
Speaker 1: more than any other deaths of Americans, rather more than
1:10:27
Speaker 1: any other in the past fifty years. From its outset
1:10:30
Speaker 1: in nineteen seventy nine, the Islamic Republic has made murdering
1:10:32
Speaker 1: Americans among its highest priorities. From the more than two
1:10:36
Speaker 1: hundred Marines killed by Hezbala in the nineteen eighty three
1:10:39
Speaker 1: de Route bombing and the six hundred or so American
1:10:42
Speaker 1: service members killed by the Iran backed militias in Iraq,
1:10:46
Speaker 1: to the many US citizens terrorized, captured, and killed by
1:10:49
Speaker 1: Hamas and other Iranian sponsored entities in Gaza and around
1:10:53
Speaker 1: the world. Tehran has repeatedly bathed in American blood. Happy
1:10:59
Speaker 1: about that too. Under the principle of self defense, action
1:11:04
Speaker 1: taken against a regime that has killed so many of
1:11:07
Speaker 1: our own citizens is legitimate, not simply for the retributed
1:11:11
Speaker 1: of justice, but to prevent further killings. It'll be preferable
1:11:15
Speaker 1: if mister Trump had spent more time in the past
1:11:17
Speaker 1: few weeks explaining that case to the American people and
1:11:20
Speaker 1: ideally securing a political mandate from Congress for it. But
1:11:25
Speaker 1: the failure to do so doesn't make the cause and
1:11:30
Speaker 1: illegitimate one. There's your legal quandary versus the practical reality
1:11:35
Speaker 1: of is it a good thing? Yet? If we are
1:11:39
Speaker 1: fully justified in finally bringing a measure of justice to
1:11:43
Speaker 1: a government that has caused so much suffering, is it
1:11:47
Speaker 1: wise to do so? Is the potential cost of a
1:11:51
Speaker 1: war to disarm, damage, or remove a regime proportionate to
1:11:56
Speaker 1: the benefit that we can expect from taking such action. Here,
1:12:01
Speaker 1: there's less confidence when a tyrannical, homicidal regime has been
1:12:04
Speaker 1: committed to killing you four decades. Regime change is self
1:12:08
Speaker 1: evidently the most desirable outcome. We're all familiar with the
1:12:11
Speaker 1: historical record. Achieving regime change remotely through airpower alone is
1:12:15
Speaker 1: an extraordinarily long probability. But even if this new round
1:12:20
Speaker 1: of punishment for Iran fails to dislodge the regime. The
1:12:23
Speaker 1: further damage that we can deal to it can only
1:12:26
Speaker 1: weaken it further. That's the argument to just pound them
1:12:30
Speaker 1: into submission and completely eliminate their military power completely. Few
1:12:36
Speaker 1: regimes have been undermined the way Tehran has in the
1:12:40
Speaker 1: past couple of years. It has just witnessed the awesome
1:12:43
Speaker 1: combination of a US Israeli intelligence and military capability, capability
1:12:48
Speaker 1: pulizing its supreme leader of almost four decades and much
1:12:52
Speaker 1: of its leadership team. It has seen the countries who
1:12:55
Speaker 1: it vowed to destroy rain down fire and destruction on
1:12:58
Speaker 1: its military facilities for a year. Its top military commanders
1:13:02
Speaker 1: taken out with breathtaking precision, its conventional and nuclear facilities
1:13:05
Speaker 1: badly damaged, Its air defense is essentially destroyed. It has
1:13:10
Speaker 1: watched as its close ally in Syria was overthrown in
1:13:14
Speaker 1: a civil war, its proxies and Gaza and Lebanon decimated.
1:13:20
Speaker 1: Even if it's even its friends in Western Hemisphere Nicholas
1:13:23
Speaker 1: Mauzurro now sits at a Brooklyn, New York City jail.
1:13:27
Speaker 1: Its sponsors Russia and China seem to regard their relationship
1:13:31
Speaker 1: with that as well as a one way affair. They
1:13:34
Speaker 1: get Iran's drones and oil. Iran gets tough diplomatic language
1:13:38
Speaker 1: for America and Israel. The Iranian people have risen up
1:13:41
Speaker 1: against the regime which has survived only by killing thousands
1:13:46
Speaker 1: of them. So if regime change doesn't come, now, what
1:13:51
Speaker 1: kind of regime survives leaderless, impoverished, isolated, besieged, mostly disarmed.
1:14:00
Speaker 1: Is Iran likely to be stronger after being on the
1:14:02
Speaker 1: receiving end of a campaign from the most technologically sophisticated
1:14:06
Speaker 1: and the best equipped militaries in the world. There are risks,
1:14:12
Speaker 1: and news of the first US casualties reminds us that
1:14:14
Speaker 1: the costs are dear, but for an opportunistic president, there
1:14:20
Speaker 1: may never be a better opportunity. And allow me to
1:14:23
Speaker 1: pivot over from Jard Baker's comments, the point out that's
1:14:25
Speaker 1: the point that Donald Trump's trying to make. Listen, we
1:14:27
Speaker 1: don't want to run your country. We don't have anything
1:14:29
Speaker 1: to do with it. We just want these evil, murderous
1:14:31
Speaker 1: thugs or a hell bent on getting a nuclear weapon
1:14:34
Speaker 1: and well wipe in Israel and other countries off the map.
1:14:37
Speaker 1: Killing Americans, death through America, death to America. They love
1:14:40
Speaker 1: hating America. Might you get something better in the final analysis,
1:14:45
Speaker 1: if the people rise up, this may be the only
1:14:47
Speaker 1: opportunity for them to do it. Can they do it?
1:14:52
Speaker 1: That's a great question to ask the citizenry there. Oh,
1:14:56
Speaker 1: for those Second Amendment fans out there in the world,
1:14:58
Speaker 1: it's a good thing to be able to be armed,
1:15:00
Speaker 1: is it? Can you imagine if every single running and
1:15:02
Speaker 1: protester had their own AR fifteen Huh, might things be
1:15:06
Speaker 1: a little bit different? I think that's a legitimate question
1:15:10
Speaker 1: to ask. Tom's on the phone. Tom had a quicker
1:15:13
Speaker 1: mind before it gets Tom listen to lunch tomorrow at
1:15:16
Speaker 1: the Works Pizza Company downtown Loveland, Little old Loveling, love
1:15:20
Speaker 1: my little Loveling, and I appreciate Tom calling this morning. Tom,
1:15:22
Speaker 1: thanks for calling, Welcome to the show.
1:15:25
Speaker 4: Thank you.
1:15:25
Speaker 8: No problem. I just let's just assume for one second
1:15:28
Speaker 8: that this tax thing for no property taxes in the
1:15:31
Speaker 8: state of Ohio passes, say it overwhelmingly passes. Why would
1:15:36
Speaker 8: anybody think for one second that they're going to pay
1:15:38
Speaker 8: any more attention to that than they did the court,
1:15:41
Speaker 8: the Supreme Court when twenty years ago that what would
1:15:45
Speaker 8: make what would make anybody think that they would honor that?
1:15:48
Speaker 8: What the people said, he.
1:15:50
Speaker 1: You know, that's a funny and legitimate point.
1:15:52
Speaker 4: Tom.
1:15:52
Speaker 1: You're right. We've been two decades into the Supreme Court
1:15:54
Speaker 1: saying our taxation system for school of funding is unconstitutional,
1:15:58
Speaker 1: and yet here we are waiting for someone who can
1:16:01
Speaker 1: come up with the concept of standing to make that
1:16:03
Speaker 1: assertion in a court of law, moving to enforce the
1:16:05
Speaker 1: Supreme Court opinion. But apparently that's not going to happen. Tom.
1:16:09
Speaker 1: The only thing I can suggest this, the only thing
1:16:10
Speaker 1: I can suggest is as a constitutional amendment, it will
1:16:16
Speaker 1: carry the force of of course a constitutional amendment. There
1:16:18
Speaker 1: it is in the ohiuse constitution, property tax is illegal,
1:16:21
Speaker 1: which means I think you or I could refuse to
1:16:24
Speaker 1: pay it and then point to our constitution and let's
1:16:27
Speaker 1: see what kind of enforcement action they engage in to
1:16:29
Speaker 1: get it to force us to pay our property taxes.
1:16:31
Speaker 1: How do you think that would play out? Tom? Right,
1:16:36
Speaker 1: you and n have standing because the state made an
1:16:39
Speaker 1: action in effort to either I don't know if there'd
1:16:41
Speaker 1: be a civil prosecution or criminal prosecution, or an effort
1:16:44
Speaker 1: to foreclose on your house for faire to pay income
1:16:46
Speaker 1: taxes or real estate taxes. I think that will be
1:16:49
Speaker 1: a vehicle to get you standing in court to fight
1:16:51
Speaker 1: it and raise the challenge. Wait a second, our constitution
1:16:54
Speaker 1: says you can't do this anymore. How are you trying
1:16:57
Speaker 1: to do it?
1:17:00
Speaker 8: Well, I don't understand. How come I don't have standing
1:17:03
Speaker 8: at the taxpayer's been pantaxis for the last thirty years
1:17:06
Speaker 8: because you're not I don't.
1:17:08
Speaker 1: You are not unique. One must have a unique, particular,
1:17:12
Speaker 1: unique legal challenge to get standing in court. Otherwise, like
1:17:16
Speaker 1: any law, you're law, you're you're impacted the same as
1:17:19
Speaker 1: everybody else in the eyes of the law. And trust me,
1:17:22
Speaker 1: standing is one of the more complicated elements of even
1:17:26
Speaker 1: being a lawyer, let alone understanding how we get into court.
1:17:29
Speaker 1: But if you're basically on the same platform, the same
1:17:31
Speaker 1: standing as everybody else, then sorry, you have to deal
1:17:34
Speaker 1: with it. So this is the crazy thing. I mean,
1:17:37
Speaker 1: go ahead. I've been commenting about the War Powers Act
1:17:39
Speaker 1: nineteen seventy three War Powers Act. I do believe fundamentally,
1:17:42
Speaker 1: and I think everybody from a legal scholar perspective believes
1:17:46
Speaker 1: that violates Supreme Court law, which is, you can't delegate
1:17:49
Speaker 1: your specifically defined authority within the Constitution to another branch
1:17:53
Speaker 1: of government. Going back to Reagan, they gave him the
1:17:56
Speaker 1: line item vita. The Supreme Court said, no, you can't
1:17:58
Speaker 1: delegate that. That's a congression respet onsibility power the purse. Well,
1:18:02
Speaker 1: here we are with the same kind of argument. Let's
1:18:06
Speaker 1: see how it plays out. But nobody's challenged it. Because
1:18:08
Speaker 1: declaration of war is specifically the purview of Congress. You
1:18:12
Speaker 1: can't war powers act around that, even though it sort
1:18:17
Speaker 1: of allows you to do that. Seven five, fifty five KRC.
1:18:22
Speaker 1: But nobody has standing for that one. Let me I
1:18:24
Speaker 1: mentioned doctor Fred Pack. He is my daddy. He's my
1:18:26
Speaker 1: whole deep talk station seventy nine and fifty five KRCD
1:18:32
Speaker 1: talk Station. Happy Tuesday, the return of tom's Awastowski. You
1:18:38
Speaker 1: can find Tom online. We the People Convention dot Org
1:18:40
Speaker 1: podcast weekly. He's got lots of great coverage on the
1:18:44
Speaker 1: website there Weather, People Convention dot Org. Tom z Awastowski,
1:18:47
Speaker 1: Welcome back to the fifty five KRC Morning Show. Topic
1:18:49
Speaker 1: near and dear to my listener's hearts as well as
1:18:52
Speaker 1: mind property taxes in the state of Ohio. Of course,
1:18:55
Speaker 1: there's a circulating petition to try to get on the
1:18:57
Speaker 1: ballot a constitutional meant that would completely eradicate property taxes
1:19:02
Speaker 1: in Ohio and I know there's a group behind that,
1:19:04
Speaker 1: and apparently that group has met with viveg. Gromis. I mean,
1:19:06
Speaker 1: you're here to explain that, but also this new poll
1:19:08
Speaker 1: that you have done. Welcome back, Tom. It's always a
1:19:10
Speaker 1: pleasure to have you on the morning show.
1:19:12
Speaker 4: Well, great to be with you, Brian, to talk about
1:19:15
Speaker 4: you know, really the most talked about topic in Ohio.
1:19:18
Speaker 4: And uh, you know, there's a lot to unpack here,
1:19:21
Speaker 4: but I was very glad I think you probably were
1:19:23
Speaker 4: as well to see the Bake meet with the Axe
1:19:26
Speaker 4: Ohio tax people, with Brian Nassey and Leonard and those guys. Uh,
1:19:31
Speaker 4: you know, they've put out a statement and I don't
1:19:33
Speaker 4: think they're being went all that well, but at least
1:19:36
Speaker 4: it shows that the theke is interested in the topic,
1:19:40
Speaker 4: is listening, you know, to people to try to figure out, okay,
1:19:43
Speaker 4: how do we address what is really an egregious, you know,
1:19:47
Speaker 4: situation where people have been taxed out of their homes
1:19:51
Speaker 4: and so yeah, I was happy to see they get together.
1:19:53
Speaker 1: Well, and I think you would be a fool to
1:19:56
Speaker 1: ignore that issue given that it is, you know, a
1:19:58
Speaker 1: really a dominant topic here. Ohio and got a lot
1:20:01
Speaker 1: of seniors struggling to stay in their homes. We got
1:20:03
Speaker 1: whacked not that long ago by a really huge increase
1:20:07
Speaker 1: in property taxes brought about by the increase in real
1:20:09
Speaker 1: estate values. I mean, something's got to give here. So
1:20:12
Speaker 1: he wants to talk about it. But did he say
1:20:15
Speaker 1: he's in favor of eliminating it by way of a
1:20:18
Speaker 1: constitutional amendment. I can't imagine he went that far yet.
1:20:22
Speaker 4: Yeah, and I I, you know, I want to share
1:20:24
Speaker 4: with your listeners something that I have not made public previously.
1:20:29
Speaker 4: And the reason why the Bank you know, is not
1:20:31
Speaker 4: you know, willing to commit I don't think anybody is
1:20:34
Speaker 4: to total repeal of property taxes is because the voters
1:20:37
Speaker 4: just don't support it. You know, couldn't do some context.
1:20:43
Speaker 4: Literally nine months ago, I said, geez, I really want
1:20:46
Speaker 4: to try to help the repeal property tax effort. You know,
1:20:50
Speaker 4: Brian and Leonard of these guys have been friends of mine,
1:20:52
Speaker 4: they're Grassrows people, They're sincere in their efforts. And so
1:20:56
Speaker 4: I and some other patriots went out and tried to
1:20:59
Speaker 4: raise money to get this on the ballot, because, as
1:21:03
Speaker 4: you know, it costs millions of dollars to collect these signatures.
1:21:07
Speaker 4: I mean, I'm one of the few people alive in
1:21:09
Speaker 4: the state who's actually passed a constitutional amendment. I was
1:21:12
Speaker 4: the president of the Ohio Liberty Coalition back in twenty
1:21:16
Speaker 4: eleven when we passed the Ohio Healthcare Amendment, and I
1:21:20
Speaker 4: know some things from that, and I've learned some hard lessons.
1:21:23
Speaker 4: So when we went out to look for money, Brian, well,
1:21:27
Speaker 4: you know, no one's going to give you millions of
1:21:28
Speaker 4: dollars if they don't think you've got a good chance
1:21:31
Speaker 4: of succeeding. So last December, we paid for a statewide survey,
1:21:38
Speaker 4: and I mean, we did a really good job of
1:21:40
Speaker 4: looking at every county individually to see will people support
1:21:45
Speaker 4: a complete repeal of property taxes? And the answer is
1:21:49
Speaker 4: absolutely not. The number came back at only seventeen point
1:21:53
Speaker 4: two percent of people in Ohio want a full repeal,
1:21:58
Speaker 4: but sixty nine percent want reform. And that had caused
1:22:03
Speaker 4: me to have to pivot and try to talk to
1:22:06
Speaker 4: the Act of File Tax people and say, guys, you
1:22:08
Speaker 4: know this is not going to fly.
1:22:10
Speaker 1: We need something else, something else, And therein lies the challenge,
1:22:14
Speaker 1: what something else is going to provide us relief? And
1:22:17
Speaker 1: yet allow, of course, schools and parks and police and
1:22:20
Speaker 1: fire to continue to be funded. Let's first start with
1:22:23
Speaker 1: the with the poll here, I see that you pulled
1:22:27
Speaker 1: twelve hundred and forty seven registered voters. I saw the
1:22:30
Speaker 1: margin of error described as plus or minus two point
1:22:32
Speaker 1: eight percent, which is a pretty good margin of error.
1:22:36
Speaker 1: Who did you hire to do the polling? Because trust me,
1:22:40
Speaker 1: you're not you understand this. I think everybody in my
1:22:42
Speaker 1: listening audience has a jaundiced eye of skepticism when it
1:22:46
Speaker 1: comes to any poll. We've all been burned by believing poles.
1:22:49
Speaker 1: So where are we with just the overall polling? Who
1:22:51
Speaker 1: did it and what specifics do you have on that?
1:22:56
Speaker 4: Well? See, this is really important because those listeners who
1:23:00
Speaker 4: are familiar with me personally and with the WEA That
1:23:03
Speaker 4: People convention, know that years ago we realized all the
1:23:07
Speaker 4: polls were propaganda, and we started doing our own polling,
1:23:11
Speaker 4: and we were the only we were literally the only person,
1:23:13
Speaker 4: I guess we were one of two people who actually
1:23:16
Speaker 4: called President Trump winning Ohio in twenty sixteen with our
1:23:21
Speaker 4: poll when they were telling us that Hillary Clinton was
1:23:23
Speaker 4: going to win by sixteen percent, and we said Trump's
1:23:26
Speaker 4: going to win by eight point four, and he won
1:23:28
Speaker 4: by eight point two. So it is. It has always
1:23:31
Speaker 4: been our policy, the Lead People Convention to do our
1:23:34
Speaker 4: own polling. Now you know, things have changed since then.
1:23:37
Speaker 4: We used to just use our own equipment and do
1:23:39
Speaker 4: you know phone calls to do the polling, and now
1:23:42
Speaker 4: you got to do a lot more. So we had
1:23:43
Speaker 4: to hire, you know, some professional polling companies to help us.
1:23:47
Speaker 4: But this is critical. We got to tell ourselves the truth.
1:23:51
Speaker 4: Tom Swatowski is not going to you know, make decisions
1:23:54
Speaker 4: that in fact, you know, literally millions of Ohioans based
1:23:58
Speaker 4: on some phony poll and so so I'm very confident
1:24:01
Speaker 4: in this poll because I helped with the questions and
1:24:04
Speaker 4: I help with the methodology, and we know we got
1:24:06
Speaker 4: what we paid for, and believe me, it costs a
1:24:09
Speaker 4: lot of money.
1:24:09
Speaker 1: All Right, we're going to dive in some of the
1:24:11
Speaker 1: polling results which are really interesting. Yes, a lot of
1:24:14
Speaker 1: people support reforming. They don't necessarily approve the abolishment, which
1:24:19
Speaker 1: Tom just pointed out. Only seventeen point two percent of
1:24:21
Speaker 1: those polled up call for the total abolishment. But that
1:24:24
Speaker 1: doesn't mean that there isn't a desire for some change here.
1:24:27
Speaker 1: Let's dive into more details. Tom Zawastowski, We the People
1:24:29
Speaker 1: Convention dot org will bring see the talk station if
1:24:35
Speaker 1: you'bout care c DE talk station by the time. So
1:24:37
Speaker 1: Tom's Awastowski for We the People Convention dot org get
1:24:39
Speaker 1: ready to dive on in the property tax reform in Ohio.
1:24:42
Speaker 1: What voters believe, what the data shows statewide survey. Tom's
1:24:46
Speaker 1: got great confidence in it. He's got prior polls that
1:24:48
Speaker 1: he has done to stand on proving that he has
1:24:50
Speaker 1: been very accurate. Now pivoting over before we dive on
1:24:53
Speaker 1: to some of the results, which I find very interesting. Tom,
1:24:56
Speaker 1: Now did you pull only property owners? Did you get
1:24:59
Speaker 1: kick out of the polling? I know renters pay property tax,
1:25:02
Speaker 1: they just don't generally realize it that it does get
1:25:05
Speaker 1: passed on in the monthly rent build the property tax,
1:25:07
Speaker 1: so the building goes up. Excuse me, you won't know
1:25:09
Speaker 1: who's going to pay it. But was there any differentiation
1:25:12
Speaker 1: in the polling between real property owners and renters?
1:25:16
Speaker 4: Yeah, there really was. And again we were careful to
1:25:19
Speaker 4: make sure we really dug down and got representation from
1:25:23
Speaker 4: all voters. Because if you're going to do a const
1:25:25
Speaker 4: social amendment, now you got to pass on the ballot,
1:25:28
Speaker 4: and there is a difference. So obviously people that rent
1:25:30
Speaker 4: don't most of them don't get that connection that their
1:25:33
Speaker 4: rent is tied to property taxes. I want to point
1:25:36
Speaker 4: out a real interesting statistic though, Well we said, geez,
1:25:39
Speaker 4: only seventeen point two percent are for total elimination. There's
1:25:43
Speaker 4: another statistic where, you know, forty two point eight percent
1:25:47
Speaker 4: of the people polled of the voters said that they
1:25:50
Speaker 4: support abolishing property taxes for owner occupied homes only. That's
1:25:56
Speaker 4: a pretty interesting statistic. And because a lot of people
1:25:59
Speaker 4: was I think you've heard from your own listeners. They
1:26:02
Speaker 4: don't want Walmart and Costco and and and you know,
1:26:05
Speaker 4: big businesses to get property tax release. They think, you know,
1:26:08
Speaker 4: it should be for property owners. And so that forty
1:26:12
Speaker 4: two point eight percent number, I think is something that
1:26:16
Speaker 4: is being reflected in Like a state Rep. Mark Heiner
1:26:20
Speaker 4: has just he's in District's ninety eight. He just put
1:26:23
Speaker 4: up an amendment to uh, you know, to abolish property
1:26:26
Speaker 4: taxes for all homeowners. The problem is brand that's like
1:26:30
Speaker 4: a ten billion dollar hit. Now, property tax revenue in
1:26:34
Speaker 4: Ohio is like twenty two to twenty four billion dollars
1:26:38
Speaker 4: ten percent. Ten billion is like a forty five percent cut.
1:26:42
Speaker 4: That's pretty tough hit to handle. I think that, you know,
1:26:46
Speaker 4: initially we need to get to meet a sweet spot.
1:26:49
Speaker 4: Is like a twenty to twenty two percent cut initially,
1:26:53
Speaker 4: And and so I don't think you can repeal private
1:26:56
Speaker 4: sectors for all property owners, but maybe for people a
1:26:59
Speaker 4: sixty five or older, or people who maybe have paid
1:27:03
Speaker 4: private taxes for twenty five years and by got maybe
1:27:05
Speaker 4: you should actually own their home after twenty five years.
1:27:08
Speaker 4: You know, there's got to be some other way to
1:27:11
Speaker 4: do this. And I'm talking to the Beck and Rob
1:27:13
Speaker 4: mccalling and other legislators about, you know, what's the best
1:27:16
Speaker 4: way to go forward that we can pass right but
1:27:20
Speaker 4: also does the things we need to do, which is
1:27:22
Speaker 4: reform our tax situation in Ohio.
1:27:25
Speaker 1: Okay, So those are some of the possible ways we
1:27:28
Speaker 1: can go rather than eliminate completely, those are some of
1:27:30
Speaker 1: the potential areas we could curve back or cut back
1:27:33
Speaker 1: the property tax for at least some folks. But that
1:27:36
Speaker 1: and actually that that suggests that the problem that I've
1:27:40
Speaker 1: been facing with the complete elimination of it is what
1:27:43
Speaker 1: will they do in response? I mean, I almost I
1:27:46
Speaker 1: almost want it to happen, just to see what our
1:27:47
Speaker 1: elected officials are faced with. I mean, talk about deer
1:27:50
Speaker 1: in the headlights, they'd be freaking out and I relish that.
1:27:54
Speaker 1: But as this, as the polling reflects, the reason that
1:27:58
Speaker 1: the vast majority people don't want to live and they
1:28:00
Speaker 1: completely is the uncertainty surrounding the replacement revenue. We don't
1:28:04
Speaker 1: know what's going to be. What will happen when that
1:28:06
Speaker 1: deer in the headlight stops and they start start acting
1:28:09
Speaker 1: on the elimination of property taxes, So owner occupied homes only,
1:28:13
Speaker 1: that's one option. Let's see. Ability to pay is central
1:28:16
Speaker 1: Ohioan sense of fairness. Eighty three point three percent believe
1:28:19
Speaker 1: recurring property taxes, if they exist, should reflect income and
1:28:23
Speaker 1: ability to pay. Sounds to me like we're getting into
1:28:25
Speaker 1: that class warfare kind of thing.
1:28:27
Speaker 2: Tom for that, that stat stocked me. I was like, whoa,
1:28:32
Speaker 2: I don't like that at all.
1:28:34
Speaker 4: That's kind of on the socialism kind of path. And
1:28:37
Speaker 4: I'm like, no, no, no, no, But it shows you though,
1:28:40
Speaker 4: the frustration is so high that people will look to
1:28:44
Speaker 4: things like that and we've got to fix it. I mean,
1:28:47
Speaker 4: you gotta love Have you heard Amy actors of proposal.
1:28:50
Speaker 1: Oh no, I haven't.
1:28:52
Speaker 4: Oh you got you got to hear that. You're gonna
1:28:53
Speaker 4: love this this real quick she spoke. She was speaking
1:28:56
Speaker 4: at the Columbus Union Hall a couple of weeks ago,
1:28:58
Speaker 4: and she said the former state health director from Columbus
1:29:02
Speaker 4: suggested that one way to lower local property taxes would
1:29:05
Speaker 4: be to increase state funding to schools, police and fire
1:29:08
Speaker 4: departments and other public bodies. So they don't need new
1:29:11
Speaker 4: property taxes. So let's just take the money out of
1:29:14
Speaker 4: your other pocket and give the schools and police all
1:29:17
Speaker 4: the money they want. So you don't even get to
1:29:19
Speaker 4: vote on it. There you go. So this is the
1:29:23
Speaker 4: problem Tom.
1:29:24
Speaker 1: On that proposal that would require the elected officials and
1:29:29
Speaker 1: Columbus to determine what any given school district is entitled
1:29:32
Speaker 1: to out of the pool of money that they have.
1:29:34
Speaker 1: Oh wow, oh yeah, we want that right.
1:29:37
Speaker 6: So here here's talking.
1:29:38
Speaker 1: About increasing union power or something I would have made.
1:29:42
Speaker 4: Well, isn't what amy actor is about? Point she's running? Okay,
1:29:46
Speaker 4: So here's the thing. The actual tax the ACTU Ohio
1:29:50
Speaker 4: tax people deserve a lot of credit because the basis
1:29:53
Speaker 4: of their repeal amendment is we are just over tax
1:29:57
Speaker 4: at Ohio. Our government at all levels is costing more
1:30:02
Speaker 4: than we can afford. So the property tax issue, Brian,
1:30:06
Speaker 4: is not just about property taxes. It's about an instrument
1:30:11
Speaker 4: to reform all of our government. We need to give
1:30:14
Speaker 4: them a haircut. And here's the memo to the legislature,
1:30:18
Speaker 4: to the police Department's levers. We're going to cut your spending.
1:30:22
Speaker 4: You're going to reform, you're going to get rid of
1:30:25
Speaker 4: duplicate programs, you're going to be more efficient, you're going
1:30:28
Speaker 4: to implement AI And if you think about it, that
1:30:31
Speaker 4: all dovetails with the veak Ramaswami is talking about if
1:30:36
Speaker 4: he becomes governor, he wants to reform our state. So
1:30:40
Speaker 4: we we're like Florida.
1:30:42
Speaker 6: We're ready.
1:30:43
Speaker 1: I wrote down Florida while you were talking, Tom, because
1:30:45
Speaker 1: I wrote down Ramaswamy. He wants to get rid of
1:30:47
Speaker 1: the income tax here. Now that complicates matters if you
1:30:50
Speaker 1: want to get rid of the property taxes, because these
1:30:52
Speaker 1: are two sources of revenue for the state. Yet, and
1:30:55
Speaker 1: we'll let you come back and talk about this. How
1:30:57
Speaker 1: is it that Florida has been able to do all
1:30:59
Speaker 1: this and has an economy that is booming how is
1:31:02
Speaker 1: it that they're moving in the direction of eliminating property
1:31:04
Speaker 1: taxes along these lines although there are qualifications for their
1:31:07
Speaker 1: elimination of property taxes when they already don't tax income.
1:31:11
Speaker 1: This is strange. Can we mirror Florida? We'll bring Tom
1:31:13
Speaker 1: back for one more as a couple of the talk
1:31:15
Speaker 1: station seven fifty fift about KRCD talk station. We're talking
1:31:20
Speaker 1: with Tom z Awastowski from We the People Convention dot
1:31:22
Speaker 1: org about the elimination of property taxes and how we
1:31:26
Speaker 1: might go about doing it now. His well conducted survey
1:31:28
Speaker 1: reflects that, you know, a lot of people are tuned
1:31:30
Speaker 1: into the reality of eliminating it is going to create
1:31:32
Speaker 1: some major uncertainty or about what's going to replace the revenue.
1:31:35
Speaker 1: So only seventeen point two percent of the folks say
1:31:38
Speaker 1: absolutely abolished property taxes, but that doesn't mean they don't
1:31:41
Speaker 1: all want it. So sixty nine percent of voters support
1:31:44
Speaker 1: reforming the current property tax system. And that's some of
1:31:46
Speaker 1: the areas we've been talking about with Tom this morning.
1:31:48
Speaker 1: If we don't eliminate it completely, what can we do
1:31:50
Speaker 1: by giving relief? And of course you were talking you
1:31:52
Speaker 1: mentioned Florida, which I had written down in advance to
1:31:55
Speaker 1: ask you about Florida has a different way of life.
1:31:59
Speaker 1: They don't have see here, they don't have income tax
1:32:05
Speaker 1: except corporate income tax I think is five point five percent.
1:32:09
Speaker 1: Their state sales tax is six percent. And they're moving
1:32:13
Speaker 1: forward with a proposal to eliminate property taxes a homestead
1:32:17
Speaker 1: property exemption. That's not second homes or vacation rentals or
1:32:20
Speaker 1: commercial property. But if you have your single primary residence home,
1:32:24
Speaker 1: it will be eliminated, with the exception of school taxes
1:32:29
Speaker 1: they're supposed to have, Like the school taxes will still
1:32:31
Speaker 1: come out of like I guess the property tax built.
1:32:33
Speaker 1: But it's a long way toward reform. Tom, how come
1:32:36
Speaker 1: we can't be Florida.
1:32:39
Speaker 4: Well, I think here's the best way. Stop spending. Yeah,
1:32:43
Speaker 4: I love these people who keeps talking about, oh, we
1:32:45
Speaker 4: got to replace the revenue. That's the whole point there,
1:32:48
Speaker 4: you got to replace it. The whole point is to
1:32:51
Speaker 4: cut your spending, to reform government. I just can't believe it.
1:32:57
Speaker 4: But it's a culture. Remember, you know, you go into
1:33:00
Speaker 4: off and I don't care if your township trustee or
1:33:02
Speaker 4: county commissioner, you know, running a police department. What is
1:33:06
Speaker 4: your culture more and more and more. We need this,
1:33:10
Speaker 4: we need that, give us more money. Let's put another
1:33:12
Speaker 4: levee on about it. We have to change that culture.
1:33:15
Speaker 4: And that's what they're doing in Florida, and that's what
1:33:18
Speaker 4: I think the Veke is going to want to do
1:33:20
Speaker 4: here in Ohio. But I've said that the Theke listen,
1:33:24
Speaker 4: they're not going to change. We learn from Doge. What
1:33:27
Speaker 4: we learned from Doge. Oh, here's all this fraud and
1:33:30
Speaker 4: abuse and things you should cut and they cut nothing
1:33:33
Speaker 4: because if they won't cut unless they have to. So
1:33:37
Speaker 4: this property tax bill has to be balanced. We've got
1:33:41
Speaker 4: to cut enough so that they have to reform right
1:33:45
Speaker 4: and get the message. But also we have to give
1:33:48
Speaker 4: relief to the people who got thirty percent increases in
1:33:51
Speaker 4: their property taxes. They got to get made whole. We
1:33:54
Speaker 4: got to give some of that back. So we're talking
1:33:57
Speaker 4: about it, you know. And the other part of it is, Brian,
1:34:00
Speaker 4: you know this, I don't care if we cut all
1:34:03
Speaker 4: the property taxes. Are we cut a dollar of property taxes,
1:34:07
Speaker 4: the interests, the unions particularly are going to spend thirty
1:34:11
Speaker 4: million dollars to defeat it at the no member election.
1:34:16
Speaker 4: So we are raising money, and I will know this week,
1:34:20
Speaker 4: this not this week, this month, we will know if
1:34:22
Speaker 4: we can raise the money we need to be able
1:34:25
Speaker 4: to pass it. If we do get the legislature to
1:34:28
Speaker 4: act on something that does cut property taxes and reform
1:34:33
Speaker 4: government at all levels, that's my goal, that's what I'm
1:34:36
Speaker 4: working on. I asked your listeners for their prayers that
1:34:39
Speaker 4: we get this funding. We've been working really hard on
1:34:41
Speaker 4: it for like ten months and we think we're there.
1:34:44
Speaker 4: But without the funding, the legislatures is not going to
1:34:48
Speaker 4: put anything on the ballot that cha't be passed. And
1:34:51
Speaker 4: you've got to have money to fight the left when
1:34:53
Speaker 4: they come out and demonize everything you're doing.
1:34:56
Speaker 1: And it's interesting to me that that adds money. Money
1:35:00
Speaker 1: equals ads money equals propaganda, that people are so incapable
1:35:05
Speaker 1: of thinking for themselves and ignoring the ads and just
1:35:08
Speaker 1: looking at like, for example, your survey. If you are
1:35:10
Speaker 1: asked a simple question like do you think we need
1:35:12
Speaker 1: property tax reform in Ohio, and they say yes overwhelmingly,
1:35:17
Speaker 1: and when you point to the loss of revenue and that,
1:35:19
Speaker 1: no one just immediately says, well, there's too many services
1:35:22
Speaker 1: coming out of Ohio. They're trying to do too many
1:35:24
Speaker 1: things with too little money. Maybe we need to start
1:35:26
Speaker 1: cutting government. And how appealing that would sound if you
1:35:28
Speaker 1: think about it logically and reasonably. Where does the problem
1:35:31
Speaker 1: come from? The problem comes from a bloated government that
1:35:34
Speaker 1: spends too much and therefore needs to consume more of
1:35:36
Speaker 1: our dollars. That's period and the story, and that transcends
1:35:40
Speaker 1: the state of Ohio. We could point to the federal
1:35:42
Speaker 1: government on that level, couldn't we Tom going back to Dog.
1:35:46
Speaker 4: Well, absolutely, Yeah's and you're hitting it right on the head.
1:35:49
Speaker 4: It's unfortunate that are these people who want to keep
1:35:54
Speaker 4: raising our taxes use our tax money to propagandas about
1:35:58
Speaker 4: Todd and here we are, as taxpayers trying to protect
1:36:01
Speaker 4: our own interests, and we've got to go out and
1:36:03
Speaker 4: raise millions at power so we can defend ourselves. There's
1:36:06
Speaker 4: something wrong with that whole balance of power. We shouldn't
1:36:09
Speaker 4: have to do that, but that's what we have to do,
1:36:12
Speaker 4: and that's what we're trying to do. I have a
1:36:14
Speaker 4: lot of hope. I think you're going to see something
1:36:16
Speaker 4: come out in the next month or so that it's
1:36:18
Speaker 4: going to be very, very good for taxpayers that's going
1:36:22
Speaker 4: to cut their their expenses, and it's also going to
1:36:25
Speaker 4: send a message to every government agency at every level
1:36:29
Speaker 4: you got to cut your budget by like ten, fifteen
1:36:32
Speaker 4: or twenty percent because we ain't going to fund you anymore.
1:36:35
Speaker 1: Well, I know, screaming at the radio, going fraud, fraud,
1:36:37
Speaker 1: wasted abuse, fraud, wasted abuse and government programs. Yeah, we
1:36:40
Speaker 1: can address that and probably you know, deal with the
1:36:42
Speaker 1: ledged hole that's going to be left here just by
1:36:45
Speaker 1: getting rid of the fraud wasted abuse, which is that
1:36:47
Speaker 1: AI you referred to earlier as a great mechanism to
1:36:50
Speaker 1: maybe doing that on a going forward basis, We the
1:36:53
Speaker 1: People Convention dot orgs or dot org, right, we the
1:36:56
Speaker 1: People contention dot org. Tom z Awastowski, are you going
1:36:58
Speaker 1: to post the poll on your website?
1:37:01
Speaker 4: I will. I have not yet. This is the first
1:37:03
Speaker 4: time I've ever said it, you know, put it out
1:37:06
Speaker 4: there for the public. So thank you for this opportunity.
1:37:08
Speaker 1: It's an honor.
1:37:09
Speaker 4: I will probably put it out in an email to
1:37:11
Speaker 4: the state, you know, to my email list as we
1:37:14
Speaker 4: go forward. But yeah, let's let's just keep moving in
1:37:16
Speaker 4: the right direction. We hear the people. That's clear. We've
1:37:19
Speaker 4: got to do something, and I'm committed to making sure
1:37:22
Speaker 4: we do do something and something that's good.
1:37:24
Speaker 1: Well, I apperc it was sick about gares see de
1:37:28
Speaker 1: talk station. It's Tuesday, it is time. I always look
1:37:31
Speaker 1: forward to this, the inside scoop of bright Bart News,
1:37:33
Speaker 1: and I always start out the segment by saying, book
1:37:35
Speaker 1: mark the page bright Bart b R E I T
1:37:37
Speaker 1: B A r T dot com. You'm glad you did
1:37:39
Speaker 1: because you'll get to read from uh well, things that
1:37:42
Speaker 1: London Bureau Chief Oliver Laine writes about, among others, at
1:37:45
Speaker 1: breit Bart. Welcome back, Oliver Lane, London bureau Chief at
1:37:48
Speaker 1: breit Bart. Is a pleasure to have you back on
1:37:50
Speaker 1: the show, my friend.
1:37:51
Speaker 10: Well, thank you for inviting me. It's a great pleasure.
1:37:53
Speaker 1: Indeed, well, I appreciate it because yesterday Prime Minister Keir
1:37:57
Speaker 1: Starmer told are set out loud he doesn't believe in
1:38:00
Speaker 1: regime change from the Skies, defending his decision to not
1:38:03
Speaker 1: allow the United States to use British bases for the
1:38:06
Speaker 1: initial wave of attacks on Iran. Then he kind of
1:38:08
Speaker 1: pivoted and said, well, US can have access to the
1:38:12
Speaker 1: basis for defensive strikes in response to Iran's retaliatory tax.
1:38:17
Speaker 1: So I guess as a quick point of order, I
1:38:20
Speaker 1: got to ask, is someone keeping track and pointing out
1:38:23
Speaker 1: is there a fundamental difference between offensive and defensive flights?
1:38:28
Speaker 1: Are you keeping track of what airplane is being flown
1:38:31
Speaker 1: out of any given UK air base that it is? Oh,
1:38:33
Speaker 1: that's a defensive plane versus an offensive plane and sortie
1:38:37
Speaker 1: it just seemed like, I don't know, maybe not even
1:38:39
Speaker 1: a distinction. That's why we have you, Oliver Lane. What's
1:38:42
Speaker 1: going on here with the United Kingdom's response to this
1:38:44
Speaker 1: military activity?
1:38:45
Speaker 10: Indeed, yeah, it's a very fine line there, and sacre
1:38:49
Speaker 10: starm of the Prime Minister has not been a tall
1:38:51
Speaker 10: clear spell what exactly he meant about this? Because, of course,
1:38:55
Speaker 10: if you're talking about really purely defensive, that means putting
1:38:59
Speaker 10: up what air into sception fighters, which are air to
1:39:02
Speaker 10: weear missiles. They're up there to take down drones, uranium fighters, missiles.
1:39:06
Speaker 10: But as we know, not just from this conflict, but
1:39:09
Speaker 10: from every other conflict in modern history, Ukraine, etc. What's
1:39:14
Speaker 10: the most effective, fool proof and cost effective way to
1:39:19
Speaker 10: stop enemy missiles? Well, it's to take them out before
1:39:21
Speaker 10: they launch. You take them out on the ground.
1:39:23
Speaker 1: True, So that is that.
1:39:24
Speaker 10: Included in this deal? I suspect not, because that's essentially
1:39:29
Speaker 10: what this whole package of strikes the President Trump and
1:39:33
Speaker 10: Israel launch over the weekend is about. It's about hitting
1:39:35
Speaker 10: these things on the ground before then get in the air.
1:39:38
Speaker 10: And when you open there. You mentioned about Kissed Arma,
1:39:42
Speaker 10: our wonderful left wing globalist prime minister over here in
1:39:46
Speaker 10: the UK, and these comments he made about what Trump
1:39:50
Speaker 10: was doing and saying that the UK doesn't believe in
1:39:55
Speaker 10: regime change from the air, and it was layering on
1:39:58
Speaker 10: the criticism and it's it's really only barely below the surface,
1:40:04
Speaker 10: saying that the UK can't take military action that it
1:40:07
Speaker 10: considers unlawful. What does that imply He believes that the
1:40:10
Speaker 10: US action is unlawful, It can't take action that's not
1:40:14
Speaker 10: thought through, doesn't have a conclusion in mind. What does
1:40:16
Speaker 10: that imply, Well, it implies he believes that President Trump
1:40:20
Speaker 10: is flying blind on this. He's just launched the attack
1:40:22
Speaker 10: and has no endgame in mind. So yeah, this is
1:40:26
Speaker 10: I don't know if you want to call it insulting.
1:40:27
Speaker 10: I don't know if you respect kiss Starmer enough to
1:40:30
Speaker 10: think anything. He says could possibly be insulting, but he's
1:40:33
Speaker 10: certainly trying to make clear what he thinks about Trump,
1:40:37
Speaker 10: and it ain't a lot.
1:40:38
Speaker 1: Well, there's sort of half step, half measure using him
1:40:41
Speaker 1: for defensive purposes. That sounds to me like he's trying
1:40:44
Speaker 1: to have his cake and eat it too. Well, you know,
1:40:46
Speaker 1: we're gonna let use him for some things which maybe
1:40:48
Speaker 1: appease the you know, the US government, or maybe is
1:40:51
Speaker 1: or anybody else who's in favor of the conflict. But
1:40:53
Speaker 1: there have been many suggestions, and I'm not bringing it
1:40:56
Speaker 1: up as a unique thought myself, but that it may
1:40:59
Speaker 1: be the kure Starmer struggling with the fact that you
1:41:01
Speaker 1: have a very sizeable Muslim population. We know that very well.
1:41:05
Speaker 1: It's been building for years and years and years. I
1:41:08
Speaker 1: mean how Elvis Costello wrote about it back in the
1:41:11
Speaker 1: day London is full of Arabs, remember that from the
1:41:15
Speaker 1: song from Elvis Costello back in the day. Is that
1:41:18
Speaker 1: the problem is he afraid of his the residents of
1:41:21
Speaker 1: the UK that have a very substantial presidence in the
1:41:24
Speaker 1: Muslim community and probably aren't in favor of what's going on.
1:41:27
Speaker 10: Thank you for quoting on this, Costello to I mean that,
1:41:29
Speaker 10: but a big smile on my face. You and I
1:41:34
Speaker 10: don't need to make these points about is Starma trying
1:41:38
Speaker 10: to appease a particular voting block in the UK. We
1:41:42
Speaker 10: don't need to do that, because President Trump did it
1:41:44
Speaker 10: for us this morning. He went out there and said
1:41:46
Speaker 10: it pretty clearly when he was spoke to a British newspaper,
1:41:50
Speaker 10: the Sun, and said that he was very disappointed with
1:41:54
Speaker 10: the with Starma and the UK. And actually, if you
1:41:57
Speaker 10: look at the language that he used, I'm going to
1:41:58
Speaker 10: read this quote out here in a second, and I
1:42:01
Speaker 10: think it's pretty clear that President Trump is actually shocked
1:42:05
Speaker 10: and upset by the degree to which Britain, which is
1:42:09
Speaker 10: a country he clearly loves, has let him down. Now
1:42:13
Speaker 10: that this is a tragedy, because it's not really Britain
1:42:15
Speaker 10: that's leading him down at all. It's a kiss starmer,
1:42:17
Speaker 10: a prime minister who, by the way, is the least
1:42:20
Speaker 10: popular British prime minister in the history of polling, in
1:42:24
Speaker 10: the history of all data. He has the lowest opinionatium
1:42:27
Speaker 10: any leader ever. So it's not like the British people
1:42:29
Speaker 10: are standing four square behind him on this decision. But
1:42:32
Speaker 10: I'm going to read this quite out to you. President
1:42:33
Speaker 10: Trump said, and I quote, I never thought i'd see that.
1:42:37
Speaker 10: I never thought i'd see that from the UK. We
1:42:41
Speaker 10: love the UK, And he said about Britain, it's also
1:42:45
Speaker 10: not such a recognizable country. London is a very different
1:42:48
Speaker 10: place with a terrible mayor. You have a terrible mayor there,
1:42:51
Speaker 10: some terrible people, but it's a very different place. And
1:42:54
Speaker 10: this is when he was being asked by the newspaper
1:42:57
Speaker 10: whether he thought that, as you said at the beginning
1:42:59
Speaker 10: of this segment, you know, Starmer is essentially having to
1:43:02
Speaker 10: appease a particular block of voters. And I think that's
1:43:05
Speaker 10: absolutely right. So what I want to mention here is
1:43:08
Speaker 10: we had a very important special election here just last
1:43:12
Speaker 10: week Thursday last week, and this was in a what
1:43:15
Speaker 10: you would call a true labor heartland, a safe seat.
1:43:19
Speaker 10: The Labor Party has been active in British politics for
1:43:21
Speaker 10: about one hundred years, about a century early nineteen twenties.
1:43:24
Speaker 10: This seat has been Labor for one hundred years. It
1:43:28
Speaker 10: has won every single election there for a century. So
1:43:32
Speaker 10: if they can't win there, they cannot win anywhere. That's
1:43:35
Speaker 10: the point I'm trying to make. And guess what special
1:43:37
Speaker 10: election last week Labor came third. This is our left
1:43:42
Speaker 10: wing party smashed into third place, and by who, by
1:43:46
Speaker 10: a pro Gaza, pro Palestine sectarian interest party who came first.
1:43:53
Speaker 4: So wow.
1:43:55
Speaker 10: The situation we're in now is that for decades the
1:43:58
Speaker 10: Labor Party has been the main political beneficiary of Britain's
1:44:03
Speaker 10: policy of mass migration. People have come here in great numbers.
1:44:06
Speaker 10: They've been converted into paper citizens, they've been given their passports.
1:44:10
Speaker 10: Then they've got the vote to run, the right to
1:44:12
Speaker 10: vote and who g only speaking have they voted for?
1:44:16
Speaker 10: All the data we have shows they have voted for
1:44:18
Speaker 10: the Labor Party. Labor has controlled those votes, and particularly
1:44:21
Speaker 10: in Muslim communities, it's block voting, which by the way,
1:44:25
Speaker 10: is illegal. But that's just one of those things that
1:44:27
Speaker 10: we're too polite as Britain's to talk about. And it
1:44:29
Speaker 10: goes on and on. But now we're in a position,
1:44:31
Speaker 10: as we have seen from last week, in this new
1:44:33
Speaker 10: era of British politics, of secretarian British politics, those migrant
1:44:38
Speaker 10: communities are becoming more I guess, confident of themselves. They
1:44:41
Speaker 10: know what they want and they're no longer content to
1:44:44
Speaker 10: be controlled by Labor. They want their own party, which
1:44:48
Speaker 10: serves their own narrow interests, and it seems that means
1:44:52
Speaker 10: the party that is willing to go furthest on being
1:44:55
Speaker 10: pro Gaza, pro Palestine, as it was this case one
1:44:57
Speaker 10: week ago, that's the party that wins. So when President
1:45:01
Speaker 10: Trump is looking at from the situation from the outside
1:45:03
Speaker 10: and he's going, well, Britain's our greatest ally. We love Britain.
1:45:07
Speaker 10: I personally love Britain. Britain's always been on our side.
1:45:10
Speaker 10: Why is Britain suddenly now not interested in joining preemptive
1:45:15
Speaker 10: strikes in the Middle East? What conclusion can he draw
1:45:20
Speaker 10: that he's afraid of his own voters.
1:45:23
Speaker 1: Wow, you're providing a nice cautionary tale for we here
1:45:25
Speaker 1: in the United States of America who were facing a
1:45:28
Speaker 1: similar being overrun by immigrants from foreign lands which you
1:45:32
Speaker 1: do not share American values clearly, right?
1:45:35
Speaker 10: May I say something at this stage, my assisting at
1:45:37
Speaker 10: the stage, I've been doing this job. How long have
1:45:39
Speaker 10: I been here? Thirteen fourteen years? And this is this
1:45:41
Speaker 10: thing I always say when I have this opportunity to
1:45:45
Speaker 10: speak from my rural idoll in the countryside in England,
1:45:49
Speaker 10: because of course I've had to retreat here because I
1:45:51
Speaker 10: cannot stand to live in London because it's as prisident.
1:45:53
Speaker 10: Trump says, it's a very different town. And this is
1:45:56
Speaker 10: the point I always make right. The great benefit I
1:45:59
Speaker 10: bring to you, my American friends and cousins. I am
1:46:02
Speaker 10: your crystal ball. What is happening here today is what's
1:46:06
Speaker 10: coming for you in six months, six years, whatever. Okay,
1:46:10
Speaker 10: this is the future. Pay attention, it's already landed. In Minnesota.
1:46:13
Speaker 1: We're struggling with the Somali community and the in various
1:46:17
Speaker 1: other ethnic or ethnic my recent ethic migrants who have
1:46:21
Speaker 1: congregated in the individual cities and then elected politicians like
1:46:25
Speaker 1: Ileanomar who share their thoughts and philosophies. But we can,
1:46:29
Speaker 1: and we currently are taking steps to stop the flow
1:46:32
Speaker 1: and hopefully keep our own personal identity and real quick
1:46:35
Speaker 1: here we're struggling here in the United States. We have
1:46:38
Speaker 1: a constitution that requires Congress to declare war. But we
1:46:42
Speaker 1: also have a president who is recharged in charge of
1:46:45
Speaker 1: and is the head of the American military, and he
1:46:47
Speaker 1: directs military affairs, but he also our commander in chief
1:46:50
Speaker 1: rather but he also is responsible for foreign policy. And
1:46:52
Speaker 1: these things all overlap now in so far as Keer Starmer,
1:46:56
Speaker 1: what is his authority? Can Parliament chime in on this
1:47:00
Speaker 1: and say no, no, no, you got to play with
1:47:01
Speaker 1: the Americans more nice. So you need to open up
1:47:02
Speaker 1: these air bases to allow them for offensive and defensive strikes.
1:47:06
Speaker 1: Is there some opportunity here for the United Kingdom to
1:47:09
Speaker 1: change directions in terms of care Starmer's current stance on.
1:47:13
Speaker 10: This great question. So obviously we don't have a written
1:47:16
Speaker 10: constitution in the UK like you guys have in the US,
1:47:18
Speaker 10: and there's a lot of not case law as such,
1:47:21
Speaker 10: but there's center as a president built up here. I
1:47:25
Speaker 10: believe the right to go to war is royal prerogative
1:47:28
Speaker 10: and the King is advised by the Prime Minister. So
1:47:31
Speaker 10: the King in Parliament is embodied there by the Prime Minister.
1:47:34
Speaker 10: So if the Prime Minister wants to get to a war,
1:47:35
Speaker 10: as far as we were, there's anything really that can
1:47:37
Speaker 10: stop him, apart from unless Parliament gets so upset about
1:47:41
Speaker 10: this that they have a photo no confidence in the
1:47:44
Speaker 10: Prime Minister to bring down the government.
1:47:45
Speaker 2: And that's that.
1:47:46
Speaker 10: So what this means is in practice, if we know
1:47:51
Speaker 10: action like this is coming, And a good example of
1:47:54
Speaker 10: this is all this talk we're having at the moment
1:47:57
Speaker 10: about a potential Western alliance of peacekeeper going to Ukraine.
1:48:01
Speaker 10: Such a thing we know that's on the horizon, and
1:48:03
Speaker 10: as a way to keep Parliament on side, the Prime
1:48:05
Speaker 10: Minister has already said if we do this, we'll give
1:48:09
Speaker 10: Parliament a vote on it first. But in terms of
1:48:13
Speaker 10: the more immediate which is this business of will Starmer
1:48:18
Speaker 10: won't he get involved with what's going on in Iran?
1:48:21
Speaker 10: Actually this has nothing to do with Parliament. What this
1:48:24
Speaker 10: comes down to is this sa Kere Starmer. Our prime
1:48:27
Speaker 10: minister is actually relatively new in politics. He's only been
1:48:30
Speaker 10: in Parliament for like ten years or something. And to
1:48:33
Speaker 10: have gone from being a newbie backbencher to being Prime
1:48:36
Speaker 10: Minister of the UK so quickly, very unusual, very impressive.
1:48:39
Speaker 10: And the reason for this is he's not a career politician.
1:48:42
Speaker 10: He is a human rights lawyer, very senior lawyer. Was
1:48:46
Speaker 10: actually the Director of Public Prosecutions, the most senior prosecutor
1:48:51
Speaker 10: in the whole of the UK, and that was his
1:48:53
Speaker 10: last job before he came into politics. So he got
1:48:55
Speaker 10: sort of imported into the Labor Party from this very
1:48:58
Speaker 10: important legal job and as I say, human rights lawyer,
1:49:01
Speaker 10: this guy is the world's number one fan of international
1:49:06
Speaker 10: law is that he is the rules based international orders
1:49:11
Speaker 10: like number one reply Guy, Okay, So he absolutely is
1:49:15
Speaker 10: is dedicated to these concepts. And when it comes to
1:49:20
Speaker 10: President Trump coming to the UK and saying, Okay, we're
1:49:23
Speaker 10: going to launch these strikes, we need to use British bases,
1:49:26
Speaker 10: I presume we have your permission, because we always have
1:49:28
Speaker 10: in the past. So Kis Darmer's not looking at this
1:49:30
Speaker 10: from a position of what is the British national interest?
1:49:33
Speaker 10: What's best for the world? You know, how can I
1:49:36
Speaker 10: help an ally? Why do I really have any good
1:49:39
Speaker 10: reason to say no? He's looking at it from I've
1:49:41
Speaker 10: got my stack of United Nations law textbooks here and
1:49:47
Speaker 10: they say no, and ergo I must say no because
1:49:50
Speaker 10: law is the most important thing in the world to me.
1:49:52
Speaker 10: We are being ruled by a cabal of lawyers and
1:49:55
Speaker 10: it is incredibly bad for this country. It is damaging
1:49:57
Speaker 10: us on the world stage, and it is destroying the
1:49:59
Speaker 10: special RelA.
1:50:00
Speaker 1: So London Burea Chief Oliver Lane, your comment earlier that
1:50:03
Speaker 1: kir Starmer believes that our actions against Iran are unlawful.
1:50:07
Speaker 1: You're referring to his perception of international law might they
1:50:10
Speaker 1: pivot over and ask what Kure Starmer's position is visa
1:50:12
Speaker 1: the Iran's atrocities over the years murdering its own people,
1:50:17
Speaker 1: and whether or not that too might buy vi A
1:50:19
Speaker 1: violation of international law funding terrorist organizations who indiscriminately kill
1:50:23
Speaker 1: people who enter Israel unlawfully and murder women, children, grandmothers,
1:50:27
Speaker 1: burned babies. I mean, we could go on for hours
1:50:29
Speaker 1: and hours the articulated position on any of those things
1:50:31
Speaker 1: via international law exactly.
1:50:34
Speaker 10: So this is the contradictions continue to roll on because
1:50:38
Speaker 10: we have the reports from Britain's Foreign Intelligence Agency six,
1:50:44
Speaker 10: Internal Intelligence Agency MI five. They are very clear that
1:50:47
Speaker 10: Iran is a threat. In fact, in Parliament yesterday, when
1:50:51
Speaker 10: Sir Kara Starmer was trying to build this case to
1:50:54
Speaker 10: explain to the British people why he wasn't being involved,
1:50:57
Speaker 10: he admitted that Iran had launched twenty attempted terror attacks
1:51:03
Speaker 10: against people in Britain over the past year alone, and
1:51:07
Speaker 10: every single one of those attacks was intercepted and foiled
1:51:09
Speaker 10: by the intelligence agencies. Because, let's be honest, one of
1:51:12
Speaker 10: the best things that Britain, one of the best things
1:51:14
Speaker 10: in the world that Britain's do IS. We're very good
1:51:16
Speaker 10: at being spies with the Nation of James Bond, so
1:51:19
Speaker 10: we're very good at intercepting those terror attacks. That doesn't
1:51:22
Speaker 10: change the fact they wanted to do them. They wanted
1:51:24
Speaker 10: to kill those people. So he admitted that Britain is
1:51:27
Speaker 10: under attack from Iran and our intelligence agents IS have
1:51:30
Speaker 10: admitted that Iran is the number one sponsor of state
1:51:33
Speaker 10: terrorism in the world. We are being attacked, our allies
1:51:37
Speaker 10: are being attacked. The government admits this. And yet for Sikstarma,
1:51:41
Speaker 10: no war because the United Nations hasn't said it's okay.
1:51:45
Speaker 10: And to him that's the most important thing.
1:51:47
Speaker 1: Wow. And considering the body the make up of the
1:51:49
Speaker 1: United Nations, I mean, hell, they have the countries along
1:51:54
Speaker 1: the lines of Iran on the Human Rights Council, for
1:51:56
Speaker 1: God's sake, it's a laughable entity and organization. It becomes
1:52:01
Speaker 1: more and more pointless every year. And what more can
1:52:04
Speaker 1: I say. I'm just I'm thankful we have a constitution
1:52:07
Speaker 1: because you and your bunk are out there in the world,
1:52:10
Speaker 1: somewhere in the United Kingdom, Oliver Lane, you can speak
1:52:13
Speaker 1: your mind here on the fifty five KRC Morning Show.
1:52:15
Speaker 1: And I based upon everything I've read you might be
1:52:17
Speaker 1: subject to arrest in your country for these words.
1:52:21
Speaker 10: I pick my words very carefully and as we as
1:52:24
Speaker 10: we all must in this country, which is a remarkable
1:52:27
Speaker 10: situation to be in, because we live in a time
1:52:30
Speaker 10: where the police conduct dorn arrests, down arrest braids, for
1:52:34
Speaker 10: speech crimes, for throwaway tweets, you know, these little pops
1:52:40
Speaker 10: here and there of thought which will get you into
1:52:43
Speaker 10: the inside of a prison cell. So you know, we
1:52:46
Speaker 10: have to be careful, we have to be sensible because
1:52:48
Speaker 10: if I'm on the inside of a prison cell, well
1:52:50
Speaker 10: I can't keep updating you what's happening in.
1:52:52
Speaker 1: The world, and you wouldn't be on the fifty five
1:52:53
Speaker 1: Krsy Morning Show, which my listening audience I truly appreciate.
1:52:57
Speaker 1: We also appreciate what everything that bright Bart's doing each
1:52:59
Speaker 1: and every day. Oliver Lane, London Bureau Chief, it is
1:53:02
Speaker 1: always a pleasure to have you on the program. I
1:53:04
Speaker 1: look forward to our discussions down the road again. And
1:53:06
Speaker 1: have a wonderful week, my friend. Thanks for your time
1:53:08
Speaker 1: this morning.
1:53:09
Speaker 10: It's gonna be a busy week, but it's gonna be
1:53:10
Speaker 10: a good one.
1:53:11
Speaker 1: Thanks for me. I hope you are right on the
1:53:12
Speaker 1: good part. Busy definitely from fifty.
1:53:15
Speaker 6: Five KRC the Talk STATIONDG see.
1:53:20
Speaker 1: Once fifty five KRC the talk station.
1:53:32
Speaker 4: It is that time.
1:53:33
Speaker 1: I'm sorry, Daniel Davis. It's time for the Daniel Davis
1:53:35
Speaker 1: Deeve Dive. I was lasting and laughing at the bumper
1:53:37
Speaker 1: music that Joe is playing from Pink Floyd generally speaking
1:53:40
Speaker 1: about Warren generally, and that's what you and I typically
1:53:43
Speaker 1: talk about. Said as it is, we are engaged in
1:53:45
Speaker 1: global conflict and nobody knows better than Daniel Davis, retired
1:53:48
Speaker 1: Lieutenant colonel. And you can find podcasts from Daniel Davis
1:53:50
Speaker 1: throughout the week wherever you get your podcast. Daniel Davis
1:53:54
Speaker 1: Deep Dive. Welcome back, my friend. Gie. It's too bad
1:53:56
Speaker 1: we don't have anything to talk about today. Good to
1:53:58
Speaker 1: have you back.
1:53:58
Speaker 9: You know, I was thinking about that, Brian. It's like, man,
1:54:01
Speaker 9: what are we going to talk about to day? There's
1:54:02
Speaker 9: hard anything? Oh wait a minute, Oh yes, yike.
1:54:07
Speaker 1: I don't want to throw a curveball because there's a
1:54:08
Speaker 1: lot of you know, activity going on that we can
1:54:10
Speaker 1: we can focus on it. We will. But I thought
1:54:12
Speaker 1: it rather interesting, perhaps comical. If you can find levity
1:54:16
Speaker 1: in this situation. I was talking to Congressman David Taylor,
1:54:19
Speaker 1: I believe it was on Friday, and we were talking
1:54:22
Speaker 1: about the War Powers Authorization of War Powers Resolution, Congressman
1:54:25
Speaker 1: Massy Rokanna saying, listen, we got a vote on this.
1:54:28
Speaker 1: He expressed some favor in that, and I said out loud,
1:54:31
Speaker 1: well the votes next week sometime. I think they have
1:54:34
Speaker 1: a queued up for Thursday. I said, well, what happens
1:54:37
Speaker 1: if Donald Trump's launches the war over the weekend ahead
1:54:39
Speaker 1: of the vote. And that's exactly what happened, So I
1:54:42
Speaker 1: don't think he was necessarily trying to get out ahead
1:54:44
Speaker 1: of the vote. What we found out, though, is I
1:54:46
Speaker 1: guess the Israeli intelligence is pretty damn good. You think
1:54:50
Speaker 1: a zoom call would have been a better idea for
1:54:52
Speaker 1: the Ayatola and his top leaders. They all congregated in
1:54:55
Speaker 1: one single spot. I thought they would have known better
1:54:58
Speaker 1: than that. Daniel Davis, your reaction to that, Yeah.
1:55:02
Speaker 9: It's it's a mixed one. At least according to what
1:55:05
Speaker 9: the Iranians have said was that they they encouraged him
1:55:08
Speaker 9: to go into another place. They encouraged him to go
1:55:11
Speaker 9: into many underground bunkers that they have and he said, no,
1:55:15
Speaker 9: I'm just gonna keep going about my normal business and
1:55:17
Speaker 9: if I die, I die. Part of me thinks that
1:55:20
Speaker 9: they that was part of the plan. As an eighty
1:55:22
Speaker 9: six year old, I think he just said, you know what,
1:55:24
Speaker 9: I'm gonna die. Use me as a martyr. That's where
1:55:27
Speaker 9: I can best serve. That's what That's part of it.
1:55:29
Speaker 9: But then the other part is less is less clear.
1:55:32
Speaker 9: If you wanted to become a martyr, that's one thing,
1:55:35
Speaker 9: But to have a meeting with a lot of your
1:55:37
Speaker 9: top leaders that doesn't seem to be very wise. So
1:55:40
Speaker 9: I think that was a big mistake. It could be
1:55:43
Speaker 9: that they thought that, you know, the conventional military wisdom
1:55:46
Speaker 9: is you attack in the middle of the not too
1:55:48
Speaker 9: three am in the morning. That's kind of our motus opera.
1:55:50
Speaker 9: And died and when the sun came up at like
1:55:52
Speaker 9: six something. Apparently they had this meeting at eight, and
1:55:54
Speaker 9: I guess they thought, Okay, well it's not going to
1:55:56
Speaker 9: happen today, so let's come back together. And that curve
1:55:59
Speaker 9: ball was pretty costly for the Iranian side.
1:56:02
Speaker 1: Well, of course, it ties into the whole idea of
1:56:04
Speaker 1: what is going to happen next? If this is regime change.
1:56:08
Speaker 1: We'll see, we'll find out. But you know, there's a
1:56:10
Speaker 1: command of control structure, there's a hierarchy, and most of
1:56:13
Speaker 1: the hierarchy evaporated in that one bomb strike. So what's left.
1:56:18
Speaker 1: I imagine there are enough fundamentalist individuals and somebody could
1:56:21
Speaker 1: step in the shoes of the Iotola and take over
1:56:23
Speaker 1: that role. But well, that person have the same power
1:56:26
Speaker 1: and control that the late Iatola had, because I understand
1:56:30
Speaker 1: this was like a cult of personality. He was the guy,
1:56:34
Speaker 1: and what he said goes, and everything was built in
1:56:37
Speaker 1: and around supporting him.
1:56:40
Speaker 9: Well, this is something we need to understand here so
1:56:42
Speaker 9: that we have a sober understanding of what should come next.
1:56:46
Speaker 9: The Iranians fully foresaw this, and they had a plan
1:56:49
Speaker 9: in place. They had a continuity's government plan like we
1:56:52
Speaker 9: have here, and they had by some reports, two and
1:56:55
Speaker 9: three deep on nearly all the senior leader positions. They
1:56:58
Speaker 9: also had something that we're seeing play out in that
1:57:01
Speaker 9: a version of the dead hand strategy to where if
1:57:03
Speaker 9: you lose communications because they anticipated that we would hit
1:57:06
Speaker 9: the command of control centers, that we would try to
1:57:08
Speaker 9: knock out their computer system, cyber attax, et cetera. And
1:57:11
Speaker 9: that they would lose connect connectivity, so they already had
1:57:14
Speaker 9: an action plan in place and said, if you lose contact,
1:57:17
Speaker 9: here's your actions. Don't wait for any more instructions. You
1:57:21
Speaker 9: start launching these missile batteries. You start launching those, here's
1:57:24
Speaker 9: your target set, et cetera. And it worked brilliantly from
1:57:28
Speaker 9: the Iranian perspective. And I would challenge these characterizations that
1:57:32
Speaker 9: I see a lot of people making that this as
1:57:34
Speaker 9: a cult personality situation, because the Iranian situation is built
1:57:38
Speaker 9: on a hierarchical system and a bureaucracy that transcends just
1:57:44
Speaker 9: the iatola. He is a figure, he is important figure.
1:57:47
Speaker 9: He is the head of state. But they have a
1:57:50
Speaker 9: lot of other governing institutions and bodies and positions. So
1:57:54
Speaker 9: I think that they are going to have more success
1:57:57
Speaker 9: replacing this that I think many in the West may think.
1:57:59
Speaker 9: And so far, that exactly the way it's worked out,
1:58:01
Speaker 9: and there hadn't been any diminution or reduction in their
1:58:04
Speaker 9: ability to conduct affairs or to have a coherent command
1:58:07
Speaker 9: of control system. And you haven't seen anybody rise up
1:58:10
Speaker 9: against it. And I'll tell you one other thing that's
1:58:12
Speaker 9: not working out in our favor at all. On the
1:58:15
Speaker 9: surface of it, you had this tragedy where a girls'
1:58:17
Speaker 9: school was hit in the opening rounds of this, whether
1:58:20
Speaker 9: by an American is there's really missed, We don't know yet,
1:58:23
Speaker 9: but hundreds of kids were killed in teachers and that
1:58:27
Speaker 9: has galvanized the country against us, and they're openly protested.
1:58:32
Speaker 9: There was millions of people marching at their funeral I
1:58:34
Speaker 9: think earlier today, just hours ago, and that is not
1:58:38
Speaker 9: helping our hope that people would rise up against the
1:58:42
Speaker 9: regime after we knocked out the Mola, the Iola and
1:58:45
Speaker 9: then turn over right now, there's no evidence that's going
1:58:47
Speaker 9: to happen at all.
1:58:48
Speaker 1: Well, let me suggest perhaps it is because the Itola
1:58:52
Speaker 1: had been going around killing tens of thousands of his
1:58:54
Speaker 1: own people who did raise the spector did go out
1:58:56
Speaker 1: and protest. Maybe they still have that taste in the
1:58:58
Speaker 1: back of the mountain. They're waiting to see how things
1:59:00
Speaker 1: settle out. So I can of course understand loyalists taking
1:59:03
Speaker 1: to the street to protest a horrific action like blowing
1:59:06
Speaker 1: up a school. Question is whether there's an equal, if
1:59:08
Speaker 1: not greater number behind the scenes or keeping their powder
1:59:11
Speaker 1: dry because they're afraid that well, the troops might pull
1:59:14
Speaker 1: a kind of gun them down in the streets.
1:59:16
Speaker 9: Well, they certainly may, and if a lot of them
1:59:19
Speaker 9: protests up, that almost certainly would happen. But I'll tell
1:59:22
Speaker 9: you there's another dynamic here. I've talked to somebody I
1:59:26
Speaker 9: know that's in the United States that absolutely hated the regime.
1:59:29
Speaker 9: In fact, it was driven out. His family was driven
1:59:31
Speaker 9: out by I've talked to another friend of mine who
1:59:34
Speaker 9: himself interviewed somebody, and these are two people that absolutely
1:59:38
Speaker 9: hate the Iotota regime and all that and wanted to
1:59:41
Speaker 9: be overthrown. But they said that we have put them
1:59:43
Speaker 9: in this really, really awkward position to where you're saying, listen,
1:59:47
Speaker 9: you're wanting us to help you who is attacking us,
1:59:51
Speaker 9: Israel and the United States. You know, somebody who's been
1:59:54
Speaker 9: an enemy of is or Iran for a long time,
1:59:57
Speaker 9: and you're wanting us to somehow say, yes, we're going
1:59:59
Speaker 9: to see, We're going to take your side. Who you're
2:00:02
Speaker 9: killing our people, our civilians, and are blowing up our
2:00:05
Speaker 9: cities and blowing up our military, and we're gonna help
2:00:08
Speaker 9: you to try to overturn this. And then the other
2:00:10
Speaker 9: thing they say, both of them said, is that, Look,
2:00:13
Speaker 9: you've got a terrible track record of having regime change
2:00:17
Speaker 9: and then just walking away and leaving chaos behind. And
2:00:19
Speaker 9: we don't want to be another failed state. So that's
2:00:23
Speaker 9: making people not want to embrace what we're doing. And
2:00:26
Speaker 9: we got a lot of you know, we got a
2:00:28
Speaker 9: lot of bad history there on our side. It doesn't
2:00:30
Speaker 9: help us.
2:00:31
Speaker 1: Well, I suppose intent isn't worth a wit when you're
2:00:33
Speaker 1: talking about actual collateral damage, But the intent, I suppose,
2:00:37
Speaker 1: and I think I'm on solid ground on this. We
2:00:39
Speaker 1: don't want to kill the Iranian people. That may happen
2:00:42
Speaker 1: as consequence of war, which happens all the time. That's
2:00:45
Speaker 1: the regrettable part about it. That's why we all weep
2:00:47
Speaker 1: over warfare, because innocent people die. But we are truly
2:00:50
Speaker 1: after the military and the idea of liberating them from
2:00:55
Speaker 1: the military. That's the thumb of oppression, as we would
2:00:57
Speaker 1: put it, that prevents them from enjoying the free and
2:01:00
Speaker 1: perhaps working cooperatively with their neighbors in the region.
2:01:04
Speaker 9: Well, but you got to understand though, from I mean,
2:01:06
Speaker 9: it's not too dissimilar from what we have here. We
2:01:09
Speaker 9: may not a lot of people may not like you
2:01:11
Speaker 9: know whoever's in the White House at any given time,
2:01:14
Speaker 9: but everybody supports the troops. Well, there's a similar situation
2:01:17
Speaker 9: in Iran, at least from part of it is that
2:01:20
Speaker 9: the military per se that keeps them, you know, that's
2:01:23
Speaker 9: their national security fences made up of people like them,
2:01:27
Speaker 9: so they there's their neighbors and whatever the neighbor they
2:01:29
Speaker 9: care about them. It's you know, it's the guys who
2:01:31
Speaker 9: were given orders, especially the ones that were keeping security
2:01:35
Speaker 9: that we're attacking the protesters. So those guys have a
2:01:37
Speaker 9: different category. But the general military who are getting attacked
2:01:41
Speaker 9: and stuff are part of the population. So that's that's
2:01:44
Speaker 9: not necessarily they don't necessarily view them as an enemy.
2:01:47
Speaker 1: At large, all right, Daniel Davis, You and I have
2:01:49
Speaker 1: talked about this quite a few times in different battle theaters.
2:01:53
Speaker 1: The same thing applies here, the potential of running out
2:01:56
Speaker 1: of interceptors. We don't know how many bombs, rockets, long
2:01:59
Speaker 1: term or long range missiles of the Iranians have. They
2:02:02
Speaker 1: clearly have more, but we are going through the interceptors
2:02:05
Speaker 1: of various types mentioned earlier, more than changes of underwear
2:02:10
Speaker 1: you know, daily for me, and we're going through thousands
2:02:12
Speaker 1: of these things, it looks like they're going to run
2:02:14
Speaker 1: out at some point. We can't make them as quickly
2:02:16
Speaker 1: as they need them, so more and more of these
2:02:18
Speaker 1: rockets are going to end up hitting targets.
2:02:21
Speaker 9: Yeah, that is a huge problem. And when we're already
2:02:23
Speaker 9: seeing something I thank you and I talked about before.
2:02:26
Speaker 4: Is that.
2:02:26
Speaker 9: Listen, we saw in June twenty twenty five that a
2:02:30
Speaker 9: lot of these Iranian missiles were getting through, and the
2:02:32
Speaker 9: longer that war went, the more of them we're getting through.
2:02:34
Speaker 9: And I said, there's no reason to think that they
2:02:36
Speaker 9: wouldn't start the next round where they ended up the
2:02:38
Speaker 9: last one. And that's how it's working out. I don't
2:02:40
Speaker 9: know if you've been seeing a lot of these missiles
2:02:42
Speaker 9: inner incoming into Israel. Yes, but I mean you see
2:02:45
Speaker 9: sometimes there's these whole broadches and you see two or
2:02:47
Speaker 9: three intercepted, and you see a bunch of them getting
2:02:50
Speaker 9: through there. So even with the interceptors we have, there's
2:02:53
Speaker 9: already a lot of the ballistic missiles that are getting through.
2:02:56
Speaker 9: We have some success on the drones, at least some success.
2:03:00
Speaker 9: Some of those are still getting through. But if you
2:03:01
Speaker 9: get to the point of where there's not enough to
2:03:04
Speaker 9: even shoot down some of the missiles here. Yeah, there's
2:03:07
Speaker 9: going to be a world to hurt because look, I
2:03:09
Speaker 9: think that Iran has foreseen this possibility and has prepared
2:03:12
Speaker 9: for decades, for decades, and they have an enormous stock
2:03:16
Speaker 9: pile of these things in these big underground missile cities
2:03:19
Speaker 9: some are calling them, which they have released some video
2:03:21
Speaker 9: and shows, and it's just tavernus and miles of underground tunnels.
2:03:25
Speaker 9: And I'm talking to like massive things that you can
2:03:27
Speaker 9: drive big trucks into, stuffed full of ammunition and weapons
2:03:32
Speaker 9: and missiles, missile launchers, drones, the big ones, the medium
2:03:36
Speaker 9: sized ones, all kinds of ordinance. So the evidence suggests
2:03:40
Speaker 9: that they have more offensive missiles than we do defensive missiles.
2:03:43
Speaker 9: And if this thing drags out, we're going to be
2:03:46
Speaker 9: in some trouble.
2:03:46
Speaker 1: Well, given Donald Trump's pronouncements that they haven't seen anything yet,
2:03:50
Speaker 1: is it possible that intelligence sources know where these are
2:03:53
Speaker 1: and like ultimately bombing the underground nuclear based or nuclear facilities,
2:03:58
Speaker 1: that those two will be targets, maybe, you know, eviscerating
2:04:01
Speaker 1: Iron's ability to like our interceptor missiles, their ability to
2:04:05
Speaker 1: continue to launch these massive barrages.
2:04:09
Speaker 9: I have no doubts that that's a priority target for us,
2:04:12
Speaker 9: that has been from the beginning. I don't know why
2:04:13
Speaker 9: we would wait on that. I'm not sure what Trump
2:04:16
Speaker 9: may mean on that, but I'll just tell you these
2:04:18
Speaker 9: facilities were built specifically to withstand those kinds of missiles,
2:04:22
Speaker 9: and we have very few of these big GBU bunker
2:04:26
Speaker 9: busters that we used in the Operation Midnight Hammer, and
2:04:30
Speaker 9: even those had limited capacity under the very deeply underground
2:04:34
Speaker 9: strikes that we hit there at four to Zho and tons,
2:04:37
Speaker 9: et cetera. So we don't have that many. And some
2:04:39
Speaker 9: of these have to be carried by B twos and
2:04:41
Speaker 9: you have to fly over the target and that makes
2:04:43
Speaker 9: them at risk of being shot down, so that it's
2:04:47
Speaker 9: a big risk that goes along with that. But the
2:04:48
Speaker 9: bottom line is there's so many of these and we
2:04:50
Speaker 9: don't know where.
2:04:51
Speaker 1: They all are.
2:04:52
Speaker 9: This is a country, remember, four times bigger than the
2:04:55
Speaker 9: country of Iraq geographically. This stuff is spread out all
2:04:58
Speaker 9: over the place and you're not gonna find I mean,
2:05:00
Speaker 9: just look how much trouble we had Israel had finding
2:05:03
Speaker 9: all the tunnels of Hamas in this tiny little Gaza strip.
2:05:06
Speaker 9: They never found them all They're still looking for some today.
2:05:09
Speaker 9: If that gives you an indication of how hard it
2:05:11
Speaker 9: is going to be for us to knock out Iran.
2:05:13
Speaker 1: I always try to maintain an awareness of how vast
2:05:16
Speaker 1: the land is. Yeah, two point four times the state
2:05:19
Speaker 1: of Texas. That's a lot of real estate. The retired
2:05:22
Speaker 1: Lieutenant Colonel Daniel Davis for the Daniel Davis Deep Die
2:05:24
Speaker 1: find his podcast wherever you get yours, Daniel Davis. Something
2:05:27
Speaker 1: tells me we were talking about this next Tuesday.
2:05:30
Speaker 9: I have a feeling you're right.
2:05:32
Speaker 1: Well, at least we have an interesting topic to talk about.
2:05:33
Speaker 1: God bless you, sir. We'll talk text Tuesday. Have a
2:05:35
Speaker 1: great week, my friend.
2:05:36
Speaker 6: See the fifty five krs the talk station, Hey, forty
2:05:42
Speaker 6: eight to.
2:05:42
Speaker 1: Fifty five KRCD talks Station. I love when the doctor's
2:05:45
Speaker 1: from OHC or in studio to talk about cancer because
2:05:48
Speaker 1: one thing in this divided world that we all can
2:05:51
Speaker 1: collectively agree on one hundred percent without hesitation, cancer sucks
2:05:55
Speaker 1: without further ado. And I know OHC has been doing
2:05:57
Speaker 1: clinical trust for a long long time, and I've learned
2:06:00
Speaker 1: a lot about chronic clinical trials from the doctors that
2:06:03
Speaker 1: I've talked to over the years, and apparently this is
2:06:06
Speaker 1: the first place to start, not the last. Clinical trials
2:06:10
Speaker 1: are how the folks at OHC and cancer researchers find
2:06:13
Speaker 1: better treatments that are the vital step in providing cancer
2:06:16
Speaker 1: patients hope. And joining me today in studio OHCS, Doctor A. G.
2:06:20
Speaker 1: Glah is a medical oncologists and hematologists and director of
2:06:23
Speaker 1: stem cell transplant and Cellular Therapy here to discuss why
2:06:26
Speaker 1: clinical trials are a vital part of treating cancer. Welcome
2:06:30
Speaker 1: to the fifty five Carcy Morning Show. It's a real
2:06:31
Speaker 1: pleasure to have you here, doctor Glave.
2:06:33
Speaker 11: Good morning, Thank you very much.
2:06:36
Speaker 1: Guessing here, it's my pleasure, all right. The benefits of
2:06:39
Speaker 1: being in a clinical trial. First off, what exactly is
2:06:42
Speaker 1: a clinical trial? This boiled down to its barest curve.
2:06:45
Speaker 11: Clinical trial is different stages of testing a new treatment.
2:06:49
Speaker 11: So we start with phase one, Phase two, Phase three.
2:06:52
Speaker 11: Phase one we're testing the safety of the product, Phase
2:06:57
Speaker 11: two safety and efficacy, and stage three or phase three,
2:07:01
Speaker 11: we're actually comparing it with the standard of care. So
2:07:04
Speaker 11: there are many many steps for the clinical trials or
2:07:07
Speaker 11: the product to make it to the market and to
2:07:10
Speaker 11: be available for the patients, to make sure it's safe, effective,
2:07:15
Speaker 11: better than what we have currently.
2:07:16
Speaker 1: All right, So I would imagine stage one and two
2:07:19
Speaker 1: confirm that it will directly address the cancer issue, and
2:07:24
Speaker 1: then the stage three clinical trial is to determine whether
2:07:26
Speaker 1: it does a better job than the previously recommended standard
2:07:30
Speaker 1: of care.
2:07:30
Speaker 11: Correct. And I'll be honest with you, with the pre
2:07:32
Speaker 11: clinical work, we know it's safe, we know it works,
2:07:36
Speaker 11: but we have to prove to FDA and everyone and
2:07:39
Speaker 11: the patients that really it does that on a real
2:07:43
Speaker 11: life issue.
2:07:44
Speaker 2: All right.
2:07:45
Speaker 1: So the hopeful benefit of being in a clinical trial
2:07:48
Speaker 1: is you're going to get at least as far as
2:07:50
Speaker 1: the prior standard of care. But the hope is it's
2:07:53
Speaker 1: going to do a lot better job, better job less
2:07:56
Speaker 1: side effects. Oh, you're in my wheelhouse now, sir. In
2:08:00
Speaker 1: side effects, How does OHC handle cancer research for their
2:08:04
Speaker 1: cancer patients? At least as so far as the clinical
2:08:06
Speaker 1: trial areas can start.
2:08:07
Speaker 11: So honestly, in my practice and my colleagues practice, we
2:08:11
Speaker 11: offer patients clinical trial in every stage of the disease,
2:08:14
Speaker 11: so frontline, second line, third and fourth line, we have
2:08:20
Speaker 11: clinical trials that covers all these bases. And the advantage
2:08:24
Speaker 11: of that you're getting actually the new technology and the
2:08:26
Speaker 11: treatment in the current situation, it's going to be in
2:08:31
Speaker 11: the future standard of care. And that happened with CARTI.
2:08:34
Speaker 11: If you go back seven years ago when I was
2:08:37
Speaker 11: studying that program at Duke, we had really clinical trials,
2:08:41
Speaker 11: that's all what we had. But shortly after we have
2:08:44
Speaker 11: as a standard of care and now we call it
2:08:46
Speaker 11: cure essions with lymphoma. So you can see actually the
2:08:50
Speaker 11: evolution of clinical trials becoming the standard of care. The
2:08:54
Speaker 11: advantage of having a clinical trial early on you're getting
2:08:58
Speaker 11: the new technology. You're actually helping other patients by proving
2:09:03
Speaker 11: that this works.
2:09:04
Speaker 1: Yeah, if you want to be altruistic, that's a place to.
2:09:07
Speaker 11: Be absolutely and basically you're benefiting your disease. So these
2:09:13
Speaker 11: therapy is most likely not chemotherapy. They are more target
2:09:16
Speaker 11: therapy or immune therapy that has less different side effects
2:09:20
Speaker 11: and less side effects than the chemotherapy that hits everything.
2:09:23
Speaker 1: Well, being a medical oncologist nematologist, you did just mention
2:09:27
Speaker 1: lymphoma and tell me a little bit more about blood
2:09:29
Speaker 1: cancer program with HC and how you're helping patients, cause
2:09:32
Speaker 1: I'm one of them.
2:09:35
Speaker 11: Well, lymphomas is part of the hematological madignancies that we
2:09:39
Speaker 11: deal with. Our program is actually a complete program, comprehensive
2:09:44
Speaker 11: that does stem cell transplant, CARTI immune therapy and basically
2:09:49
Speaker 11: the basic treatment of the hematologic madignancy is including them
2:09:53
Speaker 11: filma my looma, acute leukemia's, chronic leukemias. And we see
2:09:57
Speaker 11: also benign in hematology, so patients with anemia that's not
2:10:01
Speaker 11: known why, whether iron deficiency or be twelve. Patients with
2:10:06
Speaker 11: bleeding disorders we see that as well. Patients with clothing
2:10:09
Speaker 11: disorder we see that. And we were quite you know,
2:10:13
Speaker 11: advanced in our approach to these kind of things, given
2:10:16
Speaker 11: the research that we're doing, given the experience that we
2:10:20
Speaker 11: have in our group, I think this is a lot
2:10:23
Speaker 11: to speak about.
2:10:24
Speaker 1: Oh, I would imagine, So what are the newest trials
2:10:26
Speaker 1: you have going on that people need to know about
2:10:28
Speaker 1: along these lines, doctor law.
2:10:30
Speaker 11: So we have actually multiple exciting trials. One of them
2:10:33
Speaker 11: is actually a very new approach to breast cancer, so
2:10:37
Speaker 11: triple negative breast cancer that's metaesthetic. We have a bryer
2:10:41
Speaker 11: Cell which is a new clinical trial of allergenic carti
2:10:46
Speaker 11: meaning carti coming from a different donor. And this is
2:10:50
Speaker 11: just amazing to have CARTI invading the space of the
2:10:54
Speaker 11: solid tumors, because most of the time it's for hermatological delgancies.
2:10:58
Speaker 11: But now we talk about sol tumors. We also have
2:11:01
Speaker 11: for acute leukemia a new trial coming in and it's
2:11:05
Speaker 11: not only acute leukemia, is the acute teele and phoblastic leukemia, which.
2:11:09
Speaker 10: Is rare kind of disease.
2:11:11
Speaker 11: But the treatment for it, the standard treatment most of
2:11:14
Speaker 11: the time is not that effective. So having the car
2:11:17
Speaker 11: TI and that kind of space is extremely important.
2:11:20
Speaker 1: Well, the doctors that have come in and preceded you,
2:11:23
Speaker 1: doctor Gaal, talk about car TI this it's I hate
2:11:27
Speaker 1: to be so bold and stating, and you can certainly
2:11:29
Speaker 1: temper my optimism. It sounds to me like it is
2:11:33
Speaker 1: going to be the magic bullet for many, if not all,
2:11:37
Speaker 1: cancers down the road.
2:11:38
Speaker 11: So I'm going to add to that.
2:11:39
Speaker 1: Actually, oh yeah, double down, go ahead. Absolutely.
2:11:43
Speaker 11: So when you look at the CARTI, what we're doing
2:11:45
Speaker 11: today is going to be different in five years, it's
2:11:47
Speaker 11: going to be car TI still the same concept. But
2:11:50
Speaker 11: what we're doing with the CARTI itself as a construct
2:11:53
Speaker 11: is just amazing. We're hitting different engines, we're hitting different pathways,
2:11:57
Speaker 11: we're having less side effects the allegenetic cars which is
2:12:01
Speaker 11: coming not necessarily from the patient, so we don't depend
2:12:04
Speaker 11: on the immune system that's been beaten up. We depend
2:12:07
Speaker 11: on a normal immune system to bring to the patients
2:12:10
Speaker 11: and modify that to fight the disease. So honestly, uh,
2:12:14
Speaker 11: we're going to see evolution of the car TIE and
2:12:16
Speaker 11: I think you're absolutely right. It's going to be the
2:12:18
Speaker 11: name of the game.
2:12:19
Speaker 1: So if I can maybe rephrase it again correctly if
2:12:23
Speaker 1: I'm wrong, Currently it's bespoke. Each individual patient has a
2:12:28
Speaker 1: car TI therapy designed specifically for them. Someday you're going
2:12:33
Speaker 1: to get a box off the shelf.
2:12:35
Speaker 11: Absolutely, and we're doing that currently in terms of you know,
2:12:39
Speaker 11: of the shelf. And I think that's a great term
2:12:42
Speaker 11: because the manufacturing time of CARTI takes average of three weeks.
2:12:46
Speaker 11: But with the ilegenatic one, that's off the shelf literally,
2:12:49
Speaker 11: oh god, you know.
2:12:50
Speaker 1: So that's you know, that's exciting stuff right there, doctor Glow.
2:12:54
Speaker 1: And that's see, this is the kind of thing. Someday
2:12:56
Speaker 1: you're going to come in here and you just say
2:12:58
Speaker 1: it's done.
2:12:58
Speaker 3: You've got it.
2:12:59
Speaker 1: We've beat cancer. So all right, Clinical trials OHG. That's
2:13:03
Speaker 1: what it's all about. Be there, be altruistic, but also
2:13:06
Speaker 1: be in the cutting edge of cancer research. Listen, I'm
2:13:08
Speaker 1: a patient. I happy to have them in here and
2:13:10
Speaker 1: support with the work that they're doing, but they give
2:13:12
Speaker 1: me wonderful treatments. So to learn more about OHC cancer treatments,
2:13:16
Speaker 1: a second opinion, and learn about clinical trials that probably
2:13:18
Speaker 1: are available for you at OHC, visit ohcare dot com,
2:13:23
Speaker 1: ohcare dot com, or give them a call. It eight
2:13:25
Speaker 1: eight eight sixty eight hundred. That's eight eight eight six
2:13:28
Speaker 1: four nine forty eight hundred, doctor Glaw. Exciting stuff. Thank
2:13:31
Speaker 1: you so much for coming in and talking about Lisciener
2:13:33
Speaker 1: to me today