Latest / Honey Badger Radio / The Civil Right Feminists Hate the Most | HBR Talk 261

Transcript

The Civil Right Feminists Hate the Most | HBR Talk 261 · Honey Badger Radio

• 0:00
  Hello, and welcome to HBr Talk two sixty one one thing. Oh no,
• 0:07
  that's not it. Uh my copy didn't copy again the civil right feminists
• 0:14
  hate the most, but people are starting to understand this. That was last
• 0:19
  week's show. I'm your host Hannah Wallen, who has to have at least
• 0:23
  one technical difficulty for show. Here with nonsense annihilator Lauren Brooks, Badger in
• 0:28
  Chief Alison Teaman and the personification of perceptivity Mike Stevenson to wade through the sludge
• 0:34
  of feminist claims about how our criminal justice system handles sexual assault allegations. We
• 0:40
  have a full house tonight, guys, so this should be an interesting show.
• 0:44
  But before huh, I said mmmmm, I will I will second that
• 0:50
  comment, and we can bring in UK statistics because we have someone from the
• 0:55
  UK yea and all of it is relevant to our interests. It is it
• 1:00
  is now. Feminist feminists are mad about not getting enough convictions for sexual assaults,
• 1:06
  but they've really wanted to get more convictions for sexual assault. They should
• 1:08
  start considering when women do it, then they would get a lot more convictions.
• 1:15
  There. Women will readily admit they did stuff and think it's okay.
• 1:19
  But before we get into all that, we gotta do what we gotta do.
• 1:23
  As always, Honey Badger Radio dishes out as Morgese board of thought provoking
• 1:26
  discussions, and as experiences both recent and long past have demonstrated the provoked thoughts
• 1:33
  are fighting back, They've made it clear that for people like us, relying
• 1:37
  on third party payment platforms like Patreon to fund our work is treading on than
• 1:41
  ice or building our house in the path of a rapidly growing wildfire. In
• 1:45
  the light of this, we strongly encourage at least our supporters to switch at
• 1:49
  least their support for us to Feed the Badger dot com the most stable way
• 1:55
  to help us out, and if you want to tip us directly instead of
• 1:59
  relying on any social media platforms, tip jar. The link for that is
• 2:02
  Feed the Badger dot Com slash just the tip, and as always, the
• 2:07
  same risk applies to our social media platforms, which is why you should further
• 2:13
  provoke the thought police by tracking our thought provoking discussions on Honey Badger Brigade dot
• 2:17
  com, where you can find your way to all of our content, as
• 2:21
  well as a link to Feed the Badger dot Com in the dropdown menu at
• 2:24
  the top of the page. So there we go. Feminists claim that only
• 2:29
  one percent of sexual assaults lead to a conviction. According to the article we're
• 2:35
  about to read, this is a serious problem that can be blamed on the
• 2:38
  process of investigation, and they have ideas on how to change that process to
• 2:44
  increase that number. Let's take a look at how they support this narrative and
• 2:49
  see if you can spot their two major fundamental mistakes. The first one should
• 2:54
  be readily available at the beginning of the article, right there under the head
• 3:00
  line one percent of sexual assaults lead to a conviction. It's telling that they're
• 3:05
  saying sexual assault rather than um the R word. I mean, we're still
• 3:10
  live on YouTube, so I don't know if I can call it the R
• 3:13
  word without jeopardizing our monetize ability. But high luck shows I live in one
• 3:23
  of those countries, one of those many countries where rape is a crime that
• 3:30
  with which only men can be charged. Um. Sometime ago, during most
• 3:37
  of Honey Badger Radio's tenure, if I can call it that, um,
• 3:44
  it's you know, you know, rape is something with which only men can
• 3:47
  be charged, and this is this is something that often happened. UM.
• 3:53
  Feminists and feminist adjacent people's would say in ninety five percent of people charged with
• 4:01
  rape are men, and I'll be there going, um, only women can
• 4:06
  be charged with rape. Oh, sorry, only men can be charged with
• 4:11
  rape, So how are you doing this? Exactly? They know what the
• 4:15
  five percent say, Actually, most people who get raped are men, largely
• 4:24
  because of the prison system. And they'd go, well, who's doing the
• 4:27
  rape? It's men, isn't, hello, Joe Rogan? And then we
• 4:31
  go, well that the only people who can be charged with rape are men.
• 4:36
  So you're you're here saying that of the people charged with rape are men,
• 4:44
  and I'm here going, well, by definition, by legal definition,
• 4:47
  the only people who could be charged with rape are men, so it should
• 4:50
  be one hundred percent. So where are you finding this ten percent of people
• 4:57
  who aren't men but are still being charged with rape. Exactly? The fuck
• 5:00
  they are doing something and involving thorns or some shit. It's interesting about the
• 5:09
  prison system is feminist. When they say that it's it's men doing it,
• 5:12
  they're they're lying like, yes, the men's prison system only houses men,
• 5:19
  but women are part of the staff. And guess where most of the sexual
• 5:26
  misconduct is in prisons? It is not between inmates. It is between staff,
• 5:31
  right, like we have to it is between staff and inmates. Right.
• 5:36
  So you have these staffers that are taking advantage of an inmate's captivity,
• 5:44
  you cannot you cannot claim that these inmates are in a position to consent if
• 5:50
  this was your boss in the workplace, Like if I worked for a man,
• 5:56
  I don't. But if I worked for a man um and I came
• 6:00
  out and said, oh, you know, I've been having this sexual relationship
• 6:04
  with my male boss, feminists would go through the roof instantly. You know
• 6:10
  that that I was being taken advantage of, regardless of the circumstances, regardless
• 6:15
  of whether I had made this decision myself, even if I sought out their
• 6:19
  relationship. Because you can't consent to your boss. Your boss has a power
• 6:26
  dynamic that puts you in a position where you're you're you're unable to consent.
• 6:31
  That is in fact in their in their survey methods when they survey people on
• 6:39
  sexual victimization, they ask if you've been victimized, They ask if you've been
• 6:46
  raped. They don't say have you been raped? Have you ever had sex
• 6:49
  with someone? Have you ever had sex? Because your boss made you do
• 6:56
  it. Have you ever had sex because someone offered you a promotion? You
• 7:00
  know? Have you ever had sex because someone offered you extra pay at work?
• 7:03
  Like those kind of questions. So you you call that rape when a
• 7:10
  woman experiences in a workplace, right, and you call it rape when a
• 7:14
  female prisoner experiences it. In the prison system. Most sexual misconduct in the
• 7:21
  male prison system is female staff perpetrated sexual misconduct, sexual exploitation of prisoners,
• 7:32
  and inmate on inmate rape is two and a half times believe I checked last
• 7:41
  time. It's two and a half times more prevalent in female prisons than male
• 7:46
  prisons. So the fact that that, and I believe the community rape probably
• 7:54
  still like the community sexual assault of men still eclipses prison rape. But the
• 8:00
  reason why there's such a high rate of male victims of other male inmates is
• 8:05
  because there's just a large prison population of a male prison population. Female prison
• 8:09
  population is smaller. But when you look at the community stats, I mean,
• 8:13
  they're they're basically equal in the last year. So yeah, it's it's
• 8:20
  if they did include women, they would probably probably increase that number. And
• 8:24
  I actually wonder if because this is interesting because I've I've been sort of watch
• 8:30
  dogging these um organizations that supposedly deal with sexual assault exploit sexual assault, usually
• 8:37
  to make money. But for one example is right. At one point they
• 8:43
  did a PSA in which they described that in a year there would be x
• 8:48
  many pregnancies caused by rape, and they used it. They basically just create
• 8:54
  They just used a a rate at which sexual intercourse is likely to result insects,
• 9:03
  like one instance of sexual instant of court is likely to result in pregnancy,
• 9:05
  not sex. Sorry, And then they applied it to how many instances
• 9:09
  of for sexual assault were happening in the US in the year, and then
• 9:13
  they found out like maybe sixty thousand rape babies. The only problem is that
• 9:20
  they lumped the male victims, so a sixty thousand women pregnant with babies as
• 9:26
  a result of having them women being raped. The only problem is that they
• 9:31
  lumped the male victims in with the female victims, so there was a lot
• 9:35
  of pregnant men, like thirty thousand pregnant men. That's pretty And I sent
• 9:39
  them a message. I don't think they ever fixed it because why bother?
• 9:41
  Right, And when they drumming up the hysteria to get the coffers full of
• 9:46
  filthy lucre. But the reason why I mentioned this is, on average,
• 9:50
  less than one percent of sexual assaults ever lead to conviction. I wonder if
• 9:56
  they're actually including the male sexual assaults in this to plump up the figures and
• 10:01
  make them look worse because basically zero percent of sexual assaults of men and in
• 10:07
  conviction. Well, we'll take a look at the beginning of the article.
• 10:11
  They start out by saying rape is the easiest violent crime to get away with
• 10:16
  in the United States, which I think is a loadable. I think the
• 10:20
  easiest violent crime to get away with in the United States is police brutality.
• 10:26
  Like we hear I'm not kidding, Like that's I and I know people are
• 10:33
  gonna be like, well, yeah, but you're an end cap, yes
• 10:35
  I am, and and that's that does partly affect it. But from what
• 10:39
  I've noticed, um, like there's a lot of under the radar stuff that
• 10:46
  happens, Like we get told about it when somebody gets shot, if that
• 10:54
  person is black or some other minority, if that person is female, if
• 11:01
  they feel like they can really make you sympathetic. But um, there were
• 11:05
  two news stories real close together that that happened that we talked about on HBr
• 11:11
  News a few years ago. One of them was talked about nationally and probably
• 11:20
  would have become a big national news story if the locals had not told Al
• 11:26
  Sharpton to fuck off and go home, which is one of the reasons I
• 11:30
  love Dayton. But because they did, they basically were like, we do
• 11:35
  not need you. Get out of here. We are we are having our
• 11:39
  conversation with the police, right And that was the Walmart shooting here in Beaver
• 11:45
  Creek, And I say here, I'm not in Beaver Creek, but I'm
• 11:48
  close to Beaver Creek, so and I shop at that Walmart all the time.
• 11:54
  And it was a dumb situation. The police were given false information by
• 12:01
  a caller to nine one one who should have known better. They thought they
• 12:05
  were coming into an active shooter scenario, and the reason they fired on the
• 12:09
  guy was because he in an active shooting scenario. What he said would be
• 12:15
  threatening in crazy, but he thought he was just walking around the store with
• 12:20
  a toy because it was a pellet gun. It wasn't a real gun.
• 12:24
  And he has just on the phone with his girlfriend and the cops come along
• 12:31
  start pointing their guns at him, and he clearly thought he was going to
• 12:35
  reassure them by telling them the gun wasn't real, and that destroyed the situation.
• 12:43
  Immediately, the cops shot him because they didn't have time to find out
• 12:48
  if he was going to shoot more people. Well, he hadn't shot anybody,
• 12:52
  the caller said he did. The caller said he was reloading and pointing
• 12:58
  it at children and everything like it was. It was really stupid and yeah,
• 13:03
  you know, they never covered anymore that in the news. But I
• 13:07
  bet the military handled it because the caller was military, so um, I
• 13:11
  would I would bet that the caller suffered some sort of penalty. I don't
• 13:16
  know what it would be, but it was I was thinking too, like,
• 13:20
  oh, is this somebody with PTSD? No, No, it was
• 13:24
  just a dip shit, Just a fucking dipshit, um bet. At the
• 13:28
  same time, there was a similarly um ridiculous circumstances incident in Salina, Ohio
• 13:39
  with somebody that some of my family members knew were you know, he was
• 13:45
  friends with my brother and so so my family has a friend who was shot
• 13:50
  by police and though no recourse for his family, no recourse for any of
• 13:56
  his people, right um. The reason was because they the court determined that
• 14:03
  the officer had reason to shoot, and it was a situation where, you
• 14:09
  know, the guy had a series of unfortunate events that left him walking from
• 14:15
  his car to the location he had been driving to. He had his gun.
• 14:20
  He was open carrying his gun. It was not in his hand,
• 14:26
  so he was not holding it. He wasn't pointing it at anything. It
• 14:30
  was actually in a dumb position. It was tucked into his pants because he
• 14:33
  didn't have any place else to put it. But you could see it clearly,
• 14:37
  so well that some lady called the cops from inside her house and she
• 14:43
  did the same thing. She made up a bunch of bullshit about how scary
• 14:48
  he was, and like he was just a guy walking down the street,
• 14:52
  shirtless with with a gun stuck in the back of his pants that anybody could
• 14:56
  see, so anybody knew he had it. And the cop that approached him
• 15:03
  was on leave. For there's a psychic value you have to go through if
• 15:09
  you've been involved in a violent incident, and in this situation, this cop
• 15:13
  should not have been on duty. He had been involved in When you go
• 15:16
  through a violent incident where you have to make snap decisions, and you have
• 15:22
  to either use violence or defend against violence, like avoid violence. It creates
• 15:28
  there's there's a bunch of brain chemistry that happens that creates I would almost call
• 15:33
  it like a temporary mini PSD PTSD, Like I've been through this a bunch
• 15:39
  of times, right, and you are on a different level of awareness,
• 15:43
  an alertness and sensitivity to the potential for violence and the need for you to
• 15:52
  respond with violence for a period of time after this happens, right, So
• 15:56
  your your actions toward another person in a scary situation or a heightened stress situation
• 16:07
  in that time period will be different than they would have been if you had
• 16:11
  not experienced violence prior to that time period. You know, like really closely
• 16:15
  prior to that time period, so you're more likely to Like a good example
• 16:22
  of this is one of my brother's friends. I shouldn't call me my brothers
• 16:27
  for my friend, one of my childhood friends, because we used to hang
• 16:30
  out all the time and raz each other all the time. We had this
• 16:33
  game going on when we were young, where we would my parents had a
• 16:40
  big house and we would hide around the corner and jump out and scare each
• 16:42
  other, like and it was just fun. So we did this all the
• 16:47
  time, right, But about maybe maybe three weeks after the first time my
• 16:57
  female purpose trader assaulted me, and that was the time that she literally beat
• 17:06
  me into submission, Like I literally was subdued. I couldn't move. I
• 17:12
  was so exhausted from the fight that I couldn't move. Right, three weeks
• 17:17
  later, he's hiding in a closet and he jumps out and I clocked him
• 17:21
  right in the jaw. Like I didn't punch people growing up. That wasn't
• 17:26
  my thing. Like I I was the person that would say nasty things to
• 17:29
  you in a fight, or I would try to be diplomatic and prevent the
• 17:33
  fight. But I never threw the first punch except for that time. I
• 17:37
  did, Like he yells boot and I like just got him really good.
• 17:41
  And I was so embarrassed. I couldn't understand why I did that, because
• 17:45
  we jumped out at each other like that all the time. Man, Like
• 17:51
  I now, I understand, right, But back then, now right,
• 17:56
  So this cop shows up to deal with the situation that this woman has reported
• 18:02
  on the phone, and you know the guy who was friends with my brother
• 18:07
  that I, like, I didn't know him he is given an order that
• 18:12
  he can't comply with. He's told to put his hands in the air and
• 18:18
  drop the gun. Well, the guns in his pants, so he's confused
• 18:25
  because he doesn't want to reach for it in front of the cop who is
• 18:29
  pointing a gun at him, and so he just kind of like stood there.
• 18:33
  He didn't have his hands on the gun, he didn't put his hands
• 18:37
  over his head, and the cop shot him. And then again there's a
• 18:41
  situation where I'm not sure that cop would have done that if he had not
• 18:47
  recently been involved in a firefight, and I'm not sure his instructions would have
• 18:55
  been so stupid if he hadn't been involved in a firefight. But he should
• 19:03
  have been accountable for responding to that an incident because he shouldn't have been on
• 19:07
  duty and he shouldn't have agreed to be on duty, And the department was
• 19:11
  responsible for that, And the department was never held responsible for the death of
• 19:17
  my brother's friend. And just to be clear, that's not the same guy
• 19:22
  that I punched when I was startled very I didn't like I said, I
• 19:26
  didn't know this guy he was. He was part of the stuff going on
• 19:30
  with my brother's band. But to say that rape is the easiest crime to
• 19:34
  get away with the United States, you have to ignore the fact that state
• 19:41
  violence. In order to hold state violence account the state accountable, or operatives
• 19:45
  of the state accountable for state violence, you have to appeal to the state,
• 19:51
  and the state can tell you. The state can tell you to fuck
• 19:55
  off. Sorry, I just had like a three hour conversation with Karen today,
• 19:59
  So it's okay, But probably Karen that's like, no, we're all
• 20:03
  here, ye, Hannah, rape happens to white women. Yeah, therefore
• 20:12
  it's it's a much unger deal, right. Yeah, we got into the
• 20:19
  first sence. We got into the first sense. Um. Also, the
• 20:25
  other thing is that you know that they're they're screwing around with numbers here.
• 20:27
  Oh yeah. First of all, I depending on where they're getting their rape
• 20:32
  numbers, they're probably getting it from from surveys. Lauren, I'm getting a
• 20:36
  little bit of feedback. It's the National Crime Victim Survey, the Justice Department's
• 20:41
  National Crime Victims Okay, Yeah, so it is a survey people reporting crimes.
• 20:47
  Okay, experience that includes male victims. Yeah, that include male victims,
• 20:52
  And um, why they have a woman on there, and I'm guessing
• 20:56
  that the mention of the fact that this number includes male victims, it won't
• 21:02
  probably won't happen, so they are using it to pat it. But I
• 21:04
  mean, I could be wrong. But the other thing is that this is
• 21:11
  a population survey, so this is people who say that they were sexually assaulted,
• 21:17
  So a lot of them don't ever come to the police, to the
• 21:22
  attention of the police. For whatever reason, they don't want to reveal this
• 21:27
  to the police. I'm guessing because a large portion of this is occurring within
• 21:33
  relationships, so it's probably occurring over in an over all context of violence with
• 21:40
  a person that they may not want to go to jail. But this is
• 21:45
  this is not this is the police can't prosecute a rate that they don't know
• 21:52
  about. And it's not fair to only look at the rate at which people
• 22:00
  reveal that they have been subject to something on a crime survey, and only
• 22:08
  for rape, not for the other crimes, because the other crimes also,
• 22:12
  you know, people will reveal that they've had thefts or even burglaries or or
• 22:18
  even assaults that that never they never they never said, they never took to
• 22:22
  the police. But that's not included here. So they feminists will compare the
• 22:26
  rate at which people reveal on these surveys, on these crime surveys, with
• 22:33
  the rate at which these crimes, like how many convictions they have of these
• 22:37
  crimes in a year? Only for rape. Every other crime, it's comparing
• 22:41
  the rate how many people are accused or or charges are laid by the police.
• 22:49
  So in the case of assault, in the case of theft, or
• 22:52
  the case of burglary, charges are laid by the police are compared to how
• 22:56
  many convictions occur. But rapeists special we compare how many people on a population
• 23:03
  survey say they were raped compared to how many rapes are charged in a year.
• 23:07
  It's completely disingenuous. Well, I hereby report that which is unreported,
• 23:15
  to refute your claim of your report of that which is hereby unreported checkmates,
• 23:22
  Allison, okay. And if you want to do the whole only the x
• 23:29
  percent, like the only of rapes, go on, um, well,
• 23:34
  then you should compare to how many are false, how many false accusations are
• 23:41
  prosecuted? Really, well, I remind you of there there is the unreported
• 23:51
  and then there is the unreportable. Yes, you can, you can,
• 23:55
  you can you can. You can tell me about all of those convictions that
• 24:00
  go I mean, sorry, not convictions. Well, let's just say convictions
• 24:03
  that go unreported in countries where they can legally be reported. And I'm here
• 24:10
  to raise my hand and go, okay, well, what about those countries
• 24:14
  and those states in which it cannot be reported because it's unreportable because there is
• 24:19
  no such crime. Which this is what pisses me off about people who say,
• 24:26
  until nineteen ninety three, it wasn't technically possible for a woman to report
• 24:34
  rape against her husband. And I sit there twiddling my thumbs for a few
• 24:40
  seconds and then go, Okay, that's possible. I mean, we could
• 24:48
  look into to the legality that goes behind that. But for how long has
• 24:55
  it not been possible for a husband to report rape against her wife? Yeah?
• 25:02
  And I'm not I'm not just talking about the countries in which in which
• 25:07
  a man cannot report a rape against a woman for any reason. Even in
• 25:11
  the countries and states where it is recognized as a crime for a woman to
• 25:17
  rape a man, it's still not recognized as a crime for a wife to
• 25:22
  rape her husband for exactly the same reasons you're talking about. When you say,
• 25:26
  until nineteen ninety three, it wasn't possible for for a wife to report
• 25:32
  rape against her husband. And this just throws people for a loop because they
• 25:37
  think they've got a checkmate. When when when they say this shit about nineteen
• 25:41
  ninety three, which was bullshit. Well, and then you introduce the dimension
• 25:48
  that they absolutely never considered in their entire lives. Well, what's the situation
• 25:52
  for ment? What? What? What? What? What thet Yeah,
• 25:55
  you're making a comparison. You're making a comparison between X and Y that requires
• 25:59
  no both. There there are a couple of states that had large as that
• 26:03
  that said you couldn't report rape against your husband, you know, But at
• 26:10
  the same time, you could report rape under circumstances that didn't involve you fighting
• 26:15
  back, that didn't involve being forced um against against somebody who wasn't your husband.
• 26:22
  So in those situations, very hard in a marriage situation for the court
• 26:27
  to sort out whether there was consent or not. And uh, in like
• 26:33
  in Ohio, I don't think we had that law. But our law here
• 26:37
  says that if you are going to try to get somebody convicted of rape,
• 26:45
  you have to have more evidence than just the word of the accuser. And
• 26:48
  people talk about patriarchy, that is something that has existed. But all of
• 26:53
  history that a husband couldn't be charged with rape against his wife. Please tell
• 27:00
  me the first point in history in which a wife could be charged with rape
• 27:04
  against a husband. Yeah, because you could charge men with rape in the
• 27:08
  in the thirteenth century, you could charge men with rape in the twelfth century.
• 27:15
  Technically you could charge men with rape since they had courts. Yeah,
• 27:19
  as long as there's been police in courts. And the other thing is that
• 27:23
  they're what they failed to look at is even if even if the court says,
• 27:30
  yeah, this isn't our jurisdiction because we just can't undangle it, and
• 27:36
  we can't we don't have the resources. The resources were an issue for a
• 27:41
  long time. And how are you gonna You're gonna be pretty choosy about what
• 27:44
  you would judicate over if you've got a circuit court judge, you know,
• 27:48
  who basically just walks around barefoot in the desert and it appears every three years,
• 27:53
  um, you know, and you're probably not going to put certain things
• 27:57
  to him or her to decide. So a lot of these rape cases,
• 28:02
  these genuine rape cases, they were dealt with through vigilante or posse justice,
• 28:07
  and they just go lynch the guy. And that's been the case probably throughout
• 28:11
  all of human history, judging by the way that more tribal cultures deal with
• 28:15
  rape now and in the case where a husband raped his wife, maybe the
• 28:21
  judicial system didn't want to get involved because they didn't feel like they had the
• 28:26
  ability to untangle the knot. But I'm pretty sure it was quite likely her
• 28:30
  relatives would get involved. And also if Europe, the answer would have been
• 28:37
  as Skimmington. Yeah, Simmington was a community action against the abusive partner in
• 28:45
  a couple if the abusive partner was a man. Conversely, if the abusive
• 28:51
  partner was a woman, then they would shame the man for not being able
• 28:55
  to control her. Yeah, But the extra judicial you know, so there
• 29:02
  would they just completely discount the fact that not everything gets in front of a
• 29:07
  judge that people disapprove of. Yeah, And many things that they disapprove so
• 29:11
  strongly of they will refuse to put it in front of a judge because the
• 29:15
  only thing that will give them a sense of closure is some man's neck broken
• 29:22
  off, you know. That's it. Like a lot of these tribal people.
• 29:27
  They're not going to sit in front of a judge and allow them to
• 29:30
  decide what to do with a guy who's raped their daughter. No, they're
• 29:33
  going to have a three generation war, go kill his whole tribe. Yeah,
• 29:40
  you know something is also act like this only happens with with sexual assault,
• 29:44
  Like people just don't report it because the system can't sort it out,
• 29:48
  or for other reasons, Like they'll say women won't report rape if it was
• 29:52
  in the context of prostitution or some other illegal activity. Well, guess guess
• 29:56
  who I does? Who else doesn't report those crimes? Now, if if
• 30:00
  somebody breaks into my apartment right now, they're not going to get much because
• 30:03
  like I don't, I don't. We don't have a lot of valuable stuff.
• 30:06
  We have a bunch of old, old shit, right, But let's
• 30:08
  say we had something we don't have, like maybe we kept a lot of
• 30:12
  money in here for some stupid reason, um or uh, we had some
• 30:17
  valuable family heirlooms like that that we're worth a lot of money, you know,
• 30:22
  or something, and somebody broke in and stole that shit. I would
• 30:25
  go straight to the cops, right, I would have whatever documentation I could
• 30:29
  get my hands on, go straight to the cops. This this happened.
• 30:32
  This person broke my door down, they stole my shit, uh you know,
• 30:34
  and and or somebody did this and I don't know who if that was
• 30:38
  the case, you know, and they would come in and they would have
• 30:41
  investigate. And there's all that, right, But what if it was drug
• 30:44
  money? What if I was a drug dealer? Would I do the same
• 30:48
  thing if somebody broke into my house and stole my my drug profits. No,
• 30:55
  I would not go to the cops for that. First thing they would
• 30:59
  ask is we're you get all that money? You don't have a job,
• 31:02
  you know, like how come you had ten thousand dollars in your apartment and
• 31:07
  and and you don't work anywhere. You're on welfare, Like uh, well,
• 31:11
  uh you see, officer, was a gift, you know, Like,
• 31:17
  no, I'm not going to report that. So there's a shitload of
• 31:18
  crime that never gets reported to the police because it takes place in the context
• 31:25
  of illegal activities. But feminists are only sympathetic to victims of rape who are
• 31:30
  female who don't report because the crime takes place in the context of illegal activities.
• 31:38
  They don't give a rat's ass about somebody who gets a beat down because
• 31:42
  they live with a drug dealer who got robbed by a rival drug dealer or
• 31:49
  a rival gang member, right that those crimes, those crimes don't get reported
• 31:55
  until somebody gets killed. Yeah. No, I guess they think that,
• 32:00
  you know, karma is going to come back and snatch the ass and uh
• 32:04
  get them in some way, shape or form. But that's not how it
• 32:07
  works or how it should work, you know. Yeah, there's a real
• 32:15
  um just they don't double, yes, yes, absolutely double. And the
• 32:23
  other thing is how many prostitutes like And what they're doing is they're appealing to
• 32:30
  the fact that prostitution is a victimless crime, except um, prostitutes don't tend
• 32:36
  to be the best people in general. Yeah, um, you know that's
• 32:40
  an unfortunate truth. Like, I'm sure there's some wonderful prostitutes out there,
• 32:45
  but they tend to be involved in some pretty skeezy stuff right. Well,
• 32:50
  And then you know, you also have the situation of, um, keeping
• 32:53
  prostitution illegal facilitates the victimization of people who don't volunteer for the job. Yes,
• 33:02
  true enough, yes, um. But the I think the overall point
• 33:09
  is that it's completely disingenuous. Yeah, to compare the rate at which people
• 33:15
  reveal that they are victims of rape and also lump in all the male victims
• 33:20
  of rape with with the female victims and then compare that to the conviction rate.
• 33:24
  They don't do that with any other crime. Well, here's the thing
• 33:29
  in terms of like, let's let's say it was one hundred percent true that
• 33:35
  though a big part of the reason rape is not prosecuted is because victims who
• 33:42
  could prosecute are not reporting their crimes right like to to to the system,
• 33:47
  that doesn't make the system responsible, all right, Feminists telling women that you
• 33:54
  shouldn't report because you're not going to get treated right when you go in and
• 33:59
  report, and of telling women, in order to hold the criminal accountable,
• 34:04
  you're gonna have to tough out the scrutiny of the system because you should be
• 34:08
  angry enough at what was done to you to fight that battle, right,
• 34:15
  And that is more to blame than anything. If you make somebody afraid to
• 34:22
  go to the police and report a crime, then they're not going to go
• 34:25
  to police and report a crime. Now, is it possible that reform is
• 34:32
  needed? An investigation? It is it's possible, but I don't think it's
• 34:37
  as as much of the problem as feminists make it out to be. Definitely
• 34:45
  not. I mean, it's just such a convoluted situation when it comes to,
• 34:51
  you know, situations of sexual assault, right, because you know,
• 34:54
  you've got to think about situations when this happens. I would you know,
• 35:00
  I don't know. I can't say for sure, but I would ventures to
• 35:04
  say that a lot of these cases happen when people are under the influence,
• 35:09
  right, And I think some of it, not all of it, but
• 35:15
  require a little bit of situational awareness. And god forbid you tell women that
• 35:21
  they maybe need to be a little bit more careful about what they're doing and
• 35:25
  what where they are doing it and with whom you know that you just you
• 35:31
  can't do that. And so, you know, when it comes to trying
• 35:37
  to get a victim or I mean, get a somebody charged for this supposed
• 35:46
  crime, you know, things like that come into play, and if it
• 35:52
  doesn't work out in their favor, then they cry that, oh my god,
• 35:54
  the system didn't work out in my favor, so it's wrong and it's
• 35:59
  bad. Then it needs to be fixed. Well, no, maybe you
• 36:04
  just need to take a little bit of accountability for what happened to you.
• 36:07
  And I don't know, it's it's just not always what it is made out
• 36:15
  to be. Yeah, it's different. And so far as with prostitution,
• 36:23
  the prostitutes themselves are these suppliers of the product that is being sold to the
• 36:34
  the bias so speak, whereas with drugs, the mules are merely working for
• 36:40
  the kingpins. And this is lives of the difference. With drugs, the
• 36:46
  kingpins merely give the same product to the mules, whereas with pimps um,
• 36:58
  they're merely regulating the mule if you can even call them mules. Well,
• 37:05
  it's it's a service, it's not a product, so it's a there's a
• 37:08
  little difference there. They're they're regulating the service exactly. Sex isn't illegal,
• 37:15
  but drugs are. And and and this is the difference. Like, um,
• 37:21
  the only reason prostitution is even an industry is because the supply is being
• 37:29
  reduced through means other than legal means. And and how is that even the
• 37:36
  case if sex isn't illegal, Like, we could solve the drug problem by
• 37:43
  just making these popular drugs legal, you know, we we can even tax
• 37:50
  them if if, if that's what you want to do, and you know,
• 37:52
  it might it might bring about some kind of degeneracy which might fix itself
• 38:00
  organically after a generation or two. But how do we fix the prostitution problem
• 38:07
  given that sex is already legal. Yeah, it's a bit more complicated,
• 38:13
  isn't it. If if you could, if you could just let men and
• 38:16
  women interact organically, naturally without I don't know, I don't know what is
• 38:23
  it? What is it we're doing? What is it that the powers that
• 38:28
  be are doing to society that makes sex between men and women become a market
• 38:37
  that is controlled in the black markets. That's where we come into it and
• 38:45
  go, hmm. Maybe it's something to do with the demonization of a certain
• 38:55
  kind of sexuality, namely men. Yeah. I mean, if if I
• 39:00
  had to take my stab in the dark at it, it would be that,
• 39:04
  you know, look at what we do, we incentivize women to procreate.
• 39:08
  Right, and so Jesus Christ, I already forgot where I was going
• 39:15
  with it. Go on, all right, can we get to the article?
• 39:19
  Yeah, I wasna say. When it really comes down to it,
• 39:22
  like prostitution laws don't outlaw sex with prostitutes. They outlaw the exchange of currency
• 39:30
  right and response to it, which is really kind of convoluted. You're outlawing
• 39:36
  the exchange of currency for for something that isn't illegal to do it. It's
• 39:42
  always been a strange arrangement. But when it comes to and like and when
• 39:49
  it comes to allegations, a lot of times there's debate over is it rape
• 39:54
  If somebody has sex with a prostitute and then doesn't pay her like it's it's
• 40:00
  well when when you look at the history of um rape laws and rape standards,
• 40:07
  the answer would be yes, because that's rape is theft. It is
• 40:12
  a form of theft of your your sexual services. It's violation your bodily autonomy.
• 40:20
  So your your fundamental property, your most baseline property, is your own
• 40:25
  body. You own it, you live in it, and nobody else is
• 40:29
  supposed to be able to take it away from you. So there is that
• 40:31
  right. But when it comes down to it, this again is something that
• 40:36
  is only sympathized when it happens to female prostitutes. Very very few organizations talk
• 40:46
  about the fact that it happens to male prostitutes, so very rarely does because
• 40:53
  male sexuality is worth exactly fuck all Well, the thing is, it's it's
• 41:02
  it's more likely to happen because female um patrons of male prostitutes aren't gonna want
• 41:14
  to pay for something that they think is worth. Fuck all men will,
• 41:20
  Men will pay for something that they think is valuable. Women you can't even
• 41:22
  get women to pay for something that they think is valuable, right, Like
• 41:25
  if there were, if it was a possibility, women would show up to
• 41:30
  male prostitutes with coupons. Can I get off? I'm not talking about your
• 41:36
  pants. You are absolutely right about that. Women are the cheapest creatures on
• 41:40
  earth. It's I'm sorry, it's facts. Don't hate me, it'll hate
• 41:45
  It's the truth. It's just a sad fact, right, yeah. And
• 41:49
  it's and it's not just because women don't value male sexuality. It's because women
• 41:55
  are always skin flints. Like that's all right, exactly, it's in our
• 42:00
  nature. Right. But but in any case, like it is partly because
• 42:05
  you know, yeah, that's like that's that's that's it. But in any
• 42:12
  case, this use of the National Crime Victimization Survey. So we've looked at
• 42:17
  the first two fundamental errors. The first one is the error that only one
• 42:22
  percent of sexual assaults ever lead to conviction because we're talking about when when you
• 42:29
  say assaults, but you're talking about a survey. This is not stats on
• 42:34
  actual crime. This is self reported, right, people saying this happened to
• 42:38
  me. You never can be one hundred percent certain that every person reporting to
• 42:45
  that survey is telling the truth, right, That's the first thing. The
• 42:50
  second thing is when you look at the questions, are they treating things as
• 42:55
  rape that the community doesn't think of as rape? And so are people reporting
• 43:00
  these things happened but the reason they didn't report it to police is because they
• 43:05
  didn't feel like a rape victim like And that's I can't emphasize enough. There
• 43:14
  is a significant difference between what feminists say about your ability to consent to sex
• 43:22
  with some alcohol in your system and how people behave in regard to sexual interaction
• 43:30
  with some alcohol in their system. And feminists only think that women can't consent
• 43:37
  with some alcohol in their system. If a man and a woman both have
• 43:39
  some alcohol in their system and they're both at the same level of intoxica intoxication,
• 43:46
  he's considered a rapist and she's considered a victim even if they're both consented.
• 43:52
  That's bullshit. So the mistakes there are they're counting things as sexual assault
• 43:58
  that may not be sexual and they're lumping male and female stats together. But
• 44:05
  now they're going to treat it as a problem that only exists for women,
• 44:08
  exactly. And if you take into account the fact that if you look at
• 44:15
  current statistics, women are the most. They are becoming more and more and
• 44:21
  they were like alcoholics, right, they are abusing alcohol at a higher rate
• 44:27
  than they ever really have in history. And so you have a bunch of
• 44:32
  drunk chicks under the influence and they're not really sure of what's going on,
• 44:38
  and you don't you had they run into these situations where they're not sure of
• 44:44
  what they're doing. So, yes, the question of rape becomes questionable because
• 44:50
  they're not in their right mind. They're not making good decisions when they're in
• 44:54
  that state. But no, let's let's it's just no they're getting rape.
• 45:00
  Let's just lean the men. It's not. Yeah, the gal that I
• 45:05
  went to college with that used to go to parties and get drunk and grab
• 45:08
  some guy by the t shirt and drag him off into another room to have
• 45:13
  sex with him was totally a victim. Absolutely, Yes, feminists, but
• 45:17
  those guys who were even more drunk than she was. They were perpetrators.
• 45:22
  They had they had they had way more agency than she did. Yeah,
• 45:27
  that's the problem. So you hear twenty three percent of rape or sexual assaults
• 45:30
  victim victims, only twenty three percent reported the crime to police, All right?
• 45:36
  How much? What percentage of that twenty three percent were women? Is
• 45:43
  the reason that the the other what seventy seven percent isn't reporting is because a
• 45:54
  large portion of them won't be taken seriously because of their X. So if
• 46:01
  those do do report, the FBI's Uniform Crime Reporting Database shows that only about
• 46:07
  twenty percent of reports lead to arrest. Right. And according to the nonprofit
• 46:15
  Rape Abuse and Incest National Network RAIN, which analyzes the national data recording sexual
• 46:21
  assault and rape, only half of arrests lead to a trial. So we're
• 46:27
  talking about of the twenty three percent of the assaults that get reported, only
• 46:34
  twenty percent of those actually lead to arrest, and then even a small only
• 46:43
  half of those actually go to trial where there's you know, someone who actually
• 46:49
  will listen to the facts of the case, you know. So my definition
• 46:54
  that just men's rights advocates, because all they're trying to do. Is that
• 47:00
  cap for their rights as men and so and so they are let's convert this
• 47:06
  into into an initialism, they're just MRAs. So they're just winding and complaining
• 47:12
  about shit that doesn't matter. And and this is where I'm attacking both sides
• 47:19
  of the political spectrum, isn't it. There you go? So I got
• 47:24
  to point out a few things about the twenty percent number here. Uh let's
• 47:29
  let's I'm gonna go back to the seven years in Hell case because like everything
• 47:32
  happened in that case, I'm telling you, um, one of the allegations,
• 47:37
  one of the demonstrably false allegations that seven Years in Hell guy faced was
• 47:45
  rape. His ex went to the police. She filed a police report claiming
• 47:53
  that he had broken into her apartment and raped her. And she gave a
• 48:01
  day and a time when that allegedly occurred, right, she said, she
• 48:07
  gave all the details. This is this is when that happened. Turned out
• 48:10
  that he was on video somewhere else. He was arrested. Well, they
• 48:16
  didn't call it an arrest. They called it bringing him in for questioning,
• 48:21
  right, But they kept him for twelve hours and they interrogated him for twelve
• 48:27
  hours. They withheld his medicines, which they're not allowed to do, and
• 48:37
  they only let him go when his lawyer basically said, look, if you're
• 48:40
  not going to charge him, you have to let him go. Well,
• 48:43
  they didn't have anything, and he produced evidence of his innocence, so obviously
• 48:51
  they had to let him go, right, So that was a false report.
• 48:57
  She reported again by changing her story, picked a different day. Oh,
• 49:04
  I had the day wrong. I forgot what day it was, and
• 49:08
  he got dragged in again for questioning. Technically he wasn't under arrest, but
• 49:15
  he got dragged in again for questioning. And fortunately again he had a variety
• 49:22
  of receipts showing that he could not have committed the crime because he was elsewhere.
• 49:29
  And so she shopped around for another day. She changed her story a
• 49:34
  third time, and you know, he was dragged in again, and finally
• 49:43
  his attorney said, we're going to sue if you don't stop this. There's
• 49:46
  obviously no credibility to this story. Once the accuser has changed the date and
• 49:53
  time repeatedly, you know that she's just shopping around for some time. He
• 50:00
  can't account for. There's no actual physical evidence of sexual assault. There's no
• 50:07
  placement of him anywhere near her her location. She has a restraining order against
• 50:13
  them. You know, she kept a thirty day restraining order emergency temporary emergency
• 50:17
  restraining order going for a whole year by using continuances' for the case for the
• 50:23
  hearing. So she just kept pushing the hearing back, and that thirty days
• 50:29
  was ten times as long as it was supposed to be. But in any
• 50:34
  case, like that's an incident where a report can be said to not lead
• 50:38
  to arrest, Well, that report was false, right, And of course
• 50:44
  it never went to trial because that report was false. But if it had
• 50:50
  been a different situation, right, So my last experience with this, and
• 51:00
  I like, at the time, I didn't know I was autistic, so
• 51:01
  I didn't know why I couldn't describe my perpetrators. You're still not necessarily autistic
• 51:09
  kind of you might just be normal. No, I'm diagnosed. And like
• 51:16
  you know how many times I've been in the same room with you. If
• 51:20
  somebody asked, and I've watched your videos, I couldn't describe you right now
• 51:24
  other than to tell your hair color. Like I've seen your face hundreds of
• 51:31
  times, and I couldn't describe you. I couldn't tell with people what shape
• 51:35
  your noses. I couldn't describe what kind of eyes you have. Like,
• 51:39
  that's autism. That's one of the fun things about autism. Right, So,
• 51:45
  like, so I go into if I if I go into that situation
• 51:50
  and describe that, right, I'm going to go into the police department.
• 51:52
  I'm going to say this happened to me. And there were three guys And
• 51:55
  did you see their faces? Yes? What do they look like? I
• 51:58
  don't know? Now, who's the cop going to arrest? Right, you
• 52:06
  gonna go out and look for the guys with no faces, Like, there's
• 52:09
  a lot more investigation that has to take place before there can be in arrest.
• 52:14
  And if the victim, even even trying to cooperate, cannot give the
• 52:20
  officer information. Right, if the perpetrators used objects and didn't leave DNA and
• 52:30
  you know things like that, if they don't have a license plate of the
• 52:35
  vehicle, they don't have a way to identify the vehicle. And it's to
• 52:38
  the degree that I reported a when I was a security guard at a university,
• 52:47
  there was a building that was in two parts, had a breezeway in
• 52:52
  between the two parts of the building that you could drive a car through it.
• 52:59
  Were supposed to drive a car through You had to get up on the
• 53:01
  sidewalk to drive a car through it. But you could drive a car through
• 53:04
  it. And somebody did and almost ran me over and call the cops,
• 53:08
  and I'm reporting it. I had all but the last digit on the license
• 53:14
  plate, but they couldn't identify the car without that last digit, right,
• 53:20
  So in a situation with a with a and it was like the only reason
• 53:25
  I had it was because I was reading it off into my walkie as as
• 53:31
  they were driving away from me. They just drove away too fast for me
• 53:34
  to catch the last one. But in a situation where the crime was more
• 53:39
  serious, they would attract him, find a found a way to track them
• 53:42
  down, but it would have taken a lot longer, and it wouldn't have
• 53:46
  been enough. Like if if you didn't have the whole license plate and that
• 53:50
  was the only evidence, you'd have been slight. So there are plenty of
• 53:57
  situations where a doesn't happen because there isn't enough evidence to lead to who is
• 54:05
  the perpetrator? If you can't identify a suspect, who do you arrest?
• 54:13
  Right? Like, that's the first problem. You know, the second problem
• 54:17
  is obviously some reports are false, and then it comes down to people who
• 54:27
  are able to describe a face purely through their imagination. Yeah well, I
• 54:32
  mean, I witness testimony is notoriously horrible, you know, I mean,
• 54:37
  unless it's you know, one on one like this first person witness. I
• 54:44
  mean, and even then you can get things completely wrong, details like yeah,
• 54:52
  but um, you know, listen, if that's what you got,
• 54:55
  that's what you got. What else do you have to go on? Yeah?
• 55:00
  Well, and then you also have there's this brings up another thing.
• 55:05
  All right, So we get told that the overwhelming majority of rape is perpetrated
• 55:09
  by people that the that the victim knows. Yeah, that's based on criminal
• 55:19
  convictions. But here we're like, only one out of five reports to police
• 55:24
  leads to an arrest. And what if what if that claim is bullshit?
• 55:30
  What if a significant number of people go to the police report the crime and
• 55:36
  then can't give enough evidence or information to identify the suspect, Because you know,
• 55:44
  I could at least if somebody I knew commits the crime, I can
• 55:47
  at least say this person by name did this to me? Right, And
• 55:52
  even if I was going to falsely accuse somebody, which obviously I wouldn't want
• 55:54
  to do somebody I know did this to me, you know, like go
• 56:00
  in and say the person by name did this to me. You at least
• 56:04
  have that when the accused is someone the accuser knows. But when the accused
• 56:12
  is actually a stranger and you don't have that evidence or that information, right,
• 56:19
  then again, like how are the police supposed to arrest someone if they
• 56:24
  don't know who to arrest? And then you only take a case to trial
• 56:31
  if you have a chance of conviction, right, And if you have a
• 56:35
  chance, you only have a chance of conviction if you have evidence that meets
• 56:40
  the standard that evidence has to prove beyond a reasonable doubt. Prosecutors don't take
• 56:49
  cases to court to lose. So if you have an accuser who's uncooperative,
• 56:57
  if you have a situation where the evidence gathering doesn't net evidence that's going to
• 57:06
  demonstrate that the crime happened or prove that the person who's accused was the perpetrator,
• 57:14
  they're not going to take it to trial. So it goes on.
• 57:20
  Most reliable data on conviction rates comes from a Justice Department study that analyzed convictions
• 57:25
  between nineteen ninety and two thousand and nine. Well, they say most reliable
• 57:30
  data, But I'm kind of concerned, you know, Is it that it's
• 57:35
  the data they like the best or the data they consider the most reliable?
• 57:40
  They say? The study concluded that rape trials in conviction around thirty five percent
• 57:45
  of the time. Taken together, this means that only about eight eight tenths
• 57:52
  of one percent of assaults of accusations correcting the article here of accusations lead to
• 57:59
  a convict. And then then they start to make some admissions, right,
• 58:07
  The data here is admittedly murky, murky murky, Like, are you kidding
• 58:15
  me? It's it's not even data. National studies don't consistent consistently distinguish rape
• 58:24
  from sexual assault, an umbrella term that includes rape as well as other forced
• 58:30
  acts. Well, there's a reason for that. In some states they don't
• 58:32
  have the label rape anymore. They just use the label sexual assault. Oh
• 58:37
  geez, So it's just a fucking umbrella term, right, because right,
• 58:43
  listen, Obviously, penis and vagina or vagina on penis, actual rape is
• 58:52
  a completely different category of a type of sexual assault than just I brushed her
• 59:00
  boob in a way that she did. She thought I touched her her tits.
• 59:06
  That's a completely different fucking thing, you know. But no, what
• 59:09
  they do to boost their numbers is to lump them all together, you know
• 59:17
  what I mean? Oh God, they they're lumping basically lumping everything from groping
• 59:24
  in with full on forcible rape right in order to get this so well,
• 59:31
  it's the vagina on penis doesn't count as rape, but finger through hair does
• 59:37
  count as rape. Yeah, I see, that's that's part of the problem.
• 59:40
  And then of course we still go back to you look at that,
• 59:46
  right, and a woman will feel sexually assaulted and claim to be sexually assaulted
• 59:53
  if she thinks that it was on purpose when a man touched her butt.
• 1:00:00
  M right. That that, you know, just because the train is packed
• 1:00:06
  like sardines and nobody is not touching and that guy's behind her with his back
• 1:00:15
  turn to her, it doesn't doesn't change the fact that it was deliberate and
• 1:00:19
  he was groping her. He doesn't even matter if she doesn't know what part
• 1:00:24
  of his body touched her. Oh it had to be his hand, right,
• 1:00:28
  That a woman will be like that. Men don't seem to have that
• 1:00:32
  attitude about it. And in fact, um men will weather behavior that women
• 1:00:42
  will will freak out about it and call sexual misconduct. And I've I've watched
• 1:00:46
  this happen in in circumstances where um, you know it was it was another
• 1:00:52
  woman's place to step up and defend him. Uh, she was married to
• 1:00:57
  him. But going to a renaissance fair with a guy in a kilt is
• 1:01:00
  very enlightening. I will say that because at a renaissance very, you know,
• 1:01:05
  you're you're dealing with a lot of drunk women, a lot meat is
• 1:01:09
  very it doesn't feel like you're getting drunk at all, right, you're it's
• 1:01:14
  it's very sweet it you don't taste a lot of alcohol in it, but
• 1:01:19
  at the meat at the rand is pretty alcoholic. And H and I have
• 1:01:23
  seen some pretty falling down drunk women do some pretty inappropriate shit that they would
• 1:01:29
  never tolerate if a man did it to them. And you know, walking
• 1:01:32
  up and touching somebody else's chest, walking up and touching somebody else's legs,
• 1:01:37
  walking up and reaching under somebody else's clothes without asking or without waiting for an
• 1:01:45
  answer, and uh, yeah that that like that guy's not going to go
• 1:01:51
  on a survey and say I was groped, I was molested, Like he's
• 1:01:55
  not going to do it. He was annoyed, he was embarrassed. Yeah,
• 1:02:00
  and she should have been thrown out right that that chick should have been
• 1:02:06
  thrown out. That was inappropriate behavior. You can't act like that in here.
• 1:02:08
  Get the fuck out. But what ended up happening was, you know,
• 1:02:14
  wife stood in between him and her and said, what the hell do
• 1:02:16
  you think you're doing? And she backed down because wife was bigger and stronger
• 1:02:22
  and carrying a battle axe piece tide but it was a real battle axe.
• 1:02:28
  Um, I like her anyway. So so yeah, like that was that
• 1:02:32
  was the end of that. But you don't see that, uh with with
• 1:02:37
  the opposite sex, Like there weren't. Weren't men just randomly reaching up women's
• 1:02:42
  skirts to see if they were real well, I mean, like I don't
• 1:02:46
  know, the whole real scotsman thing, no wonder where and all that.
• 1:02:50
  Um, it's not really a good excuse, but to see if they were
• 1:02:52
  real like benches. I guess this might be the reason women wore long skirts
• 1:02:59
  for all of human history, as far as anyone can costs attain. Yeah,
• 1:03:04
  underwear was not like underwear was an invention of modern society. Not modern
• 1:03:13
  as in today, but as in more more technologically advanced society. The idea
• 1:03:21
  that you you like have your layers of clothes are not about warmth but about
• 1:03:27
  modesty and cleanliness. Yeah, but it like, honestly, that scene in
• 1:03:35
  Crocodile Dundee, for instance, where where he goes up and grabs the crots
• 1:03:40
  to to see if the woman is a real woman is is funny because it
• 1:03:45
  would never happen in real life. It's funny because it's outrageous and inappropriate.
• 1:03:51
  Nobody would ever tolerate it. Happening in real life would lead to the guy
• 1:03:53
  getting the ship beaten out of him, and then the cops would be called
• 1:03:58
  and he wouldn't be able to press charges against his assailants because the cops would
• 1:04:00
  be like, what the hell are you doing grabbing a woman's crotch? But
• 1:04:05
  but yeah, so murky murky my ass right. Um, this this is
• 1:04:12
  not this. I can't even count us this data now, Like they're to
• 1:04:15
  the point where they're counting things that only women report and then claiming that it
• 1:04:25
  is data on rape when it's actually data on a whole spectrum of things that
• 1:04:30
  may or may not have happened. That the lower down on the scale of
• 1:04:36
  inappropriateness that you get or the lower down on the scale of violence you get
• 1:04:44
  in terms of the behavior um, the more likely the behavior is going to
• 1:04:50
  get reported on the basis of the woman's feelings rather than the basis of the
• 1:04:56
  facts of the incident. And when they happen men, men don't report them.
• 1:05:00
  But they're counting men's experiences in this right. And what we're looking at
• 1:05:08
  here is a spectrum of things that men who are surveyed might answer, yes,
• 1:05:14
  these things happen to me, but they're not going to go to the
• 1:05:16
  cops. So the majority of these non reports, the majority of the people
• 1:05:20
  that didn't go to the cops, may have been men. And to bring
• 1:05:27
  it back to Crocodile Dundee, just because you ban guns, and if you
• 1:05:35
  then report on knife crime and say look how bad knife crime is, you
• 1:05:41
  can go ahead and say, well, that's not a knife, this is
• 1:05:45
  a fucking gun. You could go ahead and say you could say something about
• 1:05:51
  knife crime or gun crime. But it all depends on what you've banned and
• 1:05:56
  what you have and banned, And the same goes for rape, like rape
• 1:06:00
  with a penis is totally different from rape with a vagina. And oh,
• 1:06:05
  we can sit here until the cows come home talking about that's not a knife,
• 1:06:10
  that's a gun, and that's not a gun, that's a knife.
• 1:06:12
  Doesn't fucking matter. Maybe we can make things equal by law. Sorry to
• 1:06:17
  sound like such a fucking leftist, but maybe things should be equal under law,
• 1:06:24
  like like that that is a knife, and that is a gun,
• 1:06:28
  and that is a penis, and that is a vagina. Can we do
• 1:06:31
  that? Is that a thing? I don't fucking no. Well, I
• 1:06:35
  know one thing, given the data that shows the I don't like to cite
• 1:06:46
  the alleged vampire effect because I don't believe in it. But what I do
• 1:06:51
  notice is that if you commit violence against a child and then raise that child
• 1:06:57
  in a violent environment, that child is more likely to grow up to use
• 1:07:01
  violence instead of diplomacy and camaraderie in their interactions with other people. Right,
• 1:07:10
  And when you look at the history histories of people who are sexual assault perpetrators,
• 1:07:16
  you find that they were sexual assault victims at a much higher rate than
• 1:07:20
  a general population. So if you want, if you don't want perpetration like
• 1:07:29
  stobdiddling kids. That's and that that in particular needs to be said to women
• 1:07:34
  school teachers in particular UM because if you look at the histories of men who
• 1:07:41
  are convicted there there, they've got a really high rate of being victimized by
• 1:07:48
  women when they were young. So there's that, But it goes on national
• 1:07:56
  data regarding convictions UM and trials as incredibly difficult to find if the data is
• 1:08:01
  tract at all. Many victims are assaulted by the same person, but reliable
• 1:08:04
  statistics on repeat offenders aren't available, So how do they know that if there's
• 1:08:12
  no reliable Like the one study that does really demonstrate that, there's a Navy
• 1:08:17
  study that I think it was a Navy study, Noe's the Marines, and
• 1:08:23
  I have it somewhere that in which like thirteen percent of the respondents admitted to
• 1:08:33
  violent criminal behavior, including sexual assault behavior. And and then there was the
• 1:08:40
  there was the Lissac study that he really screwed up. How he drew conclusions
• 1:08:47
  based on his data and his data is a little questionable, but his study.
• 1:08:53
  One thing that you can actually reliably take from his study is that rape
• 1:08:59
  is an abnormal behavior that is usually committed by career criminals, not your average
• 1:09:03
  person, and that they are usually repeat offenders. That about four percent of
• 1:09:14
  the population that are all repeat offenders, at least in terms of male perpetrator
• 1:09:18
  rape, about four percent of the male population is responsible, Like four to
• 1:09:25
  six percent is responsible for ninety percent of rapes, real small percentage of perpetrators
• 1:09:33
  with abnormal characteristics, And like that tells you something. He interpreted that for
• 1:09:41
  some reason to mean that there was a epidemic of rape on university campuses,
• 1:09:50
  but the data that he had didn't show that. It was just sort of
• 1:09:54
  something that he'd like, well, I want to say this, so I'm
• 1:09:57
  going to say it. And that was it. But so here we have
• 1:10:00
  this data, this non data data that could be based on a lot of
• 1:10:06
  incidents that happened that men tolerated happening to them and didn't report to the police
• 1:10:11
  because they didn't think of themselves as victims at the time. Being used to
• 1:10:15
  claim that men are getting away with raping women left and right. And here
• 1:10:21
  we have this this claim that, um, you know, this maybe a
• 1:10:26
  lot of repeat offenders, and national data is hard to find. We can't
• 1:10:30
  really prove this. But we're going to say the statistic themselves are always in
• 1:10:36
  flux, and the data shifts year to year. But one thing is certain.
• 1:10:41
  The United States is bad at prosecuting sexual assault. So they just hedged
• 1:10:45
  the fuck out of this. There's no there's no validity to the claim that
• 1:10:54
  they're about to make here based on the things they've said so far. But
• 1:10:59
  then they go on and say, and when less than one percent of assaults
• 1:11:02
  and again we're going to say, allegations lead to any repercussions, more violent
• 1:11:09
  criminals walk free. So how do we get better at prosecuting sexual assault?
• 1:11:14
  We need to change how we treat sexual victims, you know, like,
• 1:11:19
  okay, so what's the change. What do they deem a sexual assault victim?
• 1:11:26
  At every stage in the judicial process. An undercurrent of disbelief, distrust,
• 1:11:31
  and mistreatment toward victims makes it less likely that rapists are prosecuted for their
• 1:11:38
  crimes. Like fifty years ago, people used to complain about about male teachers
• 1:11:48
  with their multipods and their Scottish accents and the hey, teacher, leave them
• 1:11:54
  kids alone. But honestly, the worst they were doing was, you know,
• 1:11:59
  bullying them through social means, much like as illustrated by you know,
• 1:12:04
  pink flood in the wall and and and such. All the boy fancies himself
• 1:12:11
  a poet, and he would They would point his fucking cane as the student
• 1:12:16
  and say, you think you're good for anything, laddie, And you know,
• 1:12:23
  people would complain about that shit, and that's and that's all well and
• 1:12:26
  good. But at this point, we've we've we've reached this situation where those
• 1:12:33
  where those um, those hard ass male teachers have been all but ejected from
• 1:12:42
  the school system. And now we're left with these these women. And I'm
• 1:12:47
  sure some of them are still trying to do their job as they're supposed to
• 1:12:53
  do it, but we're also left with these women who will I mean,
• 1:12:59
  do I even need to finish this sentence? You all know what I'm talking
• 1:13:02
  about. Don't tell the class that they can't have any pudding if they don't
• 1:13:06
  eat their tuna. If only that was all they were doing at this point,
• 1:13:12
  that at this point, this point, they're saying, you need to
• 1:13:15
  cut your dick off or you can't have any pudding. You know what I
• 1:13:20
  mean. It's it's yeah, it's definitely gone to a place that nobody ever
• 1:13:27
  would have expected when we first started talking about sexual perpetration among female teachers.
• 1:13:32
  Now they're brainwashing students into self sterilization. Very strange situation. And it's it's
• 1:13:41
  not it's not like these teachers are doing it and necessarily in order to sexually
• 1:13:45
  assault them theirselves. It's like Commodo dragons. I feel like I said this
• 1:13:51
  in in in in some streams some time ago. The thing about Commodo dragons
• 1:13:58
  is they don't bite the organism that they intend on feeding on. They bite
• 1:14:05
  an organism knowing that someone that some other Kimmodo dragons somewhere down the line will
• 1:14:13
  eat it when it's dead. Yeah, And that's and that's what and that's
• 1:14:18
  what I mean. This, it doesn't it doesn't happen through conspiracy. It
• 1:14:21
  happens um just through this this organic process that um, this its evolutionary process
• 1:14:32
  that as long as there's enough of them biting these children and giving them,
• 1:14:41
  uh the this insipid um giving them a crippling mental health condition, that upon
• 1:14:51
  them giving them these diseases, not that not so that they can sexually assault
• 1:14:58
  them, but so that someone else down the line can septually assault them other
• 1:15:04
  wise. So it's it's not a conspiracy theory. It's an organic process that
• 1:15:11
  the whole reason that this exists is because it's happened so gradually that as long
• 1:15:16
  as someone is fucking up these children down the line, someone else in the
• 1:15:24
  same um with with with the same theory of mind can actually rape them further
• 1:15:33
  down the line. And it just keeps going because it's able to just roll
• 1:15:40
  this over from from the front and the back, and it just keeps going
• 1:15:45
  because it keeps working, because it has this front end and this back end
• 1:15:50
  that is able to make this happen, and because there's no opposition to this,
• 1:15:56
  and this this is why Commodo Dragons were able to avoidolve to this state,
• 1:16:01
  and it's the same reason these evil cunts have been able to evolve to
• 1:16:09
  this state, albeit on a you know, on a much shorter, you
• 1:16:13
  know, temporal plan, not that it's even a plan, it's just it
• 1:16:17
  happens organically. And this has happened organically because that not enough of us have
• 1:16:25
  been here to say, hey, this is what's happening, because because there
• 1:16:30
  have been other woke assholes to say no, this is happening. This couldn't
• 1:16:36
  possibly happen. Now dare you say this is happening? This is a sorry
• 1:16:43
  sorry, but going on with the article? Um, this this thing about
• 1:16:48
  this disbelief, distrust and mistreatment, all right. That claim relates to the
• 1:16:56
  investigation process looking for evidence in all directions. So an accusation has to be
• 1:17:02
  treated as just an accusation until there is evidence. And if there is no
• 1:17:09
  evidence, then it is appropriate for the investigating officer to treat the accusation as
• 1:17:15
  potentially false. It is potentially true and potentially false until there is evidence one
• 1:17:20
  way or another. Absence of evidence that the allegation is true can be taken
• 1:17:26
  by an investigator is evidence that it is false. So that's the first step.
• 1:17:32
  Now, it's not enough evidence to prosecute somebody from making a false allegation,
• 1:17:36
  right, but it is enough evidence to start examining the details of the
• 1:17:43
  allegation for holes. You know, like the the accuser in the Rolling Stone
• 1:17:55
  article that claimed that she was thrown onto a pile of glass and gang raped
• 1:18:01
  and then didn't have injuries from the glass. And of course the the accused
• 1:18:09
  boys who's who would have been slaving their their body parts into the glass,
• 1:18:14
  they didn't have any injuries either. Like the injuries would have been horrific there,
• 1:18:18
  right, And obviously that's a big hole in the allegation right there.
• 1:18:23
  Um. But but yeah, they're they're objecting to investigating those those issues with
• 1:18:33
  allegations. They're they're they're objecting to the idea that police might demonstrate any skepticism
• 1:18:41
  at all and act on that skepticism by by actually uh checking into like is
• 1:18:50
  this is this possible? Did the thing that you know does? Does?
• 1:18:55
  Does the accused have the capacity to commit the crime? Um? Was the
• 1:19:01
  accused somewhere else when the crime took place? Well, is it possible that
• 1:19:06
  the accuser made the crime? Up Right? You can't you can't ask those
• 1:19:12
  questions even when it's evident that those questions should be asked, because you know,
• 1:19:19
  that's that's mistreatment, That's that's um, disbelief, distrust, skepticism is
• 1:19:27
  not allowed. That's that's what they're saying here. Um. So then you
• 1:19:32
  have the next paragraph. Let's start with the with reporting the crime. No
• 1:19:36
  crime will ever be investigated unless police know about it, a point I made
• 1:19:41
  earlier. The Justice Department puts the percentage of rapes and sexual assaults reported at
• 1:19:45
  between twenty percent and forty percent as the number fluctuates each year. And again
• 1:19:51
  I will point out, I will bet whatever the percentage is, Let's say
• 1:19:57
  we take the middle of that and say thirty percent. If thirty percent of
• 1:20:01
  rapes and other sexual assaults are reported, and they lump that all together,
• 1:20:06
  that includes things that you know, again, women women report based on subjective
• 1:20:14
  evidence that they've drawn conclusions on, you know, like rape is not subjective,
• 1:20:19
  but groping can be, and sexual harassment can be too, right,
• 1:20:27
  that's very subjective. So probably the majority of that thirty percent is women reporting
• 1:20:35
  incidents. And if you're lumping those things together, the stat no longer can
• 1:20:43
  be applied as a determining as part of the determining statistics on how frequently rape
• 1:20:53
  leads to a conviction, because we're talking about like how many unreported sexual assaults
• 1:21:00
  constitute are are are made up of things like, um, you know,
• 1:21:03
  somebody somebody just reports being or respondent reports on the survey being groped when in
• 1:21:14
  fact, you know, maybe somebody bumped into them or or tripped into them,
• 1:21:16
  or they were in a crowded place and just thought they were grouped.
• 1:21:21
  How many of those reports are incidents? Where two people engaged in drunk sex
• 1:21:29
  when they were not too intoxicated to appraise their actions, but the woman reporting
• 1:21:35
  it on the survey exaggerates her level of drunkenness in the survey. Right,
• 1:21:41
  how many of those are things that men don't complain about when they happen and
• 1:21:46
  women do. It really doesn't make sense. Reporting a sexual assault can be
• 1:21:54
  traumatic. The reprocess of reporting is inherently invasive when your body is the scene
• 1:22:01
  of the crime. Victims do report who report immediately after the assault undergo sane
• 1:22:09
  exam. It's sexual assault nurse examination, So it's it's kind of like calling
• 1:22:17
  the National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey the NISVS survey. It's the the
• 1:22:26
  survey survey and the exam exam performed by a sexual assault nurse examiner, in
• 1:22:32
  which the nurses photograph the victim's body and collect evidence from their genitals. Recounting
• 1:22:38
  the experience means reliving the worst moment of your life in front of strangers.
• 1:22:44
  Rape victims often feel ashamed or they blame themselves for what happened, and talking
• 1:22:47
  about the assault is incredibly difficult. There's where this depends on the nature of
• 1:22:54
  the assault. Like if you were drunk out of your gourd and you had
• 1:22:58
  sex with somebody and you feel like you were too drunk to consent, you
• 1:23:02
  know, too drunk to appraise your actions. Um, but you weren't incapacitated
• 1:23:09
  like you might be questioning things. But if somebody beats the funk out of
• 1:23:13
  you and hold you down and does things to your body against your will,
• 1:23:16
  you're not ashamed of that. Um. You don't blame yourself for that.
• 1:23:21
  You blame them. And it's it's cathartic to to say, this person did
• 1:23:30
  this bad thing to me and I'm angry about it. Aside from anything else,
• 1:23:35
  I'm um. It is true that, um, the average male has
• 1:23:45
  great capacity for um processing alcohol that than does the average woman. Now,
• 1:23:54
  obviously you can you can slice this apart when it comes to women who are
• 1:23:59
  more used to alcohol and women and men who are less used to alcohol.
• 1:24:04
  And it all depends on body mass, which is not just a male female
• 1:24:10
  thing. It's a it's a fat muscle thing. Well, there's a whole
• 1:24:15
  bunch of factors that go into it. Body mass, kidney health, metabolism,
• 1:24:19
  like your liver health. All those things can affect like how you process
• 1:24:25
  alcohol and how it affects you. And yeah, so if if if a
• 1:24:30
  man does challenge you to drink the same amount of alcohol as he does,
• 1:24:35
  like in that scene from Raiders of the Lost Arc, then it doesn't It
• 1:24:41
  doesn't matter if the alcohol you're drinking is is the wine that his family grew
• 1:24:46
  up with. It comes down to body mass and and the constitution of your
• 1:24:55
  body mass. But this is one of the many reasons women's women should be
• 1:25:00
  wary of men who tried to do this, who who tried to access though
• 1:25:08
  as a woman you should be just as as as capable of handling your alcohol
• 1:25:15
  as a man is, but it's not. It's not necessarily the case because
• 1:25:20
  of you know, weights and high and bodied mass index and such and to
• 1:25:29
  that, to that degree, I dare say women need to be more wary
• 1:25:34
  than men are on average. Obviously, um only only on average. Like
• 1:25:45
  if if you're if you're a tiny man who's not used to his alcohol,
• 1:25:47
  then you need to be worried about a woman about woman, a woman who
• 1:25:53
  challenges you to to drink the same amount the same amount of alcohol that she
• 1:25:58
  does. But well, what it really comes down to, it we really
• 1:26:03
  in the United States in particular, we have a really bad approach to discussing
• 1:26:09
  alcohol with kids, and because of this, we have a really bad phenomenon
• 1:26:17
  of kids using alcohol as a form of rebellion against authority instead of just a
• 1:26:25
  thing that you know, sometimes people drink. Like when I talk to my
• 1:26:29
  kids about it, I didn't do any of the more a moralizing that people
• 1:26:31
  usually do in regard to alcohol. I talked about other things, like you're
• 1:26:36
  when you're young, your kidneys are still developing, your liver still developing.
• 1:26:41
  This substance is technically a poison. There's a small amount of it you could
• 1:26:45
  ingest. You know that the amount makes the poison, right, there's a
• 1:26:48
  small amount of it you can ingest once your liver and kidneys are developed enough
• 1:26:51
  to handle it. Um that that is relaxing, and then there's a slight
• 1:26:58
  larger amount that is too relaxing. And then beyond that you start to experience
• 1:27:02
  symptoms of poisoning, like you get intoxicated, really seriously intoxicated. You get
• 1:27:09
  dizzy, you get a little nauseous, and eventually it'll make you throw up.
• 1:27:15
  It'll make you unable to control your body well enough to prevent yourself from
• 1:27:19
  inhaling your vomit. There's a lot of other risks. You may make stupid
• 1:27:24
  decisions after and you know, drinking too much of it, and it does
• 1:27:30
  damage to your body. So if you decide you're going to use alcohol,
• 1:27:34
  you should wait until you're through your adolescence. You know, at least far
• 1:27:40
  enough through that you're you pretty well got good developed kidneys and liver, and
• 1:27:45
  do it in moderation so that you're not damaging yourself. And you know,
• 1:27:48
  in particular, my son, like our family has some genetics that you really
• 1:27:55
  have to watch out for addiction, you know, like we have we have
• 1:28:00
  some family heritage that says we're more likely to become addicted alcohol. So moderation
• 1:28:09
  is even more important in that instance, because it's a lot easier to quit
• 1:28:12
  something that you're doing a little than it is to quit something that you're doing
• 1:28:15
  a shitload. And so there's that, you know, we we can't we
• 1:28:23
  can't have as much fun as everybody else with substances. That's okay, we
• 1:28:27
  got other things we can do. Right. If you talk to your kids
• 1:28:30
  about it like that, then they are not going to treat it as something
• 1:28:34
  to use to rebel against you. They're going to think of it as something
• 1:28:39
  that they have to judge for themselves and be careful with, you know,
• 1:28:45
  don't be stupid. Like honestly, you know, you don't see a lot
• 1:28:50
  of people running around in the streets hitting themselves in the head with a twenty
• 1:28:54
  pound sledgehammer, going he isn't this fun? Then I'm having a blast bam
• 1:28:58
  right in the skull. You't, no, because they know that hurts,
• 1:29:01
  they know it looks stupid, they know it sounds stupid. But you know,
• 1:29:09
  like with alcohol, it's the same effect if you get plowed every week,
• 1:29:14
  you know, go out and get blasted and then do stupid shit and
• 1:29:19
  wake up with a hangover the next day. The only thing is it just
• 1:29:23
  takes a little bit longer and you're swallowing something instead of hitting yourself in the
• 1:29:28
  head with a twenty pound sledge It's worth putting out at this point that my
• 1:29:32
  family is particularly susceptible to having their dicks cut off and and and their breasts
• 1:29:42
  cut off and inverted into the opposite. See what do you see what satirical
• 1:29:47
  point I'm making. We're not We're not going to be able to explain to
• 1:29:53
  future generations how susceptible families are too. Yeah, no, you won't because
• 1:30:00
  although I actually could say that about my family now that I think about it,
• 1:30:06
  um not. And I'm not going to tell that story. That's that's
• 1:30:12
  too brutal of a story, honestly. Um D. Yeah, Hannah's Hannah
• 1:30:18
  likes telling us stories about this one, you guys do not. She's not
• 1:30:24
  tell you everything, this story everything. Yeah, that's the one that's that's
• 1:30:30
  awful. It's that's an awful situation. Um. But no, uh,
• 1:30:35
  and it's it's sad, but yeah. Um. In any case, my
• 1:30:42
  point on this is, like the way we handle alcohol has created a situation
• 1:30:46
  where young women endanger themselves and the young men they hang out with in a
• 1:30:53
  number of ways, including you know, allegations of sexual assault and sexual assault
• 1:31:00
  affecting the young men who then have no recourse because our society views alcohol facilitated
• 1:31:10
  sexual assault as something men do, not something women do. Right. And
• 1:31:14
  then on top of that, and I think I've told this story before,
• 1:31:17
  but one of my childhood friends was much older than me, friend of the
• 1:31:24
  family, somebody who I maintained friendship with as I grew into adulthood until he
• 1:31:30
  moved away, got married, moved away, started working and stuff. But
• 1:31:34
  he was the son of the fire chief when no the police chief, son
• 1:31:41
  of the police chief when I was in school, and so he was he
• 1:31:46
  had CPR training. He had a bunch of you know, understanding of things
• 1:31:54
  that the rest of us really hadn't had to think about because we were just
• 1:31:58
  kids. Like he had a little less of being just a kid than the
• 1:32:02
  rest of us because his dad was a cop and he was the chief of
• 1:32:06
  police and everything goes to goes to a party, and you know, he
• 1:32:11
  was reticent because he didn't want to get caught at an alcohol party, which
• 1:32:15
  is like the majority of parties that happen in you know, in my area.
• 1:32:20
  So you know, he goes, walks in, sees that yeah,
• 1:32:25
  yeah, everybody's in here getting drunk. Okay, I'll see you guys later.
• 1:32:27
  I'll hang out with you sometime when everybody's not getting drunk, because if
• 1:32:30
  I get caught here, it's not going to look good for my dad.
• 1:32:33
  Goes to his car and he's on his way there, he sees one of
• 1:32:38
  his friends, one of his classmates, is slumped over the steering wheel in
• 1:32:43
  her car and uh, you know, he's trying to get in the car
• 1:32:47
  and it's it's uh or he's trying to get her attention in the car.
• 1:32:51
  She's not responding when he bangs on the window and stuff. Finally he opens
• 1:32:57
  the door and she just falls out and she has no pulse and so he
• 1:33:03
  starts yelling for help and starts CPR. And you know, this is in
• 1:33:10
  the eighties. This isn't like you can't just call nine one one. There
• 1:33:15
  is no nine one one back then. So a bunch of drunk teenagers had
• 1:33:19
  to go back in the house, find the list of emergency phone numbers,
• 1:33:26
  identify the number for an ambulance for the squad and called him. So he
• 1:33:33
  did CPR for something like fifteen or twenty minutes, half an hour maybe before
• 1:33:42
  the emergency services arrived. And of course, once you know, the adults
• 1:33:48
  were there to help this girl and she survived. But once the adults were
• 1:33:54
  there to help this girl, you know, like he made himself scarce so
• 1:33:58
  that he wasn't get and caught at a at an alcohol party. But she
• 1:34:03
  had she had drunk a bunch of like jello shots and other things. It
• 1:34:09
  wasn't just a little bit of beer. She'd try to keep up with the
• 1:34:11
  boys, and it all hit her system at once, and she was just
• 1:34:16
  she just like had her whole everything stopped. And that's in the eighties,
• 1:34:25
  Like that's happening a lot more today because girls are just thinking, well,
• 1:34:29
  you know, I can do anything the boys can do. Well, you
• 1:34:31
  know, if he weighs two hundred and thirty pounds and you weigh one hundred
• 1:34:36
  and thirty pounds, the number of drinks it takes to kill you is much
• 1:34:43
  smaller than the number of drinks it takes to kill him, and maybe smaller
• 1:34:46
  than the number of drinks it takes to get him drunk. And if he's
• 1:34:53
  drinking like five point five proof beer and your d drinking some fruity drink that
• 1:35:01
  has rum in it, that has like Bacardi one fifty one in it,
• 1:35:05
  you're gonna get drunk a lot faster. So like this is this is another
• 1:35:11
  problem, Like girls drink higher alcohol content drinks with a lot of sugar in
• 1:35:17
  them that disguise the alcohol make it difficult for them to notice how quickly they're
• 1:35:23
  imbibing. It's very dangerous. So that like all of that's you know,
• 1:35:27
  going on. But you know, back to the Okay, sorry, I
• 1:35:32
  was gonna say back to the alleged trauma of reporting a sexual assault. All
• 1:35:36
  right, Well, reporting any assault is traumatic. Having someone not automatically believe
• 1:35:43
  you in a moment like that might be traumatic. I had to report being
• 1:35:48
  assaulted in twenty nineteen, not a sexual assault. I just got punched a
• 1:35:54
  bunch of times and thrown on the floor and thrown into a wall and stuff
• 1:35:58
  because I wouldn't hit her back. And this was a It was a dumb
• 1:36:04
  situation, and it was an embarrassing situation, and the most traumatic thing about
• 1:36:10
  it was that it happened in an environment where nobody should be expected to behave
• 1:36:15
  that way. So it was embarrassing to report the crime because I had to
• 1:36:18
  admit that somebody in that environment behaved that way. And I failed at diplomacy
• 1:36:25
  so badly that I let a conflict get to that point, and so that
• 1:36:30
  was that was embarrassing. But I reported it anyway, and then I got
• 1:36:34
  falsely charged. But I don't feel bad about reporting it, right, And
• 1:36:40
  I don't think that would necessarily stop me from if somebody breaks into my house
• 1:36:45
  and steals from me, reporting that you know, I would have to go
• 1:36:51
  through a situation where they arrested me for reporting a theft in my own home
• 1:37:00
  by a stranger. Like before I start saying, you know, you shouldn't
• 1:37:03
  report any crimes to the police, And this idea that we should we should
• 1:37:10
  stop investigating thoroughly investigating an allegation and viewing it as potentially true and potentially false
• 1:37:19
  until there's evidence one way or another because cops can make mistakes is bullshit.
• 1:37:27
  You know, I would rather go through what I went through than be able
• 1:37:31
  to report that somebody did something to me and with no evidence get them convicted
• 1:37:41
  because the cops didn't question that, because then there would be somebody that was
• 1:37:45
  that would be subject to state violence and incarceration who did nothing wrong. Many
• 1:37:57
  police departments exacerbate this problem when they miss understand the role that trauma plays in
• 1:38:00
  victim's behavior. When investigators aren't trained in trauma informed practices, they might use
• 1:38:05
  an interrogation tactics on victims, which only makes the process more traumatizing. The
• 1:38:13
  specter of the false rape allegation looms large for victims and police. Now that's
• 1:38:17
  not melodramatic or anything. Victims who fail to report often say they didn't expect
• 1:38:26
  to be believed, and many who do report find that they weren't. One
• 1:38:30
  detective told The Atlantic that he thought eight out of every ten cases he investigated
• 1:38:33
  were false. But they haven't asked the investigator why he thinks that, have
• 1:38:40
  they? He's obviously a misotonist misologity. You know how common our false allegations
• 1:38:50
  really? And no one knows for sure, but all of their research suggests
• 1:38:57
  they're rare. Now remember this line, remember the sentence. Okay, it
• 1:39:01
  says here in this sentence all all is an absolute term. It means no
• 1:39:06
  exceptions. All of the research suggests they're rare. According to this sentence,
• 1:39:13
  in this paragraph, next paragraph right, The consensus among academic research seems to
• 1:39:19
  be that two to ten percent of reports are false. Some studies say,
• 1:39:26
  some studies say as high as forty percent or nine What happened to all of
• 1:39:32
  the research? What happened to no exceptions? If some studies say forty percent
• 1:39:39
  or ninety percent, now they're at Most of the available literature puts the figure
• 1:39:45
  much lower. The consensus says, the sun revolves around the earth. How
• 1:39:50
  very day you know? I look at this like all right, So when
• 1:39:59
  they say consents us, Now, remember who we we mentioned in the previous
• 1:40:03
  study that um was incorrectly reported by the researcher in terms of what the conclusions
• 1:40:12
  of that study were. Was you know, he reported a study that showed
• 1:40:16
  that rape is a rare um behavior among among men, that actually only about
• 1:40:27
  about um six percent of the male population might be responsible for ninety five percent
• 1:40:34
  of rape or something like that. And uh, they're the repeat offenders,
• 1:40:40
  their career criminals. They're not your normal guy. There, there's something wrong
• 1:40:44
  with them, right that that that do this, So your normal average guy
• 1:40:47
  is not a threat um. And he he took that that research that showed
• 1:40:53
  that and used it to report that there was an epidemic of serial rape on
• 1:40:58
  university campuses. Right, David Lissac was the head researcher on that case.
• 1:41:04
  So when we click on consensus, let's write click on consensus and open the
• 1:41:12
  link that is there evidence that two percent to ten percent of allegations are false
• 1:41:20
  and no more. And here we have done. Oh gosh, look who
• 1:41:29
  it is. It's David lisak. Gee. We should we should really trust
• 1:41:33
  this research, shouldn't we? Guys? We should definitely trust the conclusions because
• 1:41:39
  he is a history of drawing great conclusions from his research. I mean,
• 1:41:43
  it's the government, and they're here to help you, Hannah. Don't you
• 1:41:46
  know they love us, You're here to help Yeah, you know. Honestly,
• 1:41:50
  I don't know that he's involved in the government, but I do know
• 1:41:54
  that he's a feminist. He's a feminist researcher. And one of the issues
• 1:41:59
  that I have with us and then Karen's discussed this. I wish she was
• 1:42:01
  on tonight because this is a point that she's made before and I'm not I'm
• 1:42:05
  not going to make it as well as she does. But the studies that
• 1:42:11
  minimize the number of false allegations, the ones that feminists like to emphasize,
• 1:42:17
  they don't have the same standard for measuring whether an allegation is false or not
• 1:42:23
  as the studies that come up with around forty to sixty five percent of allegations
• 1:42:29
  being false. I don't know about the standard for the ninety percent study.
• 1:42:32
  I would be interested in finding out that out as well. But in order
• 1:42:38
  to get that two to ten percent, what they do is they severely limit
• 1:42:45
  how an allegation can be investigated for falsehood, and they limit it to the
• 1:42:53
  point where if a woman doesn't, you know, come in banging pots and
• 1:42:58
  pans and scream it was false. I made the whole thing up. Ha
• 1:43:00
  ha ha, it's not false. Even if they they're not allowed to investigate
• 1:43:08
  for holes in the story. They're not allowed to look for evidence of falsehood,
• 1:43:13
  you know, unless you know, maybe the victim comes in with exculpatory
• 1:43:16
  evidence that doesn't have anything to do with consent. For instance, like seven
• 1:43:21
  years a hell guy with the video that Jodie was somewhere else at the time
• 1:43:27
  she said he was raping her. You know, those are instances that they'll
• 1:43:31
  accept as false. But instances where, for instance, you know, she
• 1:43:39
  says this happened, and he can't prove he wasn't there. He can't prove
• 1:43:45
  what did or didn't happen. And even if he says it didn't happen,
• 1:43:53
  he can't exonerate himself. They can't go through and look for you know,
• 1:44:00
  was there a complete lack of evidence in the case that you know, she
• 1:44:03
  couldn't prove sex happened at all. She couldn't. There was no DNA,
• 1:44:09
  there was no witness, there was no nothing, and it's just he said,
• 1:44:13
  she said, he said, she said. Cases were all treated as
• 1:44:15
  not false. So they can confirm beyond a reasonable doubt that two to ten
• 1:44:25
  percent of reports are false, and they can confirm beyond a reasonable doubt that
• 1:44:33
  one percent of allegations of sexual assault in general are true. Maybe because some
• 1:44:43
  of those allegations there are false convictions too, so maybe less than one percent,
• 1:44:48
  you know that eight tenths of one percent might be closer. Meanwhile,
• 1:44:55
  they're they're saying most rapists are not convicted, right, which which you might
• 1:45:00
  respond to by saying, well, if they weren't convicted, and surely that
• 1:45:05
  means they're confirmed as not rapists, which surely would include them in the percentage
• 1:45:15
  people who were accused of rape, but we're not, in fact rapists,
• 1:45:19
  which would make them false accusations. Well one thing that, yeah, one
• 1:45:25
  thing that you can say one for certain, right, like, say we
• 1:45:30
  know for a fact that we can confirm beyond a reasonable doubt that two to
• 1:45:36
  ten percent of reports are false, and we can confirm beyond a reasonable doubt
• 1:45:44
  that some percentage less than one percent are are true. So if we apply
• 1:45:50
  that to the unknown, because let's let's maximize that to ten percent. That
• 1:45:55
  means that eighty nine percent are unknown. The likelihood is that at least ten
• 1:46:06
  percent of those are false, you know, and those that are unreported to
• 1:46:13
  police, at least ten percent of those are also false. We can only
• 1:46:18
  confirm that less than one percent of those are true, and the remainder there
• 1:46:25
  again like becomes questionable, murky. That's the main thing that we can draw
• 1:46:31
  from this is that most reports are unverifiable, unverified and unverifiable. So when
• 1:46:42
  feminists say that one percent of rapes lead to a conviction, they are lying.
• 1:46:50
  What they can truthfully say is that less than one percent of rapes are
• 1:46:57
  ever rape allegations are ever verified, and that may not even be true because
• 1:47:02
  they're counting all sexual assaults as one thing, whether it's rape or not.
• 1:47:09
  So less than one percent of all sexual assault allegations are verifiable with an unknown
• 1:47:16
  the caveat that an unknown percentage of those are rape. But this doesn't take
• 1:47:20
  into account. This doesn't take into account all of the women who were unreportedly
• 1:47:28
  raped by men. Let's just not take into account all the men who were
• 1:47:31
  unreportedly rape by women. That's not a thing, as we've already covered.
• 1:47:35
  Yeah, it doesn't matter if they report it or not, because it's not
• 1:47:40
  a thing that's even recognized by a law. So the unreported counts towards the
• 1:47:47
  women, but not towards the men. And so this does the thing I
• 1:47:53
  wanted to do, but it doesn't do the thing I do not want it
• 1:47:57
  to do. As such, it's if that wasn't bad enough, Now,
• 1:48:09
  let's get to the to the real irony here, all right, So we
• 1:48:12
  have just gone through all of this article, you know, like, oh,
• 1:48:15
  it's really bad, A bunch of rape happens that isn't getting convicted.
• 1:48:19
  It's it's, uh, you know, the epidemic of unreported, unprosecuted rape.
• 1:48:29
  Blah blah blah blah blah. Hello, what is the next paragraphs that?
• 1:48:33
  Here? The next paragraph says, it's important to note that every study
• 1:48:38
  I could find analyzing false reports relied on what percentage of reports were marked false
• 1:48:43
  by police, not the number of people successfully prosecuted for filing false reports.
• 1:48:48
  There aren't any national requirements for what constitutes a false report, and there aren't
• 1:48:53
  any oversight or appeals processes if a police, if police label of report false.
• 1:48:59
  So what she's saying there is, if police don't label a report false
• 1:49:05
  if there are not successful prosecutions, it's not a false report. Can we
• 1:49:10
  apply that stantard to rape? I think they get mad if we apply that
• 1:49:15
  standard to rape. If police don't prosecute a rape, if police don't mark
• 1:49:20
  a rape verified, and there's not a successful prosecution, meaning a conviction,
• 1:49:28
  right then it wasn't a rape, because that would mean that ninety nine point
• 1:49:34
  two percent of allegations are false by the standard she sets for measuring false allegations.
• 1:49:43
  If we measure sexual assault by that same standard, ninety nine point two
• 1:49:47
  percent of allegations are false. Is that what they want? Shit? Wait,
• 1:49:59
  really need to change men to women? Yeah's that that would fix the
• 1:50:05
  problem. Yeah. You know, where we look at men answering questions about
• 1:50:13
  their sexual violence, about ten percent of women overall admit to using coercive and
• 1:50:19
  violent strategies to obtain sex against the will of the victim. And they're not
• 1:50:27
  women with criminal histories necessarily, it's a pretty sad statement. Still, there's
• 1:50:35
  a persistent idea in American society that it's common for women to lie about being
• 1:50:40
  raped. False reports do happen, and when they do, they go viral
• 1:50:45
  and Why no, they don't. Most false reports never get discussed in public
• 1:50:49
  at all. When they go viral, it's usually because somebody tried to make
• 1:50:54
  a news story out of the alleged rape and then it falls apart. But
• 1:50:59
  she goes on and why not? The stories tend to be really interesting.
• 1:51:02
  Take, for example, the Duke Lacrosse case or the Rolling Stone article.
• 1:51:05
  We can all think of an example of a false report that became a media
• 1:51:09
  sensation, But the amount of coverage given to false rape allegations can make them
• 1:51:14
  seem far more common than they actually are, creating an atmosphere of mistrust for
• 1:51:18
  victims and police. It's sort of us how often an allegation that news media
• 1:51:30
  attempts to make hay with falls apart, isn't it? Like? Do they
• 1:51:36
  just cherry pick the false allegations to make a big deal out of and they're
• 1:51:41
  ignoring the more credible rape allegations? Is that what's happening? Like our journalists
• 1:51:46
  just trying to make allegations look false? Are they trying to destroy the public
• 1:51:58
  opinion of women is what it is? Or are they stupid? Maybe like
• 1:52:02
  they can't tell the difference and so they get taken for a ride every time,
• 1:52:06
  and they're like, oh, this is a big deal, and then
• 1:52:09
  it turns out to be a false allegation or is it maybe indicative of how
• 1:52:14
  frequently false allegations happen, Like I asked that question to the journalist. You
• 1:52:21
  know, this is what pisces me off about every every other area of this
• 1:52:28
  icophobia we're talking about. It's been happening with women versus men for the last
• 1:52:35
  hundred years, but so many of us in this sphere of influence focused on,
• 1:52:45
  Look how much white people are being attacked. Look how much straight people
• 1:52:50
  are being attacked, Look how much cis CIS people are being attacked. And
• 1:52:58
  they're not going to fix any thing because they're not looking at where it all
• 1:53:03
  originated, which is the degree to which men are being attacked. I mean,
• 1:53:12
  yes, it's developed to this point that none of us ever thought it
• 1:53:16
  would be developed, the icophobic point that the West would inevitably develop this not
• 1:53:28
  just fuck men, but funck white people, fuck assist people, straight people.
• 1:53:33
  But it all started with fuck men. I just and I just wish
• 1:53:40
  people could see where it all came from, because otherwise you're just addressing the
• 1:53:45
  symptoms rather than the cause. This is the cause, folks. This I
• 1:53:54
  mean, missentry is the word for it. I don't want to, I
• 1:53:56
  don't want to reduce it to identity politics. But this is not an identity.
• 1:54:01
  It's it's it's a poison, myscendry. It's not an identity. It's
• 1:54:09
  a poison, and it's the poison that has existed in our society since one
• 1:54:15
  hundred years ago at the very least. And it's where all the other poisons
• 1:54:21
  came from, because because y'all just accepted this particular poison. Yeah, of
• 1:54:30
  course men oppress women. Of course, men rape women. Of course,
• 1:54:33
  men sexually assault women. Why wouldn't they, Yeah, yeah, yea most
• 1:54:38
  all sense. And yeah, of course white people oppress black people. You
• 1:54:43
  know, wait what no, no fucking this is where it started, Like
• 1:54:51
  your own people oppress the other people. The very idea that you consider women
• 1:55:00
  to be the other people is where all sided. Women aren't the other people.
• 1:55:03
  And you know it, women are the people just as much as men
• 1:55:08
  are the people. The moment you started considering women to be the other people
• 1:55:15
  was where all started going wrong, because you know, they're not. In
• 1:55:18
  no given society anywhere in history or geography were women ever the other people.
• 1:55:27
  But you just you got on board with this, with this, I don't
• 1:55:32
  know what addictive to call it, but this idea that women are the other
• 1:55:36
  people, the oppressed people. It's where are all started. Yeah, And
• 1:55:43
  I honestly I'd go with a noun because it's more of a lie than anything
• 1:55:45
  like that. There's some difference between men and women that makes us almost like
• 1:55:50
  two different species. Like we have differences that give us different strengths and different
• 1:55:57
  weaknesses, different vulnerabilities, different needs. But the that's a small percentage of
• 1:56:02
  what we are, and the majority of what a human being is is the
• 1:56:08
  same for both sexes. And when it comes to natural rights, for instance,
• 1:56:12
  bodily autonomy, the right to pursue your own welfare, you know,
• 1:56:18
  and and so on, the right to be non interfered with, right,
• 1:56:23
  the right to life, that doesn't differ between the sexes. And what we've
• 1:56:30
  ended up with in a situation or in in the modern situation, is this
• 1:56:34
  belief that places men beneath women women above men. We have this presumption of
• 1:56:45
  othering, and we have a presumption of two tiers of value and two tiers
• 1:56:53
  of personality I guess character or women are treated like they're better than men,
• 1:57:00
  and women are treated like they're more ethical than men, which is the reverse
• 1:57:03
  might actually be true because men are more accountable in society, like other people
• 1:57:10
  hold men more accountable than they hold women like that even without the internal accountability,
• 1:57:17
  men can't get away with things that women can get away with, right,
• 1:57:21
  But we also treat women like they're more important, and it's it's not
• 1:57:26
  even natural. And at some point I'm going to do a longer discussion about
• 1:57:30
  that that the idea of natural gyna centrism is bullshit. It never existed.
• 1:57:36
  There has never been natural gynocentrism. There's been a dedication to children, to
• 1:57:44
  preserving children. Men and women have taken roles around preserving children, and women's
• 1:57:48
  role as a utilitarian role in protecting and producing, protecting and preserving and then
• 1:57:59
  mentoring children rights has given women an advantage in being prioritized. But it's not
• 1:58:09
  because they're women. It's because they've fulfilled the role of giving birth, nursing,
• 1:58:15
  nurturing, and being the direct like the immediate shield for children, where
• 1:58:24
  men have taken the role of providing, protecting the family and the household and
• 1:58:30
  being the satellite shield for children, their mentoring was a little different as well,
• 1:58:38
  right, But that doesn't translate into women being valued because they're women.
• 1:58:45
  It translates into women being valued because of what they do for children. So
• 1:58:50
  it's child centric, it's gene centric. Those things are natural, but it
• 1:58:57
  is not natural to place women at a higher value than because they're women.
• 1:59:01
  That's entirely artificial. It's entirely propagated by social attitudes and intentions of women in
• 1:59:15
  general. Exploitation by women, and men don't have to put up with it
• 1:59:19
  forever. It can be cured, it can be corrected, and it should
• 1:59:25
  be and our society has the right. Men have the right to demand that
• 1:59:30
  it is cured and work toward that end. So, like, that's something
• 1:59:36
  that I know that there are going to be people that are going to disagree
• 1:59:41
  strong, strongly with me on this, but I challenge you to cite any
• 1:59:46
  evidence that doesn't go back to child birth, child nurturing, and child protection.
• 1:59:59
  Well, the great the irony of all of this is that women are
• 2:00:03
  naturally xenophobic and if anything, men are naturally microphobic. Now, this goes
• 2:00:15
  against a lot of what I've been trying to say for a lot of the
• 2:00:17
  time. But women are gatherers. Women are people who who strengthened the home,
• 2:00:29
  the hearth, the family. And men are the people who who venture
• 2:00:36
  beyond the home to hunt and to expand and so forth. So it stands
• 2:00:45
  to reason that that men are interested in that which exists beyond the familiar,
• 2:00:55
  and women are interested in that which exists within the home. And so it's
• 2:01:01
  get that. That's how ironic it is that all of this comes about.
• 2:01:10
  Because because human beings are so intelligent, the most intelligent species that's ever exist
• 2:01:16
  on earth, we're able to be able. The reason we were able to
• 2:01:23
  get this far is because despite our nature, we're able to look beyond that
• 2:01:30
  which we are naturally drawn. We are able to look to that which were
• 2:01:43
  which even contradicts our nature. And I think that's how we were able to
• 2:01:48
  get this far, because we're able to look beyond our nature and balance our
• 2:01:55
  nature against not nature. And this is why, after all the the developments
• 2:02:05
  we were able to make technologically and so on and so forth, despite women's
• 2:02:15
  likecophobia, women looked beyond their nature and looked towards xenophobia. And despite men's
• 2:02:26
  nature, they will look able to beyond their oophobia and wait, I've I've
• 2:02:32
  I should have written this down before I talk. This is why I script
• 2:02:35
  things before I talk. But I hope you can you can get what I'm
• 2:02:40
  saying. And that's the reason I confused myself is because it's all very confusing.
• 2:02:46
  Well, yes, when when one thing I can point out is,
• 2:02:50
  you know, you look at peacetime versus wartime, and you look at women's
• 2:02:55
  tendency when when you talk about xenophobia and orcophobia and men's and women different ways
• 2:03:00
  of handling resources. Women, women have a tendency to a mass resources.
• 2:03:08
  Men have a tendency to focus on the production of resources. So men will
• 2:03:13
  team up to produce a larger amount of resources to create plenty for all.
• 2:03:18
  Women will hoard resources in to the detriment of others, and that sort of
• 2:03:29
  I'll just give you my theory on so called male violence in the middle of
• 2:03:33
  this. I don't think it exists. There is no such thing as violence
• 2:03:40
  that is uniquely male. There is violence that is perpetrated by males. Much
• 2:03:46
  of it is done on behalf of women. War happens for the purpose of
• 2:03:50
  hoarding resources at the feminine behavior. It's something that women direct. It's something
• 2:03:56
  that men do in response to women's direct And if if hoarding resources did not
• 2:04:04
  make men attractive to women, men would not do it because they produce.
• 2:04:09
  Instead, they increase production, They team up for that purpose, and they
• 2:04:14
  they trade for that purpose. Right. So I don't I don't think that
• 2:04:19
  you can count war as something uniquely male, even though the people who are
• 2:04:24
  forced into it are always poor and minority men, right, not upper classmen
• 2:04:32
  necessarily, but poor men, not women. Right. And it's similarly criminal
• 2:04:42
  violence. Interpersonal criminal violence usually revolves around the acquisition of resources, not the
• 2:04:49
  production of resources. The acquisition of resources. When it does result around the
• 2:04:56
  production of resources, it's it's usually in relation to a type of resource that
• 2:05:02
  women have demanded a safety net that resulted in outlawing that particular resource or outlawing
• 2:05:13
  that particular type of business, like drugs um like all the drug laws,
• 2:05:17
  all the alcohol laws, all the blue laws. Those are at the behest
• 2:05:20
  of women. Women are the ones that come along and say, gosh,
• 2:05:24
  we got to do something about this. Pass a law. You know,
• 2:05:27
  men men just condemn other men for engaging in it and don't do business with
• 2:05:31
  them, like they exclude them like, all right, this guy's useless,
• 2:05:34
  We're not going to deal with him, or they rescue them from it from
• 2:05:38
  it by taking them out of circumstance and not letting them have access, you
• 2:05:43
  know. But they don't they don't pass laws. Well, they pass laws,
• 2:05:45
  but they don't demand laws. Women demand laws, you know. So
• 2:05:50
  all of that goes back to this this division. You want to get rid
• 2:05:57
  of this phenomenon that people think is natural, this kind of centric phenomenon,
• 2:06:01
  this this alien behavior of women's um demand to be treated in society as if
• 2:06:11
  they are more valuable than men. You have to get women to start being
• 2:06:16
  producers of resources and being able to team up to increase the supply of resources
• 2:06:25
  rather than hoarding resources in order to you know, like preserve themselves at the
• 2:06:30
  expense of the next person in the next family, the next community, the
• 2:06:33
  next country. It's just a it's a psychological change. It's not a change
• 2:06:40
  of nature necessarily. It's a change of behavior, change of the way people
• 2:06:45
  think. But women will always be a source of resources in terms of the
• 2:06:54
  next generation. That they will always be the ones who get pred sorry,
• 2:07:00
  the ones who get pregnant and produced the next generation. And this is why.
• 2:07:09
  Um so many world worldviews have resulted to the idea that women's burden burden
• 2:07:25
  on the species is to produce new people, and so they well, since
• 2:07:34
  women produce new people, men have to do something else. And we see
• 2:07:43
  this as a problem because this is what Hitler used to say. Well,
• 2:07:48
  women's burden is that they produced new people, and so men's burden is that
• 2:07:55
  they fight. Was yeah, and so I guess, I guess we have
• 2:08:03
  to figure out how that's wrong. And we have to figure out while I
• 2:08:09
  stop hiccuping. I gotta hate when I get a hiccups. It's actually painful
• 2:08:15
  for me when I get the hiccups. I don't know if it's like that
• 2:08:16
  for everyone else, but it feels like he's punching me and the gut every
• 2:08:20
  single time, and the back and the chest. I get that too.
• 2:08:28
  But speaking of hiccups, I gotta work tonight that that's completely unrelated. So,
• 2:08:33
  um So, what I think we're gonna do is our last thing that
• 2:08:35
  we read was but the amount of coverage given to false repellegations can make them
• 2:08:39
  seem far more common than they actually are, creating an atmosphere of mistrust for
• 2:08:43
  victims and police. Um, we're gonna come back next week to that point
• 2:08:50
  and continue the article from there. And I think we're going to continue discussing
• 2:08:54
  this issue. Um. There's in a Voice for Men article. It's not
• 2:08:58
  a new article, but it is about, um, the the experience of
• 2:09:03
  the male experience of sexual violence and how much more common it is than people
• 2:09:07
  think. Uh. And uh, so I think I want to follow this
• 2:09:11
  article up with that one. We might get to the point where we start
• 2:09:16
  that article next week. UM, but I think we're gonna we're gonna do
• 2:09:20
  maybe a little series on this because this claim is based on misrepresenting a host
• 2:09:28
  of issues around the topic of sexual misconduct. UM. So I mean you
• 2:09:37
  can look forward to that next week, we'll continue discussing this Dallas Morning News
• 2:09:41
  article and um then possibly get into the fact that actually, uh, male
• 2:09:48
  victims of female violence I may outnumber female victims of male violence significantly, and
• 2:09:56
  uh that may that that includes sec rual violence. And there's an article on
• 2:10:03
  a Voice for Men in regard to the prison rape situation as well that I
• 2:10:11
  want to look at. So I think that's probably where we're headed for the
• 2:10:15
  next few weeks. So you guys understand, like, we're not quit in
• 2:10:18
  the middle of the article and then just going to come back and read the
• 2:10:20
  rest of the article and then go on to some other subject the following week.
• 2:10:24
  I think I think this topic is really important to get a handle on.
• 2:10:28
  Feminists lie about a lot of things in regard to this, But we
• 2:10:31
  can conclude, at least at this point in the article that everything else they're
• 2:10:37
  going to say, all the recommendations they're going to make, are based on
• 2:10:41
  a false premise. It's not true that less percent of rapes are lead to
• 2:10:48
  a conviction. They've cobbled together a bunch of different types of data that they've
• 2:10:58
  misrepresented as rape data in order to make that claim. So from there we'll
• 2:11:05
  we'll go on next week. I don't have I don't think I have any
• 2:11:09
  super chats here. Let me double check. Going all the way back,
• 2:11:16
  I have not seen a single super chat come through, which that's fine.
• 2:11:20
  I'd rather see him come through our system anyway. So I'm gonna skip from
• 2:11:26
  the super chats. We'll take a look at the super chows. I might
• 2:11:30
  start looking at those first, anyway. Let's see here, scroll scroll,
• 2:11:35
  scroll, we have an enormous discord like it seems like every time every time
• 2:11:45
  I come in here, it's bigger than it was the last time. I
• 2:11:48
  know it's not, but it feels like it. Okay, let me see
• 2:11:54
  here we have you can read this one on the next show. I have
• 2:12:03
  something I'm gonna have to look at. I can't click on the original message
• 2:12:11
  here. It just takes me to my freaking profile. What the fucke?
• 2:12:18
  Yeah, I can see the superchows. There's a message from a doze that
• 2:12:20
  says you can read this one on the next show, But I don't know
• 2:12:24
  which when it's referring to, because it's not taking me like to the original
• 2:12:31
  message when I okay, there were right, Yeah, okay, so I
• 2:12:37
  guess there we go. There's the next one. I hit done, and
• 2:12:39
  then somebody commented, all right, so there we go. HBr talk to
• 2:12:43
  fifty eight catching up slowly. I think I missed this when this is like
• 2:12:45
  two shows ago or longer. Laws that prevent people from collecting rainwater never made
• 2:12:50
  sense and in other news, as the Sun rose today, California's rationale is
• 2:12:54
  that if people collected rainwater, that water would not be able to return to
• 2:12:58
  the water cycle, so as natural resources or sources of water would not be
• 2:13:03
  replenished. I'm actually going to relate this to today's story. This was anonymously
• 2:13:11
  given to because it doesn't give the name give the person a name. This
• 2:13:15
  says bought, but it doesn't say like usually we have a name. But
• 2:13:24
  as if people have to use water and they're wastewaters to go somewhere, this
• 2:13:26
  wastewater is not treated in return to nature. Two, if people do not
• 2:13:31
  collect rainwater, they would just be pulling water in from the other water sources.
• 2:13:37
  True, this water would be taken out from the natural water cycle.
• 2:13:41
  If people were allowed to collect rainwater, they would have never taken water from
• 2:13:45
  those other sources. Three. People cannot collect an unlimited amount of rain,
• 2:13:48
  their personal water storage would have eventually topped off in any access would have returned
• 2:13:52
  to the natural bodies of water. California law currently allows people to collect only
• 2:13:58
  rainwater that falls on their roofs. That's that's insane um. But yeah,
• 2:14:01
  California claims that the water wouldn't be able to return to the water cycle.
• 2:14:07
  They don't know what they're talking about, but that's California for you. They
• 2:14:11
  really, the people in charge are just completely inept. Yeah, at their
• 2:14:18
  jobs, and God love California, but I'm so glad I'm out of there.
• 2:14:26
  Right. So, there's two types of interpersonal violence law. There's interpersonal
• 2:14:31
  violence law that out that criminalizes interpersonal violence on the basis of the injury to
• 2:14:41
  the victim, that the victim has a right to their bodily autonomy, their
• 2:14:46
  body and integrity, and the perpetrators violating their right right. The other type
• 2:14:52
  that has existed throughout time his property damage right. That if the victim of
• 2:15:01
  interpersonal violence is treated as the property of an upper class person, a wealthier
• 2:15:09
  person, so an indentured servant, a slave for the longest time children that
• 2:15:16
  was that was treated as an offense against the owner right, and that means
• 2:15:26
  it was an offense against the use of the resource. The person is a
• 2:15:30
  resource. All other forms of interpersonal violence where where freemen are concerned, they're
• 2:15:37
  just lumped in together like you're you're victimizing the individual. You're preventing the individual
• 2:15:43
  from pursuing happiness, You're preventing the individual from being a whole and a healthy
• 2:15:48
  person, right causing harm. When you look at rape, feminists like to
• 2:15:56
  keep rape as a female experienced male perpetrated crime, But why would it be
• 2:16:05
  significantly different from any other form of interpersonal violence. You're looking at damage to
• 2:16:09
  the person. You're looking at violating their bodily autonomy. You're looking at violating
• 2:16:16
  their human right to bodily autonomy and bodily integrity. That's not gendered. Every
• 2:16:26
  human being has that right, regardless of whether they're male or female, or
• 2:16:30
  or young, big or tall, short or small. You're like, doesn't
• 2:16:33
  matter, right, You only have a difference in the right to bodily autonomy
• 2:16:39
  and integrity versus something like property damage if you're looking at something that is owned
• 2:16:46
  by another person or that another person is responsible for. Like, when you
• 2:16:50
  damage damage somebody's child, you're damaging something somebody who's helpless that the parents are
• 2:16:58
  responsible for. When you you're a child, you are you're committing a crime
• 2:17:01
  against two people. And when you injure a servant, you're committing a crime
• 2:17:09
  against the owner. As a slave, you're committing a crime against the owner.
• 2:17:13
  So either feminists or arguing that women should own men or men should own
• 2:17:18
  women and rape should be treated as a crime against the owner, and like,
• 2:17:24
  or they're arguing that women are pets and children and men are responsible for
• 2:17:30
  them, and rape should be treated as a crime against the caregiver. They're
• 2:17:37
  not smart enough to figure out that women are not public property. That women
• 2:17:41
  are if you want bodily autonomy, you must be independent, and that therefore
• 2:17:52
  a crime like sexual assault is a crime against the person's right too bodily and
• 2:18:00
  hegridy and bodily autonomy, and it cannot be gendered. Just a point.
• 2:18:07
  The rainwater thing made me think about it because the rationale that California is engaging
• 2:18:11
  in is with with water cycle is that water is public property, that the
• 2:18:16
  natural resources public property right, and gendering sexual violence treats women as public property,
• 2:18:28
  exactly the opposite of what women, at least feminists want want women to
• 2:18:33
  be right, except when it benefits them. Show. Meredith G gave us
• 2:18:41
  five dollars HBr News four or five weight Those are Brian's We are looking at
• 2:18:50
  mainframe maintaining frame. Okay, here we go. Uh. Meredith G gave
• 2:18:54
  us five dollars and said, uh HTBR talk to sixty one honey for the
• 2:18:58
  Badgers. Thanks for the interesting conversation. Have to check out early due to
• 2:19:01
  an early morning and we'll catch later. And that's our super super chow.
• 2:19:09
  I can't find my tab with rumble, M I just gotta look and double
• 2:19:16
  check. There it is. Oh, it's because rumble is blue. Now
• 2:19:20
  freaking you gotta change everything. Uh, And there are there are no paid
• 2:19:28
  rumble rants. But Mangaka pointed out Mangoka ninety two pointed out right away,
• 2:19:35
  less than one percent of sexual assaults lead to a conviction, or one percent
• 2:19:39
  of sexual assault allegations lead to a conviction, exactly exactly the point they get.
• 2:19:46
  They got that wrong. Um, let's see all of the studies show
• 2:19:52
  that my yes, manga, all of the studies show that most of the
• 2:19:56
  studies agree. Then then that's that's the other one. And consensus is useful,
• 2:20:03
  but it's not. Um, it's not ironclad. It's never been ironclad,
• 2:20:09
  and it'll never be ironclad. So there you go, like like people
• 2:20:16
  are looking at the idea that the idea that most scientists agree that this is
• 2:20:22
  the scientific consensus, and it's only started getting through to people in the last
• 2:20:30
  dare I say the last three years that maybe the scientific consensus of what we
• 2:20:35
  call scientists is not necessarily the case. Yeah, because of the particular things
• 2:20:43
  that have happened, and because we're still alive on YouTube, I can't really
• 2:20:46
  go into what that is. Yeah, well, I'll be more general about
• 2:20:50
  it, and I can say this, all right, It's easy to claim
• 2:20:54
  there is a particular consensus if you are silencing anybody who dissents from the consensus.
• 2:21:01
  And silencing can include shaming, it can include attacks on the careers of
• 2:21:09
  the individuals involved. It can include just flat out exclusion where you say,
• 2:21:16
  well, they when these people talk, it doesn't count, right, And
• 2:21:20
  it can even include threats and intimidation and various other means of making a person
• 2:21:28
  decide that it's not worth the risk to speak out. And we've seen that
• 2:21:35
  in another area. We've seen that in domestic violence victim's advocacy right, and
• 2:21:41
  Murray Strauss talked about that this isn't even new, like this is now decades
• 2:21:46
  ago that he noticed this and started reporting on it, and his whole career
• 2:21:52
  was wrecked by it, and everybody that has discussed his findings is shamed for
• 2:21:58
  discussing his findings. So like we're talking decades of feminist manipulation of consensus in
• 2:22:09
  order to be able to claim consensus it goes their way in order to be
• 2:22:15
  able to shame people into compliance with it. So just because the word consensus
• 2:22:22
  gets used doesn't necessarily mean that you have arrived at fact or truth. It
• 2:22:30
  means that further investigation is needed to determine whether consensus is accurate. And that's
• 2:22:37
  that way in all forms of that, every scientific finding, every philosophical belief,
• 2:22:46
  every religious belief, all forms of reformation, any type of government,
• 2:22:52
  any type of learning knowledge, whatever. Consensus can be useful in decision making,
• 2:23:01
  but it doesn't tell you what is or is not true. It's supremely
• 2:23:07
  ironic that the people who spake out against capitalism well nevertheless tell you that,
• 2:23:16
  Well, they won't follow where the where the money goes, Yeah they will,
• 2:23:22
  Well, they will nevertheless tell you the consensus of where the money goes
• 2:23:30
  is clearly the truth. Hey yeah, Well, and now to to know
• 2:23:37
  the type of fallacy we're talking about here just before we take off. Um,
• 2:23:43
  the name of the fallacy is argumentum ad populum. It means appeal to
• 2:23:50
  the people. It is a fallacious argument based on claiming um that the truth
• 2:23:56
  of a matter is whatever the concerns is. It's whatever the most popular or
• 2:24:01
  common belief is right. Like like I said, consensus isn't irrelevant, like
• 2:24:09
  scientific consensus isn't completely lacking in value. It's a tool, not a not
• 2:24:18
  a gait I guess if and when people treat it as a tool. All
• 2:24:22
  right, everybody's agreeing on this is we've decided we're going to go forward based
• 2:24:26
  on this um. That's that's fair. There's nothing terribly wrong with that as
• 2:24:33
  long as it's not being used to shut out dissent and and questioning of the
• 2:24:39
  the wisdom of the decision being based on the consensus. But the moment it's
• 2:24:46
  used to do that, to shut out descent and um identify something as a
• 2:24:54
  fact or a truth, that's that's the fallacious argument that's appealed to the people.
• 2:25:00
  That's argumentum at populum. So just remember that because you you have to
• 2:25:05
  be able to fall back on that when you get into arguments with people and
• 2:25:11
  they start saying, well, you're going against the consensus. So what we're
• 2:25:16
  not deciding what to do next. We're talking about what's true or not.
• 2:25:20
  You can use it to decide what to do next. But when we're talking
• 2:25:24
  about whether or not as something something is true, consensus doesn't prove that.
• 2:25:31
  There you go. Well that I will thank my co hosts for sticking out
• 2:25:33
  this little bit longer than usual sausage. This one's, this one's a foul
• 2:25:39
  sausage here honestly, Well, thank everybody who listened. I thank thanks to
• 2:25:46
  everybody who works in the background to make HBr talk happen. And good night all