Latest / Booker Scott: Truth Be Told / Kings - Comey - Covid Indictments

Transcript

Kings - Comey - Covid Indictments · Booker Scott: Truth Be Told

0:01
Speaker 1: It's 6 Eastern, 3 o'clock Pacific. He's literally the former
0:05
Speaker 1: director of the FBI.
0:07
Speaker 2: He knows exactly what 8647 means.
0:10
Speaker 1: From coast to coast and around the world, from America
0:14
Speaker 1: Out Loud Talk Radio.
0:15
Speaker 2: But I'm sick and tired of the fact that our
0:17
Speaker 2: president has been targeted over and over again with rhetoric
0:21
Speaker 2: that clearly calls for the assassination of this man.
0:24
Speaker 1: It's time for Truth Be Told with Booker Scott.
0:28
Speaker 3: For over a year, we have heard the Democrats and
0:31
Speaker 3: the left go to the streets every weekend and say,
0:34
Speaker 3: no kings, no kings in America. We don't care what
0:37
Speaker 3: kings have to say. We are the people and kings
0:40
Speaker 3: just don't matter. However, Tuesday, when King Charles III goes
0:46
Speaker 3: to Congress, it is the left and the Democrats that
0:49
Speaker 3: give incredible standing ovations one after another. The irony, You
0:55
Speaker 3: can't make this up. This is politics in America, and
0:58
Speaker 3: I am Booker. This is The Truth Be Told. Thank
1:01
Speaker 3: you for joining us tonight and every night. I appreciate it.
1:04
Speaker 3: If you found us later on a podcast, thank you
1:06
Speaker 3: so much for making that extra effort to do that.
1:09
Speaker 3: We're going to talk about King Charles's visit. I think
1:12
Speaker 3: it's pretty important. Even I really don't necessarily care about
1:16
Speaker 3: the monarchy of the United Kingdom or England. But for
1:20
Speaker 3: some reason, this felt a little bit different. I think
1:22
Speaker 3: it was an important visit from King Charles III. Donald
1:26
Speaker 3: Trump and Melania will be going to England later. We
1:29
Speaker 3: have other news, though. We have James Comey, who has
1:32
Speaker 3: been indicted again. Dr. Moran, he is also indicted, but
1:37
Speaker 3: he is in the close proximity of Dr. Fauci. He
1:41
Speaker 3: was a senior advisor to him. He has been indicted.
1:44
Speaker 3: I'm going to get into that story. You had Minneapolis
1:47
Speaker 3: raids that took place on Tuesday. 22 of them took
1:51
Speaker 3: place in learning centers where The fraud has been alleged
1:55
Speaker 3: has taken place into the billions by the Somalian community.
1:59
Speaker 3: I'll get into that story as well. But let's start
2:01
Speaker 3: with King Charles III and his visit. And he first
2:05
Speaker 3: went to Congress. And let's start things off with Speaker
2:08
Speaker 3: Mike Johnson.
2:10
Speaker 2: Members of Congress, I have the high privilege and distinct
2:12
Speaker 2: honor of presenting to you His Majesty Charles III.
2:24
Speaker 3: And it was a big standing ovation by everyone. And
2:26
Speaker 3: I think that's nice. That's respectful. That's the way it
2:28
Speaker 3: should be when someone comes to speak at Congress. However,
2:33
Speaker 3: it has been a very long time since anyone from
2:35
Speaker 3: England has gone to Congress. In fact, this is the
2:39
Speaker 3: only the second time in American history that it has
2:42
Speaker 3: been done. Why is it important? Well, if you pay
2:45
Speaker 3: attention to what is going on in Western Europe, I
2:48
Speaker 3: talked about it Monday night. and to a larger extent, NATO.
2:52
Speaker 3: I believe that it's time to close NATO. America has
2:55
Speaker 3: propped up NATO and Western European countries for years. I
2:59
Speaker 3: mentioned this on the show Monday night with Matt Palumbo.
3:02
Speaker 3: You know, let's hang on to Poland. Poland still seems
3:06
Speaker 3: to want to contribute to NATO and be a part
3:08
Speaker 3: of it. And it would be a good idea maybe
3:10
Speaker 3: to have Poland as an outpost for America to keep
3:13
Speaker 3: an eye on Russia and other places in Eastern Europe.
3:17
Speaker 3: But that western part of Europe, you see them, really,
3:21
Speaker 3: the western civilization, that part of England and Europe is
3:26
Speaker 3: in trouble. They have not paid attention to their borders,
3:31
Speaker 3: and illegal immigrants have come in from all over the
3:34
Speaker 3: world into those countries, and England is in trouble in reality.
3:39
Speaker 3: and I don't know that they even want to be
3:41
Speaker 3: associated with America. That's the way I felt coming into this.
3:44
Speaker 3: Now King Charles comes in, and this is just a
3:47
Speaker 3: week after he talked about how much England loves the Muslims,
3:50
Speaker 3: that he comes and speaks to America. So I don't
3:52
Speaker 3: know what we make out of King Charles, but I
3:55
Speaker 3: think it was an important visit for him to try
3:58
Speaker 3: to mend some fences that obviously, through this Iran conflict,
4:03
Speaker 3: when no one in Europe helped out, especially England, And
4:07
Speaker 3: then even in France, where Macron wouldn't even allow anyone
4:10
Speaker 3: to land planes there. And there were other countries in
4:14
Speaker 3: NATO as well that did the same thing. Now Charles
4:16
Speaker 3: and England, they are coming to help in some way.
4:19
Speaker 3: They at least allow American bombers to come land at
4:23
Speaker 3: air bases there in England. So they are offering a
4:26
Speaker 3: little bit of help there. But I think it's an
4:29
Speaker 3: important message. America and England, as you heard in speeches
4:32
Speaker 3: by both Donald Trump and King Charles, are We have
4:36
Speaker 3: been together for a very long time, in good times
4:39
Speaker 3: and in bad, as King Charles III said in a
4:42
Speaker 3: speech at the state dinner with Donald Trump on Tuesday night.
4:46
Speaker 3: But let's get into some words here that he said
4:48
Speaker 3: in Congress. Here is King Charles.
4:51
Speaker 4: Of the principles reiterated, often verbatim, in the American Bill
4:56
Speaker 4: of Rights of 1791. And those roots go even further
5:02
Speaker 4: back in history. The US Supreme Court Historical Society has
5:08
Speaker 4: calculated that Magna Carta is cited in at least 160
5:13
Speaker 4: Supreme Court cases since 1789, not least as the foundation
5:20
Speaker 4: of the principle that executive power is subject to checks
5:24
Speaker 4: and balances.
5:29
Speaker 3: And he's giving some history about the connection with England
5:32
Speaker 3: and America. The Magna Carta is what America used before
5:36
Speaker 3: the Constitution and, of course, the Declaration of Independence that
5:40
Speaker 3: came July 4th, 1776, that we declared our independence from
5:45
Speaker 3: the very nation that King Charles represents and as is
5:49
Speaker 3: the king of.
5:50
Speaker 4: It is the very fact of our vibrant, diverse, and
5:54
Speaker 4: free societies that gives us our collective strength.
6:00
Speaker 3: And are you curious what the talking heads on television
6:03
Speaker 3: in England think about King Charles' visit here? I'll leave
6:07
Speaker 3: it up to you to make a determination whether it's
6:10
Speaker 3: important to you or not, but listen to this from
6:13
Speaker 3: the talking heads in England.
6:14
Speaker 5: What do you make of the King saying that there, then,
6:17
Speaker 5: as we have a look at some of the other
6:18
Speaker 5: front pages.
6:19
Speaker 6: As well that have got the King?
6:20
Speaker 7: Well, unfortunately, Patrick, he's made a terrible mistake because diversity
6:23
Speaker 7: is not our strength.
6:25
Speaker 8: Demonstrably true.
6:26
Speaker 7: I think Will said on the previous show something very
6:28
Speaker 7: interesting that resonated with me, is that this is something
6:30
Speaker 7: that's been said to us for 20 years in a row,
6:34
Speaker 7: 20 years plus, but there's never been any evidence to
6:39
Speaker 7: prove that diversity is our strength whatsoever. It's a prescription.
6:43
Speaker 7: It's not evidence-based statistics. It's, by the way, what you
6:47
Speaker 7: see is our strength. You're just going to have to
6:49
Speaker 7: get used to it irrespective of what you see.
6:51
Speaker 3: And that Some great points are made there. The Western
6:54
Speaker 3: part of Europe and England, they went hard into diversity, equity,
6:59
Speaker 3: and inclusion. And this gentleman here on English television is saying,
7:04
Speaker 3: you know, this is not what England is. It is
7:07
Speaker 3: not what makes England great is diversity. This is something
7:10
Speaker 3: they've made up over the last 20 years. And that's
7:13
Speaker 3: my problem with King Charles. That is really who he
7:16
Speaker 3: is in his actions. whether it's the climate control and
7:20
Speaker 3: climate change or it's allowing Muslims to come into his country.
7:26
Speaker 3: His actions are different than the words that he gave
7:28
Speaker 3: on Tuesday, although I do think it is important to
7:31
Speaker 3: try to mend the fences. I would much rather America
7:35
Speaker 3: have an agreement and working with those countries as opposed
7:40
Speaker 3: to China. And that's always the alternative that we have
7:43
Speaker 3: to look at. Donald Trump welcomed King Charles and Queen
7:48
Speaker 3: Camilla into the White House on Tuesday night. They had
7:51
Speaker 3: a state dinner. It was a white tie event. And
7:54
Speaker 3: here are some remarks that President Donald Trump gave.
7:57
Speaker 1: I want to congratulate Charles on having made a fantastic
8:02
Speaker 1: speech today at Congress.
8:04
Speaker 9: He got the Democrats to say, and I've never been
8:06
Speaker 9: able to do that.
8:08
Speaker 8: I couldn't believe it.
8:12
Speaker 7: I couldn't believe it.
8:14
Speaker 10: They like him more than they've ever liked any Republican
8:17
Speaker 10: or Democrat, actually.
8:19
Speaker 8: So I just want to thank you and congratulations.
8:22
Speaker 3: It's odd, isn't it, that they like a king more
8:25
Speaker 3: than they like Donald Trump or any even Democrat president.
8:30
Speaker 3: They stood repeatedly in Congress for the king. No kings.
8:35
Speaker 3: It's ironic, I thought. There were parts of the dinner
8:38
Speaker 3: Tuesday night that almost felt like a roast, as I
8:42
Speaker 3: They kind of went back and forth at each other,
8:44
Speaker 3: Donald Trump and his speech, which I thought was a
8:46
Speaker 3: really good speech by Donald Trump. And King Charles' speech
8:49
Speaker 3: was as good. And here's one thing that Prince Charles
8:53
Speaker 3: said during his speech. Got to laugh.
8:56
Speaker 10: On this occasion, I cannot help noticing the readjustments to
9:02
Speaker 10: the East Wing, Mr.
9:03
Speaker 2: President.
9:05
Speaker 10: Following your visit to Windsor Castle last year. And I'm
9:10
Speaker 10: sorry to say that we British, of course, made our
9:13
Speaker 10: own small attempt at real estate redevelopment of the White
9:17
Speaker 10: House in 1814.
9:20
Speaker 3: And so they took some pokes at each other, one another.
9:23
Speaker 3: But I think it is important that this happened at
9:27
Speaker 3: this time in history. I think both leaders, Donald Trump
9:31
Speaker 3: and King Charles, realize how important it is that our
9:34
Speaker 3: countries stay together in some way. Donald Trump does, for sure.
9:39
Speaker 3: And I think King Charles sees it as well. But
9:41
Speaker 3: you have to pay attention to the actions of these
9:44
Speaker 3: leaders in the western part of Europe more than you
9:48
Speaker 3: do their words, because it was just a couple of
9:50
Speaker 3: months ago that they all decided not to help with
9:53
Speaker 3: America or Iran in any way. So keep that in mind.
9:58
Speaker 3: Look at the actions. Don't pay attention to the words. Well,
10:01
Speaker 3: a former National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases employee
10:06
Speaker 3: is facing an indictment for his role in a scheme
10:09
Speaker 3: to evade Freedom of Information Act that, uh, came out
10:14
Speaker 3: of the COVID virus. His name is Dr. David Morins.
10:17
Speaker 3: He's now 78 years old. He lives in Maryland, and
10:20
Speaker 3: he is charged with conspiracy against the United States' destruction, alteration,
10:26
Speaker 3: or falsification of records in federal investigations, concealment, removal, or
10:32
Speaker 3: mutilation of records, and aiding and abetting. Morins served as
10:36
Speaker 3: a senior advisor in that office to the director from
10:40
Speaker 3: 2006 until through 2022. Quote from the Department of Justice
10:46
Speaker 3: Todd Blanche, these allegations represent a profound abuse of trust
10:50
Speaker 3: at a time when American people needed it most during
10:53
Speaker 3: the height of a global pandemic. That's what Todd Blanch said,
10:57
Speaker 3: and he went on to say, as alleged in the indictment, Dr.
11:00
Speaker 3: Moran's and his co-conspirators deliberately concealed information and falsified records
11:07
Speaker 3: in an effort to suppress alternative theories regarding the origins
11:12
Speaker 3: of COVID-19. Government officials have a solemn duty to provide
11:16
Speaker 3: honest and well-grounded facts and advice in service of the
11:20
Speaker 3: public interest. not to advance their own personal or ideological agendas.
11:26
Speaker 3: If you remember back during COVID, we couldn't say China.
11:31
Speaker 3: Donald Trump was president at the time. He couldn't say China.
11:33
Speaker 3: If we said China on social media, we were banned.
11:37
Speaker 3: They did away with our accounts. It was an odd
11:41
Speaker 3: time for sure. And if you go back now in
11:43
Speaker 3: history and things that have come out in hearings on
11:46
Speaker 3: Capitol Hill, we know exactly what happened. We know that
11:50
Speaker 3: they hid information about China. They did not want it
11:53
Speaker 3: to be about the Chinese government or the CCP. They
11:58
Speaker 3: wanted it to be specifically about a wet market and
12:01
Speaker 3: bad soup. There were two different ways that this could
12:04
Speaker 3: have gone. It could have been the wet market and
12:07
Speaker 3: bad soup, or it could have been a bioweapon. They
12:11
Speaker 3: did not want it to be a bioweapon because when
12:13
Speaker 3: you trace everything back, where did it go? Peter Daszak,
12:18
Speaker 3: Echo Health Alliance. Fauci. Fauci worked with Peter Daszak, and
12:24
Speaker 3: somehow they got around doing gain-of-function research, and they did
12:28
Speaker 3: that by going to the Wuhan lab. It has been
12:31
Speaker 3: declassified now, but somewhere back in 2019, something happened in
12:36
Speaker 3: that lab. Dr. Robert Redfield gave this testimony under oath
12:42
Speaker 3: in a congressional hearing back in 2023. He said it
12:45
Speaker 3: has been declassified now, but there were three major things
12:49
Speaker 3: that happened in that lab back in September of 2019.
12:54
Speaker 3: The first thing was all genetic sequencing of all of
12:57
Speaker 3: these doctors that worked in this dual-use lab in Wuhan.
13:02
Speaker 3: It had disappeared. It was gone. Your life work has
13:06
Speaker 3: been about this, whatever that is. And it disappears. Dr.
13:12
Speaker 3: Redfield said that just doesn't happen. People do not lose
13:16
Speaker 3: their life's work in this work. Another thing that happened
13:20
Speaker 3: was the army, the People's Liberation Army of China, they
13:24
Speaker 3: came in and took over of that Wuhan lab in 2019,
13:29
Speaker 3: September 2019. It was in March of 2020 that our
13:34
Speaker 3: country started shutting down as we saw the the virus
13:38
Speaker 3: come from China, from that Wuhan lab. The third thing
13:42
Speaker 3: that happened that Dr. Robert Redfield talked about in that hearing,
13:45
Speaker 3: in that testimony, was that they changed the air filtration
13:50
Speaker 3: system inside that lab in Wuhan. So those three things happened.
13:55
Speaker 3: You had genetic sequencing that was disappeared, gone, no longer exists.
14:03
Speaker 3: You had the army of China, by the CCP, come
14:06
Speaker 3: in and take over that lab in Wuhan. And then
14:10
Speaker 3: the third thing was an air filtration system that had
14:13
Speaker 3: been changed completely. So those three things happened in that lab.
14:18
Speaker 3: And it's pretty easy to understand that COVID came from
14:23
Speaker 3: that lab. But Dr. Fauci, Dr. Moran's here, who has
14:27
Speaker 3: now been indicted, they didn't want that narrative out. They
14:30
Speaker 3: wanted to protect China. And maybe they wanted to cover
14:33
Speaker 3: their own butts, too, because they had done something they
14:37
Speaker 3: weren't supposed to, and that's they gain-of-function research. Even President
14:41
Speaker 3: Barack Obama said, stop doing this. It's dangerous. So by
14:46
Speaker 3: using Echo Health Alliance, they could go around what the
14:49
Speaker 3: government says. And Fauci was feeding Echo Health Alliance, and
14:55
Speaker 3: then they gave their information over to the Wuhan lab.
14:58
Speaker 3: As a senior advisor, Moran's counseled Senior NIAID Official One,
15:04
Speaker 3: who was named in this indictment, haven't named the name,
15:07
Speaker 3: but Official One, and other senior-level staff on senior-level policies,
15:13
Speaker 3: developed recommendations and solutions for issues impacting the National Institutes
15:17
Speaker 3: of Health, which was Fauci, and wrote and edited manuscripts.
15:22
Speaker 3: Moran's gathered information from grantees and others in the scientific
15:27
Speaker 3: community and to establish facts about the nature of COVID-19.
15:32
Speaker 3: This enabled Moran's to understand NIH and NIAID's historical activities
15:39
Speaker 3: in coronavirus research, assist in formulating policy and procedures, and
15:45
Speaker 3: brief senior official one, so he could then relay information
15:49
Speaker 3: to the President of the United States, Congress, and the public.
15:53
Speaker 3: So you have Moran's that is changing the story in
15:56
Speaker 3: the background, trying to protect that narrative that it was
15:59
Speaker 3: bad soup from a wet market in Wuhan and didn't
16:03
Speaker 3: come from the lab where they changed everything in September
16:06
Speaker 3: of 2019. He knew all of that, but he didn't
16:10
Speaker 3: want that information out. There are a couple of different
16:14
Speaker 3: reasons why, I guess. You can look at it that way.
16:17
Speaker 3: It could be nefarious. That's one thing. It could be nefarious.
16:21
Speaker 3: Or as I said a few minutes ago, it could
16:23
Speaker 3: be to cover their own butts. Fauci's butt. Where will
16:28
Speaker 3: this go? What will it lead to? Who knows? Maybe
16:31
Speaker 3: there is some more accountability coming for the things that
16:34
Speaker 3: we saw during COVID.
16:35
Speaker 11: Wake up, America, can't you see? What's going on here
16:44
Speaker 11: in the land of the free? Many women and men
16:50
Speaker 11: have died for the.
16:52
Speaker 8: Freedom Wake up, America, can't you see?
16:59
Speaker 1: More Truth in Minutes on America Out Loud Talk Radio.
17:02
Speaker 3: Someone asked me the other day, how do you even
17:05
Speaker 3: get a sense of what's going to happen next? It's hard.
17:08
Speaker 3: I don't know that we can, the way the news
17:10
Speaker 3: moves so fast. But you know what I told them?
17:13
Speaker 3: I said, I've been checking out Poly Market a little bit.
17:17
Speaker 3: It's extremely insightful. You're basically watching how thousands of people
17:21
Speaker 3: are betting on outcomes. Political elections, big policy moves, even
17:27
Speaker 3: events you wouldn't expect. It's kind of like a live
17:30
Speaker 3: pulse on what the public actually believes. And you can
17:34
Speaker 3: see trends before they even happen and before they even
17:38
Speaker 3: make the mainstream news. For me, it's not about gambling.
17:43
Speaker 3: It's about understanding the probabilities and where the momentum is shifting.
17:48
Speaker 3: If you like or love the news like I do,
17:51
Speaker 3: maybe you're a news junkie, but you want to take
17:53
Speaker 3: a little deeper look at what people really think, go
17:56
Speaker 3: to Polymarket. It's a fascinating tool. Polymarket.com. FBI Director James Comey,
18:23
Speaker 3: he made a lot of mistakes when he was there
18:26
Speaker 3: as the FBI Director, which, by the way, is a
18:29
Speaker 3: 10-year assignment when you are appointed by a president. So
18:33
Speaker 3: you overlap presidents. He should have been kicked out long
18:37
Speaker 3: before he ever was. If you go back to 2016
18:40
Speaker 3: and the things that he did with Hillary Clinton's server,
18:44
Speaker 3: he decided on his own that he was not going
18:47
Speaker 3: to bring charges. It wasn't his job. That was the
18:50
Speaker 3: Department of Justice's, but he did that. If Hillary Clinton
18:54
Speaker 3: had have won back in 2016, taken office January 2017,
18:58
Speaker 3: the very first thing she would have done would have
19:02
Speaker 3: been fired to James Comey. There would have been no
19:05
Speaker 3: doubt about that. James Comey really messed her up in
19:08
Speaker 3: her opinion. It hurt her chances, according to Hillary Clinton
19:12
Speaker 3: and the Democrats going into that election back in 2016.
19:16
Speaker 3: He didn't do them any favors, so he would have
19:18
Speaker 3: been gone. Unfortunately, Donald Trump did not make that decision
19:22
Speaker 3: when he came into office, and James Comey really messed
19:26
Speaker 3: things up in a lot of ways. And maybe he's
19:29
Speaker 3: connected to things that are going on in southern Florida
19:33
Speaker 3: in a grand jury. Catherine Herridge, the former reporter for
19:36
Speaker 3: Fox and CBS, who is now an independent journalist, does
19:40
Speaker 3: a fantastic job. She is connecting the two. She thinks
19:45
Speaker 3: that the ending chapter is here in that grand jury
19:48
Speaker 3: in South Florida for justice. Brennan, and possibly there could
19:52
Speaker 3: be more coming for James Comey in connection with that.
19:56
Speaker 3: And that has to do with the intelligence assessment that
20:00
Speaker 3: was changed in January of 2017 before Donald Trump came
20:04
Speaker 3: into office. That was Barack Obama who did that. The
20:07
Speaker 3: intelligence community, all 17 agencies, they brought him that intelligence assessment.
20:13
Speaker 3: He said, I don't like it. I want it changed.
20:15
Speaker 3: Russia is involved here, which was part of the Russian
20:18
Speaker 3: collusion hoax that never actually existed. But to about half
20:23
Speaker 3: the country, it still does to this day, even though
20:25
Speaker 3: we know that it doesn't. Very similar to the COVID
20:28
Speaker 3: things that we talked about in the first segment. There
20:31
Speaker 3: were a lot of lies that took place for well
20:34
Speaker 3: over a decade in this country, and And I think
20:37
Speaker 3: that it has added to the division in this country.
20:42
Speaker 3: It has created a chasm between varying issues and opinions.
20:48
Speaker 3: And it's unfortunate, really, as we celebrate 250 years of
20:52
Speaker 3: this country, probably never more divided than we are right
20:55
Speaker 3: now instead of being united. But these things have a
20:59
Speaker 3: lot to do with it. So there's a possibility that
21:02
Speaker 3: the grand jury in South Florida is getting to the
21:05
Speaker 3: last chapter, as Catherine Herridge says, and maybe James Comey
21:09
Speaker 3: can be connected to Brennan and Clapper, James Clapper, if
21:13
Speaker 3: you remember him. Those were three big names that were
21:16
Speaker 3: involved in that intelligence assessment for Barack Obama when they
21:21
Speaker 3: changed that just prior to Donald Trump coming into office
21:23
Speaker 3: in 2017. But now, a federal grand jury in the
21:27
Speaker 3: Eastern District of North Carolina, that's important, in North Carolina,
21:33
Speaker 3: They indicted former director of the FBI, James Comey, for
21:38
Speaker 3: making threats to harm President Donald J. Trump. And if
21:42
Speaker 3: you remember this, because everybody talked about it, I brought
21:45
Speaker 3: it to you on this program. This had to do
21:48
Speaker 3: with the shells that Comey says he found on the
21:52
Speaker 3: beach in North Carolina. He found shells that spelled out 8647.
21:56
Speaker 3: He takes a picture of it and he posts it
22:00
Speaker 3: on his Instagram account. He says that he didn't know
22:04
Speaker 3: what it meant. 86 means to kill. 47 is Donald Trump,
22:08
Speaker 3: the 47th president of the United States. There was a
22:12
Speaker 3: lot of 86-47 going on at that time on social
22:15
Speaker 3: media and other places. People were saying 86-47, kill Donald Trump.
22:21
Speaker 3: And we saw what happened Saturday night at the White
22:23
Speaker 3: House Correspondents' Dinner. Someone tried to kill Donald Trump. That's
22:28
Speaker 3: the narrative that has been created by mainstream media and
22:31
Speaker 3: people like James Comey. If he didn't think that there
22:35
Speaker 3: was something wrong with 8647, why did he remove his
22:39
Speaker 3: Instagram account? If you remember, he was also brought back
22:43
Speaker 3: in for questioning with regards to that. They have already
22:47
Speaker 3: indicted James Comey once, and that fell apart, unfortunately. That
22:52
Speaker 3: was a big problem they had in the Virginia U.S.
22:56
Speaker 3: Attorney's Office. when Donald Trump replaced Eric Siebert with Lindsey Halligan.
23:02
Speaker 3: It was actually Pam Bondi that did that. Lindsey Halligan,
23:06
Speaker 3: for the first time in her career, presented before a
23:08
Speaker 3: grand jury to try to indict James Comey. James Comey
23:13
Speaker 3: and Letitia James, both of those cases and indictments were
23:16
Speaker 3: thrown out. Neither one of the grand juries in those
23:20
Speaker 3: cases would bring charges. And so that's what happened to that.
23:24
Speaker 3: And now we're going to see what happens here. It's
23:26
Speaker 3: important because it is in North Carolina. It's not in Virginia.
23:29
Speaker 3: That makes a difference. The indictment includes two counts, first
23:33
Speaker 3: in violation of 18 U.S.C. 871, alleging that James Comey
23:39
Speaker 3: knowingly and willfully made a threat to take the life
23:43
Speaker 3: of and to inflict bodily harm upon the president of
23:46
Speaker 3: the United States. This charge alleges that on May 15, 2025,
23:51
Speaker 3: by publicly posting an image over the Internet, via Instagram
23:55
Speaker 3: depicting 8647, which a reasonable recipient who is familiar with
24:01
Speaker 3: circumstances would interpret as a serious expression of an intent
24:05
Speaker 3: to do harm to the President of the United States.
24:08
Speaker 3: The indictment also charges Comey in violation of 18 U.S.C. 875.
24:13
Speaker 3: that James Comey consciously disregarded a substantial risk that his
24:18
Speaker 3: communications would be viewed as threatening violence, and that he
24:22
Speaker 3: knowingly transmitted a communication in interstate commerce that contained a
24:28
Speaker 3: threat to injure the person or of another, which a
24:31
Speaker 3: reasonable recipient who is familiar with the circumstances would interpret
24:35
Speaker 3: as a serious expression of an intent to do harm
24:39
Speaker 3: to a person. Attorney General Todd Blanch said this in
24:43
Speaker 3: the Department of Justice media release, threatening the life of
24:47
Speaker 3: the President of the United States is a grave violation
24:50
Speaker 3: of our nation's laws. The grand jury returned an indictment
24:56
Speaker 3: alleging James Comey did just that. At a time when
24:59
Speaker 3: this country has witnessed violent incitement followed by deadly actions
25:04
Speaker 3: against President Trump, and other elected officials. The temperature needs
25:08
Speaker 3: to be turned down, and anyone who dials it up
25:11
Speaker 3: and threatens the life of the president will be held accountable.
25:15
Speaker 3: Here is Todd Blanch on Tuesday afternoon.
25:18
Speaker 8: Good afternoon.
25:20
Speaker 6: Today, a grand jury sitting in the Eastern District of
25:23
Speaker 6: North Carolina returned an indictment against James Comey on two counts.
25:29
Speaker 6: The first count is that on or about May 15th
25:32
Speaker 6: of last year, he knowingly and willfully making a threat
25:35
Speaker 6: to take the life of and to inflict bodily harm
25:38
Speaker 6: upon the President of the United States. Count two, same day,
25:42
Speaker 6: May 15th, 2025, that the defendant, James Comey, knowingly and
25:47
Speaker 6: willfully transmitting in interstate commerce a communication that contained a
25:52
Speaker 6: threat to kill the President of the United States. Both
25:55
Speaker 6: of these counts carry a maximum term of imprisonment of
25:58
Speaker 6: 10 years.
26:01
Speaker 3: So Comey may be looking at 20 years behind bars.
26:05
Speaker 3: I'm waiting for him to be perp walked. For some reason,
26:09
Speaker 3: the Trump administration, the DOJ under Trump, they won't do
26:13
Speaker 3: the same things that Joe Biden did when they put
26:16
Speaker 3: people like Peter Navarro and Steve Bannon in leg shackles
26:21
Speaker 3: for really simple crimes that they were alleged to have committed,
26:26
Speaker 3: which was not show up before a subpoena in Congress.
26:30
Speaker 3: James Comey is threatening the life of the President of
26:33
Speaker 3: the United States, regardless of what James Comey says, because
26:36
Speaker 3: he says he didn't know what 8-6-4-7 meant. Come on.
26:40
Speaker 3: You've been in law enforcement your entire life, and you
26:42
Speaker 3: don't know what 86 meant? To get rid of somebody?
26:46
Speaker 3: And 47? And you just happen to be walking down
26:49
Speaker 3: the only beach in North Carolina that had shells arranged 8-6-4-7?
26:54
Speaker 3: You didn't take the time to do that yourself. It
26:57
Speaker 3: was obvious that James Comey had the intent to do
27:00
Speaker 3: exactly what he did, send the message that he meant
27:03
Speaker 3: to send, which is do harm, kill Donald Trump. What
27:08
Speaker 3: is James Comey saying now? Because he's always saying something.
27:12
Speaker 3: Here's James Comey, Tuesday night.
27:14
Speaker 8: Well, they're back.
27:16
Speaker 5: This time about a picture of seashells on a North
27:19
Speaker 5: Carolina beach a year ago. And this won't be the
27:23
Speaker 5: end of it. But nothing has changed with me. I'm
27:26
Speaker 5: still innocent. I'm still not afraid. And I still believe
27:31
Speaker 5: in the independent federal judiciary. So let's go. But it's
27:35
Speaker 5: really important that all of us remember this is not
27:39
Speaker 5: who we are as a country. This is not how
27:41
Speaker 5: the Department of Justice is supposed to be. And the
27:44
Speaker 5: good news is we get closer every day to restoring
27:48
Speaker 5: those values.
27:50
Speaker 8: Keep the faith.
27:51
Speaker 3: Remember the Childhood Learning Center that had the sign that
27:55
Speaker 3: was misspelled. It spelled it Learning Center. No N in
28:00
Speaker 3: Learning Center. That was in Minnesota. An independent journalist, Nick Shirley,
28:05
Speaker 3: did the reporting on that back months ago, and the
28:08
Speaker 3: entire country went nuts over billions of dollars of fraud.
28:13
Speaker 3: It was alleged by a U.S. attorney in Minnesota at
28:15
Speaker 3: the time that there could be up to maybe possibly
28:19
Speaker 3: $ 9 billion in fraud. Those were his words, not mine.
28:23
Speaker 3: Over five years, Minnesota received $ 18 billion for the programs
28:28
Speaker 3: that they are alleged to have all this fraud. And
28:31
Speaker 3: the U.S. attorney said maybe half of that amount, up
28:35
Speaker 3: to possibly half of that amount, could have been fraud.
28:39
Speaker 3: And that's where the $ 9 billion came from. We don't
28:41
Speaker 3: know yet. We know that they have convicted about 80 people,
28:45
Speaker 3: and all but eight of those have been Somalian descent.
28:51
Speaker 3: Federal agents executed multiple searches Tuesday in Minnesota, seizing records
28:56
Speaker 3: and other evidence in an ongoing fraud investigation by the
29:00
Speaker 3: Trump administration of publicly funded social programs for children. The
29:05
Speaker 3: funny thing is Governor Tim Walz, who has allowed this
29:08
Speaker 3: fraud to continue for years, it was documented in 2018, 2019.
29:15
Speaker 3: the entire time that he has been the governor. And
29:18
Speaker 3: in fact, when he became the running mate of Kamala
29:21
Speaker 3: Harris back in 2024, a lot of people on the
29:25
Speaker 3: Democrat side were worried that he was going to bring
29:28
Speaker 3: down the ticket because of all the fraud in Minnesota.
29:31
Speaker 3: People have known about this fraud for a very long time. Well,
29:34
Speaker 3: with regard to these 22 raids, no details were disclosed, really.
29:39
Speaker 3: Tim Walz is clarifying that it was through his state
29:42
Speaker 3: agencies working with the federal agencies. that they had done
29:45
Speaker 3: these raids, 22 of them. The searches occurred only months
29:49
Speaker 3: after conservative influencer Nick Shirley, who I mentioned earlier, posted
29:52
Speaker 3: a video that claimed members of Minnesota's Somali community were
29:56
Speaker 3: running fake child care centers so they could collect federal subsidies.
30:02
Speaker 3: It caught the attention of President Trump and the Trump
30:05
Speaker 3: administration and also conservative activists. People on social media were
30:10
Speaker 3: going nuts over it. As I mentioned, Governor Tim Walz,
30:13
Speaker 3: he welcomed the raids Tuesday. He said, quote, we catch
30:18
Speaker 3: criminals when state and federal agencies share information, joint investigations work,
30:24
Speaker 3: and securing justice depends on it. That's Tim Walz who
30:28
Speaker 3: said that. This is the same person that doesn't want
30:31
Speaker 3: the federal agents anywhere near his state or cities when
30:34
Speaker 3: you look at ICE and the things that have happened there.
30:38
Speaker 3: Tim Walz is a liar. That's what he is. Let's
30:41
Speaker 3: move on. We had a hearing on Capitol Hill with
30:44
Speaker 3: the EPA chief. That's Lee Zeldin. I think he's doing
30:47
Speaker 3: a great job in rolling back so many regulations that
30:51
Speaker 3: the Biden administration had put on. I think financially, from
30:54
Speaker 3: an economy standpoint, we're going to start feeling these in
30:57
Speaker 3: the back half of this year, in 2026 and going
31:01
Speaker 3: into 2027. But here is this exchange. I think it's
31:06
Speaker 3: indicative of a member of the House of Representatives reading
31:10
Speaker 3: questions that a staff are put together for them with
31:13
Speaker 3: no depth of knowledge of what they're really talking about.
31:17
Speaker 12: When climate change is flooding our streets, poisoning our air.
31:22
Speaker 3: Flooding our streets. Listen to the way this question is
31:26
Speaker 3: framed here by this Democrat. Flooding our streets when climate
31:31
Speaker 3: change is flooding our streets. Has anybody seen that?
31:33
Speaker 12: Driving up health care and disaster cuts. How can the
31:36
Speaker 12: EPA justify abandoning that duty to protect Americans to appease
31:41
Speaker 12: polluters under the false flag of economic growth?
31:44
Speaker 2: Following the law, Section 202 of the Clean Air Act,
31:46
Speaker 2: where does it say anything about fighting global climate change?
31:51
Speaker 8: Loper Bright, Supreme Court case. You familiar with it?
31:54
Speaker 9: No, maybe others are not, but let me ask.
31:57
Speaker 3: But that's really important.
31:58
Speaker 2: As a member of Congress, Loper Bright says that we
32:01
Speaker 2: as an agency don't have the authority to get creative
32:04
Speaker 2: if Section 202 of the Clean Air Act.
32:06
Speaker 12: No, but you don't have, excuse me, you do not
32:09
Speaker 12: have the right to say climate change does not exist,
32:12
Speaker 12: that it's a hoax, and that's where this administration.
32:14
Speaker 3: Is coming from. But that's not what Lee Zeldin is
32:17
Speaker 3: saying here. He is making a reference to the Chevron
32:21
Speaker 3: deference case There was probably the most important case the
32:24
Speaker 3: Supreme Court decided last year, maybe the most important decision
32:29
Speaker 3: of the Supreme Court in a decade, Chevron deference that
32:32
Speaker 3: had been around since the early 80s. And that allowed
32:36
Speaker 3: administrations to come in, Democrat would come in, everything would
32:40
Speaker 3: change because there's so much ambiguity in laws. And Chevron
32:45
Speaker 3: deference decision in the Supreme Court, It made a big
32:48
Speaker 3: difference because no longer can administrations just interpret law the
32:54
Speaker 3: way that they want to interpret it, which is good.
32:58
Speaker 3: That's a good thing that the Supreme Court made that decision.
33:00
Speaker 3: That's what Lee Zeldin is pointing out to this congresswoman
33:04
Speaker 3: who has no idea what he's talking about. She has
33:06
Speaker 3: no idea. It's all news to her. She's never heard
33:10
Speaker 3: of these Supreme Court cases. Here's more of this. I
33:13
Speaker 3: don't know what Loperbright is. Do you know what the major.
33:15
Speaker 9: Policies doctrine is? I'm upset because.
33:17
Speaker 2: Do you know what the major policies doctrine is? You're
33:19
Speaker 2: a member of Congress.
33:20
Speaker 8: You should know.
33:21
Speaker 12: Well, you have moved from someone who defended the environment
33:26
Speaker 12: to all.
33:26
Speaker 13: Of a sudden.
33:26
Speaker 2: I'm very defensive about not knowing the two biggest landmark
33:30
Speaker 2: Supreme Court cases of the last.
33:31
Speaker 8: Year with regards to your question.
33:33
Speaker 12: You are very defensive about changing your policy and your
33:37
Speaker 12: positions with regard to the environment.
33:39
Speaker 9: Now, do just tell me.
33:40
Speaker 3: Do you want me to tell you what the two biggest...
33:42
Speaker 3: Supreme Court cases.
33:43
Speaker 8: Are of the last few years.
33:44
Speaker 9: This is what I want you to tell me.
33:45
Speaker 3: Michigan v.
33:46
Speaker 7: EPA.
33:46
Speaker 12: Whoa.
33:47
Speaker 3: West Virginia v.
33:47
Speaker 7: EPA.
33:47
Speaker 9: You know, you're here because you need money from us.
33:50
Speaker 12: So halt for the second and wait for the questions
33:53
Speaker 12: and answer the questions.
33:54
Speaker 3: Well, I answered your question.
33:55
Speaker 1: Oh, you didn't.
33:55
Speaker 2: And you didn't like my answer because you don't know
33:57
Speaker 2: what Loper Bright is. Because you don't know what the
33:59
Speaker 2: major policies doctrine is. Because you're asking me.
34:03
Speaker 3: Loper Bright was the suit that brought the Shafron Deference
34:07
Speaker 3: case to the Supreme Court. Loper Bright is a fishing company,
34:10
Speaker 3: and that's what that case had to do with. They
34:13
Speaker 3: brought Chevron deference back to the Supreme Court. She obviously
34:16
Speaker 3: doesn't know what any of that is about.
34:19
Speaker 2: Asking about section 202 of the clean air act and
34:21
Speaker 2: you don't you don't read it you don't know what
34:23
Speaker 2: it says.
34:23
Speaker 9: Listen and what you want to do is to deny
34:26
Speaker 9: you want no.
34:27
Speaker 2: I actually read the law i do my homework really
34:30
Speaker 2: you're just somebody who likes to have the microphone on
34:32
Speaker 2: you know what i have.
34:33
Speaker 1: To do i read the law i read the supreme.
34:35
Speaker 9: Court cases and i would say.
34:37
Speaker 3: No we should do for your constituents is actually a read.
34:40
Speaker 9: Statute budget is at real risk.
34:42
Speaker 3: Listen to her.
34:43
Speaker 9: She doesn't have answers because she doesn't know.
34:45
Speaker 3: She's reading questions a staffer asked her. Lee Zeldin challenged
35:08
Speaker 3: her with the fact that I can't do what you're
35:11
Speaker 3: asking me to do because it's not in the law.
35:14
Speaker 3: I can't just change what you said we could do. You,
35:18
Speaker 3: your body did this, the house of representatives, the Senate
35:21
Speaker 3: and a president somewhere signed this into law. And I can't,
35:24
Speaker 3: as an administrator, just arbitrarily change what you guys said.
35:30
Speaker 3: That's the way it works. That's the way it should work.
35:32
Speaker 3: But Chevron deference made that difference. And, um, Obviously, this
35:36
Speaker 3: woman doesn't like it. This Democrat doesn't like it. And
35:39
Speaker 3: now she gets to the point of threatening the EPA.
35:43
Speaker 3: This is the Appropriations Committee. She says, now we're going
35:46
Speaker 3: to defund you. That's all the Democrats have. Defund. Defund. Defund.
35:52
Speaker 3: That is their go-to threat.
35:53
Speaker 9: That's BS.
35:55
Speaker 3: BS. Do you think I made up these cases?
35:58
Speaker 9: Yeah, I think you have made up a whole lot
36:01
Speaker 9: of cases.
36:01
Speaker 3: I made up Loperbright. I made up West Virginia versus EPA.
36:04
Speaker 3: I made up Michigan versus EPA. Lee Zeldin is doing
36:07
Speaker 3: a great job. A lot of people are suggesting him
36:09
Speaker 3: for Attorney General of the United States. He was a
36:12
Speaker 3: JAG attorney for 20 years in the reserves. I think
36:16
Speaker 3: he's doing a great job right where he is in
36:19
Speaker 3: the EPA.
36:20
Speaker 13: I don't know about you, but the one thing the
36:21
Speaker 13: last five or so years has taught me is that
36:24
Speaker 13: there's a lot, and I mean a lot, of companies
36:26
Speaker 13: and services out there that don't share the foundational values
36:29
Speaker 13: of this country and we the people. And I've spoken
36:31
Speaker 13: to a lot of you about it who share the
36:33
Speaker 13: same concerns, and you wonder where to shop. Where to
36:36
Speaker 13: spend your hard-earned money without feeling gross about it. It
36:39
Speaker 13: can be frustrating, but here's the good news. You don't
36:41
Speaker 13: have to do the research yourself and you don't have
36:43
Speaker 13: to tie yourself up in knots any longer because we've
36:46
Speaker 13: done the legwork for you. At mammothnation.com, we have thousands
36:50
Speaker 13: of vetted, freedom-loving, pro-America companies who actually share your values.
36:54
Speaker 3: So now the ball's in your court.
36:56
Speaker 13: Keep spending money with companies that frustrate you and then
36:58
Speaker 13: use the proceeds to fund initiatives that are in direct
37:01
Speaker 13: competition with your values or be a part of something better.
37:04
Speaker 3: I think the choice is pretty easy.
37:06
Speaker 13: Come be a part of the solution. Join Mammoth Nation
37:08
Speaker 13: today and you can save 30% off your membership by
37:11
Speaker 13: using promo code USA.
37:36
Speaker 3: I guess most of us remember the FISA court, the FISC,
37:40
Speaker 3: the FISA court, the 702. Everybody was talking about that
37:43
Speaker 3: for a while and what all of that was and
37:46
Speaker 3: what it allowed our government to do, which ultimately was
37:49
Speaker 3: to spy on a presidential campaign and that of Donald
37:52
Speaker 3: Trump going back to 2016. And you have to tie
37:56
Speaker 3: in the Russian hoax that we are now seeing that
38:00
Speaker 3: was a hoax. And we always knew that because we
38:03
Speaker 3: relied on reporting from People like John Solomon and Sarah Carter,
38:08
Speaker 3: Catherine Herridge at the time of Fox and went to
38:11
Speaker 3: CBS and now is independent. Laura Logan. Those were the
38:14
Speaker 3: people that we depended on to get our information from.
38:18
Speaker 3: We assumed and we believed our discernment, our wisdom said
38:22
Speaker 3: that they were right. And were they right? Well, as
38:25
Speaker 3: it turns out, when it comes to the FISA abuse,
38:28
Speaker 3: there were investigations afterwards in the House of Representatives and
38:31
Speaker 3: There were also investigations by the Inspector General of the
38:35
Speaker 3: Department of Justice, and they came to the same conclusion
38:38
Speaker 3: that there was abuses in the FISA court and with
38:42
Speaker 3: the 702. I would point out that it was actually
38:45
Speaker 3: Article 1, not Section 702, that allowed the FISA court
38:50
Speaker 3: and the FBI to spy on Carter Page. You remember
38:54
Speaker 3: that name? You have to go back in history. This
38:57
Speaker 3: is a long time ago now, as we start connecting
38:59
Speaker 3: these dots with what John Solomon said in a podcast.
39:04
Speaker 3: And when I heard this, I literally just about fell
39:07
Speaker 3: off the couch in hearing how his journey started. Because
39:12
Speaker 3: it was John Solomon that went on Sean Hannity back
39:16
Speaker 3: in 2017, I guess. And he did a story on
39:18
Speaker 3: the abuse of the 702. And when he got home
39:24
Speaker 3: that night from wherever he was, at work or whatever,
39:28
Speaker 3: at 1045 at night, he was met by a couple
39:31
Speaker 3: of government agents. And that's the story that I'm going
39:34
Speaker 3: to get to. But to get there, I think we
39:36
Speaker 3: need to set everything up. And we have to remember
39:39
Speaker 3: the Russian hoax and the fact that it was paid
39:42
Speaker 3: for by the DNC, Hillary Clinton, and even to a
39:45
Speaker 3: greater extent, it was someone in the Clinton circle who
39:49
Speaker 3: Charles Dolan, a longtime attorney for the Clintons, who hired
39:54
Speaker 3: Igor Danchenko to create that pee story. Remember the story
39:58
Speaker 3: of Donald Trump peeing on a prostitute? That was completely
40:01
Speaker 3: made up by Igor Danchenko, who was later arrested by
40:06
Speaker 3: the Durham investigation. He was acquitted, but he was only
40:10
Speaker 3: arrested for lying because opposition research isn't a lie, but
40:14
Speaker 3: he lied to investigators is what the accusation was. But
40:17
Speaker 3: the court found him innocent. They acquitted him of those charges.
40:21
Speaker 3: There was also Kevin Clinesmith, the FBI attorney, that he
40:26
Speaker 3: also lied. And he did plead guilty to that. And
40:31
Speaker 3: he didn't go to prison, but he was put on probation.
40:35
Speaker 3: So there were a couple of arrests that came out
40:38
Speaker 3: of that and what was the Russian hoax. But how
40:42
Speaker 3: did we find out about it? Well, we found out
40:44
Speaker 3: about it through John Solomon and Sarah Carter. mainly they
40:48
Speaker 3: were on Fox news almost daily. I always wondered how
40:52
Speaker 3: they got their information because to me, because I believed
40:55
Speaker 3: in what they were reporting, that their information was good
40:59
Speaker 3: and it was coming from great sources and they really
41:02
Speaker 3: had some good sources somewhere, somewhere they had some good sources.
41:07
Speaker 3: And now as Donald Trump comes into office and we
41:10
Speaker 3: are seeing that the Russian hoax was a complete lie,
41:15
Speaker 3: where it started, who knows? It appears that it started
41:18
Speaker 3: with Barack Obama, John Brennan, James Clapper, Comey, that possibly
41:23
Speaker 3: this was a whole color revolution, you know, to overthrow
41:27
Speaker 3: a government. Is that what this is? Was it the
41:31
Speaker 3: CIA that was involved with it? You know, there's so
41:34
Speaker 3: many different ways we can go about when we consider this.
41:39
Speaker 3: And then you also have to consider, okay, did John
41:42
Speaker 3: Solomon actually have good information? Were we part of a PSYOP?
41:46
Speaker 3: Does everything that I believe, is it true or not?
41:52
Speaker 3: And that's sort of the question, isn't it? We believe
41:56
Speaker 3: what we want to believe. Was I fooled? Did I
42:00
Speaker 3: believe John Solomon and Sarah Carter because I wanted to
42:03
Speaker 3: believe them? It's interesting. Let's first go to John Solomon here.
42:10
Speaker 3: Let's listen to this audio. This is the audio that
42:12
Speaker 3: blew me away in his experience in what happened to
42:16
Speaker 3: him on the night that he first started talking about
42:19
Speaker 3: the 702 FISA abuse. And we're going to get into
42:22
Speaker 3: that in just a minute. But I want to get
42:24
Speaker 3: into what the FISA court is in Section 702, just
42:28
Speaker 3: to refresh your memory as we set all of this up.
42:31
Speaker 3: Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act is FISA, and it was enacted
42:35
Speaker 3: in 2008 as part of the FISA Amendment Act. This
42:39
Speaker 3: is the Section 702. It authorizes the U.S. government to
42:43
Speaker 3: conduct warrantless surveillance of non-citizens located outside the United States
42:50
Speaker 3: for foreign intelligence purposes. Now, this would be for things
42:54
Speaker 3: like terrorism, so that we can prevent another 9-11 from happening.
42:59
Speaker 3: It allows agencies like the National Security Agency to target
43:03
Speaker 3: foreigners abroad and collect their communications, such as e-mails, phone calls,
43:08
Speaker 3: text messages. often by compelling U.S.-based tech companies to provide
43:15
Speaker 3: the data. So that's where some of the abuse can
43:19
Speaker 3: come in. That's the slippery slope. And as you remember,
43:22
Speaker 3: the 702 was up for debate, and whether they were
43:25
Speaker 3: going to continue it in Congress or not, they ended
43:28
Speaker 3: up passing it. I had Jason Fick on this program
43:31
Speaker 3: who was suing the government and taking it all the
43:33
Speaker 3: way to the Supreme Court over Section 702. Now, the
43:37
Speaker 3: claim that Section 02 was abused to spy on Trump
43:40
Speaker 3: campaign primarily stems from broader concerns about the FISA misuse,
43:45
Speaker 3: though the specific surveillance of the Trump campaign involved a
43:49
Speaker 3: different part of FISA, and that is Title I, not
43:52
Speaker 3: Section 702. Former President Donald Trump and his supporters said,
43:56
Speaker 3: have alleged that FISA was used to illegally spy on
44:01
Speaker 3: his 2016 presidential campaign, particularly citing their surveillance of campaign
44:07
Speaker 3: aide Carter Page. So let's go back to Carter Page
44:12
Speaker 3: real quick. The FBI obtained a FISA warrant under Title
44:16
Speaker 3: I to surveil Carter Page, who was working in the
44:20
Speaker 3: Trump campaign back in 2016, based on suspicions of his
44:25
Speaker 3: ties to Russian operatives. So they then, Comey and the FBI,
44:32
Speaker 3: who went and lied before the FISA court, along with
44:36
Speaker 3: Kevin Clinesmith, he was one that made a change in
44:39
Speaker 3: one of those FISA applications. They were saying that he
44:43
Speaker 3: was tied to Russia. So they were tying Russia in
44:46
Speaker 3: way back then in the campaign in 2016. Remember the
44:50
Speaker 3: Alpha Bank story? that was at Trump Tower. That's a
44:53
Speaker 3: part of this too. Alpha Bank, a Russian bank that
44:56
Speaker 3: had nothing to do with Donald Trump, but they used
44:58
Speaker 3: that to get into Trump Tower to also spy on
45:02
Speaker 3: the Trump campaign. So when Donald Trump would say they're
45:06
Speaker 3: wiring Trump Tower, they were wiring Trump Tower. The fact
45:10
Speaker 3: is our government spied on Americans and our government also
45:16
Speaker 3: abused their power in spying on an opposition political party
45:21
Speaker 3: and campaign and candidate, and that was Donald Trump. And
45:24
Speaker 3: that's what Donald Trump said from the beginning. And who
45:26
Speaker 3: was out front pushing the stories was John Solomon, Sarah Carter.
45:31
Speaker 3: They were instrumental in it. So let's hear what John
45:34
Speaker 3: Solomon has to say and how all of this started
45:37
Speaker 3: for him. This blew me away.
45:40
Speaker 14: Perhaps the most profound moment of the last decade of
45:42
Speaker 14: my career occurred in March of 17. I had just
45:45
Speaker 14: done a story that got Sean Hannity's attention. So I
45:48
Speaker 14: was on Fox News. It was about rapid rise in
45:52
Speaker 14: unmaskings where Americans' intelligence is looked at even though there's
45:55
Speaker 14: no warrant. They unmask your name and they know what
45:57
Speaker 14: you said to someone overseas and they don't get a
45:59
Speaker 14: warrant for it. And it had gone up like two,
46:01
Speaker 14: 300% in the last year of Barack Obama, which is
46:03
Speaker 14: very odd. It was odd to the FISA court. That's
46:06
Speaker 14: why they put the data out. They were concerned that
46:07
Speaker 14: this is a trend. I just thought it was a
46:10
Speaker 14: good civil liberty story, so I wrote it. And at
46:12
Speaker 14: that point, I had been repeatedly told that don't waste.
46:15
Speaker 8: Your time on Russia collusion. It's going nowhere.
46:17
Speaker 14: And by the way, from some of the most senior
46:19
Speaker 14: leaders of the FBI and the Justice Department.
46:21
Speaker 3: Interesting comment there from John Solomon. I'm just going to
46:24
Speaker 3: stop it for a second. He said that Russian collusion
46:28
Speaker 3: isn't going anywhere. Leave it alone. Don't touch it. By
46:31
Speaker 3: the way, he says it was from some of the
46:34
Speaker 3: top people in the Department of Justice and also the FBI.
46:37
Speaker 3: Who would that be? Who was at the top of
46:39
Speaker 3: the Department of Justice during Obama and then in 17
46:43
Speaker 3: under Donald Trump? You had Jeff Sessions. You had Rod Rosenstein.
46:48
Speaker 3: Just a couple of names there. Let's keep going with
46:50
Speaker 3: John Sullivan.
46:50
Speaker 14: The very people who might also have gone out and
46:53
Speaker 14: told us there was something there when there wasn't.
46:55
Speaker 8: But they were telling me it wasn't.
46:58
Speaker 14: Got home about 10.45, 11 o'clock at night.
47:01
Speaker 8: My wife's already in bed.
47:02
Speaker 14: I pull in the driveway and there's a blue sedan
47:05
Speaker 14: sitting in front of my mailbox with its yellow fog
47:07
Speaker 14: lights on. And I pull in the driveway and these
47:10
Speaker 14: two GI men get out of their car. It's about
47:13
Speaker 14: 11 o'clock at night.
47:14
Speaker 3: And.
47:16
Speaker 8: And as I'm getting out of my car, I say,
47:18
Speaker 8: are you Mr. Solomon? I'm like, I don't know. Am
47:19
Speaker 8: I being arrested? What's going on?
47:20
Speaker 14: Did they throw cuffs on me? Did I break some
47:22
Speaker 14: classified secret I shouldn't have today? And they're like, you
47:24
Speaker 14: don't know who we are. We can't tell you who
47:26
Speaker 14: we are, but you're at the tip of a very
47:30
Speaker 14: large iceberg, and we hope you drill into it. And
47:32
Speaker 14: I'm like, what in God's name are you guys talking about? Well,
47:35
Speaker 14: that thing you were reporting on television. Yeah, it was
47:37
Speaker 14: a FISA court filing. It is the apex of a
47:42
Speaker 14: very large scandal, and you need to drill down in it.
47:45
Speaker 14: And I'm like, all right, walk me through this guy. Well,
47:47
Speaker 14: we can't tell you. It's all classified. Okay, that's not
47:49
Speaker 14: very helpful.
47:50
Speaker 3: So are these guys white hats, or are they part
47:54
Speaker 3: of the CIA? I don't know. I don't know that
47:56
Speaker 3: John Solomon knows at this point. He's asking them, again,
47:59
Speaker 3: 11 o'clock at night. He comes home, and there's a
48:02
Speaker 3: car at his house. That would scare me also. He
48:06
Speaker 3: wonders if he's going to be arrested. They tell him,
48:09
Speaker 3: you are on to something. It's just the tip of
48:12
Speaker 3: the iceberg, this FISA stuff. As it turns out, they
48:16
Speaker 3: were correct. It is really the tip of the iceberg
48:19
Speaker 3: as we're finding out about burn bags and hidden evidence
48:23
Speaker 3: inside the FBI and at the DNI. Let's go on
48:27
Speaker 3: with John Solomon.
48:28
Speaker 8: Can you give me something of more generic description? Yeah.
48:32
Speaker 14: We work in the Intelligence Committee, and our agencies were
48:36
Speaker 14: asked to participate in one of the greatest political dirty
48:38
Speaker 14: tricks in history. And if it isn't stopped, and one
48:42
Speaker 14: day when it is over, uncovered, we will lose the
48:47
Speaker 14: tools that keep you and I safe at night.
48:49
Speaker 8: We won't be able to find terrorists and we won't find.
48:52
Speaker 14: Spies because these tools will be taken from us because
48:55
Speaker 14: we abused them in the last couple of years.
48:57
Speaker 3: So these two guys that show up at John Solomon's
48:59
Speaker 3: house at 11 o'clock at night are saying you're on
49:02
Speaker 3: to something, but it's just the tip of the iceberg.
49:05
Speaker 3: It's much deeper. Drill down deeper. Keep after it. And
49:08
Speaker 3: which he and Sarah Carter and others did. Catherine Erich
49:12
Speaker 3: is another one that did a great job. They dug
49:14
Speaker 3: down deeper and they kept finding things that so many
49:18
Speaker 3: of us believed, and I know that I believed it.
49:20
Speaker 3: My discernment, my wisdom said that John Solomon was coming
49:24
Speaker 3: up with the truth here. I didn't know where he
49:26
Speaker 3: was getting it, but it turns out he may have
49:28
Speaker 3: been getting it from inside the government the entire time.
49:32
Speaker 3: Very interesting stuff here that John Solomon is talking about.
49:36
Speaker 8: Holy mackerel, what's going on here?
49:38
Speaker 14: And so, They couldn't give me much more detail, but
49:41
Speaker 14: they inspired me to start wondering about whether I was
49:44
Speaker 14: missing something big. And I got home by that time,
49:46
Speaker 14: and there were 20 minutes. It was about 11, 20
49:48
Speaker 14: at night. From 11, 20 at night to 2 in
49:50
Speaker 14: the morning, I wrote a long email to my then
49:53
Speaker 14: work sister, Sarah Carter, who was just a fantastic reporter.
49:57
Speaker 14: Now the drug czar for President Trump. And I just
49:59
Speaker 14: tried to remember everything they told me. Like, Sarah, I
50:01
Speaker 14: don't know what the hell these guys are trying to
50:03
Speaker 14: tell us. But tomorrow morning, let's wake up and find out.
50:06
Speaker 14: And that sent us on our journey.
50:08
Speaker 3: Again, the things that he just said amazed me when
50:11
Speaker 3: I came across this audio. And I came across it
50:14
Speaker 3: on Tuesday night. And I really wanted to start putting
50:17
Speaker 3: together the dots here, connecting the dots. Solomon really was
50:23
Speaker 3: the guy. He was out front. He was the tip
50:25
Speaker 3: of the spear on everything that we were learning. And
50:28
Speaker 3: we heard earlier in this hour from Jenna Ryan. Everything
50:32
Speaker 3: that he reported also really had a lot to do
50:36
Speaker 3: with the 2020 election, the aftermath, the insurrection, because everybody
50:40
Speaker 3: that believed that reporting, which I was one of them,
50:43
Speaker 3: maybe you were too, I still to this day believe
50:46
Speaker 3: John Solomon. But you have to wonder now, meeting a
50:49
Speaker 3: couple of government officials, agents, was every part of this
50:54
Speaker 3: a psyop? I don't believe that. I believe that John
50:57
Speaker 3: Solomon was reporting the truth. But that meeting that night
51:02
Speaker 3: shaped much of the narrative. And then you get into
51:06
Speaker 3: the 20 election, and it's stolen, and then January 6th.
51:10
Speaker 3: You have to connect it all together. That meeting shaped
51:14
Speaker 3: the narrative. And then I wondered if Solomon ever asked
51:17
Speaker 3: them if they were CIA. Are you guys with the CIA?
51:22
Speaker 3: What a psyop this would have been if we were
51:24
Speaker 3: all a part of it, making everything that we believe
51:27
Speaker 3: just a ploy. Or were these the good guys? Were
51:31
Speaker 3: they the, quote, white hat guys, unquote. And everything we
51:36
Speaker 3: believe is 100% the truth, because they were the white
51:40
Speaker 3: hat guys. This was the biggest scandal in American history,
51:46
Speaker 3: and now it is being uncovered. I believe John Solomon.
51:50
Speaker 3: I believe that is the truth. And you really have
51:53
Speaker 3: to have wisdom and discernment to know the difference. Because
51:57
Speaker 3: Solomon has been the guy for everything from inside government,
52:01
Speaker 3: It would appear he was getting his information from the
52:03
Speaker 3: good guys. For the Russian hoax, Mueller investigation, COVID, weaponization, censorship,
52:10
Speaker 3: he was it. Sarah Carter. He was the first and
52:15
Speaker 3: the best with inside information. Or was it intentional? Was
52:20
Speaker 3: it part of a color revolution? Was it a coup
52:23
Speaker 3: orchestrated by Brennan and the CIA to divide the country
52:27
Speaker 3: beyond repair and Because that's what socialists need to take
52:31
Speaker 3: over the country. Assume for a minute that Solomon was
52:35
Speaker 3: used by the CIA. How did Solomon corroborate his snitches,
52:41
Speaker 3: those guys in his front yard that night? Or are
52:45
Speaker 3: they the good guys? With honor. There are actually good
52:50
Speaker 3: guys with honor still in our government. You see, you
52:54
Speaker 3: and me and others, we made the choice to believe
52:57
Speaker 3: Solomon and Sarah Carter and their reporting on everything. Everything.
53:03
Speaker 3: If our discernment is right, our fight was instrumental in
53:07
Speaker 3: helping uncover the greatest political scandal and coup in history.
53:13
Speaker 3: And beyond that, you have to tie together what Tulsi
53:16
Speaker 3: Gabbard and Kash Patel are now finding inside the buildings
53:20
Speaker 3: in the offices of the FBI. Donald Trump had another
53:24
Speaker 3: cabinet meeting this week. Here is what Tulsi Gabbard said
53:27
Speaker 3: they are finding starting it off with Donald Trump.
53:30
Speaker 7: You've also found many bags of information.
53:35
Speaker 8: I think they call them burn bags.
53:36
Speaker 2: They're supposed to be burned and they didn't get burned
53:39
Speaker 2: having to do with how corrupt the 2020 election was.
53:43
Speaker 8: And when will that all come out?
53:45
Speaker 3: Real quick, if bad guys wanting to get rid of
53:50
Speaker 3: the evidence, would they have not burned the burned bags?
53:54
Speaker 3: Why were the burned bags left? It's a question I
53:57
Speaker 3: asked last month on this program. Why did they leave
54:01
Speaker 3: the burned bags if they intended to destroy the evidence?
54:04
Speaker 3: Or was it the good guys, the white hats, leaving
54:08
Speaker 3: information for it to be found by the Trump administration? Mr. President,
54:12
Speaker 3: I will be the first to brief you.
54:14
Speaker 15: Once we have that information collected. But you're right, we
54:18
Speaker 15: are finding documents literally tucked away in the back of
54:22
Speaker 15: safes and random offices in these bags and in other areas,
54:27
Speaker 15: which again speaks to the intent of those who are
54:29
Speaker 15: trying to hide the truth from the American people and
54:32
Speaker 15: trying to cover up the politicization that was led by
54:36
Speaker 15: people like John Brennan and James Clapper and others that
54:40
Speaker 15: have caused really immeasurable harm.
54:42
Speaker 8: To the American people and to our country. Thank you.
54:45
Speaker 2: We look forward to hearing it.
54:47
Speaker 3: And we look forward to hearing it also. Real quick,
54:50
Speaker 3: before we go to the break, 702 has done some
54:53
Speaker 3: really good things. It's not just bad. It was used
54:57
Speaker 3: by bad people and abused. But it has found terrorists
55:01
Speaker 3: through the years. And I think the country needs something
55:05
Speaker 3: like this. It just doesn't need bad people abusing it.
55:09
Speaker 3: What it does need are good, honorable people, women and
55:13
Speaker 3: men in the government, who happen to realize that what
55:17
Speaker 3: they are doing is trying to overthrow a presidency, an election,
55:22
Speaker 3: and then create an insurrection. We need those people in
55:26
Speaker 3: our government, and it appears that we have them, and
55:29
Speaker 3: it appears that our wisdom, our discernment, was right in
55:33
Speaker 3: following John Solomon and Sarah Carter in what they brought
55:38
Speaker 3: to us as the truth.
55:40
Speaker 1: There is only one truth. You've been listening to The
55:43
Speaker 1: Truth Be Told with Booker Scott on America Out Loud.