Latest / UK Column Radio / False Flags and Fallen Republics: Iran, 9/11, and the Architecture of Manufactured Enemies

Transcript

False Flags and Fallen Republics: Iran, 9/11, and the Architecture of Manufactured Enemies · UK Column Radio

0:16
Speaker 1: Hello, and welcome to the UK colum Today. I'm joined
0:19
Speaker 1: once again by Matt Ertt. Welcome to the program.
0:21
Speaker 2: Matt, a pleasure to be back on with you.
0:24
Speaker 1: Well, it's good to have you on. And Well today
0:27
Speaker 1: we're going to look at false flags forgetting with Iran.
0:30
Speaker 1: But some historical context that's got to be said, Matt,
0:33
Speaker 1: that certain things never change.
0:35
Speaker 2: Yeah, certain things never change. That's an understatement. I think. Definitely,
0:42
Speaker 2: historical context is important, and just getting a sense of
0:44
Speaker 2: the modus operandi of this parasite that's been latched onto
0:49
Speaker 2: us and that's been manipulating society such that we feel
0:52
Speaker 2: ourselves increasingly calling for policies that result in our own
0:58
Speaker 2: enslavement and the destructions of millions of innocent people. That's
1:01
Speaker 2: not a new thing. It does partially require our consent,
1:05
Speaker 2: But to get that consent requires partially disinformation, partially creating
1:09
Speaker 2: an atmosphere of propaganda that dehumanizes whatever target is supposed
1:15
Speaker 2: to be framed as our enemy, and then ultimately our
1:20
Speaker 2: support to those governing institutions that are planning to wage
1:24
Speaker 2: either preventative war or just create a more dictatorial dragnet
1:28
Speaker 2: controlling and surveilling the local population and going back to
1:31
Speaker 2: the days if you want to go for history, we
1:33
Speaker 2: can go back to the days of Nero lighting Roman
1:36
Speaker 2: fire and blaming a lot of persuading a lot of
1:40
Speaker 2: soft minded Roman citizens that the cause of these fires
1:47
Speaker 2: are these terrorist Christian Christians that just hate our freedoms
1:53
Speaker 2: and we have to clamp down, and the propaganda worked.
1:56
Speaker 2: It was only later on that people began to wake
1:58
Speaker 2: up and realize that it was actual Nero who commanded
2:01
Speaker 2: his own Praetorian Guard to go and carry out the
2:03
Speaker 2: burning of Rome. But the population drank the kool aid
2:07
Speaker 2: and saw no problem in watching jubilantly. In some cases,
2:14
Speaker 2: Roman torches of human beings regularly lit on fire for
2:18
Speaker 2: public spectacle and thrown human beings thrown into into the
2:22
Speaker 2: lions or just you know, slaughtered for for entertainment, and
2:26
Speaker 2: people thought that was divine justice as well as entertaining
2:29
Speaker 2: at the same time. So not a different not it's
2:33
Speaker 2: not as different as as you would like it to
2:35
Speaker 2: be from the type of psychological mindset of people championing
2:38
Speaker 2: freedom fries to get revenge on those on the baddies
2:43
Speaker 2: who hated our freedoms and carried out you know, these
2:46
Speaker 2: attacks on nine to eleven, twenty five years ago, and
2:52
Speaker 2: and it's it's it's a very similar psychodynamic Yeah.
2:55
Speaker 1: It's pretty It's fascinating you say that because you're you're
2:59
Speaker 1: talking about soft mind romans. And here we are in
3:02
Speaker 1: the twenty first century, and we've were surrounded by soft
3:05
Speaker 1: minded Westerners in particular, who seem to have swallowed the
3:11
Speaker 1: mantra from the mainstream media and politicians that the first
3:16
Speaker 1: role of government is to keep people safe. This is
3:18
Speaker 1: the mantra that was absolutely bullied into people during COVID,
3:23
Speaker 1: has been ever since, and increasingly so as we head
3:27
Speaker 1: towards head into this latest conflict in Iran. And again
3:33
Speaker 1: I began by saying, some things never change, but one
3:38
Speaker 1: of the chances that humanity is going to wise up
3:40
Speaker 1: to this type of tactic.
3:42
Speaker 2: The universe has given us many opportunities to pull our
3:44
Speaker 2: heads out of our asses over the last thousands of years,
3:47
Speaker 2: to stop falling for the exact same trick every time,
3:50
Speaker 2: and we haven't done it yet. I'm presuming that humanity,
3:55
Speaker 2: so you know, I have faith that humanity is ultimately
3:58
Speaker 2: created for a better destiny than the one that we've
4:00
Speaker 2: been living under. Under the yoke of oligarchism that sort
4:04
Speaker 2: of just plays us like fools. And there they've got
4:06
Speaker 2: a sort of art of bringing out the worst in
4:09
Speaker 2: people that are managed as human cattle by this this
4:12
Speaker 2: oligarchy that rewards and incentivizes bad behavior, bad thinking, and
4:17
Speaker 2: punishes people who actually are in alignment with natural law
4:21
Speaker 2: in the healthiest sense of the term. So I do
4:23
Speaker 2: hope you know, now we've entered the age over the
4:25
Speaker 2: last century or so of the of we've harnessed the
4:31
Speaker 2: power of the atom. It could do a lot of good.
4:33
Speaker 2: It has done a lot of good for desalination, you know,
4:36
Speaker 2: I applied for under moral purposes. There's incredible, great good.
4:41
Speaker 2: We could end hunger forever in ways that no previous
4:44
Speaker 2: phase of human civilization could ever imagine. But at the
4:46
Speaker 2: same time, if you have this imperial system that is
4:49
Speaker 2: managing your scientific policy and foreign policy, then bombs will
4:54
Speaker 2: be the outcome. And sure enough, we you know, we're
4:58
Speaker 2: at that place right now. I think we're at testing
5:00
Speaker 2: moments for humanity. Since the world is littered with a
5:04
Speaker 2: lot of nuclear warheads, a lot of thermonuclear warheads, there's
5:08
Speaker 2: certain strategic doctrines like the Sampson doctrine that we know
5:12
Speaker 2: has been activated in Israel where they feel certain people
5:16
Speaker 2: within the Zienus complex within that part of the world
5:19
Speaker 2: feel like it is their duty to basically unleash their
5:24
Speaker 2: nuclear arsenal if they should feel existentially threatened at any time,
5:30
Speaker 2: and Iran might be very easily that trigger. I don't
5:33
Speaker 2: know if it will be, but it certainly is possible
5:36
Speaker 2: at this point that a major power clash might be
5:40
Speaker 2: the consequence, whether by design or whether even by missteps,
5:44
Speaker 2: that could pull in some of the Ron's key allies China,
5:47
Speaker 2: rush of both nuclear powers into a major conflict that
5:50
Speaker 2: could feasibly set us back many centuries, if not millennia.
5:55
Speaker 2: So the fact that we're receiving so much SIOP right
5:59
Speaker 2: now in the narrative space, both mainstream and alt media,
6:03
Speaker 2: like as far as warning people psychologically preparing them for
6:06
Speaker 2: the idea of new false flags Iranian sleeper cells that
6:10
Speaker 2: we should expect to be activated across the globe. I
6:14
Speaker 2: think it smells of something fishing. It smells of something
6:17
Speaker 2: that would probably be less Iranian. If we actually did
6:21
Speaker 2: start seeing a greater acceleration of terrorist incidents, it would
6:24
Speaker 2: be probably less Iranian and much more. It would smell
6:27
Speaker 2: a lot more like the Five Eyes if it did happen.
6:30
Speaker 2: And I think that it's important that people really inoculate
6:32
Speaker 2: themselves psycho spiritually from that type of deceit that is
6:38
Speaker 2: replicating a lot of the patterns that we saw leading
6:41
Speaker 2: up to nine to eleven, and many other false flag
6:45
Speaker 2: operations that found were found to have the hands of
6:50
Speaker 2: the FBI, of the CIA, of GCCHQ, of ceases behind them,
6:54
Speaker 2: even in the last twenty five years alone, ignoring everything
6:57
Speaker 2: that went before that, which also has the hand of
6:59
Speaker 2: until agencies going back through the darkest days of the
7:02
Speaker 2: Cold War.
7:03
Speaker 1: Well, look, before we get onto the idea of Rrenian
7:05
Speaker 1: sleeper sales and whatnot, I want to come back to
7:07
Speaker 1: this because you began by mentioning Rome, and when we
7:11
Speaker 1: were talking about this topic a couple of days ago,
7:14
Speaker 1: you know, you highlighted the sort of features of the
7:18
Speaker 1: collapsing Roman Republic, the glorification of violence, and a whole
7:25
Speaker 1: host of other sort of attributes that could very easily
7:30
Speaker 1: be mapped onto it now.
7:31
Speaker 3: Of course, in those days it was the you.
7:33
Speaker 1: Know, the the arena and throwing people to the lines
7:37
Speaker 1: and so on today. It's Hollywood movies. But it's the
7:40
Speaker 1: same type of thing that's going on. So people are
7:42
Speaker 1: being softened up for something. And I'll just be interested
7:47
Speaker 1: in you're saying a little bit more about that.
7:49
Speaker 2: It's it's something that I think a lot of people
7:51
Speaker 2: are thinking more and more about these days. Right, What
7:54
Speaker 2: are the dynamics that led into the collapse of Rome?
7:56
Speaker 2: And sure enough, the parallels are startling when you really
8:00
Speaker 2: take a cogent look at what was behind the moral
8:06
Speaker 2: and mental collapse of the citizenry that resulted in what
8:10
Speaker 2: was There was something viable in Rome as a republic,
8:13
Speaker 2: and I think the founding fathers of the United States
8:15
Speaker 2: understood that very well as they were studying the works
8:18
Speaker 2: of Cicero of Plato. Well, Plato inspired Cicero, and the
8:21
Speaker 2: best of Rome, you could say, came from some of
8:24
Speaker 2: the best of the Greek philosophers as well from earlier on.
8:27
Speaker 2: But also you know Seneca and his efforts to try to,
8:33
Speaker 2: you know, correct Nero's errors and bring back a more
8:36
Speaker 2: republican attitude even though Rome had slipped into empire. But
8:39
Speaker 2: that the founding fathers who understood that there was something
8:43
Speaker 2: to be emulated and to learn from back in seventeen
8:46
Speaker 2: seventy six and years before that, when they were trying
8:48
Speaker 2: to configure what would be this new kind of government
8:50
Speaker 2: that had never really existed except in the form of ideas,
8:53
Speaker 2: But how do you practically do it? They recognized the
8:55
Speaker 2: difference between Rome as a republic and Rome later on
8:58
Speaker 2: as an empire. Don't want to emulate, and the republic
9:02
Speaker 2: had the idea that the purpose of society is not
9:05
Speaker 2: the state per se. The purpose is that this state
9:10
Speaker 2: is the effect of the decisions and responsibilities that are
9:13
Speaker 2: taken up by the citizenry that have to be active
9:17
Speaker 2: and engaged in defending their rights and participating in the
9:22
Speaker 2: political process and being part of the discussions that affect
9:25
Speaker 2: the policies of the society. That was part of the
9:28
Speaker 2: Roman the best of the Roman ethos and the idea
9:32
Speaker 2: of the citizen soldier. You know, the concept of Cincinnatis,
9:35
Speaker 2: the great Soldier, that was a retired general, a man
9:39
Speaker 2: of great skill, who was at a time of crisis
9:43
Speaker 2: during I guess it was the Second Carthaginian War, was
9:46
Speaker 2: asked by the people to take up the sword again
9:49
Speaker 2: and lead the armies to defend Rome. At a time
9:51
Speaker 2: of crisis, and he did so. As a dictator. He
9:53
Speaker 2: was given full power. But once he did the job
9:56
Speaker 2: of defending Rome, he gave back the sword, he picked
9:59
Speaker 2: up the plow again, he gave up the absolute powers
10:02
Speaker 2: that he enjoyed, and he became really the icon of
10:07
Speaker 2: the Roman ideal in those days, which again George Washington
10:11
Speaker 2: and the best of his allies picked up on when
10:13
Speaker 2: they created the Society of the Cincinnatis in the seventeen
10:16
Speaker 2: eighties with Marquis de Lafayette and others, was the idea
10:19
Speaker 2: of the citizen soldier. That, of course, is very anathema
10:22
Speaker 2: to the more Samuel P. Huntington thing which Huntington and
10:25
Speaker 2: the other neocons in America going back to seventeen seventy six,
10:28
Speaker 2: this other deep state structure that represented this darker other
10:31
Speaker 2: America more allied to the system of the British East
10:34
Speaker 2: India Company. Instead of the ideals of the Constitution. They
10:38
Speaker 2: were of the view that, no, the rom we should
10:40
Speaker 2: be learning from an emulating is the Roman Empire. It's
10:44
Speaker 2: the Pax Romana that should be the type of Rome
10:47
Speaker 2: that we bring back. And that's what Samuel P. Huntington
10:49
Speaker 2: when he was writing the soldier in the state was
10:52
Speaker 2: very much zeroing in on was the idea of the permanent,
10:57
Speaker 2: weaponized soldier, not the citizen soldier, the career soldier, of
11:01
Speaker 2: the mercenary, the praetorian guard, the Roman legionnaire. That would
11:05
Speaker 2: be the basis in the foundation upon which a nation
11:10
Speaker 2: would exert their authority over the world through military might,
11:14
Speaker 2: through power of the will over the week. And that
11:17
Speaker 2: was not the Roman Republic, and we lost that when Cicero,
11:20
Speaker 2: who stood up against Mark Antony and company that was
11:23
Speaker 2: playing a very dangerous game with the cults of isis
11:26
Speaker 2: with the cults of Mithra that we're trying to right.
11:29
Speaker 1: So it's right interesting you bring that in because that
11:32
Speaker 1: is one of the other things that we were talking about,
11:34
Speaker 1: the fact that we started saying strange cults coming into
11:38
Speaker 1: Rome at that time. And again here we are in
11:40
Speaker 1: the twenty first century and we're starting to see strange
11:42
Speaker 1: cults appearing amongst the political class.
11:46
Speaker 2: Yeah, it's it's again. You could say that there's a
11:49
Speaker 2: direct continuity there, even though the form has changed, the
11:54
Speaker 2: core the kernel of these under these these occult priesthoods
11:59
Speaker 2: that utilized mystery religions like Isis, or as it was
12:03
Speaker 2: brought in Isis Sarapis into Rome was the Roman variation
12:08
Speaker 2: of the Isis cult of Egypt that Marc Anthony and
12:11
Speaker 2: Cleopatra were allied to, or the Mythraic cult, which was
12:15
Speaker 2: the sort of male only warrior cult of the Pretorring
12:19
Speaker 2: Guard and the Legionnaires as their religion that Ambroctavio Augustus
12:26
Speaker 2: was more closely allied with. But these cults were always
12:28
Speaker 2: working together. They were kind of playing humanity like game board,
12:31
Speaker 2: picking which empire they wanted to utilize as the seat
12:35
Speaker 2: of their power projection. Whether it was going to be Alexandria,
12:39
Speaker 2: Marc Anthony's and Cleopatra's base of operations, or whether it
12:42
Speaker 2: was going to be Embroctavio Augustus's base in Rome. That
12:46
Speaker 2: was still a bit of a dispute, But it was
12:48
Speaker 2: a bit of a rigged game in a sense because
12:50
Speaker 2: these cults, especially also if you add in sibel Attis,
12:55
Speaker 2: the Sibelian cult that was brought in during the Second
12:58
Speaker 2: Cunic War, which was a more feminine oriented cult in
13:02
Speaker 2: contrast to the Mithraic masculine oriented cults. But they all
13:05
Speaker 2: work together. They all had the exact same initiatory degree,
13:08
Speaker 2: the exact same sort of recipe book to liberate the
13:12
Speaker 2: initiate from the shackles of their conscience. That you know,
13:17
Speaker 2: different tactics techniques that utilized the Lucinian mysteries as part
13:22
Speaker 2: of the initiation of disassociating practitioners from their former identities
13:28
Speaker 2: as they die to be reborn as a new identity
13:30
Speaker 2: that is more self actualized, if you want to use
13:33
Speaker 2: a Carl Jungian language, which is also why Carl Jung
13:37
Speaker 2: saw himself walking in the footsteps of mithra as a
13:40
Speaker 2: Mithraic initiate. He saw himself wanting to revive the Downissian
13:44
Speaker 2: cults also of Rome that he believed was the proper
13:49
Speaker 2: primitive Christianity that he sought to revive. Was this Downisian
13:53
Speaker 2: sort of isis kind of frenzied ecstatic state tradition back then,
14:00
Speaker 2: which is again what what what Christianity resisted that was?
14:03
Speaker 2: That was what Christianity actually said, No, we can't tolerate
14:07
Speaker 2: this type of unnatural defiance of natural law, and we
14:10
Speaker 2: should instead tap into to an idea of the mysteries
14:14
Speaker 2: that is available for everybody. The mysteries are not from
14:17
Speaker 2: for an initiated elite. The mysteries of God's creation, of
14:21
Speaker 2: the idea that we're all made in the living image
14:23
Speaker 2: of the Creator and that should be the foundation around
14:25
Speaker 2: which laws and the governance of society should be found founded,
14:29
Speaker 2: is a much more noble idea that that was spreading.
14:32
Speaker 2: It was like a breath of fresh error, and it
14:34
Speaker 2: was something that Cicero had tried to do, but he
14:36
Speaker 2: only had the stoic world to promote it. He didn't
14:40
Speaker 2: have the type of deeper spiritual, sort of a gopic
14:45
Speaker 2: sense that only was innovated in a seriously systematic way
14:50
Speaker 2: in the Christian movement that came after his assassination, when
14:52
Speaker 2: Rome had already collapsed into its new evil destiny. So yeah,
14:56
Speaker 2: it's it's the parallels to today and the rise of
15:00
Speaker 2: things like the Skull and Bones, which in many ways
15:02
Speaker 2: is a mythraic cult inside of America set up in
15:04
Speaker 2: the eighteen thirties, or the different ways that the Scottish
15:07
Speaker 2: Rite and the Grand Orient and other Free Masonic agencies
15:11
Speaker 2: have been organized around the same kind of formula. It's
15:15
Speaker 2: not dissimilar.
15:15
Speaker 1: But would you would you consider extreme versions of Madstream
15:21
Speaker 1: religion like christian Zionism, more hobbyism, more some of the
15:26
Speaker 1: stronger extremist versions of Christianity and Islam. Would you consider
15:31
Speaker 1: those to be in the same kind of category.
15:33
Speaker 2: The more perverse expressions of these things might be, I could,
15:36
Speaker 2: I would see them sort of as downstream of these
15:39
Speaker 2: mystery cultists, but not you know, if you look at
15:44
Speaker 2: for maybe something like Albert Pike. You know, he wrote
15:48
Speaker 2: a book called Morals and Dogma, and it's a useful
15:51
Speaker 2: book as far as a good assessment of the evolution
15:54
Speaker 2: of these occult agencies. And he made a strong point
15:57
Speaker 2: that I think has been well proven that things like
15:59
Speaker 2: the Jesuits that emerged in the fifteen thirty four period
16:03
Speaker 2: in Paris and then it was brought in to other
16:07
Speaker 2: parts of Europe, the society of Loyola and Francis Xavier,
16:15
Speaker 2: that you could say is tied as Pike identified it,
16:18
Speaker 2: I think correctly so, to the Templars, as one of
16:22
Speaker 2: several different aspects of the underground Templars that took on
16:27
Speaker 2: new manifestations after they were taken down in that particular
16:32
Speaker 2: brand or iteration that they found themselves. In thirteen oh seven,
16:36
Speaker 2: when Jacques de Molay and others were arrested, they didn't disappear.
16:39
Speaker 2: Some of their operations went over into the Knight's Hospitality,
16:44
Speaker 2: phenomenally rival group, but I think from the top down
16:47
Speaker 2: always aligned with the Templars. Some of them manifested in
16:51
Speaker 2: different orders, like the Order of the Garter, the Order
16:53
Speaker 2: of the Fleece in Austria, the Golden Fleece. Other aspects
16:58
Speaker 2: of it manifested as the Rosicrucians a little bit later
17:01
Speaker 2: after the Jesuits. But the Jesuits, I think, were very
17:04
Speaker 2: much more organized and competent form of Templars when they
17:09
Speaker 2: when they were created. And I think a lot of
17:11
Speaker 2: the in my research, a lot of the worst manifestations
17:14
Speaker 2: of Christianity or of Islam for that matter, are are
17:18
Speaker 2: not naturally occurring. Things like the Crusader Christianity that that
17:23
Speaker 2: justifies killing infidels for the sake of Jesus, you know,
17:27
Speaker 2: whether it's for the capture of the Holy Land or
17:29
Speaker 2: whatever that manifested in so much pain and blood during
17:31
Speaker 2: the Crusades, or the the witch trial, you know, operations
17:37
Speaker 2: that that killed maybe some witches, which is there was
17:40
Speaker 2: a witch problem, but it also admittedly killed a lot
17:43
Speaker 2: of innocent people too, who are just falsely blamed or
17:46
Speaker 2: accused by jealous neighbors or superstitious people in their village.
17:51
Speaker 2: That type of terrible Christianity was never truly Christian. It
17:56
Speaker 2: was always it, always had it at its core. These
18:00
Speaker 2: mystery cultists who have infiltrated even into the Islamic world.
18:04
Speaker 2: If you look at like Slafeism, you know so the
18:07
Speaker 2: fact that the founder of Salafiism, Jamal al abden alaf
18:11
Speaker 2: Ghani in the eighteen eighties, eighteen seventies, eighteen eighties, this
18:15
Speaker 2: guy was known as the chameleon. You know he was.
18:19
Speaker 2: There's a good case to be made that he was
18:22
Speaker 2: a traveling partner of Madame Jhleda Blavatski. Everywhere she would
18:27
Speaker 2: go across Europe, so would he go. He was also
18:29
Speaker 2: in correspondence with dal Vedre, the founder of Synarchism, who
18:34
Speaker 2: also saw him as as an ascended master, as a
18:37
Speaker 2: personality who was teaching him as his guru, how the
18:41
Speaker 2: hidden forces of the beyond are working to shape the
18:44
Speaker 2: world that he was trying to create, which is a
18:46
Speaker 2: world run by high priests in an occult sort of
18:48
Speaker 2: initiation system that became the foundation of later fascism of
18:52
Speaker 2: the twentieth century. So this guy was a he was
18:55
Speaker 2: more of like this this dark esoteric Soufist, I would say,
19:00
Speaker 2: more of a Satanist than anything else. And yet he
19:03
Speaker 2: was the one who created radical Islamist Salafiism, That's what
19:07
Speaker 2: you know. I think most people who got into his
19:11
Speaker 2: the ideology that he created. As he was also a
19:13
Speaker 2: servant for the British Empire, he worked very closely with
19:17
Speaker 2: high level officials from the British Orientalists. I think it
19:20
Speaker 2: was the Arab Bureau at the time. The Cairo Bureau
19:25
Speaker 2: was actually employing him for a few commissions in Egypt
19:29
Speaker 2: as well as in Iran at a different moment. And
19:32
Speaker 2: so I think most people who got pulled into his
19:36
Speaker 2: movement didn't realize that they didn't know what the joke was.
19:39
Speaker 2: The joke was on them, you know. He saw all
19:41
Speaker 2: he basically religion, yeah, to weaponize dumb people to become
19:46
Speaker 2: tools and play things of a higher empire, just the
19:49
Speaker 2: same way that the high initiates of the who created
19:51
Speaker 2: the templars. These Bernard de clare Vaux occultists saw the
19:58
Speaker 2: usefulness of Christianity as a to radicalize stupid people who
20:04
Speaker 2: are desperate without a sense of hope. We had a
20:06
Speaker 2: lot of nihilism in the case of Europe, where there
20:08
Speaker 2: was a lot of plague, a lot of famine, not
20:10
Speaker 2: a lot of sense of a future. In the uh
20:12
Speaker 2: you know, ten seventies, ten eighties, famines and plague were rampant.
20:17
Speaker 2: It was it was dark psychologically and spiritually. So to
20:21
Speaker 2: give people a new sense of purpose and hope, He's like, Okay,
20:24
Speaker 2: let's rebrand Christianity now, and let's give it a new impulse,
20:29
Speaker 2: a new purpose to go and fight for something noble.
20:33
Speaker 2: And you know, we'll just ignore the parts of Jesus's
20:36
Speaker 2: message that say love thy neighbor and turn the other cheek.
20:38
Speaker 2: We'll just get rid of that, and we'll try to
20:40
Speaker 2: turn human beings into disposable weapons, which will also solve
20:44
Speaker 2: overpopulation of our own Europeans while we're at it, throwing
20:48
Speaker 2: them as ten fodder into the Muslim world. You know.
20:52
Speaker 2: So yeah, it's not really it's not really Christian or
20:55
Speaker 2: Muslim as far as I could see it, or Jewish
20:56
Speaker 2: when you see the worst aspects of evil being done
21:00
Speaker 2: in the name of the Jewish banner. I also don't
21:02
Speaker 2: see that as authentically Jewish either. I see that as
21:04
Speaker 2: the same Satanic underground that uses Kabbalism and other initiatory
21:09
Speaker 2: practices with their Satanic, pseudo Christian and pseudo Muslim counterparts
21:14
Speaker 2: to keep evil going on the earth.
21:18
Speaker 1: Okay, So the reason I asked that question, of course,
21:20
Speaker 1: is because obviously the current US Secretary stip for Warpaid
21:24
Speaker 1: Texas is so covered in various symbolism on his own body,
21:31
Speaker 1: and obviously he is now openly expressing his Christian Zionists beliefs,
21:36
Speaker 1: if those are actually genuine in the first place. But
21:39
Speaker 1: the question is is he just an idiot or is
21:41
Speaker 1: he part of something more occultic.
21:46
Speaker 2: I think he's an idiot and he's a part of
21:48
Speaker 2: something o cultic, because I yeah, it's not mutually exclusive.
21:56
Speaker 2: But I presume that he has a I mean, he
22:03
Speaker 2: wears his goals on his on his chest, as you say,
22:07
Speaker 2: on his bare chest with the For those who don't know,
22:10
Speaker 2: we're referring to his weird giant Kingdom of Jerusalem, that
22:16
Speaker 2: Holy Sepulcher cross that he has tattooed emblazoned on his chest.
22:20
Speaker 2: He's given speeches openly publicly on camera in Israel, calling
22:24
Speaker 2: for the rebuilding of Solomon's temple as the purpose of
22:27
Speaker 2: his life. Now, there might there are games within games.
22:33
Speaker 2: That's part of the Jesuit way, you know, And this
22:37
Speaker 2: goes on way before. The Jesuits were created as a synthetic,
22:40
Speaker 2: powerful cult to both project power nominally under a weaponized Christianity,
22:47
Speaker 2: but also to keep the Catholic Church itself in check.
22:49
Speaker 2: Many popes were died mysterious debts who tried to reign
22:52
Speaker 2: in the Jesuit order over the centuries, you know, including
22:55
Speaker 2: the pope in seventeen seventy three who banned the Jesuits
22:57
Speaker 2: and died months later saying if I die, it's going
22:59
Speaker 2: to because the Jetsuit's killed me. So it's partially they
23:02
Speaker 2: were created as an internal, relatively independent order, like the
23:06
Speaker 2: Templars were, to keep the cardinals the papacy itself in
23:09
Speaker 2: check as well as you know, use the papacy kind
23:13
Speaker 2: of like the Roman Empire, instead of a beacon of
23:16
Speaker 2: moral teaching and inspiration, stead to turn it into a
23:20
Speaker 2: place of material power projection. Now for Pete Hegseth, is
23:26
Speaker 2: he aware that there is an ultimate agenda to accelerate
23:32
Speaker 2: the tension to the point that the Jews who have
23:37
Speaker 2: been induced to live in that particular area of the
23:40
Speaker 2: globe are weaponized this to the extent that they ultimately
23:44
Speaker 2: are detonated, annihilating those Jews and Arabs living in that land.
23:50
Speaker 2: I don't know if he's fully aware of that, but
23:52
Speaker 2: I think that the idea of creating a cataclysm of
23:59
Speaker 2: vast proportions in order to justify after an age of pain,
24:04
Speaker 2: a new age that involves somehow the reconstituting of the
24:09
Speaker 2: templar run Kingdom of Jerusalem in that particular area, is
24:14
Speaker 2: something which Pete Hesith I think, does feel very strongly about.
24:18
Speaker 2: He does seem to be a very he does. You know,
24:20
Speaker 2: he wrote a book called American Crusade before becoming Minister
24:24
Speaker 2: of War where he calls for reviving, renovating the weak
24:31
Speaker 2: and defeminate American identity around a new age of crusade,
24:37
Speaker 2: and he literally points out China and Islam have to
24:40
Speaker 2: be the organizing principle of this new age of crusade
24:43
Speaker 2: that creates this new identity. And I suspect that he,
24:48
Speaker 2: along with other weird techno bro eschatologists circling around the
24:54
Speaker 2: figure of Peter Thiel, like jd Vance and others. Who are,
24:57
Speaker 2: you know, a creature of Peter Theel who's obsessed with
25:00
Speaker 2: the Antichrist. These guys do have an obsession with invoking
25:04
Speaker 2: the Antichrist, or in this case, they might use the
25:09
Speaker 2: language they want to invoke the Christ. But I think
25:12
Speaker 2: the actual recipe book goes in another direction. It's disturbing.
25:19
Speaker 2: I suspect that it is templar esque, and I think
25:22
Speaker 2: that it is designed to bring back the New Kingdom
25:25
Speaker 2: of Jerusalem two point zero, maybe with the more technocratic
25:28
Speaker 2: black Rock managed vinear.
25:30
Speaker 1: If we're talking about false flags, of course, and you
25:33
Speaker 1: mentioned at the beginning the possibility of a narrative around
25:37
Speaker 1: the idea of, you know, Iranian agents in various countries, Well,
25:45
Speaker 1: I suppose one of the first things we should say
25:46
Speaker 1: is that Iranians are schied.
25:49
Speaker 3: And I'm not aware of too much.
25:55
Speaker 1: Or any blame on share communities around the world for
25:59
Speaker 1: any of the type of alleged Islamic terrorism that we've
26:02
Speaker 1: seen in the past nine to eleven was certainly not
26:05
Speaker 1: So how are they going to build a narrative when
26:08
Speaker 1: there is no sort of past precedent, or are they
26:11
Speaker 1: just going to ignore the sun Shia separation and just
26:15
Speaker 1: say Islam.
26:16
Speaker 2: Yeah, I think that they're kind of capitalizing on people's
26:19
Speaker 2: general ignorance of the nuances of Islam and to the
26:24
Speaker 2: degree that we oversimplify as where we're wont to do
26:27
Speaker 2: and dumb down phases of human civilization as we as
26:32
Speaker 2: we find ourselves people do get susceptible to sophistry that
26:37
Speaker 2: ignores nuance, and a Muslim is a Muslim is a Muslim, right,
26:41
Speaker 2: They're one thing most Americans, most Westerners that I know,
26:44
Speaker 2: most Canadians that I know, are not sensitive to the
26:48
Speaker 2: diverts is they don't know that most victims of Islamic
26:51
Speaker 2: terrorism or Islamist terrorism has been Muslims who just didn't
26:55
Speaker 2: particularly believe in the exact same interpretation of the Quran
27:00
Speaker 2: as these particular cell a feists and you know ikwan esque,
27:04
Speaker 2: you know, type of operatives of So they don't know,
27:08
Speaker 2: They just don't know, and they don't know that the
27:11
Speaker 2: only reason why this is even a problem or a
27:14
Speaker 2: phenomenon is because of the vast financial, military logistical support
27:22
Speaker 2: provided by Western intelligence agencies going back. You know, you
27:26
Speaker 2: could as one start jump on point and you could
27:29
Speaker 2: go to big New Brazinski's operations cyclone in nineteen seventy
27:33
Speaker 2: nine under Carter, which has it's on the public record.
27:37
Speaker 2: You know, he oversaw infusing five hundred million dollars of
27:41
Speaker 2: US taxpayer money into radicalizing madrasas in Afghanistan, but also
27:46
Speaker 2: more broadly utilizing also certain assets within Pakistan, within Saudi
27:51
Speaker 2: Arabia at that time to help promote this radicalization of young,
27:57
Speaker 2: you know, nihilistic little men who didn't have a sense
28:01
Speaker 2: of a future, whose economy was being annihilated. They didn't
28:04
Speaker 2: know why, they had only despair, no security, and so
28:08
Speaker 2: they were more susceptible to being provided a free education
28:12
Speaker 2: and then maybe even some money to join this group
28:14
Speaker 2: that they don't fully even understand, but they know that
28:17
Speaker 2: their families will be taken care of. They'll get one
28:18
Speaker 2: hundred dollars a week if they just go and pick
28:21
Speaker 2: up an AK forty seven and fight a thing. And
28:24
Speaker 2: you know, Allah's just smiling upon them when more money
28:27
Speaker 2: comes into their little cell, and they don't ask questions
28:30
Speaker 2: beyond that. They're just happy abiding by their particular twisted
28:35
Speaker 2: belief that was made possible by top down CIA and
28:38
Speaker 2: other intelligence agencies in order to suck in the Soviets
28:42
Speaker 2: into their own wasting war, which is a big new
28:44
Speaker 2: Later on, when asked in the nineties in an interview
28:48
Speaker 2: with some French magazine in ninety seven, was it worth
28:50
Speaker 2: having created now Islamic terrorism and created al Qaeda out
28:54
Speaker 2: of your effort to destroy the Soviet Union? And he
28:58
Speaker 2: said it was worth every penny, thought it was the
29:00
Speaker 2: greatest success of his life.
29:03
Speaker 1: And so it continued to be a great success for
29:05
Speaker 1: them because they then redeployed al Kada and other parts
29:08
Speaker 1: of the world, in Syria and so on, so so
29:12
Speaker 1: and that, and that that has morphed the ISIS and
29:14
Speaker 1: a whole bunch of other various branches. But then on
29:18
Speaker 1: top of that, we've seen the ideology that we've sponsored
29:22
Speaker 1: in these countries being brought into Europe and into the
29:26
Speaker 1: United Kingdom and being brought that ideology being bought brought
29:30
Speaker 1: into mosques in the UK, and therefore that creates a
29:34
Speaker 1: perception within the UK population of extreme Islam here and
29:40
Speaker 1: then the next day and of course we've had a
29:42
Speaker 1: number of very high profiles, so called hit preachers, uh
29:47
Speaker 1: and that has helped bring about Tommy Robinson and the
29:51
Speaker 1: whole sort of right wing push against Islam in the
29:59
Speaker 1: UK to the point where we're almost ready for some
30:03
Speaker 1: kind of serious civil unrest.
30:05
Speaker 3: So it is a gift that keeps on giving.
30:08
Speaker 2: Yeah, I remember that there was a public letter written
30:13
Speaker 2: by something like eight different heads of state from Pakistan
30:17
Speaker 2: and Egypt and of Sri Lanka. There's a number of
30:22
Speaker 2: heads that Libya had written this public letter to the
30:26
Speaker 2: British Foreign Office in like two thousand condemning England's providing
30:34
Speaker 2: of space and support to all of the headquarters of
30:38
Speaker 2: these various terrorist agencies, to Great Tigers, Liberation groups, other things,
30:44
Speaker 2: other Islamist groups that were all being provided space to
30:48
Speaker 2: organize their international networks in England, with you know, the
30:52
Speaker 2: UK saying well, you know, we don't judge as long
30:54
Speaker 2: as people just were liberal, what's the liberal way of
30:57
Speaker 2: doing as long as you obey our laws were we'll
30:59
Speaker 2: let you do your thing here and what you do
31:02
Speaker 2: in your own country that that's not our business. Now
31:04
Speaker 2: of course that's not actually true. It was called Lundonistan
31:08
Speaker 2: for a reason. There was a book written called Lundonistan
31:10
Speaker 2: going through you know, British intelligence and other support for
31:15
Speaker 2: these these different seemingly independent movements that were not so
31:18
Speaker 2: independent at the end of the day, but we're useful
31:20
Speaker 2: a destabilizing governments that we're tending to break away from
31:24
Speaker 2: globalization and the rules of this rigged game that was
31:27
Speaker 2: keeping them enslaved and subjugated to the system of this
31:29
Speaker 2: city of London Wall Street banking cartel at the top.
31:33
Speaker 2: So anytime you had a Libya or a country trying
31:36
Speaker 2: to go go renegade, get off the reservation and maybe
31:39
Speaker 2: you know, utilize a national bank to fund their local
31:41
Speaker 2: development or utilize the type of credit outside of the
31:44
Speaker 2: IMF or the World Bank in order to find a
31:48
Speaker 2: development project like what Kadafi was trying to do, or
31:51
Speaker 2: what moremark could Mubarak had had even just toyed with,
31:56
Speaker 2: even so slightly about building water projects and desalination Egypt
32:00
Speaker 2: outside of the authorization of the World Bank, with the
32:03
Speaker 2: help maybe of Sudan, which also had a plan at
32:06
Speaker 2: the same time to do certain development and cooperation with
32:10
Speaker 2: Egypt on the Nile under Bashir, who had to be targeted,
32:14
Speaker 2: which was done through the funding of of separatist groups
32:18
Speaker 2: like the Tigray Liberation groups also provided a lot of
32:21
Speaker 2: which got a lot of their support not from just
32:23
Speaker 2: fundraising locally in Ethiopia, you know, or whatever. They got
32:29
Speaker 2: that support through Western intelligence and military, you know, special
32:32
Speaker 2: operations units that train them, provided them the weapons, the instructions,
32:36
Speaker 2: the information, and I would say even probably the ideological
32:40
Speaker 2: scaffolding to recruit new young people, including in bukah ram
32:44
Speaker 2: and in Mali and others. So it's it's it's a
32:48
Speaker 2: it's a fraud. We're being lied to completely about what
32:51
Speaker 2: is this thing, and we're being told, you know, Iran
32:54
Speaker 2: in the Shia world is the leader of the axis
32:56
Speaker 2: of evil behind all of our terrorist problems, because you know,
33:00
Speaker 2: they're tied to hesbal Lah, which is we're told the
33:04
Speaker 2: cause of all of our terrorist problems. And it's like, no,
33:06
Speaker 2: these are not Hesbelond. Never really did. They've never been
33:09
Speaker 2: found to be to find any you know, serious at
33:13
Speaker 2: least not in the last thirty years at least any
33:16
Speaker 2: serious acts of terrorism, not against civilians in the West
33:20
Speaker 2: and Iran certainly not at all. There's been no court
33:22
Speaker 2: case that I've ever known of of any Iran of
33:25
Speaker 2: Iran ever having been found guilty of any active of
33:29
Speaker 2: terrorism beyond maybe you could say the hostage taking, which
33:33
Speaker 2: it seems was also a collusion something that was being
33:36
Speaker 2: done in collusion with Henry Kissinger back in nineteen eighty,
33:41
Speaker 2: which is a whole other thing onto itself. But so yeah,
33:44
Speaker 2: the whole Shia versus souon a thing. People don't get that.
33:46
Speaker 2: They don't get that we've been sponsoring the most radical
33:49
Speaker 2: Sunni Wahabbyite groups with our allies that we even put
33:53
Speaker 2: in power, like the House of Saud was you know,
33:56
Speaker 2: a plaything of Shorn Office, as was the Hashermites for
33:59
Speaker 2: being used as terrorists against the Ottoman Empire by the
34:03
Speaker 2: British Foreign Office by T Lawrence to blow up infrastructure
34:07
Speaker 2: in the Ottoman Empire as part of this British directed
34:11
Speaker 2: Arab Spring two point or one point zero in you know,
34:14
Speaker 2: nineteen fourteen, fifteen, sixteen seventeen, the Arab Uprising, where they
34:19
Speaker 2: were all promised, you know, Britain will will support you
34:21
Speaker 2: and help you out and respect your you becoming the
34:26
Speaker 2: new you know, king of the Arab world if you
34:31
Speaker 2: just help us take down our nemesis, the Ottoman Empire,
34:35
Speaker 2: which they did. They which again involved a lot of terrorism,
34:37
Speaker 2: and they were rewarded with getting Jordan. They were constituting
34:41
Speaker 2: the thirties with the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia for this
34:44
Speaker 2: particularly talented Wahabia Bedwin tribe that did a lot of
34:49
Speaker 2: good service for their masters, and they continued.
34:51
Speaker 3: To over the years, and all of which laid the
34:54
Speaker 3: groundwork for Israel.
34:56
Speaker 2: Absolutely, yeah, it was super convenient, right, And that plays
34:59
Speaker 2: into also the most from Brotherhood, which is also the
35:02
Speaker 2: outgrowth of Albana, who is directly tied to a British intelligence,
35:09
Speaker 2: to this school teacher who all of a sudden had
35:11
Speaker 2: this great idea to create this this ikwan, you know,
35:14
Speaker 2: two point zero in Egypt until he got taken down
35:19
Speaker 2: after assassinating enough leaders, including attempting to assassinate Nasser. But
35:23
Speaker 2: this is like a very kind of jesuitical operation in
35:26
Speaker 2: the Muslim world around his thing that then migrated into
35:30
Speaker 2: Saudi Arabia when it was when it was illegalized in Egypt,
35:33
Speaker 2: but always received, was always had. And there's people like
35:37
Speaker 2: William Engdahl Trimsson who's done really impeccable work on the
35:42
Speaker 2: British Free Masonic overlays with these Muslim brotherhood networks that typically,
35:50
Speaker 2: like you said, are incubated within the Sunni world and
35:56
Speaker 2: will often kill rational reasonable Sunnies as well as as
36:00
Speaker 2: well as Jews as well as Christians. They don't care.
36:03
Speaker 2: But it's it's it's not an authentically emergent thing. It's
36:08
Speaker 2: it's totally artificial.
36:10
Speaker 1: We're expecting that at some point in Notto, just in future,
36:14
Speaker 1: there's going to be some event it's going to happen,
36:16
Speaker 1: which may be blamed on Iranian backed or terrorists of
36:22
Speaker 1: some kind. What kind of what kind of thing do
36:25
Speaker 1: you think we're going to see? Is it going to
36:27
Speaker 1: be back to the sort of uh, stadium bombings, stabbings,
36:33
Speaker 1: these types of things? Are we going to see something
36:35
Speaker 1: more again? To to nine to eleven do you think?
36:38
Speaker 3: I don't know.
36:39
Speaker 2: There's definitely signs to maybe all of the above, you know,
36:44
Speaker 2: I don't know. We we've definitely seen the stage set
36:48
Speaker 2: with narrative scenes that have been planted as signal to
36:52
Speaker 2: sort of shape the zeitgeist, the collective subconscious to be prepared.
36:57
Speaker 2: It's like, you know, if you were to ask this
36:59
Speaker 2: question in months before nine to eleven, you know, is
37:02
Speaker 2: it going to be what type of falls would I mean?
37:06
Speaker 3: Of course I can't expect you to be specific about
37:08
Speaker 3: that but.
37:08
Speaker 2: But but you know what I was gonna, what I
37:10
Speaker 2: was just said in the stage for is to say like, well,
37:12
Speaker 2: you could say, well, is it going to be a
37:14
Speaker 2: bioterror attack because the Pentagon is running bioterror operations like
37:19
Speaker 2: or tabletop exercises like Dark Winter in December of two thousand,
37:23
Speaker 2: I think, or maybe a summer of two thousand, right,
37:25
Speaker 2: acting like well, what do we do and if they're
37:27
Speaker 2: if Saddam Hussein unlisha is a weaponized smallpox operation into
37:31
Speaker 2: America as a justification for US to declare martial law
37:34
Speaker 2: patriot acts and invade Saddam Hussein's a rock. That was
37:39
Speaker 2: one of the options they were floating. Another one involved
37:41
Speaker 2: planes flying into Pentagons. You know, a year before the
37:45
Speaker 2: thing itself happened, that they were doing tabletop exercise and
37:48
Speaker 2: what do we do if planes are hijacked and are
37:50
Speaker 2: sent into the World Trade Center and the Pentagon, which
37:53
Speaker 2: were literally enshrining tabletop exercise that they work through, and
37:57
Speaker 2: you're like, well, what's it going to be? You know,
37:59
Speaker 2: they could have done either one of those. They chose
38:01
Speaker 2: to go with the planes the plane story instead. I mean,
38:04
Speaker 2: today we have the cyber polygon where we've been told.
38:08
Speaker 2: You know, Iran has a very adept cyber warfare program,
38:13
Speaker 2: also helped out by the Chinese, So you know, the
38:16
Speaker 2: narrative has opened up to make Americans very suspicious of
38:21
Speaker 2: the possibility that some combination of the Ranians and or
38:24
Speaker 2: the Chinese and or the Russians might together launch what
38:28
Speaker 2: might be just controlled blackouts to shut down our grids,
38:32
Speaker 2: or might it be like Larry Silverstein, you know, I
38:34
Speaker 2: was you and I were chatting just the other day
38:36
Speaker 2: about how this creepy, creepy.
38:38
Speaker 3: Before you go, we'd better remind everybody who Larry Silverstein is.
38:42
Speaker 2: Oh, yeah, he's this real estate mogul. The design is
38:47
Speaker 2: real estate mogul who became infamous for having purchased the
38:51
Speaker 2: World Trade Center right before the operation in nine to
38:55
Speaker 2: eleven happened. I think maybe a year beforehand. He ended
38:58
Speaker 2: up just weeks before taking out this irrationally large counter
39:04
Speaker 2: or terrorist insurance policy on the World Trade hit ter
39:08
Speaker 2: buildings for like seven billion dollars, overvalued, far overvaluing the
39:13
Speaker 2: actual price tag on the buildings themselves. Great timing, but
39:17
Speaker 2: he's a character, and he you know, he's caught on
39:20
Speaker 2: camera saying strange things, talking about him watching and being
39:25
Speaker 2: on the phone with certain unnamed power brokers saying at
39:28
Speaker 2: a certain moment, I told him to pull it, possibly not.
39:33
Speaker 3: Just with respect to World Trades Enter seven, right.
39:36
Speaker 2: Yeah, with this exactly so the building that wasn't hit.
39:40
Speaker 3: By anything and fell done all by itself.
39:43
Speaker 2: Yeah, yeah, that happened to have like all of the IRS,
39:47
Speaker 2: the different agencies that were actually looking into where all
39:50
Speaker 2: these these missing funds went. That Donald Rumsfeld had announced
39:55
Speaker 2: was like a two trillion dollar deficit or or unaccounted
39:57
Speaker 2: for funds that should have been part of the Pentagon budget.
40:01
Speaker 2: They just the money to trillion dollars went missing. He
40:04
Speaker 2: just announced it on September the tenth, and the IRS
40:06
Speaker 2: was or that particular bureau within the Building seven was
40:10
Speaker 2: the best position to look into those discrepancies. They were
40:14
Speaker 2: gone now, and there were other departments in that Building
40:17
Speaker 2: seven as well. And I mean again, there's a documentary
40:21
Speaker 2: which I found to be the most the highest quality
40:23
Speaker 2: film on covering nine to eleven called Codex nine to eleven,
40:28
Speaker 2: recently produced by an old friend of mine just a
40:31
Speaker 2: few months ago, and it's comprehensive. It'll take people through
40:35
Speaker 2: Larry Selverstein's background, his connections to deep Anyway Codex Nine
40:40
Speaker 2: to eleven. Now, the thing is, he's a character who
40:42
Speaker 2: also just recently made a purchase of a building called
40:45
Speaker 2: the US was called the US Bank Tower in California.
40:52
Speaker 2: It's the biggest skyspaper Los Angeles, Los Angeles, that's right.
40:58
Speaker 2: And he did something really weird, you know, he pulled
41:00
Speaker 2: this is back in twenty twenty he made the purchase.
41:04
Speaker 2: But then what he also did is he took out
41:07
Speaker 2: counter terrorism insurance as well. But then he also invited
41:10
Speaker 2: artists in. So starting in twenty twenty three, he basically
41:13
Speaker 2: invited LA's a variety of artists from all around LA
41:18
Speaker 2: to come in to the vacant seventy second floor of
41:22
Speaker 2: that building to do art for months and months and months.
41:25
Speaker 2: They're allowed to do art and come in at certain
41:27
Speaker 2: times of the day and do art. They get paid
41:29
Speaker 2: grants from Larry Silverstein. What else is happening Like these kids,
41:34
Speaker 2: I've seen some videos of them talking about how excited
41:37
Speaker 2: they are of doing art on a floor that no
41:39
Speaker 2: one's really ever going to see, on the seventy second
41:41
Speaker 2: floor of the US Bank building. It's very strange. So
41:45
Speaker 2: it's a strange thing to do. You'd want you think,
41:47
Speaker 2: if you were going to do art, it would be
41:49
Speaker 2: in an area where maybe I'm the first floor, or
41:51
Speaker 2: around the building where people.
41:52
Speaker 3: With say when everybody's going in or not.
41:55
Speaker 2: That would make more sense to me.
41:57
Speaker 3: But the problem is.
42:00
Speaker 2: It's something very similar. As soon as he bought the
42:01
Speaker 2: World Trade Center building, he put out a similar grant
42:05
Speaker 2: for artists across New York. I think they had like
42:07
Speaker 2: twenty or thirty artists selected to come into all the
42:10
Speaker 2: vacant spots within the World Trade Center to do art
42:13
Speaker 2: and sculpture and whatever they wanted to do. When there
42:15
Speaker 2: was one particular art group called the Gelatine Artists co
42:19
Speaker 2: Op or Art Art Collective from Austria that was brought
42:23
Speaker 2: into the ninety first and ninety second floor of the
42:26
Speaker 2: World Trade Center building that actually had the plane going
42:29
Speaker 2: right where they were, and they were operating there for
42:31
Speaker 2: months with a film an art exhibit called the Beefing
42:36
Speaker 2: where they literally carved out windows, they created a new
42:39
Speaker 2: balcony as part of their weird modern art exhibit. It
42:44
Speaker 2: was very weird. They published their sketches, their weird, very
42:49
Speaker 2: esotericy ideas in the form of a book that's a
42:52
Speaker 2: collectors item. Today, it sells for like six hundred bucks,
42:54
Speaker 2: the cheapest kind you can get. I tried to buy one,
42:55
Speaker 2: but you can still get the scans online where within
42:58
Speaker 2: it this is a year before the actual buildings fall.
43:01
Speaker 2: They're featuring sketches of buildings literally on fire, collapsing, and
43:05
Speaker 2: people jumping out of the buildings like that's in the
43:08
Speaker 2: published sketch books of this Gelatine art group under the
43:13
Speaker 2: b thing, and the exhibit that they were preparing for
43:16
Speaker 2: that was announced and that they did opened on September eleventh,
43:20
Speaker 2: two thousand and one. So to what degree they were
43:23
Speaker 2: fully aware? Were they into some weird occult stuff that
43:26
Speaker 2: will allowed them to justify being a part of this thing?
43:29
Speaker 2: What else was happening while these artists were at work
43:32
Speaker 2: in these particular sensitive areas of those buildings that maybe
43:37
Speaker 2: involved nobody paying attention to special operations or other groups
43:42
Speaker 2: setting up controlled demolitions. I don't have that information, but
43:46
Speaker 2: it caused the mind to wonder when we know that
43:48
Speaker 2: certainly controlled demolitions were used to take down those buildings,
43:54
Speaker 2: and if that's the case, it would have been weeks
43:56
Speaker 2: or months of planning and preparation to install those things,
44:01
Speaker 2: So it would have been a good cover story. In
44:03
Speaker 2: the fact that Larry Silverstein has done it again in
44:06
Speaker 2: two thousand and three, twenty twenty three, twenty twenty four
44:09
Speaker 2: with his new acquisition causes me a bit of discomfort.
44:15
Speaker 2: So is it going to be that or is it
44:17
Speaker 2: going to be something else? You know, we're already seeing
44:19
Speaker 2: cases of Islamic terrorist groups or you know, shootings, there's
44:23
Speaker 2: school shootings, there's a variety of smaller localized incidents. I
44:28
Speaker 2: didn't look into the particular case by case of the
44:30
Speaker 2: newest batch of incidences, or the US consulate in what
44:33
Speaker 2: is Copenhagen that caught fire. I didn't look at the
44:37
Speaker 2: forensics of these particular things. Iran is denying any is
44:43
Speaker 2: not holding themselves like they're saying it's not them. But
44:47
Speaker 2: who is Who is doing these things right? Who isn't
44:50
Speaker 2: flaming this anti Islamic sentiment? Who's creating Who wants to
44:54
Speaker 2: extend the Patriot Act into a more perverse version of
44:57
Speaker 2: this evil thing that it's always been, to maybe extend
45:01
Speaker 2: more and more to even domestic groups instead of just
45:03
Speaker 2: simply being foreign terrorism, but maybe having that idea the
45:07
Speaker 2: definition of terrorism extend to American or British citizens who
45:12
Speaker 2: wants those things. I mean, it's already happening. Of course,
45:15
Speaker 2: a lot of conservatives who would normally be in opposition
45:17
Speaker 2: to this being extended to American citizens, who could then
45:21
Speaker 2: be treated as terrorists, thus without habeas corpus, without maybe
45:25
Speaker 2: necessarily public trials or the right to even see the
45:28
Speaker 2: evidence used against them. These conservatives would normally be very
45:31
Speaker 2: much in opposition to that under Biden, which they were
45:34
Speaker 2: when Biden was trying to do this to conspiracy theorist
45:37
Speaker 2: saying that these are all potentially terrorists, and people were
45:40
Speaker 2: up in arms saying that this is to Patriotach two
45:42
Speaker 2: point zero. But now that Trump is in there and
45:44
Speaker 2: he's saying, well, look at Antifa, look at Black Lives Matter,
45:50
Speaker 2: look at these groups that clearly are inclined towards terrorism,
45:54
Speaker 2: and that there's no denying that they are. They burnt
45:57
Speaker 2: whole cities down and kill people into that or George Floyd.
46:01
Speaker 2: But now you're saying, well, okay, we can now label
46:04
Speaker 2: any member of these groups as domestic terrorists. Okay, but
46:08
Speaker 2: doesn't that create a legal precedent that is a very
46:11
Speaker 2: difficult genie to put back in the bottle? Can't this
46:14
Speaker 2: now be extended once you have anybody who's affiliated with
46:17
Speaker 2: antifause domestic terrorist? Couldn't that then be extended to anybody
46:21
Speaker 2: you like? You know, that's a very big legal benchmark
46:24
Speaker 2: you've done there, that could be applied to anybody. What
46:26
Speaker 2: happens when when a liberal like a left a person
46:29
Speaker 2: on the left side of the dictatorship comes into power?
46:33
Speaker 2: How are they going to use that new president under
46:36
Speaker 2: the modified Patriot Act? So I think we're being played
46:39
Speaker 2: against ourselves and we're acquiescing to it based upon our
46:42
Speaker 2: pet our unresolved bigotry, our prejudices about what is Islam,
46:47
Speaker 2: what is the left, what is China? What? All these
46:50
Speaker 2: these unexamined assumptions are being worked upon, worked on, and
46:54
Speaker 2: amplified by the social engineers. We're actually behind terrorism to
46:59
Speaker 2: begin with, to get us to acquiess and support either
47:01
Speaker 2: new crusades abroad that are going to kill many more
47:04
Speaker 2: millions of innocent people, including ourselves, as well as more
47:08
Speaker 2: technocracy to keep us safe from those other things that
47:11
Speaker 2: we're supposed to be afraid of day to day.
47:14
Speaker 1: Yes, and of course Britain is further down that road
47:17
Speaker 1: than the United States because we actually did make a
47:21
Speaker 1: direct action protest group a terrorist organization until that was
47:25
Speaker 1: challenged in the courts. But that is not that the
47:29
Speaker 1: removal of that prescription from Palestine action is not a
47:32
Speaker 1: don dale as yet because it's still subject to appeal.
47:36
Speaker 1: So so you know, this is, as you say, an
47:40
Speaker 1: extremely dangerous direction to be going in.
47:44
Speaker 3: And you know, we saw during the.
47:47
Speaker 1: Covidocracy, the emergency legislation which was imposed on many countries.
47:53
Speaker 1: We had then Coronavirus Act in the UK that was
47:57
Speaker 1: not a wartime incident. But add the war dynamic into this,
48:04
Speaker 1: or a significant terrorism dynamic into this, and you can
48:07
Speaker 1: see that that the the power brokers would be very
48:12
Speaker 1: much attempting to make that kind of extremely draconian grab
48:20
Speaker 1: and maybe maybe they'll find a receptive audience because the
48:24
Speaker 1: fear and the the the encouragement of people to be
48:29
Speaker 1: afraid of just living gives them the the authority its
48:35
Speaker 1: effectively to do this because they're getting no opposition.
48:39
Speaker 2: Yeah, no, absolutely, you know, people forget that the US,
48:45
Speaker 2: after especially the BioShield Act of two thousand and four hundred,
48:49
Speaker 2: Dick Cheney that BioShield Act is something which expanded and
48:55
Speaker 2: already bad bioweapons Pentagon run bio weapons international program by
49:00
Speaker 2: fact a magnitude of something like like three hundred percent.
49:04
Speaker 2: I mean, it was a huge expansion of the bioweapons
49:10
Speaker 2: warfare program of the United States, and it was done
49:12
Speaker 2: again under a very similar pretext of the planes hitting
49:16
Speaker 2: buildings that didn't actually happen, not at least the way
49:19
Speaker 2: we were told. And it was the anthrax attacks, the
49:23
Speaker 2: weaponized anthracs that were letter mailed out to various politicians
49:27
Speaker 2: and journalists from September eighteenth, two thousand and one until
49:30
Speaker 2: December two thousand and one, and books have been written
49:34
Speaker 2: demonstrating that that was an inside job tied more closely
49:38
Speaker 2: to operations than Fort Dietrich, and not anything to do
49:41
Speaker 2: with anything happening in Afghanistan or Iraq. But it did
49:47
Speaker 2: create a fear complex in people, and it justified again
49:50
Speaker 2: what is now become the creation of what has now
49:53
Speaker 2: become the last estimate I saw from the Chinese Foreign
49:56
Speaker 2: Ministry that was corroborated by the Russians as well, that
49:59
Speaker 2: came out in the the hearings in the I guess
50:02
Speaker 2: it was the Congress in two thousand and twenty three
50:07
Speaker 2: or twenty two with Victoria Newland is that there are
50:10
Speaker 2: upwards of three hundred international very opaque biolabs tied to
50:15
Speaker 2: the Pentagon with no real oversight, many of them she
50:19
Speaker 2: admitted to at least forty in Ukraine alone. But we
50:22
Speaker 2: also know that there's been at least another fifty set
50:25
Speaker 2: up in Georgia starting with under George Bush and Cheney
50:29
Speaker 2: and then amplified by Obama. In South Korea, there's the
50:35
Speaker 2: Jupiter Centaur systems created under Obama as bioweapons systems that
50:39
Speaker 2: were discovered by South Korean authorities to be developing weaponized coronavirus.
50:47
Speaker 2: Whatever that even is now, I don't even know what
50:49
Speaker 2: that is, but whatever that pathogen is antrax. There was
50:54
Speaker 2: protests in the streets of Seoul by citizens saying, stop
50:58
Speaker 2: developing weaponized attracks our backyard. We have drone dispersion systems.
51:02
Speaker 2: There's a number of ways to insert these types of
51:05
Speaker 2: bacteriological agents into the food system, the atmospheric systems. You know,
51:13
Speaker 2: it doesn't take a huge stretch of the imagination to
51:15
Speaker 2: see how a new type of uh you know, like
51:20
Speaker 2: I mentioned earlier, the thing that made the crusaders possible
51:22
Speaker 2: was the type of despair, despair, the fear, the normalized
51:25
Speaker 2: death that had set in the case of Europe because
51:29
Speaker 2: of the controlled famines, the plagues that periodically swept away
51:35
Speaker 2: and killed, empty out whole villages of people, and that
51:39
Speaker 2: that just created such a psycho a psychotic place where
51:43
Speaker 2: people were so pliable at that point, at that point
51:46
Speaker 2: to be weaponized and given a new sense of dignity
51:48
Speaker 2: and mission. So you can, you know, you can see
51:50
Speaker 2: how a new plague could be introduced and then blamed upon.
51:56
Speaker 2: You know, China has got they've already got the Wuhan story.
51:59
Speaker 2: You know that they were already out to get us.
52:02
Speaker 2: And that's why we had to shut down our economy
52:04
Speaker 2: and ruin lives, was because the Chinese, the chicoms and
52:07
Speaker 2: their Wuhan virus. Ignoring the fact that, as professors like
52:13
Speaker 2: Dni Hankoul have proven, there was no actual pandemic per se.
52:19
Speaker 2: There was a novel thing inserted into our world that
52:25
Speaker 2: did result in strange symptoms of something, but the all
52:29
Speaker 2: cause mortality before the vaccines were rolled out, the all
52:33
Speaker 2: cause mortality was actually higher. I think it was in
52:35
Speaker 2: twenty nineteen than it was in twenty twenty. So whatever
52:38
Speaker 2: actually caused the increase and there was a spike of
52:40
Speaker 2: increase of death when the whole pandemic was announced, that
52:44
Speaker 2: we had more to do with how the governments were
52:47
Speaker 2: induced to adopt unnatural protocols by the World Health Organization
52:52
Speaker 2: to intubate unnaturally, resulting in like eight out of ten
52:56
Speaker 2: pagent across New York and isolating jile old people, not
53:00
Speaker 2: giving people the proper type of care that they needed
53:03
Speaker 2: when they're in in a health crisis, and letting them
53:05
Speaker 2: die instead of rehabilitate or you know, resuscitating them, or
53:09
Speaker 2: just playing with statistics or making the seasonal flu disappear
53:12
Speaker 2: in order for it to be replaced by now this
53:14
Speaker 2: new thing, statistical manipulation. But now in people's minds, they think, well,
53:19
Speaker 2: China did that to us, just like they're doing They're
53:22
Speaker 2: they're killing us with Opium War two point zero, with
53:24
Speaker 2: a FENTONYL crisis. That's another way that shines killing us
53:27
Speaker 2: and destroying our freedom. So, like Pete Hegseeth had put
53:30
Speaker 2: out in his American Crusade, the enemy has been rebranded
53:34
Speaker 2: from being Islamic terrorism to that and Chinese communism, some
53:41
Speaker 2: hybrid you know, evil villain, access of evil, image of boogieman.
53:48
Speaker 2: That is the new organizing principle for the new Crusader society. A.
53:52
Speaker 1: The only country that I'm aware of that's actually, you know,
53:55
Speaker 1: pursuing chemical warfare at the moment, seems to be Israel.
54:01
Speaker 2: Maybe whatever, the Pentagon. Yeah, those two.
54:03
Speaker 1: Yeah, you know, glacys say it is being native reporting
54:08
Speaker 1: a glacacid is being used in southern le Lebanon to
54:11
Speaker 1: destroy the food there that's growing and obviously in much
54:16
Speaker 1: larger quantities and than than we would be putting on
54:19
Speaker 1: or that farmers in the West would be putting on
54:22
Speaker 1: crops and so on.
54:22
Speaker 3: But you know, you can see how easy it would be,
54:26
Speaker 3: that is, to to completely pollute a.
54:31
Speaker 1: Food supply. But so far the only the only definitive
54:38
Speaker 1: perpetrators of this type of activity are Western government.
54:43
Speaker 2: Yeah, the hypocrisy of it is very loud. It's very loud.
54:46
Speaker 2: I know the same thing too. There was enough cases
54:50
Speaker 2: I remember Lavrov bringing this to the attention of or
54:54
Speaker 2: the the the Russian representatives that the UN Security Council
54:57
Speaker 2: try to bring attention to the fact that that experimentation
55:02
Speaker 2: or bacteriological warfare on cattle, on livestock in and around
55:07
Speaker 2: the Donetsk area had already been.
55:11
Speaker 3: Happening.
55:12
Speaker 2: Really, you know, we're drones run by Kiev were releasing
55:16
Speaker 2: and launching all sorts of bacteriological agents onto animals, chickens
55:20
Speaker 2: and other things, even certain experimentation on humans. Same thing
55:24
Speaker 2: in China, where again they're circled by US biolabs that
55:27
Speaker 2: the Chinese Foreign Ministry at different times put out the
55:29
Speaker 2: warning that there's been attacks on food, on their food,
55:32
Speaker 2: their livestock through the release of these different weapons, these
55:35
Speaker 2: pathogens that were developed by the Pentagon since the fifties,
55:39
Speaker 2: which was using these things on civilian populations since the
55:42
Speaker 2: Korean War and the Vietnam War, and Agent Orange, and
55:45
Speaker 2: you know, even doing things on syphilis, experimentation on blacks
55:48
Speaker 2: in America in the nineteen sixties and seventies even earlier.
55:52
Speaker 1: Matt were just about to run out of time. But
55:55
Speaker 1: what I'm just to finish off, then, how would you
55:58
Speaker 1: recommend that people arm themselves against what is very likely
56:04
Speaker 1: to be an even more difficult information space in the
56:09
Speaker 1: coming months.
56:11
Speaker 2: Oh, they got to keep their heads on their shoulders
56:12
Speaker 2: and have knowledge. If you have knowledge, you can't be
56:14
Speaker 2: lied to. You know. The lies only sink in, and
56:17
Speaker 2: they only work when people don't have real knowledge of
56:20
Speaker 2: the thing that they have an opinion about, and are
56:22
Speaker 2: very susceptible and can like flail like grass in the wind,
56:26
Speaker 2: you know, and have one opinion one day, and when
56:29
Speaker 2: another sophisticated line of persuasion and rhetoric is put upon them,
56:34
Speaker 2: they will change their opinion. You know. And anti war
56:37
Speaker 2: people who two seconds ago were absolutely against wars abroad
56:40
Speaker 2: are all of a sudden rationalizing when there whoever, whichever
56:47
Speaker 2: talking heads they happen to respect on podcasts give them
56:51
Speaker 2: that argument that now we're bombing Iran and it's a
56:54
Speaker 2: good thing. It's a patriotic and good thing, even though
56:56
Speaker 2: you were against it two seconds ago. Look how many
56:58
Speaker 2: people have really made that transition to becoming neocons who
57:02
Speaker 2: are anti neocon you know, magapatriots, not that long ago.
57:06
Speaker 2: So I think that that wouldn't happen if they had
57:09
Speaker 2: real knowledge, if they took the time to earn thoughts
57:11
Speaker 2: that have deep rooted foundation, you know, of real knowledge
57:16
Speaker 2: versus simple opinion, ephemeral opinion, then they would be immune
57:21
Speaker 2: from that type of garbage, and they would be much
57:23
Speaker 2: stronger people, much with many more wits about them to
57:26
Speaker 2: be able to problem solve in times of crisis, when
57:29
Speaker 2: arsonists are running around lighting fires and telling us it's
57:31
Speaker 2: the other village, we should be able to look at
57:33
Speaker 2: the art who are the arsonists are running around lighting fires?
57:36
Speaker 2: Instead of listening to those arsenists tell us who to fear.
57:39
Speaker 2: So that's what I would just say as outgoing remarks.
57:44
Speaker 1: Well, look, I hope this discussion has inspired some people
57:48
Speaker 1: in this direction.
57:50
Speaker 3: I mean, what where for people that.
57:54
Speaker 1: Haven't been doing this looking at this particular area of
57:56
Speaker 1: where would you recommend they start?
57:58
Speaker 2: Well, Like I mentioned, there is this really excellent documentary
58:02
Speaker 2: called Codex nine to eleven that available for free to
58:05
Speaker 2: watch on Rumble. It's about two hours long. I've watched
58:07
Speaker 2: hundreds of nine to eleven documentaries. This one is the
58:10
Speaker 2: best most comprehensive responsible picture I've ever seen put together
58:15
Speaker 2: on on every aspect you could possibly imagine and think
58:18
Speaker 2: and things you couldn't even imagine, including this weird arts
58:20
Speaker 2: group that you know was that I only briefly mentioned
58:23
Speaker 2: in our in our show. The other thing I would
58:26
Speaker 2: say is my wife and I Cynthia. We've we've been
58:29
Speaker 2: working a lot on making documentaries, videos, uh, books and
58:34
Speaker 2: even even special special reports to help sort of strengthen
58:39
Speaker 2: people's minds to understand how to how to avoid these syops.
58:42
Speaker 2: And two things that we recently published are called Breaking
58:46
Speaker 2: Free of Anti China Syops Volumes one. In volume two,
58:49
Speaker 2: some of the chapters we've made into films just going
58:52
Speaker 2: through how we're being lied to about what is our enemy,
58:55
Speaker 2: which includes also a big, a big chunk of that
58:58
Speaker 2: is on the Islamist question being funded by m I six,
59:03
Speaker 2: the c I and what have you. So if people
59:05
Speaker 2: go and check those things out, they're available on Canadian
59:08
Speaker 2: Patriot dot org, Risintide Foundation dot net or substack Matthewert
59:13
Speaker 2: dot substack dot com. That will get them a lot
59:18
Speaker 2: of information.
59:19
Speaker 1: Yeah, super, thank you, And we'll have the links to
59:21
Speaker 1: that and to all that that stuff in the show
59:25
Speaker 1: notes so people won't have to go too far to
59:28
Speaker 1: see it. Matt, thank you very much for joining me
59:31
Speaker 1: again today. We'll leave it there for now. Plenty more
59:34
Speaker 1: to talk about in the coming weeks, so it will
59:36
Speaker 1: be too long before we see again, hopefully.
59:38
Speaker 3: Thank you for that.
59:40
Speaker 2: Okay, thank you