Latest / UK Column Radio / UK Column News Podcast 2nd August 2024

Transcript

UK Column News Podcast 2nd August 2024 · UK Column Radio

0:08
Speaker 1: Good afternoon. It's Friday, the second of August twenty twenty four,
0:11
just after one o'clock. Welcome to UK column News. I'm
0:14
your host Make Robinson joining me today by video link.
0:16
We have Mark Anderson from the United States and Debbie Evans.
0:19
Welcome to the program both. Now we're going to get
0:22
started off with Keir Starmer's announcement yesterday of a new
0:27
aspect of policing in the UK that follows on from
0:30
the violence that there's been on the streets over the
0:32
last few days. Let's have a listen to this.
0:36
Speaker 2: A gang of thugs got on trains and buses, went
0:40
to a community that is not their own, a community
0:44
grieving the most horrific tragedy, and then proceeded to throw
0:50
bricks at police officers, police officers who just twenty four
0:56
hours earlier had been having to deal with an attack
1:02
on children in their community, their community. And let me
1:07
be clear, the meeting this afternoon was not about pointing
1:13
the finger of blame. That is not how this government
1:17
of service conducts its business, because it doesn't work.
1:23
Speaker 1: Rather, this was a.
1:25
Speaker 2: Meeting to pull together our response, a response both to
1:30
the immediate challenge, which is clearly driven by far right hatred,
1:35
but also all violent disorder that flares up, whatever the
1:39
apparent cause or motivation, we.
1:42
Speaker 3: Make no distinction.
1:44
Speaker 2: Crime is crime, and so to that end, I can
1:49
announce today that following this meeting, we will establish a
1:52
national capability a cross police forces to tackle violent disorder.
1:58
These thugs a mobile, well, they move from community to community,
2:03
and we must have a policing response that can do
2:06
the same.
2:09
Speaker 1: So a new policing response responds to deal with this
2:12
kind of violent behavior. They're talking about local insight and
2:16
data being used to gain a national understanding of where
2:19
these criminals are operating, including the British Transport Police alerting
2:23
when they see a spike entryin ticket sales that could
2:26
be linked to organized violent disorder. They're talking about it
2:29
considering how we can deploy facial recognition technology, which is
2:33
already used by some forces more widely across the country.
2:36
This will mean criminals can be targeted, find and brought
2:39
to justice quickly. Now, a lot of people were unhappy
2:43
with what was presented by Charles on Wednesday's program, and
2:47
perhaps what I'm about to present isn't going to make
2:49
it any happier because we've got to ask ourselves some
2:51
serious questions here. The government has responded in this way
2:56
to what has happened over the last couple of days,
2:58
or at least this is their they're claiming that this
3:01
is a response, a direct response to what has happened
3:04
over the last couple of days. I would suggest to
3:06
you that actually this is something which has been building
3:09
up for much much longer. If we go back to
3:12
twenty seventeen, the UK column was reporting this is Sajid Javid,
3:18
and he was saying at that time ISIS and right
3:21
wing extremists both exploit grievances, distort the truth, and undermine
3:26
the values that hold us together. And this perhaps might
3:29
seem ironic in some ways that the UK government of
3:33
the day was attempting to conflate ISIS terrorists with far
3:38
right extremists. This was twenty seventeen or so we were
3:42
starting to see this narrative of the rise of far
3:45
right extremists starting to build in the mainstream political and
3:49
media narrative. But if we bring him back on screen
3:53
again and then move to Nick Bassu, who was at
3:58
that time they met Metropolitan Police kind of terrorism assistant commissioner.
4:02
He said, I'm worried that the radicalization of some of
4:04
the most vulnerable people in our society, namely our children,
4:08
is happening both from the Islamist and extreme right wing ideologies.
4:13
And again we're saying the same narrative, this conflation of
4:17
left and right, or percept perception of left and right
4:21
terrorism in the West said to Henry Jackson, society and
4:24
age of extremes, a new pattern of far right offenders
4:27
emulating or copying the tactics of high profile Islamist assailants.
4:32
And we start to see this narrative being built. It's
4:36
not organic, it's not happening, it's not grassroots, it's being
4:39
created by the state. We start to see in the
4:44
Times Tory turmoil could lead to a far right revival
4:49
over the overt message here if we look at the text,
4:51
the return to dominance of the two main parties, which
4:54
saw Labor and the Conservatives share right any percent of
4:56
the vote, was one of the most surprising consequences of
4:59
the referendum years ago. It left many in the center
5:03
ground pining for a new party. So this is from
5:06
twenty eighteen and they're talking about a new extreme right
5:10
wing party appearing and of course that's exactly what has happened.
5:13
The Reform Party has appeared. It's mainstream, it's right wing,
5:18
it has taken over a certain amount of the narrative
5:21
from the Conservative Party. And my question is was that
5:24
something which happened organically or was that something that was arranged.
5:28
In the meantime, we started to see the propaganda so
5:33
apps coming out from various police forces around the country
5:36
across the line how far would you go? This was
5:38
targeted at the young, all designed to an inverted commas
5:42
prevent the rise of right wing extremism, when in fact
5:46
what it was intended to do was the exact opposite.
5:48
We started to be bombarded with mainstream media headlines Boris
5:53
Johnson being spineless about not dealing with the burgher ray
5:57
at the time the Daily Telegraph Johnson refus uses to
6:00
back down on Burgers. In the meantime, we have burgeoning
6:04
immigration and the collapse of our infrastructure putting pressure more
6:08
pressure on people. The NHS is collapsing, collapsing, leading at
6:12
leading medic warns Thames Water, Sunak and Starmer will both
6:16
be dreading the most likely option for utility at risk
6:19
of collapse, and this is right across the country. Other headlines,
6:22
how do we tackle the UK's housing crisis? So at
6:25
the same time that they're pumping up migration, and let's
6:28
just remind ourselves of this graph. You know one point
6:32
two million people coming into the country in twenty twenty
6:34
three and five hundred thousand people leaving the country in
6:38
twenty twenty three, so significant net migration putting pressure on
6:43
while the government is allowing infrastructure collapse. This of course
6:46
puts people in a state of stress and they start
6:52
looking for leaders. And the question then is what kind
6:55
of leaders do they migrate too. Well, let's bring one
6:58
of them on screen.
7:01
Speaker 4: When you see these communities and you see these houses,
7:03
you think this is a British community or you might
7:05
have British Muslims. They are enemy combatants in these houses.
7:09
In these houses are enemy combatants who want to kill you,
7:12
maim you, and destroy you. They want to destroy our
7:14
way of life.
7:18
Speaker 1: Now that's not a peaceful narrative there. This is absolute
7:22
class of civilizations narrative that was being pushed out. And
7:27
who is behind the class of civilizations ideology? You need
7:31
to look into that when we start looking at other leaders.
7:35
Let's look at Tommy Robinson Light. So here's Starmer standing
7:39
in front of his double cross there, and this morning,
7:42
who did we have also in front of his double
7:45
cross virtue signaling? Is he? What's he telling us here?
7:49
I'm going to suggest that we are being played and
7:52
when we're looking as members of society and citizens and
7:55
whatnot for people to lead, we've got to be careful
7:58
about who it is that we are asking to lead.
8:02
Now the next point, here's the metro from a few
8:05
years ago London police take the knee with Black Lives
8:08
Matter protests. Does anybody think that this was by accident?
8:12
What was this design to do? It was designed to
8:15
enrage a certain part of the population. In fact, it
8:17
was designle to suggest it was designed to radicalize a
8:21
certain part of the population and drive people towards the
8:24
right wing extreme. This is building the right wing extreme
8:28
in my opinion. Then, over the last couple of days
8:33
we've seen this as the Palestine protests have seen other
8:37
influences begin to move in. Brian and I visited and
8:41
Ben as well visited the Palestine protests some months ago,
8:44
and we found it to be extremely peaceful, extremely decent
8:47
people in general. But now we're starting to see this.
8:51
And if we just zoom in on the flag and
8:52
the left here, well, first of all, Alan Miller saying
8:55
Isis and Hamas flags. Well, let's look at the ISIS flag,
8:59
and the left's not the nicest flag, it's an al
9:01
Qaeda flag. But we've got somebody who's masked up there
9:05
with a red bandana and carrying the flag. Who is
9:10
this person? What's he doing there? Is he a genuine
9:15
pro Palestine protester? I would suggest he is not, because
9:19
if we look at where that flag comes from, this
9:22
is the Syrian Revolution Memory Project, and of course this
9:28
is the terrorist groups that the British government funded in Syria,
9:34
the anti Asad terrorist groups that the British government funded
9:37
in Syria. Now on the streets of Britain in amongst
9:40
people protesting what's going on in Gaza, but these people
9:44
were funded by the British state in Syria, and these
9:49
people have made death threats against Vanessa Billi, amongst others.
9:52
So these are not good people. They're not. And my
9:56
question therefore is what are they doing amongst this protest?
9:59
Are they there to wind up a certain section of
10:02
the society? And I would just make the point that
10:04
if we remember this piece of legislation which is now
10:07
an Act of Parliament, the Covert Human Intelligence Sources Criminal
10:11
Conduct Bill, and we have to ask ourselves if we
10:14
are living in a regime where the government is prepared
10:18
to say that an agent of the state is able
10:22
to commit breaches of the laws, to be able to
10:24
break the law, then to what degree does that end?
10:27
Where does that end? There's no limitation on these covert
10:30
intelligence sources the kinds of laws that they can break.
10:35
So would it be beyond the British government to be
10:38
running a psychological operation on us? Let's not forget this,
10:42
Lady Juliette Harkin, formerly BBC Media Action talking about their
10:46
efforts to bring opposition onto the streets in Syria. Again,
10:53
is this the kind of thing that we would not
10:55
also see in this country? And let me remind you
10:57
about the integrated operating concept, which is Ministry of Defense
11:01
doctrine in the UK, making it very clear that the
11:04
enemy is not just abroad, it's also at home. We
11:08
are being played. So I'm going to say that if
11:11
we think, if we're going to focus on the enemy
11:13
as being this lot on the left, we are looking
11:17
at a symptom, and that is the wrong target. We
11:20
need to be focusing on the enemy on the right
11:23
because this is the disease that is bringing people into
11:26
the country and the numbers that they're coming into. And
11:30
there are a number of voices in this country that
11:33
are operating on behalf of the problem on the right.
11:36
There because the people that are reacting to those people
11:41
in the way that they are are giving Keir Starmer
11:44
and his state infrastructure the go ahead therefore to bring
11:50
in more and more to Corneian rules, which is supposed
11:52
to be what we're fighting against in the first place.
11:54
I'm starting to see things like this on X The
11:58
lion had a little growl yesterday. Wait till that f
12:01
in roars. If the line roars in a violent way,
12:05
we are playing into the hands of the state. There
12:08
are other ways to deal with this, For example, stop
12:12
funding the state. That might be a place to start.
12:14
That's a peaceful action that can be taken. Stop funding
12:17
the state and they will get the state's attention very quickly.
12:21
There is no need to go around destroying our own
12:24
communities in frustration at what's going on around us. And
12:28
I completely understand and get the frustration, and I understand
12:31
why the narrative that Tommy Robinson and people like that
12:35
would put forward, it would be attractive to people. But
12:38
I strongly urge that we consider what is happening here
12:42
and how we are being played. And that's my thoughts
12:46
on this, debbie. Have you got any comments? Do you
12:50
disagree with me? I'm quite happy if people disagree with me.
12:53
You can fight me in the comments and in the
12:55
chat box, in the forums and on YouTube and so on.
12:58
But what are your thoughts on this?
13:01
Speaker 3: Oh?
13:01
Speaker 5: Well, good afternoon everybody, And no, I agree with you, Mike,
13:04
and I think that this is a deliberate attempt by
13:07
Keir Starmer to disrupt the British public, to make them angry.
13:11
Of course they're angry, of course the British public are angry.
13:14
But he wants he wants us to be angry. He
13:16
wants division, he wants any excuse to come down hard.
13:20
And we said that change was going to be happening,
13:23
and he's only been in government four weeks and I'd say,
13:25
already we're starting to see that. And isn't he the
13:27
Prime minister that wants to let out loads of prisoners
13:30
out of prison?
13:31
Speaker 3: Early.
13:33
Speaker 5: Is that to disrupt perhaps.
13:35
Speaker 1: Very good question. What happens when we start, Well, we
13:39
can talk about that more an extra but Debbie, let's
13:42
move on then to well some o of the future. Now,
13:46
this is something that you've talked about and I've talked
13:48
about in the past, but many people aren't even aware
13:50
of that this perhaps is even more egregious than the
13:55
World Health Organization and their efforts undermining stid sovereignty.
14:02
Speaker 5: Yes, it really really is. And happy holidays to everybody
14:06
if you're out and about enjoying the fine weather, because
14:09
behind the scenes there's plenty going on, and parliaments out,
14:13
schools out. Everybody's maybe on holiday watching the Olympics, but
14:18
what is going on behind the scenes. And even actually
14:20
in February, on Valentine's Day, February fourteenth, I was talking
14:25
about the Summit for the Future, and I was warning
14:28
about it, and I want to revisit it now because
14:30
we'd be looking at two words, in particular your two
14:33
new buzzwords, which will be peace and security. But that
14:36
really doesn't mean what it says. So let's remind ourselves
14:40
that the Great Reset started with Prince Charles back in
14:43
twenty twenty one when he announced it at the World's
14:47
Economic Forum. So this was, in my opinion, the first
14:51
phase of the Great Reset. And I've been looking at
14:55
all of these summits and I thought, well, actually, what
14:57
does the word summit mean? So this is what the
15:00
word summit means. It means the highest point, you know,
15:03
somewhere like Everest, the top most level attainable, the highest
15:07
level of officials, a conference of highest level officials such
15:12
as heads of government. So we know that this is
15:15
a high level meeting. So I went to the Council
15:19
of Councils and ironically, the Council of Councils is actually
15:24
it's been created by the Council on Foreign Relations. What
15:28
was a surprise. But it's a think tank and it
15:30
serves to facilitate dialogue between twenty seven major policy institutes
15:35
from the world's most influential countries. And it publishes a
15:38
nice handy guide as the global summits we should be
15:41
looking out for. So here's the guide. This if you
15:44
want to go online and look for the guide, you
15:47
can see. I think that's yes, that's it. Global summits
15:49
to watch in twenty twenty four. So which ones do
15:52
we need to watch in twenty twenty four. We've already
15:55
had a few of which we've discussed earlier on in
15:57
the year, but these are the ones I want to
15:59
focus on in particular. So in September we've got the
16:02
Summit of the Future. In October we've got Bricks and
16:06
that's going to be chaired by Russia in October, and
16:10
we've got the World Health Summit, which will come on
16:12
to later in the news. And in November we've got
16:14
COP twenty nine and G twenty So we've got a
16:17
very busy eight weeks of high level meetings and decision makers.
16:22
So let's start at September twenty twenty four because the
16:25
Summit for the Future is really important and they've already
16:29
called to arms, you know, urgent call to countries to
16:32
accelerate the delivery of the sustainable goals. Well I call
16:35
them unsustainable quite frankly. But why why are they in
16:39
such a rush? Well they're blaming conflicts like Ukraine and
16:43
Israel for a delay and so now they've only reached
16:46
seventeen percent of their goal, so they're way they're falling
16:51
short big time. So I thought I'd go to the
16:53
World Economic Forum, like you do to check what they're saying,
16:56
and they seem to be referring to the Summit of
16:58
the Future. And thank you the person on Twitter who
17:01
said to me, oh, no, you're using Jonathan Van TAM's analogy. Now,
17:04
I promise you I'm not. I'm using the World Economic
17:07
Forum who refer to the Summit of the Future as
17:10
a football match, and they reckon now that they need
17:13
to go back to the locker room. They need to
17:15
restrategize because the game is going to be lost or
17:18
won in the second half. And they they stress the
17:22
importance of this summit. But what's it all about because
17:26
they call it multilateralism, that's the name that they actually
17:31
call it. But in my terms, this means global governance.
17:36
So I've got a little short video just to explain.
17:39
Have a look at this.
18:01
Speaker 6: Is the multilateralism we have today, capable of managing the
18:05
global challenges we're experiencing.
18:09
Speaker 7: Welcome to the U and Laverin and Archives Geneva. We're
18:12
here at the Commons, our space for sharing knowledge and
18:14
debating questions on multilateralism. This is the journey to the
18:19
Summit of the Future. In the lead up to this
18:21
unique UAN meeting, in twenty twenty four, we're exploring with
18:25
experts the questions we should be asking to ensure effective
18:29
and inclusive multilateralism for today and.
18:32
Speaker 3: For the future.
18:33
Speaker 6: In his Report Our Common Agenda, the UN Secretary General
18:36
called for the Summit of the Future as a critical
18:39
moment for members of the UN to consider how to
18:42
build more effective global governance capable of dealing with today's
18:46
challenges and those to come. The Summit is expected to
18:50
create a new Pact for the future and revive global
18:53
solidarity for current and future generations.
18:57
Speaker 7: So through this playlist, we're talking with experts pretictioners in
19:01
the leader to.
19:02
Speaker 6: The Summit, and these conversations explore the ideas raised in
19:06
the Secretary General's policy Briefs as well as the proposals
19:10
from the report of the High Level Advisory Board on
19:13
Effective Multilateralism.
19:15
Speaker 7: What kind of multilateralism do we need for our future?
19:24
Speaker 5: So let's return to the United Nations themselves and look
19:30
at the next chapter. So they have now published the
19:34
next chapter where they're predicting their eighty percent of the
19:37
world's young of world's young people will all live in
19:40
Africa and Asia by twenty one hundred, So that's a
19:44
pretty big ambition. But what are their key messages. Their
19:46
key messages are to prioritize young people, to let the
19:50
young lead the way. That's if they're not bumping into
19:53
lamp posts absorbed by their phones. I should add, they
19:55
want you to act now for the future, to ditch
19:58
the pessimism, embrace the current courage. It's all about sustainable
20:02
goals that, in my opinion, and this is my opinion,
20:05
that are unsustainable. And it's very generation centric, cover all generations.
20:09
But what's the Pact for the future, Because you know,
20:12
the Pact for the Future is a pact, so I
20:16
looked very closely at it and it seems to be
20:18
a global courter action for peace and security. So peace
20:22
in my language means your silence and censorship, and security
20:26
means their security. We get tracked and trace. But it's
20:29
looking at the sustainable goals, financing for development, it's looking
20:34
at tech innovation, digital cooperation, the youth again. And we've
20:39
got two annexes there, the Global Compact, the Global Compact
20:42
Declaration and the Declaration of Future Generations. I'll come onto
20:46
that in a minute. But we've also got an engine
20:49
room for the young. So we've got an engine room
20:52
youth survey where it would appeal. It would appear that
20:55
the young are quite happy to be taxed on luxury
20:58
items for the good of the planets. So you know,
21:00
you can't have a plane ticket without extra tax because
21:03
that goes to the planet. They want to create a
21:05
platform for young dreamers and you can be a guardian
21:09
of tomorrow. And apparently Whales have already got a Commissioner
21:11
for future generations. But they've got three more aims as well.
21:15
And their three aims are Global Digital Compact, which is
21:20
basically military applications of artificial intelligence. They want a special
21:25
envoy for future generations, and an emergency platform which really
21:29
covers all bases and puts all member states into lockstep,
21:33
depending on whether it's a health emergency, whether it's a
21:37
cyber emergency, whatever it is. But what's the future beyond
21:40
twenty twenty four. They've got a little roadmap, and here's
21:43
the little roadmap. So we're looking at Beijing thirty, the
21:48
World Social Summit, that's the news of its own COP thirty,
21:51
and the twenty twenty seven SDG Summit, which is going
21:55
to be the last checkpoint between the twenty thirty agender.
21:58
So that's why they are in a rush. And I've
22:01
got one little bit more video very quickly to show you,
22:04
which is about the Summit of the Future.
22:09
Speaker 8: The summat of the Future is about how we cooperate
22:11
at the global level to solve our biggest shared problems,
22:14
and that includes the problem of not having implemented and
22:18
not having reached some of the goals that we've already agreed,
22:21
including the Sustainable Development Goals, the Principles of the UN Charter,
22:25
the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the Paris Agreement on
22:27
Climate Change, and so many other goals and agreements that
22:31
we've already reached that would really deliver the future we want.
22:35
But it's also about how we cooperate to address the
22:39
new opportunities fast developing digital technology such as AI, and
22:44
how we minimize the risks of some of those developments.
22:47
It's about how we solve problems at the global level,
22:49
how we work together, and how we deliver a future
22:52
that is fairer, more sustainable, and better for all of
22:55
humanity and not just the few who benefit these days
22:58
from these developments.
23:02
Speaker 5: So this is a big summit with a bigger gender
23:05
that will mean big changes for us all, and the
23:08
next few slides, I'm just going to ask you all
23:10
to go to the website and freeze the screen if necessary,
23:14
because there's a lot of details, so I just want
23:15
to illustrate what they're doing. So this is the Summit
23:18
of the Future website, to be held twenty to twenty
23:21
third of September over the Equinoxus. Stephanie very kindly reminded
23:27
me it's been presented as a once in a lifetime,
23:30
a generation opportunity to mend trust. And there's a lovely
23:35
picture of a mural there. I thought Ben might like
23:37
to do a little bit more research in. It's the
23:40
Eduardo Colcobra mural and it's got lots of symbology. So
23:45
here's the provisional program, and I just ask you to
23:47
freeze the screen. So here we have Sunday's program and
23:51
we can see they're talking about peace and security. And
23:53
here we go not acceleration anymore with turbo charging, and
23:57
they use the word turbo charging all the time, charging
24:00
the twenty thirty ath gender. Here's the Monday provisional program
24:06
and you can see the future starts now and common
24:08
digital future. And then I'll just show you some screenshots
24:12
of the Pact for the Future, which is a declaration,
24:16
and please look out for the Pact of the Future
24:18
because that's going to have many more details in it,
24:21
and you can see the actions on the next slide
24:24
I've highlighted. I'm not going to read them all out,
24:26
but please go and have a look because this is
24:29
what is heading our way, turbo charging again and in
24:34
an area of peace and security. There's a whole chapter
24:38
designed to that to make us feel safe, but they're
24:41
looking at new forms of conflict. And here are the
24:44
declarations themselves. So we've got the Future Generations Declaration first.
24:49
Secondly we've got the draft Digital Compact Declaration, which means
24:54
basically that digitization will transform the world. And of course
24:59
finally to end up the UK, we are fully in
25:02
support of it multilateralism and we're really looking forward to
25:06
the Summit of the Future. And to anybody that wants
25:08
to read a little bit more about the United Nations,
25:10
I thoroughly recommend Joan beyond the United Nations Global strait Jackets.
25:16
Speaker 1: Thank you, Debbie, thank you very much for that. Mark.
25:19
Let's welcome to the program. And if Debbie's talking about
25:23
what the United Nations is doing with their summits. There've
25:26
been on their summits taking place as well.
25:30
Speaker 9: Indeed, my good day everyone. Yeah, the Sovereignty Summit too
25:35
took place this past Monday. I was able to cover
25:38
just part of it, so I took some original photos
25:41
via screenshot. This is Frank Gaffney, the co founder of
25:44
the Sovereignty Coalition and executive chairman of the Center for
25:48
Security Policy. And they have a pretty solid outlook in
25:52
terms of being on the lookout for the avian or
25:55
bird flu H five N one, whatever is going to
25:58
become the next pandemic. They're getting out all the legal
26:02
guns they can, all the intellectual arguments they can, trying
26:05
to reinforce US sovereignty for the next pandemic. So they
26:09
seem to be very proactive, which is reassuring to a point.
26:13
Here we show Representative Ralph Norman, a Congressman, a Republican
26:17
and out of South Carolina. And the part I covered
26:20
mainly had to do with a bill that's languishing a bit.
26:24
House Resolution fourteen twenty five would authorize the US Senate
26:27
to treat both the WHO Pandemic Treaty and the associated
26:31
International Health regulations, both as treaties. The problem thus far
26:36
is that the bill has been dormant parked in the
26:38
House Foreign Affairs Committee. But it does have fifty nine
26:41
co sponsors, which is somewhat helpful the way Congress operates.
26:45
And we'll go on from there. I wrote some news
26:47
briefs from this event. The bill is called the Know
26:52
WHO Pandemic Preparedness Treaty Without Senate Approval Act. A bit worthy,
26:57
but there it is. According to the Library of Congress,
26:59
which is Congress dot gov. It quote establishes that any
27:03
convention or agreement on pandemic related issues reached by the
27:07
whose World Health Assembly pursue it to a specified negotiating body,
27:12
shall be deemed to be a treaty requiring the advice
27:15
and consent of the Senate. Constitutionally, that means a two
27:19
thirds supermajority of those present. That's a caveat would be
27:23
needed in the Senate to approve US entry into such
27:27
WHO treaties. And we can keep moving another more, a
27:33
little bit more text from my news brief. Representative Norman
27:37
and the Sovereignty Senators mister Gaffney agreed that such a
27:40
measure should be pursued to secure the principle that the
27:42
US must not fail to exercise its sovereign treaty powers
27:47
via the Senate, less the nation become mired and nude
27:50
draconian health edicts that blind side the citizenry in the
27:54
same way that the citizenry, don't we all remember it
27:57
was blindsided by fear infused COVID nineteen edicts back in
28:01
twenty twenty. Of course, that kind of trapes into twenty
28:04
twenty one a bit, And there's more points of interest
28:09
here as we go along. I may not read all
28:11
of this, but I got this right out of the
28:13
text of HR fourteen twenty five via Congress dot Gov
28:17
the Library of Congress. Maybe some of us have forgotten this.
28:22
Back on May eighteenth of twenty twenty, then President Trump
28:25
sent a letter to the WHO, sent it to Taedrose,
28:29
the director general there, and he made a couple of points.
28:32
The US contributions to the WHO would be halted due
28:36
to the who's mismanagement of the COVID nineteen outbreak and
28:39
the lack of independence from the People's Republic of China,
28:43
that is, the who's lack of independence, And b the
28:47
US would evidently or as supposedly withdraw from the WHO
28:52
if the WHOW did not commit to substantive improvements within
28:56
thirty days. There was another point there. President Trump May
29:00
eighteen letters cited numerous instances of WHO mismanagement of the
29:04
COVID nineteen pandemic, and that included a repeated grossly inaccurate
29:10
or misleading claims about the transmissibility of the virus and
29:13
about the Government of China's alleged handling of the outbreak.
29:17
Of course, that's a little bit of a nebulous part
29:19
of this, but that's right in the bill. So it's
29:21
a pretty detailed bill that gets into some pretty controversial points.
29:26
And we'll continue from there. And this is another aspect
29:30
that I was able to cover that past Monday. Another
29:34
aspect of it is came from Matt Staver, the Liberty Council,
29:38
and he spoke as a separate organization that operates a
29:42
lot or participates a lot with the Sovereignty Coalition, the
29:45
Liberty Council, and he talked about a law suit the
29:48
South Bay Pentecostal Church versus Newsom, and an associated suit
29:53
was Harvest Rock Church versus Newsom, Newsom being Gavin Newsom
29:57
the governor of California, and mister Staver talked about the
30:03
decision date. He went back in history a little bit,
30:06
February fifth, twenty twenty one, and the deciding court was
30:09
the US Supreme Court. For months, California permitted Hollywood film
30:13
studios and large retailers to open their doors, but the
30:16
Golden State cracked down and Harvest or excuse me, houses
30:20
of worship, preventing them from opening their doors to even
30:24
a single worshiper. Recognizing this unequal treatment, South Bay United
30:29
Pentecostal Church and Harvest Rock Church sued California asking that
30:33
religious worship be treated at least as well as these
30:35
secular activities. And there was a comparable case involving a
30:40
Roman Catholic diocese versus Cuomo. So in this aspect of
30:46
the Sovereignty Coalition program, Mike, they're talking about the Liberty
30:51
Council being among the organizations that would be very vigilant
30:54
and battling any further attempts if there's another pandemic declaration
30:59
to shut down on houses of worship. So all in all,
31:02
the part that I saw seem to be an indication
31:06
that there's some pretty vigilant voices out there that are
31:10
waiting in the wings for any move by Tad Rose
31:13
and the WHO as they solidified the pandemic treaty and
31:19
whatever final touches they might do in the international health
31:22
regulations very vigilant toward any new pandemic and what that
31:27
crackdown may consist of, so.
31:30
Speaker 1: They'll be.
31:32
Speaker 9: I'm trying to get a hold of the video from
31:34
that program so I can watch more of the participants,
31:37
including the well known doctor Peter McCullough, and next week,
31:40
I presume I'll have a little bit more on this
31:43
to see how that overall event rounded out and what
31:46
they have in store in terms of preventing the worst
31:50
effects of another pandemic should it be declared.
31:53
Speaker 1: Yeah, okay, thank you very much. Mark right. If you
31:56
like what the UK called does you would like to
31:58
support us, then please have a look at support dot
32:02
UK column dot org. There are options to help us there.
32:05
We do need your supports five or a month. If
32:07
you want to be a member. Of course, that gives
32:09
you access to UK column News Extra, which we will
32:13
be on straight after this news program. If you would
32:18
like to share our material, we would very much appreciate
32:20
that as well. Of course we are increasingly censored and
32:25
you can access are as the algorithm for us SO,
32:29
UK column dot org and UK column extracts, so the
32:31
place to go for that. You can pick something up
32:34
at the UK Column Shop. And thank you very much
32:38
again to everybody that is either a member or has
32:41
picked up a copy of your life in their hands.
32:44
Still copies available if you would like to get hold
32:48
of one. If you haven't got it yet, please do so. Debbie,
32:52
your blog will be up this afternoon. What do we
32:54
get to look forward to this week?
32:58
Speaker 5: Well, you get my observations on Paris twenty twenty four
33:02
opening ceremony. Maybe there's some things in there that perhaps
33:05
you haven't noticed. And who's heard of sippery Stockholm International
33:09
Peace Research Institute. Perhaps maybe a new segment coming up
33:13
on that. And also, yeah, Dements, your case is expected
33:18
to almost triple across the world by twenty fifty. I
33:20
wonder why that could be. So that and plenty more.
33:23
Speaker 1: Okay, thank you. A reminder of the Gutsy Woman interview
33:28
between Brian and the Natasha McCallum that's on the website
33:30
went at at one pm yesterday of course, but it
33:32
is up on the website now, So if you haven't
33:34
seen that yet, do have a look. This was looking
33:37
at the inside of for Nahiehus and everybody should be
33:42
aware of that particular campaign that's ongoing at the moment
33:45
to get the women that were apparently abused in for
33:49
nehie Hus some justice. Finally, I just mentioned the October event.
33:54
Nineteenth of October twenty twenty four. The tickets are on
33:57
sale night at the UK column Shop. We hope to
34:00
see as many of you there as possible. Please pick
34:04
up your ticket there on sale at an early bird
34:06
price at the moment. Please have a look and decide
34:09
if you want to come. We look forward to meeting
34:11
everybody that's there. Now, let's have a look at the
34:15
war situation at the moment, and will you be impressed
34:18
to know that Ukraine has taken delivery if it's first
34:22
f sixteen's allegedly lots of mainstream media talking about this
34:26
at the moment, but mostly relying on unnamed sources. We're
34:31
not clear at this point whether any of them will
34:33
actually take to the air, whether they're in Ukrainian airspace,
34:37
or who will be piloting them. In fact, because of
34:40
course the Ukrainians don't have anybody that can fly them
34:42
at this stage, and won't have for quite some time.
34:46
But in the meantime, this article, this is an opinion
34:50
piece in the New York Times. Only a strong US
34:53
noe Israel will stop war eleven And in fact, the
34:56
print version of this uses the word total, So we'll
34:59
stop total war in Lebanon. In fact, total regional wars
35:03
what this is talking about. So if we just have
35:05
a look at what they're saying here, if Israel goes
35:08
further and launches a major operation to uproot Hasbla, which
35:11
right wing members of Prime Minister and now whose government
35:14
have been urging, it would be devastating. And they're talking
35:17
about economic collapse, humanitarian crisis, and the increasing likelihood of
35:23
attacks in Syria, in Iraq, Yemen and so on. So
35:28
the broadening of the conflict. None of this is in
35:32
the United States interest, says this o ED, while making
35:36
clear that it would continue to defend Israel against direct
35:39
attacks by Iran. Hesbil's patron Washington needs to make clear
35:43
to Israel that it will not sanction such a war
35:45
or facilitated by supplying munitions, joining the Israeli military and
35:50
attacks against Hasbela or providing diplomatic cover for the deaths
35:55
of civilian So if that is the position of the
35:57
opinion piece in the New York Times that the should
36:02
be absolutely pushing against Israel on this, I wonder what
36:06
the opinion of the new or the potential new Vice
36:10
president is. Because Mark was talking about JD. Ve Ants
36:14
last week, let's just have a listen to this. This
36:17
is from the Cato Institute a couple of months ago
36:20
when he was speaking.
36:23
Speaker 10: There's another reason, actually motivated by my view that America
36:27
can't do everything. We sort of ask ourselves what do
36:30
we want out of our Israeli allies, and more importantly,
36:33
what do we want out of all of our allies
36:34
for at large? Do we want clients who depend on us,
36:38
who can't do anything without us, or do we want
36:41
real allies who can actually advance their interests. So my
36:45
biggest criticism of our approach in Ukraine is that it
36:49
has no strategic end in sight and it's not leading
36:52
anywhere that's going to ultimately be good for our country.
36:54
We are subsidizing the Europeans to do nothing. The Europeans
36:58
are not carrying their fair the burden, especially when it
37:01
comes in provision of weapons and their own and they're
37:04
de industrializing their own country at the same time that
37:08
they say that Putin must be defeated at all costs.
37:11
But I actually think that Washington, at least current Washington leadership,
37:14
really likes the fact that the Europeans are completely dependent
37:18
on us. That's not an alliance. These people aren't increasingly allies.
37:23
They are client states of the United States of America
37:26
who do whatever we want them to do. Why, I
37:28
think we have a real opportunity to ensure that Israel
37:31
is an ally in the true sense that it's going
37:34
to pursue their interests, and sometimes those interests won't totally
37:37
overlap with the United States, and that's totally reasonable. But
37:39
they are fundamentally self sufficient. And I think the way
37:42
that we get there in Israel is actually by combining
37:46
the Abraham Accord's approach with the defeat of Hamas. That
37:50
gets us to a place where Israel and the Sunny
37:52
Nations can play a regional counterweight to Iran. Again, we
37:56
don't want a broader regional war. We don't want to
37:59
get involved in a regional war. The best way to
38:02
do that is to ensure that Israel, with the Sunni Nations,
38:05
can actually police their own region of the world, and
38:09
that allows us to spend less time and less resources
38:11
on the Middle East and focus more on East Asia.
38:15
And the same way that we want our own allies
38:18
to do the job in Europe so that we can
38:21
focus on East Asia. I think that the same is
38:23
true of the Sunny Nations in Israel in the Middle East.
38:25
We want to focus more on East Asia.
38:29
Speaker 1: So that should be absolutely clear to everybody. And actually,
38:31
this narrative is pretty much what Trump was pushing while
38:35
he was president. If you remember him attending the inauguration
38:39
of the new NITTO headquarters in Brussels in twenty eighteen
38:43
or so, and he was talking about the fact that
38:46
Europe was not paying its way and so on. But so,
38:49
what Jada Vans is saying there, very very clearly, is
38:53
that the United States wants Europe to deal with Putin,
38:55
wants Israel to deal with Iran so that it can
38:58
deal with China. So you know, they're they're very He
39:01
was very clear there that that they He wasn't saying
39:05
that they didn't want a regional war in the Middle East.
39:07
He was saying they don't want to be involved in
39:09
the regional war in the in the Middle East because
39:10
they want to focus on Asia. Right, So, I think
39:14
that is pretty clear what he's saying. This is what
39:17
the Trump presidency, should he become a president, is going
39:21
to represent. Mark very briefly, I don't know if you've
39:23
got any thoughts on that.
39:26
Speaker 9: Yeah, briefly, Mike, I like what I hear. For the
39:30
most part, I'm hearing an increasingly non interventionist what used
39:34
to be insulted as a isolationist stance, but a non
39:38
interventionist stance at least to a reasonable degree. And I
39:42
like his distinction between client and an ally. A real
39:45
ally can stand on their own two feet, love him
39:49
or hate him, But a client or less than that
39:52
is an overly dependent other nation that is going to
39:56
go the wrong way and then increasingly lean on the
39:59
US tax. So compared to past administrations, mister Vance is
40:03
sounding pretty promising on a scale of one to five,
40:07
with a five being pretty good. I give him at
40:09
least a three and a half, maybe a four at
40:11
this point.
40:12
Speaker 1: Right, Well, we can talk about this more an extra
40:14
but I'm going to say I completely disagree with you
40:15
all that but we'll talk about more on that. An
40:18
extra in the meantime, what's going on in Russia or
40:22
with Russia and Africa.
40:26
Speaker 9: Oh, yes, the Valde Discussion Club, they don't get a
40:31
lot of press. I don't know in terms of the
40:33
alternative media. I don't know, Mike if Uk column over
40:37
a longer period. I've been on board, most recently about
40:40
two years. I don't know if you've given much to
40:42
the Valde Discussion Club. But this is sort of an overview,
40:46
kind of a straightforward report for today, the Russia Africa
40:51
cooperation outlook and objectives. They've had a lot of meetings lately,
40:57
most recently in latter July, and it has to do
41:01
with Bricks. Bricks is involved in this, but we'll move
41:03
on and just kind of do an overview of what's
41:06
been going on. Another news brief I wrote for today's report,
41:10
the Ten Bricks Nations Political and business affairs. BRICKS calls
41:14
itself an inner governmental organization and includes Brazil, Russia, China,
41:18
Iran and Saudi Arabia are often worked out at the
41:22
Valdai Discussion Club, a Moscow based think tank and discussion
41:25
forum frequented by Russian President Vladimir Putin. On March eighteenth
41:30
of this year, the Valde Club hosted an expert discussion
41:34
dedicated to the financial settlements of the Bricks countries. But
41:37
then the club went on to hold a major conference,
41:40
the first one on African soil in Tanzania on July
41:44
twenty four this year. That event's development was significantly influenced
41:48
by the expansion of Bricks this year, which, in addition
41:52
to South Africa, added also Egypt and Ethiopia. Thus, key
41:55
African countries are receiving additional representation in the Brick structure
42:00
that determines what are called quote the general principles of
42:04
the countries of the global Non West and South regarding
42:08
world politics and economics, as organizers of the July twenty
42:12
fourth event explained, adding that the conference considered the following
42:16
topics and we have a few bullet points. Economic cooperation
42:19
between Russia and African countries and their shared values. I'm
42:23
not sure exactly what those values are at this point.
42:26
The role of media in their promotion and cultural cooperation.
42:30
I would wonder which media and in what way the
42:34
approaches of the participating countries quote to the problem of
42:37
climate change, a connection with a social agenda, and it's
42:41
not altogether clear what their view is on climate change.
42:44
Is it markedly different than the US led unipolar world
42:48
and tasks for combating world poverty and inequality. I'd like
42:53
to think that would include serious monetary reform, but we
42:56
don't know yet. And this is the Ambassador of Russia Tanzania,
43:01
mister Andre Veticon Veticion. I'm kind of maybe I need
43:06
Alex here. This is what he had to say. Global politics,
43:10
the economy, and technological competition will never be the same
43:14
as before. More countries are striving to strengthen their sovereignty,
43:18
their self sufficiency, national and cultural identity. The countries of
43:22
the global South and East are gaining prominence. And I
43:25
believe we have one more quote from this gentleman. This
43:28
new political and economic reality now service the foundation for
43:32
the emerging multipolar and multilateral world order. And this is
43:38
an inevitable process, he claims. It reflects the cultural and
43:42
civilizational diversity that is inherently part of humanity, despite all
43:47
attempts at artificial unification. So he's implying that what the
43:52
West does through his global governance efforts is in some
43:56
way artificial. Perhaps he's correct on that. And this is
43:59
a an associated report by the Valdeta Discussion Club Russia
44:04
Africa cooperation outlook and objectives, and just some of the contents.
44:08
Readers can get into the screens there to the screen
44:12
there and freeze that to see the contents. And this
44:15
is part of those contents. I highlighted a key part.
44:19
I'll read the top paragraph only half. Russia Africa relations
44:23
have become more substantive and regular over the past year,
44:26
with development strategies, plans, road maps and summit meetings that
44:30
have become regular despite the challenges, and plans for annual
44:33
Russia Africa ministerial conferences. And then the highlighted part. A
44:38
system of Russian African relations is gradually gradually taking shape
44:42
from chaos, dissonance and competing initiatives. Political signals are increasingly
44:48
often complemented with practical efforts in various speares. However, there
44:52
is still room for a closer alignment of Russia's political
44:55
and economic interests in the region, considering that political dialogue
44:59
with some countries developing more actively than economic cooperation is
45:04
so some of us a little dry, but they're obviously
45:06
trying to make a pretty big stride forward here, Mike.
45:10
In their version of a world order that is more multipolar,
45:15
they claim the US part, the US led part, is
45:18
of course unipolar and artificial and is prone to a
45:22
lot of manipulation. Some might argue that this is just
45:27
another dialectic to kind of merge East and West together,
45:31
and it will bring just another form of global governance
45:33
that we'll found that we'll find just as equally objectionable
45:36
as we find the Western lead version. I don't know
45:40
that it's a deceptive thing like that. That's an argument
45:43
I've heard. But that's the latest. There'll be more from
45:46
this group as I sort this out and probably get
45:49
into that report a little more, perhaps next week or
45:52
the week after. So with that, I think we're good
45:54
for today for now.
45:57
Speaker 1: Okay, thank you, Mark, thanks for that. I mean, let's
46:00
come back to you then and back on the topic
46:03
of health and world health.
46:07
Speaker 5: Yes, but before I but before I talk about worlds health,
46:10
I just want to add that the MHRA have put
46:13
the May and July board meeting on YouTube. Please everybody
46:18
go and click on it, because we really need them
46:20
to know that we're watching. And it would appear that
46:22
Dame June is still there, but we'll hold off on
46:25
that for now. But yeah, back to Future Health, and
46:28
you know it's all about the future, the future of Britain,
46:31
Tony Blair, the Future Health, the Summit of the Future.
46:35
And we're looking at October and I'm going into October
46:39
and I'm seeing what's going on. Well, we've got Bricks
46:41
to start off with the Bricks Summit, which I said
46:44
was going to be shared by Russia. So that's on
46:48
the twenty second to twenty fourth of October, but just
46:50
before then, because I do think these eight weeks between
46:53
September and the end of November are going to be
46:56
pivotal and they're going to we're going to start seeing
46:59
a tightening screws on us. So the World Health Summit's
47:03
thirteenth fifteenth of October in Berlin meant to be building
47:07
trust for a healthier world. And we've got a huge
47:09
three hundred and fifty speakers and I'll show you some
47:11
of those in a minute. Three thousand participants over sixty sessions,
47:15
and they're going to be looking at women's health, antimicrobial resistance,
47:20
health around climate shocks, which pretty much includes everything including vaccines,
47:25
digital health of course, artificial intelligence, and again youth leaders
47:30
of the future, and just to take you to the
47:33
website for their future health so you can see where
47:36
to go. This is the main front page of the website,
47:40
building trust for a healthier world. But if we go
47:43
to look at their mission, we can see that again.
47:46
This they call this a unique platform for global health.
47:52
I think that's on the next slide. Yeah, is a
47:55
unique platform where stakeholders, politicians, scientists, the private sector and
48:02
civil society can all meet to talk about the sustainable
48:06
development goals. And this is they say political decisions will
48:11
affect human health and quite clearly that they are wanting
48:16
to accelerate everything. But if we look at the central topics,
48:20
the central topics are again we say antimicrobial resistance, artificial intelligence,
48:26
the youth again, young people, women's health, climate and how
48:30
climate will affect health. And I just want you to
48:33
see their program because they've brought out a draft program
48:36
and this has only just been published. So you can
48:40
freeze the screen again because there's so much on that
48:43
you might want to choose a particular session to go
48:46
and watch, because I do think that this is going
48:48
to battle. So this is for October and just freeze
48:54
the screen so you can see the agenda. And then
48:55
we've also got the fourteenth and the fifteenths so you
49:00
can see the agendas for both of those days. And
49:03
who's running it. Well, we've got a gentleman called Axel Priest,
49:07
who's the World Health Summit President. And I'm just going
49:12
to highlight a number of the members, not so much
49:15
by name, but by organizations. So we've got the United
49:18
Nations participating, the Red Cross, Google Health Welcome the who
49:24
of course Bill and Melinda Gates as well the usual suspects.
49:30
And what about their partners, Well, you won't be surprised
49:33
to see Bill and Milinda Gates or Pfizer, Seppie, the
49:38
European Commission and Semens, the major partners, premier partners. We've
49:43
got the Rockefeller Foundation, We've got Bayer, Johnson and Johnson.
49:47
I mean, it really is a feast for your eyes.
49:52
Of all of the names that you're used to supporting partners.
49:55
There you go, you've got the Global Fund. I mean,
49:59
it's extraordinary, big events and it's going to be taking place,
50:03
as I say, in October. But let's look at some
50:06
of the speakers, because they have got they've got so
50:09
many speakers. So of course we've got Tedros from the WHO.
50:14
We've also got the Ambassador on Antimicrobial Resistance for a
50:19
federal Ministry of Health Germany, and also the CEO of
50:24
the Union of International Cancer Control. So these are the
50:28
three big agendas here that the WHO are going to
50:32
be looking at. But let's look at a few more
50:34
of the speakers, and I'm just going to just highlight
50:37
just a few because there really are so many. So
50:39
we're looking at speakers from Google Deep Mind, and there
50:42
we see Dame Sally Davis. Of course she's our very
50:45
own UK Envoy for Antimicrobial Resistance. We've got UNAIDS, we've
50:50
got the Max Plank, We've got Bill Gates. I mean
50:53
that the names go on, and if we go on
50:55
to the next slide, you'll see some more familiar faces.
50:58
Jeremy Farrow, who's the chief Scientists for the WHO, Richard Horton,
51:03
editor of The Lancet. We've got YouTube being represented, and
51:07
we've got epidemic preparedness being represented, and even more on
51:11
the next slide, we've got GAVI, we've got Welcome, we've
51:15
got the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Pfizer,
51:19
the Rockefellers, the lists just go on and on a big,
51:24
big summit. But I mean, let's look at the next slide,
51:28
because we're looking at the United Nations political declaration. Now,
51:33
this is the one that I've been talking about. This
51:35
is one of the days where purely anti microbial resistance
51:40
is going to be talked about. And this is why
51:42
I say this is going to be a bigger gender
51:45
moving forward. So what they're saying is that it contributes
51:48
to five million deaths a year, including many children. The
51:53
financial costs are extreme, one trill in US dollars for
51:59
additional health care. But they say that treating antibiotic resistance
52:03
infection could cost a staggering, eyewatering four hundred and twelve
52:08
billion pounds a year and with loss productivity of four
52:12
hundred and forty three billion dollars a year. So I mean,
52:16
they're putting big figures on this. And as I've said
52:19
all along, antimicrobial resistance, how real is this agenda? Probably
52:24
in my opinion, about as real as climate change and
52:28
all of these sustainable goals that appear unsustainable. So here's
52:32
the big banner for antimicrobial resistance. AMR is invisible. I
52:38
am not. Well, it's going to be a big day
52:42
and I predict big changes. But let's go on to November,
52:46
because I did say the eight weeks were going to
52:48
be busy, and I'm just going to flash up a
52:51
couple of big, big dates for your diary. The UN
52:54
Climate Change in November, the conference in Baku eleventh to
52:59
the twenty second of November twenty twenty four, and then
53:02
we've got the G twenty as well in Rio that's
53:07
on November eighteenth to the nineteenth. That's going to be
53:10
another huge summit. And of course in December we just
53:15
round it all off with Epidemic Preparedness Day. So as
53:20
far as I can see from what I'm looking at online,
53:25
it would appear that the weeks between the end of
53:28
September to the end of November are going to be
53:31
extremely busy. There are going to be a lot of
53:33
major decisions made that could affect us very very quickly.
53:38
And like I say, we're going from the word acceleration
53:41
to turbocharged. So keep an eye when we all get
53:44
back from holiday and the kids go back to school.
53:46
I think we're going to see a lot of changes
53:48
very quickly.
53:50
Speaker 1: Okay, Debbie, thank you very much. Well, we're just going
53:52
to finish with farming and well the government's pushing this
53:57
out this morning is from Deprah. We're introducing a new
54:01
deal for farmers. So they've announced it's their commitment to
54:05
introduce a new deal for farmers to address low confidence
54:08
and provide stability to the farming sector. So this is
54:12
what they have to say, optimizing environmental land management schemes
54:17
so that they can produce the right outcomes for all farmers,
54:20
including those who've been too often ignored, such as small grassland,
54:23
upland and tenant farmers, while delivering food security and nature
54:28
recovery in a just an equitableut way. So they're claiming
54:33
to maintain food security and my question is are they
54:36
going to do any such thing now. Harry Metcalf is
54:40
a farmer in the UK who has a YouTube channel
54:42
called Harry's Farm, and he released a video yesterday commenting
54:46
on the issue of environmental land management and food security.
54:51
Let's have a listen to this.
54:54
Speaker 11: We have a consumption of always saying right in the
54:56
UK about around one point eight million tons. I think
55:00
the twenty four harvest is going to be about nine
55:03
hundred tons.
55:05
Speaker 3: You don't have to go back.
55:06
Speaker 11: You go back to twenty twelve, we were exporting seven
55:10
hundred thousand tons, so we're growing two points something million
55:14
tons of rape.
55:15
Speaker 3: Twenty twenty four were down.
55:17
Speaker 11: To nine hundred thousand tons, and just going on a
55:22
perception and chatter amongst farmers that might go down to
55:27
six hundred thousand tons next year. It's just decimated the
55:31
tonnage of obviously rate being grown in this country food
55:34
if you like. And with all these environmental things happening
55:38
as well, the wheat tonnage is going down.
55:41
Speaker 3: There's a I.
55:44
Speaker 11: Don't know what's going to happen in harvest twenty five
55:46
when reality hits, when the actual amount of food produced
55:50
in this country has dropped so dramatically. We're not talking
55:54
about ten percent, we're talking about half the amounts, and
55:57
we're huge numbers. And I noticed also stock numbers on
56:01
the upland farms the reports just being published, they're massively
56:05
down with so they've dropped six hundred and something thousand
56:08
head of sheep this year, just in one year alone.
56:12
Speaker 3: I don't know. I'm sure the government know what they're doing.
56:14
Speaker 11: All these schemes but it's having a dramatic effect on
56:17
the amount of food we grow in this country.
56:21
Speaker 1: I'm sure the government knows exactly what it's doing. I
56:23
think he's right about that, but perhaps not in the
56:25
way that he means. The government absolutely knows what it's doing.
56:29
The government absolutely understands that the UK is a country
56:33
that already imports sixty percent of its food and as
56:37
Harry Metcalf, they're making the point we're no longer exporting
56:41
certain types of produce because we're not producing enough of it.
56:46
As these land management schemes continue to develop. Any remember,
56:50
I appreciate Debbie's point about change, but Starmar talking about change.
56:55
In fact, he's just accelerating the change which was already
56:59
in progress. And with respect to farming, that change was
57:04
the taking of land out of production for food and
57:09
turning it back into so called environmental schemes. This is
57:13
extremely dangerous. And if we think we began the program
57:17
by talking about the pressure that people have been under
57:19
as a result of immigration, and the fact that not
57:23
just immigration, but also the collapse of infrastructure as people
57:27
have been taking money out of the system, hands had
57:30
over fist. This is going to increase pressure even further
57:34
because inevitably, with shortages, prices are going to go up
57:38
again on a long term basis. Now, Harry talking about
57:42
twenty twenty five harvest being when the you know, when
57:47
things sort of become apparent to people. We've been warning
57:51
about this for how many years now? This has been coming,
57:55
so nobody should be surprised. Hopefully it could be revert
58:00
but the food production scenario in this country is Debbie,
58:05
I would say absolutely in seeing I don't know if
58:08
you've got any thoughts, well.
58:11
Speaker 5: I mean, I just go back to be honest, Mike.
58:14
You know, we hear all the time about the sustainable
58:17
development goals, and clearly this is to make everything unsustainable.
58:23
We are not a sustainable country, and they are deliberately
58:27
dismantling us. They are deliberately destroying, disrupting, in order to
58:33
create carnage so that we are completely unsustainable. So their
58:37
sustainable goal is unsustainability or am I am I getting
58:42
it wrong? That's just the way I see. Everything is inverted,
58:45
everything is turned upside down, and with all of the
58:48
land being reclaimed for solar farms and wind turbines, wind
58:52
farms as well, it's clear what the agenda is and
58:56
that is to destroy any sustainability that this country ever had.
59:02
Speaker 1: Absolutely I found it interesting and slightly amusing. You use
59:05
the word carnage, of course, because Mark Carney is a
59:08
key figure that's behind all this. When we're talking about day,
59:13
we're not just talking about the British government. We're also
59:15
talking about people that have worked within the British government
59:19
but are in other roles now. But we're talking about
59:23
multi national organizations like the World Economic Forum of the
59:27
United Nations and so on. So there are many players
59:30
in this game, and we'll be talking more and more
59:33
about them in the coming days and weeks. Well, look,
59:35
we've got to leave it there for today, so I'm
59:37
going to say thank you very much to Debbie and
59:38
Mark for joining us. Thank you all for watching. If
59:42
you're a UK Called members, stick around on the live
59:44
stream and we'll be back in a few minutes for
59:46
some extra Otherwise, have a great weekend. I won't see
59:50
you until for another two weeks, but the news will
59:54
continue as usual. See you Monday.
59:56
Speaker 3: Bye bye.
1:00:01
Speaker 10: At the empty the