Latest / Reformed Thinking / The Invasion | C. S. Lewis

Transcript

The Invasion | C. S. Lewis · Reformed Thinking

0:00
Reformed thinking presents the deep dive.
0:02
When we talk about theology, about God, about the universe,
0:06
there's this, this pressure, isn't there?
0:09
Oh, absolutely. A pressure to make it all small,
0:12
to fit these enormous, life altering truths into a neat
0:15
little box that we can easily understand.
0:18
A sound bite. We want the simple answer, the
0:20
comfortable answer. Exactly.
0:23
And that's what we're going to be talking about today.
0:24
We're doing a deep dive into CS Lewis's argument against that
0:27
very instinct we're drawing from his book Mere Christianity,
0:31
specifically the section he titled The Invasion.
0:34
A very telling title. It is our whole mission here is
0:38
to get a handle on why Lewis claims that real Christianity
0:41
has to contain difficult ideas, why things like sin and
0:45
rebellion and yes, even the devil aren't just optional
0:48
extras you can edit out, he says.
0:49
We're living in enemy occupied territory.
0:52
And if that's your starting point, well, the solution isn't
0:54
going to be a simple nursery rhyme.
0:55
OK, let's unpack this. So Lewis, he he starts by sort
1:00
of clearing the ground. He wants to set aside the
1:03
philosophies that people grab onto precisely because they're
1:05
easy, because they don't demand too much.
1:08
The simple paths. The simple paths, and he
1:10
identifies 2 big ones. First, there's atheism.
1:13
He doesn't spend a lot of time on it here, but he basically
1:15
says it's an inadequate explanation for reality.
1:19
It just can't account for the moral dimension of our lives,
1:22
which is a theme he comes back to again and again.
1:25
Sure, the idea that we know things are right and wrong.
1:27
Exactly. But the second one is, I think,
1:30
much more interesting for our discussion.
1:31
It's the one he calls Christianity and water.
1:35
I think we all know what that looks like.
1:37
It's everywhere. It is.
1:38
It's this reduction of the faith into its most palatable form.
1:44
It's the belief in a good God up in heaven.
1:46
And because of that, everything down here is, you know,
1:49
fundamentally all right. The celestial grandfather idea.
1:53
God just wants everyone to be nice and happy.
1:55
That's it. It's a very comfortable, very
1:57
sentimental belief, and it's designed specifically to avoid
2:02
any kind of, well, cognitive dissonance.
2:05
Avoids the hard questions. So to keep that comfortable
2:08
feeling, what does this Christianity in water have to
2:11
cut out what gets left on the editing room floor?
2:14
Well, everything that makes Christianity what it is, really
2:17
it has to get rid of every difficult, every terrifying
2:21
doctrine that actually calls for a real response from us.
2:24
Like repentance? Repentance is the big one.
2:26
If everything's basically fine, then you don't really need to
2:29
worry about original sin. You don't need to think about
2:31
spiritual judgment or the reality of hell.
2:33
And you certainly don't need a devil.
2:34
You. Absolutely.
2:36
And most critically, the entire violent, dramatic story of the
2:40
Redemption becomes, well, sort of unnecessary, superfluous.
2:44
Why would you need such a drastic rescue mission if we're
2:46
not in any real danger? So these doctrines are removed
2:49
because they introduce a conflict, a war, and simple
2:53
religion can't handle a war. It can't.
2:56
And Lewis then goes deeper and says this whole expectation,
2:59
this demand that religion should be simple is based on a totally
3:03
false idea about how reality works.
3:05
We have this, you know, this desire for neatness, for things
3:09
to be clean and logical. But Lewis says just look around
3:13
you when you look closely at anything real, it's not simple,
3:17
even if it seems that way at first.
3:18
This. Is where he brings in that
3:19
fantastic example of the table. Yes, the simple wooden table on
3:24
the surface. What could be more
3:25
straightforward? It's solid, it's brown, it's
3:28
flat, it's simplicity itself. That's such a classic CS Lewis
3:32
move, right? Take some completely mundane
3:34
something you don't even think about and just pull the
3:36
philosophical rug out from under you.
3:38
He was a master at it because the moment you stop just looking
3:41
at the table and you as a thinking adult ask what is this
3:45
thing really, the simplicity just vanishes.
3:48
You fall down a complete rabbit hole.
3:50
Instantly, you're thrown into all these layers of complex
3:52
mystery. You ask a physicist and they'll
3:55
tell you the table is mostly empty space.
3:57
Right, it's just atoms whizzing around at incredible speeds.
4:00
It's not solid in the way my eyes tell me it is.
4:03
Not at all. Then you ask, well, how am I
4:04
even seeing it? And now you're talking about
4:07
light waves bouncing off it hitting your optic nerve, your
4:09
brain doing this incredibly complicated processing job to
4:13
turn electrical signals into the conscious experience of brown
4:17
and flat. So just recognizing a piece of
4:20
furniture involves quantum mechanics, biology, neurology,
4:24
all these things we barely understand.
4:26
Exactly. The table isn't simple.
4:27
It's this, this meeting point for a dozen interwoven
4:31
mysteries. And Lewis's point is, if it
4:33
takes that much complexity just to explain a piece of furniture.
4:37
How can we possibly demand that the nature of God, the structure
4:41
of the universe, and the problem of human existence be any
4:45
simpler? You.
4:46
Can't. It's just not logical.
4:48
If you're content with the explanation you'd give a child,
4:50
that's fine for the child. But if you as an adult really
4:54
want to know what's going on, you have to be ready for a
4:56
difficult answer. It seems like the core problem
4:59
he's flagging is that a lot of people who attack Christianity
5:03
are really just attacking the kindergarten version of it.
5:05
Precisely. They find a flaw in a Sunday
5:07
school story meant for a six year old, and then they hold
5:11
that up as a reason to dismiss the whole thing, using it as a
5:15
shield against the, you know, the actual adult doctrine.
5:18
Lewis calls it a silly procedure, and he says people do
5:22
it consciously, or maybe more often unconsciously, because
5:25
they want to find a reason to dismiss the faith.
5:28
They attack the childish version.
5:30
And then what happens when you present them with the robust
5:33
theological adult version? They pivot immediately.
5:36
Instead of actually grappling with the ideas, the full
5:39
structure of reality, with sin and judgement and redemption,
5:42
they suddenly complain that it's too difficult.
5:45
So first it was too simple, now it's too complicated.
5:47
Right, They say, well, if God were really good, he would have
5:50
made religion simple. They have this idea that
5:52
simplicity is beautiful and a good God must love beauty, so it
5:55
should all be easy. Which, as Lewis points out,
5:58
completely misunderstands what Christianity even claims to be.
6:01
It's not a set of rules God just invented that he could have made
6:05
easier if he felt like it. That's the disastrous
6:08
assumption. If it were just a system of
6:10
rules, maybe they could have been streamlined, but
6:12
Christianity's claim is that this is God's statement to us
6:16
about certain unalterable facts. Facts about his own nature,
6:21
about our nature, and about the way the world actually is.
6:25
Yes, and facts aren't simple just because we want them to be.
6:28
You can't simplify the law of gravity because you find it
6:30
inconvenient, and in the same way you can't just wish away the
6:33
reality of sin to make your worldview more comfortable.
6:37
That's such a key way to reframe it for anyone listening.
6:39
We're not talking about religion as a set of rules, we're talking
6:42
about religion as a description of reality.
6:45
And Lewis pushes that description a step further.
6:48
He says reality isn't just complicated.
6:50
It's also, in his words, usually odd.
6:53
Not just intricate, but weird, unpredictable, doesn't follow
6:57
the neat patterns we expect. No, it doesn't.
6:59
And this is where he gets really interesting because he draws a
7:01
line from this spiritual oddness to what we see in the physical
7:07
world. He says nature itself doesn't
7:09
seem to care about our desire for, you know, aesthetic
7:12
tidiness. He uses the solar system, which
7:15
is a perfect example because our minds, you know, we love
7:18
geometry and logic. We expect order.
7:21
If you're told that planets orbit the sun, you instinctively
7:25
anticipate some kind of mathematical elegance.
7:27
You'd think they'd be spaced out at equal distances.
7:30
Right. Or maybe the distance increases
7:31
by a neat ratio, like it double S each time, or follows some
7:34
beautiful sequence you expect it to fit on a clean chart.
7:37
And you'd expect the sizes to be regular too.
7:40
Maybe they get progressively bigger or smaller, Something
7:42
that feels designed with our sense of order in mind.
7:45
That perfect symmetrical, human designed neatness.
7:50
But what do we actually find when we look at the solar
7:52
system? A total mess from that
7:54
perspective. Yeah, there's no rhyme or reason
7:56
that's immediately obvious in the sizes or the distances.
7:59
It's asymmetrical, sprawling. It almost seems random.
8:03
And then you look at the details like the moons.
8:05
It's all over the place. One has 1 moon, another has
8:08
four, another has two, some have none, and then one has this huge
8:11
bizarre ring system. It's an eccentric reality.
8:14
It completely defies our preference for simple geometry.
8:18
And what's the theological take away from that?
8:20
How does the messiness of space apply here?
8:22
Well, the application is just stunning, Lewis suggests.
8:25
That this faith we hold as a religion, you could not have
8:28
guessed. Meaning if it was too neat, we
8:30
should be suspicious. Exactly.
8:32
If Christianity offered a spiritual universe that was
8:35
perfectly logical and obvious, a salvation plan that fit neatly
8:39
into our human ideas of justice and fairness, well, we'd have
8:43
every reason to think we just made it all up ourselves.
8:45
Are we too convenient? Too convenient, too symmetrical.
8:48
But the actual doctrines are anything but God becoming a man,
8:54
the sovereign of the universe, submitting to a criminal's
8:56
execution, A resurrection from the dead, a life that demands
9:01
daily difficult spiritual struggle.
9:03
None of that is what you'd invent if you were designing a
9:06
comfortable religion. Not at all, he says.
9:08
These doctrines have that queer twist about it that real things
9:11
have. It's the strange, the
9:13
unexpected, the counterintuitive parts that give it the ring of
9:16
truth because it feels like something that comes from
9:19
outside our own imaginations. So if we want an answer that
9:22
actually lines up with reality, a reality that's both
9:25
complicated and odd, we have to be willing to leave the simple,
9:28
comfortable answers behind. The problem isn't simple, so the
9:32
solution can't be simple either. It demands that we accept a
9:35
certain cosmic messiness is part of the truth.
9:39
And that insistence on facing all the facts, not just the
9:42
convenient ones, brings us to what Lewis sees as the central
9:45
problem that any serious worldview has to deal with.
9:48
OK, what is that central problem?
9:49
It's this. We live in a universe that
9:51
contains a huge amount of what is obviously bad, suffering,
9:55
injustice, things that seem meaningless.
9:58
But, and this is the absolute key, the universe also contains
10:02
creatures. US who know that it's bad.
10:05
We have an internal moral standard that judges the
10:07
external world. Yes, we're trapped inside a
10:10
system that often seems broken, but we carry within us an
10:13
undeniable memory or knowledge of how it ought to be.
10:17
That conflict is the breaking point for the simple
10:19
philosophies. Both for atheism and for
10:22
Christianity and water both. Lewis says only two world views
10:26
really take this conflict seriously.
10:28
Only two look at all the facts, the brokenness outside and the
10:31
moral law inside, and don't blink.
10:34
And those two are. 1st the Christian view which says this
10:37
is a good world that has gone profoundly wrong.
10:40
It's a rebellion, it's broken, but it still has the memory, the
10:44
moral DNA of what it was created to be.
10:47
That moral law written on the heart is a reformed tradition,
10:50
would say. Precisely, and the second view
10:51
is dualism. OK, So what is dualism
10:54
basically? Dualism is the belief that there
10:57
are two equal and independent powers in the universe.
11:00
They've both existed forever. 1 is entirely good, the other is
11:03
entirely bad, and this universe is just the battlefield where
11:06
they are locked in an endless war.
11:08
And Lewis actually gives dualism some credit at first, doesn't
11:11
he? He calls it something like the
11:12
manliest and most sensible creed on the market next to
11:15
Christianity. He does, and it's because it
11:18
takes the conflict seriously. It doesn't pretend the world
11:21
isn't a war zone. It correctly identifies that
11:24
feeling of being pulled in two directions, of a war going on
11:27
inside us and around us. It acknowledges that spiritual
11:31
tension. So it's more honest than the
11:33
simple philosophies. Much more.
11:34
But after giving it that credit, Lewis then shows that it has a
11:37
fatal philosophical flaw, a catch that makes the whole
11:41
system impossible when you really examine it.
11:44
And what's that catch? The problem comes up the second
11:47
you say that the good power and the bad power are truly equal
11:50
and independent Co eternal. Neither one made the other, and
11:54
neither has any final authority over the other.
11:57
If that's true, then our whole idea of morality just completely
12:00
falls apart. How so?
12:02
Well, think about it. If they're just two equal
12:04
forces, and each one thinks it's right, then what do we actually
12:07
mean when we call one good and the other bad?
12:10
Right, They're just rivals. One likes creating, the other
12:13
likes destroying. One likes gentleness, the other
12:15
likes cruelty. They're just backing their own
12:18
preferences. That's it.
12:20
And Lewis says that leaves you with two options.
12:22
Option 1 is that when we say we side with the good power, we
12:27
just mean we happen to prefer it, like you prefer coffee over
12:30
tea. A subjective taste.
12:32
A subjective taste, and if that's all it is, we have to
12:34
stop talking about good and evil as if they are objective
12:37
standards. Saying cruelty is evil becomes
12:40
no different than saying I don't like broccoli.
12:42
It's just your opinion. But nobody actually believes
12:45
that. We all believe that kindness
12:48
ought to be preferred over cruelty.
12:50
Whether we feel like being kind in the moment or not, we believe
12:53
it's an objective standard. And that's the hinge of the
12:55
whole argument. The moment you insist on that,
12:57
the moment you say 1 power is good with a capital G, you must
13:01
mean it's the one you ought to prefer regardless of your
13:03
feelings. You're saying that the other
13:05
power is actually objectively wrong, Mistaken.
13:10
OK. And why is that a problem for
13:11
dualism? Because the moment you say one
13:14
of them is wrong, you have just introduced a third thing into
13:18
the universe. A standard of some.
13:19
Kind a standard, a law or rule of what is objectively good that
13:23
stands above and outside of both of them.
13:26
And that standard has to be the ultimate reality.
13:29
So if there's a rule that judges both powers, that rule or the
13:33
lawgiver who made it must be the real God.
13:36
The real ultimate God, that third thing is, as Liz puts it,
13:39
farther back and higher up than either of them.
13:42
So the two powers aren't ultimate anymore.
13:44
They are both subject to this higher law and.
13:46
What we call good and bad is just a description of their
13:49
relationship to that ultimate God.
13:51
Yes. One power is in a right
13:54
relationship with him and the other is in a wrong rebellious
13:56
relationship. And just like that, the whole
13:58
idea of a war between 2 equal sovereigns collapses.
14:02
It's not dualism anymore. That's a really clean, logical
14:06
argument, but he doesn't stop there, does he?
14:08
He says you can come at dualism from a totally different
14:10
direction just by looking at the nature of Vadnais itself.
14:14
Right, he asks. Is a very practical question.
14:17
If dualism were true, the bad power would have to be a being
14:21
that just loves vadnais for its own sake, purely for the sake of
14:25
being bad. But do we ever actually see that
14:27
in real life? Do we meet people who are cruel
14:30
just because cruelty is wrong? It doesn't seem to work that
14:33
way. Even the most terrible acts seem
14:35
to have some other motive behind them.
14:37
They do. Lewis uses cruelty as the test
14:40
case because it seems like the closest thing to pure malice.
14:43
But when you dissect it, he says, you find other drivers.
14:46
He points to two main ones. First, there's sadism, which is
14:49
a perversion where cruelty is linked to some kind of sensual
14:52
pleasure for the person doing. That's corrupt pleasure.
14:55
And the second, which is much more common, is that the cruelty
14:57
is a means to an end. You're trying to get something
15:00
Money, power, safety, control. And this is where he makes this
15:04
incredible counterintuitive point.
15:06
Pleasure, money, power, safety. In themselves, these aren't evil
15:10
things as far as they go. They are good things, or at
15:13
least they're desirable parts of a normal, healthy life.
15:16
So the wickedness isn't in wanting the thing itself, it's
15:19
in how you pursue it. It's entirely in pursuing that
15:22
good thing by the wrong method or way too much, or at the
15:25
expense of something much better.
15:27
This completely changes how you have to think about sin.
15:30
Lewis is arguing that Vadnais can't exist on its own.
15:33
It needs something good to spoil.
15:35
Yes, goodness is original. It is itself.
15:38
Vadnais is only spoiled goodness.
15:40
It's a parasite. You have to have a healthy body
15:43
before a disease can come and corrupt it.
15:45
The disease doesn't create anything new, IT just ruins what
15:48
was already there. And that plays out in our
15:50
motivations. A person can do a good deed for
15:53
the pure sake of goodness, even if it's hard and they get
15:56
nothing out of it. But Lewis claims nobody does a
15:59
cruel thing just for the sake of cruelty being wrong.
16:02
They do it because it was in some twisted way pleasant or
16:05
useful to them, and they were getting some kind of corrupted
16:07
good out of it. That parasitic relationship is
16:10
the key. Go back to the sadism example.
16:12
We call it a sexual perversion. The word itself tells you it's a
16:16
twisting of something that was originally normal and good.
16:20
You can explain the perversion by starting with the normal
16:22
function, but you can't explain the normal by starting with the
16:25
perversion. The dependency only goes one
16:27
way. So let's bring that back to the
16:29
bad power and dualism. If this being is supposed to be
16:33
eternally and independently evil, it would have to be able
16:36
to create its own evil from scratch.
16:38
You would have to supply its own impulses, its own desires.
16:41
But Lewis says this is impossible.
16:43
He calls the independent bad power a mere bogey.
16:47
For it to even be bad, it has to have good things to want, like
16:51
power or victory, and good impulses to pervert.
16:54
Even its own existence is a good thing.
16:56
Existence itself is a good thing.
16:58
Intelligence is a good thing. Willpower is a good thing.
17:01
For the bad power to do anything at all, it has to use these
17:04
tools. And where did it get them it?
17:06
Can't have created them itself because they're good.
17:08
It must be constantly borrowing or stealing them from the good
17:11
power. To be effective in its malice.
17:14
The bad power has to use weapons that it could only have gotten
17:17
from its enemy. And that is the final nail in
17:19
the coffin for dualism. The bad power is an independent
17:24
it's part of the good powers world, a part that has gone
17:27
wrong. A part that has gone terribly
17:29
wrong. And this whole philosophical
17:31
line of reasoning leads directly to what Christian doctrine has
17:35
been saying all along. That the devil is a fallen
17:37
Angel. Exactly.
17:38
That's not just some story for kids.
17:40
It's a precise theological statement recognizing the fact
17:43
that evil is a parasite, not an original thing.
17:46
If the devil were an eternal independent being, that would be
17:50
dualism. But because he is a fallen
17:52
creature, a being who took the good gifts of intelligence and
17:56
will and existence that God gave him and chose to corrupt them
17:59
through rebellion, he proves his own dependency on guard with
18:03
every move he makes. It's a sobering thought that
18:05
every quality that makes a wicked person effective, their
18:08
cleverness, their determination, their charisma, are all good
18:12
things in their essence. They're just being twisted and
18:14
misused. They are wielding borrowed
18:16
weapons against the very one who provides them.
18:19
And This is why Lewis is so careful to distinguish real
18:22
Christianity from both dualism and the watered down version.
18:26
He admits that once you get past Christianity and water, the real
18:29
thing is much closer to dualism than most people think.
18:33
In what way? In that it takes the dark power
18:35
seriously, Lewis says when he first really read the New
18:38
Testament, he was surprised at how often it talks about a
18:41
mighty evil spirit, a real force behind death and disease and
18:44
sin. Christianity agrees with dualism
18:48
on one key point. This universe is at war.
18:52
There is a real personal, external enemy.
18:54
But the nature of that war is completely different.
18:57
Completely. It is not a war between two
18:59
independent powers, it is a civil war.
19:01
It is a rebellion. A rebellion that took place
19:03
inside the Kingdom of the One True King.
19:05
Yes, the dark power was created by God.
19:07
It was good when it was created. Powerful, intelligent,
19:10
beautiful. And then it used the free will
19:12
God gave it to go wrong. The fight is between the
19:15
rightful king and a group of rebels, not between 2 equal
19:18
sovereigns. And this idea of a civil war is
19:20
what leads Lewis to his most powerful, most defining image
19:24
for the human condition. It is.
19:26
He sums it all up by saying enemy occupied territory.
19:30
That is what this world is. And if you let that image sink
19:33
in, it changes everything about how you see the Christian story.
19:37
It's not a self help program or a cozy philosophy anymore.
19:40
No, it becomes a desperate, dramatic wartime story.
19:45
The Gospel is the story of the rightful King, the one who has
19:48
total sovereignty over this territory, landing behind enemy
19:51
lines. He landed, as Lewis says, in
19:53
disguise. And the purpose of that landing?
19:55
The King is here to call everyone still loyal to him, all
19:58
of us trapped in this occupied territory, to join a great
20:02
campaign of sabotage. I love that word choice
20:05
sabotage. It's so active.
20:07
It's not about just sitting back and waiting for rescue.
20:09
Not at all. It means you are actively
20:11
working against the enemy's operations.
20:13
Every act of true kindness, every moment of forgiveness,
20:16
every choice for integrity over corruption is a piece of
20:19
sabotage against the rebel network.
20:21
This metaphor even makes sense of things in the Christian life.
20:25
They can sometimes feel a bit abstract, like going to church.
20:31
Right in this wartime setting, attending church isn't just a
20:34
social gathering or an ethics lesson, Lewis says.
20:37
You are listening in to the Secret Wireless from our
20:40
friends. You're getting your orders from
20:42
headquarters. You're getting your orders,
20:43
you're being reminded of who you are, whose side you're on, what
20:46
the King's strategy is. It's the communication line that
20:49
keeps you from forgetting that you're a loyalist in a hostile
20:52
land. And that explains why the enemy,
20:54
the occupying force, would be so desperate to stop us from
20:58
listening to that broadcast. Absolutely.
21:00
The tactics are often simple, but they're insidious.
21:03
Lewis mentions just plain laziness.
21:05
It's hard to get out of bed on a Sunday.
21:08
But he says the enemy is much more effective when they play on
21:10
our conceit, our pride, our pride and especially our
21:13
intellectual snobbery. That feels very relevant for
21:16
today, the idea that smart, sophisticated modern people are
21:20
surely past the need for something as old fashioned as
21:23
church or reading an ancient book.
21:25
That's the whisper campaign the enemy tells you.
21:28
That kind of thing is for the simple minded, the uncritical.
21:32
Real intelligence means figuring it all out on your own,
21:35
independent of the King's official communications.
21:38
It's the parasite at work again, using the good gift of
21:41
intelligence to encourage isolation and rebellion.
21:44
It's the classic move, and Lewis knows that by saying all this,
21:48
by framing it as a civil war, he's bringing the devil back
21:51
into the conversation for people who've tried very hard to get
21:54
rid of him. People will scoff, they'll say
21:56
you don't really mean in this day and age you're reintroducing
21:59
the devil with hoofs and horns and all that.
22:01
And I love Lewis's response. He's so dismissive of that
22:04
chronological snobbery. He says he has no idea what the
22:07
time of day has to do with an objective fact.
22:09
He's not bothered about the cartoonish image.
22:11
Not at all. The hoofs and horns are
22:13
irrelevant, but in every other way his answer is an emphatic
22:17
yes. I do.
22:18
He fully affirms the reality of a mighty evil spirit, a real
22:22
power behind the corruption we see in the world.
22:24
The Rebellion has a general, and we need to take that general
22:27
seriously. So the whole story of the
22:29
Gospel, the incarnation, the cross, the resurrection, it's
22:33
all framed as the King's costly and dramatic invasion to reclaim
22:38
his territory from these rebels. That's why it can't be simple.
22:41
The problem is a cosmic war, so the solution had to be a cosmic
22:45
victory. The cost of liberation was
22:47
immense. That really brings it all
22:49
together. We started with this human
22:51
demand for religion to be simple.
22:53
We saw how Lewis sets aside the easy answers, atheism and
22:56
Christianity and water, because they don't face the facts.
22:59
Right. And then we saw that the very
23:00
existence of objective evil requires an objective standard
23:03
of good, which points to 1 Ultimate sovereign God dualism
23:08
can't stand. And most critically, when we
23:11
looked at how evil actually works, we saw that it has to be
23:14
a parasite. It can't create.
23:16
You can only spoil. It has to steal its power, its
23:18
intelligence, its very existence from the good.
23:22
The fact that the rebellion can even function is a backhanded
23:24
confirmation of the King's authority, since the rebels are
23:27
using his borrowed goods to fight him.
23:29
Lewis leaves us with a really chilling final thought about
23:32
this dark power. He says he doesn't know what the
23:34
devil looks like, but he suggests that if someone truly
23:38
wants to know him better, they will be allowed to.
23:41
But then he adds that sharp warning.
23:44
Whether you'll like it when you do is another question.
23:46
That is a stark warning because if you follow the logic of his
23:50
argument, getting to know the nature of the rebellion means
23:53
getting to know the nature of your own sin and.
23:55
Think about what that really means for you listening right
23:58
now. If Lewis is correct, then every
24:01
single second of your life, every breath you take, every
24:03
thought in your head, your ability to choose your will
24:06
itself is a gift. It's all borrowed from the good
24:09
power. So every time we choose sin,
24:11
we're not just breaking a rule. It's more than that.
24:13
Since sin is the parasitic pursuit of a good thing in a
24:16
spoiled way, every deliberate act of rebellion is an act of
24:20
theft. You're taking the very
24:22
capability God gives you and using it against His purposes.
24:26
It's a profound betrayal of the One who is lending you the power
24:29
to act at all. That completely reframes what
24:31
sin is. It's not just an offense against
24:34
God, it's structurally dependent on Him, which makes it both
24:38
deeply foolish and parasitic. It does.
24:40
It means the call to join the sabotage, the call to repentance
24:43
and to realign yourself with the king isn't just a religious
24:47
duty. It's a call to sanity, a call to
24:50
stop sawing off the branch you're sitting on.
24:52
So the final question Lewis leaves us with, the thing to
24:54
really Mull over is that if you accept that every good thing in
24:58
you, even your ability to will a bad thing, is borrowed from God,
25:03
how does that change the way you fight in this civil war?
25:05
How seriously does it make you take the battle that's raging
25:08
around you and, more pointedly, inside you?
25:11
That's the depth you arrive at when you finally accept the
25:13
reality of the invasion.