Latest / Radio Baloney - The Richie Baloney Show! / MSM Narrative Lover Seth Macfarlane Vs Free Speech

Transcript

MSM Narrative Lover Seth Macfarlane Vs Free Speech · Radio Baloney - The Richie Baloney Show!

• 0:03
  So let's see, so from myth and form to your seth MacFarlane doesn't like
• 0:07
  social media because it gives a voice to people that didn't go to college or
• 0:13
  journalism. Hmm, nothing elitist about that at all. Let's take a look
• 0:19
  Fox doing all these other things, and then social media comes in and you
• 0:23
  you know, I think journalists are fucking incredible. Yes, if somebody who
• 0:29
  writes an entire army, I think journalists are fucking incredible. Okay, all
• 0:39
  right, let's that's a great start right there. Article about how much you
• 0:44
  suck, but they like, fucking went to college, got a degree,
• 0:47
  earned it, take the time to go through all the things they don't particularly
• 0:52
  like about it. Amazing. But then when you give that same power to
• 0:55
  every person in the universe with a Twitter account, has that ever affected You
• 1:00
  just said it more eloquently than how credulous are these people? Like? How
• 1:03
  credulous is this guy? He thinks they're trying to tell you the truth?
• 1:08
  I ever could? It is truely? I am also I I will defend
• 1:14
  to the death the presence and existence of journalists. As you said earlier,
• 1:21
  print media is in trouble. It is. Yeah, I mean, look
• 1:25
  now remember this for later. He said, you said journalists. There,
• 1:30
  journalists he's got he would defend to the death journalists. Not entirely true,
• 1:34
  as we'll see in a little bit. But let's continue the way I'm going
• 1:38
  to look at it, Like when you look at a New York Times article
• 1:41
  on Instagram. That's funny, that's his funny sentence. But yeah, but
• 1:47
  they do have an Instagram and you look at the headline and you read it,
• 1:51
  and you maybe click on the link and you read the story. That
• 1:53
  story, whether you agree with it or not, whether you connect with it
• 2:00
  or not, has been written by somebody who did the research, who did
• 2:04
  the work, who did the footwork, who did the research, did the
• 2:09
  footwork, you mean they read other people's articles and then repeated it, because
• 2:15
  that's pretty much what they do. But anyway, let's continue put in the
• 2:21
  hours to to at least make an attempt to communicate the truth to their audience.
• 2:27
  And yeah, they're not perfect. Oh credulous, I mean, I
• 2:30
  don't know. Let's see WMD's in Iraq. New York Times talked about that
• 2:37
  Russia hoax went on for years. There was officer sic nic They said that
• 2:42
  Sam so that he was killed by January sixth rioters like eight months later they
• 2:46
  corrected that, which nobody saw. What did they have to say about you
• 2:52
  know, when Biden was talking about how if you got the JAB you wouldn't
• 2:54
  get sick and you couldn't transmit, I didn't say anything. They didn't do
• 2:58
  any leg work on any of this stuff, as far as I can tell.
• 3:00
  As far as I can tell, they were just pushing a narrative and
• 3:05
  approved narrative. And that's what it feels like to me, is that their
• 3:07
  job is to spout approved narratives, and that seems like all that they actually
• 3:15
  do. But let's continue. You know, they're not far, they're just
• 3:19
  their opinion. They're not perfect. If they make a mistake, and they
• 3:22
  do make their share of mistakes, shut out complex, Y'll fuck up all
• 3:24
  the time. Anyway, can continue. You know there are retractions. There
• 3:29
  are admissions of that, Yes, retractions, sixty pages in that nobody ever
• 3:32
  sees that come months later. That's sure. You know, that's what separates
• 3:38
  Fox News. Fox News is in it for the dough. That's his SI
• 3:42
  Wait a second, Fox, I thought he said he would defend to the
• 3:45
  life of journalists. I thought we said he was going to defend journalists.
• 3:49
  It turns out it's not all journalists. Though. It's not all journalists.
• 3:53
  It turns out it's just journalists who tell him what he wants to hear.
• 3:57
  Those are the ones he's going to defend. Continue, as I can put
• 4:00
  it, they're in it for the money, and they make a lot of
• 4:02
  money, and they get a lot of viewers. Is it worth It wouldn't
• 4:05
  be to me. I wouldn't be able to sleep at night, but it
• 4:10
  makes them a lot of money. Complex and and well, they say things
• 4:14
  that sometimes aren't popular at Hollywood. I mean Seth McFarlane here, He wouldn't
• 4:18
  be able to sleep at night if he said things that weren't approved by every
• 4:21
  single person around him. You know, if you weren't just regurgitating things that
• 4:27
  he'd heard on CNN and MSNBC, he wouldn't be able to sleep at night.
• 4:30
  You know, when you look at legitimate journalism, it just I go
• 4:34
  back to my what I said. You look at a New York Times article
• 4:36
  on Instagram and then you look at the comments, and everyone thinks they're an
• 4:41
  expert. Everybody thinks that they know better than the person who did the legwork.
• 4:46
  They don't do any legwork. It's obvious they're not doing that. They're
• 4:51
  wrong about so much. Lablake, that was just some crazy comic book.
• 4:57
  That was some crazy comic book guests or you know, crazy. They're not
• 5:01
  doing any leg work. They're just repeating things they're told to repeat. That's
• 5:06
  it. They're pushing the approved narrative. That's all that it is. There's
• 5:12
  no leg work involved there. Everybody thinks they know better than the person who
• 5:16
  put in the hours, did the research, did the interviews, did the
• 5:19
  follow up, made did the best that they could to make sure. If
• 5:24
  you did four hours of your own research every night, you would be better
• 5:28
  informed than anybody at the New York Times. You would. You'd be doing
• 5:31
  more work than they do. Let's continue or that everything that they put into
• 5:36
  print is factual, and maybe they missed something, maybe they fucked up,
• 5:41
  but they did their best, and then you know me. Johnny spaghetti stain
• 5:46
  on his shirt writes a comment that's bullshit. It's it's shocking to me that
• 5:54
  any press outlet just but what if the thing they're telling you is clearly false
• 6:00
  and anybody can see that, any sane person can recognize that, well,
• 6:04
  these claims that Trump has been a Russian agent since the eighties, that seems
• 6:10
  unlikely. Johnny Spaghetti shirt, Johnny Spaghetti stayed on his shirt. Does it
• 6:16
  need to be a journalist to know that's ridiculous? Johnny Spaghetti stayed on his
• 6:21
  shirt? Does it need to Does it need to be an expert to know
• 6:25
  that maybe sex change, sex changes for children is insane? Anyway, let's
• 6:30
  continue. They can sent to comments under there, because there is there are
• 6:35
  studies that have shown that if you read an article on social media, you
• 6:40
  process it. You process it a certain way once you read the comments and
• 6:43
  you start absorbing the inevitable extremism that comes of the comments that are going to
• 6:48
  reduce that to black and white extremism being anything that disagrees with the preferred or
• 6:55
  the accepted narrative. Your perception of the original article is affected that you go
• 7:00
  back to the original article and you look at it in a more extreme,
• 7:03
  more polarized way. Fox maybe a more critical way. Maybe that's a better
• 7:10
  way to put it. Maybe, oh well, maybe I'll look into this
• 7:13
  a bit more. But you don't want to do that because you don't have
• 7:15
  a degree in journalism, so it would be complete, a complete waste of
• 7:18
  time. Your brain just simply couldn't handle it. I find this astonishing,
• 7:24
  this level of elitism, it's grotesque. This is the typical leftist attitude towards
• 7:32
  just the regular person. Too stupid, You can't possibly understand, you need
• 7:38
  to be told by us. I'm Seth McFarlane. I'm Seth MacFarlane. You
• 7:43
  think that I don't know? You think that I don't You think somebody in
• 7:46
  my position wouldn't understand it wouldn't be able to be the arbiter. Isn't the
• 7:51
  arbiter of truth