Latest / The Epstein Chronicles / Mega Edition: Zorro Ranch And The Information Blackout (10/11/26)

Transcript

Mega Edition: Zorro Ranch And The Information Blackout (10/11/26) · The Epstein Chronicles

0:00
Speaker 1: What's up everyone and welcome to another episode of the
0:03
Speaker 1: Epstein Chronicles. When it comes to Jeffrey Epstein and Zorro Ranch,
0:08
Speaker 1: we're all still trying to figure out what exactly was
0:11
Speaker 1: going on. One thing is for sure, we don't have
0:14
Speaker 1: the full story. But the good news is, we're starting
0:18
Speaker 1: to piece it together. And I think that when we
0:22
Speaker 1: do have the full story, it's going to be pretty
0:24
Speaker 1: shocking to people. Because Jeffrey Epstein chose Zorro Ranch for
0:28
Speaker 1: a reason. And that reason... is location. And considering the
0:32
Speaker 1: sensitive installations that Zorro Ranch is nestled between, it starts
0:37
Speaker 1: to make a whole lot of sense. Because Jeffrey Epstein
0:40
Speaker 1: was a whole lot more than a lone predator. And
0:43
Speaker 1: in this article from Raw Story, we're going to talk
0:45
Speaker 1: a little bit more about Jeffrey Epstein and his alleged
0:48
Speaker 1: ties to the CIA. This article was published by Raw
0:52
Speaker 1: Story and the headline. Little known detail at Epstein's Zorro
0:56
Speaker 1: Ranch may point to CIA ties. This article was authored
1:01
Speaker 1: by Alexander Willis. And as far as I'm concerned, the
1:04
Speaker 1: evidence has been mounting for years that Jeffrey Epstein was
1:08
Speaker 1: working with and for the CIA. Not just the CIA,
1:13
Speaker 1: but Epstein's Genesis story. Well, that all started at Langley.
1:18
Speaker 1: So that's why I tell you, if you think we've
1:20
Speaker 1: seen all the Epstein files, you have another thing coming.
1:23
Speaker 1: We most certainly have not. We haven't even seen all
1:26
Speaker 1: the files that the DOJ has. Never mind Epstein. what
1:29
Speaker 1: they're stashing at Langley. After combing through the Justice Department's
1:34
Speaker 1: publicly available files on Jeffrey Epstein for months, veteran journalist
1:39
Speaker 1: Elisa Valdez Rodriguez came to a striking conclusion on Tuesday
1:43
Speaker 1: that the disgraced financier's communication infrastructure suggests ties to U.S. intelligence.
1:49
Speaker 1: No doubt about it. Why would he have the kind
1:52
Speaker 1: of things that he had on this property? It makes
1:55
Speaker 1: zero sense for a normal person, some lone predator, To
1:59
Speaker 1: have the shit that Epstein had. Epstein was CIA. Valdez
2:04
Speaker 1: Rodriguez bluntly claimed. In the headline of her latest report.
2:08
Speaker 1: Published Tuesday. Citing the advanced communication network. At his New
2:12
Speaker 1: Mexico compound. As proof. Well I think it's pretty strong proof.
2:18
Speaker 1: It's not the smoking gun. But when you add it
2:20
Speaker 1: with everything else we know. Not looking so good. For
2:23
Speaker 1: the CIA. And look let's be very clear. I've said
2:28
Speaker 1: from the very beginning that Jeffrey Epstein was a CIA cutout.
2:33
Speaker 1: He was first flipped by the FBI, and then after that, well,
2:38
Speaker 1: they figured out what they had. And once the government
2:41
Speaker 1: figures out that they have a useful tool, they use it.
2:44
Speaker 1: And according to our intelligence services, letting Epstein abuse girls
2:49
Speaker 1: was acceptable as long as he performed his duties for
2:52
Speaker 1: the intelligence service. Kind of like Whitey Bulger. He was
2:56
Speaker 1: an informant for the government for all those years, but
2:59
Speaker 1: he was still murdering people. He was still acting the
3:02
Speaker 1: way he did, and the government just protected him because
3:05
Speaker 1: they found him useful. You know, means justify the end
3:08
Speaker 1: and all. There's no public confirmation from the CIA, the
3:11
Speaker 1: Justice Department, or any official source that Epstein worked for
3:15
Speaker 1: or was an asset of U.S. intelligence. Oh yeah, because
3:19
Speaker 1: they're so forthcoming. They want to be so transparent that
3:22
Speaker 1: they got rid of all the people that were involved
3:25
Speaker 1: in the petition. So now, James Comer's leading the band?
3:29
Speaker 1: Oh yeah, we're going to get to the bottom of this.
3:31
Speaker 1: I'm sure of it. Valdez Rodriguez had previously uncovered that
3:36
Speaker 1: Epstein's New Mexico compound, formerly known as Zorro Ranch, was
3:40
Speaker 1: outfitted with a private microwave communications link, a military-grade communications
3:45
Speaker 1: channel that appears to still be maintained by the property's
3:48
Speaker 1: new owner, former GOP candidate and billionaire businessman Don Huffines,
3:53
Speaker 1: a strong ally. of President Donnie Diddles. Well, that's odd.
3:59
Speaker 1: Why would that still be in operation? And furthermore, what's
4:02
Speaker 1: underneath Zorro Ranch in those catacombs? What the hell is
4:06
Speaker 1: going on down there? And why would the government continue
4:09
Speaker 1: using that facility? Valdez Rodriguez has uncovered that Zorro Ranch
4:14
Speaker 1: was likely built by Bradbury Stamm, a major U.S. government-linked
4:19
Speaker 1: contractor that does not build individual homes. And she also
4:23
Speaker 1: exposed high-ranking officials for their previously undisclosed ties with a
4:28
Speaker 1: wealthy financier. Well, good job by Ms. Valdez Rodriguez. Imagine
4:34
Speaker 1: calling yourself a journalist and not being interested in what
4:38
Speaker 1: happened here. I just don't get it. I really just
4:41
Speaker 1: don't get it. The revelations combined with reporting from journalist
4:45
Speaker 1: Kate Justice suggest Epstein may have been recruited as a
4:49
Speaker 1: CIA asset as a teenager with the help of Donald Barr.
4:53
Speaker 1: father of Trump's former Attorney General, William Barr, led Valdez
4:57
Speaker 1: Rodriguez to conclude that Epstein's operations were at least in
5:01
Speaker 1: part facilitated by U.S. intelligence. That's where she loses me.
5:05
Speaker 1: I don't think Donald Barr had anything to do with
5:07
Speaker 1: it as far as recruiting him. And I think that
5:10
Speaker 1: Jeffrey Epstein was flipped by the FBI first. And then,
5:13
Speaker 1: of course, the FBI and the CIA, they talk. And
5:18
Speaker 1: if they have an informant that might be useful, well...
5:22
Speaker 1: Now look, I'm not saying that Donald Barr's dad didn't
5:25
Speaker 1: have anything to do with it afterwards. Maybe he did.
5:28
Speaker 1: I don't know. But what I will tell you is this.
5:33
Speaker 1: Jeffrey Epstein was an asset for the government. The files
5:40
Speaker 1: were always public. The documents were always there. The story
5:43
Speaker 1: was always visible to anyone who looked. Valdez Rodriguez wrote. True.
5:47
Speaker 1: 100% true. And you just have to do the legwork
5:51
Speaker 1: to put the pieces together. There's no gigantic mystery here.
5:55
Speaker 1: Now look, again, there is no smoking gun. There's not
5:58
Speaker 1: going to be. You're dealing with intelligence. They clean up
6:02
Speaker 1: their mess. When an asset is burned, they're burned. That
6:06
Speaker 1: means all the records, everything connecting them to the service,
6:10
Speaker 1: that's gone. And that's exactly what happened with Epstein. But
6:15
Speaker 1: not only did they get rid of the paper trail, well,
6:18
Speaker 1: they had to get rid of the source. Valdez-Rodriguez also
6:24
Speaker 1: highlighted a telling email exchange Epstein had just over three
6:27
Speaker 1: years before his death in jail while awaiting trial on
6:30
Speaker 1: sex trafficking charges. The NYC medical examiner ruled it a suicide.
6:36
Speaker 1: In March of 2016, Epstein communicated with an individual named William,
6:42
Speaker 1: who Valdez-Rodriguez identified as being Bill Patterson, a New Mexico
6:47
Speaker 1: businessman and owner of Patterson Ranch Airport in Santa Fe.
6:51
Speaker 1: about setting up an internet connection for Zorro Ranch. Look,
6:55
Speaker 1: Epstein's tentacles reach deep. And when it comes to New Mexico, folks, again,
7:00
Speaker 1: we are just scratching the surface. There's a lot going
7:04
Speaker 1: on down in New Mexico. Of the options available, Epstein
7:10
Speaker 1: chose the most difficult option, one that Patterson said would
7:13
Speaker 1: require incredibly expensive industrial, military-grade equipment. I wonder why he
7:19
Speaker 1: needed that. I'm sure it was just so he could,
7:21
Speaker 1: you know, send emails to Henry Jarecki or so that
7:25
Speaker 1: he can contact Prince Andrew. I mean, how much more
7:28
Speaker 1: evidence do people need? The silver lining of choosing the
7:32
Speaker 1: most difficult option, Valdez Rodriguez explained, was that it would
7:36
Speaker 1: make interception of communications effectively impossible. So what people will
7:41
Speaker 1: say is he was just a private guy, you know,
7:43
Speaker 1: rich guy, private, didn't want anyone to know about all
7:47
Speaker 1: of his, you know, business dealings. What are you, a
7:49
Speaker 1: conspiracy theorist? The documents recording that choice and everything that
7:55
Speaker 1: followed are sitting in the DOJ's publicly available Epstein file archive.
8:00
Speaker 1: They've been there since the files were released. Almost no
8:03
Speaker 1: one has read them, Valdez Rodriguez wrote. Well, there's a
8:06
Speaker 1: lot going on in the files. And I think each
8:09
Speaker 1: person who's interested in the story has their own rabbit
8:12
Speaker 1: holes to jump down. And right now, we're focusing on
8:16
Speaker 1: Jeffrey Epstein's death when it comes to the files. But
8:19
Speaker 1: we're going to make our way through all of it. well,
8:23
Speaker 1: maybe not all of it, 3 million documents, a lot
8:24
Speaker 1: of documents, but the ones that are consequential, the ones
8:29
Speaker 1: that I find to be enlightening. Our journey has just begun.
8:33
Speaker 1: What they reveal is not merely a connectivity decision. It's
8:37
Speaker 1: the operational signature of an intelligence asset building covert communications
8:42
Speaker 1: infrastructure surrounded by the men who built them, protected by
8:45
Speaker 1: the institutions that owned them, and connected literally through a
8:49
Speaker 1: satellite uplink with direct-to-orbit communications authorization for wherever his handlers
8:55
Speaker 1: needed that data to go. And I don't think Epstein
8:57
Speaker 1: had handlers in the traditional sense. I think that Epstein
9:02
Speaker 1: was a free agent. He had contacts. He had people
9:05
Speaker 1: at these agencies that he could go through. And people
9:09
Speaker 1: certainly contacted him for jobs. 100%. But I don't think
9:14
Speaker 1: he had a handler in the traditional sense. You know,
9:17
Speaker 1: going to the park for a meetup or a drop-off.
9:22
Speaker 1: all right, the bench over by the statue, you're going
9:24
Speaker 1: to look under the bench and there is a hollowed
9:27
Speaker 1: out piece of it. And that's where you'll find your message.
9:29
Speaker 1: I don't think that's what Epstein was doing. I think
9:31
Speaker 1: that Epstein was working for himself a lot of the time,
9:35
Speaker 1: but that he would take jobs on spec. You know,
9:37
Speaker 1: he'd be contacted by Russia or he'd be contacted by
9:40
Speaker 1: the Mossad or somebody at CIA or MI6, whatever. And
9:46
Speaker 1: he would effectively be the middleman. He'd facilitate whatever it
9:49
Speaker 1: is they're looking for. And I think that when you
9:53
Speaker 1: really get into it and you start looking at what
9:55
Speaker 1: Epstein really was, that's what he was, a facilitator. a
10:00
Speaker 1: man that would make things happen yeah I could connect
10:03
Speaker 1: you oh I can loan you that oh I got
10:06
Speaker 1: a guy and that's why Epstein was indispensable to these
10:09
Speaker 1: people and that's why in my opinion he was protected
10:12
Speaker 1: for so long and now that the state of New
10:14
Speaker 1: Mexico has launched their investigation I wonder how deep they're
10:18
Speaker 1: gonna go So, like usual, we'll keep an eye on things,
10:22
Speaker 1: and when we have some more information one way or
10:24
Speaker 1: the other, we'll get it added to the catalog. All
10:27
Speaker 1: the information that goes with this episode can be found
10:31
Speaker 1: in the description box. What's up, everyone, and welcome to
10:34
Speaker 1: another episode of the Epstein Chronicles. One of the most
10:39
Speaker 1: interesting and disturbing topics when it comes to Jeffrey Epstein
10:43
Speaker 1: is Zorro Ranch. And now we're learning that a new whistleblower...
10:49
Speaker 1: has sent pictures of alleged burial sites to New Mexico lawmakers.
10:55
Speaker 1: And on its face, that seems to be the kind
10:58
Speaker 1: of evidence that could blow things open, right? I mean,
11:01
Speaker 1: actual evidence that girls were killed at Zorro Ranch, that
11:06
Speaker 1: would blow this whole thing open. But I'm going to
11:10
Speaker 1: caution everybody, like usual, to not jump the gun. We
11:14
Speaker 1: have no idea who sent this email, who sent the photos.
11:18
Speaker 1: or if it's even real. And considering the concerted effort
11:21
Speaker 1: to continue to confuse people when it comes to Jeffrey Epstein,
11:25
Speaker 1: I remain super cautious and guarded when it comes to
11:28
Speaker 1: evidence that allegedly points to something like this. Now, with
11:32
Speaker 1: that said, that doesn't mean that I don't believe that
11:36
Speaker 1: there are graves on this property. I think that it's
11:39
Speaker 1: a very good possibility. And as you all know, I'm
11:43
Speaker 1: not somebody that really buys in to all the conspiracy nonsense.
11:46
Speaker 1: I don't think you need to here. I mean, there's
11:48
Speaker 1: enough disturbing information, enough salacious information that's verifiable that I
11:54
Speaker 1: have no idea why people want to dive down rabbit
11:56
Speaker 1: holes that have no end. Unless, of course, those people
11:59
Speaker 1: are trying to confuse you. Because there's a lot of
12:02
Speaker 1: that out there. So when I say be cautious, that's
12:06
Speaker 1: what I mean. Be very, very cautious of falling into
12:10
Speaker 1: the trap of following your confirmation bias. Just because you
12:14
Speaker 1: want something to be real doesn't mean that reality is
12:17
Speaker 1: going to cooperate. And that's why for me anyway, if
12:20
Speaker 1: there is something that fits with my confirmation bias, those
12:24
Speaker 1: are the issues that I try to remain the most
12:26
Speaker 1: skeptical about. Because I don't want to fall into the trap, right? Oh, well,
12:31
Speaker 1: I already believe this. So let's find the evidence that
12:33
Speaker 1: fits what I believe already. And I think a lot
12:36
Speaker 1: of people fall into that trap. I know I have
12:38
Speaker 1: in the past. But when it comes to this case,
12:41
Speaker 1: I think that the most important thing is to follow
12:44
Speaker 1: the evidence wherever that evidence takes you. So in this episode,
12:48
Speaker 1: we have an article from International Business Times and the headline,
12:52
Speaker 1: Epstein Files Whistleblower Claims Gravelike Plots Were Spotted at Zorro
12:57
Speaker 1: Ranch As FBI Faces Questions. This article was authored by
13:02
Speaker 1: Chrisnell Longino, a whistleblower, has claimed to have discovered grave-like
13:08
Speaker 1: plots at Jeffrey Epstein's former Zorro Ranch in New Mexico,
13:13
Speaker 1: sharing photos with state lawmakers investigating the late financier. The images,
13:18
Speaker 1: which have not been independently verified, reportedly show several dug-up
13:23
Speaker 1: burial sites on the property. Now look, that sounds disturbing, right?
13:28
Speaker 1: But we have to keep in mind that it could
13:31
Speaker 1: be other things. Was an animal buried there? Did somebody
13:35
Speaker 1: bury a pet dog? You know, things like that, right?
13:39
Speaker 1: We have to ask all the questions. And if you're
13:41
Speaker 1: going to investigate something, you have to turn over every rock,
13:45
Speaker 1: shake every bush, and kick in every door. And that
13:48
Speaker 1: obviously was never done here. The revelation comes amid renewed
13:52
Speaker 1: attention on Epstein's activity and raises fresh questions about the
13:56
Speaker 1: FBI and other authorities' handling of evidence linked to the
14:00
Speaker 1: controversial estate. What evidence? Nobody raided the estate. Not one
14:06
Speaker 1: single federal officer showed up there, kicked in the door,
14:09
Speaker 1: waved a 4-4, or anything similar. And for those of
14:12
Speaker 1: you who have been listening since 2019, you know exactly
14:16
Speaker 1: how crazy I went when that news broke. I mean,
14:21
Speaker 1: it was so insane to me that I had to
14:23
Speaker 1: go down to Zorro Ranch myself. And I'm not exactly
14:26
Speaker 1: what you would call a journalist, especially back then. But
14:29
Speaker 1: I knew something was up, and I knew something was wrong.
14:33
Speaker 1: and I still know something is wrong. Now, if that
14:35
Speaker 1: means that there's bodies that are buried there, I don't know.
14:39
Speaker 1: But I do know that we don't even have close
14:43
Speaker 1: to anywhere near the whole story when it comes to
14:45
Speaker 1: what was going on at Zorro Ranch. The tipster whose
14:52
Speaker 1: identity has been redacted reportedly broke into the ranch in
14:56
Speaker 1: 2020 and discovered multiple plots they believe had been used
15:00
Speaker 1: for burials. They sent the images to Democratic representatives Andrea
15:05
Speaker 1: Romero and Mariana Anaya last month, along with an email
15:09
Speaker 1: stating that the sites appeared to have bodies removed. Look,
15:13
Speaker 1: very possible. I'm not going to sit here and tell
15:15
Speaker 1: you that this is BS, because I don't think it is.
15:19
Speaker 1: I think that weird stuff was happening at that ranch,
15:22
Speaker 1: and I think most of us understand that when people
15:25
Speaker 1: are having rough sex, things can go south. One of
15:29
Speaker 1: these dudes might have been choking a girl or something.
15:31
Speaker 1: Who knows? I don't want to speculate too far. But
15:35
Speaker 1: a lot of things can go wrong. And then, of course,
15:37
Speaker 1: there's the more nefarious idea that they were murdered on purpose, right?
15:42
Speaker 1: That it wasn't an accident. So, until we have more evidence,
15:46
Speaker 1: I'm not going to close the door on any of it,
15:48
Speaker 1: to be honest with you. I realize that this might
15:50
Speaker 1: be illegal, the tipster wrote, but men like that don't
15:53
Speaker 1: deserve the protection of the law. Romero, who heads a
15:57
Speaker 1: bipartisan commission investigating Epstein in New Mexico... forwarded the correspondence
16:02
Speaker 1: to Kyle Hartsock, Director of Special Investigations at the State
16:06
Speaker 1: Department of Justice, who assured her that the tip was
16:09
Speaker 1: being looked into. Well, can we get some confirmation on that?
16:15
Speaker 1: Can we get an update? Because I really just don't
16:17
Speaker 1: believe that the government gives a shit. Now, hopefully it's
16:21
Speaker 1: going to be different with the state-led investigation here in
16:24
Speaker 1: New Mexico, but we have to understand that there's a
16:27
Speaker 1: lot of pieces in play. And there's a lot of
16:30
Speaker 1: rich people, powerful people, in New Mexico who want this
16:33
Speaker 1: to go away. The new claims add to the scrutiny
16:39
Speaker 1: of the FBI and other agencies involved in the Epstein investigation.
16:43
Speaker 1: Critics note that multiple tips and warnings about the Zorro
16:47
Speaker 1: Ranch have emerged over the years, yet authorities have said
16:51
Speaker 1: that they could not find corroborating evidence. One anonymous tip
16:55
Speaker 1: from 2019 claimed that Epstein and Ghislaine buried two foreign
17:00
Speaker 1: girls on the property and offered videos of alleged abuse
17:03
Speaker 1: for payment in Bitcoin. Yo, like what? Now again, we
17:10
Speaker 1: have to keep in mind that there are a lot
17:12
Speaker 1: of people out there that will look to try and
17:14
Speaker 1: exploit a situation like this. And they'll say they have
17:18
Speaker 1: this or that, the other thing, try and get some
17:20
Speaker 1: Bitcoin and scam people. So I'm not saying that all
17:25
Speaker 1: of this is 100% or that it's true. but I
17:29
Speaker 1: feel like all of it has to be explored, and
17:31
Speaker 1: that's because of the negligence that we've seen throughout the
17:34
Speaker 1: whole entire process. The authorities have not earned the benefit
17:39
Speaker 1: of the doubt, so in my opinion, every single tip
17:42
Speaker 1: must be investigated, no matter how small or large. Public
17:47
Speaker 1: reaction online has highlighted frustration over the perceived lack of accountability.
17:53
Speaker 1: One social media user wrote, Bro, I can't believe that
17:56
Speaker 1: they've been tipping the FBI off for years and the
17:59
Speaker 1: FBI still has the audacity to say they couldn't find
18:02
Speaker 1: any evidence. Others warn that the evidence may have already
18:06
Speaker 1: been destroyed as the property has changed hands and landscaping
18:09
Speaker 1: work has already reportedly been completed. Well, that's part of it, right?
18:15
Speaker 1: And it just so happens that Mr. Huffines ends up
18:18
Speaker 1: buying the land, huh? I guess it's just another coincidence.
18:24
Speaker 1: State authorities have acknowledged receipt of the tip, but have
18:27
Speaker 1: been cautious about providing additional details. Romero told Al Jazeera,
18:32
Speaker 1: we will get details on the veracity of any claims
18:35
Speaker 1: as we conduct our investigation. I can't provide any additional
18:39
Speaker 1: context or clarification regarding the email that you're referencing. And
18:44
Speaker 1: I would expect this to be the kind of response
18:47
Speaker 1: we get, because if they have an investigation going, they
18:50
Speaker 1: don't want to jeopardize it by possibly polluting a jury
18:54
Speaker 1: pool or tipping somebody off. So I don't expect them
18:58
Speaker 1: to be forthcoming with actual granular details. Anaya and Hartsock
19:06
Speaker 1: did not respond to a request for comment and the
19:08
Speaker 1: photos have not been independently verified by journalists. So that's
19:12
Speaker 1: what I'm saying about being cautious. Don't take this as canon, right?
19:17
Speaker 1: We don't know yet. But it's certainly a possibility and
19:20
Speaker 1: certainly something That merits further discussion on the podcast and
19:24
Speaker 1: certainly in New Mexico. Last month, New Mexico State Attorney
19:30
Speaker 1: General Raul Torres ordered a reopening of inquiries into the
19:34
Speaker 1: ranch following the release of the latest tranche of Epstein
19:37
Speaker 1: files by the U.S. Department of Justice. These files included
19:42
Speaker 1: references to the property and unverified claims about Epstein's conduct,
19:46
Speaker 1: renewing public interest in the investigation. well I think the
19:51
Speaker 1: public was never informed in the first place that's the
19:54
Speaker 1: problem if the legacy media would have told the truth
19:57
Speaker 1: from the beginning this would have been a whole different
20:00
Speaker 1: story Experts warn that verifying such claims may be difficult
20:07
Speaker 1: due to the size of the property and the potential
20:09
Speaker 1: for evidence to have been removed or destroyed. Online commentators
20:14
Speaker 1: have speculated about the use of incinerators or other methods
20:18
Speaker 1: for disposing of remains, while others suggested that modern tools
20:22
Speaker 1: like drones with ground-penetrating radar and cadaver dogs could assist investigations.
20:28
Speaker 1: There's no doubt, but you have to have a general area, right?
20:31
Speaker 1: It's a gigantic property. So you get a basic area,
20:36
Speaker 1: you grid it off, and you start looking. Now is
20:39
Speaker 1: that what they're going to do? I hope so. Because
20:42
Speaker 1: that's the way you find evidence if you're really looking.
20:49
Speaker 1: Moving a body is one thing, but getting every last
20:52
Speaker 1: trace is an entirely different matter, one analyst noted. The
20:56
Speaker 1: main thing is the ranch is so big. That could
20:59
Speaker 1: work for or against a cover-up. It's entirely possible even
21:02
Speaker 1: the people who buried the bodies don't know where they are.
21:05
Speaker 1: Authorities are reportedly considering these challenges as they review the
21:09
Speaker 1: tip and plan the investigative approach. The alleged grave-like plots
21:14
Speaker 1: at Toro Ranch, combined with years of whistleblower tips and
21:18
Speaker 1: the controversial history of Epstein's activity, have created a complex,
21:22
Speaker 1: intense backdrop for the ongoing investigation. A state and federal
21:26
Speaker 1: authorities continue to review evidence the public and lawmakers alike,
21:30
Speaker 1: are waiting for answers about what occurred at the New
21:33
Speaker 1: Mexico estate. So look, hopefully this investigation gives us some
21:37
Speaker 1: more answers. Because one thing I know for sure, we
21:42
Speaker 1: have only begun to scratch the surface of what Jeffrey
21:45
Speaker 1: Epstein was up to at Zorro Ranch. All the information
21:50
Speaker 1: that goes with this episode can be found in the
21:54
Speaker 1: description box. And the article that we're going to read
21:57
Speaker 1: today from 2019, July 2019, just shows you with some
22:03
Speaker 1: hindsight as guidance that everything that he says in this
22:06
Speaker 1: article was nothing but wind. Words are wind. Action is
22:14
Speaker 1: what we require. And Mr. Balderas and the authorities in
22:19
Speaker 1: New Mexico have not done their jobs. And You know,
22:25
Speaker 1: I hate to say it, but from where I'm sitting,
22:29
Speaker 1: it's obvious that the Bill Richardson connection here is stagnating
22:33
Speaker 1: what's going on in New Mexico. And we have to
22:36
Speaker 1: get over that shit. All right. I don't care that
22:38
Speaker 1: he was a big time Democratic politician. I don't care
22:43
Speaker 1: that he was Bill Clinton's homie. I don't care that
22:45
Speaker 1: he was nominated and got a seat in Obama's cabinet.
22:50
Speaker 1: That doesn't give him any cover from me anyway. It
22:53
Speaker 1: might for Hector Balderas and the rest of the people
22:56
Speaker 1: that are getting fat at the buffet of confirmation bias
23:00
Speaker 1: and those who are going deaf in their echo chamber.
23:03
Speaker 1: But me, I don't give a rat's ass who these
23:06
Speaker 1: people were involved with. Every last one of them. All right,
23:09
Speaker 1: Bill Richardson, Steve Mnuchin on the other side, all of
23:13
Speaker 1: them should be forced to testify about what they knew.
23:18
Speaker 1: And the fact that none of them have really been
23:22
Speaker 1: forced to do so, it just shows you the shell
23:26
Speaker 1: game that these so-called law enforcement officials, such as these
23:33
Speaker 1: attorney generals like Balderas, it shows you that they really
23:37
Speaker 1: do not care. Their job isn't to protect the public, folks.
23:42
Speaker 1: Their job is to play their political games and make
23:46
Speaker 1: sure that their political homies don't get caught up. Bill
23:51
Speaker 1: Richardson was caught up in a hit and run accident
23:53
Speaker 1: in New Mexico. Do you think anything occurred for him?
23:57
Speaker 1: Any sort of consequences? Of course not. He had to
23:59
Speaker 1: pay to fix the damage. But if you or I
24:03
Speaker 1: were involved in a hit and run and we took off,
24:05
Speaker 1: do you think the state police would show up at
24:07
Speaker 1: our house with some kind words for a conversation with us?
24:12
Speaker 1: Or do you think we'd be going to jail and
24:14
Speaker 1: they'd be telling us that we could tell it to
24:16
Speaker 1: the judge? They really don't care. I'll say option two,
24:20
Speaker 1: at least in my experience growing up in the inner city,
24:24
Speaker 1: pretty much any time anyone I knew had an interaction
24:28
Speaker 1: with the police, they ended up going to jail, okay?
24:31
Speaker 1: Just about any time. And yet these scumbag sons of
24:35
Speaker 1: bitches run around involved in child sex trafficking, involved in
24:38
Speaker 1: pay-for-play schemes, involved in all sorts of heinous, disgusting, gross shit.
24:45
Speaker 1: And the only ones that are ever left holding the bag,
24:48
Speaker 1: the only ones that ever have to do any time,
24:51
Speaker 1: the only ones that ever suffer any penalties are the
24:55
Speaker 1: common person like you or I. I'm sick of it, folks.
24:59
Speaker 1: I'm really sick of it. And there needs to be
25:00
Speaker 1: accountability across the board. If I have to live my
25:04
Speaker 1: life a certain way and I have to follow all
25:07
Speaker 1: of your dumb ass rules that you make in that
25:10
Speaker 1: cesspool of Moise Isley, a.k.a. Washington, D.C., then the rest
25:15
Speaker 1: of your rich-ass disgusting friends, they have to live by
25:18
Speaker 1: those same exact rules. And if not, well, people like
25:22
Speaker 1: me will be here on a regular basis, running their
25:26
Speaker 1: fat mouths, letting people know just how backwards all of
25:33
Speaker 1: this is. This is never what it was meant to be, folks.
25:37
Speaker 1: All right? This is never what it was meant to be.
25:40
Speaker 1: We have been living under a state of... I don't
25:45
Speaker 1: even know what to call it. A dictatorial governance since
25:50
Speaker 1: JFK's death? Or a coup, basically, since JFK's death? Have
25:54
Speaker 1: we had one real politician, one real president elected since JFK?
25:59
Speaker 1: Or has it all been manipulated? Even before then, even. See,
26:03
Speaker 1: it's all a big game. It is all a big game.
26:07
Speaker 1: And up until recently, these guys were laughing in our faces.
26:11
Speaker 1: Up until recently... These people thought they'd get away with
26:14
Speaker 1: their shit forever. But guess what? They never thought that
26:18
Speaker 1: locking us up for six months would have the effect
26:21
Speaker 1: that it's having. And people are digging. Information is coming out.
26:28
Speaker 1: You see it with the Panama Files. You see it
26:31
Speaker 1: with the FinCEN files. And hopefully it won't be long
26:34
Speaker 1: here before somebody blows the doors off of this whole
26:39
Speaker 1: entire thing in New Mexico. Our article today is from KOB.com.
26:47
Speaker 1: It's a local New Mexico station. And the headline is,
26:52
Speaker 1: Balderas believes previous investigations failed Epstein's alleged New Mexico victims.
26:59
Speaker 1: So basically what Balderas is saying and what he would
27:01
Speaker 1: have you believe all the way back in 19 is
27:04
Speaker 1: that the previous investigations into what occurred with Epstein failed
27:08
Speaker 1: the survivors, but he... Mr. Balderas, good friend of accused
27:13
Speaker 1: Bill Richardson, well, he's gonna be the hero. This article
27:20
Speaker 1: was authored by Patrick Hayes and Chris Ramirez. It originally
27:26
Speaker 1: ran July 16th of 2019. Albuquerque, New Mexico. New Mexico
27:32
Speaker 1: Attorney General Hector Balderas believes other agencies that were investigating
27:37
Speaker 1: financier pedophile Jeffrey Epstein, for child sex crimes have failed
27:42
Speaker 1: in the past. Oh yeah, and the New Mexico Division
27:46
Speaker 1: of Law Enforcement has done a sterling job here, huh?
27:49
Speaker 1: They have done a fantastic job, Mr. Balderas. Do you
27:52
Speaker 1: want a pat on the shoulder? Do you want a
27:56
Speaker 1: trophy maybe? A ribbon? For inactivity maybe? But to call
28:02
Speaker 1: out and say that other investigations have failed in the past,
28:05
Speaker 1: which they have, and then to act like your investigation
28:09
Speaker 1: is like some kind of large, sprawling, deep dive into
28:14
Speaker 1: what occurred is laughable at best. New Mexico has not
28:20
Speaker 1: lifted a finger from where I'm sitting to help these survivors.
28:24
Speaker 1: And it's an absolute joke. What I'm very concerned with
28:30
Speaker 1: is that these survivors were not given a voice early
28:33
Speaker 1: on in the investigation. And we want to make sure
28:36
Speaker 1: we capture their story and that we do everything we
28:39
Speaker 1: can to bring justice for them, Balderas said. Now, this
28:42
Speaker 1: was July 2019. Fast forward to today. Still no large
28:48
Speaker 1: investigation in New Mexico. The ranch has not been raided.
28:51
Speaker 1: No subpoenas have been put forth. And yet the band
28:56
Speaker 1: marches on, huh? and yet Bill Richardson's buddy, Balderas here,
29:01
Speaker 1: can sit around and blow smoke up everybody's ass, like
29:06
Speaker 1: they're initiating and being involved in some huge, large investigation
29:11
Speaker 1: of Jeffrey Epstein. Yeah, right. In my opinion, the reason
29:16
Speaker 1: there is no investigation going on in New Mexico is
29:20
Speaker 1: because of the connections to Bill Richardson. He is the
29:24
Speaker 1: key player here, the key piece here, And like I
29:27
Speaker 1: said earlier, is basically the king of New Mexico. So
29:32
Speaker 1: the fact that his stooge, Baldaris, is the attorney general. Yeah.
29:40
Speaker 1: know it makes you just shake your head right in
29:43
Speaker 1: a place like new mexico especially it is obvious how
29:47
Speaker 1: corrupt things are following charges being filed in new york
29:52
Speaker 1: baldaris said he has reached out to some of epstein's
29:55
Speaker 1: alleged victims Well, I don't know about that. I haven't
29:58
Speaker 1: heard anybody talking about how Hector Balderas has stepped forward
30:04
Speaker 1: to try and get things going in New Mexico. I mean,
30:06
Speaker 1: he might have behind the scenes. Again, I'm not privy
30:09
Speaker 1: to what goes on behind the scenes. I'm just like
30:11
Speaker 1: the rest of you. I don't have that sort of
30:14
Speaker 1: inside information. But you would think in a year that
30:17
Speaker 1: we would have heard something, right? A little bit of something,
30:20
Speaker 1: something about New Mexico if they were really engaged in
30:24
Speaker 1: trying to help these survivors. But we haven't heard nothing.
30:28
Speaker 1: And when I went to Zorro Ranch in February, certainly
30:31
Speaker 1: wasn't any police yellow tape anywhere. There certainly weren't any
30:35
Speaker 1: FBI investigators pulling things out of the house. All was normal.
30:42
Speaker 1: And if it was up to New Mexico and the
30:45
Speaker 1: leadership there, the people who were in charge behind the
30:49
Speaker 1: scenes and the ones who make these decisions, it would
30:51
Speaker 1: stay that way. They don't want this to come out.
30:54
Speaker 1: They don't want to be blown up. They don't want
30:56
Speaker 1: their role in this sex scheme, this child trafficking enterprise,
31:01
Speaker 1: to take center stage. But they can only hide for
31:04
Speaker 1: so long. Something really, really bad was going on at
31:09
Speaker 1: Zorro Ranch, folks. And I plan on getting to the
31:13
Speaker 1: bottom of it. What I can confirm is that we
31:19
Speaker 1: are interviewing many survivors and victims, Balderas said. I can't
31:23
Speaker 1: comment as to the specific nature at this time. Yeah,
31:26
Speaker 1: I don't like maybe again behind the scenes, maybe that
31:29
Speaker 1: stuff was occurring, but I have not heard any of that. OK,
31:33
Speaker 1: I have not heard anyone talk about how Balderas is
31:36
Speaker 1: stepping up to the plate here, how he's trying to
31:38
Speaker 1: help out, how he's trying to do the right thing,
31:41
Speaker 1: how he's trying to be a better man. All I
31:44
Speaker 1: see is more shadows, more secrecy, and more BS coming
31:50
Speaker 1: out of New Mexico. And the new report on Bill Richardson, well,
31:54
Speaker 1: that's just the cherry on top, right? That adds the context.
31:57
Speaker 1: That adds more meat to the bone. And it shows you,
32:02
Speaker 1: when looked at in the big picture, that Bill Richardson
32:05
Speaker 1: is another scuzzbag who really needs to sit down under
32:09
Speaker 1: oath and explain in detail what his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein.
32:15
Speaker 1: Anything less than that is a dereliction of duty on
32:18
Speaker 1: the part of the U.S. government. Balderas is investigating what
32:24
Speaker 1: happened at Epstein's ranch in Stanley, New Mexico and other
32:28
Speaker 1: parts of the state. Yeah, okay, sure. Such a large,
32:31
Speaker 1: sprawling investigation, Mr. Balderas. You should just be commended for
32:37
Speaker 1: your great work here. More than a decade ago, Epstein
32:43
Speaker 1: was accused of sex crimes involving underage girls in New Mexico. However,
32:48
Speaker 1: he was never formally charged. Yeah, never, not once in
32:51
Speaker 1: New Mexico, never once not on the sex registry list,
32:54
Speaker 1: never charged, nothing. Dude went down to New Mexico and
32:59
Speaker 1: lived like a proverbial king, even with this cloud over
33:03
Speaker 1: his head. Business as usual in New Mexico, though. And
33:09
Speaker 1: you mean to tell me That this Balderas character can
33:13
Speaker 1: get up there and talk about his investigations and how
33:16
Speaker 1: he cares about what's going on? Please. I've been doing
33:20
Speaker 1: extensive research into New Mexico for this case and, obviously,
33:26
Speaker 1: my other story that I'm working on, the West Mesa
33:29
Speaker 1: Bone Collector story that happened in New Mexico as well.
33:32
Speaker 1: Eleven dead girls, still nobody caught. Something stinks in New Mexico.
33:40
Speaker 1: This was a multi-state trafficking operation, and there were great
33:43
Speaker 1: risks that were ignored in the past, Balderas said. Yeah,
33:47
Speaker 1: great risks that were ignored in the past because your
33:49
Speaker 1: boy Bill Richardson was involved, huh? Why don't you take
33:53
Speaker 1: the blinders off there, Mr. Balderas? Why don't you really
33:56
Speaker 1: dig in, huh? State law. As a part of a
34:00
Speaker 1: 2008 plea deal federal prosecutors gave to Epstein, he was
34:04
Speaker 1: required to register as a sex offender. It's unknown whether
34:09
Speaker 1: Epstein registered with New Mexico authorities while he lived here
34:12
Speaker 1: in the state, or if state laws require that he register. Well,
34:16
Speaker 1: we already know that that's not the case. He didn't
34:18
Speaker 1: have to register. He registered, and then he was sent
34:20
Speaker 1: a letter by DPS saying that he did not have
34:23
Speaker 1: to register because his crimes in that state didn't warrant it.
34:29
Speaker 1: I mean, are you kidding me right now? The laws
34:32
Speaker 1: in New Mexico... They don't even have stringent trafficking laws
34:35
Speaker 1: on the books in New Mexico, or at least didn't
34:37
Speaker 1: when Epstein was running things. So if ever a state
34:45
Speaker 1: needed an overhaul, if ever a state needed to catch
34:48
Speaker 1: up with the times when it comes to sex crimes
34:50
Speaker 1: and human trafficking, New Mexico is that state. And if
34:55
Speaker 1: I was an indigenous girl living in New Mexico, a
34:57
Speaker 1: family who had a daughter who was indigenous, I would
35:00
Speaker 1: be moving out of there ASAP. Because there is a
35:03
Speaker 1: serious problem with indigenous girls going missing in New Mexico
35:07
Speaker 1: and nobody giving a goddamn about it. Tuesday morning, the
35:14
Speaker 1: Albuquerque Journal reported former New Mexico Governor Bill Richardson's spokesman
35:19
Speaker 1: confirmed Richardson had visited Epstein-Zorro Ranch at least one time
35:24
Speaker 1: while campaigning for governor with his wife. It's always with
35:28
Speaker 1: the wife, right? Dershowitz, I was with my wife. Jess Staley,
35:31
Speaker 1: I was with my wife. As if your wife is
35:33
Speaker 1: like this moral compass that we can rely on as
35:36
Speaker 1: a solid witness. Her decision making is already called into
35:41
Speaker 1: question by marrying a scumbag like you. Now all of
35:44
Speaker 1: a sudden I'm just supposed to take her word as gospel? Sorry,
35:48
Speaker 1: what if your wife was sickened into it too? Again,
35:51
Speaker 1: I don't know if that's the case, but how am
35:52
Speaker 1: I supposed to know? How am I supposed to just
35:55
Speaker 1: believe your narrative when all of the evidence points in
35:58
Speaker 1: a different direction? The Journal reported Richardson's name was found
36:04
Speaker 1: in Epstein's Little Black Book, which is now filed as
36:06
Speaker 1: a court record. Richardson is on a witness list that
36:10
Speaker 1: also includes President Donald Trump. When asked whether the New
36:14
Speaker 1: Mexico Attorney's General Office was looking at the Richardson connection,
36:18
Speaker 1: Balderas said he couldn't elaborate on specific details about the
36:23
Speaker 1: scope of the investigation. AKA translation, Richardson's not being looked into.
36:28
Speaker 1: Richardson put me in this position. He's a kingmaker. I
36:31
Speaker 1: can't go after my buddy Bill Richardson. That's basically what
36:34
Speaker 1: Balderas is telling us here. He's such a joke and
36:37
Speaker 1: a clown. And the people, the great people of New Mexico,
36:41
Speaker 1: certainly deserve much better. I loved my time in New
36:45
Speaker 1: Mexico with the people. They were very, very, very welcoming,
36:48
Speaker 1: very warm. And it was a very enjoyable stay from
36:52
Speaker 1: that perspective. But those very people deserve so much better
36:56
Speaker 1: than they're getting from this Balderas character. It's premature for
37:02
Speaker 1: me to comment on the specifics. What I can ensure
37:05
Speaker 1: you is the investigation is active and we will be
37:08
Speaker 1: forwarding this evidence to New York prosecutors, Balderas said. So
37:13
Speaker 1: you're just going to forward all of the evidence to
37:15
Speaker 1: the New York prosecutors, huh? Kick it to the federal
37:18
Speaker 1: level so that you have the cover from your boy,
37:20
Speaker 1: Billy Richardson. You could say to Bill, look, I didn't
37:23
Speaker 1: initiate this. It's the feds. It wasn't me. And you
37:28
Speaker 1: still have your cover there with your good boy, Billy, huh?
37:31
Speaker 1: Too much of a coward to run it through your
37:34
Speaker 1: own state. What's the point of being the Attorney General
37:38
Speaker 1: if you aren't going to man up and go after
37:41
Speaker 1: the most sick and the most perverse criminals your state
37:46
Speaker 1: has to offer? And if you can find somebody sicker
37:50
Speaker 1: and more twisted than Jeffrey Epstein and those who were
37:54
Speaker 1: involved with him, I am most certainly all ears. But
37:59
Speaker 1: until that comes, until that point comes, I'm here to
38:03
Speaker 1: tell you that Balderas, the government of New Mexico, and
38:08
Speaker 1: everybody else involved in investigating Zorro Ranch has been negligent
38:13
Speaker 1: in their duty. If you'd like to contact me, you
38:18
Speaker 1: can do that at bobbycapucci at protonmail.com. That's B-O-B-B-Y-C-A-P-U-C-C-I at protonmail.com.
38:27
Speaker 1: You can also find me on Twitter at B-O-B-B-Y underscore C-A-P-U-C-C-I.
38:33
Speaker 1: All right, everybody, all of the links that go with
38:36
Speaker 1: this episode can be found in the description box. What's up, everyone,
38:41
Speaker 1: and welcome to another episode of the Epstein Chronicles. The
38:46
Speaker 1: battle over transparency in Jeffrey Epstein continues to rage in
38:51
Speaker 1: New Mexico. And now, authorities in New Mexico... or accusing
38:56
Speaker 1: the federal government, the DOJ, of refusing to turn over documents.
39:02
Speaker 1: Now I know, that's going to shock everybody, because of
39:04
Speaker 1: course we're dealing with the most transparent administration in history,
39:08
Speaker 1: according to them, and they should have no problem turning
39:11
Speaker 1: over this documentation. Well, if they weren't running a cover-up.
39:17
Speaker 1: But unfortunately, this cover-up is alive and well. And the
39:21
Speaker 1: people who promised us that they were going to blow
39:23
Speaker 1: the lid off of it, are now enabling it. And
39:27
Speaker 1: if that doesn't get you mad, I don't know what will.
39:31
Speaker 1: So in this episode, we're going to dive down to
39:33
Speaker 1: New Mexico and we're going to get an update on
39:36
Speaker 1: the battle for the unredacted documents. This article was published
39:40
Speaker 1: by CNN and the headline, New Mexico Attorney General says
39:45
Speaker 1: DOJ is withholding critical information related to to Epstein's Zorro Ranch.
39:51
Speaker 1: This article was authored by Kenita Lyre. And look, this
39:56
Speaker 1: should not be a surprise to anybody. This has been
39:59
Speaker 1: the game with Zorro Ranch from the beginning. There's a
40:02
Speaker 1: reason this place wasn't rated. What do you think they forgot?
40:06
Speaker 1: It wasn't on their to-do list? They actively avoided it.
40:11
Speaker 1: So you should be asking yourself and the people in charge, why? Why?
40:17
Speaker 1: New Mexico Attorney General Raul Torres is accusing the U.S.
40:20
Speaker 1: Justice Department of withholding access to unredacted files related to
40:25
Speaker 1: late convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, arguing that the lack
40:29
Speaker 1: of cooperation is preventing the state from bringing justice to survivors.
40:35
Speaker 1: Every day that the U.S. DOJ withholds these records, the
40:38
Speaker 1: foundation upon which a New Mexico prosecution to be built erodes.
40:43
Speaker 1: Torres wrote in a scathing letter, to Acting Attorney General
40:46
Speaker 1: Todd Blanch on June 30th that was publicly released on Thursday.
40:52
Speaker 1: I mean, at some point, somebody has to check Todd Blanch, right?
40:56
Speaker 1: And say, look, dude, you're doing this wrong. Everything you're
40:59
Speaker 1: doing is a bunch of BS. And you're obviously, obviously,
41:04
Speaker 1: at the helm of a cover-up. So is there ever
41:07
Speaker 1: going to be anybody that steps up to the plate
41:10
Speaker 1: and holds these people accountable? I mean, it's Congress's job,
41:13
Speaker 1: but they're not doing it. The Senate, they have no
41:16
Speaker 1: desire to do it. Everybody's scared of Donald Trump. And
41:19
Speaker 1: make no mistake, that was the whole entire point of
41:23
Speaker 1: getting rid of all the people that were involved in
41:25
Speaker 1: the discharge position on the Republican side. There can be
41:30
Speaker 1: no debate. There can be nobody going against the grain.
41:34
Speaker 1: Everybody has to march in lockstep. And for me, that
41:38
Speaker 1: is unacceptable. And not only that, it's wholly un-American. It
41:42
Speaker 1: goes against the spirit of of what America is and
41:45
Speaker 1: who we are as a people. Listen, folks, it's one
41:48
Speaker 1: thing to be an agitator and act like a fool,
41:51
Speaker 1: like we see some people doing with Charlie Kirk. And
41:53
Speaker 1: it's a whole ass other thing to be somebody that's
41:56
Speaker 1: demanding accountability. There's no exploding microphones here, folks. All the
42:02
Speaker 1: documentation's there. All the witnesses are there. The question is,
42:07
Speaker 1: who's listening? Witnesses relocate and become unreachable. Memories already strained
42:12
Speaker 1: by years of trauma fade further. Physical and documentary evidence degrades,
42:17
Speaker 1: is lost, or is rendered more difficult to authenticate with
42:21
Speaker 1: the passage of time, Torres added. And that's what I
42:23
Speaker 1: was talking about previously. The longer they're able to exhaust us,
42:30
Speaker 1: the longer they're able to kick the ball down the road,
42:32
Speaker 1: the better off for them. I mean, look, they waited
42:35
Speaker 1: this long and they waited out Virginia. That was always
42:41
Speaker 1: part of the plan. Because I have to tell you,
42:43
Speaker 1: if Virginia was here, she'd be wrecking these dudes. You
42:47
Speaker 1: thought she was going bananas the first time around? Forget it.
42:52
Speaker 1: And guess what? She wouldn't be alone. But the longer
42:54
Speaker 1: we wait, the more chance there is that people who
42:58
Speaker 1: know the truth, people who know what happened, aren't going
43:02
Speaker 1: to be around. Or the memories degrade. Or the evidence
43:05
Speaker 1: walks away. We all know the story. And we all
43:09
Speaker 1: recognize the hustle. Torres' letter marks the latest criticism of
43:14
Speaker 1: the U.S. Justice Department's handling of the Epstein case, as
43:17
Speaker 1: Congress forced the department to release files related to the
43:21
Speaker 1: sex trafficker with a bipartisan bill late last year. Well, yeah,
43:25
Speaker 1: it wasn't Trump. I know he takes credit for it.
43:28
Speaker 1: You know, he's done more for Epstein survivors than anyone.
43:32
Speaker 1: Imagine saying that with a straight face. Imagine actually saying
43:36
Speaker 1: that with a straight face. Bros out here rage baiting everybody.
43:39
Speaker 1: The President of the United States acting like a troll
43:43
Speaker 1: on X. Or I guess it would be Truth Social, right?
43:45
Speaker 1: It gets reposted to X. The whole ass thing is
43:49
Speaker 1: like a bad TV show. At this point, what else
43:52
Speaker 1: can you call it? New Mexico is investigating allegations of
43:58
Speaker 1: illegal activity surrounding the property Epstein owned near Santa Fe,
44:02
Speaker 1: known as Zorro Ranch. A Justice Department spokesperson told CNN
44:07
Speaker 1: that the agency substantively responded last month to a request
44:11
Speaker 1: from the New Mexico Attorney General's office. The DOJ reiterates
44:15
Speaker 1: that it welcomes New Mexico undertaking an additional investigation of
44:19
Speaker 1: the Zorro Ranch and stands ready to provide necessary assistance
44:24
Speaker 1: with New Mexico's investigation. The spokesperson said in a statement,
44:28
Speaker 1: Should that investigation uncover potential federal crimes, the DOJ will
44:33
Speaker 1: work closely with our law enforcement partners to investigate, as appropriate, prosecute, Oh, yeah, well,
44:40
Speaker 1: I'm going to sleep well tonight. In fact, I'm going
44:43
Speaker 1: to stop talking about this because, you know, the authorities
44:46
Speaker 1: are here, and they're going to make sure everything's fine.
44:49
Speaker 1: The same people that fucked it up the first time around.
44:52
Speaker 1: Nobody believes you, okay? And if you really wanted to help,
44:56
Speaker 1: you'd be turning this documentation over, not acting the fool.
45:02
Speaker 1: The New Mexico criminal probe was reopened in February after
45:05
Speaker 1: the U.S. DOJ release of millions of files related to Epstein,
45:09
Speaker 1: which included a 2019 email received by a local radio
45:13
Speaker 1: host that alleged that somewhere in the hills outside of Zorro,
45:17
Speaker 1: two foreign girls were buried on orders of Jeffrey and
45:20
Speaker 1: Madam G. That allegation is unverified, but it's also not
45:25
Speaker 1: clear to what extent it had been investigated by law enforcement,
45:29
Speaker 1: before the recent renewed interest in Epstein. Let me help
45:32
Speaker 1: you out. It wasn't investigated, okay? Up until recently, when
45:37
Speaker 1: all of you got interested in this, nobody gave a fuck.
45:40
Speaker 1: And for all these years, the DOJ was able to
45:42
Speaker 1: do whatever they wanted because there was no pushback. Because
45:46
Speaker 1: people were trying to classify this story as some gigantic conspiracy.
45:51
Speaker 1: You know, like an exploding microphone on someone's chest. When
45:55
Speaker 1: in reality... This is anything but. Now, of course, there's
45:58
Speaker 1: a lot of people out there that have injected shit
46:02
Speaker 1: into this story that just isn't true. But what we
46:05
Speaker 1: talk about, the path we're on, well, go back and
46:08
Speaker 1: check the records. Every single person that we've talked about
46:11
Speaker 1: on this podcast was named in those files. Every last person.
46:19
Speaker 1: Some of the Epstein survivors, including Shantae Davies and the
46:22
Speaker 1: late Virginia Roberts, have said the ranch was one of
46:25
Speaker 1: the places... where they were sexually assaulted. Annie Farmer as well.
46:29
Speaker 1: Let's not forget Annie. Several lawmakers criticized the heavy redactions
46:33
Speaker 1: in the Epstein files the DOJ began releasing in December
46:37
Speaker 1: of 2025, and the U.S. DOJ's internal watchdog is reviewing
46:42
Speaker 1: the redaction process. Some members of Congress have been allowed
46:47
Speaker 1: to view the unredacted documents, but they have to travel
46:51
Speaker 1: to a DOJ annex, sit at one of four DOJ-owned computers,
46:55
Speaker 1: use a clunky and convoluted software system provided by DOJ,
47:00
Speaker 1: and search for and read documents while DOJ staffers look
47:04
Speaker 1: over our shoulders. According to Democratic Representative Jamie Raskin, the
47:09
Speaker 1: ranking member of the House Judiciary Committee. So where's the oversight?
47:14
Speaker 1: Who's providing it? Is the DOJ providing oversight to Congress?
47:17
Speaker 1: Or is it vice versa? Imagine being part of Congress
47:20
Speaker 1: and letting these dudes run roughshod over you. I'd be
47:23
Speaker 1: going crazy. It's all I'd be talking about. You think
47:26
Speaker 1: Thomas Massey was annoying? Let me get elected to Congress.
47:30
Speaker 1: I would end up being the most hated person to
47:32
Speaker 1: ever step into those halls. I would go there for
47:36
Speaker 1: one term and I would look to do nothing but disrupt.
47:40
Speaker 1: That's right, all their bullshit, all their craziness, disrupt it. No,
47:44
Speaker 1: not voting for that. Sorry, that's bullshit. Oh no, that's
47:47
Speaker 1: a terrible bill. Not voting for that either. And for
47:51
Speaker 1: those of you who know me, you know that I
47:53
Speaker 1: have a background in political science. But I don't run
47:57
Speaker 1: around yapping about it all the time because guess what?
47:59
Speaker 1: It's meaningless, okay? When you really get down to it,
48:03
Speaker 1: besides understanding, you know, political theory and shit, useless. But boy,
48:08
Speaker 1: I would love to walk into those halls and let
48:13
Speaker 1: Congress really know how I feel. Because at some point,
48:16
Speaker 1: there has to be somebody that does it right. Look,
48:18
Speaker 1: all you people are crazy. Everything you're doing is criminal, basically.
48:23
Speaker 1: And the whole reason all of you, for the most part,
48:26
Speaker 1: I won't say everybody, because I don't believe in absolutes.
48:29
Speaker 1: But the reason that most of these people go to
48:31
Speaker 1: Congress or the Senate is for personal benefit. Not for
48:35
Speaker 1: their district. Not for their constituents. Not for you or me.
48:39
Speaker 1: For themselves. Have you taken a look at Nancy Pelosi's
48:42
Speaker 1: stock trades? Have you taken a look at the Trump
48:45
Speaker 1: boys and how they've benefited? Now, go to the grocery
48:49
Speaker 1: store and see how it's working for you. But sure,
48:54
Speaker 1: tell me how great Congress is and how much they
48:56
Speaker 1: care about you. In last week's letter, Torres outlined six
49:00
Speaker 1: attempts from the New Mexico DOJ office to reach the
49:03
Speaker 1: federal agency, including a February 13 request for documents and
49:08
Speaker 1: an effort last month to set up an in-person meeting
49:11
Speaker 1: during Torres' visit to Washington, D.C. Despite verbal assurances of
49:16
Speaker 1: cooperation from the U.S. DOJ, access to the records and
49:20
Speaker 1: has not been granted. No substantive response has been provided,
49:25
Speaker 1: and more than 130 days have now elapsed since the
49:28
Speaker 1: New Mexico Department of Justice initial request, Torres wrote. The
49:32
Speaker 1: NMDOJ views this length of time as an unreasonable delay
49:37
Speaker 1: under any rule of reason. Well, I would say so. Like,
49:41
Speaker 1: imagine being part of the DOJ, you get this request,
49:44
Speaker 1: and you're like, eh, maybe. We'll see. Let's see what
49:47
Speaker 1: Todd Baby Billy Blanche says. As part of the criminal investigation,
49:52
Speaker 1: New Mexico authorities searched Zorro Ranch in March. Oh, well,
49:56
Speaker 1: that's great. About ten years too late. Separately, the state
50:00
Speaker 1: has a special legislative panel called the New Mexico Survivor
50:04
Speaker 1: Truth Commission, which is also investigating Zorro Ranch. Last month,
50:08
Speaker 1: the committee subpoenaed multiple banks, several U.S. attorney's offices, as
50:13
Speaker 1: well as the office of Torres and New Mexico Governor
50:16
Speaker 1: Michelle Lujan Grisham for information. Well, good. They should have
50:20
Speaker 1: done all of that. And I hope they keep doing it.
50:23
Speaker 1: Because it's a long time coming. Everybody who was involved,
50:28
Speaker 1: everybody who looked the other way, everybody who did anything
50:31
Speaker 1: that could be indictable should be indicted. Just like with
50:35
Speaker 1: any other criminal operations. That's all I'm asking for. I'm
50:39
Speaker 1: not asking for a pogrom. I'm not asking for people
50:42
Speaker 1: to be dragged from their homes. What I am asking
50:46
Speaker 1: for is a real, robust investigation. And you know why?
50:50
Speaker 1: Because it's never happened up until now. So until it does,
50:53
Speaker 1: you can expect my fat yap to keep moving. Alright,
50:58
Speaker 1: so that's going to do it for this one. And
51:00
Speaker 1: after this episode, you can expect another two episodes... of
51:05
Speaker 1: my Tyler Robinson slash Charlie Kirk series talking about the
51:09
Speaker 1: trial and where things are at. And honestly, I think
51:12
Speaker 1: it all dovetails into what we talk about with Epstein.
51:16
Speaker 1: The legal system, all the crazy conspiracies, all of it.
51:20
Speaker 1: And considering the stakes at that trial, I think the
51:23
Speaker 1: truth matters. And that's my plan to try to get
51:26
Speaker 1: as close to the truth as we possibly can. Like
51:29
Speaker 1: with our Epstein work, we're going to do the same
51:31
Speaker 1: exact thing and apply the same level of scrutiny that
51:34
Speaker 1: we do here to the Charlie Kirk trial and what's
51:38
Speaker 1: going on with Tyler Robinson. Because look, I'm not going
51:41
Speaker 1: to sit here and tell you that I take everything
51:43
Speaker 1: the state says at face value. You know, I don't,
51:46
Speaker 1: but at the same time, I'm not going to be
51:47
Speaker 1: dog walked by a bunch of grifters and chaos merchants.
51:52
Speaker 1: I want the truth. So that's what we're going to
51:54
Speaker 1: try and get to the truth. So buckle up folks.
51:57
Speaker 1: We have a long ride through this muck to get
52:00
Speaker 1: to the clarity. All the information that goes with this
52:04
Speaker 1: episode can be found in the description box.