Latest / The AI Practitioner Brief / Siri's App Access, Anthropic's Proof, and AWS's Speed — November 4, 2026
Transcript
- 0:00[music]
- 0:05SPEAKER_00: Welcome to The AI Practitioner Brief, the podcast from AIPractitioner.substack.com,
- 0:10SPEAKER_00: where I turn the latest AI in tech news into practical insights
- 0:14SPEAKER_00: for AI practitioners.
- 0:15SPEAKER_00: I'm Lina Faik, an ML engineer, consultant,
- 0:18SPEAKER_00: and lecturer in advanced machine learning at Sorbonne University.
- 0:21SPEAKER_00: It's Wednesday, November 4.
- 0:22SPEAKER_01: Wednesday already.
- 0:24SPEAKER_01: Feels like Monday was five minutes ago.
- 0:26SPEAKER_00: With me is Jimmy, my co-host on The Brief, who asks the questions I'd skip past.
- 0:30SPEAKER_01: I'll try to live up to that today.
- 0:31SPEAKER_00: Here's the tension today.
- 0:33SPEAKER_00: Apple just opened Siri up to every outside app for the first time.
- 0:37SPEAKER_00: The same week, OpenAI says ChatGPT alone now handles about a fifth
- 0:41SPEAKER_00: of Google's entire search volume.
- 0:43SPEAKER_01: So one company's playing catch-up and the other one's already winning without asking permission.
- 0:48SPEAKER_00: We'll start with the headlines, then three deep dives.
- 0:50SPEAKER_00: Apple is letting every app plug into Siri,
- 0:53SPEAKER_00: Anthropic built a way to cryptographically prove which model actually answered you,
- 0:57SPEAKER_00: and Amazon made its cloud containers scale four times faster.
- 1:00SPEAKER_01: Let's get into it.
- 1:01SPEAKER_00: First up, OpenAI.
- 1:03SPEAKER_00: The company says ChatGPT's search-like queries have reached about 20% of Google's volume.
- 1:08SPEAKER_01: 20% of Google. That's not nothing.
- 1:10SPEAKER_00: OpenAI's consumer lead, Adam Fry, said it on November 3rd.
- 1:14SPEAKER_00: ChatGPT now has 1.2 billion weekly users, up from 1 billion just two months ago.
- 1:19SPEAKER_01: Is that dictation or people actually talking to it?
- 1:21SPEAKER_00: Both combined, 250 million weekly voice users.
- 1:25SPEAKER_00: OpenAI also says it's planning to merge its chat and work modes into one product.
- 1:29SPEAKER_01: Planning. Not done yet.
- 1:30SPEAKER_00: Right. That part is still just an announcement.
- 1:33SPEAKER_00: Next, Google's Gemini team, Gemini is Google's family of AI models,
- 1:37SPEAKER_00: opened a public preview of a notebook API.
- 1:39SPEAKER_01: What does a notebook API actually do?
- 1:41SPEAKER_00: It lets developers build apps that automatically turn web pages, YouTube videos,
- 1:45SPEAKER_00: or plain text into organized notebooks
- 1:47SPEAKER_00: the same way Google's own Notebook LM tool does by hand.
- 1:51SPEAKER_01: Who gets to use it?
- 1:52SPEAKER_00: Right now, only personal Google accounts, not business ones.
- 1:54SPEAKER_00: That's the AI side.
- 1:56SPEAKER_00: Elsewhere in tech today, Databricks, the data and AI platform company,
- 2:00SPEAKER_00: took its serverless Postgres database, called Lakebase,
- 2:03SPEAKER_00: to general availability on Google Cloud.
- 2:05SPEAKER_01: Remind me what serverless means here.
- 2:07SPEAKER_00: You don't provision servers yourself.
- 2:09SPEAKER_00: It scales up and down automatically, including down to zero when nothing's running.
- 2:13SPEAKER_00: So you're not paying for idle capacity.
- 2:15SPEAKER_01: Fine. That's the usual pitch for serverless.
- 2:18SPEAKER_00: There's also a new open source tool called Agent Desktop,
- 2:20SPEAKER_00: which lets an AI agent click around real desktop apps on Mac, Windows,
- 2:24SPEAKER_00: and Linux by reading the app's underlying structure instead of guessing
- 2:28SPEAKER_00: from screenshots.
- 2:28SPEAKER_01: Honestly, I'm not sure this one earns a headline.
- 2:31SPEAKER_01: Feels like a new agent tool like this drops every week.
- 2:34SPEAKER_00: Fair, it's a small project, but it's a real alternative to screenshot-based agents,
- 2:38SPEAKER_00: worth one line. Last one, a review of recent SaaS filings found that 29 out
- 2:43SPEAKER_00: of 48 subscription businesses over $100 million in revenue actually shrank
- 2:47SPEAKER_00: in October.
- 2:48SPEAKER_01: What was that number in September?
- 2:49SPEAKER_00: Four, the analysis points to weaker new sales, not more cancellations,
- 2:54SPEAKER_00: and companies under $5 million in revenue were hit hardest.
- 2:56SPEAKER_01: Let's start with Siri then, since you opened with it.
- 2:59SPEAKER_00: Apple put out a developer note on November 3rd.
- 3:01SPEAKER_00: Starting now, in the iOS 27.3 beta, any developer can plug their app into Siri AI.
- 3:07SPEAKER_01: Beta meaning not everyone has it yet.
- 3:10SPEAKER_00: Right, it's a developer preview, live on the beta versions of iOS, iPadOS, macOS, and VisionOS.
- 3:16SPEAKER_00: Regular App Store apps using it won't be allowed until next spring.
- 3:20SPEAKER_01: So nobody's actually using this today.
- 3:22SPEAKER_00: Developers are testing it today.
- 3:24SPEAKER_00: Regular users get it once Apple approves the first wave of apps.
- 3:27SPEAKER_00: The mechanism is called AppIntense,
- 3:29SPEAKER_00: a framework that lets an app describe what it can do and what content it holds
- 3:33SPEAKER_00: so Siri can act on it.
- 3:34SPEAKER_01: How is that different from what Siri already does with apps like Maps or Reminders?
- 3:39SPEAKER_00: Before, Apple had to handwrite the integration for each of its own apps.
- 3:42SPEAKER_00: AppIntense lets any outside developer do that themselves and bundle several steps
- 3:46SPEAKER_00: into one request Apple calls a skill.
- 3:49SPEAKER_01: Give me an example.
- 3:50SPEAKER_00: Say you want to reorder your usual coffee and get it added to your calendar.
- 3:54SPEAKER_00: Instead of opening two apps, you ask Siri once, and it calls both apps intense in sequence.
- 3:59SPEAKER_01: That's the thing Apple's rivals have had for years, isn't it?
- 4:02SPEAKER_00: Pretty much.
- 4:03SPEAKER_00: Google and Amazon opened their assistants to outside developers years ago,
- 4:06SPEAKER_00: through Google Actions and Alexa skills.
- 4:09SPEAKER_00: Apple kept Siri mostly closed,
- 4:11SPEAKER_00: partly because it insisted on doing a lot of the processing on the device itself
- 4:14SPEAKER_00: for privacy, which is slower to build than running everything in the cloud.
- 4:18SPEAKER_01: So this is Apple catching up, not leading.
- 4:20SPEAKER_00: That's a fair reading.
- 4:21SPEAKER_00: Apple's own personalized Siri upgrade slipped repeatedly
- 4:24SPEAKER_00: after first being promised back in 2025.
- 4:27SPEAKER_00: Opening Siri to every app is a different move.
- 4:29SPEAKER_00: It's admitting Apple can't build all the useful integrations itself.
- 4:33SPEAKER_01: Is there a reason it's blocked in the EU?
- 4:35SPEAKER_00: The reporting doesn't say why, it's just listed as currently unavailable there,
- 4:39SPEAKER_00: along with anyone under 13.
- 4:41SPEAKER_00: My guess is regulatory review, but that's a guess, not something Apple has confirmed.
- 4:45SPEAKER_01: I'd rather you say that than make something up.
- 4:47SPEAKER_00: Exactly, so we're leaving it there.
- 4:49SPEAKER_00: What's clear is this is a land grab for attention on the lock screen,
- 4:52SPEAKER_00: right as OpenAI's voice mode pulls in a quarter of a billion weekly users
- 4:56SPEAKER_00: on its own app.
- 4:57SPEAKER_01: So Apple needs other people's apps to make Siri worth opening in the first place.
- 5:01SPEAKER_00: That's the bet.
- 5:02SPEAKER_00: Whether developers actually billed for it depends on how many
- 5:05SPEAKER_00: of these skills Apple approves once spring comes.
- 5:08SPEAKER_01: And once all these outside apps are feeding Siri information and taking actions
- 5:11SPEAKER_01: through it, that's a bigger permissions question than Apple's note let on.
- 5:15SPEAKER_00: It is. And that question, who's allowed to act on your behalf,
- 5:19SPEAKER_00: and whether you can trust what actually ran,
- 5:21SPEAKER_00: is exactly where the next story picks up.
- 5:23SPEAKER_01: Who's allowed to act on your behalf is one trust problem.
- 5:26SPEAKER_01: Knowing what actually answered you is another.
- 5:28SPEAKER_00: Which is exactly what Anthropic just tackled.
- 5:31SPEAKER_00: On November 2nd, Anthropic published FlashProof,
- 5:34SPEAKER_00: an open source tool that cryptographically proves which specific AI model generated
- 5:38SPEAKER_00: a given response.
- 5:39SPEAKER_01: Proves it how?
- 5:40SPEAKER_00: It uses something called a ZSK snark,
- 5:42SPEAKER_00: a type of cryptographic proof that lets you verify a computation was done correctly
- 5:47SPEAKER_00: without redoing it or seeing the private data behind it.
- 5:49SPEAKER_01: That sounds like it belongs in cryptocurrency, not AI.
- 5:53SPEAKER_00: It does come from the same family of math used in some blockchain systems.
- 5:57SPEAKER_00: Here, the model provider runs the request and hands back the answer plus
- 6:00SPEAKER_00: a proof tied to a specific, committed version of the model's weights.
- 6:03SPEAKER_01: So the proof says this exact model produced this exact answer, not just some model somewhere.
- 6:10SPEAKER_00: Right, that's the whole point.
- 6:11SPEAKER_00: It's a response to a real complaint that API providers could quietly swap
- 6:15SPEAKER_00: in a cheaper, smaller version of a model while still charging for the expensive one,
- 6:19SPEAKER_00: and customers have no way to check.
- 6:21SPEAKER_01: Has that actually happened, or is this a hypothetical?
- 6:24SPEAKER_00: There have been accusations of exactly that across the industry,
- 6:27SPEAKER_00: though Anthropik's own announcement doesn't pin it on a specific company.
- 6:30SPEAKER_00: The tool is aimed at making that kind of swap checkable.
- 6:33SPEAKER_01: Does it actually work yet?
- 6:34SPEAKER_00: Anthropic tested it on Meta's open model, Llama 4 Maverick,
- 6:38SPEAKER_00: running a shrunk-down 4-bit version with about 400 billion parameters.
- 6:42SPEAKER_00: A proof for a thousand token request came out to about 19 megabytes,
- 6:46SPEAKER_00: and a normal computer can check it in about 20 seconds.
- 6:48SPEAKER_01: 20 seconds to check one answer.
- 6:51SPEAKER_01: That's not nothing, but it's not instant either.
- 6:53SPEAKER_00: It's not, and that's the catch.
- 6:55SPEAKER_00: Generating these proofs
- 6:56SPEAKER_00: for a full-sized frontier model costs far more computing power than running
- 7:00SPEAKER_00: the model itself.
- 7:01SPEAKER_00: Anthropic's own researchers say production use at that scale isn't close
- 7:05SPEAKER_00: to commercially viable yet.
- 7:06SPEAKER_01: So this doesn't change anything for someone calling an API today?
- 7:10SPEAKER_00: Not yet. If you're buying inference right now,
- 7:12SPEAKER_00: you still have no receipt proving which model answered you.
- 7:15SPEAKER_00: This is a research prototype that shows the idea works, not something live in any product.
- 7:19SPEAKER_01: I don't think cost is the only reason this stalls.
- 7:22SPEAKER_01: I think a lot of providers would rather you couldn't check in the first place.
- 7:25SPEAKER_00: That's your read, not something Anthropics Post says.
- 7:28SPEAKER_00: But it's a real incentive problem either way,
- 7:31SPEAKER_00: since the providers who'd benefit most from staying unverifiable are
- 7:34SPEAKER_00: the least likely to adopt this voluntarily.
- 7:36SPEAKER_01: It's open source, though.
- 7:38SPEAKER_01: Could someone else build the checking layer and point it at a provider
- 7:41SPEAKER_01: that doesn't want to be checked?
- 7:42SPEAKER_00: In theory, yes.
- 7:43SPEAKER_00: That's exactly why Anthropic released it openly rather than keeping it internal.
- 7:48SPEAKER_00: Whether anyone actually does that against an uncooperative provider is unresolved today.
- 7:52SPEAKER_01: Feels like the kind of thing that only gets built once someone gets caught.
- 7:55SPEAKER_00: Maybe. And that need for proof gets more urgent as more systems,
- 7:59SPEAKER_00: like the Siri integrations we just covered,
- 8:01SPEAKER_00: start delegating real actions to models nobody outside the company can fully verify.
- 8:06SPEAKER_01: Delegating real actions to systems you can't verify?
- 8:09SPEAKER_01: Sounds like it needs infrastructure that doesn't fall over, too.
- 8:12SPEAKER_00: Which brings us to Amazon.
- 8:13SPEAKER_00: AWS's Container Service, called ECS, short for Elastic Container Service,
- 8:18SPEAKER_00: got a lot faster at scaling itself up under load.
- 8:21SPEAKER_01: Scaling meaning adding more capacity automatically when traffic spikes?
- 8:25SPEAKER_00: Exactly. ECS runs your app in containers,
- 8:28SPEAKER_00: and Fargate is AWS's option for running those containers without you managing
- 8:32SPEAKER_00: the underlying servers.
- 8:33SPEAKER_00: The improvement here is about how fast the system notices it needs more capacity.
- 8:37SPEAKER_01: What was slow about it before?
- 8:39SPEAKER_00: By default, AWS's monitoring service, CloudWatch,
- 8:42SPEAKER_00: only publish CPU and memory numbers for your containers once every 60 seconds.
- 8:47SPEAKER_00: The autoscaler can only react to data it's actually seen.
- 8:50SPEAKER_01: So a traffic spike could sit unnoticed for almost a full minute.
- 8:53SPEAKER_00: Right.
- 8:54SPEAKER_00: AWS now offers an option to publish those same numbers every 20 seconds instead,
- 8:59SPEAKER_00: letting the autoscaler check three times as often.
- 9:01SPEAKER_01: And that actually moves the needle.
- 9:03SPEAKER_00: According to AWS's own tests,
- 9:05SPEAKER_00: the time to even trigger a scale-out dropped from 363 seconds to 86 seconds.
- 9:10SPEAKER_00: That's a 76% cut.
- 9:12SPEAKER_01: What about actually getting new capacity running, not just noticing you need it?
- 9:16SPEAKER_00: Total time from detecting the spike to having new tasks leave dropped from 386 seconds to 109.
- 9:22SPEAKER_00: One blog covering it separately found Fargate SLA Breach Time down 69% in its own ramp tests.
- 9:28SPEAKER_01: Two different sets of numbers from two different tests.
- 9:31SPEAKER_01: Worth keeping those separate.
- 9:32SPEAKER_00: Agreed. AWS's benchmark and that blog's benchmark aren't the same test,
- 9:36SPEAKER_00: but they point the same direction.
- 9:38SPEAKER_01: Is this just free then?
- 9:39SPEAKER_01: Seems like an easy switch.
- 9:40SPEAKER_00: Not entirely.
- 9:42SPEAKER_00: The high-resolution metrics are a new pricing line on your CloudWatch bill,
- 9:45SPEAKER_00: so checking three times as often costs more than checking once a minute.
- 9:49SPEAKER_01: So you're trading a monitoring bill for fewer missed scaling windows.
- 9:52SPEAKER_00: That's the trade exactly.
- 9:54SPEAKER_00: For most workloads the extra CloudWatch cost is small next to what
- 9:57SPEAKER_00: a missed scaling event costs you in an outage, but it's not nothing.
- 10:00SPEAKER_01: I've been on the other end of that 60-second lag before,
- 10:03SPEAKER_01: watching a dashboard while a service falls
- 10:05SPEAKER_01: over and the autoscaler just hasn't caught up.
- 10:07SPEAKER_00: That's the exact gap this closes.
- 10:09SPEAKER_00: If your service sees bursty traffic and you're still
- 10:12SPEAKER_00: on ECS's default 60-second metrics, this is worth checking this week.
- 10:16SPEAKER_00: Switch the target tracking policy to the high-resolution option and weigh
- 10:19SPEAKER_00: the CloudWatch cost against how much a slow scale-out actually costs you.
- 10:23SPEAKER_01: That's a concrete one.
- 10:24SPEAKER_01: Does it apply to everything on ECS?
- 10:26SPEAKER_00: It's available across Fargate,
- 10:28SPEAKER_00: ECS's managed instances and regular EC2 in every AWS commercial and GovCloud region,
- 10:34SPEAKER_00: so there's no setup you're locked out of.
- 10:35SPEAKER_01: Good, that's one thing someone can actually go do today.
- 10:38SPEAKER_00: Apple opened Siri to outside developers today,
- 10:41SPEAKER_00: trying to catch up to a chat GPT that's already winning on its own terms.
- 10:45SPEAKER_00: Anthropic gave the industry its first real way to prove which model answered a question.
- 10:49SPEAKER_00: And Amazon showed that checking your infrastructure more often pays for itself
- 10:53SPEAKER_00: in outages you avoid.
- 10:54SPEAKER_01: I'll bet that once Apple's Siri apps actually ship next spring,
- 10:57SPEAKER_01: the real story is how many get rejected, not how many get approved.
- 11:01SPEAKER_00: That's Wednesday.
- 11:02[music]