Latest / The Vault: The Epstein Files / Inside The OIG Interview: The Testimony Of An Unnamed R&D Officer From MCC (Part 8) (5/12/26)

Transcript

Inside The OIG Interview: The Testimony Of An Unnamed R&D Officer From MCC (Part 8) (5/12/26) · The Vault: The Epstein Files

• 0:00
  Speaker 1: What's up, everyone, and welcome to another episode of the
• 0:02
  Epstein Chronicles. In this episode, we're diving right back into
• 0:06
  that interview given by the unnamed R and D officer
• 0:10
  from MCC to the OIG inspectors question. Okay, so now
• 0:15
  that we know that the count was off over here,
• 0:17
  and that the ten PM count, according to the lieutenant's
• 0:20
  log says seventy two, but ten PM says seventy three
• 0:23
  plus one, right, and now R and D is actually
• 0:26
  reporting that there is an inmate in there, except they're
• 0:29
  still reporting seventy three plus one. And then at midnight,
• 0:33
  where is the midnight it says seventy two over here
• 0:36
  and the count slip shows seventy three. What does that
• 0:38
  tell you about the counts that we're done? In the
• 0:41
  shoe question by the other investigator, what he's asking if
• 0:47
  there's only seventy two people in there and they're reporting
• 0:50
  seventy three and it just so happened to coincide and
• 0:53
  this one, and you need to know that background information.
• 0:57
  They reported seventy three and the opposlut tenant who took
• 1:00
  the count found it was actually only seventy two, made
• 1:04
  the change and changed out and keyed out Fernandez. So
• 1:08
  what redacted is asking you is the fact that they
• 1:11
  reported seventy three on all of these does that indicate
• 1:14
  anything to you about the counts if they were done
• 1:17
  or were they not done? Answer? Yeah, this looks like
• 1:19
  someone wasn't paying attention because this what does this look
• 1:23
  like to you? Question? Well, that's what I was going
• 1:26
  to ask. What is RA Answer? RA is where the
• 1:30
  guy is sitting in a dry cell? Question is that
• 1:34
  R and D? Answer? Yeah, so he was. So because
• 1:37
  it's now the twelve o'clock count, and it's prior to
• 1:40
  the count, they can go ahead and keep him in
• 1:42
  where he's actually assigned. So it seems that during the
• 1:45
  ten o'clock count, he was still keyed to the shoe,
• 1:48
  So what was it plus one or something? So now
• 1:51
  at twelve o'clock, because he wasn't keyed there at ten o'clock,
• 1:55
  they keyed him in there now because the twelve o'clock count,
• 1:58
  which is correct and accurate and what they should have done.
• 2:01
  But now he's plus one, he's here where he should
• 2:04
  be where he stated on this notification, right, So that's accurate.
• 2:09
  But if he's no longer there, they should have been
• 2:11
  putting what's here? Question? Right answer, because he's not plus
• 2:17
  one up there no more question. Yeah, So this one
• 2:20
  is clearly that they're off. These guys, though, are still
• 2:24
  even with the seventy three plus one, it should have
• 2:26
  been seventy two plus one. If they're trying to say
• 2:30
  we got one outside, it shouldn't be seventy three plus one.
• 2:33
  They're utilizing the same number. It looks like on the
• 2:36
  E one. Somehow it seems that they're or they had
• 2:39
  that number, that base count number, and they knew we
• 2:42
  need this as the number we need to report. But
• 2:44
  also we got a plus one over in the R
• 2:47
  and D. So they're still off in their account. Does
• 2:50
  that indicate to you that they didn't actually conduct the count,
• 2:53
  that they just used the number that they thought they
• 2:55
  were supposed to report. Answer? It doesn't indicate that they
• 2:58
  didn't count. Question because if they counted, wouldn't that have
• 3:03
  been the right number? Answer? Sometimes you can count stuff.
• 3:07
  She gets caught off by the investigator, But wouldn't it
• 3:10
  be really coincidental if they miscount at the exact number
• 3:13
  that they were supposed to actually provide. They definitely miscounted,
• 3:17
  But there are seventy two people in there and they
• 3:20
  just happen to miscount exactly what the E one shows
• 3:23
  that they were supposed to count. It's a coincidence. And
• 3:27
  the fact that it happened twice in a row. What
• 3:30
  does that tell you? The other investigator jumps in, no,
• 3:33
  three times in a row. Answer, I'm not going to
• 3:38
  answer that question. Well, based on your experience, right, your
• 3:42
  experience of working in control, working in R and D,
• 3:45
  what do you think happened? Do you think that they
• 3:47
  did the count or not? I mean, how would they
• 3:52
  have gotten that number that they were supposed to report?
• 3:55
  Answer by probably just looking in their log and seeing, okay,
• 3:58
  when you take over my post, oh we got seventy
• 4:01
  two guys. One's in R and D, but they still
• 4:03
  got him keyed out to our unit based on maybe
• 4:06
  what someone told them. Question and when you worked in
• 4:09
  the unit at midnight, do you remember this being an
• 4:11
  issue at all? Because this is where we're told the
• 4:14
  absolute tenant who took the count redacted, she had to
• 4:19
  run around and try to figure this thing out. She's
• 4:22
  the one who had to come in and say, like, okay,
• 4:25
  where who's what where? And I can verify this. Do
• 4:29
  you remember that at all. Answer no. Question. Do you
• 4:33
  remember any telephone calls with the shoe saying you got
• 4:36
  a bad count? You got to recount? Answer no. If
• 4:40
  she's taking the count, I let her deal with it
• 4:44
  and I work on whatever else. Question Okay, So you're
• 4:46
  not actually involved with her while she's doing it? Answer
• 4:51
  no question. Okay, And you wouldn't have been, being that
• 4:54
  you came from R and D. You wouldn't have been
• 4:56
  the person that she said, hey, can you verify with
• 4:58
  R and D that this person is there? Answer? If
• 5:03
  she asked me? And that's what I did, then, But
• 5:05
  I don't recall that question doing that? Okay, you don't
• 5:13
  remember at all, though in that specific you do. Did
• 5:16
  you recall her being there at all? Answer? Yeah, she
• 5:21
  was there. Question so you remember her being in the
• 5:23
  control center? Answer? Uh huh. Question and you he gets
• 5:28
  cut off by the guard because she also made rounds
• 5:32
  on the unit. She walked around the institution. Question all right,
• 5:35
  and then as far as being keyed in and out,
• 5:38
  so I guess it's he BP thirty eight. Would that
• 5:41
  show when Fernandez was actually keyed in and out of
• 5:44
  the system on August tenth? Answer? Fernandez the guy from
• 5:49
  she gets cut off by the investigator. So Fernandez three
• 5:52
  point fifteen, who was never keyed out, he wasn't keyed out?
• 5:58
  Answer the dry cell guy. Question yeah, answer, yeah, it
• 6:03
  would show on thirty eight. Question on thirty eight it
• 6:05
  would actually show a time answer uh huh. Question and
• 6:09
  how do we get to that just to make a
• 6:11
  note redacted? Question? Okay, So we wouldn't even be able
• 6:15
  to get it at this point, hopefully that day maintained it.
• 6:19
  Answer well, sentry only goes back forty five days. So
• 6:22
  question you're talking about this document? Answer yeah. Question. Now
• 6:27
  if they did save these documents back, then would we
• 6:30
  be able to see when he was keyed in? Answer? Yeah.
• 6:33
  Question and if it's not saved answer it only goes
• 6:37
  back forty five days. Question okay, all right, so that
• 6:43
  will be very telling as well if we can get
• 6:46
  that before we start taking everything away. There's an issue
• 6:51
  with initials, being that I showed you these Can you
• 6:55
  just initial at the top? Question? Do you know anything
• 6:58
  about counts not actually being conducted at this time? In
• 7:01
  August of twenty nineteen? Answer no. Question When you would
• 7:05
  work on the custody side of the house, would you
• 7:08
  be involved in things like counts. Answer if I'm counting
• 7:11
  a unit with an officer, yeah, or if I'm the
• 7:14
  one taking the count yes. Question did you ever do
• 7:17
  any counts in the shoe? Answer I've done counts in
• 7:20
  the shoe? Question you have? Answer but she gets cut off?
• 7:25
  And when you were there? Did they actually conduct the counts? Answer?
• 7:31
  When I do counts, I conduct counts. Yeah. Question yeah, yeah,
• 7:35
  but I mean I'm not talking about you. I know
• 7:37
  you did, but I mean the people that you were
• 7:39
  there with, were they actually you know, you're supposed to
• 7:43
  have two people to count? Was the other person also counting? Answer? Well,
• 7:48
  if I have, if I'm working, yeah, counting. It's not
• 7:51
  a question. We're not even having that conversation. So question
• 7:56
  did you ever have anybody push back on you? Like no, no, no,
• 7:59
  we're good? Answer no. Question. Have you heard of people
• 8:04
  who when they're starting the shift just filling out the
• 8:07
  count slips and the roundsheets and be like ahead of time?
• 8:11
  Answer well, if they're on their own unit, I can't
• 8:14
  tell you what they're doing on their unit. I can
• 8:16
  tell you what I'm doing on my unit. Question but
• 8:19
  like in the shoe, have you ever heard of like
• 8:21
  people coming in and filling out both count slips and
• 8:24
  roundsheets at the very start of their shift. Answer if
• 8:27
  they've done that, I've never seen it. Question you've never
• 8:30
  seen it. Have you ever heard of people doing anything
• 8:33
  like that? Answer? I've heard of it, but I've never
• 8:35
  seen it. Question is that a good practice? Answer? No,
• 8:39
  question Is it known that you can't do that? Answer?
• 8:42
  You're not supposed to do that. Question Does everyone know
• 8:46
  that they can't especially if we're talking about round sheets?
• 8:49
  Does everyone know that you can't go and say it
• 8:51
  goes from eight am until twelve pm? You can't go
• 8:55
  in at eight am and write out everything you did
• 8:58
  for all around all the way to twelve pm. Answer,
• 9:02
  you can't do that because anything can happen. An emergency
• 9:05
  can take place, an inmate could get removed from your unit,
• 9:08
  you could get a new guy, and there's a number
• 9:11
  of things that could take place that you're not supposed
• 9:13
  to even your logbook pre fill out your log. Question
• 9:18
  is there any training, though that you all receive saying
• 9:20
  anything you got to do this when you're actually conducting
• 9:23
  the rounds, and certainly you know maybe after the fact
• 9:27
  is okay because you already did it. But beforehand. Answer.
• 9:32
  Maybe if the lieutenant sees it, you know, they might say, hey,
• 9:35
  you know, you're not supposed to pre fill out your
• 9:37
  count slips. They might say, you know, you can fill
• 9:39
  out the dates, the time, the unit. You might could
• 9:42
  even fill out the name, but you're not supposed to
• 9:44
  put in the actual number because you don't know what
• 9:47
  can happen. Question So as far and discernible talking about
• 9:51
  count slips, I'm talking about round sheets. Answer, Oh, no,
• 9:56
  you're not supposed to. They always tell you. The lieutenants,
• 9:59
  they always say that you're not supposed They always tell
• 10:01
  everybody that question. And do you know if back in
• 10:04
  August of twenty nineteen they were also saying that answer No,
• 10:09
  I don't know about that question. And is there any
• 10:13
  training that's provided to teach people how to actually fill
• 10:16
  out round sheets and count slips or is it supposed
• 10:18
  to be common sense? Question? Normally your training on the
• 10:22
  job and as you go along. So if I'm new
• 10:25
  and you know I'm training up under your officer, you
• 10:27
  might show me certain things, and people just learn by
• 10:30
  asking questions and maybe another officer just showing them the ropes,
• 10:34
  and everybody don't do everything the way they're supposed to do.
• 10:37
  So I might come in as a new officer and
• 10:40
  you might be showing me stuff and it could be
• 10:42
  completely wrong, but I'm doing what you showed me because
• 10:45
  that's all I know. So it just depends on who's
• 10:48
  training who and who's showing who what to do, and
• 10:51
  that's pretty much it because on the job right now,
• 10:55
  we have new staff training and new staff. We have
• 10:57
  staff that's here like a month training staff that's here
• 11:00
  a week. So the blind leading the blind question. So
• 11:04
  if someone makes the excuse that no one ever told
• 11:07
  me that I could do that, but I saw other
• 11:09
  people filling out round sheets ahead of time, so that's
• 11:11
  why I did it. Is that an excuse? Do you believe?
• 11:14
  So you think that that was an actual excuse to say, like,
• 11:17
  well he did it, so I did it, and that
• 11:20
  makes it okay because don't you think it's pretty common
• 11:23
  sense that no, you can't. You're certifying a document saying
• 11:27
  you conducted that round at that time. Answer? Yeah, common
• 11:31
  sense to the people that think outside the box. But
• 11:34
  common sense is not common to everybody. And I'm not
• 11:36
  trying to be a smart ass, you know. Question No,
• 11:40
  it's a good point. Answer and you know, I've been
• 11:43
  doing law enforcement for a while, you know, corrections, juvenile
• 11:46
  school safety, so I've seen things on the job that
• 11:49
  made me take my job very seriously. But when you
• 11:52
  have no knowledge, you have no experience, no correctional background,
• 11:56
  you've never been placed in an environment that you felt
• 11:59
  was that dangerous for you to be as mindful as
• 12:02
  you should be, and you don't, then nothing happens. You
• 12:05
  follow what you see everybody else doing in past practice,
• 12:08
  and it's not always right. And a lot of people
• 12:10
  don't read what they're supposed to be doing. They just
• 12:13
  go by what you tell them. And what I could
• 12:15
  tell you what to do doesn't necessarily mean that that's
• 12:19
  actually what you're supposed to be doing. Question, sure answer.
• 12:24
  And if you don't read it in black and white
• 12:26
  for yourself, how would you know that this is actually
• 12:29
  what you should be doing. And it's just a lack
• 12:31
  of training around here. Staff are not being trained, and
• 12:34
  that's what creates a lot of our problems. We don't
• 12:37
  have bad institution, we just have a lack of training,
• 12:40
  you know. And I don't think that people are willing
• 12:42
  to work. I think they want to work, but it's
• 12:44
  a lack of training, and it's a lack of morale
• 12:47
  in the institution. So I think that's what the biggest
• 12:49
  problem is. People are not being properly trained. So yeah,
• 12:53
  if I see you doing it, I think it's okay.
• 12:56
  I'm not ever thinking, oh, you know what, maybe I
• 13:00
  shouldn't do that something might happen, if nothing ever really
• 13:03
  happens to me. All right, folks, we're gonna wrap up
• 13:05
  right here, and in the next episode, we're gonna pick
• 13:08
  up where we left off. All the information that goes
• 13:11
  with this episode can be found in the description box.