Latest / World Ablaze with George Fontes / LA Mayor Primary Election, Iran, USA, Israel - WTF, and Belfast Burns After Attempted Beheading

Transcript

LA Mayor Primary Election, Iran, USA, Israel - WTF, and Belfast Burns After Attempted Beheading · World Ablaze with George Fontes

• 0:00
  All right, everyone, welcome back to another World of Blaze being recorded the 9th of June
• 0:10
  2026.
• 0:13
  Today, we're going to talk about or at least touch on the LA mayor's race.
• 0:17
  We're going to discuss the outcome of that as far as the primary is concerned.
• 0:23
  Anyway, this is actually what a lot of people don't realize is the election to get the two
• 0:28
  front-running candidates on the ballot for the general election.
• 0:33
  This race, this primary, was in contention because, well, by all accounts and all means,
• 0:40
  Spencer Pratt was going to be the number two, the number two to advance to the general election.
• 0:45
  And after overnight ballot drops, there was a sudden shift, sudden change, which somehow
• 0:52
  favored Nitya Rahman, a candidate who had no support, nobody knew, who allegedly didn't even
• 1:02
  win her own district, but somehow gained nearly double the votes after mail-in ballots to increase
• 1:11
  her lead over Spencer Pratt, therefore knocking him out of the race. A lot of circumstances there
• 1:19
  that are questionable, for sure.
• 1:22
  A lot of suspicion.
• 1:23
  But hey, we can't call it ballot fraud.
• 1:25
  We can't call it a lack of voter integrity.
• 1:30
  We can't call it anything other than a straight-up, stand-up California election.
• 1:39
  Because hey, LA is mostly Democrat, so there's no way Spancher is going to win anyway.
• 1:44
  But that's beside the point.
• 1:46
  and then we're going to discuss Iran a little bit and look here's the thing I'm known for my
• 1:54
  deep dive geopolitical assessments but this time around I'm not really going to do that
• 2:00
  I'm going to pull a Tim Dillon and talk about things based on how I feel my feelings right
• 2:05
  but no seriously I will talk about it I'll discuss it I'll touch on it it's going to be
• 2:11
  more of an opinion segment. I'm not really going to go and, again, dive too deep into the weeds of
• 2:17
  what's happening, but it's definitely going to be worth an update conversation. And by the end of
• 2:23
  that particular segment, you may disagree with me. You may not want to follow me anymore, whatever.
• 2:28
  But regardless, I'm going to say what I have to say. And then we move on to an attempted beheading.
• 2:36
  That's right. One of the amazing contributors to society in the form of an African immigrant
• 2:44
  from Somalia attempted to literally behead a man in Belfast.
• 2:52
  So the reaction of Ireland is, well, they're burning the place down in protest of their
• 2:59
  government who has allowed the mass migration that is largely gone unchecked to enter into
• 3:06
  Ireland.
• 3:07
  It's a case of nearly preferential treatment towards migrants with a lack of concern for
• 3:17
  the citizens of Ireland themselves.
• 3:20
  And this situation has been going on, geez, I mean, I want to say at least a few years
• 3:25
  now.
• 3:25
  the migrant issue.
• 3:29
  But this display of violence,
• 3:32
  I was going to pull the video up.
• 3:35
  I don't think I'm going to include it,
• 3:37
  but you can look it up on X.
• 3:39
  Okay, this is what I'll do.
• 3:40
  I'll leave a link.
• 3:41
  I'll leave a link to the video.
• 3:42
  If you have an X account
• 3:44
  and you're on X social media,
• 3:45
  I'll leave a link to the video.
• 3:47
  You can watch it on your own
• 3:49
  at your own discretion.
• 3:52
  But yes, the story is true.
• 3:55
  this Somali immigrant literally had this man pinned on the floor with a knife
• 4:02
  and was hacking at him, at his neck, trying to cut his head off,
• 4:08
  while also repeatedly stabbing him in the body.
• 4:12
  These are the doctors and engineers that people are opening their borders to.
• 4:17
  And yeah, that statement was probably mean, borderline racist.
• 4:21
  It was mostly facetious.
• 4:22
  but we have to talk about this.
• 4:26
  We have to have a real conversation.
• 4:29
  I think it's time to put an end to the madness.
• 4:32
  Let's just be honest.
• 4:34
  Unchecked immigration is just not working out, period.
• 4:40
  So before we move on to the actual show,
• 4:44
  for my regular listeners here,
• 4:46
  if this is your first time, hang in there.
• 4:49
  It's going to be a good show.
• 4:50
  For my first time listeners, a few updates here. I have migrated to a new host platform.
• 4:56
  And this platform is allowing me to distribute my video content pretty much everywhere. That being
• 5:05
  said, I've also been opened up or approved to have the video version of this podcast included
• 5:11
  in Apple Podcasts. Yes, that's right. I got lucky. I made the grade. I said, sure, we'll let this
• 5:17
  crazy idiot blabber and talk and discuss sensitive topics and situations and maybe throw a few,
• 5:23
  I don't know, curse words in there. But yeah, they opened me up for it. So if you're one of
• 5:29
  those people who like to stick to one platform and you're tired of bouncing around to like YouTube
• 5:33
  and Rumble, Spotify, wherever you want to watch my content. And let's say you're a Mac person,
• 5:39
  you're an Apple person. You're someone who likes Apple podcasts. Well, now the video versions will
• 5:44
  be included there. And I'm also told by my hosting provider that the videos will also be distributed
• 5:51
  to any RSS aggregator. So any other app, there's another independent app out there. I think it's
• 5:59
  called Fountain. There's a few independent podcast applications out there in which you
• 6:04
  can listen to podcasts that will actually show the video content. And so now the video content
• 6:10
  will be automatically included in my RSS feed.
• 6:13
  And any app that displays or will pick that up in the RSS feed and play video,
• 6:18
  you will now see the video version on those apps.
• 6:20
  So you don't necessarily have to go to YouTube or Rumble or even Spotify
• 6:24
  to watch the video version.
• 6:27
  You could do it from the comfort of the app of your choice.
• 6:32
  Well, as long as they play video anyway.
• 6:35
  Secondly, there's a project I'm working on.
• 6:40
  I'm not going to guarantee it's going to come to fruition, but here's the premise.
• 6:46
  Been discussing with a few people about putting a panel-style show together, a show where I
• 6:53
  will be hosting and participating, obviously.
• 6:57
  And I'm looking at about four, maybe five other people to be on this panel to where
• 7:01
  we have open discussions about current events.
• 7:04
  the goal is to be more off the cuff, not so much deep divey, not so data heavy as this show is.
• 7:12
  And I thought it'd be great to have a show like that where we can just talk. We can be
• 7:18
  reactive to what's happening in real time, or at least what's going on throughout the week.
• 7:24
  And we can really offer opinions from our own perspectives. So be on the lookout for that.
• 7:33
  And if this happens, just throwing this out there because the reason I'm throwing this
• 7:37
  out there is I want to get your feedback.
• 7:39
  It's going to be a live stream show or live stream centric.
• 7:43
  So the plan is a once a week live streamed show, not necessarily a podcast per se, but
• 7:49
  a live stream show where every week you'll tune in to the particular channel and watch
• 7:56
  the show.
• 7:57
  And I think this is going to be good.
• 7:59
  It'll be a good content.
• 8:01
  It'll be a great project to have.
• 8:04
  And I believe it's going to tap into the audience that wants to see things and feel a part of
• 8:11
  something that is happening right then and now.
• 8:15
  So be on the lookout for that.
• 8:19
  I'll announce how the show comes together, how it progresses throughout my show here.
• 8:26
  But do me a favor.
• 8:28
  Give me some feedback.
• 8:28
  If that's something you really think would be beneficial or you would like to see, please leave some feedback in the comments.
• 8:39
  Let me know that that's something that you'd be interested in.
• 8:43
  But as of now, it is something that we're planning to do.
• 8:46
  So that being said, thanks for tuning into this episode.
• 8:50
  Let's get on with this particular show and let's start with LA.
• 8:56
  So what happened?
• 8:56
  What happened? What's the uproar? Well, the uproar was the upset out of nowhere Spencer Pratt,
• 9:04
  who came onto the scene claiming he was going to clean up LA. He tugged at the heartstrings
• 9:10
  of just about every Angeleno or person of Los Angeles for simply pointing out the inequities
• 9:20
  in the previous administration, the corruption, the lack of attention, the dirtiness, the
• 9:26
  homelessness, the increased drugs, the wages, hell, the mismanagement of emergency services.
• 9:33
  And yeah, pretty much specifically referring to the handling of the Palisade fires,
• 9:39
  a place where people's homes still haven't been rebuilt.
• 9:43
  And so Spencer Pratt was fed up.
• 9:46
  Many people in Los Angeles were fed up.
• 9:49
  And it looked that it would possibly be a chance to get the longstanding Democrat Party rule of Los Angeles, at least in the mayoral position.
• 10:07
  There might have been a chance to change that.
• 10:09
  It really seemed that way.
• 10:11
  During the election process, as votes were being counted, Spencer Pratt was miles ahead of the third candidate, Nithya Rahman, who nobody heard of, who had no support, who had no momentum.
• 10:29
  And it looked like it was going to be, of all things, surprisingly, Karen Bass and Spencer Pratt on the ticket for the general election in November.
• 10:41
  Now, the fact that Karen Bass got so many votes is ridiculous in and of itself.
• 10:44
  I mean, she is literally the reason LA is a dumpster fire.
• 10:49
  Everything from very questionable decisions to appointing people in leadership positions
• 10:56
  who have zero experience, the mishandling, again, of emergency services, questionable
• 11:05
  use of taxpayer funds.
• 11:07
  There's exorbitant salaries that were being paid.
• 11:11
  Now, I know this isn't necessarily the mayor's decision.
• 11:13
  These things are voted on.
• 11:15
  But you can't say the mayor doesn't have pull.
• 11:19
  And saying, you know what?
• 11:20
  I believe this position deserves X amount of money.
• 11:23
  And this is what we're going to pay said person.
• 11:27
  Her salary alone was very generous for a mayor.
• 11:31
  And so with the drugs, the increased homelessness, the increased crime, the lack of attention to the city, to her patrons, to her taxpayers, to the seemingly outright abuse of taxpayer funds, exorbitant salaries, the lack of actual experience and credibility for leadership positions.
• 11:56
  positions. I mean, we just keep going. Given all that, it looked like LA was finally fed up and
• 12:03
  they were going to just kick her out and replace her, maybe even give a Republican a chance.
• 12:09
  Now, I'm going to make this clear from my position. I don't really think that this was
• 12:16
  necessarily Republican versus Democrat. It was more like, let's get the crazy out and put someone
• 12:21
  in charge of LA who actually cares about LA, who actually cares about the job and isn't using it
• 12:28
  just for status, for clout, for photo ops, for the ability to go on paid vacations in Africa or
• 12:34
  wherever the hell she went. I'm just saying, this is the real story. It wasn't Democrat versus
• 12:41
  Republican. It wasn't MAGA versus the Democrats or the liberals. It really wasn't. But the Democrat
• 12:48
  party wants you to believe that's what it was.
• 12:50
  They wanted to rally their troops
• 12:52
  to make sure that MAGA didn't
• 12:54
  get into the city and spread their dark doctrine The darkness is going to spread into LA Well at least that what Nithya Rahman said That was part of her campaign speech actually
• 13:06
  See, the thing I found interesting in this whole race is the Democrat Party,
• 13:10
  Democrat Party in this mayoral race in Los Angeles,
• 13:16
  they didn't really have a platform other than they didn't like Trump
• 13:20
  and they'd be damned if MAGA influenced policy in LA.
• 13:24
  That was it.
• 13:26
  There was nothing else.
• 13:28
  There wasn't any real talk of looking into the corruption of LA because maybe that would
• 13:34
  also implicate Mayor Karen Bass herself.
• 13:37
  I don't know.
• 13:38
  But that talk wasn't being had.
• 13:40
  They were talking about wages at least or cost of living, at least Nithya Raman did.
• 13:50
  They did talk about maybe lower cost of housing.
• 13:53
  Wink, wink, right?
• 13:55
  But, well, at least Nithya Rahman did.
• 13:57
  So at least two things that at least I could say that candidate, Nithya Rahman, spoke on.
• 14:02
  But none of them were talking about looking into the corruption, except for Spencer Pratt.
• 14:07
  Nobody was talking about cleaning up the streets and the homeless situation other than Spencer Pratt.
• 14:14
  No one talked as if they cared about L.A. and longed for the L.A. of their childhood,
• 14:20
  which was a great place to live and grow up.
• 14:23
  other than Spencer Pratt.
• 14:25
  No, the other candidates were virtue singly,
• 14:29
  saying really nothing other than
• 14:30
  we're going to keep Trump out,
• 14:32
  we don't like Trump,
• 14:33
  and the MAGA influence
• 14:36
  is not going to influence policy in LA.
• 14:38
  And that's pretty much it.
• 14:39
  That's all they really had to say.
• 14:43
  And so let's just find out what happened here.
• 14:46
  How did Spencer Pratt go from
• 14:47
  being the top second candidate
• 14:50
  to be on the general election ballot
• 14:53
  for the race of the position of mayor in LA
• 14:58
  to suddenly,
• 15:00
  suddenly not making the cut.
• 15:03
  After all the hoopla,
• 15:05
  after all the push.
• 15:08
  And yeah, we can talk about,
• 15:09
  there's an overwhelming majority
• 15:12
  of registered Democrats in LA.
• 15:16
  But given the situation,
• 15:18
  I think people wanted someone who was going to actually care about them rather than stick to party politics.
• 15:26
  I mean, it really was pointing that way.
• 15:27
  All the polls were looking that way.
• 15:30
  But that's not what we got.
• 15:33
  And so if you're on social media and you're looking online, Instagram, mostly X, though.
• 15:39
  X is really the spot for politics.
• 15:41
  But if you're looking, let's say on X, the Democrat influencers, Democrat accounts on X, the big guys, don't call it fraud.
• 15:50
  How dare you?
• 15:51
  There's nothing suspicious.
• 15:52
  You don't understand California voting laws.
• 15:55
  Well, we're going to touch on some of those questionable laws, laws that can easily be manipulated.
• 16:02
  But first, let's discuss Nithya Raman, like Top Ramen, I guess.
• 16:12
  Okay, I'm sorry.
• 16:12
  I wasn't trying to make fun of her.
• 16:15
  It's just how you pronounce the name.
• 16:16
  So let me do it again respectfully.
• 16:19
  Nithya Raman.
• 16:21
  Okay?
• 16:22
  So let's discuss Nithya Raman versus Spencer Pratt.
• 16:26
  I'm going to play a couple of their speeches here.
• 16:31
  Okay?
• 16:31
  One from her, one from Spencer, and one additional clip from Spencer just because it kind of stands out.
• 16:42
  And so let's look at those.
• 16:45
  Let's see what happened here.
• 16:47
  Let's see the difference in why Nithya Raman suddenly, at the 11th hour, as they say, gained so many votes.
• 16:56
  Like literally double the votes overnight.
• 17:00
  and then maintain a trajectory to knock Spencer Pratt off the ballot.
• 17:06
  Let's check this out.
• 17:09
  All right, so here's Nithya Raman.
• 17:12
  I'm going to play this from the 133 mark just so we can get right to it.
• 17:17
  This is from C-SPAN, by the way.
• 17:19
  So legitimate source.
• 17:20
  This is a real video.
• 17:21
  It's not made up.
• 17:23
  And let's hear Nithya Raman.
• 17:25
  Let's hear her position.
• 17:26
  Let's hear what she has to offer LA, what she's going to do for the citizens of Los Angeles.
• 17:34
  A few months ago, this campaign was a long shot.
• 17:39
  No one knew who I was.
• 17:41
  I was the last to enter this race.
• 17:43
  We had no institutional backing.
• 17:46
  But what we did have was a vision for Los Angeles, that this city should be affordable
• 17:52
  enough to still be a place of real opportunity where families are not pushed out, where artists
• 17:59
  can afford to stay and make their art a place where working people can build a future.
• 18:06
  That is the vision that we have for Los Angeles.
• 18:11
  Okay, applause.
• 18:14
  I don't disagree that that's what people want, but they're applauding for the same old.
• 18:22
  status quo, another Democrat that wants to continue to run the city.
• 18:33
  Now, Nithya Raman may actually want to make LA affordable, but let's not forget it's the
• 18:39
  Democrat party and their decisions that made LA unaffordable.
• 18:46
  Combine that with the Democrat leadership in the governor and his cabinet and the legislation at the state level of California that have also made policy decisions that have made California expensive and for the most part housing unattainable for the average person out there.
• 19:07
  I mean, unless you're some tech mogul making millions, billions, or even trillions of dollars.
• 19:11
  but hey listen Nithya so far you're on the right track but for everyone listening let's just not
• 19:19
  forget who put LA in the situation they're in in the first place and by the way forgot to mention
• 19:25
  she she has been part of the problem she is a city council member of Los Angeles she actually
• 19:35
  is a city council person. She was part of that problem. But let's continue to hear what she has
• 19:44
  to say. A vision where government actually functions and delivers every day on this city's
• 19:59
  beautiful, big-hearted values.
• 20:02
  Where we stand up against ice.
• 20:05
  Oh.
• 20:07
  Oh, stand up against ice.
• 20:10
  Where we show up for our gay and trans siblings.
• 20:19
  That's what demanded applause, really?
• 20:21
  Where we stand up for gay and trans siblings.
• 20:24
  Where we stand up for ice.
• 20:27
  even when she was talking about affordability
• 20:29
  didn't get that big of a reaction
• 20:31
  she was talking about family
• 20:32
  but when she brings up
• 20:35
  ICE
• 20:36
  and gay and lesbian
• 20:39
  and how we're going to stand up
• 20:42
  to both and stand up for
• 20:44
  so standing up to ICE and standing up for
• 20:46
  the gay and lesbians
• 20:47
  in LA all of a sudden
• 20:49
  cheers away that's right
• 20:51
  Nithya that's what matters
• 20:53
  so far hasn't
• 20:56
  hasn't mentioned anything about fixing the corruption,
• 21:00
  the dirty streets,
• 21:02
  the lack of functioning infrastructure,
• 21:05
  the homelessness,
• 21:07
  the drug use,
• 21:08
  but let's continue to hear what she has to say.
• 21:10
  A vision where our neighborhoods are safe,
• 21:14
  where they're full of trees and shade and alive with activity
• 21:18
  and people and good food and community.
• 21:25
  We had a beautiful vision, a vision of Los Angeles that's joyful and welcoming and ambitious.
• 21:36
  And we believe, we believe that Angelenos were hungry for that vision.
• 21:41
  And we were right.
• 21:43
  We were right.
• 21:43
  Look at all of you.
• 21:46
  I'll have to say, I mean, she has a great personality, but she's literally running on
• 21:51
  vibes and feelings here.
• 21:52
  She's not running on anything hard, or at least, I mean, willing to tackle the hard truths of what's really affecting LA.
• 22:04
  It's just, you know, good food, trees, lesbian and gay rights, and stand up to ice.
• 22:13
  And it's a great vision.
• 22:14
  We'll be happy.
• 22:15
  We'll have community, and this is what we want.
• 22:20
  You know, food and trees.
• 22:21
  Food and trees, everybody.
• 22:23
  This is good.
• 22:24
  This is the vision we all want, right?
• 22:27
  This is what people somehow, somehow voted for to the level that she allegedly somehow
• 22:37
  pushed out Spencer Pratt.
• 22:39
  Well, that's interesting because we're going to go ahead and watch Spencer Pratt.
• 22:45
  We're going to see what Spencer Pratt stands on.
• 22:49
  We're going to see the contrast.
• 22:50
  We're going to compare.
• 22:52
  We're going to look at what Spencer Pratt wants to do and what he is offering the city of LA,
• 22:59
  which apparently people didn't want to vote for at all.
• 23:05
  Didn't believe in.
• 23:08
  Here's that Spencer Pratt speech here.
• 23:11
  The world I was running for mayor.
• 23:14
  Since then, I've been blown away by the outpouring of support and encouragement.
• 23:18
  it. It's been powerful to see how many people in the city are ready for real change. Everyone
• 23:24
  here knows Los Angeles has reached a breaking point. And for a long time, I was hoping someone
• 23:29
  else would step up and fix this mess. But now you've entrusted me to do the job. And
• 23:36
  I take that responsibility seriously. I'm going to make sure we do this right. The city
• 23:41
  doesn't need another politician brokering deals and trading favors. We need leadership
• 23:47
  that shows up, takes responsibility, and delivers results.
• 23:51
  No more cover-ups and corruption.
• 23:54
  No more self-dealing and incompetence.
• 23:57
  No more backroom deals and special interests.
• 24:00
  We are done with all of it.
• 24:05
  Did Spencer just address corruption and backdoor deals
• 24:09
  and overall the shady mishandling of L.A. under Karen Bass?
• 24:17
  Sounds like he did.
• 24:18
  Those sound like real problems and issues that would affect LA.
• 24:23
  Like, you know, the condition of Los Angeles, both physical condition and the vibe of LA.
• 24:33
  Sounds like it.
• 24:35
  Sounds like he's onto something here.
• 24:37
  Sounds like he's frustrated.
• 24:38
  I mean, it's this versus trees and good food and LGBTQ and stopping ice.
• 24:51
  So far, sounds like Spencer really wants to fix the city.
• 24:56
  It doesn't sound like he's just selling vibes.
• 24:59
  See what else he has to say.
• 25:03
  When I'm mayor, I will serve all the people of Los Angeles,
• 25:07
  not the insiders and political machines.
• 25:10
  Our city government will meet its most basic responsibilities again,
• 25:15
  protecting lives, preparing for disasters,
• 25:19
  and delivering real recovery when crises hit.
• 25:23
  We will expose and eliminate the waste and corruption
• 25:26
  that have turned City Hall into a black hole for taxpayer dollars,
• 25:31
  and every budget will answer to you, the taxpayer.
• 25:34
  Public safety will be restored as a core function of government.
• 25:41
  I will fully support our law enforcement officers and our first responders and demand elite performance from our public safety agencies.
• 25:54
  But support will not mean blind loyalty It will mean high standards Corruption and incompetence will be confronted not covered up
• 26:07
  Our homelessness, we are ending the scam.
• 26:10
  Yes.
• 26:14
  Okay, so Spencer wants to put a stop to corruption.
• 26:20
  He is calling for accountability.
• 26:23
  He's calling for supporting law enforcement.
• 26:25
  fixing the issue that has been going on with emergency services.
• 26:31
  Safety first.
• 26:35
  So far, the contrast between Spencer Pratt's speech
• 26:41
  and what he stands for versus Nithya Ryan's
• 26:45
  trees and good food vibes.
• 26:49
  Really?
• 26:50
  I mean, it's as if Nithya Ramon's on a different planet
• 26:55
  than Spencer.
• 26:57
  Excuse me.
• 26:59
  Sorry.
• 27:00
  Need another sip.
• 27:01
  But it sounds like Nithya Raman's on a different planet
• 27:05
  than Spencer Pratt here, right?
• 27:09
  By the way, cheers, everybody.
• 27:14
  So how is it that Nithya Raman pulled ahead
• 27:19
  to knock Spencer Pratt of the race?
• 27:21
  Were trees and good food more important?
• 27:23
  or was it the LGBTQ that pushed her over the top?
• 27:31
  And by the way, do we have to specifically always address the LGBTQ community?
• 27:36
  I mean, look right here, everyone, all you LGBTQ plus, I don't even know anymore, but
• 27:43
  look here.
• 27:45
  No one cares.
• 27:47
  You're human, just like the rest of us.
• 27:51
  You all pay taxes.
• 27:53
  You all have to deal with drug-infested streets, homeless encampments, low wages.
• 28:00
  Does your sexual preference really matter when it comes to fixing those issues?
• 28:07
  Do politicians literally specifically have to represent your cause or call out and acknowledge
• 28:18
  your sexual preference in order to get you to pay attention to them?
• 28:21
  I mean, aren't you a human being in the end?
• 28:26
  Does it matter?
• 28:28
  Was that Spencer's problem?
• 28:30
  He didn't address the LGBTQ directly and say, I'm going to stand for you?
• 28:38
  I mean, it sounds like everything in his speech is going to stand for you regardless.
• 28:42
  It's all like basic needs, you know, necessities of life to live within a well-run city.
• 28:51
  So what is it?
• 28:54
  What is it, everyone?
• 28:55
  What is it that puts Spencer Pratt from number two to advance to the general election to down to the bottom?
• 29:05
  What was it?
• 29:07
  Hmm?
• 29:08
  You know, I have one more clip here from Spencer.
• 29:12
  And let's go ahead and play that as well.
• 29:14
  Because it seems like Spencer was really serious about cleaning the city up.
• 29:18
  It really did.
• 29:19
  Let's check this out.
• 29:22
  Short clip, by the way.
• 29:23
  If elected, he'll enlist the IRS to audit the city government.
• 29:27
  Also as mayor, I have a good relationship with the IRS criminal investigation team.
• 29:31
  First week, I'm bringing them in.
• 29:33
  Here's all the books.
• 29:34
  Open this up.
• 29:35
  Let's see all the corruption.
• 29:38
  Open this up.
• 29:39
  Let's see all the corruption.
• 29:43
  Sounds like Spencer Pratt was obsessed with the corruption in the city of LA.
• 29:48
  It sounds like that was the issue that people didn't want to vote for, right?
• 29:52
  Right?
• 29:53
  Like no one was concerned with fixing LA, the corruption, the abuse of taxpayer money,
• 29:58
  the drugs, the increased crime.
• 30:02
  Again, the fumbling of managing emergency services.
• 30:07
  None of that was a concern for LA, apparently.
• 30:10
  Because if you're a Democrat, you don't care that this person would actually want to run
• 30:16
  and fix your city because, dare I say, he could possibly be a Republican.
• 30:24
  But you're more than willing to cast your votes in support of the person who put you
• 30:29
  in the position you're in, namely Karen Bass.
• 30:32
  And somehow overnight during these ballot drops, give the split vote away to Nithya
• 30:41
  Raman, who nobody knows and who's running on vibes and trees and good food.
• 30:46
  I mean, is this the upside down world?
• 30:52
  See, these are the reasons.
• 30:54
  This is why people are calling this voter fraud.
• 31:01
  This is why people are saying this is very suspicious.
• 31:06
  Not to mention that during the voter counts or the counting of votes,
• 31:13
  that by all means,
• 31:16
  Spencer Pratt had a very healthy lead
• 31:19
  over Nithya Raman
• 31:21
  until it was time to count
• 31:25
  all those ballot drops.
• 31:28
  And then over 40,
• 31:30
  I think like 40, 44% of all the ballot drops
• 31:33
  went to Nithya Raman.
• 31:35
  That's not suspicious.
• 31:39
  No, that's,
• 31:41
  you just don't know
• 31:42
  how California voting works.
• 31:44
  That's the problem.
• 31:45
  You just don't understand.
• 31:48
  That's the real issue.
• 31:50
  Okay.
• 31:51
  Well, I got this little graphic here from,
• 31:56
  I think it's Corbin Williams.
• 31:59
  Corbin Williams on X.
• 32:01
  I got this graphic from him.
• 32:02
  Go ahead and check this out.
• 32:03
  Because this basically spells it out visually
• 32:07
  without me going too deep in the weeds on the polls
• 32:10
  and where everything was at.
• 32:11
  Like, here it is.
• 32:13
  Okay.
• 32:14
  Election night, June 2nd.
• 32:16
  Here's Nithya Raman at the bottom.
• 32:18
  She has less than 62,000 votes.
• 32:23
  Karen Bass, somehow, 117,579.
• 32:26
  And here is Spencer Pratt, 86,323.
• 32:30
  Now, besides the starting point here, I want you to notice the progression of votes gained
• 32:35
  by both Bass and Pratt.
• 32:39
  They both seem very in line, gradual, what you would expect, right?
• 32:45
  There are definitely gains, right?
• 32:49
  From June 2nd through June 4th through 5th through June 6th, you can see the gains that
• 32:54
  look gradual, that look real.
• 32:57
  But here's what people are wondering about.
• 33:00
  Early June 3rd through 4th, okay?
• 33:03
  Nithya Raman, 71,000 votes.
• 33:06
  You see this double arrow here?
• 33:08
  right?
• 33:10
  See that?
• 33:11
  How does she go
• 33:12
  from 71,000
• 33:14
  to within a day
• 33:17
  maybe two at the most
• 33:19
  more than double
• 33:21
  the votes?
• 33:23
  How does she gain
• 33:24
  more than double?
• 33:25
  How does she gain
• 33:26
  the amount
• 33:28
  that is like
• 33:29
  statistically impossible?
• 33:33
  How does she go from
• 33:34
  71,000 to
• 33:35
  153,500
• 33:38
  788 votes. And then from there, she just exponentially just keeps gaining votes to
• 33:45
  where she eventually knocks Spencer Pratt out of the race. How does that work? I mean, I'm going to
• 33:54
  leave this here. I'm not going to switch the slide because I want you to keep looking at this.
• 33:58
  How does this make sense? How is this not suspicious? And this is why people keep calling
• 34:06
  for the end of lack of voter ID, ballot harvesting, counting votes well beyond the close of the
• 34:19
  election, like of the voter election day.
• 34:22
  Your votes should be in by said day, period.
• 34:27
  We shouldn't be able to count them for another two weeks because a vote might be in the mail.
• 34:33
  might be, you know, wink, wink, right? Little quotes. Like, come on. Are we really supposed
• 34:39
  to sit here and accept? And listen, this is common in California. If you don't know by now,
• 34:44
  I do live in California. Like I'm sure my listeners know I live in California.
• 34:48
  I got to deal with this. And yeah, sure. I'm conservative. And I don't whine every time a
• 34:54
  Republican loses because sometimes it's the Republicans or the registered voters that are
• 35:01
  Republican in California, sometimes it's their fault. They just don't get off their ass and vote.
• 35:04
  They give it away. And I've admitted that and I've said it. But when you have situations like this,
• 35:11
  where you have this anomaly, and there's a lot of people on X, I'm going to switch this over.
• 35:17
  There's a lot of people on X saying, you have no proof. Where is your proof of fraud?
• 35:22
  You have no, where's the proof of fraud? There is no proof. Really? There's no proof?
• 35:26
  there's no proof hold on we go back no proof explain that there where's my cursor explain explain
• 35:34
  this explain this you can't is this proof um is definitely suspicious uh is definitely an anomaly
• 35:52
  And beyond that, California, they'll be damned if the federal government comes in to oversee an audit account.
• 36:03
  No, no, we can't have that either.
• 36:05
  No integrity in California, apparently.
• 36:08
  But I guess we have oversight, right?
• 36:10
  There's ballot curing.
• 36:12
  It's just questionable.
• 36:15
  Apparently, that in and of itself is an oversight provision, which maybe, I don't know.
• 36:22
  because according to California, it's inclusive of everybody.
• 36:26
  Because California claims it's more important to include every vote, right?
• 36:36
  Rather than be hasty about things and count the votes who, you know,
• 36:44
  actually were submitted on time.
• 36:47
  The votes that were accounted for without question.
• 36:52
  that didn't have to go through this voter hearing system
• 37:00
  or method of verifying signatures somehow.
• 37:09
  Hmm.
• 37:11
  And so that with ballot harvesting,
• 37:16
  which is another questionable voter tactic here
• 37:21
  or methods and means applied or used in voting.
• 37:26
  Also questionable.
• 37:28
  I mean, what can go wrong, right?
• 37:30
  What can go wrong?
• 37:32
  Well, let's talk about ballot harvesting
• 37:36
  and some of the vulnerabilities.
• 37:39
  So I gathered a lot of info,
• 37:42
  and I'm not going to give you an ear beating on this stuff, okay?
• 37:45
  But I gathered a lot of info.
• 37:47
  And let's just talk about the vulnerability issues.
• 37:53
  So here's the primary fraud concerns and risks.
• 37:57
  Now, first off, let's address ballot harvesting.
• 38:02
  Ballot harvesting is when a person or group of people can go and collect ballots from individuals
• 38:11
  to then go and drop them off at ballot boxes.
• 38:17
  or wherever ballots are being collected.
• 38:20
  And so this has been called into question
• 38:25
  because there's no real oversight, right?
• 38:28
  Like, who's to say the person is not dismissing
• 38:33
  or throwing out ballots
• 38:34
  or physically tearing them up
• 38:39
  or losing them conveniently?
• 38:42
  Like, I don't know.
• 38:42
  It's just there's so much there that can go wrong, right?
• 38:47
  There's so much there that can go wrong.
• 38:49
  So here's the primary fraud concerns, everybody.
• 38:54
  California transitioned to unlimited ballot harvesting And again unlimited ballot harvesting where any person can collect any number of ballots Creates several opportunities for abuse
• 39:09
  Want to read that again?
• 39:11
  Any person, any person can collect any number.
• 39:18
  Like, if you wanted to rent a U-Haul truck and stuff it with ballots,
• 39:21
  apparently you can do that.
• 39:22
  so let's go over some of the bullet points of concern voter coercion and ballot brokers so
• 39:34
  concerns exist that paid political operatives sometimes called ballot brokers target vulnerable
• 39:41
  populations so we're talking about like nursing homes you know like elderly people
• 39:47
  homeless shelters, etc.
• 39:52
  And it's been said that they can easily pressure these people
• 39:56
  into voting how they want by merely assisting these people
• 40:01
  and casting their votes, right?
• 40:05
  Like, I'm just going to help you fill it out.
• 40:06
  Here's the candidates.
• 40:08
  Well, here's the choice you have for governor.
• 40:10
  Here's the choice you have for mayor.
• 40:12
  Yeah, this person stands for this, but these people,
• 40:16
  they're really bad. And here's why they're bad. If it was me, I would choose this person,
• 40:21
  but it's your vote. You cast it however you want. Hmm. All right. So the other concern is
• 40:29
  destruction of opposing ballots. This one's an obvious one, right? Operatives have been accused
• 40:35
  of harvesting ballots and then selectively destroying those belonging to voters who likely
• 40:41
  support the opposing party.
• 40:44
  Then there's the big one, chain of custody, because there really is no chain of custody.
• 40:49
  We have no idea how these things are being handled, what's going on with them whatsoever.
• 40:56
  So unlike ballots returned via U.S. Postal Service or official drop boxes, harvested
• 41:02
  ballots are often held by private individuals with no documented chain of custody or state
• 41:09
  oversight.
• 41:10
  Now they're important what they're,
• 41:12
  there is no oversight.
• 41:13
  Who is watching these people?
• 41:16
  Nobody.
• 41:17
  He just got free reign to go collect ballots as many as they want.
• 41:22
  And apparently any person.
• 41:24
  And again,
• 41:25
  as many ballots as they want,
• 41:27
  no oversight.
• 41:31
  So there's no chain of custody.
• 41:33
  Like there's no verification on where these ballots have gone,
• 41:38
  how they were handled.
• 41:40
  Nothing.
• 41:42
  There's also a lack of transparency.
• 41:45
  There's no front-end requirement for harvesters to disclose their political affiliation to voters,
• 41:51
  nor is there a back-end mechanism for counties to track who dropped off specific ballots or in what quantities.
• 42:02
  So apparently they can't even tell if this said person who can collect unlimited amounts of ballots,
• 42:07
  They can't verify whether or not they actually collected, let's say, 7,000 or 10,000 and actually dropped off 7,000 or 10,000.
• 42:13
  No.
• 42:13
  They can just come in and say, hey, here's the ballots I collected, and here they are.
• 42:17
  So they could have collected 10 and submitted 2,000, right?
• 42:21
  10,000 ballots collected, but 2,000 submitted.
• 42:24
  There's no oversight.
• 42:25
  How would we know?
• 42:26
  We don't.
• 42:27
  There is no way to know.
• 42:29
  See, things like that are what bring people to question the voter integrity in California.
• 42:37
  And of course, that's not all.
• 42:39
  Let's talk about the voter IDs, right?
• 42:43
  Isn't that a big thing?
• 42:46
  Voter IDs, like in California, apparently you don't have to show ID at all.
• 42:55
  Well, that's interesting.
• 42:58
  Let's go ahead and check this out.
• 43:02
  Let me go ahead and pull this up for you guys.
• 43:05
  Okay, got it.
• 43:07
  So here we go.
• 43:08
  Check this out.
• 43:10
  Now, in California, you don't necessarily need ID.
• 43:14
  All right.
• 43:14
  Now, here's where you do need it.
• 43:16
  If you're a first-time voter, especially, you know, first-time federal election voter for sure.
• 43:22
  But after that, there's no real need for it.
• 43:25
  Okay.
• 43:25
  But then the waters get a little murky because as we go down here,
• 43:31
  it says pending legislation and legal chances.
• 43:34
  It says right here, voter ID.
• 43:39
  It says, while ID is not generally required as of June 2026,
• 43:43
  there are efforts to change this, and there should.
• 43:45
  So let me back it up a little bit.
• 43:47
  It does say here, okay, so when we go over acceptable forms of ID,
• 43:53
  so, for example, if a voter falls into a specific category that they can't meet, right,
• 44:01
  They can provide either photo or non-photo identification.
• 44:06
  And here's acceptable forms.
• 44:08
  So there's California driver's license or state ID.
• 44:10
  That makes sense.
• 44:11
  Passport makes sense.
• 44:13
  Student or military ID, sure.
• 44:16
  I think student IDs would be pretty easy to manipulate, but those are valid IDs.
• 44:22
  Recent utility bill or bank statement, which I get, but there's no picture associated with it.
• 44:29
  So kind of questionable.
• 44:31
  There's a government-issued check or paycheck, but still, again, no photo associated with it.
• 44:39
  And then official government mail.
• 44:43
  And again, still no photo associated with it.
• 44:47
  But these are the other acceptable forms.
• 44:49
  so far the forms of acceptable id don't all necessarily correlate who it says you are
• 44:59
  to being able to verify who you are via picture i just read multiple forms of id that do not
• 45:06
  connect the name with who you are who you look like like you can i could present you a bill
• 45:12
  but you still can't verify that's me if i am unwilling or unable to present you a photo id
• 45:18
  so like what's the point right and there's some other strange legal standings here when it comes
• 45:29
  to voter id because on the one hand california says you do need to present it to register
• 45:35
  but after you're registered you don't need to present it anymore
• 45:40
  right so basically anybody who knows that you're a registered voter can target you
• 45:48
  steal your voting papers or whatever, or pose as you,
• 45:54
  and cast a vote that is opposite of what you actually wanted to vote.
• 46:00
  I mean, it's possible, right?
• 46:01
  Because no one's checking IDs.
• 46:04
  Let's go over some other interesting legalities when it comes to voter ID.
• 46:12
  So, cursor here, guys.
• 46:14
  So, going to the bottom.
• 46:15
  And I'm going to reread this about the general requirements, right?
• 46:18
  So it says, while ID is not generally required as of June, 2026, there are efforts to change this.
• 46:26
  So there's a 2026 ballot initiative, a constitutional amendment known as a California voter ID initiative has qualified for the November 3rd, 2026 general election ballot.
• 46:37
  If approved by voters, it would require government-issued ID for in-person voting and the use of the last four digits of an ID number for mail-in ballots.
• 46:50
  Now, here's another interesting opposition to that, though.
• 46:55
  So local requirements are prohibited.
• 46:57
  In response to a 2024 Huntington Beach measure, which was Measure A, that sought to implement local voter ID requirements, the state passed Senate Bill 1174.
• 47:12
  This law explicitly prohibits local governments from enacting or enforcing their own voter ID mandates.
• 47:21
  mandates. The California Supreme Court upheld this state preemption in January, 2026.
• 47:30
  So local municipalities who say, nah, screw that. We got to verify who you are. Well,
• 47:36
  apparently you're not allowed to do that according to the state of California.
• 47:41
  And then there's identification at registration. So it says, while physical ID is again,
• 47:47
  rarely required at polling places.
• 47:51
  Individuals must provide a California driver's license,
• 47:53
  state ID number,
• 47:54
  or the last four digits of their social security number
• 47:58
  to register to vote.
• 47:59
  Again, this is only at the time of registering to vote.
• 48:04
  Okay.
• 48:05
  But it also says, again,
• 48:08
  physical IDs are rarely required at polling places.
• 48:15
  So questionable, right?
• 48:17
  very suspicious, feels like the government of California set everything up to get their way,
• 48:25
  depending on who's in power. Because I'll be honest, this can also work in favor of the
• 48:29
  Republican Party, right? Let's say that California was all Republican Party candidates running
• 48:37
  things like a legislation, Senate, governor, city mayors.
• 48:46
  Like, let's say it was just so outrageously majority Republican.
• 48:52
  It sounds like these measures that are already put in place by the state of California would
• 48:56
  highly benefit them as well.
• 48:58
  But then again, we're going to have the argument, is it fair?
• 49:00
  Is it right?
• 49:02
  Is it fraud?
• 49:03
  It's definitely suspicious.
• 49:05
  definitely leads to anomalies like that, right?
• 49:10
  Like this, right?
• 49:14
  Where apparently Nithya Raman can go from 71,000 votes
• 49:20
  to double, more than double actually,
• 49:23
  in one day after ballot drops, overnight ballot drops.
• 49:29
  That's very suspicious.
• 49:31
  So don't call it fraud.
• 49:35
  Okay, we won't call it fraud.
• 49:37
  We'll call it anomalous.
• 49:39
  We'll call it suspicious for sure.
• 49:41
  Sus, as they say.
• 49:43
  It is definitely, definitely precarious, peculiar.
• 49:50
  What do you want us to call this?
• 49:52
  Let me go back to that again.
• 49:54
  What do you want us to call that?
• 49:56
  What is that?
• 49:58
  What do we call that?
• 50:01
  Answer that.
• 50:02
  What is that?
• 50:05
  That.
• 50:07
  What is it?
• 50:08
  What do we call that?
• 50:10
  Huh?
• 50:11
  I'm sorry.
• 50:11
  For those who don't have the video portion, basically, I keep pulling the graph up where
• 50:16
  it shows the strange more than double votes counted in favor of Nithya Raman overnight.
• 50:25
  But seriously, how do we explain that?
• 50:27
  So, okay, let's not call it fraud.
• 50:30
  Fine.
• 50:31
  Again, we'll call it an anomaly.
• 50:32
  We'll call it anomalous.
• 50:33
  We'll call it precarious.
• 50:34
  We'll call it peculiar.
• 50:35
  We'll call it suspicious, sus, whatever you want me to say.
• 50:41
  But those suspicions that are recognized by the anomalous patterns of behavior lead to people investigating in order to find the evidence that you want us to present in exposing the fraudulent voter system of California.
• 51:05
  How's that? Does that work?
• 51:07
  Yeah. Can we agree on that?
• 51:10
  No? Why?
• 51:11
  Because it's Democrat versus Republican?
• 51:13
  Because it's trees and good food
• 51:15
  and vibes versus actually
• 51:17
  fixing the issues of LA,
• 51:19
  the fraud, the homelessness,
• 51:22
  the drug use,
• 51:23
  the crime,
• 51:26
  low wages.
• 51:27
  Alright. Well, hey, you know what? You do you,
• 51:29
  LA. You're going to get what you voted for.
• 51:32
  You got the two
• 51:33
  candidates you want.
• 51:35
  now. Now you've got the borderline socialists in Nithyan Raman and the self-proclaimed Marxist
• 51:43
  in Karen Bass to go ahead and continue to govern the city down this spiral of ineptitude. So cool.
• 51:52
  That's great. That's great. You guys go ahead and have it. Go ahead and have it. And with that, I'm not saying, but maybe I'm
• 52:01
  But I think I'm going to end this segment here on California's mayoral election in the city of LA.
• 52:10
  All right.
• 52:11
  So now it's time to talk about Iran, Israel, United States of America.
• 52:19
  That old hat.
• 52:22
  Conflict.
• 52:23
  The update.
• 52:24
  Eh, not sure I really have one.
• 52:26
  You see, I usually do the geopolitical deep dives and give you these really well put together assessments based on facts and data.
• 52:36
  What's actually happening?
• 52:38
  I don't think I would do that this time because like, what is there to tell that I haven't said?
• 52:44
  You know, what is there to say?
• 52:48
  Look, you all know how I feel.
• 52:50
  Everyone who listens to my show know how I feel.
• 52:52
  You all know how I feel.
• 52:53
  Look, I don't believe the Islamic regime should exist.
• 52:58
  I don't believe the IRGC should exist.
• 53:01
  I think these terrorist funding motherfuckers should be hunted to the ends of the earth,
• 53:09
  just like we did to the Nazis.
• 53:10
  I don't believe that they have ever offered any benefit to anybody in the Middle East.
• 53:17
  They've done nothing.
• 53:19
  They've done nothing but harass and terrorize the entire fucking area
• 53:23
  since they took over in 1979.
• 53:25
  And after they took over,
• 53:28
  you know, a lot of people will claim,
• 53:30
  oh, Iran was never a threat.
• 53:33
  There was no nuclear weapons development.
• 53:34
  I mean, what, are you naive?
• 53:37
  But just because you didn't see them
• 53:38
  trying to develop a nuclear weapon last week
• 53:40
  means they forgot about it two weeks later.
• 53:43
  They were always in pursuit of one,
• 53:45
  regardless of what they tell you.
• 53:46
  They lie to your face.
• 53:48
  And then people want to bring up the JCPOA,
• 53:51
  the wonderful deal that Obama made.
• 53:55
  You mean the deal?
• 53:57
  The deal that literally allowed Iran
• 54:00
  to choose which inspection agency was used?
• 54:04
  Which facility they inspected?
• 54:07
  At what time?
• 54:08
  That deal?
• 54:10
  You mean the President Obama
• 54:12
  who actually appeased Iran
• 54:15
  and unfroze assets and gave them money?
• 54:19
  That president?
• 54:19
  Yeah, that was an amazing deal.
• 54:22
  The JCPOA was garbage.
• 54:25
  It was garbage.
• 54:26
  They put all the cards in the hands of Iran.
• 54:29
  It was, it was nothing more than, than virtue signaling.
• 54:34
  It was, it was, it was, it was virtue signaling about trying to be good to Iran while also
• 54:38
  keeping them under control and making sure that they are not a detriment or a threat
• 54:42
  to anybody in the West.
• 54:43
  No, no, not, not Iran.
• 54:45
  They're our friends.
• 54:46
  hold on let me have a drink for my muslim brothers out there
• 54:54
  oh it's a delicious old-fashioned
• 54:57
  yeah i know you muslims don't drink i don't give a fuck so listen
• 55:09
  the problem i'm seeing right now is we have a president who really really like
• 55:15
  wants to handle Iran,
• 55:18
  he literally does not want them
• 55:20
  to have a nuclear weapon.
• 55:21
  He's been saying this since the 80s,
• 55:23
  well before he was a president.
• 55:24
  He's never liked how Iran has treated America.
• 55:28
  The fact that after they took power,
• 55:30
  the Islamic regime,
• 55:31
  they went ahead
• 55:33
  and literally just about immediately
• 55:35
  attacked the U.S. Embassy.
• 55:38
  And all through the 80s,
• 55:40
  through their proxy,
• 55:42
  Hezbollah,
• 55:43
  attacked many,
• 55:44
  US people out there in the Middle East.
• 55:48
  They've killed thousands of Americans throughout the years.
• 55:54
  Directly and indirectly and mostly indirectly.
• 55:56
  You know, they kind of act like a mafia.
• 55:58
  Like, hey, they're the boss, but then they have these buffers.
• 56:01
  That's why they use their proxy.
• 56:03
  So you can never really put the finger and point it directly at them because it's like,
• 56:08
  well, we didn't really do it, right?
• 56:11
  But everybody knows.
• 56:12
  That's the thing they all know.
• 56:14
  But regardless, what Trump did is he bombed the shit out of them.
• 56:21
  And through precision strikes, and if we're all being honest, he has really hurt Iran.
• 56:30
  By patrolling the Strait of Hormuz, he has really hurt Iran financially more than anything.
• 56:37
  And they need those finances to operate.
• 56:40
  They need those finances to continue to pay their proxies.
• 56:44
  they're really on their heels.
• 56:48
  Okay?
• 56:48
  And it seems like they are in control
• 56:51
  and they really have the power,
• 56:53
  but they don't.
• 56:54
  They don't because the US capability
• 56:57
  to wipe them off the planet,
• 57:00
  like literally, is there.
• 57:02
  It's a very real threat.
• 57:05
  But Trump doesn't want to do that.
• 57:08
  Trump doesn't want to put boots on the ground.
• 57:11
  So he is fine.
• 57:13
  As he stated from the outset, he is fine with ensuring that they agree to a new deal, that they understand and agree that they are never, ever allowed to have a nuclear weapon.
• 57:29
  And that means that they also cannot develop uranium.
• 57:33
  And of course, a lot of people will argue, especially on the Democrat side, saying, well, there's organizations that confirm that they never had uranium enriched to 60% or more, or even 40%.
• 57:45
  That's all a lie.
• 57:46
  They never had it.
• 57:48
  And they'll try to argue that our Secretary of National Intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard, said herself, oh, no, no, Iran was never a threat.
• 58:01
  but they never had the nuclear weapon.
• 58:05
  Are you fucking naive?
• 58:07
  Really?
• 58:09
  It may be true that intelligence reports said they don't have one now.
• 58:15
  It doesn't state they were never pursuing it
• 58:18
  because they did find evidence of enriched uranium.
• 58:22
  Why would you be enriching uranium to 40% to 60% or more
• 58:26
  if the goal isn't trying to develop nuclear weapons?
• 58:30
  And when we're talking about an extreme fundamentalist regime here, like a literal terrorist authoritarian government who funds other terrorists, I guarantee you the goal was to pursue a nuclear fucking weapon.
• 58:50
  So where does this lead us?
• 58:51
  well I got a gripe with Israel too here
• 58:54
  because Trump realizes
• 58:56
  that
• 58:58
  regime change is not
• 59:01
  going to really happen unless he sacrifices
• 59:03
  US troops
• 59:05
  because the next
• 59:07
  step in escalation there's two
• 59:09
  options you either drop the bomb and just wipe
• 59:11
  Iran off the face of earth but then the civilian
• 59:13
  casualties would be astronomical
• 59:14
  and that would not be good for the US
• 59:16
  and it literally is travesty
• 59:19
  or
• 59:20
  you send boots on the ground
• 59:25
  and run precision operations
• 59:30
  to specifically target
• 59:32
  the IRGC and the Islamic regime,
• 59:35
  which will escalate
• 59:37
  and spill out into the streets.
• 59:39
  And again, civilian casualties
• 59:41
  will be astronomical.
• 59:43
  And we will ultimately have
• 59:45
  a massive US death toll.
• 59:49
  It'll just happen.
• 59:49
  people will die on both sides.
• 59:52
  And Trump doesn't want to see anybody die.
• 59:55
  Well, he doesn't want to see U.S. soldiers die.
• 59:58
  So what's the alternative?
• 1:00:01
  Well, it's allowing evil to exist
• 1:00:05
  if they agree to not do, well, pursue a nuclear weapon.
• 1:00:13
  pursue the idea, the development of a nuclear weapon.
• 1:00:20
  That's all he has at this point.
• 1:00:22
  If Trump is not willing to do the other two options
• 1:00:25
  and wipe the IRGC and the Islamic regime off the face of the earth,
• 1:00:29
  then the only thing you have is a deal.
• 1:00:32
  And that's exactly what he has been trying to do.
• 1:00:37
  So we're about, what, 100 days, maybe a little over 100 days in?
• 1:00:40
  and so every time Trump tries to come to the table
• 1:00:43
  and get the guys to negotiate
• 1:00:44
  we got a little problem
• 1:00:47
  United States America
• 1:00:48
  we got a little devil on the shoulder here
• 1:00:49
  that won't stop yapping
• 1:00:51
  it's like that little yippee dog that doesn't shut the fuck up
• 1:00:54
  biting people's heels
• 1:00:55
  so
• 1:00:56
  Israel decides
• 1:00:59
  well you know technically
• 1:01:01
  you know you guys were a ceasefire
• 1:01:04
  between you and the US
• 1:01:06
  you know Iran, US and Israel
• 1:01:07
  but you didn say nothing about Hezbollah over here in Lebanon You didn say nothing about that So we going to fucking bomb these guys You know instead of bombing you we going to bomb them right That cool because that wasn part of
• 1:01:21
  Oh, it was.
• 1:01:23
  Oh, you see,
• 1:01:25
  every ceasefire
• 1:01:28
  and peace agreement
• 1:01:29
  opportunity
• 1:01:30
  deal
• 1:01:33
  has been usurped by
• 1:01:35
  Israel's actions.
• 1:01:37
  It's like they just can't fucking help themselves.
• 1:01:40
  And I want to make myself very clear.
• 1:01:45
  I don't hate Israel.
• 1:01:48
  I believe they have a right to fucking exist among a massive sea of Arab nations.
• 1:01:57
  They have been attacked since their inception in 1948.
• 1:02:01
  78 years, by the way.
• 1:02:03
  78 fucking years.
• 1:02:05
  They have done nothing but defend themselves.
• 1:02:09
  But as I've argued online and got a lot of flack for,
• 1:02:13
  I can also criticize them.
• 1:02:16
  I can also question their preemptive strike policies
• 1:02:20
  throughout the years.
• 1:02:21
  I can question their mowing the lawn policy.
• 1:02:25
  And if people don't know what that is,
• 1:02:26
  look up Israel mow the lawn.
• 1:02:29
  It's literally where they gun down people
• 1:02:32
  who they think or feel
• 1:02:35
  are getting a little too close to that buffer zone.
• 1:02:38
  And they call it mowing the lawn.
• 1:02:42
  Not letting it get too big, you know?
• 1:02:46
  I get it.
• 1:02:47
  If you've been attacked for 78 continuous years, you're going to do these things.
• 1:02:52
  And as far as preemptive strikes go, let me just say this.
• 1:02:56
  I agree with it.
• 1:02:57
  If you have solid intelligence that there is an absolute imminent danger and threat to your nation and your citizens.
• 1:03:07
  Like, you know for a fact that tomorrow at 7 a.m., they're going to detonate a bomb at our embassy.
• 1:03:17
  Got it.
• 1:03:19
  And that's totally plausible.
• 1:03:22
  Israel has literally and has been acknowledged around the world as one of the best intelligence services ever, period.
• 1:03:33
  So I get it.
• 1:03:34
  And the U.S. would do the same thing.
• 1:03:35
  We have preemptively struck people because of our intelligence.
• 1:03:39
  We know that, hey, if you say you're going to deploy troops on us tomorrow, well, we're
• 1:03:44
  just not going to let that happen.
• 1:03:44
  We're just going to cut you off of the past and take care of that.
• 1:03:48
  Nip it at the butt, as they say, right?
• 1:03:51
  So I get it.
• 1:03:54
  I get it.
• 1:03:55
  Israel, Israelis, government of Israel, right here.
• 1:03:59
  I get it.
• 1:04:00
  I'm not saying you don't have a right to defend yourself.
• 1:04:02
  I'm not saying let yourself be run over by terrorists.
• 1:04:05
  But when you have the U.S. who has literally had your fucking back since 1948,
• 1:04:13
  and if I'm being honest, and this is going to piss you off,
• 1:04:15
  but you're still going to hear me say it,
• 1:04:17
  we are literally, the United States of America is literally
• 1:04:20
  the major fucking reason you exist.
• 1:04:24
  Like if it wasn't for U.S. involvement from the outset,
• 1:04:26
  you would have been overran and taken by the Arabs a long time ago.
• 1:04:32
  We support you, man.
• 1:04:34
  We support you militarily.
• 1:04:35
  if it's not directly we're giving you the equipment you need we're giving you
• 1:04:40
  the money you need we're helping you develop technologies and in turn you've done the same
• 1:04:46
  well not the money but you have helped develop technologies or and you've shared it with us so
• 1:04:52
  yeah you know kudos you you've over the years shared intelligence but but let's be honest
• 1:04:59
  if it wasn't for the U.S. and what we have done for Israel
• 1:05:03
  throughout all these years, you would have been swallowed up
• 1:05:07
  and you would have been obliterated.
• 1:05:10
  Period.
• 1:05:12
  Now, in this day and age, the other Arab nations
• 1:05:16
  don't necessarily want to wipe you off the face of the earth.
• 1:05:20
  So there is that.
• 1:05:22
  It seems to be more or less the sole focus of Iran
• 1:05:26
  and their proxies right now.
• 1:05:29
  So at least you're not fighting a war against everybody anymore.
• 1:05:33
  At least you know exactly who your enemies are.
• 1:05:37
  So I'm not saying you don't have a right to defend yourself,
• 1:05:39
  but when you have the president of the United States of America
• 1:05:42
  trying to get Iran to come to the table,
• 1:05:47
  to agree to never, ever pursue a nuclear weapon,
• 1:05:51
  and more importantly, to ensure that they don't pursue,
• 1:05:54
  get whatever uranium it is that they have,
• 1:05:57
  gather it up and destroy it
• 1:06:00
  but you can't fucking hold
• 1:06:06
  you can't hold in your rage
• 1:06:10
  long enough to let that happen because look
• 1:06:14
  you're really disrespecting the US at this point
• 1:06:19
  you're undermining the intentions of the United States
• 1:06:23
  of America which is to take away
• 1:06:25
  one of the worst things we could ever let Iran have,
• 1:06:29
  which is a nuclear weapon.
• 1:06:31
  Look, Israel, just fucking hold on for a minute.
• 1:06:36
  Let's get this deal done.
• 1:06:38
  And after it's done,
• 1:06:40
  if you want to go back to bombing the shit out of everybody,
• 1:06:42
  go ahead.
• 1:06:43
  I mean, no one's saying you can't.
• 1:06:45
  I mean, we're not at the level to where we control you.
• 1:06:49
  I know everybody thinks that you control the US,
• 1:06:51
  but you really don't.
• 1:06:52
  We all know it.
• 1:06:55
  How do you think it would be, Israel, answer me this,
• 1:06:58
  if the U.S. tomorrow, because you, because Netanyahu,
• 1:07:01
  can't hold his fucking angst,
• 1:07:04
  can't stop and listen to President Trump for even a fucking second.
• 1:07:09
  How do you think it would be,
• 1:07:11
  because Trump doesn't take too kindly to disrespect.
• 1:07:14
  What if he just decides, like, you know what?
• 1:07:16
  Fuck it.
• 1:07:17
  You guys handle this.
• 1:07:19
  We're out.
• 1:07:20
  Like, no, no, no.
• 1:07:21
  Like, he turns to you and says, no, we're out.
• 1:07:24
  Money, gone.
• 1:07:25
  not sending anymore.
• 1:07:27
  You need anything?
• 1:07:28
  Give me a call.
• 1:07:29
  I might answer.
• 1:07:30
  I don't know.
• 1:07:31
  Depends how the situation looks.
• 1:07:34
  We might come back in.
• 1:07:35
  Who knows?
• 1:07:36
  Could you imagine that?
• 1:07:38
  It could happen here, Israel.
• 1:07:42
  Look, if you want to be an ally,
• 1:07:44
  it's a two-way street here.
• 1:07:47
  I mean, the U.S. is all the way across the pond.
• 1:07:49
  It's not like we're next door to you.
• 1:07:51
  We go out of our way to help you.
• 1:07:54
  And yeah, we have some bases in the area, but we literally have sent our naval fleets there to patrol the Strait of Hormuz.
• 1:08:03
  Maybe you can give President Trump a chance to get this fucking deal done before you start shooting rockets off again.
• 1:08:11
  Now look, if Hezbollah isn't listening either, okay, if Iran says, you know, ceasefire, and that is a ceasefire for Iran, Hezbollah, Israel, and U.S., okay, and then Hezbollah doesn't hold back, then yeah, destroy them.
• 1:08:30
  Of course, retaliate.
• 1:08:32
  But so far, it has been Israel who can't help themselves.
• 1:08:37
  Like, look, I already know a lot of people who disagree,
• 1:08:41
  especially pro-pro-Israel people,
• 1:08:43
  because apparently Israel can do no wrong.
• 1:08:45
  You can't criticize Israel.
• 1:08:47
  You can't talk about Israel's foreign policy in a bad light.
• 1:08:51
  You can't do anything.
• 1:08:54
  And the reality is me, myself, I have defended Israel many times,
• 1:08:58
  and I've sat here, and I respect the relationship,
• 1:09:01
  and I understand what they bring at the table to the U.S.
• 1:09:04
  and what we offer them.
• 1:09:07
  But right now, Israel's all, you know, well, I can't say all the people, but Netanyahu,
• 1:09:14
  hey, the government is acting like that ungrateful fucking child who's had that silver spoon
• 1:09:20
  in their mouth, their entire upbringing.
• 1:09:24
  And they're just being bratty little fucking assholes who just don't understand that daddy's
• 1:09:33
  trying to get something done.
• 1:09:35
  Oh, I know that's going to offend everybody, right?
• 1:09:37
  How dare you say the U.S. is our dead?
• 1:09:39
  Well, I don't mean it literally, but if you're that sensitive, well, then fuck off.
• 1:09:45
  Well, literally, let's just be honest.
• 1:09:47
  Israel, chill the fuck out for a second.
• 1:09:50
  Let President Trump get things done, and then you can go back to fucking blowing people up.
• 1:09:54
  All right?
• 1:09:55
  That's what I have to say.
• 1:09:56
  Period.
• 1:09:57
  Oh, yeah, and fuck the Islamic regime and the IRGC.
• 1:10:00
  I feel that way, too.
• 1:10:01
  So anyway, let's defend Israel.
• 1:10:04
  Let's help Israel.
• 1:10:06
  disrespect Israel, but Israel, it goes fucking both ways, a two-way street. And if you keep
• 1:10:10
  disrespecting and undermining President Trump's abilities to try
• 1:10:14
  to get something done there, at some point, man, don't be surprised if Trump
• 1:10:18
  turns his back because, again, he is one of those guys that does not
• 1:10:22
  not go for being disrespected It just doesn So I think he giving you a lot of rope in this situation a lot of leniency right now But mark my words this can easily turn against you
• 1:10:35
  So Netanyahu, if you're listening to me, and I can absolutely tell you for a fact, I do
• 1:10:39
  have an increase of listeners from Israel.
• 1:10:42
  So maybe they're monitoring me.
• 1:10:43
  I don't know.
• 1:10:44
  But I want you to know, I don't hate Israel whatsoever.
• 1:10:47
  But you guys need to chill the fuck out.
• 1:10:50
  All right, everyone.
• 1:10:51
  Now it's time for the last segment of the show.
• 1:10:52
  Let's talk about what happened in Ireland, in Belfast.
• 1:10:56
  A man, a migrant from Africa, a doctor, engineer, contributor to society,
• 1:11:02
  attempted to behead a man.
• 1:11:05
  That's right.
• 1:11:05
  Literally behead the man.
• 1:11:07
  Not with a machete either.
• 1:11:08
  It looks like it was a knife.
• 1:11:09
  It wasn't a very large knife, but he continued to, while on top of him,
• 1:11:14
  stab in the neck and saw off the head.
• 1:11:19
  and when the man kept moving around,
• 1:11:22
  he would then take the knife and stab the man in the body.
• 1:11:26
  Now, as promised, I will not play that video.
• 1:11:31
  If you want to watch that, you can find it on social media.
• 1:11:34
  You can go to X.
• 1:11:35
  I can leave a link, but I think I would have refrained from even doing that.
• 1:11:40
  I said I was, but it changed my mind.
• 1:11:43
  Look, you can find it if you really want to see it.
• 1:11:45
  That's something you're into.
• 1:11:46
  I'm not saying you get off on it.
• 1:11:49
  I'm just saying it's graphic.
• 1:11:52
  So if you have the stomach for it, then fine.
• 1:11:55
  You can find it.
• 1:11:57
  So let's go ahead and read this article from the BBC about what happened.
• 1:12:06
  Man arrested on suspicion of attempted murder after a brutal knife attack.
• 1:12:11
  Why can't the BBC ever be like honest?
• 1:12:16
  What do you mean suspicion of attempted murder?
• 1:12:19
  Like there's literal video.
• 1:12:21
  In fact, this picture is from that video and it's blurred out.
• 1:12:23
  So you don't see the horrific graphic nature.
• 1:12:27
  It just can't help themselves, can they?
• 1:12:31
  But regardless, I'll continue to read.
• 1:12:34
  A man believed to be Sudanese has been arrested on suspicion of attempted murder
• 1:12:39
  after a brutal knife attack in Belfast.
• 1:12:43
  The man in his 30s remains in custody
• 1:12:46
  after the incident in Northern Belfast
• 1:12:48
  at about 2230 BST on Monday.
• 1:12:53
  Police are not seeking anyone else
• 1:12:56
  in relation to the incident.
• 1:12:58
  Police have said they recovered
• 1:13:01
  what they believe to be a kitchen knife at the scene.
• 1:13:05
  Video circulating online shows a number of people,
• 1:13:08
  including one wielding a hurling stick confronting the apparent attacker until the police arrived.
• 1:13:15
  A man injured in the attack, aged in his 40s, is in hospital where his condition is described as serious.
• 1:13:21
  Police said he had serious slash wounds to his back, face, had eye injuries as well.
• 1:13:28
  They praised local residents for their actions, which they said saved the man's life.
• 1:13:34
  So who was the attacker?
• 1:13:36
  The home office said the attacker was on leave to remain in the UK until 2028.
• 1:13:43
  He entered the UK in 2023 and was granted refugee status the same year.
• 1:13:50
  The individual claims to have entered the UK via the common travel area.
• 1:13:56
  An initial statement from the PSNI on Tuesday morning said police believe the attacker was Somali,
• 1:14:04
  but have since confirmed he is Sudanese.
• 1:14:07
  The Chief Constable John Boucher,
• 1:14:11
  I believe that's correct, Boucher, Boucher?
• 1:14:13
  Anyway, he said he understood the suspect
• 1:14:16
  made his way from Sudan to Paris
• 1:14:18
  before flying to Dublin
• 1:14:20
  and then traveling by bus to Belfast
• 1:14:23
  on the 10th of February in 2023,
• 1:14:26
  the date on which he claimed asylum.
• 1:14:28
  There is no trace of this suspect
• 1:14:30
  on any of our national security databases
• 1:14:33
  and he was not one or known to the police service of Northern Ireland.
• 1:14:40
  He appealed to the public to please let the PSNI,
• 1:14:44
  let the police do their jobs, unfettered and undistracted by wider concerns.
• 1:14:49
  There may be about disorder.
• 1:14:52
  And the reason he said that is because Belfast is on fire.
• 1:14:57
  Belfast is on fire.
• 1:14:59
  The citizens united, they came about and they are done.
• 1:15:03
  You see, Ireland has been under a lot of stress and pressures
• 1:15:11
  and questionable actions regarding migrants.
• 1:15:17
  And I think this is going to be one of those actions
• 1:15:20
  that really pushes Ireland over the edge.
• 1:15:23
  I mean, the guy was literally, and again,
• 1:15:25
  you can watch the video if you wish to,
• 1:15:27
  was literally being beheaded.
• 1:15:29
  The guy was attempting to behead this guy with a knife.
• 1:15:33
  and it wasn't a big knife.
• 1:15:35
  So this is going to take effort and commitment.
• 1:15:38
  And this man was committed.
• 1:15:41
  So we have Protestants and Catholics alike,
• 1:15:44
  regardless of their differences in Ireland,
• 1:15:45
  which there are differences between the two.
• 1:15:48
  They're arm-in-arm now.
• 1:15:49
  They're together.
• 1:15:50
  They want migrants out.
• 1:15:51
  They want their country back.
• 1:15:54
  And I got some videos,
• 1:15:56
  but this conversation is a bigger conversation
• 1:15:59
  we have to have about immigration policy.
• 1:16:02
  not just US, which we talk about quite often.
• 1:16:07
  USA is always under the gun for wanting to put up border walls
• 1:16:11
  and control immigration while the rest of the world
• 1:16:13
  lets immigrants just come in unchecked,
• 1:16:18
  no background checks, unstopped apparently,
• 1:16:22
  and we get these criminals and crazies
• 1:16:26
  that are re reigning, reigning havoc upon the citizens of these countries.
• 1:16:33
  And then you got guys like Piers Morgan denying there's ever a problem. Oh, there is no immigration
• 1:16:38
  problem. There are no, there are no criminals coming in. These are refugees. These are
• 1:16:42
  contributors to society. How bigoted you are. You're so bigoted. Really? What do you got to
• 1:16:48
  say to this Piers? Hmm? I mean, is this enough Mr. Piers Morgan to finally address on your show
• 1:16:56
  and actually make a statement and where maybe this isn't right.
• 1:17:00
  Maybe we do got to think about the immigration situation that's going unchecked.
• 1:17:07
  Maybe beheading someone on the streets is not a good thing.
• 1:17:12
  Maybe these people literally are not compatible with, dare I say, Western culture.
• 1:17:21
  Maybe they're just not.
• 1:17:23
  it's okay to not let everybody in
• 1:17:26
  and it is also okay to give
• 1:17:29
  someone refugee status
• 1:17:31
  but they need to be vetted
• 1:17:33
  they need to be checked thoroughly
• 1:17:35
  and not just nonchalantly
• 1:17:37
  granted refugee status
• 1:17:39
  you don't know who these people are
• 1:17:41
  so we go from rape gangs
• 1:17:45
  to beheadings
• 1:17:47
  we go to certain groups of immigrants
• 1:17:52
  trying to take over government
• 1:17:54
  and enforce their own policies
• 1:17:56
  and change policy
• 1:17:57
  to beheadings.
• 1:18:01
  And Ireland is...
• 1:18:03
  We just had the death of Henry Novak.
• 1:18:07
  That was actually December 2025.
• 1:18:10
  But it spilled out
• 1:18:12
  after the body cam footage came out.
• 1:18:14
  The rage spilled out into the streets.
• 1:18:17
  The citizens had enough
• 1:18:18
  after they saw the recently released
• 1:18:20
  body cam footage
• 1:18:21
  where the police apprehended poor Henry Novak,
• 1:18:26
  who was stabbed and bleeding to death.
• 1:18:30
  And the police were more concerned
• 1:18:32
  about whether or not he may have been racist
• 1:18:35
  or could have been bigoted.
• 1:18:39
  They were more concerned with that
• 1:18:41
  rather than administering first aid,
• 1:18:45
  checking for the stab wounds.
• 1:18:48
  Even though the whole time Henry Novak was saying,
• 1:18:50
  I can't breathe.
• 1:18:51
  I'm bleeding.
• 1:18:51
  I'm bleeding.
• 1:18:52
  And he literally died in handcuffs.
• 1:18:56
  A week later, we have a murder, attempted murder by beheading in Belfast, Ireland.
• 1:19:12
  Piers, when are you going to call this out?
• 1:19:14
  I'm not trying to single out Piers Morgan
• 1:19:17
  but he has
• 1:19:19
  been one of the
• 1:19:21
  largest voices
• 1:19:23
  in podcasting, broadcasts
• 1:19:25
  whatever
• 1:19:26
  is from the UK
• 1:19:28
  who tends to defend
• 1:19:30
  the immigration policies
• 1:19:32
  and if you dare stand up to it
• 1:19:35
  or say hey I want my country back
• 1:19:37
  oh you bigoted what do you mean you want your country back how dare you not want to have multiple cultures come together and live together and progress together It like yeah well no one really against that Piers but
• 1:19:50
  they are against crazy fucking people who want to run around trying to behead you.
• 1:19:55
  They're against groups of people trying
• 1:19:58
  to rape your daughters.
• 1:20:02
  Maybe we, I don't know, control that through vetting these
• 1:20:06
  you know,
• 1:20:07
  civilized individuals that you want to come into your country,
• 1:20:13
  these contributors,
• 1:20:14
  these doctors,
• 1:20:15
  these engineers,
• 1:20:17
  these pillars of society.
• 1:20:23
  Oh,
• 1:20:23
  so let's see some videos here and I'm just going to scroll X because there's so
• 1:20:29
  many of them.
• 1:20:29
  I'm just going to talk over it.
• 1:20:31
  I don't have to play the sound effects,
• 1:20:32
  but here's some action in Belfast.
• 1:20:36
  that's happening now.
• 1:20:39
  So here we got a car burning,
• 1:20:43
  crashing into apartments.
• 1:20:48
  You guys seeing this?
• 1:20:53
  Here we have people gathering
• 1:20:56
  and protest to migrants.
• 1:20:59
  Here we have a building on fire.
• 1:21:03
  Here we have people walking the streets now.
• 1:21:06
  walking the streets, allegedly going door to door
• 1:21:10
  to look for migrants and evict them.
• 1:21:16
  Here we have more people gathering in protest,
• 1:21:20
  standing up.
• 1:21:21
  Of course, this one's England, though.
• 1:21:25
  And if we go over here, here's Sky News
• 1:21:27
  that has a lot of footage.
• 1:21:30
  Here's, I'll check this out.
• 1:21:33
  Look at that.
• 1:21:36
  are those SWAT team vehicles
• 1:21:46
  they're a bunch of armored vehicles
• 1:21:47
  trying to break through
• 1:21:48
  yeah they're very well used to using their armored land rovers
• 1:21:52
  they tend to either spread themselves across the street
• 1:21:55
  and drive up the street
• 1:21:56
  or they'll literally filter into like single files
• 1:21:58
  we saw on images there
• 1:21:59
  and work their way through the barricades
• 1:22:01
  the metal crash barriers are no resistance really
• 1:22:03
  to an armored land rover
• 1:22:04
  and you can see one literally just drives into one there.
• 1:22:08
  But they will literally follow in line until they get to the end of the street
• 1:22:11
  and then they'll form up again.
• 1:22:12
  But they are exceptionally experienced in using their vehicles,
• 1:22:15
  almost like a moving cordon.
• 1:22:16
  We saw images earlier on where they lined the vehicles up across the road,
• 1:22:20
  drove them towards a crowd of people.
• 1:22:22
  That's crazy.
• 1:22:23
  All right.
• 1:22:25
  So those are a bunch of, I guess, riot police response to the riots
• 1:22:29
  over there in Battle of Fast.
• 1:22:31
  All right.
• 1:22:31
  So here's a bus on fire.
• 1:22:33
  here's the
• 1:22:34
  keep scrolling down here
• 1:22:37
  here's some more rioting
• 1:22:39
  here's some more rioting
• 1:22:41
  right here
• 1:22:42
  here's the
• 1:22:45
  city on fire or another building on fire
• 1:22:47
  right here
• 1:22:48
  here's another good shot of some
• 1:22:51
  you know
• 1:22:53
  riots
• 1:22:54
  so anyway I mean if you're just in the audio
• 1:22:57
  this is probably like what are you guys looking at
• 1:22:59
  so what I'm looking at
• 1:23:00
  or multiple shots of riots in Belfast
• 1:23:06
  where people are burning the city in protests.
• 1:23:09
  And I don't know if they're going to get this under control or not,
• 1:23:13
  but to be quite honest,
• 1:23:16
  the people have a right to be pissed at this point.
• 1:23:19
  The citizens of Ireland, those in Northern Ireland especially,
• 1:23:23
  since this is where this beheading or attempted beheading happened,
• 1:23:26
  they're done.
• 1:23:28
  they're coming together and they're letting their government know like you are not looking out for
• 1:23:33
  a best interest you are not standing up to this unfettered unchecked migration of crazy
• 1:23:40
  motherfuckers like they want their country back and it's not fucking bigoted or racist to say you
• 1:23:48
  want your fucking country back it's not it's not okay and that country can literally belong
• 1:23:56
  to people of any color.
• 1:24:00
  It can be a black person from Africa and Ireland
• 1:24:05
  who came over and decided to integrate
• 1:24:07
  and want to be part of the Irish culture
• 1:24:09
  and poses no threat whatsoever.
• 1:24:13
  It absolutely could be that person.
• 1:24:15
  It could be a person from India.
• 1:24:17
  It could be a Sikh from India
• 1:24:19
  who decided Ireland's going to be the home for his family
• 1:24:22
  and he totally commits to Ireland
• 1:24:24
  Ireland and integrates and loves the culture and poses no threat to Ireland.
• 1:24:29
  And yes, it could be a white person from Ireland.
• 1:24:32
  Bottom line, this is about protecting the citizens who care about Ireland, Irish culture,
• 1:24:39
  and offer something to the people of Ireland and to the country of Ireland.
• 1:24:45
  And they all come together and stand together as one people, just as it usually happens anyway
• 1:24:52
  in the United States of America, as it should happen in the UK,
• 1:24:55
  as it should happen in France and in Germany, everywhere,
• 1:24:59
  where someone should absolutely have a right to relocate to a country,
• 1:25:04
  but you have to be able to want to actually live, integrate,
• 1:25:07
  and support the country, the destination that will become your home.
• 1:25:13
  And if you don't want to do that and you want to run around the street
• 1:25:17
  like a bunch of wild fucking animals,
• 1:25:19
  raping and stabbing and trying to behead people,
• 1:25:23
  then you need to go.
• 1:25:25
  You are, as the UK had told Shank Ugar
• 1:25:31
  and why he can't enter the UK,
• 1:25:33
  you are non-conducive to the public good.
• 1:25:41
  With that, we're ending the show.
• 1:25:44
  So, as usual, you want to grow this show.
• 1:25:48
  look, I just found out that my show
• 1:25:50
  has been restricted by Apple.
• 1:25:52
  There's certain episodes apparently that
• 1:25:54
  stood out and apparently me, myself
• 1:25:56
  as a host, George Fonce himself
• 1:25:57
  is also restricted.
• 1:26:00
  Apparently, I'm red flagged
• 1:26:02
  even when I go on
• 1:26:04
  other shows as a guest. How interesting
• 1:26:06
  that is. I just found that out.
• 1:26:08
  Huh. So
• 1:26:09
  how are we going to fight this system?
• 1:26:12
  Well, I'm going to ask you to continue
• 1:26:14
  to share World of Blaze
• 1:26:16
  with everybody.
• 1:26:16
  If you have a friend who likes what you like, let them know about the show.
• 1:26:23
  Make them subscribe.
• 1:26:25
  You subscribe.
• 1:26:26
  Turn on notifications.
• 1:26:27
  Follow the show.
• 1:26:29
  Share the show and spread the word because apparently the podcast industry doesn't like me.
• 1:26:35
  Why?
• 1:26:35
  Because I'm blunt.
• 1:26:36
  I tell it how it is.
• 1:26:38
  I'm not afraid to take on the controversial topics.
• 1:26:42
  And you know what's even crazier is really like everything I talk about is really backed up by facts and data.
• 1:26:52
  And yeah, I have my opinions, but at the same time, most of those opinions are based in fucking reality.
• 1:26:58
  So do me a favor.
• 1:27:02
  I need you all to start leaving comments in your podcast apps that you like to use.
• 1:27:07
  You need to start putting the five stars.
• 1:27:09
  Look, I'm not, this isn't a big ask.
• 1:27:10
  Okay.
• 1:27:10
  I've been doing this for a few years.
• 1:27:11
  I know how many listeners I have.
• 1:27:13
  I see you every time there's an episode.
• 1:27:17
  I got the numbers.
• 1:27:18
  I see the YouTube page growing.
• 1:27:20
  Thanks to everybody who has been subscribing.
• 1:27:22
  If you haven't subscribed there yet, please go to YouTube.
• 1:27:25
  Go to my channel.
• 1:27:26
  Look for World of Blaze with George Fonts.
• 1:27:28
  Handle is at Fonts of Blaze and subscribe on my YouTube channel.
• 1:27:32
  And again, let's spread the word because apparently I am fighting uphill.
• 1:27:36
  And apparently it's not going to matter how much advertising I even try to do at this point
• 1:27:40
  because if Apple's restricted me
• 1:27:42
  and other podcast apps get their information from Apple,
• 1:27:46
  then I'm pretty much screwed.
• 1:27:47
  So I may be working on alternative measures
• 1:27:52
  to help get the show out there.
• 1:27:54
  And listen, I want you to understand,
• 1:27:56
  the show's done fairly well.
• 1:27:59
  It has done well, and I appreciate all you supporting me.
• 1:28:01
  And I literally do.
• 1:28:03
  I don't know what else I can tell you
• 1:28:04
  other than I really am thankful that you listen to me
• 1:28:06
  and that you support me,
• 1:28:08
  even though I say some outlandish shit.
• 1:28:10
  but please, please spread the word.
• 1:28:13
  At this point, all I have is word of mouth and organic growth,
• 1:28:16
  and we're going to fight the system together, all right?
• 1:28:21
  Appreciate all of you.
• 1:28:23
  Have a great day.
• 1:28:40
  Bye.