Latest / Talk to Prince Show - Solving World's Problems / Prince Israel Zaar on: The JE Files or List Shouldn't be the End All

Transcript

Prince Israel Zaar on: The JE Files or List Shouldn't be the End All · Talk to Prince Show - Solving World's Problems

0:00
Speaker 1: Talking about the thing that destroys you, oh, flaming the
0:07
Speaker 1: flames that burns you, or doing the things that hurts you.
0:14
Speaker 1: You know, the the the the wisdom of understanding and
0:22
Speaker 1: the the wisdom of knowledge and strategy, it's much about
0:30
Speaker 1: foresight into calculation and measurement and balancing strategy with common
0:47
Speaker 1: sense and reason and rationality. It's a self defeating when
0:59
Speaker 1: in the game of politics and political science and and
1:06
Speaker 1: into party strategy that the party in power happens to
1:16
Speaker 1: be the one destroying itself instead of the opposition destroying
1:24
Speaker 1: or supportaging or exposing the party in power. The the
1:32
Speaker 1: Geoffrey Hastin stuff with the fire or the last it's
1:37
Speaker 1: it's it's becoming a conundrum in politics and strategy. The
1:46
Speaker 1: Republican base and the MEGAS supporters, the MARGA supporters are
1:56
Speaker 1: they are self destroying, you know, the the f Stein
2:03
Speaker 1: fire or the least. It's something that the Obama administration
2:13
Speaker 1: saw that you're Biden administration saw, even the first Jump
2:17
Speaker 1: administration saw if that file was to be released, it
2:22
Speaker 1: should have been released already. And the concept of a file,
2:32
Speaker 1: the conspiracy of a fire, it's very different from the
2:37
Speaker 1: file itself. I assuming that most of the conspiracy on
2:42
Speaker 1: the file and the what the file is and what
2:46
Speaker 1: and what the file isn't was stoked by politics and
2:56
Speaker 1: conspiracy conspiratrue strategy to garner at the base too, to
3:05
Speaker 1: believe in the concept of the deep state, and that
3:09
Speaker 1: that government that everybody should hate, and therefore we're gonna
3:16
Speaker 1: come in and clean it, and we're gonna be honest
3:18
Speaker 1: and transparent. I'm gonna expose all the secrets of the
3:21
Speaker 1: hidden truth, about the gf K fires, about the esteemed
3:26
Speaker 1: files and Jeff Reesting files, and gonna gonna uncover and
3:33
Speaker 1: release to the public that which the government has been hiding.
3:38
Speaker 1: Those are just, sir, empty talk and conspiracies to to
3:42
Speaker 1: convince people that that those coming are gonna fix something,
3:47
Speaker 1: gonna release something. But assuming that that fire, the Jeffreston
3:54
Speaker 1: file is true, if it hasn't been released, it means
4:01
Speaker 1: there is much to it than a file itself. Sometimes
4:07
Speaker 1: you said the truth ist bier to be tall, and
4:09
Speaker 1: that if you expose to certain truth, you wish that
4:14
Speaker 1: the truth was not tall. You know, the the consequentiality
4:22
Speaker 1: of the fire and releasing the fire might be too
4:26
Speaker 1: dangerous to the system. That shakes the foundation of the
4:31
Speaker 1: security of the state, and it might expose the worst
4:42
Speaker 1: and it might affect so much of the American in
4:45
Speaker 1: lead that nobody will be left clan to be a leader.
4:51
Speaker 1: And you're politically going to affect the American country as
4:57
Speaker 1: itself and in my the consequential to our influence around
5:02
Speaker 1: the world. You don't know which the fire will implicate.
5:06
Speaker 1: And and we cannot underestimate and degrade the the crime alleged,
5:19
Speaker 1: the alleged to be committed with the young kids and
5:22
Speaker 1: young girls, And we cannot refute the fact that if
5:29
Speaker 1: there is a crime, there's a crime, and the crime
5:31
Speaker 1: should be charged. Supposedly crimes are committed. Some of those
5:38
Speaker 1: can be tried under the military court. It can be
5:42
Speaker 1: they can be sick. They can be courts that they're
5:44
Speaker 1: based on the explosiveness of what is in the fire.
5:48
Speaker 1: They can still sick justice without making it political who
5:54
Speaker 1: they are using the information to damage people, because being
6:02
Speaker 1: on the file, on the lease or whatever that is
6:05
Speaker 1: does not in it self incrementate somebody, but it might
6:09
Speaker 1: be differametry and damaging. And people can extrapolate what is
6:15
Speaker 1: that that is not there and truth and facts and
6:20
Speaker 1: fiction and conspiracy may be used against good people who
6:26
Speaker 1: happen to be in association with that said person, but
6:32
Speaker 1: in good fight, in bona fide, good fight, and has
6:35
Speaker 1: nothing to do what is on the fire. So it's
6:40
Speaker 1: not much about what is on the fire. Is to
6:43
Speaker 1: extrapol it on what is in the fire and use
6:46
Speaker 1: that to damage people politically, the politics of the fire.
6:53
Speaker 1: It's more than seeking justice to those who are actually
6:59
Speaker 1: affected by such heinous crimes. So it's not much about
7:08
Speaker 1: those people that are the victims of the crime, but
7:14
Speaker 1: it's to use that though see or the fires or
7:19
Speaker 1: whatever comes out of it, to use that and go
7:23
Speaker 1: agains potential political candidates. That can only be the reason
7:32
Speaker 1: with all this fascination and the promise made that might
7:39
Speaker 1: not be kept. You know, sometime when you're from the outside,
7:45
Speaker 1: you can see things and visualize things and suspect things
7:51
Speaker 1: and create conspiracies about things than when you are inside.
7:59
Speaker 1: And once once you're insight and you're the one supposed
8:06
Speaker 1: to lead, and the governance becomes something different. It's not
8:13
Speaker 1: everything you see that you will say, or everything you're
8:16
Speaker 1: supposed to do that you do. You weigh in the
8:20
Speaker 1: consequences of your actions and decisions, and you get to
8:26
Speaker 1: see that sometimes the right thing to do is not
8:32
Speaker 1: to do the right thing itself. That conundrum and that
8:37
Speaker 1: that etique dilemmas you know, it comes with governance and leadership,
8:48
Speaker 1: not to keep the country together and to do for
8:54
Speaker 1: the sake of unity and peace and prosperity and security
8:58
Speaker 1: and safety of the system itself, for the sake of
9:04
Speaker 1: continuation of that system and the consistency in our way
9:09
Speaker 1: of life. Sometimes certain crimes are so heinous, so barbaric,
9:19
Speaker 1: so inhumane, accrue are repregnant that the system ways the
9:33
Speaker 1: consequences of release are non release, and for the sake
9:38
Speaker 1: of the system, the system goes with not releasing the fire.
9:43
Speaker 1: But they do see all the names. Not that the
9:47
Speaker 1: system doesn't want to, not that the people working for
9:53
Speaker 1: the system doesn't want to, but that this system doesn't
9:58
Speaker 1: want them to because they fall out and the consequences
10:04
Speaker 1: might be too grave. That it doesn't threaten threatens a person,
10:12
Speaker 1: but threatens the survivor the faith, the good faith and
10:16
Speaker 1: credit of the state itself. You don't push certain things
10:23
Speaker 1: under the rock because you want to. It puts certain
10:28
Speaker 1: things under the rock because it's the most ethiqual thing
10:31
Speaker 1: to do, and ethics etica delivers something. It's not about
10:36
Speaker 1: right or wrong, it's about the consequentiality of what we do.
10:46
Speaker 1: She leaders they see what the ordinary person doesn't see.
10:52
Speaker 1: They make tough decisions on life and death, and sometimes
10:58
Speaker 1: they make decisions that are not humane and not good,
11:04
Speaker 1: not right to the common man of the common person.
11:10
Speaker 1: But those decisions are necessary for the survival of the system. See,
11:16
Speaker 1: the system is not a person. The system is not
11:21
Speaker 1: a moral entity. The right and wrong created by the
11:26
Speaker 1: system can sometimes be particular, be peculiar, just to that system.
11:35
Speaker 1: That's why they often say that word is good and
11:38
Speaker 1: bad in certain systems are opposite in the other systems.
11:44
Speaker 1: And the right and wrong in one culture or traditional
11:46
Speaker 1: religion it's contrary to that which is to other traditional
11:52
Speaker 1: cultural religion. Our political system here might be with the
11:57
Speaker 1: things of political system does might be repugnant on just
12:02
Speaker 1: on fedal other practical systems, depending way they see it.
12:09
Speaker 1: The explosiveness of this everything is fired should not damage
12:18
Speaker 1: the state itself. You know, civil lawsuits can be made
12:26
Speaker 1: and people can pay the price in various ways, but
12:30
Speaker 1: it mustn't be political crucifixion. We must not use this
12:36
Speaker 1: at the be all and all of everything. These things
12:42
Speaker 1: happen years ago. The system delayed. She said that justice
12:50
Speaker 1: delayed is justice denied. Those working for the system failed
12:55
Speaker 1: itself not to take care of this fires or this
12:59
Speaker 1: case time ago, and it becomes something so politically suicidal
13:12
Speaker 1: for the party in power that they are based and
13:16
Speaker 1: their elect officious cannot see the consequentiality of what they're
13:26
Speaker 1: pushing for. Releasing the fire, I tre not being justice
13:37
Speaker 1: because those who are on the fire, if purportantly it
13:42
Speaker 1: is true, of which there is not basis for that
13:45
Speaker 1: to betray, or it's not proving to be true. Assuming
13:48
Speaker 1: that that was true, assuming that what they say is true,
13:54
Speaker 1: that the most powerful humans are on that fire, it
13:57
Speaker 1: means they got the powers, look at the money, the courts,
14:00
Speaker 1: and they can get away with everything they want. So
14:05
Speaker 1: you know, sef served the purpose, it will not serve
14:09
Speaker 1: the intended purpose. It's just a political suicide. The departy
14:18
Speaker 1: in power must be mindful that the conspiracies that they
14:29
Speaker 1: created and want elections for maybe a monster that end
14:36
Speaker 1: up destroying themselves. So the everything is fire might be
14:42
Speaker 1: just the beginning. If you don't want that can come
14:46
Speaker 1: warm to destroy you and your party, And it should
14:53
Speaker 1: be careful when you're selling your podcast or while you guys,
14:57
Speaker 1: you guys just talk a lot, h just talk. And
15:04
Speaker 1: are you talking for the party, for the for the
15:06
Speaker 1: person you support? Are you talking do you believe in
15:10
Speaker 1: something and ideology? Is that the red line that cannot
15:13
Speaker 1: be crossed? Do you believe in that wish you're talking about. Oh,
15:18
Speaker 1: you're just trying to keep your name, make some money
15:21
Speaker 1: for yourself and create some fame for yourself. Are you
15:26
Speaker 1: talking for the system? Do you care about the system?
15:31
Speaker 1: You care about the survivor and the continuation of the system.
15:38
Speaker 1: If you get it your way, will it be beneficial
15:42
Speaker 1: to the system? Will you help the person that you support?
15:49
Speaker 1: Will help the president? Will you help your cause? Will
15:56
Speaker 1: you help your party? The joke you're sicking is inventitiveness, sadism, vengeance?
16:10
Speaker 1: Oh what is it? You actually care about the victims
16:18
Speaker 1: of those crimes? Crimes? If perportantly those crimes are that?
16:23
Speaker 1: Now you alerts? Because I studied law, you know the
16:31
Speaker 1: guilt is proven by the courts inno sense, it's assumed. Hm,
16:41
Speaker 1: there is no legal proof. There is no verdict. That's
16:47
Speaker 1: typolo it that affirms or ascertain that the alerts it's true.
17:01
Speaker 1: Because you think about something doesn't make it true. Because
17:06
Speaker 1: there is a cook top conspiracy that lasts for centuries
17:12
Speaker 1: doesn't make it true. Unless that which is true is
17:14
Speaker 1: true and based with matters of the law, That which
17:19
Speaker 1: is true to the common person may be dismissed out
17:24
Speaker 1: of court. In the court of law, you must understand
17:29
Speaker 1: that the crime and the prosidure to see justice are
17:34
Speaker 1: two different things. If the crime is committed in bright daylight,
17:42
Speaker 1: the technicality or the prosidure to pursue that justice might
17:48
Speaker 1: be wrong, and for that reason, the case itself might
17:51
Speaker 1: be tous out of court. So you cannot allerge something.
17:57
Speaker 1: And I actually believe in that which you are allerging,
18:01
Speaker 1: and it's credibility and sufficient and justifiable information and facts
18:07
Speaker 1: or evidence to support which you are a legend. The
18:16
Speaker 1: f thing is fire, Jeffreys file is some conspiracy, some
18:25
Speaker 1: spotted facts, some dotted lines that people connect what they
18:31
Speaker 1: want to see or refuse to connect what they don't
18:33
Speaker 1: want to see. So you cannot have for use that
18:42
Speaker 1: as the be all to disrupt your political gender, to
18:52
Speaker 1: disrupt the blueprint of your party or the plank of
18:58
Speaker 1: your party, and mister much to do tomorrow in the future,
19:08
Speaker 1: then hang onto something that by every statistics, you cannot
19:14
Speaker 1: get that which you want, because that which you want
19:17
Speaker 1: does not exist a fire on that list. It's a beast.
19:25
Speaker 1: Those are reasonable assumptions. What's those are just improving conspiracies,
19:32
Speaker 1: because it cannot use that to forget these successes, the
19:39
Speaker 1: achievements that your party has done. You cannot use that
19:44
Speaker 1: as a reason therefore to dumb your leader or to
19:48
Speaker 1: disrupt your own party on to the to the advantage
19:52
Speaker 1: of your of your position. Those two things are not
19:57
Speaker 1: actually like the basis of common sense reason, nationality, and
20:03
Speaker 1: count productive to your party. Assuming that your guy is
20:10
Speaker 1: on the list, or you do assuming assuming that your
20:19
Speaker 1: leader is on the list, what will you do? What
20:28
Speaker 1: you do you stop your support for the party, or
20:35
Speaker 1: you ask their leader to resign or to be tried
20:39
Speaker 1: in prison or jail or punished or as communicated, or
20:45
Speaker 1: what will you want to happen? Shoot in case you must,
20:50
Speaker 1: you must think through all these things in the game
20:53
Speaker 1: of politics, the science of politics, and the common sense
20:58
Speaker 1: of politics in politics is on It's a Machiavellian intelligence.
21:05
Speaker 1: You know, when you deal with politics, you must remember
21:07
Speaker 1: the three eyes intelligence, intentionality and intensity, the projection, the
21:17
Speaker 1: perception in the perspective, the public relations, how to get
21:23
Speaker 1: out of things, what to say, the p R the media,
21:29
Speaker 1: the consistency of the message, and the inconsistency of inconsistency.
21:35
Speaker 1: As a political strategy, if that which is that, which
21:44
Speaker 1: is that is true, that, if that which comes out
21:48
Speaker 1: to the public going to be damain and with a consequence,
21:52
Speaker 1: then you start to prepare the audience, your fans, your supporters.
21:58
Speaker 1: You start to know out true the deniability that does
22:06
Speaker 1: not lead to legal consequences or political negative causalities. Maybe
22:21
Speaker 1: I did, maybe I didn't, or maybe I forgot, or
22:23
Speaker 1: maybe I can't remember, or maybe it's I want to
22:27
Speaker 1: talk about it because it's confidential, or maybe it's out
22:30
Speaker 1: of the the the policies, it's out of my jurisdiction,
22:38
Speaker 1: out of my domain, out of my lane. That there
22:41
Speaker 1: are many things, or maybe it was past or the future.
22:45
Speaker 1: Let's look over look into the future. Maybe I should
22:50
Speaker 1: have done better, I should have been more careful. That
22:55
Speaker 1: there are many ways to open up without being incriminated,
23:02
Speaker 1: but to soften the base, or to to assume the
23:08
Speaker 1: valuability of human and the flowness in our creation, and
23:13
Speaker 1: at the same time to give in with measurement, proportion
23:21
Speaker 1: and balance mm hmm, and do not be so absorbed.
23:30
Speaker 1: Also call up in deniability that inconsistency betrays geniousness. But
23:45
Speaker 1: that which is is, that which is, what is on
23:48
Speaker 1: the fire, is what is on the fire. And people
23:51
Speaker 1: will know what is on that fire. If there is
23:53
Speaker 1: the fire, they know themselves. We have seen very powerful
23:58
Speaker 1: people paid the price for that fire, from royalty to
24:05
Speaker 1: other dynasties. And we know the potency of association to
24:12
Speaker 1: that person or to everything related to that person. But
24:17
Speaker 1: that was the past, that was what was that the
24:23
Speaker 1: pictures and the videos can't show. But that which you
24:30
Speaker 1: see on the video, on the picture may not speak
24:34
Speaker 1: for itself. And even if that person was speaking for
24:38
Speaker 1: itself on that video of picture, the man of that
24:41
Speaker 1: person may have been impaired, maybe a cup of wine
24:45
Speaker 1: or or the cigarette, or exuberance, or that there were
24:50
Speaker 1: some chemicals on Now that impact the judgment of that person.
24:56
Speaker 1: So killed by association, it's not a guilt that is
25:02
Speaker 1: tried in the court of law. Assumption. It is not
25:07
Speaker 1: a fact, and the fact itself must follow prosidure as
25:14
Speaker 1: a technicality in the law betrays the fact itself something
25:21
Speaker 1: the human being. You misunderstand justice for fairness, of fairness,
25:31
Speaker 1: for goodness or morality, the cost of law. It's not
25:36
Speaker 1: about it's not a moral institution. It's illogical, legalistic arpetration
25:45
Speaker 1: system where some of them. Justice is not about the
25:49
Speaker 1: rightness of the thing. This for the legal procedure of
25:59
Speaker 1: the That's why sometimes get to settle out of court
26:07
Speaker 1: to do reparations and minimize the damage before it hates
26:14
Speaker 1: politicians and destroy their careers, hite powerful people and ruin
26:20
Speaker 1: their lives. If those mistakes were made. Being at the
26:29
Speaker 1: wrong place at the wrong time, being in the right
26:31
Speaker 1: place at a long time is almost the same. People
26:36
Speaker 1: always regret that if they would look back in hindsight,
26:44
Speaker 1: who do things differently. You cannot always use the pass
26:50
Speaker 1: against a person unless the person refuses to make amends,
27:02
Speaker 1: because restorative justice it's very important for the better man
27:09
Speaker 1: and unity and collision of society. The concept of politics
27:16
Speaker 1: just to punish somebody, to to to seek great people
27:20
Speaker 1: for and to to have that that excitement on the media,
27:25
Speaker 1: to to to crucify, or to to malign, or to
27:29
Speaker 1: just you know, to destroy or to make ridicule, to
27:36
Speaker 1: just to find a glee of sadistic Mcavelian joy. By
27:45
Speaker 1: destroying the carry off somebody, you end up destraying the
27:49
Speaker 1: best you have. You must have followed beans and humans
27:54
Speaker 1: with a lot of cash, we do the dumbest of
27:57
Speaker 1: things because the recods sometimes the best of friends that
28:02
Speaker 1: don't have the interests of those people, but they care
28:06
Speaker 1: just about the cash and to be part of that power.
28:13
Speaker 1: So being very wealthy doesn't immune people for doing the
28:18
Speaker 1: dumbness of things or making mistakes. But do you use
28:24
Speaker 1: that as the catch you? My mind takes away good
28:29
Speaker 1: people away from politics. That's why when I would talk
28:34
Speaker 1: to people to run for office, the first thing they
28:37
Speaker 1: said to me is that I like to run for office, Prince,
28:40
Speaker 1: but I got so many skeletons in the closet. I
28:44
Speaker 1: let him know that there's no human without the skeleton
28:45
Speaker 1: in the closet. We will have some good to offer
28:50
Speaker 1: the system. Believe in yourself and the patriotic Let society
28:56
Speaker 1: crucify you as a crucify Jesus and let you sacrifice
29:05
Speaker 1: your life for the good of the country and for
29:11
Speaker 1: the greatness of the system. Human character is flawed. Human
29:18
Speaker 1: judgment can't be flawed. What the good that humans do
29:26
Speaker 1: should never forgotten. They are very good humans. That are
29:31
Speaker 1: flawed humans, and they are very flawed humans. They are
29:37
Speaker 1: the genius is of over time. Always look at the
29:41
Speaker 1: good in the person, and sometimes find it in the
29:46
Speaker 1: wisdom of your heart to forgive, to let go, to
29:52
Speaker 1: move on, to move forward, and content to do the
29:56
Speaker 1: big things they have now you plan to them. It's
30:01
Speaker 1: a word of thinking, Philosopher, Prince. Here are Intelligence's philosopher,
30:08
Speaker 1: Prince Is Rozarre July sixteenth, twenty twenty five from the
30:14
Speaker 1: great city of Las Vegas, USA. Thank you,