Latest / Real Crime with Adam Shand / From The Desk | How Many Chances Does the State Get to Kill You?
Transcript
- 0:10Speaker 1: Welcome to Real Crime with Adam Shand and this is
- 0:12Speaker 1: my Friday feature from the desk. Got a question for you.
- 0:17Speaker 1: If a state tries to execute you and fails, should
- 0:20Speaker 1: it be allowed to have another crack? It's not an
- 0:23Speaker 1: issue here, of course, because we abolished capital punishment in
- 0:27Speaker 1: 1985 and the Federal Parliament passed legislation in 2010 prohibiting
- 0:32Speaker 1: its re-establishment by any state or territory. I note that
- 0:35Speaker 1: about 30% of Australians want to see the death penalty
- 0:38Speaker 1: brought back, but that's another debate. But this question of
- 0:42Speaker 1: the limits of the state's powers is now hanging over Tennessee,
- 0:46Speaker 1: where the killer, Krista Pike, survived a lethal injection procedure
- 0:50Speaker 1: on September 30th.
- 0:52Speaker 2: Last week, Krista Pike was taken from the death chamber
- 0:55Speaker 2: to hospital in this ambulance. Believed to be the first
- 0:58Speaker 2: US convict to have ever survived lethal doses of execution drugs.
- 1:03Speaker 1: According to reporting and her legal team, she received two
- 1:07Speaker 1: doses of the execution drug pentobarbital during that procedure. It
- 1:12Speaker 1: wasn't enough to do the job. She remained alive and
- 1:16Speaker 1: was taken to the hospital. Her lawyers now say she's
- 1:20Speaker 1: regained consciousness and is speaking, although she remains seriously unwell
- 1:25Speaker 1: and very pissed off. The first thing she said was,
- 1:28Speaker 1: where am I and who are you?
- 1:30Speaker 2: On Monday night, It was our understanding that Krista was
- 1:33Speaker 2: brain dead and that life support would be removed the
- 1:36Speaker 2: next day.
- 1:37Speaker 1: A judge has ordered evidence from the failed execution preserved.
- 1:41Speaker 1: Any recording of that evening, September 30th, will need to
- 1:47Speaker 1: be preserved. Before we lose perspective on why Pike was
- 1:50Speaker 1: in the death chamber, let's not forget her victim, Colleen Slemmer.
- 1:55Speaker 1: She was 19 when she was tortured and murdered in 1995.
- 2:00Speaker 1: Pike was 18 at the time and she was convicted
- 2:03Speaker 1: and sentenced to death. But when a government takes the
- 2:07Speaker 1: power to kill a prisoner, it takes responsibility for how
- 2:10Speaker 1: that killing is carried out. You may have heard the
- 2:14Speaker 1: old story about hanging in England. If the rope broke,
- 2:17Speaker 1: the condemned person had to be spared. It's a powerful idea.
- 2:22Speaker 1: The authorities had their chance. Perhaps survival was a sign
- 2:27Speaker 1: of divine intervention. Perhaps mercy should follow. But it's largely
- 2:31Speaker 1: a myth. There was no automatic English rule guaranteeing a
- 2:35Speaker 1: reprieve when a rope failed. In 1866, William Collier was
- 2:41Speaker 1: taken to the gallows at Stafford. The rope's slice failed
- 2:44Speaker 1: and he fell. Officials got another rope and hanged him again.
- 2:49Speaker 1: The sentence, that he be hanged by the neck until death,
- 2:52Speaker 1: didn't specify a limit on the number of ropes that
- 2:55Speaker 1: could be used. Then there was John Babacombe Leigh. In 1885,
- 2:59Speaker 1: at Exeter Prison, they tried three times to hang him.
- 3:04Speaker 1: Each time, the trapdoor failed to open properly. Eventually, the
- 3:08Speaker 1: execution was stopped. Home Secretary Sir William Harcourt commuted the
- 3:13Speaker 1: sentence to life imprisonment. Lee served 22 years before his release.
- 3:18Speaker 1: His rope hadn't broken. The gallows mechanism had failed. And
- 3:23Speaker 1: his reprieve was an act of discretion. Survival did not
- 3:27Speaker 1: automatically cancel the sentence. And so what about Krista Pike?
- 3:32Speaker 1: Tennessee has suspended executions for the rest of this year
- 3:35Speaker 1: and ordered an independent review. Her lawyers had raised concerns
- 3:41Speaker 1: beforehand about her small veins and medical conditions. They say
- 3:46Speaker 1: those warnings matter to what happened. Prison authorities have said
- 3:49Speaker 1: they followed the state's protocols. The question now is whether
- 3:54Speaker 1: Pike should ever be taken back to the death chambers. Legally,
- 3:59Speaker 1: surviving an execution does not make a person immune from
- 4:02Speaker 1: another attempt in the United States. And there is an
- 4:06Speaker 1: important precedent. In 1946, Willie Francis survived an attempt to
- 4:11Speaker 1: electrocute him in Louisiana. His case reached the United States
- 4:15Speaker 1: Supreme Court. In 1947, the court permitted a second attempt,
- 4:21Speaker 1: which was successful. Its judgment rejected the constitutional challenges in
- 4:25Speaker 1: the circumstances before it, treating the failure as an accident
- 4:29Speaker 1: rather than a deliberate effort to inflict additional suffering. That
- 4:34Speaker 1: decision matters. It means we cannot simply declare that trying
- 4:38Speaker 1: again is always unconstitutional. But it doesn't settle Pike's case.
- 4:44Speaker 1: Her condition, what officials knew beforehand, what went wrong, and
- 4:49Speaker 1: the risks of a proposed new procedure would need examination.
- 4:54Speaker 1: The constitutional prohibition on cruel and unusual punishment would be
- 4:58Speaker 1: central to that argument, according to lawyers I've spoken to.
- 5:02Speaker 1: But on the face of it, Pike does not seem
- 5:04Speaker 1: likely to gain an automatic reprieve. The moral question is
- 5:09Speaker 1: something each of us can consider. Supporters of another attempt
- 5:13Speaker 1: will say a jury imposed a death sentence. A failed
- 5:18Speaker 1: injection should not overturn that decision. They'll ask why survival
- 5:24Speaker 1: through chance should produce a different outcome from that faced
- 5:28Speaker 1: by another person convicted of an equally terrible crime. That,
- 5:32Speaker 1: of course, is a serious argument. And Colleen Slimmer's family
- 5:37Speaker 1: should not be expected to feel sympathy for the woman
- 5:40Speaker 1: convicted of killing her. However, the state has already subjected
- 5:45Speaker 1: Pike to a procedure intended to end her life. She
- 5:48Speaker 1: survived and required hospital treatment. If she recovers... Should the
- 5:53Speaker 1: government prepare her for death all over again? It seems
- 5:58Speaker 1: quite monstrous. What limits apply to that power? If another
- 6:03Speaker 1: attempt failed, would a third be acceptable, or a fourth?
- 6:07Speaker 1: At what point does carrying out a sentence become a
- 6:10Speaker 1: succession of ordeals that the original sentence never contemplated? A
- 6:16Speaker 1: government's duty to act humanely cannot depend on whether we
- 6:20Speaker 1: like the prisoner. It matters most when the prisoner has
- 6:24Speaker 1: committed something appalling. Otherwise, the standard becomes whatever we're prepared
- 6:29Speaker 1: to tolerate happening to someone we despise. There's a tension here.
- 6:34Speaker 1: The state attempts to end a life. After that attempt fails,
- 6:38Speaker 1: medical staff work to preserve life. That medical care is necessary.
- 6:44Speaker 1: A prisoner remains a human being entitled to treatment. But
- 6:49Speaker 1: there is something awful about recovering from that ordeal while knowing...
- 6:53Speaker 1: the government might seek another opportunity to execute you. Does
- 6:57Speaker 1: that additional suffering change the moral calculation? Or do you
- 7:02Speaker 1: believe that because Colleen Slemmer endured a terrible death, Pike's
- 7:06Speaker 1: suffering should carry no weight? Commuting a death sentence to
- 7:11Speaker 1: imprisonment would not erase Pike's conviction. It wouldn't declare her innocent.
- 7:16Speaker 1: It would just change the punishment. People can disagree about
- 7:20Speaker 1: whether that's warranted while agreeing... that the state must explain
- 7:25Speaker 1: its failure. The responsibility for a lawful and humane punishment
- 7:30Speaker 1: belongs to the state. After a failed execution that leaves
- 7:35Speaker 1: a prisoner needing life-saving treatment, should the state be allowed
- 7:39Speaker 1: another attempt? Does the original sentence justify trying again?
- 7:44Speaker 2: Or....
- 7:45Speaker 1: Has the state reached a point where mercy is the
- 7:48Speaker 1: more defensible exercise of its power? And even if a
- 7:52Speaker 1: court permits another attempt, would that make it morally correct?
- 7:57Speaker 1: How many chances should a government get to kill someone
- 8:00Speaker 1: in its custody? For those seeking a return to the
- 8:03Speaker 1: death penalty here, this is indeed food for thought. I'm
- 8:07Speaker 1: Adam Shand. This is From the Desk. You can follow
- 8:10Speaker 1: me on Facebook and subscribe to continue the conversation. Thanks
- 8:14Speaker 1: for listening. Thanks for listening to this episode and supporting
- 8:26Speaker 1: this story. Independent storytelling that shapes the world is what
- 8:30Speaker 1: Podshape really cares about. Right now, there's thousands of people
- 8:33Speaker 1: listening to this show and our other true crimes, and
- 8:36Speaker 1: they're completely engaged. More than 10 million Australians listen to
- 8:39Speaker 1: podcasts each week. If you've ever thought about advertising your
- 8:43Speaker 1: business in a podcast, there's a link to reach out
- 8:45Speaker 1: in the show notes or head to podshape.com to book
- 8:49Speaker 1: a free call.