Latest / Radio Baloney - The Richie Baloney Show! / Radio Baloney Live! News Review Hangout Stream

Transcript

Radio Baloney Live! News Review Hangout Stream · Radio Baloney - The Richie Baloney Show!

0:00
Speaker 1: What is best in life to crush your enemies, see
0:03
Speaker 1: them driven before you and they have a lamentation of
0:06
Speaker 1: the women.
0:14
Speaker 2: All right, what is it Sunday night?
0:16
Speaker 3: Is?
0:16
Speaker 2: It's Sunday night, must be the Sunday Night Radio Baloney Live.
0:21
Speaker 2: It's good to see everybody. It looks like our multi
0:24
Speaker 2: streaming problems on Friday have been resolved and by me
0:29
Speaker 2: doing nothing and it's just working again. Excellent, excellent. Our
0:34
Speaker 2: stream is live on kick right now as well as
0:37
Speaker 2: rumble x locals, so everything's working well. Rose the Ottawa,
0:42
Speaker 2: how you guys doing. That's a little quiet this evening already.
0:47
Speaker 4: I do know?
0:48
Speaker 2: Did I do something? What did I do? What did
0:49
Speaker 2: I do? All right, let's go to the menu, see
0:53
Speaker 2: what we're going to talk about tonight. Very quickly, go
0:55
Speaker 2: back to the chat, dol out some good garma, and
0:58
Speaker 2: then we will come back and do these stories in detail.
1:01
Speaker 2: First off, I just can't get enough of these ex
1:04
Speaker 2: NBA players trolling the w n b A and making
1:07
Speaker 2: actually a kind of an important point. Actually, I mean
1:10
Speaker 2: it's not just for nothing, it's not just for for giggles.
1:14
Speaker 2: I mean they're making an important point about lunatic ideologies.
1:19
Speaker 2: Royce White just keeps going. Do you say that he's
1:22
Speaker 2: an autobot versus the Decepticons? The Decepticons. That's what this
1:26
Speaker 2: is turning into. The thing is he's totally right though
1:30
Speaker 2: by saying that, you know, by their rules, he can
1:32
Speaker 2: just change. He can just say he's a woman and
1:35
Speaker 2: he is. There's nothing they could really say. I mean,
1:38
Speaker 2: I've gone through this before. But their own authorities, then
1:41
Speaker 2: their own high priests on this stuff agree and let's
1:46
Speaker 2: see Woke two point zero. Get ready for Woke two
1:49
Speaker 2: point to righty up North says yeah point one point
1:53
Speaker 2: oh is dead and the rebrand is underway. Yeah, where
1:56
Speaker 2: nobody's fooled? Who's fooled by?
1:59
Speaker 3: Who?
2:00
Speaker 2: Quad is? Woke? Quad was crazy? That's god, We're not
2:03
Speaker 2: crazy anymore. She's still crazy. I mean just look at
2:07
Speaker 2: her face. Uh I thought this was interesting. So this
2:14
Speaker 2: is a clip from Rickey Gervais from like twenty years ago,
2:17
Speaker 2: and this is important in context of the new booklet,
2:22
Speaker 2: the new leaflet that the UK Home Office is putting
2:26
Speaker 2: out for the people who keep invading their country illegally.
2:30
Speaker 2: And uh yeah, it's actually it's actually tragic what woke
2:37
Speaker 2: The level of woke dysfunction that's been introduced into Western countries.
2:42
Speaker 2: We're going to look at the breakdown of the Canada
2:45
Speaker 2: US trade negotiations. The deal completely failed. Our government is
2:51
Speaker 2: not being honest with us, it is not being transparent.
2:57
Speaker 2: I would like to see what the details are before
2:59
Speaker 2: I trust anything that comes out of Mark Carney's mouth,
3:03
Speaker 2: the technocrat, globalist central banker. So we will spend some
3:10
Speaker 2: time on that. And we're also going to talk about
3:13
Speaker 2: and this is related to Mark Cartey as well, central
3:16
Speaker 2: bank digital currencies. Here Kean Becksty from Juno News, they
3:21
Speaker 2: through a freedom of information request got a document in
3:25
Speaker 2: which the Canadian military is a warning that digital ID
3:30
Speaker 2: technology is a tool of authoritarian control. So, yeah, that's
3:36
Speaker 2: not good. We don't want that. We go through this
3:40
Speaker 2: a little bit here and we'll deal with that. I'll
3:43
Speaker 2: show you Mark Carti's history with this stuff, cbdc's and
3:47
Speaker 2: we'll go through a little explanation of it and Mark
3:49
Speaker 2: Carty's various censorship and surveillance legislation, which is really his
3:55
Speaker 2: main focus as a leader, to be honest, other than
3:58
Speaker 2: tanking trade negotiations. Yeah, it's all, it's actually all just
4:02
Speaker 2: terrible stuff. Terrible stuff. Hang around and you can see
4:05
Speaker 2: the terrible stuff. Here's Joe Rogan talking about flock cameras.
4:09
Speaker 2: So I thought we'd just take a look at what
4:12
Speaker 2: our flock camera's exactly. I mean, it's a brand of camera.
4:16
Speaker 2: It's I guess, a totalitarian weapon to be used against
4:20
Speaker 2: the population. So yeah, we'll talk about that and just
4:25
Speaker 2: various This is the last tab of the evening, and
4:27
Speaker 2: it's just various stuff. Some of it's funny, some of
4:31
Speaker 2: it's just kind of like scary news, some of it's crazy,
4:35
Speaker 2: woke ding bets, all kinds of stuff. There's a crazy
4:38
Speaker 2: raccoon at the ball game. That's fun. Everybody loves that.
4:44
Speaker 2: And then we have and then that's it. That's all
4:48
Speaker 2: we're doing. So I picked out a nice pottery instructional
4:53
Speaker 2: pottery video for us tonight. As you can see, this
4:56
Speaker 2: is a professional pottery lady. She's wearing a special safety
5:00
Speaker 2: T shirt. It's very tight. It keeps everything in place,
5:03
Speaker 2: so nothing. You know, there's no harm that can be
5:06
Speaker 2: done while doing pottery, which can be quite dangerous. Now,
5:09
Speaker 2: when I first started watching this, I thought, oh, she's
5:12
Speaker 2: making a boner out of clay, But then it changed
5:15
Speaker 2: all of a sudden. It wasn't that. Maybe that's a
5:17
Speaker 2: separate bonus's making. Maybe that's a different thing. Then I thought,
5:19
Speaker 2: maybe it's a flashlight or something that seems a bit odd.
5:22
Speaker 2: But it turns out it was just a mug that's
5:26
Speaker 2: like a pumpkin mug, So it's not really that. All right,
5:30
Speaker 2: Let's move on. Let's go to the chat, shall we.
5:36
Speaker 2: And as everybody knows, we're streaming right now on Rumble,
5:41
Speaker 2: on Kick on X and on locals. And if you're
5:44
Speaker 2: watching on Kick, by the way, we need followers there,
5:46
Speaker 2: so just follow Just do it now, do it, don't
5:49
Speaker 2: even think about it, just do it. But everybody knows
5:53
Speaker 2: we're streaming on Rumble, X, locals and Kick right now.
5:56
Speaker 2: And when you like the stream, wherever you are, you
5:58
Speaker 2: get free good karma. But when you're in Earth you
6:00
Speaker 2: get extra good karma, the special radio bolone good karma
6:03
Speaker 2: that can only bring good things to your life. Rosie
6:06
Speaker 2: is first in the chat. First, like, that's six good
6:10
Speaker 2: karmas right there, Boom to see how easy that was.
6:13
Speaker 2: Now she's got six good karmas in her back pocket.
6:15
Speaker 2: I mean that's pretty pretty handy. I'd feel pretty. I
6:19
Speaker 2: feel pretty secure at least for the next twenty four hours.
6:22
Speaker 2: With that much good karma, says I had to show
6:24
Speaker 2: up early to make up for lost time Friday. Not unforgivable,
6:28
Speaker 2: not not acceptable Ottawa James, Hey, I'll like number two.
6:34
Speaker 2: That's five good karmas, so easy, Nevada. Third, that's four
6:41
Speaker 2: good karmas so easy, so easy. Why wouldn't everybody do that?
6:46
Speaker 2: Why wouldn't everybody do this? I mean, in these troubled times,
6:49
Speaker 2: can you afford to turn your back on good karma?
6:51
Speaker 2: Free good karma? I wouldn't do it. I'm not crazy. Uh,
6:55
Speaker 2: Rosie says, Hey, Ritchie, what did you do for fun
6:57
Speaker 2: this weekend? Well? My week Uh watched boxing. Yesterday, I
7:02
Speaker 2: did boxing. I did tiny a little bit of work
7:04
Speaker 2: before I went to sleep. But I just watched boxing.
7:06
Speaker 2: I like doing that on Saturdays. At what James is doing? Good?
7:12
Speaker 2: All right, let's see purproper er. What else is going on?
7:26
Speaker 2: Rosie says Richie. You mentioned he can say he's a woman. Now,
7:29
Speaker 2: then you said I have been through this before. Maybe
7:32
Speaker 2: clarify a little. I meant we've been through the stuff
7:36
Speaker 2: I'm going to show you before. I have not been
7:38
Speaker 2: a woman before or thought I was a woman at
7:40
Speaker 2: any point. So maybe I will. Maybe I will. All
7:44
Speaker 2: I have to do is say it so, and then
7:45
Speaker 2: if you don't agree with me, your hate. Let's see,
7:50
Speaker 2: oh onta, what James watched boxing too? It looks like
7:52
Speaker 2: smart man, great minds think alike. Nevada says, Carney threw
7:58
Speaker 2: Canadians under the US Friday night. We're gonna get to
8:01
Speaker 2: that for sure. Cardie is such an ass. Nevada says, yep,
8:05
Speaker 2: don't know what. James says, can't stand Cardi. I think
8:08
Speaker 2: at this point it's just clear. I mean, the man,
8:10
Speaker 2: he's either sabotaging the country or he's an utter and
8:13
Speaker 2: total failure. Rosie says, rich, I think you might want
8:26
Speaker 2: to publish a stream pamphlet one only links from x
8:29
Speaker 2: YouTube and rumbo, no malware links, no impersonating others are
8:33
Speaker 2: confusing handles, no links to full dude. That's probably a
8:36
Speaker 2: good idea. That's probably a good idea. Well, let's see
8:45
Speaker 2: jj Ottawa Rosi one to three four says number three
8:48
Speaker 2: is hate speech. Hate speech. I don't know what's going on.
8:51
Speaker 2: Let's see, I don't know what's going on. La la
8:57
Speaker 2: la la la. All right, let's just move on, let's
9:00
Speaker 2: just get on with the let's just do this all right,
9:04
Speaker 2: So WNBA, it's really hilarious, and it's all because the
9:08
Speaker 2: WNBA still hasn't figured out what the W means in WNBA.
9:13
Speaker 2: I think it should mean whatever. That's my that's my
9:17
Speaker 2: position of this, the W should mean and I think
9:20
Speaker 2: has always meant whatever. Royce White autobots versus the scepticons,
9:27
Speaker 2: that's what this is turning into. So Royce White is
9:30
Speaker 2: the XNBA player, are one of the two XNBA players
9:34
Speaker 2: that has declared for the WNBA draft. He says, if
9:37
Speaker 2: he puts on a wig, he's a woman. And look,
9:41
Speaker 2: those are the rules. Those are the rules. Look, before
9:45
Speaker 2: we get to this in this video very quickly, let's
9:48
Speaker 2: just American Psychological Association understanding transgender people, gender identity, and
9:53
Speaker 2: gender expression again, American Psychological Association, Transgender is an umbrella.
10:01
Speaker 2: Transgender is an umbrella term for people whose gender identity,
10:05
Speaker 2: gender expression, or behavior does not conform to that typically
10:11
Speaker 2: associated with the sex to which they were assigned at birth.
10:14
Speaker 2: So gender identity that just an abstraction, right, It's nothing
10:20
Speaker 2: to do with genetics. There's nothing there's no physical science
10:23
Speaker 2: involved in that gender expression. Again, this is just an abstraction.
10:28
Speaker 2: One might just say it's preferences right or behavior. So
10:34
Speaker 2: again not really, there's not really any actual physical science
10:38
Speaker 2: involved here. I mean, so does that mean that all
10:42
Speaker 2: effeminate men are in the wrong body? There's nothing really
10:46
Speaker 2: solid here to go on. It all just feels kind
10:49
Speaker 2: of like bullshit. Let's say, Transgender Health Group now says
10:53
Speaker 2: it's guidelines for treating youth are only opinions and it
10:57
Speaker 2: tends to bate. So the World Professional Associate Jation of
11:00
Speaker 2: Transgender Health's guidelines underpinned Canada's approach to treating gender distressed children.
11:06
Speaker 2: So World Professional Association of Transgender Health is the authority
11:11
Speaker 2: on these matters that all the other authorities appeal to
11:16
Speaker 2: and also wash their hands of guilt with, and also
11:22
Speaker 2: used to wash their own hands of guilt in their
11:24
Speaker 2: own complicity in the whole matter. So they're so their
11:34
Speaker 2: guidelines are just opinions, not based in science, not based
11:39
Speaker 2: in fact. Right now, even the Canadian government, now, the
11:44
Speaker 2: Canadian government itself used the World Professional Association of Transgender
11:50
Speaker 2: Health for its own laws for its own policies and
11:54
Speaker 2: its own law. I mean, look in Canada, Canadian Human
11:59
Speaker 2: Right Canadian Human Rights sect. It was amended under the
12:02
Speaker 2: Trudeau government to include gender identity or expression. Again, these
12:06
Speaker 2: are just abstract ideas, right, There's nothing physical, there's nothing
12:11
Speaker 2: actually scientific about this at all. So when Royce White says,
12:19
Speaker 2: I can just say I'm a woman, I can put
12:21
Speaker 2: a wig on my head and that's part of my
12:23
Speaker 2: gender expression, and that means I'm a woman according to
12:27
Speaker 2: their rules. And I'm talking about the high priests of
12:30
Speaker 2: this stuff, the authorities, the associations that promote this stuff.
12:36
Speaker 2: He's just doing what they've said he can do. And again,
12:41
Speaker 2: this is putting up a brick wall, a brick wall
12:45
Speaker 2: in the path of the lunatic gender ideology, the redefining
12:49
Speaker 2: of gender into an infinite series of abstractions. So he says,
12:53
Speaker 2: autobots versus decepticons. That's what this is turning into. My
12:57
Speaker 2: new trans basketball nickname is top to miss Prime. We
13:04
Speaker 2: have another one. This decepticond is telling me. Decepticond is
13:08
Speaker 2: telling me I'm not transitioning correctly. Let me explain something
13:12
Speaker 2: to you. Boo boo. The Queen doesn't answer to anybody
13:17
Speaker 2: about my hormones, genitalia, or wardrobe. Well, let's take a
13:21
Speaker 2: quick look here at this video.
13:24
Speaker 5: I'm not even gonna say good morning because it is
13:26
Speaker 5: clearly not one. I'm long online and I'm seeing these
13:31
Speaker 5: crazy posts from other dolls talking about swite a man
13:36
Speaker 5: in Minnesota who's running for something, who is Maco. I'm
13:45
Speaker 5: gonna show you that IMAJASL cool hair bro for me,
13:55
Speaker 5: You're gonna have to do a lot more. We have
13:57
Speaker 5: to do a lot more. So you're gonna have to
13:59
Speaker 5: do a lot more.
14:00
Speaker 2: But not according to American Psychological Association, not according to
14:06
Speaker 2: World Professional Association for Transgender Health in Canada. I mean
14:11
Speaker 2: this is a moot point, right, It's just whatever abstraction
14:15
Speaker 2: will do. So you know I have it our good
14:20
Speaker 2: authority here that Royce White is totally correct in what
14:23
Speaker 2: he's saying.
14:25
Speaker 5: You don't just get to make posts saying, as I
14:28
Speaker 5: stated a few days ago, i am declaring for the
14:29
Speaker 5: twenty twenty seven w NBA draft, my I identify as
14:34
Speaker 5: sometimes as identifying as a transgender woman. My wig is
14:39
Speaker 5: in the mail. And then the next post was what
14:41
Speaker 5: I just showed you. It came y'all. My first week
14:43
Speaker 5: tomorrow our test on the court. This is my feminine
14:45
Speaker 5: air glow up. Did I slay? If y'all don't eat
14:48
Speaker 5: yas queen, you're transphobic. I really don't understand all the hatred.
14:52
Speaker 5: I just want to play some hoops with my fellow ladies.
14:56
Speaker 5: Royce White for US Senate, Minnesota, twenty twenty six, WNBA
15:01
Speaker 5: let her play. I'm sorry, but transgender women don't take
15:07
Speaker 5: up that much space because we know the reality. We
15:12
Speaker 5: know that it's not that simple. We know that we
15:14
Speaker 5: don't have our male privilege anymore. We don't get to.
15:18
Speaker 2: All of this is totally irrelevant, okay, so by the ideology,
15:24
Speaker 2: the ruling ideology of transgenderism. Okay, according to all of
15:29
Speaker 2: the leading authorities on this right, it's just all abstract.
15:34
Speaker 2: It could be anything like you just say it and
15:37
Speaker 2: you are again. Like Transgender Health, the World Professional Association
15:43
Speaker 2: of Transgender Health, that's the high priests of transgenderism. They
15:48
Speaker 2: say it's about just gender expression. And also all of
15:53
Speaker 2: their standards of care are only opinions, no science, not fact,
15:58
Speaker 2: not fact, just opinions. Canadian government would totally back up,
16:02
Speaker 2: of course. You know, maybe it's not fair to use
16:04
Speaker 2: the Canadian government because the Canadian government is the wokest
16:07
Speaker 2: organization in the world. But look, I mean, you have
16:12
Speaker 2: a whole country here that also agrees that. Yeah, you
16:15
Speaker 2: just say it and you are and nobody can question you.
16:18
Speaker 2: Otherwise that's against I mean, in canada's literally against the law.
16:22
Speaker 2: It's against the Canadian Human Rights Act. So good thing
16:26
Speaker 2: this person's not in Canada because you could be getting
16:31
Speaker 2: in some trouble. I'm afraid questioning Royce White and his
16:34
Speaker 2: obvious womanhood. I mean, look, he said it. He said
16:38
Speaker 2: it right, That's that's concrete evidence right there, according to
16:45
Speaker 2: transgender ideology. So look, why is it? I mean, this
16:51
Speaker 2: is funny. Obviously, it's very silly. It's funny, but it's
16:54
Speaker 2: important because it is important to know what's real and
16:57
Speaker 2: what's not. This is how that cannot recognize reality from
17:04
Speaker 2: delusion is going to fail. It's going to collapse. Okay,
17:09
Speaker 2: And of course this is not the only place where
17:11
Speaker 2: unreality rules within leftism and with leftist governments. I'm in Canada,
17:17
Speaker 2: I know, Royce continues, Now, I can't wear a wig
17:22
Speaker 2: in a suit. Who says, who is there? An itc
17:26
Speaker 2: International trans Court that oversees the trans dress code with
17:30
Speaker 2: a beautiful black women transitions. We don't follow the trends,
17:34
Speaker 2: we set the trends. Beards and suits is the new
17:37
Speaker 2: deconstruction of CIS normative Wardrobeig, you're late with the nails.
17:44
Speaker 2: That's CIS woman's stuff. So, by the way, I'm sure
17:47
Speaker 2: we could find one hundred thousand PhD thesis saying exactly
17:53
Speaker 2: this at this point. PS, once I drop the all
17:58
Speaker 2: spark in this barken bag, I don't even know what
18:00
Speaker 2: that means. It's over for you haters. Royce White for president,
18:11
Speaker 2: Let Roisia Roisia play. He's going by Roysia down. So
18:18
Speaker 2: the point he's performing a valuable function here for society
18:21
Speaker 2: again of putting that brick wall in the path of frankly,
18:27
Speaker 2: just a delusional, insane ideology. Right, And nobody even cared
18:32
Speaker 2: about this stuff until they started getting kids involved, Right
18:37
Speaker 2: until they started insisting that they must commit medical gender
18:42
Speaker 2: experiments on children and tell four year olds that they're
18:46
Speaker 2: born in the wrong body. Right, none of it. Nobody
18:50
Speaker 2: actually cared until they did that. Now it's important. Now,
18:54
Speaker 2: it's important to to point out the lunacy to just
19:00
Speaker 2: show it for what it is. It's not real, right,
19:03
Speaker 2: it's the realm of the unreal. It's not real, and
19:06
Speaker 2: therefore it should be discredited because if we can't deal
19:11
Speaker 2: with reality, we can't have the Western civilization, can't have
19:15
Speaker 2: a civilization. It will fall. All right, now, what's going on?
19:25
Speaker 2: Let's see?
19:28
Speaker 3: All right?
19:28
Speaker 2: What do you guys talking about? What are you guys
19:37
Speaker 2: talking about? Hold? I want second, I want to check
19:41
Speaker 2: something very quickly. I want to repeat. Anybody watching on kick,
19:45
Speaker 2: just follow the channel. Just follow the channel. We just
19:48
Speaker 2: started there, we're new there, all right, just follow just
19:53
Speaker 2: do it, do it. You might want to watch another
19:54
Speaker 2: stream sometime then you'll know. Then it'll show up in
19:57
Speaker 2: your feet or whatever. I don't know. All right, let's see.
20:04
Speaker 2: And if you're watching on Rumble two, we we got
20:06
Speaker 2: plenty of room, plenty of room for new followers, new subscribers.
20:10
Speaker 2: Water's fine, let's see. Mm Rosie says, oh no, they
20:28
Speaker 2: need to increase viewers on the w n b A.
20:31
Speaker 2: They should choose a new w were Wolf, Warm Chocolate, Wild,
20:35
Speaker 2: the Beast, Wicked Walrus, whiskey whiskey. That is that uh,
20:41
Speaker 2: that is what that is? What will work. She says,
20:44
Speaker 2: that is what will work. I'm going with whatever the
20:47
Speaker 2: whatever National Basketball Association. I think they have to if
20:52
Speaker 2: they're gonna, you know, be woke in virtue signal, I
20:54
Speaker 2: think they have to go with that. Jj Ottawa. Rosie
21:00
Speaker 2: has only libs believe it hates speech. I hate speeches.
21:04
Speaker 2: It's just censorship. Right. Let's see, Travis says, damn it, Rosie,
21:15
Speaker 2: I am late number five. So that's a two good
21:17
Speaker 2: karmas plus one extra good karba for damn it Rosie.
21:21
Speaker 2: That's three good karmas right there? Boom so easy. Why
21:24
Speaker 2: wouldn't everybody do that? It's crazy, right, crazy?
21:31
Speaker 3: Uh?
21:42
Speaker 2: Rosie says, nothing they do comes across as an opinion. No,
21:45
Speaker 2: they claim that it's fact. Right. W Path claimed that
21:50
Speaker 2: everything they were doing, their standards of care were based
21:53
Speaker 2: on evidence. They were evidence based. It's clearly never been
21:57
Speaker 2: the case, and now they've been forced to admit it.
22:00
Speaker 3: Uh.
22:03
Speaker 2: And telling parents your child will commit suicide, that's one
22:06
Speaker 2: of the most evil things they've done. Like, that's genuinely evil.
22:14
Speaker 2: Let's see, Nevada's having pizza for dinner. Don't tell me
22:17
Speaker 2: about it. I forgot to have dinner before this dray
22:19
Speaker 2: damn it could eat after Let's say do jj otto.
22:29
Speaker 2: Rosie says, he's gatekeeping. You could be a trans woman
22:32
Speaker 2: just like Rosie is gatekeeping which user names are allowed.
22:38
Speaker 2: They're different things. It's not the same thing. Rosie says,
22:44
Speaker 2: does he resemble actress Julietta Margiles from Er if she
22:48
Speaker 2: was not wearing makeup and had crazy tattoos? Let's go back,
22:53
Speaker 2: are you talking about are you talking about this lady? Well,
22:58
Speaker 2: this lady, this lady right here, So I'll read that. Okay,
23:04
Speaker 2: I'll read that again. Uh, Rosie asked, does he resemble
23:09
Speaker 2: actress Juliana Mark Giles from Er if she was not
23:13
Speaker 2: wearing makeup and had crazy tattoos? Now, one thing you
23:16
Speaker 2: might not be aware of is that Rosie has and
23:18
Speaker 2: I'm not joking here, I'm being very serious, literally face blindness.
23:22
Speaker 2: So just does not know who's who. So like celebrities
23:26
Speaker 2: and stuff, shesus got no idea. They're all the same
23:29
Speaker 2: person to her pretty much. So I thought that that
23:34
Speaker 2: qualifier would be necessary for this comment. Okay, Uh, whether
23:39
Speaker 2: or not this resembles the actress Juliana Mark Mark Margot,
23:44
Speaker 2: I believe it's Mark Giles from er It's called face blindness.
23:50
Speaker 2: It's not She's fine, she's getting through life fine, it's
23:54
Speaker 2: not a problem, right, And she's she's offered up this
23:57
Speaker 2: information willingly. So she's cool, she's great. But occasionally it
24:02
Speaker 2: means she will think that a man looks like an
24:06
Speaker 2: actress from her. And that's really the extent of the
24:12
Speaker 2: damage there. So you know, it's fine. We can all
24:14
Speaker 2: live with that. We can all live with that, all right.
24:19
Speaker 2: And then after this I have to go let's see,
24:23
Speaker 2: hold on.
24:25
Speaker 6: Who loves your baby?
24:26
Speaker 4: You're beautiful?
24:29
Speaker 2: There we go all right, No, no, I'm not doing that.
24:42
Speaker 2: Let's say Rosie says that he had mental health. Heads
24:46
Speaker 2: is screwed up for sure. Well, it used to be
24:48
Speaker 2: considered a mental illness until political correctness turned the world
24:51
Speaker 2: upside down. Jay, how you doing enjoying the discourse? Hey, Richie,
24:57
Speaker 2: and friend's number six? Well number six is one point five.
25:00
Speaker 2: Good Karma's right there. Let's go, all right, what do
25:08
Speaker 2: we got next? Let's see, So let's talk about wok Wan.
25:13
Speaker 2: So the the the Democrats in the United States are
25:17
Speaker 2: saying Woquan was crazy crazy. I don't feel like the
25:21
Speaker 2: rest of the the left, and the rest of the
25:22
Speaker 2: Western world is echoing that. I think that they don't
25:25
Speaker 2: feel the need to step back, like in Canada, why
25:28
Speaker 2: would you, right, They got a liberal government, you know,
25:31
Speaker 2: the Mark Carney super popular. He's no threat to wokeness.
25:34
Speaker 2: He's just as woke as any of them. Labor is
25:38
Speaker 2: in power in the UK, so they don't feel the
25:40
Speaker 2: need to step back to pretend to be more moderate
25:46
Speaker 2: than they really are, all of these that crazy dingbat commies.
25:50
Speaker 2: But in the States they have to. The midterms are
25:52
Speaker 2: coming up. It's important that they try and trick the
25:55
Speaker 2: American people into voting for them. Now, Marty up North
25:59
Speaker 2: posted and he says woke one point zero is dead
26:03
Speaker 2: and the rebrand is underway in the USA and here
26:07
Speaker 2: in Canada, not really in Canada, though not really in Canada.
26:11
Speaker 2: They don't need to here. For years, the progressive script
26:15
Speaker 2: was non negotiable. Biology is bigotry in Canada. That's every
26:19
Speaker 2: institution and the mainstream media would say that merit is
26:24
Speaker 2: oppression again. You're not going to get an argument from
26:27
Speaker 2: the mainstream media or any of the institutions or any
26:31
Speaker 2: of the left wing politicians in Canada. Speech is violence again. Again,
26:37
Speaker 2: every disparity is systemic racism. Again, this is all alive
26:40
Speaker 2: and well. Woke one point zero was doing just find
26:43
Speaker 2: in Canada, I will say, but again in the States
26:46
Speaker 2: they do feel they need to moderate because they've got
26:49
Speaker 2: those Because the United States is the population at least,
26:53
Speaker 2: maybe not the institutions, but the population is not as
26:57
Speaker 2: captured as other Western countries. Wok one was crazy, AOC said, Well,
27:04
Speaker 2: she was an architect of Wok one. It seemed like
27:06
Speaker 2: she believed everything she was saying. Then, you know, very passionately.
27:12
Speaker 2: I will say, let's take a look at this.
27:14
Speaker 5: Wok one was crazy.
27:17
Speaker 7: With Alexandria Okazi Kut just called wok one crazy. But
27:21
Speaker 7: what is wok one and how did it shift into
27:24
Speaker 7: toxic territory?
27:25
Speaker 8: Getting woke lunacy and transgender insanity the hell out of
27:30
Speaker 8: our government?
27:31
Speaker 2: Well, she said there, how did it turn into talk? Well,
27:34
Speaker 2: let's watch that again. Hold on a second. I want
27:36
Speaker 2: to want you to say that one more time.
27:38
Speaker 7: Wok one crazy. But what is wok one and how
27:41
Speaker 7: did it shift into toxic territory?
27:44
Speaker 2: How did it shift into toxic territory? It didn't shift.
27:47
Speaker 2: It was toxic all the way through anti meritocratic, blatantly
27:52
Speaker 2: racist against white people, delusional, more concerned with at defending
28:01
Speaker 2: abstractions than reality, the constant oppressed depressor narratives, trying to
28:07
Speaker 2: find that everywhere on, covering every rock, every stone, every pebble,
28:11
Speaker 2: every grade of sand, to find out where the phobia
28:13
Speaker 2: or racism was, or at least the next one. It
28:18
Speaker 2: was always, I mean, that is what it is. It
28:20
Speaker 2: didn't shift into being toxic. It is fundamentally toxic. It
28:24
Speaker 2: woke does what woke is.
28:28
Speaker 8: Let's continue getting woke, lunacy and transgender insanity the hell
28:33
Speaker 8: out of our government.
28:34
Speaker 7: First, let's clarify AOC didn't invent the term, and there's
28:38
Speaker 7: no official definition. She was quoting a tweet from New
28:41
Speaker 7: York City Councilman Tosa about comments he met back in
28:45
Speaker 7: twenty twenty one that assist white man should not be
28:47
Speaker 7: the next head of the city council. Comments he now
28:50
Speaker 7: sees as woke, won and crazy.
28:53
Speaker 2: See, the thing is, it didn't shift into that. That
28:55
Speaker 2: is wokeism, like that is modern progressivism to modern leftism.
29:03
Speaker 2: Like what else were they going to do? There was nothing.
29:05
Speaker 2: There's no other place to go than that. Right, He's
29:09
Speaker 2: this is what they were being taught in the universities
29:12
Speaker 2: and the colleges for decades already. Again, it's not a
29:16
Speaker 2: shift that just fundamentally what progressivism is, modern leftism. Far love,
29:22
Speaker 2: call it whatever you like, call it woke, but that's
29:24
Speaker 2: what it is. It can't do anything else, and it's
29:28
Speaker 2: not gone anywhere. These people haven't changed their minds. AOC
29:31
Speaker 2: has not changed their.
29:32
Speaker 7: Mind Basically, woke one is being used as a retrospective
29:36
Speaker 7: label for the pandemic times around twenty twenty, when progressive
29:40
Speaker 7: social justice politics became especially prominent for supporters. It was
29:45
Speaker 7: a time for correcting long standing injustices think DEI, hashcheck,
29:50
Speaker 7: me too, and Black Lives Matter protests against police violence
29:53
Speaker 7: after George Floyd's murder. Originally, the term woke emergant Black
29:57
Speaker 7: American communities in the twentieth century, meaning to stay alert
30:01
Speaker 7: to racism, discrimination, and injustice. So how did a civil
30:05
Speaker 7: rights slogan become a political attack line? During wok one,
30:09
Speaker 7: social media turned into a public scholing brun calling out
30:12
Speaker 7: people for using racial slurs, sexual harassment, or insensitivity. Some
30:17
Speaker 7: of the accused lost their jobs or reputations. Critics judged
30:21
Speaker 7: this as overreach. By the twenty twenty four election, that
30:25
Speaker 7: criticism became a political weapon by promising to roll back
30:29
Speaker 7: so called woke policies and put Americans first. Trump and
30:32
Speaker 7: the Mega movement resonated with voters who felt alienated by
30:36
Speaker 7: the Democrats' cultural agenda.
30:38
Speaker 2: That also too, that the Democrats saying that they hated them, right,
30:43
Speaker 2: we just outright saying that they were looking forward to
30:48
Speaker 2: how wonderful it was going to all the demographic changes
30:50
Speaker 2: were going to be. You know, I just generally deconstructing everything,
30:57
Speaker 2: telling them they live in a terrible country, the terrible
31:00
Speaker 2: history and a terrible culture, and it's not going to
31:03
Speaker 2: appeal to everybody, is it. Americans seem a little bit
31:07
Speaker 2: more immune to it than other countries in the West, though,
31:10
Speaker 2: I have to.
31:10
Speaker 7: Say, beglash help propel Trump back into the White House
31:13
Speaker 7: in twenty twenty four. Fast forward to twenty twenty six,
31:17
Speaker 7: and here's where AOC's take on Walk one becomes important.
31:20
Speaker 7: Mid term elections are coming up. There's speculation that she
31:23
Speaker 7: could run for president in twenty twenty eight, and what.
31:27
Speaker 2: We all right, For some reason, Rumble decided to sign
32:45
Speaker 2: me out in the middle of a stream for some reason,
32:49
Speaker 2: everybody still there? Can you guys hear me? Is everybody
32:53
Speaker 2: still there? Can you hear me? All right, I'll have
32:59
Speaker 2: to wait for the delayed catch up. If you're still there.
33:02
Speaker 2: It looks like the kickstream came back on again. Let
33:07
Speaker 2: me check, all right, all right, my apologies. For some reason,
33:19
Speaker 2: Rumble decided to sign me out of the stream, which
33:24
Speaker 2: is kind of amazing and uh but amazingly also we
33:28
Speaker 2: managed to get back in again. So wow, that was
33:31
Speaker 2: not Uh, that was not cool. Man. We've been having
33:35
Speaker 2: some real glitchy stuff going on with Uh, We've have
33:40
Speaker 2: some real glitchy stuff going on with Rumble Studio lately.
33:44
Speaker 2: I think it's like, what three streams in a row? Now,
33:47
Speaker 2: something's going on. Something is going on with Rumble Studio.
33:50
Speaker 2: That's not not not making me happy, I'll tell you.
33:54
Speaker 2: All right, huh okay, there we go. So I was
33:58
Speaker 2: about I'm ready to be honest with you. I was
34:00
Speaker 2: about to just pack it in. I thought, well, if
34:01
Speaker 2: that's it, if they just shut off the stream, now,
34:03
Speaker 2: fuck it. I just I'm done. I'm done, you know
34:06
Speaker 2: tonight dealing with any more of this shit. But yeah, again,
34:11
Speaker 2: there's been nothing but problems with the Rumble studio this week,
34:14
Speaker 2: the last stream the multi streaming didn't work. Before that,
34:17
Speaker 2: the whole Rumble studio was there. I mean, I love Rumble,
34:21
Speaker 2: it's great, but you know, come on, guys, like deal
34:24
Speaker 2: with some of these bugs. It's a problem. RpW says
34:28
Speaker 2: it happens probably Iranian hackers. That was what I thought.
34:32
Speaker 2: That was my first thought. All right, let's go back,
34:35
Speaker 2: let's go back a little bit here and uh, all right,
34:39
Speaker 2: let's go back here. All right, let's start up again.
34:45
Speaker 2: I think we're around here.
34:46
Speaker 7: When it stopped cultural agenda, That backlash helped propel Trump
34:50
Speaker 7: back into the White House in twenty twenty four. Fast
34:53
Speaker 7: forward to twenty twenty six, and here's where AOC's take
34:56
Speaker 7: on Walk one becomes important. Midterm elections are coming up.
35:00
Speaker 7: There speculation that she could run for president in twenty
35:03
Speaker 7: twenty eight and what we are seeing them up.
35:06
Speaker 2: And by the way, if she runs, she's not going
35:08
Speaker 2: to get like ten percent, she'll get around what Kamala got.
35:12
Speaker 2: She could even win. Terrified. I mean, think about that, Kamala, Kamala,
35:17
Speaker 2: you think you just.
35:18
Speaker 9: Fell out of a coconut tree.
35:22
Speaker 2: That woman who was just undemocratically selected by the Democrat
35:28
Speaker 2: establishment who couldn't get through an interview. It was totally unqualified,
35:35
Speaker 2: utterly unqualified. She got like forty percent of the vote.
35:41
Speaker 2: And it's not like it's not like Trump won by
35:43
Speaker 2: fifteen twenty thirty forty points. No, I mean it was
35:47
Speaker 2: still pretty close. Even though he swept the swing states,
35:52
Speaker 2: you know those rest belt states. Still she she was,
35:56
Speaker 2: she was right there, like it's and it's not like
35:58
Speaker 2: he won them by you know a points either, right,
36:02
Speaker 2: So AOC I mean weirder and you know, weirder other
36:09
Speaker 2: tragic events in Western history have happened before. But let's continue. Oh,
36:13
Speaker 2: here's mom Donnie before we listen to him about woke.
36:17
Speaker 2: Let's hear this. So I guess this is when he
36:21
Speaker 2: was a naive young man of like I don't know,
36:24
Speaker 2: like five years ago or something. Let's take a look.
36:27
Speaker 2: What is he saying here?
36:28
Speaker 4: What we believe it, Whether it's BDS right, or whether
36:35
Speaker 4: it's the the end goal of season, the means of.
36:37
Speaker 2: Production and a big Commy smile right there, big evil
36:43
Speaker 2: wolf like commy wolf in sheep's a big wolf in
36:47
Speaker 2: sheep's clothing. Commy smile, right, after that, seizing the means
36:50
Speaker 2: of production, seizing the means of production. Well, again, he's
36:55
Speaker 2: not like fifteen. It's not something he wrote in his call,
36:58
Speaker 2: you know, in his you know great ten yearbook or something, right,
37:02
Speaker 2: grown man, not that long ago. So let's hear what
37:05
Speaker 2: he says here. And by the way, in case you
37:07
Speaker 2: didn't know, all these comedies.
37:09
Speaker 7: Lie progressives trying to distance themselves from ideas pushed during
37:14
Speaker 7: Wok one. Do you think Wok one was crazy?
37:20
Speaker 2: Look?
37:20
Speaker 1: I think that each person has a responsibility to tell
37:26
Speaker 1: New Yorkers, to tell Americans when they're running for office,
37:28
Speaker 1: what they believe.
37:30
Speaker 2: You mean, like this.
37:32
Speaker 4: Where we firmly believe in whether it's BDS right or
37:37
Speaker 4: whether it's the end goal of seasonal means of production.
37:41
Speaker 2: Like that you mean, because don't tell us you don't
37:43
Speaker 2: believe that anymore. We don't believe you.
37:46
Speaker 1: And sometimes what you believe can change, it can develop,
37:50
Speaker 1: it can grow.
37:51
Speaker 7: But this doesn't necessarily mean the left is moving to
37:53
Speaker 7: the center. Recent primaries show progresses from Mandonibeck candidates in
37:57
Speaker 7: New York to absolute cy Eden Michigan, still winning, but
38:01
Speaker 7: with a focus on affordability and access to healthcare. Over
38:04
Speaker 7: cultural issues. So whether the reckoning with woque one is
38:08
Speaker 7: actually an idea.
38:09
Speaker 2: Have been saying for ages wok hasn't gone anywhere. It's
38:12
Speaker 2: still there in the places where it's gone more quiet.
38:15
Speaker 2: They are just reassembling. They are just reorganizing for the
38:19
Speaker 2: next assault on sanity.
38:21
Speaker 7: Iological shift or new political strategy is up for debate,
38:25
Speaker 7: but it's clear with key elections coming up, progressives are
38:28
Speaker 7: trying to change the conversation.
38:31
Speaker 3: Yeah.
38:32
Speaker 2: Look, the DSA people, most of them are just openly communists.
38:37
Speaker 2: They call themselves socialists, but they're just openly communists, you know.
38:41
Speaker 2: And the Soviets called themselves socialists too, and that's a
38:45
Speaker 2: third of the Democrat Party now. So yeah, woke too,
38:50
Speaker 2: not looking forward to it. It's gotta be much worse.
38:53
Speaker 2: They're gonna lie a little bit. The aocs will lie,
38:56
Speaker 2: but the rest of the dsay they're not actually really
38:59
Speaker 2: hiding it. Uh. I guess it just comes down to
39:07
Speaker 2: nothing good can come from ever listening to idiots like this.
39:11
Speaker 2: I guess that's what it comes down to, all right,
39:16
Speaker 2: Should I even do? Should I? Should I try and
39:18
Speaker 2: do an arid a rumble? Wallet? Adreed? I like that.
39:22
Speaker 2: I like it when people give me their tether crypto stuff.
39:25
Speaker 2: That's awesome, all right, people, We hear a lot about crypto,
39:30
Speaker 2: but here's the part that most people miss. Crypto was
39:32
Speaker 2: created so you could actually own and control your money,
39:38
Speaker 2: keep it away from those damn commies. After the two
39:41
Speaker 2: thousand and eight financial crisis. Bitcoin was designed as an
39:45
Speaker 2: alternative to banks. So instead of a bank holding your money,
39:48
Speaker 2: delaying transfers, or limiting access, your in control the way
39:53
Speaker 2: it ought to be. And if you've ever had to
39:56
Speaker 2: wait for a transfer to clear, I know you, guys,
39:58
Speaker 2: I know you guys. Have you felt that problem? Now
40:02
Speaker 2: fast forward to today. Everyone's heard a crypto, but getting
40:06
Speaker 2: started still feels a little complicated. Tell me about it, brother.
40:11
Speaker 2: That's exactly why I use Rumble wallet. It takes all
40:16
Speaker 2: that complexity and makes it simple, so so simple, which
40:19
Speaker 2: is the best way choose what you want Bitcoin, dollar
40:23
Speaker 2: backstable coins or even digital gold backed by real, real
40:27
Speaker 2: precious gold. No complicated setup, which is the best way
40:32
Speaker 2: to set up in the not complicated way. It connects
40:35
Speaker 2: with the Moon Bay, which I believe is in the sky,
40:38
Speaker 2: so you know it's good. So you can use your
40:40
Speaker 2: credit card, your debit card or bank and be up
40:44
Speaker 2: and running in minutes, which everybody knows is the best
40:48
Speaker 2: way to be up and running. Once you're set up,
40:51
Speaker 2: you can even support your favorite Rumble creators like me directly. Really,
40:56
Speaker 2: you should do that immediately. So do this now. Scan
41:00
Speaker 2: the QR code or click the link in the description
41:04
Speaker 2: and download a Rumble wallet. From there, you can set
41:08
Speaker 2: up your wallet tap by, and you, my friend, are
41:12
Speaker 2: in the game, which is the best way to be
41:15
Speaker 2: regarding the game. In just a few minutes, you can
41:19
Speaker 2: go from hearing about crypto to actually owning some you
41:22
Speaker 2: know what to do, all right, nailed it, nailed it again.
41:32
Speaker 2: I can't take all the credit. That is beautiful copy,
41:35
Speaker 2: beautifully written copy. It's perfect. I mean I got a
41:38
Speaker 2: few ad libs in there. We got to maybe a
41:39
Speaker 2: bit of comy hate or something, but it's beautiful. I mean,
41:43
Speaker 2: they just laid it out on a silver platyform me, folks,
41:45
Speaker 2: And that's why I and you at home, I know,
41:49
Speaker 2: felt the power of Rumble Wallet. There coursing through our veins,
41:53
Speaker 2: coursing through our blood, hitting our freaking brains like a hurricane.
42:00
Speaker 2: Was born for this, folks, Born to read the rumble
42:02
Speaker 2: Wallet add and nothing else. But I gotta do something
42:07
Speaker 2: with my time. Let's see RpW says Nick Shirley and
42:13
Speaker 2: James O'Keeffe are showing how democrats cheat and one registered
42:17
Speaker 2: voter can vouch for eight unregistered voters. I know we
42:21
Speaker 2: showed that on the show. Actually, I guess maybe I
42:24
Speaker 2: missed that because you didn't watch every second of every
42:26
Speaker 2: live stream, which is unforgivable. But we have covered that.
42:29
Speaker 2: Let's see.
42:31
Speaker 3: Uh.
42:32
Speaker 2: G Flood says, and now you do in. G Flood
42:35
Speaker 2: says nice comedy hate, nice coming hate. You are so welcome,
42:39
Speaker 2: Rosie says, rumble wallet ad read very professional, not enough
42:43
Speaker 2: comedy hate. Well it was limited with the commy hate.
42:47
Speaker 2: I will say you got the job then got fired
42:50
Speaker 2: for being two comedy seven point nine out of ten. Well,
42:54
Speaker 2: thankfully seven point nine out of ten. And I'm no biologist,
42:57
Speaker 2: but I do believe that's the most you can get
43:00
Speaker 2: out of ten. Chief Flt says not hiding it will
43:11
Speaker 2: define woke too. It's getting more extreme. It's a thing.
43:17
Speaker 2: Uh let's see. I Flett says. Woke two will make
43:21
Speaker 2: woke one look tame yep uh Avanta says Democrats could
43:30
Speaker 2: cheat anyone in I mean, Biden got eighty one million votes.
43:34
Speaker 2: The good thing is that Trump administration has dealt with
43:37
Speaker 2: some of the issues as an around you know, voter
43:43
Speaker 2: and some states have dealt with the issues are on
43:45
Speaker 2: like voter ID and the mail in ballots and all
43:47
Speaker 2: of that and chain of custody. RpW says Dems for cheating.
43:53
Speaker 2: She didn't really get forty, but I mean, how much
43:57
Speaker 2: was the cheat? So say the cheating was, you know,
44:00
Speaker 2: three percent would be a lot of cheating. That's a
44:03
Speaker 2: lot of votes, right, and then you add on to
44:08
Speaker 2: what they probably did already, which is like a couple percent.
44:11
Speaker 2: So I mean, so, I mean, look, either way, she'd
44:13
Speaker 2: be well into the forties, which is terrifying. All right,
44:22
Speaker 2: let's move on. What have we got next? We're forty
44:24
Speaker 2: six minutes and already god damn it, goddamn it. Let's
44:30
Speaker 2: see already a right where we go next? All right?
44:35
Speaker 2: So I wanted to show you this old clip, which
44:38
Speaker 2: I think is twenty years old for Ricky Gervais, but
44:42
Speaker 2: it's relevant in the context of what the UK Home
44:46
Speaker 2: Office has just put out. This pamphlet they've put out
44:49
Speaker 2: that tells illegal migrants not two rape women and not
44:54
Speaker 2: two rape children, not to like hit or kick their partner,
44:58
Speaker 2: not to control it over the way. I mean, the
45:00
Speaker 2: real big ones here are the two top ones which
45:04
Speaker 2: nobody should be well, nobody you want in your country
45:07
Speaker 2: should need to be told not to do that. Okay,
45:11
Speaker 2: you can see here this pamphlet for the newcomers, the
45:14
Speaker 2: people illegally storming their beaches that immediately go onto benefits
45:18
Speaker 2: and have to be supported by British taxpayers. Always make
45:22
Speaker 2: sure the other person freely and clearly agrees to sex
45:25
Speaker 2: or sexual contact. And never use threat, force or pressure
45:29
Speaker 2: to make someone have sex. Never tried to have sex
45:32
Speaker 2: with someone who was a sleep drunker and able to
45:34
Speaker 2: consent nearby. Stop if they say no or change their mind.
45:38
Speaker 2: You shouldn't need to be told this. In the UK,
45:42
Speaker 2: the law is clear and strict. Both people. Both people
45:45
Speaker 2: must agree to sex or sexual contact of any kind.
45:50
Speaker 2: I again, you shouldn't have to tell people this. If
45:55
Speaker 2: you know there's a group that you have to print
45:57
Speaker 2: this out for because they don't know this. The easy
46:00
Speaker 2: solution is don't let them in, like protect your own people.
46:05
Speaker 2: If you're like, this is evidence that they know what's
46:10
Speaker 2: going to happen when these people get to the UK.
46:13
Speaker 2: Not every single one of them obviously, but so what
46:17
Speaker 2: this is evidence that they know they're predicting this. Why
46:21
Speaker 2: not just say no to them? Anyway? The Heartland's Tribune
46:29
Speaker 2: posted this, It really doesn't matter whether you belong to
46:32
Speaker 2: the left tribe or right tribe. We are at the
46:34
Speaker 2: point Ricky Gervais called twenty years ago, let's take a look.
46:44
Speaker 10: What sort of society has to remind someone not to rape?
46:51
Speaker 10: Was that people going just ofout raping ma'am?
46:57
Speaker 2: Oh no?
46:58
Speaker 10: Remember remember the advert well you can't ripe I can't
47:08
Speaker 10: what you can't ripe?
47:11
Speaker 2: I can't?
47:12
Speaker 10: What it was the idea was that campaign going We've
47:19
Speaker 10: got to remind him? Was there people in court? Were
47:21
Speaker 10: the judge going, why did you rape her?
47:23
Speaker 2: I forgot.
47:25
Speaker 3: You?
47:25
Speaker 2: Forget your head?
47:26
Speaker 10: Who wasn't screwed on? Get out of your scamp?
47:30
Speaker 2: What sort of yes? What sort of society? That's a
47:33
Speaker 2: really interesting question, isn't it. What sort of society do
47:38
Speaker 2: you have to.
47:41
Speaker 3: In?
47:41
Speaker 2: What sort in what sort of society do you have
47:43
Speaker 2: to print up pamphlets to in? What sort of society
47:46
Speaker 2: do you have to print up pamphlets to tell people
47:49
Speaker 2: who are legally that you're allowing to illegally into your
47:52
Speaker 2: into your country at to not rape. And I'm guessing
47:56
Speaker 2: that this isn't even just for them. This is going
47:59
Speaker 2: to be for or they're legal immigrants as well. It
48:05
Speaker 2: makes no sense. It's this is the definition of suicidal
48:08
Speaker 2: empathy right here. All right, let's get back to the
48:11
Speaker 2: chat for a minute. RpW says, three percent is nothing
48:16
Speaker 2: for Democrats. They got Brandon eighty one billion votes out
48:19
Speaker 2: of thin air. That was a special circumstance though, right
48:24
Speaker 2: with the universal malee in voting, these massive amounts of
48:28
Speaker 2: malee in voting, it made it possible for them to
48:31
Speaker 2: just drop these huge vote dumps. So you're ninety nine
48:36
Speaker 2: for Biden in the middle of the night. Let's see,
48:49
Speaker 2: Rosie says Richie, we need upgraded March Princess Polodi set
48:53
Speaker 2: RB shirt dark chocolate Editiara. I think that would be
48:57
Speaker 2: very fun. You could have a couple of versions, one
48:59
Speaker 2: with Smith and Wesson, one without. I'll get right on it.
49:05
Speaker 2: I'll get right on it. Let's see. Let's see, uh,
49:12
Speaker 2: Rosie says, was there comby hate? There was I missed.
49:15
Speaker 2: It must have been too outraged at the fake folks.
49:20
Speaker 3: Uh.
49:20
Speaker 2: Devanta says, yeahk Cobby hate went right over my head.
49:22
Speaker 2: I guess well, you need to pay more attention then,
49:24
Speaker 2: don't you. All right, let's move on to the next sag.
49:28
Speaker 2: What do we got that? Was there anything else from
49:33
Speaker 2: the UK here first? Though? That we haven't? Okay, all right,
49:39
Speaker 2: let's move on to the US Canada trade deal. That's
49:43
Speaker 2: just completely fallen apart. That was a targeted deal, by
49:46
Speaker 2: the way, It's not the larger US mc A or
49:50
Speaker 2: KUZMA as you call it in Canada deal, but it's
49:52
Speaker 2: falling apart, and immediately the cheerleading for Cardia's begun in
50:00
Speaker 2: the media. I am very suspicious about this. The claims
50:04
Speaker 2: have been made on both sides that both sides had
50:08
Speaker 2: major changes right at the end. I don't doubt that
50:11
Speaker 2: there were changes and adjustments right up till the end
50:14
Speaker 2: on both sides, because that's how these things normally work out.
50:18
Speaker 2: But the United States is being much more open about
50:24
Speaker 2: the terms of the deal, whereas while there is total
50:27
Speaker 2: opacity almost on the Canadian side, which is normal for
50:31
Speaker 2: the currenty Liberal party, they are not transparent on anything
50:36
Speaker 2: and this is no exception, which makes me very suspicious.
50:40
Speaker 2: Food professor posted this important information is emerging from the
50:44
Speaker 2: American sources about the failed candidate US deal. Washington apparently
50:50
Speaker 2: sought restrictions on Canada's future trade agreements, likely aimed at China,
50:55
Speaker 2: and changes affecting Quebec's French language commercial rules, but no
51:01
Speaker 2: draft text has been released. Now there is a part
51:05
Speaker 2: a segment of the Kuzma, the USMCA deal, which does
51:09
Speaker 2: deal with trade restrictions on outside trading partners. It's really
51:15
Speaker 2: aimed at China, which would not go over well with Karney,
51:19
Speaker 2: who's absolutely in bed with China, who made the quite
51:24
Speaker 2: frankly disastrous choice to allow Chinese evs and to Canada's
51:29
Speaker 2: already beleaguered auto market. The man who went to Beijing
51:34
Speaker 2: and sat down with Chinese officials and on camera said
51:39
Speaker 2: that he said that he's Canada's part of the New
51:44
Speaker 2: World Order. Obviously, nobody in that room would have thought
51:48
Speaker 2: it was a Canadian led New World Order. They would
51:50
Speaker 2: think it was a Chinese led New World Order. Obviously
51:56
Speaker 2: that would be a major problem for Carney. Claims that
52:01
Speaker 2: the US wanted to prohibit all Canadian trade deals or
52:05
Speaker 2: eliminate French labels entirely remain unverified. Ottawa should release the
52:11
Speaker 2: proposed terms. Canadians deserve to know exactly what Washington demanded
52:16
Speaker 2: and what it offered in return. There's no reason not
52:19
Speaker 2: to know because the deals dead. Carni walked away from it,
52:23
Speaker 2: so there was no There is no reason not to
52:26
Speaker 2: release those terms. The Canadian people should see this. They
52:30
Speaker 2: should see what they should see. What kind of negotiator
52:34
Speaker 2: Mark Carnei really is not what Rosemary Barton's teleprompter told
52:39
Speaker 2: us he was. But what kind of negotiator he really is?
52:42
Speaker 2: What the terms really were? Again, we're getting basically nothing
52:46
Speaker 2: from him. We're getting far more. We have to learn
52:48
Speaker 2: about it through American sources, but it needs to be verified.
52:53
Speaker 2: It needs to be made clear that's not happening here.
53:03
Speaker 2: From Terry Glavin, skepticism about anything the American President says
53:07
Speaker 2: out loud is not Trump derangement syndrome. And I agree
53:11
Speaker 2: and I think that, and I know that Trump's supporters
53:14
Speaker 2: in the United States take what he says with a
53:17
Speaker 2: grain of salt. They understand that it's politics and it's
53:21
Speaker 2: not unpatriotic for Canadians. To be skeptical about the way
53:25
Speaker 2: Prime Minister Carney has explained the war we've just entered.
53:30
Speaker 2: Be careful what you're led to believe. Yes, one hundred percent,
53:35
Speaker 2: a trade war with the United States is obviously disastrous
53:40
Speaker 2: or Canada. The American economy is ten times bigger than Canada's.
53:44
Speaker 2: It's not a war we can win. It's just foolishness.
53:50
Speaker 2: Zero head says, did Canada just sign its own economic
53:53
Speaker 2: death warrant? Yeah, Resmussen reports, and they're quoting here from
54:00
Speaker 2: a New York Times report. I believe quote the US
54:05
Speaker 2: offer included a reduction on tariffs on steel from fifty
54:09
Speaker 2: percent to twenty five percent, so just taking us back
54:12
Speaker 2: a year and a half to what it was because
54:14
Speaker 2: Cardi made everything worse. Obviously, a reduction on Canadian autos
54:18
Speaker 2: from twenty five percent to fifteen percent. I'm seeing reports
54:22
Speaker 2: now that it was down to seven percent. But again,
54:27
Speaker 2: we need the details released by our own government. A
54:31
Speaker 2: removal of the ten percent tariff on Canadian lumber, and
54:34
Speaker 2: cooperation on numerous other measures representing the best deal offered
54:39
Speaker 2: in comparison to any other country which relies on heavily
54:43
Speaker 2: US markets, relies heavily on US markets. Now, the if
54:47
Speaker 2: that's true, removal of the ten percent tariff on Canadian lumber,
54:50
Speaker 2: that's a tariff's on soft wood lumber. That would have
54:54
Speaker 2: been a godsend for British Columbia. But British Columbia the
54:59
Speaker 2: West in general doesn't matter to Ottawa, which is where
55:02
Speaker 2: Mark Carnea is, so he would easily just throw that
55:06
Speaker 2: away right as being totally unimportant, even though it's very important.
55:12
Speaker 2: Carneia abruptly ordered negotiations to walk away, claiming the deal
55:16
Speaker 2: was not good enough, and declared further retaliation against the US.
55:21
Speaker 2: There is nothing productive that can come of this, like
55:24
Speaker 2: there is nothing good. The longer this goes on, the
55:27
Speaker 2: more it hurts Canada. The United States, with its giant
55:31
Speaker 2: economy and large population, can handle it can shrug off
55:35
Speaker 2: Canadian tariffs. Canada can't shrug off tariffs, which are essentially
55:44
Speaker 2: added costs. It's actually essentially a tax on Canadians right
55:50
Speaker 2: with our crumbling economy, Canada can't. It's going to just
55:53
Speaker 2: hurt Canada. It's going to hurt Canada far more than
55:57
Speaker 2: it's going to hurt the United States. It's just count
56:00
Speaker 2: productive and dumb. Around seventy eight percent of all Canadian
56:04
Speaker 2: exports rely on US consumer markets. These goods and these
56:10
Speaker 2: goods and resources only make up about thirteen percent of
56:13
Speaker 2: all US imports. Again, the United States can shrug it off.
56:15
Speaker 2: Canada is going to feel the pain, and it's pain
56:18
Speaker 2: that's really inflicted on is by our own government because
56:21
Speaker 2: they're the ones setting these retaliatory tariffs. Meanwhile, around fifteen
56:26
Speaker 2: percent of US exports go to Canada. The US exports
56:29
Speaker 2: make up eleven percent of total GDP, and Canada exports
56:32
Speaker 2: make up thirty three percent of GDP. This is not
56:35
Speaker 2: going to end well. Mark Carney does not care about
56:38
Speaker 2: Canada table salt. This is from the New York Times
56:44
Speaker 2: article just In Greer reveals that the New York Times.
56:48
Speaker 2: Greer reveals to the New York Times the details of
56:51
Speaker 2: the trade deal Carney rejected. Canada was offered the most
56:55
Speaker 2: preferential treatment in the world, reduced tariffs on steel aluminum
57:00
Speaker 2: autos at seven percent. If that is true, seven percent,
57:04
Speaker 2: that's I mean that there's that is that is the
57:09
Speaker 2: solution for the Canadian auto industry, or at least it
57:13
Speaker 2: helps right, that doesn't kill the Canadian auto industry. Seven percent,
57:19
Speaker 2: the elimination of ten percent lumber tariff. And also keep
57:23
Speaker 2: in mind autos at seven percent, that's just on non
57:26
Speaker 2: American parts. That's not the whole car The elimination of
57:30
Speaker 2: ten percent lumber tariff. That would be huge for Western Canada,
57:34
Speaker 2: for British Columbia, but again politically not important federally for
57:40
Speaker 2: Mark Kearney. So yeah, he'd think nothing of just throwing
57:44
Speaker 2: that away. That's not gonna help him. Let's see socialism
57:50
Speaker 2: sux post of this marquee, this trade deal is unacceptable
57:53
Speaker 2: to China. Pull the plug now. I don't think he'd
57:58
Speaker 2: be glum. I think he'd happily do it. Happily do it.
58:01
Speaker 2: I think that the Canada's collusion with China Canada's collusion.
58:07
Speaker 2: It's its allowance of Chinese interference into Canada's democracy for
58:15
Speaker 2: the benefit of the Liberal Party and for Mark Karney.
58:17
Speaker 2: Let's not forget they interfered even in the Liberal leadership
58:22
Speaker 2: leadership race which saw Mark Carney become king. They have
58:26
Speaker 2: they have interfered in what the last at least four
58:29
Speaker 2: federal elections in Canada, not to mention provincial They've got
58:33
Speaker 2: secret police stations all over the place they have infiltrated.
58:37
Speaker 2: We're full of Chinese criminal gangs. M The Liberal parties
58:45
Speaker 2: fine with it because they benefit, they benefit from the interference.
58:51
Speaker 2: Uh So again, I want to see the details the
58:56
Speaker 2: terms that were rejected by Carney. I have a big
58:59
Speaker 2: feeling it was the United States wanting a more united
59:05
Speaker 2: front on China and that would probably include not allowing
59:11
Speaker 2: tens of thousands of Chinese electric exploding spy cars into
59:15
Speaker 2: the country. If he scuttled the deal for that, that
59:20
Speaker 2: is a disgrace. Wealth Moose posted this, This is the
59:25
Speaker 2: part Canadians need to pay attention to. Let's take a look.
59:31
Speaker 2: And by the way, look I've run out of patience
59:34
Speaker 2: with Mark Caarty entirely. There was eight months where the
59:38
Speaker 2: Canadian side just did nothing. That doesn't seem like the
59:42
Speaker 2: wartime prime minister that Mark Carney told his told us
59:47
Speaker 2: this was that this was the you know, the greatest
59:49
Speaker 2: challenge in threats to Canada since World War Two. He
59:52
Speaker 2: hasn't been acting like it. I mean, in the week
59:54
Speaker 2: leading up to this deal being finalized, he was on
59:57
Speaker 2: vacation in Italy. So some doesn't add up With Carnie.
1:00:01
Speaker 2: It almost feels like he's intentionally sabotaging this for his
1:00:05
Speaker 2: own purposes.
1:00:08
Speaker 6: Canada declined to finalize the trade deal under the terms
1:00:11
Speaker 6: agreed earlier this week, despite the US offer to Canada
1:00:16
Speaker 6: to receive the best treatment of any major export to
1:00:19
Speaker 6: our market. New demands and walk backs of other commitments
1:00:22
Speaker 6: by Canada have upended the careful balance reached in the
1:00:25
Speaker 6: past days. Canada declined to finalize the trade deal under
1:00:30
Speaker 6: the terms agreed earlier this week, despite the US offer
1:00:35
Speaker 6: to Canada to receive the best treatment of any major
1:00:38
Speaker 6: export to our market. New demands and walk backs of
1:00:41
Speaker 6: other commitments by Canada have upended the careful balance reached
1:00:45
Speaker 6: in the past days.
1:00:47
Speaker 2: Now do I take everything that he says with a
1:00:50
Speaker 2: grain of salt? Yes, of course, anybody should. But show
1:00:54
Speaker 2: us the actual details are Carnee, Liberal Party of Canada, Right,
1:00:59
Speaker 2: this can all be settled. It's gonna all be settled.
1:01:08
Speaker 2: Let's see common sense prevails. Posted this. But sir, that's
1:01:12
Speaker 2: not what CBC says. It's Trump's fault. Yeah, anything bad
1:01:15
Speaker 2: happening in Canada is all Donald Trump's fault. Because the
1:01:19
Speaker 2: CBC told me so that this is This isn't exaggeration,
1:01:25
Speaker 2: This is literally tens This is I don't know what
1:01:29
Speaker 2: twenty million Canadians are him with the finger up the
1:01:32
Speaker 2: nose depressing. Where's Elijah posted this? Carni stated there were
1:01:40
Speaker 2: three last minute changes that the US had asked for
1:01:43
Speaker 2: which led to the breakdown of negotiations. Well, let's take
1:01:46
Speaker 2: a look.
1:01:48
Speaker 9: The government isn't gonna like that. I made this video
1:01:50
Speaker 9: and you're gonna see why a second watch this.
1:01:54
Speaker 11: US introduced at the last hours, in the last hours,
1:01:58
Speaker 11: efforts to restrict our ability to have other trade deals.
1:02:01
Speaker 9: Interesting, did they really put that in at the last minute?
1:02:04
Speaker 9: Because under Article thirty two to ten in Kuzma, it
1:02:07
Speaker 9: clearly states the rules very strict rules for members looking
1:02:11
Speaker 9: to negotiate a free trade agreement with non market economies
1:02:15
Speaker 9: i e. China.
1:02:17
Speaker 2: Yeah, I think it's widely understood this is targeted at China.
1:02:21
Speaker 9: And it clearly states that if a Kuzma partner signs
1:02:24
Speaker 9: a free trade agreement with a non market country, the
1:02:28
Speaker 9: other partners are permitted to leave Kuzma with six months
1:02:31
Speaker 9: notice and replace it with a separate bilateral agreement. And
1:02:35
Speaker 9: if we're being honest, the US is worried about China
1:02:38
Speaker 9: because they put a report that shows that dozens of countries,
1:02:40
Speaker 9: including Canada, helped China dodge Trump's tariffs. And it wasn't
1:02:45
Speaker 9: just the US saying this. The Canadian Steel Producers Association
1:02:48
Speaker 9: literally said the same thing, that Canada must not become
1:02:51
Speaker 9: the dumping ground for excess steel and aluminum.
1:02:54
Speaker 2: And get so if this is the case, and it
1:02:57
Speaker 2: seems very plausibly so right, it's actually all very reasonable,
1:03:01
Speaker 2: isn't it. And again, this is something that has been
1:03:04
Speaker 2: dealt with in the KUSMA or the US USMCA deal itself.
1:03:10
Speaker 2: This isn't like out of left field.
1:03:13
Speaker 9: That's where they said. That's coming from China. And to
1:03:16
Speaker 9: be specific, they clearly stated that there needs to be
1:03:19
Speaker 9: a potential policy response, including tariffs against Chinese trade practices
1:03:24
Speaker 9: in electric vehicles and its supply chain. And here's the
1:03:28
Speaker 9: crazy part. They want Canada. Look at the last line
1:03:32
Speaker 9: right above where it says Canada must issue a tariff
1:03:35
Speaker 9: package that's fully aligned in scope and quantum with final
1:03:40
Speaker 9: US Section three oh one tariffs. This is in America
1:03:44
Speaker 9: asking for this. This is the Canadian Steel Producers Association.
1:03:48
Speaker 2: This is why independent media in Canada is so important,
1:03:51
Speaker 2: because this will not be in the CTV Nightly News
1:03:55
Speaker 2: are global certainly not on the CBC right. They want
1:04:00
Speaker 2: Canadians ignorant and naive and stupid and willing to just
1:04:05
Speaker 2: eat whatever crap comes out of there at teleprompters. Let's continue,
1:04:12
Speaker 2: all right, Let's hear it from the technocrat horse's mouth
1:04:16
Speaker 2: himself here, CBC watcher, curious carni play. He frames us
1:04:21
Speaker 2: demands for alignments on terraces with third countries, steal aluminum derivatives,
1:04:25
Speaker 2: and any language restricting Canada's ability to cut independent trade
1:04:29
Speaker 2: deals as a novel power play, a trampo sovereignty. But again,
1:04:34
Speaker 2: this is all stuff that has been dealt with in
1:04:37
Speaker 2: the USMCA. This isn't weird, this isn't crazy, this isn't
1:04:42
Speaker 2: erratic behavior. This is normal.
1:04:46
Speaker 11: Always resisted, as I said in my remarks, and always
1:04:48
Speaker 11: will be resisted, efforts to restrict our protections of our language,
1:04:56
Speaker 11: our culture.
1:04:57
Speaker 2: That's clearly not true though, right now, what is but
1:05:00
Speaker 2: our language and our culture? Hold on a second, let's
1:05:03
Speaker 2: go back there for a second. I want to rewatch.
1:05:05
Speaker 11: That's always resisted, as I said in my remarks, and
1:05:09
Speaker 11: always will be resisted, efforts to restrict our protections of
1:05:15
Speaker 11: our language, our culture, and in effect our sovereignty.
1:05:19
Speaker 2: What does that mean though, exactly? Please release the details
1:05:24
Speaker 2: so we know exactly what you mean. Is it about
1:05:27
Speaker 2: French language packaging? Is that what it's about? I mean,
1:05:30
Speaker 2: we want to know. Tell us what that means, because
1:05:32
Speaker 2: that sounds very kind of scary, anonymous, and they're trying
1:05:35
Speaker 2: to destroy our culture. Well, what is it actually? Though?
1:05:40
Speaker 2: I get guaranteed there is zero chance he is transparent
1:05:44
Speaker 2: with the Canadian people, but you should be. I mean,
1:05:47
Speaker 2: for God's sake, that's the responsible thing to do if
1:05:50
Speaker 2: you care about Canada.
1:05:52
Speaker 11: So elements coming in, ramping up, any of them individually,
1:05:57
Speaker 11: but collectively put us in a position where what had
1:06:03
Speaker 11: been on a trajectory apps in those elements for a
1:06:07
Speaker 11: fair deal, a good deal for Canadian It's not perfect,
1:06:10
Speaker 11: but a good deal a deal we would not.
1:06:12
Speaker 2: Accept were they again. We want to see the details
1:06:17
Speaker 2: what actually happened in these negotiations, some transparency, please, I
1:06:21
Speaker 2: don't just take your word.
1:06:23
Speaker 3: For it, okay.
1:06:24
Speaker 1: So, CD was Howard Lutnik's involvement in the last days
1:06:28
Speaker 1: an impediment to getting a deal?
1:06:30
Speaker 11: It's a question for the US administration Ultimately, ultimately, I'm
1:06:35
Speaker 11: responsible for the decisions of the Canadian government. We take
1:06:38
Speaker 11: it as a cabinet, but I certainly bear those responsibilities.
1:06:43
Speaker 11: And so the head of the US administration, the President,
1:06:45
Speaker 11: bears responsibility for the decisions they take. But I will
1:06:49
Speaker 11: say this, which is that the Canadian team Unified Unified,
1:06:56
Speaker 11: the individuals you see here, their team members are in Bass,
1:07:00
Speaker 11: are in Washington, my chief of staff of Unified talking together,
1:07:05
Speaker 11: the Clerk of the Privy Council, everyone in the loop.
1:07:08
Speaker 11: Everyone knows what our objectives are collective decision making.
1:07:12
Speaker 2: As I say, well, it looks like the directive is
1:07:14
Speaker 2: to just simply sabotage the deal for your personal gain, right,
1:07:19
Speaker 2: for political gain. Right, you're looking at the polls. You
1:07:23
Speaker 2: need a little bit of a bubb it's gone down
1:07:24
Speaker 2: a little bit your popularity. This stuff plays well. I
1:07:28
Speaker 2: mean it the stuff that, the garbage that comes out
1:07:31
Speaker 2: of the CBC, the Global News, the CTV teleprompters plays
1:07:36
Speaker 2: well with the Canadian people for some reason. I guess
1:07:38
Speaker 2: it's I guess maybe Canadians are the most ignorant electorate
1:07:43
Speaker 2: in the Western world. Possibly maybe it's that, But anyway,
1:07:48
Speaker 2: let's continue.
1:07:49
Speaker 11: They Ultimately, I in the cabinet bear responsibility for those decisions.
1:07:52
Speaker 2: But unity.
1:07:54
Speaker 11: You cannot say that about the United States administration.
1:07:57
Speaker 2: Unity and just political ambition.
1:08:00
Speaker 3: Is that it?
1:08:01
Speaker 11: And as a consequence, last point, go to your colleagues,
1:08:07
Speaker 11: and I think this is important in these subs. In
1:08:10
Speaker 11: these last few days, we were drilling down on specific
1:08:14
Speaker 11: issues where that might have been papered over the differences
1:08:19
Speaker 11: in the administration if there were indeed differences. Ultimately there's
1:08:22
Speaker 11: a decision maker at the top, and in drilling down
1:08:25
Speaker 11: on those a number of those issues that I just
1:08:28
Speaker 11: referenced became very clear and there was not a deal
1:08:32
Speaker 11: that we would.
1:08:33
Speaker 2: Well like what not becoming a vassal state of China?
1:08:36
Speaker 2: How about that? Is that one of them? I mean?
1:08:39
Speaker 2: What is it? Exactly right? Is it your censorship and
1:08:46
Speaker 2: media control legislation? Is it Bill C eleven? Is it
1:08:50
Speaker 2: Bill C eighteen the Online Streaming Act, which allows the
1:08:53
Speaker 2: CRTC in Canada to mess with the algorithm to the
1:08:57
Speaker 2: benefit of social media, the algorithms to the benefit of
1:09:01
Speaker 2: the Liberal Party? Is it Bill C eighteen which prevents
1:09:06
Speaker 2: which is which? Is it Bill C eighteen the Online
1:09:09
Speaker 2: News Act, which was an attempt to extort money from
1:09:12
Speaker 2: American social media companies to force them to pay to
1:09:16
Speaker 2: have Canadian news on them, which is why you can't
1:09:19
Speaker 2: get Canadian news on any metaproduct Facebook, Instagram. By the way,
1:09:24
Speaker 2: about one hundred Canadian independent media outlets went under because
1:09:30
Speaker 2: of that right, which serves the Liberal Party very well,
1:09:33
Speaker 2: because the independents tend to not just be scenographers for
1:09:38
Speaker 2: the PMO. Was that part of it? If that's part
1:09:43
Speaker 2: of it? If the because that has been a bipartisan
1:09:47
Speaker 2: problem for Democrats and Republicans, Biden and Trump. I have
1:09:52
Speaker 2: a feeling that was in there.
1:09:53
Speaker 4: So what.
1:09:55
Speaker 2: Alignment on China, which obviously Carnie's not gonna want because
1:09:59
Speaker 2: he's totally in bed with the Chinese Communist Party. Alignments
1:10:04
Speaker 2: on social media policies, alignment on tech, well, again, Cartie's
1:10:11
Speaker 2: not going to like that because we'll see eleven and
1:10:13
Speaker 2: we'll see eighteen. Help him control the Canadian population and
1:10:17
Speaker 2: what they think. If these are the things that really
1:10:23
Speaker 2: held it up, it's a disgrace. Let's see what else
1:10:28
Speaker 2: do we have here, Elevate Reports says under Article thirty
1:10:40
Speaker 2: two ten of Kuzma, the provision imposes conditions regarding trade
1:10:43
Speaker 2: deals with non market countries. If true, Carne has whipped
1:10:48
Speaker 2: the population into a frenzy over a non issue yet again,
1:10:52
Speaker 2: and Warner is correct to ask the question, well, what's
1:10:55
Speaker 2: the question here? From Mark Warner? The idea that China
1:11:00
Speaker 2: the trade would be at the center of this round
1:11:01
Speaker 2: of trade negotiations with Canada and Mexico is the eleventh
1:11:05
Speaker 2: hour revelation when the US has been telegraphing this with
1:11:09
Speaker 2: neon signs. Since Biden is mystifying aget Biden, the Biden
1:11:13
Speaker 2: administration as well. Our Canadians really serfs who believe Our
1:11:17
Speaker 2: Canadians really serfs who believe anything leaders say. Unfortunately, yes,
1:11:24
Speaker 2: or a large enough portion of them, a majority of them.
1:11:30
Speaker 2: All right, So I want to come back to this
1:11:35
Speaker 2: one point here. Hold on, where is it? Oh let's see,
1:11:42
Speaker 2: hold on, Oh wait a second, what the hell's going on?
1:11:50
Speaker 2: Hold on, give me one second. Something weird happened. Okay,
1:12:02
Speaker 2: on second, and we'll be back up and running. All right,
1:12:13
Speaker 2: all right, So, if the New York Times report from
1:12:18
Speaker 2: Jamison Greer here with information from If the New York
1:12:22
Speaker 2: Times report which is quoting Jamison Greer, is true, that
1:12:28
Speaker 2: you know, reduce tariffs on steel. We reduced to back
1:12:30
Speaker 2: to what they were about a year and a half ago,
1:12:32
Speaker 2: and aluminum, but auto is at seven percent, which that's workable.
1:12:36
Speaker 2: And the elimination of the ten percent lumber tariff if
1:12:40
Speaker 2: that's true. And then the reason this deal was was
1:12:45
Speaker 2: walked away from was ended by Carnie by the Canadian
1:12:49
Speaker 2: government over trade with China and Bill C eleven and
1:12:58
Speaker 2: Bill C eighteen. That's the disgrace. That's almost criminal at
1:13:02
Speaker 2: that point, it's almost criminal. And I think that the
1:13:06
Speaker 2: reason we're not going to get details, that the Charney
1:13:09
Speaker 2: government is going to continue to be totally opaque on
1:13:11
Speaker 2: this is because that's what it is. Right, If they
1:13:15
Speaker 2: really had something that would make them look good, we'd
1:13:20
Speaker 2: see it. We know they'd put it out. There's a
1:13:23
Speaker 2: reason why we're not all right. It's really really depressing. Actually,
1:13:30
Speaker 2: I'm sorry, it's just depressing. Anybody watching on kick right now.
1:13:34
Speaker 2: We've not been there for very long. Please follow. We
1:13:37
Speaker 2: need followers there, subscribers, Please follow. You know what to do,
1:13:40
Speaker 2: same thing on rumbel everywhere else. What are you guys
1:13:43
Speaker 2: talking about? Let's see what are we an hour and fifteen?
1:13:48
Speaker 2: Let's see jj Otto Rosie says, only master negotiator, economic
1:13:53
Speaker 2: genius Mark Karney was able to negotiate no deal. Yeah,
1:13:57
Speaker 2: where the master negotiator? Just no deal? I mean again,
1:14:02
Speaker 2: look for eight months, according to their counterparts in the States,
1:14:06
Speaker 2: Canada did literally nothing nothing. They just weren't a part
1:14:11
Speaker 2: of It. Doesn't sound like they're trying to get a deal.
1:14:15
Speaker 2: It makes me very suspicious of everything that they say.
1:14:20
Speaker 2: Gee Flett says, unity and publicly funded media. That's what
1:14:23
Speaker 2: Mark Kartney's talking about, social cohesion, which means Canadians only
1:14:29
Speaker 2: get approved information. That's what he means by social cohesion
1:14:33
Speaker 2: when he talks about that. Let's see purp, what's going on.
1:14:53
Speaker 2: Let's see, Oh, you're talking about the twenty twenty election. Still,
1:14:58
Speaker 2: let's see flit says sixty nine then sixty million for Obama,
1:15:04
Speaker 2: eighty one million for Biden, almost twenty five percent more
1:15:07
Speaker 2: votes in two thousand and eight because of the mail
1:15:09
Speaker 2: in voting, because of COVID. That's obviously what it was.
1:15:13
Speaker 2: That's why you had these huge vote dumps in the
1:15:15
Speaker 2: middle of the night. They were like ninety eight percent,
1:15:18
Speaker 2: ninety nine percent for Biden. It was obviously totally corrupt obviously.
1:15:23
Speaker 2: I mean, you don't even need to get you know,
1:15:25
Speaker 2: rehash that just clearly. Let's see channel mod castigating Rosie
1:15:36
Speaker 2: all using all caps as shouting and is offensive. Please
1:15:40
Speaker 2: restrict your typing to CamelCase or you will be temporarily bad.
1:15:44
Speaker 2: Channel mod says Channel mod is not an official mood
1:15:48
Speaker 2: of the channel. It has no power to ban anybody.
1:15:50
Speaker 2: Just to be clear here, all right, but thank you
1:15:53
Speaker 2: very much, thank you very much. That chat police. All right,
1:15:59
Speaker 2: you're fine, You're good. RpW says Obama and Soros had
1:16:09
Speaker 2: a secret meeting with Carney. Well, Karney would love he
1:16:12
Speaker 2: loves Soros. Obviously, Karney is counting on Trump losing the midterms.
1:16:17
Speaker 2: Carney shouldn't take advice from Trump's enemies. Carney's ambitions and
1:16:27
Speaker 2: goals are not Canada's. They're Mark Carney's, right, So you
1:16:30
Speaker 2: have to completely separate the idea that he's working for
1:16:34
Speaker 2: Canada's interests. He is not. He's working for his interests.
1:16:37
Speaker 2: His interests are not Canada's interests. And it doesn't matter
1:16:40
Speaker 2: what comes out of Rosemary Barton's teleprompter. That much should
1:16:44
Speaker 2: be clear by now. And also, Mark Carney is a
1:16:49
Speaker 2: inveterate liar. Look even lied about sending moving Brookfield's headquarters
1:16:55
Speaker 2: down to New York. He lied about his personal wealth.
1:17:01
Speaker 2: He said all he had was real estate and cash.
1:17:05
Speaker 2: Just a blatant and obvious lie. I mean, we know
1:17:09
Speaker 2: that he's got all of those deferred stocks with Brookfield
1:17:12
Speaker 2: and also lots and lots of a fortune in stocks,
1:17:16
Speaker 2: ninety one percent of it in the United States. He
1:17:19
Speaker 2: was just lying. He's constantly lying. Well, let's see do
1:17:25
Speaker 2: do do Odawa James says, Mexico is signing. Why not Canada?
1:17:30
Speaker 2: Because Mexico wants the deal? Is why? Briver Burber birch
1:17:43
Speaker 2: Ohawa James says, I trust Jamie said more than Carnie. Well,
1:17:46
Speaker 2: I take anything any of them say with a grain
1:17:49
Speaker 2: of salt. But again, there's an easy solution. Show us
1:17:52
Speaker 2: the actual details that will clear it up. Jj Ottawa says,
1:18:00
Speaker 2: Ary is such a liar. Lied about Gordi Howe Bridge true,
1:18:03
Speaker 2: lied about his asset holdings, Yes, lied about being called
1:18:06
Speaker 2: governor Cardy. Yep, he's lied NonStop ever since he first
1:18:14
Speaker 2: announced for Liberal leadership. The guy's full of shit. Avanta says,
1:18:18
Speaker 2: I agree, Well, let's see no stop talking about updating.
1:18:27
Speaker 2: Stop it, stop at everybody, don't do that here, says
1:18:33
Speaker 2: he's probably trying to hurt Trump before our midterms. Well,
1:18:36
Speaker 2: I think that the narrative is that the Republicans are
1:18:42
Speaker 2: going to get wiped out in the midterms. I'm not
1:18:44
Speaker 2: convinced that that's true at all, but that's just the
1:18:46
Speaker 2: prediction every like every election that Trump's president, right midterm
1:18:51
Speaker 2: president like, that's just their default position. So I'm not
1:18:55
Speaker 2: convinced of that at this point. But yeah, he's probably
1:19:00
Speaker 2: trying to wait out Trump. It won't matter if even
1:19:04
Speaker 2: if he loses the House and the Senate to the midterms,
1:19:07
Speaker 2: it doesn't matter because he's still the Terroristy's using now
1:19:12
Speaker 2: he's he is allowed to use. Let's see it all right.
1:19:31
Speaker 2: Generle Mod says Rosie diagnosing psychiatric disorders without official accreditation
1:19:36
Speaker 2: is a serious offense and may result in a temporary ban. Again,
1:19:41
Speaker 2: I just want to be clear, Gennel Mod is not
1:19:43
Speaker 2: actually an official mod of this genial and has no
1:19:46
Speaker 2: power to ban anybody. Rosie. You're just fine, And I
1:19:51
Speaker 2: personally like it when Rosie diagnoses other people in the
1:19:55
Speaker 2: chats psychiatric disorders, and I believe for on.
1:20:06
Speaker 6: J J.
1:20:06
Speaker 2: Nevada says, Now, this is such an important point. I
1:20:08
Speaker 2: heard true, Jina. They call him to China because he's
1:20:14
Speaker 2: half a bad and he's half of Vagina. It's not nice,
1:20:19
Speaker 2: not nice. Everybody says, it's not a nice thing, not
1:20:21
Speaker 2: a nice thing. I heard true. China updated his ass
1:20:25
Speaker 2: with a plunger. It was there a video of him
1:20:28
Speaker 2: just dancing around with a plunger. So you know where
1:20:31
Speaker 2: that one, you know where that went. Katie helped her that,
1:20:34
Speaker 2: Nevada said, of course she did. I can't wait for
1:20:37
Speaker 2: the tell all book from Katie Katie Perry. You know
1:20:40
Speaker 2: it's coming, you know it's coming. Uh, Nevada says, CARDI
1:20:47
Speaker 2: is China's bitch. Now, look, I mean the man went
1:20:50
Speaker 2: to China and proclaimed China, you know, the the leader
1:20:55
Speaker 2: of the New World Order. Nobody in that room that
1:20:58
Speaker 2: he was in and where Beijing or was confused about
1:21:01
Speaker 2: what he meant when he talked about the New World Order.
1:21:04
Speaker 2: Nobody thought it was that Canadian led New World Order.
1:21:07
Speaker 2: I'll just say that just all. I mean, that should
1:21:10
Speaker 2: have just been the end of him politically. But again,
1:21:14
Speaker 2: I don't have control over the CBC teleprompters. So unfortunately,
1:21:20
Speaker 2: let's see Tramis Eves says, well, damn it, Rosie become
1:21:26
Speaker 2: offensive for the channel mot Now, absolutely not. That's an
1:21:29
Speaker 2: intrinsic important part of this channel. Damnit Rosie. All right,
1:21:34
Speaker 2: I'm gonna take a look at Dreid. See if there's
1:21:37
Speaker 2: an ADREI I want to do. No, no, I've updated
1:21:41
Speaker 2: my terms. I will not read an ad for under
1:21:44
Speaker 2: thirty seven cents. That's us though, So that's still like
1:21:47
Speaker 2: four hundred dollars Canadian. But I will not do it.
1:21:51
Speaker 2: Let's see, I don't come that cheap. Let's see, Ritchie,
1:21:56
Speaker 2: may I borrow the roadcaster for five minutes please? That
1:21:59
Speaker 2: would be impossible. How would we even do that? Rosie?
1:22:03
Speaker 6: What?
1:22:04
Speaker 2: What the hell? What the hell? I want to play
1:22:07
Speaker 2: sound bites, will dedicate them to channel bots, straight to
1:22:10
Speaker 2: jail right away. Also, you could stuff, Oh well, I
1:22:13
Speaker 2: could use it though, is that what you're talking about?
1:22:15
Speaker 2: Channel mod right to Jim right away. But I also
1:22:19
Speaker 2: like Channel MOD. I mean, you gotta have somebody in
1:22:21
Speaker 2: there keeping control, keeping you degenerates under control. Somebody's got
1:22:25
Speaker 2: to watch you, you know. So I don't know, I
1:22:27
Speaker 2: encourage I still encourage that channel mod Let's say, and
1:22:33
Speaker 2: RpW says, being crazy keeps me from going in saying,
1:22:39
Speaker 2: and I think it was like a Joker laugh but
1:22:41
Speaker 2: from like the Good Joker movie. Let's say, uh Ros
1:22:45
Speaker 2: says Richie. Maybe you should do a call in time,
1:22:48
Speaker 2: call in show one time. I've got some whold on
1:22:51
Speaker 2: a second, there's actually some breaking news. Maybe you should
1:22:59
Speaker 2: shut up. Have you ever tried that. I'm not doing that.
1:23:02
Speaker 2: I'd have to. Like you guys know how I feel
1:23:05
Speaker 2: about doing new things. I don't like it, okay, not
1:23:09
Speaker 2: a fan. Don't like the new things, new software and stuff,
1:23:14
Speaker 2: and I gotta figure things out. And then maybe my
1:23:17
Speaker 2: phone maybe just like my phone is ringing and I
1:23:20
Speaker 2: I can do like Bluetooth with the thing. No, I'm
1:23:22
Speaker 2: not doing all that shit, absolutely not. I mean, what
1:23:27
Speaker 2: if I'm in the middle of a stream and my
1:23:29
Speaker 2: phone's connected to the audio interface and then all of
1:23:33
Speaker 2: a sudden, like I get like a phone call from
1:23:36
Speaker 2: like a hooker, I mean like somebody, like like somebody
1:23:39
Speaker 2: does crosswords and something I don't know. But I'm not
1:23:44
Speaker 2: doing that, absolutely not. It's outrageous. It's outrageous that you
1:23:51
Speaker 2: would even suggest that, for God's sakes, mean, what is
1:23:55
Speaker 2: going on here? That Chad is just a freaking jungle
1:23:58
Speaker 2: at this point, I don't know what the hell's going on,
1:24:00
Speaker 2: all these crazy suggestions, crazy suggestions. I'm ready to throw
1:24:05
Speaker 2: in the towel right now. Quite frankly, I've had enough.
1:24:08
Speaker 2: I've had enough. If only there were some sort of
1:24:10
Speaker 2: inspiring words to get me through this.
1:24:19
Speaker 11: It's how you adapt and handle adversity.
1:24:22
Speaker 12: And when things aren't going weft, that's the time where
1:24:26
Speaker 12: victory is there.
1:24:30
Speaker 2: Thanks Todd Howell, I almost forgot that victory is like
1:24:34
Speaker 2: right there for me. So all right, well keep going.
1:24:37
Speaker 2: I'm not throwing in the towel, all right, Rosie says,
1:24:41
Speaker 2: did you know Todd Howell ran a marathon? I didn't
1:24:44
Speaker 2: know that. Actually I heard, no, I did. I heard
1:24:46
Speaker 2: he ran thirty five marathons in thirty five days. So
1:24:51
Speaker 2: pretty cool, pretty cool, like that guy from Cambridge. Let's say,
1:24:57
Speaker 2: let's see, are we doing a Todd Howell? All right,
1:25:06
Speaker 2: we'll do all right, We're gonna do a quick link
1:25:09
Speaker 2: monkey here or an hour and a half in. I
1:25:11
Speaker 2: don't have that much time, so we'll do this very quickly.
1:25:14
Speaker 2: And then I really want to do the next story. Okay,
1:25:16
Speaker 2: so we're gonna do this one. And by the way,
1:25:19
Speaker 2: I have to end at nine o'clock for this week
1:25:21
Speaker 2: up until Friday. I don't have to worry. I can
1:25:23
Speaker 2: go along on Friday. But there's something I have to
1:25:26
Speaker 2: do this week, and I have to end the stream
1:25:29
Speaker 2: at nine o'clock. All right, this important thing it you can,
1:25:35
Speaker 2: I'll just suck it. Actually, what I'm gonna say right now,
1:25:38
Speaker 2: all right, let's do this link monkey thing. All right,
1:25:41
Speaker 2: link monkey, fetch me by link. Better not be something gross.
1:25:51
Speaker 2: Our very own Todd Howell ran his first marathon this weekend.
1:25:55
Speaker 2: What legend?
1:25:56
Speaker 11: This weekend?
1:25:56
Speaker 1: Our very own chief meteorologist Todd hal ran his first
1:25:59
Speaker 1: marriage on to News. Anchors Brittany Bailey and John Becker
1:26:03
Speaker 1: checked in with him before the race earlier this week.
1:26:05
Speaker 11: Take a look.
1:26:07
Speaker 12: I went and got some energy jails and got supplies today,
1:26:10
Speaker 12: just took a little shakeout run. So I'm my oldest
1:26:12
Speaker 12: three walker. Davis and Owen they are training. They're the
1:26:15
Speaker 12: ones who basically came up with the idea, Hey Dad,
1:26:18
Speaker 12: let's go, let's go run run a marathon. And so
1:26:21
Speaker 12: we're just going to get her done, just no time.
1:26:24
Speaker 12: We are going to cheer you on. We're going to
1:26:26
Speaker 12: be with you every since.
1:26:27
Speaker 2: Get her done. I'll tell you this man is a stud.
1:26:29
Speaker 2: This man is an absolute stud. Unbelievable, unbelievable quality from
1:26:36
Speaker 2: Todd hell as we all know. All right, let's see,
1:26:41
Speaker 2: all right, So I want to get onto the last
1:26:48
Speaker 2: major story here, and I think you guys going to
1:26:52
Speaker 2: enjoy it. All right, So we did all that, all right?
1:26:55
Speaker 2: So hold on one second, all right, hold on? Do
1:27:06
Speaker 2: you know News posted this and through a freedom of
1:27:10
Speaker 2: and through a freedom of information request, they got at
1:27:15
Speaker 2: some documents from Canadian military intelligence. Exclusive Military intelligence identified
1:27:22
Speaker 2: digital IDs cbdc's as tools of authoritarian control. And you
1:27:29
Speaker 2: know this is going to tie back to Mark Karney, right,
1:27:31
Speaker 2: you know it. Military intelligence warned liberals that digital IDs
1:27:36
Speaker 2: CBDC were effective tools of authoritarian control. So unsurprisingly, you
1:27:45
Speaker 2: have to get this from through a freedom of information requests.
1:27:48
Speaker 2: Mark Karney is not going to want.
1:27:49
Speaker 3: You to know that.
1:27:51
Speaker 2: Canadian military intelligence warned that digital identity, central bank, digital currencies,
1:27:56
Speaker 2: smart cities, and other digital technologies formed the basis of
1:28:00
Speaker 2: an authoritarian toolkit, an architecture capable of surveillance and state control,
1:28:08
Speaker 2: especially when combined. But provincial and federal governments are are
1:28:14
Speaker 2: incremental but a whole lot of second people, I got it.
1:28:24
Speaker 2: I'm trying to rush because I'm we're getting up to
1:28:27
Speaker 2: the wire here, we got half an hour left. But
1:28:29
Speaker 2: provincial and federal governments are incrementally advancing the same technologies.
1:28:37
Speaker 2: Authoritarian toolkit, an architecture capable of surveillance and state control. Well,
1:28:43
Speaker 2: that sounds a lot actually like the legislation that Mark
1:28:47
Speaker 2: Kearney has been passing. Censorship, surveillance, authoritarian control. We're going
1:28:53
Speaker 2: to get to that. But first, Juno News obtained a
1:28:56
Speaker 2: twenty twenty four Canadian Forces Intelligence Command assessment after a
1:29:01
Speaker 2: lengthy and fraught access to information process. The request was
1:29:06
Speaker 2: filed more than a year ago and sought twelve records,
1:29:09
Speaker 2: but only one has been disclosed. Well, I'd like to
1:29:12
Speaker 2: see all of them. But yeah, the government's going to
1:29:16
Speaker 2: fight any kind of transparency in Canada. Obviously, much of
1:29:20
Speaker 2: the material was considered too sensitive, with the intelligence assessment
1:29:24
Speaker 2: itself marked top secret Canadian eyes. Only significant portions remain
1:29:29
Speaker 2: withheld for national security reasons. The partially disclosed material examines
1:29:35
Speaker 2: how authoritarian governments such as China, China and Russia used
1:29:40
Speaker 2: digital technologies to monitor monitor their populations, restrict individual behavior,
1:29:47
Speaker 2: and reinforce state control. Well, Carney loves China right in
1:29:52
Speaker 2: the New World Order is as he pledged his allegiance
1:29:56
Speaker 2: to in China. So yeah, I mean, obviously Carney's not
1:30:03
Speaker 2: going to want people to hear about this. He's a
1:30:06
Speaker 2: huge fan of China and their authoritarianism. Apparently he has
1:30:10
Speaker 2: never said a bad word about it, has he Mark Karney?
1:30:13
Speaker 2: I don't believe that he has, so, first off, Mark Carney,
1:30:19
Speaker 2: Mark Carney's positions. Carney has expressed clear support for cbdc's
1:30:23
Speaker 2: in the past, particularly during and after his time as
1:30:27
Speaker 2: a central banker. In his twenty twenty one book Values,
1:30:31
Speaker 2: Building a Better World for All, maybe more like building
1:30:35
Speaker 2: a better world for Mark Karney, he wrote, the most
1:30:38
Speaker 2: likely future of money is a central bank stable coin
1:30:42
Speaker 2: known as a central bank digital currency or CBDC. By
1:30:47
Speaker 2: the way, he published that book in like twenty twenty two, right,
1:30:50
Speaker 2: so this is not well and let me repeat, sorry,
1:30:54
Speaker 2: my edition is twenty twenty two of his book. But
1:30:57
Speaker 2: he published a book in twenty twenty one, So this
1:31:00
Speaker 2: is an ancient history for him. He argued that he
1:31:03
Speaker 2: properly designed CBDC could fulfill the functions that private cryptocurrencies
1:31:09
Speaker 2: and stable coins aim for, while addressing legal and governance issues,
1:31:14
Speaker 2: governance issues that he viewed as undermining those alternatives. He
1:31:18
Speaker 2: was dismissive of cryptocurrencies, including bitcoin, as the core of
1:31:21
Speaker 2: our democratic monetary system. Well, once you take a look
1:31:25
Speaker 2: into cbdc's you'd understand why Mark Kearney would like them better.
1:31:31
Speaker 2: As Bank of England governor from twenty thirteen to twenty twenty,
1:31:34
Speaker 2: he advocated for central banks to develop CBDCs. In twenty
1:31:39
Speaker 2: twenty one remarks, he warned that delays risked letting big
1:31:42
Speaker 2: tech dominate the future of money. In twenty nineteen Jackson
1:31:46
Speaker 2: holl He floated the idea of a synthetic hedgemonic currency.
1:31:51
Speaker 2: I don't like it when Carney used the word headgemonic.
1:31:54
Speaker 2: Involving a network of CBDCs that could reduce the US
1:31:58
Speaker 2: dollars dominance, shared international working groups on CBDCs and helped
1:32:03
Speaker 2: advance related initiatives. I wonder if this might be another
1:32:07
Speaker 2: reason the US IS doesn't seem to like Mark Curney
1:32:13
Speaker 2: very much. Earlier as Bank of Canada Governor twenty eight
1:32:18
Speaker 2: twenty thirteen. He was involved in the early stages of
1:32:21
Speaker 2: digital currency thinking, though the more intensive Canadian research phase
1:32:26
Speaker 2: came later. So he's very interested in this stuff and
1:32:30
Speaker 2: its Once we take a look at it, it's easy
1:32:33
Speaker 2: to understand why. So this is from the Cato Institute,
1:32:36
Speaker 2: and this is just a really good little rundown of
1:32:39
Speaker 2: what CBDCs are and what the implications of them existing are.
1:32:45
Speaker 2: Why central bank digital currencies shouldn't be adopted by Robert J.
1:32:51
Speaker 2: Norbert J. Michael and Nicholas Anthony from twenty twenty three.
1:32:56
Speaker 2: What is a central bank digital currency? A central bank
1:32:59
Speaker 2: digital currenturrency or CBDC is a digital national currency. Like
1:33:06
Speaker 2: paper dollars, A CBDC would be a liability of the
1:33:10
Speaker 2: Federal Reserve, so they're talking about in the United States here.
1:33:15
Speaker 2: Unlike paper dollars, it would offer neither the privacy protections
1:33:19
Speaker 2: nor the finality that cash provides. So it's psych you
1:33:24
Speaker 2: could call it smart money. It knows the government would
1:33:28
Speaker 2: know what you're spending the money on all the time.
1:33:31
Speaker 2: It will be used to keep a record of everything
1:33:34
Speaker 2: you do financially and obviously and this will get into it.
1:33:39
Speaker 2: There are real dangers of tyranny here that direct digital liability,
1:33:44
Speaker 2: a sort of digital tether between citizens and the central bank,
1:33:49
Speaker 2: make CBDCs a radical departure from the digital dollars millions
1:33:53
Speaker 2: of Americans already used today. While a CBDC would not
1:33:58
Speaker 2: offer any unique benefits to Americans compared to existing technologies,
1:34:02
Speaker 2: it would pose serious risks. For example, a CBDC could
1:34:08
Speaker 2: spell doom for what little financial privacy protections remain. They're
1:34:13
Speaker 2: going to know everything you're spending money on, and they
1:34:17
Speaker 2: can prevent you from spending money on things they don't
1:34:20
Speaker 2: want you buying. Quote, we don't know who's using a
1:34:23
Speaker 2: one hundred dollars bill today, and we don't know who's
1:34:26
Speaker 2: using one thousand pesos built today. The difference with the
1:34:30
Speaker 2: CBDC is the central bank will have absolute control on
1:34:35
Speaker 2: the rules and regulations that will determine the use of
1:34:38
Speaker 2: that expression of central bank liability, and also we will
1:34:42
Speaker 2: have the technology to enforce that. So in Canada, in
1:34:47
Speaker 2: a country where during the Freedom Convoy, people's bank accounts
1:34:51
Speaker 2: were frozen by the banks on the orders of the government,
1:34:55
Speaker 2: you can see where this kind of technology is. You
1:34:59
Speaker 2: know naturally going to go for any you know, tyrannical
1:35:04
Speaker 2: minded government, but simply a CBDC would most likely be
1:35:09
Speaker 2: the single largest assault to financial privacy since the creation
1:35:13
Speaker 2: of the Bank Secrecy Act and the establishment of the
1:35:16
Speaker 2: Third Party doctrine. The threat to freedom that a CBDC
1:35:21
Speaker 2: could pose is closely related to its threat to privacy.
1:35:25
Speaker 2: With so much data in hand, a cb DC would
1:35:28
Speaker 2: provide countless opportunities for the government to control citizens' financial activity.
1:35:36
Speaker 2: They decide that you've had too many stakes this week,
1:35:38
Speaker 2: that's too much carbon, that's too much of a carbon footprint.
1:35:41
Speaker 2: You can't buy that. They can stop you buying it
1:35:44
Speaker 2: at the point of purchase. They think you've been driving
1:35:47
Speaker 2: too much. You go to fill up your tank to
1:35:50
Speaker 2: go visit your sick mother. No, you've you've been driving
1:35:53
Speaker 2: too much. Government doesn't like it, can't do it now.
1:35:56
Speaker 2: That is the power it will be afforded. That will
1:35:59
Speaker 2: be a afforded to the government. How might such financial
1:36:03
Speaker 2: control occur, well, freezing or seizing assets again, obviously at
1:36:08
Speaker 2: the Liberal Party of Canada is very interested in that.
1:36:11
Speaker 2: As we found out during the Freedom Convoy. Governments have
1:36:15
Speaker 2: long recognized that freeings free. Governments have long recognized that
1:36:19
Speaker 2: freezing someone's financial resources is one of the most effective
1:36:23
Speaker 2: ways to lock them out of society. However, a CBDC
1:36:27
Speaker 2: could make the process easier and faster for governments by
1:36:31
Speaker 2: establishing a direct line between citizens and the government itself.
1:36:37
Speaker 2: They can just say you're not buying that negative interest rates.
1:36:43
Speaker 2: While interest rates are typically thought of in terms of
1:36:46
Speaker 2: positive rates, a CBDC could allow policymakers to also set
1:36:50
Speaker 2: negative rights. This is just unbelievable. In fact, a negative
1:36:55
Speaker 2: interest rate would result in people losing money. Proponents are
1:36:59
Speaker 2: arguing that this strategy could be implemented to spur spending
1:37:03
Speaker 2: and prevent people, or make it impossible for people to
1:37:06
Speaker 2: save for the future, making them again very vulnerable and
1:37:11
Speaker 2: reliant on the government programmable spending. This is really terrifying.
1:37:18
Speaker 2: The programming capabilities of a CBDC could mean that people
1:37:22
Speaker 2: would be prohibited from buying certain goods or limited in
1:37:26
Speaker 2: how much they might purchase. For example, policymakers could try
1:37:31
Speaker 2: to curb drinking by limiting nightly alcohol purchases or prohibiting
1:37:36
Speaker 2: purchases for people with alcohol related offenses or anything. Or
1:37:41
Speaker 2: they think you your carbon footprint is too big, right,
1:37:44
Speaker 2: so you can't buy that stake, or you can't you
1:37:47
Speaker 2: can't take that flight, you can't go on that vacation,
1:37:50
Speaker 2: you can't drive up to see your sick mother. And
1:37:54
Speaker 2: you know, across the state or across the province or
1:37:56
Speaker 2: wherever you are the Western world where these things will
1:37:58
Speaker 2: come into being. It is terrifying, terrifying. Now, this is
1:38:07
Speaker 2: obviously the perfect tool for a tyrannical government. Again, take
1:38:13
Speaker 2: a look at China, right, take a look at China
1:38:19
Speaker 2: and in Canada it obviously Mark Kearney is going to
1:38:23
Speaker 2: love this because legislatively his obsession has not being with economics.
1:38:28
Speaker 2: I mean again, he's considered the genius economist, at least
1:38:32
Speaker 2: by Rosemary Barton's teleprompter. But legislatively his obsession has been
1:38:36
Speaker 2: on censorship, control and surveillance. Mark Kearney Government bills Surveillance
1:38:41
Speaker 2: and Online Content Regulation Bill C twenty two. This is
1:38:48
Speaker 2: a surveillance bill that great surveillance infrastructure Bill C eight,
1:38:53
Speaker 2: Cybersecurity Act, Ability to direct service cutoffs with GAG orders,
1:38:59
Speaker 2: expands warrantless data powers. Bill C thirty four forces proactive
1:39:05
Speaker 2: censorship of adult speech. That's not even all of them,
1:39:08
Speaker 2: but let's just very quickly go through. Bill C twenty
1:39:10
Speaker 2: two increases risk of surveillance state government spying. This is
1:39:14
Speaker 2: from the Canadian Constitution Foundation. Bill C eight would allow
1:39:19
Speaker 2: minister to secretly cut off phone internet service, again awarding
1:39:23
Speaker 2: from the Canadian Constitution Foundation. So the government doesn't like
1:39:28
Speaker 2: what you're doing on the Internet, they can just order
1:39:32
Speaker 2: the provider to ban you. You just can't have that anymore.
1:39:36
Speaker 2: And also, by the way, there's a gag order that
1:39:39
Speaker 2: comes along with it, so you can't even tell anybody
1:39:42
Speaker 2: what's been done to you. Now if you don't want
1:39:45
Speaker 2: to be further persecuted by the Canadian government. What's this here?
1:39:54
Speaker 2: Canadian Constitution Foundation again stop Internet censorship oppose Bill C
1:39:59
Speaker 2: thirty four. While the CCF supports keeping kids safe. Bill
1:40:05
Speaker 2: C thirty four would require platforms and AI companies to
1:40:09
Speaker 2: reduce exposure to what the government calls harmful content. Well,
1:40:13
Speaker 2: they're sneaking it in with you know, we have to
1:40:15
Speaker 2: protect the kids. They always use that when they've got
1:40:18
Speaker 2: a trojan horse for something really tyrannical, shifting decisions about
1:40:24
Speaker 2: acceptable public discourse away from citizens and towards a handful
1:40:28
Speaker 2: of bureaucrats in Ottawa. Most shockingly, the bill would censor
1:40:32
Speaker 2: the output of artificial intelligence chatbots like chat, GPT and
1:40:37
Speaker 2: Gemini to ensure they don't give harmful answers on sensitive topics, so,
1:40:43
Speaker 2: in other words, so that they don't accurately describe reality
1:40:46
Speaker 2: or history or anything that liberals don't like. A free
1:40:52
Speaker 2: society depends on strong protections for freedom of expression, including
1:40:56
Speaker 2: speech that is controversial or unpopular. Power to label unfavorable
1:41:01
Speaker 2: speech as harmful undermines these protections and shifts control over
1:41:06
Speaker 2: to public discourse from Canadians to government appointed regulators. It's
1:41:12
Speaker 2: all very distope. Canada is a at this point is
1:41:16
Speaker 2: just a cautionary tale for the rest of the world.
1:41:18
Speaker 2: That's our purpose to warn the rest of the world.
1:41:20
Speaker 2: But yet that's not even all the bills here. You
1:41:22
Speaker 2: have Bill C nine as well, Bill C and I
1:41:24
Speaker 2: in his passed. Here's what you need to know. This
1:41:27
Speaker 2: is just what Carney's been up to in the last
1:41:29
Speaker 2: eighteen months. Bill C and I in has passed. Here's
1:41:33
Speaker 2: what you need to know. Bill C nine is the
1:41:36
Speaker 2: Combating Hate Act. Yeah, things that the Liberal Party hates.
1:41:48
Speaker 2: Let's see Bill C and I has removed the good
1:41:51
Speaker 2: faith religious religious expression defense from convictions for criminal hate speech.
1:41:58
Speaker 2: What all good governments do? Let's see what kind of
1:42:03
Speaker 2: religious speech will put me at risk of charges? This
1:42:06
Speaker 2: is difficult to know in advance. You know, it's a
1:42:09
Speaker 2: good bill when nobody really knows what's going to happen
1:42:11
Speaker 2: with it or how it's going to be used. Let's see.
1:42:17
Speaker 2: The Supreme Court of Canada has defined hatred as the
1:42:19
Speaker 2: most extreme forms of the emotions described by vilification or detestation.
1:42:25
Speaker 2: The Court has said detestation tends to inspire enmity and
1:42:31
Speaker 2: extreme ill will, which goes beyond mere disdain or dislike.
1:42:35
Speaker 2: In other words, just whatever, you know, some woke judge
1:42:39
Speaker 2: or woke politician wants it to mean. That's what it means.
1:42:43
Speaker 2: So what do we have in Canada. We have a
1:42:47
Speaker 2: government that legislatively and a Prime minister that legislatively is obsessed,
1:42:54
Speaker 2: is obsessed with censorship and surveillance and control of the
1:42:58
Speaker 2: Canadian people. We have a prime minister that's very fond
1:43:03
Speaker 2: of this idea, is a big fan of this idea
1:43:05
Speaker 2: of cbdc's and we also have a military that secretly
1:43:10
Speaker 2: warned that CBDCs are are tools of authoritarian control, which
1:43:17
Speaker 2: we have to find out about because Juno News was
1:43:19
Speaker 2: able to get the information through a freedom of information request.
1:43:26
Speaker 2: So that's the state of Canada right now, people, all right,
1:43:31
Speaker 2: and you can see now why I really wanted to
1:43:33
Speaker 2: get to that segment, right you can see now? All right?
1:43:39
Speaker 2: Is there any better ads for me?
1:43:40
Speaker 4: Now?
1:43:41
Speaker 9: No?
1:43:41
Speaker 2: Nothing? Nothing over thirty seven cents? Damn it?
1:43:45
Speaker 3: All right?
1:43:54
Speaker 2: What are you guys talking about? See, let's see what
1:44:15
Speaker 2: are you talking about here? R PW says America as
1:44:21
Speaker 2: the first Amendment. Canada evidently doesn't. It's not just evidently
1:44:25
Speaker 2: we don't. Also, our Charter of Rights and Freedoms Section
1:44:29
Speaker 2: one says you've got all the freedoms such as free
1:44:32
Speaker 2: speech and everything I listed below unless the government decides
1:44:35
Speaker 2: you don't. That is literally what it is. It's awful. Uh,
1:44:48
Speaker 2: let's see what are you jabbering on about? Rosie and
1:44:58
Speaker 2: listen to is he run? Play the Todd Hallell marathon video.
1:45:02
Speaker 2: I did play it. Tell your parents they need to
1:45:04
Speaker 2: come to Knoxville, Tennessee with you to watch you run
1:45:06
Speaker 2: a marathon. But thh dead go home by way of Alberta.
1:45:10
Speaker 2: Say I'm not doing any of that. Let's see, let's
1:45:13
Speaker 2: see uh jug jug is He says, Yeah, Canada's followed,
1:45:19
Speaker 2: Long live Alberta. If I don't think that Alberta separation
1:45:25
Speaker 2: is a pipe dream, I don't think it's going to
1:45:26
Speaker 2: happen now. I don't think that the uh. I don't
1:45:30
Speaker 2: think that the you know, Alberta plebiscite on whether or
1:45:36
Speaker 2: not to have a you know, a plebiscite, a referendum
1:45:38
Speaker 2: is going to win in October. I just don't think so.
1:45:40
Speaker 2: I don't think it's there yet. But if Canada keeps
1:45:43
Speaker 2: going in the direction that it's going, and it looks
1:45:45
Speaker 2: like it certainly will till at least twenty twenty nine, Yeah,
1:45:49
Speaker 2: it's going to become more and more real. There's no question.
1:45:53
Speaker 2: Rosie says. All I can think of is Canadian truckers
1:45:56
Speaker 2: makes me so very angry. Well, Mark Kearney was big
1:45:59
Speaker 2: on urging Trudeau to crack down in unconstitutional ways. So yeah,
1:46:06
Speaker 2: he's not a fan. He's not a he's McCarty's not
1:46:08
Speaker 2: a fan of democracy. All right. Let's see, as he says,
1:46:17
Speaker 2: I'm not surprised is the control CBDCs give them goes
1:46:20
Speaker 2: along with the need to censor and control the centers. Yep,
1:46:24
Speaker 2: I know, James says, does China. China have CBDC. They're
1:46:29
Speaker 2: running test projects of it to go along with their
1:46:32
Speaker 2: social credit system. Uh so they're quite advanced on the
1:46:38
Speaker 2: whole tyranny thing. Tyranny by just denying people things the
1:46:43
Speaker 2: ability to travel, the ability to work, stay in hotel,
1:46:46
Speaker 2: all of that stuff. Jd L. How you doing and
1:46:51
Speaker 2: making such an important point in the chat here, I
1:46:53
Speaker 2: hit the like button. JDL says, hit the like button.
1:46:55
Speaker 2: Everybody hit the like button. Why wouldn't you do it?
1:46:58
Speaker 2: Get that free? Good karmak about people? RpW says, Trump
1:47:03
Speaker 2: has said America will not have Cbdc's the total opposite. Yeah,
1:47:07
Speaker 2: Cardie's gone quiet about it. But go for a second
1:47:10
Speaker 2: think that he doesn't agree with the things he was
1:47:12
Speaker 2: saying a few years ago. Ottawa. James says, that's some
1:47:19
Speaker 2: fucked up read Carti's book. Yeah, it's actually really boring too.
1:47:23
Speaker 2: He's not a good or dynamic writer in any way.
1:47:26
Speaker 2: And his ideas aren't you even original? It's all very
1:47:30
Speaker 2: dull and cliched. I have to be honest, not that
1:47:35
Speaker 2: it bothers me to be honest about it anyway, all right,
1:47:42
Speaker 2: and we got some Todd howl aboja's nice. Nice, all right,
1:47:48
Speaker 2: let's get out to the last stuff we're gonna deal with.
1:47:50
Speaker 2: We had ten minutes left in this bad boy. Fox
1:47:52
Speaker 2: News posted this Darth Vader takes the podium at a
1:47:55
Speaker 2: San Diego city meeting to mockingly defend flock police servi
1:48:00
Speaker 2: valance cameras, suggesting the technology could be a powerful asset
1:48:05
Speaker 2: to the dark side. This is what the airport it's
1:48:07
Speaker 2: this is funny, all right. First, very quickly, though, flock
1:48:11
Speaker 2: cameras are deployed widely across nearly the entire United States.
1:48:16
Speaker 2: And what are flock cameras. They are surveillance cameras. They're
1:48:20
Speaker 2: not like traffic cameras to give you a ticket if
1:48:23
Speaker 2: you're on a red light or you're speeding or something.
1:48:25
Speaker 2: They're just purely surveillance cameras to track moving objects. And
1:48:30
Speaker 2: Flock Safety Cameras is a company. Flock Cameras is a company, right,
1:48:38
Speaker 2: So they're deployed widely across nearly the entire United States,
1:48:42
Speaker 2: reported in all fifty states plus Washington, DC, though coverage
1:48:47
Speaker 2: is sparse in places like Alaska and The company itself
1:48:50
Speaker 2: sites operations in forty nine states. Flock Safety states it
1:48:56
Speaker 2: has more than one hundred and twenty thousand cameras in
1:48:59
Speaker 2: its network wow used by over five thousand law enforcement
1:49:03
Speaker 2: agencies and communities, with the network covering roughly seventy percent
1:49:08
Speaker 2: of the US population and performing tens of billions of
1:49:12
Speaker 2: vehicle scans monthly. So if your government isn't tyrannical, well
1:49:18
Speaker 2: this is good for preventing crime. If your government is China,
1:49:23
Speaker 2: well it's just going to be used to oppress you,
1:49:25
Speaker 2: just law abiding citizens and any dissenter right. And of
1:49:29
Speaker 2: course it can be used that way in any country,
1:49:31
Speaker 2: including the United States or Canada, or England or Austra wherever.
1:49:37
Speaker 2: Let's hear from Darth Vader, who's a big fan of
1:49:40
Speaker 2: these things.
1:49:42
Speaker 11: Darth Vader.
1:49:52
Speaker 13: The Emperor is a fan of Flock, and we must
1:49:56
Speaker 13: continue utilizing Flock technologies so that we can fall and
1:50:00
Speaker 13: surveil the rebel scum as they move from playground to playground,
1:50:05
Speaker 13: from playground to pool, from pool to gymnasium. Because we
1:50:09
Speaker 13: all know that the block cameras are not only following
1:50:12
Speaker 13: the license plate readers, they are following children. They are
1:50:15
Speaker 13: following children in parks and gymnasiums, and we need this.
1:50:19
Speaker 13: I need this so I can stock my ex girlfriend.
1:50:22
Speaker 2: This technology will help us find That was maybe the
1:50:27
Speaker 2: best part right there, so he could stock his ex girlfriend.
1:50:32
Speaker 13: And the rebel scum and they're hidden base on. Oh,
1:50:35
Speaker 13: this technology will help us find Luke Skywalker as he
1:50:38
Speaker 13: traverses the universe in his X wing. This technology is unnecessary,
1:50:45
Speaker 13: necessary force.
1:50:47
Speaker 12: Don't Peter.
1:50:50
Speaker 2: Legend? What does Todd Hell think? An absolute legend? I
1:50:55
Speaker 2: agree with Todd Hell on this one legend legend right there,
1:51:00
Speaker 2: classic classic Darth Vader, all right. William the Samaritan posted this,
1:51:10
Speaker 2: what is the point in even having a pope anymore?
1:51:12
Speaker 2: The popes are so lame, They're just a bunch of commies.
1:51:15
Speaker 2: We should perhaps be a little less fearful of Islam.
1:51:18
Speaker 2: Popely who says, uh, I don't know. I've like, do
1:51:23
Speaker 2: you know anything about the history of Christianity and the
1:51:27
Speaker 2: history of Islam? Apparently not so. I guess the pope
1:51:32
Speaker 2: has suicidal empathy as well. Let's see, we should perhaps
1:51:36
Speaker 2: be a little less fearful of Islam? Like, what is
1:51:38
Speaker 2: even the point? What is the point having a pope
1:51:41
Speaker 2: for a guy who rails on about western hegeviity. He
1:51:44
Speaker 2: talks like an out of touch white Western liberal, even
1:51:49
Speaker 2: the pope. It's a run of bad popes, isn't it.
1:51:52
Speaker 2: It's been a run of bad popes. I think I
1:51:54
Speaker 2: have to say, all right, alex Altan, the Canadian government
1:52:00
Speaker 2: still can't figure out how to build enough houses, but
1:52:03
Speaker 2: they have figured out how to build whatever the hell
1:52:05
Speaker 2: this is. Well, this is for some LGBTQ, but all
1:52:10
Speaker 2: the other letters as well, which I can't remember. Thing
1:52:13
Speaker 2: in Canada. And obviously this thing probably cost a fortune
1:52:17
Speaker 2: to build. And I don't know what it is. I
1:52:21
Speaker 2: don't know what the hell that is. It's like a
1:52:24
Speaker 2: cylinder with like holes taken out of it. I don't know.
1:52:30
Speaker 2: Is it like an ecstasy pill with like a bunch
1:52:32
Speaker 2: of little bytes taken out of it? No idea, But
1:52:36
Speaker 2: apparently this is what's important in Canada. Let's see, Joe Rogan.
1:52:41
Speaker 2: I don't like this flock camera thing. I know it
1:52:44
Speaker 2: can protect people from crime, but I also know hundreds
1:52:46
Speaker 2: of cops have been busted for stalking people. Stalking people. Well,
1:52:50
Speaker 2: let's take a look here. Yeah, I'm worried.
1:52:55
Speaker 14: I don't like this Flock camera thing. It freaks me out.
1:52:57
Speaker 14: And I know that it can protect people from crime,
1:53:00
Speaker 14: but I also know that like hundreds of cops have
1:53:02
Speaker 14: been busted using it to stalk on their ex wives,
1:53:05
Speaker 14: stalk people. Yeah, it's like there's people that have had
1:53:09
Speaker 14: access to these things that probably shouldn't have access to
1:53:12
Speaker 14: and they're getting arrested.
1:53:14
Speaker 2: So it's like, how long was this going on? What
1:53:16
Speaker 2: has happened? How many lives have been.
1:53:21
Speaker 14: Altered forever because someone had access to this and some
1:53:24
Speaker 14: cop who wasn't supposed to win and did something to
1:53:27
Speaker 14: someone that he wouldn't have.
1:53:28
Speaker 2: Been able to do.
1:53:28
Speaker 14: If you can't just spy on us and just be
1:53:33
Speaker 14: a corporation.
1:53:34
Speaker 2: And well, I guess it's that whole freedom for a
1:53:36
Speaker 2: security thing.
1:53:37
Speaker 14: Right have access to all the license plates and all
1:53:41
Speaker 14: the cars, and now they can track you through GPS
1:53:43
Speaker 14: and the unique characteristics of your phone. So now there's
1:53:47
Speaker 14: another software that they have they could just track.
1:53:49
Speaker 2: Where you are at all times. Yeah, yeah, yeah, I
1:53:54
Speaker 2: think I think Darth Vader makes such a good point.
1:54:00
Speaker 13: Again, the Emperor is a fan of Flock, and we
1:54:10
Speaker 13: must continue utilizing Flock technologies so that we can follow
1:54:14
Speaker 13: and surveil the rebels coum as they move from playground
1:54:19
Speaker 13: to playground.
1:54:20
Speaker 2: There you go, Darth Vader, big fan. Earth Vader, can't
1:54:23
Speaker 2: be wrong, all right. I'm getting a demand here to
1:54:29
Speaker 2: raid Eric Shen, So I think we'll do that. Uh again,
1:54:33
Speaker 2: I got I've got to make sure I'm done by
1:54:35
Speaker 2: like nine o'clock sharp until Thursday, well up until Thursday.
1:54:39
Speaker 2: Then after that we can go a bit longer, doesn't matter.
1:54:42
Speaker 2: I won't be on a strict leash on this, but uh,
1:54:45
Speaker 2: we do have to until Friday night. Friday night we don't,
1:54:50
Speaker 2: but until Thursday night, I guess,