Latest / International Flavor: Where the Truth Tastes Better / Castro Indictment, Grand Jury Theater, and the Dangerous Expansion of American Legal Power Beyond Bo

Transcript

Castro Indictment, Grand Jury Theater, and the Dangerous Expansion of American Legal Power Beyond Bo · International Flavor: Where the Truth Tastes Better

• 0:00
  Hello, good morning. Welcome. I'm Samuel
• 0:03
  Trap. This International Flavor. I'm
• 0:05
  coming to you live from the Lake Ozark
• 0:06
  Real Estate Art Studio. Coming to you
• 0:08
  live on damradio.comlive
• 0:11
  uh in uh reverse or in um the past as it
• 0:16
  were. You know what? We should change
• 0:18
  it. Instead of uh damradio.com/mpodcast,
• 0:22
  we should we should call it damradio.com
• 0:29
  because it's in the past. It's history.
• 0:32
  It is now history. Kind of like the uh
• 0:36
  uh and and you know, my initial reaction
• 0:39
  to this is just
• 0:41
  bull crap is my initial reaction to
• 0:45
  this. And I'm not sure if I can get it.
• 0:48
  They're going to want me to pay for it,
• 0:50
  I'm sure. And uh let's see.
• 0:54
  I want to see it, but it does give the
• 0:56
  page, so I can get on to Pacer and pull
• 0:59
  it off. Maybe I will try to do that.
• 1:01
  It's a 26 page docket, and it is United
• 1:07
  States District Court for the Southern
• 1:09
  District of Florida.
• 1:12
  This is now my initial reaction before I
• 1:15
  ever read this is uh that um let's see
• 1:21
  that would be us.gov
• 1:23
  SDFl
• 1:25
  wouldn't it? Uh let's let's see if we
• 1:28
  can find this because I've been thinking
• 1:31
  about this
• 1:33
  uh
• 1:36
  stupidity ever since and this is lawyers
• 1:40
  being a-holes is all this is and um in
• 1:45
  my opinion and and and idiotic you know
• 1:48
  is is what this is site cannot be
• 1:52
  reached I wonder if it's if if if we are
• 1:55
  blocked in the studio video. Um,
• 1:59
  wonder why. I wonder if I go to my my
• 2:02
  base account.
• 2:08
  I'm sorry to be doing this on the fly
• 2:11
  while we're sitting here, but this is
• 2:15
  this is craziness. And here we are
• 2:19
  again.
• 2:21
  Uh, where's my registered app? I have to
• 2:25
  do two-party login.
• 2:28
  Well, I'm trying to get on and get the
• 2:30
  the Castro indictment. I want the
• 2:33
  original document from the court. I
• 2:36
  don't trust the ones that people people
• 2:39
  ship out to you um from New York Times
• 2:44
  and elsewhere. I don't trust any of
• 2:46
  those people. So,
• 2:48
  uh nor should you. It's a bad plan all
• 2:52
  the way around. But I got to get on to
• 2:55
  my Google authenticator
• 2:57
  in order to log in. And sorry, you get
• 3:00
  to walk through this with me, but where
• 3:02
  is my account? Hello. How's the family?
• 3:07
  55 5943. We'll get you in.
• 3:12
  943.
• 3:15
  And are we in? We are indeed in. Son of
• 3:19
  a nutcracker. They're doing it again.
• 3:23
  Uh, so the second time if you have to go
• 3:25
  in, it's 378-541.
• 3:28
  378541
• 3:31
  entered. I understand. Quit quizzing me.
• 3:35
  Uh, let's see. Please choose a court.
• 3:38
  Well, I tried to uh
• 3:43
  SDF.
• 3:46
  Nope, not South Carolina.
• 3:49
  F. Sorry you people get to listen to
• 3:52
  this, but here we are. Florida Southern
• 3:55
  District. There we have it. Southern
• 3:59
  District of Florida documents. Here we
• 4:02
  are. Query.
• 4:04
  What's this guy's name? Raul Castro,
• 4:07
  right? C A S T R O. They're indicting
• 4:12
  him for murder is what I hear. Uh and
• 4:15
  and you know
• 4:18
  he's not he's not a citizen of America
• 4:21
  and and this is my problem. Uh the party
• 4:25
  defendant is Raul uh Castro Ruse Castro
• 4:31
  Raul party defendant.
• 4:33
  Maybe it's cuz he filed action here
• 4:36
  before and submitted himself previously
• 4:39
  to uh here's a file closed in 1991.
• 4:44
  Gonzalez versus Castro. Where where's
• 4:47
  the latest ones? These are not it. But
• 4:50
  this gives me the case number. I have
• 4:52
  the case number. So, at least if they're
• 4:54
  not lying to us on the uh on the news.
• 4:59
  Here it is. Case number
• 5:04
  03
• 5:09
  USA Raul Modesto Castro ruse.
• 5:14
  Okay, so we're going to go back um
• 5:17
  because this was just Ro Modesto party
• 5:22
  defendant. Here he is. 03
• 5:27
  filed 821
• 5:29
  of 03.
• 5:31
  So they're they're game playing for
• 5:33
  sure. And if we go to the history and
• 5:37
  documents and run the query. Oh, yep. So
• 5:41
  this is so now they're claiming so that
• 5:44
  you can't see the prior you can't see
• 5:47
  the prior case filed 423 of 2026. Motion
• 5:52
  for miscellaneous relief. Order on
• 5:54
  motion for miscellaneous receive
• 5:56
  receipt. And then here we go. indictment
• 6:00
  filed um 423 of 2026.
• 6:06
  And I'm gonna download this so Jr. can
• 6:09
  have it later.
• 6:12
  Cost me $260.
• 6:15
  My download will come into the zip
• 6:19
  and we shall keep it up. Here's document
• 6:22
  number eight. Okay. Sorry to go through
• 6:25
  all of that with you here, but this was
• 6:29
  entered on 429 of 2026 and filed by BMDC
• 6:34
  Angela Noble, Clerk of District Court,
• 6:37
  US of America by Raul Madestro Castro
• 6:40
  Ree. So, so this indicates to me that
• 6:43
  what we're going to do is we're going to
• 6:44
  be flying into to to uh Cuba uh to you
• 6:50
  know attacking somebody and here's a
• 6:51
  superseding indictment general
• 6:54
  allegations.
• 6:57
  Let's see.
• 6:59
  We're going to read this whole thing to
• 7:01
  you just because. Okay. The grand jury.
• 7:04
  So, this is a grand jury. First of all,
• 7:06
  you can indict a ham sandwich into a
• 7:08
  grand jury because nobody's there. Okay?
• 7:11
  So, this isn't a prosecutor taking a a
• 7:15
  stand. This is a prosecutor saying,
• 7:17
  "Well, citizens, 12 citizens, or eight
• 7:19
  said whatever the hell they pick. 12
• 7:21
  citizens indicted this man, so they got
• 7:23
  to believe something." Well, they only
• 7:24
  believe what you tell them, you dumbass.
• 7:26
  They only believe that because you said
• 7:30
  something to them, and you're the
• 7:32
  lawyer, so there's nobody present but
• 7:33
  you. And there's there's nobody for the
• 7:36
  defense. There's no rules of evidence.
• 7:39
  There's nothing. It's whatever you say.
• 7:41
  So if you don't want to indict him,
• 7:44
  guess what you do? You shut up and
• 7:46
  nobody gets indicted, right? But if you
• 7:49
  want him to be indicted, you can say any
• 7:52
  lie that you want to say and then not
• 7:55
  take
• 7:57
  uh what do you call it? Not take
• 7:58
  responsibility for it. Right? You don't
• 8:01
  have to worry about all of that. We're
• 8:04
  and and this is all over J.R.'s TVs is
• 8:06
  the the reason I'm I'm watching this and
• 8:09
  I was interested in it anyway, but but
• 8:11
  oh my god, they've indicted the man.
• 8:13
  They indicted him on April the 23rd, you
• 8:16
  [ __ ] It's like, why are we putting
• 8:19
  it out now? And it was entered in the
• 8:21
  Florida Southern District docket on
• 8:24
  April the 29th of 2026. These guys are
• 8:28
  lying to you just like they always do.
• 8:32
  and they call it a superseding
• 8:34
  indictment. Something's happened. Now,
• 8:35
  first of all, this case is case number
• 8:37
  03
• 8:39
  CR20685
• 8:42
  03. You know what that means? 2003 is
• 8:46
  the first time they tried to file this.
• 8:48
  And when you look at the freaking docket
• 8:50
  and you look at the docket sheet, which
• 8:52
  is why you have to go to the docket
• 8:53
  sheet because these people lie and they
• 8:57
  lie across the board. You know, this is
• 9:00
  just BS. There's an attachment. It's
• 9:03
  restricted, which means I can't probably
• 9:04
  get it. Let's see. This document is
• 9:07
  sealed and not available. It's probably
• 9:09
  the original indictment because the
• 9:11
  document history starts at number six.
• 9:14
  Document number six. Motion for
• 9:16
  miscellaneous relief. Let's read that
• 9:18
  son of a bucket and we'll download this
• 9:21
  for you. Sealed documents are no longer
• 9:23
  available in CMS or or CMF or via Pacer.
• 9:27
  Contact the court directly to request
• 9:29
  the document. So this document has been
• 9:31
  sealed. Okay. So this is the request for
• 9:33
  miscellaneous relief and they sealed it
• 9:36
  and that is why they've done it and so
• 9:38
  they don't want you to be able to get it
• 9:40
  right and they don't want it's not p
• 9:42
  well it can be public. You send a
• 9:43
  sunshine request or whatever. And then
• 9:45
  there's the order for miscellaneous
• 9:46
  relief. Well, let's see if that one is
• 9:48
  sealed as well. View document. Uh this
• 9:52
  one sealed documents are no longer
• 9:53
  available. So, I'm paying whatever. I
• 9:55
  paid 10 cents for that uh new document
• 9:59
  that says, "Haha, you can't have it."
• 10:01
  Motion to unseal the case. Here's one.
• 10:03
  And number 10. Motion to unseal.
• 10:07
  This came afterward. Maybe now this is
• 10:09
  why it's unsealed, right? Maybe now
• 10:11
  they've unsealed something. View
• 10:13
  document. Nothing's happening.
• 10:17
  I'm trying to pay the the dime. Come on.
• 10:21
  To accept the charges. view document.
• 10:24
  Otherwise,
• 10:28
  nothing. Wonder how many times I paid
• 10:30
  for that.
• 10:32
  Wonder how many times I've done that.
• 10:34
  Let's see. But I do have the indictment
• 10:36
  now. But you can't get the rest. It's
• 10:38
  it's uh you know, they object. They
• 10:40
  don't want to give it to me. Um come on.
• 10:42
  What have I done? Son of a nutcracker.
• 10:46
  Let's see if I go back. That's the New
• 10:48
  York Times. I don't want that version.
• 10:50
  Uh
• 10:55
  I don't like you.
• 10:57
  Well, I'm on a roll today. Let's go back
• 10:59
  to our uh Southern District of Florida.
• 11:02
  Pacer login.
• 11:05
  Southern
• 11:07
  District
• 11:08
  Florida.
• 11:11
  Duh. Duh. Duh. Anyway, I am grumpy about
• 11:16
  this. Let's go back to the query and let
• 11:19
  us get our go back to uh uh what's his
• 11:23
  name?
• 11:26
  The old
• 11:28
  what have I been blocked? Hide the case.
• 11:31
  We want Raul.
• 11:35
  Raul Perez Perez. That is not who we're
• 11:38
  after here, folks, friends and
• 11:41
  neighbors. But where are we in our
• 11:44
  document download?
• 11:46
  Okay, let's get back there. We want case
• 11:50
  number 03CR
• 11:54
  and the superseding indictment.
• 11:59
  Here we go.
• 12:01
  But you can't get the rest. They haven't
• 12:03
  uh unlocked it. And uh it's it's there's
• 12:08
  stuff that is unavailable and that is
• 12:11
  unavailable to us. and Luis Ro Gonzalez.
• 12:16
  Who are these people there? There's a
• 12:18
  bunch of people listed. Lorenzo, Alberto
• 12:20
  Perez, Perez, Emilio, Jose, Pallesio,
• 12:23
  Blanco, Jose Fidel, Gual
• 12:27
  Barzaga, Raul Simanca, Cardinas, and
• 12:31
  Luis Ro Gonzalez, Parardo Rodriguez,
• 12:34
  defendants superseding indictment. Okay,
• 12:37
  this thing is how many pages we got
• 12:40
  here, friends and neighbors. Page one of
• 12:42
  26, superseding indictment. Introduction
• 12:45
  since seizing power over the Republic of
• 12:47
  Cuba in 59. So this is your this is your
• 12:50
  grand write up of why the US should be
• 12:52
  able to charge anybody on the planet
• 12:54
  with murder, which is not what the law
• 12:57
  says, but they're doing it anyway cuz
• 13:00
  they're crooks. That's my initial
• 13:01
  initial take of how you file murder
• 13:04
  charges against somebody
• 13:06
  in another country. It's just [ __ ]
• 13:09
  Since seizing power of the Republic of
• 13:11
  Cuba in 1959, Fidel Alejandro Castro
• 13:14
  Ruiz Fidel Castro Raul Modesto Castro
• 13:18
  Rou Castro Rouge as depicted below. They
• 13:21
  put their pictures and others establish
• 13:23
  a dictatorship. The Castro regime
• 13:26
  designed to maintain and protect their
• 13:28
  rule and prevent regime change. What do
• 13:30
  we do? So, we we we engage in regime
• 13:33
  change. That's what we do. It's what we
• 13:35
  live for, right? And some people are all
• 13:37
  happy about this. I am not. It's none of
• 13:39
  your freaking business. Stay out of it.
• 13:41
  For the next several decades, Cubans
• 13:43
  fled to the United States through the
• 13:46
  Florida Straits, risking their lives and
• 13:48
  many times resulting in the death of
• 13:50
  those migrants in those waters on their
• 13:53
  journey to freedom.
• 13:56
  Hermanos Al- Rescata, Brothers to the
• 13:59
  Rescue, Inc., BTTR was organized in
• 14:02
  Miami and flew unnamed unarmed, sorry,
• 14:05
  Cessna aircraft to rescue or guide Cuban
• 14:09
  migrants stranded or lost at sea. In the
• 14:12
  '9s, BTR's flights also flew to support
• 14:15
  anti-Castro pro-democracy movements in
• 14:18
  Cuba. So, they're meddling in other
• 14:20
  countries. Now, fine. Good for them.
• 14:23
  That's fine. Cuba sent spies to Miami,
• 14:26
  Florida to obtain information on BTTR
• 14:29
  and report back to the Castro regime.
• 14:33
  These spies were part of a group cenamed
• 14:35
  Lored Aispa, the Wasp network. The spies
• 14:39
  successfully infiltrated BTR, reported
• 14:41
  back to the Castaster regime on BTTR
• 14:44
  activity. On around January 1996,
• 14:49
  BTTR flew unarmed Cessna aircraft in or
• 14:51
  around Cuban airspace and dropped
• 14:53
  pro-democracy leafets that landed on the
• 14:55
  Cuban mainland. Cessna aircraft used by
• 14:57
  BTTR flew at speeds significantly slower
• 15:00
  than the Cuban MIG uh fighter jets in or
• 15:04
  around January 1996. The Cuban military
• 15:07
  headed by Castro Rouge engaged in
• 15:09
  training missions during which Cuban MIG
• 15:11
  fighter jets located and followed planes
• 15:14
  with flight speeds and at the altitudes
• 15:16
  as those planes used by BTTR.
• 15:20
  So they trailed them. US does the same
• 15:22
  thing. You know, if we want to harass
• 15:24
  somebody, we do the same thing. Escort
• 15:28
  their planes, right? We seize their
• 15:31
  ships. We do whatever else we feel like.
• 15:34
  We surround their island. Okay. In or
• 15:39
  around February 96, pro-democracy groups
• 15:42
  in Cuba planned demonstrations in Cuba
• 15:44
  and BTTR plan to support those desk
• 15:48
  demonstrations through flights to Cuba
• 15:51
  at the time of the demonstration. The
• 15:53
  Castra regime did not permit the planned
• 15:56
  pro-democracy demonstrations. I imagine
• 15:58
  democracy would be wellreceived in Cuba,
• 16:02
  right?
• 16:04
  Just like it is in Ukraine,
• 16:07
  right? That's a place isn't corrupt. Not
• 16:10
  remotely. Right. And BTTR plan blah blah
• 16:14
  blah. The Castro regime did not permit
• 16:16
  the planned pro-democracy demonstrations
• 16:18
  in Cuba at that time. There's a
• 16:21
  surprise. They know that it's a
• 16:23
  dictatorship. You already said that
• 16:24
  ahead. You said that. Well, Qatar is a
• 16:26
  dictatorship dictatorship, too. I
• 16:29
  imagine if we went and scheduled a
• 16:31
  pro-democracy
• 16:33
  um uh what do you call it? A
• 16:35
  pro-democracy demonstration in front of
• 16:39
  the uh prince's residence or in the
• 16:43
  prince's private airport right next to
• 16:46
  the real airport, then you might have
• 16:49
  some arrests and people punished for it
• 16:53
  because guess what? That's a
• 16:55
  dictatorship, too.
• 16:58
  It's a but we're not attacking Qatar.
• 17:01
  We're not attacking anybody else that
• 17:03
  has dictatorships around the planet.
• 17:05
  Well, secretly we are, but we're not
• 17:07
  charging them with murder, you know.
• 17:08
  We're we're getting new airplanes from
• 17:10
  them. They're getting new airplanes, you
• 17:13
  know. Oh, geez. What? Well, since
• 17:14
  they're our friends and they provide us
• 17:16
  with oil and they don't piss us off like
• 17:18
  everybody else does. Well, you know what
• 17:20
  we'll do? Since they lick our rear ends,
• 17:23
  we will lick back
• 17:26
  and we'll never say a word. But if we
• 17:28
  don't like you, we're going to fly in,
• 17:30
  send some special forces goons to go in
• 17:32
  there and kill people uh and seize you
• 17:35
  and arrest you for criminal charges in
• 17:38
  America. Why? Because we're the biggest
• 17:41
  swinging dicks on the planet. And that's
• 17:44
  what we do because we played football.
• 17:46
  Hurwah, we play we're in the Marines.
• 17:48
  Hurrah. You know, that's what we did.
• 17:50
  And so in or around 26, these
• 17:52
  pro-democracy groups planned their
• 17:54
  demonstrations. They didn't get a go.
• 17:55
  The Castro regime didn't permit them.
• 17:57
  Surprise. And the planned per democracy
• 18:00
  demonstrations at Cuba at that time and
• 18:02
  instructed its spies not to fly with
• 18:05
  BTTR during the planned BTTR flights in
• 18:09
  February 96.
• 18:13
  On February 24, sorry about that. On
• 18:14
  February 24th, 1996, three BTR aircraft
• 18:19
  flew from South Florida toward Cuba
• 18:22
  anyway, and Cuban MiGs shot down two of
• 18:26
  them in international waters, killing
• 18:29
  four US nationals and three American
• 18:32
  citizens. Okay. Well, if you're going to
• 18:35
  take risks like that, how do I want to
• 18:38
  put this? If you're going to go to
• 18:40
  Ukraine and fight on behalf of Ukraine
• 18:43
  in Ukraine against the Russians and the
• 18:46
  Russians kill you, that's not on us.
• 18:50
  We don't get to charge
• 18:53
  Vladimir Putin with a crime because he
• 18:57
  happens to lead the country that you are
• 18:59
  fighting against and somebody killed
• 19:01
  you.
• 19:02
  It's crap. Do we say it's I mean we say
• 19:05
  the same thing, right? We say the same
• 19:06
  thing. If a if a Ukrainian goes into
• 19:10
  Russia and bombs in Kursk and and any of
• 19:13
  these foreigners that ran in there,
• 19:16
  which they did, a lot of mercenaries in
• 19:18
  there, a lot of US mercenaries in there,
• 19:19
  a lot of British, a lot of them have
• 19:21
  been captured in the U in the and in
• 19:22
  Russia, they're all over the news and
• 19:24
  and we are all up in arms. Oh, these
• 19:26
  people ought to be given Geneva
• 19:28
  Convention status. They're war
• 19:30
  combatants. No, they're not. They're
• 19:32
  freaking terrorists. They're
• 19:33
  mercenaries.
• 19:35
  They are. That's what they are. They
• 19:37
  were hired as mercenaries and they went
• 19:39
  over. They are not subject to the Geneva
• 19:42
  Convention. They're committing crimes.
• 19:44
  And that's true. You're a mercenary.
• 19:46
  You're not a You're not a a a combatant.
• 19:50
  You're not a combatant. You You are not
• 19:52
  fighting. You're You may be fighting on
• 19:54
  behalf of a country, but you're not part
• 19:56
  of their armed forces. You're not. Most
• 19:59
  of them don't even speak Ukrainian. It's
• 20:01
  crazy. Well, most Ukrainians don't speak
• 20:03
  Ukrainian.
• 20:05
  It's crazy. Uh, and I shouldn't say
• 20:08
  most, but a very good percentage.
• 20:10
  Anyway, including these three American
• 20:12
  citizens were all shot down. And you may
• 20:14
  not like what I'm saying. I don't care.
• 20:16
  This is the truth anyway. And so, you
• 20:19
  might be going, "Yeah, but yeah, but we
• 20:21
  need to do what's right. Who are we to
• 20:23
  determine what's right? Who the hell are
• 20:26
  you to determine what's right? My right
• 20:28
  might be different than your right."
• 20:29
  Right? So, here you're going to hear my
• 20:32
  right. If you want to call and argue
• 20:33
  with me, please do. 573746820.
• 20:37
  Convince me why some why we have
• 20:40
  jurisdiction over the planet other than
• 20:42
  saying we have the biggest military and
• 20:44
  the biggest dicks. That's it. We're so
• 20:47
  we're the we're the big bad we're the
• 20:48
  big bad wolf and therefore we get to do
• 20:50
  what we want. The end. That's it. That's
• 20:52
  what power buys you and you buy into
• 20:55
  that power narrative. You know that's uh
• 20:57
  you know a lot of people aren't going to
• 20:59
  like that, right?
• 21:01
  So anyway, let's get to the Castro
• 21:03
  regime here. They they subtitle. Here's
• 21:05
  sub paragraph one. Fidel Castro, Castro
• 21:07
  Ruse, and others seized power in Cuba on
• 21:09
  about January 9, 1959. Overthrowing then
• 21:12
  President Fulgensio Batista Ualdivar.
• 21:16
  The Castro regime controlled Cuba
• 21:18
  thereafter.
• 21:19
  The cat paragraph two. The Castro regime
• 21:22
  established various ministries to
• 21:23
  support its objectives. El Minister Od
• 21:25
  Lasa Armadas Revolius the Ministry of
• 21:29
  Revolutionary Armed Forces controlled
• 21:32
  all branches of the Cuban military
• 21:35
  within Minfar. The Cuban Air Force and
• 21:37
  Air Defense apparatus was named La
• 21:39
  Defensa anti-air
• 21:42
  revolving
• 21:44
  area and air defense forces. Castro
• 21:47
  paragraph three. Castro regime created
• 21:49
  Ladretzion d country intelligence
• 21:52
  militar director of counter intelligence
• 21:53
  military intelligence part of minfar as
• 21:57
  its military intelligence agency. El
• 21:59
  ministerio dilateria minister of
• 22:02
  interior oversaw the dire directorative
• 22:04
  intelligence. I'm going to quit reading
• 22:05
  them in Spanish and give them to you the
• 22:07
  other way. That focused on foreign
• 22:09
  intelligence gathering. unindicted
• 22:10
  co-conspirator one was minister of the
• 22:15
  defend uh the directorate of
• 22:17
  intelligence. So they're naming this guy
• 22:19
  that's the unindicted co-conspirator
• 22:22
  one. They didn't indict him but they
• 22:24
  listed him as a co-conspirator. From in
• 22:27
  or around 1959 through in around 2008
• 22:30
  Castro Reese uh was the minister of
• 22:33
  Minfar.
• 22:34
  He was also vice president from 1976 to
• 22:37
  2008. From 1959 through June 1996,
• 22:42
  Cuba's political headquarters, including
• 22:44
  the ministries, were located at the pal
• 22:46
  revolutionary palace in Havana, Cuba.
• 22:49
  Superior headquarters. That's the
• 22:51
  superior headquarters. Paragraph 7 96.
• 22:53
  Unindicted. They didn't indict.
• 22:55
  Co-conspirator 2 was the base commander
• 22:57
  at San Antonio airfield in Cuba. At
• 23:00
  least paragraph 8 at least as early as
• 23:02
  1992 through approximately 96.
• 23:05
  Defendants Lorenzo Alberto Perez, Alilio
• 23:08
  Jose Palacio Blanco, Jose Fidel Gual
• 23:11
  Barzaga,
• 23:13
  Raul Simanca Cardinis and Luis Raul
• 23:16
  Gonzalez Parardo Rodriguez were trained
• 23:18
  MIG fighter pilots in DAA F. Luis
• 23:23
  Francisco Perez Perez was also a trained
• 23:26
  MIG fighter pilot in DAA F during this
• 23:30
  time
• 23:32
  and they have pictures of them. Okay.
• 23:35
  At least as early as in or around 1992
• 23:38
  through February 24, 1996, La Perez
• 23:41
  Perez, Blanco Barzaga, Cardinius, and
• 23:43
  Rodriguez and LF Perez Perez were jet
• 23:46
  fighter pilots stationed at San Antonio
• 23:49
  de Laspanos airfield in Cuba.
• 23:53
  Okay, that's the background of the
• 23:55
  people. So, these people were uh fighter
• 23:58
  pilots. Okay, the other people Castro
• 24:01
  Ruse and others known and unknown to the
• 24:03
  grand jury,
• 24:05
  of course, because you don't freaking
• 24:06
  know. Cast and others known and unknown
• 24:09
  to the grand jury. You can indict a ham
• 24:12
  sandwich member grand jury. You ever get
• 24:14
  called to a grand jury, you got to say,
• 24:15
  "No thanks. This is crap. There's nobody
• 24:18
  to There's nobody to tell the other side
• 24:20
  of the story." You get one side of the
• 24:21
  story. If you can't win here, lawyer,
• 24:23
  you're a terrible freaking lawyer. And
• 24:25
  the lawyer, the prosecutor that goes up
• 24:27
  and says and and the prosecutor uh goes
• 24:30
  and gets a an indictment, tries to get
• 24:32
  an indictment by providing a uh an a
• 24:35
  sealed or unsealed indictment and gives
• 24:37
  it to the uh to the uh grand jury and
• 24:41
  the grand jury doesn't give him an
• 24:43
  indictment. That's a shitty lawyer. That
• 24:46
  is a very bad lawyer. And they go,
• 24:48
  "Well, the grand jury didn't find enough
• 24:50
  evidence." Oh, idiot. Because you didn't
• 24:53
  tell them more. Just lie. That's what
• 24:55
  everybody else is doing. The whole
• 24:56
  thing's a scam anyway. You get one side
• 24:59
  of the story. A grand jury is nothing.
• 25:03
  You think it's grand. Why? Cuz they call
• 25:05
  it grand. It's grand. Oh my god. I've
• 25:09
  been invited to the grand jury. Isn't
• 25:13
  that grand? That's just freaking grand.
• 25:15
  I've been invited to the grand jury.
• 25:18
  Wonder who's going to show up? Nobody,
• 25:20
  you [ __ ] Nobody shows up. The only
• 25:23
  person standing there is the prosecutor.
• 25:25
  He gives you a presentation and at the
• 25:27
  end says, "Now, do you think we should
• 25:29
  indict him or not?" And you go, "Yeah, I
• 25:32
  only heard one side of the story. So,
• 25:34
  let's go watch a movie. Um, let's let's
• 25:37
  go watch a movie." And at the end of the
• 25:39
  movie, go, "Boy, that was a bad dude.
• 25:41
  That that Joker, he was a bad guy. Let's
• 25:45
  indict the actor who played him. That's
• 25:47
  the same freaking thing, you [ __ ]
• 25:51
  If you think the grand jury is grand,
• 25:54
  you better think again. It ain't so
• 25:56
  grand. It's stupid. And you what they
• 26:00
  have, okay, so in in in most states, and
• 26:02
  by the way, uh it's hard to do
• 26:04
  afterward. You have to file a motion to
• 26:06
  dismiss or you got to do something. But
• 26:07
  if they have the grand jury, suddenly
• 26:09
  they don't have to have a preliminary
• 26:10
  hearing, right? They don't have to have
• 26:12
  one. they've had the preliminary
• 26:13
  hearing. So, in a preliminary hearing,
• 26:15
  most lawyers go and and the reason they
• 26:18
  go to see the preliminary hearing. So,
• 26:19
  you get charged with a felony. You go to
• 26:21
  court in a felony, the very first step,
• 26:23
  and your idiot lawyer, if he isn't doing
• 26:25
  it, he's an idiot in my opinion. Okay?
• 26:27
  and uh or he has strategic other thing.
• 26:30
  But you better find out exactly why he's
• 26:32
  not doing it because the first thing
• 26:34
  that you should do if you're charged
• 26:36
  with a felony, especially in the state
• 26:38
  of Missouri, is at the end of it say,
• 26:42
  you know, before you ever because what
• 26:43
  happens is you'll get sent to associate
• 26:45
  court. You go to the lower court and in
• 26:47
  the lower court you sit there and your
• 26:48
  only thing at the lower court is either
• 26:51
  get a uh uh wave the preliminary hearing
• 26:56
  or they have a preliminary hearing. Even
• 27:00
  if you don't ask a question, go to the
• 27:04
  preliminary hearing cuz you'll get the
• 27:06
  evidence. You'll get to see what the uh
• 27:09
  prosecutor presents to the judge to
• 27:12
  charge you. He has to have all the
• 27:14
  elements of the crime. And if you got a
• 27:17
  good judge, judge might just throw it
• 27:18
  out. And if you have a good lawyer, you
• 27:20
  may win at the preliminary hearing part.
• 27:22
  This is where you attack the sufficiency
• 27:24
  of evidence. Okay, so here's this grand
• 27:27
  jury indictment. Why are they telling us
• 27:30
  all this? Why why are they giving us
• 27:31
  this whole long story of drama at the
• 27:34
  end? Because this is the movie they
• 27:36
  played for the grand jury. That's why.
• 27:39
  And so I'm sharing it with you. The
• 27:40
  grand jury process is a joke. Okay. And
• 27:43
  maybe not in every state. Maybe they
• 27:45
  have different provisions in different
• 27:47
  states, but in federal court and in
• 27:49
  state court, you don't get to be there.
• 27:52
  Okay? In Missouri, at least in most
• 27:54
  other places, doesn't freaking matter.
• 27:56
  If you have a preliminary hearing
• 27:57
  process, though, that's a different
• 27:59
  deal. You get to have a hearing to find
• 28:01
  out if there's sufficient information to
• 28:03
  charge you with a crime. Now, you're
• 28:06
  charged with a crime. The preliminary
• 28:08
  hearing replaces the grand jury. Okay?
• 28:11
  Then you can file an indictment. The
• 28:12
  indictment has to be heard by who? The
• 28:14
  grand jury. The grand jury hears it. Now
• 28:16
  they don't have to do anything. You they
• 28:18
  don't you don't get the right to have a
• 28:19
  hearing. There was Well, there's already
• 28:21
  been a a a a sort of preliminary
• 28:23
  hearing. There's a grand jury
• 28:24
  indictment. So the grand jury indictment
• 28:27
  gets rid of the need to have a
• 28:29
  preliminary hearing. Okay. And the state
• 28:31
  level. Okay.
• 28:34
  And there are ways, you know, there's
• 28:36
  defenses and all that is different for
• 28:38
  different charges, different for
• 28:39
  different stuff like that. But the
• 28:40
  reason you have a grand jury is because
• 28:42
  a grand jury is a joke and that that
• 28:44
  this lets people believe that there's
• 28:46
  some formal legal process that it's it's
• 28:48
  really [ __ ] But they put it out
• 28:50
  there anyway cuz there's nobody there to
• 28:52
  defend the accused. Nobody. And this is
• 28:55
  how you get past step one of charging
• 28:57
  somebody with a felony. So all you have
• 29:00
  is the basics. And so now if you go to
• 29:02
  trial and you go through, you have to
• 29:04
  attack the basics because you you have
• 29:07
  they've already gotten the right to
• 29:08
  charge you by putting this crazy
• 29:10
  [ __ ] uh process called the grand
• 29:14
  jury in your lap. Okay. So now we're
• 29:17
  going to have the background of the
• 29:18
  shootown. We have the background of the
• 29:20
  participants. You know what they did.
• 29:22
  And now we have the background to the
• 29:24
  shootdown. Castro Ruse and others known
• 29:27
  and unknown to the grand jury used their
• 29:30
  leadership, membership, and association
• 29:33
  to form a dictatorship with absolute
• 29:36
  authority in Cuba. Oh my god, that's
• 29:38
  horrible. Grand jury is sitting there
• 29:40
  thinking that's atrocious. They they're
• 29:42
  dictators, man. These are dictators. Of
• 29:46
  course, they're the bad guys. The Castro
• 29:48
  regime established and maintained
• 29:50
  control over Cuba and her people through
• 29:53
  a reign that eliminated disscent,
• 29:55
  preserved their power, territory, and
• 29:57
  reputation, and through expropriation
• 29:59
  and nationalization of private business
• 30:02
  funded those objectives. Gee, that
• 30:04
  sounds just like America. Only here we
• 30:07
  call it democracy. There they call it
• 30:10
  they call it that's a dictatorship. You
• 30:13
  think you think of the Clinton regime,
• 30:15
  the the Biden regime, Obama, you think
• 30:17
  that's not that's not those guys are all
• 30:20
  above board, right? They've never done
• 30:22
  anything. They never kill anybody. They
• 30:25
  didn't fly jets and kill, you know,
• 30:27
  private citizens. What about Israel?
• 30:30
  They don't just go out and kill
• 30:32
  humanitarian aid workers. That had never
• 30:34
  happened. They don't just fly into other
• 30:36
  countries and bomb the [ __ ] out of them,
• 30:37
  killing all kinds of civilians. They
• 30:39
  don't do that. No, no, no. We would
• 30:42
  never do that. We're a democracy. We're
• 30:44
  the good guys, right? We are the good
• 30:46
  guys. Well, we should quiz that because
• 30:49
  we're really not all that great. You
• 30:51
  know, individually, we're decent. You
• 30:53
  know, we're good folks. But don't go
• 30:55
  thinking that just because you happen to
• 30:56
  be elected that you're some kind of a
• 30:59
  good guy. I mean, just look in the look
• 31:01
  in the look in the state houses. Look
• 31:04
  around you. Wake up. Beginning in or
• 31:08
  around 1959, Cubans fled the Castro
• 31:10
  regime. Oh my god. They've been fleeing
• 31:13
  to the United States of America and
• 31:15
  elsewhere. Well, you know, there's
• 31:16
  plenty of Ukrainians here. Maybe they've
• 31:18
  been fleeing. Maybe they've been fleeing
• 31:22
  not a war. Maybe they've been fleeing
• 31:25
  the BS structure of the dictatorship
• 31:29
  that we installed.
• 31:31
  Maybe that's what they're doing. You're
• 31:34
  pretty selective in choosing who you get
• 31:36
  to charge with the crime, right? I
• 31:37
  better hurry this up or I'm never going
• 31:39
  to make it through. Beginning in I'm I'm
• 31:42
  having too much fun with this. This is
• 31:43
  crap. This is complete crap. The
• 31:47
  beginning in or around 1959, Cubans fled
• 31:49
  the Castro regime. Blah blah blah. I
• 31:50
  already said that. Beginning in at least
• 31:52
  or as early as around 1960. Oh my god.
• 31:55
  They've been doing it for 65 years. The
• 31:58
  former Soviet Union allied with Cuba. Oh
• 32:02
  my god. Vladimir Putin once again is the
• 32:05
  guilty party. Holy crap. It's Vlad. He's
• 32:09
  at it again. Beginning in 1960, the
• 32:13
  former Soviet Union allied with Cuba and
• 32:16
  pro began providing the Cuban government
• 32:19
  with significant economic and military
• 32:21
  support.
• 32:24
  Now, that's a big deal. I mean, my god,
• 32:26
  the US government doesn't ally with
• 32:29
  other countries and provide any of them
• 32:31
  with significant economic and military
• 32:33
  support. That doesn't happen, does it?
• 32:35
  in around 1978. I I want to know what
• 32:38
  sense that that what what what benefit
• 32:41
  that sentence has in here other than to
• 32:44
  say Soviet Unions are bad dudes. Those
• 32:47
  are some bad people. It was a bad it was
• 32:51
  a good theory. It just you you know
• 32:54
  can't quite work that way. Doesn't work
• 32:57
  that way.
• 32:58
  Doesn't work that way. Beginning uh
• 33:02
  inner well in or around 1978, the US and
• 33:05
  Cuba reached an agreement establishing a
• 33:09
  maritime and airspace boundary in the
• 33:12
  straits of Florida and elsewhere based
• 33:14
  on an equidistant measurement at the
• 33:17
  24th parallel, that is 40 to 60 nautical
• 33:21
  miles north of Cuba and well beyond
• 33:25
  Cuba's 12mile maritime and airspace
• 33:28
  jurisdiction.
• 33:30
  So they're talking about having some
• 33:32
  some rules, right? The 24th parallel did
• 33:37
  not extend Cuban maritime and airspace
• 33:39
  jurisdiction, but did serve as an
• 33:41
  operational identifier, triggering
• 33:43
  nottorious requirement to Havana air
• 33:46
  traffic control when planes crossed the
• 33:49
  24th parallel and route to Cuba. In or
• 33:52
  around 1980, Cubans fled Cuba by boat
• 33:57
  inmas from the Mariel Harbor through the
• 34:00
  Florida Straits. While many Cubans
• 34:02
  survived that voyage, others perished at
• 34:05
  sea.
• 34:07
  After the Soviet Union dissolved in '
• 34:09
  91, their economic support for Cuba
• 34:12
  ceased. Cuba suffered economic recession
• 34:15
  which peaked in around 94. Cuban
• 34:18
  citizens continued to flee the Castro
• 34:20
  regime for the United States by boat
• 34:23
  raft and makeshift flotation vessels,
• 34:26
  including many who did not survive the
• 34:28
  journey. During that time, BTR rescued
• 34:32
  many fleeing Cubans at sea. At least as
• 34:36
  early as in or around 92, the DI, that's
• 34:40
  the Defense Intelligence Directorate,
• 34:43
  Directorate of Intelligence, sent spies
• 34:45
  to the center district of Florida to,
• 34:47
  among other tasks, infiltrate BTR and
• 34:51
  report to the Castro regime on its
• 34:54
  activities. Now, riddle me this, Batman.
• 34:58
  Are we not engaged in the same thing in
• 35:03
  reverse? Are there spies from America
• 35:07
  going into Cuba? Now, if they get caught
• 35:10
  on Cuban sto so soil, they're going to
• 35:12
  be killed or they're going to be denied
• 35:14
  by the United States, right? So, these
• 35:17
  guys, they they're the ones with all the
• 35:19
  genius. And I'm sure they didn't have to
• 35:21
  provide any of this evidence, but this
• 35:22
  is what they put. Those spies included
• 35:25
  Renee Gonzalez
• 35:27
  aka Castor aka Iselene and Juan Pablo Ro
• 35:33
  aka German aka Vedit. The spies posed as
• 35:39
  exiled pilots fleeing Cuba. Juan Pablo
• 35:43
  Ro also offered himself to the FBI as an
• 35:45
  informant on the activities of Miami
• 35:47
  based exile groups including BTR.
• 35:51
  the DIA directed and controlled his
• 35:54
  cooperation with the FBI. That's
• 35:56
  comfortable for you to say now, right?
• 35:59
  But back then, I guarantee you didn't
• 36:01
  either know that or you wouldn't have
• 36:03
  said it. And you you know, who knows
• 36:05
  whether it's true even now.
• 36:08
  This is this is it's it's you're not
• 36:10
  allowed to lie to the court, right?
• 36:12
  You're not allowed to. But but all of
• 36:13
  this is questionable questionable stuff.
• 36:17
  What evidence do you have of all this?
• 36:18
  Oh, we gave that to the grand jury, did
• 36:20
  you? You showed them a movie and they
• 36:22
  said, "Yeah, let's get these guys."
• 36:24
  That's what you did.
• 36:26
  And and how do you have anything if it's
• 36:29
  not if it if you're not willing to
• 36:30
  subject it to cross-examination by
• 36:33
  somebody else with a different uh focus
• 36:36
  with a that that isn't doesn't have the
• 36:38
  same goal as you to indict somebody.
• 36:42
  On about July 13, 1994, 70 Cubans
• 36:45
  attempted to flee the Caster regime in a
• 36:47
  tugboat named El de Marzo. The 13th of
• 36:50
  March, the Castro regime's coast guard,
• 36:51
  a branch of military controlled by
• 36:53
  Castroiz, sank the tugboat and killed
• 36:55
  dozens of their own citizenry. What does
• 36:58
  this have to do with anything? They sunk
• 37:02
  a tugboat of people trying to leave and
• 37:04
  they said, "You're not leaving." If
• 37:06
  America had a rule that said you
• 37:07
  couldn't take your tugboat and leave
• 37:09
  American waters and said, "By the way,
• 37:11
  if you go out there, we're going to kill
• 37:13
  you."
• 37:15
  Hm. H
• 37:18
  wonder what would happen there. Shortly
• 37:20
  thereafter, in or around August 1994,
• 37:23
  Cubans filled the streets in protest
• 37:25
  along with the iconic seaw wall known as
• 37:27
  El Malikon in Havana, Cuba in response
• 37:30
  to castaster continued repression of
• 37:32
  seafaring migration to the United
• 37:34
  States. On about November 1994, three
• 37:37
  unarmed United States civilian aircraft
• 37:40
  operated by BTTR dropped leaflets and
• 37:44
  other items that landed on the Cuban
• 37:48
  mainland.
• 37:50
  H. So, American aircraft flying over.
• 37:56
  What does this show?
• 37:58
  Oh, now I'm going to have to find out.
• 38:01
  Um,
• 38:03
  tell you what, the Castro regime took no
• 38:05
  military action against those aircraft.
• 38:08
  Isn't that crazy? Sorry, I got
• 38:10
  distracted. Honor about July 13, 1995.
• 38:14
  Four unarmed US civilian aircraft
• 38:16
  operated by BTTR
• 38:19
  flew along with a maritime flotilla from
• 38:21
  the US toward Cuba to commemorate the
• 38:23
  sinking of the El Traitz de Marta. So on
• 38:27
  13th of July they were celebrating the
• 38:29
  sinking of the 13th of March. The Castro
• 38:32
  regime's coast guard met the flotilla
• 38:34
  and formed a blockade. The Castro regime
• 38:36
  dispatched MIG fighters to the area. The
• 38:38
  regime took no further action. In or
• 38:41
  around 95, a Cuban dissident group
• 38:43
  advocating for peaceful transition from
• 38:45
  Castro to a democratic government formed
• 38:47
  in Cuba. They were known as Consilio
• 38:50
  Kubano.
• 38:53
  On or about January 9, 1996 and January
• 38:57
  1396, four unarmed civilian aircraft
• 38:59
  operated by BTTR flew leafits containing
• 39:02
  epserts from the US nations uh United
• 39:04
  Nations Universal Declaration of Human
• 39:07
  Rights that landed on the Cuban
• 39:09
  mainland. Cubans including members of
• 39:11
  Consilo Kubano received the lease.
• 39:14
  Consilo Kubano planned a meeting to
• 39:16
  begin on about February 24, 1996. The DI
• 39:19
  Defense Intelligence Directorate on
• 39:21
  behalf of Castro regime formulated
• 39:23
  operation a scorpion operation scorpion
• 39:26
  to perfect the confrontation of the
• 39:29
  counterrevolutionary actions of BTTR and
• 39:31
  provided instructions to its Miami based
• 39:34
  agents to continue to provide
• 39:35
  information to on BTTR plans and
• 39:38
  activities but not to fly with BTTR to
• 39:41
  Cuba in around February 96.
• 39:46
  Part of the operation scorpion's mission
• 39:48
  was for the Wasp network to provide
• 39:49
  information related to BTTR which
• 39:51
  notably included any flight plan toward
• 39:53
  Cuba on February 2496 to coincide with
• 39:55
  the concealer Kubano meeting. The Wasp
• 39:58
  network provided information with the DI
• 40:00
  in which the DI was to turn provided uh
• 40:02
  was in turn to provide to the Cuban
• 40:05
  military including DEFAR Castroiz and
• 40:07
  the Castro regime in response to BTTR
• 40:09
  flights honor about January 96 and honor
• 40:12
  about January 1396 and in anticipation
• 40:14
  of future flights by BTTR uh DAFF
• 40:18
  engaged in training missions. This is
• 40:19
  the flight people with their MIG fighter
• 40:21
  pilots including La L Perez Press,
• 40:24
  Blanco Baraga, Cardinius Rodriguez, and
• 40:26
  LF Perez Press. The pilots practiced
• 40:29
  locating and flying low, slowflying
• 40:31
  civilian aircraft like the ones used by
• 40:33
  BTTR. At about this time, the Castro
• 40:36
  regime quashed Cusilio Kubano's planned
• 40:38
  meeting and prevented the organization
• 40:40
  from gathering on February 24,96 and
• 40:43
  thereafter.
• 40:45
  Okay, so these are all activities of a
• 40:47
  foreign government taken on foreign
• 40:49
  soil. Nothing has happened. If they
• 40:52
  didn't capture any of these guys, maybe
• 40:54
  they did and they're charging them with
• 40:55
  crimes. And so, uh, that's fine because
• 40:58
  they're in your jurisdiction and you
• 40:59
  catch them here. If you can catch them
• 41:01
  here, you can get them for murder, but
• 41:03
  you can't get them for murder in
• 41:04
  somewhere that occurred elsewhere in the
• 41:06
  world. Okay? The murder had to occur in
• 41:08
  the jurisdiction you're flying in. Okay?
• 41:11
  And and that's what they're talking
• 41:13
  about. Remember that little line that
• 41:14
  they gave you about here's a line that
• 41:15
  we agreed to under treaty. We said we'd
• 41:18
  give notice to each other and we
• 41:19
  wouldn't go any further than that.
• 41:20
  That's how I'm I'm that's seems to be
• 41:22
  the way they're trying to claim
• 41:23
  jurisdiction over these planes shot down
• 41:25
  uh over um um probably the Cuban spaces,
• 41:28
  but we're not there yet. Let's get to
• 41:30
  the shootown. And and that'll that that
• 41:32
  would give you uh maybe give you
• 41:34
  jurisdiction in the uh federal court in
• 41:38
  Florida, but I doubt it because it
• 41:40
  doesn't cover the sea. It covers
• 41:44
  everywhere else, right?
• 41:46
  A jurisdiction on a boat, that's
• 41:48
  different. If you have a jurisdiction on
• 41:50
  a boat and on a US boat, US licensed
• 41:52
  boat, something like that, maybe that
• 41:54
  would work, right? Maybe. But you can't,
• 41:57
  you know, you still got to have both
• 41:58
  parties located in the boat. If I blow
• 42:00
  up a boat from somewhere else, I'm not
• 42:02
  on the boat. I just blew up a licensed
• 42:04
  boat, right? You're not on that boat.
• 42:06
  You can't take jurisdiction of me on a
• 42:08
  boat that I'm not on as the captain of
• 42:10
  that boat. Anyway, the shootown. Now
• 42:12
  we're getting to the meat. At BTTR's
• 42:14
  January 96 flight, Casteries authorized
• 42:16
  use of deadly force against BTTR. Okay,
• 42:19
  that's his prerogative as he can say,
• 42:21
  "Kill those bastards. Shoot them down."
• 42:24
  You think we don't do the same? What do
• 42:26
  we do in America? Blow up that uh blow
• 42:28
  up that leader of Iran. Blow up his son.
• 42:31
  Blow up his wife and kids. Blow up that
• 42:33
  school over there full of girls because
• 42:35
  all the elites are over there going to
• 42:37
  school. You know, blow up Gaza. you
• 42:39
  know, blow it the freak up. Why not? I
• 42:42
  mean, geez, we're What are they going to
• 42:43
  do? Charges with murder? I don't think
• 42:45
  so. Not in America.
• 42:47
  They might be. If they could catch us in
• 42:49
  Iran at the time Donald Trump flies to
• 42:52
  Iran and maybe they'll pick him up and
• 42:55
  go, "Well, sir, we're going to charge
• 42:56
  you with a crime. Have a nice day." And
• 42:58
  they put him in prison. Okay. So, that's
• 43:00
  how you get jurisdiction. You don't get
• 43:01
  jurisdiction by creative means like
• 43:03
  this. This is good stuff. So, I'm I'm
• 43:05
  eager to find out where they're going.
• 43:07
  But I'm only halfway through and I'm
• 43:09
  only nine pages of 26. So I got to
• 43:11
  cruise a little faster and quit
• 43:12
  commenting and yelling at people. So
• 43:16
  Castro authorized the use of deadly
• 43:18
  force against BTTR. Oh my god. After
• 43:22
  January 1996,
• 43:24
  at least as early as in or around
• 43:26
  February 94 and continuing through at
• 43:28
  least around July 96, the military chain
• 43:31
  of command at San Antonio deboss
• 43:33
  airfield in Cuba was from the air base
• 43:35
  to Dayfar. from Dfar to Minfar then back
• 43:37
  down the same chain of command. All
• 43:39
  orders to kill by the Cuban military
• 43:41
  traveled through this chain of command
• 43:42
  with Castro and Fidel Fidel Castro as
• 43:45
  the final decision makers. Okay, similar
• 43:49
  Donald Trump if he chooses to kill the
• 43:51
  leader the Alamei they want to kill him.
• 43:55
  Trump gives the order. Okay, Trump
• 43:57
  ordered that guy killed. Period. End of
• 44:00
  sentence. Okay, so there you go. that
• 44:03
  happened and uh he gave that order while
• 44:05
  located on American soil. He's more
• 44:07
  guilty of a crime of murder in America
• 44:10
  than they're ever going to be able to
• 44:12
  establish by any creative weaving of a
• 44:14
  tale like I'm telling you right now.
• 44:16
  Okay? And not that I'm saying you should
• 44:18
  be. These are decisions that are made by
• 44:20
  foreign governments all the time. What
• 44:22
  was what was uh um Maduro charged with?
• 44:26
  Possession of machine guns. Possession
• 44:29
  of machine guns. That's even more
• 44:31
  creative. That is even more [ __ ] by
• 44:32
  the way. But uh uh this one, let's we'll
• 44:35
  we'll get to the end because I haven't
• 44:36
  read all this. I just knew I I knew what
• 44:38
  it was going to contain before I read
• 44:40
  it. So, I chose to do it right here.
• 44:41
  Right here live. So, you're getting
• 44:43
  Sam's live thought process while I read
• 44:46
  this horse crap. Uh uh indictment. Oh my
• 44:49
  god. They've indicted someone at the
• 44:51
  time of their destruction. Okay. Wait,
• 44:53
  wait, wait, wait, wait.
• 44:55
  On or about February 2496 at 1:30 p.m.
• 44:59
  approximately three unarmed US civilian
• 45:01
  aircraft operated by BTTR bearing tail
• 45:04
  numbers and November 259, November 2456
• 45:09
  Sierra and November 5485 Sierra left
• 45:14
  Opaaka
• 45:15
  airport in Miami Dade County, Florida.
• 45:18
  Honor about February 24, 1996, a DFR MIG
• 45:21
  fighter jet upright by La Perez Pres and
• 45:23
  LF Pres destroyed two of the BTR
• 45:26
  aircraft bearing tail numbers November
• 45:28
  2456 Sierra and November 5485 Sierra.
• 45:33
  They killed four United States nationals
• 45:36
  including US citizens,
• 45:38
  three US citizens. At the time of their
• 45:41
  destruction, the two BTTR aircraft were
• 45:44
  flying outside Cuban territory. In fact,
• 45:47
  they're flying over international water
• 45:49
  traveling away from Cuba despite their
• 45:51
  contact with the Tavana air traffic
• 45:53
  control tower. Cuban military did not
• 45:55
  provide BTTR with any warning of the
• 45:58
  imminent destruction of their aircraft.
• 46:01
  Okay, those are facts that maybe maybe
• 46:04
  can be proven. Maybe they were just said
• 46:05
  in a movie format to the uh grand jury.
• 46:08
  After the Castro regime shot down the
• 46:10
  two BTTR aircraft, Barzaga, Cardinius,
• 46:13
  and Rodriguez followed the third BTTR
• 46:15
  aircraft with tail number November 256
• 46:18
  near the 24th parallel. But that
• 46:20
  aircraft escaped destruction.
• 46:24
  And then you show a picture of this soul
• 46:26
  surviving aircraft on February 26. Count
• 46:29
  one. Okay, those are the facts. Those
• 46:31
  are the facts. Okay, count one. Count
• 46:35
  paragraph count one. conspiracy to kill
• 46:37
  a US national under USC 18USC section uh
• 46:42
  2332B2
• 46:44
  paragraph 1 through 33rd of the general
• 46:46
  allegations section are incorporated
• 46:48
  here in by reference beginning at a time
• 46:50
  unknown to the grand jury but at least
• 46:52
  as early as in or around January 96 and
• 46:55
  continuing in or around April 96 while
• 46:57
  outside the United States defendants
• 46:59
  they were outside the United States
• 47:01
  defendants Ro Mestro Castro Ruse Lorenzo
• 47:04
  Alberto Perez Perez Ailio Jose Palacio
• 47:06
  Blanco, Jose Fidel Gual Barzaga and Raul
• 47:10
  Samanka Cardinius and Luis Raul Gonzalez
• 47:13
  Partardo Rodriguez did knowingly and
• 47:16
  willfully combine, conspire, confederate
• 47:18
  and degree with each other and with
• 47:22
  other persons known and unknown to the
• 47:24
  grand jury to kill a national of the
• 47:26
  United States while the national was
• 47:28
  outside of the United States and that is
• 47:30
  CC, MD1P, AA and other pilots and
• 47:34
  passengers of aircraft. craft operated
• 47:36
  by BTTR. Which conspiracy contemplated
• 47:39
  their murder? As defined in title 18, US
• 47:43
  code uh section 111, I'm sorry, 1,111,
• 47:48
  sub paragraph A. Object of the
• 47:50
  conspiracy was the object of the
• 47:52
  conspiracy to kill US nationals by
• 47:54
  shooting down BTTR aircraft using
• 47:57
  information provided by spies in Miami
• 47:59
  to terrorize, intimidate, and retaliate
• 48:01
  against Cuban people and the Cuban exile
• 48:03
  community.
• 48:05
  Overt acts to achieve the objective of
• 48:07
  this conspiracy. defendants and their
• 48:09
  co-conspirators cons committed and
• 48:11
  caused to be committed at least one of
• 48:13
  the following overt acts among others in
• 48:15
  the southern district of Florida and
• 48:17
  elsewhere because they know it's not
• 48:18
  southern district Florida in or around
• 48:20
  1994 after BTTR's November 1994 flights
• 48:23
  and dropped leaflets in Cuban territory
• 48:25
  DI formulated plan for Juan Pablo Ro to
• 48:28
  fly to a BTTR aircraft to Cuba in late
• 48:31
  '95 to embarrass and undermine BTTR
• 48:34
  what's that got to do with anything
• 48:35
  seriously
• 48:37
  honor about December nomber 4, 1995. DI
• 48:40
  agreed to that Raul that Juan Pablo
• 48:43
  wrote should continue to inform on BTTR.
• 48:45
  Okay. At least as early as January 1396.
• 48:48
  And after BTR's January 96 and January
• 48:51
  1396 dissemination of leaflets that
• 48:54
  landed on the Cuban mainland, Castro
• 48:55
  Ruse met with military leaders and
• 48:57
  authorized them to take decisive and
• 48:59
  deadly action against BTTR aircraft.
• 49:02
  Okay. He said what any leader would say.
• 49:04
  America would say that. China, you can't
• 49:06
  come fly your [ __ ] into our territory
• 49:09
  and drop leaflets telling Americans that
• 49:11
  Donald Trump is fat. You can't do that.
• 49:14
  You're not allowed. And so therefore, I,
• 49:16
  Donald Trump, say, "Blow those aircraft
• 49:17
  up if they cross our airspace again."
• 49:19
  You think we're not going to do that?
• 49:20
  We're absolutely going to do that. On or
• 49:23
  about January the 18th, 1996, DI
• 49:25
  instructed was network to report on US
• 49:27
  military personnel and asset movement as
• 49:28
  well as the United States military
• 49:30
  preparedness at the Bokeh Chica Naval
• 49:32
  Air Station. a United States military
• 49:34
  installation located in Key West
• 49:37
  Southern District of Florida. Honor
• 49:39
  about January 1896, DI instructed Juan
• 49:42
  Pablo Rokin and Renee Gonzalez to
• 49:44
  determine what aircraft BTTR used and
• 49:46
  other details regarding its January 13
• 49:50
  flight. Oh my god, they're looking for
• 49:52
  information on how to stop these people.
• 49:54
  On or about January 2696, Gardo
• 49:57
  Hernandez, a Cuban spy operating in the
• 49:59
  southern districts of Florida, returned
• 50:01
  to the US from Cuba with approval for
• 50:02
  Operation Scorpion and cancelling his
• 50:04
  previous plan for Juan Pablo Rou to fly
• 50:06
  a BTTR plane to Cuba to embarrass an
• 50:09
  undermined BTTR.
• 50:12
  But on about January 29, 96, DA convide
• 50:14
  instruct conveyed instructions to its
• 50:17
  Miami based spies regarding Operation
• 50:19
  Scorpion and the approved confrontation
• 50:21
  with BTTR. That's on change 29. On about
• 50:25
  January 3096, the DI instructed Juan
• 50:27
  Pablo Ro and Renee Gonzalez to avoid
• 50:29
  flying with BTTR and to use the
• 50:31
  particular phrases over the radio to
• 50:33
  communate with Cuba if they were on the
• 50:35
  flight with BTTR. On about February 196,
• 50:38
  the DI and its agents in the Southern
• 50:40
  District of Florida and elsewhere began
• 50:42
  planning Pablo Juan Pablo Ro's return to
• 50:45
  Cuba. The DI informed uh Gerardo
• 50:47
  Hernandez that the DI wanted Juan Pablo
• 50:50
  filmed entering and leaving a
• 50:51
  CubanAmerican exile group headquarters.
• 50:55
  On or about February 3rd or February
• 50:57
  5th, 96, the DI instructed its agents to
• 51:01
  make Operation Scorpion a priority and
• 51:04
  urgently report to BTTR flight data. On
• 51:07
  about February 13, Cuban spies operating
• 51:09
  in Sardisa, Florida directed Renee
• 51:12
  Gonzalez to provide clear, detailed,
• 51:14
  precise information about upcoming BTTR
• 51:16
  flights. They ordered R. Renee Gonzalez
• 51:18
  not to join any flight and directed that
• 51:20
  if he could not avoid flying with BTTR,
• 51:23
  he should broadcast specified phrases
• 51:25
  via the aircraft's radio. On about
• 51:27
  February 18,96, DI instructed that Juan
• 51:30
  Pablo Rook and Renee Gonzalez should not
• 51:31
  fly with BTTR or any other organization.
• 51:34
  on February 24, 25, 26, 27, the
• 51:37
  anticipated meeting date of the uh
• 51:40
  Consilio Kubano.
• 51:42
  Honor about February 21, Juan Pablo Ro
• 51:44
  falsely informed the FBI that BTR would
• 51:47
  not be flying during the weekend of
• 51:49
  February 2496, even though, as he then
• 51:51
  knew, BTTR was scheduled to fly during
• 51:54
  that time. So they're they found a psy
• 51:56
  here. Honor about February 2296, the DI
• 52:00
  communicated that a DI officer had
• 52:01
  traveled to Mexico to support the
• 52:03
  departure of Juan Pablo Ro from the US
• 52:05
  to Cuba. Honor about February 2296, Juan
• 52:08
  Pablo Ro met with Herardo Hernandez. On
• 52:12
  about February 23, Renee Gonzalez met
• 52:14
  with Herardo Hernandez. On about
• 52:16
  February 23, Juan Paul Ro Juan Pablo Ro
• 52:19
  left Miami as directed and returned to
• 52:21
  Cuba. At least as early as in or around
• 52:24
  February 96, Castro Re's command and
• 52:26
  with direction from the unindicted
• 52:28
  co-conspirator number two, La Perez
• 52:31
  Perez, Blanco Barzaga, Cardinius,
• 52:34
  Rodriguez, LF Perez, Perez and others
• 52:36
  engaged in training missions
• 52:39
  using Cuban military aircraft to find,
• 52:41
  track, pursue, intercept small civilian
• 52:44
  aircraft off the coast of Cuba.
• 52:47
  Paragraph 22. On about February 24,96 on
• 52:50
  about uh at or about 3 p.m. Three
• 52:52
  unarmed civilian aircraft operated by
• 52:54
  BTTR having those tail numbers flew
• 52:57
  south across the 24th parallel. At
• 53:00
  approximately 3 p.m. La Perez Pres and
• 53:03
  LF Pres in MIG 1 and Blanco in a MIG 2
• 53:06
  took off from San Antonio Laspanos Air
• 53:09
  Force located near Havana, Cuba. at 3:20
• 53:12
  p.m. Perez Perez and uh sought
• 53:14
  authorization to destroy the unarmed
• 53:16
  civilian aircraft bearing tail number
• 53:19
  and November 2456s which was flying at
• 53:22
  the time over international waters. La
• 53:25
  Perez pres
• 53:27
  LF were given the authorization to
• 53:31
  destroy unarmed civilian aircraft. At
• 53:34
  approximately 3:21 p.m. without warning,
• 53:37
  Pres and LF Pres shot down BTR's unarmed
• 53:41
  civilian aircraft bearing tail numbers
• 53:43
  blah blah blah using air-to-air missile
• 53:46
  and killing pilot CC and his passenger
• 53:48
  PM. At approximately 3:26 p.m. in
• 53:52
  response to requests for authorization
• 53:53
  by Less Pres and the other press pilots
• 53:56
  were given authorization to destroy a
• 53:58
  second unarmed BTTR aircraft at
• 54:01
  approximately 3:28 p.m. Without warning,
• 54:03
  Less President LF press present MIG1
• 54:06
  destroyed the second unarmed civilian
• 54:07
  aircraft bearing number November 5485
• 54:11
  Sierra using an air-to-air missile
• 54:13
  killing the pilot and his passenger at
• 54:14
  time of the shootown of the two BTR
• 54:16
  aircraft. Barzag and Cardinius in MIG 3
• 54:18
  and Rodriguez and MIG 4 were inside
• 54:21
  their Cuban fighter jets ready to
• 54:23
  deploy. They listened to La Pres and LF
• 54:25
  Pres radio requests for authorization to
• 54:27
  destroy unarmed civilian aircraft. The
• 54:29
  authorization received for the same in
• 54:31
  conference that those aircraft were
• 54:33
  destroyed. Barzag and Cardinius in MIG 3
• 54:35
  and Rodriguez in MIG 4 took off from San
• 54:37
  Antonio Laspano air located in Havana,
• 54:40
  Cuba to join La Perez Perez and Pres in
• 54:43
  MIG 1's pursuit of third unarmed
• 54:44
  civilian aircraft bearing tail number
• 54:46
  and 25506 with the intent of destroying
• 54:50
  that aircraft as well. unindicted
• 54:52
  co-conspirator two authorized Barzaga
• 54:55
  and Cardinius in MIG 3 and Rodriguez in
• 54:58
  MIG 4 to take off from San Antonio Leos
• 55:00
  Bano Sarfeld located near Havana to join
• 55:03
  La Perez present other press pursuit of
• 55:05
  the third unnamed civilian aircraft with
• 55:07
  the intent of destroying that vi that
• 55:10
  aircraft all in violation
• 55:13
  of US code section 2332B2
• 55:18
  which by the way doesn't apply by
• 55:22
  to anything that we've talked about.
• 55:25
  It's a US code. How in the world are
• 55:29
  these people all in violation of title
• 55:33
  18 US code? They aren't even located in
• 55:37
  America.
• 55:39
  Okay. So, that's interesting. The the
• 55:42
  easy answer would be just go screw you
• 55:44
  guys. We we aren't doing this. But
• 55:46
  they've politicized it. So the judge has
• 55:47
  to, you know, rethink and and and give
• 55:50
  any sort of re the grand jury indicted
• 55:53
  these people. Come on. What else are we
• 55:55
  going to do? That's it. So murder,
• 55:57
  that's the first count one murder has
• 56:00
  now been told to us about what that is.
• 56:04
  The you know all of these people full of
• 56:08
  photos. We have general allegations. We
• 56:10
  have a superseding indictment. We have
• 56:13
  overt acts that they conducted.
• 56:16
  Um, that's that's all count one.
• 56:22
  Conspiracy to kill US nationals. That's
• 56:26
  conspiracy, friends and neighbors. That
• 56:29
  is it.
• 56:31
  Count two, destruction of aircraft.
• 56:34
  Paragraphs 1 through 34 of the general
• 56:36
  allegations section and paragraph 4
• 56:38
  through31 of the overt act section are
• 56:41
  incorporated by reference on or about
• 56:43
  February 24 in the special jur aircraft
• 56:46
  jurisdiction of the United States.
• 56:50
  Right? So now they have a special
• 56:52
  aircraft jurisdiction because that's why
• 56:56
  they mentioned that agreement with the
• 56:58
  uh with the uh uh
• 57:02
  Cuban government from way back when they
• 57:04
  said if you crossed this parallel. So
• 57:07
  while in the special aircraft
• 57:09
  jurisdiction of the United States,
• 57:11
  unmentioned by the way, the US 18USC
• 57:15
  32A1
• 57:17
  uh 34 49 USC 46501 sub paragraph 2. So
• 57:23
  they're creating their own jurisdiction
• 57:25
  here all in an effort to be able to and
• 57:29
  this is extremely tenuous and BS just by
• 57:32
  reading it because they aren't even
• 57:33
  mentioning the jurisdiction. They're
• 57:35
  just, you know, you throw the grand jury
• 57:37
  doesn't know crap about jurisdiction
• 57:39
  anyway. Jurisdiction is for the the
• 57:41
  courts to decide. It's for lawyers to
• 57:43
  have before they get there. You know,
• 57:45
  you have to have the jurisdiction. So,
• 57:47
  they have to convince the court. But if
• 57:48
  the court's on your side and the court's
• 57:51
  going to, you know, just give you what
• 57:52
  you want, you have to wait till appeal.
• 57:54
  But in the meantime, you get to have an
• 57:56
  act. You get to file a case. And Donald
• 57:58
  Trump goes, "Well, man, let's go do what
• 58:00
  we did to Maduro. Man, that was great,
• 58:02
  wasn't it? And we charged him with
• 58:03
  holding a machine gun. He's got a
• 58:06
  machine. I'm the biggest baddest wolf on
• 58:09
  the planet. I'm going to go get him. And
• 58:12
  so, you know, this this is what they're
• 58:14
  trying to do. All the way back in April,
• 58:16
  they saw that. Oh my god. Here's a plan.
• 58:18
  We're going to capture that dude. Things
• 58:20
  will change in Cuba then. That's right.
• 58:26
  Excuse me. Jeez, what games we play. You
• 58:30
  got nothing better in your life than to
• 58:31
  lie about jurisdiction. You know, you
• 58:33
  just create your own jurisdiction. This
• 58:36
  is government overreach at its finest.
• 58:38
  This is this is what you do to make a
• 58:40
  name for yourself. Yeah, I charge Castro
• 58:42
  with a crime. Well, man, that was great.
• 58:45
  I guess I could do that. Who needs to be
• 58:46
  a lawyer? What difference does it make?
• 58:48
  You're not using it anyway. You're not
• 58:50
  using the law here. This is this is uh
• 58:53
  creativity at its finest. Uh so honor
• 58:57
  about February 24 in the special
• 58:58
  aircraft jurisdiction of the United
• 59:00
  States Ra Modestro Castro Ruiz Lorenzo
• 59:02
  Alberto Paris Paris. So here they're
• 59:04
  charging Castro
• 59:06
  did willfully destroy and wreck an
• 59:08
  aircraft aircraft that is a United
• 59:11
  States civilian aircraft bearing tail
• 59:14
  number blah by means of an air-to-air
• 59:16
  missile which resulted in the death of
• 59:18
  human beings CC and PM in violation of
• 59:21
  title 18 US code sections blah blah
• 59:24
  blah.
• 59:28
  Where is the jurisdiction over Raul
• 59:32
  Madestro Castro? Where? It's not
• 59:36
  mentioned. There's no jurisdiction
• 59:39
  mentioned.
• 59:41
  Even if we the aircraft happened to be
• 59:45
  in the special aircraft jurisdiction of
• 59:47
  the United States, the defendant wasn't
• 59:51
  Lorenzo Alberto Perez. Perez. Maybe he
• 59:55
  was. We don't know where he filed the
• 59:57
  missile, fired the missile from, do we?
• 59:59
  That's not mentioned. Whether he was in
• 1:00:01
  that aircraft or not, this is this is
• 1:00:02
  poorly written crap. This is just some
• 1:00:06
  guy telling a story to 12 citizen going,
• 1:00:08
  "Don't you want to get that Castro after
• 1:00:10
  all these years? This is what's going
• 1:00:12
  on." Count three, destruction of an
• 1:00:14
  aircraft.
• 1:00:16
  Same thing. And they're they're the next
• 1:00:18
  aircraft by means of an air-to-air
• 1:00:20
  missile. Nothing different in that
• 1:00:21
  count, just a different airplane. Count
• 1:00:24
  four, murder.
• 1:00:26
  Count for murder. Paragraph 1 through 34
• 1:00:29
  of general allegations, paragraph 4
• 1:00:31
  through 31 of the overt acts of count
• 1:00:33
  one are incorporated by reference under
• 1:00:36
  about February 2496 special maritime and
• 1:00:38
  territorial jurisdiction of the United
• 1:00:41
  States. Of course, Raul Modestro Castro
• 1:00:44
  was not there.
• 1:00:48
  Do you think that if Donald Trump is in
• 1:00:50
  his office in in uh Washington DC and he
• 1:00:54
  killed um uh Ayatoll uh which which
• 1:00:58
  Kmeni was it? Uh he killed one of the
• 1:01:00
  Kmenis
• 1:01:02
  that and everybody else that he ordered
• 1:01:05
  killed over there. Well, we just killed
• 1:01:06
  him, you know. We just we we killed him.
• 1:01:09
  He's admitted it. He's put it out there.
• 1:01:12
  I killed those guys. And that's that. I
• 1:01:14
  took them out. I gave the or of course
• 1:01:15
  he gave the order. who else gave the
• 1:01:17
  order that the special the special
• 1:01:21
  jurisdiction of Iran is going to take
• 1:01:24
  place and they'll arrest Trump in the
• 1:01:26
  White House through a special action,
• 1:01:28
  drag him on over to Iran and get him for
• 1:01:31
  murder under Iranian law. You'd think
• 1:01:33
  that was third world country law. That's
• 1:01:36
  what this is that I'm reading to you.
• 1:01:38
  This is third world country [ __ ]
• 1:01:41
  law. This is the the king changing his
• 1:01:44
  mind and and uh you get a you get a die
• 1:01:47
  because I say you get to die. Why don't
• 1:01:49
  you just send over the special forces,
• 1:01:51
  kill the guy like you did in Iran? What
• 1:01:54
  in the why this joke? I'd much more
• 1:01:57
  support the other stuff than going in a
• 1:02:00
  de destroying
• 1:02:02
  a system that I like to think is meant
• 1:02:06
  to be above reproach. This is not it.
• 1:02:11
  This is [ __ ] And the lawyers
• 1:02:14
  playing these games are horseshit
• 1:02:16
  lawyers. These aren't real lawyers. This
• 1:02:19
  is crap. And uh you can tell them I said
• 1:02:22
  so. I don't care. This is crap. Where
• 1:02:24
  you Let me go in there and defend this
• 1:02:28
  guy. No news, no nothing. And just keep
• 1:02:30
  going to the to the to Let me ask a
• 1:02:33
  couple of questions
• 1:02:35
  in front of the grand jury and see if
• 1:02:37
  they say. Well, wait a minute.
• 1:02:40
  How you going to get jurisdiction?
• 1:02:43
  Where are you creating this jurisdiction
• 1:02:46
  in the US? You have to we Oh, we can get
• 1:02:50
  once he shows up on American soil. Maybe
• 1:02:54
  if he committed murder in another
• 1:02:55
  country, there are exceptions to the
• 1:02:57
  rule that you can get it or that you or
• 1:02:59
  that he committed murder or directed a
• 1:03:02
  murder while located in another country,
• 1:03:04
  but the murder occurred on US soil and
• 1:03:08
  he directed it. You could get him for
• 1:03:09
  the crime of conspiracy to commit
• 1:03:11
  murder. any of things would be fine if
• 1:03:13
  he traveled to visit his grandma in
• 1:03:17
  Florida and you chose to arrest him then
• 1:03:20
  you could arrest him and maybe take
• 1:03:22
  jurisdiction but using it as a basis for
• 1:03:25
  Donald Trump to engage in a military
• 1:03:27
  action to go and capture the guy and
• 1:03:30
  bring him to bring him to the joke of a
• 1:03:32
  process like this in America just like
• 1:03:37
  the idiots did up in New York to Maduro.
• 1:03:40
  I'd have rather you just killed the guy
• 1:03:42
  and moved on. I'd have felt better about
• 1:03:44
  it, you know, cuz that at least it's a
• 1:03:47
  military action, you know. Sodom
• 1:03:49
  Hussein, we need to just kill that guy.
• 1:03:52
  Uh who the hell else was the guy uh ran
• 1:03:55
  the terrorist organizations? We chased
• 1:03:57
  him around forever, you know, and they
• 1:03:59
  killed him in Afghanistan somewhere and
• 1:04:01
  blah blah blah. That you you you at
• 1:04:04
  least can say, "Well, they've, you know,
• 1:04:05
  the CIA did the right thing." But this
• 1:04:07
  is [ __ ] I mean this lawfare crap is
• 1:04:11
  what we fight, what I fight. This is
• 1:04:14
  this is the rules being twisted for you
• 1:04:17
  to create some kind of scenario. And it
• 1:04:19
  no matter how you slice it, it's BS.
• 1:04:22
  Okay, so account five is also murder. So
• 1:04:25
  we had murder account four,
• 1:04:28
  the general allegations blah blah blah.
• 1:04:30
  They did willfully and unlawfully with
• 1:04:33
  malice of forethought. kill CC a human
• 1:04:36
  being with premeditation and during the
• 1:04:38
  perpetration of an attempt to perpetrate
• 1:04:40
  sabotage, that is the destruction of an
• 1:04:43
  aircraft in violation of title 18 US
• 1:04:46
  code 32. So they're extrapolating the
• 1:04:49
  supposed jurisdiction of somebody that
• 1:04:52
  destroys an aircraft
• 1:04:55
  into murder, not using the murder
• 1:04:58
  statute, but using he destroyed the
• 1:05:00
  aircraft. Okay. So, this is this is
• 1:05:03
  creative writing 101 from your, you
• 1:05:06
  know, eighth grade literature class for
• 1:05:10
  for your eighth grade teacher. This is
• 1:05:12
  these facts are pretty solid, right? Not
• 1:05:15
  they're [ __ ] The same thing goes
• 1:05:17
  for count number five. They same exact
• 1:05:19
  uh title, just different person.
• 1:05:21
  Paragraph uh count six, murder. Same
• 1:05:24
  thing. Same maritime special. They
• 1:05:26
  destroyed an aircraft in violation of
• 1:05:29
  title 18 and somebody got killed. Count
• 1:05:31
  seven murder. Same thing. And that is
• 1:05:34
  it. Um, and they didn't say who the
• 1:05:38
  juror signed. They wiped his name out so
• 1:05:40
  you can't see it. So, it's a US
• 1:05:42
  attorney. Get this. Jason Reading
• 1:05:45
  Quinones. Wonder if he's a Cuban. Uh,
• 1:05:49
  Yara Lorenzo Clucas, first assistant US
• 1:05:52
  attorney. and Abby Waxman, assistant US
• 1:05:56
  attorney, and Michael Gilfarb, assistant
• 1:05:59
  US attorney. These guys are the morons
• 1:06:02
  who signed this. Okay. And uh they made
• 1:06:06
  sure to get rid of the jury for P four
• 1:06:09
  person, you know, because that guy
• 1:06:10
  doesn't want to get killed by any of the
• 1:06:12
  spies from Cuba that are around. But
• 1:06:14
  they're the idiots that have been sucked
• 1:06:17
  into. I mean, imagine you got four US
• 1:06:19
  attorneys going, "Yeah, I'll sign this
• 1:06:20
  thing." But boy, it's much more
• 1:06:22
  important that you believe what we told
• 1:06:25
  you and you uh you uh you know, help us
• 1:06:30
  get this bad guy sign this indictment so
• 1:06:32
  so that we can get on TV and say, "Well,
• 1:06:35
  all we did was give the grand jury the
• 1:06:37
  facts." You know, the facts. You know,
• 1:06:40
  we told him you the grand jury doesn't
• 1:06:42
  understand jurisdiction. That's for
• 1:06:45
  sure.
• 1:06:46
  You know when when was Castro located on
• 1:06:52
  the aircraft that k that killed these
• 1:06:54
  people? You can't just destroy an
• 1:06:56
  aircraft and get and get picked up. So
• 1:06:58
  something so now they're just sitting
• 1:07:00
  there going, "Well, we indicted the man.
• 1:07:02
  We indicted him for destroying an
• 1:07:04
  aircraft." And by the way, once we get
• 1:07:06
  him on US soil,
• 1:07:08
  you know, jurisdiction will will apply
• 1:07:10
  then. And this is what happened in 2003.
• 1:07:13
  So, what they're doing is they're taking
• 1:07:15
  the stuff from 2003. Murder lasts
• 1:07:17
  forever. I'll bet you I'll bet you
• 1:07:19
  anything that the uh code provision of
• 1:07:23
  uh destruction of an aircraft in Title
• 1:07:26
  18, US Code 32.
• 1:07:30
  Let's see if we can find that.
• 1:07:32
  Title 18, US Code 32. Where are we
• 1:07:38
  morons? Where are we? Let's see if
• 1:07:43
  somebody's selling you something. Wait,
• 1:07:45
  I'm not creating a PDF. I am
• 1:07:49
  researching. This is what's happening.
• 1:07:51
  Okay, these people are amazing lawyers,
• 1:07:55
  aren't they? Wow.
• 1:07:59
  Wow. These guys are geniuses. Title 18,
• 1:08:03
  US Code section 32A is a federal
• 1:08:06
  criminal statute defining the crime of
• 1:08:09
  destruction of aircraft or aircraft
• 1:08:12
  facilities. Also known as the Aircraft
• 1:08:16
  Sabotage Act. It criminalizes the
• 1:08:19
  willful damage destruction or disable
• 1:08:21
  disablement of civil aircraft and
• 1:08:24
  surrounding facilities.
• 1:08:26
  This the statute, let's see, 18 US code.
• 1:08:31
  Let's get to the actual code.
• 1:08:34
  Okay, here's the code.
• 1:08:37
  A, whoever willfully sets fire to
• 1:08:41
  damages, destroys, and wait, which
• 1:08:43
  paragraph did they use on us? Hang on a
• 1:08:45
  second. They used paragraph se, let's
• 1:08:48
  see, 18 US code 32A.
• 1:08:54
  And A has Jesus,
• 1:08:57
  eight sub paragraphs. Okay, first
• 1:09:00
  paragraph. Sets fire to, damages,
• 1:09:03
  destroys, disables, or wrecks any
• 1:09:06
  aircraft in the special aircraft
• 1:09:08
  jurisdiction of the United States or any
• 1:09:10
  civil aircraft used, operated, or
• 1:09:13
  employed in interstate, overseas, or
• 1:09:15
  foreign air commerce.
• 1:09:17
  Two, place or cause to be placed a
• 1:09:19
  destructive device substance in or upon
• 1:09:21
  blah blah blah. That one doesn't apply.
• 1:09:23
  Sets fire to, damages, destroys, or
• 1:09:25
  disables an air navigation facility.
• 1:09:27
  That one doesn't apply. Four. With
• 1:09:29
  intent to damage, destroy or disable an
• 1:09:31
  aircraft. Sets fire to damage destroyers
• 1:09:32
  disabled or places destructive device in
• 1:09:35
  or approximately two. Nope, that's a
• 1:09:36
  bomb. In interferes with or disables
• 1:09:39
  with intent to endanger the safety of
• 1:09:41
  any person, or with reckless disregard
• 1:09:43
  for the safety of life, anyone engaged
• 1:09:45
  or operating an aircraft in any air
• 1:09:47
  navigation facility. Now, that's not
• 1:09:49
  there either. uh performs an act of
• 1:09:52
  violence against or incapacitates any a
• 1:09:54
  vehicle or any individual on any such
• 1:09:56
  aircraft if such air act of violation of
• 1:09:59
  incapacitation is likely to endanger the
• 1:10:01
  safety of the aircraft.
• 1:10:03
  Communicates information knowing the
• 1:10:05
  information to be false and circumstance
• 1:10:08
  in which information may reasonably
• 1:10:10
  believed thereby endangering the safety
• 1:10:12
  of any aircraft in flight. Nope.
• 1:10:14
  attempts to cons or conspires to do
• 1:10:16
  anything prohibited under subp
• 1:10:18
  paragraphs 1 through seven
• 1:10:21
  shall be fined under this title or
• 1:10:23
  imprisoned not more than 20 years or
• 1:10:27
  both. Okay, that's if you committed any
• 1:10:30
  of these things, it's 20 years and the
• 1:10:32
  special aircraft jurisdiction of the
• 1:10:35
  United States is defined as terms
• 1:10:40
  defined in other law. In this chapter,
• 1:10:43
  the terms aircraft engine, air
• 1:10:45
  navigation, appliance, civil aircraft,
• 1:10:47
  foreign air commerce, interstate air
• 1:10:49
  commerce, landing area, overseas
• 1:10:51
  commerce, propeller, spare part, special
• 1:10:53
  aircraft jurisdiction of the United
• 1:10:56
  States have the meanings given to those
• 1:10:59
  terms in 4,000
• 1:11:02
  4,102A
• 1:11:06
  of title 49. So now we're going to go to
• 1:11:10
  there.
• 1:11:12
  and find out what title 49
• 1:11:16
  says. T I T L E 49 USC.
• 1:11:23
  Oops. See,
• 1:11:26
  and see what this says.
• 1:11:31
  There is no statute uh you are thinking
• 1:11:34
  of
• 1:11:36
  which is the foundation definition
• 1:11:38
  section for aviation. Okay. This section
• 1:11:43
  overview transportation aviation
• 1:11:45
  definitions. This section defines
• 1:11:49
  where is it?
• 1:11:51
  Mhm.
• 1:11:53
  We need the full text. General
• 1:11:55
  definitions. Here we are. Uh blah blah
• 1:11:59
  blah. Landing. Landing. Landing. There
• 1:12:01
  are a lot of of paragraphs.
• 1:12:06
  What was it? Special. Special. What was
• 1:12:09
  it? What was that title? Definition of
• 1:12:12
  special aircraft jurisdiction. Special.
• 1:12:15
  That'll be in the S's. Foreign. Boy,
• 1:12:18
  there's a lot of them. Um person small
• 1:12:22
  hub aircraft. Um limited definitions.
• 1:12:26
  Come on.
• 1:12:29
  It's gone. Public aircraft person
• 1:12:32
  predatory.
• 1:12:35
  Nope. There's nothing here. United
• 1:12:38
  States air traffic.
• 1:12:41
  Well,
• 1:12:44
  we're going to search
• 1:12:47
  because it looks like it might be uh
• 1:12:51
  it might it'd be really funny if it
• 1:12:53
  wasn't even uh wasn't even there
• 1:12:56
  anymore. Um
• 1:13:00
  it'd be real hilarious if it wasn't even
• 1:13:03
  part of it anymore. if it wasn't even
• 1:13:05
  part of the general definitions.
• 1:13:08
  Uh,
• 1:13:10
  but I can't find it so far. Um,
• 1:13:14
  definitions 41102
• 1:13:18
  policy.
• 1:13:22
  Wow, this is huge though. These titles
• 1:13:25
  go on forever.
• 1:13:27
  I'll have to look that up for you and
• 1:13:28
  figure out tomorrow whether or not these
• 1:13:31
  special well this is the last show of
• 1:13:33
  the week sadly but uh we have um
• 1:13:37
  aviation we have these definitions that
• 1:13:40
  they put in there uh that is just um
• 1:13:45
  we're not able to get there definition
• 1:13:48
  of special aircraft jurisdiction we're
• 1:13:51
  not able to get to it and uh
• 1:13:56
  Let's see.
• 1:13:59
  Let's find this and see if we can can
• 1:14:02
  get to it. I think we can, but I'm not
• 1:14:04
  in my legal research thing. I'm just in
• 1:14:06
  regular old Google right now. So, I'll
• 1:14:09
  have to look this up when I'm um
• 1:14:12
  federal jurisdiction for crimes aboard
• 1:14:15
  aircraft. Okay. Um, so certain aircraft
• 1:14:20
  outside the US, foreign aircraft that
• 1:14:22
  have their next scheduled destination,
• 1:14:24
  blah blah blah. Special aircraft
• 1:14:27
  jurisdiction. Um,
• 1:14:34
  yeah.
• 1:14:36
  Added July. It's it's it's not there.
• 1:14:40
  It's uh Department of Justice. this.
• 1:14:43
  It'd be really funny if it just isn't
• 1:14:46
  there.
• 1:14:48
  It'd be freaking hilarious if that
• 1:14:50
  jurisdiction uh sentence just doesn't
• 1:14:53
  work anymore. But I'm going to have to
• 1:14:54
  look it up. I apologize for my diet
• 1:14:56
  tribe this morning on reading this uh
• 1:15:00
  this craziness of charging people with
• 1:15:03
  murder. I'm very much against the use of
• 1:15:07
  the legal system uh as a joke, right?
• 1:15:10
  And uh we do it far too often. All the
• 1:15:14
  crap creation. And now what do they do?
• 1:15:17
  They honor these a-holes. They, oh geez,
• 1:15:20
  these are great lawyers. No, they're
• 1:15:22
  idiots. And what they're doing is is
• 1:15:26
  really not lawyerly behavior. Okay? If
• 1:15:31
  you have a valid, reasonable argument to
• 1:15:34
  put something out there, I expect you
• 1:15:37
  to. But using the law as a as a freaking
• 1:15:42
  club to beat people over the head with,
• 1:15:45
  I don't like that. It It drives me
• 1:15:48
  crazy. And uh and I just don't like it.
• 1:15:52
  Any person could read. I mean, my first
• 1:15:54
  thing that I found there was um uh
• 1:15:58
  remember what this said? Uh where'd it
• 1:16:00
  go?
• 1:16:02
  Overview. This section defines terms by
• 1:16:06
  uh you know you're likely looking the
• 1:16:08
  foundation definitions for section of
• 1:16:11
  aviation and transportation law in 40
• 1:16:14
  USC 102 which contains general property
• 1:16:18
  and administrative definitions right and
• 1:16:22
  these definitions navigable airspace
• 1:16:25
  stuff like that where they get to uh put
• 1:16:30
  the transportation
• 1:16:32
  sections in there. Let's see. Uh let's
• 1:16:36
  see if this one has the the interstate
• 1:16:41
  errors, transport, mail, medium, public
• 1:16:44
  aircraft, small hub,
• 1:16:47
  state authority, ticket a kinds of uh
• 1:16:52
  limited definitions here. And I want to
• 1:16:56
  find here in find law. I want to search
• 1:17:01
  the
• 1:17:03
  uh special what was it called again?
• 1:17:06
  Let's get to it. The special aircraft
• 1:17:08
  jurisdiction
• 1:17:11
  um
• 1:17:12
  is
• 1:17:14
  where I was Darn it. Where'd my PDF go?
• 1:17:21
  Let's see here.
• 1:17:26
  All of these things I mean these are
• 1:17:27
  important. uh destruction of the
• 1:17:30
  aircraft in violation of title 18 US
• 1:17:33
  code is where they are and the given the
• 1:17:37
  definition
• 1:17:38
  of uh the destruction of the aircraft in
• 1:17:42
  violation of of the special jurisdiction
• 1:17:45
  the special aircraft jurisdiction
• 1:17:50
  special maritime
• 1:17:52
  honor about February 24 in the special
• 1:17:56
  maritime and territorial jurisdiction
• 1:17:58
  iction of the United States, right?
• 1:18:02
  Special maritime and territorial
• 1:18:04
  jurisdiction. Okay, it's not maritime.
• 1:18:06
  They weren't on the water.
• 1:18:09
  The territorial jurisdiction of the US
• 1:18:13
  doesn't apply to Castro. Arguably, if
• 1:18:18
  this uh Lorenzo Alberto Perez was flying
• 1:18:21
  in US airspace, maybe you could get him.
• 1:18:25
  But all this joke of a document is is to
• 1:18:28
  give these people something to say to
• 1:18:31
  show that they are doing something.
• 1:18:34
  These people have higher aspirations
• 1:18:37
  and so they have to take these, you
• 1:18:40
  know, and and the people with money now
• 1:18:42
  know that these guys
• 1:18:45
  these guys will um will uh uh file
• 1:18:52
  anything, you know, we'll file anything,
• 1:18:54
  right? And uh the penalty sheets are
• 1:18:58
  listed, all this stuff is listed for for
• 1:19:01
  all of these people. So if they've what
• 1:19:03
  they're trying to do is
• 1:19:07
  name these pilots, even the ones that
• 1:19:09
  didn't kill anybody, the ones that just
• 1:19:11
  flew and escorted, they're going to name
• 1:19:12
  these guys with the conspiracy so that
• 1:19:15
  they can go and maybe one of them ran
• 1:19:18
  away to the United States, got on a boat
• 1:19:19
  and got here. So they got him and so
• 1:19:21
  they arrested him and they're they got
• 1:19:24
  him and his family and everybody trying
• 1:19:26
  to figure out how they can coax uh
• 1:19:28
  Castro to show up in the United States
• 1:19:31
  or give his whereabouts or spy inside or
• 1:19:34
  whatever to find out where he is so they
• 1:19:37
  can do a Maduro type raid in uh in Cuba
• 1:19:40
  and arrest a guy. And this is Donald
• 1:19:43
  Trump cleaning up the world. This is us.
• 1:19:45
  I I object. I I I object. Overruled. I
• 1:19:50
  strenuously object.
• 1:19:53
  Remember that? Anyway, that's a movie
• 1:19:55
  reference. Sorry. I strenuously object.
• 1:19:58
  Oh, great. You know that helps. I
• 1:20:00
  strenuously object.
• 1:20:02
  So, well, stress yourself out there.
• 1:20:05
  Strain, will you? Go ahead. Strain
• 1:20:07
  there. Do it again. Uh, no. It's
• 1:20:10
  overruled. Uh, that's funny. Um, at any
• 1:20:13
  rate, I believe this is uh uh joke law
• 1:20:17
  101 for those of you who didn't go to
• 1:20:19
  law school and uh you know they they
• 1:20:22
  taught jurisdiction on the one day that
• 1:20:24
  you were absent. Um you got to be there.
• 1:20:27
  Uh and even if I went to uh Australia
• 1:20:31
  and killed somebody,
• 1:20:34
  they might be a How are they going to
• 1:20:36
  get jurisdiction? There's extradition.
• 1:20:39
  There are all kinds of ways to submit
• 1:20:41
  yourself to the jurisdiction. You commit
• 1:20:43
  a crime in uh you commit a felony drug
• 1:20:46
  felony in I don't know, pick a state.
• 1:20:48
  Pick it. Pick pick it. Let's come up
• 1:20:50
  with something uh reasonable like
• 1:20:52
  Georgia. You create a crime. You commit
• 1:20:54
  a crime in Georgia. A felony. Okay. And
• 1:20:57
  then you immediately leave the state.
• 1:21:01
  So, can the German or German Georgian
• 1:21:03
  police come to your home in Wyoming
• 1:21:09
  and arrest you?
• 1:21:12
  Nope. They got no authority. Now, the
• 1:21:15
  feds could for something else. If they
• 1:21:17
  charge you with a federal crime, but
• 1:21:18
  that's not what happened. You know, you
• 1:21:19
  have your you have your drug crime that
• 1:21:21
  you committed in whatever. The feds can
• 1:21:23
  go anywhere pick you up the the end.
• 1:21:25
  They just pick you up. That's what they
• 1:21:26
  do. It's what they live for. uh
• 1:21:29
  selectively of course and if they want
• 1:21:32
  to heck they go to other countries and
• 1:21:33
  arrest you there and uh drag you back
• 1:21:36
  but they don't really have jurisdiction
• 1:21:37
  over you until you get back. Okay. Now
• 1:21:40
  arguably if you're on an American uh
• 1:21:43
  airplane somewhere else there's probably
• 1:21:46
  limit, you know, limitations or
• 1:21:49
  extensions of authority with a US air
• 1:21:53
  person on a US aircraft.
• 1:21:57
  But if you're on Turkish Airways, I
• 1:21:59
  wonder when they take uh they take
• 1:22:01
  effect there. Do they take effect inside
• 1:22:04
  of uh um
• 1:22:08
  uh the aircraft or is it when you cross
• 1:22:10
  into US airspace? I'm not sure how that
• 1:22:12
  works. Maybe it's only in the airport. I
• 1:22:14
  haven't read that. I haven't studied
• 1:22:15
  that. What I'm saying though is you
• 1:22:18
  cannot create jurisdiction that doesn't
• 1:22:21
  exist.
• 1:22:23
  You just can't do it. And uh so
• 1:22:26
  jurisdiction that doesn't exist, you
• 1:22:28
  can't you can't cure bad um bad
• 1:22:33
  jurisdiction doesn't work. Uh a lack of
• 1:22:37
  jurisdiction is attackable any time. If
• 1:22:42
  you didn't have jurisdiction, the first
• 1:22:44
  thing first thing that should be done is
• 1:22:46
  maybe see but if you hire a lawyer that
• 1:22:48
  lawyer has to limit because if a lawyer
• 1:22:51
  appears on your behalf to fight
• 1:22:53
  something they say you've submitted to
• 1:22:55
  the jurisdiction of the court just to
• 1:22:57
  make an argument. So you got to limit
• 1:22:59
  the jurisdiction at the very beginning.
• 1:23:01
  You say, "Listen, I want to um enter
• 1:23:04
  appearance for this guy only to fight
• 1:23:07
  jurisdiction
• 1:23:09
  and talk about the jurisdiction issue,
• 1:23:12
  but I want to enter appearance on this
• 1:23:14
  guy." Uh, you know, or I want you, you
• 1:23:17
  know, create get a charitable
• 1:23:18
  organization
• 1:23:20
  to fight the jurisdiction. In fact, I
• 1:23:22
  have a charitable organization. And I
• 1:23:24
  had to I had to hire a lawyer for Castro
• 1:23:26
  just to go fight these guys. Um just to
• 1:23:29
  go, how you getting jurisdiction? Let's
• 1:23:32
  have a fight over jurisdiction for
• 1:23:34
  Maduro.
• 1:23:36
  You can't take it the way that you've
• 1:23:38
  taken it. And I wonder if anybody is
• 1:23:40
  really defending the guy or if you know,
• 1:23:43
  well, geez, look what they've done.
• 1:23:45
  That's what the lawyers are saying. Look
• 1:23:46
  what they've done. What a horrible
• 1:23:49
  fight. Well, we're be going against the
• 1:23:51
  entire group of people. Everybody hates
• 1:23:53
  Castro. Who's going to defend him?
• 1:23:55
  Nobody. Nobody's going to defend him.
• 1:23:58
  And that's the shame of our system right
• 1:24:01
  there. The shame is it ain't about the
• 1:24:03
  law anymore. It's about a system that
• 1:24:06
  doesn't exist and that they they use as
• 1:24:09
  a club and the people who are in it are
• 1:24:13
  part of a club that the that the
• 1:24:17
  clubbers are using the club the legal
• 1:24:20
  club to fight the people who would stand
• 1:24:23
  up for it like me by the way because I
• 1:24:26
  am not a member of the club that just
• 1:24:29
  buries my head in the sand to say that
• 1:24:32
  OG jurisdiction exists. My ass
• 1:24:36
  jurisdiction doesn't exist and you
• 1:24:38
  aren't that stupid or that far gone that
• 1:24:41
  you think it does. These whoever these
• 1:24:44
  uh a-holes are that signed this joke of
• 1:24:48
  a pleading, you know, this joke of an
• 1:24:51
  indictment. And then you know why they
• 1:24:53
  really want the record sealed? because
• 1:24:56
  they're creating a BS scenario that they
• 1:24:59
  don't want any yahoo to just be able to
• 1:25:02
  log on and pull down. Maybe that would
• 1:25:05
  be the fun part would be to send a uh
• 1:25:07
  request
• 1:25:09
  uh an a freedom of information request
• 1:25:12
  or a court request and say, "Hey, I want
• 1:25:15
  these documents. Can you provide them,
• 1:25:17
  please?
• 1:25:18
  Why can't I have them if you're not
• 1:25:20
  willing to give them up?" you know, oh
• 1:25:22
  gee, we have security measures in place.
• 1:25:25
  We have to worry about the security of
• 1:25:28
  the world. You know, we're we're we're
• 1:25:30
  taking care of you. Really, you just
• 1:25:32
  don't realize it, right?
• 1:25:36
  Yeah.
• 1:25:37
  Anyway, that's my diet tribe for today.
• 1:25:40
  I'm uh I'm leaving you. I'm done. I'm
• 1:25:42
  Samuel Trap. This is U DAM radio. Samuel
• 1:25:47
  Trap. uh samuel t@
• 1:25:51
  internationalflavor.com
• 1:25:53
  should should you wish to send me a uh
• 1:25:57
  an email.
• 1:25:58
  I'd like to hear from you. Um and at any
• 1:26:02
  rate, I think that is going to end
• 1:26:05
  today's diet tribation. D is that a
• 1:26:09
  word? Datribalization.
• 1:26:11
  I don't know. Let's make up a new word.
• 1:26:12
  I have coined a new phrase. In the
• 1:26:16
  meantime, you just have a fantastic
• 1:26:19
  Thursday and I will see you come Monday
• 1:26:22
  morning.