Latest / Yaron Brook Show / Nostalgia; Birth Rates; Talent & Immigration; Climate Change; Hegseth; News | Yaron Brook Show

Transcript

Nostalgia; Birth Rates; Talent & Immigration; Climate Change; Hegseth; News | Yaron Brook Show · Yaron Brook Show

• 0:02
  Speaker 1: A lot of the fundamental misters of widow little cells
• 0:10
  Speaker 1: and an individuals. This is all right, everybody, welcome to
• 0:21
  Speaker 1: your one book show on this Thursday, December fourth. I
• 0:27
  Speaker 1: hope everybody's having a great week so far. And uh yeah, weekend,
• 0:33
  Speaker 1: it's just around the corner, all right. Uh so, uh
• 0:38
  Speaker 1: let's see, no real announcements. I don't have any real
• 0:42
  Speaker 1: announcements today. We will I'll see you tomorrow and on
• 0:47
  Speaker 1: Saturday we'll have a show probably both will be at
• 0:50
  Speaker 1: this time to be a East coast time. All right,
• 0:53
  Speaker 1: let's let's just jump in. I mean, we're going to
• 0:56
  Speaker 1: return to a topic that we keep returning to, and
• 0:58
  Speaker 1: I expect us to keep it to to this topic
• 1:00
  Speaker 1: because it's just keeps being out there and keeps being emphasized,
• 1:05
  Speaker 1: and it's a topic on which the left and the
• 1:07
  Speaker 1: right agree. Uh you know, you you It's one of
• 1:11
  Speaker 1: those topics that the populist left and the populist right
• 1:15
  Speaker 1: all agree about, and that is this idea that things
• 1:20
  Speaker 1: just suck today. I mean, Matt Walsh just had a tweet,
• 1:24
  Speaker 1: I mean just just just today this morning, just had
• 1:26
  Speaker 1: a tweet to reflect some of this in more broad
• 1:30
  Speaker 1: terms and then and then there's the whole economists think
• 1:35
  Speaker 1: thing about how you know you can't a vote anything
• 1:39
  Speaker 1: today and you could affote more in the past, and
• 1:41
  Speaker 1: and we'll go over some of that in a minute.
• 1:43
  Speaker 1: But here's here's Matt Walsh's tweet representing the right. But
• 1:47
  Speaker 1: this is I think this, This is feelings that you
• 1:50
  Speaker 1: get from the left as well. This is this could
• 1:52
  Speaker 1: be Elizabeth Waughan writing this. This could be pretty much
• 1:55
  Speaker 1: anybody writing this. Here's Matt Walsh. It's an empirical fact
• 2:00
  Speaker 1: that basically everything in ourday today lives has gotten worse
• 2:04
  Speaker 1: over time. Over the years. The quality of everything food, clothing, entertainment, air, travel, roads, traffic, infrastructure, housing, etc.
• 2:14
  Speaker 1: Has declined in observable ways. Even new inventions, search engines,
• 2:21
  Speaker 1: social media, smartphones have gone downhill, downhill drastically, not a
• 2:28
  Speaker 1: little bit drastically. This isn't a random old man yells
• 2:34
  Speaker 1: at the clouds complaint. It's true. It's happening that the
• 2:39
  Speaker 1: client can be measured. Everyone sees it, everyone feels it. Meanwhile,
• 2:44
  Speaker 1: political pundits and podcast hosts speaking of things that are
• 2:48
  Speaker 1: getting worse focus on anything and everything except these practical,
• 2:52
  Speaker 1: real problems that actually affect a quality of life. I mean,
• 3:03
  Speaker 1: it's true that pretty much everything that the gunment touches
• 3:07
  Speaker 1: has gotten worse over the years or is getting worse
• 3:10
  Speaker 1: to some extent, to some extent to another, But none
• 3:17
  Speaker 1: of this is really true. There are few things that
• 3:20
  Speaker 1: are getting worse that impact all of us. Education getting worse,
• 3:26
  Speaker 1: air traffic control getting worse. Air travel. Is it getting worse?
• 3:33
  Speaker 1: I mean maybe, but it's also getting cheaper and people
• 3:39
  Speaker 1: are doing it. I mean, if you just follow like
• 3:43
  Speaker 1: how much people do something, you assume that it's because
• 3:47
  Speaker 1: it's better or better for them within the context of
• 3:49
  Speaker 1: their lives and their abilities. People travel like one hundred
• 3:54
  Speaker 1: x what they used to, Like the Golden Age in
• 3:56
  Speaker 1: the nineteen seventies used to dress up in a suit
• 3:59
  Speaker 1: and tie and go to the airport, and most people
• 4:03
  Speaker 1: didn't fly like an American vacation was an American vacation.
• 4:06
  Speaker 1: Like in the nineteen seventies, it was you got it,
• 4:09
  Speaker 1: you got camper, and you got in a car and
• 4:12
  Speaker 1: you drove and maybe somebody, some of you feel nostalgic
• 4:16
  Speaker 1: to that, and that's great, good for you. I've done
• 4:20
  Speaker 1: I did those road trips. But today most Americans get
• 4:23
  Speaker 1: in their plane, they flying anywhere they want. I mean,
• 4:27
  Speaker 1: Americans are traveling more to Europe, they're traveling more to Asia,
• 4:30
  Speaker 1: They're seeing the world, They're traveling more. In the United States.
• 4:33
  Speaker 1: They're driving less, flying much much much much much much more.
• 4:39
  Speaker 1: So the travel might be worse. I don't know, space
• 4:43
  Speaker 1: for your knees or whatever. But it's so much cheaper
• 4:47
  Speaker 1: that people are doing it so much more that you
• 4:50
  Speaker 1: have to say that in the context of human life,
• 4:52
  Speaker 1: it is so much better. Food. Food, really, God, I mean,
• 5:00
  Speaker 1: I remember the nineteen seventies and what you can go
• 5:06
  Speaker 1: out there's no way to go out, what kind of
• 5:12
  Speaker 1: what kind of you know, options that you have fast
• 5:17
  Speaker 1: food and maybe some big chains and and and and
• 5:20
  Speaker 1: maybe an odd here in their Chinese restaurants, and but God,
• 5:25
  Speaker 1: think about the plufor of choices you have today, right
• 5:28
  Speaker 1: if you're foody or even a little bit of a food,
• 5:31
  Speaker 1: or you just enjoy food, the choices unbelievable. And and
• 5:37
  Speaker 1: and you can choose anywhere from a fast food but
• 5:41
  Speaker 1: a wide variety of fast food, much bigger than there
• 5:43
  Speaker 1: was in the seventies, to the fanciest restaurants possible. The
• 5:48
  Speaker 1: celebrity chef, the quality of the food, the healthy orientation
• 5:53
  Speaker 1: of the food. If you're vegan, if you're I don't know,
• 5:56
  Speaker 1: a carnivore, whatever you are, whatever type of diet you have,
• 6:00
  Speaker 1: the especiality restaurants that they go for you. And the
• 6:03
  Speaker 1: same with the supermarket. You're going to supermarket today. I mean, really,
• 6:09
  Speaker 1: you're insane if you think the variety is not so
• 6:13
  Speaker 1: much larger now. True, if you only like quote American food, flavorless, tasteless,
• 6:20
  Speaker 1: like meat and potatoes, then yeah, now there's flavor in
• 6:24
  Speaker 1: the food. And maybe you view that as a as
• 6:26
  Speaker 1: a downgrade. And I remember, like the nineteen seventies were
• 6:32
  Speaker 1: TV dinners. Maybe the variety of TV dinners has gone down,
• 6:36
  Speaker 1: maybe because we're more health conscious and now there are
• 6:39
  Speaker 1: other options, but like microwave dinners and living off of
• 6:43
  Speaker 1: microave dinners, maybe the quality of those has gone down.
• 6:46
  Speaker 1: I don't know. But oh my god. You can get
• 6:49
  Speaker 1: fruits and vegetables from anywhere in the world all year round.
• 6:54
  Speaker 1: You can get whatever you want. You want a boring
• 6:57
  Speaker 1: meat and potatoes dinner, yeah, you can get You can
• 7:01
  Speaker 1: get cobD meat. You can get meat from Japan, where
• 7:04
  Speaker 1: they massage the cows and they drink beer all day.
• 7:09
  Speaker 1: You can get anything you want. Things have gotten worse. Food.
• 7:14
  Speaker 1: You gotta be kidding me. Clothing, clothing, I mean, this
• 7:20
  Speaker 1: is where it just shows how ignorant this guy is
• 7:23
  Speaker 1: because he's got such narrow view of what is consumed
• 7:28
  Speaker 1: and what are the possibilities and what are the options,
• 7:31
  Speaker 1: and narrow view of everything. But God, there are more
• 7:39
  Speaker 1: options in terms of clothing today than ever before. You know,
• 7:42
  Speaker 1: maybe maybe the clothes last shorter, but I doubt it.
• 7:46
  Speaker 1: And you can get now especiality clothes for exercise, especiality
• 7:49
  Speaker 1: clothes for yoga, especially hoity clothes for I don't know what.
• 7:53
  Speaker 1: And and people have more clothes than ever because clothes
• 7:56
  Speaker 1: so cheap. And they're not cheap because they're worse. They're
• 8:00
  Speaker 1: cheap because they're cheap because they made in Bangladesh and
• 8:05
  Speaker 1: they're made in quantity. And if you look, you go
• 8:08
  Speaker 1: to the mall and you look at some of the
• 8:10
  Speaker 1: options in terms of the kind of kind of variety
• 8:14
  Speaker 1: of clothing and colors and styles I know, never in
• 8:19
  Speaker 1: human history, because they be more better, more choices now,
• 8:22
  Speaker 1: I know, right, I mean, the whole point of Matt Walsh,
• 8:26
  Speaker 1: his whole stick is choice is bad. Options are bad.
• 8:30
  Speaker 1: You should be white Christian with a white ful home
• 8:33
  Speaker 1: to make your dinner. Maybe it's what's cooking is not
• 8:36
  Speaker 1: that good. And he remembers his mother's cooking and he
• 8:38
  Speaker 1: misses that. And you should have three kids, maybe three
• 8:42
  Speaker 1: point two if you're really ambitious. A station wagon. Oh god,
• 8:46
  Speaker 1: no station wagons. That's why cause of deteriorated. Right now
• 8:50
  Speaker 1: he has an suv poor soul. And you know, no choices.
• 8:57
  Speaker 1: Choices are bad. But in all these realms they're more choices. Entertainment.
• 9:04
  Speaker 1: You know, I probably agree with him on entertainment. Art
• 9:07
  Speaker 1: is worse, education is worth. Anything to do with the
• 9:10
  Speaker 1: intellectual side is worse. Anything to do with the material
• 9:13
  Speaker 1: side much better, not even close, so much better. Housing housing, really,
• 9:24
  Speaker 1: nineteen sixties Davage house at American Bought was I think
• 9:27
  Speaker 1: under fifteen hundred square feet. Today it's over three thousand
• 9:32
  Speaker 1: square feet, so the houses have doubled in size. In
• 9:37
  Speaker 1: the nineteen fifties, many families would live in a house
• 9:41
  Speaker 1: together in order to be able to vote it. Today
• 9:45
  Speaker 1: we have small households. So not only do we have
• 9:48
  Speaker 1: three thousand square feet. It's two thousand square feet without
• 9:50
  Speaker 1: four kids, maybe with only two, maybe with zero. So
• 9:55
  Speaker 1: square feet per person living in the household has gone
• 9:58
  Speaker 1: through the roof, and the houses are just better. Refrigerators
• 10:03
  Speaker 1: are better, the stoves are better, the microwaves are better,
• 10:08
  Speaker 1: the gas stoves or electric stoves or whatever type of
• 10:12
  Speaker 1: whatever you call it. I don't know anything about kitchens
• 10:15
  Speaker 1: is better. All of it is better. I've given you
• 10:19
  Speaker 1: some stats on refrigeration. It's insanity. Now two infrastructure maintained
• 10:26
  Speaker 1: by governments, it's probably worse. Traffic is worse because, surprise, surprise,
• 10:32
  Speaker 1: in the nineteen seventies, fifties, sixties, people struggled to have
• 10:37
  Speaker 1: one car. Now they have two. Three foot every kid
• 10:41
  Speaker 1: has a call, everybody drives. Yeah, so traffic's gone up
• 10:43
  Speaker 1: because we have more people and everybody has a car.
• 10:46
  Speaker 1: Everybody has a car, and such sances have got it worse. Really,
• 10:52
  Speaker 1: does he tried trachypt as? He tried? You know what's
• 10:55
  Speaker 1: he talking about? Does he remember Yahoo? Social media is worse?
• 11:02
  Speaker 1: Well maybe I don't know. I have no idea. Smartphones
• 11:06
  Speaker 1: are worse. No, they're not. They're better, much better, hugely better,
• 11:10
  Speaker 1: not even in the same ballpark better. Never mind that
• 11:15
  Speaker 1: the very fact that you have a smartphone is a
• 11:18
  Speaker 1: modern phenomenon. This made life better. So it's true. This
• 11:23
  Speaker 1: is not the old man yells at clouds. This is
• 11:28
  Speaker 1: the bigoted, misogynistic, anti progress, anti Mondo unity conservative yelling
• 11:44
  Speaker 1: at the clouds. And he's wrong. He's just wrong on
• 11:50
  Speaker 1: everything everything. You know. Somebody points out that they can
• 11:56
  Speaker 1: order something at nine am in the morning and get
• 11:58
  Speaker 1: it chipped to the house by one pm in the
• 12:00
  Speaker 1: same day, and Matt Will's response to that is, yes,
• 12:04
  Speaker 1: you can get your cheap shit quickly, and it's still
• 12:07
  Speaker 1: cheap shit. It's cheap, it's not shit. Maybe he buys shit.
• 12:13
  Speaker 1: I don't buy shit. The stuff I get is mostly good.
• 12:17
  Speaker 1: And you know what if it's shit, you know what
• 12:18
  Speaker 1: I do. If it arrives and it's shit, what do
• 12:20
  Speaker 1: I do? I put it back in the box, turn
• 12:23
  Speaker 1: it around and send it back and get my money
• 12:24
  Speaker 1: back in the mail. Which is God just a miracle
• 12:28
  Speaker 1: that people will give you your money back. I mean, I
• 12:32
  Speaker 1: grew up in Israel, where nobody ever gave you your
• 12:34
  Speaker 1: money back. You bought something that was it, that was
• 12:36
  Speaker 1: for life. You could never get your money back. Even
• 12:38
  Speaker 1: if it turned out it was something else in the box,
• 12:40
  Speaker 1: then you intended. You never got your money back. In America,
• 12:44
  Speaker 1: you don't need sometimes you don't even need a receipts
• 12:46
  Speaker 1: and you get your money back. It's just my d
• 12:52
  Speaker 1: boggling to me how clueless people like Matt walshaw about
• 12:57
  Speaker 1: the world and how they their pessimism, the darkness, their
• 13:04
  Speaker 1: narrow mindedness sells as much as it does. I mean,
• 13:08
  Speaker 1: Matt walsh has three point nine million followers on Twitter,
• 13:13
  Speaker 1: three point nine million people exposed to his bullshit. It's
• 13:18
  Speaker 1: just and it's just untrue. It's unrelated to reality. And
• 13:25
  Speaker 1: what's amazing is pointing out reality, pointing out facts, pointing
• 13:29
  Speaker 1: out I mean, look what we're doing here. We're podcasting
• 13:34
  Speaker 1: as Matt Welsh does, but I'm doing it live, life
• 13:38
  Speaker 1: streaming life streaming all around the world, and it's instantaneous
• 13:44
  Speaker 1: and the quality is pretty damn good video live. How
• 13:49
  Speaker 1: much does it cost you to listen to you on
• 13:51
  Speaker 1: book show, particularly those who don't participate in the super
• 13:55
  Speaker 1: chat and don't go on payin, How does it cost
• 14:00
  Speaker 1: you nothing? Nothing? Life hasn't got a better I mean,
• 14:12
  Speaker 1: Matt Walls tapes his shows and he puts them up there.
• 14:15
  Speaker 1: I don't know if he does them to life. I
• 14:16
  Speaker 1: think he tapes them, puts them on there. How much
• 14:18
  Speaker 1: does it cost him to put them up there and
• 14:21
  Speaker 1: to get access to the world, literally the world with
• 14:25
  Speaker 1: his nonsense, with his crap, with his cheap shit. Not
• 14:31
  Speaker 1: a zero, He's really cheap. I think you might have
• 14:38
  Speaker 1: to buy a subscription to watch Matt Walsh's stuff here
• 14:41
  Speaker 1: in the Iron Book Show you get it for free.
• 14:45
  Speaker 1: That should make you want to trade value for value.
• 14:48
  Speaker 1: I don't see any superchats yet. Remember, you get to
• 14:53
  Speaker 1: dictate the content. With the superchats. You get to ask
• 14:55
  Speaker 1: questions that I then answer. And I know a lot
• 14:57
  Speaker 1: of you are saving up for the big New Years Eve,
• 15:00
  Speaker 1: but we got we gotta keep feeding. We gotta keep
• 15:03
  Speaker 1: running the show until New Year's Eve. It doesn't stop.
• 15:06
  Speaker 1: I should just go on vacation until New Year's Eve. Yeah,
• 15:12
  Speaker 1: I mean, it's just mind buggling to me. Just the
• 15:17
  Speaker 1: mentality that this requires to hold. This is the mentality
• 15:22
  Speaker 1: of a twelve twenty. Somebody wants to go back, and
• 15:25
  Speaker 1: somebody is obsessed with negativity and badness. I mean the
• 15:32
  Speaker 1: car he drives is so much safer than it was
• 15:35
  Speaker 1: in the in the nineteen seventies or eighties. It is
• 15:38
  Speaker 1: more sophisticated, it's more developed. Again, Matt is relatively young,
• 15:43
  Speaker 1: so maybe he doesn't know all this, and maybe maybe
• 15:46
  Speaker 1: it's also that he doesn't have much experience, right, he's
• 15:49
  Speaker 1: he was. He probably doesn't get out much. He probably
• 15:52
  Speaker 1: doesn't fly around the world much. Yeah, I mean, he
• 15:59
  Speaker 1: probably doesn't use this his phone that much. I don't know.
• 16:02
  Speaker 1: It sure appears that this ignorant is partially based on
• 16:06
  Speaker 1: lack of experience in living in life. And then you
• 16:11
  Speaker 1: have the economists like this finance guy who I told
• 16:15
  Speaker 1: you about, who published this essay about how in America
• 16:17
  Speaker 1: today poverty line is at one hundred and forty thousand dollars.
• 16:23
  Speaker 1: And since then there's been a lot of back and forth.
• 16:25
  Speaker 1: A lot of people have criticized it, and he's come
• 16:27
  Speaker 1: back and a lot of people have defended him, and
• 16:28
  Speaker 1: it's gone back and forth and so on. But the myth,
• 16:32
  Speaker 1: you know, the myth persists, you know, the basically you
• 16:37
  Speaker 1: cannot you cannot you know, in nineteen sixty three or whatever,
• 16:43
  Speaker 1: you know, in this essay, this guy writes. He writes,
• 16:46
  Speaker 1: and this is a really good essay today published by
• 16:49
  Speaker 1: Matt and Glesis. In this substax slow boring, and he writes,
• 16:55
  Speaker 1: I mean the guy who wrote one hundred and forty thousand,
• 16:57
  Speaker 1: Guy Green, Michael Green. Between nineteen twenty twenty four, everything changed,
• 17:06
  Speaker 1: and that today's a family needs two incomes to maintain
• 17:09
  Speaker 1: the standard of living. They used to be provided by one.
• 17:15
  Speaker 1: Here's what you wrote. The labor market shifted, the labor
• 17:19
  Speaker 1: model shifted. A second income became mandatory to maintain the
• 17:22
  Speaker 1: standard of living the one income formally provided. But a
• 17:25
  Speaker 1: second income meant childcare became mandatory, which meant two cars
• 17:29
  Speaker 1: became mandatory. Or maybe you'd simply be asking for a
• 17:32
  Speaker 1: lot of a lot, generationally speaking, because living near your
• 17:37
  Speaker 1: parents helps to defray those childcare costs. So you can't
• 17:40
  Speaker 1: move because you have to stay in your parents. Now
• 17:44
  Speaker 1: here's the thing. We need to compare apples to apples.
• 17:52
  Speaker 1: If you want a nineteen sixty three lifestyle, if you
• 17:56
  Speaker 1: are willing to live in a nineteen sixty three home
• 18:00
  Speaker 1: and your wife, you know, maybe maybe this is what
• 18:03
  Speaker 1: med Welsh does. Although Medwalsh makes millions of dollars, so
• 18:06
  Speaker 1: he probably doesn't. But if you want to live in
• 18:08
  Speaker 1: nineteen sixty three standards where the wife stays at home,
• 18:12
  Speaker 1: it doesn't work. Of course if she doesn't work, no
• 18:15
  Speaker 1: need for childcare, right, because she can take care of
• 18:17
  Speaker 1: the kids. And you don't go out to restaurants because
• 18:23
  Speaker 1: she kiks, right, she's not cooking, And you're willing to
• 18:27
  Speaker 1: live in a house like you could have lived in
• 18:30
  Speaker 1: nineteen sixty three. So let's say what you know if
• 18:36
  Speaker 1: you went out there and actually bought a house that
• 18:40
  Speaker 1: is about you know, fifteen hundred square feet, sixteen hundred
• 18:45
  Speaker 1: square feet this house posting I see here. This is
• 18:49
  Speaker 1: in Jacksonville. Jacksonville is about the median city in America
• 18:54
  Speaker 1: in terms of costs in terms of wages, so wages
• 18:58
  Speaker 1: about where the median is, and house spices about where
• 19:01
  Speaker 1: the median is. It's pretty pretty representative. You could buy,
• 19:06
  Speaker 1: you could rent this house for two thousand dollars a month,
• 19:09
  Speaker 1: sixteen hundred square feet. It's got three bedrooms, two baths.
• 19:13
  Speaker 1: And since you were living at trad con trad we're
• 19:17
  Speaker 1: not con just trad life, right, you probably have you
• 19:20
  Speaker 1: have four kids, so the kids would have to double
• 19:22
  Speaker 1: up in a bedroom. But I doubled uped with my
• 19:25
  Speaker 1: brother in a bedroom, and my sister's doubled up in
• 19:27
  Speaker 1: their bedroom. And that's how we lived. We had one
• 19:30
  Speaker 1: bathroom in the entire apartment. It was about I don't know,
• 19:39
  Speaker 1: twelve hundred square feet maybe fourteen hundred square feet the
• 19:42
  Speaker 1: whole apartment with one to three four bedrooms. You know,
• 19:50
  Speaker 1: my dad had an office in the home. Parents had
• 19:52
  Speaker 1: a bedroom, and we doubled up in the two bedrooms. Right,
• 20:00
  Speaker 1: That's how people lived. And we had a we had
• 20:02
  Speaker 1: one bathroom for all six of us, six people, one bathroom.
• 20:08
  Speaker 1: If you're willing to live like that, there's plenty of
• 20:11
  Speaker 1: homes you can buy for that kind of money. You
• 20:14
  Speaker 1: can rent for two thousand bucks. You can rent a
• 20:16
  Speaker 1: whole home like that. Now, if you're making kind of
• 20:19
  Speaker 1: the median, which is I don't know, about eighty thousand
• 20:22
  Speaker 1: a year, right, if you're in the age group of
• 20:27
  Speaker 1: thirty five to fifty four, which is the Pea coating
• 20:31
  Speaker 1: years and where you have kids, and you're making eighty
• 20:34
  Speaker 1: thousand a year, you can buy a home. You can
• 20:36
  Speaker 1: rent a home for two thousand dollars a month. That
• 20:38
  Speaker 1: kind of home, and your wife can stay home she
• 20:41
  Speaker 1: doesn't work, and you can have one car, and yeah,
• 20:47
  Speaker 1: you can have it all. No need for childcare. By
• 20:49
  Speaker 1: the way, this particular house Injectiononville is in a neighborhood
• 20:53
  Speaker 1: where the school is rated really high, so it's a
• 20:56
  Speaker 1: little bit more expensive, probably because school district is good.
• 21:05
  Speaker 1: So the whole thing is really really stupid. Now, it's
• 21:11
  Speaker 1: true college tuition has gone up, but you know, most
• 21:13
  Speaker 1: people didn't go to college in the nineteen sixties. Who
• 21:16
  Speaker 1: said all four of your kids need to go to
• 21:18
  Speaker 1: college certainly didn't happen in the sixties. We survived. Child
• 21:24
  Speaker 1: cares up, but you don't need childcare because your wife
• 21:26
  Speaker 1: is home. Health care costs up, you know that's true.
• 21:31
  Speaker 1: But you know, if you have a job. One, if
• 21:34
  Speaker 1: you have a job, you're probably getting health care through
• 21:37
  Speaker 1: your employee anyway. And you know, one person having a
• 21:43
  Speaker 1: job you can get the employer will pay your health
• 21:46
  Speaker 1: care for six people. So if you want to live
• 21:51
  Speaker 1: a trad life, you can live a trad life. Here's
• 21:55
  Speaker 1: the problem. Nobody wants to live that life. Nobody wants
• 22:01
  Speaker 1: to live that life. People are ambitious and in order
• 22:05
  Speaker 1: to achieve their ambitions, not just monetarily, but in terms
• 22:10
  Speaker 1: of fulfillment in life. Women go to work. They don't
• 22:16
  Speaker 1: go to work just for the money, because it's true that,
• 22:18
  Speaker 1: particularly in early days, and particularly if you have four kids,
• 22:21
  Speaker 1: a lot of that money just goes to pay the childcare.
• 22:25
  Speaker 1: But they want to have a job because it's fulfilling
• 22:28
  Speaker 1: and because you know what, one day the kids will
• 22:30
  Speaker 1: grow up and they continue to have a job. So
• 22:38
  Speaker 1: you know, women want fulfilling lives, say, go on and work,
• 22:42
  Speaker 1: or they go on and study, they go to school,
• 22:47
  Speaker 1: so they're not at home to take care of the
• 22:48
  Speaker 1: kids and to cook all your meals so you don't
• 22:50
  Speaker 1: have to go to restaurants. And you have a huge
• 22:54
  Speaker 1: number of restaurants in the world right now because people
• 22:55
  Speaker 1: are not cooking at home and they want to go
• 22:58
  Speaker 1: up the choices. Those are choices that indeed have enhanced
• 23:04
  Speaker 1: human life, particularly if you're a woman. Not maybe it
• 23:09
  Speaker 1: worse now. It's true if you're a tadman, traditional man,
• 23:13
  Speaker 1: and you expect the woman to be in the house
• 23:17
  Speaker 1: cleaning and taking care of the kods and washing and
• 23:22
  Speaker 1: cooking all day, and you don't want your wife to
• 23:26
  Speaker 1: have an education or career or to do anything too interesting,
• 23:31
  Speaker 1: then yeah, life might suck for you. Good. I'm cool
• 23:36
  Speaker 1: with that. I'm cool with people who have Neanderthal attitudes,
• 23:42
  Speaker 1: having you know, unhappy lives. That is not a bad thing.
• 23:47
  Speaker 1: It's actually called I think it's called justice. Justice. The
• 23:55
  Speaker 1: reality is that people have two incomes, not be they
• 24:00
  Speaker 1: need two incomes to live the lifestyle of the nineteen sixties.
• 24:04
  Speaker 1: They have two incomes because they want to live the
• 24:05
  Speaker 1: lifestyle of somebody in twenty twenty five. They want to
• 24:09
  Speaker 1: go to nice restaurants, They want to have a three
• 24:12
  Speaker 1: thy five hundred square foot home, particularly if they have
• 24:14
  Speaker 1: four kids. They don't want to have four kids. They
• 24:17
  Speaker 1: only want to have two kids and both want to
• 24:21
  Speaker 1: have careers, and they want to have nice stuff and
• 24:26
  Speaker 1: two cars and a nice home. They don't want to
• 24:33
  Speaker 1: be stuck in the sixties. So the reason we have
• 24:39
  Speaker 1: two income households is not because wages are down. It's
• 24:42
  Speaker 1: because wages are up. The reality is women can go
• 24:46
  Speaker 1: out now and make a good living. Nineteen sixties had
• 24:50
  Speaker 1: very few opportunities even if they wanted to go out
• 24:52
  Speaker 1: into the workforce. Workforce was not taking women. There weren't
• 25:01
  Speaker 1: enough jobs and they weren't interested in women. There was
• 25:04
  Speaker 1: clear discrimination. That's changed. Women have become more ambitious and
• 25:09
  Speaker 1: then and workplaces have opened up, so as we become richer,
• 25:17
  Speaker 1: not poorer. Richer. More people are working and that makes them,
• 25:22
  Speaker 1: as a household even richer. But of course expenses have
• 25:27
  Speaker 1: gone up as well. But expenses have gone up not
• 25:30
  Speaker 1: because we're maintaining a nineteen sixty three lifestyle, but because
• 25:34
  Speaker 1: we're maintaining a completely different, far superior, materially, far superior
• 25:41
  Speaker 1: materially lifestyle and spiritually, by the way, because a woman
• 25:45
  Speaker 1: working is spiritually better than women not working, or woman
• 25:48
  Speaker 1: getting an education or pursuing her passion is false superior
• 25:52
  Speaker 1: than a woman not doing that spiritually, then we are
• 25:57
  Speaker 1: living at a much better materially and spiritually spiritual way
• 26:02
  Speaker 1: of life. Nostalgia I mean, if you want to have
• 26:07
  Speaker 1: nostalgia for the spirit of the nineteenth century, for the
• 26:11
  Speaker 1: sense of life of the nineteenth century, for the music
• 26:14
  Speaker 1: and novels of the nineteenth century, I'm with you. For
• 26:17
  Speaker 1: the intellectual rigor and passion and interest of a very
• 26:23
  Speaker 1: small class of people, granted, but of the enlightenment of
• 26:27
  Speaker 1: the founding fathers. Yeah, I'm with you, but from a
• 26:33
  Speaker 1: material perspective, I will say it again, over and over
• 26:37
  Speaker 1: again and again. If you're a woman, if you're black,
• 26:40
  Speaker 1: if you're a minority of any kind, if you're gay,
• 26:44
  Speaker 1: it's never been better to be alive than right now.
• 26:48
  Speaker 1: If you're a trad man, I feel sorry for you
• 26:52
  Speaker 1: because the reality is that history is going to leave
• 26:54
  Speaker 1: you way behind. Unless you know the thiritarians come about
• 27:00
  Speaker 1: and impose a trad life on us. Most of us
• 27:04
  Speaker 1: do not want a trad life. We want a twenty
• 27:08
  Speaker 1: first century life. In that sense, we have even socially
• 27:15
  Speaker 1: better than we will. All right, so much for the nonsense.
• 27:24
  Speaker 1: And again it's not it's not a left or right issue.
• 27:28
  Speaker 1: It's on both left and right. They both think this,
• 27:31
  Speaker 1: and just generally people think this. It's crazy. All right,
• 27:39
  Speaker 1: all right, let me do my reminder. We have a
• 27:43
  Speaker 1: goal for every hour of the show. We're almost half
• 27:46
  Speaker 1: an hour into the show. We're not even scraping the
• 27:50
  Speaker 1: surface of the first goal, our goal, so please consider
• 27:54
  Speaker 1: doing the super Chats twenty dollars. The next thing about
• 27:57
  Speaker 1: super Chats is, I know many of you have questions
• 27:59
  Speaker 1: for me, or want to challenge me, or think I'm
• 28:02
  Speaker 1: completely wrong about something. The super chat is a great
• 28:04
  Speaker 1: way to get your voice heard, and the thousands of
• 28:07
  Speaker 1: people who listen to watch the show will actually hear
• 28:10
  Speaker 1: it because I will read every single super Chat, no
• 28:13
  Speaker 1: matter what you write in it. So and I do.
• 28:18
  Speaker 1: I answer all the questions. I read all the super Chats.
• 28:20
  Speaker 1: Sometimes slips into the next show, not today. I don't
• 28:23
  Speaker 1: think we'll have that many, but you know, yeah, I
• 28:26
  Speaker 1: read them all. So come and participate, engage. I know.
• 28:31
  Speaker 1: I see a lot of comments on the comments after
• 28:34
  Speaker 1: the videos about things people disagree with me. I wish
• 28:38
  Speaker 1: they'd come on the show and tell me and ask
• 28:40
  Speaker 1: questions and challenge me on the question. We get a few,
• 28:44
  Speaker 1: we get a few, but come on the show. I
• 28:47
  Speaker 1: love to answer the crazy stuff that you guys think.
• 28:51
  Speaker 1: I love to respond to it. And yeah, somebody's writing
• 29:00
  Speaker 1: about Einran being Jewish. Asked me about that? What I
• 29:05
  Speaker 1: think about being Jewish? Generally ask me about it. That'd
• 29:09
  Speaker 1: be cool, all right. So another set of mythologies that
• 29:19
  Speaker 1: exists out there, and a lot of what we do
• 29:21
  Speaker 1: in the show is talk about kind of the bs
• 29:24
  Speaker 1: that that goes for commentary and news out there in
• 29:28
  Speaker 1: the world. Another set of mythologies we talked yesterday about,
• 29:31
  Speaker 1: like the complete distortion of history and how people are
• 29:34
  Speaker 1: radical radicalized by some of the most stupid stuff there is. Yeah,
• 29:43
  Speaker 1: super chep me was Gnub. I don't know who Gnub
• 29:46
  Speaker 1: is anyway. Yeah. So one of those that I saw
• 29:53
  Speaker 1: yes yesterday. I was going to comment on it yesterday
• 29:55
  Speaker 1: but didn't ever, you ran out of time. One of
• 29:58
  Speaker 1: those was one of those is a headline I read,
• 30:06
  Speaker 1: and this is the headline, white fertility collapsed. The rest
• 30:12
  Speaker 1: of the planet didn't. Now, I just scratched my hair
• 30:17
  Speaker 1: had quite a bed on that one. White fertility. First
• 30:21
  Speaker 1: of all, it's just bizarre to me that people think
• 30:28
  Speaker 1: in terms of whiteness. I don't know what that means.
• 30:32
  Speaker 1: I don't really care. Why should I care if white
• 30:34
  Speaker 1: fertility collapsed? Why do I care about white people? Who
• 30:38
  Speaker 1: the fo white people? What is white people? What does
• 30:42
  Speaker 1: it even mean? I mean the amount of what's called melt.
• 30:47
  Speaker 1: Melt is something in your skin that determines whether you're
• 30:49
  Speaker 1: white or not. Why is that important? How does that
• 30:51
  Speaker 1: determine anything? How is that relevant for anything? I really do,
• 30:58
  Speaker 1: and I know many of you will be insulted by this.
• 31:00
  Speaker 1: They'll be, I'll be the comment section will just go
• 31:03
  Speaker 1: nuts over this. But I can't wait for the day
• 31:07
  Speaker 1: when you know we're all mutts wall you can differentiate us.
• 31:15
  Speaker 1: There's no line, right, I mean, people are really really
• 31:20
  Speaker 1: dark have now become you know, less dark, and people
• 31:23
  Speaker 1: really really light and become less light, and we're all
• 31:25
  Speaker 1: basically the same from an insignificant perspective of the color
• 31:29
  Speaker 1: of us skin. Maybe well, then focus on something else.
• 31:32
  Speaker 1: I don't know the shape of our eyebrows. I'm sure
• 31:38
  Speaker 1: they won't because racists won't give up. They won't give up.
• 31:43
  Speaker 1: They'll they'll find other distinguishing characteristics. Who the hell cares?
• 31:49
  Speaker 1: Race doesn't exist. It's a complete social construct. It's a
• 31:55
  Speaker 1: made up thing really, from the late eighteenth century and
• 31:59
  Speaker 1: into the nineteenth cent. Human beings exist, individual human beings,
• 32:08
  Speaker 1: And of all the characteristics one can attribute to individual
• 32:12
  Speaker 1: human beings, the skin color seems to me to be
• 32:15
  Speaker 1: the least important, the least significant, the least meaningful. So
• 32:20
  Speaker 1: the first thing that struck me in the headline is white.
• 32:22
  Speaker 1: Who cares? Second, it's just false, it's true. White fertility
• 32:28
  Speaker 1: is collapsed. But then the second part is the rest
• 32:31
  Speaker 1: of the world didn't. That's just completely, utterly, unbelievably false.
• 32:41
  Speaker 1: The article says, then, in the generation now starting school
• 32:44
  Speaker 1: is the first and recorded history that will grow up
• 32:46
  Speaker 1: on a planet where people of European descent are a
• 32:49
  Speaker 1: shrinking global minority. I mean people of European descent have
• 32:54
  Speaker 1: always been a minority, and yes, the shrinking, but so
• 32:58
  Speaker 1: is everybody else. Have you seen birth rates in Asia?
• 33:03
  Speaker 1: Like have you seen the birth rates in South Korea?
• 33:08
  Speaker 1: South Koreans are disappearing faster than Europeans Japanese. Have you
• 33:16
  Speaker 1: seen the birth rates in China? I mean Asians, East
• 33:21
  Speaker 1: Asians are disappearing. Even in India, which has had relatively
• 33:26
  Speaker 1: very high birth rates, their birth rates are collapsing. They're not,
• 33:32
  Speaker 1: you know, way down there below Evaser yet. But if
• 33:36
  Speaker 1: you look, you know, Italy is at one point two
• 33:39
  Speaker 1: five children per woman. I mean South Korea and Japan
• 33:42
  Speaker 1: would would would would kill for one point two four,
• 33:45
  Speaker 1: Spain one point two three, Germany one point three six.
• 33:48
  Speaker 1: Remember two point one is replacement. Poland one point twenty six,
• 33:52
  Speaker 1: Canada one point three three, Australia one point five eight.
• 33:56
  Speaker 1: Even the US non Hispanic white rate is only one
• 33:59
  Speaker 1: point six four. Yeah, meanwhile Toky is one point nine nine.
• 34:04
  Speaker 1: But here's the thing. The headline didn't say that fertility
• 34:12
  Speaker 1: in other countries, cultures, parts of the world, was that
• 34:20
  Speaker 1: it was higher than than in Europe. That's not what
• 34:23
  Speaker 1: the headlines say. It said fertility is collapsing. Well, fertility
• 34:27
  Speaker 1: is collapsing. In Tokey, it used to be three four five,
• 34:31
  Speaker 1: it's now only two. And guess what direction that's heading down?
• 34:36
  Speaker 1: Each of two point nine down from like six. Nigeria's
• 34:40
  Speaker 1: five point two down from like eight. Pakistan is three
• 34:44
  Speaker 1: point four down from like six, Indonesia two point two
• 34:48
  Speaker 1: down from like four five, and most of Sahavan Africa
• 34:52
  Speaker 1: remains above four down from above eight. The world fertility
• 35:00
  Speaker 1: is collapsing, and the reality is. The reality is this
• 35:06
  Speaker 1: was a really interesting data point that I didn't realize,
• 35:09
  Speaker 1: But it's true. Who do you think has more kids
• 35:13
  Speaker 1: in America today? Put people or rich people? Put aside
• 35:20
  Speaker 1: race because that's unimportant, but put people of rich people,
• 35:23
  Speaker 1: who has more kids? Who has more kids? In Europe?
• 35:29
  Speaker 1: In European countries, put people a rich people. The answer
• 35:35
  Speaker 1: is rich people, rich people having more kids than poor people.
• 35:41
  Speaker 1: Partially because with all the opportunities that are available, rich
• 35:46
  Speaker 1: people can afford to have their to have you know,
• 35:52
  Speaker 1: two family incomes, and to pay for childcare and for
• 35:55
  Speaker 1: an suv and for a big house. Put people have
• 36:00
  Speaker 1: fewer kids because they can't afford the childcare. The mother
• 36:02
  Speaker 1: still has to work, but they can't affoid the childcare,
• 36:04
  Speaker 1: and therefore they had fewer kids. So you're much more
• 36:09
  Speaker 1: likely to three to see in the US three kids
• 36:14
  Speaker 1: in a family that is relatively wealthy than you are
• 36:19
  Speaker 1: in a family that's poor. And my guess, my guess
• 36:25
  Speaker 1: is that you will see start seeing that on a
• 36:28
  Speaker 1: national basis, poor countries their fertility rates are going to collapse.
• 36:37
  Speaker 1: Now I know you you know, these people don't care
• 36:39
  Speaker 1: about poor and rich. They care about skin color. It
• 36:42
  Speaker 1: happens that the poor countries also have different skin colors
• 36:45
  Speaker 1: than white, so the whites tend to be richer, at
• 36:47
  Speaker 1: least for now. So you know what you're getting is,
• 36:57
  Speaker 1: you know, complete change. The fertility is going to change.
• 37:08
  Speaker 1: The dynamics of fertility are changing dramatically to loge extent,
• 37:12
  Speaker 1: and I'd say overwhelmingly because women have opportunity costs. They
• 37:18
  Speaker 1: have other options they have alternatives. They don't have to
• 37:22
  Speaker 1: stay home and have kids four five sixty seven. They
• 37:27
  Speaker 1: can actually go study at university. They can go work
• 37:32
  Speaker 1: and make money and become less dependent on a man.
• 37:36
  Speaker 1: They can marry later and have maybe two kids or
• 37:40
  Speaker 1: one kid, or no kids at all, and live a
• 37:41
  Speaker 1: fulfilled life. I know some of you think that's impossible,
• 37:46
  Speaker 1: but in reality, it's very possible. So the reality is
• 38:04
  Speaker 1: the birth rates are going down all over the world.
• 38:07
  Speaker 1: I expect them to go down for a long time,
• 38:12
  Speaker 1: for decades to come, as poor countries become richer, as
• 38:18
  Speaker 1: women in poor countries gain rights and get the opportunity
• 38:22
  Speaker 1: to go out and actually work, as the opportunity cost
• 38:29
  Speaker 1: of not working, you know, it's just ridiculous. So they
• 38:33
  Speaker 1: work because again of the independence and the pleasure that
• 38:42
  Speaker 1: that brings them. And then what I expect will happen
• 38:51
  Speaker 1: is as people become richer and they have living robots
• 38:56
  Speaker 1: to do a lot of the you know, day to
• 38:59
  Speaker 1: day stuff that needs to get done, and maybe they
• 39:01
  Speaker 1: have AI tutors for their kids. And you know, who knows,
• 39:06
  Speaker 1: we've become really, really rich, we'll start having more kids.
• 39:10
  Speaker 1: And I think which people will lead that effort, we'll
• 39:13
  Speaker 1: have more kids. I mean, isn't it like the guy
• 39:18
  Speaker 1: who has the most kids right now is a lune
• 39:21
  Speaker 1: musk ideas what thirteen fourteen kids? And it's fascinating to
• 39:25
  Speaker 1: me that thed trador whatever don't know what to do
• 39:30
  Speaker 1: with their luonn musku is. On one hand, he's having
• 39:31
  Speaker 1: a lot of kids. That's good, we love kids, we
• 39:33
  Speaker 1: want it to be and you know, and then mostly
• 39:36
  Speaker 1: white kids. But he's doing it in this unconventional way
• 39:42
  Speaker 1: by sleeping with lots and lots of different women who
• 39:44
  Speaker 1: land up raising the kids by themselves, and the trad
• 39:47
  Speaker 1: guys that are like, oh, that's wrong, that's somehow, that's
• 39:49
  Speaker 1: how we're all wrong. But you know, but he's a guy,
• 39:52
  Speaker 1: so it's okay. Maybe Here's the thing, though, The thing
• 39:58
  Speaker 1: that really upsets them is not fertility rates are really collapsing.
• 40:02
  Speaker 1: It's not even the white fertility rates are collapsing. What
• 40:04
  Speaker 1: really upsets them. What really upsets them is immigration. Continuation
• 40:13
  Speaker 1: of the story. This is Mario Nafal on Twitter. Lay
• 40:17
  Speaker 1: on top of the largest sustained migration in human history
• 40:21
  Speaker 1: between twenty twenty twenty five, roughly one hundred and ten
• 40:23
  Speaker 1: million people moved from the global South to the north,
• 40:27
  Speaker 1: North America, Europe, and Australia, with un projections showing another
• 40:32
  Speaker 1: two to three hundred million by mid century. No previous empire,
• 40:36
  Speaker 1: no previous century, has ever been population has seen such
• 40:40
  Speaker 1: population movements on this scale. Yeah, I mean, it's not
• 40:45
  Speaker 1: that long ago that the entire human population, not that
• 40:48
  Speaker 1: long ago at all, was five hundred million people. So
• 40:52
  Speaker 1: I don't know if they mean that in terms of
• 40:55
  Speaker 1: migration as a percentage of the total population, or they
• 40:58
  Speaker 1: mean that as a shier number. Clearly is a she
• 41:01
  Speaker 1: in a number it's never been seen before, because there's
• 41:03
  Speaker 1: never been this many people before, And they say the
• 41:06
  Speaker 1: result is already visible in every major Western city, Native
• 41:10
  Speaker 1: children are minorities today in the public schools of London, Paris, Emsdam, Stockholm, Toronto, Sydney,
• 41:15
  Speaker 1: and most large American metros. The rest of the West
• 41:19
  Speaker 1: is simply next in line. By twenty forty twenty fifty,
• 41:22
  Speaker 1: the native born European descent will be minorities in the
• 41:26
  Speaker 1: under thirty age group in every single Western country without exception.
• 41:31
  Speaker 1: There is no longer a national story. It is the
• 41:34
  Speaker 1: biggest demographic turnover the world has ever witnessed. I somehow
• 41:40
  Speaker 1: doubt this is true, completely doubt this is true. Happening
• 41:44
  Speaker 1: in one human lifetime driven by fertility differentials, no government
• 41:49
  Speaker 1: has ever reversed and migration flows, no democracy has ever
• 41:53
  Speaker 1: stopped once they reach a critical mass. So much bs there,
• 42:01
  Speaker 1: partially because the world's never being this rich, never being
• 42:07
  Speaker 1: this prosperous, never being this easy to move, never being
• 42:11
  Speaker 1: this easy to communicate, never being this easy to produce,
• 42:16
  Speaker 1: never lived this long. Yeah, everything that happens from now
• 42:21
  Speaker 1: on is going to be different than what's happened in history,
• 42:24
  Speaker 1: because we are dramatically different than anything that's happened in history.
• 42:33
  Speaker 1: So yeah, here's the headline. I think it was the
• 42:37
  Speaker 1: same day, right a little later on the same day,
• 42:40
  Speaker 1: and this one was was this one was retweeted. I
• 42:44
  Speaker 1: think they were both retweeted by lun Musk, but this
• 42:47
  Speaker 1: one was definitely retreated by lun Musk. White nations, White nations.
• 42:52
  Speaker 1: It used to be coude and uncouth to even talk
• 42:56
  Speaker 1: this way, and now it's like poor white nations in
• 43:00
  Speaker 1: sinc The replacement is no longer a theory. Again. Mariona
• 43:07
  Speaker 1: Fazz goes on in what statisticians are labeling the most
• 43:10
  Speaker 1: coordinated demographic event ever recorded. Coordinated. Who's exactly coordinating in this?
• 43:15
  Speaker 1: Every single major white Western country has since early nineteen
• 43:19
  Speaker 1: nineties simultaneously slashed native birth rates below revelation. That's right.
• 43:24
  Speaker 1: I mean the government basically had a one child policy
• 43:27
  Speaker 1: in the West. They slashed. Every culture slashed. It's from
• 43:31
  Speaker 1: the top down slash birth rates. It's so this is
• 43:38
  Speaker 1: I mean, he considers himself journalists. This is such garbage reporting.
• 43:44
  Speaker 1: Nobody slashed birth rates. Birthrates went down, not because anybody
• 43:49
  Speaker 1: decided they should go down, but because individuals made decisions
• 43:53
  Speaker 1: about their own lives. And you see, but when you
• 43:55
  Speaker 1: don't think about individuals, when you can only think about groups,
• 43:59
  Speaker 1: only think about nations, only think about races, only think
• 44:02
  Speaker 1: in terms of collectives tribes, then birth rates were slashed.
• 44:08
  Speaker 1: But no individuals made decisions in their own context, of
• 44:11
  Speaker 1: their own lives that led to low birth rates. Okay,
• 44:14
  Speaker 1: who cares simultaneously slash native birth rates? Somebody slashed made
• 44:20
  Speaker 1: birth rates below replacement while importing importing, I love that
• 44:24
  Speaker 1: word importing. We brought them in, We bought them like slaves.
• 44:29
  Speaker 1: Importing third world migration at levels that now drive eighty
• 44:33
  Speaker 1: to one hundred percent of their population growth. Census bureaus
• 44:38
  Speaker 1: from Washington to Warsaw are spilling the same terrifying numbers.
• 44:42
  Speaker 1: Farn Born shares of double triple, the worst in just
• 44:45
  Speaker 1: one generation. Oh my god, the world is going to end.
• 44:48
  Speaker 1: Sweden nineteen percent, Germany twenty percent, Canada pushing thirty percent.
• 44:52
  Speaker 1: Fans in the UK on the same trajectory. The platterin
• 44:56
  Speaker 1: is identical, the timing eerily aligned. There's a concer expiracy here.
• 45:00
  Speaker 1: There has to be. It's all planned. It's the world
• 45:04
  Speaker 1: Economic Forum. I think even Iceland, even Iceland has got
• 45:11
  Speaker 1: now twenty three point one percent farign Born. Iceland will
• 45:16
  Speaker 1: never be the same. That white ice and the white
• 45:19
  Speaker 1: skin that people have was attuned, people were tuned with nature.
• 45:24
  Speaker 1: And now there'll be brown skin on ice, on white snow.
• 45:28
  Speaker 1: I don't know if that's allowed. That's that's all wrong.
• 45:33
  Speaker 1: It goes against nature, it goes against the harmony whatever
• 45:39
  Speaker 1: aging boomers, collapsing pensions, corporate demand for endless growth, and
• 45:43
  Speaker 1: a corporate demand for endless growth. I love that. And
• 45:45
  Speaker 1: a post nineteen forty five legal framework weaponized to make
• 45:49
  Speaker 1: restrictive possible radioactive. No single phone call is no single
• 45:54
  Speaker 1: phone callers ever needed. The incentives locked in the media, narrative,
• 45:58
  Speaker 1: locked in the NGOs, and thought's locked in. The scent
• 46:02
  Speaker 1: was simply labeled hate until the numbers became undeniable. No
• 46:08
  Speaker 1: differentiation here between Islamist migration dedicated to turning Europe into
• 46:14
  Speaker 1: an Islamist caliphud and just plain old people migrating for
• 46:19
  Speaker 1: economic reasons, which is wonderful. Yeah, some migration is bad.
• 46:29
  Speaker 1: If the migrants are coming in order to change you,
• 46:32
  Speaker 1: that's bad. But if the migrants are coming to change themselves,
• 46:37
  Speaker 1: that's good. But you can't differentiate those because what matters
• 46:45
  Speaker 1: really to these people is skin color. Skin color. I mean,
• 47:00
  Speaker 1: if Mariana Fas is worried about Africa having high birth rates,
• 47:06
  Speaker 1: I've got a solution for it. He should advocate for
• 47:10
  Speaker 1: women to be educated for feminist emancipation and birth rates
• 47:16
  Speaker 1: in Africa will go down. Happens everywhere everywhere. Now there's
• 47:23
  Speaker 1: an issue about people not having kids and not getting married.
• 47:30
  Speaker 1: I think people are missing out by doing so. But
• 47:34
  Speaker 1: that's a different conversation worth having about the value of
• 47:38
  Speaker 1: marriage and the value of having kids. And you know,
• 47:44
  Speaker 1: the lack of meaning in the modern world. And you know,
• 47:47
  Speaker 1: it's a funny thing, is how much I find myself
• 47:51
  Speaker 1: on these shows defending the modern world when I'm such
• 47:56
  Speaker 1: a big critic of it. Because the criticisms I hear
• 48:02
  Speaker 1: are so off base, are so misaligned with reality, are
• 48:07
  Speaker 1: so you know, unconnected to what's really going on and
• 48:13
  Speaker 1: what the real problems are. Then I find myself constantly
• 48:17
  Speaker 1: defending the status quo. I don't want the status quo.
• 48:20
  Speaker 1: I want to blow up the status quo, but not
• 48:23
  Speaker 1: to go backwards to twelve twenty, but to go forward
• 48:26
  Speaker 1: to twenty two hundred. Not to reject the Enlightenment and
• 48:34
  Speaker 1: embrace a Christian theocracy as an white Christian theocracy, as
• 48:39
  Speaker 1: most of these people do, but because I want to
• 48:43
  Speaker 1: go forward to fully embrace the Enlightenment, fully, embrace reason fully, embrace,
• 48:48
  Speaker 1: embrace self interest fully, fully fully embrace capitalism, and then
• 48:54
  Speaker 1: see what individuals choose to do with their life. Have kids,
• 48:56
  Speaker 1: not have kids, by a big house, by a small house, work,
• 49:03
  Speaker 1: stay home, get married, not get married. I want people
• 49:07
  Speaker 1: to have choices, choices in the best possible world, in
• 49:14
  Speaker 1: a world where they have many, many, many good choices,
• 49:19
  Speaker 1: not in the world in which we live with you know,
• 49:21
  Speaker 1: a lot of crappy choices, a lot of choices dictated
• 49:24
  Speaker 1: by from above by governments, and a lot of you know,
• 49:30
  Speaker 1: garbage analysis and commentary by out people who call themselves intellectuals.
• 49:40
  Speaker 1: All right, we are approaching the end of the first hour.
• 49:44
  Speaker 1: We're still short in terms of our goals. So if
• 49:48
  Speaker 1: you would like to support the show, see it grow,
• 49:51
  Speaker 1: and if you would like to just value for value
• 49:56
  Speaker 1: for the content you're receiving, jump in with a sticker,
• 49:59
  Speaker 1: any amount with a question. Questions twenty dollars, fifty dollars,
• 50:03
  Speaker 1: questions are particularly appreciated. All right, let us continue with this,
• 50:08
  Speaker 1: with the with the discussion, because the next story I
• 50:11
  Speaker 1: have is about talent and immigration. And you know, there's
• 50:16
  Speaker 1: a story today post today on the American Enterprise Institute's
• 50:21
  Speaker 1: website talking about immigration and the reality that if you
• 50:28
  Speaker 1: look at today's economy, today's economy is driven by a
• 50:32
  Speaker 1: relatively small set of individuals who are pushing forward. Economic
• 50:36
  Speaker 1: growth today is dependent on a few industries, mainly in
• 50:40
  Speaker 1: Silicon Valley, that are pushing things forward. Chip makers, things
• 50:46
  Speaker 1: like chip makers, you know, designers, you know, AI programmers,
• 50:53
  Speaker 1: you know, this is in research groups technology. This is
• 50:56
  Speaker 1: where things are being pushed and where economic growth manifests itself.
• 51:05
  Speaker 1: If you think about that, you know you need to
• 51:14
  Speaker 1: be high skilled for that to keep pushing the frontiers
• 51:20
  Speaker 1: of innovation, the frontiers of science, the frontiers of engineering,
• 51:23
  Speaker 1: the frontiers of AI and everything that it implies. And
• 51:27
  Speaker 1: even when it comes to national security, if you constantly
• 51:30
  Speaker 1: want to combat the latest generation of drones, the latest
• 51:33
  Speaker 1: generation of AI, the latest generation of electronic interference, you
• 51:39
  Speaker 1: need smart people. You need a lot of smart people.
• 51:44
  Speaker 1: You need people with extraordinary abilities. It's the kind of
• 51:51
  Speaker 1: cognitive abilities that maybe one in one thousand people have
• 51:57
  Speaker 1: that would make about one hundred and sixty four thousand
• 51:59
  Speaker 1: Americans eligible. And let's say out of those, maybe one
• 52:04
  Speaker 1: hundred thousand are actually going to go into these areas
• 52:07
  Speaker 1: and fields and actually manifest this. One hundred thousand. That's it.
• 52:12
  Speaker 1: One hundred thousand people are going to drive the US economy.
• 52:15
  Speaker 1: I mean, there's just not enough Americans now. The way
• 52:21
  Speaker 1: we've done this in the past is no problem. We
• 52:25
  Speaker 1: suck into America the best, the smartest, the most able,
• 52:29
  Speaker 1: the most hard working people in the world. We bring
• 52:34
  Speaker 1: them to this country from everywhere. Indeed, China has played
• 52:39
  Speaker 1: a huge role in this. You know, five Asian countries India, China,
• 52:44
  Speaker 1: South Korea, Japan, and Philippines account for over thirty eight
• 52:48
  Speaker 1: percent of the growth in US software developers, twenty five
• 52:51
  Speaker 1: percent of the increase in scientists and engineers, twenty one
• 52:55
  Speaker 1: percent in the growth of physicians between nineteen ninety and
• 52:59
  Speaker 1: nineteen nineteen. So we would have significantly less software engineers, scientists,
• 53:07
  Speaker 1: physicians if we hadn't brought people in from those five
• 53:10
  Speaker 1: Asian countries. You know, in twenty nineteen, we had four
• 53:20
  Speaker 1: hundred thousand Chinese students studying in American universities. That was
• 53:25
  Speaker 1: more than a third of all international students in America.
• 53:30
  Speaker 1: Now that is declining significantly, and it's going to decline
• 53:36
  Speaker 1: even more under the you know, under the Trump administration.
• 53:50
  Speaker 1: I mean, when Meta launched its super Intelligence Lab, it
• 53:54
  Speaker 1: hired eleven researchers, eleven people into the super Intelligence Lab.
• 54:00
  Speaker 1: These are the best of the best in AI, all
• 54:06
  Speaker 1: of them, all eleven, every single one of them was
• 54:10
  Speaker 1: an immigrant. Seven of the eleven were from China. Indeed,
• 54:18
  Speaker 1: one third of the world's top AI scientists researchers are Chinese,
• 54:24
  Speaker 1: and most of those work in the United States. So
• 54:29
  Speaker 1: if you cut people off, if you don't accept Chinese immigration,
• 54:34
  Speaker 1: these people stay in China, and all the talent stays
• 54:37
  Speaker 1: in China. It doesn't come here. Does that benefit of
• 54:40
  Speaker 1: the United States, But we stay white and poor and
• 54:46
  Speaker 1: maybe occupied by the Greater Chinese Empire one day because they,
• 54:52
  Speaker 1: you know, they sucked up all the talent we didn't.
• 54:57
  Speaker 1: We're trying to restrict immigration. We're trying to restrict immigration
• 55:01
  Speaker 1: from everywhere. We're trying to restrict immigration of talented people,
• 55:05
  Speaker 1: of exceptional people, trying to restrict immigration in particular of Chinese.
• 55:12
  Speaker 1: And it's nuts. It is completely nuts. It's insane. Now, yeah,
• 55:20
  Speaker 1: we've got some security issues with China and you have
• 55:22
  Speaker 1: to vet these people and you have to watch out
• 55:24
  Speaker 1: fur them, but it's worth it. A few of them
• 55:28
  Speaker 1: will be spies, will survive, will thrive. Some of those
• 55:35
  Speaker 1: European scientists we brought in after World War Two who
• 55:37
  Speaker 1: all build atomic bombs and our hydrogen bombs and stuff,
• 55:40
  Speaker 1: turned out to be spies too. All we still beat
• 55:45
  Speaker 1: the Soviets, we still did better. And part of why
• 55:48
  Speaker 1: we beat the Soviets. Part of why we beat communism,
• 55:50
  Speaker 1: part of why we're richer than China, part of why
• 55:53
  Speaker 1: we're still the most successful country in the world is
• 55:57
  Speaker 1: because we've been open to immigrants, wide open to immigrants.
• 56:03
  Speaker 1: And now we view immigrants as a pest, as diluting
• 56:09
  Speaker 1: our whiteness, as making us poorer, as making us more violent.
• 56:16
  Speaker 1: All untrue, But it doesn't matter statistics. Don't let statistics
• 56:21
  Speaker 1: ever interfere with you know, I mean, don't let facts.
• 56:26
  Speaker 1: Don't let reality ever interfere with ideal you know, people's
• 56:29
  Speaker 1: ideology out there. I mean, a good friend Miller in
• 56:42
  Speaker 1: the Trump administration says migrants is just avatars of the
• 56:47
  Speaker 1: average characteristics of their own home country. This is not true.
• 56:53
  Speaker 1: Immigrants are individuals. Some of them are bad. Some of
• 56:58
  Speaker 1: them are bad, and you should deal with them, deport them,
• 57:02
  Speaker 1: put them in prison. But when they come here, if
• 57:10
  Speaker 1: we let them, if we encourage them, and mainly if
• 57:14
  Speaker 1: we just don't give them handouts, they don't become images
• 57:20
  Speaker 1: of what they wore back then. I mean, the best
• 57:22
  Speaker 1: example of this are Indians. I mean, Miller claims, to
• 57:29
  Speaker 1: quote Milla, that they recreate the conditions and terrors of
• 57:34
  Speaker 1: their broken homelands. Look at Indians, Indians a poor country
• 57:41
  Speaker 1: with a lower GDP per capita than Jamaica, Guatemala, South Africa,
• 57:47
  Speaker 1: very poor country, not hygienic, not a pleasant place. And
• 57:55
  Speaker 1: yet Indians come to America they become super ye, super successful.
• 58:02
  Speaker 1: They're a median household income, way above the American average,
• 58:07
  Speaker 1: even white American average. They're way over represented when it
• 58:14
  Speaker 1: comes to CEOs at elite colleges. And yet Indias in
• 58:17
  Speaker 1: India have arranged marriages and their tribal and they're you know,
• 58:23
  Speaker 1: they have a caste system. You know, they're untouchables. I mean,
• 58:27
  Speaker 1: it's completely cast different. They come to America and except
• 58:30
  Speaker 1: America as it is, and all those traditions, all those
• 58:34
  Speaker 1: all those bad stuff, it breaks away, it dissolves, it
• 58:36
  Speaker 1: goes away within one maybe two generations, all gone. But
• 58:41
  Speaker 1: think about how many of the leading CEOs in America
• 58:44
  Speaker 1: today are Indian. How many of Indians children of Indian
• 58:50
  Speaker 1: immigrants are in elite colleges. Now, it's true that the
• 58:58
  Speaker 1: people who immigrate from India the United States are not random.
• 59:02
  Speaker 1: They're the people who have the ambition, the wherewithal to
• 59:07
  Speaker 1: immigrate to America. They have above average drive. They're more conscientious,
• 59:12
  Speaker 1: the more ambitious they want to be in America. They
• 59:15
  Speaker 1: don't want to be in India anymore. And that's true
• 59:17
  Speaker 1: of almost all immigrants. I mean, the idea of keeping
• 59:25
  Speaker 1: immigrants out, particularly successful Indian immigrants out, is barbaric. American
• 59:31
  Speaker 1: whites who want to keep Indians out of America on Neanderthals,
• 59:45
  Speaker 1: it's barbaric. It's placing an essential on your skin color.
• 59:54
  Speaker 1: Or they're just cowards. Really, this is it. They're afraid
• 59:58
  Speaker 1: of the competition. They're afraid a beaten for their job
• 1:00:02
  Speaker 1: by somebody who doesn't look like them, who's going to
• 1:00:06
  Speaker 1: make more money than them, who's going to be more
• 1:00:09
  Speaker 1: successful than them. Oh, Fred's an electrician. He doesn't want
• 1:00:16
  Speaker 1: competition from Indian electricians. They might actually be better at
• 1:00:19
  Speaker 1: their jobs than Fred. They might make more money than Fred.
• 1:00:24
  Speaker 1: They might get the kids into Harvard easier than Fred
• 1:00:28
  Speaker 1: gets his kids into Harvard. So yeah, immigration birth rates.
• 1:00:49
  Speaker 1: Nostalgia for some distant past is so much driven by
• 1:00:56
  Speaker 1: a zenophobia, a racism, a kind of a barbaric you know,
• 1:01:04
  Speaker 1: longing for some distant place that never really existed. And
• 1:01:13
  Speaker 1: it's driven more than anything by fear. It's driven by blood.
• 1:01:18
  Speaker 1: Heites who don't want their life challenge, don't want their
• 1:01:25
  Speaker 1: income challenge, don't want their jobs challenged, don't want their
• 1:01:28
  Speaker 1: culture challenged. It's the culture, they tell me. Well, I mean,
• 1:01:33
  Speaker 1: if you believe your culture is so good as we did,
• 1:01:36
  Speaker 1: as we used to believe in this country, then we
• 1:01:39
  Speaker 1: assimilate everybody. They adapt to our culture. We don't adapt
• 1:01:44
  Speaker 1: to theirs. Again, they're cowards, they're afraid. They actually don't
• 1:01:49
  Speaker 1: believe in American culture. They don't believe the American culture
• 1:01:52
  Speaker 1: is strong. They don't believe the American culture is resilient.
• 1:01:56
  Speaker 1: And maybe elements of American culture are not. Maybe that
• 1:02:01
  Speaker 1: part of the culture that involves sitting around on your
• 1:02:06
  Speaker 1: sofa drinking beer, watching TV, skimping on work, skimping on education,
• 1:02:13
  Speaker 1: skimping on ambition, relying on welfare, maybe that part of
• 1:02:17
  Speaker 1: the American culture needs to die. And maybe some boost
• 1:02:24
  Speaker 1: of some energy for migrants who will compete with you.
• 1:02:29
  Speaker 1: But the part of American culture, the independence that don't
• 1:02:34
  Speaker 1: step on me, go get them the wealth, creation, including
• 1:02:40
  Speaker 1: the sports and everything else. If we're so confident that
• 1:02:44
  Speaker 1: that's good and it is good, I think then the
• 1:02:48
  Speaker 1: immigrants will just assimilate into it. The Jews who came
• 1:02:52
  Speaker 1: in the late nineteenth century, and the Irish and the Italians,
• 1:02:56
  Speaker 1: the Eastern Europeans and the Russians who came here, they
• 1:03:01
  Speaker 1: didn't have a similar culture to what America had in
• 1:03:05
  Speaker 1: the nineteenth century. They loved, they changed within a couple
• 1:03:10
  Speaker 1: of generations. They were Americans, just like anybody else. So
• 1:03:15
  Speaker 1: what is it you're afraid of that they have a
• 1:03:16
  Speaker 1: different color skin. I don't have hostility towards Americans. I
• 1:03:22
  Speaker 1: love Americans. I am an American God. I have hostility
• 1:03:27
  Speaker 1: towards anybody of any skin color, any nationality that believes
• 1:03:32
  Speaker 1: believes in stagnation. I have hostility towards anybody of any
• 1:03:37
  Speaker 1: skin color who evaluates other people based on their skin
• 1:03:40
  Speaker 1: color or their nation of origin. I have hostility towards
• 1:03:45
  Speaker 1: anybody of any skin color who's a tribalist and a collectivist.
• 1:03:51
  Speaker 1: And the thing is about America and Americans that I love. Oh,
• 1:03:58
  Speaker 1: here we go, here we go. Here's the question. Right,
• 1:04:02
  Speaker 1: are you Jewish? There's the question? So yes, Fred is
• 1:04:07
  Speaker 1: not just not just afraid of immigrants that might change
• 1:04:15
  Speaker 1: his culture, but he's just afraid of Jews, or he
• 1:04:20
  Speaker 1: just hates Jews, or he just things we run the
• 1:04:23
  Speaker 1: world and are trying to destroy him. Good. I'm glad
• 1:04:28
  Speaker 1: he's afraid. He should be afraid. America that I love
• 1:04:36
  Speaker 1: is an America of individualism and America of individuals, an
• 1:04:41
  Speaker 1: America of ambition, an America of achievement, and America of nothing.
• 1:04:50
  Speaker 1: No aim is impossible, No great achievement is out of reach.
• 1:04:58
  Speaker 1: And America that ins people from anywhere in the world
• 1:05:02
  Speaker 1: as individuals and treats them the way they deserve, if
• 1:05:06
  Speaker 1: they're productive, if they good human beings, treats them well,
• 1:05:11
  Speaker 1: is it criminals, put them in jail or send them packing.
• 1:05:23
  Speaker 1: That's the America worth saving. That's the America worth protecting. Yeah,
• 1:05:36
  Speaker 1: here it is. Here's the anti Semitism coming through. Do
• 1:05:39
  Speaker 1: Jewish people, and I'm reading this in the chat just
• 1:05:41
  Speaker 1: because you have to confront some of these straight on.
• 1:05:44
  Speaker 1: Do Jewish people advocate for immigrants as a means of
• 1:05:47
  Speaker 1: protecting themselves as they have done poorly in countries that
• 1:05:50
  Speaker 1: are ethnically homogeneous. Really, Jews in England, they have done
• 1:05:55
  Speaker 1: phenomenally well. England's fairly used to be fairly homogeneous and
• 1:06:01
  Speaker 1: in the nineteenth century. Jews did amazingly well in England.
• 1:06:05
  Speaker 1: Jews did amazingly well in Germany, amazingly well. In ethnically
• 1:06:10
  Speaker 1: homogeneous Germany, Jews did better than Germans. Maybe that's why
• 1:06:15
  Speaker 1: they were hated so much. Jews have done everywhere well,
• 1:06:21
  Speaker 1: whether they have been in homogeneous society or heterogeneous societies.
• 1:06:28
  Speaker 1: I mean, just look at America. Have Jews done well
• 1:06:32
  Speaker 1: in America because people came in who are less good?
• 1:06:36
  Speaker 1: Or did Jews do well in America because they out educated, outcompeted,
• 1:06:42
  Speaker 1: out thought many of the nan Jews because they were
• 1:06:47
  Speaker 1: more American than many Americans. See, this is the thing.
• 1:06:52
  Speaker 1: People like freed have been left behind. They're not succeeding.
• 1:06:57
  Speaker 1: The Indians are doing better than them. Oh have done
• 1:07:00
  Speaker 1: better than them for generations. Now those immigrants, I'll compete them,
• 1:07:06
  Speaker 1: do better, live better lives, and feed as upset. Fred
• 1:07:14
  Speaker 1: as upset. I advocate for freedom. Immigration is just an
• 1:07:21
  Speaker 1: aspect of freedom. I advocate for American's right to employ
• 1:07:28
  Speaker 1: anybody he wants to. It's none of the government's business
• 1:07:32
  Speaker 1: if that's a Mexican, if that's a Guatemalan, as long
• 1:07:35
  Speaker 1: as they're not a threat as long as they're not
• 1:07:37
  Speaker 1: they don't violate people's rights. I advocate for individuals, individual rights, individualism.
• 1:07:42
  Speaker 1: I advocate for the America, America of the nineteenth century,
• 1:07:47
  Speaker 1: where people could come from anywhere in the world, and
• 1:07:49
  Speaker 1: as long as they worked and fed themselves, they thrived.
• 1:08:01
  Speaker 1: I advocate for immigrants because I love America and America
• 1:08:08
  Speaker 1: is the land of individuals of any skin color. Israel
• 1:08:15
  Speaker 1: is a multicultural state. This is a question, do you
• 1:08:17
  Speaker 1: want multicultural un Isuela? Israe is one of the most
• 1:08:19
  Speaker 1: multicultural places on planet Earth. There are Jews in Israel
• 1:08:23
  Speaker 1: from Morocco, from Yemen, from Iraq, from Uzbekistan, as well
• 1:08:29
  Speaker 1: as from Russia and from Poland, from France and from Spain,
• 1:08:35
  Speaker 1: from Ethiopia. There are black Jews, completely black skin Jews.
• 1:08:42
  Speaker 1: There are brown skin Jews. You want to tell me
• 1:08:46
  Speaker 1: about Israel, Fred, Really, you ever been there? How many
• 1:08:50
  Speaker 1: years have you lived in Israel? I love it when
• 1:08:56
  Speaker 1: people are going to lecture me about Israel. And of
• 1:09:00
  Speaker 1: these really population, twenty percent of these redly population I'm
• 1:09:03
  Speaker 1: not even counting the West Bank and Gaza just in
• 1:09:05
  Speaker 1: Israel are Arabs. They might be Muslim Arabs, though Christian Arabs,
• 1:09:13
  Speaker 1: but they're Abbs. The reason I am playing amount with
• 1:09:20
  Speaker 1: fred it is because you know, you say Fed is
• 1:09:23
  Speaker 1: done as a post. I don't think Fed is done
• 1:09:24
  Speaker 1: as a post. I think Fed is typical of what
• 1:09:28
  Speaker 1: many many people out there, many young people out there think,
• 1:09:35
  Speaker 1: many young people think out there. So yeah, Israel is,
• 1:09:41
  Speaker 1: as I said, multicultural place. Israel is a place that
• 1:09:46
  Speaker 1: has twenty percent Arabs. Israel is a place that has
• 1:09:53
  Speaker 1: people from all over the world. The only thing that
• 1:09:56
  Speaker 1: unites those people eighty percent is that none Jews consider
• 1:10:00
  Speaker 1: them Jews. That's the only thing that unites them. And
• 1:10:07
  Speaker 1: Israel is the place for Jews to escape to, that's all.
• 1:10:14
  Speaker 1: And you know I'm for that as long as anti
• 1:10:17
  Speaker 1: Semitism exists, that Jews have a place to escape to.
• 1:10:24
  Speaker 1: If Frenchmen were being hunted down, then it's good that
• 1:10:30
  Speaker 1: they be one country where Frenchmen can go where they
• 1:10:32
  Speaker 1: won't be hunted down. So that is, that is the
• 1:10:39
  Speaker 1: value of Israel. America is never ethnocentric state, and it
• 1:10:48
  Speaker 1: shouldn't be now, shouldn't be. Now? All right, let's do
• 1:10:57
  Speaker 1: a few of these quickly. First, climate change. I've told
• 1:11:00
  Speaker 1: you climate change is on the retreat. The environmentalist movement
• 1:11:05
  Speaker 1: is not having a good, good, good time. First, a
• 1:11:09
  Speaker 1: Trumpet administration today lowered this is the kind of stuff
• 1:11:12
  Speaker 1: that Trump does that is good, that is really good,
• 1:11:16
  Speaker 1: and this is kind of offsets all the bad offsets
• 1:11:19
  Speaker 1: in terms of economics, not in terms of the character
• 1:11:21
  Speaker 1: of the administration, but offsets in terms of economics the
• 1:11:24
  Speaker 1: bad stuff that he does. Trumpet administration today lowered fuel
• 1:11:29
  Speaker 1: economy rules for car makers, so Biden raised them. Now,
• 1:11:33
  Speaker 1: ideally they would go to Congress and eliminate them completely,
• 1:11:37
  Speaker 1: but you know, lowering them is better than nothing, and
• 1:11:40
  Speaker 1: lowering them is significant because if you lower them enough,
• 1:11:43
  Speaker 1: then you get to the point where it's not it
• 1:11:46
  Speaker 1: doesn't matter to auto companies. Now, I don't know if
• 1:11:48
  Speaker 1: you know how fuel economy works. They set a standard
• 1:11:51
  Speaker 1: like fifty miles per gallon, which is what I think
• 1:11:54
  Speaker 1: the Obama you know, the Biden standard was by twenty something,
• 1:12:00
  Speaker 1: twenty twenty thirty two. What that means is the every
• 1:12:03
  Speaker 1: car makeup on average, the car that it makes have
• 1:12:06
  Speaker 1: to be that. So they can make make SUVs and
• 1:12:11
  Speaker 1: pickup trucks that are gas guzzling, where actually American car companies,
• 1:12:16
  Speaker 1: you know, do very well with those cars. They make
• 1:12:18
  Speaker 1: a good profit on them. But in order to sell
• 1:12:22
  Speaker 1: those cars, they have to sell a bunch of small
• 1:12:23
  Speaker 1: cars that have very very high gas mileage, or maybe
• 1:12:27
  Speaker 1: they have to sell a bunch of electric cars in
• 1:12:29
  Speaker 1: order that are on average they're the fifty miles per gallon.
• 1:12:35
  Speaker 1: The lower that average is, the fewer electric cars, the
• 1:12:39
  Speaker 1: fewer small cars American companies can make, which is good.
• 1:12:44
  Speaker 1: It's good because American companies are not good at making
• 1:12:47
  Speaker 1: small cars. They never have been if the market had
• 1:12:51
  Speaker 1: been allowed to work, if the government never intervened. I believe,
• 1:12:57
  Speaker 1: I mean, I can't prove this, and maybe I'm wrong,
• 1:12:58
  Speaker 1: but I believe have happened is instead of the American
• 1:13:02
  Speaker 1: car company is going bankrupt every decade, American car companies
• 1:13:06
  Speaker 1: would have specialized in the cause that they have a
• 1:13:10
  Speaker 1: comparative advantage in because gas guzzling cars, pickup trucks, SUVs,
• 1:13:18
  Speaker 1: station wagons, and just big cause. And they would have
• 1:13:23
  Speaker 1: left the small cause to the Japanese and there would
• 1:13:29
  Speaker 1: have been a division of labor. There's absolutely no reason
• 1:13:33
  Speaker 1: for Ford and Ge General Motors to be making little
• 1:13:38
  Speaker 1: cars that they can't make any money on. They can't
• 1:13:42
  Speaker 1: make any money on and that, you know, they don't
• 1:13:50
  Speaker 1: make any sense to them. They're not particularly good at building.
• 1:13:53
  Speaker 1: They should build the stuff they're good at. They should specialize.
• 1:13:58
  Speaker 1: But the gas mileage rules, the fuel economy rules force
• 1:14:03
  Speaker 1: auto companies to make small cars. Trump blowing this allows
• 1:14:09
  Speaker 1: a little bit more specialization. Again, eliminating it would let
• 1:14:12
  Speaker 1: the car industry in a sense focus on specialization. I
• 1:14:17
  Speaker 1: mean BMW should make you know, uh, a model three
• 1:14:23
  Speaker 1: little sports Sedan's, Mercedes should make luxury cars to Yota
• 1:14:31
  Speaker 1: and and those guys should make should make small family cars.
• 1:14:35
  Speaker 1: There should be a division of Labman. The Chinese should
• 1:14:37
  Speaker 1: make electric cars. So this is great. Of course, the
• 1:14:44
  Speaker 1: environmentalists and the climate change people are going nuts because
• 1:14:47
  Speaker 1: these stands are being lowered, which means more gas guzzling,
• 1:14:50
  Speaker 1: which means more uh you know, uh, more yes, emissions. Uh.
• 1:14:57
  Speaker 1: The auto companies are loving it. General Motors Ford today
• 1:15:02
  Speaker 1: came out with a statement stellanis Kreisler. You know, I
• 1:15:07
  Speaker 1: really like this. So this is a This was a
• 1:15:11
  Speaker 1: very pro auto company move, but it's pro everybody moved.
• 1:15:15
  Speaker 1: This is a pro everybody move. It's a pro rights
• 1:15:18
  Speaker 1: pro freedom move. The second story I found with this
• 1:15:26
  Speaker 1: was really interesting and expected. But last year there was
• 1:15:32
  Speaker 1: a study published, an economic study published in Nature magazine. Nature,
• 1:15:36
  Speaker 1: of course is not an economic magazine, but it's a
• 1:15:40
  Speaker 1: science magazine, and the study was about the economic consequence
• 1:15:44
  Speaker 1: of climate change. It was an economic paper and it
• 1:15:48
  Speaker 1: basically said that climate change was going to be a disaster.
• 1:15:53
  Speaker 1: The research predicted decline of sixty two in world output
• 1:16:00
  Speaker 1: because of climate change by twenty one hundred, by twenty
• 1:16:03
  Speaker 1: one hundred, sixty two percent. Now, the study was criticized
• 1:16:08
  Speaker 1: almost immediately. People challenged them, and it turned out it's
• 1:16:14
  Speaker 1: this is funny. It's funny because this paper would have
• 1:16:18
  Speaker 1: never been published in the econ magazine economics magazine, because
• 1:16:22
  Speaker 1: this is just a stupid error that people would have
• 1:16:24
  Speaker 1: caught it very quickly. It turns out that one outlier,
• 1:16:29
  Speaker 1: one country outlier in the data, who's bicky stunt, That
• 1:16:36
  Speaker 1: outlier explains the entire sixty two percent decline. If you
• 1:16:42
  Speaker 1: take are as Bikki Stan out of the data, the
• 1:16:45
  Speaker 1: decline is only twenty three percent. And of course that
• 1:16:48
  Speaker 1: is such an amateur mistake, that is such a stupid
• 1:16:52
  Speaker 1: mistake in data analysis that the twenty two percent is
• 1:16:56
  Speaker 1: bogus probably as well. Of course other people. You could
• 1:17:01
  Speaker 1: challenge this paper on a one hundred different ways, but
• 1:17:04
  Speaker 1: the reality is that Nature has retracted the paper, which
• 1:17:08
  Speaker 1: is rare. The paper now if you click on it,
• 1:17:13
  Speaker 1: if you click on the paper, it's and this is
• 1:17:15
  Speaker 1: like a hugely cited paper. The UN Climate Reports cites
• 1:17:20
  Speaker 1: it in every climate organization in the world, every anti
• 1:17:24
  Speaker 1: fossil fuel group in the world have cited this paper
• 1:17:27
  Speaker 1: as proof that we need to do something about climate
• 1:17:29
  Speaker 1: change because climate change will destroy the economy of the planet.
• 1:17:34
  Speaker 1: And now at Nature, when you click out the paper,
• 1:17:37
  Speaker 1: it says retract that article. I love it. So climate
• 1:17:43
  Speaker 1: change is losing politically, it's losing the mind, the hearts
• 1:17:47
  Speaker 1: and minds of people. It's losing, and it's also losing
• 1:17:53
  Speaker 1: people are challenging it scientifically, its consequences scientifically, and there's
• 1:18:00
  Speaker 1: a lot more criticism if you actually run the numbers.
• 1:18:05
  Speaker 1: The amount of money to be invested in climate change
• 1:18:08
  Speaker 1: mitigation today, if you run the numbers properly, is zero
• 1:18:14
  Speaker 1: because of how much wealthier we will be if we
• 1:18:17
  Speaker 1: don't mitigate climate change. Climate change mitigation is unbelievably expensive.
• 1:18:22
  Speaker 1: And if you take that into account, then we're actually
• 1:18:25
  Speaker 1: better off suffering whatever economic damage happens because we're so
• 1:18:28
  Speaker 1: much richer and we can deal with whatever problems we
• 1:18:31
  Speaker 1: have later when we're richer. But you're never going to
• 1:18:36
  Speaker 1: see a paper like that published in Nature. But they
• 1:18:39
  Speaker 1: do exist out there in the economic literature in different places,
• 1:18:45
  Speaker 1: all right, quickly in Heckseth. Two stories today on Heckseth
• 1:18:49
  Speaker 1: one is the Bottom of Defense came back with its
• 1:18:52
  Speaker 1: conclusions about remember Hexseth texting with other people about the
• 1:18:59
  Speaker 1: operation and in Yemen months ago when the US bombed
• 1:19:04
  Speaker 1: the Hooties and basically you know. The report says the
• 1:19:11
  Speaker 1: Secretary sent non public Department of Defense information identifying the
• 1:19:16
  Speaker 1: quantity and strike times of manned US aircraft over hostile
• 1:19:20
  Speaker 1: territory over an unapproved, unsecure network approximately two to four
• 1:19:26
  Speaker 1: hours before the execution of those strikes, using a personal
• 1:19:30
  Speaker 1: cell phone to conduct official business and send non public
• 1:19:34
  Speaker 1: DoD information through signal risks, potential compromises of sensitive Department
• 1:19:40
  Speaker 1: of Defense information which could cause harm the defensive Department
• 1:19:45
  Speaker 1: personnel and mission objectives. In other words, hexset actions could
• 1:19:50
  Speaker 1: have engaged US pilots and US goals for the mission.
• 1:19:57
  Speaker 1: Hexset does not have the power to declassif fine, you
• 1:20:01
  Speaker 1: can't just by tweeting it make it declassified. You know
• 1:20:08
  Speaker 1: what's clear here with that? Uh? You know heck Sith
• 1:20:12
  Speaker 1: acted completely inappropriately during this and that this for any
• 1:20:18
  Speaker 1: other person, any other person, would have been a reason
• 1:20:26
  Speaker 1: to dismiss hex Sith, on the other hand, wrote no
• 1:20:32
  Speaker 1: classified information, total exoneration case closed, untrue, untrue. Inspector General
• 1:20:40
  Speaker 1: found that he again, I read it to you identified
• 1:20:44
  Speaker 1: you know, department non public, department defense information. That's classified information,
• 1:20:50
  Speaker 1: strike times, strike weapons, classified information. You can read the
• 1:20:55
  Speaker 1: report yourself. And yet he will not be fired. He
• 1:21:03
  Speaker 1: will now be fired. There. Report actually states if this
• 1:21:15
  Speaker 1: information had fallen into the hands of US advertaries, HUTI
• 1:21:19
  Speaker 1: forces might have been able to county US forces or
• 1:21:21
  Speaker 1: reposition personnel and assets to avoid planned US strikes. Even
• 1:21:26
  Speaker 1: though these events did not ultimately occur, the secretary's actions
• 1:21:30
  Speaker 1: created a risk to operational security that could have resulted
• 1:21:35
  Speaker 1: in failed US mission objectives and potential harm to US pilots.
• 1:21:40
  Speaker 1: This is a fireable offense. He should be fired for
• 1:21:43
  Speaker 1: this now. Of course, the second story is about the
• 1:21:46
  Speaker 1: bombing of the boats. The admiral who approved that accept
• 1:21:51
  Speaker 1: the claims he went to the bathroom and wasn't in
• 1:21:53
  Speaker 1: the room when that happened. You love a commander, a
• 1:22:00
  Speaker 1: a senior officer, the guy in charge of things, blaming
• 1:22:05
  Speaker 1: subordinates and claiming he was out peeing while the decisions
• 1:22:08
  Speaker 1: were made to cover his ass. I mean, Hexeth is
• 1:22:13
  Speaker 1: just pathetic, just pathetic, just pathetic. Should be fired for
• 1:22:29
  Speaker 1: both of those things. For not taking responsibility for the
• 1:22:31
  Speaker 1: boat strike, I mean, the boat strikes illegal anyway. They
• 1:22:35
  Speaker 1: should all they should all be fired for that. Trump
• 1:22:37
  Speaker 1: should be impeached for that. Uh uh. And he should
• 1:22:41
  Speaker 1: be fired for revealing or discussing classified information over an
• 1:22:46
  Speaker 1: unsecure network. Any other defense Chairman of chief, head of
• 1:22:52
  Speaker 1: the Defense Department, Secretary of War would have been fired. Finally,
• 1:22:57
  Speaker 1: I saw this story. This is kind of interesting and
• 1:22:59
  Speaker 1: fits into what we do here. It says that Americans
• 1:23:02
  Speaker 1: are paying a lot less attention to the news than
• 1:23:04
  Speaker 1: they used to. In twenty sixteen, which was the first
• 1:23:08
  Speaker 1: year Pew ran the survey, asking Americans if they're likely
• 1:23:12
  Speaker 1: to follow the news, closely fifty percent of Americans said yes.
• 1:23:17
  Speaker 1: Today it's thirty six percent. So Americans, this is true
• 1:23:22
  Speaker 1: of Democrats, true of Republicans. People are you know, listening
• 1:23:27
  Speaker 1: to the news, following the news, tracking the news a
• 1:23:31
  Speaker 1: lot less? A lot of it has to do with
• 1:23:33
  Speaker 1: the fact that they are convinced now that the news
• 1:23:36
  Speaker 1: is reported by mainstream media, but as well as the
• 1:23:40
  Speaker 1: non mainstream media is just unreliable and just it's not
• 1:23:47
  Speaker 1: worth it. It's what I tell you all the time. Don't
• 1:23:50
  Speaker 1: listen to news, don't keep track of it. Just come
• 1:23:52
  Speaker 1: to you Iron Book Show for our daily news shows,
• 1:23:55
  Speaker 1: and you'll get everything you need to know. There's nothing
• 1:23:58
  Speaker 1: in the news right now. I don't cover that you
• 1:24:01
  Speaker 1: need to know. And if I don't catch it today,
• 1:24:05
  Speaker 1: I'll catch it tomorrow. So yeah, this saves you. So
• 1:24:09
  Speaker 1: you know that I'm I guess having news shows like
• 1:24:12
  Speaker 1: this is part of their fifty one percent going to
• 1:24:15
  Speaker 1: thirty six percent. I do this. You don't have to
• 1:24:17
  Speaker 1: follow the news closely. Maybe there seems to be a
• 1:24:22
  Speaker 1: market for this, Maybe not for my particular views about
• 1:24:26
  Speaker 1: the news. Not maybe not for my particular you know opinions,
• 1:24:30
  Speaker 1: but for condensing the news and not having to follow it,
• 1:24:36
  Speaker 1: you know, as closely as maybe people once used to
• 1:24:39
  Speaker 1: would be good. And then finally, this is just a
• 1:24:42
  Speaker 1: funny thing. I saw this video of Christy Gnome yesterday.
• 1:24:47
  Speaker 1: So you know how Pam Bondi in the past has
• 1:24:51
  Speaker 1: said that President Trump has saved two hundred and fifty
• 1:24:54
  Speaker 1: eight million lives by stopping the floor of fence and
• 1:24:57
  Speaker 1: all into the United States. Two hundred and fifty eight
• 1:25:01
  Speaker 1: million lives. Now, no one that we haven't stuck to
• 1:25:06
  Speaker 1: flow fentanyl into the United State. It's still flowing in.
• 1:25:09
  Speaker 1: But secondly, the total number of overdoses in the United
• 1:25:14
  Speaker 1: States is seventy thousand. Seventy thousand. How are you going
• 1:25:18
  Speaker 1: to save two hundred and fifty eight million lives? That
• 1:25:20
  Speaker 1: assumes all of us would take fentanyl if not for
• 1:25:23
  Speaker 1: Donald Trump. And Donald Trump has prevented all of us
• 1:25:25
  Speaker 1: from taking fentanyl. And she says this, Pam Bondi, who
• 1:25:30
  Speaker 1: is an intelligent woman. I mean she has to be,
• 1:25:32
  Speaker 1: because she's she's you know, she's a you know, head
• 1:25:36
  Speaker 1: of the Justice Department. You have to be intelligent to
• 1:25:38
  Speaker 1: do that. No, No, no, two hundred and fifty eight million. Anyway,
• 1:25:44
  Speaker 1: Trump on Monday said that he has saved three hundred
• 1:25:49
  Speaker 1: million people no, he said on Monday, the three hundred
• 1:25:53
  Speaker 1: million people have died last year from drugs. Three hundred
• 1:25:58
  Speaker 1: million people. Wow, that would empty America. That would make
• 1:26:01
  Speaker 1: America very very thin if three hundred million people had died.
• 1:26:06
  Speaker 1: I mean, FED would like that if the people who
• 1:26:08
  Speaker 1: had died were all of non white skin color, and
• 1:26:12
  Speaker 1: whites could be a majority again. Oh, maybe we can
• 1:26:16
  Speaker 1: get the right drugs into the right hands. We could
• 1:26:19
  Speaker 1: do that. Well, Chris chrisy known today or no yesterday, yesterday,
• 1:26:24
  Speaker 1: when during the or the day before, whenever the cabinet
• 1:26:29
  Speaker 1: meeting was. She said, You've saved She says this to Trump,
• 1:26:33
  Speaker 1: You've saved hundreds of millions of lives with the cocaine
• 1:26:38
  Speaker 1: you've blown up in the Caribbean. Cocaine was not coming
• 1:26:42
  Speaker 1: to America, by the way, Cocaina was not coming to America. FED.
• 1:26:50
  Speaker 1: I'm not labeling you anything. I'm just I'm just identifying
• 1:26:55
  Speaker 1: your views from what you have said. You're worried about
• 1:26:59
  Speaker 1: white Americas on track to becoming minority. You don't like that.
• 1:27:03
  Speaker 1: I was just suggesting a path to make them a
• 1:27:06
  Speaker 1: majority again, because that's what you care about, that's what's
• 1:27:10
  Speaker 1: important to you. That matters to you. Now that is racist,
• 1:27:14
  Speaker 1: that it matters to you. That is absolutely one hundred
• 1:27:16
  Speaker 1: percent racist. That's just a fact. That's just the definition
• 1:27:19
  Speaker 1: of racism. But put that aside. I mean, I'm just
• 1:27:23
  Speaker 1: just trying to help you out here, give you, give
• 1:27:26
  Speaker 1: you a way to achieve your goal. I know, you know,
• 1:27:35
  Speaker 1: people don't like to be called racists. And you know,
• 1:27:40
  Speaker 1: and and they reflect back to when they left called
• 1:27:43
  Speaker 1: people racist when they weren't racists. But this is the problem.
• 1:27:48
  Speaker 1: Some pay people, sometimes people are racists, some pay people.
• 1:27:51
  Speaker 1: Sometimes people say things that are racists, that are racists.
• 1:27:56
  Speaker 1: And by saying things that are that are racists are racists.
• 1:28:01
  Speaker 1: They are racists by by saying things, so these are racist.
• 1:28:11
  Speaker 1: In an ideal world, in a world with no anti semitism,
• 1:28:18
  Speaker 1: I don't care who lives in is room. There's no
• 1:28:24
  Speaker 1: anti Americanism, there's no anti whiteness. There's no persecution of
• 1:28:28
  Speaker 1: white people going on in most of the world. Maybe
• 1:28:32
  Speaker 1: in a maybe in a few places, a little bit
• 1:28:33
  Speaker 1: in South Africa, but generally no. So you don't need
• 1:28:38
  Speaker 1: you know, if you're really worried about your whiteness, there's
• 1:28:40
  Speaker 1: plenty of other countries you can escape too, and you know,
• 1:28:45
  Speaker 1: create you a little white enclaves or whatever. So I
• 1:28:48
  Speaker 1: have no worry about whites being here. No, I have
• 1:28:58
  Speaker 1: no problem with skin color being the dominant, dominant in
• 1:29:03
  Speaker 1: terms of anything. You know. I would like to see
• 1:29:09
  Speaker 1: Americans be the majority of people in America. But then
• 1:29:15
  Speaker 1: I think anybody should be able to become an American.
• 1:29:20
  Speaker 1: All right, guys, that is the news and commentary on
• 1:29:24
  Speaker 1: the news for this Thursday, December fourth, And now is
• 1:29:31
  Speaker 1: the point where we shift to your super chats. We
• 1:29:34
  Speaker 1: have a few, we could still use more. And the
• 1:29:36
  Speaker 1: more super chats, the more I get to talk about
• 1:29:39
  Speaker 1: things you want to talk about. I mean, I'm not
• 1:29:42
  Speaker 1: gonna respond to FED anymore, so FED can come in. Yeah,
• 1:29:49
  Speaker 1: Israel is a Jewish enclave because Jews are being I'll
• 1:29:53
  Speaker 1: respond to this, and then I'm stuck. Jews are being
• 1:29:56
  Speaker 1: run down, they're being hunted, they're being killed, being discriminated
• 1:30:00
  Speaker 1: against all over the world, and Israel there needs to
• 1:30:03
  Speaker 1: be a Jewish enclave for them to escape to. And
• 1:30:07
  Speaker 1: that's that Israel serves that purpose. Whites are not in
• 1:30:10
  Speaker 1: that situation and therefore they don't need an enclave. And
• 1:30:13
  Speaker 1: if they did, need an enclave. Then America is probably
• 1:30:16
  Speaker 1: not the right place for them anyway, because they're almost
• 1:30:18
  Speaker 1: a minority already in America. So they, you know, they
• 1:30:21
  Speaker 1: should emigrate to places that maybe are more likely to
• 1:30:24
  Speaker 1: stay quote white, I don't know, you all go to
• 1:30:27
  Speaker 1: Denmark or you know whatever. You know, The reality is
• 1:30:36
  Speaker 1: America is not Israel. I know that's hard for people
• 1:30:39
  Speaker 1: to get. America is not surrounded by countries they want
• 1:30:43
  Speaker 1: to destroy it. You know, America is not occupied by
• 1:30:49
  Speaker 1: by by a majority people who are discriminated against everywhere
• 1:30:53
  Speaker 1: else in the world they go to. America is not Israel.
• 1:30:56
  Speaker 1: I mean, it's hard to contemplate that, and you don't.
• 1:30:59
  Speaker 1: Not every country is the same, and every country is different,
• 1:31:03
  Speaker 1: and that's okay for every country to be different. In
• 1:31:10
  Speaker 1: an ideal world, it wouldn't matter what your skin color is,
• 1:31:13
  Speaker 1: wouldn't matter what your so called racist, and it wouldn't
• 1:31:15
  Speaker 1: matter what your religion is. I mean, one could hope
• 1:31:19
  Speaker 1: that there would be very few religions anyway. All right,
• 1:31:25
  Speaker 1: we are going to take super chats. Let me remind
• 1:31:28
  Speaker 1: you that the show is funded through the support of
• 1:31:30
  Speaker 1: people like you. If you listen, if you watch, even
• 1:31:34
  Speaker 1: if you disagree, even if you hate, you are gaining
• 1:31:38
  Speaker 1: a value from this show. One way to reciprocate is
• 1:31:44
  Speaker 1: go on Patreon Patreon dot com, type in yourn Book
• 1:31:46
  Speaker 1: Show and become a monthly supporter of the Yourn Book Show.
• 1:31:49
  Speaker 1: I'm looking. I think now we only need five to
• 1:31:52
  Speaker 1: make till the end of the month new Patreon subscribers
• 1:31:56
  Speaker 1: to meet our December thirty first goal. So five and
• 1:32:06
  Speaker 1: so yeah. Please if you're not yet a supporter of
• 1:32:09
  Speaker 1: the one Bookshew on Patreon, please become one. Ten dollars
• 1:32:13
  Speaker 1: you actually get the podcast, the podcast with no advertising.
• 1:32:18
  Speaker 1: No advertising saves you from all that hassle. And twenty
• 1:32:22
  Speaker 1: five dollars you can join the live AMAS by video.
• 1:32:28
  Speaker 1: Let me see what else? Did I want to say? Yeah,
• 1:32:33
  Speaker 1: I'm gonna jump in, jump in here to the super chats.
• 1:32:36
  Speaker 1: We'll do we'll we'll remind everybody, all right, Alex, Hi,
• 1:32:42
  Speaker 1: you on I work in video games. You often criticize
• 1:32:45
  Speaker 1: people who play games in their mother's basement, But do
• 1:32:49
  Speaker 1: you think the medium can have real autistic value in
• 1:32:53
  Speaker 1: reevaluating games as a long term I'm reevaluating games as
• 1:32:57
  Speaker 1: a longtime productive career. Oh no, look, I am not
• 1:33:01
  Speaker 1: anti computer games. Even if computer games do not have
• 1:33:06
  Speaker 1: a a what did you call it? A real autistic value,
• 1:33:11
  Speaker 1: they have immense entertainment value. They're a lot of fun. Now.
• 1:33:15
  Speaker 1: I don't play video games, but I love that people
• 1:33:18
  Speaker 1: have video games and can play video games and get
• 1:33:20
  Speaker 1: excited about video games and compete on video games. Video
• 1:33:23
  Speaker 1: games are great. What I criticize is the people who
• 1:33:29
  Speaker 1: make video games the center of their life and give
• 1:33:34
  Speaker 1: up on the rest of life in order to play
• 1:33:36
  Speaker 1: video games. That's what I hate. So, yeah, video games
• 1:33:50
  Speaker 1: are great. There's nothing wrong with them. Could they have
• 1:33:55
  Speaker 1: autistic value maybe? I mean, I don't know, but potentially
• 1:34:00
  Speaker 1: they could. Absolutely, But in any case, the fund their entertainment,
• 1:34:06
  Speaker 1: so why not engage in it. Yeah. You know, if
• 1:34:13
  Speaker 1: you like video games then you enjoy playing them and
• 1:34:16
  Speaker 1: it's fun to program them, then go ahead and program them.
• 1:34:20
  Speaker 1: Go ahead and program them. By the way, alex Media,
• 1:34:23
  Speaker 1: if you're looking for a software engineer, my my son
• 1:34:27
  Speaker 1: is looking for a job, so let me know. You
• 1:34:34
  Speaker 1: can write to me if if if you have any
• 1:34:36
  Speaker 1: opportunities for him at your at yourn bookshow dot com.
• 1:34:39
  Speaker 1: Anybody out there, uh for a I guess a junior
• 1:34:42
  Speaker 1: software engineer, but without with quite a bit of experience
• 1:34:45
  Speaker 1: now worked at Amazon for a while. Uh not you
• 1:34:49
  Speaker 1: have any algorithm? Part one is fascism just socialism with
• 1:34:53
  Speaker 1: the worst brand. Are the concept of racial higherarchys or
• 1:34:57
  Speaker 1: higher keys in general, less appealing than a egalitarianism to
• 1:35:01
  Speaker 1: population saturated with Christianity and altruism. Altruism demands a zero
• 1:35:07
  Speaker 1: class societal structure, while Nazism and fascism demand altruistic sacrifice.
• 1:35:13
  Speaker 1: The essence of the structure they're trying to impose is
• 1:35:17
  Speaker 1: opposite of the meeksilli inherit doth so I think you
• 1:35:20
  Speaker 1: onto something. Now, remember both demand altruistic sacrifice. Christianity I
• 1:35:27
  Speaker 1: mean sorry, Communism demands the sacrifice of the able to
• 1:35:33
  Speaker 1: the unable. It demands the sacrifice of ability to need.
• 1:35:38
  Speaker 1: It demands the sacrifice of success failure. It demands the
• 1:35:43
  Speaker 1: sacrifice of the rich to the poor. So both communism
• 1:35:48
  Speaker 1: and Nazism demand sacrifice. But one of the reasons communism
• 1:35:53
  Speaker 1: is so appealing it's because it's the same kind of
• 1:35:57
  Speaker 1: sacrifice that Christianity demands. It's the mixill inherit the earth.
• 1:36:02
  Speaker 1: As you say, it's hard of a rich man to
• 1:36:06
  Speaker 1: you know, to pass through. It's hard if a camera
• 1:36:09
  Speaker 1: to pastor I of needle than a rich man to
• 1:36:11
  Speaker 1: get into heaven. It's the same kind of sacrifice as Christianity.
• 1:36:17
  Speaker 1: So communism goes together and socialism go together with Christianity.
• 1:36:22
  Speaker 1: Was the kind of sacrifice that Nazism demands is different.
• 1:36:27
  Speaker 1: It's still sacrifice, and in that sense it's still Christian,
• 1:36:32
  Speaker 1: but it's a different kind of sacrifice, more oriented around
• 1:36:36
  Speaker 1: other types of hierarchy, hiarchy related to uh for example,
• 1:36:42
  Speaker 1: related to race in some forms of fascism, or related
• 1:36:47
  Speaker 1: to affinity to a state. Sacrifice to the state again
• 1:36:50
  Speaker 1: very similar to the sacrifice of a Christian to the
• 1:36:54
  Speaker 1: Church or to God. The state just fills in for
• 1:36:58
  Speaker 1: the church in God. But it's it's not egalitarian, and
• 1:37:05
  Speaker 1: there's definitely a strong appeal of eganitarianism in a Christian culture,
• 1:37:10
  Speaker 1: and we live in way too much of a Christian culture.
• 1:37:21
  Speaker 1: Robert Positive shows for the win, ordinary decent people working hard,
• 1:37:28
  Speaker 1: living well, learning, creating, producing isn't news, but it's ninety
• 1:37:32
  Speaker 1: seven percent of everything that happens in the world every
• 1:37:36
  Speaker 1: day thanks to the Positive Show. Of course, Fetz says,
• 1:37:48
  Speaker 1: I don't care about Christian's part. But yes, America was
• 1:37:52
  Speaker 1: vastly majority white before nineteen sixty five. Yeah, and a
• 1:37:55
  Speaker 1: much worse place to live. It's so much richer today
• 1:38:00
  Speaker 1: to Loge extent because of all the immigrants that have
• 1:38:02
  Speaker 1: come in. As I described earlier, most of wealth created
• 1:38:05
  Speaker 1: is being created by immigrants who've come to this country
• 1:38:08
  Speaker 1: and made your life as a white person better richer. Yeah. Right.
• 1:38:23
  Speaker 1: I think the whole replacement, the whole replacement stuff replacement
• 1:38:27
  Speaker 1: that people talk about, it's just science fiction. Immigrants don't
• 1:38:31
  Speaker 1: come because you know, they're encouraged to replace whites. They
• 1:38:35
  Speaker 1: come because they see opportunities. Indians who migrated to this country,
• 1:38:41
  Speaker 1: you want to luck out of this country, Fred, That's
• 1:38:44
  Speaker 1: what you said. Did not come here because somebody advocated
• 1:38:48
  Speaker 1: for them to come and to replace whites. They came
• 1:38:49
  Speaker 1: here because they saw opportunities, and they came in and
• 1:38:52
  Speaker 1: they created wealth that you benefit from. That everybody benefits from,
• 1:38:55
  Speaker 1: no matter what just skin color you benefit from the
• 1:39:01
  Speaker 1: United States peaked at around nineteen sixty five. I wish
• 1:39:04
  Speaker 1: you had a time machine it could go back to
• 1:39:06
  Speaker 1: nineteen sixty five. I was alive in nineteen sixty five.
• 1:39:09
  Speaker 1: You want. You have no concept of how much better
• 1:39:14
  Speaker 1: life is today than nineteen sixty five. You've bought into
• 1:39:17
  Speaker 1: you've been brainwashed by a bunch of ignorant neanderthal traditionalists
• 1:39:28
  Speaker 1: who worship the past, but have no concept, no concept
• 1:39:35
  Speaker 1: of how much better life is today because they don't
• 1:39:39
  Speaker 1: like certain things, like their colored people in the streets.
• 1:39:44
  Speaker 1: But in terms of every objective measure, every objective measure
• 1:39:49
  Speaker 1: of wealth, of success, of quality of life, of stand
• 1:39:53
  Speaker 1: of living, of diversity of options, of ability to succeed
• 1:39:59
  Speaker 1: in life, life is so much better today than it
• 1:40:01
  Speaker 1: was in nineteen sixty five. There are a few realms
• 1:40:05
  Speaker 1: in which it was, but the realms that affect the
• 1:40:08
  Speaker 1: day to day lives of Americans, in all of those realms,
• 1:40:11
  Speaker 1: life is better today than it was in nineteen sixty five, Catherine,
• 1:40:17
  Speaker 1: And that has been a theme of this show and
• 1:40:20
  Speaker 1: today earlier, and it's been a theme of many of
• 1:40:22
  Speaker 1: my shows. Yeah, Catherine, why do you hear often that
• 1:40:29
  Speaker 1: Iinrand is only for students and younger people? Is it
• 1:40:32
  Speaker 1: because she tried to make things understandable? Partially? But I
• 1:40:36
  Speaker 1: think more than that, because she presented an ideal. She
• 1:40:42
  Speaker 1: thought the world was black and white, black and white,
• 1:40:45
  Speaker 1: and so it's a good and evil not in so
• 1:40:47
  Speaker 1: it's a skin color. She thought there were good guys
• 1:40:50
  Speaker 1: and bad guys. She thought there was truth, and that
• 1:40:56
  Speaker 1: is viewed as simplistic and juvenile and appeals to add
• 1:41:01
  Speaker 1: the lessons and doesn't appeal to really sophisticated people. Really
• 1:41:07
  Speaker 1: sophisticated people understand that life is gray and there's no
• 1:41:11
  Speaker 1: right or wrong, and everything everything is to be. You know,
• 1:41:16
  Speaker 1: nobody's really good and nobody's really evil, and you can't
• 1:41:21
  Speaker 1: never know the truth. And that's why it's ideals, like
• 1:41:27
  Speaker 1: capitalism is an ideal. I mean, that is so far
• 1:41:31
  Speaker 1: into the way people think. Lincoln for comparison on quality
• 1:41:37
  Speaker 1: of life, my grandpa bought my dad his first computer
• 1:41:41
  Speaker 1: for eighteen hundred dollars almost six thousand dollars inflation adjusted
• 1:41:47
  Speaker 1: for sixty four killerbytes of RAM. I paid around four
• 1:41:51
  Speaker 1: hundred dollars for lapped Up recently that had sixty four
• 1:41:55
  Speaker 1: gigabytes of RAM on Black Friday. Same story with video games,
• 1:42:01
  Speaker 1: Dad paid one hundred dollars in twenty twenty five dollars,
• 1:42:06
  Speaker 1: so for for low quality sixteen bit games, you know
• 1:42:13
  Speaker 1: I paid, I pay half for for that four K,
• 1:42:19
  Speaker 1: for that four K graphics, sixteen bit video games, I
• 1:42:25
  Speaker 1: pay half for the four K graphics. Same with television software,
• 1:42:28
  Speaker 1: and list goes on and run. Yeah, I mean, all
• 1:42:29
  Speaker 1: of those goods a ninety nine percent cheaper today, ninety
• 1:42:32
  Speaker 1: nine point nine percent cheaper today if you take into
• 1:42:35
  Speaker 1: quant if you take into kant quality. My first computer
• 1:42:39
  Speaker 1: was an SC thirty Mac. It was three thousand dollars.
• 1:42:44
  Speaker 1: It was a box with a little color screen in it.
• 1:42:49
  Speaker 1: It had I don't catter, it had, you know, megabytes.
• 1:42:53
  Speaker 1: Everything was megabytes. It hard drivers megabytes. I mean, you
• 1:42:58
  Speaker 1: can't even compare it to what what you have today. No,
• 1:43:01
  Speaker 1: it's kilobytes. Everything was kilobites. There's three thousand dollars, and
• 1:43:05
  Speaker 1: what I could write for three thousand dollars today is
• 1:43:08
  Speaker 1: much much better than any super cue computer that existed
• 1:43:11
  Speaker 1: when I bought my first computer Lincoln. Also, it was
• 1:43:18
  Speaker 1: really striking visiting my dad's childhood home. He said, it's
• 1:43:21
  Speaker 1: much smaller and worse than he remembers, since our house
• 1:43:24
  Speaker 1: now is triple the size. Yeah. Yeah, nineteen sixty five,
• 1:43:29
  Speaker 1: you should all go to nineteen sixty five. God, the ignorance.
• 1:43:34
  Speaker 1: But this is the thing. If you listen to Matt Walsh,
• 1:43:38
  Speaker 1: if you listen to these guys, they constantly tell you
• 1:43:41
  Speaker 1: the lie. They constantly create this mythology and it you know,
• 1:43:53
  Speaker 1: they constantly create a mythology and you know, but but
• 1:44:00
  Speaker 1: this is the mythology Matt Walsh creates, and you buy
• 1:44:03
  Speaker 1: into it. Whether he's a tool or not, you buy
• 1:44:04
  Speaker 1: into it. It's the Matt Walsh Is and Nick foyantis
• 1:44:08
  Speaker 1: Is of the world. It's the Tucker Causon's of the world.
• 1:44:12
  Speaker 1: All really from a from a you know, just a
• 1:44:16
  Speaker 1: just a factual basis, and am buiga bat basis. Basically morons,
• 1:44:23
  Speaker 1: and they know nothing, they understand nothing. They're anti American,
• 1:44:28
  Speaker 1: every single one of them. They have no concept of
• 1:44:30
  Speaker 1: what America is, what America stood for, what the founders
• 1:44:33
  Speaker 1: actually said, and what they stood for, what they what
• 1:44:36
  Speaker 1: they boards meant. They want some in nineteen sixty five
• 1:44:42
  Speaker 1: utopia that never existed, Lincoln. Lincoln says, nineteen sixty five
• 1:44:54
  Speaker 1: is too modern for Michael Knowles. He wants ninety sixty five.
• 1:44:58
  Speaker 1: No want he won a twelve to twenty three hundred
• 1:45:01
  Speaker 1: years you know, two undred fifty years later, don't exaggerate
• 1:45:06
  Speaker 1: christoph Aside from material wealth, isn't the case that government
• 1:45:10
  Speaker 1: regulations and taxes are worse today and people feel trapped?
• 1:45:14
  Speaker 1: I think I think government regulations are worse and taxes
• 1:45:17
  Speaker 1: are worse. Taxes, I'm not sure. The marginal tax right
• 1:45:20
  Speaker 1: in nineteen sixty five was much higher, right, marginal the
• 1:45:25
  Speaker 1: high marginal tax rates were much higher. Yeah, I mean,
• 1:45:27
  Speaker 1: there are many ways in which nineteen sixty five was better,
• 1:45:31
  Speaker 1: but they're not the ways in which people are complaining.
• 1:45:33
  Speaker 1: If people are complaining about I want to start a business,
• 1:45:37
  Speaker 1: and in nineteen sixty five was easier for me to
• 1:45:39
  Speaker 1: start a business, and today I'd say, yeah, absolutely, Yeah,
• 1:45:42
  Speaker 1: let's fix that. If they were saying, you know, I was,
• 1:45:45
  Speaker 1: taxes was significantly lower, they were two high and sixty
• 1:45:48
  Speaker 1: five they're too higher today. Yeah, I'm all for that absolutely.
• 1:45:54
  Speaker 1: You know, if they were if they were saying, what
• 1:45:56
  Speaker 1: we want is more economic freedom, and it's not clear
• 1:45:59
  Speaker 1: by some mentions there's more economic freedom now by some dimensions,
• 1:46:02
  Speaker 1: there was no economic freedom of sixty five. Its it's
• 1:46:07
  Speaker 1: tricky how to measure that. Right nineteen sixty five, the
• 1:46:11
  Speaker 1: government regulated the price of IF airline tickets if you
• 1:46:15
  Speaker 1: wanted to fly from I don't know, from Miami to
• 1:46:18
  Speaker 1: New York, you paid a price determined by the government,
• 1:46:22
  Speaker 1: and it was a very high price, much higher than today.
• 1:46:26
  Speaker 1: If you wanted to trade stocks, the commission your boke
• 1:46:29
  Speaker 1: a god was dictated by the government. In nineteen sixty five,
• 1:46:33
  Speaker 1: trucking was completely regulated. Every aspect of transportation was completely
• 1:46:37
  Speaker 1: regulated by the government. So in many respects were less
• 1:46:41
  Speaker 1: regulated and then nineteen sixty five. So it's tricky to
• 1:46:44
  Speaker 1: figure this out. Even in those realms, what was better
• 1:46:50
  Speaker 1: today or them clock As pessimistic as we all tend
• 1:46:55
  Speaker 1: to be, I do see objectives and growing online. I
• 1:46:58
  Speaker 1: think it'd be a real player in the next few decades.
• 1:47:01
  Speaker 1: I think it will be I hope. So it's going,
• 1:47:04
  Speaker 1: there's no question, And the number of intellectuals is going.
• 1:47:07
  Speaker 1: And that's what makes a difference. That's what makes a difference.
• 1:47:14
  Speaker 1: Why does how he been swaying a think faster than light?
• 1:47:18
  Speaker 1: Thinks faster than light? Sharing of information is possible. Does
• 1:47:22
  Speaker 1: objectivism have objections to the theory of relativity? No, The
• 1:47:26
  Speaker 1: fact that how he thinks that is not a position
• 1:47:29
  Speaker 1: shed by objectivism, and it's not a philosophical position. His
• 1:47:33
  Speaker 1: position is a scientific one. He has his reasons. I
• 1:47:38
  Speaker 1: have no idea what they are, but it's not a
• 1:47:41
  Speaker 1: position and objectivism. Objectivism is the philosophy of iron Man.
• 1:47:44
  Speaker 1: Iron Man had no position on the theory of relativity.
• 1:47:48
  Speaker 1: Objectivism has no opinion on the theory of relativity. That's
• 1:47:52
  Speaker 1: not a question of philosophy, it's a question of science.
• 1:47:56
  Speaker 1: Objective scientists might have an opinion, and I disagree. Cook
• 1:48:04
  Speaker 1: ll be card seen Deep Space nine, highly recommended. I
• 1:48:09
  Speaker 1: am a cook guy. I really love the first, the
• 1:48:14
  Speaker 1: initial Star Trek, but that's partially because I haven't seen
• 1:48:16
  Speaker 1: a lot of the latest Star Treks. Also, I did
• 1:48:21
  Speaker 1: not see Deep Space nine, although it's come highly recommended
• 1:48:24
  Speaker 1: by people. I careful people. I respect their opinions, but
• 1:48:27
  Speaker 1: I haven't seen it. I need to get into it
• 1:48:30
  Speaker 1: at some point. Lincoln, we live much better life than
• 1:48:35
  Speaker 1: that of George Washington, one of the richest men in
• 1:48:38
  Speaker 1: the colonies, but lots of his teeth, lost all of
• 1:48:41
  Speaker 1: his teeth at thirty and died at sixty seven. Absolutely
• 1:48:47
  Speaker 1: Lincoln collapsing White birth rate. My dude, Japan is literally
• 1:48:52
  Speaker 1: starting fertility visas and you can buy abandoned homes under
• 1:48:56
  Speaker 1: ten k there. Yep, Rafael Ayran, the corporate presentation went well.
• 1:49:04
  Speaker 1: Thanks for your advice. I'm glad it went well. Also
• 1:49:07
  Speaker 1: noticed it's my three anniversary as a YBS member. Cheers
• 1:49:11
  Speaker 1: to that. Absolutely, cheers Rafael. Thank you Lincoln. I'm suddenly
• 1:49:19
  Speaker 1: planning on having kids with my corent girlfriend and future wife,
• 1:49:23
  Speaker 1: but not until we're both done with our education in
• 1:49:26
  Speaker 1: our thirties. Yeah, good for you, John says AIRI YouTube
• 1:49:33
  Speaker 1: ice raids versus rule of law. Good good. I agree
• 1:49:37
  Speaker 1: with that. I'm glad they did a video of that.
• 1:49:42
  Speaker 1: Jason one. Washington State is not friendly to vouchers or
• 1:49:47
  Speaker 1: charter schools. Al Moses Lake School District is on its
• 1:49:52
  Speaker 1: fourth day of being closed due to a strike. The
• 1:49:57
  Speaker 1: district lost money in an accounting anomaly, levies didn't pass,
• 1:50:02
  Speaker 1: and teachers say they want what they used to have
• 1:50:06
  Speaker 1: and a cola. The district will go to courts to
• 1:50:11
  Speaker 1: push teachers back to work. I'd love to stand with
• 1:50:15
  Speaker 1: the signs saying privatize Redine Ran, but i'd be but
• 1:50:20
  Speaker 1: it'd be pointless. Well, you never know. If it'd be pointless,
• 1:50:23
  Speaker 1: people might actually Redine Ran because of it. They might say,
• 1:50:26
  Speaker 1: who is this crazy? What's he doing? Maybe there's something
• 1:50:29
  Speaker 1: maybe I should go find out. Is there any reasonable
• 1:50:33
  Speaker 1: way not to let this crisis go to waste for
• 1:50:37
  Speaker 1: capitalist cause? Any thoughts for the school district and teachers union? No,
• 1:50:42
  Speaker 1: I mean not really. I don't know how you take
• 1:50:46
  Speaker 1: advantage of the crisis, other than to say these kind
• 1:50:48
  Speaker 1: of things don't happen in private education. Maybe one school's
• 1:50:52
  Speaker 1: teachers strike and then you just shift your teachers to
• 1:50:55
  Speaker 1: your students to another school. You don't get teacher strikes.
• 1:50:58
  Speaker 1: That if everything was so, it's an opportunity to make
• 1:51:02
  Speaker 1: the case of privatization, accepting the fact that only a
• 1:51:07
  Speaker 1: few people will even have an openingir to it. Pi
• 1:51:14
  Speaker 1: Gupta Fred's question, so not all his questions are free.
• 1:51:19
  Speaker 1: I don't know what that means. Would you tolerate a
• 1:51:21
  Speaker 1: non Jewish majority in Israel? I mean again, when anti
• 1:51:27
  Speaker 1: Semitism doesn't exist? And yes, I don't care about being Jewish.
• 1:51:31
  Speaker 1: I don't care about Israel being Jewish or not. The
• 1:51:35
  Speaker 1: only reason Israel needs to have a Jewish majority right
• 1:51:38
  Speaker 1: now is because there is an existential risks to people
• 1:51:42
  Speaker 1: who are perceived to be Jewish by the world. If
• 1:51:47
  Speaker 1: if there was a perceived risk physical risk programs against
• 1:51:54
  Speaker 1: white people, then those people, I mean, you know, those
• 1:51:58
  Speaker 1: people should you don't have every right to gang together
• 1:52:02
  Speaker 1: to protect themselves. But that's not the case. And if
• 1:52:05
  Speaker 1: you can't tell the difference between those two, then you're
• 1:52:08
  Speaker 1: just evading. You're not trying, right, You're not trying. So
• 1:52:13
  Speaker 1: you can you can take a simplistic say oh, it's no,
• 1:52:17
  Speaker 1: or you can actually think about what my answer actually
• 1:52:20
  Speaker 1: means and what my actually, my actual answer is. It's
• 1:52:24
  Speaker 1: not bullshit. There's antisemitism everywhere in the world. Jews are
• 1:52:29
  Speaker 1: persecuted everywhere in the world. Even in America it's becoming
• 1:52:33
  Speaker 1: more antisemic. Submitted. I would love a world in which
• 1:52:36
  Speaker 1: there's no Israel, that Israel is never created, because a
• 1:52:42
  Speaker 1: world wid Israel was never created is a world where
• 1:52:47
  Speaker 1: the Dreyfus trial never happens. It's a world where there's
• 1:52:50
  Speaker 1: no massive anti semitism in Europe. It's a world where
• 1:52:53
  Speaker 1: Hitler doesn't kill six million Jews. It's a world where
• 1:52:58
  Speaker 1: Jews are not persecuted in Era and in Moroacco and
• 1:53:02
  Speaker 1: in Yemen and in all these other countries and kicked
• 1:53:05
  Speaker 1: out it's a better world where Jews just assimilate into
• 1:53:09
  Speaker 1: the population. I'm all for that. I have no affinity
• 1:53:14
  Speaker 1: to a Jewish state except and this is this is
• 1:53:19
  Speaker 1: where people can't think. This is the amazing part is
• 1:53:22
  Speaker 1: they they they just can't actually hold an argument, hold
• 1:53:27
  Speaker 1: hold an actual argument being made, except in a world
• 1:53:34
  Speaker 1: in which they're persecuted. They need some way to escape
• 1:53:36
  Speaker 1: to have Jews ever done any persecuting? Oh suddenly in
• 1:53:43
  Speaker 1: the Old Testament, Yeah, a lot of persecuting. They were,
• 1:53:46
  Speaker 1: It was awful, but since then very little, primarily because
• 1:53:52
  Speaker 1: they've had no political power to do it. So again,
• 1:53:56
  Speaker 1: you you're it's all collectivism with you. All you can
• 1:53:59
  Speaker 1: think of is this group and that group and that group.
• 1:54:02
  Speaker 1: And I don't care. They're bad people who are Jewish.
• 1:54:06
  Speaker 1: They're good people who are Jewish. They're bad people who
• 1:54:08
  Speaker 1: are white, the good people who are white, the bad
• 1:54:09
  Speaker 1: people who are black, the good people who are black,
• 1:54:11
  Speaker 1: That bad people who are Indian, The good people are Indian.
• 1:54:18
  Speaker 1: Tell me about Jewish persecution, you know, the Jews persecuting
• 1:54:23
  Speaker 1: who who exactly what if they persecuted? And don't tell
• 1:54:27
  Speaker 1: me Palestinians, because that will show you know what you
• 1:54:29
  Speaker 1: are of the israelly Palestinian conflict. But you know, did
• 1:54:33
  Speaker 1: they persecute the Germans? Did Jews persecute the Germans? They
• 1:54:36
  Speaker 1: persecute the English? Did they persecute the Romans, the Greeks?
• 1:54:41
  Speaker 1: Who did they persecute the Babylonians? Who did they persecute
• 1:54:44
  Speaker 1: exactly as a people? Oh, they persecuted ethnic Russians. All right,
• 1:54:53
  Speaker 1: wipe this guy out. He is a complete nutcase. He
• 1:54:58
  Speaker 1: doesn't know history, he does no facts. He is just
• 1:55:04
  Speaker 1: another run of the mill anti Semite. During the Bolshevik Revolution,
• 1:55:11
  Speaker 1: Jews didn't persecute anybody. Communists persecuted people. Some of those communists,
• 1:55:18
  Speaker 1: a minority were Jewish. So what white people persecuted? White
• 1:55:26
  Speaker 1: people persecuted the majority of Russians. Ethnic Russians were persecuted
• 1:55:33
  Speaker 1: by white people because most of the Communists were white.
• 1:55:41
  Speaker 1: Oh God, so pathetic. Sypathetic again, you know, brainwashed by
• 1:55:49
  Speaker 1: people who don't know history, don't know history, and people
• 1:55:55
  Speaker 1: who don't know, you know any anything about you know,
• 1:56:01
  Speaker 1: their own history, about European history, about Jewish history. And
• 1:56:05
  Speaker 1: they come on and they pretend that like they're experts,
• 1:56:09
  Speaker 1: they know stuff. They because what because they watch the
• 1:56:12
  Speaker 1: YouTube video by some racist creep. They've watched you know,
• 1:56:16
  Speaker 1: a say, and there's a reason I'm engaging with Fred.
• 1:56:20
  Speaker 1: There's a reason because you know, if he comes back up,
• 1:56:23
  Speaker 1: probably just block him. Because so many people out there
• 1:56:27
  Speaker 1: are like this, So many people out there are convinced
• 1:56:30
  Speaker 1: of their own knowledge because they've watched some video by
• 1:56:34
  Speaker 1: some creep out there, by some white nationalists, by some
• 1:56:38
  Speaker 1: white supremacists. And what they do is they can't they
• 1:56:48
  Speaker 1: ask you question, you give them an answer. They can't
• 1:56:50
  Speaker 1: follow the argument either. They because they don't want to,
• 1:56:53
  Speaker 1: not because they're not capable of they're smart enough to
• 1:56:55
  Speaker 1: follow it. They don't want to. It would actually require
• 1:56:58
  Speaker 1: an argument, they actually require following. They don't want to
• 1:57:03
  Speaker 1: follow it. They don't want to follow it. I don't
• 1:57:07
  Speaker 1: silence opposition. I silence useless people who refuse to think,
• 1:57:17
  Speaker 1: who refuse to confront evidence when presented with it. I
• 1:57:20
  Speaker 1: silence people who just repeat the same thing over and
• 1:57:22
  Speaker 1: over again, who have nothing to add to the conversation,
• 1:57:25
  Speaker 1: and who are fundamentally disruptive as a consequence. That's who
• 1:57:29
  Speaker 1: I silence. I don't silence people who disagree with me.
• 1:57:32
  Speaker 1: Lots of people who disagree with me on here. But
• 1:57:35
  Speaker 1: if you're not willing to engage with evidence, if you're
• 1:57:37
  Speaker 1: not willing to engage with facts, if you can't follow
• 1:57:40
  Speaker 1: an argument because following the argument would upset your world
• 1:57:45
  Speaker 1: view too much, then you're useless to me. Why would
• 1:57:48
  Speaker 1: I not block you? You know? What did Rush Limbaugh
• 1:57:52
  Speaker 1: used to say about you know, about his audience and
• 1:57:56
  Speaker 1: taking questions? Is the only purpose of it is to
• 1:57:59
  Speaker 1: make him look good? Yeah? I mean I'm with Rush.
• 1:58:07
  Speaker 1: I made an argument, you refuse to listen to it,
• 1:58:10
  Speaker 1: and that's why you're being removed. All right, Lincoln. If
• 1:58:22
  Speaker 1: I want an SUV, foward all the way. If I
• 1:58:25
  Speaker 1: want a non luxury sedan, I'm going to Yoda. I
• 1:58:30
  Speaker 1: have a Lexus Suv. It's a wonderful automobile. So if
• 1:58:34
  Speaker 1: you want a big SUV maybe, but even even the
• 1:58:37
  Speaker 1: big Lexus Suv is pretty cool, Matt. This administration has
• 1:58:42
  Speaker 1: made men such as Haig Saith. Yeah, I mean they
• 1:58:46
  Speaker 1: took nobody and made him into something. Uh, all right,
• 1:58:53
  Speaker 1: that is it for today. Oh we got we got
• 1:58:56
  Speaker 1: a question coming in from a vlus. What did I
• 1:59:00
  Speaker 1: want to remind you? Yeah? I want to remind you
• 1:59:02
  Speaker 1: of Patreon. I want to remind you that December thirty first,
• 1:59:06
  Speaker 1: we will have a big fundraising event. There'll be the
• 1:59:10
  Speaker 1: year end Show. We'll be raising a lot of money.
• 1:59:12
  Speaker 1: I think the goal of this year will be twenty
• 1:59:14
  Speaker 1: thousand dollars on the show. So if you want, if
• 1:59:20
  Speaker 1: you would like to contribute like more than five hundred dollars,
• 1:59:23
  Speaker 1: which is the max you can do on YouTube, then
• 1:59:29
  Speaker 1: you can do it on PayPal and just let me
• 1:59:35
  Speaker 1: know that you wanted to go towards. Once you let
• 1:59:41
  Speaker 1: me know that you wanted to go towards the year
• 1:59:46
  Speaker 1: end show. Lincoln said, I had a super chat on Fuentes.
• 1:59:51
  Speaker 1: I didn't see it. I'm looking back. I cannot see
• 1:59:59
  Speaker 1: the one Fort George Washington. Oh there it is, Okay,
• 2:00:05
  Speaker 1: there it is. I don't know what how that I skipped?
• 2:00:08
  Speaker 1: I skipped down, all right? A good rule of thumb
• 2:00:12
  Speaker 1: for your mental health. Never listened to anyone who had
• 2:00:15
  Speaker 1: Nick for Intese on this show. Yes that that that
• 2:00:19
  Speaker 1: would be a big improvement in people's lives. Avery Lasque says,
• 2:00:25
  Speaker 1: how much for your thoughts? On an NBA Ethics Assignment
• 2:00:28
  Speaker 1: Professor reflection, I had to do read through. It'd be
• 2:00:34
  Speaker 1: great content, I promise. So what do you want me
• 2:00:37
  Speaker 1: to read? I mean, how long is whatever it is
• 2:00:40
  Speaker 1: you want me to read? That would determine how much,
• 2:00:44
  Speaker 1: you know I would charge it depended how you know
• 2:00:46
  Speaker 1: it's an ethics assignment. So how long is it? You
• 2:00:50
  Speaker 1: know it's going to take me five minutes to read,
• 2:00:52
  Speaker 1: ten minutes to read. Let me know and I'll tell
• 2:00:56
  Speaker 1: you how much. All right, guys, I will see you tomorrow.
• 2:01:00
  Speaker 1: Don't forget the December thirty first show, two and a
• 2:01:03
  Speaker 1: half pages. I don't know one hundred bucks for me
• 2:01:06
  Speaker 1: to give you my feedback on that. It's like a song.
• 2:01:09
  Speaker 1: I guess. I will see you guys tomorrow. I guess
• 2:01:13
  Speaker 1: same time. Matt says. Coleman Hughes had a great video
• 2:01:16
  Speaker 1: on a fantasy she did. It was a very good
• 2:01:19
  Speaker 1: It was a very good Coleman Hughes does good stuff.
• 2:01:21
  Speaker 1: I like Coleman Hughes. He's one of the best commentators, podcasters,
• 2:01:26
  Speaker 1: whatever you want to call them out there, young intellectuals
• 2:01:29
  Speaker 1: out there. He's one of the best non objectives young
• 2:01:33
  Speaker 1: intellectuals out there. So check out Coleman Hughes. He's very good.
• 2:01:40
  Speaker 1: Thank you. Matt all right, guys see tomorrow. Bye.