Latest / Merryn Talks Money / Venezuela’s Oil Reserves Versus Reality: Why Output Can’t Jump Overnight

Transcript

Venezuela’s Oil Reserves Versus Reality: Why Output Can’t Jump Overnight · Merryn Talks Money

• 0:02
  Speaker 1: Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, Radio News. Welcome to Merin Trucks Money,
• 0:19
  Speaker 1: the podcast in which people who know the markets explain
• 0:22
  Speaker 1: the markets. I'm Merin Sumset Web and today I am
• 0:24
  Speaker 1: speaking with Michael Haig, Managing director and global head of
• 0:27
  Speaker 1: Fixed Income and Commodities Research for Society General R.
• 0:31
  Speaker 2: Well.
• 0:32
  Speaker 1: It has been a fairly eventful start to the year,
• 0:34
  Speaker 1: to say the least. In a move that's stunned most
• 0:37
  Speaker 1: of US US forces carried out the audacious seizure of
• 0:40
  Speaker 1: Venezuela's president, Nicholas Maduro. Now, given the Venezuela holds the
• 0:44
  Speaker 1: largest proven oil reserves on the planet, this has major
• 0:49
  Speaker 1: implications for the oil markets, or rather a lot of
• 0:51
  Speaker 1: people think it has major implications for the oil markets.
• 0:54
  Speaker 1: We're going to get into that with Michael. But also,
• 0:55
  Speaker 1: of course we are not going to let them go
• 0:57
  Speaker 1: without talking about gold and silver and how we can
• 1:00
  Speaker 1: make even more money im precious metals. Michael, Welcome to
• 1:03
  Speaker 1: Merin Talks Money.
• 1:05
  Speaker 2: Great to be here, Thank you.
• 1:07
  Speaker 1: Okay, Now, I just I said that at the end
• 1:08
  Speaker 1: about making even more money and gold and silver. Because
• 1:11
  Speaker 1: Marin talks money, listeners I think are quite heavily invested
• 1:14
  Speaker 1: in precious metals, so we will get to that, hopefully
• 1:17
  Speaker 1: we'll have quite a lot of time for that. But
• 1:19
  Speaker 1: I think we kind of got to start with Venezuela,
• 1:21
  Speaker 1: haven't we. I said in the introduction about the massive
• 1:24
  Speaker 1: oil reserves, the largest on the planet. But of course,
• 1:27
  Speaker 1: at the moment, Venezuela produces very little oil, well under
• 1:31
  Speaker 1: a million barrel today, and this move doesn't really mean
• 1:36
  Speaker 1: that they'll be producing much more in the near future,
• 1:38
  Speaker 1: so maybe there aren't really any implications for oil markets
• 1:42
  Speaker 1: at all.
• 1:43
  Speaker 2: I think there is something a little bit technical that
• 1:45
  Speaker 2: we have to just bring up before we get into
• 1:48
  Speaker 2: how this affect the global markets. So when we talk
• 1:50
  Speaker 2: about the largest oil reserves in the world, this is
• 1:53
  Speaker 2: what Venezuela says that they have. And actually when we
• 1:57
  Speaker 2: talk about reserves, we talk about proven reserves, and that
• 1:59
  Speaker 2: has to do with the geology, how likely it is
• 2:02
  Speaker 2: that we can extract this easily, and the economics behind it.
• 2:06
  Speaker 2: So unless the economics makes sense, it's not considered to
• 2:09
  Speaker 2: be proven reserve. So when they announced they had three
• 2:12
  Speaker 2: hundred and three billion barrels of oil in reserves, this
• 2:15
  Speaker 2: is when oil prices were roughly one hundred dollars a barrel.
• 2:17
  Speaker 2: Now they're at sixty, so I don't know the exact
• 2:20
  Speaker 2: proven reserves that they would have, but it's certainly less
• 2:23
  Speaker 2: than three hundred and three billion barrels in reserves, but
• 2:26
  Speaker 2: it's still massive.
• 2:27
  Speaker 1: Hang on, Michael, can I can I just stop you there?
• 2:29
  Speaker 1: I want to go back to your definition there of
• 2:31
  Speaker 1: proven reserves. Do you mean if it's not economic to
• 2:33
  Speaker 1: remove it extracted at the current oil price, it doesn't
• 2:38
  Speaker 1: count as a proven reserve?
• 2:40
  Speaker 2: That's right? Yeah, okay, interesting, these things aren't audited all
• 2:43
  Speaker 2: the time. It's kind of a little bit you know,
• 2:45
  Speaker 2: the beauty is in the eye of the beholder. The
• 2:48
  Speaker 2: SEC actually has very strict definitions as to what's considered
• 2:51
  Speaker 2: to be a proven reserve. But price is forty dollars
• 2:54
  Speaker 2: lower than when we had the three hundred and three
• 2:57
  Speaker 2: billion barrel number being released to the market is a
• 3:00
  Speaker 2: bit high, but nonetheless it's still massive. Even eighty billion
• 3:04
  Speaker 2: barrels would be massive. But we have this number of
• 3:07
  Speaker 2: reserve out there, as you rightly point out, that doesn't
• 3:11
  Speaker 2: match what they produce and certainly doesn't match what they export.
• 3:14
  Speaker 2: So you're right, they produce about nine hundred thousand barrels
• 3:17
  Speaker 2: a day right now and export nine hundred minus two
• 3:21
  Speaker 2: hundred and fifty ish, because that's what they consume locally.
• 3:25
  Speaker 2: Now that difference, that export number has even dropped further
• 3:28
  Speaker 2: with sanctions. The other thing to point out, of course,
• 3:32
  Speaker 2: is that not all oil is equal, and Venezuela is
• 3:35
  Speaker 2: in a very special place in the sense that it's
• 3:38
  Speaker 2: oil isn't just heavy, it's what we call extra heavy.
• 3:41
  Speaker 2: So it's almost like goo coming out of the ground,
• 3:43
  Speaker 2: and that means that you need to add dilutant or
• 3:47
  Speaker 2: condensate or as we keep an eye on napther, so
• 3:52
  Speaker 2: you need to add that into the solution. It comes
• 3:54
  Speaker 2: out of the ground, and you even need it to refine.
• 3:57
  Speaker 2: So even if you could manage to change the entire
• 4:01
  Speaker 2: refining industry in the world to use just Venezuelan oil
• 4:05
  Speaker 2: at three hundred and three billion barrels, that would satisfy
• 4:08
  Speaker 2: eight years worth of consumption. Now that's not what's going
• 4:11
  Speaker 2: to happen. But just to give you some context on
• 4:14
  Speaker 2: the size of their.
• 4:14
  Speaker 1: Reserves, okay, can I just check with you? So where
• 4:17
  Speaker 1: does that additive come from? I think, as I understand it,
• 4:20
  Speaker 1: comes from Russia into Venezuela at the moment, but could
• 4:22
  Speaker 1: also be imported from the US.
• 4:24
  Speaker 2: Yes, right, yes, So back in the day, about three
• 4:26
  Speaker 2: hundred thousand barrels of naptha was being imported into Venezuela
• 4:31
  Speaker 2: from the United States. That match is about three million
• 4:35
  Speaker 2: barrels a day of production. So right now nine hundred
• 4:39
  Speaker 2: thousand barrels a day is being produced of crude oil
• 4:42
  Speaker 2: and about one hundred thousand barrels is being imported of
• 4:45
  Speaker 2: which in the last month that we had observation it
• 4:47
  Speaker 2: came from Russia and Singapore actually, but normally it comes
• 4:50
  Speaker 2: from Russia and China.
• 4:52
  Speaker 1: Okay. So with Venezuela can only be a major oil
• 4:55
  Speaker 1: producer and exporter of it has a symbiotic relationship with
• 4:59
  Speaker 1: an exporter of sorry, what's it called again, napthera naphtha.
• 5:03
  Speaker 1: You could only do it if it has a symbiotic
• 5:05
  Speaker 1: relationship with somebody who produces naptha.
• 5:08
  Speaker 2: It for its very extra heavy oil. It doesn't have
• 5:11
  Speaker 2: just extra heavy oil. It has the majority of it
• 5:13
  Speaker 2: is extra heavy.
• 5:15
  Speaker 1: Okay, thank you. And just for context, if we talk
• 5:17
  Speaker 1: about Venezuela producing at the moment under a million barrel
• 5:21
  Speaker 1: of oil a day? How much do the really big producers,
• 5:24
  Speaker 1: So the top producers in the world of the US, Saudi, Russia,
• 5:27
  Speaker 1: and they're all churning out well over ten million, right, yeah, twenty.
• 5:30
  Speaker 2: For the US thirteen million barrels a day. Saudi is
• 5:34
  Speaker 2: roughly nine, but they're cutting back on their production on purpose.
• 5:37
  Speaker 2: They could go up to eleven, Russias around ten, so
• 5:40
  Speaker 2: they're pretty small by all accounts.
• 5:43
  Speaker 1: Yeah, and then after that you get down to Iraq, Iran, Crea, etcetera,
• 5:48
  Speaker 1: all three, three, fourish and Norway a bit below that exactly, etcetera.
• 5:53
  Speaker 1: So it is possible in theory for Venezuela to get
• 5:57
  Speaker 1: up to sort of two three is right there with
• 5:59
  Speaker 1: three peak?
• 6:00
  Speaker 2: Oh yeah, for sure. I mean the question is how
• 6:03
  Speaker 2: long that would take?
• 6:04
  Speaker 1: That's my next question. How long if everything went well
• 6:08
  Speaker 1: for Venezuela. We can argue about what well means, but
• 6:11
  Speaker 1: in this context, let's have well becoming a country that
• 6:14
  Speaker 1: people feel is politically stable and financially stable enough to
• 6:18
  Speaker 1: invest in, and the oil infrastructure is gradually built out
• 6:22
  Speaker 1: as President Trump would like, using the big US oil
• 6:25
  Speaker 1: services companies. How long would it take for Venezuela that
• 6:28
  Speaker 1: are producing much more.
• 6:31
  Speaker 2: So, if we think about getting to between two and
• 6:35
  Speaker 2: three million barrels a day, most industry experts would say,
• 6:40
  Speaker 2: without rushing the situation, that would take between five and
• 6:43
  Speaker 2: ten years. If you listen to Donald Trump, he said
• 6:46
  Speaker 2: that his ambition is to actually get these things moving
• 6:49
  Speaker 2: in the next eighteen months. Now, it could get moving,
• 6:52
  Speaker 2: but it's certainly nothing to be excited about in terms
• 6:55
  Speaker 2: of barrel But if we wanted to go back to
• 6:58
  Speaker 2: where we were back in the days of the peak
• 7:00
  Speaker 2: three point four million barrels a day, I'm going to
• 7:02
  Speaker 2: guess ten years.
• 7:03
  Speaker 1: Okay, So I suppose the answer to the original question,
• 7:07
  Speaker 1: does the political change of Venezuela mean anything for the
• 7:09
  Speaker 1: oil market? The answer is kind of know.
• 7:11
  Speaker 2: It doesn't mean anything from a barrel perspective. It definitely
• 7:14
  Speaker 2: means something from a sort of a geopolitical perspective, because
• 7:18
  Speaker 2: within Venezuela you have China that is very much part
• 7:21
  Speaker 2: of its industry. Russia is very important in the context
• 7:26
  Speaker 2: of supplying that naptha, and also it's important in the
• 7:29
  Speaker 2: context of because Venezuelan oil has declined over the years,
• 7:34
  Speaker 2: Russian oil has replaced it. Because they're quite similar kind
• 7:37
  Speaker 2: of gravity levels, viscosity. So if you change the Venezuelan makeup,
• 7:42
  Speaker 2: you change the outlook for Russia, you changed the outlook
• 7:44
  Speaker 2: for China, and then you might get responses from them,
• 7:48
  Speaker 2: which creates some sort of more geopolitical term or potentially
• 7:51
  Speaker 2: and that then could as a second order, affect the
• 7:55
  Speaker 2: oil market.
• 7:56
  Speaker 1: Okay, And there are other things that may affect the
• 7:58
  Speaker 1: oil market and at the moment as well. I mean
• 8:00
  Speaker 1: you say that OPEK has been restricting output, but there
• 8:03
  Speaker 1: is political shifts in Saudi right which may change that. Yeah.
• 8:08
  Speaker 2: I mean, OPEK does what it has originally set up
• 8:12
  Speaker 2: to do, which is to manage the market, reduce the volatility,
• 8:17
  Speaker 2: and by doing that, it's essentially cutting its own production
• 8:20
  Speaker 2: or bringing its production back online. Right now, they are
• 8:23
  Speaker 2: still cutting. They were bringing back a lot of oil
• 8:25
  Speaker 2: barrels last year in twenty twenty five. They have cut
• 8:29
  Speaker 2: because they see surpluses rising, demand being quite low, so
• 8:34
  Speaker 2: they have refrained from bringing back their barrels until April.
• 8:39
  Speaker 2: In my own opinion, they're going to have to reevaluate
• 8:42
  Speaker 2: their strategy in April because we're very, very oversupplied, and
• 8:45
  Speaker 2: that's even ignoring Venezuela. So yeah, there's a few dynamics
• 8:50
  Speaker 2: at play here. There's another dynamic, of course, which isn't
• 8:54
  Speaker 2: real demand. Its Chinese strategic petroleum reserve buying. So that's
• 8:59
  Speaker 2: them putting oil into their commercial as well as government
• 9:02
  Speaker 2: stockpiles for quote unquote energy security. That has been absolutely
• 9:07
  Speaker 2: rampant over the last six months, maybe even the last
• 9:10
  Speaker 2: nine months, and that is part of the reason, if
• 9:13
  Speaker 2: not the majority of the reason as to why oil
• 9:15
  Speaker 2: prices haven't dropped yet.
• 9:17
  Speaker 1: So, Michael, let's talk more about this Chinese strategic reserve.
• 9:20
  Speaker 1: Why are they building this? What's the plan?
• 9:22
  Speaker 2: Well, China imports roughly twelve million barrels a day of
• 9:26
  Speaker 2: oil eleven twelve million barrels a day. They're not a
• 9:29
  Speaker 2: significant enough producer so that they don't have to rely
• 9:32
  Speaker 2: on the international markets. Most of that oil is obviously
• 9:34
  Speaker 2: coming from the Middle East and Russia, some of it
• 9:37
  Speaker 2: a little bit comes from Venezuela. But obviously they're in
• 9:39
  Speaker 2: a very sensitive situation, so they have been building out
• 9:43
  Speaker 2: their spr strategic pratronium reserve and they combine that with
• 9:46
  Speaker 2: their commercial reserves. Actually that belong to the state owned
• 9:49
  Speaker 2: oil companies and we guess that they have roughly one
• 9:53
  Speaker 2: point four billion barrels in SPR. Compare that to the US,
• 9:57
  Speaker 2: which has probably about four hundred million barrels. So it's
• 10:00
  Speaker 2: gigantic and some people believe, and I think it's a
• 10:03
  Speaker 2: little bit extreme, that this could go to two billion
• 10:06
  Speaker 2: barrels by the end of twenty twenty six, but probably
• 10:08
  Speaker 2: more like one point five to one point six. If
• 10:10
  Speaker 2: you divide that those billions by their daily import numbers,
• 10:14
  Speaker 2: they're covered for not just thirty days, they're covered for
• 10:19
  Speaker 2: hundreds of days should anything go wrong. So you have
• 10:22
  Speaker 2: a lot of conspiracy theorists that think, okay, well, what
• 10:24
  Speaker 2: if they invaded Taiwan and the West cut off their
• 10:28
  Speaker 2: supplies of oil? How long could they survive for? Who
• 10:31
  Speaker 2: knows what the motivation is. They'll say they're building their
• 10:34
  Speaker 2: SPR for energy security. There's no rawl in place as
• 10:38
  Speaker 2: to how much they must accumulate. But these numbers are gigantic.
• 10:41
  Speaker 2: But at some point they'll stop buying and that's what
• 10:44
  Speaker 2: will affect be all.
• 10:45
  Speaker 1: Market slight side question, how do you store that amount
• 10:49
  Speaker 1: of oil?
• 10:50
  Speaker 2: Well, I mean it depends on where you are in
• 10:51
  Speaker 2: the world. There are natural caverns in the US. For instance,
• 10:55
  Speaker 2: they're called salt dome caverns. They're along the Gulf coast,
• 10:58
  Speaker 2: so these are natural caverns with very thick salt that
• 11:01
  Speaker 2: has been solidified, so it's a natural storage facility and
• 11:04
  Speaker 2: it's very cheap to store it there. But generally speaking,
• 11:07
  Speaker 2: you're building these facilities. These could be above or underground
• 11:10
  Speaker 2: storage facilities, which by the way, is very metal intensive,
• 11:13
  Speaker 2: so these are basically large storage facilities.
• 11:16
  Speaker 1: Huh okay, amazing. Well, I mean, it seems perfectly sensible
• 11:19
  Speaker 1: for China to do that under circumstances, wouldn't you say,
• 11:21
  Speaker 1: And obviously they must have much higher reserves than the
• 11:24
  Speaker 1: US if they're going to do it, because the US
• 11:26
  Speaker 1: is such a big producer in China is not. So exactly,
• 11:28
  Speaker 1: this makes sense in not necessarily a scary way.
• 11:32
  Speaker 2: It does. It's just that we've never seen these kind
• 11:35
  Speaker 2: of builds we have in the past with China, which
• 11:38
  Speaker 2: leads to the question of why they're doing it. But
• 11:41
  Speaker 2: without trying to get too deep into that, it's about
• 11:44
  Speaker 2: energy security.
• 11:44
  Speaker 1: At the end of the day, let me ask you
• 11:46
  Speaker 1: about the long term outlook for oil. I know you
• 11:49
  Speaker 1: wrote an interesting article the other day, not the other
• 11:51
  Speaker 1: day a while back about comparing whale oil to oil
• 11:55
  Speaker 1: and about how long it took, even even once crudel
• 11:59
  Speaker 1: was discovered started to be used, how long it took
• 12:02
  Speaker 1: for people to stop using whale oil. So you say
• 12:04
  Speaker 1: it was about fifty years until it was only negul
• 12:07
  Speaker 1: little supply coming into the US. And of course you
• 12:09
  Speaker 1: could argue that's because there weren't very many whales left,
• 12:12
  Speaker 1: or it could just be the gradual shift from waleil
• 12:17
  Speaker 1: to crude oil. And I think the point you were
• 12:19
  Speaker 1: trying to make there was that if an energy infrastructure
• 12:22
  Speaker 1: is set up for one type of energy, it takes
• 12:25
  Speaker 1: a very very long time to shift it to using
• 12:28
  Speaker 1: a different type of energy.
• 12:29
  Speaker 2: No, that's exactly right, And by all accounts, back in
• 12:32
  Speaker 2: the eighteen sixties, seventies, eighties nineties, where we saw this
• 12:37
  Speaker 2: decline in whale oil imports into the US and the
• 12:39
  Speaker 2: growth of the crude oil industry, you know, the infrastructure
• 12:42
  Speaker 2: was a lot more simple. Let's say, in the world
• 12:44
  Speaker 2: wasn't addicted to oil. Now the entire world is set
• 12:48
  Speaker 2: up for oil. In fact, you know, if you did
• 12:51
  Speaker 2: want to transition away from oil, that's certainly likely to
• 12:55
  Speaker 2: happen within the developed markets, but I don't anticipate it
• 12:58
  Speaker 2: happening in the emerging markets. In fact, that's going to
• 13:00
  Speaker 2: continue to grow.
• 13:01
  Speaker 1: Yeah, I mean, one of the unusual things about the
• 13:03
  Speaker 1: whale old story, well, it's very interesting, is it is
• 13:05
  Speaker 1: one of the few examples of a source of energy
• 13:09
  Speaker 1: stopping being used, whereas everything else has been not a
• 13:12
  Speaker 1: transition but an addition. Right, It's exactly more, we use
• 13:15
  Speaker 1: more word, we use more coal, we use more oil,
• 13:18
  Speaker 1: et cetera, et cetera. Everything we add on is simply
• 13:21
  Speaker 1: an addition. So with that in mind, the idea that
• 13:25
  Speaker 1: long term demand for oil will actually fall is that
• 13:30
  Speaker 1: for argument, isn't it?
• 13:32
  Speaker 2: It certainly is.
• 13:33
  Speaker 1: That would be very unusual in the history of the world,
• 13:36
  Speaker 1: Very very unusual.
• 13:37
  Speaker 2: That's right. And if you look at projections from US
• 13:40
  Speaker 2: oil majors, from European oil majors, from industry associations like
• 13:45
  Speaker 2: the International Energy Agency, for example, the EIA out of
• 13:49
  Speaker 2: the USA, the path of oil demand out of twenty
• 13:54
  Speaker 2: fifty is just so wide in terms of opinions as
• 13:57
  Speaker 2: to where we go. Some think it continues to grow,
• 14:00
  Speaker 2: some things, it declines dramatically from here on out. My
• 14:04
  Speaker 2: own opinion on this matter when you look at the
• 14:06
  Speaker 2: vast array of paths that oil could go, is that
• 14:09
  Speaker 2: I anticipate that we peak at about one hundred and
• 14:13
  Speaker 2: thirty million barrels a day of demand for oil, and
• 14:16
  Speaker 2: then we get a gradual decline starting around twenty thirty
• 14:20
  Speaker 2: five twenty forty.
• 14:21
  Speaker 1: What is total demand now.
• 14:22
  Speaker 2: So that one hundred and thirty million barrels a day
• 14:25
  Speaker 2: compares to total demand today of around one hundred and
• 14:27
  Speaker 2: three hundred and four million barrels a.
• 14:29
  Speaker 1: Day, okay, and then a decline from twenty thirty five
• 14:32
  Speaker 1: as we shift to what or as global population peaks
• 14:36
  Speaker 1: in declines the.
• 14:37
  Speaker 2: Population angle wouldn't really have a big of an impact there.
• 14:40
  Speaker 2: I think what's replacing oil at that point is natural gas. Obviously,
• 14:44
  Speaker 2: we see a lot of investment in liquefication and regasification
• 14:50
  Speaker 2: facilities around the world. Natural gas is most certainly the
• 14:54
  Speaker 2: transitional commodity that can be shipped around globally, and there's
• 14:58
  Speaker 2: a lot more oppeiing than say something like coal. But yes,
• 15:02
  Speaker 2: I mean the vast majority of what declines for oil
• 15:06
  Speaker 2: by twenty thirty five and twenty forty is coming from
• 15:09
  Speaker 2: the developed markets. And that switch to natural gas and alternatives, renewables,
• 15:14
  Speaker 2: et cetera. But you know, as I mentioned, if you
• 15:18
  Speaker 2: looked at the growth of demand the developed markets, you'd
• 15:21
  Speaker 2: see it coming down in twenty thirty five. You'd see
• 15:23
  Speaker 2: the emerging markets still increasing beyond twenty thirty five. But
• 15:27
  Speaker 2: the decline in the developed mildly offsets the increase in
• 15:30
  Speaker 2: the emerging markets, and that's why you see the decline.
• 15:34
  Speaker 1: Interesting. I'm getting briefly back to whale oil. You know,
• 15:37
  Speaker 1: there was there a supply problem there, right, and I
• 15:40
  Speaker 1: don't know if you if you remember, I certainly do,
• 15:43
  Speaker 1: the stress over peak oil a while back, where everyone
• 15:46
  Speaker 1: was convinced that we were actually going to run out
• 15:48
  Speaker 1: of oil, that there'll be no more discoveries, there'll be
• 15:50
  Speaker 1: no more reserves, and we had to make the transition
• 15:53
  Speaker 1: to other sources of energy, not because of climat or
• 15:56
  Speaker 1: environmental worries, but because we were going to run out
• 15:58
  Speaker 1: of the stuff. That no longer seems a risk at all.
• 16:01
  Speaker 1: We constantly seem to be new discoveries. And did peqil
• 16:05
  Speaker 1: just disappear as an idea?
• 16:07
  Speaker 2: Yeah? I think so, because you know, we went through
• 16:11
  Speaker 2: in fairly recent history and call it the two thousand
• 16:14
  Speaker 2: to twenty fifteen period of time where technology really was
• 16:19
  Speaker 2: developed to extract oil that we didn't think we had before,
• 16:22
  Speaker 2: at least we didn't think we had assets access to.
• 16:24
  Speaker 2: And what I'm talking about there is shale oil, which
• 16:27
  Speaker 2: is a US story. This was not part of any
• 16:30
  Speaker 2: conversation before the year two thousand. Now, I know, I'm
• 16:32
  Speaker 2: going back twenty five years, but that is relatively recent
• 16:35
  Speaker 2: and is still an incredibly part of the equation. So
• 16:38
  Speaker 2: that wasn't part of the discussion when we were talking
• 16:40
  Speaker 2: about peak oil back many many decades ago. But it
• 16:44
  Speaker 2: just goes to show, you know, when you're running out
• 16:47
  Speaker 2: of something or prices getting too high, technology has a
• 16:51
  Speaker 2: way of fixing the problem, and high prices have a
• 16:54
  Speaker 2: way of fixing the prosblem. So even without delving into
• 16:58
  Speaker 2: technological advancements, if prices start to go up because you're
• 17:01
  Speaker 2: thinking about running out of something, this incentivizes the oil
• 17:04
  Speaker 2: companies to invest more in places where you weren't extracting
• 17:09
  Speaker 2: all before.
• 17:10
  Speaker 1: Yeah, well, as they were saying, commodities, right, the solution
• 17:13
  Speaker 1: to high prices is high prices exactly. We could leave
• 17:32
  Speaker 1: oil now but stick with energy and move maybe to
• 17:35
  Speaker 1: talking about copper, because a big part of the idea
• 17:37
  Speaker 1: of transitioning into a more electrified world is one in
• 17:42
  Speaker 1: which we upgrade our grids, we make everything run off electricity,
• 17:47
  Speaker 1: and we use renewable sources more, etc. Now, everyone who
• 17:49
  Speaker 1: listens to this podcast, in fact, anyone who reads the newspapers,
• 17:52
  Speaker 1: will know what a problem that is and the huge
• 17:55
  Speaker 1: infrastructure demands that we have going forward, and that of
• 17:58
  Speaker 1: course has affected the i s of various industrial commodities.
• 18:01
  Speaker 1: And copper is the classic right for the electrification of
• 18:04
  Speaker 1: the world, and we've seen it at new high after
• 18:06
  Speaker 1: new high after new high. Is the solution to high prices?
• 18:10
  Speaker 1: There high prices or are the dynamic different? Today?
• 18:13
  Speaker 2: Copper does have a very unique outlook actually, because you know,
• 18:18
  Speaker 2: we can talk about electrification of the world and need
• 18:21
  Speaker 2: for copper and other base metals in energy transition. But
• 18:25
  Speaker 2: you know, before we started, let's just step back, before
• 18:27
  Speaker 2: we started talking about energy transition, the whole premise behind
• 18:31
  Speaker 2: copper's rise or demand was purely about urbanization and population growth.
• 18:38
  Speaker 2: That became less of a subject because we're all pretty
• 18:42
  Speaker 2: much aligne that China has peaked in terms of its
• 18:44
  Speaker 2: use for copper, incremental demand for copper for urbanization needs
• 18:51
  Speaker 2: and population growth. And the question then became, ten years ago,
• 18:56
  Speaker 2: would the incremental demand from electrication demand for copper way
• 19:00
  Speaker 2: the decline that you would get from copper through demand
• 19:03
  Speaker 2: declines from traditional demand, And the answer to that is yes.
• 19:08
  Speaker 2: So if you go country by country and you look
• 19:10
  Speaker 2: at what they're planning to do their stated policies for electrification,
• 19:14
  Speaker 2: and you add up what does that mean in terms
• 19:16
  Speaker 2: of tonnage of copper, and you compare that to the
• 19:20
  Speaker 2: declining copper through traditional needs, it offsets it. So it
• 19:23
  Speaker 2: always had this kind of bullish story. And we've been
• 19:27
  Speaker 2: talking about this for four or five years. Even before
• 19:29
  Speaker 2: COVID COVID hits, we didn't talk about anymore. We had
• 19:32
  Speaker 2: lots of other things to worry about, including energy security,
• 19:35
  Speaker 2: in the cost of living crisis, etc. But a couple
• 19:38
  Speaker 2: of things have changed in the last two three years
• 19:41
  Speaker 2: for copper and it's given it an extra leg up.
• 19:44
  Speaker 2: So the first one, of course, is AI and data centers. Right,
• 19:48
  Speaker 2: we talk about data centers and we talk about how
• 19:50
  Speaker 2: energy intensive they are, but let's imagine you go inside
• 19:53
  Speaker 2: one of these things. It's all about copper wiring, So
• 19:56
  Speaker 2: the demand for copper from AI and data centers even
• 20:00
  Speaker 2: talked about two three years and now we're talking about
• 20:02
  Speaker 2: substantial amounts of copper needed for that. On top of that,
• 20:06
  Speaker 2: we have to take into account the unfortunate geopolitical situation
• 20:10
  Speaker 2: we're in right now where everybody is basically trying to
• 20:13
  Speaker 2: increase their defense expenditure, and actually that is incredibly metal
• 20:17
  Speaker 2: intensive because you think about aircraft carriers, bullets, tanks, it's
• 20:21
  Speaker 2: all metal and copper is in everything.
• 20:24
  Speaker 1: So well, it's even just the building of the factories,
• 20:27
  Speaker 1: isn't it. I mean, you know, let alone the products themselves,
• 20:30
  Speaker 1: but the building of the factories requires large amount.
• 20:35
  Speaker 2: Copper is literally everywhere. If I took a part of
• 20:37
  Speaker 2: this room we're sitting in, I'd find it pretty much
• 20:40
  Speaker 2: in everything that we're touching or looking at. But you're
• 20:43
  Speaker 2: exactly right, it's the building of factories as well, and
• 20:46
  Speaker 2: you have to add into account, of course, hopefully successful
• 20:50
  Speaker 2: resolution between Russia and Ukraine, and then we have to
• 20:53
  Speaker 2: rebuild Ukraine, and that's incredibly copper intensive. If you look
• 20:57
  Speaker 2: at countries in the past that have had to be rebuilt,
• 21:00
  Speaker 2: the amount of copy that you need to do that
• 21:02
  Speaker 2: is enormous. And you can look back even in World
• 21:04
  Speaker 2: War Two where we had to rebuild most of the world,
• 21:07
  Speaker 2: and that was incredibly copper intensive. So there's lots and
• 21:10
  Speaker 2: lots and lots of things going on in copper that
• 21:13
  Speaker 2: are supporting its price, not just one thing. So I'm
• 21:16
  Speaker 2: not sure that the cure to high prices is high prices,
• 21:20
  Speaker 2: which we generally say is the way that prices are
• 21:22
  Speaker 2: going to drop. I have a hard time seeing how
• 21:26
  Speaker 2: all of these things lose momentum in the short term
• 21:30
  Speaker 2: here for copper, and I see it continuing to rally.
• 21:33
  Speaker 1: Okay, and how could the supply of copper go up fast?
• 21:37
  Speaker 1: Well it can't, Well what could we can't? It actually can't.
• 21:40
  Speaker 1: There is no way to. I mean, obviously it's verging
• 21:43
  Speaker 1: on im possible to open new minds anywhere anymore, isn't
• 21:46
  Speaker 1: it because of environmental regulation, et cetera. And so if
• 21:50
  Speaker 1: you get one big mind that goes offline for a
• 21:52
  Speaker 1: short period or whatever, there's no way to compensate for that.
• 21:55
  Speaker 2: Well, we have we do have inventories within Shanghai, the
• 21:58
  Speaker 2: London Metal Exchange, the comics market in New York. There
• 22:01
  Speaker 2: are inventories and buffers there, but you know that's just
• 22:05
  Speaker 2: what they're there for as a moderate buffer in case
• 22:08
  Speaker 2: there's a short term shock. Really, but if we're talking
• 22:11
  Speaker 2: about long term needs for copper to cater all these
• 22:15
  Speaker 2: things we're talking about, defense, AI, rebuilding countries, electrification, you
• 22:21
  Speaker 2: need more copper to come out of the ground, and
• 22:23
  Speaker 2: it takes ages to start a new mine, as you mentioned,
• 22:27
  Speaker 2: for environmental reasons.
• 22:29
  Speaker 1: So should everyone have a couple of existing copper miners
• 22:32
  Speaker 1: in their portfolio.
• 22:33
  Speaker 2: I don't think it's a bad idea. I mean, this
• 22:35
  Speaker 2: is going to likely go on for quite some time. Obviously,
• 22:38
  Speaker 2: nothing goes up in a linear bottom left to top
• 22:41
  Speaker 2: right hand graph in terms of price performance. But it's
• 22:45
  Speaker 2: one of these things that I'm having a hard time
• 22:47
  Speaker 2: finding reasons as to why it would collapse other than
• 22:50
  Speaker 2: a recession or even a depression. But there's too many
• 22:54
  Speaker 2: things that are supporting it.
• 22:56
  Speaker 1: Yeah, although even in a recession there's defense facility. Is
• 23:00
  Speaker 1: it's just going to keep being rebuilt, aren't they That's
• 23:02
  Speaker 1: one thing, or recession is not going to stop.
• 23:04
  Speaker 2: Yeah, and let's get a bit macro here. You'd mentioned, well,
• 23:09
  Speaker 2: copper is one of my favorite commodities because we call
• 23:12
  Speaker 2: it Doctor Copper. It's the one thing that can forecast
• 23:14
  Speaker 2: macroeconomic outlook. It's very very good at that, but it's
• 23:18
  Speaker 2: also very very good at predicting a negative macroeconomic outlook
• 23:22
  Speaker 2: if we were running into a recession. You look at
• 23:24
  Speaker 2: copper prices historically, and we can go back hundreds of years, actually,
• 23:28
  Speaker 2: well at least dozens in the futures market. In the
• 23:30
  Speaker 2: spot market, we can go back hundreds of years. The
• 23:33
  Speaker 2: copper market is the one that collapses before anything else
• 23:36
  Speaker 2: when you're running into a recession. So I keep an
• 23:38
  Speaker 2: eye on that for that reason. But it's very resilient
• 23:41
  Speaker 2: right now.
• 23:42
  Speaker 1: Okay, let's talk about the other industrial metals briefly. And
• 23:45
  Speaker 1: one of the things I mentioned earlier was that in
• 23:47
  Speaker 1: this geopolitical environment, on top of the idea that everyone
• 23:51
  Speaker 1: is rebuilding their defense industries, people are also attempting to
• 23:54
  Speaker 1: rebuild their well in the West anyway, their manufacturing basis
• 23:57
  Speaker 1: to rebuild the infrastructure that maybe they've lost it over
• 23:59
  Speaker 1: the last twenty thirty years as a result of relentless globalization.
• 24:04
  Speaker 1: So if we've got that rebuilding and we've got people
• 24:07
  Speaker 1: slightly concerned for all sorts of geopolitical reasons about all
• 24:10
  Speaker 1: sorts of things, maybe stockpiling various metals. Is it the
• 24:13
  Speaker 1: case that we're not just talking about copper, We're talking
• 24:15
  Speaker 1: about the entire industrial metal base being in a fairly
• 24:18
  Speaker 1: intense ballmarket over the next few years.
• 24:20
  Speaker 2: Minimum, Yes, some of them more than others. Nicol has
• 24:24
  Speaker 2: always been a favorite as a potential ballmarket metal on
• 24:31
  Speaker 2: the back of electrification. Of course, Donald Trump and the
• 24:34
  Speaker 2: US administration right now kind of backing off from that
• 24:37
  Speaker 2: has made that market a little bit less exciting. Also,
• 24:41
  Speaker 2: nickel was previously losed a lot in primarily in building
• 24:46
  Speaker 2: as a component in the steel manufacturing. That's less exciting
• 24:51
  Speaker 2: right now because of the decline if you like, or
• 24:54
  Speaker 2: the slow down in China, So they're not as exposed
• 24:58
  Speaker 2: to all these very bullet elements as say something like copper.
• 25:04
  Speaker 2: So that's a bit of an outlier. But having said that,
• 25:06
  Speaker 2: you've hit on something very important because another aspect of
• 25:10
  Speaker 2: what is driving some of this bullish momentum, and maybe
• 25:12
  Speaker 2: we can get into silver a little bit later.
• 25:15
  Speaker 1: Is oh, we are definitely on our way to talking
• 25:17
  Speaker 1: about zilver. I'm literally gearing up for that right now.
• 25:20
  Speaker 2: It's about stockpiling, right, critical material stockpiling. So you know,
• 25:25
  Speaker 2: to go back to oil, what countries generally do with
• 25:28
  Speaker 2: oil in terms of stockpiling is that they collect import
• 25:33
  Speaker 2: ninety days worth of oil, put it in storage, and
• 25:36
  Speaker 2: that's called their strategic petroleum reserve. That's how much they're
• 25:40
  Speaker 2: supposed to hold in case something goes wrong. We don't
• 25:43
  Speaker 2: have things like that for base metals. And so if
• 25:46
  Speaker 2: one was to look at the countries that import things
• 25:50
  Speaker 2: like nickel and zinc and lead, aluminum, copper, et cetera,
• 25:56
  Speaker 2: and you said, okay, well, what if they decided to
• 25:58
  Speaker 2: do the same thing with those metal that they do
• 26:01
  Speaker 2: with the energy complex, notably oil, and by ninety days
• 26:05
  Speaker 2: worth of cover of what they normally import, you'd be
• 26:08
  Speaker 2: talking about a tremendous amount of material that would put
• 26:12
  Speaker 2: these markets in big deficits and that would would increase
• 26:15
  Speaker 2: the prices. So we're not there yet in terms of
• 26:19
  Speaker 2: critical material and the impact on things like zinc and lead,
• 26:22
  Speaker 2: these smaller markets, but definitely copper and silver come up
• 26:26
  Speaker 2: in this conversation.
• 26:28
  Speaker 1: Yeah, okay, well let's go on to silver. That one
• 26:31
  Speaker 1: of our favorite topics on this podcast. My co host
• 26:34
  Speaker 1: John Steppek is mildly obsessed by silver, So I'm sorry
• 26:38
  Speaker 1: he's not here to talk to you about it, but
• 26:39
  Speaker 1: let me do it for him. So, given everything we've
• 26:42
  Speaker 1: just said, but also given these stunningly sharp rise in
• 26:47
  Speaker 1: the silver price, is that sustainable? Is this a bubble?
• 26:50
  Speaker 1: And if it is a bubble, is it a rational bubble?
• 26:52
  Speaker 1: Or is this not a bubble at all?
• 26:53
  Speaker 2: Well, it's fascinating you say that. We try and be
• 26:56
  Speaker 2: very quantity in our analytics at SOB. We've got a
• 27:00
  Speaker 2: model for almost everything, including bubbles. Is a particular market
• 27:04
  Speaker 2: in a bubble? So I test these things out all
• 27:07
  Speaker 2: the time, and a couple of weeks ago we ran
• 27:09
  Speaker 2: it through our silver complex and it churned out the
• 27:12
  Speaker 2: fact that we were in a bubble. And I thought, well,
• 27:15
  Speaker 2: hang on a second, have we been in a situation
• 27:17
  Speaker 2: like we're in right now for silver compared to history?
• 27:20
  Speaker 2: And the answer is no. What's going on there is
• 27:24
  Speaker 2: the fact that silver, we have to remember, is basically
• 27:27
  Speaker 2: fifty percent industrial and it's fifty percent precious. It doesn't
• 27:31
  Speaker 2: move up and down with gold, but it can't move
• 27:33
  Speaker 2: in a separate direction in the long term. So the
• 27:37
  Speaker 2: gold silver ratio is fairly volatile, which means that they
• 27:40
  Speaker 2: do have different paths. But generally speaking, silver does do
• 27:44
  Speaker 2: what gold does. It's the market is ten times smaller
• 27:47
  Speaker 2: than the gold market, which means it's way more volatile.
• 27:49
  Speaker 2: The way I explained the silver market, it's it's just
• 27:52
  Speaker 2: like gold but on steroids. Basically, if gold's going to
• 27:55
  Speaker 2: go up, it's going to go up more. If gold's
• 27:56
  Speaker 2: going to go down, it's going to go down with gold,
• 27:58
  Speaker 2: but buy more. But I have to add on top
• 28:00
  Speaker 2: the industrial complex. Now, what's going on with silver, of course,
• 28:04
  Speaker 2: is the fact that we've been running into three years
• 28:06
  Speaker 2: of deficit. Now, before we got all excited about investing
• 28:10
  Speaker 2: in precious metals and de dollarization, central bank buying, etc.
• 28:14
  Speaker 2: Nobody really cared about the small deficits in silver. But
• 28:17
  Speaker 2: once you start getting a leg up in silver prices
• 28:21
  Speaker 2: and ETF buying and movements of silver from one location
• 28:25
  Speaker 2: to another because of fears of tariff impositions, then all
• 28:29
  Speaker 2: of a sudden, the inventory of silver becomes incredibly important.
• 28:33
  Speaker 2: And when you're in the market of deficits and you're
• 28:35
  Speaker 2: expecting to have more deficits going forward, that's the support
• 28:39
  Speaker 2: behind silver Now, silver's very volatile. Is it going to
• 28:42
  Speaker 2: come off? Yes, of course it will. Will it continue
• 28:45
  Speaker 2: to rise? I think it will.
• 28:47
  Speaker 1: Okay, that's what we want to hear.
• 28:50
  Speaker 2: And gold gold I have actually more conviction on because
• 28:54
  Speaker 2: it's a much more solid market in terms of liquidity.
• 28:58
  Speaker 2: And of course central banks don't really get involved in
• 29:01
  Speaker 2: silver at all, but they're very much in the gold complex.
• 29:05
  Speaker 2: So I took a very interesting experiment because nobody really
• 29:09
  Speaker 2: knows how much more central banks are going to buy,
• 29:11
  Speaker 2: how long this de dollarization story is going to continue.
• 29:15
  Speaker 2: But if you take a list of all the central
• 29:18
  Speaker 2: banks around the world and you look at see which
• 29:21
  Speaker 2: central banks are holding lower amounts of gold relative to
• 29:24
  Speaker 2: their total reserves. So some central banks, like the US
• 29:27
  Speaker 2: has eight thousand tons of gold, China has two three
• 29:30
  Speaker 2: hundred tons of gold. So these are pretty big. But
• 29:33
  Speaker 2: the really important question.
• 29:34
  Speaker 1: And we're sure about those numbers, are.
• 29:36
  Speaker 2: We No, we're not sure about the China number. These
• 29:39
  Speaker 2: are self reported by China to the IMF. We keep
• 29:43
  Speaker 2: track of imports into China from London. We look at
• 29:47
  Speaker 2: what they say they've bought, etc. So we go with
• 29:51
  Speaker 2: the stated number, but knowing there's a little bit of
• 29:54
  Speaker 2: probably uncertainty there, But I think the important thing is
• 29:58
  Speaker 2: is that even if you take that two thousand and
• 29:59
  Speaker 2: three one hundred ton number for China, that is roughly
• 30:04
  Speaker 2: six percent of their total reserves. So if you're off
• 30:07
  Speaker 2: by another two thousand tons, you're still below twenty percent
• 30:12
  Speaker 2: of total reserves. And that's what most central banks are
• 30:14
  Speaker 2: aiming to accumulate. So if you take the top, say
• 30:19
  Speaker 2: fifty central banks, and you rank order them by the
• 30:22
  Speaker 2: amount of gold that they're holding as a percent of
• 30:24
  Speaker 2: total reserves, and you exclude the ones that are holding
• 30:27
  Speaker 2: a lot of gold, and you're left with the remainder,
• 30:30
  Speaker 2: and you ask this one question, what if those central
• 30:34
  Speaker 2: banks moved one percent of their total reserves that are
• 30:38
  Speaker 2: not gold into gold, just one percent, And you looked
• 30:42
  Speaker 2: at all these different countries, whether it's the Philippines, Japan, China,
• 30:45
  Speaker 2: et cetera. These are the countries that have low relative reserves,
• 30:49
  Speaker 2: and you assume that they all did that, then you'd
• 30:51
  Speaker 2: be talking close to one thousand tons of gold being demanded. Now, remember,
• 30:56
  Speaker 2: in any given year, normally central banks by about seven
• 31:00
  Speaker 2: hundred tons, So if they made this incremental shift to
• 31:04
  Speaker 2: one thousand tons, in addition to the seven hundred that's
• 31:07
  Speaker 2: normally being purchased, that mechanically would lift gold prices about
• 31:12
  Speaker 2: one thousand dollars an ounce.
• 31:14
  Speaker 1: Okay, which would make the share prices of the miners
• 31:17
  Speaker 1: go even more berserk than they've gone already.
• 31:19
  Speaker 2: Even more berserk. And by the way, we look at
• 31:22
  Speaker 2: the cost of production of all the different miners, and
• 31:26
  Speaker 2: they are all making money. There is not one gold
• 31:28
  Speaker 2: mine that is making no money anymore.
• 31:31
  Speaker 1: Makes a pleasant change, doesn't it. It does so from
• 31:35
  Speaker 1: your point of view, it is not too late to
• 31:38
  Speaker 1: buy silver, to buy gold, or indeed to buy the
• 31:40
  Speaker 1: silver or the gold miners.
• 31:42
  Speaker 2: I don't think it is. I mean, our house view
• 31:45
  Speaker 2: is that by the end of this year, gold is
• 31:48
  Speaker 2: going to be at five thousand dollars an ounce. Now,
• 31:49
  Speaker 2: of course, we said that when gold is at four thousand.
• 31:52
  Speaker 2: Now we're up to almost four thousand, five hundred. I
• 31:55
  Speaker 2: have a feeling, but I'm not sure when this will
• 31:58
  Speaker 2: be that I'm going to have to adjust that up again.
• 32:00
  Speaker 2: If I adjust gold up, I'm going to have to
• 32:01
  Speaker 2: adjust silver up.
• 32:03
  Speaker 1: Can you see any point, any point in time in
• 32:05
  Speaker 1: which the central banks would hold bitcoin as a reserve asset.
• 32:09
  Speaker 2: That's a fabulous question. I have devoted a bit of
• 32:13
  Speaker 2: time and attention of going to a variety of different
• 32:15
  Speaker 2: central bank websites and looking at what their policies are
• 32:18
  Speaker 2: on this, their statements, what they say they have, what
• 32:21
  Speaker 2: they might do. I found two central banks that made
• 32:24
  Speaker 2: a statement last year, the Czech Republic and Kazakhstan, that
• 32:28
  Speaker 2: said they might consider holding bitcoin or crypto in their
• 32:34
  Speaker 2: portfolios alongside gold. But the key question was might, and
• 32:39
  Speaker 2: I think it was the Czech Republic central Bank that
• 32:42
  Speaker 2: said if they did that, it would be a maximum
• 32:43
  Speaker 2: of five percent. So it's a good question, but so
• 32:46
  Speaker 2: far I don't I'm not I'm not concerned about.
• 32:49
  Speaker 1: That, Okay, So that is not a risk to your
• 32:52
  Speaker 1: outlook for gold. What is the risk to your view
• 32:55
  Speaker 1: on gold? What would turn it around?
• 32:57
  Speaker 2: A month two months ago, I was asked the question,
• 33:00
  Speaker 2: you know, obviously with higher prices, central banks are going
• 33:03
  Speaker 2: to stop buying because it just is just way too high.
• 33:07
  Speaker 2: And so I looked at sort of elasticities of response
• 33:10
  Speaker 2: of prices to demand across jewelry, across central bank buying,
• 33:14
  Speaker 2: across etf buying, and it's all basically broken with the
• 33:18
  Speaker 2: exception of jewelry demand elasticity, meaning if prices go up,
• 33:21
  Speaker 2: people buy less jewelry. That is a very strong relationship.
• 33:25
  Speaker 2: It's broken with central banks and ETF buying because those
• 33:28
  Speaker 2: are the reasons why gold prices go up. So it's
• 33:32
  Speaker 2: hard to think about an elasticity response when that is
• 33:35
  Speaker 2: the reason why it goes up. So they are the
• 33:37
  Speaker 2: causal influence. They have a positive elasticity, which means gold
• 33:41
  Speaker 2: prices they buy more. But so far central banks have
• 33:45
  Speaker 2: not reversed course on their statements as to how they
• 33:48
  Speaker 2: accumulate their gold. They still say that this is a
• 33:51
  Speaker 2: very strategic thing. It's not really about the price of
• 33:53
  Speaker 2: gold right now. That's my concern is if we see
• 33:57
  Speaker 2: a reversal in central bank buying. I do check on
• 34:00
  Speaker 2: it every month using HMRC gold export data out of
• 34:05
  Speaker 2: the UK into places like China. It has slowed down,
• 34:09
  Speaker 2: I will admit that compared to say this time last year.
• 34:14
  Speaker 2: I think if I see another one or two or
• 34:17
  Speaker 2: three months of central bank buying decline, as proxied by
• 34:22
  Speaker 2: exports out of the UK, then I'm going to have
• 34:23
  Speaker 2: to reevaluate my thinking on the role of central banks
• 34:27
  Speaker 2: and gold demand. For twenty twenty six, but so far
• 34:29
  Speaker 2: haven't seen that. The other thing that people often ask
• 34:32
  Speaker 2: about is what if we saw a massive reduction in
• 34:35
  Speaker 2: reduction in uncertainty around the world, geopolitical uncertainty, because those
• 34:40
  Speaker 2: things are very highly linked to ETF flows. So the
• 34:43
  Speaker 2: average person on the street, like you and I, we
• 34:45
  Speaker 2: don't go out and buy massive gold bars like the
• 34:47
  Speaker 2: central banks do. The easiest way of us access in
• 34:50
  Speaker 2: gold is to buy gold ETF that's backed by gold,
• 34:53
  Speaker 2: and the relationship between uncertainty and ETF flows is through
• 34:57
  Speaker 2: the roof. So uncertainty is measured in a variety of ways.
• 35:00
  Speaker 2: There's lots of indices out there, trade uncertainty, geopolitical uncertainty,
• 35:04
  Speaker 2: et cetera, et cetera. You can go on the web
• 35:06
  Speaker 2: and find these things everywhere. My favorite is Economic Policy Uncertainty.
• 35:10
  Speaker 2: It's an uncertainty index developed by some professors at the
• 35:13
  Speaker 2: University of Chicago. You get daily versions, weekly versions, and
• 35:17
  Speaker 2: if you plot it alongside ETF flows, they go up
• 35:19
  Speaker 2: and down together. So the question is is uncertainty likely
• 35:23
  Speaker 2: to come down? And my answer is no, not at
• 35:26
  Speaker 2: least in the next three years.
• 35:27
  Speaker 1: I can see where you might feel like that. Yes, listen,
• 35:32
  Speaker 1: let's go back if you if you don't mind too
• 35:35
  Speaker 1: energy And how is it best for an ordinary passing
• 35:38
  Speaker 1: to invest in the energy markets at the moment? I
• 35:40
  Speaker 1: mean it feels like it's very very hard to forcast
• 35:43
  Speaker 1: the oil price. I mean you said that forecasts are
• 35:46
  Speaker 1: all over the blaze and nobody even knows whether the
• 35:48
  Speaker 1: demand is going to be up or down over the
• 35:49
  Speaker 1: next decade, etc. So if you want to be invested
• 35:53
  Speaker 1: somehow in energy, where do you go? I mean, honestly,
• 35:57
  Speaker 1: obviously copper is a good answer, but an answer it
• 36:00
  Speaker 1: isn't copper.
• 36:00
  Speaker 2: Yeah, well, so for you know, the simplest way, simplest
• 36:06
  Speaker 2: I use inverted commas on that is to access the
• 36:09
  Speaker 2: energy complex through things like ETFs or even if you're
• 36:13
  Speaker 2: a little bit more sophisticated, buying or selling futures or
• 36:17
  Speaker 2: options on futures.
• 36:18
  Speaker 1: The problem, you know, we don't want to do that.
• 36:20
  Speaker 1: We absolutely don't want to do that. We are simple
• 36:22
  Speaker 1: people here with simple people. We want to buy an
• 36:25
  Speaker 1: equity or we want to buy any ETFEA and we
• 36:28
  Speaker 1: want to buy a straightforward, properly exposed to the physical
• 36:31
  Speaker 1: ETF nothing else with Yeah.
• 36:32
  Speaker 2: I mean this is this is probably the most sensible
• 36:34
  Speaker 2: way of accessing these markets. Now, I do have to
• 36:37
  Speaker 2: be bearish on oil going forward in case. I didn't
• 36:39
  Speaker 2: mention that before, so I wouldn't.
• 36:41
  Speaker 1: Probably you weren't quite clear enough on that. That was
• 36:43
  Speaker 1: pretty much what the question was. You were totally clearly there.
• 36:46
  Speaker 2: Is yes, So I'm not sure I would. I would
• 36:49
  Speaker 2: recommend that to people, But if you were in the
• 36:51
  Speaker 2: interest of getting access in that, I think going through
• 36:54
  Speaker 2: the energy companies themselves, or at least an ETF link
• 36:59
  Speaker 2: to those companies the most sensible. But I would stay
• 37:01
  Speaker 2: away from the actual flat price of energy through futures
• 37:05
  Speaker 2: and options because we have funny shaped curves the forward curve,
• 37:09
  Speaker 2: and if you invest in the front, you're going to
• 37:11
  Speaker 2: lose money as it rolls down the curve, et cetera.
• 37:13
  Speaker 2: So stay away from that.
• 37:14
  Speaker 1: We don't do that. What about the oil services companies
• 37:17
  Speaker 1: in the US? Now they for this for this very
• 37:19
  Speaker 1: reason things we were discussing Eliot with Venezuelan and they
• 37:21
  Speaker 1: had bit of a pop after the incident. What about those.
• 37:25
  Speaker 2: I'm not an equity analyst, so I tend to stay
• 37:28
  Speaker 2: away with making judgments on particular sectors. Within energy and
• 37:32
  Speaker 2: particularly the companies themselves. But you'd have to imagine, you know,
• 37:36
  Speaker 2: aside from Venezuela and potential opportunities there for using US
• 37:41
  Speaker 2: energy services companies. You know, if you're talking about a
• 37:45
  Speaker 2: market that is going to go through some sort of
• 37:46
  Speaker 2: bearish cycle, which is what I think it's going to
• 37:50
  Speaker 2: do in the next year, at least maybe two years,
• 37:52
  Speaker 2: is I'm not sure I would look at those sectors, Okay.
• 37:55
  Speaker 1: And the bet can we just go back briefly to
• 37:57
  Speaker 1: the bear's cycle, because I don't think we completely cover
• 37:59
  Speaker 1: up and we will talking about oil that is based
• 38:01
  Speaker 1: on what because we don't expect demand of all off
• 38:04
  Speaker 1: over the next couple of years.
• 38:05
  Speaker 2: But you yeah, well, we don't expect demand to come off.
• 38:10
  Speaker 2: It's not going to go negative, but the rate of
• 38:12
  Speaker 2: growth is slowing every year, and it will slow all
• 38:15
  Speaker 2: the way up to one hundred and thirteen million barrels
• 38:17
  Speaker 2: a day, as I mentioned before. But it's about the
• 38:20
  Speaker 2: supply side. So OPEK has been cutting oil production slash
• 38:25
  Speaker 2: exports to keep prices at a high enough level so
• 38:29
  Speaker 2: the cost of extraction in the open members is fully covered,
• 38:33
  Speaker 2: but also the social costs within each country is covered.
• 38:37
  Speaker 2: But at some point they've given up and they've said, Okay,
• 38:40
  Speaker 2: we're going to produce more because we want more of
• 38:43
  Speaker 2: the volume that we've been holding back on, which enables
• 38:46
  Speaker 2: places like Brazil, Guyana, the US and Canada to enjoy
• 38:50
  Speaker 2: that incremental demand growth by adding that supply. So they've
• 38:54
  Speaker 2: reversed course and said we're not doing that anymore. We're
• 38:56
  Speaker 2: bringing back oil into the market. So when you add
• 38:58
  Speaker 2: in what the develop market is producing, when you add
• 39:02
  Speaker 2: in what Opek is putting back into the market, and
• 39:05
  Speaker 2: then you subtract from that the incremental demand that we
• 39:07
  Speaker 2: might get next year, we end up with a surplus
• 39:10
  Speaker 2: of about three million barrels a day of on one
• 39:15
  Speaker 2: hundred and four million barrel a day market, which is
• 39:17
  Speaker 2: gigantic as a percentage. And because of that, that means
• 39:20
  Speaker 2: that inventories build around the world. They swell up. We've
• 39:24
  Speaker 2: got plenty of oil, and prices collapse. The reason why
• 39:26
  Speaker 2: they haven't collapsed right now is because China has been
• 39:29
  Speaker 2: buying all for its strategic petroleum reserve, which is a
• 39:32
  Speaker 2: whole different conversation in itself. But when they stop, that's
• 39:36
  Speaker 2: when inventories kind of grow rapidly, and that's when prices
• 39:39
  Speaker 2: come off next year.
• 39:41
  Speaker 1: Okay, so this is absolutely fabulous news if we think
• 39:45
  Speaker 1: as we do that, you know, all activity is energy transformed.
• 39:49
  Speaker 1: The cheaper energy is the better for everybody. And we
• 39:52
  Speaker 1: know so many horrible recessions have been prompted by high
• 39:55
  Speaker 1: oil prices. Seeing oil prices go lower and exactly high
• 40:00
  Speaker 1: in historical context at the moment, seeing them going lower
• 40:03
  Speaker 1: will be absolutely fabulous for global economic growth.
• 40:06
  Speaker 2: It totally well. I mean, you know, I'm not talking
• 40:09
  Speaker 2: for a collapse in all prices. Our official forecast as
• 40:12
  Speaker 2: it goes for Brent anyway, which is the more global market,
• 40:15
  Speaker 2: to go to about fifty dollars by the end of
• 40:17
  Speaker 2: the year. And we're at sixty right now. So we're
• 40:19
  Speaker 2: not talking about a twenty or a thirty percent decline.
• 40:22
  Speaker 2: And if I turn around and I tell my economists, hey,
• 40:24
  Speaker 2: I've got some good news oils coming down, what does
• 40:26
  Speaker 2: that mean for inflation? What does this mean for GDP growth?
• 40:29
  Speaker 2: They don't get overly excited by the level that I've
• 40:31
  Speaker 2: just explained there, but obviously at the margin, this is
• 40:34
  Speaker 2: very positive for people's pockets.
• 40:36
  Speaker 1: Excellent, brilliant, Thank you, Michael. See how we are ended
• 40:39
  Speaker 1: there on a positive note, see how that works.
• 40:41
  Speaker 2: We're done.
• 40:42
  Speaker 1: We are Thanks for listening to this week's Marrying Talks Money.
• 40:48
  Speaker 1: If you like us, show, rate, review, and subscribe wherever
• 40:51
  Speaker 1: you listen to podcasts and keep sending questions or comments
• 40:54
  Speaker 1: and Merrin Money at Bloomberg dot net. Also follow me
• 40:56
  Speaker 1: and John on Twitter or x I'm at marinsw and
• 40:59
  Speaker 1: John is John on The Scorest Effect. This episode was
• 41:02
  Speaker 1: hosted by me baron Sunset What. It was produced by
• 41:05
  Speaker 1: Samasadi and Moses and sound designed by Blake Mabels and
• 41:08
  Speaker 1: Aaron Casper. And special thanks of course to Michael Hay