Latest / Radio Baloney - The Richie Baloney Show! / Trudeau Continues Dystopian Attack On Free Speech

Transcript

Trudeau Continues Dystopian Attack On Free Speech · Radio Baloney - The Richie Baloney Show!

• 0:03
  Speaker 1: So Trudeau's liberals blink on censorship bill, but the fight
• 0:07
  Speaker 1: isn't over. Trudeau is not going to give up on
• 0:09
  Speaker 1: his censorship. It's dear to him. Crushing Canadians rights, basic
• 0:15
  Speaker 1: human rights like the right to express yourself is that's
• 0:19
  Speaker 1: one of his missions in life. He is absolutely dedicated
• 0:22
  Speaker 1: to that, crushing dissent. So breaking news. The Trudeau Liberals
• 0:26
  Speaker 1: blinked on their censorship law bill C. Sixty three. They
• 0:30
  Speaker 1: haven't canceled it, but they've decided to split it into
• 0:33
  Speaker 1: two parts. They're proceeding quickly on the first part, which
• 0:36
  Speaker 1: includes things like banning revenge porn and sex trafficking. By
• 0:42
  Speaker 1: the way, revenge porn was already banned by Steven Harper
• 0:44
  Speaker 1: ten years ago, and CP was banned decades ago. Obviously,
• 0:50
  Speaker 1: those who were obviously added to the censorship bill as
• 0:52
  Speaker 1: a distraction from their real purpose. I called it, you know,
• 0:56
  Speaker 1: a trojan horse bill, right. They put the stuff in it,
• 0:59
  Speaker 1: of course everybody's against as the face of it, and
• 1:02
  Speaker 1: then hid these absolutely dystopian ideas, these absolutely dystopian laws
• 1:10
  Speaker 1: inside of it.
• 1:11
  Speaker 2: Like let's take a quick look. We'll do a quick refresher.
• 1:14
  Speaker 1: I've made videos on Bill C sixty three, where I've
• 1:17
  Speaker 1: actually gone through the bill itself. You guys can find
• 1:19
  Speaker 1: that on my channel. If you're not subscribed to the channel,
• 1:22
  Speaker 1: please subscribe. You can see all of my fine, my wonderful,
• 1:25
  Speaker 1: my educational videos. Let's see what's in Bill C sixty
• 1:28
  Speaker 1: three and why are we alarmed? So this is from
• 1:32
  Speaker 1: the British Columbia Civil Liberties Association. So let's see the
• 1:37
  Speaker 1: parts that we are really concerned about are. Part two
• 1:41
  Speaker 1: proposes to make several amendments to the Criminal Code, increasing
• 1:45
  Speaker 1: penalties for hate speech related crimes, which I have the
• 1:49
  Speaker 1: beholder of course, the worst among these being life imprisonment.
• 1:54
  Speaker 1: I didn't misread that life imprisonment as a potential penalty
• 1:59
  Speaker 1: for all crime in all federal offenses. If a new
• 2:03
  Speaker 1: hate motivation offense is attached, it would also introduce a
• 2:07
  Speaker 1: new peace bond that aims to restrict people from potentially
• 2:12
  Speaker 1: hateful behavior, again in the eye of the beholder, before
• 2:16
  Speaker 1: they have done anything illegal.
• 2:18
  Speaker 2: That's the pre crime part of the bill.
• 2:22
  Speaker 1: The unbelievably dystopian pre crime part of the bill, punishing
• 2:28
  Speaker 1: you for things you haven't done. Part three will reintroduce
• 2:32
  Speaker 1: a section of the Canadian Human Rights Sect to enable
• 2:35
  Speaker 1: human rights complaints for Internet communications, so as a part
• 2:41
  Speaker 1: of that, complainants could request to be anonymous or could
• 2:46
  Speaker 1: potentially include a large number of people who see a
• 2:49
  Speaker 1: viral post. While the tribunals monetary rewards could rise to
• 2:54
  Speaker 1: twenty thousand dollars, there is a real danger that people
• 2:57
  Speaker 1: will use the new provision to gain money or to
• 3:00
  Speaker 1: carry out a grudge, given how ineffective this would be.
• 3:05
  Speaker 1: The bcc LA has also urged government to sever Part three.
• 3:11
  Speaker 1: So this is the kind of starsy informant part of this.
• 3:18
  Speaker 1: So somebody can anonymously complain to Human Rights Commission. Who
• 3:23
  Speaker 1: would a drag you in front of a kangaroo court
• 3:26
  Speaker 1: called a human rights tribunal in Canada, where there's no
• 3:30
  Speaker 1: real evidentiary rules, there's no presumption of innocence. They have
• 3:35
  Speaker 1: a one hundred percent conviction right for hate, hate basically anything.
• 3:42
  Speaker 2: To do with hate.
• 3:43
  Speaker 1: It's a far left kangaroo court, so they can have
• 3:46
  Speaker 1: you dragged in front of this tribunal all at your
• 3:49
  Speaker 1: own cost. Meanwhile, the complainant, the person who anonymously complained
• 3:53
  Speaker 1: about you, has absolutely no responsibility. The government takes on
• 3:57
  Speaker 1: all financial burden, right, if you're found that you have
• 4:02
  Speaker 1: committed a crime against wokeness. And that's really what this
• 4:05
  Speaker 1: comes down to, because this is all these are all
• 4:08
  Speaker 1: far leftist institutions, right with no objectivity. If they think
• 4:14
  Speaker 1: that you did a hate the person who complained anonymously,
• 4:18
  Speaker 1: who takes none of the responsibility for it, none of
• 4:20
  Speaker 1: the financial burden for it, the government takes all of that.
• 4:23
  Speaker 1: They can be awarded up to twenty thousand dollars, and
• 4:26
  Speaker 1: you can bet right now they will be not only
• 4:29
  Speaker 1: that they don't mention it here, but the government can
• 4:32
  Speaker 1: also get their hand in your pocket for up to
• 4:34
  Speaker 1: fifty thousand dollars. So somebody makes an anonymous complaint, you
• 4:38
  Speaker 1: go to the kangaroo court, which will find you guilty,
• 4:41
  Speaker 1: and now you're out up to seventy thousand dollars, not
• 4:44
  Speaker 1: including your own legal fees, and god knows how much
• 4:47
  Speaker 1: that could be.
• 4:48
  Speaker 2: What is this? This is to punish dissent.
• 4:51
  Speaker 1: This is to punish people who dissent against the woke
• 4:55
  Speaker 1: orthodoxy in Canada, in the Canadian institutions, certainly in these
• 5:00
  Speaker 1: kangaroo human human rights tribunals, kangaroo courts. This is Trudeau
• 5:06
  Speaker 1: getting activists, far left activists to do his dirty work
• 5:10
  Speaker 1: for him, his censorship, dirty work for him to intimidate
• 5:14
  Speaker 1: everybody who would dissent against far left orthodoxy, Trudeau's far
• 5:19
  Speaker 1: left orthodoxy. This is to intimidate them, to prevent them
• 5:23
  Speaker 1: from ever saying anything deemed politically correct again, out of
• 5:28
  Speaker 1: fear that some anonymous activist is going to put them
• 5:33
  Speaker 1: through hell and is going to be laughing about it,
• 5:35
  Speaker 1: because all they had to do is make a complaint
• 5:38
  Speaker 1: and then Trudeau Stasi is going to do all the
• 5:41
  Speaker 1: work for them. This is outrageous and insane, totally insane.
• 5:46
  Speaker 1: That's not even mentioning the pre crime part of it.
• 5:50
  Speaker 1: You haven't done anything, but some activist judge decides, well,
• 5:53
  Speaker 1: you might do a hate in the future. So now
• 5:56
  Speaker 1: you've got twelve months of house arrest and if you
• 5:59
  Speaker 1: don't like that, well we can just throw you straight
• 6:01
  Speaker 1: into prison.
• 6:02
  Speaker 2: Insanity, So let's go back. Let's see they say.
• 6:06
  Speaker 1: They're going to split off the censorship provisions and go
• 6:08
  Speaker 1: slower on those. This is a win for freedom of
• 6:12
  Speaker 1: speech and the seventy five thousand Canadians who have signed
• 6:16
  Speaker 1: our petition. But as you can see, in the video here,
• 6:19
  Speaker 1: the liberals still say they're committed to bringing in those
• 6:22
  Speaker 1: censorship provisions. The insane or welly in censorship provisions. This
• 6:28
  Speaker 1: could be a trick to make us lower our guard,
• 6:31
  Speaker 1: So splitting it off could be a trick. I have
• 6:34
  Speaker 1: personally heard C sixty three referred to by several journalists
• 6:38
  Speaker 1: as the quote kill rebel bills or in other words,
• 6:42
  Speaker 1: kill rebel news bill. Of course it is because we're
• 6:45
  Speaker 1: one of the few news outlets that doesn't take money
• 6:47
  Speaker 1: from Trudeau, so we're one of the few news outlets
• 6:50
  Speaker 1: that can't be controlled by Trudeau. I think it goes
• 6:53
  Speaker 1: much wider to just obviously anybody who would dare to
• 6:58
  Speaker 1: say something politically correct. According to according to the woke
• 7:03
  Speaker 1: commissars who are running Canada now, in every institution, it's
• 7:07
  Speaker 1: about intimidating everybody, just putting a blanket of fear over
• 7:12
  Speaker 1: the anybody on social media.
• 7:15
  Speaker 2: Let's see what, let's watch this.
• 7:18
  Speaker 3: Part two of the bill will be the Criminal Code
• 7:21
  Speaker 3: amendments and the Canadian Human Rights and Act amendments that
• 7:24
  Speaker 3: deal with the important combat against Aldred. These bills will
• 7:28
  Speaker 3: proceed on different tracks.
• 7:30
  Speaker 1: We're putting our important combat against hatred. What does that
• 7:35
  Speaker 1: mean exactly, Well, it's pretty vague in the bill. I
• 7:38
  Speaker 1: can tell you that Rebel has been quite important in
• 7:42
  Speaker 1: fighting for free speech in Canada and they've really been
• 7:46
  Speaker 1: on the front lines of it. I mean, the Trudeau
• 7:49
  Speaker 1: regime is constantly arresting their reporters like David Menzies. They
• 7:53
  Speaker 1: just arrested ezra Levant for trying to do journalism. They're
• 7:57
  Speaker 1: not hiding it, he says. Here. C sixty three will
• 8:01
  Speaker 1: create three new different censorship agencies in Canada. It would
• 8:06
  Speaker 1: give the Canadian Human Rights Commission the power to investigate
• 8:09
  Speaker 1: anyone in Canada for anything they post online or have
• 8:13
  Speaker 1: ever posted online in the past.
• 8:15
  Speaker 2: That's the other thing too.
• 8:16
  Speaker 1: You could have posted something twenty years ago, doesn't matter.
• 8:20
  Speaker 1: If an activist sees it and sees an opportunity there,
• 8:23
  Speaker 1: you may very well end up being put through legal
• 8:26
  Speaker 1: hell and lawfare by these the Human Rights Commission of
• 8:30
  Speaker 1: the Human Rights Tribunals because some activists didn't like it.
• 8:34
  Speaker 1: It would set up twenty thousand dollars bounties. That's a
• 8:38
  Speaker 1: great word for it, bounties. There's a financial there's an
• 8:42
  Speaker 1: extreme perverse incentive here for people to go after you,
• 8:46
  Speaker 1: because again, I mean, that's just free money. Why not
• 8:50
  Speaker 1: just make one hundred a thousand claims right, oh, a
• 8:52
  Speaker 1: lot of them sticks twenty thousand dollars bounties for anyone
• 8:56
  Speaker 1: who makes a complaint that's successful. It would give the
• 8:59
  Speaker 1: courts the power to make hate speech restraining orders to
• 9:03
  Speaker 1: stop people from saying things even before they do, even
• 9:06
  Speaker 1: putting them under house arrest. Our motto is telling the
• 9:10
  Speaker 1: other side of the story. But you can't do that
• 9:12
  Speaker 1: if the government tells you that you can't even say something.
• 9:16
  Speaker 1: We constantly challenge government censorship and we've had to spend
• 9:20
  Speaker 1: more than five hundred thousand dollars this year alone on
• 9:24
  Speaker 1: free speech lawyers. So you can see that it's free
• 9:29
  Speaker 1: speech is in a sad state in Canada. And if
• 9:32
  Speaker 1: this bill goes through, it's much worse. I mean, then
• 9:36
  Speaker 1: it becomes truly a dystopia. At that point, I mean,
• 9:38
  Speaker 1: could I even do this channel That's a serious question,
• 9:42
  Speaker 1: a serious question. So we shall see. I mean, my
• 9:45
  Speaker 1: hope is that this doesn't get through before Trudeau's out,
• 9:50
  Speaker 1: but you know he's gonna try, He's going to be
• 9:53
  Speaker 1: trying desperately. I mean, maybe he's just hanging on not resigning,
• 9:57
  Speaker 1: so we can try and get it through and maybe
• 9:59
  Speaker 1: with the hopes that, you know, putting that terror on
• 10:02
  Speaker 1: the population, which this is what that's what this is.
• 10:05
  Speaker 1: This is terrorism against independent thought, against independent media, against
• 10:11
  Speaker 1: any dissident channel in Canada. This is government terrorism against
• 10:17
  Speaker 1: that right. Maybe he would think that, you know, if
• 10:21
  Speaker 1: he's if he's able to silence enough voices before the
• 10:24
  Speaker 1: next election, he can somehow sneak out of minority government.
• 10:27
  Speaker 2: I don't know, but it's damn wrong. Let's see.
• 10:30
  Speaker 1: MEDUSA said, I just signed the petition Stop the Censorship
• 10:34
  Speaker 1: dot CAA.
• 10:35
  Speaker 2: Yeah.
• 10:37
  Speaker 1: Anyway, that's all I'm going to say about that. Please like,
• 10:39
  Speaker 1: share and subscribe. Subscribing really helps me out. I thank
• 10:43
  Speaker 1: you for that. I will see you next time.