Latest / The Vault: The Epstein Files / Hillary Clinton And The Transcript From Her Epstein Related Talk With Congress (Part 14) (9/18/26)

Transcript

Hillary Clinton And The Transcript From Her Epstein Related Talk With Congress (Part 14) (9/18/26) · The Vault: The Epstein Files

• 0:00
  Speaker 1: What's up everyone and welcome to another episode of the
• 0:03
  Speaker 1: Epstein Chronicles. In this episode, we're going to pick up
• 0:06
  Speaker 1: where we left off with the Hillary Clinton transcript from
• 0:09
  Speaker 1: her trip to Congress. And now doing the questioning is
• 0:13
  Speaker 1: Scott Perry. Good afternoon, Madam Secretary. Answer. Good afternoon. Question.
• 0:20
  Speaker 1: You live in a particularly beautiful part of the country. Answer.
• 0:24
  Speaker 1: Thank you. Question. Good for you. Answer. It's very pretty
• 0:28
  Speaker 1: up here. Question, Madam Secretary, once it was revealed publicly
• 0:32
  Speaker 1: that you and President Clinton were connected, I'm going to
• 0:35
  Speaker 1: use that term, to Jeffrey Epstein and Glenn Maxwell, did
• 0:39
  Speaker 1: you discuss the subject with your daughter? Answer, I'm not
• 0:42
  Speaker 1: going to talk about what I did or didn't discuss
• 0:44
  Speaker 1: with family members, but I can tell you that it
• 0:47
  Speaker 1: was something that was a grave concern to us. Scott Perry,
• 0:50
  Speaker 1: I imagine it was, and I know that you're, look,
• 0:53
  Speaker 1: I think we could probably get a long way here
• 0:55
  Speaker 1: if we could discuss or have a view into your
• 0:58
  Speaker 1: discussion with your husband. I suspect you're going to object
• 1:00
  Speaker 1: to that. Answer. You're right, Congressman. Thank you for granting
• 1:05
  Speaker 1: me that. Question. These are reasonable questions. Clinton. But Congressman.
• 1:11
  Speaker 1: He cuts her off. Did your daughter discuss it with you? Answer. Well,
• 1:15
  Speaker 1: we were all horrified by what was later. Cut off
• 1:18
  Speaker 1: again by Perry. Horrified in what way? We were all
• 1:21
  Speaker 1: horrified of what we learned about Jeffrey Epstein, Glenn Maxwell,
• 1:25
  Speaker 1: the victims. Clinton. Right, right. Question. But did you discuss
• 1:29
  Speaker 1: with your daughter when you say you were horrified the
• 1:32
  Speaker 1: connection with her father and the Epstein episode? Answer, my
• 1:36
  Speaker 1: husband's connection with Jeffrey Epstein began and ended before he
• 1:39
  Speaker 1: was charged with any crime. And so in retrospect, we
• 1:42
  Speaker 1: all say, oh my gosh, that was horrific. And why
• 1:45
  Speaker 1: didn't more people know? And why didn't more people speak
• 1:49
  Speaker 1: out at the time? But I think the chronology is
• 1:52
  Speaker 1: critically important. If we're talking about post-crime, that there was
• 1:56
  Speaker 1: a continuing connection with them That would be unacceptable, but
• 2:00
  Speaker 1: it ended before he was charged. Question, I understand that,
• 2:04
  Speaker 1: which is why I particularly said once it was revealed publicly.
• 2:08
  Speaker 1: I get that continuing to be involved with someone like
• 2:10
  Speaker 1: that after it was knowledgeable to everyone would be almost
• 2:14
  Speaker 1: an unforgivable sin. However, I'm married too. Not as long
• 2:18
  Speaker 1: as you, ma'am, but there would be questions in my family.
• 2:21
  Speaker 1: Even if I went back before we were married, there
• 2:23
  Speaker 1: would be questions. Congressman? The lawyer jumps in. I don't
• 2:27
  Speaker 1: want to interrupt you, but I don't understand the question.
• 2:31
  Speaker 1: Scott Perry. So my question is, did your daughter discuss
• 2:33
  Speaker 1: it with you? That was my particular question. Answer. I
• 2:38
  Speaker 1: think I can't recollect any specific conversation, but of course
• 2:41
  Speaker 1: we discussed the horrific crimes that he was accused of. Question,
• 2:45
  Speaker 1: but nothing about her father's connection to it. Answer. Her
• 2:49
  Speaker 1: father's connection began and ended before he was charged with crimes. Question.
• 2:53
  Speaker 1: Did your daughter ever mention to you? That she discussed
• 2:55
  Speaker 1: this matter with her father? Answer. I don't recollect that. Question.
• 2:59
  Speaker 1: Did you see photos of your husband with young girls
• 3:02
  Speaker 1: related to Jeffrey Epstein? Answer. I saw the few photos
• 3:05
  Speaker 1: that my lawyer showed me. Question. Right. Did you see
• 3:08
  Speaker 1: the photos of your husband with Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell? Answer.
• 3:13
  Speaker 1: I have seen such photos. Question. They're out there, right? Answer. Yeah. Question.
• 3:17
  Speaker 1: I imagine you're familiar, but I just want to make sure.
• 3:20
  Speaker 1: Since seeing these photos, have any questions about the content, location,
• 3:24
  Speaker 1: General circumstances come to your mind? Answer, no. It was
• 3:28
  Speaker 1: unfortunate that he ever did anything with Jeffrey Epstein. Question,
• 3:32
  Speaker 1: there was no curiosity? Lawyer jumps in, excuse me, are
• 3:36
  Speaker 1: you asking for an opinion? Or is there a fact
• 3:39
  Speaker 1: that she can share with you that would be helpful
• 3:41
  Speaker 1: in your investigation? Perry, well, I did say. There were
• 3:45
  Speaker 1: any questions? I'll give you an example. If I saw
• 3:48
  Speaker 1: a picture with my wife, it's just really hard to
• 3:51
  Speaker 1: be relevant. If my wife saw pictures with me as
• 3:54
  Speaker 1: a grown man, hanging out with obviously or close to
• 3:57
  Speaker 1: underage women, regardless if it was before we were married
• 4:00
  Speaker 1: or not, it would be a question. And so what
• 4:03
  Speaker 1: I'm asking you is, did any question regarding those photographs
• 4:06
  Speaker 1: come to your mind? Answer, I'm going to just as
• 4:10
  Speaker 1: clearly as I can state this, say I don't see
• 4:12
  Speaker 1: the relevance of your question, and I'm not going to
• 4:15
  Speaker 1: talk about conversations that I had with my family, especially
• 4:18
  Speaker 1: my husband. Question and for clarity, Are you all asserting
• 4:22
  Speaker 1: spousal privilege? Lawyer, for clarity, we're looking for the relevance
• 4:26
  Speaker 1: of her conversation with her husband and what she might
• 4:28
  Speaker 1: have thought about her conversations with. How does that help
• 4:31
  Speaker 1: further the legislative purpose of the committee as they investigate
• 4:35
  Speaker 1: the prosecution and investigation of Epstein? Lawyer, I think Mr.
• 4:40
  Speaker 1: Perry's questions directly relate to... The other lawyer jumps in.
• 4:44
  Speaker 1: To her daughter? To her husband? Clinton to what? My
• 4:46
  Speaker 1: state of mind? Lawyer, state of mind? Clinton... What possible
• 4:51
  Speaker 1: relevance does my state of mind have to the investigation?
• 4:55
  Speaker 1: So they go back and forth for a minute. Now
• 4:57
  Speaker 1: Clinton says, I'm not here to give opinions. I'm here
• 5:00
  Speaker 1: to answer factual questions. And I have answered for many
• 5:03
  Speaker 1: hours now that I had no relationship because I never
• 5:06
  Speaker 1: met the guy, to the best of my recollection, with
• 5:09
  Speaker 1: Jeffrey Epstein. Perry, and I'm not implying, and you shouldn't ever,
• 5:13
  Speaker 1: that I have made that connection. I'm not implying that.
• 5:17
  Speaker 1: You're still married, Madam Secretary? Still married, correct? Correct. Answer,
• 5:21
  Speaker 1: that's very true. Question, okay, can you identify the man
• 5:24
  Speaker 1: in these photos? Answer, I can't see them across the table. Question,
• 5:28
  Speaker 1: let me get them a little closer. Lawyer, so just
• 5:31
  Speaker 1: for the record, you would like her to identify pictures
• 5:33
  Speaker 1: of her spouse? Perry, yeah. Question, you need her to
• 5:36
  Speaker 1: testify on pictures of her spouse? Hillary Clinton, the 42nd
• 5:41
  Speaker 1: President of the United States of America? That's my husband. Question, okay,
• 5:44
  Speaker 1: do you know the location? Answer, I have no knowledge
• 5:47
  Speaker 1: of the location. I have context for the location. I
• 5:50
  Speaker 1: know nothing about the location. Question, if you were informed
• 5:54
  Speaker 1: that that's on Mr. Epstein's plane, lawyer, would you like
• 5:57
  Speaker 1: her to speculate based on your opinion or fact? Perry,
• 6:00
  Speaker 1: no ma'am, if you let me ask my question. If
• 6:03
  Speaker 1: you were informed that was on Mr. Epstein's plane, that
• 6:07
  Speaker 1: is known to have frequented not only the island, but
• 6:09
  Speaker 1: other locations where sexual abuse, horrific sexual abuse occurred, would
• 6:13
  Speaker 1: you have any questions about those photos and who's in them?
• 6:17
  Speaker 1: Lawyer jumps in, objection, calls for speculation. States facts, not
• 6:21
  Speaker 1: in evidence. I'm not instructing you not to answer. Hillary, well, no,
• 6:25
  Speaker 1: I'm not going to speculate. Perry, do you know the
• 6:27
  Speaker 1: names of any of the young girls in the photo
• 6:29
  Speaker 1: with your husband? Answer, the faces are blacked out. Congressman, correct,
• 6:34
  Speaker 1: that's the lawyer. Perry, I understand that, but the photos
• 6:37
  Speaker 1: are out there. Questioned by the lawyer, are you saying
• 6:40
  Speaker 1: she should be able to know who the individuals are
• 6:43
  Speaker 1: when they're in the photos and they're blacked out? Now,
• 6:46
  Speaker 1: Perry responds, what I'm saying is that a normal relationship
• 6:50
  Speaker 1: you would probably ask the person that you're sleeping with
• 6:52
  Speaker 1: who that person in the photo is. Lawyer, well, there
• 6:56
  Speaker 1: are many things that I would just like to stay,
• 6:58
  Speaker 1: and I'd like to stay on the record here, thank you.
• 7:00
  Speaker 1: Another lawyer jumps in. Let's wait for a question at
• 7:03
  Speaker 1: which you can give a factual answer. Clinton, that would
• 7:06
  Speaker 1: be helpful. Perry, are you aware of a single misstatement
• 7:09
  Speaker 1: of fact from any person who you know or believe
• 7:12
  Speaker 1: to be an Epstein victim? Answer, I have got no
• 7:17
  Speaker 1: knowledge of all the statements of fact. Question, so at
• 7:21
  Speaker 1: this point, the answer would be no. Answer, I don't know.
• 7:24
  Speaker 1: I have no way of knowing. Question, please don't mischaracterize
• 7:28
  Speaker 1: her statement. That's the lawyer. Perry again, are you aware
• 7:32
  Speaker 1: that your husband's name is noted multiple times in Jeffrey
• 7:35
  Speaker 1: Epstein's flight logs? Clinton, I think everyone knows that he
• 7:38
  Speaker 1: flew on Jeffrey Epstein's plane, as did many other people,
• 7:41
  Speaker 1: including Donald Trump. Stop asking me questions. Trump did it too. Yeah,
• 7:46
  Speaker 1: we'll get to that. Right now, we're talking about you.
• 7:49
  Speaker 1: and your brain-dead-ass husband. Perry, understood, understood. Well, I don't
• 7:54
  Speaker 1: know about that last one, but did you ever discuss
• 7:56
  Speaker 1: the fact that anyone or any organization that your husband's
• 8:00
  Speaker 1: name appeared on the flight logs? Clinton, I don't recall.
• 8:04
  Speaker 1: I mean, I've talked about it with my lawyers and
• 8:06
  Speaker 1: others assisting in my preparation, but I can't recall specifics. Question,
• 8:11
  Speaker 1: are you aware of trips made by your husband on
• 8:13
  Speaker 1: Jeffrey Epstein's numerous helicopters, whether piloted by Glenn Maxwell or
• 8:18
  Speaker 1: anyone else? Lawyer jumps in, objection, states facts, not in evidence. Answer,
• 8:25
  Speaker 1: I've never heard that. Question, are you aware of the allegation? Answer, no,
• 8:30
  Speaker 1: I was not. Question, the allegation does exist in the record.
• 8:34
  Speaker 1: Is that something you're curious about, Madam Secretary? Answer, I
• 8:37
  Speaker 1: have no awareness of it. Perry, questions are complete. Thank you, ma'am.
• 8:42
  Speaker 1: Next person up doing the questioning, Lauren Boebert from Colorado. Question, Ms. Clinton,
• 8:50
  Speaker 1: Madam Secretary, while we sat on the record today, are
• 8:53
  Speaker 1: you under oath? Answer, I am. Question, okay, have you
• 8:56
  Speaker 1: ever lied while being under oath? Answer, I have not. Question,
• 9:01
  Speaker 1: have you ever lied in a deposition? Answer, I have not. Question, okay,
• 9:05
  Speaker 1: thank you. Have you ever transmitted any information to Epstein
• 9:09
  Speaker 1: or Ghislaine Maxwell about the United States government? Answer, I
• 9:12
  Speaker 1: have not. Question, as has been mentioned many times here today,
• 9:16
  Speaker 1: Bill Clinton flew on Epstein's plane at least 26 times,
• 9:20
  Speaker 1: multiple international trips from 2002 to 2003, often with Maxwell.
• 9:26
  Speaker 1: When and how did you first learn of these trips?
• 9:29
  Speaker 1: And did you discuss them or review them with him
• 9:31
  Speaker 1: prior to taking the trips? Lawyer jumps in. It's a
• 9:35
  Speaker 1: compound question. I'm going to object to the latter part
• 9:38
  Speaker 1: of it. Lauren Boebert, sure. An instructor not to answer
• 9:41
  Speaker 1: on the grounds. And to this, Boebert cuts them off.
• 9:45
  Speaker 1: When and how did you learn of these trips? of
• 9:48
  Speaker 1: these trips. Clinton, I don't recall how I learned about them.
• 9:52
  Speaker 1: I knew that he was traveling on a number of
• 9:53
  Speaker 1: different planes owned by a number of different people, and
• 9:56
  Speaker 1: I don't recollect having conversations about the planes. We talked
• 10:00
  Speaker 1: about the work. We talked about the meetings that he had.
• 10:03
  Speaker 1: We talked about his efforts to try to persuade countries
• 10:06
  Speaker 1: to invest in low-cost aid trucks. That's what we talked about. Question,
• 10:11
  Speaker 1: did you discuss who he'd be traveling with? Answer, I
• 10:14
  Speaker 1: did not. I don't have any recollection of that. Question, Ms. Clinton?
• 10:18
  Speaker 1: When did you find out that your husband was spending
• 10:20
  Speaker 1: time extensively with a registered sex offender? Clinton. He did not.
• 10:24
  Speaker 1: Not after. Boebert. Okay. Clinton. He was convicted years after
• 10:29
  Speaker 1: Bill stopped having any relationship. Question. Were there any activities
• 10:33
  Speaker 1: that raised a red flag to think that he could
• 10:35
  Speaker 1: be charged of sex crimes during the time that Clinton?
• 10:39
  Speaker 1: Lawyer jumps in. Are you asking if she has awareness? Boebert. Yes.
• 10:43
  Speaker 1: Clinton of Jeffrey Epstein. Boebert. Of any red flags being
• 10:48
  Speaker 1: brought to your awareness, to your family's awareness, while your
• 10:51
  Speaker 1: husband was spending time with Jeffrey Epstein? Answer, I have
• 10:54
  Speaker 1: no recollection of anyone bringing any red flags to me. Question,
• 10:58
  Speaker 1: so have any of the victims of Epstein or Maxwell
• 11:01
  Speaker 1: ever reached out to you in any way? Clinton, I
• 11:03
  Speaker 1: don't recall that. Question, you don't recall any reason a
• 11:07
  Speaker 1: victim may have reached out to you or your counsel?
• 11:11
  Speaker 1: Lawyer jumps in, excuse me, the question's asked and answered.
• 11:14
  Speaker 1: Lauren Boebert, I asked any. Lawyer jumps in and cuts
• 11:17
  Speaker 1: her off, whether or not any victim reached out to her,
• 11:20
  Speaker 1: and she said she didn't have any awareness of that. Boebert,
• 11:23
  Speaker 1: moving on. Ms. Clinton, are you aware of anyone ever
• 11:26
  Speaker 1: telling your husband that they had damaging information about him
• 11:30
  Speaker 1: that they would release? Answer, I have no awareness of that. Question,
• 11:34
  Speaker 1: did Epstein ever ask you or Mr. Clinton for any
• 11:36
  Speaker 1: favors of any kind? Answer, I never talked to Jeffrey Epstein. Question,
• 11:40
  Speaker 1: did Maxwell ever ask you or Mr. Clinton for any
• 11:43
  Speaker 1: favors of any kind? Answer, she did not ask me. Question,
• 11:48
  Speaker 1: did Epstein have any connection to her association with the
• 11:51
  Speaker 1: Clinton Foundation? Answer, there has been the allegation that he did,
• 11:55
  Speaker 1: but I don't have any factual basis for knowing one
• 11:57
  Speaker 1: way or the other. Question, okay. And as we discussed today,
• 12:02
  Speaker 1: the small amount donated historically and the $ 20, 000 to your campaign,
• 12:06
  Speaker 1: the 1999 Senate campaign. Lawyer Johnson, excuse me, could you
• 12:10
  Speaker 1: stay for the record? It was not the campaign. So
• 12:13
  Speaker 1: if you wouldn't mind just stating the fact. Boebert jumps
• 12:16
  Speaker 1: in $ 200, 000 or $ 20, 000 to Hillary's 1999 Senate campaign? Clinton, no. Lawyer,
• 12:22
  Speaker 1: that's inaccurate. No, it was a joint, Hillary says, a
• 12:26
  Speaker 1: joint state campaign. Boebert, joint campaign. Okay, sure. Okay, so
• 12:31
  Speaker 1: we've talked about those connections. In past public statements, as
• 12:35
  Speaker 1: in 2017 speeches and interviews, you described Pizzagate as a
• 12:39
  Speaker 1: baseless conspiracy theory, alleging you and others ran a child
• 12:43
  Speaker 1: sex trafficking ring from a Washington pizzeria basement. Have you
• 12:47
  Speaker 1: reviewed any of the 2025-2026 Epstein files that were released
• 12:52
  Speaker 1: that you believe reference or relate to those specific 2016
• 12:56
  Speaker 1: claims regarding the Podesta emails? Comment Ping Pong Pizza used
• 13:00
  Speaker 1: as code possibly? Lawyer jumps in. You're asking her about
• 13:05
  Speaker 1: whether she's reviewed emails, Boebert, yes, in the Epstein files. Lawyer,
• 13:10
  Speaker 1: which relate to the wacky Pizzagate scam? Boebert, You could
• 13:14
  Speaker 1: characterize it however you want. I just would like to
• 13:17
  Speaker 1: know if she was familiar with any of them. Lawyer,
• 13:20
  Speaker 1: excuse me, your question is about whether or not she
• 13:22
  Speaker 1: has reviewed any emails in the Epstein release files about Pizzagate?
• 13:27
  Speaker 1: Lauren Boebert, correct. Hillary Clinton, Pizzagate was totally made up.
• 13:31
  Speaker 1: It was an outrageous allegation that ended up hurting a
• 13:34
  Speaker 1: number of people that caused a deranged young man to
• 13:36
  Speaker 1: show up with an assault rifle and shoot up a
• 13:39
  Speaker 1: local pizzeria. I can't believe you're even referencing it. Boebert,
• 13:44
  Speaker 1: there are no connections to the language. Hillary Clinton, well
• 13:47
  Speaker 1: QAnon people believe there are. Lauren Boebert, I don't know
• 13:51
  Speaker 1: what QAnon people believe. Hillary Clinton, have at it, have
• 13:54
  Speaker 1: at it. Question, but you've accused certain parties, and I
• 13:58
  Speaker 1: think even right now today, of promoting or slow walking
• 14:01
  Speaker 1: information in ways that fuels conspiracies. In your view, did
• 14:05
  Speaker 1: any Epstein-Maxwell related investigation or file handling pre or post
• 14:10
  Speaker 1: 2019 contribute to intersect with the spread of Pizzagate-style theories
• 14:15
  Speaker 1: about Democratic figures? Hillary Clinton, I have no way of
• 14:18
  Speaker 1: answering that. Lawyer jumps in, calls for speculation. Boebert, have
• 14:23
  Speaker 1: you or your representatives identified any Epstein file content that's
• 14:28
  Speaker 1: been misinterpreted online to revive those claims? And what steps,
• 14:31
  Speaker 1: if any, have you taken to clarify? Lawyer, again, object
• 14:36
  Speaker 1: to the grounds of speculation. Boebert, I think that is
• 14:39
  Speaker 1: all very reasonable. Clinton, well, first of all, I don't
• 14:42
  Speaker 1: follow the crazy conspiracy stories that are online. I regret
• 14:46
  Speaker 1: that anybody does. I find it quite sad, but also disturbing,
• 14:50
  Speaker 1: that people would believe some of what is put forth
• 14:53
  Speaker 1: like Pizzagate. So I have taken no steps to review
• 14:56
  Speaker 1: anything that might. Lauren Boebert, do you think pizza, Clinton,
• 15:01
  Speaker 1: have any connection to something? Boebert, sure. Clinton, which is
• 15:06
  Speaker 1: totally bogus. Boebert, John Podesta, your 2016 campaign chair, appears
• 15:12
  Speaker 1: in some Epstein file context, social overlaps, or mentions. Were
• 15:16
  Speaker 1: you aware of any of the Podesta-related communication in the
• 15:19
  Speaker 1: release files? Lawyer, can you please provide her examples or
• 15:23
  Speaker 1: the evidence that you would like us to review or
• 15:25
  Speaker 1: the exhibits that reflect that in order for her to
• 15:27
  Speaker 1: be able to do that? Answer, I can get some exhibits.
• 15:31
  Speaker 1: I'm pausing these questions in the meantime. All right, folks,
• 15:34
  Speaker 1: we're going to wrap up right here. And in the
• 15:35
  Speaker 1: next episode dealing with the topic, we're going to pick
• 15:37
  Speaker 1: up where we left off. All the information that goes
• 15:41
  Speaker 1: with this episode can be found in the description box.