Latest / Cultural Wars | America Out Loud News / The voter’s reckoning

Transcript

The voter’s reckoning · Cultural Wars | America Out Loud News

• 0:11
  Helping to secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity.
• 0:15
  This is the Constitution Study on the America Out Loud Network with your host, Paul Engel.
• 0:31
  As I've said repeatedly on this program, there are consequences, not only for how we vote, but how we decide whom to vote for.
• 0:41
  I guess you could say it's like the game show, truth or consequences.
• 0:45
  Only this time with voting.
• 0:47
  Hello there, everyday Americans, Paul Engel here with the Constitution Study, where we read and study the Constitution, teacher Iran generation be free.
• 0:54
  Glad you could join me today.
• 0:56
  You know, again, I see many, many, many, many Americans who, when it comes to their elected employees act like they had no part in what happened.
• 1:07
  They signed a line from Star Wars.
• 1:09
  It's not my fault.
• 1:11
  It's like you know, Han Solo trying to, you know, not take responsibility for the condition of the Millennium Falcon.
• 1:17
  But it is our fault.
• 1:19
  Everybody who's in elected off, even if you didn't vote for them, it's your fault.
• 1:25
  Maybe not individually, but collectively, it's our fault, and there are consequences for them.
• 1:31
  And well, if we simply ignore those facts, well, it doesn't mean the consequences go away.
• 1:39
  It just means that we get to suffer with them even more.
• 1:43
  Because the consequences of you not engaging with the problem is someone else decides.
• 1:50
  And let's take, for example, New York City.
• 1:52
  Now, New York City has a has a warm place in my heart as well as give me adjusta.
• 1:57
  See, I was born in New York City.
• 1:59
  I lived in the city until I was 11 years old.
• 2:02
  I I was down there frequently for business.
• 2:05
  I still have family that lives in the city.
• 2:08
  So when I saw them vote for a socialist mayor, I knew the trouble was coming.
• 2:14
  It was as obvious as, you know, standing in a train tunnel, standing on train tracks, looking at a light coming at you and saying, gee, I wonder if that's a train.
• 2:24
  Yeah.
• 2:25
  And it's right now running, starting to run over the people of New York City.
• 2:31
  Now, one of the issues you have with with a lot of these high tax locations, right?
• 2:35
  I I did not leave New York State because of the high taxes.
• 2:38
  Well, it was one of the reasons.
• 2:39
  It was not the chief reason.
• 2:42
  But it was I'd lived with high taxes my entire life.
• 2:46
  And now, as we're there's a uh reporting of a surge of wealthy New Yorkers leaving the city and moving to places like Florida and Texas, and yes, even Tennessee, where um the taxes are much lower.
• 3:02
  Uh some people turn around and say, no, no, no, that that's not really happening happening.
• 3:08
  Just listen to Mayor Mandami.
• 3:10
  And so for all of the discussion of the imagined exodus that would take place were we to tax the wealthiest New Yorkers by the appropriate amount.
• 3:20
  I say imagined because before I was a mayor, I was a state legislator and I was part of an effort to increase taxes on millionaires at that time.
• 3:27
  We were told the same thing then.
• 3:29
  And what we find now is that we have more millionaires today than we did at that time, even after having passed that tax.
• 3:35
  Okay, that sounds like a very interesting argument.
• 3:37
  Uh claiming that they're not losing, that the people are not leaving New York state, New York City, millionaires aren't leaving New York City because they have more than they did before, is a bit of a red herring.
• 3:49
  Because the evidence is even where I live here in Tennessee, people are leaving New York.
• 3:53
  They're going a lot of them are going to Florida.
• 3:55
  Again, some are coming to Tennessee because of the taxes.
• 4:00
  The fact that you have more millionaires that still live there, well, okay.
• 4:05
  Could that the question is why?
• 4:08
  Is it that the millionaires didn't leave, or that people who were not quite millionaires, you know, 2015, 20 years ago now have become millionaires?
• 4:18
  Because again, people tend to accumulate wealth over time.
• 4:22
  So uh, you know, a a recent Siena College polls showed that uh 27% of New York residents are planning to leave the state within the next five years, and 31 say they were they plan to leave when they retire.
• 4:36
  And again, it's not just Mr.
• 4:37
  Mondami, Governor Hokel, back on March 11, pleaded for wealthy Americans to move back from Florida, move back to the the empire in order to fund the state's quote-unquote generous social programs.
• 4:52
  So the exodus is real, you know, his idea of well, you have more.
• 4:57
  Gee, I wonder how many you would have had if you hadn't driven out the ones that we can prove were driven out of the state.
• 5:02
  But he's got some more here.
• 5:05
  And so for all of that conversation about this imagined exodus, we have to reckon with the very real exodus that we are seeing in the city.
• 5:13
  An exodus of working class people, an exodus of those who cannot afford to live here, and for many who work here, who now find their residence in Jersey City or in Connecticut or in Pennsylvania, anywhere else where their dollar can go a little bit further.
• 5:29
  And by the way, this is nothing new.
• 5:32
  People have been working in New York City, especially in Manhattan.
• 5:35
  First of all, you have to understand New York City is five boroughs, right?
• 5:39
  So Manhattan is the epicenter of a lot of the business.
• 5:44
  The outer boroughs, right?
• 5:46
  Staten Island, Queens, Bronx, Brooklyn, they were originally bedroom cities.
• 5:51
  They were where people who couldn't afford to live in the city went to live.
• 5:54
  They eventually got uh incorporated and then included in New York City.
• 5:59
  But for my entire life, people have lived in northern New Jersey, Jersey City, Hoboken, places like that.
• 6:06
  They've lived in in in southwestern Connecticut.
• 6:09
  And if to get away from the taxes, because they couldn't afford to live in New York City.
• 6:15
  And all if you look at the transportation system around New York City, look at the the commuter rail system, and what do you see?
• 6:24
  You have path going into New Jersey.
• 6:26
  You have whole railroads dedicated to getting people out of New York City, out onto Long Island, up into Connecticut, upstate New York, out in New Jersey.
• 6:35
  There is a whole infrastructure of rail system designed to get people out of New York City to live.
• 6:43
  Why?
• 6:44
  In Mondami's own words, where their dollar goes farther.
• 6:48
  Oh.
• 6:50
  So it's not just, I mean, people who couldn't afford to live in New York City have been moving out of New York City for decades.
• 6:57
  And um, again, this is this is nothing new.
• 7:00
  This is nothing new.
• 7:02
  This is just, we're saying, well, you know, eventually that even the rich people have had to leave New York City.
• 7:02
  This is just, we're saying, well, you know, eventually that even the rich people have had to leave New York City.
• 7:08
  But there was one more little comment I want you to listen to.
• 7:08
  But there was one more little comment I want you to listen to.
• 7:11
  And we've seen just in a snapshot from 2000 to 2020, the city lost 200,000 of its black residents.
• 7:11
  And we've seen just in a snapshot from 2000 to 2020, the city lost 200,000 of its black residents.
• 7:22
  That is the cost of inaction.
• 7:22
  That is the cost of inaction.
• 7:24
  So in other words, his issue isn't isn't the rich people.
• 7:24
  So in other words, his issue isn't isn't the rich people.
• 7:28
  We've had black people leaving.
• 7:28
  We've had black people leaving, you little racist.
• 7:32
  But again, notice is that's a cost of inaction.
• 7:35
  Well, yeah, your status quo, he talks about 2020 through your 2000 to 2020.
• 7:41
  What about the decades?
• 7:42
  What about the century, the last century where we've watched people leaving the city?
• 7:48
  And you're just going to ignore the fact that now, when rich people could still afford to live in New York City and in New York State, and now are deciding to leave.
• 7:59
  People who can't afford to live in the city have lived outside the city for you know for my entire life.
• 8:06
  In fact, there was even um uh what was there?
• 8:09
  There's a song made.
• 8:10
  Uh it was Bachman Turner Overdrive.
• 8:13
  They have a so-called taking care of business.
• 8:15
  And they talk about, you know, hey, you get up, you go, you take the 815 into the city.
• 8:20
  That's common around New York City.
• 8:22
  You get up early to get a train into New York City because you cannot afford to live in the city.
• 8:28
  Most people can't afford to live in the city.
• 8:30
  And again, Mr.
• 8:31
  Mondami, he's worried about the the uh the black people who had to leave because they couldn't afford to live in his city, and he wants to make it more expensive for him to live in this city.
• 8:43
  And now when you see that that it used to be, right, if you were rich, you could afford to live in the city.
• 8:48
  Even the rich are saying, no mosque, I've had enough.
• 8:52
  Now, like I said, when I moved out a little over 10 years ago, high taxes was not my primary reason for leaving.
• 9:01
  It was the corruption, it was the regulation.
• 9:03
  It was the socialist idea of um uh of the city, of the state that thought they could regulate every aspect of our lives.
• 9:13
  But when I got down here to Tennessee, it it was a bit of a culture shock, not the Southern, it was it had to do with taxes.
• 9:22
  You see, in New York City, I had to pay income tax or New York State, I had to pay income tax.
• 9:27
  And when I moved down here, I realized the sales tax down here is actually higher than it was up in New York when I lived up in New York State, almost two percentage points higher.
• 9:36
  And I was like, oh my God, did I did I miss something?
• 9:40
  And then I did the math.
• 9:42
  Yes, I pay higher sales tax down here, but you know what?
• 9:45
  A, I can avoid the sales tax, I can decide not to buy stuff.
• 9:48
  B, again, I did the math.
• 9:51
  I'd have to spend $400,000 a year, just spend it in order for my additional sales tax to offset the income tax I paid up in New York.
• 10:03
  So even though I see the sales, and again, it's part of seeing the taxes.
• 10:07
  I see them here, I know what they're doing.
• 10:10
  I can I can uh um adjust my lifestyle if I want to, as opposed to the hidden taxes, the income taxes, the ones that are collected from you before you even see them.
• 10:21
  And my other, and I love to tell this the to people who still live in the empire, uh, or as my cousin calls it, the Godforsaken country.
• 10:30
  And um I tell them I moved from five and a half acres of land with a 1600 square foot house to 70 acres of land with almost a 4,000 square foot house, and my property taxes are a third of what I paid for.
• 10:47
  So while it may not have been a driving factor, it certainly was an impact once I got out of this this high tax corridor.
• 10:57
  So what's uh the city's what's New York City's solution?
• 11:00
  What's New York State's solution in order to deal with this um uh the their taxing issues?
• 11:07
  They're the fact that they're writing cash that they're writing checks that um their governments can't cash.
• 11:13
  Well, it's another tax, of course.
• 11:16
  Governor Hochel and Mayor Mandami are proposing a tax on the second home that you hold in the city that's worth five million dollars or more.
• 11:26
  Meaning, uh if I understand this correctly, if you have a second, if you if your primary resident isn't in New York City, if you have a second home in the city, they want to add an extra tax just for because you have a second home.
• 11:40
  Well, if if that tax is worth $5 million or more, I don't know.
• 11:45
  I haven't been in New York City real estate, but I don't know what you get for $5 million as a home in New York City, but whatever.
• 11:52
  They they they think they're gonna raise half a billion dollars from they say non-residents because they have a secondary home in New York City.
• 12:02
  Now, listen, if you don't need, if it's just a secondary home, well, are you willing to pay that extra tax?
• 12:12
  Or that be just one more reason for you to leave the Godforsaken empire.
• 12:18
  Let's face it, New York City has a $5.4 billion budget deficit.
• 12:23
  And as I've been saying, they are um they're putting in, they're they're trying to spend more money they don't have, and they're trying to do it by taxing people rather rather than realizing you guess what?
• 12:36
  You don't have the money to spend it.
• 12:39
  You look at the city and state's budget problems, I'll bet you it's like it's like Congress's, it's not a taxing problem, it's a spending problem.
• 12:47
  But you have two Marxists.
• 12:49
  Now, Mayor Mandami is an avowed Marxist, he's an avowed socialist.
• 12:54
  Governor Hochel is simply an acting Marxist.
• 12:57
  He actually is a Marxist by by deed, if not by by admission.
• 13:01
  And their answer to everything is steal from somebody else so that we can give it to people we think deserve it.
• 13:08
  And you know what?
• 13:09
  If you have the means, you can go somewhere else.
• 13:14
  Let's face it.
• 13:15
  Uh, you know, if you if you have a second home in, if you can afford a second home in New York City, a home worth $5 million or more.
• 13:25
  That's a luxury you probably don't need, unless, of course, you do a lot of business in New York City, and and uh, you know, you you don't listen as your primary residence, but you're there a lot because it makes sense for for doing business.
• 13:39
  At that point, wouldn't it make more sense maybe to rent some place rather than buy a place?
• 13:46
  Again, you know, it it the these are the people that the that the people of New York City and of New York State have voted for to be their chief executives.
• 13:56
  And apparently that's what they want.
• 13:58
  They want to be driven into bankruptcy.
• 14:00
  Into bankruptcy.
• 14:02
  They want to drive people out of their city, out of their state.
• 14:02
  They want to drive people out of their city, out of their state.
• 14:07
  They want to destroy the very tax base they plan to use to fund their programs.
• 14:07
  They want to to destroy the very tax base they plan to use to fund their programs.
• 14:13
  And this is these are the people that the people of the empire have chosen.
• 14:13
  And this is these are the people that the people of the empire have chosen.
• 14:20
  You know, Hochel and Mondami were not foisted on the people of New York.
• 14:25
  They voted for them.
• 14:25
  They voted for them.
• 14:29
  They actually.
• 14:29
  They asked for them.
• 14:32
  This is their wish.
• 14:35
  It's who they voted for.
• 14:36
  It's who they wanted.
• 14:38
  And now, as they're suffering the consequences, suddenly we say, well, wait a second.
• 14:43
  Not only are middle income people who can't afford to live in the city moving out to commute into the city, but the wealthy people, they're not moving out to commute into the city.
• 14:54
  They're moving out of the state.
• 14:57
  See, if you have somebody that moves to northern New Jersey or to Southern Connecticut and commutes into the city, they're still working in the city, they're still paying city income tax.
• 15:10
  But when they move not just out of the city, but out of the state, when they go to Florida and Tennessee and Texas, not only does both the city and state lose, they lose that tax base.
• 15:19
  They lose that income.
• 15:22
  And now what are they going to do?
• 15:25
  The thing is, you know, there's an old adage.
• 15:28
  Um, what you want more of, you subsidize what you want less of, you tax.
• 15:33
  Well, if you're going to keep taxing wealthy people, you're gonna have less wealthy people to collect tax from.
• 15:40
  And the people that you that voted for you, they're the ones that are going to be suffering the consequences.
• 15:46
  And if they're not prepared for that, those consequences can be quite severe.
• 15:51
  Remember, proper preparation prevents poor performance.
• 15:54
  We want to be prepared.
• 15:55
  There's a lot of things I did to prepare to leave the state before I actually left the state.
• 16:00
  There's a lot of things I prepare to do, things that I hope I never have to do, but I'm prepared for anyway.
• 16:06
  Yes, I have uh you know, food stored in in my house.
• 16:10
  I part part of it's because I've lived in rural America most of my life, and I'm used to the idea of going to the grocery store once every week or two, not every day.
• 16:19
  But I have a fire extinguishers in my house.
• 16:22
  I have uh you know, emergency kits and trauma kits and first aid kits in my house in my car because not because I want them, but because when I need them, I really really need them.
• 16:34
  So, how can you be prepared for the emergencies in your life?
• 16:38
  Well, one of the things you can try, one of the things I suggest are the emergency kits from the wellness company.
• 16:44
  Go to AmericaOutloud.shop and click on the emergency kits panels.
• 16:47
  These are kits designed, well, for all different types of emergencies.
• 16:52
  But this is not the stuff you get at the uh the pharmacy.
• 16:56
  These have prescription drugs in them.
• 16:58
  They have a guidebook to help you use them.
• 17:00
  They've got the type of medical supplies that really make a difference.
• 17:03
  And if during COVID, you realize there were certain drugs you couldn't get because well, some bureaucrat said they they didn't help.
• 17:10
  You know what I'm talking about.
• 17:13
  They've got kits for general medical emergencies, first aid, travel.
• 17:17
  They have kits for children and and you know, even molden allergies.
• 17:22
  Best of all, since you listen to America out loud, use the code out loud at checkout, you'll get 20% off of your order.
• 17:29
  So give it a try.
• 17:30
  Go to AmericaOut Loud.shop, uh, click on the emergency kits panel, see what's in the kits, and and see which kit works best for you.
• 17:38
  I want you to be an informed consumer.
• 17:40
  By the way, when you check out, yes, use the code out loud.
• 17:43
  You're also gonna deal with a doctor to get the prescriptions you need.
• 17:47
  So you've got those prescription medications that you need when you need them without waiting to go to the doctor or the urgent care and get a prescription or the fact that hey, maybe some idiot decided that this wasn't a good idea.
• 18:00
  We you shouldn't have access to these drugs, and suddenly a man-made shortage is around.
• 18:06
  Proper preparation prevents poor performance, and it starts by going to AmericaOut Loud.shop and uh clicking on the emergency kit panel ordering today.
• 18:23
  Well, get ready, my fellow Americans, July 2nd, 3rd, and 4th.
• 18:28
  America Outloud.news in partnership with Clear and the Wellness Company invites you to Nashville, Tennessee for a red, white, and blue celebration.
• 18:38
  You'll never forget.
• 18:40
  We're saluting 250 years of America and 10 incredible years of America Out Loud News, standing strong for truth, justice, and the nation we all love.
• 18:50
  Three days of high impact speakers, powerhouse voices, delivering dynamic, unforgettable insights that will fire up your patriot spirit.
• 19:00
  And on July 4th, well brace yourself because you'll experience America's most explosive fireworks show, lighten up downtown Nashville in pure patriotic glory.
• 19:11
  You can reserve your spot with early bird priceline right now at America Outloud dot news forward slash Nashville.
• 19:19
  It's America Outloud News 25010 Nashville be there.
• 19:24
  One in three people will face cancer, and most never see it coming.
• 19:27
  I'm Dr.
• 19:28
  Kelly Victory with the wellness company, and I know this personally.
• 19:42
  That's why I formulated SHIELD, a two-part system designed to support immune health and antioxidant defense, a chemical-free cocoa mix and soft gels.
• 19:52
  Prevention is power.
• 19:53
  Visit TWC.
• 20:00
  In just two minutes per day, you can reclaim your health and cut your grocery bill in half with one simple convenient product.
• 20:07
  Our doctor formulated Green 85 juice formula's powerful dose of ultra-concentrated essential nutrients, stops hunger in its tracks, and supplies your cells with what's missing in the grocery store food.
• 20:19
  Go to ChemicalfreeBody.com forward slash out loud today, get nature's super multivitamin Green 85, empower your immune system, cut down on your grocery bill, and save 20% on your first order.
• 20:38
  Welcome back, everyday American Jeffrey.
• 20:40
  Join the Constitution say today.
• 20:41
  We're talking about votes and consequences.
• 20:43
  And sometimes the consequences of our votes impact other votes.
• 20:49
  Take the great state of Texas.
• 21:00
  A new uh they they call it the Texas Election Administration Management Team or Team.
• 21:06
  And it's a new, it's a 2.0 version of well, they refer to as a glitch-ridden update to a originally clunky database.
• 21:06
  And it's a new, it's a 2.0 version of well, they refer to as a glitch-ridden update to a originally clunky database.
• 21:15
  Now again, I spent 30 years in IT.
• 21:15
  Now, again, I spent 30 years in IT.
• 21:18
  Uh, I dealt mostly with hardware, but I've dealt with several database systems.
• 21:18
  Uh, I dealt mostly with hardware, but I've dealt with several database systems.
• 21:21
  So I I I can understand what may be going on here at a very high level.
• 21:21
  So I I can understand what may be going on here at a very high level.
• 21:26
  You know, database design actually is very technically.
• 21:26
  You know, database design actually is very technically involved.
• 21:30
  Getting them to operate properly.
• 21:32
  It's not just hardware, it's software.
• 21:35
  I've dealt with plenty of database systems that uh well were slow and clunky until they were properly tuned.
• 21:45
  Uh, according to the the um uh one of the election administrators, uh county chairs are frustrated they're hitting barriers when entering candidates for the big primary.
• 21:56
  Um another said uh not being able to have access to so many precious functions in the old team, very frustrating.
• 22:04
  Now, as I understand it, it this is all about progress.
• 22:08
  I don't mean the progressive movement, I mean progress, but we never seem to answer the question, progress to what?
• 22:15
  See, apparently this civics is a company made this program.
• 22:19
  They spent the state of Texas 17 million dollars on it, and um, it's supposed to be a real-world tested applications to ensure the integrity of voter and election-related data.
• 22:31
  However, election officials that actually have to deal with this, they've been complaining for months about data integrity, security, legal and compliance risks, leading to the erosion of public trust in Texas elections.
• 22:47
  In a letter to the uh state uh secretary, Texas Secretary of State, uh Jane Nelson, um uh Tassio, that's the the Texas election administration.
• 22:58
  I'm sorry, that's the Texas Association of County election officials.
• 23:01
  Um, they come, they said that they have concerns have all fallen on deaf ears, that the Secretary of State have cut off all communications with people dealing with these problems, with these quote-unquote improvements.
• 23:14
  So I have to ask the people of Texas is this a consequence of your elections?
• 23:21
  Now, according to a spokeswoman for the uh Texas Secretary of State that the upgrade has been quite an undertaking involving the migration of more than 20 million records and the training of hundreds of users in the new system.
• 23:35
  Uh the assistant of the Secretary of State for Communications said since that time we have had four successful elections, including the March 3rd primary, in which a record number of Texas voters cast a ballot.
• 23:46
  While it is not unexpected to have issues launching and implementing a new system, we continue to systemically address problems and offer county election officials direct support.
• 23:55
  However, the actual electoral officials disagree.
• 24:00
  They describe deflection and gaslighting and said the Secretary of State's office has been diabolical.
• 24:21
  All of these in dealing with voter registration applications and compliance problems.
• 24:27
  And again, this is Texas.
• 24:30
  We're not talking New York or California.
• 24:32
  We're talking Texas.
• 24:35
  And the Randall County elections administrator, uh, Shannon Lackley told the Federalist in an interview, the issue we're having is it's just so inconsistent.
• 24:44
  What works today may not work tomorrow.
• 24:48
  Now, again, I spent 30 years in IT.
• 24:51
  I've seen situations like this where upgrades that are often rushed when they're rushed or when they don't take into consideration all the possibilities and permutations when they're not properly tested and vetted beforehand can lead to these types of problems.
• 25:08
  I don't know what the specific problems are.
• 25:10
  I'm not even offering to go down and fix them.
• 25:13
  But I'm, you know, when you're doing an upgrade like that and people are reporting a problem, the first thing you have to do is recognize there must be a problem.
• 25:22
  Now, maybe it's a problem with the system, maybe it's a problem with the data, maybe it's a problem with the training, but there is a problem.
• 25:29
  And when you're talking voting, when you're talking the exercise of our one uh most important civic duties, the backbone and foundation of the republic, it's something that should be taken seriously.
• 25:43
  Now, the Secretary of State's office say, well, we're taking it seriously, but the people that are using the system say, no, you're not.
• 25:52
  And that, ladies and gentlemen, is part of what is eroding trust in our public uh institutions.
• 25:58
  It you know, there's already a trust problem with elections.
• 26:02
  People who don't think their elections count, or think people who think that there may be cheating, or in this case, maybe just a bad system.
• 26:10
  And it's not like this is unprecedented.
• 26:12
  Anybody remember when Obamacare first wrote rolled out its first website?
• 26:16
  Yeah, the one that spent more time down than it did up.
• 26:20
  If nothing else, Texas should say we must have a problem somewhere.
• 26:25
  Let's hold off, let's roll back, let's figure out what the problem is, deal with it, and then implement it.
• 26:32
  It's not what I'm hearing from the local people.
• 26:35
  I understand this desire to get things done.
• 26:37
  We just have to complete this.
• 26:40
  The problem is that may make things even worse.
• 26:42
  Because if they're talking about data loss or data corruption, if you don't roll back, now you've got possibly corrupt data.
• 26:50
  You've heard the saying, hopefully, garbage in, garbage out.
• 26:53
  If there's garbage going into these systems, how can you ever trust them again?
• 26:57
  To me, that's a serious issue in any state, especially in you look at a state the size of Texas.
• 27:06
  Now, not everything's going wrong in Texas.
• 27:09
  Texas legislators have spent uh the past year implementing regulatory changes designed to limit access to the estimated 1.7 illegal aliens that reside within the state.
• 27:22
  Um, this is this is interesting because it's led to both support and criticism for those state actors.
• 27:30
  Now, according to a report by the Texas Tribune, uh the state has taken steps such as tightening eligibility requirements for occupational licenses, restricting access to commercial driver's license, limiting who can qualify for in-state tuition at public universities, and um there's more than 6,400 refugees and DACA recipients have lost their commercial driver's license, and their additional restrictions are expected to affect again, non-citizens working in licensed industries.
• 28:00
  Industries.
• 28:01
  And you know, again, people are complaining, oh my God, you're taking away their licenses.
• 28:01
  And you know, again, people are complaining, oh my God, you're taking away their licenses.
• 28:06
  They shouldn't have the license in the first place.
• 28:06
  They shouldn't have the license in the first place.
• 28:08
  If you require, now again, states over license everything.
• 28:08
  If you require, now again, states overlicense everything.
• 28:12
  I talked to my barber, and he tells he tells me about what is necessary.
• 28:12
  I talked to my barber, and he tells he tells me about what is necessary here in Tennessee, just to have a barber shop.
• 28:17
  Here in Tennessee, just to have a barber shop.
• 28:21
  And you know, but again, if it requires a license, should you be able to get a license if you're not legally here?
• 28:21
  And you know, but again, if it requires a license, should you be able to get a license if you're not legally here?
• 28:28
  We're not just talking citizens.
• 28:28
  We're not just talking citizens, permanent residents.
• 28:31
  If you are here legally and you're allowed to work, that should be a requirement for getting any state required license.
• 28:38
  I don't care if you're practicing medicine and law or if you're cutting hair.
• 28:43
  If it's required license, then they should be here legally.
• 28:46
  I have no problem with fact.
• 28:47
  I wish if more states did this, well, maybe we wouldn't have the same immigration problems that we have today, regardless of what the federal government has been doing.
• 28:56
  The state apparently is also examining in the 1982 Supreme Court decision plier versus Doe, requiring public schools to educate non-citizens.
• 29:06
  And again, to me, it's not a question of citizens, it's legal residency.
• 29:10
  Are you here legally?
• 29:12
  A spokesman for government app Abbott's office made a statement saying benefits, licenses, and taxpayer funded services should not be used to incentivize incentivize unlawful presence at the expense of hardworking Texans.
• 29:25
  These steps ensure compliance with federal law, protect the integrity of our systems, and prioritize jobs and resources for legal residents and citizens.
• 29:34
  Again, this is a consequence of elections of your vote.
• 29:42
  The people in Texas have voted for a legislature that says, you know what?
• 29:47
  If you're not here legally, you shouldn't get our benefits.
• 29:50
  They elected a chief executive, a governor that's willing to put teeth to that.
• 29:57
  That who has an office listen, if you're not here legally, then you shouldn't be getting these these access to licenses.
• 30:06
  You shouldn't have benefits, you shouldn't have taxpayer funded services if you're not here legally.
• 30:11
  No, she said the unlawful presence.
• 30:13
  It incentivize people to come and be here illegally.
• 30:17
  Meanwhile, in California, apparently the state's going full 1984 censorship mode.
• 30:25
  See, there's an independent journalist by name of Nick Shirley, and he went viral.
• 30:30
  He made the national news back in January over allegations of state administered fraud in California.
• 30:37
  Remember, had all those fraud allegations in Minnesota.
• 30:40
  This guy starts exposing uh alleged fraud administered by the state in California, which of course really pissed the California lawmakers off.
• 30:51
  Oh, not that there was fraud, but that it was exposed.
• 30:56
  Now, in an interview with California State Assemblyman uh Tave Tangimpa, I think that's how it's pronounced.
• 31:03
  Uh, he told the Daily Signal that the California legislature is advancing legislation that would limit the release of video recordings by independent journalists who investigate taxpayer funded programs.
• 31:16
  Um yeah, freedom of the press apparently doesn't exist in California.
• 31:20
  Now, Assembly Bill 2624 was introduced in the state legislature by a similar woman, Mia Bonta.
• 31:28
  Gee, I wonder if she's any relation to the state attorney general.
• 31:32
  And of course, this legend showed up after Shirley exposed what was going on.
• 31:38
  This video questioning health care and daycare fraud in the state, and that video got up to 149 million views on X.
• 31:48
  As as uh Timega told the Daily Signal, ask yourself this.
• 31:52
  Why are Democrats trying to protect people who are being questioned about state administration and non-governmental organizations over their funding and what that funding actually achieves?
• 32:03
  Why is the government alleging that those who question how funds are being used are harassing people?
• 32:09
  That's a very good question.
• 32:12
  Now, for everyone out here who thought, hey, this is a First Amendment issue, it is not a First Amendment issue.
• 32:19
  First five words of the First Amendment.
• 32:21
  Congress shall make no law.
• 32:22
  Congress hasn't made a law, it's not a First Amendment issue.
• 32:26
  Is this a 14th Amendment issue?
• 32:28
  You betcha.
• 32:30
  And I can point it on two reasons.
• 32:31
  First of all, this is attempting to deprive people, in this case, independent journalist, quote independent journalists, meaning journalists that don't work for some a company that the government recognizes, and they're depriving them of their liberty without due process of law.
• 32:49
  That's a violation of the 14th Amendment.
• 32:52
  It's also a violation because they're targeting, quote unquote, according to this reporting, independent journalists, meaning you take two people doing exactly the same job.
• 33:02
  One works for ABC, NBC, CNN, whatever.
• 33:06
  The other is freelance.
• 33:08
  And the law would only impact one of them.
• 33:10
  That is not equal protection under the law.
• 33:13
  That is also a 14th Amendment violation.
• 33:17
  What it really is at its heart is a violation of Article 1, Section 3 of the California Constitution, which reads every person may freely speak, write and publish his or her sentiments on all subjects being responsible for the abuse of this right.
• 33:34
  A law may not restrain or abridge freedom of speech or press.
• 33:41
  This, ladies and gentlemen, abridges the liberty of press.
• 33:45
  You're saying if you're not one of the targeted, tagged, licensed people, you don't have freedom of the press.
• 33:53
  You cannot report on this stuff.
• 33:56
  Now, this happens because the people of California have hired these legislators that think the government is above reproach.
• 34:04
  You can't, you can't question the government.
• 34:07
  You can't question what we're doing.
• 34:09
  Those are the very same scenarios we saw in the Soviet Union.
• 34:14
  We see in Cuba, we saw in Communist Venezuela, communist China, where you're not allowed to criticize or question the state.
• 34:23
  That's not the United States of America.
• 34:25
  The very fact that the state legislature is spending time on this legislation shows that the people of California are suffering the consequences of their bad decisions.
• 34:36
  Who they vote for and how they decide who to vote for.
• 34:40
  And they're suffering the consequences.
• 34:42
  Sadly, as often happens, the rest of the country are going to suffer some of those consequences as well.
• 34:49
  See who you vote for and how you decide who to vote for is a very important part of the civic life of our duty as American citizens.
• 34:59
  Now, there are a lot of organizations that will say I'm wrong.
• 35:00
  Now, there are a lot of organizations that'll say I'm wrong.
• 35:02
  They're going to do everything they can to protect the criminal corruption in government that are going to try to mess with the election system to get their ends and do much, much more.
• 35:02
  They're going to do everything they can to protect the criminal corruption in government that are going to try to mess with the election system to get their ends and do much much more.
• 35:13
  And they are often supported.
• 35:13
  And they are often supported, these lobbying efforts are supported by not profit non for profits that are supported by companies you do business with.
• 35:15
  These live lobbying efforts are supported by not profit non-for-profits that are supported by companies you do business with.
• 35:23
  See, there are several companies I don't do business with anymore because of the entities they support.
• 35:23
  See, there are several companies I don't do business with anymore because of the entities they support.
• 35:28
  I want to buy from companies that believe what.
• 35:28
  I want to buy from companies that believe what I believe.
• 35:31
  We can.
• 35:32
  One of those companies is Patriot Mobile, America's only Christian conservative wireless provider.
• 35:38
  Now I joined them several years ago, not because they're Christian conservative, although I am, not because of their 4G and 5G coverage, not because of their 100% U.S.
• 35:48
  based customer support.
• 35:49
  I joined them because they support organizations that are fighting to protect our rights, freedom of religion, speech, press, uh, to be secure from unreasonable searches and seizures, to not be deprived of liberty without due process of law.
• 36:03
  They also support uh the sanctity of life, our veterans and our first responders.
• 36:08
  That's why I became an affiliate about a year or so ago.
• 36:12
  So join us today at Patriot Mobile.
• 36:14
  And guess what?
• 36:15
  Use the code constitution at checkout and get your activation absolutely free.
• 36:19
  Just go to patriotmobile.com/slash constitution, find a plan that works for you, find a discount that works for you.
• 36:26
  Everyone from veterans of first responders to families with multiple lines are eligible for discounts.
• 36:31
  And then don't forget to use the code constitutional checkout to get your new line activated absolutely free.
• 36:37
  So join me in using my cell phone to defend not just your rights, but the rights of your family and your neighbors by going to Patriot Mobile.comslash constitution, finding a plan of discount that works for you, and using the code constitution at checkout to get your new line activated absolutely free.
• 36:53
  I also hope you'll join me here at America Outloud.news.
• 36:58
  Think you should too.
• 37:00
  Why?
• 37:00
  Well, because corporate media has been lying to us for decades and they've been found out.
• 37:04
  We live in the information age where information's at our fingertips, but where do you go?
• 37:08
  Who do you trust?
• 37:10
  Well, I trust people I can verify.
• 37:12
  One of those is America Outloud.news.
• 37:14
  So join me.
• 37:15
  Read the stories and articles, then share them.
• 37:18
  Listen to the podcast, watch the videos, then share them.
• 37:21
  You'd be surprised how many people have never heard this news because corporate media doesn't want them to know.
• 37:27
  See the act of sharing this information, sharing this news, letting people know the things the government and the corporate media don't want them to know, helps secure the blessings of liberty for all of us.
• 37:41
  I cannot tell a lie.
• 37:43
  My sinuses are blocked.
• 37:45
  George, you cross the Delaware.
• 37:47
  You can cross congestion.
• 37:49
  Here, try clear.
• 37:53
  Freedom smells like victory.
• 37:56
  Come celebrate 250 years of American independence.
• 38:02
  25010 Independence Day celebration in Nashville on July 2nd through 4th.
• 38:09
  Go to America 250 Nashville.com.
• 38:13
  Use code XLEAR for 20% off admission.
• 38:17
  Clear.
• 38:17
  Breathe in the independence.
• 38:19
  Have you been looking for a healthy snack for on the go?
• 38:23
  Well, not all energy bars are soft and sugary.
• 38:27
  Bear bars are a crunchy savory bar made from just six simple natural ingredients.
• 38:34
  Bear bars or plant-based, organic gluten-free contain six grams of protein and are low temperature dried for unique crunch.
• 38:43
  Most energy bars are based on chocolate or fruit and are held together with syrups or sweeteners.
• 38:50
  To learn more, just visit barebar.com slash out loud.
• 38:55
  I'm Doug Evans, author of the sprout book.
• 38:58
  And I'm also a father with a three-year-old daughter.
• 39:01
  And that's why we grow sprouts.
• 39:04
  Did you know that you could take seeds, add water, and get fresh organic vegetables in three to five days without soil, sunshine, or fertilizer for under a dollar a serving?
• 39:17
  That's the miracle of sprouting.
• 39:19
  And I want to share that with you.
• 39:21
  Go to the spouting company.com slash out loud and use the code out loud for a special offer.
• 39:34
  Welcome back, everyday American Jewry.
• 39:36
  Join the Constitution today.
• 39:37
  Today we've been talking about votes and consequences, the consequences of who you decide to vote for and how you make that decision.
• 39:45
  Now, I'm going to head off to Illinois, because this is hang with me, this is a little interesting.
• 39:50
  There is a bill in the Illinois General Assembly, SB3444.
• 39:56
  It's called the Artificial Intelligence Safety Act.
• 40:00
  And the idea is it's presents it's supposed to be a safety framework for what they call frontier AI models.
• 40:09
  What is this?
• 40:10
  Well, the bill defines a frontier model as one using more than 10 to the 26 power computational operations or a compute course that costs that exceeds 100 million dollars.
• 40:23
  What is this supposed to do?
• 40:25
  Oh, yeah, yeah, yeah.
• 40:26
  It's supposed to shield people from liability for what comes out of the AI.
• 40:36
  Specifically, Section 10 states that a developer may not be held liable for critical harms if the developer did not intentionally, intentionally or recklessly cause the critical harm.
• 40:47
  Now, what does this mean?
• 40:48
  Well, there's a couple interesting twists here, because one is it really is trying to treat an artificial intelligence as an artificial person.
• 40:58
  Because the idea is the artificial intelligence, the developer of the artificial intelligence is not responsible for what gets done by their product.
• 41:07
  Artificial intelligence is a product.
• 41:10
  Think of it this way, right?
• 41:12
  You you're a parent.
• 41:13
  You raise a human being.
• 41:14
  When that human being becomes an adult, you're not responsible for their actions.
• 41:20
  Well, that's kind of what this Illinois bill says.
• 41:22
  You have to be what they call a frontier model.
• 41:24
  Once you've run through 10 through the 26 power computational operations, or once they spent 100 million dollars on your compute costs, you're now considered a artificial adult, and your developer cannot be held liable for the criminal harms caused by the the product of the artificial intelligence.
• 41:45
  Yeah, this is uh this again, but I find interesting is the the idea of liability shields.
• 41:54
  Now, this is a state actor, right?
• 41:57
  This is not a First Amendment issue.
• 41:59
  When Congress does this, this is a First Amendment.
• 42:00
  Congress does this, this is a First Amendment.
• 42:01
  This is a state actor.
• 42:01
  This is a state actor.
• 42:03
  But it does violate the Illinois Constitution.
• 42:03
  But it does violate the Illinois Constitution under Article 1, Section 5.
• 42:06
  Under Article 1, Section 5, we read the people have the right to assemble in a peaceful manner, to consult for the common good, to make known their questions, their opinions and their to their representatives, and to apply for redress of grievance.
• 42:09
  We read: the people have the right to assemble in a peaceful manner, to consult for the common good, to make known their questions, their opinions and their to their representatives, and to apply for redress of grievance.
• 42:22
  When a government actor says you cannot sue there's a liability shield, you have denied people the right to petition.
• 42:22
  When a government actor says you cannot sue there's a liability shield, you have denied people the right to petition for a redress of grievance.
• 42:32
  Now, are there situations, are there types of grievances that possibly you should not be able to do?
• 42:38
  For example, um the the lawful commerce in arms, where you can't sue the manufacturer for the criminal use of their product.
• 42:48
  Now, I haven't been detailed into this law yet, but this doesn't the synopsis I saw doesn't deal with this key the developer cannot be held for the criminal abuse by others.
• 43:02
  It simply says, listen, you know, uh, once you've reached that threshold level, developers cannot be held accountable for what their product does unless they can people someone can show that they they purposely did this.
• 43:17
  In fact, reading from the synopsis of the bill says it provides that a developer of frontier artificial intelligence model shall not be held liable for the critical harms caused by the frontier model if the developer did not intentionally or recklessly cause the critical harms and the developer publishes a safety and security protocol and transparency report on its website.
• 43:38
  In other words, it's pretending that this art of this quote unquote artificial intelligence is a separate entity.
• 43:44
  It's not the product of the developer.
• 43:46
  No, this is, I mean, imagine this, right?
• 43:48
  If you um uh you know if you found a critical error in I don't know, Microsoft Word, and it caused you harm, could you sue Microsoft?
• 44:01
  Yes.
• 44:03
  But if you're in Illinois and Microsoft said, no, we used an AI model for that, and we didn't cause the critical harm.
• 44:09
  It was the AI model.
• 44:10
  You can't sue us because, well, it was the AI that did it.
• 44:14
  I guess this is the modern version of the dog ate my homework.
• 44:19
  But what I'm really curious about is why is the state of Illinois promoting that?
• 44:24
  Why are they looking at this?
• 44:26
  Why are they trying to detach the AI product from its developer?
• 44:31
  Again, it's it's it's this, it's like we've turned AI into people.
• 44:36
  It's like we we think we're in the the matrix or or Terminator.
• 44:41
  It's the machine, it's completely similar.
• 44:43
  I have no responsibility.
• 44:44
  I created this AI, I designed it, I developed it, I trained it, but I have no responsibility for what it actually did.
• 44:51
  Sorry, no.
• 44:53
  An artificial and an artificial intelligence is not an artificial person.
• 44:58
  And that's what this is law is trying to make.
• 45:02
  Reading some of this, you know what?
• 45:04
  If it let's say, let's say uh you took one of these AIs, right?
• 45:09
  And uh you asked the AI, hey, how do I create a chemical, biological or radiological device?
• 45:17
  I want to create a dirty bomb.
• 45:20
  And it tells you how.
• 45:24
  Does it does it have an does it hold any results?
• 45:26
  Now, if you were to ask a person, how do I make a dirty bomb, and they were to tell you that person would be held liable?
• 45:33
  But if you ask an artificial intelligence, now suddenly the person that created that that said, I'm sorry, but my my safety code will not allow me to disperse disseminate that type of information.
• 45:47
  It's an interesting conundrum.
• 45:50
  And it's uh um, it's it to me, it's interesting on several several levels.
• 45:57
  But I keep finding this interesting.
• 45:59
  We're trying to turn these artificial intelligences into artificial people as if they have some sort of moral agency, as if they can make moral decisions.
• 46:10
  An artificial intelligence doesn't make moral decisions, it answers questions.
• 46:15
  The morals are instilled by safety protocols placed in the artificial intelligence by the developer.
• 46:22
  And the same way, if a car manufacturer does not put proper safety uh uh uh products into its car, and you are injured by them, you can sue.
• 46:33
  Why is that any different for the the company that the entity that created the the uh uh the artificial and why is it only these big corporations?
• 46:44
  Uh in other words, if you're gonna spend a hundred million dollars on an AI, this is not someone you know, working in their basement.
• 46:54
  This is not a small company that's saying, you know what, I I got this great idea for an AI, and I'm gonna create no, no, no.
• 46:59
  These are the major, these are the chat GPTs, the Microsoft's, the uh the the uh the Googles of the world.
• 47:07
  And that to me may be a reason why the state of Illinois is promoting this.
• 47:12
  Not because they're worried about the safety, not because they're worried about the promotion of artificial intelligence.
• 47:17
  Seems to me this is more about protecting the backsides of major corporations when they create these products and let them loose, and we find out, by the way, they give out garbage information all the time.
• 47:30
  They lie, they slander, they defame.
• 47:34
  But the developers don't want to be held accountable for that.
• 47:37
  That seems to me a more logical reason.
• 47:39
  Don't have proof, but that's my my assumption.
• 47:43
  That's the that's my opinion based on what I've seen so far.
• 47:46
  Okay, now this story got my attention, and it's a bit different.
• 47:49
  It's not so much about voting about the consequence of vote, it's about the actual vote process and our lack of understanding.
• 47:56
  So back on April 9th, the Supreme Court declined to uh uh intervene in a debate in a controversy about primaries.
• 48:08
  They declined to reinstate a gentleman by the name of Samuel Ronan, who had previously run as a for office as a Democrat, and he wanted to be on the Republican ballot in the May 5th primary.
• 48:21
  Uh, this is for the uh seat in the in the House of Representatives from the state of Ohio.
• 48:28
  Now, the court didn't sign the order, they didn't, there was no uh dis dissension, nothing.
• 48:34
  They just no, we're not gonna, we're not gonna do this.
• 48:38
  This means that Mr.
• 48:38
  Ronan will not appear on the ballot in the Republican primary for Ohio's 15th district on May 5th.
• 48:45
  Now, a lot of people say, well, what's wrong with this?
• 48:47
  What's going on here?
• 48:48
  Why is a Democrat trying to be on the Republican Party ticket?
• 48:53
  Well, um, this case started because a voter filed a protest saying that uh um Mr.
• 49:00
  Mr.
• 49:00
  Ronan was claiming to have changed party affiliations, but uh he bore no allegiance to the Republican Party.
• 49:00
  Ronan was claiming to have changed party affiliations, but uh he bore no allegiance to the Republican Party.
• 49:07
  Now, I weren't this up for one very specific reason.
• 49:07
  Now, I weren't this up for one very specific reason.
• 49:12
  You have to remember primaries are not public elections.
• 49:12
  You have to remember primaries are not public elections.
• 49:18
  They are publicly funded elections for private organizations.
• 49:18
  They are publicly funded elections for private organizations.
• 49:22
  The Democratic Party and the Republican Party are private organizations.
• 49:22
  The Democratic Party and the Republican Party are private organizations.
• 49:28
  You have no right.
• 49:28
  You have no right to tell a private organization who can be on their ballot.
• 49:34
  Now, these are usually set up by state law and uh, but this is still a private organization.
• 49:42
  Meaning the private organization can set their own rules for voting in their private elections, even though they're publicly funded.
• 49:52
  It's why I don't participate in primaries.
• 49:56
  And a lot of people, but but then how you the whole purpose of a primary is for the taxpayer to pay for an election for a private organization to limit who will be on the ballot.
• 50:07
  It is a method of control of the election.
• 50:12
  You want to know what is the biggest one of the biggest problems in our elections is the fact that these parties have taken over the state election laws to the point where they control the elections, not the people nor their representatives.
• 50:26
  Now it's interesting because I saw this article on the Epoch Times, and of course, they're focusing on well, you know, uh he was a candidate for the DNC in 2017.
• 50:35
  Um he ran for the the Democratic Party nomination uh to the House of Representatives in 2016, and now he wants to run on the Republican ballot.
• 50:45
  It has nothing to do with donkeys and elephants.
• 50:48
  The donkeys and elephants are private organizations.
• 50:54
  They aren't public entities.
• 50:56
  They're private, not for private, they're 501c4s, I believe.
• 51:00
  They are no different than say, like uh the NAACP or any other politically active group.
• 51:08
  They're private organizations.
• 51:10
  The very fact that we spend taxpayer money to deprive us and tell us who can be on the ballot is to me insane.
• 51:21
  But that's because we've been taught since childhood.
• 51:24
  This is how it works.
• 51:26
  This is what is wrong with our election process.
• 51:30
  Right?
• 51:30
  Now, again, I'd love, I think states should find a much better way to determine who is on the ballot.
• 51:36
  I think there should be some, you know, maybe a petition, all right.
• 51:39
  If you can get X number of signatures on a petition, you are on the ballot.
• 51:44
  Or, you know, some variation thereof.
• 51:48
  Because this whole question of third party candidates all come from the control the two major parties have over the election process and the way they use that to prevent people who don't bend the knee to donkeys and elephants from actually getting on the ballot and opposing them, especially higher in the election brackets, right?
• 52:07
  As you get to from local to state to to federal, you see more and more control over who's allowed on the ballot.
• 52:15
  Because again, if your name is on the ballot, it's really, really, really hard to get elected.
• 52:20
  Sure, technically you could have a uh a sign in, a write-in uh ballot uh process, but again, that's very, very hard to do.
• 52:29
  So I look at this not because it's like, oh my God, that the Republicans are evil, they wouldn't let him on the ballot, or you know, he's just a Democrat trying to infiltrate him and manipulate the Republican.
• 52:40
  No, this is about a private organization that manipulates the election and the fact that the vast majority of Americans not only don't realize that, they promote the idea.
• 52:52
  And that uh to me, that's where the real problem is.
• 52:56
  So again, today we've been talking about votes and consequences.
• 53:00
  And as we're seeing, the primary system is starting up for the midterm elections.
• 53:04
  And uh I want you to think are you first, are you gonna vote?
• 53:09
  I think you should vote.
• 53:10
  If you are a citizen of the United States, I think you should vote.
• 53:14
  How do you decide who to vote for?
• 53:16
  That to me is the real question.
• 53:19
  As I said before, I have one question I ask every candidate, and I make a point of reaching out to candidates, even at the local level, and I ask them show me when you fulfilled your oath to support the constitution when it was hard, when it cost you something.
• 53:35
  And the general answer I get is a blank stare.
• 53:38
  Because nobody thinks about it this way.
• 53:40
  You are applying for a job where you will take an oath by uh by oath or affirmation, you will by you will swear to make a solemn promise to support the constitution of the United States and in many many cases of your state as well.
• 53:55
  When did you do that when it was hard?
• 53:58
  See, it's easy to do that when everybody's going along, but it's when it's difficult when you're up you're opposing something, that character is exposed.
• 54:10
  Will you stand up to your oath even when people say you're wrong?
• 54:15
  Will you stand up to your oath even when the party threatens you?
• 54:18
  Will you stand up for your oath when that when the people will mock you?
• 54:24
  Or do you fold?
• 54:26
  Do you have the character?
• 54:28
  Do you have the spine to stand up for your oath?
• 54:32
  Or will you simply fold like a cheap suit as soon as the pressure comes on?
• 54:37
  That tells me a lot about the person and about whether or not I can support the idea of them representing me and some body.
• 54:46
  Now, you know, these these are important ideas.
• 54:49
  And uh I keep telling people I'd love when I get the opportunity to talk.
• 54:52
  In fact, May 16th, I'm going to be in Lake County, Florida, speaking at the uh that county's branch or chapter of the Constitution Party.
• 55:04
  Uh, you can find out more.
• 55:05
  Go to the website, Constitution Study.com slash events.
• 55:08
  You'll see that event listed, and you can find out more.
• 55:10
  If you're in the area, I'd love to see.
• 55:13
  I'd love you to stop by and join me.
• 55:15
  I'm going to have a really interesting time.
• 55:16
  I got a really good uh talk uh wound up for it.
• 55:19
  So it's going to be a lot of fun.
• 55:21
  So hopefully join me in that's Eustace, Florida.
• 55:24
  It's Lake County on May 16th of this year.
• 55:29
  Uh it starts at 5 p.m., I believe.
• 55:31
  And uh we should have a really good time.
• 55:33
  Again, find out more by going to Constitution Study.com/slash events.
• 55:38
  You'll find it on the Constitution Creation Day Banquet in Eustace, Florida.
• 55:42
  And again, if you're in the area, I hope to see you there.
• 55:46
  I also hope you'll join me for the Constitution Study on America Out Loud Talk Radio, heard on the iHeartRadio Network every weekday, 4 p.m.
• 55:54
  Eastern time.
• 55:55
  You can listen on our media player.
• 55:56
  We have apps for Apple Android and Alexa, and of course, you can always listen via podcast.
• 56:00
  Listen via podcast.
• 56:01
  Now, it generally takes a day or two for an episode to go from talk radio to podcast, but you get to listen to your favorite podcast app.
• 56:01
  Now it generally takes a day or two for an episode to go from talk radio to podcast, but you get to listen to your favorite podcast app.
• 56:08
  Do me a favor though, subscribe to the show.
• 56:08
  Do me a favor though, subscribe to the show, leave us a rating on Apple Podcasts.
• 56:10
  Leave us a rating on Apple Podcasts.
• 56:12
  It helps the algorithm show us to more people, which of course hopefully means more people will click the link and join us here for this great content on the Constitution Study.
• 56:13
  It helps the algorithm show us to more people, which of course hopefully means more people will click the link and join us here for this great content on the Constitution study.
• 56:22
  And you can find all the links you need at the homepage at AmericaOut Loud.news.
• 56:22
  And you can find all the links you need at the homepage at AmericaOut Loud.news.
• 56:26
  But please share those links.
• 56:26
  But please share those links.
• 56:28
  Share this program.
• 56:28
  Share this program.
• 56:30
  Share the good news that the Constitution still matters and our rights are still defended.
• 56:35
  By doing so, you're helping to share the blessings of liberty to everyone who calls this great nation home.