Latest / The Late Debate / The Late Debate | 23 July

Transcript

The Late Debate | 23 July · The Late Debate

• 0:00
  Speaker 1: Wel late, Hello, and welcome to the show. I'm Dnikity Georgio,
• 0:09
  Speaker 1: joined by kaylab Bond and James McPherson. This is a
• 0:13
  Speaker 1: very discombobulated set tonight. Well, so I just want to
• 0:17
  Speaker 1: preface by saying, James said, oh, I've got to sit
• 0:19
  Speaker 1: in the girl's chair tonight, like whoa, You're going to
• 0:22
  Speaker 1: get cooties or something.
• 0:23
  Speaker 2: Well, I've reconsidered that and now I think maybe sitting
• 0:25
  Speaker 2: in this seat will give me special wisdom because you
• 0:28
  Speaker 2: come up with some great lines. So maybe thanks, no,
• 0:33
  Speaker 2: I'm here. I'm saying, maybe it's not you. Maybe it's
• 0:36
  Speaker 2: the seat. We'll find out tonight.
• 0:38
  Speaker 1: Right backman, and if you obviously James McPherson's had a
• 0:42
  Speaker 1: busy night. He's the busiest man on the network. He
• 0:44
  Speaker 1: hosted Cherry and he's back to host this program.
• 0:46
  Speaker 3: What a Metal.
• 0:47
  Speaker 1: He's obviously trying to he's trying to score.
• 0:49
  Speaker 2: Brown podcast this morning, and you're on my podcast.
• 0:52
  Speaker 4: As I said, what a suckhole. But this just doesn't
• 0:55
  Speaker 4: feel right. This, this just does not feel you know,
• 0:58
  Speaker 4: normally I look over there and I get to look
• 1:00
  Speaker 4: at Deneka, and at least Anika is quite attractive.
• 1:03
  Speaker 5: But now, James McPherson.
• 1:07
  Speaker 3: Tell you what these blokes they keep me alive? Don't they.
• 1:12
  Speaker 1: Coming up tonight? A muslab leader tells a Sydney counselor
• 1:16
  Speaker 1: to keep her mouth shut after she opposed an Islamic
• 1:20
  Speaker 1: call to prayer broadcast at a Sydney mosque.
• 1:22
  Speaker 3: Whoever said diversity was our strength?
• 1:25
  Speaker 1: Australia is in the grips of a youth crime crisis,
• 1:28
  Speaker 1: So why don't police want you to post videos and
• 1:31
  Speaker 1: photos of their criminal acts on social media?
• 1:34
  Speaker 3: And are the robots coming for us?
• 1:36
  Speaker 1: Open Ai says some of its most advanced AI models
• 1:40
  Speaker 1: went rogue and hacked.
• 1:42
  Speaker 3: A start up. Good grief, but first.
• 1:45
  Speaker 1: Japan is in the middle of a heat wave and
• 1:47
  Speaker 1: it seems the heat has gone to the office workers' heads.
• 1:51
  Speaker 1: Hairy legs are now the talk of the workplace as
• 1:54
  Speaker 1: Tokyo businesses encourage men to swap suits and ties for
• 1:57
  Speaker 1: t shirts, trainers and shorts effort to stay cool and
• 2:01
  Speaker 1: reduce energy use. Now this has sparked a very bizarre
• 2:05
  Speaker 1: workplace culture war of sorts in what has been dubbed
• 2:09
  Speaker 1: leg hair harassment, referring to the discomfort of seeing male
• 2:12
  Speaker 1: colleagues leg hair in the office and incredibly, get this.
• 2:16
  Speaker 1: There's even been an uptick in men getting laser hair
• 2:19
  Speaker 1: removal in Japan. As a matter of social etiquette when
• 2:22
  Speaker 1: wearing shorts, a Tokyo Metropolitan Government environmental officials said, we
• 2:28
  Speaker 1: want to give people more options in the severe heat,
• 2:30
  Speaker 1: not tell them what to wear.
• 2:32
  Speaker 3: There should be no.
• 2:33
  Speaker 1: Issue as long as the work attire is not offensive
• 2:36
  Speaker 1: to anyone. A survey found fifty three point five percent
• 2:39
  Speaker 1: of respondents opposed wearing shorts to work during summer, forty
• 2:43
  Speaker 1: six point five percent supported the idea. Now, among those
• 2:48
  Speaker 1: against it, the biggest concerns for both men and women.
• 2:51
  Speaker 3: Were body shape and body hair.
• 2:53
  Speaker 1: Some women argue it's unfair that they are expected to
• 2:56
  Speaker 1: wear tights while men are free to bear their legs.
• 3:00
  Speaker 1: Bear in mind, this is not an unfamiliar debate. Even
• 3:02
  Speaker 1: for us down Under, there have been air conditioning disputes.
• 3:06
  Speaker 1: Women often complain workplaces are kept too cold because temperatures
• 3:10
  Speaker 1: are traditionally set around male metabolic rates, and I, for one,
• 3:14
  Speaker 1: would absolutely.
• 3:15
  Speaker 3: Agree with that.
• 3:16
  Speaker 1: What do you think this, says Caleb, about the standards
• 3:20
  Speaker 1: of a tire in the workplace.
• 3:22
  Speaker 5: Well, it's bloody terrible I have.
• 3:29
  Speaker 4: There, you go, that's the most you're going to get,
• 3:32
  Speaker 4: and that I wouldn't be doing that normally in the office.
• 3:34
  Speaker 4: I can tell you I've only done it for your
• 3:36
  Speaker 4: viewing pleasure at home. Now I think standards have slipped
• 3:41
  Speaker 4: significantly in the office unfortunately. I mean that the chap
• 3:46
  Speaker 4: sitting across from me often comes in in a.
• 3:48
  Speaker 5: T shirt and I would never dream.
• 3:50
  Speaker 4: Now, I'll admit there are days where I've come into
• 3:52
  Speaker 4: the office in a polo shirt and that I've felt
• 3:57
  Speaker 4: uncomfortable doing that, But I've just been out about during
• 4:01
  Speaker 4: the day or something and i haven't gone home before
• 4:02
  Speaker 4: I've come in, and so that's what I've done, and
• 4:05
  Speaker 4: I've not particularly enjoyed doing it. James comes in in
• 4:07
  Speaker 4: a T shirt. Now, I think this should be banned.
• 4:10
  Speaker 4: I think in the office, for the most part, men
• 4:14
  Speaker 4: should be wearing a suit and tie.
• 4:17
  Speaker 5: You know, women should be.
• 4:18
  Speaker 4: Wearing dresses or a blouse and a skirt, and things
• 4:23
  Speaker 4: would be much better if we adhere to those standards.
• 4:26
  Speaker 4: I mean, once you start saying that there are no
• 4:28
  Speaker 4: standards when it comes to dress, then it's very easy
• 4:32
  Speaker 4: to become sloppy about everything else, Because if you don't
• 4:35
  Speaker 4: care about your appearance and you don't show the people
• 4:38
  Speaker 4: around you the respect of looking good, then why should
• 4:41
  Speaker 4: we care about anything else either? I mean, why not
• 4:44
  Speaker 4: let the kitchen go to rack and ruin. Why don't
• 4:46
  Speaker 4: we care about the quality of our work?
• 4:48
  Speaker 5: Why don't we just let the whole place turn into
• 4:50
  Speaker 5: dust and see how we go? Because whether you like
• 4:55
  Speaker 5: it or not, it says.
• 4:56
  Speaker 4: Something about you and the work you produce and the
• 5:00
  Speaker 4: people around you when you dress well to go to work.
• 5:03
  Speaker 5: Now, I wouldn't go so far as to have laser
• 5:05
  Speaker 5: to the heir removal soil my legs.
• 5:07
  Speaker 4: I can get it well because I'm not a cyclist,
• 5:10
  Speaker 4: for one, so I don't need to worry about all
• 5:13
  Speaker 4: of that business. But no, I think this is terrible
• 5:16
  Speaker 4: that you should have maximum air conditioning so that we
• 5:19
  Speaker 4: can wear suit and tie all year round.
• 5:21
  Speaker 5: I reckon well defense.
• 5:24
  Speaker 2: Wearing a T shirt to the office, I must say
• 5:26
  Speaker 2: I've lasered the hair off my arm. So Calum and
• 5:29
  Speaker 2: Nika are not offended in the workplace. I cannot believe
• 5:32
  Speaker 2: they're upset about some leg here. This is what you know.
• 5:36
  Speaker 2: Prosperous nations with nothing to worry about start arguing about. Seriously,
• 5:42
  Speaker 2: people should not be offended by that. But what amuses
• 5:45
  Speaker 2: me most is that they think by wearing shorts in
• 5:48
  Speaker 2: the workplace it will have a major effect on energy
• 5:51
  Speaker 2: consumption and thereby help to save the planet. That is
• 5:54
  Speaker 2: one of the most ridiculous things I've ever heard in
• 5:56
  Speaker 2: my life. If only saving the planet was that easy.
• 6:00
  Speaker 2: There are shorts and the planet's see.
• 6:02
  Speaker 3: Well, that's it.
• 6:02
  Speaker 1: But I actually do not like the idea of wearing
• 6:04
  Speaker 1: shorts in the office. I think it's wrong. It's just
• 6:08
  Speaker 1: it's just wrong. Nobody wants to see.
• 6:10
  Speaker 3: Your pin the ways we'll put your pins away.
• 6:14
  Speaker 1: I think it's suitable for a woman to wear a
• 6:16
  Speaker 1: dress or a skirt above the knee, but just just
• 6:19
  Speaker 1: above the knee. I don't think anything short is appropriate
• 6:22
  Speaker 1: in the office.
• 6:24
  Speaker 3: Well, you'd enjoy it, of.
• 6:25
  Speaker 1: Course, you'd love it, Caleb, but I think you have
• 6:28
  Speaker 1: to wear it be modest. Now, I will say, obviously,
• 6:30
  Speaker 1: there is a real workplace culture of Friday you come
• 6:33
  Speaker 1: into the office and I have only just started wearing
• 6:36
  Speaker 1: jeans on a Friday in the office in the last
• 6:38
  Speaker 1: two weeks, and the first time I wore jeans on
• 6:40
  Speaker 1: a Friday.
• 6:41
  Speaker 3: I felt really uncomfortable. I felt exposed. I didn't like
• 6:45
  Speaker 3: it at all.
• 6:46
  Speaker 1: But now I don't know, I just feel like I'm
• 6:47
  Speaker 1: getting used to it. But and I understand that that's
• 6:50
  Speaker 1: what you do on a Fridays, it's casual Fridays. But
• 6:53
  Speaker 1: I couldn't fathom coming into this office in the middle
• 6:56
  Speaker 1: of the week wearing inappropriate clothes as if I'm going
• 6:59
  Speaker 1: out for lunch.
• 7:00
  Speaker 3: I don't agree with it at all.
• 7:02
  Speaker 4: I mean, my standards have probably slipped a little bit.
• 7:05
  Speaker 4: I'm a bit more lax than I used to be
• 7:07
  Speaker 4: because you know, we come in here later at night,
• 7:10
  Speaker 4: and there were a few people in the office and whatever.
• 7:12
  Speaker 4: So perhaps I don't care as much about it, and
• 7:14
  Speaker 4: maybe I should do something about that. But I don't
• 7:16
  Speaker 4: normally come in in anything short of you know, at
• 7:18
  Speaker 4: least Chino's and a shirt or something. But you know,
• 7:21
  Speaker 4: every day when I was chief of staff at the
• 7:23
  Speaker 4: Herald Son, I wore a suit and tie. On weekends,
• 7:28
  Speaker 4: the minimum was sort of a jacket, shirt and chinos.
• 7:31
  Speaker 4: I never went in in jeans because I sort of
• 7:34
  Speaker 4: felt that, you know, I was in a semi leadership
• 7:37
  Speaker 4: position and I had to set a tone for the
• 7:40
  Speaker 4: rest of the newsroom. And I think it, whether you
• 7:43
  Speaker 4: like it or not, you rock up in a certain tie,
• 7:46
  Speaker 4: it says I mean business, and that sort of sets
• 7:48
  Speaker 4: the tone for how things go from there.
• 7:50
  Speaker 2: Do you think working from home will change people's attitude
• 7:53
  Speaker 2: towards the office? It could go one of two ways, right,
• 7:55
  Speaker 2: because you're in your pajamas and your bed socks or
• 7:58
  Speaker 2: whatever working And then on those rarecsis that you do
• 8:00
  Speaker 2: go into the office, do you then dress up because
• 8:03
  Speaker 2: it's like an occasion or are you so used to
• 8:07
  Speaker 2: being casual that now people will just adopt casual everywhere.
• 8:11
  Speaker 2: I think that's probably where the culture is going to go.
• 8:14
  Speaker 5: I think that's what's caused the change.
• 8:16
  Speaker 1: Because do you know during COVID there was actually a
• 8:19
  Speaker 1: massive uptick in people buying tracksuits online.
• 8:23
  Speaker 3: So a lot of lifestyle.
• 8:24
  Speaker 1: Brands were raking it in during the pandemic because people
• 8:27
  Speaker 1: were working from home in their tracksuits. And I don't
• 8:29
  Speaker 1: think that that's ever left that trend, to be.
• 8:31
  Speaker 4: Honest, That's another one that really people The track is
• 8:34
  Speaker 4: outside the house unless you're exercising and you're wearing a
• 8:37
  Speaker 4: tracksuit for exercise. You don't eat nah, I don't wear
• 8:42
  Speaker 4: the tracks to the shops. Absolutely not in the house
• 8:45
  Speaker 4: only it's the only. And don't get me started on
• 8:48
  Speaker 4: ugg boots and slippers to the show.
• 8:51
  Speaker 5: I just none of it.
• 8:52
  Speaker 4: Please please, can we just rest Well, it's nice, you know,
• 8:56
  Speaker 4: we're losing all the special things in the world, at
• 8:59
  Speaker 4: least these intact dressing up to go to the officer,
• 9:02
  Speaker 4: dressing up to go anywhere.
• 9:04
  Speaker 5: For that matter.
• 9:05
  Speaker 4: Now, last night we talked about the fact that Pauline
• 9:09
  Speaker 4: Hansen made comments yesterday on four BC about domestic violence
• 9:13
  Speaker 4: that were then taken out of context by All on
• 9:16
  Speaker 4: Sundry to make it sound like she was saying, well, actually,
• 9:19
  Speaker 4: you know women commit domestic violence, doing it a two
• 9:23
  Speaker 4: way street, just get yourself out of.
• 9:25
  Speaker 5: There if you're not happy about it. Now, that is
• 9:27
  Speaker 5: not what she said.
• 9:28
  Speaker 4: We talked about it last night, but if you missed it,
• 9:31
  Speaker 4: this is part of what she said on four BC yesterday.
• 9:35
  Speaker 6: It's also a two way street. But I'm not saying
• 9:39
  Speaker 6: that just men and women can lose their cruel as well.
• 9:44
  Speaker 6: Society is under so much pressure Gary than what it
• 9:47
  Speaker 6: used to be. Ever has been passed.
• 9:50
  Speaker 4: And so it set people on fire when she said
• 9:53
  Speaker 4: it's a two way street. What she was talking about was, yes,
• 9:56
  Speaker 4: we have a problem with domestic violence committed by men
• 9:59
  Speaker 4: in this country. Also, in the broader discussion about domestic violence,
• 10:02
  Speaker 4: we should talk about all domestic violence. I don't think
• 10:05
  Speaker 4: there is a problem with that. But on the back
• 10:07
  Speaker 4: of that, the nine papers today have gone and dragged
• 10:11
  Speaker 4: up a podcast that Pauline Hanson appeared on last year
• 10:16
  Speaker 4: called The Broken Father's Podcast. It's a hosted by chap
• 10:20
  Speaker 4: called Jared Percy Purcell, And of course you might have
• 10:23
  Speaker 4: gathered by the name of the podcast. The tone of
• 10:25
  Speaker 4: it is that they talk about issues within the family
• 10:29
  Speaker 4: court and men who then become estranged from their children
• 10:33
  Speaker 4: because of decisions of the family court.
• 10:35
  Speaker 5: So paul and Hanson goes on.
• 10:36
  Speaker 4: This podcast late last year, so no one's noticed up
• 10:40
  Speaker 4: until this point, and made comments about domestic violence that
• 10:45
  Speaker 4: the nine papers published today and called an exclusive. Now
• 10:49
  Speaker 4: I'm not sure it is actually an exclusive if it's
• 10:52
  Speaker 4: previously been published on a podcast, I suspect you might
• 10:56
  Speaker 4: say that they had the exclusive. But nevertheless, the nine
• 10:59
  Speaker 4: newspapers called this and exclusive and had a major go
• 11:03
  Speaker 4: to for saying what she said. This is an excerpt
• 11:06
  Speaker 4: from her appearance on The Broken Father's podcast.
• 11:10
  Speaker 7: You've got to wind back a lot of issues to
• 11:11
  Speaker 7: do with the family law court. And what I would
• 11:14
  Speaker 7: say is child support. Go after child support. A lot
• 11:20
  Speaker 7: of people see it as a cash cow. Domestic violence
• 11:23
  Speaker 7: takes up about seventy five percent of police officers time
• 11:25
  Speaker 7: now and that's why we're not dealing through real crime
• 11:28
  Speaker 7: out there. The whole thing needs to be wound back.
• 11:32
  Speaker 5: Now.
• 11:32
  Speaker 4: Look, you can make of the comments what you will.
• 11:35
  Speaker 4: I'm not sure it would be advisable to say that
• 11:38
  Speaker 4: the fact police are dealing with domestic violence is a
• 11:41
  Speaker 4: big problem. And yes, domestic violence is a problem, but
• 11:43
  Speaker 4: police also.
• 11:45
  Speaker 5: Need to deal with it.
• 11:46
  Speaker 4: But again, you can go and listen to the entirety
• 11:48
  Speaker 4: of the podcast, or you can read the comments that
• 11:51
  Speaker 4: were published by the nine newspapers in order to generate outrage.
• 11:56
  Speaker 4: And of course that is what is now happening. I mean,
• 11:58
  Speaker 4: Pauline Hanson, if you look at the available polling, would
• 12:02
  Speaker 4: be tomorrow, if there were an election, probably the opposition
• 12:05
  Speaker 4: leader of this country. So she's coming under more scrutiny
• 12:09
  Speaker 4: than she ever has, and rightly so. All political figures,
• 12:13
  Speaker 4: whether it is the opposition leader of the Prime Minister,
• 12:15
  Speaker 4: Angus Taylor, Anthony Alberanezi, paul In Hanson, Larissa Waters, should
• 12:19
  Speaker 4: all be put under pressure at various points and they
• 12:22
  Speaker 4: can either own up to their comments and say, look,
• 12:24
  Speaker 4: I said what I said, you cop at sweet and
• 12:27
  Speaker 4: move on, or they.
• 12:28
  Speaker 5: Can fight it out in the media. I mean, clearly,
• 12:31
  Speaker 5: what we are.
• 12:31
  Speaker 4: Now seeing, and it's been going on for a few
• 12:33
  Speaker 4: months now, is that certain sections of the media will
• 12:36
  Speaker 4: do anything they can to go after Pauline Hanson. And
• 12:39
  Speaker 4: that's fine, that is their prerogative. I do wonder though,
• 12:43
  Speaker 4: now whether Pauline Hanson, having risen to the station she
• 12:48
  Speaker 4: now has after being a political outsider for thirty odd years,
• 12:52
  Speaker 4: she is now very much in the mainstream.
• 12:55
  Speaker 5: She is the woman of the moment.
• 12:58
  Speaker 4: Whether she needs to be a little more careful about
• 13:00
  Speaker 4: what she says. And I'm not saying that she needs
• 13:03
  Speaker 4: to wholesale give up on being Pauline Hansen, because of
• 13:06
  Speaker 4: course a large part of what makes Pauline Hanson work
• 13:09
  Speaker 4: is that she says what she thinks. But you also
• 13:13
  Speaker 4: have to consider, I suppose when you're doing that that
• 13:15
  Speaker 4: some things are going to be taken out of context,
• 13:18
  Speaker 4: and so when you're saying them, you perhaps need to
• 13:21
  Speaker 4: exercise a little more discretion than you otherwise had to.
• 13:25
  Speaker 2: I think the example is Donald Trump. It could easily
• 13:27
  Speaker 2: have been said of Donald Trump as he began to
• 13:30
  Speaker 2: make his course towards the presidency, he's a loose cannon.
• 13:34
  Speaker 2: But now he's going to become the president of the
• 13:35
  Speaker 2: United States, he should tighten the way he speaks. Well,
• 13:38
  Speaker 2: he did the opposite. He just was himself, and then
• 13:41
  Speaker 2: every time the media misconstrued his comments, he pushed back
• 13:45
  Speaker 2: on the media, and people went with him because people
• 13:47
  Speaker 2: were smart enough to realize Trump was often taken out
• 13:51
  Speaker 2: of context or he didn't really mean what was inferred.
• 13:55
  Speaker 2: How much more so for Pauline Hanson. It's ludicrous to
• 13:58
  Speaker 2: think Pauline Hanson is somehow making light of domestic violence,
• 14:02
  Speaker 2: or suggesting that women just mostly make things up, or
• 14:06
  Speaker 2: that somehow men are the primary victims of tibet, all
• 14:09
  Speaker 2: these things that are now being insinuated. I don't think
• 14:12
  Speaker 2: anybody really believes it. So I think Pauline Hanson should
• 14:16
  Speaker 2: stick with what's got her to the point where she
• 14:19
  Speaker 2: is at, which is not speaking like a politician speaking
• 14:23
  Speaker 2: like your next door neighbor speaks, and we don't misunderstand
• 14:26
  Speaker 2: our family and friends when they just, you know, say
• 14:30
  Speaker 2: what's on their mind. And I think Pauline Hanson should
• 14:32
  Speaker 2: continue and just push back on the media who play
• 14:35
  Speaker 2: these gotcha games, and I think people will be very sympathetic.
• 14:38
  Speaker 1: Well, look again, it is their prerogative to go after
• 14:41
  Speaker 1: politicians and find out information. But I'm just wondering if
• 14:44
  Speaker 1: this is almost turning into a quasi witch hunt suddenly,
• 14:47
  Speaker 1: because they're clearly targeting Pauline Hanson. They're trying to find
• 14:50
  Speaker 1: absolutely little, every little thing that they possibly can to
• 14:53
  Speaker 1: try and incriminate her. And it would not surprise me
• 14:56
  Speaker 1: if a lot of these leaks are coming from her
• 14:59
  Speaker 1: political opponent, like within the Labor Party or the Coalition,
• 15:02
  Speaker 1: because that's what happens in politics. The politicians, they leak
• 15:07
  Speaker 1: things out to the media, They do their own research,
• 15:09
  Speaker 1: they put together their own dirt file of sorts to
• 15:12
  Speaker 1: try and outplay the competition and try and make their
• 15:16
  Speaker 1: opponents look bad.
• 15:18
  Speaker 3: Pauline does need to watch what she says.
• 15:21
  Speaker 1: I think that sometimes her speech has been very sloppy,
• 15:25
  Speaker 1: and if you even look at the transcript from that
• 15:27
  Speaker 1: podcast that was published in the nine newspapers today.
• 15:30
  Speaker 3: I don't disagree with her.
• 15:31
  Speaker 1: She was questioning where the payments were always spent on children?
• 15:34
  Speaker 1: This is in terms of child support. Great question to ask.
• 15:37
  Speaker 1: I mean that should be something that is being investigated.
• 15:39
  Speaker 1: What is going on when it comes to child support payments.
• 15:42
  Speaker 1: I think where she slipped up was in her subsequent
• 15:45
  Speaker 1: comments where she said domestic violence takes up seventy five
• 15:47
  Speaker 1: percent of police officers time. Now that's why we're not
• 15:51
  Speaker 1: dealing with the real crime out there.
• 15:53
  Speaker 5: Well, because domestic violence is a real crime.
• 15:55
  Speaker 1: Domestic violence and you know, one of my best friends
• 15:58
  Speaker 1: is a police officer and her date majority of her
• 16:01
  Speaker 1: time is spent on DV. She said it goes so
• 16:04
  Speaker 1: unreported that the media would have no idea just how
• 16:08
  Speaker 1: bad it is out there. So it is a scourge.
• 16:10
  Speaker 1: It is really bad and it does need a lot
• 16:13
  Speaker 1: of time and attention from police. So again it was
• 16:15
  Speaker 1: a sloppy comment. But this is slopping now from nine newspapers.
• 16:19
  Speaker 1: I mean, we've just had Anthony Albanesi deliver the worst budget,
• 16:24
  Speaker 1: the worst budget.
• 16:24
  Speaker 3: Australians are worse off.
• 16:27
  Speaker 1: And they don't seem to be doing dirt files on
• 16:30
  Speaker 1: Anthony Albanesi.
• 16:31
  Speaker 3: They don't seem to.
• 16:32
  Speaker 1: Be analyzing every single section of what Anthony Albanesi is
• 16:36
  Speaker 1: doing wrong and doing expose a's on him.
• 16:39
  Speaker 3: They're going after Pauline Hanson. It's very clear.
• 16:41
  Speaker 2: I think it's fair enough to go back through things
• 16:44
  Speaker 2: that they've said previously that might have gone unreported. It's
• 16:47
  Speaker 2: just not right to take it out of context. The
• 16:50
  Speaker 2: other interesting little lesson in this is that these days,
• 16:54
  Speaker 2: your audience is not your audience. So Pauline Hanson sitting
• 16:57
  Speaker 2: in that podcast studio talking about men's issues to a man,
• 17:02
  Speaker 2: which she presumes will be viewed by people who have
• 17:05
  Speaker 2: a similar sort of perspective on things. But the way
• 17:09
  Speaker 2: media is now and social media, your audience is not
• 17:13
  Speaker 2: your audience. I'm talking to you, but I'm actually talking
• 17:17
  Speaker 2: to the whole world, and that is something that now
• 17:19
  Speaker 2: everybody has to factor into their conversations. The person you're
• 17:23
  Speaker 2: talking to may not be the person who's going to
• 17:25
  Speaker 2: react to what you've just said. It's someone out there,
• 17:27
  Speaker 2: so you do have to be a little careful and
• 17:30
  Speaker 2: clarify where maybe you might not have needed to if
• 17:33
  Speaker 2: this was a private or a restricted conversation, and you.
• 17:37
  Speaker 4: Know you have to sort of make those calls as well,
• 17:40
  Speaker 4: and you might make different calls today than you were
• 17:42
  Speaker 4: making six months ago about do I go on the
• 17:45
  Speaker 4: Broken Father's podcast or do I go on this podcast,
• 17:48
  Speaker 4: or do I talk to these people because it is
• 17:51
  Speaker 4: going to come under scrutiny. And I take the point that, yes,
• 17:55
  Speaker 4: you know, you can play the Trump card as it were,
• 17:58
  Speaker 4: and say, well, you know, it's all fake news, and
• 18:00
  Speaker 4: people get over it. Into a large part they do,
• 18:02
  Speaker 4: and that becomes part of the law of someone like
• 18:05
  Speaker 4: a Pauline Hanson or a Donald Trump. But I think
• 18:08
  Speaker 4: you've also got to be conscious of not handing too
• 18:10
  Speaker 4: many free kicks when it's unnecessary to do.
• 18:14
  Speaker 5: So, you know, within reason, you keep doing.
• 18:16
  Speaker 4: What you're doing, but if you kind of hand things
• 18:19
  Speaker 4: up to the hostile media to use, they will keep
• 18:23
  Speaker 4: using them. Now, maybe that's part of the strategy, but
• 18:27
  Speaker 4: I think you've got to be careful about that to
• 18:28
  Speaker 4: some degree in a way that you probably didn't.
• 18:30
  Speaker 5: Have to a year or two year, or you know,
• 18:33
  Speaker 5: thirty years ago.
• 18:33
  Speaker 2: Have you noticed in recent interviews, when Pauline Hanson is
• 18:36
  Speaker 2: asked a stupid question by journalists. She's done this a
• 18:39
  Speaker 2: few times. I've observed she doesn't immediately, she pauses, and
• 18:43
  Speaker 2: she gets this smirk on her face, almost like she's
• 18:47
  Speaker 2: amused herself, and it's like she's inviting people who are
• 18:50
  Speaker 2: watching to be amused at the question. And then she answers.
• 18:55
  Speaker 2: And I've seen enough times now that I'm sure it's
• 18:58
  Speaker 2: a deliberate thing that she's decided rather hit back at
• 19:01
  Speaker 2: silly questions from the press, pack just pause, get a
• 19:05
  Speaker 2: smirk on her face as if to say, you're an idiot,
• 19:08
  Speaker 2: and then she hits back.
• 19:10
  Speaker 3: Well, it's out of the.
• 19:11
  Speaker 1: Trump and Nigel Farage play because they do the exact
• 19:14
  Speaker 1: same and they are always willing to hit out at
• 19:16
  Speaker 1: the media. But again, that's what makes them that that
• 19:19
  Speaker 1: gives them their public profile.
• 19:20
  Speaker 3: So I totally the other thing.
• 19:22
  Speaker 2: Quickly, I know you want to move on, but once
• 19:24
  Speaker 2: this is my other problem with if she starts changing
• 19:26
  Speaker 2: the way she speaks, Once you start playing the media's game,
• 19:30
  Speaker 2: then you'll be holding to the media's games. That would
• 19:32
  Speaker 2: be my other caution for her. If she's going to
• 19:34
  Speaker 2: change the way she behaves, well, then then now she's
• 19:37
  Speaker 2: got to keep going with that.
• 19:38
  Speaker 1: So I don't think she'll change. She hasn't changed in
• 19:41
  Speaker 1: her entire political life. Why would she start changing now?
• 19:44
  Speaker 1: And it's working, and it's working more than ever, so
• 19:46
  Speaker 1: why would you? Why would you change that? Now you've
• 19:49
  Speaker 1: probably seen you know, in your local area. You might
• 19:51
  Speaker 1: have a local area Facebook or social media page, but
• 19:54
  Speaker 1: people might post criminals or criminal activities, so that where
• 19:57
  Speaker 1: you're aware of an alleged perpetrator, you can keep an
• 20:00
  Speaker 1: eye out to make sure that you know they're not
• 20:03
  Speaker 1: in your building, they're not stealing things for example. Well,
• 20:06
  Speaker 1: police on the Northern Beaches in New South Wales have
• 20:10
  Speaker 1: asked people to stop posting criminals in the act or
• 20:16
  Speaker 1: any of their alleged crimes or anti social behavior. They
• 20:20
  Speaker 1: said that making their actions public only actually encouraged more
• 20:24
  Speaker 1: children and teens to gravitate towards bad behavior. Now, this
• 20:28
  Speaker 1: was spoken about at a d y Surf club. Sorry,
• 20:32
  Speaker 1: this was at a public meeting at the Dysurf Life
• 20:35
  Speaker 1: Saving Club in the week. New South Wales Police Youth
• 20:38
  Speaker 1: Command and Crime Prevention Boss Philip Callahan said quote, there
• 20:41
  Speaker 1: is a lot of evidence starting to come out that
• 20:43
  Speaker 1: it's gravitating kids towards that behavior. They see something on
• 20:47
  Speaker 1: social media and oh, that's person's got notoriety, that person's
• 20:51
  Speaker 1: had a thousand likes, there's five hundred comments in there
• 20:55
  Speaker 1: saying how bad their behavior is. He said that he
• 20:58
  Speaker 1: had been contacted by resident worried about such incidents in
• 21:02
  Speaker 1: these local areas like for example, eat bike riders and
• 21:06
  Speaker 1: so on and so forth. Now in New South Wales
• 21:09
  Speaker 1: there are post and boast laws, so young crims if
• 21:13
  Speaker 1: they go and post their crimes online then they can
• 21:16
  Speaker 1: be charged. And this was only legislation I think that
• 21:18
  Speaker 1: came into force in the last twelve to eighteen months
• 21:21
  Speaker 1: or so.
• 21:23
  Speaker 3: I don't agree.
• 21:24
  Speaker 1: With the police assertion on this that people shouldn't be posting.
• 21:27
  Speaker 1: I find it really really helpful in my local community
• 21:31
  Speaker 1: when people do post these perpetrators online because I want
• 21:34
  Speaker 1: to see their faces. I want to see who they are,
• 21:37
  Speaker 1: and therefore I can keep an eye out. It's like
• 21:39
  Speaker 1: neighborhood watch, really, I mean, this is the new neighborhood watch.
• 21:42
  Speaker 1: Once upon a time there was a phone number for
• 21:44
  Speaker 1: neighborhood watch, but now largely it is done by social media.
• 21:47
  Speaker 3: So I disagree with that.
• 21:49
  Speaker 1: I do understand that there are a lot of kids
• 21:51
  Speaker 1: out there who think, oh, I'm such a hero, I've
• 21:53
  Speaker 1: done this, everybody is talking about me. But I almost
• 21:57
  Speaker 1: feel like if you are talking about it, people are
• 21:59
  Speaker 1: more like to dB people in when they see that
• 22:01
  Speaker 1: sort of behavior personally.
• 22:04
  Speaker 3: And I also just.
• 22:05
  Speaker 1: Wonder why are they trying to It's almost like a
• 22:08
  Speaker 1: form of censorship in my view, to be honest, Caleb,
• 22:11
  Speaker 1: but they don't want you to be but they just
• 22:13
  Speaker 1: want to be like, no, we're going to handle the situation,
• 22:15
  Speaker 1: not you.
• 22:16
  Speaker 5: I find it very strange this idea.
• 22:18
  Speaker 4: And I accept that there are kids who can make
• 22:21
  Speaker 4: crimes and then post the stuff on social media themselves
• 22:25
  Speaker 4: because they are trying to build a following, but fundamentally
• 22:28
  Speaker 4: they're trying to build a following on their profiles so
• 22:31
  Speaker 4: that people know where to go to see what they
• 22:33
  Speaker 4: are doing, and they become a character that other nefarious
• 22:37
  Speaker 4: sort of people.
• 22:37
  Speaker 5: Are interested in.
• 22:39
  Speaker 4: But I find it it's like the argument that kid
• 22:43
  Speaker 4: plays violent social media game, sorry, violent video game, therefore
• 22:48
  Speaker 4: kid will become violent, as though you know, if a
• 22:50
  Speaker 4: kid plays too much World of Warcraft, they're going to
• 22:52
  Speaker 4: start murdering people. I'm not sure that there is a
• 22:56
  Speaker 4: correlation and causation in this case, because it would be
• 22:59
  Speaker 4: the same case surely. Now I've been a police reporter.
• 23:03
  Speaker 4: I as a police reporter at the Advertiser in Adelaide.
• 23:06
  Speaker 4: So when I was writing about crime that was going
• 23:09
  Speaker 4: on in Adelaide and then publishing that in the newspaper,
• 23:12
  Speaker 4: was I creating more crime? Because I was making people
• 23:15
  Speaker 4: aware of the crime that was going on in Adelaide,
• 23:18
  Speaker 4: which was my job.
• 23:19
  Speaker 5: Now, my readers wanted to know what.
• 23:20
  Speaker 4: Was going on because they want to know what's going
• 23:22
  Speaker 4: on in their community around them. But now we're being
• 23:24
  Speaker 4: told by the police that if you give crime a
• 23:27
  Speaker 4: platform by telling people what is going on and showing
• 23:30
  Speaker 4: videos or what's going on in the community, that you
• 23:33
  Speaker 4: are encouraging more crime. So what we all just meant
• 23:36
  Speaker 4: to pretend that there isn't crime going on and not
• 23:40
  Speaker 4: see the reality of what's happening in the world. I
• 23:43
  Speaker 4: accept it may be embarrassing for governments and police forces
• 23:47
  Speaker 4: at some points in time to have crime shown because
• 23:51
  Speaker 4: they go, oh, you know gee, it makes us look
• 23:53
  Speaker 4: bad because perhaps we're not on top of it.
• 23:55
  Speaker 5: But it's the reality of what's going on.
• 23:59
  Speaker 4: If you're a kid when you're watching you know, Mavers
• 24:02
  Speaker 4: post in your local Facebook group about a crime that
• 24:05
  Speaker 4: was committed in the local community, and that's what's making
• 24:08
  Speaker 4: you go, ah, well, I'm going to go and commit
• 24:10
  Speaker 4: crime now. I suspect we've got bigger problems to deal
• 24:13
  Speaker 4: with than Mayvers posting on Facebook.
• 24:15
  Speaker 2: What if MAVs posts baking cakes, then all the young
• 24:18
  Speaker 2: people start baking making cake maybe to work there way,
• 24:21
  Speaker 2: I have a great I think there's a couple of
• 24:23
  Speaker 2: things that could be true. At the same time. Surely
• 24:25
  Speaker 2: let's take the police officer at face value that there
• 24:28
  Speaker 2: are some young people who want notoriety. They've been raised
• 24:32
  Speaker 2: in a culture where, you know, to get someone to
• 24:34
  Speaker 2: like whatever you've done on social media that gives you
• 24:38
  Speaker 2: value and affirms your sense of worth and identity. Okay,
• 24:41
  Speaker 2: let's give him that. But at the same time, crime
• 24:44
  Speaker 2: prevention and transparency should not be mutually exclusive. And I
• 24:48
  Speaker 2: think we're a little cynical because it was the e
• 24:51
  Speaker 2: Safety Commissioner who wanted violent acts of terrorism i e.
• 24:55
  Speaker 2: A church minister being stabbed in the eye some time
• 24:59
  Speaker 2: ago one to that taken down because it might encourage
• 25:02
  Speaker 2: other acts of terrorism. And a lot of us thought
• 25:05
  Speaker 2: is that the problem, or do you just not want
• 25:08
  Speaker 2: that discussion about extremism and certain religions to be had
• 25:14
  Speaker 2: and you're just trying to brush it under the carpet.
• 25:16
  Speaker 2: And this is something we've seen right around the world
• 25:18
  Speaker 2: with terror acts. It's got echoes of that. Doesn't it
• 25:22
  Speaker 2: this idea that police would rather you not post videos
• 25:25
  Speaker 2: of crimes being committed in your area because if the
• 25:29
  Speaker 2: videos aren't posted, then you're not aware that there's crimes
• 25:31
  Speaker 2: being committed in your area.
• 25:33
  Speaker 3: Would you rather know?
• 25:35
  Speaker 2: You would rather know, but police would rather you not
• 25:37
  Speaker 2: know because then it looks like there's no crime issue
• 25:40
  Speaker 2: in your area.
• 25:41
  Speaker 1: But also, if you're so worried that these kids are
• 25:44
  Speaker 1: going to gain some notoriety out of this, then well
• 25:50
  Speaker 1: when you catch them, lock them up.
• 25:53
  Speaker 3: Isn't that the problem that we discuss a lot. I mean,
• 25:56
  Speaker 3: isn't that the core of this then?
• 25:58
  Speaker 1: I mean, if you've got these delinquents out there committing
• 26:01
  Speaker 1: these crimes thinking they're absolute heroes, so then they're repeat offenders,
• 26:06
  Speaker 1: well lock them up.
• 26:08
  Speaker 2: It's not lacks bail laws, it's social media.
• 26:10
  Speaker 1: No, I'm sayg yeah, exactly, it's always social media, right,
• 26:13
  Speaker 1: never mind the justice system never mind the bail laws. No, no,
• 26:17
  Speaker 1: it's all social media. It's always easy to blame someone else.
• 26:20
  Speaker 4: Well, even Kitty Crimson adhere to the rule that if
• 26:22
  Speaker 4: it wasn't posted on social media, it didn't really happen.
• 26:26
  Speaker 4: It would seem something that is going to happen. I
• 26:28
  Speaker 4: think is really sad here in Sydney where we are
• 26:31
  Speaker 4: broadcasting from Wentworth Park, which is the greyhound track in Sydney,
• 26:36
  Speaker 4: going to be demolished this year.
• 26:38
  Speaker 5: Now we knew this was coming.
• 26:40
  Speaker 4: The new South Wales state government had announced that they
• 26:43
  Speaker 4: wanted to take Wentworth Park back and knock the place
• 26:47
  Speaker 4: over so they could build a park, so we could
• 26:49
  Speaker 4: put up more houses around it to deal with infinity
• 26:51
  Speaker 4: migration that Anthony Albanezi tells us we need. But they've
• 26:56
  Speaker 4: now struck a deal whereby Wentworth Park, which.
• 26:59
  Speaker 5: Is right next to the CBD.
• 27:01
  Speaker 4: It's in Piermont in Sydney, so right next to the city,
• 27:05
  Speaker 4: prime location after nearly one hundred years, will be knocked
• 27:09
  Speaker 4: over after October, which will be the last time a
• 27:12
  Speaker 4: dog race will run there. Now, the justification for all
• 27:17
  Speaker 4: of this, and look personally, I think the real reason
• 27:20
  Speaker 4: behind all of this is that the government would quite
• 27:23
  Speaker 4: like to get rid of a dog track in the city,
• 27:25
  Speaker 4: because once you get rid of dog racing in the city,
• 27:27
  Speaker 4: then it sort of becomes out of sight, out of mind,
• 27:30
  Speaker 4: and then people might forget about it, and then one
• 27:32
  Speaker 4: day when you want to try and ban it, people go, oh,
• 27:34
  Speaker 4: I didn't know dog.
• 27:35
  Speaker 5: Racing was still going on. I haven't seen anything going
• 27:37
  Speaker 5: on for ages.
• 27:38
  Speaker 4: I think there might be other stuff behind this, But
• 27:41
  Speaker 4: the justification they are using is that there's a whole
• 27:44
  Speaker 4: bunch of new houses houses because they're not going to
• 27:47
  Speaker 4: put up any houses, no room for houses, apartments, dog
• 27:49
  Speaker 4: boxes that they're going to put up around the location
• 27:52
  Speaker 4: where Wentworth Park is in Pimont, right next to the city.
• 27:56
  Speaker 4: Thirty four hundred new homes they reckon they're going to
• 27:59
  Speaker 4: build in the nearby area, including on the old fish
• 28:03
  Speaker 4: markets in Sydney. Then just over the road at Gleebe
• 28:06
  Speaker 4: Island they want to put up eight thousand and five
• 28:09
  Speaker 4: hundred apartments, which is another thing that gets my goat
• 28:13
  Speaker 4: because you're taking a productive asset, which is the last
• 28:16
  Speaker 4: working port in Sydney, Sydney Harbor, I should say, Gleebe Island,
• 28:20
  Speaker 4: and then turning it into houses to deal with the
• 28:23
  Speaker 4: infinity migration. Why is it that we have to give
• 28:27
  Speaker 4: up on things that are useful and are used within Sydney,
• 28:32
  Speaker 4: be it the gleebe Island Port, Working Port, or Wentworth
• 28:38
  Speaker 4: Park with a race dogs twice a week and I
• 28:41
  Speaker 4: have been there many times. We've got to get rid
• 28:43
  Speaker 4: of these things. I mean they tried to do it
• 28:44
  Speaker 4: to rose Hill Racecourse of course, and they failed in
• 28:47
  Speaker 4: that endeavor, thank god. But we've got to get rid
• 28:50
  Speaker 4: of all these things that we have because the federal
• 28:53
  Speaker 4: government has imported lots of people. So now we're going
• 28:55
  Speaker 4: to build dog box apartments in the inner city because
• 28:58
  Speaker 4: that's all we can. You know, people live somewhere, so
• 29:00
  Speaker 4: that's where we're going to put them. And then we're
• 29:02
  Speaker 4: going to demolish other things around it that are being
• 29:05
  Speaker 4: used and are quite nice so that we can, I
• 29:07
  Speaker 4: don't know, put up another park for these people to
• 29:09
  Speaker 4: go to or something. There are two parks on either
• 29:11
  Speaker 4: side of Wentworth Park in Sydney as it is.
• 29:15
  Speaker 5: What's wrong with them? Go and walk your dog there.
• 29:18
  Speaker 4: Why is it that we have to give up the
• 29:20
  Speaker 4: dog track because Elbow wants to shoehorn more people into Sydney.
• 29:24
  Speaker 3: Well, hang on a second.
• 29:25
  Speaker 1: I don't disagree with you that migration is a large
• 29:28
  Speaker 1: problem and it has had a massive contribution to the
• 29:31
  Speaker 1: housing crisis. But we can't also get every day Ossie's
• 29:34
  Speaker 1: into houses right now. And if you do want a
• 29:36
  Speaker 1: house in the city, you have to go out in
• 29:39
  Speaker 1: whoopwoop to find a property that you can afford right now.
• 29:42
  Speaker 1: So why wouldn't we if you've got prime land sitting there,
• 29:45
  Speaker 1: use it and build some houses and try and get
• 29:47
  Speaker 1: more and more people into properties.
• 29:48
  Speaker 3: Because we have a supply crisis.
• 29:50
  Speaker 1: You've got Anthony Abenezy trying to tax his way out
• 29:52
  Speaker 1: of supply.
• 29:53
  Speaker 3: You can't do that. Supply is the key issue.
• 29:55
  Speaker 1: Second point I would make and correct me if I'm
• 29:57
  Speaker 1: wrong here. But the New South Wales Greyhound b Readers
• 30:00
  Speaker 1: Owner Owners and Trainers Association, they've already requested our early
• 30:04
  Speaker 1: termination over this lease, right so they're ready to get
• 30:07
  Speaker 1: rid of this lease.
• 30:08
  Speaker 4: So no, no, no, hang on, hang on, hang on, hanging
• 30:10
  Speaker 4: handing you're suggesting that's because they don't like went with Park.
• 30:13
  Speaker 5: No, I don't not necessarily.
• 30:14
  Speaker 1: True that they talk about the accusations that that's.
• 30:17
  Speaker 4: Because because it was coming anyway, right, I mean the
• 30:20
  Speaker 4: governor already said that this was going to stop.
• 30:22
  Speaker 5: Dog race was going to stop and went Worth Park. Right.
• 30:24
  Speaker 5: What they have now negotiated is that it will happen earlier.
• 30:27
  Speaker 4: Now, that may be if the situation is that it
• 30:30
  Speaker 4: is going to go. Getting out of there earlier then
• 30:33
  Speaker 4: gives them more time to go and find somewhere else
• 30:35
  Speaker 4: to sit up a base.
• 30:36
  Speaker 5: Somewhere else, Well, go find Why don't you go to
• 30:39
  Speaker 5: find somewhere else to live?
• 30:40
  Speaker 3: Why do you need what's the point of keeping that there?
• 30:43
  Speaker 3: Just what as a sentimental as a little bit of
• 30:45
  Speaker 3: a sentimental.
• 30:46
  Speaker 5: It's being used, but it's not going to be.
• 30:48
  Speaker 3: Used from from that from that time because other parks in.
• 30:51
  Speaker 4: The area, because the state government is deemed that it
• 30:53
  Speaker 4: will be so.
• 30:54
  Speaker 2: So I ask a question, who owns Wentworth Park?
• 30:56
  Speaker 5: I believe it's owned by the state government.
• 30:59
  Speaker 2: Right, so the Gray Association are renting the facility.
• 31:02
  Speaker 5: They've had the grace.
• 31:03
  Speaker 2: So if I own a house, do I not have
• 31:05
  Speaker 2: the right to say, you know what, I want to
• 31:07
  Speaker 2: do something different with my property now? So the renter
• 31:09
  Speaker 2: will have to leave at the end of the least.
• 31:12
  Speaker 4: Well, you might have the right to do it, but
• 31:13
  Speaker 4: it doesn't mean that I don't have the right tools
• 31:15
  Speaker 4: to disagree with you doing so.
• 31:18
  Speaker 2: It is because you like greyhound racing, not because there's
• 31:21
  Speaker 2: anything morally wrong happening here.
• 31:24
  Speaker 4: Well, I think it's also a distraction of history. I
• 31:26
  Speaker 4: think it's fundamentally bad for the sport and that is
• 31:31
  Speaker 4: a piece of important sporting infrastructure in a prime spot
• 31:35
  Speaker 4: in the Sydney CBD.
• 31:37
  Speaker 5: Because the state government doesn't want it used anymore. That's
• 31:41
  Speaker 5: why it's about to not be you.
• 31:42
  Speaker 1: I'm saying your argument, Caleb, you just want this piece
• 31:44
  Speaker 1: of prime infrastructure just sitting there. What just so people
• 31:47
  Speaker 1: can just look at and go, oh, that was where
• 31:48
  Speaker 1: the righthound so it can.
• 31:49
  Speaker 5: Continue to be you.
• 31:50
  Speaker 2: Crowds at greyhound racing are not exactly exploding. Okay, so
• 31:55
  Speaker 2: grandstand is not typically full for a.
• 31:57
  Speaker 5: When you have a big race there, the grandstand will
• 31:59
  Speaker 5: be full.
• 32:00
  Speaker 2: How often would the Greyhound grandstand be full two or
• 32:05
  Speaker 2: three times a year?
• 32:06
  Speaker 5: Probably?
• 32:07
  Speaker 4: There?
• 32:07
  Speaker 3: You got that that's not value for money, Caleb.
• 32:09
  Speaker 5: Ok you don't think it's value for money.
• 32:11
  Speaker 4: You go and tell the people who work in greyhound
• 32:13
  Speaker 4: racing that they don't generate economic benefit for this state.
• 32:16
  Speaker 1: I'm not saying that they don't. The point is is
• 32:18
  Speaker 1: that clearly it is not being used to its full capacity.
• 32:22
  Speaker 1: So if greyhound breeders say, if the greyhound breeders are saying,
• 32:27
  Speaker 1: you know what, we want to terminate this lease early.
• 32:29
  Speaker 3: We want to get out of.
• 32:29
  Speaker 1: There, what is the point of it just sitting there idle?
• 32:33
  Speaker 1: And even even when it comes to the fish market
• 32:36
  Speaker 1: the port. You mentioned the port as well, Cleb, why
• 32:39
  Speaker 1: wouldn't you.
• 32:40
  Speaker 3: Want to develop it? Put apartments there?
• 32:42
  Speaker 5: There's a working port.
• 32:44
  Speaker 1: But Caleb, I just think that we have a housing
• 32:47
  Speaker 1: crisis of this kintry.
• 32:48
  Speaker 3: We need more supply.
• 32:50
  Speaker 4: So what we should do, because we have infinity migration
• 32:53
  Speaker 4: is just build dog boxes on top of everything everywhere.
• 32:56
  Speaker 3: But unfortunately Sydney is apartment living.
• 32:59
  Speaker 2: Just develop our it is Do we develop the botanic
• 33:01
  Speaker 2: gardens for housing?
• 33:02
  Speaker 3: No, because the botanic gardens are used all the time.
• 33:05
  Speaker 5: So's Wentworth Park, so's Gleebe Island.
• 33:09
  Speaker 4: You just prefer that you like the way that the
• 33:11
  Speaker 4: botannic park is used.
• 33:12
  Speaker 5: You don't like the way you.
• 33:15
  Speaker 2: Have summarized my position. I don't care about dog racing,
• 33:18
  Speaker 2: so I'm not that passionate about keeping Wentworth. So that's true.
• 33:21
  Speaker 3: All right, let's be let we just never to agree
• 33:24
  Speaker 3: on this one. We've always we're never going to agree
• 33:26
  Speaker 3: on this one anyway.
• 33:27
  Speaker 4: Janiga just wants to pay paradise, put up a parking lot.
• 33:30
  Speaker 1: I just want to watch greyhound racing, don't you. Okay,
• 33:32
  Speaker 1: let's move on now. Now you might remember the story
• 33:36
  Speaker 1: brought you a couple of months ago. The lakember Mosque
• 33:38
  Speaker 1: here in Sydney that had applied to put the Islamic
• 33:42
  Speaker 1: Call to Prayer wanted to build more loud speakers on
• 33:46
  Speaker 1: its mironette to broadcast that the Islamic Call to prayer.
• 33:53
  Speaker 1: Now it has gone to the local council to try
• 33:55
  Speaker 1: and get approval. So more than sixteen hundred people of
• 33:58
  Speaker 1: lodge submissions objecting the plan. The Lebanese Muslim Association has
• 34:03
  Speaker 1: said its petition has already attracted five thousand signatures in support.
• 34:08
  Speaker 1: Now there was a local councilor from Canterbury Bankstown. Her
• 34:12
  Speaker 1: name is Barbara Curry. She has put forward a motion
• 34:14
  Speaker 1: to block the plan. She has said, while places of
• 34:17
  Speaker 1: worship play an important role in supporting the spiritual and
• 34:20
  Speaker 1: cultural needs and life of our community. Their location within
• 34:24
  Speaker 1: employment and residential areas requires careful management of potential amenity impacts,
• 34:29
  Speaker 1: particularly in relation to noise. Well, she was met with
• 34:33
  Speaker 1: this rebuke from gamel Kia from the Lebanese Muslim Association.
• 34:38
  Speaker 1: He said she has an obligation, with all due respect,
• 34:43
  Speaker 1: to keep her mouth shut until the umpire's decision is made.
• 34:49
  Speaker 5: Wow.
• 34:50
  Speaker 1: Well, firstly, when I read that, I thought, here we
• 34:52
  Speaker 1: have a Muslim man telling a white woman to keep
• 34:55
  Speaker 1: her mouth shut and g silly me. I thought that
• 34:58
  Speaker 1: diversity was supposed to be our strength. Now you cannot
• 35:01
  Speaker 1: deny that there would be people who would object to
• 35:03
  Speaker 1: this plan, and that is why there's about sixteen hundred
• 35:05
  Speaker 1: people who have lodged submissions saying no, okay, this is
• 35:09
  Speaker 1: not about the noises such. It's about taking over a
• 35:12
  Speaker 1: public space to profess Islamic teaching. This is a this
• 35:16
  Speaker 1: is our territory and that is what bothers me the
• 35:19
  Speaker 1: most here. I mean, we wouldn't go into the middle
• 35:21
  Speaker 1: of Gaza James and say, oh, can you play the
• 35:23
  Speaker 1: church bells?
• 35:24
  Speaker 3: How would that go down? Oh?
• 35:25
  Speaker 5: Could a little bit of fun?
• 35:26
  Speaker 2: Probably wouldn't go down that well, So help me understand
• 35:29
  Speaker 2: this you've got the Lebanese Muslim Association telling the female
• 35:33
  Speaker 2: counselor she's making too much noise.
• 35:35
  Speaker 1: Yes, yeh irony, the irony, and to keep her mouth shut.
• 35:40
  Speaker 2: Yeah, I've just said all that.
• 35:42
  Speaker 5: Yeah, yeah, I'm not sure where to go after that.
• 35:44
  Speaker 5: I mean, for goodness sake, I keep you as a counselor.
• 35:48
  Speaker 4: Your job is to voice community concerns. And then in
• 35:53
  Speaker 4: the process of voicing community concerns, you're being told to
• 35:57
  Speaker 4: keep your mouth shut because someone else is making a decision.
• 36:00
  Speaker 5: Last I checked.
• 36:01
  Speaker 4: You know, making comments in the media or publicly does
• 36:05
  Speaker 4: not influence the decision makers in making a fair decision
• 36:08
  Speaker 4: in terms of development. And to run that line, I
• 36:11
  Speaker 4: think is absolutely ridiculous. Hey, very quickly before we get
• 36:14
  Speaker 4: to a break. You know, I don't like AI if
• 36:16
  Speaker 4: you're a regular viewer.
• 36:17
  Speaker 5: And here's another reason not to trust AI.
• 36:20
  Speaker 4: Open AI, which runs chat GPT, was recently running some
• 36:24
  Speaker 4: tests on a new system of THEIRS, and in doing so,
• 36:26
  Speaker 4: it hacked into another businesses systems, completely independent of anything
• 36:32
  Speaker 4: they were doing. Now they're trying to sell out this
• 36:34
  Speaker 4: thing to be autonomous, and while they were testing it,
• 36:37
  Speaker 4: it just went off and hacked into another business and
• 36:40
  Speaker 4: you think this AI stuff is going to be the
• 36:43
  Speaker 4: way that we fix the world. I mean, look, it's
• 36:46
  Speaker 4: hacking into systems one day.
• 36:48
  Speaker 5: Next day you're going to.
• 36:49
  Speaker 4: Get more stuff like this, you know, attacking in the
• 37:21
  Speaker 4: main frames.
• 37:22
  Speaker 5: It's going after Granny's, it's beating up kids. Is going
• 37:26
  Speaker 5: really well.
• 37:27
  Speaker 1: You know that vision never gets sold what he's been
• 37:29
  Speaker 1: taken away by the police and the boloms.
• 37:31
  Speaker 5: So sad.
• 37:32
  Speaker 3: Oh god, it cracks me up every time. All right,
• 37:34
  Speaker 3: we're gonna take a quick break.
• 37:35
  Speaker 1: Coming up, we'll take a look at tomorrow's papers, including
• 37:38
  Speaker 1: South Australian Health officials under investigation apparently accessing the confidential
• 37:43
  Speaker 1: health records of AFL star Tony Madras he recovered from
• 37:47
  Speaker 1: life threatening injuries.
• 37:48
  Speaker 3: That's next. Welcome back to the show.
• 37:56
  Speaker 1: Let's take a look at tomorrow's front pages. James, it's
• 37:59
  Speaker 1: not good if you own a car.
• 38:01
  Speaker 2: It's not good unless you've got an ev deneaker.
• 38:03
  Speaker 3: Oh of course, Chris Bowen, I love that.
• 38:05
  Speaker 2: Front page of tomorrow's courier mail. The headline reads petrol
• 38:08
  Speaker 2: on the rates fire. Homeowners are almost certainly facing a
• 38:12
  Speaker 2: fourth interest rate hike this year thanks to soaring petrol prices.
• 38:16
  Speaker 2: The chance of a rate rise by the end of
• 38:18
  Speaker 2: the year is dramatically escalated to ninety five percent after
• 38:22
  Speaker 2: being just forty six percent last month. IG Markets senior
• 38:26
  Speaker 2: analyst Tony sircam or seconds was due to the sycamore
• 38:31
  Speaker 2: said this was due to the rising price of oil
• 38:33
  Speaker 2: and strong employment figures released by the ABS yesterday. So
• 38:37
  Speaker 2: we know what will happen. Jim Chalmers will of course
• 38:39
  Speaker 2: blame things happening Ian and life will carry on with
• 38:44
  Speaker 2: all of us paying through the nose at the bowser.
• 38:46
  Speaker 1: It's all the global it's all the global impacts. And
• 38:48
  Speaker 1: you know Australia's caught in the cross with the crosshairs.
• 38:50
  Speaker 1: There you go, That's exactly what he's going to say.
• 38:52
  Speaker 4: What was it that happened underneath the sycamore tree?
• 38:55
  Speaker 5: In dream A little dream of me?
• 38:58
  Speaker 4: You know, you know, you know the Songmaks dreamer, little
• 39:02
  Speaker 4: dream of Me.
• 39:04
  Speaker 5: Anyway, it's a bit in there, but the sycamore.
• 39:05
  Speaker 1: Birds singing in the sycamore bird singing.
• 39:07
  Speaker 5: In the sycamore tree.
• 39:08
  Speaker 4: There. You know, I thought you'd be across the sycamore James,
• 39:10
  Speaker 4: you being a great lover of music.
• 39:13
  Speaker 2: Indeed, it seems like I'm not Kayla.
• 39:15
  Speaker 3: The question is do you know? Do you know the
• 39:17
  Speaker 3: mummers and the papers?
• 39:18
  Speaker 2: No? Oh my god, okay, sorry, does Billy joelsing that?
• 39:23
  Speaker 1: Oh god, look forget it. It just gets worse every night,
• 39:26
  Speaker 1: doesn't it. It's embarrassing. I'm sure you're embarrassed at home.
• 39:29
  Speaker 1: Let's take a look now at the Australian ALPS world
• 39:32
  Speaker 1: away from Bondi. Look at Albo with his arms flapping
• 39:35
  Speaker 1: about their Labour's division over Israel, the bird flu.
• 39:38
  Speaker 3: Labor under the sycamore tree.
• 39:40
  Speaker 1: Labour's division over Israel is threatening to overshadow its fiftieth
• 39:44
  Speaker 1: national conference just months after the Bondi terror attack, with
• 39:47
  Speaker 1: a push to restore demands on Hummas disarming in the
• 39:52
  Speaker 1: party's policy platform, competing with calls for stronger criticisms of
• 39:56
  Speaker 1: the Jewish state. The closed door debate on Israel comes
• 39:59
  Speaker 1: as the sur one nation loomed large. On the first
• 40:02
  Speaker 1: day of the national conference in adelaide As Labor and
• 40:04
  Speaker 1: PS branch members and delegates backed higher taxes on fossil
• 40:07
  Speaker 1: fuels and an expansion of government owned renewaballs projects. Well,
• 40:13
  Speaker 1: here we go again with Labour's division when it comes
• 40:16
  Speaker 1: to Israel. And let's not forget that Anthony Albanezi was
• 40:19
  Speaker 1: once a pro Palestine activist back in his youth, so
• 40:24
  Speaker 1: we know where his allegiances lie when it comes to.
• 40:26
  Speaker 4: This indeed, and yet he is well aware of what
• 40:30
  Speaker 4: all of this carry on does to the party.
• 40:33
  Speaker 5: And this is sort of you know, one of the
• 40:34
  Speaker 5: great things.
• 40:35
  Speaker 4: About the ALP is that publicly they generally present a
• 40:39
  Speaker 4: united front whatever they're doing. You know that the faction
• 40:43
  Speaker 4: sort of understand that at the end of the day,
• 40:45
  Speaker 4: solidarity forever, and that's what holds them together.
• 40:48
  Speaker 5: But when they go off to national conference and state conference.
• 40:51
  Speaker 4: And they have these fights, we see what the Labor
• 40:54
  Speaker 4: Party actually is and what they look like. And so
• 40:57
  Speaker 4: you've got parts of the Labor Party saying, oh, well,
• 40:59
  Speaker 4: we should put the wording back in there to disarm Hamas,
• 41:02
  Speaker 4: and then you've got others saying, no, we can't.
• 41:04
  Speaker 5: We've got a little of water it all down. This
• 41:06
  Speaker 5: is the real ALP.
• 41:08
  Speaker 2: The interesting thing about this as well as at the conference,
• 41:11
  Speaker 2: there were pro pelstin and protesters outside the venue hurling
• 41:15
  Speaker 2: all sorts of abuse at Penny Wong and others. You
• 41:19
  Speaker 2: would think they'd be appreciative of this Labor government who
• 41:22
  Speaker 2: are clearly pro Palestine and quite antagonistic towards Israel. And
• 41:28
  Speaker 2: yet they don't get any credit from Propelstinian supporters.
• 41:31
  Speaker 3: No, they never do.
• 41:33
  Speaker 4: On the front of the Daily Telegraph tomorrow, it says
• 41:36
  Speaker 4: ISIS brides made it back to Australia now Hanson asked
• 41:39
  Speaker 4: Coalition to join forces and stop fighters returning to Pauline
• 41:43
  Speaker 4: pops the question day A bit of a saucy story
• 41:47
  Speaker 4: in front of the Daily Telegraph tomorrow, exclusive by Matthew Binns,
• 41:51
  Speaker 4: it says Pauline Hanson has challenged the Coalition to join
• 41:55
  Speaker 4: forces with one nation to slam the door on ISIS
• 41:58
  Speaker 4: linked fighters returning home, offering Angus Taylor the numbers in
• 42:01
  Speaker 4: Parliament to pass sweeping new counter terrorism laws.
• 42:05
  Speaker 5: In a letter delivered to mister.
• 42:07
  Speaker 4: Taylor this morning, as Hanson spelled out her concerns that
• 42:10
  Speaker 4: thirteen men linked to Islamic Stage and held in Iraq
• 42:13
  Speaker 4: could follow ISIS brand's in returning to Australia. The letter said,
• 42:17
  Speaker 4: this Labor government is doing everything it can to enable
• 42:20
  Speaker 4: these people to return, while telling the Australian people it
• 42:23
  Speaker 4: is powerless to stop them.
• 42:27
  Speaker 5: Now, this is good.
• 42:28
  Speaker 4: The only thing I'm not quite clear on though, is
• 42:31
  Speaker 4: that she's told the Coalition she'll give them the numbers
• 42:34
  Speaker 4: to pass it. They don't have the numbers in the
• 42:37
  Speaker 4: lower House, so maybe they would have the numbers in
• 42:39
  Speaker 4: the Senate to get something up. But you're not going
• 42:43
  Speaker 4: to get something through the lower House without the support
• 42:45
  Speaker 4: of the government, right, No, you're quite correct, Dawn.
• 43:00
  Speaker 3: So you were going to make more of a point.
• 43:01
  Speaker 4: So well, I'm just saying that it's not going to
• 43:04
  Speaker 4: pass anywhay. So you know, she can runt the letter
• 43:07
  Speaker 4: to Angus Taylor and say, well, we'll give you the
• 43:09
  Speaker 4: numbers to pass it. Unless it's got the support of
• 43:11
  Speaker 4: the government, it's not going to pass in the lower House.
• 43:13
  Speaker 4: But I guess the broader point is, you know, how
• 43:16
  Speaker 4: much does the Coalition want to engage with one nation?
• 43:20
  Speaker 4: Because you know, Paul Enhans is clearly extending the Twigger Friendship's.
• 43:26
  Speaker 2: Pretty hard to say no to this proposal, would it not?
• 43:29
  Speaker 4: Well, you look stupid, I think if you don't take
• 43:31
  Speaker 4: it up, don't you, because at least then you've had
• 43:33
  Speaker 4: to go at trying to get something through the Senate.
• 43:34
  Speaker 5: Then it goes off to the Lower House and it loses.
• 43:36
  Speaker 2: And you expose the government's ineptitude on national security. Let's
• 43:41
  Speaker 2: go to the front page of tomorrow's Herald's son Vick's
• 43:44
  Speaker 2: dyre demo job reads the headline unemployment in Victoria has
• 43:47
  Speaker 2: risen to the highest in Australia, with the gap between
• 43:50
  Speaker 2: our state and the national average the worst in sixteen years,
• 43:54
  Speaker 2: prompting business sheep business chiefs to warn the Allen government's
• 43:59
  Speaker 2: work from home and anti worker policies were quote unquote
• 44:03
  Speaker 2: coming home to roost? Is anyone really surprised?
• 44:07
  Speaker 3: Who would have thought? Who would have thought when you
• 44:10
  Speaker 3: mandate government did not think? Well?
• 44:12
  Speaker 1: No, well, who would have thought that if you mandate
• 44:14
  Speaker 1: that it's going to have the exact opposite effect. Unbelievable.
• 44:18
  Speaker 1: Let's take a look at the advertiser. This is a
• 44:20
  Speaker 1: shocking story. Exclusive Health staff probed over Modra file access
• 44:25
  Speaker 1: snoop docs.
• 44:26
  Speaker 3: Spy on mods. Yeah, great headline essay.
• 44:28
  Speaker 1: Health is investigating eight staff accused of accessing Crow's legend
• 44:33
  Speaker 1: Tony Modra's medical records as he recovered from life threatening
• 44:36
  Speaker 1: injuries in Flinda's medical center.
• 44:39
  Speaker 3: It was only a few days ago that we found
• 44:40
  Speaker 3: that the.
• 44:40
  Speaker 1: MODRA has made a recovery is put out a statement,
• 44:44
  Speaker 1: but this is absolutely appalling. I think you know that
• 44:48
  Speaker 1: they're confidential for a reason.
• 44:51
  Speaker 2: It's interesting to me about that. And we don't have
• 44:53
  Speaker 2: the rest of the article. But they're investigating not a
• 44:56
  Speaker 2: staff member, but eight staff Are they working in together
• 45:00
  Speaker 2: or is it just eight people who were very curious?
• 45:02
  Speaker 4: And what the hell are you doing looking up someone's
• 45:04
  Speaker 4: medical records when you shouldn't be anyway, that's.
• 45:08
  Speaker 5: Really low stuff I have to say. And you know
• 45:10
  Speaker 5: what else is in the Advertiser tomorrow? My column? Make
• 45:13
  Speaker 5: it and read it every Friday. Every Friday. Pick up
• 45:16
  Speaker 5: a copy of the Taser from the best column in
• 45:18
  Speaker 5: the country.
• 45:19
  Speaker 4: Now I know self praise is no recommendation on the
• 45:22
  Speaker 4: front of the cans Post tomorrow.
• 45:24
  Speaker 5: Use the curtains new claiming wedding dress for all case.
• 45:27
  Speaker 5: This is an extraordinary story.
• 45:29
  Speaker 4: This is a woman allegedly chopped up her own bridle
• 45:32
  Speaker 4: shops curtains to make a bodgy wedding gown for a client.
• 45:36
  Speaker 4: A court has heard the allegations against Allison Davies, owner
• 45:39
  Speaker 4: of Cairn's Bridle and Formal Wear shop, Genovia Bridle and
• 45:44
  Speaker 4: co accused employee Dominique Marianne Rowland were detailing court on Thursday.
• 45:49
  Speaker 4: The pair allegedly left in their wake seventy five complainants,
• 45:52
  Speaker 4: including sixty two brides, one debutante and twelve family members
• 45:56
  Speaker 4: who helped pay for dresses. Roll In fifty three plated
• 45:59
  Speaker 4: guilt in the Cans Magistrate Court to dishonestly causing a
• 46:03
  Speaker 4: detriment of one hundred and twenty one, four hundred and
• 46:06
  Speaker 4: eighty two dollars and fifty six cents to different persons
• 46:09
  Speaker 4: and dishonestly applying to her own use a wedding dress
• 46:13
  Speaker 4: belonging to a woman to Tom Feeney said, on one occasion,
• 46:17
  Speaker 4: Roland was involved in a texting change where a decision
• 46:20
  Speaker 4: was made to use a stores curtains as material for
• 46:23
  Speaker 4: a dress, which was then provided to the bride four
• 46:26
  Speaker 4: days before her wedding home.
• 46:28
  Speaker 2: My know how they found out about this, Well, the
• 46:30
  Speaker 2: bride was throwing shade.
• 46:32
  Speaker 1: Ah, you're full of the puns tonight, full of the puns,
• 46:36
  Speaker 1: and they're not. We're going to take a quick break
• 46:38
  Speaker 1: coming up. Do you like ants in your food? Well,
• 46:40
  Speaker 1: apparently a Aussie chef in South Threa does and now
• 46:44
  Speaker 1: he's facing jail time.
• 46:45
  Speaker 3: That's next. Welcome back.
• 46:49
  Speaker 1: Well, the Prime Minister almost took a bit of a
• 46:51
  Speaker 1: tumble today when an escalator he was on abruptly stopped
• 46:55
  Speaker 1: and pull he was stopped in his tracks. Who I
• 47:10
  Speaker 1: like how he quickly looked at it.
• 47:11
  Speaker 3: Did anybody see that?
• 47:12
  Speaker 1: Because it reminded us actually at this moment, remember this
• 47:15
  Speaker 1: trip that he had whip sees at the back of
• 47:17
  Speaker 1: the stage. And then he told us no, actually I
• 47:19
  Speaker 1: didn't fall off the stage, even though he had to
• 47:21
  Speaker 1: be helped up, because he did fall on the stage.
• 47:24
  Speaker 1: And you know what else, it reminds me of this character.
• 47:27
  Speaker 1: Let's bring him up. Well, there he goes. Remember Joe
• 47:29
  Speaker 1: Biden and the tripping montage. Gee, it never gets so old,
• 47:32
  Speaker 1: does it.
• 47:33
  Speaker 4: You know, the Prime Minister is very lucky. He could
• 47:36
  Speaker 4: have come a cropper there, and I imagine that he
• 47:38
  Speaker 4: could have gone tumbling down the escalator and then we
• 47:41
  Speaker 4: would have had to look for someone.
• 47:42
  Speaker 5: Else to do the job.
• 47:43
  Speaker 2: He was confused because he was trying to work out
• 47:45
  Speaker 2: is it the escalator or the economy?
• 47:48
  Speaker 3: You're on fire?
• 47:49
  Speaker 2: James mcphirst his seat, Danika.
• 47:53
  Speaker 5: But the answer it to the seat. No.
• 47:55
  Speaker 4: No, I'm glad he didn't come a cropper, because he
• 47:57
  Speaker 4: could have been a hell of a lot was. I
• 47:58
  Speaker 4: tell you what, someone who has had things come acropper.
• 48:01
  Speaker 4: An AUSI chef who's over in South Korea, Joseph Lidgerwood,
• 48:06
  Speaker 4: who is from Tazzy. He's been working at a Michelin
• 48:09
  Speaker 4: starred restaurant in South Korea, but he is in a real.
• 48:13
  Speaker 5: Spot of bother. The coppers want to put him away
• 48:15
  Speaker 5: for a year because he.
• 48:17
  Speaker 4: Was serving a dessert, a sorbet dessert that was topped
• 48:21
  Speaker 4: with ants, and he said this brings a certain acidity
• 48:24
  Speaker 4: to the dish. And you know, Diana's could opt out
• 48:27
  Speaker 4: of the ants if they wanted to. But apparently the
• 48:29
  Speaker 4: problem is that there are only ten insects that approved
• 48:32
  Speaker 4: for consumption in South Korea and ants are not one
• 48:35
  Speaker 4: of them. So they now want him locked up for
• 48:38
  Speaker 4: a year for serving ants in the dessert.
• 48:41
  Speaker 5: I think that's utterly ridiculous.
• 48:43
  Speaker 4: I mean, we've got aunt jin and all sorts of
• 48:45
  Speaker 4: things here over there, You get locked up for a
• 48:47
  Speaker 4: year for serving ants?
• 48:49
  Speaker 5: Crazy?
• 48:50
  Speaker 3: Would you try an ant?
• 48:51
  Speaker 5: Absolutely? Yeah, no problem.
• 48:55
  Speaker 1: I'm not eating ants, I'd give it a go.
• 48:58
  Speaker 2: All right. I know a lot of you are wondering
• 49:00
  Speaker 2: is there a God? And his proof that there is
• 49:04
  Speaker 2: a couple a couple of people. She's driving past Nigel Farag,
• 49:12
  Speaker 2: who's conducting it looks like a press conference on the
• 49:14
  Speaker 2: side of the road, calls him a wanker and drives
• 49:16
  Speaker 2: straight into the back of the car in front of her.
• 49:18
  Speaker 2: Like I said, there is.
• 49:20
  Speaker 1: A God, there is a god. Instant karma is going
• 49:22
  Speaker 1: to get you. In the wise words of John Lennon.
• 49:25
  Speaker 5: Do you think she's learned her listen though, No, she'll
• 49:28
  Speaker 5: be blame.
• 49:31
  Speaker 3: She always blame somebody else. Enough.
• 49:32
  Speaker 4: When she fills out the form for the insurance company
• 49:35
  Speaker 4: and they say you know who was the party had fault,
• 49:37
  Speaker 4: she will write Nigel Farage.
• 49:39
  Speaker 5: You know that that's just bastard. He caused me to
• 49:41
  Speaker 5: cratch Mike car.
• 49:43
  Speaker 3: Yeah.
• 49:43
  Speaker 1: The left always looking for somebody else to blame but themselves.
• 49:46
  Speaker 1: They are always the most hypocritical of them all. All right,
• 49:49
  Speaker 1: thank you for your company. This evening, that's all we've
• 49:50
  Speaker 1: got time for. Stay tuned, it's time for the Rita
• 49:53
  Speaker 1: Panahy Show.
• 49:53
  Speaker 3: Good Night,