Latest / Reformed Thinking / Soteriology: Doctrine of Salvation

Transcript

Soteriology: Doctrine of Salvation · Reformed Thinking

0:00
Welcome to Reformed Thinking. This is the show where we take
0:03
dense theological and academic sources, gather up all those
0:07
heavy pages and break them down. The goal is simple, really.
0:11
We want to give you a shortcut to being well informed without
0:15
the academic fatigue that you know usually comes with studying
0:18
systematic theology. Which is real?
0:20
The fatigue. Absolutely.
0:22
So today our deep dive is into excerpts from Paul Anz's well
0:27
known work, The Moody Handbook of Theology.
0:30
And specifically we are looking at soteriology.
0:33
Yes, for those who might not be familiar with that term,
0:35
soteriology is the doctrine of salvation.
0:38
So OK, let's unpack this. We are going to uncover the
0:41
actual mechanics of how salvation works.
0:43
Right down to the bolts, yeah. We will look at historical
0:46
blunders where brilliant minds got the cross completely wrong,
0:49
we will examine the precise Greek terms of the atonement,
0:53
and we will look at the absolute sovereignty of God in the entire
0:57
process. Grasping these concepts does not
0:58
just fill your head with Bible trivia.
1:00
No, not at all. When you understand the
1:02
mechanics of the atonement and the sequence of salvation, it
1:06
completely shifts how you view God's justice and His grace.
1:11
You move away from a sentimental view of religion and step into a
1:15
rigorous, awe inspiring understanding of a holy God
1:19
dealing legally and lovingly with human sin, right?
1:22
It changes the way you read your Bible, the way you pray, and the
1:25
way you understand your own standing before the Creator of
1:28
the universe. Now, as Protestant Christians
1:30
who hold to Reformed theology and adhere to the Westminster
1:33
Confession, this specific topic hits very close to home for us.
1:38
We have a distinct theological background, but our mission
1:41
today is to lay out all the historical and theological
1:44
angles presented in the source material impartially.
1:47
Right, we want to look at what's actually on the page.
1:49
We want you to see the full picture of what it's been
1:51
taught, what has been debated, and what the scriptures actually
1:54
say. According to Enza's analysis.
1:57
I think the best place to start is looking at how things can go
2:00
wrong when you lose sight of those mechanics.
2:03
NS outlines the first section of this material as essentially a
2:07
historical graveyard of atonement theories.
2:09
Graveyard is a good word for it. Throughout church history, some
2:12
incredibly brilliant minds looked at the cross and just.
2:16
Got the meaning completely wrong.
2:17
Yeah, he lists seven false theories of the atonement.
2:21
It is startling to see how easily theology can drift when
2:24
it loses sight of God's holiness.
2:26
It happens fast. Very fast.
2:28
The first one he brings up is the Ransom to Satan theory.
2:32
This was developed by origin around the 3rd century and was
2:34
actually held by Augustine as well.
2:36
Which is. Wild to think about.
2:37
Right, the basic idea is that because of the fall in the
2:41
garden of Eden, Satan help people captive as a victor in
2:45
war. Therefore, God had to pay a
2:47
ransom and that ransom was paid to Satan in the form of Christ's
2:50
death. Honestly, when I first read this
2:53
my mind went straight to a modern day hostage situation.
2:57
If humanity is held captive by Satan, why wouldn't God pay the
3:01
ransom to the kidnapper? It tracks logically if you think
3:04
of it purely from a hostage negotiation standpoint.
3:07
It does sound plausible on a superficial level, especially
3:10
when you consider the cultural context of the 3rd century.
3:13
The early church was experiencing intense persecution
3:17
and the idea being held hostage by dark forces felt very literal
3:21
to them. That makes sense.
3:23
But the theological flaw there is massive.
3:25
You have to ask who was actually offended by sin?
3:28
God's holiness was offended, not Satan's.
3:31
Satan does not dictate terms to God.
3:33
Payment or ransom had to be made to God to avert His righteous
3:37
wrath against sin. Not some back alley deal with
3:40
the devil. Precisely.
3:42
Furthermore, Satan never had the actual authority or the right to
3:45
free humanity. God alone holds that authority.
3:49
This theory fails because it makes Satan the benefactor of
3:52
Christ's death. It elevates him way too.
3:54
Much It gives Satan far too much credit, treating him almost as
3:57
an equal negotiating partner with the Almighty.
4:00
The cross was a definitive judgment and a crushing blow to
4:03
Satan, not a payoff or a negotiated settlement with him.
4:06
That makes a lot of sense. You cannot have God paying off a
4:09
cosmic rebel. Then ends brings up the
4:12
recapitulation theory. Yes, Ireneus.
4:15
Right advanced by Ireneus in the 2nd century.
4:17
He taught that Christ went through all the phases of Adam's
4:20
life and experience, including the experience of sin, so that
4:24
Christ could succeed where Adam failed.
4:26
There's a grain of truth there regarding the last Adam concept.
4:29
I find that concept fascinating. Paul talks about that in First
4:32
Corinthians 15 and ends acknowledges that element of
4:36
truth, but Irenaeus seems to take it too far.
4:39
Way too far. The major critique here is that
4:41
this theory ignores the cross almost entirely.
4:44
It suggests that Jesus just needed to come down, live a good
4:47
life, pass all the tests Adam failed, and that somehow resets
4:51
the board for humanity. But living a good life, even a
4:54
perfect one, does not save anyone from the penalty of sin.
4:57
No, it neglects the necessity of the shedding of blood.
5:01
It assumes that salvation is achieved through a perfect human
5:04
track record rather than a substitutionary death.
5:07
So it completely misses the legal requirement.
5:10
Right. Then you move forward in history
5:12
into the Middle Ages with the commercial theory.
5:15
Anselm. Set forth by Anselm in the 11th
5:16
century, he taught that through sin, God was robbed of the honor
5:21
that was due him. To resolve this, God needed
5:24
satisfaction. So it's an honor issue for him.
5:26
Yeah, Christ through his death brought honor back to God and
5:31
received a reward which he then passed on to sinners as
5:34
forgiveness. Which sounds very medieval.
5:37
You really have to look at Anselm's environment to
5:39
understand this. He lived in a feudal society.
5:41
In feudalism, everything was based on the honor of the Lord.
5:46
If a serf offended the Lord, the Lord's honor had to be
5:49
satisfied. Right, the whole system
5:50
collapses otherwise. The problem here is that Ansel
5:53
mapped a medieval societal structure directly onto the
5:56
character of God. It sounds remarkably like the
5:59
medieval system of penance. Give a certain amount of
6:01
satisfaction for a certain amount of violation.
6:03
Spot on. It asserts so much satisfaction
6:05
for so much violation. It elevates God's honor above
6:09
His justice and His Holiness. It turns it into a transaction
6:11
of prestige. It ignores the vicarious
6:14
substitutionary suffering of Christ in our place, making it a
6:18
transaction of prestige rather than a legal payment for
6:21
objective moral guilt. It is wild how much our cultural
6:25
surroundings can warp our reading of scripture if we are
6:28
not careful. And some literally turned God
6:31
into a feudal Lord. He did.
6:33
Following that, we see theories that reduce Christ to a mere
6:37
human figure, completely stripping away the supernatural
6:40
element of the atonement. The liberal theological views.
6:42
Yeah, there is the moral influence theory by Peter Avlard
6:46
which modern liberal theological slogans later adopted.
6:49
This view claims that the death of Christ was not necessary to
6:52
expiate or cover sin. So what was the point of it
6:55
then? According to this view, the
6:56
cross was simply a demonstration of God's love meant to soften
7:00
sinners hearts and bring them to repentance.
7:02
Just an emotional appeal. Right.
7:04
And alongside that is the example theory or martyr theory
7:07
championed by the Socinians. This suggests sin did not need
7:11
to be punished at all. Christ was just an example of
7:13
extreme obedience meant to inspire us to reform our lives.
7:17
Which completely guts the gospel.
7:19
But wait, plain devil's advocate here.
7:21
Jesus was a good example, right? He did demonstrate love.
7:24
Why are these theories considered so dangerous?
7:27
Because an example does not save a drowning man.
7:30
Oh, that's a good way to put it. Both of those theories stripped
7:34
the cross of its saving efficacy.
7:36
If the cross is just a display of love without an actual
7:40
penalty being paid, it is a meaningless tragedy.
7:43
Right. Imagine someone drowning in the
7:45
ocean and a person on the pier says I love you so much I'm
7:48
going to prove it by jumping in and drowning right next to you.
7:51
But they make no effort to pull the drowning person out.
7:54
That's not love, that's bizarre. That is just a tragic waste of a
7:57
life. Ends points out that Scripture
8:00
insists the death of Christ was substitutionary.
8:02
It achieved something objective. A Sinner is justified before a
8:05
holy God through a legal transaction, not just influenced
8:09
by a tragic demonstration of solidarity.
8:11
Furthermore, the example theory views Christ only as a man.
8:15
Which denies his deity. And it explicitly denies the
8:19
necessity of the atonement, which contradicts verses like
8:23
Romans 324 that insist on justification through a
8:26
redemptive price. Then we have the accident theory
8:30
advocated by Albert Schweitzer in the late 19th and early 20th
8:33
centuries. This one is just sad.
8:35
It sounds incredibly cynical. Schweitzer proposed that Christ
8:39
became enamored with his own Messiahship, preached a coming
8:43
Kingdom, and was mistakenly crushed in the process by the
8:46
Roman and Jewish authorities. So he just miscalculated.
8:50
Schweitzer basically thought Jesus tripped and fell into a
8:52
crucifixion because he misread the political climate.
8:55
He saw zero value for others in the death of Christ.
8:58
But ends provides a shark scriptural refutation here.
9:01
He does. He cites numerous occasions in
9:03
the Gospel of Matthew where Jesus explicitly predicted his
9:06
own death. He knew the betrayal was coming,
9:09
he knew the method of execution, and he knew the timeline.
9:12
Christ's death was not an accident.
9:14
No, it was the predetermined plan of God, as Acts chapter 2
9:18
verse 23 makes clear. Finally, there is the
9:21
governmental theory by Hugo Grotius.
9:23
Right, the compromise view. It was a compromise view
9:26
designed to soften the harshness of a strict penal substitution.
9:31
Grotius taught that God Forgives sinners without requiring an
9:35
equivalent payment. So he just waves the fee.
9:38
He reasoned that Christ made a token payment to uphold the
9:42
principle of government in God's law.
9:44
Think of it like a parking ticket.
9:46
You owe a massive fine, but the judge lets you pay $1.00 just to
9:50
show respect for the law, then waves the rest.
9:53
Once that token was paid, God set aside the law's requirement
9:57
and forgave sinners. But that makes God's law seem
9:59
really arbitrary. It makes God subject to change.
10:02
He threatens a sentence but does not carry it out.
10:05
It implies God's law is flexible and can be brushed aside if the
10:08
optics are right. Which violates his immutability.
10:11
Scripture teaches the absolute necessity of propitiating God.
10:15
The wrath of God must be fully assuaged, not just brushed aside
10:18
with a token gesture. It requires full payment.
10:21
What is fascinating here is the common thread running through
10:23
through all these false theories.
10:25
They all fail because they isolate and elevate 1 attribute
10:28
of God, like His love, His honor, or His role as a cosmic
10:32
governor. While completely ignoring his
10:35
absolute holiness. Yes, and the inescapable
10:38
necessity of dealing with sin in a strictly legal,
10:42
substitutionary manner. So if all those historical
10:45
theories failed so miserably because they dodged the legal
10:49
reality of sin, what actually happened on the cross?
10:52
Now we get to the core. That pivots us to the core
10:55
mechanics of the atonement. NS lays out the correct meaning
10:59
by introducing 5 massive theological terms.
11:02
The Big 5. Let us walk through these
11:05
slowly, because the Greek insights provided here are
11:08
incredibly revealing. The foundational meaning of
11:10
Christ's death is its substitutionary character.
11:13
He died in place of sinners. NS highlights 2 specific Greek
11:17
prepositions used in the New Testament to teach this.
11:19
The first is anti, which means instead of.
11:23
We see this in Matthew 20 where it says Christ gave his life as
11:25
a ransom for or anti many. Instead of many.
11:28
The second is hopper, meaning in behalf of or in place of, used
11:32
in Galatians 3 and 2nd Corinthians 5.
11:34
Think of this in the context of a courtroom analogy.
11:36
You need a picture this vividly. OK, set the scene.
11:39
You are the defendant sitting in the chair at the defense table.
11:43
The judge has reviewed the evidence and your guilt is
11:45
undeniable. The verdict is handed down and
11:49
the sentence is death. There is no appeal.
11:52
A completely hopeless situation. Substitution means that Jesus
11:56
Christ steps into that courtroom, walks up to the
11:59
defense table, removes you from the defendant's chair, sits down
12:02
in your place, and take the full weight of that death sentence
12:06
upon himself. Wow.
12:07
It's a vicarious act. The Latin word vicarious means
12:11
one in place of another. His guiltless record is
12:13
exchanged for your guilty record.
12:15
He representatively bore the punishment rightly due to
12:18
sinners. He did not just stand next to
12:20
you and offer moral support support.
12:21
He physically took the punishment so that the
12:24
executioner's blow landed on him instead of you.
12:26
That leads directly into the second term redemption.
12:29
This is a rich one. NS dissects 3 specific Greek
12:33
words used for redemption, and they all center around the
12:35
ancient slave market. We need to visualize the Greco
12:38
Roman world here. Slavery was ubiquitous.
12:41
It was everywhere in that society.
12:42
The first word is agarasso, which literally means to
12:46
purchase in the marketplace. The Agora.
12:49
Right. The agora was the central public
12:52
space in ancient Greek city states, the center of athletic,
12:56
artistic, spiritual and political life, but also the
12:59
commercial hub where slaves were bought and sold.
13:02
The believer is purchased out of the slave market of sin.
13:05
The purchase price was the death of Jesus Christ.
13:09
You were bought at a terrible cost.
13:11
Because of this, the believer now paradoxically belongs to
13:14
Christ as his willing slave. The nuances of the next two
13:18
words add so much clarity to this picture.
13:21
The second word is exaggerazo. The prefix X means out of.
13:25
So out of the market. This means Christ not only
13:28
purchased believers in the slave market, but He entirely removed
13:32
them from the slave market. They aren't going back.
13:34
Imagine being bought by a master who then carries you outside the
13:38
city gates, far away from the auction block.
13:40
You are never going back on display.
13:41
You are never going to be sold again.
13:43
You are redeemed from the curse and the bondage of the law.
13:45
That's a staggering picture of security and the third term.
13:48
The third term is lutru, which carries the specific idea of
13:52
obtaining release by the payment of a price or a ransom.
13:56
We are set free because a literal legal ransom was paid in
14:01
blood. So redemption is viewed sin
14:03
word. It addresses the fact that
14:04
mankind was in bondage to sin and desperately needed a release
14:08
from that slavery. Yes, the third and 4th terms are
14:11
reconciliation and propitiation. I would love for you to contrast
14:15
these two because people often mix them up or think they mean
14:18
the exact same thing they. Frequently get blurred together.
14:21
NS explains that reconciliation from the Greek cataloso is
14:25
manward. It deals with removing the
14:27
barrier of hostility between US and God.
14:30
That is a critical distinction to grasp.
14:32
Sin created a literal objective barrier between man and God,
14:37
rendering man hostile toward his Creator.
14:39
We weren't just neutral. No, it's not just that we had a
14:42
misunderstanding with God. We were actively at war with
14:44
Him. Reconciliation is the act of God
14:46
removing that barrier, producing peace and enabling man to be
14:49
saved. God initiated this change.
14:51
He moved to reconcile sinful man to himself.
14:54
Now contrast that with propitiation.
14:57
If reconciliation is man word, propitiation is God word.
15:01
The Greek verb. He'll ask, Am I means to satisfy
15:04
the righteous demands of God? Because God is completely holy,
15:08
His wrath is directed towards sin.
15:10
We often squirm at the idea of God's wrath, preferring to focus
15:13
only on his love. But a truly good judge must have
15:16
wrath toward evil. If a judge doesn't punish evil,
15:19
he's a corrupt judge. Right.
15:20
That wrath must be a swage to spare humanity from eternal
15:24
destruction. Propitiation means that the
15:26
death of Christ fully satisfied God's holiness.
15:29
It vindicated his righteous standard.
15:31
And the beauty of this is that God provides the very remedy he
15:34
demands. He requires a perfect sacrifice
15:36
to satisfy his wrath, and then he steps in and provides that
15:39
precise sacrifice in the person of his son.
15:42
That brings us to the final 2 terms in this section,
15:44
Forgiveness and Justification. Ends defines forgiveness as the
15:48
legal act of God whereby He removes the charges held against
15:51
the Sinner because proper satisfaction has been made.
15:54
The common Greek word Athena means to let go, release, or
15:57
send away. This is the negative side of
16:00
salvation, the cancelling of the debt, but justification is the
16:04
positive side. It is the forensic legal act of
16:08
God whereby He declares the believing Sinner righteous.
16:11
This is where we see the full scope of God's grace.
16:15
Forgiveness removes the penalty, but justification bestows
16:18
righteousness and gives a legal title to all the blessings
16:21
promised to the just. It is grounded entirely on the
16:24
death of Christ apart from any human works.
16:26
Imagine you are holding a massive financial Ledger
16:29
representing your life. It is double entry bookkeeping
16:32
A. Very clear way to look at.
16:34
It on one side are your assets and on the other are your
16:36
liabilities. You owe billions of dollars in
16:39
debt because of your sin. Every wrong thought, every
16:42
selfish action is written in red ink.
16:45
A mountain of debt. Forgiveness is God taking a pen
16:48
and crossing out the debt, wiping the Ledger clean.
16:50
You owe nothing but. If that was all that happened,
16:53
your account would just sit at a flat 0.
16:54
Exactly. I mean spot on.
16:56
You would not be in debt, but you'd be entirely broke.
16:59
You'd have 0 assets. Justification is God taking the
17:03
infinite righteousness of Jesus Christ and depositing billions
17:06
of dollars in assets into to your account.
17:09
You are not just debt free, you are declared perfectly righteous
17:12
and infinitely wealthy in the eyes of the court.
17:15
That Ledger analogy captures the forensic nature of justification
17:19
perfectly. It is an accounting term.
17:22
Through this legal declaration, God maintains His absolute
17:25
integrity and His holy standard. Because the books are balanced.
17:28
Right. Yet he is still able to enter
17:30
into fellowship with sinners, because they now have the very
17:34
righteousness of Christ imputed to them their ledge who shows
17:37
Christ's perfection. Now we step into one of the most
17:40
debated topics in church history, which ends outlines in
17:43
the next section the extent of the atonement.
17:46
Here we go. The core question here is did
17:48
Christ die for every single person who has ever lived, or
17:52
did he die specifically and exclusively for the elect?
17:55
A massive question. NS lays out the arguments for
17:58
both sides, and we are going to present those arguments
18:00
impartially, just as the source material does, so you can see
18:03
the reasoning behind both camps. First, let us look at the
18:07
arguments for unlimited atonement.
18:09
This is the view that Christ died for every person
18:12
universally, but his death is only effective for those who
18:15
actually believe the gospel. The arguments for unlimited
18:19
atonement rely heavily on taking certain New Testament statements
18:22
at face value, focusing on the universal language used by the
18:26
biblical authors. Like the word world?
18:29
Ends points out that words like world, whosoever and all are
18:33
used frequently. For instance, the word whosoever
18:36
is used over 110 times in the New Testament.
18:39
Usually with an unrestricted meaning, such as in the famous
18:42
passage of John chapter 3. Furthermore, verses like First
18:45
Timothy chapter 2 state that Christ gave himself as a ransom
18:48
for all. The argument here is
18:50
straightforward. All denotes everyone without
18:53
exception. They also point to second Peter
18:56
chapter 2 verse one. Which describes false teachers
18:59
who are doomed to destruction, yet it says they are denying the
19:02
master who bought them. This suggests that a purchase or
19:04
atonement was made even for those who ultimately perish in
19:07
their rebellion. On the other side of the debate
19:09
is limited atonement, or as Ends prefers to call it, definite
19:13
redemption. This is the Calvinistic view
19:16
which aligns with our Reformed background.
19:18
But let us look at how the text frames the argument logically
19:21
and scripturally. The defense for particular
19:24
redemption argues that Christ died for a particular definite
19:28
group of people and that his death actually secured their
19:32
salvation, rather than just making salvation a possibility.
19:35
The scriptural argument points to verses where Christ's
19:38
sacrifice is directed at a specific named group.
19:41
In John chapter 10, Jesus says he lays down his life for the
19:45
sheep. Not everyone is included in that
19:47
flock. Jesus explicitly tells some
19:50
people later in that same chapter that they do not believe
19:52
because they are not part of his flock.
19:54
Acts chapter 20 says he purchased the church with his
19:57
own. Blood.
19:57
But the logical argument presented by ends is incredibly
20:00
robust. It centers on the absolute
20:02
sovereignty of God. Right.
20:04
If God is absolutely sovereign, as Ephesians chapter 1 states,
20:08
then His plan cannot be frustrated.
20:10
If Christ actually paid the penalty for the sins of all
20:12
people, and yet some people go to hell, then God's plan is
20:16
thwarted. The effect of the atonement is
20:18
severely weakened. It didn't actually save them.
20:20
The logic follows that if Christ paid for all the sins of every
20:23
person, then everyone is justified, which leads to
20:27
universalism, the belief that everyone will be saved.
20:30
To avoid universalism, the definite redemption view states
20:33
that when the Bible uses words like world or all, it means
20:37
people from every tribe, tongue, and nation, all classes of
20:41
people, rather than every single individual without exception.
20:45
So, synthesizing this debate from the source material, we see
20:48
two different approaches to the text.
20:50
One emphasizes the universal language of the gospel
20:52
invitations and the broad scope of God's love.
20:55
The other highlights the effective, precise nature of a
20:58
sovereign God's plan. As ends outlines the Calvinistic
21:01
position, understanding the cohesive nature of a sovereign
21:04
God ensures we recognize that Christ's sacrifice was not just
21:08
a potential provision that might fail depending on human free
21:10
will. Instead, it was a precise,
21:13
intentional, and fully effective payment that actually secures
21:16
the salvation of those the Father chose.
21:19
Moving from the extent of the atonement we arrive at the
21:22
actual process of salvation ends divides this into God's side and
21:26
man's side. Starting with God's side, we
21:28
look at the sovereign architecture of salvation.
21:30
This is where we really start to see the gears turning behind the
21:34
scenes of human history. Here is where it gets really
21:37
interesting. Yes, the doctrines of election
21:40
and predestination. Ends dives into these doctrines
21:43
and makes a very pointed statement here that I think is
21:45
crucial for anyone struggling with these heavy concepts.
21:48
What does he say? He says the question concerning
21:51
election is not whether one understands it perfectly, but
21:54
whether the Bible teaches it. If the Bible teaches it, one is
21:57
obligated to believe it, even if it causes some mental friction.
22:00
Which it often does. He defines election as the
22:03
eternal act of God, whereby He and His sovereign good pleasure
22:08
chooses a certain number of people to be the recipients of
22:10
special grace and eternal salvation.
22:12
The Greek word used in Ephesians chapter 1 is ecligo, which means
22:17
to call out from among the people.
22:19
The characteristics of election detailed by ends are vital for
22:23
getting this right. First, it took place in eternity
22:26
past, before anyone was even born, before the foundation of
22:29
the world was laid. Second, it is an act of a
22:32
sovereign God based purely on His sovereign will.
22:35
It is not conditioned on anything man does or any merit
22:38
foreseen in man. God did not look down the
22:41
corridors of time with a celestial telescope to see who
22:44
would choose him and then elect them based on their future
22:47
choice. Because that would make election
22:49
dependent on man. Turning God into a reactor
22:52
rather than a sovereign actor. Instead, Romans Chapter 9 makes
22:56
it clear that election is not according to human works, but
22:59
according to the free choice of God, reflecting His perfect
23:02
justice and His incomprehensible love.
23:04
Closely tied to election is predestination.
23:07
Ends breaks down the Greek word pro Rizzo, which means to mark
23:11
out beforehand. The English word horizon is
23:13
derived from this Greek word. I love that imagery so much.
23:17
God, by His sovereign choice, marked out the horizon line of
23:21
the believers life in eternity past.
23:24
It determines our status as adopted children and assures our
23:27
future glorification. You look out at the horizon and
23:30
you know exactly where the boundary is drawn.
23:32
The concept of adoption is perhaps one of the most
23:35
beautiful elements of this sovereign architecture.
23:37
The Greek word is huyothesia, which literally translates to
23:42
placing as a son. Ends illuminates this by
23:45
explaining the historical context of Roman adoption law,
23:48
which the Apostle Paul was employing when he wrote to the
23:50
churches. This is not like modern adoption
23:53
in Roman in law, the patriot protestus or the power of the
23:56
father was absolute. When someone was adopted, 4
24:00
specific legally binding things occurred.
24:03
Walk us through those four steps. 1st The adopted person
24:06
lost all rights in their old family and gained all the rights
24:09
of a fully legitimate son in the new family.
24:11
That complete. Second, they became a full heir
24:14
to the new father's estate. They were entitled to the
24:16
inheritance. 3rd, The old life of the adopted person was
24:20
completely wiped out legally. All prior debts were cancelled
24:24
as if they had never existed. The slate was wiped perfectly
24:28
clean. And fourth, in the eyes of the
24:30
law, the adopted person was literally and absolutely the son
24:34
of the new father. The biological children had no
24:37
more claim to the father than the adopted child debt.
24:40
Connecting this to you, the listener, think about what this
24:43
means for your legal standing before God.
24:46
You aren't just a forgiven criminal who is allowed to sweep
24:49
the floors of heaven or sit in the back row of the choir.
24:52
Your entire legal and familial status in the universe has been
24:55
rewritten by a sovereign decree. You have been placed as a full
24:58
heir with all old debts wiped out, possessing the right to
25:01
call the creator of the universe ABBA Father.
25:04
It is a staggering reality when you grasp the Roman context Paul
25:08
was using. If God does all the choosing,
25:10
marking out the horizon and predestining the adoption, this
25:13
raises an important question. What does the human do?
25:16
Does humanity just sit back like robots?
25:19
This brings us to man's side of the process, which ends
25:22
categorizes under the terms of salvation.
25:25
The primary issue here is the purity of the Gospel.
25:29
What is actually required for salvation?
25:31
ENS addresses false views, particularly the believe only
25:34
view which is also known as non Lordship Salvation.
25:37
Advocates of the non lordship view argue that requiring
25:40
repentance or spiritual fruit adds human works to salvation.
25:44
They suggest you can have Jesus as Savior without submitting to
25:47
him as Lord. It is the idea of fire
25:49
insurance. You get the ticket to heaven,
25:51
but you keep driving the car of your life however you want.
25:54
But ENS provides a sharp theological correction.
25:57
He points out that Jesus himself began his ministry with a call
26:00
to repentance. The Greek word for repentance is
26:03
mentanio. The critique of the non large
26:05
ship view centers on the misunderstanding of what
26:08
repentance actually is. Repentance is not a human work
26:11
that we generate to earn favor. If it were, then yes, it would
26:14
violate the principle of grace. But as Acts Chapter 11
26:18
indicates, repentance is a divinely bestowed grace.
26:20
It is a spirit generated change of mind.
26:23
Ends Quotes. William Mounts, who defines
26:25
Metanio as a radical moral turn of the whole person from sin and
26:30
to God. True belief includes a
26:32
transformed life. You cannot separate the Savior
26:35
from the Lord. Acknowledging Jesus as Lord of
26:38
your life is the natural, inevitable response of genuine
26:42
salvation. You do not repent to get saved.
26:45
You repent because the grace of God has opened your eyes to the
26:48
horror of your sin and the beauty of Christ.
26:50
To clarify what genuine belief looks like, ends outlines the
26:54
three essential elements of saving faith.
26:56
It is not just mere intellectual ascent.
26:59
Knowing facts about Jesus does not save you any more than
27:02
knowing facts about George Washington makes you a citizen
27:04
of the 18th century. You can pass a theology exam and
27:07
still be completely lost. The first element is knowledge.
27:10
This involves the intellect. You must believe certain basic
27:13
truths, such as the deity of Christ, His substitutionary
27:17
death, and His bodily resurrection.
27:19
You have to know what you are placing your faith in.
27:21
The second element is conviction, which involves the
27:23
emotions and the inner working of the Holy Spirit.
27:26
A person must have an inner conviction of their own sin.
27:29
The Holy Spirit personalizes the sin, creating remorse and a
27:33
desperate realization of the need for salvation.
27:36
It moves from humanity is sinful to I am a wretched Sinner in
27:41
need of grace. This naturally results in the
27:43
radical moral turn of dependence we just discussed.
27:45
And the third element is trust. This is a settled act of the
27:49
will. After acquiring the knowledge
27:51
and experiencing the conviction, there must be a deliberate
27:53
decision to trust Christ entirely.
27:56
True faith always results in a new life.
27:58
A person cannot claim to have saving faith and continue loving
28:02
the world and practicing sin in the same way they did before.
28:04
If anyone is in Christ, they are a new creature.
28:07
The old things pass away, new things come.
28:09
Moving from the human response back to the divine provision
28:13
ends introduces the concept of grace, dividing it into two
28:16
distinct categories, common grace and efficacious or special
28:20
grace. Common grace is the unmerited
28:22
favor of God displayed toward all mankind and His general care
28:25
for them. A great question to ask is why
28:27
God gives sunshine, rain and fertile seasons to atheistic
28:30
farmers who hate Him. Or why society functions at all?
28:34
Why isn't the world just a burning wasteland of anarchy?
28:37
NS explains that this is common grace.
28:39
God imparts general blessings to all people indiscriminately.
28:43
He delays judgement to give people time to repent.
28:46
Furthermore, common grace functions to restrain sin NS
28:50
outlines 4 channels of restraint.
28:52
What are those for? Direct action by God, such as
28:55
when he restrained Laban from harming Jacob.
28:59
The work of the Holy Spirit contending with mankind.
29:02
The warnings of prophets and the establishment of human
29:05
government to punish evil and maintain civil order.
29:08
Enz also references A mysterious restraining force in Second
29:11
Thessalonians chapter 2, known as the Restrainer, who holds
29:14
back the manifestation of the Lawless 1.
29:17
Because this restrainer must be strong enough to hold back the
29:19
forces of Satan himself and suggest this is a reference to
29:22
the Holy Spirit's current work of common grace in the world.
29:25
The Holy Spirit is actively keeping the floodgates of evil
29:28
from bursting open completely. But common grace, while it
29:31
restrains evil and provide material blessings, does not
29:34
save anyone. For salvation, a person needs
29:38
efficacious grace. Efficacious means effective.
29:41
This is the work of the Holy Spirit that effectively moves an
29:44
individual to believe in Jesus Christ as Savior.
29:47
A major misconception about efficacious or irresistible
29:51
grace is the idea that God drags people kicking and screaming
29:55
into His Kingdom against their will.
29:57
That is a terrible caricature of Reformed theology, and it is not
30:01
what Ends teaches. Rather, special grace changes
30:05
the heart. It empowers the human will and
30:08
inclines the human heart toward faith.
30:10
It makes the person perfectly willing to accept Jesus Christ.
30:14
The individual comes willingly because their desires have been
30:17
radically altered by the Holy Spirit.
30:19
God takes a heart of stone that hates him and replaces it with a
30:22
heart of flesh that loves him. So what does this all mean for
30:24
you? It means that if you have
30:26
believed the gospel, it is not because you were inherently
30:29
smarter, more insightful, more spiritual than your neighbor.
30:32
It is because God first wooed. You.
30:34
He dispensed efficacious grace, effectively draw on you, and
30:37
enabled your spiritually dead heart to respond in faith.
30:40
You responded because He gave you the capacity to do so.
30:43
This logically leads us to the final results of salvation
30:47
outlined by ends, regeneration and eternal security.
30:51
Regeneration is the instantaneous impartation of
30:54
spiritual life. Ends distinguishes this
30:56
carefully from conversion. Conversion is the human response
31:00
of faith and repentance, but regeneration is entirely God's
31:03
doing. In regeneration, the soul is
31:06
passive. It is a resurrection from
31:09
spiritual death. Ends provides A fascinating
31:11
chart contrasting the first physical birth with the second
31:14
spiritual birth. Your first birth originates from
31:16
sinful parents. Your second birth originates
31:19
from God. The first birth is through
31:21
corruptible seed, the second is through the incorruptible seat
31:24
of the Holy Spirit. In your first birth, your
31:26
position is an object of divine wrath.
31:29
In your second birth, your position is an object of divine
31:31
love. Regeneration is an instantaneous
31:34
act of God, not a cooperative effort where you do your part
31:37
and God does his. You do not assist in your own
31:39
birth. Because salvation is entirely a
31:41
work of God from beginning to end, we can have absolute
31:44
confidence in the final doctrine discussed in this section,
31:47
eternal security. Ends.
31:49
Contrast the Armenian view, which suggests a person can
31:52
forfeit their salvation through sin or a deliberate act of the
31:56
will, with the Calvinist view, often called the perseverance of
31:59
the Saints. And suggests a better title is
32:02
the perseverance of the Lord, because the basis for the
32:04
security of salvation does not rest with man's ability to hold
32:07
on to God, but with God's ability to keep the believer.
32:11
And systematically breaks down how the entire Trinity
32:14
guarantees the airtight security of the believer.
32:17
First, the securing work of the Father.
32:20
Believers are secure because the Father chose and predestined
32:23
them in eternity past. The same ones He foreknew, He
32:27
called justified and will ultimately glorify.
32:31
The chain is unbroken. None are lost in the process
32:34
from eternity past to future glorification. 2nd The securing
32:38
work of the Sun. Christ redeemed the believer,
32:41
justified them, and now acts as their constant advocate and High
32:44
priest, continually making intercession for them before the
32:47
throne. If a believer could be lost, it
32:50
would imply that Christ's intercession is ineffective,
32:52
which is a theological impossibility.
32:54
Ends points out a brilliant nuance in the Greek of John
32:57
chapter 10 verse 28, where Jesus says his sheep will never
33:01
perish. The Greek text uses a double
33:03
negative OMI, which translates literally to not never.
33:08
It is positioned emphatically to reinforce the point that a
33:11
follower of Christ will absolutely not never perish.
33:15
The grammar itself is designed to eliminate all doubt.
33:18
Finally, there is the securing work of the Holy Spirit.
33:21
The Spirit has regenerated the believer and sealed them for the
33:24
day of redemption. That seal is a literal down
33:27
payment, guaranteeing our future inheritance.
33:30
To lose your salvation, you would need a force stronger than
33:32
the Father, capable of overthrowing the constant
33:35
intercession of the Sun, and powerful enough to break the
33:38
permanent seal of the Holy Spirit.
33:40
The eternal security of the believer is the completion and
33:43
crowning glory of God's sovereign plan of salvation.
33:46
We have covered a massive amount of theological ground today.
33:49
We started by looking at how medieval theologians
33:52
misunderstood the cross, theorizing that God owed Satan a
33:55
ransom or that Anselm's feudal honor system dictated the
33:59
atonement. We moved through the precise
34:01
legal terminology of the Greek language, seeing how
34:04
justification operates like a courtroom declaration and a
34:08
Ledger transfer. We examine the debate over the
34:10
extent of the atonement, and we walk step by step through the
34:14
unbreakable chain of salvation from election and eternity past
34:19
to glorification in the future. As we wrap up this deep dive
34:22
into the source material, I want to leave you with a final
34:25
thought to Mull over on your own.
34:27
Let's hear it. If your salvation was entirely
34:30
secured by God's sovereign choice before the foundation of
34:33
the world, and if it is guaranteed by the unbroken seal
34:36
of the Holy Spirit, how does that alter the way you handle
34:39
the absolute worst day of your week?
34:42
That's a great question. If you are held so tightly by
34:44
the Trinity that you cannot be snatched from His hand, what
34:48
does your daily anxiety actually accomplish?
34:50
If God has conquered your greatest problem, which is your
34:53
sin and eternal separation from Him, and secured your future
34:56
with an ironclad guarantee, then the temporary trials of this
35:00
life are placed into a completely different context.
35:02
They do not threaten your actual standing.
35:04
Thank you for joining us for this deep dive on Reformed
35:07
thinking. Keep asking hard questions, keep
35:09
relying on the grace of God, and keep seeking truth in the
35:12
primary sources.