Latest / Turley Talks / Ep. 3385 EPSTEIN BACKFIRE! Trump and MAGA Come Out MORE UNITED than EVER!!!
Transcript
- 0:00[SPEAKER_04]: The liberal globalist order is on its brink and awakening a new conservative age.
- 0:06[SPEAKER_04]: Dr. Steve Turley joined me every day as we discover answers to today's toughest challenges and explore the re-bondalization of conservative civilization.
- 0:18[SPEAKER_03]: This is Turley Talks.
- 0:20[SPEAKER_03]: I mean, look, I think this one surprised me a bit because of all these complaints online going after Trump.
- 0:26[SPEAKER_03]: And the extreme fog you might think is approval ratings were going down Republicans.
- 0:30[SPEAKER_03]: If anything, they're going up Republicans who approve of Trump, look at our CNN poll, the prior one, eighty six percent the one out this week.
- 0:36[SPEAKER_03]: ADA percent Republicans have a Quinnipiac, the prior poll, ADA percent of Republicans this week out, ninety percent Republicans.
- 0:45[SPEAKER_03]: If anything, Donald Trump's approval rating has gone up since this whole Epstein saga started, he is at the apex or close there too in terms of his popularity with Republican voters, Epstein files, complaints or not.
- 0:58[SPEAKER_00]: You just prove that not everything online is real.
- 1:01[SPEAKER_00]: That's real life.
- 1:02[SPEAKER_00]: Go now.
- 1:03[SPEAKER_00]: Amazing.
- 1:04[SPEAKER_00]: Twitter is actually not reality.
- 1:06[SPEAKER_00]: Is there any reason that you can find that this hasn't taken hold and hurt him?
- 1:11[SPEAKER_03]: Yeah, I mean, on X or you hear about is the F-steen files, but how about out in the real public?
- 1:17[SPEAKER_03]: Republicans who said the top issue was F-steen case.
- 1:20[SPEAKER_03]: The answer is one, one, and not one percent
- 1:24[SPEAKER_03]: One respond, and this is a great little finding that Ariel Edwards Levy, who of course is part of our polling unit, found just one single Republican said that the nation's top problem is, in fact, the Epstein case not much of a surprise that, therefore, Donald Trump's appropriating has not suffered with Republicans because of the Epstein case, because the bottom line is most Americans say it's not up high up on their priority.
- 1:47[SPEAKER_04]: What happens when the legacy media tries to destroy Donald Trump with their biggest bombshell ever, only to spectacularly backfire and unite his entire base like never before?
- 2:03[SPEAKER_04]: Well, we just witnessed precisely that in real time over the last twelve hours and it's absolutely glorious.
- 2:10[SPEAKER_04]: The repulsive never trumpers over at the Wall Street Journal thought they had him cornered with their Jeffrey Epstein hit piece, but instead they may have handed trump
- 2:22[SPEAKER_04]: the biggest political victory of his presidency thus far.
- 2:26[SPEAKER_04]: We're going to see exactly how the Democrats and their legacy media allies just played themselves and why we may look back and see how this moment
- 2:38[SPEAKER_04]: was the one that defined Trump's entire second term.
- 2:42[SPEAKER_04]: You are not.
- 2:43[SPEAKER_04]: Get to want to miss this greetings everyone.
- 2:45[SPEAKER_04]: It is line stream front.
- 2:46[SPEAKER_04]: I am your host, Dr. Steve.
- 2:48[SPEAKER_04]: You're a patriot professor.
- 2:49[SPEAKER_04]: It is my job to help you make sense of the madness.
- 2:53[SPEAKER_04]: I keep you sane and insane time.
- 2:55[SPEAKER_04]: So make sure to smack that bell.
- 2:57[SPEAKER_04]: and subscribe button as you can see, we're live on YouTube, on rumble, on Twitter, you name it.
- 3:03[SPEAKER_04]: You're not gonna wanna miss a single episode.
- 3:06[SPEAKER_04]: We bring you the breaking stories and the analysis.
- 3:09[SPEAKER_04]: You're not gonna hear anywhere else.
- 3:11[SPEAKER_04]: As always, we got a jam pack show for you today.
- 3:14[SPEAKER_04]: More than ever for sure, our super chats are up.
- 3:16[SPEAKER_04]: So feel free to send in your comments or questions.
- 3:20[SPEAKER_04]: It'll be my privilege to read them out to everyone.
- 3:22[SPEAKER_04]: If you have questions or comments, do you want me to read and answer?
- 3:26[SPEAKER_04]: You can do that in two ways.
- 3:28[SPEAKER_04]: either through a one time gift via our super chat or by becoming a courageous Patriots club member where your one time monthly gift will enable you to ask me as many questions as you like to just click on that link below to join you have instant access to all kinds of exclusive lime Q and A's and special content either way it'll be my privilege to answer your questions throughout the livestream also I do want to give a big shout out to one of our sponsors for today's
- 3:53[SPEAKER_04]: live streams and that is being dream now.
- 3:55[SPEAKER_04]: I've told you guys about being dream a lot.
- 3:58[SPEAKER_04]: I've been using being dream every night now for months and I genuinely cannot imagine my nights without it.
- 4:07[SPEAKER_04]: If you're like me, okay, I'd lie awake for hours thinking about the future of the news to the world.
- 4:13[SPEAKER_04]: I just couldn't turn off my brain.
- 4:15[SPEAKER_04]: It was exhausting and it would take me about two hours to fall asleep every night.
- 4:21[SPEAKER_04]: Now, seriously, with bean dream, I fall asleep within thirty minutes.
- 4:26[SPEAKER_04]: And I stay asleep all throughout the night.
- 4:28[SPEAKER_04]: And I wake up without that foggy sluggish feeling.
- 4:31[SPEAKER_04]: And in fact, since I began taking dream consistently, I've noticed a real difference in my focus, my mood, my energy throughout the day.
- 4:40[SPEAKER_04]: You can see it right here.
- 4:41[SPEAKER_04]: I'm giving it my best, right?
- 4:42[SPEAKER_04]: Well, that's, I mean, that's after a great night's sleep.
- 4:44[SPEAKER_04]: So dream is made up of top quality science back ingredients.
- 4:49[SPEAKER_04]: to help you relax and get the deep uninterrupted sleep your body needs.
- 4:52[SPEAKER_04]: It's a seriously gang.
- 4:54[SPEAKER_04]: I take a bean dream every night to become a ritual.
- 4:57[SPEAKER_04]: I actually look forward to.
- 4:59[SPEAKER_04]: And like other sleep aids, there's no groginess the next day, just clear headed, focused energy.
- 5:05[SPEAKER_04]: So if sleep is something that you've been struggling with and let's admit it, most of us are, I simply cannot recommend bean dream enough.
- 5:14[SPEAKER_04]: Right now, you can save up to thirty five percent off with my exclusive beam discount.
- 5:18[SPEAKER_04]: Just click on the link below or scan the QR code and use code, totally at checkout.
- 5:23[SPEAKER_04]: Don't settle for restless nights.
- 5:25[SPEAKER_04]: Try and dream.
- 5:27[SPEAKER_04]: You'll feel the difference.
- 5:28[SPEAKER_04]: Click on that link below right now.
- 5:30[SPEAKER_04]: It's amazing stuff.
- 5:32[SPEAKER_04]: All right.
- 5:34[SPEAKER_04]: My friends, the woke left is simply the gift that keeps on giving.
- 5:43[SPEAKER_04]: Never in my life have I seen a political movement.
- 5:50[SPEAKER_04]: that so predictably trips over itself, that so predictably steps on the lying down rate, that so consistently and recurrently self-implodes that routinely snatches defeat from the jaws of victory as the utterly narcissistic self-unaware woke left.
- 6:19[SPEAKER_04]: to call them the wilde coyote apolitics would be an insult to Warner Bros.
- 6:26[SPEAKER_04]: Because at least, while he could assemble an acne rocket, and his would be feudal pursuit of the roadrunner.
- 6:34[SPEAKER_04]: At least, while he coyote was entertaining, unlike while he co-bear, unlike the now cringe unemployed Stephen co-bear while he coyote was funny.
- 6:50[SPEAKER_04]: No, no.
- 6:51[SPEAKER_04]: The woke left is in a class all by itself when it comes to total and complete and consistent failure.
- 7:02[SPEAKER_04]: After weeks of Republican infining, after days upon days of members of the MAGA faithful turning on each other over these Epstein files.
- 7:15[SPEAKER_04]: The woke left, the Democrat adults,
- 7:19[SPEAKER_04]: found a way to unite maga and the republican party like never before and i'm going to lay it all out for you let's start with what actually happened so all this week the wall street journal owned by the ultra never trump
- 7:38[SPEAKER_04]: Rupert Murdock and his news core.
- 7:41[SPEAKER_04]: They spent days hyping up with a called a bombshell explosive story about Trump's relationship Jeffrey Epstein.
- 7:51[SPEAKER_04]: The anticipation was building.
- 7:53[SPEAKER_04]: Trump's opponents were salivating, hoping beyond a hope that the dreams of Rachel Maddo would finally come true that this, this would finally be the end of the Trump presidency.
- 8:06[SPEAKER_04]: And then the Wall Street Journal, as of yesterday, as of last night, released this bombshell story.
- 8:16[SPEAKER_04]: And like, Haraldo standing in front of Al Capone's just open vault.
- 8:24[SPEAKER_04]: The bombshell that was supposed to rock the very foundations of the Trump presidency turned out to be what many are calling
- 8:36[SPEAKER_04]: the most pathetic political dud ever.
- 8:44[SPEAKER_04]: It was an alleged birthday letter from the year, two thousand and three that Trump supposedly wrote to Jeffrey Epstein.
- 8:57[SPEAKER_04]: It featured a lude hand drawn outline of a naked woman with the message, happy birthday, Jeffrey.
- 9:06[SPEAKER_04]: and may every day be another wonderful secret.
- 9:13[SPEAKER_05]: Oh, are we just reading that?
- 9:17[SPEAKER_05]: Makes me just, I mean, it's just so fucking, is that even remotely sound like Donald with the guy grew up and quit happy birthday, Jeffrey.
- 9:28[SPEAKER_04]: And may every day be another wonderful secret.
- 9:34[SPEAKER_04]: That's it.
- 9:36[SPEAKER_04]: That's their smoking gun.
- 9:37[SPEAKER_04]: A supposed birthday card.
- 9:42[SPEAKER_04]: From over twenty years ago, it's both a hand-drawn picture and a mock dialogue between Trump and Epstein.
- 9:50[SPEAKER_04]: It has literally nothing to do.
- 9:52[SPEAKER_04]: No resemblance whatsoever to the live, the literal library of volumes of past writings that we have directly from Trump's pen.
- 10:02[SPEAKER_04]: There's nothing that even remotely corroborates that this came from Trump twenty years ago to boot.
- 10:08[SPEAKER_04]: And now we're learning the Wall Street Journal.
- 10:10[SPEAKER_04]: Doesn't even have the letter in their possession.
- 10:14[SPEAKER_04]: And they can't even corroborate its authenticity.
- 10:17[SPEAKER_04]: It just came from some memoir of Jeffrey Epstein's.
- 10:23[SPEAKER_04]: But they went ahead and like the sleazy legacy media outlet scum that they are, the tabloid tramps that they in the legacy media as a whole have become.
- 10:37[SPEAKER_04]: They went ahead and published it anyway in a desperate attempt to try to hurt Trump.
- 10:44[SPEAKER_04]: in the midst of all of this Republican and MAGA in fighting.
- 10:47[SPEAKER_04]: I wouldn't use the Wall Street Journal for toilet paper at this point.
- 10:52[SPEAKER_04]: And if you've got a subscription cancel it now, you could go off this livestream as far as I'm concerned and cancel it now.
- 11:05[SPEAKER_04]: Now, first off, gang, seriously, as of this morning, now we know
- 11:14[SPEAKER_04]: why Trump has been avoiding the Epstein files like Superman and Kryptonite over the last few weeks.
- 11:20[SPEAKER_04]: Now we know, now it all makes sense.
- 11:23[SPEAKER_04]: It wasn't making sense.
- 11:25[SPEAKER_04]: Even Alex Jones was going, I don't understand it.
- 11:27[SPEAKER_04]: I do a whole episode of what Trump said.
- 11:29[SPEAKER_05]: I don't know what we're doing.
- 11:31[SPEAKER_05]: And then all of a sudden he gives another tweet saying he hates all the mega people who are obsessed with Epstein.
- 11:36[SPEAKER_05]: I know what he's doing.
- 11:37[SPEAKER_05]: You know, I mean, that's my best Alex.
- 11:40[SPEAKER_04]: I mean, everybody was like, why is he saying the things he's saying?
- 11:44[SPEAKER_04]: Why is he doing this?
- 11:46[SPEAKER_04]: Now it all makes sense.
- 11:47[SPEAKER_04]: Now we know why Trump has been saying that the Epstein files are actually just another Democrat scam.
- 11:53[SPEAKER_04]: It's like the Russia collusion hoax, another Democrat fabricated lie put together by Obama Clinton Biden.
- 11:59[SPEAKER_04]: He got wind of this story coming a couple of weeks ago.
- 12:04[SPEAKER_04]: I don't know if he knew the precise details, but he did know it was going to be a scandalous piece deliberately trying to tie Trump to Epstein and his sexual abuse.
- 12:16[SPEAKER_04]: So now we know why Trump has been playing down the Epstein files.
- 12:22[SPEAKER_04]: and even attributing them to Democrat operatives.
- 12:25[SPEAKER_04]: So this tabloid trash hit piece explains a lot of what's been going on over the last few weeks.
- 12:32[SPEAKER_04]: And we're getting corroboration that Trump knew about it for the last couple of weeks because of what Trump just did.
- 12:39[SPEAKER_04]: Trump did not just completely, totally, absolutely, unequivocally deny anything involving this Wall Street Journal hit piece.
- 12:52[SPEAKER_04]: He went nuclear.
- 12:53[SPEAKER_04]: He announced he's going to be suing the Wall Street Journal.
- 12:56[SPEAKER_04]: He's going to be suing newscore and he's going to be suing Rupert Murdock himself.
- 13:00[SPEAKER_04]: According to Trump, he had personally warned both the journal and Murdock that the letter was absolutely fake.
- 13:10[SPEAKER_04]: And that they were not to even think about publishing this piece, especially after they couldn't even corroborate its authenticity.
- 13:18[SPEAKER_04]: But they published it anyway.
- 13:21[SPEAKER_04]: So again, this is confirmation that you knew about the hit piece ahead of time.
- 13:25[SPEAKER_04]: And I think it explains a lot of Trump's rather dismissive posture towards the Epstein files and even towards many of his mega supporters who felt so betrayed over how he's been handling the release of the files.
- 13:39[SPEAKER_04]: And you know, I'm just, gang, I'm just going to say it.
- 13:46[SPEAKER_04]: I am going to say it.
- 13:48[SPEAKER_04]: I say it maybe once every couple of years, so now's a perfect time for me to say this.
- 13:56[SPEAKER_04]: There are too many effing black pillars on the right.
- 14:02[SPEAKER_04]: There are too many effing black pillars on the right.
- 14:09[SPEAKER_04]: I have been dealing with their negative, nanny, dooming vomit for eight freaking years on this channel.
- 14:17[SPEAKER_04]: Don't get me right.
- 14:18[SPEAKER_04]: Ninety eight percent of my all.
- 14:19[SPEAKER_04]: I love, you know, you guys are awesome.
- 14:21[SPEAKER_04]: We're all in this together.
- 14:22[SPEAKER_04]: We know a new conservative age is rising.
- 14:24[SPEAKER_04]: We get it.
- 14:25[SPEAKER_04]: We understand the massive
- 14:27[SPEAKER_04]: global, not globalist global dynamics that are happening is moving the world back to a nationalist populist traditionalist age we know that but the right there is the two percent whatever the right is replete with these online trolls and and yes influencers
- 14:50[SPEAKER_04]: who simply cannot comprehend how the world is actually moving in our direction.
- 14:56[SPEAKER_04]: How we are actually winning, not just here, but all over the freaking world.
- 15:01[SPEAKER_04]: That's why I write my books.
- 15:04[SPEAKER_04]: My books are there to document all the scholarly literature that shows, yes, globalism is dead and the new civilization's conservative world is rising.
- 15:17[SPEAKER_04]: And we've got
- 15:19[SPEAKER_04]: a right wing echo sphere that is addicted to losing.
- 15:27[SPEAKER_04]: Forget not being tired of winning.
- 15:30[SPEAKER_04]: These online and influencer A holes don't even know how to win.
- 15:39[SPEAKER_04]: Why I don't listen to them?
- 15:43[SPEAKER_04]: Why I've paid no heed to them?
- 15:46[SPEAKER_04]: That's why they're so despondent and despairing all the time.
- 15:50[SPEAKER_04]: No matter what, they have no idea how to win.
- 15:55[SPEAKER_04]: They've constructed an entire perception of the world that is utterly defeatous, bleak, cynical, repulsively fatalistic.
- 16:06[SPEAKER_04]: And you don't build civilization with that.
- 16:10[SPEAKER_04]: You don't save civilization with that.
- 16:15[SPEAKER_04]: You only further destroy it and burn it down.
- 16:21[SPEAKER_04]: They only know how to tear down Trump and his administration spread their misery in their cloud of doom everywhere they digitally roam.
- 16:32[SPEAKER_04]: President Trump in fairness to him has had to deal with this despairing doom loop.
- 16:41[SPEAKER_04]: on the right now for more than three weeks.
- 16:44[SPEAKER_04]: And you look, and I've done my bet.
- 16:46[SPEAKER_04]: If you follow the channel, if not, make sure you smack that bell and subscribe button.
- 16:50[SPEAKER_04]: But I have done my best to try to give both sides of the Epstein saga there do because they are both legit parts of the maga coalition.
- 17:00[SPEAKER_04]: So there are those who care very, very deeply about the Epstein files.
- 17:04[SPEAKER_04]: And I have talked and I have expressed their concerns.
- 17:07[SPEAKER_04]: I think very faithfully.
- 17:09[SPEAKER_04]: There were those who care deeply about the Epstein files, and there were devout hardcore and mega supporters who could not give a flipping rip about them.
- 17:23[SPEAKER_04]: And unfortunately, the influence of world, the online independent content creator world, my world, they have seemingly staked their careers on exposing the Epstein files.
- 17:39[SPEAKER_04]: So they don't just care about them.
- 17:41[SPEAKER_04]: I mean, Epstein, it just appears is like their entire world.
- 17:48[SPEAKER_04]: And again, I get it.
- 17:51[SPEAKER_04]: I've reported on it.
- 17:52[SPEAKER_04]: I've analyzed it.
- 17:54[SPEAKER_04]: Epstein legitimately represents
- 17:58[SPEAKER_04]: a two-tier justice system where a globalist political and economic elite get away with the most heinous crimes imaginable, absolutely, and that is horrific.
- 18:13[SPEAKER_04]: We should be repulsed by that.
- 18:16[SPEAKER_04]: Epstein represents further a deep state
- 18:20[SPEAKER_04]: that functions as a rogue parallel government comprised of international intelligence agencies that operate by both blackmail and freaking murder.
- 18:31[SPEAKER_04]: I get it.
- 18:33[SPEAKER_04]: It's horrific.
- 18:35[SPEAKER_04]: They spread chaos everywhere they go with their color revolutions in the life.
- 18:44[SPEAKER_04]: But for heaven's sake,
- 18:49[SPEAKER_04]: Can we at least find some semblance of trust and fidelity and credence for the guy who literally got shot in the face for us?
- 19:07[SPEAKER_04]: Can we now acknowledge that there was indeed a very reasonable, viable rationale
- 19:20[SPEAKER_04]: For how the Trump administration has been handling, yet steam files up till now.
- 19:26[SPEAKER_04]: Again, we're now learning it.
- 19:27[SPEAKER_04]: This is coming from White House Press Secretary Caroline Levitt, that the Wall Street Journal is refusing to show the Trump administration the letter.
- 19:35[SPEAKER_04]: They've conceded that they, the Wall Street Journal, don't even have it in their possession when they were asked to verify the alleged document they're basing their entire freaking fake story on.
- 19:48[SPEAKER_04]: I mean, you can't make this stuff up.
- 19:52[SPEAKER_04]: So Trump is doing what Trump does best.
- 19:55[SPEAKER_04]: He is fighting back.
- 19:58[SPEAKER_04]: He's not wallowing a despair.
- 19:59[SPEAKER_04]: Why do they do this?
- 20:01[SPEAKER_04]: Why do they do this?
- 20:01[SPEAKER_05]: Why do they do this?
- 20:04[SPEAKER_04]: That's who they betrayed me again.
- 20:06[SPEAKER_04]: Rupert Murdoch always betrayed Noah.
- 20:08[SPEAKER_04]: He's a neocah.
- 20:11[SPEAKER_04]: He's fighting back.
- 20:14[SPEAKER_04]: He's going to sue their asses just like he did with ABC's utterly repulsive, Georgie Stephanopoulos and CBS's sixty minutes who deliberately tried to interfere in a presidential election by doctoring that disastrous interview with Kackles Kamala.
- 20:32[SPEAKER_04]: The latest word we're getting as of this morning is that Trump is going to call Rupert Murdoch to the stand to testify in court.
- 20:40[SPEAKER_04]: Murdoch is going to be required to take the stand.
- 20:43[SPEAKER_04]: That is, unless he settles like the cowards at CBS and ABC did, which he will.
- 20:50[SPEAKER_04]: Just watch.
- 20:51[SPEAKER_04]: He will.
- 20:53[SPEAKER_04]: Oh, and the memes are already coming out on that.
- 20:57[SPEAKER_04]: This is what Trump's presidential library is going to look like after all these multi-million dollar lawsuits.
- 21:03[SPEAKER_04]: If you're listening by way of our twenty million podcast downloads, it's a picture of Versailles palace.
- 21:09[SPEAKER_04]: I mean, that's, and it's all been
- 21:12[SPEAKER_04]: paid for by all these legacy media outlets that are paying out tens of millions dollars because they lie.
- 21:17[SPEAKER_04]: I mean, crushed ABC in their false reporting.
- 21:20[SPEAKER_04]: He crushed CBS with their deliberate manipulation deceptive editing and went on to win that election and landslide.
- 21:26[SPEAKER_04]: Now he's going to finally crush that rapidly anti-Trump think of that.
- 21:32[SPEAKER_04]: Rupert murder.
- 21:33[SPEAKER_04]: I certainly hope Rupert murder.
- 21:34[SPEAKER_04]: I hope Fox News gets new ownership very, very soon.
- 21:40[SPEAKER_04]: I found it quite interesting that neither Jesse Waters nor Sean Hannity touched this story in their shows last night.
- 21:47[SPEAKER_04]: Nobody is going near this.
- 21:51[SPEAKER_04]: And for good reason, because if the woke left and the anti-Trumpers thought this was going to hurt Trump, they are as of today, finding themselves in their own world of hurt.
- 22:06[SPEAKER_04]: This is where this story
- 22:09[SPEAKER_04]: takes a turn for the glorious because the woke laugh like they always do seemed to manage to bring together the maga movement is more united than
- 22:21[SPEAKER_04]: ever through their pathetic backfiring antics wait until you see this.
- 22:27[SPEAKER_04]: But first gang, if you are just joining us on our live stream Friday, I'd love to hear your thoughts on all of this.
- 22:33[SPEAKER_04]: Let us know what you think by either sending us a super chat or by clicking on that link below and sending on joining our courageous Patriot Club.
- 22:40[SPEAKER_04]: We're for just only a one monthly fee I'll feature your comments on all our broadcasts and you can ask me as many questions as you like.
- 22:48[SPEAKER_04]: I'll be happy to answer them here on this.
- 22:50[SPEAKER_04]: live stream.
- 22:51[SPEAKER_04]: Also, you know, do you ever wonder why your brain feels foggy?
- 22:55[SPEAKER_04]: You know, even when you're eating clean and exercising, it may not be burnout.
- 22:59[SPEAKER_04]: It could be, I kid you not, parasites.
- 23:02[SPEAKER_04]: Ground-breaking research from Dr. Alan McDonald revealed a direct link between chronic parasitic infections and neurological disease, like multiple scrosis.
- 23:12[SPEAKER_04]: Parasites can cause inflammation, nerve damage, and long-term content decline.
- 23:17[SPEAKER_04]: More reason to do a full-body cleanse at least once a year.
- 23:21[SPEAKER_04]: While the wellness companies got you covered, they've got a solution for you.
- 23:26[SPEAKER_04]: I've remectin and Mabendis all.
- 23:29[SPEAKER_04]: The gold standard Parasite solution now combined in one cleanse combo.
- 23:33[SPEAKER_04]: Design to eliminate harmful invaders and support your immune system naturally.
- 23:38[SPEAKER_04]: Medical grade, not some trendy herbal gimmicks.
- 23:42[SPEAKER_04]: Feel just a quick intake form and get a three-month supply ship straight to your door.
- 23:47[SPEAKER_04]: Mahah is officially here and the wellness company is making hard to get medications digitally accessible so you can live your best life now.
- 23:57[SPEAKER_04]: Head on over to twc.health slash curly.
- 24:01[SPEAKER_04]: Use code thoroughly to save ninety dollars off plus free shipping.
- 24:06[SPEAKER_04]: Clink on that link below and cleanse your body today.
- 24:10[SPEAKER_04]: neat stuff.
- 24:11[SPEAKER_04]: I mean, I love the wellness company.
- 24:13[SPEAKER_04]: We just had Kelly victory on, I love her name.
- 24:17[SPEAKER_04]: Dr. Kelly victory on, believe last weekend, two weekends ago, talking about just some precise of this amazing stuff, this body cleanse to get rid of all the parasites in your body.
- 24:28[SPEAKER_04]: Gosh knows what we've gotten our bodies.
- 24:30[SPEAKER_04]: That's for sure.
- 24:30[SPEAKER_04]: All right, here's where the story takes a turn that only a Trump story can take.
- 24:38[SPEAKER_04]: Just stays before this Wall Street Journal story drop.
- 24:42[SPEAKER_04]: As you know, Trump's MAGA base was experiencing what many called the biggest internal division since the movement began.
- 24:50[SPEAKER_04]: Many Trump supporters were furious about the administration's handling of the Epstein files.
- 24:56[SPEAKER_04]: Many were calling for Attorney General Pam Bondi and her immediate resignation.
- 25:01[SPEAKER_04]: Trump himself even ended up basically lashing out at his own supporters, calling them weaklings for being duped by Democrats.
- 25:09[SPEAKER_04]: Basically, I don't watch you voting for him.
- 25:11[SPEAKER_04]: I don't want you supporting me anymore.
- 25:14[SPEAKER_04]: The Washington Examiner, which is itself, it wrestles with its own revert Murdoch like never Trump nonsense.
- 25:22[SPEAKER_04]: The Washington Examiner went so far as to say that this could end up being Trump's Afghanistan.
- 25:28[SPEAKER_04]: Referring to Biden's dramatic drop and approve of after you botched the Afghanistan, which were all in the August of the first year of his presidency, the summer of his first year of his presidency.
- 25:38[SPEAKER_04]: It was, and it was a poll drop that he never recovered from.
- 25:42[SPEAKER_04]: And lo and behold,
- 25:45[SPEAKER_04]: The moment that the Wall Street Journal story hit, everything changed.
- 25:51[SPEAKER_04]: And I mean literally everything.
- 25:55[SPEAKER_04]: The entire MAGA ecosystem that was black-pilling and doom-spooling all over the place, they suddenly turned around and rallied around Trump like we haven't seen in years.
- 26:11[SPEAKER_04]: The response from major conservative voices was immediate and unified, and ironically, one of the first to come to Trump's defense.
- 26:22[SPEAKER_04]: was none other than Elon Musk himself.
- 26:27[SPEAKER_04]: The guy who just weeks ago claiming that Trump was in the Epstein files.
- 26:31[SPEAKER_04]: Now again, this whole fabricated fiasco coming from the Wall Street Journal explains so much of what we've been seeing over the last several weeks.
- 26:41[SPEAKER_04]: But Elon was one of the first to call this out as pure and total BS bogus in his words.
- 26:49[SPEAKER_04]: Megan Kelly, again, another huge critic of Trump's handling of the Epstein files of the last few weeks.
- 26:54[SPEAKER_04]: She called it, quote, the dumbest attempted hit piece I've ever read.
- 27:02[SPEAKER_04]: Laura Lumer, who had been demanding more transparency, of course, on Epstein, defended Trump saying that Rupert Murdoch is a backstabber, and that Trump should cut him off forever.
- 27:14[SPEAKER_04]: And of course, JD Vance are amazing vice president.
- 27:19[SPEAKER_04]: uh... who many are all your way behind man there you go come on with my my team back there is falling asleep uh... jd vance there we go our amazing vice president many already calling him number forty eight rightly so he came out and set up bluntly forgive my language but this story is complete and after bullshit the walls regional should be ashamed for publishing it here's speaker of the house mike johnson just this morning on cnb see
- 27:47[SPEAKER_02]: it's someone drew a, in two thousand and three, might have drawn a picture of a, I don't know, a body letter before the guy even, you know, all the real info had even been out at that point.
- 28:02[SPEAKER_02]: I don't think about this guy.
- 28:05[SPEAKER_01]: The president and I talked about that ridiculous allegation this morning.
- 28:08[SPEAKER_01]: He said it's patently absurd.
- 28:10[SPEAKER_01]: He's never drawn such a picture.
- 28:11[SPEAKER_01]: He's never thought of drawn such a picture.
- 28:14[SPEAKER_01]: And he said, did you see the language of this bogus supposed communication or card or something?
- 28:18[SPEAKER_01]: I supposedly sent to Epstein.
- 28:20[SPEAKER_01]: He said, I don't talk like that.
- 28:21[SPEAKER_01]: I don't think like that.
- 28:22[SPEAKER_01]: They're literally making things up.
- 28:24[SPEAKER_01]: He's so frustrated by it.
- 28:25[SPEAKER_01]: And he's going to wind up, I think, suing some of the media outlets that have put all this out there because they inform them that it was totally contrived.
- 28:34[SPEAKER_01]: Look, the president is the most maligned and attack political figure in the history of American politics.
- 28:39[SPEAKER_01]: There's no question about it, but he's also the most resilient.
- 28:42[SPEAKER_01]: And you see at the same time, his approval ratings are skyrocketing by CNN had a story.
- 28:47[SPEAKER_01]: I think a day or two ago, he was at ninety percent approval rating.
- 28:51[SPEAKER_01]: There's never been a president that high, so the more that they attack him, the more they're thinking, we'll see through it.
- 28:58[SPEAKER_04]: I think Julie Kelly frankly said it fast.
- 29:01[SPEAKER_04]: She did put up a great tweet.
- 29:03[SPEAKER_04]: Yeah, go ahead.
- 29:04[SPEAKER_04]: That's it right there.
- 29:06[SPEAKER_04]: This article is actually gift unsubstantiated garbage published by a never Trump news org claiming to have some smoking gun about ties between the president and Epstein is precisely the sort of bad faith coverage the president can use as a lifeline.
- 29:25[SPEAKER_04]: Hopefully, the administration will mock this shit out of it, run and express outrage or try to debunk.
- 29:32[SPEAKER_04]: And that's, of course, exactly what is happening.
- 29:36[SPEAKER_04]: I mean, that she just, that's bullseye.
- 29:38[SPEAKER_04]: The anti-Trumpers, the Democrats, the woke left, the legacy media.
- 29:43[SPEAKER_04]: They will never seem to realize that whenever they team up,
- 29:50[SPEAKER_04]: to so obviously sabotage President Trump, whether it's in the form of the Russian collusion hoax or all the fake news fabrications or the law fair and the sham indictments, whatever it is, all it ends up doing is uniting the manga base to rally around Trump.
- 30:11[SPEAKER_04]: It happens every single time.
- 30:17[SPEAKER_04]: After the Mara Longa raid, Trump's polls went up ten points.
- 30:22[SPEAKER_04]: They soared.
- 30:25[SPEAKER_04]: We the Alvin Bragg indictment.
- 30:27[SPEAKER_04]: That was on the, that was released Thursday night.
- 30:30[SPEAKER_04]: We had a live stream Friday literally just hours after that Alvin Bragg Manhattan corrupt DA released his indictment.
- 30:39[SPEAKER_04]: And I told you, you watch, this is going to make Trump more popular than ever.
- 30:44[SPEAKER_04]: And what happened?
- 30:44[SPEAKER_04]: His polls went up, his support increase.
- 30:47[SPEAKER_04]: It happens every day after they freaking trying to kill him in Butler, Pennsylvania.
- 30:54[SPEAKER_04]: It seemed like the entire world rallied around Trump.
- 30:58[SPEAKER_04]: And again, we know why.
- 31:00[SPEAKER_04]: This isn't just surmising.
- 31:02[SPEAKER_04]: It's not just a pin.
- 31:04[SPEAKER_04]: We talk about this all the time on this channel.
- 31:06[SPEAKER_04]: It's a dynamic that's social, cultural anthropologists call the process.
- 31:11[SPEAKER_04]: The process is segmentary oppositions.
- 31:14[SPEAKER_04]: It's a fancy, schmancy way of saying external threats, breed internal solidarity.
- 31:20[SPEAKER_04]: External threats.
- 31:22[SPEAKER_04]: breed internal, so I'm going old Gavin Newsom here, external threats, breed internal solidarity.
- 31:29[SPEAKER_04]: It's technically known as the process of segmentary oppositions.
- 31:33[SPEAKER_04]: We see it all the time, for example, as kids like my brother and I don't have a brother, but I'm just giving you an example of illustration.
- 31:41[SPEAKER_04]: My brother and I might drive our mother crazy because we can't get along.
- 31:45[SPEAKER_04]: We're always fighting, right?
- 31:48[SPEAKER_04]: But then our cousins come on over.
- 31:51[SPEAKER_04]: And then if they threaten us in any way, well, my brother and I, who were just fighting, will end up like banding together against any kind of external conflict coming from our cousins.
- 32:03[SPEAKER_04]: So you've heard of numerous occasions, right?
- 32:06[SPEAKER_04]: Where you got like some drunk couple fighting.
- 32:10[SPEAKER_04]: Trump has been a wife of a boyfriend girlfriend.
- 32:13[SPEAKER_04]: They're making a scene.
- 32:14[SPEAKER_04]: Someone calls the police.
- 32:15[SPEAKER_04]: The police shows up and the pair who were just hating on each other and fighting.
- 32:20[SPEAKER_04]: They end up banding together against the police.
- 32:24[SPEAKER_04]: It's this very same principle of segmentary oppositions.
- 32:28[SPEAKER_04]: And scholars have noticed, I mean, you just keep going with this.
- 32:31[SPEAKER_04]: So if my brother, my cousins get no conflict with the neighbors kids, right?
- 32:36[SPEAKER_04]: So we're all fighting.
- 32:37[SPEAKER_04]: And my mom sends us out.
- 32:40[SPEAKER_04]: of the house and then we go on into the neighborhood and we hang out with the neighbors kids and all of us on the neighbor kids become a little bit of a threat then all of a sudden our whole extended family my brother my cousins we now all see ourselves as one.
- 32:54[SPEAKER_04]: And then if our neighborhood, we're faced with threats from kids from another neighborhood, what happens?
- 33:01[SPEAKER_04]: Same dynamic.
- 33:03[SPEAKER_04]: We all band together against the rival neighborhood and so on and so on and so on and so on.
- 33:08[SPEAKER_04]: And now you see how nations can rise up against nations, right?
- 33:11[SPEAKER_04]: External threats breed internal solidarity.
- 33:15[SPEAKER_04]: So this is why.
- 33:17[SPEAKER_04]: And I will say every time.
- 33:23[SPEAKER_04]: Every time you could literally put money on this, every time the anti-Trump forces try to take Trump out the entire MAGA movement rallies around him, guaranteed it happens literally every single time.
- 33:41[SPEAKER_04]: Their efforts at weakening Trump only end up making him stronger.
- 33:46[SPEAKER_04]: I mean, if you haven't learned that over the last eight years, dude, you have not learned freaking anything.
- 33:51[SPEAKER_04]: I don't know what else to tell you.
- 33:53[SPEAKER_04]: But here's where Trump showed us his true political genius.
- 33:58[SPEAKER_04]: What did he do?
- 33:59[SPEAKER_04]: Let's kind of let's close this circle.
- 34:02[SPEAKER_04]: Let's close the loop.
- 34:03[SPEAKER_04]: All right, so we saw we saw that the story dropped
- 34:08[SPEAKER_04]: The bomb shot, the hurl though, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh
- 34:30[SPEAKER_04]: before they released it, he did know that it was the supposed birthday card.
- 34:34[SPEAKER_04]: And he said, dude, I didn't write that authenticate to show me your authentic authentication.
- 34:39[SPEAKER_04]: They didn't even have it in their possession forever and say some talk about the world's original.
- 34:43[SPEAKER_04]: So he said, whether you better not drop it.
- 34:45[SPEAKER_04]: So it not explains why he's been kind of distancing himself in the whole Epstein fiasco.
- 34:51[SPEAKER_04]: And then they drop it and then he turns around and says, that's it.
- 34:54[SPEAKER_04]: I'm gonna sue your asses as a result of that.
- 34:59[SPEAKER_04]: And then, and then what we find is his poll numbers go up.
- 35:04[SPEAKER_04]: More and more people band together around him.
- 35:07[SPEAKER_04]: And now let's, how does he close it?
- 35:10[SPEAKER_04]: How does this whole story arc and what does he do?
- 35:15[SPEAKER_04]: What did he just order last night?
- 35:18[SPEAKER_04]: What is it put in the chat?
- 35:21[SPEAKER_04]: What did Trump just order to be released today?
- 35:27[SPEAKER_04]: I mean, if this is I'm sorry.
- 35:29[SPEAKER_04]: I am so I'm just going to say if this is in forty chess.
- 35:31[SPEAKER_04]: I don't know what the hell is.
- 35:34[SPEAKER_04]: Immediately after the Wall Street Journal story completely back via Trump went full full nuclear.
- 35:41[SPEAKER_04]: He made a move that caught everyone on the left completely off guard.
- 35:46[SPEAKER_04]: He immediately ordered Attorney General Pam Bonny to release all grand jury testimony related to Jeffrey Epstein.
- 35:54[SPEAKER_04]: That's what the Epstein files are that the grand jury testimony and all the evidence that we have now on Epstein and Attorney General Bonny responded immediately.
- 36:05[SPEAKER_04]: She tweeted out President Trump, we are ready to move the court tomorrow to conceal the grand jury transcripts.
- 36:11[SPEAKER_04]: Again, it was, again, they have to be careful with victims and victims names and a lot of that.
- 36:16[SPEAKER_04]: There is a lot of sensitivity, legitimately so over this release, no question.
- 36:22[SPEAKER_04]: But again, it was almost like it was literally scripted to play out this way.
- 36:28[SPEAKER_04]: This is so freaking amazing.
- 36:31[SPEAKER_04]: So apparently at some point today,
- 36:33[SPEAKER_04]: The files, the Epstein files will indeed be released.
- 36:37[SPEAKER_04]: And now on top of all that, on top of all that, as you heard at the very beginning, the polls are coming out.
- 36:47[SPEAKER_04]: And it's like, it's like clockwork.
- 36:50[SPEAKER_04]: It's the same thing we've been seeing for eight years.
- 36:54[SPEAKER_04]: The polls come out and Trump is freaking stronger than ever.
- 37:00[SPEAKER_04]: Now, at this point in this presidency, especially after the last three weeks, we should be seeing a massive slip.
- 37:08[SPEAKER_04]: We certainly saw that with Biden around this time in twenty twenty one, below and behold, look at what we got.
- 37:15[SPEAKER_04]: Quantum Insights, one of the most accurate pollsters of twenty twenty four.
- 37:20[SPEAKER_04]: They have Trump at a solid, forty-eight percent approval rating.
- 37:24[SPEAKER_04]: Remember Trump always outperforms his polls by at least two points.
- 37:28[SPEAKER_04]: As you have to remember, forty-eight percent is very solid, very strong.
- 37:32[SPEAKER_04]: And right before we went live, I saw Mark Mitchell of Rass Muson, found Trump was plus two today.
- 37:39[SPEAKER_04]: So whatever his approval rating is, it's two points higher than his negative ratings.
- 37:46[SPEAKER_04]: And take a look at the latest generic ballot.
- 37:49[SPEAKER_04]: So this is who you could have vote for in the upcoming midterms.
- 37:54[SPEAKER_04]: According to McLachlan's polling, John McLachlan, Republicans are up five.
- 38:01[SPEAKER_04]: They're up freaking five over the Democrats.
- 38:04[SPEAKER_04]: Now, even Harry Anton over at CNN was pointing out yesterday that in their own polling, they only have the Democrats up by two in their generic ballot polling.
- 38:15[SPEAKER_04]: That is nowhere.
- 38:17[SPEAKER_04]: where they need to be if they want to have a blue wave.
- 38:19[SPEAKER_04]: So you compare to where the Democrats were at this time in relation to twenty eighteen and the two thousand and six midterms when they won over forty plus seats take back the house.
- 38:30[SPEAKER_04]: They were like plus seven plus eight plus nine they're plus two now.
- 38:36[SPEAKER_04]: or plus two.
- 38:38[SPEAKER_04]: So right now, as we speak, twenty twenty six is there is no blue wave at all.
- 38:44[SPEAKER_04]: If anything, they're predicting they might be able to pick up two or three seats.
- 38:48[SPEAKER_04]: That's it.
- 38:49[SPEAKER_04]: By contrast, take a look at the Democrat approval.
- 38:55[SPEAKER_04]: If you can see it.
- 38:57[SPEAKER_04]: Behold it.
- 38:59[SPEAKER_04]: They are negative fifty three right now.
- 39:03[SPEAKER_04]: According to the latest Quinnipiac, they're at nineteen percent approval, a negative fifty-three, seven out of ten voters disapprove of the Democrats.
- 39:13[SPEAKER_04]: They are officially under the twenty percent mark.
- 39:15[SPEAKER_04]: They're about as popular as herpes right now.
- 39:21[SPEAKER_04]: This Wall Street Journal debacle.
- 39:28[SPEAKER_04]: is just the latest example of how the mainstream media has completely destroyed its own credibility.
- 39:35[SPEAKER_04]: They've cried wolf so many times that even when Trump's own supporters were frustrated with them, they still refused to believe obvious media manipulation.
- 39:48[SPEAKER_04]: The journal story was so transparently fake that it helped Trump.
- 39:54[SPEAKER_04]: It didn't hurt him.
- 39:57[SPEAKER_04]: What we're witnessing is a perfect example of how Trump continues to outmaneuver his political opponents.
- 40:04[SPEAKER_04]: The Democrats and their media allies thought that they could exploit divisions within the megabase to finally take down Trump.
- 40:12[SPEAKER_04]: Instead, they just reminded everyone why they support Trump in the first place because the alternative is trusting the same people who've been lying to us for years.
- 40:27[SPEAKER_04]: The Epstein issue was threatening to become Trump's biggest political liability.
- 40:32[SPEAKER_04]: Again, we covered it.
- 40:34[SPEAKER_04]: There was definitely some concern that this was, this was inflicting some permanent cracks in his base.
- 40:41[SPEAKER_04]: But by forcing his hand with an obviously fake fabricated story, the Wall Street Journal gave Trump the opportunity to turn it into a victory.
- 40:51[SPEAKER_04]: Now instead of being on the defensive, Trump
- 40:55[SPEAKER_04]: is on the offensive, promising to release documents that will likely expose the real perpetrators, while simultaneously filing lawsuits against the media outlets that desperately tried to defame him in frame it.
- 41:11[SPEAKER_04]: This episode has massive implications for Trump's presidency going forward.
- 41:16[SPEAKER_04]: First it shows that the mega base, while willing to criticize Trump, we are not a cult, we will criticize him.
- 41:24[SPEAKER_04]: If we think he's miscalculating, we'll say it.
- 41:26[SPEAKER_04]: We'll be very open.
- 41:28[SPEAKER_04]: We will disagree with him.
- 41:31[SPEAKER_04]: But nevertheless, we will never tolerate obvious medium manipulation.
- 41:35[SPEAKER_04]: We'll never go there.
- 41:37[SPEAKER_04]: We're a family.
- 41:38[SPEAKER_04]: We argue, but we're always a family.
- 41:43[SPEAKER_04]: Second, a demonstrates that Trump's enemies are so desperate to stop him, that they're
- 41:52[SPEAKER_04]: Their only recourse is to fabricate evidence, which only strengthens Trump's whole witch hunt narrative.
- 42:03[SPEAKER_04]: Most importantly, it shows that Trump has learned how to use the media's own tactics against him.
- 42:07[SPEAKER_04]: Instead of just denying the story, he's taking legal action while simultaneously using the controversy to push for the release of documents that will likely expose his real enemies and appease that portion of his base that are so invested in it.
- 42:24[SPEAKER_04]: The Wall Street Journal's Epstein hit piece will go down in history.
- 42:28[SPEAKER_04]: as one of the most spectacular media backfires of all time.
- 42:35[SPEAKER_04]: What was supposed to be the story that finally brought down Trump?
- 42:40[SPEAKER_04]: Instead, became that story that united his base and handed him a massive political victory.
- 42:51[SPEAKER_04]: The Democrats and their media allies keep making the same mistake.
- 42:55[SPEAKER_04]: They underestimate Trump's ability to turn their attacks into opportunities.
- 43:01[SPEAKER_04]: They thought they could exploit divisions within the MAGA base, but instead they reminded everyone why we support Trump in the first place.
- 43:12[SPEAKER_04]: As we move forward, this episode serves as a perfect reminder of why the American people elected Trump.
- 43:18[SPEAKER_04]: Not because he's perfect, but because he's willing to fight back against a corrupt system that will stop it nothing to destroy anyone who threatens their power and affluence.
- 43:32[SPEAKER_04]: The Wall Street Journal thought they were publishing a bombshell.
- 43:37[SPEAKER_04]: Instead,
- 43:38[SPEAKER_04]: They just handed Trump the ammunition he needed to go on the offensive.
- 43:44[SPEAKER_04]: And based on what we've seen so far, this is just the beginning.
- 43:49[SPEAKER_04]: The swamp is panicking.
- 43:52[SPEAKER_04]: The media is desperate and Trump.
- 43:58[SPEAKER_04]: But he's stronger than ever.
- 44:01[SPEAKER_04]: Buckle up, gang.
- 44:03[SPEAKER_04]: This is going to be one hell of a ride.
- 44:08[SPEAKER_04]: Over to you.
- 44:09[SPEAKER_04]: Over to you.
- 44:10[SPEAKER_04]: Over to you.
- 44:11[SPEAKER_04]: I want to hear what you guys have to say.
- 44:12[SPEAKER_04]: I'm sure you got plenty to say about this whole Epstein thing and just this amazing heroes arc story arc that we're seeing as Mike is putting together all of your questions.
- 44:24[SPEAKER_04]: Remember, you can ask it in two ways.
- 44:27[SPEAKER_04]: You can either send us a super chat.
- 44:29[SPEAKER_04]: I'll be happy to answer it there.
- 44:30[SPEAKER_04]: Or you can join our courageous Patriots Club at fight.
- 44:33[SPEAKER_04]: That totally talks.com slash join.
- 44:35[SPEAKER_04]: We're for just one monthly fee, you will be able to ask me any questions.
- 44:40[SPEAKER_04]: And many questions as you want, or as many comments are well, be happy to answer them here.
- 44:44[SPEAKER_04]: Also, if you are a homeowner, you do need to listen to this.
- 44:49[SPEAKER_04]: When was the last time you checked on your home title, okay?
- 44:53[SPEAKER_04]: That's the legal proof you own your house.
- 44:55[SPEAKER_04]: Well, if you're like me, the answer is never.
- 44:59[SPEAKER_04]: Well, the problem is, in today's AI and cyber world, scammers are stealing home titles, and your equity is the target.
- 45:09[SPEAKER_04]: And it works, I mean, it's crazy how it works.
- 45:12[SPEAKER_04]: Criminal's forger signature on one document.
- 45:14[SPEAKER_04]: They use a fake notary stamp.
- 45:17[SPEAKER_04]: They pay a small fee with your county, and that's it.
- 45:21[SPEAKER_04]: Boom, your home title has been transferred out of your name.
- 45:25[SPEAKER_04]: Then what they do is take out all these loans.
- 45:28[SPEAKER_04]: They even sell your property and pocket the cash.
- 45:32[SPEAKER_04]: And you won't even know what happened until you get a collection or for closure notice.
- 45:36[SPEAKER_04]: So that's why you need to stop what you're doing and find out today if you've already been a victim.
- 45:42[SPEAKER_04]: use promo code curly talks at home title lock.com to make sure your title is still in your name.
- 45:49[SPEAKER_04]: You also get a free title history report plus a free, fourteen day trial.
- 45:54[SPEAKER_04]: You get to try it out totally for free.
- 45:57[SPEAKER_04]: They're a million dollar triple lock protection.
- 45:59[SPEAKER_04]: It's amazing.
- 46:00[SPEAKER_04]: That's twenty four seven monitoring of your title.
- 46:03[SPEAKER_04]: Urgent alerts to any changes.
- 46:06[SPEAKER_04]: And if fraud were to happen, they'll spend up to one million dollars to fix it.
- 46:11[SPEAKER_04]: So go to hometownelock.com right now.
- 46:14[SPEAKER_04]: Use promo code trolley talks.
- 46:15[SPEAKER_04]: That's home to loc.com promo code trolley talks.
- 46:20[SPEAKER_04]: All right, Michael, what do we got?
- 46:21[SPEAKER_04]: What do we got?
- 46:25[SPEAKER_04]: Franz, good to hear from you.
- 46:26[SPEAKER_04]: Good morning, Dr. Steve.
- 46:26[SPEAKER_04]: Does the body politic have a symbiotic relationship with propaganda?
- 46:35[SPEAKER_04]: Yeah, yeah.
- 46:36[SPEAKER_04]: It's not, I mean, propaganda is a neutral term.
- 46:41[SPEAKER_04]: We use it projoratively, but it is a neutral term.
- 46:45[SPEAKER_04]: Because anytime you're trying to deliberately persuade the masses,
- 46:50[SPEAKER_04]: to be inclined in a particular way, to be disposed to particular issue.
- 46:56[SPEAKER_04]: That is technically propaganda.
- 46:58[SPEAKER_04]: I can give you, I mean, what would be a very good technical definition of propaganda?
- 47:05[SPEAKER_04]: Now we tend to think of that as manipulation, and that's not good.
- 47:09[SPEAKER_04]: And this goes all the way back to the classical Greek.
- 47:12[SPEAKER_04]: So this is Plato basically arguing with Aristotle, actually the other way around, because Aristotle comes later.
- 47:19[SPEAKER_04]: Plato didn't like the classical rhetorical tradition particularly the softests because he believed it was purely manipulative.
- 47:27[SPEAKER_04]: It was it was propaganda it would literally just
- 47:32[SPEAKER_04]: He saw it because it was so neutral and men it could be used for really bad things.
- 47:37[SPEAKER_04]: Trying to manipulate people to believe in lies, deliberately manipulate them to believe in lies.
- 47:43[SPEAKER_04]: Aristotle went the other way.
- 47:45[SPEAKER_04]: Aristotle said, because it's neutral, we need to cultivate the virtuous side of it.
- 47:49[SPEAKER_04]: So he would ask questions like, which is the better doctor?
- 47:53[SPEAKER_04]: The one that tells you that you're sick, but can't convince you?
- 47:58[SPEAKER_04]: or the one who tells you that your sick and can convince you so you can take the right treatment.
- 48:03[SPEAKER_04]: Well, obviously, the doctor that can persuade you for the truth is better.
- 48:07[SPEAKER_04]: So let me
- 48:14[SPEAKER_04]: Let's see if we can get a nice definition for you with that.
- 48:17[SPEAKER_04]: Propagaine is a deliberate systematic attempt to shape perceptions, manipulate cognitions and direct behavior to achieve a desired response.
- 48:25[SPEAKER_04]: That's an AI, AI overview.
- 48:28[SPEAKER_04]: So yes, the body politic by nature of politics is all about power and persuasion, then by nature, the body politic will always be propagandistic.
- 48:38[SPEAKER_04]: So that's why we have to be on guard.
- 48:40[SPEAKER_04]: That's why again, the founding fathers I thought were so brilliant in this sense of wanting a free and fair press to be able to.
- 48:50[SPEAKER_04]: counter the claims of our body politic with corroboration and to determine whether or not what they're saying really is true.
- 49:02[SPEAKER_04]: Is it true that tariffs are going to raise prices and inflation?
- 49:10[SPEAKER_04]: Well, there's there's a case that can be made that it can there's a case that can made that it that it that it that it won't and you have to be able to weigh those and both people arguing both sides have to try to do their best to persuade and then the media is supposed to be I thought a kind of balancing act with that and of course media just takes the whatever the Democrat talking point is so they just become propaganda stick in its most negative sense But yes, propaganda by definition is a part of the body politic it is absolutely symbiotic
- 49:41[SPEAKER_04]: But it can be for either good or for bad.
- 49:44[SPEAKER_04]: Trump is a master propagandist when it comes to convincing you of the truth.
- 49:53[SPEAKER_04]: Richard, Dr. Steve, your thoughts on Dr. O'Connor are, yes, a Bernal, refusing to answer questions at the auto pen hearings.
- 50:01[SPEAKER_04]: Guilty little weasels, oh, how dare you say that?
- 50:04[SPEAKER_04]: I've been Dr. and I played the thing.
- 50:08[SPEAKER_04]: What was it?
- 50:08[SPEAKER_04]: Did at any time did you see Joe Biden just absolutely cognitively not with it?
- 50:14[SPEAKER_04]: And the answer, the question was, this is with Bernal, was that Joe Biden's technically Joe Biden's assistant?
- 50:24[SPEAKER_04]: Was there any time that you saw Joe Biden not cognitively fit to be president?
- 50:28[SPEAKER_04]: I have been advised to answer that as he pleaded the fifth.
- 50:32[SPEAKER_04]: And I think Scott Jennings, he was asked, you know, what do you do with Trump's medical concerns and diagnosis?
- 50:40[SPEAKER_04]: You know, why aren't you as freaked out about that as you are with Biden?
- 50:44[SPEAKER_04]: His answer was perfect because the people, the medical, the physicians around Trump diagnosing his medical condition are not plating the fifth.
- 50:56[SPEAKER_04]: That's the difference.
- 50:57[SPEAKER_04]: Your frequency, this is what I mean.
- 50:59[SPEAKER_04]: I mean, it's very fact that you have the CNN
- 51:05[SPEAKER_04]: I mean, just social illiterates.
- 51:08[SPEAKER_04]: asking the most obviously, patently, obviously stupid questions.
- 51:14[SPEAKER_04]: So anyway, no, I mean, obviously, if ever the phrase where there's smoke, there's fire, we're true, it's this.
- 51:23[SPEAKER_04]: Obviously, so O'Connor, he's in Delaware here.
- 51:27[SPEAKER_04]: He's just like, twenty minutes away from me.
- 51:29[SPEAKER_04]: Oh, Delaware is very small.
- 51:32[SPEAKER_04]: Everybody knows everybody in Delaware.
- 51:34[SPEAKER_04]: I've never met him, but I know people who know him.
- 51:37[SPEAKER_04]: This is a family doctor of Biden, and as I understand, it's not even a GPs.
- 51:46[SPEAKER_04]: It's just a weird kind of relationship.
- 51:49[SPEAKER_04]: It's clearly corrupt.
- 51:51[SPEAKER_04]: It's clearly corrupt.
- 51:53[SPEAKER_04]: All it does is fuel the fire for more investigations.
- 51:59[SPEAKER_04]: Yeah, we'll see what happens with that.
- 52:01[SPEAKER_04]: But again, I think gut felt was talking about this last night.
- 52:05[SPEAKER_04]: We all saw it.
- 52:06[SPEAKER_04]: It's not like we're uncovering anything we don't know.
- 52:10[SPEAKER_04]: We all saw that Biden was cognitively and physically degenerate.
- 52:15[SPEAKER_04]: We all saw it.
- 52:17[SPEAKER_04]: And we just we're just surrounded by a bunch of Soviet gas lighting.
- 52:21[SPEAKER_04]: a bullet bureau saying no, no, no, no, nothing to see here.
- 52:24[SPEAKER_04]: Everything's wonderful, most particularly Jake Tapper, ironically.
- 52:29[SPEAKER_04]: And so now it's just more or less, how do we humiliate these people?
- 52:33[SPEAKER_04]: How do we find maybe, and how do we find some smoking guns of where they did know it and they knowingly lied?
- 52:42[SPEAKER_04]: So yeah, it's, yeah, that's nuts.
- 52:45[SPEAKER_04]: I love a guilty little weasels for sure Richard.
- 52:49[SPEAKER_04]: Our team or doctor truly now known as the back porch picture professor.
- 52:53[SPEAKER_04]: Yes, yes, I'm out from now on.
- 52:56[SPEAKER_04]: It looks like I do enjoy that.
- 52:58[SPEAKER_04]: I've gotten a lot of feedback from you guys and maybe morning and evening videos are going to be on the back porch will start have a lot of coffee together.
- 53:05[SPEAKER_04]: Well, and the day to get maybe with the
- 53:07[SPEAKER_04]: Whatever an adult beverage, whatever you like in the evening, it started to rain last night.
- 53:12[SPEAKER_04]: You might want to check out my what Putin said about Greenland.
- 53:17[SPEAKER_04]: America and next in Greenland, very interesting pushback there, started rain.
- 53:22[SPEAKER_04]: So I had to go inside, but we'll do some, we'll do our day videos.
- 53:26[SPEAKER_04]: in the studio, but I think a morning and evening video out in the back porch would be really nice.
- 53:32[SPEAKER_04]: Save that five times fast, right?
- 53:34[SPEAKER_04]: Welcome back from vacation.
- 53:35[SPEAKER_04]: Lake George looks amazing to bed.
- 53:37[SPEAKER_04]: It's in the communist poophole.
- 53:41[SPEAKER_04]: That is New York.
- 53:42[SPEAKER_04]: Sorry, New York to early talkers.
- 53:44[SPEAKER_04]: Well, I get oh, so I talked to some of the locals.
- 53:47[SPEAKER_04]: We went to winery.
- 53:48[SPEAKER_04]: right around there and my sister lived in New York for a number of years New York City and she said that she said they asked if we're local and I grew up in Connecticut and she said she lived New York City for one because oh that's not New York.
- 54:04[SPEAKER_04]: That's not New York.
- 54:04[SPEAKER_04]: This is real New York.
- 54:06[SPEAKER_04]: And it's red New York.
- 54:07[SPEAKER_04]: It's very, very most people up there are very conservative, which is pretty cool.
- 54:11[SPEAKER_04]: It's been so long.
- 54:12[SPEAKER_04]: I don't think I have good questions prepared today.
- 54:15[SPEAKER_04]: Mostly just silly comments and stocky jokes.
- 54:17[SPEAKER_04]: Oh, he's always great to hear from you, ROT.
- 54:20[SPEAKER_04]: That's right, I meant to say that at the very beginning, like this is our first real live stream Friday and how many weeks because I've been away or we had to July the fourth weekend.
- 54:29[SPEAKER_04]: That was really cool.
- 54:32[SPEAKER_04]: That was the day of the signing of the one big beautiful bill.
- 54:35[SPEAKER_04]: Before all of this unpleasantness kind of broke out the the whole Jeffrey Epstein fiasco.
- 54:43[SPEAKER_04]: the way it was handled at least by the Justice Department was announced that weekend of all weekends.
- 54:49[SPEAKER_04]: That's actually one of the theories, one of the theories that this was an inside job that Justice Department officials were trying to throw Pam Bondi under the bus and cash and
- 55:06[SPEAKER_04]: and Dan, by releasing it the way they did.
- 55:09[SPEAKER_04]: So anyway, it's just interesting theories there.
- 55:13[SPEAKER_04]: Davos, I was missing new Dr. Dirlie videos over the weekend, so I watched old shows like from woke liberals to conservative scholar, the story of Dr. Steve Tirlie from March of twenty twenty one, where you mentioned liking George W. Bush, but then turning against him.
- 55:27[SPEAKER_04]: I was in Afghanistan in two thousand four.
- 55:30[SPEAKER_04]: Thank you for your service, Davos.
- 55:32[SPEAKER_04]: For Bush's reelection, and I argued with my soldier pal, who always hated Bush, Trump's more effective than Bush, but can you explain why you don't like boy, oh, it's the meal good.
- 55:41[SPEAKER_04]: No, I appreciate that.
- 55:43[SPEAKER_04]: And I think we only have.
- 55:47[SPEAKER_04]: We only had it was either Bush or Kerry, and I.
- 55:50[SPEAKER_04]: I voted Bush, and I voted Bush with Bush V Gore, signing the court case there with the Florida ballots.
- 56:03[SPEAKER_04]: No, no, I just, the argument is simply that Bush in the end was just simply the conservative version of the right version of globalism.
- 56:17[SPEAKER_04]: So of liberalism and liberalism is predicated in the notion of open borders, so as to maintain very, so as to import foreign workers, cheap labor, so as to keep the costs, production costs of goods at very, very low rate.
- 56:42[SPEAKER_04]: At the same time, there's a global division of labor to send manufacturing and industry over to the global south.
- 56:49[SPEAKER_04]: So it's to keep manufacturing costs very low, but with CEO wages, corporate executive wages, very, very high.
- 56:58[SPEAKER_04]: So what we've seen doesn't matter which parties in control.
- 57:02[SPEAKER_04]: So it's in the nineteen sixties, this massive gap.
- 57:06[SPEAKER_04]: a form, you move away from each other in terms of the flat wages of workers and employees and the massive gains, particularly in bonuses among CEOs.
- 57:21[SPEAKER_04]: And then what they would do is they would use a kind of wokeness we didn't call it wokeness back then, but they would use a political correctness.
- 57:30[SPEAKER_04]: to shut down any descent from that by calling it xenophobic and racist and so forth and then after two thousand and one
- 57:41[SPEAKER_04]: Bush went full neocon with the Apaxamericana concept, and that's this notion, well it goes back to Francis Fukuyama in the nineteen nineties, and his end of history thesis, arguing that the whole of the world was finally coming to an agreement on the best political and economic system, and that's liberal democratic liberalism.
- 58:09[SPEAKER_04]: And it's only a matter of time.
- 58:11[SPEAKER_04]: This was after the fall of the Soviet Union.
- 58:13[SPEAKER_04]: It was only a matter of time before every nation in the world ends up becoming liberal democratic.
- 58:20[SPEAKER_04]: And then
- 58:20[SPEAKER_04]: People like Charles Crown Hammer came in in the late nineties and early all, especially after nine eleven.
- 58:28[SPEAKER_04]: And basically said, well, this is inevitable if history's moving in the direction of liberal democracy, why wait?
- 58:35[SPEAKER_04]: Now, this is technically a kind of lennanism.
- 58:38[SPEAKER_04]: If everything is going to this dialectically materialistic communist utopia, if that's just where history's going, why wait?
- 58:47[SPEAKER_04]: Why suffer through the lag?
- 58:50[SPEAKER_04]: Let's just go there.
- 58:51[SPEAKER_04]: Let's bring people there by force.
- 58:54[SPEAKER_04]: And so that's what's known as America's unipolar moment.
- 58:59[SPEAKER_04]: And so when you combine the end of history with America's unipolar moment, you get Iraq, you get Syria, you get all of our foreign wars.
- 59:11[SPEAKER_04]: The twenty years in Afghanistan and all this sort of stuff.
- 59:17[SPEAKER_04]: And all of that, what we have to understand is liberal by its nature.
- 59:21[SPEAKER_04]: It is liberalism.
- 59:22[SPEAKER_04]: There's just a left-wing version and a right-wing version.
- 59:26[SPEAKER_04]: And with the fall, I went more, the more I read, I went more with Sam Huntington's thesis, who was also arguing the early nineties, the clashes civilization's thesis, that argued that the fall of the Soviet Union was not the fall of Soviet communism and the victory of Western liberalism.
- 59:44[SPEAKER_04]: It was the fall of ideology itself.
- 59:47[SPEAKER_04]: It was the fall of political ideology.
- 59:50[SPEAKER_04]: So he argued that the twentieth century was the century of ideology.
- 59:54[SPEAKER_04]: The whole world was organized around two major political powers.
- 1:00:01[SPEAKER_04]: Western liberalism versus Soviet communism.
- 1:00:04[SPEAKER_04]: So the question was, which did you believe?
- 1:00:06[SPEAKER_04]: What belief system, what ideology were you aligned with?
- 1:00:11[SPEAKER_04]: With the fall of the Soviet Union,
- 1:00:14[SPEAKER_04]: Fukuyama thought Western liberalism had won, but what Sam Honnington argued was, no, no, no, the Soviet Union felt precise because nobody believes in this sort of modern, modernist ideology anymore that's trying to find the one size fits all political economic system for the world.
- 1:00:33[SPEAKER_04]: We had been trying to find that for about three hundred years and in terms of the modernist structure, we basically had three options.
- 1:00:40[SPEAKER_04]: It was either Western liberalism, Nazi fascism,
- 1:00:44[SPEAKER_04]: Soviet communism Western liberalism Soviet communism teamed up to kick out Nazi fascism and then they had their Cold War period and then then when the Soviet Union collapsed Sam hunting to basics that that was the collapse of ideology It's not like now and now this ideology is when it looks like that but you could be assured that Western liberalism will collapse as well at least as a as a globalist system
- 1:01:14[SPEAKER_04]: And when that collapse as we move from an age of an ideology to an age of identity, or more and more populations go back to nation, culture, custom, and tradition as their basis of social order.
- 1:01:25[SPEAKER_04]: And that's what Papu Cannon was arguing in the early nineties, any argue again, ninety six and two thousand, all this books about that, where the world is going and it was calling for America.
- 1:01:38[SPEAKER_04]: to embrace that early on right after the fall of the Soviet Union, but it took us non until twenty sixteen until we embrace that.
- 1:01:46[SPEAKER_04]: So that's why I moved away from kind of the Bush globalist liberalism and this kind of Republican right wing neocon version of it.
- 1:01:54[SPEAKER_04]: And I went more with what I thought to be a much more consistent nationalist populist and traditionalist paradigm of maga.
- 1:02:03[SPEAKER_04]: Maximilian, good to hear from you.
- 1:02:05[SPEAKER_04]: What exactly is rationalism?
- 1:02:06[SPEAKER_04]: And what are the limits?
- 1:02:07[SPEAKER_04]: What are its limits as an epistemology, particularly in a political context?
- 1:02:11[SPEAKER_04]: So rationalism is the idea that that true knowledge is rooted in logical inference.
- 1:02:20[SPEAKER_04]: So, all men are mortal.
- 1:02:21[SPEAKER_04]: Socrates is a man.
- 1:02:23[SPEAKER_04]: Therefore, Socrates is mortal.
- 1:02:25[SPEAKER_04]: That would be a form of rational knowledge.
- 1:02:30[SPEAKER_04]: It doesn't mean that there is such a person as Socrates.
- 1:02:33[SPEAKER_04]: It doesn't even mean there's such a thing as mortality or anything like that.
- 1:02:38[SPEAKER_04]: All we're saying is if the major premise is true and the minor premise is true.
- 1:02:43[SPEAKER_04]: then the conclusion must be true is what we have servitude of knowledge coming from the rules of inference from a major premise and a minor premise.
- 1:02:54[SPEAKER_04]: Its limitations are that the problem of what's known as infinite regress.
- 1:03:03[SPEAKER_04]: So I know my conclusion is true.
- 1:03:08[SPEAKER_04]: All men are mortal.
- 1:03:09[SPEAKER_04]: Socrates is a man.
- 1:03:09[SPEAKER_04]: Therefore, Socrates is mortal.
- 1:03:11[SPEAKER_04]: I know that is absolutely true.
- 1:03:15[SPEAKER_04]: If all I know it's true, all men are mortal.
- 1:03:17[SPEAKER_04]: So how do I know all men are mortal?
- 1:03:19[SPEAKER_04]: Well, that itself has to be the inference, the conclusion of two prior premises, a major premise and a minor premise.
- 1:03:29[SPEAKER_04]: But how do I know that major premise?
- 1:03:32[SPEAKER_04]: is true.
- 1:03:32[SPEAKER_04]: It has to be the logical conclusion of two previous premises and that never stops.
- 1:03:40[SPEAKER_04]: So in many ways, rationalism has its feet planted firmly in mid-air.
- 1:03:45[SPEAKER_04]: So now some kind of get away from that where they try to go into what's called the opitectic
- 1:03:51[SPEAKER_04]: rhetoric where you root things in performative contradictions in terms of their denial.
- 1:03:59[SPEAKER_04]: So I could start with, I could start with the premise, you know, some things exist.
- 1:04:06[SPEAKER_04]: I could start with that premise.
- 1:04:07[SPEAKER_04]: And in order for you to, I know that's true because in order for you to deny it,
- 1:04:12[SPEAKER_04]: You you have to affirm it.
- 1:04:16[SPEAKER_04]: So I say some things existed.
- 1:04:18[SPEAKER_04]: So I don't know that.
- 1:04:19[SPEAKER_04]: Well, wait a minute.
- 1:04:20[SPEAKER_04]: But I don't know that.
- 1:04:22[SPEAKER_04]: You just gave me an eye and a negation and then a demonstrative that.
- 1:04:29[SPEAKER_04]: But those are things.
- 1:04:31[SPEAKER_04]: Some things exist.
- 1:04:32[SPEAKER_04]: You can't deny the existence of things without evoking things or another one is I exist.
- 1:04:39[SPEAKER_04]: Well, I don't necessarily know that.
- 1:04:40[SPEAKER_04]: Well, what who said that?
- 1:04:42[SPEAKER_04]: I don't necessarily.
- 1:04:43[SPEAKER_04]: So you're in order to deny your own existence to you end up affirming it.
- 1:04:47[SPEAKER_04]: I remember coming across a professor's lecture and he was once lecturing about epistemology and one student shot up and said, how do you even know I exist and apparently the professor lowered his glasses and said, whom shall I say is asking?
- 1:05:06[SPEAKER_04]: So that's the stronger version of our rational argument, but again, even there, you're pre-supposing.
- 1:05:16[SPEAKER_04]: the legitimacy of the law of non-contradiction, of contradicting your, if you contradict yourself, you're by definition, not true, then you get an Eastern logic, that's more both analogic, that doesn't see it as a contradiction, that sees it more as a paradox, that gets resolved in the mystery of being.
- 1:05:34[SPEAKER_04]: So it gets tricky, and that's, I'm just saying, they say handling brains is very messy, and it does get a little bit tricky, but I think we can be
- 1:05:43[SPEAKER_04]: I think rationalism is very, very good.
- 1:05:46[SPEAKER_04]: How it applies in the political context as I understand it is generally it's going to be political philosophy, political science in terms, and very much along the lines of libertarians, where you identify ironclad principles, or supposedly ironclad principles.
- 1:06:06[SPEAKER_04]: So Thomas Sol is brilliant at this in economics.
- 1:06:10[SPEAKER_04]: where he basically unpacks for you the logic, the rationality of human action of human what's called proxies, PRAXIS, and human action, human proxies has a logic to it.
- 1:06:27[SPEAKER_04]: And if it has a logic to it, then we can actually predict there's a predictive significance to that action, and that predictive significance
- 1:06:38[SPEAKER_04]: It's, itself, creates its own logic.
- 1:06:40[SPEAKER_04]: So you have these rational principles that are then extrapolated to give you sort of a system, a political system that is considered to be rooted in reality because it's rational.
- 1:06:55[SPEAKER_04]: Again, the limitations of that is that
- 1:07:01[SPEAKER_04]: systems are themselves ultimately reflections of culture.
- 1:07:05[SPEAKER_04]: And culture, as you know, Maximilian is rooted in cult, or the sacred.
- 1:07:10[SPEAKER_04]: So it could be rational to rotio.
- 1:07:12[SPEAKER_04]: The law goes in the New Testament sense, but not in this principle.
- 1:07:18[SPEAKER_04]: John does it in the beginning was the principle.
- 1:07:20[SPEAKER_04]: John's like in the beginning was the word, the Logos, and the Logos was with God, and the Logos was God.
- 1:07:25[SPEAKER_04]: The Logos is the foundation, the basis for rationality.
- 1:07:30[SPEAKER_04]: In ancient, in the ancient conception of things like Augustine and so forth, they'll say, at all logic is ultimately rooted in the infinite mind of God, which by the way, resolves the infinite regress problem of rationality.
- 1:07:44[SPEAKER_04]: Either you would have to know everything, or you know the one who does.
- 1:07:48[SPEAKER_04]: And that's an infinite, either you have to have an infinite mind or you know the infinite, you can always defer back to the infinite mind as it were for.
- 1:07:57[SPEAKER_04]: So it's to make your own finite decisions and so forth.
- 1:08:01[SPEAKER_04]: So I think much of modern politics was very much rooted in rationality and rational principles, racially derived principles that were supposedly accessible to all people.
- 1:08:15[SPEAKER_04]: irrespective of their culture.
- 1:08:16[SPEAKER_04]: So libertarians can get into that or globalists can get into that.
- 1:08:20[SPEAKER_04]: Liberals can get into that.
- 1:08:22[SPEAKER_04]: So that's why they get into human rights, right?
- 1:08:25[SPEAKER_04]: Not American rights, not Japanese rights, but human rights because these transcend culture because they're rooted in rational principles.
- 1:08:36[SPEAKER_04]: But you need a, how do I say it?
- 1:08:42[SPEAKER_04]: You need a kind of imperialistic culture to start thinking that way.
- 1:08:46[SPEAKER_04]: That is rooted in a culture that values rationality as the principle form of knowledge, not all cultures do.
- 1:08:54[SPEAKER_04]: So there you go.
- 1:08:55[SPEAKER_04]: It's a very, very fascinating thing.
- 1:08:57[SPEAKER_04]: You always ask the best questions, maximum.
- 1:09:01[SPEAKER_04]: Terry, what shall we do about the element of conspiratorial antisemitism that's crept into the manga movement and found its voice in certain allegedly right wing detractors of maga as not right enough for their taste influencers like Darrell Castle Bradley Dean Nick Fuentes and Tucker Carlson especially in Sissa God is through with national Israel that Israel ran Epstein and that Israel should be no more common.
- 1:09:29[SPEAKER_04]: Okay, yeah, um
- 1:09:35[SPEAKER_04]: Yeah.
- 1:09:39[SPEAKER_04]: I think you want to be a little careful by calling an anti-semit.
- 1:09:42[SPEAKER_04]: I mean, the anti-semitism, I'm clearly seeing.
- 1:09:49[SPEAKER_04]: is primarily on the left, where students on college campuses are being harassed and actually discriminated against because they're Jews.
- 1:10:01[SPEAKER_04]: As I understand, that is kind of your textbook definition of antisemitism.
- 1:10:07[SPEAKER_04]: is the social ostracization of a Jewish people group, a deliberate social ostracization.
- 1:10:14[SPEAKER_04]: So it really comes down to how you're defining the anti-Semitism.
- 1:10:19[SPEAKER_04]: And I don't follow Nick Fuentes, so I get asked, I just don't follow him.
- 1:10:25[SPEAKER_04]: So I couldn't comment, and the others I can't comment.
- 1:10:29[SPEAKER_04]: With Tucker, Tucker has been very clear on this.
- 1:10:32[SPEAKER_04]: Tucker makes a very clear distinction between the Jewish people and the modern state, the modern government of Israel.
- 1:10:39[SPEAKER_04]: He makes a very clear distinction between the Jewish people and particularly diaspora around the world and the lacquered and the policies of these really government and the massade, their intelligence agencies, right?
- 1:10:52[SPEAKER_04]: And the IDF.
- 1:10:54[SPEAKER_04]: So he's extremely critical of the modern Israel government because he believes it exercises inordinate influence and Washington.
- 1:11:06[SPEAKER_04]: You see through what's known as the Israel lobby.
- 1:11:08[SPEAKER_04]: So this is Professor John Mirashimer, the University of Chicago is written a book.
- 1:11:13[SPEAKER_04]: It's a very good book.
- 1:11:14[SPEAKER_04]: Again, you don't have to read it per se.
- 1:11:15[SPEAKER_04]: You can just read up on or watch a podcast interview.
- 1:11:20[SPEAKER_04]: But he wrote it back, I think, in the early two thousands.
- 1:11:23[SPEAKER_04]: And it was a sociological study, political study, geopolitical study, ultimately, of the radically successful influence of very deliberate persuasive mechanisms and processes and practices of highly paid, very bright.
- 1:11:48[SPEAKER_04]: very effective Jewish lobbyists on behalf of the nation of Israel and to promote Israeli policy both abroad and here in the United States.
- 1:12:00[SPEAKER_04]: So that's what he's very concerned about.
- 1:12:03[SPEAKER_04]: He's very concerned that that is part of a globalist liberal structure
- 1:12:11[SPEAKER_04]: in Washington, D.C.
- 1:12:13[SPEAKER_04]: and it is part of dismantling it as part of dismantling the administrative state.
- 1:12:19[SPEAKER_04]: Getting rid of the exercising the administrative state involves exercising as well the Jewish lobby.
- 1:12:29[SPEAKER_04]: In terms of
- 1:12:32[SPEAKER_04]: In terms of just blanket statements like you know, well, it's the Jews and the Jews are about that kind of stuff.
- 1:12:37[SPEAKER_04]: No, I hear you that that sounds very, very anti-Semitic, especially historically speaking.
- 1:12:43[SPEAKER_04]: And if that's kind of the rhetoric that's coming out.
- 1:12:46[SPEAKER_04]: Again, I would see it as part of the bigger picture of just Western identity and the kind of ambiguous place.
- 1:12:55[SPEAKER_04]: And again, I'm just I haven't done a study on it.
- 1:12:58[SPEAKER_04]: This is prima facia, but the ambiguous place that Jews have had in particularly in Europe.
- 1:13:05[SPEAKER_04]: after the original diaspora, and it was a seventy-eighteen and a one thirty-five AD, when after Rome basically destroyed Jerusalem and scattered the Jews around the world.
- 1:13:19[SPEAKER_04]: And so it's, you know, it could be something very much akin to the kind of suspicions that you'll hear among, you know, say, Romanians and gypsies, for example.
- 1:13:31[SPEAKER_04]: just they're there there are no ads that don't have they're not one of us they're not a part of our land and so it may be that again we're moving from ideology to identity so that might be the darker side of it you know or however you want to phrase it but that's what I see I to be fair to all what I would say is
- 1:13:52[SPEAKER_04]: Generally speaking, on the right, there is the concern that the modern Israel government is rarely government, secular government.
- 1:14:00[SPEAKER_04]: Well, it's becoming more theocratic.
- 1:14:02[SPEAKER_04]: Yeah, I'll give you that.
- 1:14:04[SPEAKER_04]: Especially as Israel's demography goes more and more, already Jewish.
- 1:14:10[SPEAKER_04]: But they make a distinction between that and the Jews.
- 1:14:13[SPEAKER_04]: And they believe
- 1:14:14[SPEAKER_04]: They love Jewish people, but they believe the Israeli government exercises too much influence in Washington DC and dismantling that influence is part of the overall dismantling of the administrative state.
- 1:14:29[SPEAKER_04]: And now in terms of God being done with Israel and so forth, I mean, I got to tell you, that is classical Christian theology.
- 1:14:36[SPEAKER_04]: It's called super session.
- 1:14:38[SPEAKER_04]: You know, we're very sensitive to that because we're modern day American evangelicals tend to be dispensatialists.
- 1:14:47[SPEAKER_04]: That's a nineteenth century John Nelson Darby theology that made the promise that God gave to the Jews, the centerpiece of the Bible, and that is permanent.
- 1:15:02[SPEAKER_04]: where as the vast majority of Christian history has said that while Jews remain part of God's plan of salvation, Romans nine or eleven, the church is now the true Israel of God.
- 1:15:15[SPEAKER_04]: The church is now the true people of God.
- 1:15:17[SPEAKER_04]: That's a supersession.
- 1:15:18[SPEAKER_04]: That's been classical.
- 1:15:20[SPEAKER_04]: They are all the major theologians as I understand it held to some form of supersession up until about the nineteenth century.
- 1:15:27[SPEAKER_04]: So I just want to be fair there.
- 1:15:29[SPEAKER_04]: We have to be historically accurate.
- 1:15:31[SPEAKER_04]: So somebody says that God is through with the nation of Israel.
- 1:15:35[SPEAKER_04]: I'm sorry, they do historically speaking and theologically speaking, they do have justification for the through, not in terms of God's redeeming of the world.
- 1:15:44[SPEAKER_04]: I think God pulls argument in Romans nine to eleven is actually very, very
- 1:15:49[SPEAKER_04]: clear and and the best theologians see that that God is saving the world the entire world most especially the Jews at the end as part of his whole salvific process through Christ, but that doesn't mean and and and it is in it is in faith on us to the original promises, but that doesn't mean that
- 1:16:12[SPEAKER_04]: that Israel right now has a special claim on God as over and against, say, Russia, or as an over and against Greece or Bulgaria or Italy or America for that matter.
- 1:16:24[SPEAKER_04]: So that's, that's just where there would be some disagreement.
- 1:16:29[SPEAKER_04]: The one and only don't rock dog duck to Steve Fox News interviewed the CEO of crowds on demand about being off for twenty million to get protesters nationwide for some other BS leftist protests this weekend against Trump.
- 1:16:41[SPEAKER_04]: Looking at the company, they're out of LA and they provided paid protesters as far back as twenty eighteen interesting I believe.
- 1:16:48[SPEAKER_04]: Why did the Justice Department looking into these people's domestic terrorists?
- 1:16:51[SPEAKER_04]: I they are number one.
- 1:16:53[SPEAKER_04]: And how many of their employees at Cape Pate
- 1:16:57[SPEAKER_04]: to buildings or cars or looters.
- 1:16:58[SPEAKER_04]: Okay, so as I understand that they are being looked at, that's what we're finding out more and more that this pan, and again, I'm not trying to be in apologies.
- 1:17:07[SPEAKER_04]: Well, I was very critical of Trump, I was very critical of Trump in his blustering stance against Russia.
- 1:17:14[SPEAKER_04]: And I've been very critical of Trump of how he's handled the Epstein fiasco and same with Pam Bondi.
- 1:17:20[SPEAKER_04]: I'm not an apology.
- 1:17:22[SPEAKER_04]: I'm not, I'm not Trump first.
- 1:17:24[SPEAKER_04]: I am America first when all said and done.
- 1:17:26[SPEAKER_04]: I believe that Pam Bondi from the evidence that I'm seeing she is on it.
- 1:17:34[SPEAKER_04]: She is on it.
- 1:17:34[SPEAKER_04]: They are investigating all this stuff and over the net course of the next year, I know it takes a long time.
- 1:17:40[SPEAKER_04]: But over the course of the next year, we're going to see a lot of indictments.
- 1:17:43[SPEAKER_04]: That's what I understand.
- 1:17:47[SPEAKER_04]: I told you, I told you, I told you, I'm done.
- 1:17:50[SPEAKER_04]: He was black-pilling me now.
- 1:17:52[SPEAKER_04]: I did see that.
- 1:17:53[SPEAKER_04]: That was Somali Socialist is running for mayor and Minneapolis.
- 1:17:57[SPEAKER_04]: This looks bad to me.
- 1:17:57[SPEAKER_04]: How successful do you think this guy would be?
- 1:17:59[SPEAKER_04]: I know it's technically not my problem down here in Alabama.
- 1:18:02[SPEAKER_04]: That's for sure.
- 1:18:04[SPEAKER_04]: But I would like to visit these places again sometime without having to worry about their soy viet.
- 1:18:08[SPEAKER_04]: I love that government trying to take all my money.
- 1:18:11[SPEAKER_04]: Yeah, no, I'm with you.
- 1:18:12[SPEAKER_04]: I don't know too much about this.
- 1:18:14[SPEAKER_04]: The Somali guy, Somali socialist.
- 1:18:16[SPEAKER_04]: He seems pretty.
- 1:18:17[SPEAKER_04]: Yeah, man, Donnie.
- 1:18:18[SPEAKER_04]: I, I mean, they're going full Marxists.
- 1:18:20[SPEAKER_04]: They're going full communists.
- 1:18:22[SPEAKER_04]: That's just clear.
- 1:18:23[SPEAKER_04]: We knew they were, they're just being blunt about it.
- 1:18:26[SPEAKER_04]: I look there.
- 1:18:30[SPEAKER_04]: I don't know how successful he'll be in Minneapolis, but the Democrats are scared to death of these guys.
- 1:18:36[SPEAKER_04]: Okay, they are, look, how do I put this simply?
- 1:18:45[SPEAKER_04]: The Democrats have lost the white vote.
- 1:18:49[SPEAKER_04]: since nineteen sixty four ninety sixty four is the last time uh... limmy johnson last time democrats one the white vote since then they've been losing white voter on sixty percent what do you think it james carville's been saying this it with ill-han Omar
- 1:19:08[SPEAKER_04]: You know, especially with insulting white men or AOC or Jasmine Crocket.
- 1:19:16[SPEAKER_04]: What the hell are you doing going out there talking about how racist of a nation we are and how this nation is rooted in the cesspool of of of of of of of of of vile white supremacy?
- 1:19:32[SPEAKER_04]: How do you think you're going to win back the white voter?
- 1:19:35[SPEAKER_04]: How are you going to do that?
- 1:19:38[SPEAKER_04]: The answer is you're only further alienating yourselves from them.
- 1:19:43[SPEAKER_04]: And that's what Mamedani and the Somalia and Socialist guys.
- 1:19:47[SPEAKER_04]: That's all they're doing.
- 1:19:48[SPEAKER_04]: And that's why Democrats like
- 1:19:51[SPEAKER_04]: James Carval, Rage and Cajun, they're just scratching your head's going, what do I mean, what don't even say at this point?
- 1:19:58[SPEAKER_04]: This is a party that is just absolutely imploding in real time.
- 1:20:03[SPEAKER_04]: It's just so I don't know.
- 1:20:06[SPEAKER_04]: I hear what you're saying.
- 1:20:07[SPEAKER_04]: I just think they're
- 1:20:10[SPEAKER_04]: I think their imploding cities are beautiful.
- 1:20:15[SPEAKER_04]: Well, maybe I should find a better adjective.
- 1:20:18[SPEAKER_04]: Dramatic explicit symbols of their political prospects as a party.
- 1:20:29[SPEAKER_04]: Rachel, can you please interview Curtis Slywell?
- 1:20:31[SPEAKER_04]: I think it's Slywell, isn't it?
- 1:20:33[SPEAKER_04]: Of New York City to bring awareness, he's making his historic headway with striking distance.
- 1:20:39[SPEAKER_04]: Please start to see the help him, no one is fight shame on Cuomo splitting the vote.
- 1:20:44[SPEAKER_04]: I'll try, Rachel, I'll say, we can always reach out.
- 1:20:47[SPEAKER_04]: I'd love to interview Curtis.
- 1:20:50[SPEAKER_04]: It'll be wonderful.
- 1:20:51[SPEAKER_04]: Thank you for that, Rachel.
- 1:20:52[SPEAKER_04]: You're very passionate.
- 1:20:53[SPEAKER_04]: I can say, I'm wondering if are you in New York City?
- 1:20:56[SPEAKER_04]: Let me know.
- 1:20:57[SPEAKER_04]: I grew up in Connecticut.
- 1:20:58[SPEAKER_04]: I know.
- 1:20:58[SPEAKER_04]: And I'm just an hour and twenty minutes away from the guys by train.
- 1:21:02[SPEAKER_04]: Davos on the twelfth of May, twenty twenty one.
- 1:21:05[SPEAKER_04]: You said, oh my.
- 1:21:06[SPEAKER_04]: Oh my.
- 1:21:11[SPEAKER_04]: After this election, okay.
- 1:21:13[SPEAKER_04]: So it seems there's a little hope and no way to rebuild what's been lost.
- 1:21:18[SPEAKER_04]: But this is not the end.
- 1:21:19[SPEAKER_04]: In fact, it is only the beginning.
- 1:21:22[SPEAKER_04]: Three months later, Biden betrayed us to Afghanistan and sent my Afghan co-writer running from the Taliban, starting a two-year nightmare to save him.
- 1:21:32[SPEAKER_04]: Thanks for your optimism and your hope grounded in real polling and registration data.
- 1:21:38[SPEAKER_04]: Golly, you were so right.
- 1:21:40[SPEAKER_04]: Have you considered running a great hit episode?
- 1:21:45[SPEAKER_04]: That's pretty cool.
- 1:21:46[SPEAKER_04]: Thank you for that.
- 1:21:47[SPEAKER_04]: That's really, so we did my team put you up to that.
- 1:21:52[SPEAKER_04]: We should.
- 1:21:53[SPEAKER_04]: Yeah, I mean, that's so cool.
- 1:21:56[SPEAKER_04]: Thank you, Devoros.
- 1:21:56[SPEAKER_04]: Yeah, I mean, this whole channel started as a result of my doctoral studies.
- 1:22:02[SPEAKER_04]: So that's another reason why we call it Dr. Steve Turley.
- 1:22:07[SPEAKER_04]: I discovered this, so back in the day, it was called post-sacular studies.
- 1:22:14[SPEAKER_04]: Some call post-globalist studies, post-liberal studies.
- 1:22:17[SPEAKER_04]: It's increasingly now being called civilizationalist studies.
- 1:22:22[SPEAKER_04]: But back in the days of this during Obama,
- 1:22:25[SPEAKER_04]: I came across a whole field of study in a Durham University library in the UK that were basically liberal scholars arguing that the days of liberalism were over and the world was going right.
- 1:22:43[SPEAKER_04]: And it was happening right here in Europe.
- 1:22:44[SPEAKER_04]: That's where you were seeing it.
- 1:22:48[SPEAKER_04]: The nation's populist parties, the populist right parties,
- 1:22:52[SPEAKER_04]: back in the nineties were fringe, one percent, two percent, maybe three percent support.
- 1:22:59[SPEAKER_04]: Austria made a breakthrough, by the way, back then.
- 1:23:03[SPEAKER_04]: And national rally would every once in a while in France would make a breakthrough.
- 1:23:08[SPEAKER_04]: The Austrian freedom party does this.
- 1:23:10[SPEAKER_04]: But other than that, one percent, two percent, the AFD didn't exist.
- 1:23:16[SPEAKER_04]: I don't even think lega exists back then, or the brothers of Italy.
- 1:23:21[SPEAKER_04]: Well, brothers of Italy, yeah, they were they were there, but again, one percent two percent box party in Spain, they didn't exist.
- 1:23:30[SPEAKER_04]: And reform certainly in the UK.
- 1:23:33[SPEAKER_04]: And they even exist three or four years ago, right?
- 1:23:37[SPEAKER_04]: But these scholars were saying, the nineties are only getting about one to present now they're getting.
- 1:23:43[SPEAKER_04]: five, ten, fifteen, seventeen percent.
- 1:23:49[SPEAKER_04]: And if this trajectory continues, they're going to start winning elections.
- 1:23:54[SPEAKER_04]: They're going to start taking over countries.
- 1:23:57[SPEAKER_04]: And low and behold, where are we of third of Europe's countries right now, our national's populist governments?
- 1:24:04[SPEAKER_04]: And it's going to be half, and then it's going to be two thirds.
- 1:24:08[SPEAKER_04]: So they were seeing the same thing in Russia with the rise of the Archaeofuture paradigm there, where we were basically seeing kind of a orthodox
- 1:24:22[SPEAKER_04]: Statism in Orthodox, Stalinism, some would call it kind of thing, where you combine ancient Orthodox, mysticism and mythology and religion with more modernist kind of authoritarian government, we're seeing the rise of Confucianism.
- 1:24:44[SPEAKER_04]: in China, and the Tenshia, the mandate of heaven concept, that the new president at that time, President G, was talking about, so what was this, twenty twelve around that time?
- 1:24:57[SPEAKER_04]: We're seeing it with the rise of the BJP, the Hindu nationalist party that came to power just a couple of years later.
- 1:25:04[SPEAKER_04]: And again, all these scholars were predicting that's what was going
- 1:25:08[SPEAKER_04]: to happen.
- 1:25:09[SPEAKER_04]: And they were predicting that secular turkey would inevitably go back to its Ottoman sentiments and become far more Islamic.
- 1:25:16[SPEAKER_04]: And so in other words, they were saying, in effect, the theocracy of Iran in the, in the, in the, in the, in the, in the, in the, in the, in the, in the, in the, in the, in the, in the, in the, in the, in the, in the, in the, in the, in the, in the, in the, in the, in the, in the, in the, in the, in the, in the, in the, in the, in the, in the, in the, in the, in the, in the, in the, in the, in the, in the, in the, in the, in the, in the, in the, in the, in the, in the, in the, in the, in the, in the, in the, in the, in the, in the, in the, in the, in the
- 1:25:37[SPEAKER_04]: is returning this archaea future model of
- 1:25:44[SPEAKER_04]: human society and world order was inevitable.
- 1:25:48[SPEAKER_04]: That's just the way that, and then you brought Sam Huntington into that, talking about the clash of civilization and the rise of civilizationism.
- 1:25:55[SPEAKER_04]: And I was just like, I mean, it was just like, if these guys are right, that's where we're going.
- 1:26:00[SPEAKER_04]: So stop black pilling, stop worrying about it.
- 1:26:03[SPEAKER_04]: No, it's not going to be a clean ride, no question.
- 1:26:06[SPEAKER_04]: But my, we are, we are,
- 1:26:09[SPEAKER_04]: We are absolutely moving away from liberal globalism into a world of conservative, traditionalist, nationalist, populist civilizationism.
- 1:26:19[SPEAKER_04]: That's where we're going.
- 1:26:20[SPEAKER_04]: That's where Hens Maga.
- 1:26:23[SPEAKER_04]: And this is before even Trump came on in the scene.
- 1:26:26[SPEAKER_04]: And that's why when he came on the scene,
- 1:26:30[SPEAKER_04]: And this is an all the origin story of our channel.
- 1:26:33[SPEAKER_04]: When he came on the scene, that's when I talked to my colleague Ralph Cochran at the classical school I was teaching at.
- 1:26:38[SPEAKER_04]: I said, that this is it.
- 1:26:40[SPEAKER_04]: This is this is the nationalist populist traditionalist trajectory that's going on in Europe that was animating Brexit at the time.
- 1:26:49[SPEAKER_04]: That's it's come to our shores.
- 1:26:51[SPEAKER_04]: I thought it was packed cannon kind of got
- 1:26:54[SPEAKER_04]: You know, sort of, you know, dissolved with the end of Buchanan's presidential aspirations and with Trump.
- 1:27:02[SPEAKER_04]: I was like, this is Buchanan two point out.
- 1:27:05[SPEAKER_04]: That's who he is.
- 1:27:06[SPEAKER_04]: And I got to tell people about this because all the conservative commentary I was hearing at the time, uh, Glenn Beck hated him.
- 1:27:14[SPEAKER_04]: Glenn Beck freaking hated him.
- 1:27:17[SPEAKER_04]: Mark Levent, I'm never wrong for you know, which is a name Ben Shapiro.
- 1:27:21[SPEAKER_04]: I ain't not a conservative.
- 1:27:23[SPEAKER_04]: I mean, I'm like, you guys don't understand this.
- 1:27:26[SPEAKER_04]: They were thinking like what Maximilian was starting.
- 1:27:28[SPEAKER_04]: They were thinking in rationalist terms.
- 1:27:31[SPEAKER_04]: They were thinking of conservatism or these timeless principles that you can apply to all cultures irrespective of their histories and their geographies and so forth.
- 1:27:41[SPEAKER_04]: And I'm like, no, the world's going back to nation culture, custom tradition and Trump.
- 1:27:47[SPEAKER_04]: Magga is all about that.
- 1:27:48[SPEAKER_04]: Make America great again.
- 1:27:50[SPEAKER_04]: Going back.
- 1:27:51[SPEAKER_04]: That's the way forward.
- 1:27:54[SPEAKER_04]: So, thanks, man.
- 1:27:55[SPEAKER_04]: Not's awesome.
- 1:27:56[SPEAKER_04]: And that's, I just, I'm trying to be as true to that as possible for these, these last, what is it now?
- 1:28:02[SPEAKER_04]: Almost eight and a half years.
- 1:28:04[SPEAKER_04]: We started in November of twenty sixteen.
- 1:28:07[SPEAKER_04]: And yeah, predicted he would winning.
- 1:28:08[SPEAKER_04]: Yeah, I saw they stole the election.
- 1:28:11[SPEAKER_04]: But I knew they just, the globalists did not have.
- 1:28:15[SPEAKER_04]: The civilizational grounding, they didn't have the foundation to continue.
- 1:28:21[SPEAKER_04]: And so I knew it was just going to be temporary.
- 1:28:24[SPEAKER_04]: I knew they were going to implode.
- 1:28:26[SPEAKER_04]: And I knew Maga would come back stronger than ever.
- 1:28:29[SPEAKER_04]: But I wrote that in twenty twenty one.
- 1:28:31[SPEAKER_04]: I didn't know how.
- 1:28:33[SPEAKER_04]: I can't, I can't, but I just know where things are moving.
- 1:28:37[SPEAKER_04]: It's amazing stuff.
- 1:28:38[SPEAKER_04]: Thank you, Debra.
- 1:28:39[SPEAKER_04]: Scott, bless you.
- 1:28:39[SPEAKER_04]: Thank you.
- 1:28:45[SPEAKER_04]: I love it, Darth.
- 1:28:46[SPEAKER_04]: Left-roids are in no position to gloat about this Epstein thing.
- 1:28:49[SPEAKER_04]: You're in power for the last four years.
- 1:28:51[SPEAKER_04]: I've done something about then.
- 1:28:53[SPEAKER_04]: Absolutely.
- 1:28:54[SPEAKER_04]: And nobody's got an answer for that.
- 1:28:55[SPEAKER_04]: Well, we were busy.
- 1:28:56[SPEAKER_04]: I think one of them said, we were too busy doing too many wonderful things.
- 1:29:00[SPEAKER_04]: Yeah, like opening the border and sending all of our jobs overseas.
- 1:29:05[SPEAKER_04]: record inflation and forcing women to compete against transathlete?
- 1:29:10[SPEAKER_04]: I mean, yeah, not.
- 1:29:11[SPEAKER_04]: You got it, Darth.
- 1:29:12[SPEAKER_04]: No, I get nobody's buying this.
- 1:29:13[SPEAKER_04]: That's the beauty of it.
- 1:29:15[SPEAKER_04]: Nobody's buying it.
- 1:29:18[SPEAKER_04]: Magga, twenty forever, Dr. Steve, from my perspective, the handling of the Epstein file was a self-made wound that slowed all of the momentum, such as the one big beautiful bill enacting the law, recision bill passets, right, just half the other day, taking out Iran's nuclear bomb capability, numerous Supreme Court victories.
- 1:29:36[SPEAKER_04]: But focus on Epstein eventually go away as old news or must Trump administration do something that turned the narrative if so.
- 1:29:43[SPEAKER_04]: What actions are needed?
- 1:29:43[SPEAKER_04]: Yeah, no, I think that's what he's doing.
- 1:29:46[SPEAKER_04]: you know, with with telling Pam, all right, that's it, you know, this is I was waiting for this Wall Street Journal hit piece to drop and then after it dropped, I mean, I think that was going to be the the one embarrassment in there.
- 1:30:00[SPEAKER_04]: I think that's probably what Elon Musk was referring to after dropped after own so how idiotic it was.
- 1:30:06[SPEAKER_04]: He's all right.
- 1:30:07[SPEAKER_04]: Go ahead.
- 1:30:07[SPEAKER_04]: Now release the whole thing.
- 1:30:08[SPEAKER_04]: So we'll see what and again, it's going to be hard for them to release everything because there are victims involved.
- 1:30:15[SPEAKER_04]: But yeah, I know, so I think he's taking the proactive measures to turn the narrative.
- 1:30:25[SPEAKER_04]: But even if he didn't, yes, it would eventually go away.
- 1:30:28[SPEAKER_04]: Because in the end, we're finding that most mega-loyalists don't care.
- 1:30:35[SPEAKER_04]: Now, Rich Barris has pointed out that the amazing pollster, best pollster of twenty twenty four.
- 1:30:40[SPEAKER_04]: He's pointed out, MAGA is not just, you know, the Republican MAGA loyalists, the new working class that have all come in that were Democrats that have now all come in to the Republican party.
- 1:30:52[SPEAKER_04]: It's not to side.
- 1:30:52[SPEAKER_04]: It's independence.
- 1:30:54[SPEAKER_04]: It's people never ever voted Republican before, even in midterms.
- 1:30:59[SPEAKER_04]: who love Trump, but they feel very betrayed because they are the ones who tend to see their very sensitive, particularly non-white working class.
- 1:31:06[SPEAKER_04]: They're very sensitive to your justice system.
- 1:31:12[SPEAKER_04]: They're very sensitive to a double standard of justice.
- 1:31:17[SPEAKER_04]: And they put Trump in because they thought he was finally good at that.
- 1:31:21[SPEAKER_04]: They put somebody who got shot, who's himself, a victim of all of these bogus indictments and trials.
- 1:31:31[SPEAKER_04]: So finally, somebody who understood and yet he goes in and says, Ah, yeah, nothing to see here.
- 1:31:35[SPEAKER_04]: No, Epstein is a choir boy.
- 1:31:38[SPEAKER_04]: Nothing to worry about.
- 1:31:40[SPEAKER_04]: And a lot of a lot of people who are part of the MAGA movement felt very betrayed by that.
- 1:31:48[SPEAKER_04]: But the vast majority of the management, they don't give her.
- 1:31:51[SPEAKER_04]: They feel exactly the way you do it.
- 1:31:53[SPEAKER_04]: It ain't hard to win and love all this when keep it coming, love it, border one hundred percent decline in illegal border crossings.
- 1:32:01[SPEAKER_04]: It has been completely shut down going nasty portation by the thousands.
- 1:32:07[SPEAKER_04]: We've already had a by some estimates, one point five million deportations, both forced and self.
- 1:32:13[SPEAKER_04]: oligater, alcatraz, the real alcatraz getting possibly opened up again.
- 1:32:18[SPEAKER_04]: The one big beautiful bill, permanent tax cuts, the new crypto.
- 1:32:25[SPEAKER_04]: Fund, that's opening up unleashing power and wealth, likes which we've never seen before because of digitality, digitality has literally infinite scalability in a way that the second industrial revolution doesn't have being limited to time and space, cyberspace, we can infinitely scale.
- 1:32:44[SPEAKER_04]: So money can expand into heights we never even imagined, talking
- 1:32:50[SPEAKER_04]: You know, literally quadrilions of dollars potentially at some point, of course.
- 1:32:56[SPEAKER_04]: So that will comes out to trillion.
- 1:32:57[SPEAKER_04]: I think it's quadrilion, right?
- 1:32:58[SPEAKER_04]: Yeah, try quadrilion.
- 1:33:02[SPEAKER_04]: And yeah, no, I'm with you.
- 1:33:04[SPEAKER_04]: I'm with you a thousand percent.
- 1:33:06[SPEAKER_04]: I mean, he signed the one big beautiful bill on July the fourth.
- 1:33:09[SPEAKER_04]: It was amazing.
- 1:33:11[SPEAKER_04]: The parade was incredible.
- 1:33:12[SPEAKER_04]: The fireworks were incredible.
- 1:33:14[SPEAKER_04]: And then on, I think it was that Sunday was at the sixth.
- 1:33:18[SPEAKER_04]: They dropped the Epstein case closed and it was like, what?
- 1:33:23[SPEAKER_04]: So yeah, he's going to have to pivot.
- 1:33:27[SPEAKER_04]: But I think eventually it's going to go away as well.
- 1:33:30[SPEAKER_04]: I just think pivoting will
- 1:33:33[SPEAKER_04]: put them back in good grace as with those who are very, very concerned and keep in mind, I think influencers are in organically more concerned about it than your average, you know, grass, you know, rank and file grassroots, mega supporter because it makes unless people on it makes for good views and you know, it's it's intriguing and seedy and so forth and so and then a lot of them have
- 1:33:58[SPEAKER_04]: You know, stake their credibility on it.
- 1:34:00[SPEAKER_04]: Oh, this is it.
- 1:34:00[SPEAKER_04]: Now Trump's going to release it.
- 1:34:01[SPEAKER_04]: I told you it's I could, you know, they don't want to turn into Rachel Maddo.
- 1:34:05[SPEAKER_04]: We all have to we all have to be careful that, you know, we always we all have to be a people got very upset with me.
- 1:34:10[SPEAKER_04]: You know what, I thought that Trump was going to be able to turn around the
- 1:34:14[SPEAKER_04]: On January six, I thought I thought Mike Pence was going to go a Trump and he was going to send the electors back to those five states that were very, very controversial and remain so to this day.
- 1:34:27[SPEAKER_04]: Notice all those voters disappeared in twenty twenty four.
- 1:34:30[SPEAKER_04]: Remember, Biden underperformed in every single state underperformed from twenty twenty twenty sixteen norms for the exception of the five swing states at the time.
- 1:34:43[SPEAKER_04]: And those five swing states.
- 1:34:47[SPEAKER_04]: He did not just overperformed.
- 1:34:48[SPEAKER_04]: He super irrigated performed and it was all through the mail-in ballots.
- 1:34:54[SPEAKER_04]: And we're getting more and more evidence that clearly they were doctored and they were not valid.
- 1:35:03[SPEAKER_04]: And I thought Mike Pence was going to send those electors back primarily to Democrat states and said, you know, you got to give us other electors and that it would eventually be resolved.
- 1:35:16[SPEAKER_04]: through delegations, through a congressional delegation.
- 1:35:19[SPEAKER_04]: Like it was, I forget, eighteen so-and-so.
- 1:35:21[SPEAKER_04]: We've had that happen before.
- 1:35:23[SPEAKER_04]: And he didn't, he didn't.
- 1:35:25[SPEAKER_04]: I said, I believed he was going to do that because otherwise he would kill his political career.
- 1:35:31[SPEAKER_04]: And I thought he was totally mad.
- 1:35:32[SPEAKER_04]: I was wrong.
- 1:35:33[SPEAKER_04]: I was just wrong.
- 1:35:34[SPEAKER_04]: No, he's in establishment guy.
- 1:35:36[SPEAKER_04]: And they were trying to kill Trump.
- 1:35:38[SPEAKER_04]: That he was part of the inside job of getting rid of Trump.
- 1:35:42[SPEAKER_04]: Kill metaphorically, right, to watch out with them.
- 1:35:45[SPEAKER_04]: But he was trying to get rid of Trump as a standard bearer of the Republican Party.
- 1:35:52[SPEAKER_04]: And so a lot of people were mad with me on that.
- 1:35:56[SPEAKER_04]: I get it, man, I own it.
- 1:36:00[SPEAKER_04]: And so I think a lot of influencers have been promising their audience that we're going to get to the bottom of that scene.
- 1:36:07[SPEAKER_04]: And they're, you know, they just feel like, yes, and why shouldn't they?
- 1:36:10[SPEAKER_04]: I mean, you got cash, Patel in there.
- 1:36:12[SPEAKER_04]: You got Dan Bongino.
- 1:36:13[SPEAKER_04]: They were saying the same things.
- 1:36:15[SPEAKER_04]: And to have that happen, I think they felt very betrayed.
- 1:36:18[SPEAKER_04]: I mean, they're talking about the influencers themselves.
- 1:36:20[SPEAKER_04]: So anyway, so I think I'm just, what I'm trying to do, MAGA twenty forever, so I've just tried to, honestly, you know, I'm the big tent guy.
- 1:36:29[SPEAKER_04]: I'm, I'm all, I'm MAGA, a thousand percent America first.
- 1:36:33[SPEAKER_04]: If you're with, I don't care what your backgrounds are.
- 1:36:35[SPEAKER_04]: I'm care who you're coming from.
- 1:36:37[SPEAKER_04]: If you are family, you come on in.
- 1:36:39[SPEAKER_04]: We're one big crazy.
- 1:36:41[SPEAKER_04]: You know, dysfunctional family, but we love faith, family, and freedom, and we love our nation.
- 1:36:46[SPEAKER_04]: We love civilization.
- 1:36:47[SPEAKER_04]: We despise liberals.
- 1:36:49[SPEAKER_04]: We despise both.
- 1:36:50[SPEAKER_04]: And we feel sorry for them in the end, except the ones who really hurt and destroyed.
- 1:36:54[SPEAKER_04]: Then we have, we have, we have no sympathy for them whatsoever.
- 1:36:58[SPEAKER_04]: And you know, part of that family is very upset about what happened with Epstein.
- 1:37:06[SPEAKER_04]: And I get it.
- 1:37:08[SPEAKER_04]: I do.
- 1:37:09[SPEAKER_04]: I think Epstein is a symbol not just a two tier justice system.
- 1:37:13[SPEAKER_04]: He is a symbol of a rogue parallel intelligence oriented government, parallel government that is calling way too many shops in the world and needs to be reigned in and destroyed.
- 1:37:26[SPEAKER_04]: And if we don't,
- 1:37:28[SPEAKER_04]: And this could all be for not when it's done.
- 1:37:31[SPEAKER_04]: So the MAGA movement, the MAGA revolution.
- 1:37:34[SPEAKER_04]: So I'm, I'm, I try to, but I don't believe it's the beyond the end all.
- 1:37:40[SPEAKER_04]: I think the amount of winning that has been done over the course of these now near six months.
- 1:37:47[SPEAKER_04]: What's the date today?
- 1:37:48[SPEAKER_04]: Two more days and it's not even officially six months yet.
- 1:37:51[SPEAKER_04]: The winning has been so glorious.
- 1:37:53[SPEAKER_04]: I was with my uncle from San Francisco over the week.
- 1:37:59[SPEAKER_04]: I was at Lake George.
- 1:38:01[SPEAKER_04]: And so he does my mom's brother and he and his wife for their visiting with our whole extended family.
- 1:38:08[SPEAKER_04]: We do this every year.
- 1:38:11[SPEAKER_04]: And he is, he's so cool.
- 1:38:13[SPEAKER_04]: He's born bread.
- 1:38:15[SPEAKER_04]: He will be buried in San Francisco, but he's a die hard conservative and we just chat to the wee hours.
- 1:38:22[SPEAKER_04]: We have such a wonderful time.
- 1:38:24[SPEAKER_04]: He is, he's like a pig and mud.
- 1:38:26[SPEAKER_04]: He could care less about the Epstein.
- 1:38:28[SPEAKER_04]: files, he is a pig and muddy, thinks this presidency has been about as perfect a presidency as a compile.
- 1:38:36[SPEAKER_04]: You know what?
- 1:38:36[SPEAKER_04]: I'll probably go far the hill turn around said this is this is this is beyond anything I could have ever imagined a year ago, you know, so anyway.
- 1:38:47[SPEAKER_04]: Um, I'm with you, Magga, twenty four.
- 1:38:48[SPEAKER_04]: I don't think it's as bad.
- 1:38:50[SPEAKER_04]: It is.
- 1:38:50[SPEAKER_04]: I think it is.
- 1:38:51[SPEAKER_04]: I think it is a definitely, uh, unforester, uh, I've heard it put definitely unforester, but maybe this is all part of it.
- 1:38:59[SPEAKER_04]: Maybe this is, it was, we'll say, but Malindagity, I'm worried about Russia with Greenland.
- 1:39:07[SPEAKER_04]: Is there any?
- 1:39:09[SPEAKER_04]: He's all my video last, not yes, yes, I do.
- 1:39:13[SPEAKER_04]: Well, first of all, I don't think Trump is going to take over Greenland militarily.
- 1:39:18[SPEAKER_04]: I don't think he, at this point, I'm not seeing that.
- 1:39:20[SPEAKER_04]: I don't think he's going to exit by force.
- 1:39:23[SPEAKER_04]: And all, as I, like I pointed out, all Russia is doing is pointing out if you think you can encroach an R.
- 1:39:32[SPEAKER_04]: You know, orthosphere in our hedgemon, well, then we're going to encroach in yours.
- 1:39:37[SPEAKER_04]: If you think you own Europe, well, we think we own the Arctic.
- 1:39:42[SPEAKER_04]: It works both ways.
- 1:39:44[SPEAKER_04]: And by the way, we have more nukes than you do.
- 1:39:46[SPEAKER_04]: So yes, there's hope, but there is definitely a civilizational posturing multi-polar posturing for sure.
- 1:39:57[SPEAKER_04]: No, it's he quote, Dr. Steven Turley, Prostiva Cobayer's job.
- 1:40:00[SPEAKER_04]: Hey.
- 1:40:00[SPEAKER_04]: Oh, well, I'm certainly funnier.
- 1:40:03[SPEAKER_04]: Anybody can be fought corpses, funnier than Steven Cobayer.
- 1:40:06[SPEAKER_04]: Barry's son.
- 1:40:08[SPEAKER_04]: I feel bad for Cobayer.
- 1:40:09[SPEAKER_04]: I do.
- 1:40:10[SPEAKER_04]: I do.
- 1:40:10[SPEAKER_04]: I do.
- 1:40:11[SPEAKER_04]: I, if there was somebody I actually, I wouldn't say I sympathize or empathize, but I think he's actually he's a good, there is a heart there.
- 1:40:25[SPEAKER_04]: that has in the past revealed itself to be very inclined towards Christ.
- 1:40:36[SPEAKER_04]: So he, as I understand that he would consider himself, I know this kind of cringe for a lot of us, but he would consider himself a devout Catholic.
- 1:40:44[SPEAKER_04]: This is going back like twenty years ago, okay, when he was on, was that the comedy show, whatever.
- 1:40:50[SPEAKER_04]: And, and he did have people like anti-right, the one-time bishop of Durham,
- 1:40:55[SPEAKER_04]: The New Testament scholar, he had him on as a guest, the Anglican bishop, and he turned around and smiled the very first thing he said to him, is, hey, no hard feelings about Henry VIII, right?
- 1:41:07[SPEAKER_04]: Yeah, yeah, yeah.
- 1:41:10[SPEAKER_04]: And there was a time, he seemed to be able to engage in some moral seriousness in a way that was profound and beautiful.
- 1:41:21[SPEAKER_04]: But then it just looked like he just sold his soul.
- 1:41:27[SPEAKER_04]: He bought into the marketing segmentation that I guess was at CBS executives.
- 1:41:41[SPEAKER_04]: We're telling them about that.
- 1:41:43[SPEAKER_04]: You know what?
- 1:41:44[SPEAKER_04]: We're finding that about sixty five, seventy percent of those who watch late night right now are Democrats.
- 1:41:52[SPEAKER_04]: And if you go full like anti-Trump, we think, I mean, you could crush it.
- 1:41:57[SPEAKER_04]: in the late night wars.
- 1:41:58[SPEAKER_04]: You'll kill Kimmel.
- 1:42:00[SPEAKER_04]: You'll kill Jimmy Fallon.
- 1:42:02[SPEAKER_04]: And he did.
- 1:42:02[SPEAKER_04]: He went there.
- 1:42:04[SPEAKER_04]: And he turned his show into a deeply bitter partisan show.
- 1:42:12[SPEAKER_04]: And at first it attracted a lot of anti-Trumpers.
- 1:42:18[SPEAKER_04]: But then it just got ugly.
- 1:42:20[SPEAKER_04]: And it got really horrible during the COVID fiasco when he just started becoming he just became such a shill for Fauci and for Biden and for the CDC and now I just think a lot and then that all fell apart.
- 1:42:39[SPEAKER_04]: The whole paradigm collapsed and his career collapsed as well.
- 1:42:45[SPEAKER_04]: So it turns out.
- 1:42:46[SPEAKER_04]: So you know, what is it?
- 1:42:49[SPEAKER_04]: What is it, what is it, um, you know, what is it profit a man to gain the world, but loses soul, not just the way I see co bear everything that made him great died.
- 1:43:03[SPEAKER_04]: He was funny.
- 1:43:04[SPEAKER_04]: He was entertaining.
- 1:43:05[SPEAKER_04]: He was engaging at the beginning, you know, we're again, I'm talking like twenty years ago on the comedy channel and all.
- 1:43:11[SPEAKER_04]: It was actually, you know, very good.
- 1:43:13[SPEAKER_04]: I never tuned in that much, but I mean, he was he's
- 1:43:18[SPEAKER_04]: He was pretty good.
- 1:43:19[SPEAKER_04]: And then it just all died.
- 1:43:21[SPEAKER_04]: I mean, he just literally killed his career by becoming a rabid anti-Trump partisan.
- 1:43:28[SPEAKER_04]: And again, by extension, in anti-Maga, anti-half the country, not sixty percent of the country.
- 1:43:35[SPEAKER_04]: And that's just, and his career dot.
- 1:43:38[SPEAKER_04]: And I think he's the first, I think Kim Owen.
- 1:43:41[SPEAKER_04]: And
- 1:43:43[SPEAKER_04]: Uh, what's his name over at the tonight show.
- 1:43:45[SPEAKER_04]: We're going to are going to follow him.
- 1:43:47[SPEAKER_04]: Fallen.
- 1:43:48[SPEAKER_04]: As well as what's the other idiot, the late late one Seth Myers.
- 1:43:52[SPEAKER_04]: So again, Seth Myers is the same thing.
- 1:43:54[SPEAKER_04]: You'd be shoot.
- 1:43:55[SPEAKER_04]: Could hear from you, my friend.
- 1:43:56[SPEAKER_04]: Thank you for the euros.
- 1:43:57[SPEAKER_04]: All the screaming about abstinence, Sarah reminds me of the Israelites complaining.
- 1:44:01[SPEAKER_04]: She turned the journey did not go their way.
- 1:44:04[SPEAKER_04]: They expected God bless Trump.
- 1:44:06[SPEAKER_04]: Woo!
- 1:44:07[SPEAKER_04]: That's a little bit of conviction there.
- 1:44:09[SPEAKER_04]: Pretty good, you pay pretty, pretty good.
- 1:44:12[SPEAKER_04]: Yeah.
- 1:44:13[SPEAKER_04]: Is this a little grumbling?
- 1:44:14[SPEAKER_04]: What is it grumbling in the wilderness?
- 1:44:16[SPEAKER_04]: Yeah.
- 1:44:17[SPEAKER_04]: Yeah, I think so.
- 1:44:18[SPEAKER_04]: I think so.
- 1:44:19[SPEAKER_04]: I think we're seeing a little grumbling in the wilderness.
- 1:44:21[SPEAKER_04]: I love that you pay.
- 1:44:23[SPEAKER_04]: That's brilliant.
- 1:44:24[SPEAKER_04]: Brilliant theology.
- 1:44:25[SPEAKER_04]: Yeah.
- 1:44:26[SPEAKER_04]: Yeah.
- 1:44:27[SPEAKER_04]: Yeah.
- 1:44:29[SPEAKER_04]: And bottom line, the grumbling is not trusting in the promises and provisions of God.
- 1:44:35[SPEAKER_04]: So God gives the Israelites right at the beginning of law.
- 1:44:39[SPEAKER_04]: And every law command is called a trust in the promises and provisions of God.
- 1:44:44[SPEAKER_04]: So you shall have no other gods before me because you trust in the God that will provide for you.
- 1:44:49[SPEAKER_04]: You're not to steal because you trust that I'm going to take care of you.
- 1:44:52[SPEAKER_04]: You're not to covet because you trust what I've given to you and on and on and on.
- 1:44:57[SPEAKER_04]: So, all every law command is in reverses it were a call to trust in the promises and provisions of God.
- 1:45:07[SPEAKER_04]: And what you just said to you, I mean, it really, I mean, it strikes me in the heart, because literally one year ago, right, on J-Thirteenth,
- 1:45:22[SPEAKER_04]: We saw a bona fide miracle.
- 1:45:24[SPEAKER_04]: God saved the life of President Trump by a millimeter.
- 1:45:29[SPEAKER_04]: I mean, it just doesn't get closer than that.
- 1:45:35[SPEAKER_04]: And we're grumbling.
- 1:45:38[SPEAKER_04]: And he gave us this wonderful victory.
- 1:45:40[SPEAKER_04]: Again, you just can't
- 1:45:45[SPEAKER_04]: He gained votes in twenty twenty and he gained votes again in twenty twenty four you just can't get away from that first Republican when the popular votes in twenty twenty four what first
- 1:45:58[SPEAKER_04]: Canada, I think since it's eighty-four to win all seven swing states, not even Obama could pull that off.
- 1:46:04[SPEAKER_04]: He's had this amazing, unblemished streak of victories since January, twentieth.
- 1:46:11[SPEAKER_04]: And we're we're grumbling.
- 1:46:13[SPEAKER_04]: We're murmuring.
- 1:46:15[SPEAKER_04]: Brilliantly said, you pay brilliantly said, you cut us to the quick as they say.
- 1:46:21[SPEAKER_04]: Janice, thank you for the super ticker.
- 1:46:23[SPEAKER_04]: Sticker, thank you so much, Janice.
- 1:46:27[SPEAKER_04]: Johnny, it was good.
- 1:46:28[SPEAKER_04]: The reason this took so long is probably because Trump doesn't care for it as much as his supporters.
- 1:46:33[SPEAKER_04]: He didn't campaign on his heart.
- 1:46:34[SPEAKER_04]: That's true.
- 1:46:35[SPEAKER_04]: He did not.
- 1:46:36[SPEAKER_04]: Yeah, me would come up every once in a while, but he never this was this was not something you would hear at any or every campaign stop as far as I know he never even promised to release the files.
- 1:46:46[SPEAKER_04]: I'm not sure it did.
- 1:46:47[SPEAKER_04]: I wish he did, but if his base one kept her mouth shut and stupid Bonnie wouldn't have pulled that ridiculous stunt with the binders.
- 1:46:55[SPEAKER_04]: Oh gosh, talking about an unforced error.
- 1:46:57[SPEAKER_04]: To maggot influencers, this turmoil wouldn't have happened.
- 1:47:00[SPEAKER_04]: But it falls untrumped because of how it was, Ms.
- 1:47:03[SPEAKER_04]: Handel.
- 1:47:03[SPEAKER_04]: This is one where he deserves criticism.
- 1:47:05[SPEAKER_04]: Yep, yep.
- 1:47:06[SPEAKER_04]: Perp, well said, don't disagree with a single syllable there.
- 1:47:10[SPEAKER_04]: Yes, well said.
- 1:47:14[SPEAKER_04]: Willow, too.
- 1:47:15[SPEAKER_04]: Welcome back, Dr. Steve, from a PR standpoint, who knew blame for the Epstein files, fiasco.
- 1:47:20[SPEAKER_04]: Well, I think what, like just what we heard, I think in the end, you have to blame Trump.
- 1:47:24[SPEAKER_04]: The buck stops with Trump.
- 1:47:27[SPEAKER_04]: I think it got away from him a little bit, because again,
- 1:47:30[SPEAKER_04]: You know, in fairness, he did not Epstein was not the center of maga.
- 1:47:35[SPEAKER_04]: It was not the center of the America first platform in fairness.
- 1:47:38[SPEAKER_04]: It never was.
- 1:47:39[SPEAKER_04]: It was board of securities, economic security was cultural security.
- 1:47:42[SPEAKER_04]: Those are the end was dismantling the deep state and to the extent that Epstein was a symbol of that deep state and the two tier justice.
- 1:47:50[SPEAKER_04]: So we have sure we're going to bring him in there as well.
- 1:47:53[SPEAKER_04]: But that he wasn't the essence of those things.
- 1:47:56[SPEAKER_04]: But it got away from him.
- 1:47:58[SPEAKER_04]: I think it was absolutely right.
- 1:48:00[SPEAKER_04]: You had the absurdity of the Pam Bondi binder thing with the influences.
- 1:48:05[SPEAKER_04]: I do think Pam was sabotaged a bit with that with the New York office.
- 1:48:11[SPEAKER_04]: Now, Komi's daughter renowned knows just been fired.
- 1:48:14[SPEAKER_04]: She was there.
- 1:48:14[SPEAKER_04]: So I think she did get a little sabotaged on that one put again.
- 1:48:18[SPEAKER_04]: It's up to her not to get sabotaged.
- 1:48:20[SPEAKER_04]: It's up to her to identify the sabotaging and get rid of them immediately and then rectifying the situation.
- 1:48:27[SPEAKER_04]: So in the end, I do see this ultimately as Trump and then sub ultimately as sub, yeah, pen ultimately, I guess we say, Pam Bonnie.
- 1:48:39[SPEAKER_04]: So hopefully they're going to work this out.
- 1:48:41[SPEAKER_04]: We'll have to say, we'll have to see how it plays out.
- 1:48:45[SPEAKER_04]: Life of Brian, good to hear from you, friend.
- 1:48:47[SPEAKER_04]: The neocons seem to have interrupted maga when it was making mistake on fathomally stupid.
- 1:48:52[SPEAKER_04]: Had they done nothing, maga would be feuding?
- 1:48:54[SPEAKER_04]: Well said.
- 1:48:56[SPEAKER_04]: Well said, like for Brian, that's kind of my point at the beginning.
- 1:48:58[SPEAKER_04]: They're so narcissistic.
- 1:49:00[SPEAKER_04]: They're so self unaware that they engage in unforce errors that actually destroy them, that actually hurt them and sidelide them for the next several months.
- 1:49:11[SPEAKER_04]: Well said.
- 1:49:16[SPEAKER_04]: Willow tool, I saw the video on Spain.
- 1:49:18[SPEAKER_04]: I'm certainly a gas.
- 1:49:20[SPEAKER_04]: Was that not crazy?
- 1:49:21[SPEAKER_04]: Oh, if you guys haven't seen it, go look at what is it?
- 1:49:25[SPEAKER_04]: Europe is to send to Ann Arcing.
- 1:49:28[SPEAKER_04]: I saw the video on Spain.
- 1:49:29[SPEAKER_04]: It was certainly gas for the behavior of Spanish law enforcement.
- 1:49:32[SPEAKER_04]: I feel that Europe is literally going to turn to a bloodbath, but what's inside the military law will take the Spanish citizens of the infiltrator.
- 1:49:40[SPEAKER_04]: Your ideas, please.
- 1:49:41[SPEAKER_04]: Well, again, it just depends who's in power.
- 1:49:46[SPEAKER_04]: I don't trust European powers that be, including law enforcement, as long as Brussels is calling the shots.
- 1:49:55[SPEAKER_04]: I just don't.
- 1:49:57[SPEAKER_04]: So if Vox comes to power, if obvious skull comes to power, then no, then you can law enforcement will be like with Tom Haman.
- 1:50:11[SPEAKER_04]: But until then, yeah, it's ambiguous.
- 1:50:14[SPEAKER_04]: It's very ambiguous because they could be they could be standing against the protesters who are who are trying to fight for their country.
- 1:50:24[SPEAKER_04]: Yeah, and we're seeing that in the UK all the time for example.
- 1:50:29[SPEAKER_04]: Rubber guy, seventy five, all the Democrats had to do during the F-steen thing was nothing.
- 1:50:34[SPEAKER_04]: We're seeing this recurring theme, are we not?
- 1:50:37[SPEAKER_04]: You guys are all catching the same thing.
- 1:50:38[SPEAKER_04]: I agree with you, a thousand percent, but they could not resist and joined in via the Wall Street Journal and got rightfully curb stomped, brilliantly put.
- 1:50:48[SPEAKER_04]: Wow, brilliant.
- 1:50:50[SPEAKER_04]: Hi, cute.
- 1:50:51[SPEAKER_04]: Good to hear from you, my friend.
- 1:50:52[SPEAKER_04]: The alternative to Trump is insanity, but there's still customers out there doing what they're doing to children.
- 1:50:57[SPEAKER_04]: Absolutely.
- 1:50:58[SPEAKER_04]: Absolutely.
- 1:51:00[SPEAKER_04]: I think this is what's, what do I want to say?
- 1:51:04[SPEAKER_04]: This is our hedge.
- 1:51:07[SPEAKER_04]: This is ultimately our hedge against our own sort of self-sabotaging or own unforesterers.
- 1:51:15[SPEAKER_04]: Which inevitably happened.
- 1:51:16[SPEAKER_04]: We're human.
- 1:51:16[SPEAKER_04]: To errors, human is one great.
- 1:51:19[SPEAKER_04]: Englishman once said, so no, I think the one, I think the main hedge we have is no matter our enforce errors, no matter our screwups on the right.
- 1:51:36[SPEAKER_04]: We don't want to destroy you.
- 1:51:40[SPEAKER_04]: We don't want to surgically manipulate your children.
- 1:51:45[SPEAKER_04]: We don't demand transathletes compete with your daughter and get dressed with an undressed whether and in the women's locker room and women's safe spaces and so forth.
- 1:51:57[SPEAKER_04]: Yeah, no.
- 1:51:59[SPEAKER_04]: We may have disagreements and we may have faltering and failing, but they are insane.
- 1:52:06[SPEAKER_04]: They're nuts.
- 1:52:07[SPEAKER_04]: And people will go
- 1:52:09[SPEAKER_04]: with the two air is human crowd before they go with Bedlam.
- 1:52:17[SPEAKER_04]: Julie, you like how I do all that?
- 1:52:19[SPEAKER_04]: I do not like an Anglo imagery there.
- 1:52:23[SPEAKER_04]: I do not know that.
- 1:52:25[SPEAKER_04]: BW, I'm so afraid this terror mega apart and it's not even the most important thing.
- 1:52:29[SPEAKER_04]: The people in the list could be arrested for so many things.
- 1:52:32[SPEAKER_04]: No, I'm with you.
- 1:52:33[SPEAKER_04]: I don't think it will be W. I don't.
- 1:52:36[SPEAKER_04]: I don't think it's going to tear maga apart ultimately.
- 1:52:39[SPEAKER_04]: It largely because of what just height Q had pointed out.
- 1:52:42[SPEAKER_04]: The other side is insane.
- 1:52:44[SPEAKER_04]: Now, I guess they could, our side could just, you know, particularly the low propensity voter who is more prone to being interested in Epstein, interestingly enough, that's what Rich Barris has found.
- 1:52:57[SPEAKER_04]: they may not turn out, you know, for the midterm, so they may not turn out for twenty- twenty-eight.
- 1:53:01[SPEAKER_04]: Okay, that could happen.
- 1:53:02[SPEAKER_04]: Yeah, but I think we're a little early in the game on that.
- 1:53:05[SPEAKER_04]: I don't see it.
- 1:53:05[SPEAKER_04]: If Trump does an effective pivot and releases the Epstein files as a form now of defense against this, this clear hit job by Wall Street Journal and Democrats, I was going to come out
- 1:53:22[SPEAKER_04]: And you know, with all of us rallying around him in the process, I mean, he's going to come out the superior for it.
- 1:53:33[SPEAKER_04]: Robo guys, seventy five with the amount of Muslims trying to impress Sharia law, like in Texas and other places, using Trump will ban it, or if it gets bad, start deporting them, or at least the ones calling for Sharia law.
- 1:53:44[SPEAKER_04]: Can't be like Europe here.
- 1:53:46[SPEAKER_04]: Yeah.
- 1:53:46[SPEAKER_04]: Well, we're far away from that.
- 1:53:48[SPEAKER_04]: Europe, again, is right there.
- 1:53:50[SPEAKER_04]: Europe is their mass migration is from northern Africa and Middle East.
- 1:53:55[SPEAKER_04]: And that's that is the, that is the Islamosphere, civilizationosphere.
- 1:54:01[SPEAKER_04]: Our illegal migration is primarily from, you know, Latin Catholic, Latin American Catholic countries.
- 1:54:09[SPEAKER_04]: So we just don't have anywhere near the numbers.
- 1:54:11[SPEAKER_04]: I mean, we're talking, they've got three, four, five X.
- 1:54:14[SPEAKER_04]: the amount of Muslims there, and it's becoming a real problem.
- 1:54:19[SPEAKER_04]: Again, it's not just Muslims, but Muslims from Western, you know, non-European countries.
- 1:54:29[SPEAKER_04]: So, yeah, no, I know what you're saying.
- 1:54:32[SPEAKER_04]: Clearly, it's a concern.
- 1:54:35[SPEAKER_04]: It's part in parcel of the tribalization and the civilizationalism of what's happening today, because part of that civilizationalism can be separatism.
- 1:54:44[SPEAKER_04]: It can be a kind of soft secessionism that we in our town are going to have our own laws and they're going to be Islamic things like that.
- 1:54:52[SPEAKER_04]: And yeah, well, to see, I mean, President Trump certainly doesn't sound like he's going to tolerate anything even remotely like that.
- 1:54:57[SPEAKER_04]: And I doubt Texas, I doubt Austin is going to not Austin, the city, Austin, the government is going to tolerate that either.
- 1:55:07[SPEAKER_04]: life of Brian, Trump needs to court the supporters he spat on.
- 1:55:11[SPEAKER_04]: This is a gift, but he's not out of the woods.
- 1:55:13[SPEAKER_04]: Annesty, Ukraine, deep state, a quiescence can still hurt.
- 1:55:17[SPEAKER_04]: Well, he's already said that the Amnesty bill that was floated by that rhino is dead DOA.
- 1:55:23[SPEAKER_04]: That's not happening.
- 1:55:24[SPEAKER_04]: So I don't think you have to worry about that.
- 1:55:27[SPEAKER_04]: I don't know what Charlie was talking about.
- 1:55:29[SPEAKER_04]: I know Charlie made some headlines.
- 1:55:32[SPEAKER_04]: I don't I don't know.
- 1:55:32[SPEAKER_04]: I know he just made some headlines saying hey, word on the street is he's being there's a full court press get Trump to accept some kind of amnesty and yes, he did that whole thing with
- 1:55:44[SPEAKER_04]: Farmers and illegal migrants working on farms and so we shouldn't be going after that.
- 1:55:52[SPEAKER_04]: Yes, yes, yes.
- 1:55:53[SPEAKER_04]: Again, another sort of enforced error there.
- 1:55:55[SPEAKER_04]: I don't know what that was.
- 1:55:57[SPEAKER_04]: I think it was concerned about Iowa.
- 1:55:59[SPEAKER_04]: So votes and Iowa some votes and Wisconsin will say.
- 1:56:04[SPEAKER_04]: But I think he did that the wrong way, nevertheless.
- 1:56:07[SPEAKER_04]: So you don't have to worry about an honesty.
- 1:56:08[SPEAKER_04]: Ukraine, yes, we'll see what he does.
- 1:56:11[SPEAKER_04]: Ukraine, yes, he better not.
- 1:56:14[SPEAKER_04]: And I've come out and said that.
- 1:56:16[SPEAKER_04]: You got to know what time it is.
- 1:56:18[SPEAKER_04]: We are not a unipolar world.
- 1:56:20[SPEAKER_04]: We don't get to tell the world what to do.
- 1:56:22[SPEAKER_04]: You sure as hell don't get to bomb Tehran and then tell Moscow they can't bomb Kiev.
- 1:56:29[SPEAKER_04]: You can't do that anymore.
- 1:56:31[SPEAKER_04]: You could do that in ninety two.
- 1:56:33[SPEAKER_04]: You could do that in two.
- 1:56:34[SPEAKER_04]: You could do that in twenty.
- 1:56:35[SPEAKER_04]: Well, you cannot do that now.
- 1:56:39[SPEAKER_04]: We are in a multi-polar world.
- 1:56:41[SPEAKER_04]: We don't get to run around bomb and whoever the hell we want to bomb.
- 1:56:46[SPEAKER_04]: And then freak out when Russia does the same thing as it were.
- 1:56:52[SPEAKER_04]: So no, I'm with you.
- 1:56:53[SPEAKER_04]: So he's got to watch out and then deep state acquiescence.
- 1:56:56[SPEAKER_04]: Yeah.
- 1:56:57[SPEAKER_04]: Yeah, yeah.
- 1:56:58[SPEAKER_04]: We'll have to see to what extent he's delivering on the deep state.
- 1:57:01[SPEAKER_04]: I mean, again, in fairness, so much of federal employees have been let go.
- 1:57:05[SPEAKER_04]: Now, what are we at now?
- 1:57:06[SPEAKER_04]: They got hundred and twenty five thousand, hundred and fifty thousand federal employees have either been forcibly removed, fired, or they've taken early retirement.
- 1:57:15[SPEAKER_04]: I think it was seventy five thousand who took early retirement.
- 1:57:18[SPEAKER_04]: That's gigantic.
- 1:57:20[SPEAKER_04]: Supreme Court just green-lighted, fourteen hundred bureaucrats at the National Education Association.
- 1:57:28[SPEAKER_04]: Sorry, they had Department of Education, any AISM, Union, Department of Education, that's half their work force.
- 1:57:34[SPEAKER_04]: So he's to NPR was just to fund it with the
- 1:57:42[SPEAKER_04]: the latest doge bill, resisions bill.
- 1:57:46[SPEAKER_04]: So he is dismantling.
- 1:57:47[SPEAKER_04]: Pam Bondi is firing number DOJ officials.
- 1:57:50[SPEAKER_04]: All the Jack Smith guys are gone.
- 1:57:53[SPEAKER_04]: All the people associated with prosecuting J-Sixers are gone.
- 1:57:57[SPEAKER_04]: All the J-Sixers have been pardoned.
- 1:57:58[SPEAKER_04]: I mean, this is the guy who's kept his promises.
- 1:58:01[SPEAKER_04]: So we just have to trust the guy I got shot in the face for us.
- 1:58:04[SPEAKER_04]: I think we do.
- 1:58:05[SPEAKER_04]: I think we owe him that.
- 1:58:07[SPEAKER_04]: While still being critical, just like you are, which I appreciate.
- 1:58:12[SPEAKER_04]: Eric, uh, I have Epstein fatigue.
- 1:58:14[SPEAKER_04]: So Eric, you'll be one of them.
- 1:58:16[SPEAKER_04]: Yep.
- 1:58:17[SPEAKER_04]: Yep.
- 1:58:17[SPEAKER_04]: You'll be one of them as well.
- 1:58:19[SPEAKER_04]: Yeah.
- 1:58:19[SPEAKER_04]: My uncle, who's as conservative as the day as long could couldn't give a rip about Epstein and you're the majority.
- 1:58:26[SPEAKER_04]: I'm just going to say it.
- 1:58:27[SPEAKER_04]: In the end, you're in the majority is we're seeing it and all the polling that's coming out.
- 1:58:31[SPEAKER_04]: You're the majority.
- 1:58:32[SPEAKER_04]: Most Republicans, most maggot don't care.
- 1:58:35[SPEAKER_04]: There is a very vocal wing that does.
- 1:58:37[SPEAKER_04]: And, you know, they do Trump has to be, that's politics.
- 1:58:40[SPEAKER_04]: You have to be able to balance it all out.
- 1:58:43[SPEAKER_04]: But I'm with you, man.
- 1:58:44[SPEAKER_04]: I'm with you.
- 1:58:45[SPEAKER_04]: BW, I think existentialism is just a leftist idea designed to drive people into nihilism.
- 1:58:50[SPEAKER_04]: So they don't care about what happens to them.
- 1:58:52[SPEAKER_04]: Yeah, I mean, I guess so.
- 1:58:54[SPEAKER_04]: I mean, don't stay F ski is technically an existentialist, right?
- 1:58:58[SPEAKER_04]: What's a good, how do we,
- 1:59:03[SPEAKER_04]: Good definition of existentialism.
- 1:59:05[SPEAKER_04]: Let me go to trust the AI at philosophical theory or approach which emphasize the existence of the individual person as a free responsible agent determining their own development through acts of the will.
- 1:59:17[SPEAKER_04]: Yeah, um, I will definitely, I think there's a nihilism to the extent that it amputates people from, you know, nation culture, custom, tradition, family, faith, all the things that awaken the sense of obligation within us because when we have a sense of
- 1:59:39[SPEAKER_04]: obligation, it ultimately creates a sense of gratitude.
- 1:59:46[SPEAKER_04]: And what I hate about particularly liberal existentialism, like you're seeing with someone like Meghan Markle, for example, Prince Harry, is they argue that there are under no moral obligations apart from that which they personally choose to impose upon themselves.
- 2:00:08[SPEAKER_04]: But you don't choose your family.
- 2:00:10[SPEAKER_04]: You don't choose your parents.
- 2:00:12[SPEAKER_04]: You don't choose your nation.
- 2:00:15[SPEAKER_04]: Technically, historically, you don't choose your religion.
- 2:00:19[SPEAKER_04]: You don't choose your community.
- 2:00:21[SPEAKER_04]: They choose you.
- 2:00:24[SPEAKER_04]: And therefore, they awaken the sense of obligation to people, places, beliefs, traditions that you did not choose, but that chose you.
- 2:00:37[SPEAKER_04]: And that you have an obligation to.
- 2:00:39[SPEAKER_04]: And that obligation in its best expression is a gratuity.
- 2:00:49[SPEAKER_04]: It's the awakening of gratitude.
- 2:00:51[SPEAKER_04]: And the root there is grace.
- 2:00:55[SPEAKER_04]: It's all grace.
- 2:00:55[SPEAKER_04]: It's all being given to you.
- 2:00:58[SPEAKER_04]: You and I didn't choose Christmas.
- 2:01:00[SPEAKER_04]: Christmas is the gift.
- 2:01:03[SPEAKER_04]: That's the greatest gift we've been given.
- 2:01:05[SPEAKER_04]: It's Christmas.
- 2:01:07[SPEAKER_04]: All the gifts are just simply symbols with the greatest gift of them all.
- 2:01:12[SPEAKER_04]: And existentialism, liberal existentialism, says no, I choose, I choose or my more obligations.
- 2:01:22[SPEAKER_04]: And I have no obligation to you unless I ascent to a degree to
- 2:01:27[SPEAKER_04]: And that's why anybody who embraces that.
- 2:01:29[SPEAKER_04]: They never enlist in the military.
- 2:01:32[SPEAKER_04]: They never fight for anything.
- 2:01:33[SPEAKER_04]: There's no loyalty.
- 2:01:35[SPEAKER_04]: They will they will politically betray you in a heartbeat.
- 2:01:40[SPEAKER_04]: So yeah, I like and I and I like the way you're
- 2:01:45[SPEAKER_04]: you push that into a nihilism, and then you end up becoming morally numb.
- 2:01:52[SPEAKER_04]: And therefore, ironically, easily manipulated.
- 2:01:56[SPEAKER_04]: I like that very much.
- 2:01:58[SPEAKER_04]: Andrew, where can I get your conversations with academic agent?
- 2:02:04[SPEAKER_04]: I don't know if we put them on our website or our YouTube, Mike, do you know?
- 2:02:16[SPEAKER_04]: I think I mean, academic age should have on his YouTube channel.
- 2:02:24[SPEAKER_04]: So I would just, I would put like Dr. Steve Charlie academic agent.
- 2:02:28[SPEAKER_04]: And I've enjoyed, we've had, I think, two or three interviews.
- 2:02:33[SPEAKER_04]: I did something with the Lotus Eaters on the night of the election.
- 2:02:39[SPEAKER_04]: I think that's the last time I chatted with them.
- 2:02:43[SPEAKER_04]: November.
- 2:02:44[SPEAKER_04]: Oh, and if you want the wider wing, the kind of the, the motley crew, is it?
- 2:02:50[SPEAKER_04]: We have some, in a very good, very informative interview that I did, that I interviewed Carl Benjamin, if you know, Sergeant of Cod, Carl Benjamin, as well, but you know, they're all, they're all good mates.
- 2:03:04[SPEAKER_04]: And so yeah, I, I would just go to academic agents, YouTube channel, and you should be able to find it there.
- 2:03:12[SPEAKER_04]: Bahakat, do you believe that the rising entity is real sentiment at Epstein revelations will lead to them eventually losing their allies protection set the stage for the Prophet's like, Gog and Maggog's end time war.
- 2:03:25[SPEAKER_04]: That's, ah, no, I know Bahakat.
- 2:03:28[SPEAKER_04]: That's, that's, that's,
- 2:03:29[SPEAKER_04]: reading away way too much into it for me, you know, but again, it's what is Gog and Magog a really referring to is the question.
- 2:03:39[SPEAKER_04]: Again, I know there's.
- 2:03:40[SPEAKER_04]: Sorry, yeah, I'm looking at say a note, I got just from Micah.
- 2:03:46[SPEAKER_04]: Yeah, some would say it involves the current modern state of Israel, some would say no.
- 2:03:53[SPEAKER_04]: It's more allegorical.
- 2:03:55[SPEAKER_04]: You know, again, it's, I don't get too much into the prophetic stuff just because there's such a, I'm, I'm Eastern Orthodox, so we tend to have a different schema for understanding.
- 2:04:03[SPEAKER_04]: A lot is prophetic, the, the prophetic passages in scripture, but what is that?
- 2:04:10[SPEAKER_04]: Is he cool?
- 2:04:12[SPEAKER_04]: Thirty-eight.
- 2:04:13[SPEAKER_04]: I'm forgetting what cog and Magog.
- 2:04:15[SPEAKER_04]: Thirty-eight thirty-nine.
- 2:04:16[SPEAKER_04]: I thought so.
- 2:04:20[SPEAKER_04]: SE thank you for the pound sterling.
- 2:04:23[SPEAKER_04]: I likely will trump release the files.
- 2:04:26[SPEAKER_04]: I'm neutral because of the potential lawsuits and international leaders being indicted still.
- 2:04:30[SPEAKER_04]: So yeah, yeah, I'm with you on that.
- 2:04:32[SPEAKER_04]: We'll see it's supposed to be at least the process of suppose he he publicly told Pam Bonnie to release it as of last night.
- 2:04:41[SPEAKER_04]: And so she's and she said we're on it.
- 2:04:43[SPEAKER_04]: We're on it as of today.
- 2:04:45[SPEAKER_04]: So I don't know.
- 2:04:46[SPEAKER_04]: I don't have a timeline in front of me.
- 2:04:47[SPEAKER_04]: So I don't know.
- 2:04:49[SPEAKER_04]: But I'm with you.
- 2:04:49[SPEAKER_04]: Yeah, potential lawsuits.
- 2:04:51[SPEAKER_04]: We have to be careful because there are a lot of victims, lots.
- 2:04:54[SPEAKER_04]: And international figures getting exposed.
- 2:04:58[SPEAKER_04]: Yeah.
- 2:04:59[SPEAKER_04]: No question.
- 2:05:00[SPEAKER_04]: PW establishment actually wants.
- 2:05:06[SPEAKER_04]: I love mom dummy or why run Cuomo a Cuomo a candidate with more baggage there.
- 2:05:14[SPEAKER_04]: Is that LA is a Los Angeles international?
- 2:05:18[SPEAKER_04]: It's that they want mom, Donnie.
- 2:05:20[SPEAKER_04]: I think I'm understanding it.
- 2:05:22[SPEAKER_04]: So with more baggage, it's not actually want to mom, Donnie or why run Cuomo a candidate
- 2:05:31[SPEAKER_04]: I see got it.
- 2:05:32[SPEAKER_04]: Okay.
- 2:05:32[SPEAKER_04]: All right.
- 2:05:33[SPEAKER_04]: All right.
- 2:05:33[SPEAKER_04]: All right.
- 2:05:34[SPEAKER_04]: It just took me all those letters.
- 2:05:35[SPEAKER_04]: All those abbreviations.
- 2:05:38[SPEAKER_04]: So you're thinking by running Cuomo's guaranteed that a mum dummy.
- 2:05:43[SPEAKER_04]: I love that would win.
- 2:05:44[SPEAKER_04]: Marxist dummy or Carl dummy.
- 2:05:48[SPEAKER_04]: Possibly possibly.
- 2:05:50[SPEAKER_04]: It's in the problems though that.
- 2:05:53[SPEAKER_04]: The Cuomo name is still very popular in New York.
- 2:05:55[SPEAKER_04]: It really is.
- 2:05:56[SPEAKER_04]: I mean, I grew up in Connecticut.
- 2:05:59[SPEAKER_04]: You know, and I mean, we all knew who Mario Cuomo was.
- 2:06:03[SPEAKER_04]: You know, you know, the tap in Z's been renamed the bridge is that Mario Cuomo bridge.
- 2:06:10[SPEAKER_04]: You know, yeah, I mean, a lot of people thought Cuomo was going to win just because the name recognition, but you're right.
- 2:06:17[SPEAKER_04]: Maybe he just got too much baggage.
- 2:06:19[SPEAKER_04]: The argument is, though, if this is the argument, I'm not saying it's right, but it's sleigh where to drop out.
- 2:06:25[SPEAKER_04]: Now, I'm sort of drop out, Cuomo Cuoyne.
- 2:06:27[SPEAKER_04]: Adam doesn't look like he's going to pull this off.
- 2:06:29[SPEAKER_04]: Adam looks like he's very, very unpopular in New York, but we'll see.
- 2:06:37[SPEAKER_04]: When's the AOC lawsuit happening since she just called him a four serve himself on the women?
- 2:06:42[SPEAKER_04]: I'd love to see it.
- 2:06:43[SPEAKER_04]: I'd love to see him sue her ass.
- 2:06:45[SPEAKER_04]: I just think she is, she is just, again, she's bought into this, it's like this Stephen co-bear curse.
- 2:06:54[SPEAKER_04]: where, hey, it's just this worm tongue whispering in your ear, you can be really, really successful if you bash Trump.
- 2:07:01[SPEAKER_04]: And the more outrageously you bash him, I'm just thinking some of the things Cober said about Trump and Putin, right?
- 2:07:09[SPEAKER_04]: Back in his first term, Trump one point out.
- 2:07:11[SPEAKER_04]: I mean, he said some pretty pretty revolting things.
- 2:07:16[SPEAKER_04]: And it just seems like that's exactly what AOC's trying to do.
- 2:07:19[SPEAKER_04]: She's trying to out
- 2:07:21[SPEAKER_04]: bomb shell, uh, not bomb to what's it.
- 2:07:25[SPEAKER_04]: Out, um, yeah, just out.
- 2:07:29[SPEAKER_04]: Volgarine, so I guess, uh, just her fellow Democrats, and that's hard.
- 2:07:33[SPEAKER_04]: So yeah, I hope he does.
- 2:07:37[SPEAKER_04]: Curtis Gaines, what do you think about Anderson was saying the federal judge's New York response with the redactions that you have seen files?
- 2:07:43[SPEAKER_04]: I fall on for a long time, and I think he's an honest man.
- 2:07:45[SPEAKER_04]: Yeah, no, and he's, he's had to, um,
- 2:07:49[SPEAKER_04]: And he's had to defend his own name because his name got kind of
- 2:07:56[SPEAKER_04]: Soiled, I wouldn't say so, but it just got dragged into all of this.
- 2:07:59[SPEAKER_04]: And it looks like he has, he has very much been quite successful and rightly clearing his name with Epstein and so on.
- 2:08:11[SPEAKER_04]: So he has seen the files.
- 2:08:13[SPEAKER_04]: He has seen the so-called list.
- 2:08:15[SPEAKER_04]: He's kind of going back and forth on that.
- 2:08:17[SPEAKER_04]: On one hand, he said, there was a list.
- 2:08:19[SPEAKER_04]: I thought originally he said the list.
- 2:08:20[SPEAKER_04]: He's seen it.
- 2:08:21[SPEAKER_04]: And then he said, wow, technically it's not a list.
- 2:08:24[SPEAKER_04]: It's whatever, you know,
- 2:08:26[SPEAKER_04]: But he has seen the files and he believes they are, again, that both Trump and Bondi are, and effect being sabotaged from inside.
- 2:08:37[SPEAKER_04]: And he has been very good in coming out and defending the complexities of releasing these files.
- 2:08:46[SPEAKER_04]: It's so easy on a podcast to say this is what you got to do.
- 2:08:50[SPEAKER_04]: And I don't care what punk it could be on mine.
- 2:08:52[SPEAKER_04]: I don't care.
- 2:08:52[SPEAKER_04]: Play the blame on me.
- 2:08:54[SPEAKER_04]: It's so easy.
- 2:08:54[SPEAKER_04]: So you look just released to us.
- 2:08:56[SPEAKER_04]: What's the problem?
- 2:08:57[SPEAKER_04]: And he's saying, dude, these are court documents.
- 2:09:01[SPEAKER_04]: These are grand jury documents.
- 2:09:05[SPEAKER_04]: These are not things that you just release.
- 2:09:07[SPEAKER_04]: It doesn't work that way.
- 2:09:09[SPEAKER_04]: And you have an Anne in fairness to even the president is executive power.
- 2:09:14[SPEAKER_04]: He's in a judicial lane here.
- 2:09:16[SPEAKER_04]: This is the lane of the courts and the courts ultimately you're going to make the decisions on this.
- 2:09:22[SPEAKER_04]: So and and this is again is where the justice department comes in.
- 2:09:25[SPEAKER_04]: That's the bridge between the executive branch and the courts.
- 2:09:29[SPEAKER_04]: And so yeah, no, I'm I'm with you, I thought, I think Alan Joshua, which has been great.
- 2:09:34[SPEAKER_04]: We prop, we should have him on the show and see if he can bring some clarity on the issue.
- 2:09:39[SPEAKER_04]: It's very good.
- 2:09:42[SPEAKER_04]: no longer Democrat anymore, another one who left the Democrat party.
- 2:09:46[SPEAKER_04]: The one on the right, Dr. C, when is the DJ going to rest?
- 2:09:49[SPEAKER_04]: Comey Karen Bass hole a new scum for sedition since they've come out and said they're using taxpayer funds, California, help find, find, hide illegal invaders from my officers.
- 2:09:59[SPEAKER_04]: Why is Comey Karen a lot to even hold office since violated the comments control act of?
- 2:10:05[SPEAKER_04]: I don't know about that.
- 2:10:07[SPEAKER_04]: Part I'm with it.
- 2:10:09[SPEAKER_04]: I guess you could just acknowledge the communists, but I don't know when, you know, Tom Homan has made it absolutely clear.
- 2:10:18[SPEAKER_04]: You stand in the way of ice agents doing their job.
- 2:10:21[SPEAKER_04]: You're getting arrested.
- 2:10:22[SPEAKER_04]: Period simple.
- 2:10:23[SPEAKER_04]: So we'll see.
- 2:10:25[SPEAKER_04]: We'll see if they go too far.
- 2:10:29[SPEAKER_04]: Davoro's on July, sixteenth talked about Gleinmax or a real name is Glein, right?
- 2:10:36[SPEAKER_04]: What's the difference?
- 2:10:37[SPEAKER_04]: Glein, her real Mac, uh, possibly subpoena to testify to Congress.
- 2:10:42[SPEAKER_04]: Why wouldn't she tell Congress to pound sand?
- 2:10:44[SPEAKER_04]: Oh!
- 2:10:45[SPEAKER_04]: Would they put her in jail?
- 2:10:47[SPEAKER_04]: She could be pardoned.
- 2:10:48[SPEAKER_04]: That's right.
- 2:10:48[SPEAKER_04]: That's the point in exchange for naming names.
- 2:10:50[SPEAKER_04]: But if Gailen named Democrats, when that have a strong defense, of course, Elaine named Democrats, because Trump told her to do an exchange for a part possibly possibly.
- 2:11:03[SPEAKER_04]: Yeah, I think it's more let the chips fall where they may kind of approach to things.
- 2:11:10[SPEAKER_04]: Look, in the end, let's just be blunt.
- 2:11:12[SPEAKER_04]: Right now, this is about satisfying a very vocal portion, a very significant portion of Trump's space, who are very, very concerned that two tier justice and a rogue government deep state
- 2:11:28[SPEAKER_04]: are not being reigned in by the Pam Bonnie Justice Department.
- 2:11:32[SPEAKER_04]: Bottom line, that's their concern, and that Trump is betraying them in taking Pam's side rather than theirs.
- 2:11:41[SPEAKER_04]: So, bringing out Glean Maxwell for a massive public testimony, dropping bomb shells.
- 2:11:50[SPEAKER_04]: That's just, that's what they just want the truth out.
- 2:11:54[SPEAKER_04]: They don't care what the Democrats do with it afterward.
- 2:11:56[SPEAKER_04]: That's the sense that I get.
- 2:11:58[SPEAKER_04]: So.
- 2:12:00[SPEAKER_04]: But it's great point.
- 2:12:00[SPEAKER_04]: Yeah.
- 2:12:01[SPEAKER_04]: I love the way you're thinking.
- 2:12:05[SPEAKER_04]: How often share, oh, you often share information in terms of bad news for Democrats instead of good news for Republicans or great news for American freedom.
- 2:12:13[SPEAKER_04]: You're not alone.
- 2:12:13[SPEAKER_04]: Many freedom YouTubers also frequently express information from the prospective devastation for Democrats instead of goodness for American freedom Republicans.
- 2:12:21[SPEAKER_04]: Why do you pose it?
- 2:12:22[SPEAKER_04]: Is this way?
- 2:12:24[SPEAKER_04]: Is it deliberate choice you make?
- 2:12:27[SPEAKER_04]: Yeah, no, I think I'm pretty even handed on it.
- 2:12:31[SPEAKER_04]: You know, Trump just got a massive victory, or you know, things like that, the positive and the negative.
- 2:12:38[SPEAKER_04]: I think the negative tends to
- 2:12:44[SPEAKER_04]: If if it is that the negative tends to get the tilt.
- 2:12:51[SPEAKER_04]: And I tend to to bias towards the negative or others are biased towards the negative.
- 2:12:58[SPEAKER_04]: I think it's because bottom line we have been so.
- 2:13:02[SPEAKER_04]: inundated with the very black pillars that I was talking about that constantly make you feel like there's just no resistance is futile.
- 2:13:13[SPEAKER_04]: There's no way we can beat.
- 2:13:15[SPEAKER_04]: I have sat and talked with so-called conservatives who have told me point blank, you can't beat the beat's deep state.
- 2:13:24[SPEAKER_04]: The deep state will beat you every time.
- 2:13:27[SPEAKER_04]: It's just got a fall.
- 2:13:28[SPEAKER_04]: The whole thing's got a fall.
- 2:13:30[SPEAKER_04]: There's no way we can win this.
- 2:13:32[SPEAKER_04]: I mean, I've been on with with influencers who've literally said that to me.
- 2:13:37[SPEAKER_04]: You know, where they're just, they talk, they go off into these conspiracy theorists and say, you can't stop this bigger than a man at this big, you know, blah, blah, blah, blah.
- 2:13:44[SPEAKER_04]: And I'm just like, so I think I like focusing on, no, we're beating the crap out of them.
- 2:13:50[SPEAKER_04]: We're beating the living, not out of them.
- 2:13:54[SPEAKER_04]: We are taking these guys out.
- 2:13:57[SPEAKER_04]: And so that to me, I think we get excited to see that.
- 2:14:01[SPEAKER_04]: We can excited, you know, because you could say, you know, Mike, maybe like in a big fight or something, you know, Mike Tyson one, or you could say Mike Tyson just beat the living crap out of this guy or something, you know, you could go either way.
- 2:14:16[SPEAKER_04]: Well, if you really hated this guy and despises this guy.
- 2:14:21[SPEAKER_04]: then you'll probably err on the side of he beat the crap out of him.
- 2:14:25[SPEAKER_04]: Where's if you're just a fan of boxing or something?
- 2:14:27[SPEAKER_04]: Yeah, Mike Tyson won.
- 2:14:29[SPEAKER_04]: Great job.
- 2:14:29[SPEAKER_04]: If just a fan for America, we won.
- 2:14:31[SPEAKER_04]: Here's another win.
- 2:14:35[SPEAKER_04]: The one and only have actor, Dr. Steve.
- 2:14:37[SPEAKER_04]: I still think the Epstein issue is another forty chess move by Trump.
- 2:14:40[SPEAKER_04]: So do I. It's appearing more and more that way.
- 2:14:42[SPEAKER_04]: Now you have Kevin Spacey demanding to release the files along with low IQ Democrats and Congress.
- 2:14:47[SPEAKER_04]: The forty move.
- 2:14:48[SPEAKER_04]: I see is the sewer rats demanding the total exposure of the entire deep state.
- 2:14:52[SPEAKER_04]: Your thoughts checkmate.
- 2:14:53[SPEAKER_04]: Yeah.
- 2:14:54[SPEAKER_04]: I love the way you're thinking what it looks like Trump may be doing is he's actually getting DC to give up the deep state.
- 2:15:05[SPEAKER_04]: inadvertently.
- 2:15:06[SPEAKER_04]: I don't give me wrong.
- 2:15:07[SPEAKER_04]: I think the Democrats would freak out the moment all of Epstein came out because they know he's they must know something or I don't know where they knew this was going to come out.
- 2:15:17[SPEAKER_04]: Wait, do you see this is going to drop this well, well, street journal articles going to drop, but I don't think they realize again how it just plays right in the Trump's hands many in many ways the way you're talking about.
- 2:15:31[SPEAKER_04]: In human condition, thank you for the super chat, Dr. Steve, Virginia Community College instructor here.
- 2:15:36[SPEAKER_04]: How are you, myself?
- 2:15:37[SPEAKER_04]: I taught at Anoronville Community College for a number of years.
- 2:15:40[SPEAKER_04]: How about Trump ending the Department of Ed?
- 2:15:42[SPEAKER_04]: Can he get rid of it?
- 2:15:43[SPEAKER_04]: I hope so.
- 2:15:44[SPEAKER_04]: Yeah, so he can.
- 2:15:46[SPEAKER_04]: He can basically turn it into a skeleton.
- 2:15:48[SPEAKER_04]: But in the end, in order to get rid of the undergirdings, the Congress is gonna have to act, because it's so much, it's been so enshrined
- 2:15:59[SPEAKER_04]: in legislation, legislative law.
- 2:16:03[SPEAKER_04]: But oh, he can hire and fire as he sees fit because it comes under executive authority.
- 2:16:09[SPEAKER_04]: So what the Supreme Court seem to do is last week or so is given the green light to go ahead and gut it all he wants by cutting the workforce in half and then he'll cut the other workforce, other half of the workforce in due time.
- 2:16:26[SPEAKER_04]: So he can gut it.
- 2:16:29[SPEAKER_04]: fully and completely abolish it and get rid of it.
- 2:16:31[SPEAKER_04]: That's going to require Congress.
- 2:16:32[SPEAKER_04]: We'll see.
- 2:16:33[SPEAKER_04]: And again, once it's gone, it's going to be hard to bring it back.
- 2:16:37[SPEAKER_04]: It's going to be very, very hard to justify bringing it back.
- 2:16:41[SPEAKER_04]: So that's why the Democrats are so flipped out over it.
- 2:16:47[SPEAKER_04]: Johnny, what's good?
- 2:16:48[SPEAKER_04]: How'd you like to see both?
- 2:16:49[SPEAKER_04]: Hi, I'm Miyazaki.
- 2:16:52[SPEAKER_04]: Oh, and a Don Bluth or Bluth.
- 2:16:55[SPEAKER_04]: I actually don't know Don Bluth.
- 2:16:56[SPEAKER_04]: Meet and talk about their work.
- 2:16:58[SPEAKER_04]: I'm going to have to write that down.
- 2:17:00[SPEAKER_04]: I don't know, Don Bluth.
- 2:17:01[SPEAKER_04]: You were teaching me my friend.
- 2:17:05[SPEAKER_04]: They're the only two living legends for hand-drawn animation.
- 2:17:08[SPEAKER_04]: Also, what are your favorite films from each?
- 2:17:12[SPEAKER_04]: I haven't seen them all, but so far, minor, spitter way and secret of NEM.
- 2:17:16[SPEAKER_04]: Okay, so secret of NEM, blues, I'm assuming.
- 2:17:20[SPEAKER_04]: So I have to, I may have seen that.
- 2:17:25[SPEAKER_04]: Um, well, my, my favorite is spirit away.
- 2:17:28[SPEAKER_04]: Music, he hands down.
- 2:17:30[SPEAKER_04]: I, I shared that with my kids when they were, when they were young ones.
- 2:17:34[SPEAKER_04]: What is the latest one we just saw?
- 2:17:40[SPEAKER_04]: You're probably saying it right now the boy in the harron.
- 2:17:42[SPEAKER_04]: I loved.
- 2:17:43[SPEAKER_04]: I absolutely loved the boy in the harron.
- 2:17:46[SPEAKER_04]: Princess Monnoke was good.
- 2:17:48[SPEAKER_04]: I have to watch it again.
- 2:17:50[SPEAKER_04]: I was a little confused, which is good.
- 2:17:54[SPEAKER_04]: That means I have to get into it more.
- 2:17:57[SPEAKER_04]: Kiki's delivery service, my kids love that.
- 2:18:01[SPEAKER_04]: So my kids have all been to Studio Ghibli in Tokyo when they go and visit their Gigi and Baba.
- 2:18:10[SPEAKER_04]: So, but those are my, those are my super favorites.
- 2:18:14[SPEAKER_04]: And I was, there was a documentary on how to Miyazaki if you haven't seen.
- 2:18:17[SPEAKER_04]: I think it was on Netflix as well.
- 2:18:19[SPEAKER_04]: You definitely want to check out.
- 2:18:20[SPEAKER_04]: And I do, I just, I admit ignorance on Zedon Bluth.
- 2:18:24[SPEAKER_04]: I'll have to check him out.
- 2:18:29[SPEAKER_04]: She, how Alex Jones said Trump and his team were calling conservative influencers.
- 2:18:33[SPEAKER_04]: Did they call you by the way?
- 2:18:34[SPEAKER_04]: You were the absolute best commentator.
- 2:18:37[SPEAKER_05]: Well, thank you, God bless.
- 2:18:38[SPEAKER_04]: No, I did not get any call or any contact from the White House.
- 2:18:43[SPEAKER_04]: Hey, you better, you better Richard.
- 2:18:46[SPEAKER_04]: No, I did not.
- 2:18:49[SPEAKER_04]: I think,
- 2:18:52[SPEAKER_04]: I think they, if anything, I don't like the way I thought Mark Dice was cynical on this.
- 2:19:02[SPEAKER_04]: You know, basically, you know, saying, oh, you got the call, the White House is trying to control your content.
- 2:19:09[SPEAKER_04]: Well, maybe they are.
- 2:19:11[SPEAKER_04]: But again, this is, control is not necessarily a bad thing.
- 2:19:15[SPEAKER_04]: Right?
- 2:19:15[SPEAKER_04]: Like propaganda.
- 2:19:17[SPEAKER_04]: There's good propaganda.
- 2:19:17[SPEAKER_04]: There's bad propaganda.
- 2:19:19[SPEAKER_04]: You want to be persuasive the truth.
- 2:19:22[SPEAKER_04]: So with the way this is played out, it seems to me that Trump knew, look, we're going to get this bombshell.
- 2:19:31[SPEAKER_04]: And then I'm going to counter this bombshell and we're going to release the files, but not until this hits something akin to that.
- 2:19:40[SPEAKER_04]: But no, they did not call me and I very much appreciate that there's very kind of you.
- 2:19:44[SPEAKER_04]: I am honored to even just be considered among all the commentators.
- 2:19:51[SPEAKER_04]: Starblazer, Dr. So, would you please interview Whitney Webb?
- 2:19:54[SPEAKER_04]: Oh, yeah, she's done by far the most in-depth research in Epstein, even recently wrote a two volume book.
- 2:20:00[SPEAKER_04]: One nation under black.
- 2:20:02[SPEAKER_04]: Okay, yeah, that was under surveillance or something like that.
- 2:20:06[SPEAKER_04]: Yeah, she's Whitney Webb is awesome and I would love to.
- 2:20:09[SPEAKER_04]: Yes, so Mike and maybe we can reach out to Whitney and see if we can get her for an interview.
- 2:20:15[SPEAKER_04]: The one she did with Glenn Beck was brilliant.
- 2:20:18[SPEAKER_04]: That's Glenn Beckett is best.
- 2:20:19[SPEAKER_04]: It's just kind of this trying to put the pieces together with kind of the, I don't, I hate even calling it like conspiracy stuff, but like deep state stuff.
- 2:20:28[SPEAKER_04]: That's where he's at as absolute best.
- 2:20:32[SPEAKER_04]: And it looks like that is it.
- 2:20:33[SPEAKER_04]: All right, gang.
- 2:20:34[SPEAKER_04]: Great, great hanging out with you.
- 2:20:36[SPEAKER_04]: Have a wonderful weekend.
- 2:20:37[SPEAKER_04]: I will be on my back porch.
- 2:20:39[SPEAKER_04]: I'll be your back porch professor all throughout the weekend.
- 2:20:42[SPEAKER_04]: So watch out for some brand new updates and breaking news and analysis.
- 2:20:46[SPEAKER_04]: You're not going to get anywhere else.
- 2:20:47[SPEAKER_04]: So make sure to smack that bell and subscribe button.
- 2:20:50[SPEAKER_04]: Love you all.
- 2:20:51[SPEAKER_04]: God bless.
- 2:20:53[SPEAKER_04]: Thanks so much for listening this episode of the Turley Talks podcast.
- 2:20:57[SPEAKER_04]: Don't forget to subscribe, leave us a five star review, and share this episode with your friends.
- 2:21:02[SPEAKER_04]: Help us defeat the fake news media and rank us the number one news and commentary podcast all over the world.
- 2:21:09[SPEAKER_04]: Come back again tomorrow for another episode celebrating the rise of a new conservative age.