Latest / The Vault: The Epstein Files / Mega Edition: Prince Andrew And The Royal Flush (5/8/26)

Transcript

Mega Edition: Prince Andrew And The Royal Flush (5/8/26) · The Vault: The Epstein Files

0:00
Speaker 1: What's up everyone, and welcome back to the Epstein Chronicles.
0:04
Things are going from bad to worse for Prince Andrew
0:08
as the days continue to roll by. Now a new
0:12
poll in the City of York, not New York, by
0:15
the way, in the City of York shows that nearly
0:18
nine out of ten citizens who were polled want him
0:22
to relinquish his title as the Duke of York. And
0:25
can you blame them? This is the guy who is
0:28
the Duke of your city, This is the guy who's
0:31
the representative of your city. No thanks, I'll pass, get
0:36
rid of your title, go back to Mummy's house. And
0:39
it would seem that the residents of the UK end
0:44
of York in particular have just had enough at this point,
0:48
and the calls are beginning to mount and rain down
0:52
upon him, and not only him, but the royal family
0:55
for action to be taken here and for him to
0:58
be stripped of his titles for good. There is no
1:02
reason that this man should hold these titles. Just his
1:06
association with Maxwell and Epstein alone is enough for this
1:10
man to live in exile and to never be seen
1:13
on the public stage ever again. Now in his mind,
1:17
he thinks that he's going to be able to beat
1:20
this and make a comeback into public life, you know,
1:23
the whole thing. And obviously he is suffering from delusions
1:28
of grandeur. Right when you're told for your whole life
1:31
that you're not wrong, and everything you do is right,
1:35
every little decision you make is perfect, well, you end
1:38
up suffering from delusions of grandeur. And my friends, this
1:43
man certainly is suffering from that. You just take a
1:47
look at the way he presents himself. Oh, I'm an
1:49
honorable guy. I was at the pizza place. That's not
1:53
even the kid I wear when I'm running around town,
1:56
whatever that means. This guy is one of the most untrustworthy,
2:05
garbage human beings going at this point. So I don't
2:08
blame the people of the UK, and I don't blame
2:11
the people of York for demanding that this dude relinquished
2:15
these titles and for him to be completely back burnered.
2:21
So we have an article from CBS News, and we
2:25
have an article after that from the New York Post
2:28
that we're going to get to tonight as well, considering
2:30
both are relatively short. The first article is calling for
2:35
the Duke of York to relinquish these titles So let's
2:38
take a look at this article from CBS News and
2:42
let's see what they have to say about the Duke
2:46
of York and the clarion call from the people of
2:50
the UK. Now, it doesn't seem to have an author's
2:53
name on it. I'm guessing it's a staff piece, so
2:56
the link will be posted in the description box for
2:58
you to check out. There's a video. I suggest you
3:01
check it out. There are obviously a newsperson asking questions
3:06
of people on the street about the Duke of York
3:09
and him losing his title. Pretty interesting video. It runs
3:12
for like four minutes, so it'll definitely be in the
3:14
link if you want to check it out. Headline calls
3:19
mount for Prince Andrew to lose his Duke of York
3:21
title over Virginia Roberts sexual abuse allegations. The city of York,
3:28
in northern England, is steeped in more than two thousand
3:31
years of history. When CBS News Senior Foreign correspondent Holly
3:35
Williams visited recently, a thick fog hung over its medieval streets.
3:40
The weather was as murky as the scandal now shrouding
3:43
Prince Andrew, also known as the Duke of York. And
3:47
that's another thing. Look at the history of the city.
3:50
I mean, these cities, these places in England have been
3:54
around forever, thousands of years, and this is a man
4:00
who's supposed to represent the people of the UK and
4:03
what they have built and their history, and he's doing
4:06
an absolutely pathetic job of doing that. So why should
4:10
he be bestowed with any kind of royal title. Let's
4:14
be very clear, the people of the UK make the
4:16
decision here, not the Queen. They've given her that power,
4:20
but they can take that power away, and if the
4:25
royal family is not careful, they're going to find themselves
4:28
in a position where, you know, Prince Andrew is not
4:31
the only one acting as a regular citizen, if you
4:33
get my drift. Many within the ancient cities Roman Walls
4:38
think it's time for York to cut its ties with
4:41
Queen Elizabeth's second youngest son. I don't think he should
4:45
be the Duke of York anymore. One woman told Williams
4:47
on the street. We don't have that affinity that we
4:50
used to have anymore. And look that spoils over time. Right,
4:54
what do they say you don't ever want to meet
4:56
your heroes? Because most times you're going to be depressed.
5:00
And I always go back to the part in the
5:03
movie Bronx Tail where you know they're talking and you
5:08
know he's telling see about Mickey Mantle, and you know,
5:13
Mickey Mantle doesn't care about you, and he says to see,
5:17
is Mickey Mantle ever going to pay for your rent?
5:20
And it kind of dawns on sea at that point
5:22
that yeah, you know, you're right. Why am I worshiping
5:24
this guy? What do I get in return? And you
5:27
see that with the Duke of York, you know, people
5:30
worshiped him because he was a monarch, he was a prince,
5:33
and people had this opinion that the royal family or
5:38
royalty in general cared about them, because that's the narrative
5:41
that they've pitched, right, that they've carefully crafted throughout the decades.
5:46
But the reality really is, these people like Prince Andrew,
5:50
they don't care about any of us. They don't care
5:53
about us. We're nothing to them. The Dukedom of York
5:58
is traditionally held by the British monarch's second son. It
6:02
was conferred on Prince Andrew by his mother when he
6:04
was married in nineteen eighty six. Now However, with his
6:07
reputation sullied, there's a social media campaign calling for him
6:11
to be stripped of his royal title. It shouldn't come
6:14
down to social media going crazy to get this guy
6:17
stripped of his title. He should just pay the piper.
6:20
All of these titles should be given up. All of
6:22
it should just be turned over back to the Queen,
6:25
and this guy should just go and live in exile somewhere.
6:29
That's if there aren't criminal charges at some point. But
6:33
short of that, nobody wants to see this guy's face,
6:36
and as punishment, someone should take his Teddy Bear collection
6:39
from him. If these allegations are true, he should pay
6:45
the price and lose his title. Resident Alan Johnson told
6:48
CBS News, I feel most people from York feel the same.
6:52
And again, I don't live in the UK and I
6:55
don't have a bunch of access to people who live
6:58
in the UK besides listeners of my podcast and some
7:02
people I interact with on social media. But from what
7:05
I can tell and from what I have heard from
7:08
people in the UK, they want nothing to do with
7:11
it anymore. So I don't understand what the Queen is
7:14
waiting for. Strip this guy of all of his titles
7:17
make him the absolute pariah of the family and show
7:22
the rest of the world that you actually care about people.
7:26
The English are famously reserved, and the Queen herself remains
7:30
overwhelmingly popular across the country. But Prince Andrew, who has
7:34
some people boiling over with anger, and I get it right,
7:38
how people would want to give the Queen the benefit
7:40
of the doubt her subjects people who live in England
7:43
who have an affinity for the monarchy. I understand that.
7:46
And as an American it's foreign to me obviously, and
7:51
I could never be comfortable calling somebody king or queen.
7:55
That doesn't mean that people over in the UK, in England,
7:59
that's a tradition and even though we might not understand it,
8:03
that doesn't mean that, you know, it doesn't mean anything
8:05
to people. It does, and that's why I think it's
8:08
such a shame that the Royalty aren't living up to
8:11
their end of the bargain. The people have lived up
8:14
to their end of the bargain. They've funded the monarchy,
8:17
they've protected it, they've you know, harbored its secrets in
8:21
some cases, and for what to let this monster run
8:26
around and just shit on everything? So yeah, people have
8:29
had enough, and while the Queen is still experiencing a
8:33
lot of support, you're seeing it start to crumble a
8:36
little bit in areas. He's got daughters of his own,
8:41
which makes it even worse. Marie Myers told Williams. She
8:44
said that, along with all the English people, she was
8:47
simply disgusted. And again, this isn't something that came out
8:50
of the blue. People have known about Andrew and his
8:53
behavior for quite some time. And it's not just with Epstein,
8:56
Peter Nigert. You have the guy from Kazakhstan, a whole
9:00
bunch of other gun runners and undesirables. So people have
9:04
been hit to Prince Andrew's shit for a while. But
9:07
when it was just stealing before and grifting, eh, people
9:10
are willing to not pay so much attention or not
9:13
throw them under the bus. This is a whole different story.
9:17
Of all the people CBS spoke to in York, only
9:20
one person sounded somewhat sympathetic to the Prince. He is
9:24
not squeaky clean, for sure, but you have some proof.
9:27
But you have to have some proof of The woman
9:29
told Williams, she's probably a fortune hunter in my opinion,
9:33
but you know, there's no smoke without a fire. So
9:36
this is the one person that obviously hasn't watched the
9:38
news and doesn't understand what's going on here, a fortune hunter.
9:43
She already made a bunch of money suing Epstein in company.
9:47
You know how much money she could make if she
9:48
decided to sell the rights of her story to a movie,
9:51
Netflix or something much easier than going through a whole
9:55
court battle. Here. This is about justice and the whole
9:58
defense of Oh, he's a gold digger. That doesn't resonate
10:02
with me in this case. Now, that doesn't mean that
10:04
in other instances there aren't people who do that. There are.
10:08
I've said it from the beginning. I don't just believe
10:10
all women. I don't believe all anyone. I think everybody's
10:13
a great character. Everyone's capable of great evil and great
10:17
good circumstances permitting the she the woman was referring to
10:25
is Virginia Roberts, who claims that Jeffrey Epstein trafficked her
10:28
to Prince Andrew and issuing the Prince in a New
10:31
York court, alleging he sexually assaulted her on multiple occasions
10:35
when she was a teenager. Andrew denies the allegations. He
10:39
has not been charged with any crime and says he
10:41
has no recollection of ever meeting Roberts, despite a photo
10:45
showing them together with convicted sex trafficker Glen Maxwell. I
10:51
like how the post calls her what she is here,
10:53
a convicted sex trafficker, and then right back to the picture.
10:56
You still have people who don't think that picture is real.
10:59
It is just as to me, honestly, I would love
11:02
to see the proof of what you're looking at when
11:06
you think that this picture is not real, or that
11:08
it's been forged, or it's been tampered with or messed with.
11:11
I'd love to see a professional break it all down,
11:13
because I've heard from two people who have seen the
11:16
picture who are professionals, who have said the opposite. In
11:21
an interview with BBC, Andrew claim the photograph might have
11:24
been doctored. That is what I would describe as me
11:27
and in that picture. But I can't we can't be
11:30
certain as to whether or not that's my hand on
11:32
her whatever it is left side, because I have no
11:35
recollection of the photograph ever being taken. Well, maybe doctor
11:38
Elizabeth Loftis can give you some help with your false
11:41
memories pal how can you not remember Chida resident Kathy
11:46
Berry on Street in York. The photograph's there, The evidence
11:49
is there. Everybody's seeing that. Carrie is just resonating what
11:54
we're all thinking. We all saw the photo, We've seen
11:57
all of the evidence, we've seen what has been brought forward.
12:00
It's your turn to pony up, bro. Words are wind.
12:05
The Queen stripped Prince Andrew of all of his honorary
12:08
military titles last week and he's no longer allowed to
12:11
call himself his Royal Highness. But for many, especially in York,
12:16
that's not enough for the monarchy to survive this. She
12:19
has got to remove his official titles or else I
12:22
can see the monarchy itself being under serious question. Rachel Maskell,
12:27
who represents York in the British Parliament, told Williams, and
12:31
that's my opinion as well. I think there's enough support
12:34
that's going to be eroded from the royal family throughout
12:37
this whole thing that it's going to prove disastrous for
12:40
them if they don't get ahead of it, if they
12:42
don't jettison Prince Andrew and try and fix the damage
12:45
that's been done here. She said that if the prince
12:49
loses his court case and refuses to give up as dukedom.
12:52
The government needs to act. This isn't about the court
12:55
case itself, the lawmaker told CBS News, but the insight
13:00
into his associations Gallayne Maxwell, Jeffrey Epstein, and we know
13:05
his history. It's all come out. Maskell said that Andrew's
13:08
royal title drags us into that story, and as a
13:12
proud city, we don't want to go there. His legal
13:15
battle in the US is far from over, but already
13:18
the verdict on the Duke of York in the ancient
13:20
city that shares his name isn't favorable. Well, he hasn't
13:26
lost these titles yet, folks, But he has lost something
13:30
and we're gonna get to that right now in this
13:32
next article. This next article is from the New York Post.
13:36
The author Lee Brown headline, Prince Andrew now stripped of
13:41
his royal Twitter handle too. Boy, oh boy. I could
13:44
think of a lot of people that would do themselves
13:46
a big favor getting rid of Twitter. But it's funny
13:49
to see that they stripped his royal highness title on Twitter.
13:54
But still he's the Duke of York anyway. I guess
13:56
we can have all of our cake and eat it
13:58
too at once. We'll get a bell. So let's savor
14:02
this one him losing his Twitter handle, and then maybe
14:04
the tomorrow or the next day or the week after,
14:08
maybe we'll be able to feast upon the fact that
14:10
he lost his royal titles too. Until then, humiliated Prince
14:16
Andrew has lost another royal privilege, his official Twitter handle.
14:21
Oh my lord, he is no longer a blue check mark.
14:24
He is really a regular average citizen now. The scandal
14:30
scarb Royals page the Duke of York had been completely
14:34
deleted by Wednesday, with a message now saying this account
14:37
doesn't exist. His whole entire existence needs to be erased
14:42
from history at this point. I'm not big on canceling anybody,
14:45
but if anybody's ever deserved to be canceled, it's the
14:48
Joe Exotic of the Windsor family. The bio used to
14:53
read the official Twitter account for the Duke of York.
14:57
Tweets sent by hrh are signed ay, oh, isn't that
15:01
so special? I'll sign my tweets a why laughs in scumbag.
15:08
It was deleted by Buckingham Palace in a move to
15:11
overhaul the Prince's online presence, according to the Telegraph, with
15:15
Andrew's bio on the Royal Family's website also reflecting his
15:19
new status as a private citizen. How about as an
15:21
absolute moron, you should probably add that as well, if
15:24
we're keeping with the facts. While still listed as a
15:28
member of the family, his page now focuses on the
15:31
historic announcement last week by Andrew's mother, Queen Elizabeth, to
15:36
Stripper middle son of his titles and patronages. The Duke
15:40
will continue to not carry out public duties. The site stresses, Oh, well,
15:45
isn't that great glad that you guys can inform us
15:48
that he's no longer carrying out his public duties. Good
15:53
like I said, mucking stables, greeting people at Walmart, whatever
15:58
it may be, cash test dummy, certainly not the Prince
16:02
of York and certainly not in any position that is
16:05
representing the fine people of the UK. The blunt about
16:10
page ends with just one sentence on achievements prior to
16:14
stepping back from public life, saying he undertook a wide
16:17
range of public work with a strong economic and business focus. No,
16:21
he jet set it around the world, hung out with
16:23
people like Jeffrey Epstein grifted, who knows, probably sold some
16:27
state secrets. I can't prove that, but probably, And who
16:30
knows what else sorts of scum baggery this man was
16:34
up to. I'm guessing there was a few transactions, financial
16:38
transactions that were not accounted for, thrown into the mix.
16:43
Moral of the story, the guy's a scumbag and his achievements,
16:47
being two sentences long, tells you everything you need to know.
16:52
Under the heading supporting the Queen Andrew's officials official duties
16:56
are listed in the past tense, saying an important part
16:58
of the Duke of York's role was to support the
17:01
Queen's work as head of state. Yeah, you did a
17:04
fine job there, Hansy Andsy, Uncle Touchy the diddler on
17:08
the roof, What a fine job you've done helping your mother.
17:12
How embarrassing? How embarrassing to drag your ninety five year
17:15
old mother through this. What sort of animal does that?
17:19
It's like when Carmela Soprano tells Anthony Jr. What sort
17:23
of animal gets high at that confirmation? Same kind of story.
17:29
What sort of guy does this to their mother? Never
17:31
mind if she's the queen he was, However, listed as
17:36
ninth in line for the throne a birthright. Yeah, well,
17:39
disinherit him and that goes away as well. He follows
17:42
Prince Harry, who also lost the right to his hr
17:45
age title when he fled as a senior royal, and
17:47
Harry's two children with Megan Markele Archie and Lilla Bet.
17:51
I hope that Harry and Meghan Markle's kid. I hope
17:54
that somehow one of those kids ends up on the
17:56
throne at some point. Both Andrews Facebook and Insta pages
18:00
remained in place as of Wednesday morning, although the latter
18:04
was now private. In the latest humiliation for Andrew, he
18:08
was booted from royal duties in late twenty nineteen over
18:11
his ties to pedophile Jeffrey Epstein and convicted madam human
18:15
trafficker Gallaine Maxwell. So this guy, this has been a
18:19
long time coming, and we've been talking about it, but
18:21
it's nice to see it all in action. It's nice
18:23
to see it all take place, because nobody deserves it
18:27
more than this man. He had everything the world at
18:30
his fingertips, folks, and he squandered it all. How can
18:33
anyone have any empathy for that? The Queen stripped him
18:37
of his remaining titles last week so that he would
18:40
be a private citizen while fighting a Manhattan lawsuit filed
18:43
by his longtime accuser, Virginia Roberts. Andrew has always denied
18:49
her allegations. Well, that's all fine and well, and that's great.
18:53
I'm happy for him. Now he's going to have to
18:55
prove that though. Right, it's all great if you're denying this,
18:59
deny that, denying the other thing. But now shit's getting real.
19:04
And you know, for a long time you ft around
19:08
and now you're gonna find out, Andrew. You are gonna
19:10
find out, my friend, that everything that you have thought
19:14
with your narrative, that you created in your silly ass,
19:18
stupid head, none of it was real. And you, my friend,
19:23
are the prints of nothing. If you'd like to contact me,
19:28
you can do that at Bobby Kopuuchi at ProtonMail dot com.
19:31
That's b O B b y c ap you c
19:35
c I at ProtonMail dot com. You can also find
19:38
me on Twitter at bo bbu y underscore c ap
19:43
you c c I can't find Prince Andrew there. All
19:47
of the articles that we discussed this today are in
19:50
the description box. All right, folks, you know the deal.
19:53
I'll be back tomorrow morning. We'll pick back up. We'll
19:56
catch in on uh, we'll catch up I mean on
19:58
guilty Goulaine. We'll see where we're at, and we will
20:01
be off and running for the day. Hope that all
20:04
of you have a good one. What's up everyone, and
20:07
welcome back to the Epstein Chronicles. Things are really heating
20:12
up for Gallaine, Maxwell, Prince Andrew and all of the
20:16
people who are associating with them. Now, Virginia Roberts is
20:21
demanding that eight names be unsealed and released to the public.
20:29
These are names that were uncovered, if you will, during
20:33
the lawsuit with Gallaiine Maxwell during the civil lawsuit, and
20:39
Virginia Roberts lawyers want these names to be brought to
20:43
the public light. And me personally, you all know how
20:47
I feel about transparency. Let it all out. All of
20:51
these people, and I'm guessing the people who are named
20:54
here the eight are all of the people that have
20:57
been directly accused by Virginia Robbins. You know, George Mitchell,
21:01
Bill Richardson, Les Wexner, Jeffrey Ebstein, Glenn Duben, you know,
21:08
and I'm guessing she wants to continue to put a
21:13
spotlight on the fact that these people were not only enablers,
21:17
but they were also participants in the abuse. And I
21:20
think that's a big deal, right because a lot of
21:23
people seem to be confused, a lot of people seem
21:26
to not understand the scope of what went on here.
21:30
And I've seen people say, well, who are the people
21:32
that these girls were trafficked to? If you've been following
21:35
the case, then you know a lot of the names,
21:38
George Mitchell, Glenn Dubin, Bill Richardson, the names I just
21:42
named a bunch of other people. So for those who
21:46
were like, well, nobody's name and names people are naming names,
21:50
it's just not, you know, in a court of law setting.
21:54
Yet the deposition, however, was in a court of law,
22:00
so what was said during this deposition will carry a
22:04
lot more weight with certain people, for sure. And when
22:09
we're talking about this case especially, we need as much
22:13
transparency as possible because people don't believe the official narrative
22:18
and that's because the official narrative has been bogus pretty
22:22
much the whole entire time. So now that the band
22:28
aid has been completely pulled off and people are getting
22:31
a good look at what's really going on. People are
22:34
no longer going to just accept Oh, it was just
22:36
Epstein and Maxwell and that was the end of it.
22:38
People aren't going to accept that. And the sooner that
22:41
these prosecutors and our politicians realize that, the better off
22:45
they're going to be, this is going to become an issue.
22:49
This is going to become a hinge voting issue in
22:53
the future, mark my words, stuff like this, because people
22:56
are fed up. Nobody wants to look at these gross ass, disgusting,
23:01
crusty old men and think about them molesting kids and
23:06
trafficking children. Nobody wants to deal with it. So all
23:11
of these names need to be released. We need to
23:13
put all of these dudes on blast, and then they
23:15
should have the chance to answer what the accusations are
23:20
against them. But the problem is, and here's where my
23:24
big problem comes up with all of these people, they
23:26
don't want to answer for it because they know they
23:29
don't have a good answer. They know that they don't
23:32
have an alibi, so they try to avoid it. They
23:35
try to act like it never happened, and then they're
23:38
not pursued by the legacy media or they're called the socialite.
23:42
You know, they still give them cover. But all of
23:47
these people who have been named and pointed to by
23:51
Virginia and other survivors, they should all be put on blast.
23:55
So let's hope that Judge Presca continues her streak of
23:59
releasing in in this case, and let's hope that she
24:03
unseals all of this and we get ourselves a huge
24:06
tranch of information to go through until we get to
24:10
that point. However, why don't we dive into this article
24:13
from the Daily Deli Mail. And this is an article
24:17
that was authored by Daniel Bates. Headline, Prince Andrew accuser
24:22
Virginia Roberts demands identities of eight high profile john does
24:27
named in civil lawsuit she filed against Glaine Maxwell be unsealed. Now,
24:33
I don't see why they wouldn't unseal it. Maxwell's case
24:36
is over, she's convicted. She can't cry that this is
24:40
going to, you know, be detrimental to her at this point.
24:44
So let's get these names out there and let's put
24:46
all these dudes on blast. And then what you can
24:49
do is go back and listen to some of the
24:51
older episodes and see that we've been miles ahead of
24:54
the legacy media the whole entire time here. Lawyers for
25:01
Prince Andrew's accuser have asked a judge to unsealed documents
25:04
and vast swaths of information about Jeffrey Epstein and Glenn
25:09
Maxwell's sex trafficking operation. Attorneys for Virginia Roberts said Judge
25:15
Loretta Presca should publicly release material from the civil lawsuit
25:18
she filed against Maxwell containing references to eight anonymous John
25:23
does absolutely no more anonymous in this case. Enough is enough.
25:29
They haven't earned the right to be anonymous. These people
25:32
are again just wielding influence, wielding power, and that's why
25:38
they're able to keep this stuff sealed. Do you think
25:40
if it was you or me that it would be sealed.
25:42
Do you think if it was you or me that
25:44
our names wouldn't be all over the media. But because
25:47
these people are business tycoons or politicians or whatever it
25:51
might be, they should be protected. Their image is more
25:54
important than anybody else's. Huh, it's all a joke. And
25:59
all of the pro latching blue check marks that cry
26:03
on Twitter about how terrible journalism is now for us,
26:06
Oh we don't get paid it off, body, Well, that's
26:08
because your work is garbage, point blank period. If you're
26:11
not good at your job, you're not gonna make any money,
26:14
all right, So stop with the tribalism as a journalist.
26:18
I don't want to click on somebody's profile on Twitter
26:21
and see who your political affiliations are. How about just
26:24
giving us the news. Is that too difficult for you,
26:26
because if it is, you're gonna be a dinosaur, a relic.
26:31
And you're already starting to move that way, meaning the
26:33
legacy media. But they'll continue to cry about it, and
26:37
then at the same time, they won't do their jobs
26:39
to dig deeper in cases such as this to give
26:42
you folks the information you deserve. So whose fault is
26:45
it when they aren't profitable anymore? Whose fault is it
26:48
when newsrooms are getting fired? Enough with the activism, enough
26:53
with the political tribalism as a journalist, and how about
26:57
you start digging into the story. The individuals are identified
27:05
in court documents only as non parties seventeen fifty three,
27:08
fifty four, fifty five, fifty six, seventy three, ninety three,
27:13
and one fifty one. It is not clear if one
27:16
of them is the Duke of York. I'm guessing it is.
27:19
Like I said, I'm guessing all of those people are
27:22
the people that have been pointed to by Virginia Roberts
27:26
as to people who took part in her abuse, and
27:30
that certainly seems the likeliest scenario for me. Obviously, we
27:34
won't know until it's unsealed, but that's my guess. When
27:37
and if it's unsealed, we'll come back to this episode
27:40
and we'll revisit if my prognostication here was right. All
27:46
eight parties have objected to the unsealing. According to the filings.
27:50
John Doe seventeen complain that being associated with the case
27:53
would cause him annoyance and embarrassment. Imagine imagine not being
27:57
able to read the room and think that you're annoyance
28:00
and your embarrassment is worth more than justice is worth
28:04
more than these ladies getting the justice they deserve. Imagine
28:08
being this, John Doe seventeen, jerkoff. I really hope that
28:13
these people are outed, and when they are, we're gonna
28:16
do an episode on each of them. Considering all of
28:19
them want to keep their anonymity so much, we're gonna
28:22
help them air themselves out. That's what we're gonna do.
28:26
When these names are released. Another John Doe number one
28:31
fifty one claimed that they were trying to live a
28:34
private life and that disclosure meant they would be hounded
28:37
by the media. Well, I'm pretty sure that the survivors
28:40
were just trying to live a nice, young teenage life too.
28:43
How'd that work out for them? Now, you think we
28:46
should respect your privacy. You're a public figure, homie, you
28:50
have no expectation of private life. And if you were
28:54
hanging out with Jeffrey Epstein and you were partaking in
28:57
the abuse, especially, zero chance ever going to be left
29:01
alone from here on out. If law enforcement won't hold
29:05
you accountable, it's up to society to make sure you
29:09
are not welcome ever again. The request came on the
29:14
day that Judge Lewis Caplan ruled out that Robert's battery
29:17
lawsuit against Andrew, a separate case also filed that the
29:20
federal court in New York can move forward. If Judge
29:23
presca decides to unseal the documents in Robert's case, they
29:27
could shed new light on the Duke's dealings with Maxwell
29:29
and Epstein. Look, why would anyone be against transparency at
29:34
this point unless you have something to hide? And well,
29:37
we all know that Uncle Touchy has something to hide.
29:40
But Galan Maxwell, what does she have to care at
29:43
this point? Let it loose, let it go, Tell your
29:47
lawyers you don't care if it's unsealed. What more embarrassment
29:50
can you possibly suffer? Glen Maxwell, you are a human trafficker.
29:54
So let's hope that she doesn't dispute them trying to
29:57
get this unsealed. Presca is the judge who presided over
30:02
a defamation lawsuit that Roberts filed against Maxwell in twenty
30:06
sixteen for calling her a liar. The case was settled
30:10
with confidential terms, but the judge has slowly been approving
30:13
the release of hundreds of documents in the case after
30:17
applications from media organizations. Well, what do you know, the
30:20
legacy media finally doing something. If they would have covered
30:23
this from the beginning, they wouldn't have to file these
30:26
applications to get things unsealed because they would have already
30:30
known what was going on. But Judge Presca has been
30:33
very consistent with releasing documentation in this case, and I
30:37
don't expect her to deviate from that course moving forward. Here,
30:41
I would expect, and again this is just my guest
30:44
folks that this documentation is going to see the light
30:47
of day. In her letter to the judge, Robert's lawyer,
30:53
Sigurd macauley said that they were following the court's instructions
30:57
to streamline the process of making the documents public. The
31:00
numerous parties mentioned in the documents met in October and
31:04
agreed to split the objecting non parties into groups and
31:08
address the objections of the eight john Does first. But
31:11
upon review macaulay said, it is apparent that their objections
31:16
essentially mirror objections to unceiling that this Court has already rejected.
31:21
That unsealing certain documents might be embarrassing, would expose non
31:25
parties to media attention, and could result in some unfortunate
31:29
association between the non parties and Jeffrey Epstein or Glen Maxwell.
31:34
See that's how it always starts out, right, Oh, it's
31:36
a non party. Oh he's just a person of interest
31:39
in the case. He's not a suspect. Yeah, okay, So again,
31:44
non parties, we know what that means. We just mean
31:46
that it means that they're not indicted, right, they're not
31:49
under criminal investigation. But we know that Virginia has named
31:55
names and she has done it many times, and even
31:58
in court in the face of extensive prior briefing on
32:02
objections just like these. The court's unsealing process has been
32:06
quite consistent, with the exception of a narrow set of
32:09
circumstances which are generally not present here. Documents have been unsealed,
32:13
and that's for sure. Judge Presca has been very consistent,
32:16
like I said, with unsealing this documentation. She has really
32:20
wanted to get to the bottom of this, it seems like,
32:22
and she's not the type it would seem that wants
32:25
to might mess around and play games. Get this information
32:27
out there, let the people see it. The people deserve
32:30
to have transparency. McCauley added that generalized aversion to embarrassment
32:37
and negativity from being associated with the case, it was
32:40
not enough to keep the documents private. That was especially
32:44
true given the great public interest in the fact that
32:47
Maxwell's trial for recruiting and trafficking underage girls has now finished.
32:51
She was found guilty in faces sixty five years in jail.
32:55
McCauley wrote, now that Maxwell's criminal trial has come and gone,
32:58
there is little reason to reach protection over the vast
33:02
amounts of information about Epstein and Maxwell's sex trafficking operation
33:06
that were originally filed under seal in this case, And
33:09
she's one hundred percent right. What purpose does it serve
33:12
to keep things sealed at this point unless you're trying
33:15
to protect the reputation of some of your friends or something.
33:18
But personally, I don't really care about any of these people.
33:22
I want an absolute neutron bomb right dropped on all
33:26
of them, meaning they all have to come in, they
33:29
all have to sit down for interrogations. Just how's it
33:33
so different than what happened at the Capitol. They sure
33:35
went out and rounded up all those people quick enough,
33:37
didn't they. But they can't bring in Glenn Maxwell's associates. Huh.
33:42
It shows you where the priorities are at. The letter
33:48
stated that people testified in court about matters which are
33:51
under seal in the case that issue the defamation matter.
33:55
McCauley wrote that the abundance of public information now widely
33:59
available about Epstein and Maxwell's scheme through the thousands of
34:02
pages of publicly available trial transcripts cuts against any continued
34:07
ceiling in this case. Turning to each of the John does,
34:11
the letter states that John Doe seventeen is mentioned in
34:14
four documents and objects to his name being made public.
34:18
She's not wrong. All of this stuff, for the most part,
34:20
is out there already. It's just cataloging it and putting
34:24
it in a manner that is digestible because a lot
34:28
of people don't know where to start, right. There's so
34:30
much that goes on here. Finding a jump off point
34:33
is very difficult. But the information is out there, and
34:36
all of this needs to be unsealed. McCaulay wrote that
34:42
his objection is that if the material is allowed to
34:45
be made public, it will cause them to say the
34:47
least annoyance and embarrassment. Again, I don't care about your
34:51
annoyance or your embarrassment. I care about just as being fulfilled.
34:54
I care about these survivors being able to wake up
34:57
in the morning, look in the mirror and say, you
34:59
know what, but things haven't been great. You know, there's
35:03
been all this trauma that I've suffered earlier in my life.
35:06
But it's a new start for me because justice is
35:09
being pursued because Maxwell's in prison. That's what I want.
35:13
But it doesn't stop there, right, all of these co
35:15
conspirators again, just listen to what the survivors are saying themselves,
35:19
and then that's where the playbook should be. We should
35:23
be following that playbook. Meaning if the survivors say that
35:26
there's still people out there that were involved, what are
35:29
we waiting for? Indict them and let's get some trials going.
35:35
It would also cause the individual severe anxiety and distress,
35:38
an extreme personal, physical, and reputational harm. Severe anxiety and distress. Huh,
35:43
try being poor homie. Try waking up every morning and
35:46
not knowing where your next meal's coming from or how
35:49
you're gonna buy your kid that pair of Jordan's so
35:52
he can, you know, be part of the in crowd
35:54
and tell me about severe anxiety and distress as you're
35:58
swimming around in your vault like screw ruge McDuck. McCauley
36:03
said that that DOE did not cite any legal authority
36:06
and the documents should be unsealed. Those fifty three and
36:09
fifty four do not oppose unsealing the documents relating to them,
36:12
and they should be released. The letter stated, Dose fifty
36:15
five and fifty six object to their names being made
36:18
public because they claim a deposition in which they are
36:21
mentioned is unreliable. The letter states, Yeah, you know, court
36:25
documents really unreliable because nobody's ever been arrested for perjury
36:28
for lying during a deposition. Is that what you're saying here,
36:32
is that what you're putting forth that this is going
36:36
to be a lie. Because if that's the case, then
36:38
the person who was giving the deposition, meaning Virginia, well
36:42
then she should get arrested for perjury like Maxwell. Right,
36:45
But we know that's not gonna happen because Virginia is
36:47
telling the truth. McCauley argued this was not grounds to
36:55
keep the material private. John Doe's seventy three argues against
36:59
unsealing because of a general aversion to being associated with
37:02
Maxwell and Epstein and disclosure could cause substantial embarrassment. Well,
37:06
here's an idea. Don't associate with Epstein and Maxwell and
37:09
then you don't have to worry about being aired out
37:11
by the media when the walls close in. Are these
37:15
people for real? Like, I mean really, well, I was
37:18
friends with them, but I don't want you to know.
37:19
That's basically what he's saying. Dough ninety three claims that
37:24
the documents which mention them have no relevance to the
37:27
matters at hand. And could be seen as silacious dough
37:30
one forty one is mentioned the most of all and
37:33
appears in forty seven documents. According to McCauley's letter, Doe
37:37
claims they're trying to live a private life and do
37:40
not want any attention stemming from disclosure. Oh you know,
37:44
that's pretty pretty sad that you don't want any attention,
37:46
But guess what you're gonna get it? Mark my words, folks,
37:50
the second these names are released, expect a closer look
37:53
episode on all of these people. Obviously we've already covered
37:58
all of them at some point, but we'll dive right
38:00
back in and we'll get an updated version going. Because
38:04
enough is enough with the secrecy, enough is enough with
38:06
the transparency. Haven't we had enough of that in this case,
38:10
and in fact, haven't we had enough of that overall
38:12
from our government? They claim they will be hounded and pursued.
38:18
He but the media for by the media for comment
38:21
and elaboration. McCauley says this is not grounds for keeping
38:25
the document sealed, and notes that the material has already
38:28
been widely reported in the media and part has been unsealed.
38:32
The individual's involvement in the case has also been reported
38:35
already and they have already been contacted by the media
38:38
and declined to comment. Oh, I'm sure it's one of
38:41
those lovely folks that Virginia has pointed to. Maybe it's
38:44
a George Mitchell. Maybe it's a Glenn Dubin. Now you
38:48
know who knows one of them types. In her battery
38:52
lawsuit against Andrew, Roberts claims that she was forced to
38:55
have sex with him meaning Prince, meaning the individual, three
39:00
times when she was seventeen, after Epstein told her to
39:03
do so. So it's obviously Andrew. Andrew is strongly and
39:06
repeatedly denied the claims, calling them baseless in his response
39:10
and that they are designed to get a payday from him.
39:13
So how about if Virginia foregoes the payday, then what's
39:17
everybody gonna attach their horse and cart to at that point? Oh, well,
39:21
she's a money hungry person. Well, no, she's not trying
39:24
to get paid here, So what is it then? What
39:26
are you going to say then, detractors? In his ruling
39:30
allowing the case to continue, Judge Kaplan rejected Andrew's argument
39:34
that a settlement Robert signed with Epstein in two thousand
39:37
and nine to settle a civil case against him should
39:39
be grounds for dismissal. The case now moves into the
39:43
discovery phase, where each side exchanges documents and depositions are taken,
39:48
including that of the Duke himself. And this is what
39:51
we always talk about discovery phase. These people are terrified
39:54
of it, of airing themselves out, of having to expose
39:57
themselves to the public. Now, obviously I'm sure a lot
40:01
of it'll be sealed like they love to do in
40:03
the courts, but the fact that this clown is going
40:06
to have to get up there and be deposed is
40:09
making me almost giddy. At this point. Judge Presca has
40:14
been unsealing such material in the defamation case, and it
40:17
gives an insight into what is in store for the
40:19
Duke in the coming months. The documents include a deposition
40:23
from Roberts and Joanna Schuberg, who claimed she was in
40:27
the room when andrew groped Robert's breast at Epstein's New
40:30
York mansion in two thousand and one. The documents have
40:33
also included emails that Andrews sent to Maxwell in January
40:37
twenty fifteen, after Roberts claimed for the first time that
40:41
she had sex with them. The Duke messaged, Maxwell, let
40:44
me know when we can talk. Got some specific questions
40:47
to ask you about Virginia Roberts, referring to Virginia, Maxwell responded,
40:52
have some info call me when you have a moment.
40:55
So can we get those phone records? We know the
40:58
emails here, and this is the email I've talked about
41:00
in the past that establishes that he knew who Virginia was.
41:04
He says he has no idea who she was, but
41:06
he's emailing Glenn Maxwell and asking her by name. Come on, now,
41:12
who's gonna believe that bs Not me, not you. I
41:16
don't know who's buying it, maybe Mummy, But the rest
41:19
of us are sitting here like bro come on. So
41:23
we're looking at some really interesting information possibly coming down
41:28
the pipe, folks. And this is going to be a
41:32
lot of context for people who might not really have
41:35
a full grasp of what's going on yet. And if
41:39
you know anything about me yet, you should know I
41:41
love context. Prince Andrew is up against it. All of
41:47
his friends are about to get out it. Nobody wants
41:50
him in the public eye, and all that's left now
41:53
is for the justice train to pull up to the
41:57
station that's gonna do it for me tonight, folks. Obviously,
42:01
some more context episodes come in your way tomorrow, same
42:05
schedule as usual. Hope that all of you folks have
42:08
a great day today, and as for me, I'll be
42:11
back later. If you want to contact me, you can
42:13
do that at Bobby Kapuchi at ProtonMail dot com. That's
42:16
bo bbuy c ap you c CI at ProtonMail dot com.
42:22
You can also find me on Twitter at bo bbuy
42:26
underscore c ap U c CI. The link that we
42:29
discussed can be found in the description box. What's up, everyone,
42:33
and welcome back to the Epstein Chronicles. This morning, we're
42:38
gonna continue talking about the Prince of Nothing, Prince Andrew
42:42
and his absurd claims that he can't sweat, especially considering
42:48
we have seen pictures of him doing exactly that. Now.
42:52
Yesterday we heard from Alan Starkey, who was very close
42:58
to Prince Andrew and Fergie for a time before they
43:01
had a falling out. He wrote a book about them,
43:03
The Whole Nine. Well. This man, an ex American intelligence officer,
43:10
says that he never saw Prince Andrew sweat either, even
43:13
when he was wearing full wool suits. By the way,
43:17
who the hell's wearing a full wool suit to a club?
43:20
I don't buy that for a minute anyway. Then again,
43:23
we are talking about the Joe exotic of the Windsor family.
43:27
I mean, if anyone is suffering from lingering effects of
43:32
the Habsburg dynasty, it's certainly this idiot. So maybe he
43:37
was wearing a full on a wool suit to the club.
43:42
I guess it wouldn't shock me at this point. But
43:46
all we have heard so far is mister Starkey and
43:50
his account in the favor of Prince Andrew. Meanwhile, my
43:54
eyes have told me something different. Now, he could clear
43:59
this all up, meaning Prince Andrew by just releasing his
44:02
medical record that talks about his issue here. And if
44:07
there is a medical issue, then that's something that needs
44:10
to be discussed because it would be a big deal. Right.
44:13
It would account for his assertion that he cannot sweat.
44:18
Anyone could say anything, right, I could say, you know,
44:22
I'd never go to the bathroom. While you might obviously
44:26
know that I'm lying, How are you going to prove
44:28
it till you sit there and watch until you know,
44:30
until you see me go to the bathroom. It's the
44:32
same with this guy. He could sit here and tell
44:33
us until he's blue in the face, oh I don't sweat.
44:37
But the reality is we've actually seen pictures of him
44:41
leaving clubs, leaving certain events while he was sweating. Now,
44:45
maybe he had this condition for a period of time
44:48
and it went away, Maybe he took some medicine and
44:50
it went away, or it clears up on its own,
44:52
whatever it may be. But he could easily end this
44:58
whole entire line of pursuit if he just releases medical records,
45:04
not all of them, obviously, just the ones that pertain
45:07
to this specific condition. I know that if it was
45:10
me fighting for my innocence, fighting for my reputation, the
45:14
reputation of my family, I'd be willing to provide whatever
45:19
sort of evidence that's going to prove my claims. You know,
45:24
nobody's asking this guy for his DNA chart or anything
45:27
like that. But if you have some sort of medical
45:29
condition that makes it that you can't sweat, it should
45:34
be easy to provide that documentation, right, especially considering like
45:40
we're going to go over in this article, we've seen
45:42
this dude sweat several times. This article brings up five
45:46
times that we've seen it. But if you're pictured leaving
45:51
clubs or wherever it might be, and you're all sweaty,
45:54
how are you gonna sit there and try and tell
45:56
us you can't sweat? It is absurd and it is
46:02
obviously false. Now again, if you had some sort of
46:06
medical condition and you know you weren't able to sweat,
46:10
wouldn't that mean you weren't able to sweat? Ever? But
46:13
select if he could turn it on and off, if
46:14
it's like a superpower. This guy has been nothing but
46:23
lying from the beginning, in my opinion. He has done
46:25
nothing but the dishonorable thing from the beginning, in my opinion,
46:30
and he continues to do just that. I mean, the
46:34
whole I can't sweat thing is just literally one of
46:38
the more odd claims that I have ever heard when
46:41
somebody is trying to set up an alibi and set
46:44
up a defense for their alleged behavior. Oh, I can't sweat,
46:48
that can't be me. And then hearing from Alan Starkey yesterday,
46:56
more bizarreness. In my opinion, how is it that you're
47:01
gonna sit here and tell me that this dude's at
47:02
a club in a full on wool suit Oh, everybody
47:06
else was drenched and sweating all over the place, but
47:09
not Prince Andrew. Oh yeah, okay, whatever. So we know
47:13
that this guy obviously doesn't have any sort of condition.
47:17
We've seen the pictures, we've heard the accounts from other people,
47:21
and today in this article we're gonna talk about some
47:23
of this stuff. So why don't we go ahead and
47:27
do that and jump into this article from the Sun
47:30
and let's see what author Anthony Blair has to say.
47:35
No sweat five times Prince Andrew was seen sweating as
47:39
rape accuser demands proof he can't after Duke's bizarre defense,
47:45
And just take a step back for a minute and
47:47
look at this in perspective. The Prince of England is
47:54
using a so called sweating or non being able to
47:58
sweat disease as a fence for rape. Now let that
48:05
settle in for a minute. That's his alibi. The pizza
48:09
shop and I can't sweat. You mean to tell me
48:13
that that would fly for anybody else. Somebody shows up
48:16
at your house some accusations against you. You tell him
48:19
I was at the pizza shop, but nobody can confirm
48:22
that I can't sweat, But I'm sweating right now, How
48:26
do you think the investigators would react to that if
48:28
it was a normal person. But because it's Prince Andrew,
48:32
he's been able to get away with it for all
48:34
this time. Scotland Yard has nothing to say about it,
48:39
nobody cares ah, no big deal, that's just Prince Andrew
48:42
being Prince Andrew. It was one of the most bizarre
48:47
parts of the Duke of York's car crash interview with
48:50
BBC Newsnights Emily Maitliss in November of twenty nineteen. Questioned
48:56
about his accuser, Virginia Roberts, claims he was sweating profusely
49:00
when they allegedly danced together in Tramp nightclub in London,
49:03
Prince Andrew famously said he was unable to sweat, and
49:08
it's just you know, you look at these claims made
49:11
by people like him, you look at the absurdity of
49:14
it all, and it's because they were able to get
49:17
away with it for so long and lie to everybody, right,
49:22
and they were provided cover by their buddies in the media,
49:25
their friends in the entertainment industry, and we all know
49:29
what happened at ABC. Even that's just one example. They
49:33
killed that whole entire Amy Robock story because they didn't
49:36
want to lose access to the royal family. Think about
49:39
that for a minute. ABC News, owned by Disney, would
49:43
rather have access to the royal family than give Virginia
49:47
Roberts time on their network. And then after all of that,
49:54
not only are they non repentant, not only do they
49:58
not bring anybody on to their program, they go ahead
50:02
and fire the person who they think is responsible for
50:06
the leaked audio. And it turns out this young lady
50:09
wasn't even the one responsible for it according to her.
50:15
So these people have been protected for so long and
50:17
they have never had to answer for anything that they
50:20
have done, and they've been able to say absurd and
50:23
ridiculous things to defend their actions because they're never called
50:27
out on it. But we all know that the tide
50:30
is turned, and we all know that there are way
50:32
too many independent journalists, way too many independent content creators,
50:37
and way too many people who used to be part
50:40
of the legacy media who have dropped out now and
50:43
who have you know, pretty big voices. You know, people
50:46
are using sub stack and things are changing. The whole
50:49
entire landscape of the media is changing. I don't know
50:54
anyone that when I talk to them, says that they
50:57
have confidence in what they're even reading in the newspaper anymore.
51:00
The Washington Post or the New York Times. Everyone is,
51:05
you know, thinking it's politically slanted one way or the other,
51:10
or there's you know, lies of a mission. It's just
51:14
there's no trust. And the legacy media they'll tell you that, oh,
51:18
it's conspiracy theories who have It's your own fault. If
51:23
you were providing unbiased news and you were just providing
51:27
the news, I mean, you're more the welcome to give
51:30
your opinion, but you got to let people know it's
51:32
your opinion, right, People would trust you more. But when
51:36
you have all kinds of motivations, tie it on to
51:39
what you're reporting, or I go on to your Twitter
51:42
page and it's filled with maga this or Biden Harris
51:46
twenty twenty. I don't want to see that from a reporter.
51:49
That's not what I'm looking for now. Obviously we all
51:51
have our own biases, right, but good reporters, good journalists,
51:55
good people covering the news, they stuff those biases and
51:59
we just don't have enough of that. And we saw it,
52:02
especially at the very top when it comes to people
52:05
like Prince Andrew. These executives are the ones that were
52:08
protecting Andrew. Wasn't Amy Robach who didn't want the interview,
52:11
believe me. On the night of March tenth, two thousand
52:16
and one, Roberts, who says she was trafficked by Jeffrey
52:19
Epstein and Glaine Maxwell to have sex with Prince Andrew,
52:23
claimed she danced with the Duke before they went back
52:25
to Glaine's house. It was there that the notorious photo
52:29
of the queen's favorite son with his arm around the
52:32
seventeen year old Virginia was taken as Glaine watched on
52:36
and I posted an episode yesterday or last night dealing
52:41
with that picture. There was the Kiwi photographer who was
52:46
interviewed about the picture, and he dined a little bit
52:50
of his expertise about the authenticity of it and all
52:54
of that Jazz. I know, there's been some questions surrounding it.
52:56
Some people have brought up, oh, the picture's fake, or
53:00
it's been tampered with, or look, certainly doesn't seem to
53:04
be tampered with in my opinion. Obviously I'm not some
53:07
kind of you know it guy or photoshop expert, but
53:12
according to the experts who have seen it, it certainly
53:16
is not a photoshopped picture. Afterwards, Virginia says the pair
53:22
had sex and Epstein paid her ten thousand dollars around
53:25
eight thousand pounds, but when questioned about the claims, Andrew
53:29
said he was at Pizza Express in Woking, Surrey. He
53:32
also cast out on Virginia's recollection of the night. And
53:37
this is where it gets real bad for Andrew. In
53:39
my opinion, if you can't even admit to meeting this
53:42
young lady, if you can't even admit to taking that picture,
53:45
how can anyone believe anything you have to say? When
53:48
that evidence is right there in our own view. We
53:53
can see it for ourselves. We don't have to rely
53:55
on a report or telling us about it. We don't
53:57
have to rely on a source saying, oh, I was there,
54:00
I saw it, because it's right there in front of
54:03
our faces for all of us to see. In the interview,
54:10
Andrew said, there's a slight problem with the sweating claim
54:13
because I have a peculiar medical condition, which is that
54:17
I don't sweat, or I didn't sweat at the time,
54:20
or I didn't sweat at the time. Very vague, right,
54:23
very vague. The way he explains it doesn't lock himself
54:25
into anything. There, he added, I didn't sweat at the
54:29
time because I had suffered what I would describe as
54:32
an overdose of adrenaline in the Falklands War when I
54:35
was shot at, so he would describe it as that.
54:38
What did you go on to Reddit and ask some
54:41
redditors what your medical condition is? What does your doctor
54:44
describe it as? You clown? You prints of nothing? This
54:49
guy's an epic moron, folks. Andrew went on to say
54:54
that his condition has since cleared up. However, there are
54:57
at least five occasions from around this time where the
55:00
Duke was either photographed apparently sweating or or was recorded
55:05
as perspiring by witnesses. And this is where the rubber
55:09
meets the road. Right, we can make whatever claims we want.
55:12
I could get on here and tell you that I
55:15
am the descendant of Julius Caesar. Right, doesn't make it real,
55:20
And it doesn't make Prince Andrew's account of what occurred
55:24
here or him saying he can't sweat anymore real either,
55:28
especially when we have the evidence photograph, evidence, video evidence
55:33
of the contrary. China White Nightclub, London two thousand. Pictures
55:39
from July two thousand show Prince Andrew leaving China White
55:42
Nightclub in London, soho late at night. He has a
55:45
blue shirt unbuttoned and appears sweaty and disoriented. The legendary
55:50
London nightclub a favorite haunt of celebrities over the years,
55:54
and his own nephew, Prince Harry played host to the
55:57
forty year old Duke of York. So it's the picture
56:00
of him. I got the blue shirt nice and unbuttoned
56:02
and he's sweating in the picture. So obviously you can
56:06
click on the link here and you should do that
56:08
all with all of these links and you'll be able
56:11
to check these pictures out. But it's absurd. The whole
56:14
claim's absurd. I've said it was absurd from the beginning.
56:17
His buddy coming out yesterday to try and co sign
56:19
for him. I mean, could that be any more planned?
56:23
All of a sudden, everyone's abandoned Prince Andrew and now
56:27
somebody had a falling out with decides to show up
56:30
in whiteen item. Yeah, that's not a suspect or anything.
56:35
Tramp London two thousand and one undoubtedly the most damaging
56:39
picture for Prince Andrew is the one allegedly taken of
56:42
him after leaving Tramp nightclub in London with Jeffrey Epstein,
56:46
Glene Maxwell and Virginia Roberts. Virginia claimed in an interview
56:50
with the BBC's Panorama that Andrew was the most hideous
56:54
dancer I've ever seen in my life. Well, i'll tell
56:57
you what you have not seen me on the dance floor.
57:00
I look like I'm having an absolute seizure, Grandma, one
57:04
hundred percent clownish, So I don't do the whole dancing thing.
57:10
She added. It was horrible and this guy was sweating
57:13
all over me. His sweat was raining basically everywhere. I
57:16
was grossed out from it, but I knew I had
57:19
to keep him happy because that's what Jeffrey and Glane
57:22
would have expected from me. So this is the night
57:25
that Virginia and Andrew ended up back at Glene Maxwell's house,
57:31
her mu's house over in Belgrave, and this is where
57:34
the assault occurred, according to Virginia. In the notorious photo
57:42
taken after that night, Andrew appears to be wearing a
57:44
near identical blue shirt to the one worn when leaving
57:48
China White months earlier, Andrew has denied ever meeting Roberts
57:52
and has maintained his innocence. So again, how are you
57:55
going to lie to me and say you've never met
57:57
this girl when we have seen the picture? And then
58:00
to have the audacity to think anyone's gonna buy into it,
58:03
that anyone's gonna believe what you have to say is
58:07
borderline absurd. Now, obviously he thinks he can control the narrative. Still,
58:15
or used to think he can control the narrative. That's
58:17
the only reason he even did that interview with Emily Maitliss.
58:22
In a picture from a party in July two thousand
58:24
and seven, a shiny faced, wide eyed, in grinning Andrew
58:27
is seen receiving a hug an from American socialite Chris
58:31
Vaughan Aspen as she tries to lick him. I mean, really,
58:35
with the whole socialite how is that even a class
58:38
of people. I'm not trying to digress too much here, folks,
58:41
but really, socialite, how about go get a real job,
58:44
Go do something with your life. Oh my job is
58:46
to go to parties and hang out with people like Epstein.
58:49
No wonder society is teetering on the edge no wondering,
58:53
No wonder We're about to go the same way as Rome.
58:58
Other pictures taken on the same night show the Prince
59:00
with his arms around von Aspen's waist and neck as
59:04
she dances in a white mini dress. Hey, look, if
59:06
she's an adult. I don't care again what people do
59:09
in their personal life. I don't care whatever you do
59:14
with consenting adults in your bedroom or your living room,
59:17
or your garage or whatever the hell wherever the hell
59:20
you are, that's your business. And anybody who's wanting to
59:24
be involved in what people are doing in their private lives,
59:27
I find it to be very odd. But this is
59:29
a whole different ballgame, right, this dude is accused of
59:33
some Haini's shit, and the second you're accused again of
59:37
crimes against women and children, and a whole other category
59:41
of scumbag is where you belong. Billionaire's party Santrope, two
59:47
thousand and seven. Another set of snaps from the same
59:50
year show the Duke dancing with Canadian socialite Pascal Barubo
59:56
at a party throne by billionaire Tony Murray. In the
59:59
French resilt, he appears sweaty and wild eyed as he
1:00:03
poses with his daughter, Princess Beatrice, who would have been
1:00:06
around eighteen or nineteen at the time. A former San
1:00:09
Trope partygoer told The Mail Online these were really crazy
1:00:13
years for Andrew. He was clearly having a full blown
1:00:16
midlife crisis. He would have been forty seven or forty
1:00:19
eight at the time, to force from Sarah Ferguson and
1:00:22
basking in the attention he got from young women. It's
1:00:25
probably on some molly or something too. Look at the pictures.
1:00:28
Dude looks like he has gassed out of his brain.
1:00:32
I've seen many people look like that leaving the club
1:00:35
late at night here in Las Vegas. Folks, growing up
1:00:38
in Las Vegas, one thing you learned to recognize and
1:00:41
when is when somebody is lit the f up. Playing
1:00:45
golf and Buckingham Palace, former Royal Protection officer Paul Page
1:00:50
claimed he saw Prince the Prince sweating while he practices
1:00:53
golf swing in the garden at Buckingham Palace. Page, who
1:00:57
was later convicted for his partner three million three million
1:01:00
pound fraud, also said Andrew made officers collect his golf
1:01:04
pulse while they were supposed to be guarding him. So
1:01:06
this dude's out there, you know, practicing his golf swing
1:01:10
and sending the guards to go and collect his balls
1:01:12
in typical Andrew fashion. After we heard about the Teddy Bears.
1:01:16
Does this shock you? And I'm pretty sure you were
1:01:20
sweating if you're out there playing golf, probably a good
1:01:23
sweat being broken. However, Andrew's claims that he could couldn't
1:01:27
sweat have been backed up by someone who knew him
1:01:29
at the time, former US intelligence officer Alan Starkey, were
1:01:33
called a night in nineteen ninety two when the Duke
1:01:36
and Duchess of York visited Annabelle's nightclub in Mayfair, Central London,
1:01:40
just weeks before they announced their separation. Again, this is
1:01:43
what Starkey says, But my eyes tell me a different thing.
1:01:47
So you could tell me whatever you want. If I
1:01:49
have photographic evidence or video evidence that is telling me
1:01:54
something different, I'm gonna go with what I see because
1:01:58
I don't even know you. How can you even for
1:02:01
a minute think that an ex Army intelligence guy, US
1:02:04
intelligence officer is not out here playing games. Gotta be
1:02:08
cynical about people like that. It was extremely warm at
1:02:12
Anabel's that night. And Andrew was wearing a blue suit
1:02:14
of heavy wool. I don't buy it, Starky recalled last
1:02:17
week heavy wool at the club. Huh. The evening featured
1:02:20
almost constant dancing, and I watched with amazement as he
1:02:23
returned from each dance, escorting rather moist partners, yet always
1:02:28
bone dry himself. It was extraordinary. The rest of us
1:02:31
were perspiring madly, but he didn't seem to have a
1:02:34
beat of sweat on him. Earlier this month, Robert's lawyers
1:02:37
announced they were demanding the prints hand over his medical
1:02:40
records to prove that he had a medical condition preventing
1:02:44
him from sweating. His legal team have rejected the request
1:02:47
on the grounds it was harassing and seeks confidential and
1:02:50
private information and documents that are irrelevant. Meanwhile, the Duke
1:02:54
and his team are over here asking for psychiatric records
1:02:58
from Virginia. I mean, really, you want to know what
1:03:01
her and heer psychiatrist talked about. But you won't even
1:03:03
pony up evidence and some receipts about your stupid ass
1:03:07
non sweating disease. Get out of here, bro. In twenty nineteen,
1:03:12
a former aid claimed it was actually hair loss treatment
1:03:15
that the Duke was undergoing which prevented him from sweating.
1:03:18
Despite the aide's claims, doctor Sarah Jarvis, GP and clinical
1:03:22
director at Patient Info, told The Son Online there were
1:03:25
a limited number of medications that could stop sweating. She said,
1:03:30
there is a long list of drugs that can cause anhydrosis,
1:03:34
an inability to sweat. These include treatments used to manage
1:03:37
the side effects of medication for severe mental illness. Well
1:03:40
he might have that, I mean obviously some kind of
1:03:43
traumatic brain injury to be hanging out with who he
1:03:46
hung out with, acting the way he did, along with
1:03:53
the treatments for epilepsy, high blood pressure, glaucoma, osteoporosis and
1:03:57
mountain sickness. But on the whole, very few people taking
1:04:01
these drugs develop and hedrosis. There are only a couple
1:04:05
of medications licensed in the UK for managing male pattern
1:04:08
hair loss. One is a tablet and one is a
1:04:11
topical lotion. Neither of them have and hedrosis as a
1:04:15
side effect to my knowledge, and doctor Hillary Jones added,
1:04:19
I cannot think of any reason whatsoever why treatment of
1:04:22
hair loss, whether it involved medications or transplants, would interfere
1:04:26
with the normal ability to sweat. So again it comes
1:04:30
down to what you folks, believe do you believe what
1:04:32
Alan Starkey and Prince Andrew's team tells you, or do
1:04:37
you believe the pictures and what you can see for yourself. Me,
1:04:41
I'm gonna go with the visual evidence evidence. I'm gonna
1:04:45
go with the evidence that I can see, with the
1:04:47
evidence that I can look at, and with the evidence
1:04:49
that I can digest. And so far, it's not looking
1:04:56
very good for the Prince of Nothing. All Right, folks,
1:05:01
that's gonna do it for today's episode. If you'd like
1:05:05
to contact me, you can do that at Bobby Kapuchi
1:05:07
at ProtonMail dot com. That's b O b b Y
1:05:10
c A p you c c I at ProtonMail dot com.
1:05:15
You can also find me on Twitter at bo bb
1:05:18
y underscore c A p U C c I. The
1:05:22
link that we discussed can be found in the description box.
1:05:26
All Right, folks, I will be back later on with
1:05:28
an evening update and obviously some context episodes certainly coming
1:05:33
your way. Hope everybody has a great afternoon, great morning,
1:05:36
and I will be back later on tonight.