Latest / UK Column Radio / UK Column News Podcast 23rd August 2024

Transcript

UK Column News Podcast 23rd August 2024 · UK Column Radio

0:08
Speaker 1: Good afternoon. It's Friday, the twenty third of August twenty
0:10
twenty four, just after one o'clock. Welcome to UK colum News.
0:13
I'm your host, Mike Rumson joining me by video link.
0:15
Today we have Debbie Evans and Mark Anderson. We're going
0:19
to get kicked off with online safety and censorship and
0:23
the great news that Offcom has decided to begin its
0:26
recruitment process once again. And of course we all know that,
0:30
don't we that online misinformation fueled hitful riots across the country.
0:35
Their word's not mine, and so we all know as
0:39
well that the Online Safety Bill became an act in
0:41
October last year. In the run up to that royal
0:45
assent being given, Offcom at hard three hundred staff to
0:48
deal with the online safety They're now in the process
0:52
of recruiting a further one hundred staff. But as you
0:55
can see on screen there at the moment, they are
0:57
committed to protecting free speech without hits. So I don't
1:01
know what we're all complaining about anyway. This is what
1:04
they had to say. In recent years, we've grown our
1:07
expertise and technology did and cybersecurity. We've hired specialists from
1:11
firms such as meta, Google and Amazon and experts from
1:15
bodies like the NSPCC. So the companies that are going
1:19
to be responsible for centering us all under the auspices
1:25
of the Online Safety Act are providing the staff to
1:29
OFFCOM for the process. This is Debbie, very very briefly,
1:32
this is very similar, it seems to me to the MHR.
1:40
Speaker 2: I honestly, Mike, can we discuss this in extra because
1:43
I've got quite a lot to say about this, seriously?
1:47
Speaker 1: Absolutely, no, of course, you know. Anyway, the other sort
1:51
of big agenda item that Offcom is pushing at the
1:54
moment is the Media Act. It was the Media Bill,
1:57
it's now the Media Act. It has been since May.
1:59
So this got passed just before the general election. And
2:03
so this of course is what they're describing as the
2:06
biggest change to public service media framework in two decades.
2:10
So this is all about not only protecting mainstream media
2:15
and so on, but making sure that smaller providers aren't
2:18
able to compete in any kind of way. So this
2:20
is again what they said. The Secretary of State for Culture,
2:23
Media and Sport has laid the first commencement regulation before
2:27
the UK Parliament, bringing certain provisions into force on Friday,
2:31
the twenty third of August. These regulations are used to
2:34
bring specific parts of an active parliament legally into force
2:37
on a specific date. This first commencement order will allow
2:41
us to continue our implementation plans. And this is what
2:44
they're well a couple of the items that they have
2:46
on their list. They are preparing for their new duties
2:48
for video on demand services, including reviewing their audience protection measures.
2:53
So video on demand service would be the likes of
2:56
YouTube or any other sort of video service like that.
3:00
But if you remember back to twenty thirteen twenty fourteen, Offcom,
3:04
through their subsidiary the Authority for Television on Demand, was
3:08
attempting to claim that smaller video producers were video on
3:13
demand services. So we'll see how this pans out in
3:17
the coming weeks and months. They say that they'll continue
3:21
to develop the processes for designating the services which will
3:24
be in scope for the new rules. As I've just mentioned,
3:27
to ensure online PSB services are both available on popular
3:32
TV platforms and capable of being easily found and discovered
3:35
by audiences. So they want to make sure that the
3:39
likes of BBC, Eyeplayer and so on, the content that's
3:44
on there is not only easily available on the various
3:47
big video on demand platforms, but that on search engines
3:51
and so on, that content that hosted, perhaps on iPlayer itself,
3:56
is easy to find because that is the most important thing,
4:00
isn't it. But I wanted to highlight this article in
4:03
conservative homes as well as it from Miriam Kidds, former
4:07
Tory MP she was until the general election. This is sorry.
4:12
We should not defend extreme online discourse in the name
4:15
of free speech, she argues. But she does, however, make
4:18
a couple of interesting points that I just want to
4:21
highlight to see whether people want to think about them,
4:23
she said. Before the Internet, anonymous communication was seen as
4:26
carly and on her hand, poison pen letters and even
4:29
the famous anonymous pamphlets of the eighteenth century were illegal.
4:34
What we observe all too often in social media is
4:37
a pre civilizational and anarchic free for all, where liars, psychopaths,
4:41
and common and garden dickheads her words operate freely and
4:45
without penalty, and where individuals do not face the normal
4:49
consequences of speech offline. At least make it that offline,
4:54
at least make it socially and financially costly to be
4:57
insulting and predatory and anti social. She says the best
5:01
answer to online chaos is a deeply conservative one, the
5:04
rediscovery of personal responsibility. The future of online freedom of
5:08
speech depends not on an absence of regulation, but on
5:12
our collective willingness to embrace the traditional values of kindness, honesty,
5:17
and self control in our new virtual public sphere. Well,
5:21
the question is in the general context of the article
5:25
as a whole issue, arguing that that people need to
5:28
be brought out of their shells. They may want to
5:31
bring in some kind of legislation which enforces the requirement
5:36
to provide your identity online. And of course, as we
5:39
were mentioning on Wednesday's program, this is something that ofcom
5:43
is already recruiting for with respect to identity checks and
5:48
age verification and so on. But you know, where does
5:52
this take us? Because she's suggesting that people that are
5:57
out in the open are somehow in a better position,
6:02
that it's a better place to be. Well is it?
6:04
Because look at this article from the BBC conspiracy theorist
6:08
Granddad jailed over disorder. This is absolutely incredible. It's quite
6:13
incredible also that the journalist is apparently called holy constable
6:16
because they're talking about abuse against the police. But anyway,
6:19
this person'll just look at a couple of the comments
6:23
that they make in this article. A conspiracy theorist who
6:26
abused police when an anti immigration protest turned violent has
6:29
been jelled. Now you might ask, how did he abuse
6:32
the police? Was he violent himself? Well, no, he said
6:36
that police officers, MP's and the media were corrupt. He
6:39
was holding a sign up and he was shouting at
6:41
the police. So this is Peter Lynch. He's sixty one
6:44
years old and he's now been sentenced to two and
6:46
a half years two years in the eight months and
6:50
is heading off to prison. He shout it allegedly racist
6:54
and provocative remarks towards officers and called asylum seekers child killers.
6:59
This might be, you know, quite strong speech, but it
7:03
is only speech. He wasn't throwing rocks, at least there's
7:05
no evidence to suggest that he was. That's certainly not
7:08
what he's been convicted of. Here he was filmed calling
7:11
the police scum. Really, sticks and stones will break my
7:14
bones comes to mind here, are we really not going
7:17
to put people in prison for two years eight months
7:20
for yelling the word scum at the police. This is
7:22
getting beyond a joke. He was described as being a
7:28
full participant in the disorder. You were unquestionably endeavoring to
7:31
rev up the situation the best you could, said the judge,
7:35
Judge Richardson, and the placard stated that police chiefs, reporter
7:39
of civil servants, judges and the environment the agencies were
7:41
all corrupt. I mean, this is quite incredible. And then
7:45
I just want to highlight somebody else who's been arrested here,
7:48
and that is Sam Nas who has featured on the
7:51
UK column a couple of times in interviews with Brian.
7:55
So she was trafficked into this country and then had
7:58
her children taken by the state arrested yesterday apparently build
8:04
We'll find out more in due course about what's actually
8:07
happened here, but she was simply quietly protesting over the
8:11
removal of her children outside the Cabinet Office. And finally,
8:16
I'll just coming back to the so called risk riots
8:22
and the imprisonment of magistrates are apparent apparently being told
8:26
to stop jailling offenders to ease the prison crisis. This
8:30
isn't actually quite true. The headlines are misleading. At least
8:33
what they've been asked is to delay the sentencing. If
8:36
somebody is safe to be bailed, then to delay the
8:40
sentencing to later in September until they've had a chance
8:43
to release a whole bunch of prisoners from the UK
8:45
prisons to make room for the new people going in.
8:49
This is a very dangerous situation and quite incredible. But Debbie,
8:54
let's come on to you then and bring us up
8:57
to date on the on the NHS.
9:00
Speaker 2: Well interestingly, actually i'm going to be talking about the NHS.
9:04
Good afternoon, everyone, and you've just been talking about the
9:06
criminal justice system, and we're going to be that's going
9:09
to be a nice little tandem in a minute. But
9:11
I want to talk really about that the UK is
9:14
a very sick nation and I hope that this segment
9:17
will not only be a reminder for our audience but
9:21
also for anybody new that's tuning into UK column that
9:24
isn't quite aware of the chaos and disruption that's going
9:28
on within the NHS. Where are we now in the NHS,
9:32
I think, is what I'm going to be showing you.
9:34
Because there is no opt out from the NHS, there's
9:37
no sludge to get you out of the NHS once
9:40
you're in it. And I want to remind people of
9:44
what Kiir Starmer said only thirty years ago, a young
9:48
Kier Starmer nineteen ninety four. Have a listen.
9:52
Speaker 3: I do think it's time that the court system became
9:55
much more of a place where the ordinary person feels
9:57
they can go. And I think that means strippingdges and
10:00
lawyers of their wigs and gowns, are making it much
10:02
more like a GP's health center.
10:08
Speaker 2: So we're going to be stripping judges and lawyers of
10:10
their gowns, and we're going to be making courts more
10:13
like GP centers. And we have to ask the question,
10:16
what are GP centers like now? And how much decision
10:20
making does your GP have on life changing and life
10:23
altering and sometimes life ending decisions. So let's look at labor.
10:27
They're fit for the future, which what does that actually mean?
10:30
They're building an NHS fit for the future. To me,
10:33
that means they're launching a wrecking ball at it. But
10:35
what did where Streeting say? Even where Streeting has admitted
10:39
that the NHS is indeed broken. But let's look at
10:43
the reality of what's happening in the NHS, because at
10:46
the moment skin cancer patients, they're facing delays of over
10:49
a year, thirty eight three hundred and ninety two new
10:53
patients between twenty three and twenty four. I wonder why,
10:57
unless we eliminate the injections, we're never going to know
11:00
full cause? Are we? Is my question? Also, nationally, sick
11:04
leave has gone up by fifty percent in the UK
11:08
since twenty nineteen. Again, I would put the question mark why.
11:13
I think many of us know why. Going on to
11:16
personal independence payments, which are an indicative of a very
11:20
sick nation putting pressure on already overwhelmed NHS. We're seeing
11:25
claims skyrocket March twenty twenty two million, four hundred and
11:30
fifty five, one hundred and seventy seven people claims are claims,
11:35
and in April twenty twenty three claims of three million,
11:38
five hundred and forty four thousand and forty two. And
11:41
many of you will remember the A. Dowd interview that
11:43
we did where he said, actually, if disability payments go
11:47
up anymore, it's going to potentially bankrupt the country. And
11:52
mental health issues again are figuring high on that. So
11:55
let's look at the new rethink mental illness. They say
11:59
a third of people mental health worsened while they were
12:02
waiting for treatment, and surgical patients are saying that too,
12:05
that their conditions are worsening whilst they're waiting for treatment.
12:09
A third of people are going private private mental health,
12:12
and the Children's Society are reporting a shocking rise fifty
12:16
percent in the last three years. Again we have to
12:19
say why, and lock ups perhaps are largely to blame.
12:23
But with five children in a class of thirty with
12:27
likely mental health issues, we've got to ask why cancer.
12:31
One in two will develop some form of cancer in
12:33
their life. Well, that message popped up around twenty fourteen
12:37
out of absolutely nowhere. Then we look at cancer screening
12:41
that's going on in the NHS at the moment. So
12:43
again we're screening healthy people. Just remember this, we've got
12:47
a lot of sick people. Now we're screening healthy people
12:51
cervical cancer, breast and bowl. But what other tests are
12:55
we offering at the moment and inviting people to come forward?
12:58
So I just did a little kind of notice board
13:01
of a few of them. So we've got the shingles
13:03
vaccine for healthy asymptomatic people. We've got to have a
13:07
prostate PSA test, or a dementia check, or maybe you
13:10
want to be genomic sequenced or genomic tested a flu JAB,
13:14
vaccinations for pregnancy, COVID, jabs, bowel cancer, you name it,
13:18
you're being invited for it. And I want to talk
13:21
very quickly about something that who has said, which is
13:25
chemoprophylaxis and vaccination. So basically they're going to be looking
13:29
to medicate people before they get sick. So this is
13:32
about prevention. But we'll come on and talk about a
13:35
bit a bit more about that in a minute. But
13:39
is there any wonder why people healthy people now are
13:42
feeling ill because they're being made to feel ill, they're
13:46
being looked looked at, they're being tested. And I just
13:50
want to just give you a little description really of
13:52
what's called the worried well, So these are patients who
13:55
are perceived as using the health services inappropriately or disproportionately
14:00
when other more deserving patients should be given attention. Or
14:03
if we jump to Collins, who also describe it as
14:07
patients that need to take medication when they don't need to,
14:11
which is exactly what the government and the Big Farmer
14:14
are asking you to do, because that's the intention. Preventative medicine, chemoprophylaxis,
14:20
taking medicine before you're sick, And doctors may refer to
14:24
patients as the heart sink patients. Their hearts sink when
14:28
a patient walks through the door, because we're making healthy
14:31
people think that they're sick. So illness anxiety disorder. I mean,
14:36
this is just the tip of the iceberg. So walking hypochondriacs. Basically,
14:41
when someone without medical symptoms is preoccupied with worrying about
14:45
developing an illness, Well, isn't that exactly what they're trying
14:49
to do. Make people check their apps, how many steps
14:51
they've walked, how many calories they've eaten, their blood pressure,
14:54
they have to check a black screen the whole time.
14:56
And we mustn't forget in this country because in Canada
14:59
there's been the made system, the medically assisted dying program,
15:04
and in this country we have the same. And I
15:06
just want to highlight you to a BMA survey on
15:09
physician assisted dying and when you go to look at
15:13
it and what doctors actually think, worryingly, fifty percent on
15:18
the next slide, it'll show you that fifty percent believe
15:22
that the law should change in favor of assisted dying.
15:25
Whereas only thirty nine percent are against it and eleven
15:28
percent are undecided. And when you go and look at
15:31
what the public think, and I went to an article
15:34
in the Telegraph and it actually this was I found
15:37
this quite striking. That the public fear that GPS would
15:41
pressurize them to take their own lives and that doctors
15:45
would encourage assisted dying to ease pressure on the NHS.
15:50
And forty three percent of the public thought that doctors
15:55
would be incentivized to end people's lives, whereas thirty seven
15:59
percent didn't. But the article went on to say that
16:03
even though people are feared that assisted death could be normalized,
16:07
that despite that, sixty percent of two thousand surveyed actually
16:12
supported it, which is quite a worrying statistic. And I
16:15
certainly wasn't one of the two thousand were surveyed. Were
16:18
you more collapses of the infrastructure in the NHS at
16:22
the moment And this is the reality of the NHS
16:24
at the moment. So we've got pharmacies closing. We've been
16:28
talking about this for quite a while, lots of them
16:31
closing in the eye. In the next slide, it says
16:34
that so far in twenty twenty four two hundred have
16:37
closed in England only, which will leave only ten thousand
16:41
pharmacies in England open by October, which is one of
16:44
the lowest levels. And I don't know if anybody else
16:46
is noticing, but I'm noticing these zero tolerance notices everywhere where.
16:51
You have to be kind to the staff, you have
16:53
to be kind to your doctor, you have to be
16:55
kind to companies. But it doesn't seem as though anybody's
16:58
listening to the public or being kind to us. And
17:00
we're being used as a scapegoat to blame. Put the
17:03
blame on but GP surgery, so they're hanging on a
17:07
cliff edge as well. And I went to look at
17:10
a quarter of the GP practices could close because of
17:13
workload pressures and are they fit for the future. Well,
17:16
when we go to look at the GP's action, because
17:19
we know that GPS are going to be taking industrial action,
17:22
I was very interested and I've highlighted just a couple
17:25
of bits because they're taking industrial action for many reasons.
17:29
But some of the reasons you may not know are
17:31
that they're going to refuse to share data, and they're
17:35
going to refer people directly to a specialist and that
17:38
seems like a jolly good idea to me. And they're
17:40
also going to switch off for NHS software, so this
17:43
is all part of their industrial action. So perhaps we
17:45
should be reconsidering what the GPS are doing. But then,
17:49
of course what else are we looking at in the NHS. Well,
17:51
any excuse to close the hospitals. So we've got grumbling hospitals,
17:55
and we've also got hospitals full of sewage, of course,
17:58
but this is the reinforced all clad aerated concrete drama
18:02
that's been going on. We've got seven hospitals at risk
18:05
at the moment, and despite Boris Johnson promising to build
18:09
new hospitals, it seems that our new Chancellor, Rachel Reeves
18:12
has got very different ideas and she's casting doubt on
18:15
a hospital building program going ahead at all. But don't worry, because,
18:21
where as we've reported loads of times before, community diagnostic
18:25
centers that's going to be the thing of the future.
18:28
You're not going to be going to hospital, you're not
18:30
going to be seeing a doctrine. I'll be talking about
18:32
that later in the news, and it's all about how
18:35
the NHS minimize risk, and we'll go on to talk
18:39
about that later on in the news. But where are
18:42
we looking at well, if you're not going to hospital,
18:43
where are you going well, your own bed of course,
18:46
virtual wards where extra NHS beds are actually yours. And
18:51
we're going to be looking at frailty virtual wards. Now,
18:53
the frailty, the frailty, the clinical frailty scores. They come
18:57
from all sorts of different sources. But we'll talk about
19:01
that too. And how are we going to do it.
19:02
We're going to do it with medical devices. We're going
19:04
to prevent, monitor and treat people. We're going to use
19:08
implants and apps and the NHS app. Is that going
19:11
to be good enough? No, it's not. And I'll tell
19:13
you more about that later.
19:16
Speaker 1: Okay, Debbie, thank you very much for that. And Mark related,
19:21
I suppose what is the littst on the various pandemic
19:25
claims and treaties and so on.
19:28
Speaker 4: The latest Mike is that there's two scenarios. Now, note
19:32
the timing. At least in the United States, the school
19:35
year is about to start in places like Texas, it's
19:39
on the brink of starting. In a northern States. It
19:42
starts right after Labor Day, the first Monday in September
19:46
and This first light is a article by Alex Newman,
19:50
an acquaintance of mine at two different red Pill expos
19:53
one in twenty sixteen one in twenty twenty two, from
19:56
exposing the Darkness column Democrats and lobilists urgently prepared to
20:01
reimpose COVID style policies on schools. He's saying government schools
20:05
across the US must urgently prepare to reimpost COVID style
20:09
policies on students and staff in response to an expected
20:13
upcoming pandemic, warned a former high ranking public health bureaucrat
20:17
in the Obama administration. Among the key measures a push
20:22
for mechs mass vaccination excuse me. Writing in an article
20:26
published last month and the left wing outlet stat News,
20:30
the far left former pandemic official offers wide ranging advice
20:34
to school district officials on how to prepare for COVID
20:37
two point zero in this case likely the bird flu
20:41
or H five N one avian influenza. But there's a
20:45
different twist to it. There's two scenarios. Actually, we'll move on.
20:49
And this is a reference by Alex Newman to doctor
20:52
Mario Ramirez, former acting Director of the Office of Pandemic
20:56
and emergency threats within the DHA, and he's the one
21:01
warning about H five N one and that it could
21:05
jump to humans in the near future. As such, schools
21:08
must be prepared to deal with it. The warnings come
21:11
as a front group for Bill Gates, Big Pharma, and
21:14
the World Economic Forum known as the Coalition for Epidemic
21:18
Preparedness Innovations just issued similar warnings, which is very interesting.
21:24
We can move on from there. This is the person
21:29
I won't get into it a lot. This is doctor
21:31
Mario Ramirez that Alex Newman is referring to. People can
21:34
check out a little bit about his CV on this
21:37
slide if they want to freeze that later, and we'll continue.
21:43
These are some miscellaneous headlines where the WHO, however, is
21:47
not touting the bird flu. They're saying the big thing
21:51
to look off for is monkey pocks or mpox for short.
21:54
And this is just a miscellaneous collage of headlines quite recently,
21:59
as you can see. Fourteen August twenty twenty four, WHO
22:02
Director General declares mpox outbreak a public health emergency of
22:06
the International Concern. That's the big threshold they need to
22:10
declare a pandemic, so they've already made that threshold, although
22:13
it may be in its earlier stages. And then nineteen
22:16
of August, there's another headline, first meeting of the IHR
22:21
the International Health Regulations Emergency Committee regarding the upsurge of
22:26
mpox twenty twenty four, and a couple other recent headlines
22:29
that get into this, and the WHO, as we continue,
22:33
also goes on to say that the influenza from the
22:38
bird flu H five N one is at a low EBB,
22:42
so they're really saying monkey pox is the big thing,
22:45
whereas Alex Newman is hearing it's more like the av
22:48
and bird flu. So which is it? And this is
22:51
just a basic statement from the WHO, and people can
22:54
check out the details. And here's a little bit more
22:57
from Alex Newman. Apparently Americans are currently enjoying the bliss
23:01
of the inter pandemic period. Enjoy it while you can, folks.
23:06
COVID two point zero will come upon us like a storm,
23:08
he claims. We just don't know when, where or how
23:12
it will arrive. Of course, he's a constitutional writer for
23:15
the New American magazine and an oftentimes red pill expost speaker.
23:20
I believe we have another one. But if we're to
23:24
believe doctor Ramirez, it's unavoidable and only a massive vaccine campaign,
23:29
including mRNA shots for children, can save the children. And
23:33
in this same column, I'll mention that Alex Numan goes
23:36
on to say that he believes more and more people
23:38
need to homeschool right away, even now with the public
23:42
school schedule about to begin. However, we hear about MPOs
23:48
being the main culprit according to the WHO. Alex Newman
23:53
is hearing us more about the bird flu. And yet
23:57
there's an International bird Flu Summit coming up up. And
24:01
here's the screenshot from that. It shows some fairly self
24:04
evident things there, bird cattle, pats people, There's various things.
24:11
And this is from a brochure, as I indicate here
24:14
an event brochure, and the bird flew Summit will take
24:17
place in early October. This is some of the things
24:20
I pulled from the brochure in this next slide, and
24:24
the very two the very things that I pulled out
24:28
were really the most significant. The top one topics include
24:32
mass fatality management planning. Well, I highlighted that, notice what
24:36
it says here, develop and maintain plans, proceidures, programs and systems.
24:41
But the bottom one. It says conduct morgue operations a
24:45
little bit more of a kind of creepy thing there.
24:49
And another thing I pulled from it that's very interesting
24:52
is continuity of government operations. And we've seen this, especially
24:57
especially in the US, when they outline scary scenarios, they
25:01
talk about continuity of government. How will government continue if
25:05
there's a massive public nuclear attack or health emergency or
25:10
things like that, how will government continue to operate? So
25:14
a little ominous there, even though who is denying the
25:20
significance of the Avian bird flu? And this last slide
25:24
on this topic, it's just another twist on it. A
25:28
World Health Organization official on Tuesday emphasized that empocs, whether
25:32
the old or new strain, is not comparable to COVID
25:36
nineteen because its spread is more controllable. Authorities know the
25:40
measure is necessary to contain its transmission, and yet this
25:43
source here Han's Clue. A WHO regional director for Europe
25:48
added the following, So we will choose to put the
25:51
systems in place to control and eliminate empocs globally question
25:56
or will we enter into another cycle of panic and neglect?
26:00
How we respond now and in the years to come
26:02
will prove a critical test for Europe and the world.
26:06
So it's a little bit ambiguous, but it's sort of
26:09
a two tier two scenario thing, and the timing is
26:13
very important, and so this is a renewed reason under
26:16
the new Pandemic Treaty and the new IHR to be
26:19
very vigilant at this time. So back to you, Mike.
26:22
Speaker 1: Thanks Mark. I mean, I don't know whether it's ambiguous.
26:25
I think certain elements are desperate to bring this type
26:28
of regime back into place, but generally there isn't support
26:33
for it, so you know, anyway, we can talk a
26:35
bit more about that an extra now, if you like
26:38
what the UK Column does, you would like to support
26:40
us the place to go with support dot UK column
26:43
dot org. Your support is very much needed and would
26:47
be greatly appreciated. You could, however, at very least share
26:52
our material on the various platforms UK column dot org
26:55
and UK call them extract could at UK is a
26:57
place to go for that, and of course censorship continues
27:02
as we've mentioned. If you would like to pick something
27:05
up at the UK Column Shop, there's quite a few
27:07
items there for you to grab hold of, especially your
27:11
life in their hands. We want to see this distributed
27:14
as widely as possible, so please do pick up a
27:17
couple of copies if you can and send them around
27:20
your friends and so on. A reminder of the event
27:23
on the nineteenth of October twenty twenty four. The venue
27:28
will be in Bristol. Anybody that's bought tickets we will
27:31
be contacting with venue details very very shortly, but tickets
27:36
available on the UK Column shop as well. The interview
27:39
that Charles did with Kevin Lister is up on the
27:42
UK Column website now, so that went out yesterday and
27:47
this was a teacher having basically his career desimitted as
27:53
a result of him challenging transgender ideologies. On Sunday, the
27:58
ate of September, at six we will be hosting a
28:02
symposium run by International Center for Nine to eleven Justice
28:06
on aviation Impossibilities, deconstructing the official story of the nine
28:09
to eleven hijackings and air defense failures. That will be
28:13
on the UK Column website, on the community website and
28:16
various other places as well. A final reminder that the
28:21
Hope Sussex Freedom Music Festival starts today and over the weekend,
28:25
so hopefully as many people as possible are going to that.
28:28
I'm sure if you can go at the last minute,
28:31
please do. And also a reminder that Brian and I
28:35
will be speaking at the Heritage Party conference on Saturday
28:37
the twentieth of September twenty twenty four. Tickets are available
28:43
at the Heritage Party website and you'll get more details
28:46
there as well. And finally another reminder of the Died
28:51
Suddenly exhibition taking place in November. Details from Jake Fern
28:56
his email address on screen at the moment. Now let's
29:00
come on to the issue of war, and of course
29:04
Ben Wallas used to be our Secretary of State for
29:06
War and he's been making an appearance in the media
29:09
quite a bit over the last few days. So this
29:12
is from the eleventh of July. Europe can do more
29:15
to help Ukraine, says former Defense secretary. And then we've
29:18
got one here from the twentieth of August. Former Conservative
29:21
Defense secretary calls for Ukraine to be allowed to unleash
29:24
Western supplied rockets inside Russia. And then we have this.
29:29
Britain must give Ukraine everything it needs to finish the
29:31
job against Russia, says ex defense chief. That was from yesterday,
29:37
so let's have a look at He was on the
29:39
BBC Radio four Today PM program Sorry last night, and
29:43
he was very much complaining that Germany isn't pulling its
29:47
fair share here. He said, Britain, Italy and France have
29:50
supplied significant supplies of storm shadows. That is not an
29:54
endless supply, so there's an acknowledgment there that they are
29:58
using more than perhaps weekend supply. Germany has Taurus, which
30:02
is exactly the same time of missile Schultz as Chancellor.
30:05
Schultz has continued refused to release, continually refused to release them.
30:10
The best boost you give Ukraine for fighting within Ukraine
30:14
is if Germany joins France, in Italy and Britain to
30:18
release those stocks and gives Ukraine a proper stock of
30:22
those missile to deal with Russians in Ukraine. So Ben
30:26
Wallace was absolutely banging the war drums the entire time
30:30
he was Secretary of State for War and continues to
30:33
do so now that he has retired from the role.
30:36
And certainly the mainstream press absolutely came to give him
30:40
the coverage that he needs. But what other kinds of
30:43
coverage is the mainstream press giving. Well, here's The Times
30:46
in their headline here is Ukraine is invading with invading
30:49
with British tanks. What does it mean for us? And
30:53
this is really an article which is promoting the idea
30:55
that we should be playing chicken over nuclear the potential
30:58
of use of nuclear weapon. So this is what they
31:01
have to say. British officials and experts think European allies
31:05
are too concerned about provoking Russian escalation. Despite increases in
31:10
the military kit supply to Ukraine, security officials say there'll
31:13
been no sign of Russia even threatening to use tactical
31:15
nuclear weapons the nightmare scenario which would make the Third
31:18
World war threats credible. This is an incredible point of
31:23
view that's being presented here. Keep pushing because Russia is
31:27
not going to do it, and they're absolutely taking this risk.
31:32
And they cite an unnamed defense source, as these articles
31:37
like to do, saying that the Russians always split fire
31:40
and brimstone. I can promise you they haven't moved a
31:43
muscle in the direction of nuclear war since the war began.
31:46
We look at this all the time because tactical nuclear
31:49
use involves lots of stages, lots of people are involved,
31:52
lots of movement of missiles. This is quite incredible. Keep
31:56
pushing the pressure, keep using Western weapons. Maybe we're arguing
32:00
now that Western personnel should get involved, because we don't
32:04
need to worry the Russians are not going to use
32:05
their tactical nuclear weapons. And they quote Channel Betrays from
32:10
the Formacyia Director of Speaking in twenty twenty two saying
32:15
that we would respond to to a Russian use of
32:17
nuclear weapons by leading a NATO collective effort that would
32:21
take out every Russian conventional force that we can see
32:24
and identify on the battlefield in Ukraine and also in Crimea,
32:28
and every ship in the Black Sea. And this is
32:30
pretty ironic because this is basically what we're asking Ukraine
32:34
to do already, and they're failing miserably to do it.
32:38
We do not have this capability, and for the Times
32:41
to be presenting this quote as being something possible, it's
32:46
just laughable. In the meantime, the Russians themselves are pushing
32:50
back a little bit on British Britain and British think
32:55
tanks in particular. So this was a statement from a
32:57
couple of days ago from the Russian Ministry of Foreign
33:01
Affairs about this Foreign Ministry statement on imposing personal sanctions
33:06
against representatives of UK think tanks. This is what they
33:09
had to say. The UK government persists in its aggressive
33:13
anti Russia policy. As part of this vision, Russia, Sorry, London,
33:17
pursues the goal of achieving what it calls a strategic
33:19
defeat on the battlefield against our country, even if those
33:23
efforts were always doomed to failure. In doing so, it's
33:26
been making active use of a mechanism which consists of
33:29
imposing illegitimate restrictions through sanctions, as well as waging an
33:33
informational and media campaign rooted in lies in hypocrisy. All
33:38
this attests to the commitment by the UK's political establishment,
33:41
imbued as it is with anti Russia sentiment, to carry
33:45
on with its tough and system wide confrontation with Russia.
33:49
I can't disagree with anything that's said there, because we've
33:52
been talking about Britain's position on Russia for many, many years,
33:56
particularly around twenty seventeen twenty eighteen when we were talking
34:01
about the Integrity Initiative and the Institute for Staecraft. So
34:04
it's perhaps unsurprising that the Institute for Stagecraft appears on
34:09
the list of think tanks that Russia is sanctioning the Russia,
34:14
they're sanctioning personnel that belonged to these think tanks. So
34:18
we got the Forward Strategy Limited. We've got the Institute
34:21
for Steecraft. Now that's quite surprising because quite honestly, I
34:24
thought it was gone. Their website certainly gone, but apparently
34:26
it's not quite fully away yet. Media Diversity Institute, a
34:30
few others there. Chathamhouse of course mentioned Privacy International, Peace
34:34
Child International, Agacan Foundation and so on. But if we
34:38
consider the Institute for Staircraft and we think about this
34:41
because of course it was funded by the Foreign Comwealth
34:44
Office at the time, and it was running this Integrity
34:50
Initiative mechanism where basically journalists and others were and think
34:56
tanks were pushing out anti Russia propaganda in twenty seventeen
35:00
and twenty eighteen until it was highlighted how much of
35:04
a scam it was. Now we wrote this article. I
35:06
wrote this article Integrity Initiative, A look into the Deep
35:09
State in December twenty eighteen, and I just wanted to
35:12
highlight some of the text on this books. One of
35:14
the people that was sanctioned was Daniel Laffe Aidne, and
35:18
he's mentioned in this article because he and Chris Donnelly
35:21
set up the Institute for Staircraft, both from sand They
35:25
met at Sandhurst, but they I was highlighting here that
35:29
they had intended the hurt Slier Conference, sorry, the so
35:35
called Builderberg of the Levant. This is the is really
35:38
establishment and military industrial complex meeting for the discussion of
35:42
Israeli national policy. So on the attendee's list was Chris
35:46
Donnelly and also Daniel laff Any. And what I'm saying
35:49
here is that while Donnelly referred himself at that time
35:52
as being a senior fellow at the Defense Academy, Lafe Aidne,
35:56
even though he was also a senior fellow at the
35:58
Defense Academy, decided to identify himself as representing BYCOM, which
36:03
is the British Israel Communications Research Center, And that's a
36:06
pro is really advocacy organization with very close links to
36:11
the Conservative Party in the UK via Poju Subludovitz, which
36:16
is bycom's founder and former chairman who personally funded David
36:20
Cameron's Tory leadership campaign, as well as former BYCOM board
36:25
member Trevor pars who also made donations to David Cameron
36:28
and Tory constituency offices in the run up to the
36:31
twenty ten election, and we're talking about election interference. As
36:36
I say there, we note the lack of Russian election
36:39
interference at that time. And then moving on then to Africa,
36:44
because the issue of Africa continues to rumble on because
36:49
we are very interested in this Hell in particular, which
36:51
is somewhere that Russia and China have increasing influence. And
36:55
I just want to go back to a couple of
36:56
years ago when Jan Stoltenberg was saying this. He was
37:01
talking about the expansion of NATO into the Pacific area,
37:05
and he's saying, this is not about moving NATO into
37:07
the China Sea, but it is about taking into account
37:10
that China is coming closer to us in the Arctic,
37:14
in Africa investing heavily infrastructure. How dare they invest heavily
37:19
in infrastructure? So that was what he was saying at
37:21
the time. And I just want to make the point
37:23
that the EU, both the EU and the UK Foreign
37:26
Office are very interested in the Sahel region. So this
37:29
is the European Union external action. This is basically there
37:33
Foreign Office talking about this a hell. This is the
37:36
uk Sahal Region Development Partnership Summary and of course the
37:40
quantity of Conflict Stability and Security Fund money money that
37:44
goes into this area making sure that the conflict there
37:47
continues well. Certain countries in Sahel have got together and
37:51
published an open letter. This is become a Fasso, Mali
37:55
and Niger. They're asking the United Nations Security Council to
37:59
address the fact that Ukraine is actively supporting insurgencies in
38:03
the Sahel region. And of course Ukraine is a proxy
38:07
of Britain, the EU, the United States and so on,
38:11
and they're saying that they oppose and strongly condemn the
38:15
open and acknowledged support of the government of the Republic
38:18
of Ukraine for international terrorism which cannot be justified, stressing
38:23
that the acts officially claimed by Ukraine an aggressor state,
38:26
constitute a direct threat to international peace and security, particularly
38:30
in the Sahel region and in Africa. So this is
38:33
quite incredible. Even at least one mainstream media outlet has
38:38
recognized this, and that is Al Jazeera saying Ukraine is
38:42
losing the plot in Africa. Of course, Ukraine is getting
38:45
involved in funding and dealing with insurgencies in the Sahel
38:49
because Russia is active there and they perceive this as
38:54
being affront in the war. This is an expansion of
38:56
the Ukrainian Russian conflict into Africa, as we've been suggesting,
39:01
was going to happen for quite some time. So keep
39:04
an eye on this. It's going to get even more interesting.
39:07
I think in the coming days, weeks and months. Let's
39:10
come back to you, Debbie, and what's happening from the
39:14
NHS in the future.
39:15
Speaker 2: Then, well, yes, thank you. I hope the first segment
39:20
gave you an idea of what the NHS. Well, it's
39:22
incomplete and not a chaos at the moment, So what
39:24
are we going to do to make it better? And
39:26
are we patients or are we risks? So Tony Blair
39:30
has got great visions for artificial intelligence. So the NHS
39:33
is going to be controlled by artificial intelligence. Let's hear
39:36
what he has to say about how governments should deal
39:39
with AI.
39:42
Speaker 5: I am constantly saying to my own party led party,
39:44
which will probably win this election, you've got to focus
39:47
on this technology revolution. It's not an afterthought. It's the
39:50
single biggest thing that's happening in the world today that
39:53
is going to change everything. Leave us ode all the
39:55
geopolitics and the conflicts and war and America, China, all
39:59
the rest it. This revolution is going to change everything
40:03
about our society, our economy, the way we live, the
40:06
way we interact with each other. And if you don't
40:08
get across it, then when there is a crisis, you're
40:11
going to find you've got no idea how to deal
40:13
with it. I think we're living through a period of
40:15
massive change, right. This is the biggest technological changes Industrial Revolution, forture.
40:20
How do you use it to transform healthcare, education, the
40:23
way government functions. I mean, this is a huge agenda
40:25
for a government and a really exciting one. You know,
40:28
people get a bit depressed about being in politics because
40:30
you get all this criticism people, certainly in the Westfield
40:33
society is not changing fast enough and well enough. And
40:36
I say, no, it's a really exciting time to be
40:37
in politics because you've got this massive revolution that you've
40:40
got to come to terms with.
40:44
Speaker 2: And this massive revolution is taking place in the NHS.
40:48
So Digital Health published that the Blair Institute was calling
40:51
for a crash program for every citizen to have a
40:55
digital health record. Now we have to combine this with
40:58
the Internet of Things, the Internet of bodies, internets of
41:00
medical things, and we can see where that this is heading.
41:03
But further on in the article it does say that
41:06
the aim is for all British citizens to have a
41:09
digital health record within five years, and this is going
41:12
to be moving into prevention and to preparing the NHS
41:15
for an AI future. They also say that the government
41:19
should commit to this within one term of parliament, so
41:21
this is going to be when it actually does come
41:23
up for debate, it's going to be pushed through and
41:26
rushed through pretty quickly. Politico report that Blair dreams of
41:31
AI chatbots and fewer GPS, and he's really not joking
41:35
because this week the Blair Institute published a new paper
41:39
called Preparing the NHS for the AI Era, a Digital
41:44
Health Record for every citizen. And note that the UK
41:48
has a new government, which of course has a strong mandate.
41:51
Of course it's his government and he wants to reform
41:54
the NHS. I'd call it throwing wrecking ball at it personally,
41:58
But looking at the shifts we're looking to go from
42:01
treatment to prevention, hospitals to primary and community care, and
42:06
analogue into digital innovation. So what does this actually mean
42:10
for each and every one of us. Well, they say
42:12
that the digital health record is going to become the
42:15
single source of truth. I'm not quite sure what they
42:18
mean by that. You're going to get one one one
42:21
access through your digital health record, I'll call it DHR
42:24
for short Patients with long term conditions will be reliant
42:27
on apps and digital medicine and digital health. And again
42:31
they talk about prevention. But even more worryingly, artificial intelligence
42:36
will drive clinical decision making for patients and clinicians in
42:40
the UK using algorithms. Now, I don't know if you
42:43
if your trust an algorithm or AI to make clinical
42:46
decision on you, but I'm not sure that I would.
42:49
And let's remember where Streeting who appointed Lord Darzi to
42:54
do an investigation into the state of the NHS and
42:58
to look at digital health records. Just want you to
43:00
look at the diagram there, because you've see provider which
43:04
is the NHS, you see patient which is you. But
43:07
then you have the third one insurer. So let's go
43:10
to look and insurer portals because this is what the
43:13
paper is showing and it's going to give insurance companies
43:16
the ability to understand the risk of each and every
43:19
one of us, which is why I'm saying we're no
43:22
longer patients, we're risks. So they say that the NHS
43:26
should be thought of really as an insurer, but because
43:29
it hasn't got the data to perform or understand a
43:32
risk profile of its population, We're going to give this
43:36
service to insurance companies to enable personalized treatment for each
43:41
patient based on individual characteristics of risks and ill health.
43:46
So if you're high risk or if you have got
43:48
severe health, then I can imagine your risk will be
43:52
very high if we look at the patient portal. This
43:55
is the right to download records. Now they'll be using
43:57
a health wallet and you'll get chatboxes and you'll get apps.
44:02
And they mentioned Apollo there and we did mention Apollo.
44:06
We have talked about Apollo on a number of programs
44:08
before and I just want to highlight if you want
44:11
to see where India are involved and how India are
44:14
collaborating with the NHS. Twelfth of January twenty twenty four
44:18
and second of February twenty twenty four we were talking
44:21
much more about it. And if we turn our attention
44:24
to Israel as well, because we've done a lot of
44:26
work with the Israel UK Health roadmap. We can see
44:29
that we are now collaborating with Israel to study how
44:33
we can offer our citizens a basket of goods like
44:38
Israel does. So we're looking at competitions and we're looking
44:41
at two tier possibly three tier NHS or three tier
44:45
health system should I say? And of course Blair begin
44:49
believes that the Secretary of State should be in charge
44:52
of all of this, of course, and he sets it
44:54
out here saying that the Health Secretary should be the
44:57
joint data controller go with that word again, controller and
45:02
they should have links with GPS, which essentially we've all
45:05
got GP records, so that's a direct link. They also
45:09
say that there should be public engagement and we should
45:12
deliberate about it to maintain and build public trust. I
45:15
would suggest that actually, if something of this high magnitude,
45:19
we should perhaps have a referendum. But how do they
45:21
think they're going to do this? Build THEAHS into the
45:24
AI of the future. So they're going to look at
45:27
four options. The first two here build from scratch, that's
45:30
self explanatory. Or they're going to build from an existing
45:33
secondary care infrastructure such as the Federated Data Platform, the
45:38
NHS Federated Data Platform we've spoken a lot about that too,
45:41
it's controversial. Or they're going to build out an existing
45:45
primary care infrastructure because we've all got GP records of
45:49
some form, because we all have right even if we've
45:52
bopted it out and we've deregistered with our GP. And
45:56
the third and fourth to build out from an existing
45:59
primary care in structure because of course again you've got
46:02
GP records, so that's easy. Or scale an existing digital
46:06
health record on something they've already got. But what practical
46:10
steps actually should the government take. Well, they should say
46:14
that they want to establish this digital health record for
46:17
all citizens, which makes the NHS into a two possibly
46:21
stroke three tier system or a three tier health system
46:25
by using private companies and third sector organizations which could
46:28
be charities. They're going to be using wearables and essentially
46:33
the NHS is going to exist on a cloud. That's
46:36
where it's going to be. So going back to shift
46:39
one and shift two, this is what Blair is in
46:41
envisaging Shift one. We're going from treatment to prevention. So
46:44
we're all going to have a digital health assistant, all
46:46
going to use AI and they're going to use large
46:49
language models like chat GTP five, which is due to
46:52
come out and Claude four which is due to come
46:54
out at the end of the year. And then again
46:56
your hospital bed is going to now become your bed
46:59
at home. And very briefly, the conclusions, well, it's basically
47:03
it's AI or you lose the NHS. And that's very
47:07
clear what they've said there. We're going from reactive sickness
47:10
to proactive health. We're going digital health record, they're saying
47:14
is the obvious solution. And just note the words they're lockstere, privacy, security, patient, choice,
47:20
urgent and priority. And who put this document together, Well
47:24
it was John Hopkins. I'll just mentioned a few of
47:27
the names that you're bound to know, the NHS, Confederation, Boots, Imperial,
47:31
NHS England, Amazon, Royal Mail, Tesco, AXA Insurance, Cambridge University,
47:37
Oxford and you know, maybe an extra I can introduce
47:42
you to the AI doctor Eureka or I don't know
47:46
if you want to do it now, Mike. But it's
47:48
not just health that Tony Blair has got his fingers
47:51
in every pot because he's looking to do it with
47:54
DWP as well. Let's make the whole of DWP artificial intelligence.
48:00
So that's the way of the future.
48:02
Speaker 1: Yes, so we'll just put that on screen so everybody
48:05
sees that. From the big issue. Tony Blair thinks DWP
48:08
should be automated by AI. That's quite incredible the direction
48:13
of travel at the moment. We will look at that
48:15
little video clip in extra. Now let's just move on then,
48:19
just very briefly to mention again the energy price rise,
48:24
which we mentioned on Wednesday, because at that point it
48:27
was only a forecast. Cornwall Insight had pushed this side
48:30
on the nineteenth they were suggesting a nine percent increase
48:33
compared to the July price cap, and if you remember
48:36
I said at the time that the twenty seventh of
48:39
August was when we were going to find out. Well,
48:40
in fact, if we look at the text on that,
48:43
it says the levels for the next period will be
48:46
announced by the twenty seventh of August, so apparently they've
48:49
been announced today and this is what they're saying between
48:53
the first of October and the thirty first of December.
48:55
The energy price cap is set at one seven hundred
48:58
and seventeen pounds per year for a typical household. That's
49:01
an increase of ten percent. So the forecast wasn't too
49:04
far away. That's a ten percent increase. Now that's pretty
49:08
horrendous for a lot of people. Just keep in mind
49:12
that's about half of what it was at the same
49:14
period in twenty twenty two. But nonetheless it's still way
49:17
beyond what it should be, particularly because in the meantime
49:20
we're being promised all kinds of falling energy prices as
49:24
a result of the increasing number of windmills and other
49:28
things that have been installed. And of course this is
49:31
complete nonsense. We know that windmills and so on are
49:34
going to cause prices to rise even further, so we'll
49:38
see what happens in January, but many expecting the price
49:41
to go up even further at the coldest part of
49:44
the year. Mark. Let's come back to you then, and well,
49:47
in the United States you have a general election in
49:51
full swing and it's not too far now to the
49:55
vote itself, and the Democratic National Convention has been going on,
49:58
and that must have been very exciting for lots of people.
50:03
Speaker 4: A little tortuous to watch, I might add, It wasn't voluntary,
50:08
had to do it for news purposes. The Democratic National
50:11
Convention started this past Monday and concluded last night. So
50:16
this is very timely information. Although in this first slide
50:19
we're remembering that Kamala Harris, who for quite a while
50:23
was the Attorney General of California, went right up to
50:27
the US Senate rather meteoric, you might say, much in
50:31
the way that JD. Bans his very first public office
50:34
is the US Senate on the other side of the aisle.
50:38
Very very dramatic increases in terms of career. But here
50:44
five years ago, Amala Harris already a Senator only in
50:48
the one and only term that she served in the
50:51
Upper Chamber. She's already scratched and trying to be president
50:54
even before she was vice president. So she ended her
50:58
bid five years ago in the twenty election in late
51:01
twenty nineteen, here's how California factored in her rise and fall,
51:06
and so things were not so glitzy and glamorous back then.
51:10
US Senator Kamala Harris, California's highest profile presidential candidate in
51:15
decades out of California, dropped out of the Democratic primary
51:20
race on Tuesday, this is late December twenty nineteen, following
51:24
reports of divisions with her within her campaign, months of
51:28
plummeting poll numbers and struggles to raise the necessary money
51:32
to compete with the top tier of candidates. So things
51:36
were very dramatically different not so long ago. And I'll
51:39
just mention that the emphasis on polls. Not only are
51:45
the posters who are citing her keeping right up with
51:48
Trump and sometimes beating Trump in certain states, not only
51:51
are their backgrounds questionable in many cases a lot of
51:55
establishment connections, a lot of globalist connections, but the whole
52:00
enterprise of polling. And I can talk about this more
52:03
an extra even if it's accurate or somewhat accurate, can
52:07
be very deceiving, and it's very unnecessary in many ways
52:11
and creates a very unfair playing field. But moving back
52:15
on track here, this is Chuck Baldwin, a constitutional Christian columnist.
52:20
I had the pleasure of meeting him in seven in
52:24
Dallas at a conference, and he is quite conservative and Christian,
52:30
as his CV indicates. But he's a Trump critic. He
52:34
also is a Harris critic. But let's hear what he
52:37
has to say about both Trump and Harris. If Trump
52:40
had any sense of humanity and humility, he would simply
52:43
tell the truth about Harris's track record and earn his
52:47
victory with her own words and actions the way Tulsea
52:51
Gabbard defeated her in the twenty twenty Democratic primaries, he
52:55
Trump would talk about her extreme woll agenda, that of
52:59
Kamal Hay Harris, and mister Baldwin goes on to say
53:03
in a recent column from twenty two to August here
53:06
from Chuck Baldwin Live, this election, as are all national elections,
53:10
will not be decided by Democrats or Republicans. It'll be
53:14
decided by the independence, the non aligned, the uncommitted. If
53:18
Trump continues his personal insulting attacks against Harris and fails
53:23
to show the American people the real Kamala Harris, the
53:26
anti law enforcement Harris, the anti Second Amendment Harris, the
53:30
anti border protection Harris, the anti peace Harris, the anti
53:34
religious freedom Harris, the anti national sovereignty Harris, anti parents rights,
53:39
the anti freedom of speech Harris, the anti unborn babies,
53:43
right to life Harris, anti constitutional, anti Bill rights, etc.
53:48
If Trump doesn't get that out about Kamala, Baldwin is
53:51
saying Trump will lose in November. Now that might seem
53:56
a little harsh. I double before I go on, I'll
53:58
mention that I double check that out. Little bit Trump
54:01
did appear yesterday Mike in Cochise County, Arizona, right at
54:05
the border, and he has been continuing to have rallies
54:10
and news appearances, although since the shooting attempt, ambiguous though
54:15
it was, he has toned down the rallies. Maybe just
54:18
a little. Chuck Baldwin is claiming Trump is engaging in
54:22
cheap shots against Kamala Harris and little else. Well, when
54:25
I listened to Trump speak in Arizona on a video
54:28
from yesterday, he did get into some substantive issues. So
54:32
it's a little bit of a matter of opinion, but
54:34
a little bit more about the DNC conference that wound
54:37
up last night, the overriding thing is the Democratic Party
54:42
and Kamala Harris in particular are trying to make so
54:45
called reproductive rights one, if not the main, at least
54:49
one of the main issues. And one of the speakers
54:53
Wednesday night said this, in the Jewish tradition, as indicated
54:57
on the slide translated from Hebrew, person is an entire universe,
55:01
so let's save all of these universes. And this speaker
55:05
also was referring to Gosen and Israeli children being equally precious,
55:10
not just Israeli and then Corey Booker, a New Jersey
55:15
US senator who also ran for president in the Democratic
55:19
primary in twenty twenty, and also like Kamala Harris failed,
55:23
He said this, we have LGBTQ rights, rights for people
55:28
of color, reproductive rights, and we must protect social security.
55:33
And then I make the mention here He did not
55:35
mention that the reproductive right to life of the baby
55:40
itself is completely disregarded. Nor did he mention how are
55:45
we supposed to save Social Security without an uptick in
55:48
the birth rate, which would require more young workers to
55:52
exist to pay into the system. So abortion on demand
55:56
would work against saving Social Security as the Democrats claim
56:00
they want to do. You have to have more people
56:02
born into the workforce to help support the aging baby
56:07
boomers to make the Social Security and Medicare and Medicaid
56:10
system work. And so we also, again this heavy reproductive
56:16
rights emphasis at the event, reproductive rights groups, as it
56:20
shows here, applaud Harris's stance on abortion. This is a
56:24
lady named Minnie tamar Raju, president of the pro choice
56:28
non nonprofit Reproductive Freedom for All. She said, kind of strangely,
56:34
when abortion is on the ballot, we win a rather
56:38
Orwellian comment, I might add she said that Wednesday at
56:42
the DNC convention, and moving on from there, I'll continue
56:46
to highlight the way and the manner in which they
56:49
discussed abortion on demand aka reproductive rights a softer euphemism there.
56:56
This is Cecil Richards, the infamous former President of Parenthood.
57:00
She also served on the Ford Foundation. I might add
57:03
she said this at the convention even more Orwellian. One day,
57:08
our children and grandchildren may ask us, when it was
57:11
all on the line, what did you do, she asked,
57:15
And the only acceptable answer is everything we could. In
57:20
other words, as if protecting the abortion industry is a
57:25
high moral thing, is something at a high moral level.
57:30
And then there are lots of claims by NPR and
57:37
at the Democratic National Convention about the excuse me, gun
57:44
violence being the leading killer of children. And I looked
57:48
into this right after the event last night, and NPR
57:52
in March of twenty twenty four published this despite bands
57:56
in some states, more than a million abortions just in
57:59
the US alone were provided in twenty twenty three. And
58:02
then I inserted this note at the bottom, Mike, A
58:05
mere sixteen hundred and sixty sixty three children almost seventeen
58:10
hundred children and adolescents both died from US gun violence
58:14
in twenty twenty three, the source being the Association of
58:17
Healthcare Journalists. So all these grandiose claims that the leading
58:22
cause of death of children is gun violence is obviously
58:27
shown to be false. That the actual leading source of
58:31
death of children is abortion itself, and it's important to
58:37
point that out. They also noted on NPR that it
58:44
was assumed that the leading source of deaths among children
58:48
was gun violence as of twenty twenty, and that surpassed
58:53
higher accidents for the first time. But these are just
58:56
some of the misdirections and misleading things that are that
59:01
have been shared at the Democratic National Convention. And we'll
59:07
go ahead from there and wind this up.
59:11
Speaker 1: Thanks Mark, thank you, right, yeah, I believe that's it. Yes, sorry, Yes,
59:15
it is Wie over to you, and we've got an
59:20
on finally for everyone.
59:23
Speaker 2: Well, you know, if the world can't get any crazier.
59:27
I don't personally use avatars, but I know a lot
59:29
of people do. But if you want to move on
59:31
from your avatar design, your own clone, have a look
59:34
at this little piece of film.
59:37
Speaker 6: The Promise of Generative AI is shaking up the technology
59:41
world on the markets. Industry giants set to invest and
59:44
estimated one trillion dollars into artificial intelligence over the coming years.
59:48
One company at the forefront of it all is Delphi
59:51
with the launch of their groundbreaking AI clones. The company
59:55
offering users the ability to create digital versions of themselves
59:59
from companies, CEOs, to YouTubers and celebrities that can help
1:00:02
manage the workload from answering questions just sitting in on
1:00:05
zoom call via a clone. Joining me now is the
1:00:09
co founder of Delphi, Dara Lagibardian, and making his first
1:00:14
ever television appearance is Dara's AI Clone. Dara, thank you
1:00:18
for joining us, Darra's Clone. Thank you for joining us.
1:00:21
Great to see you.
1:00:23
Speaker 2: Great to see you too. Thank you for having me.
1:00:25
Speaker 6: And I want to start by asking your clone a
1:00:27
couple of questions, none of which have been sent to
1:00:30
you in advance or your company before. Now to Dari's Clones,
1:00:34
let me ask you what you believe the purpose or
1:00:37
the uses of having a clone really is.
1:00:40
Speaker 7: For the purpose of having a clone is to scale
1:00:48
your unique way of thinking and interacting. It allows you
1:00:50
to share your knowledge, experiences, and personality with others in
1:00:53
a personalized way. This can be incredibly valuable for mentoring, teaching,
1:00:57
or even just sharing your insights with a broader audience.
1:01:00
What aspect of cloning interests you the most.
1:01:05
Speaker 1: That's pathetic, Debbie, I'm deeply unimpressed with that clone. But
1:01:08
I'll just make the point that you and I have
1:01:10
been talking about digital twins for many years ago, for
1:01:13
many years now, and of course IBM one of the
1:01:16
big organizations behind that idea. This is the whole idea
1:01:20
of creating an entire digital duplicate of everything in a society,
1:01:25
with the idea of being able to effectively forecast how
1:01:30
populations will behave and so on. It's just one of
1:01:33
the aspects of it.
1:01:36
Speaker 2: It's prediction. Again, we're going for prediction. We'll talk more
1:01:41
about it in EXTRA because I can show you a
1:01:44
bit of a vision of twenty forty as well. So
1:01:47
if you're a signed up member, look forward to EXTRA
1:01:50
in a bit.
1:01:51
Speaker 1: Yes, okay, thank you very much. Thanks to everybody that
1:01:53
joined us today. We will be back, as Debbie said,
1:01:56
in a couple of minutes for Extra. Otherwise, everybody, have
1:02:00
a great weekend as best you can and we'll see
1:02:03
it one pm as usual on Monday,