Latest / Reformed Thinking / Shame, Sin, and Shalom: Curse and Covering (Genesis 9:20–29)

Transcript

Shame, Sin, and Shalom: Curse and Covering (Genesis 9:20–29) · Reformed Thinking

0:00
Sound of reformed thinking brief audio cue fades out.
0:05
Welcome back to the deep dive. Today we are opening up a
0:08
section of scripture that is well, it's often overlooked,
0:13
sometimes confusing, and let's be honest, a little bit awkward.
0:16
We're talking about Genesis 9, verses 20 through 29.
0:19
It's that short, very strange story about Noah, wine,
0:24
nakedness, and then a prophecy that just it seems to chart the
0:28
course for all of human history. It's a huge passage, but also a
0:30
deeply challenging 1. I mean, here we have Noah the
0:32
hero, the man who survived the destruction of the old world.
0:35
The one man called righteous, who walked with God.
0:38
And immediately in this new world, he's shown to be
0:41
fallible. So our mission today, I think,
0:43
is to figure out why. Why is this embarrassing
0:46
incident, this private failure of a biblical giant, preserved
0:49
for us? And how does it work as a piece
0:52
of the bigger story of redemption?
0:54
Yes, because it's not just a strange anecdote.
0:56
We're going to see that this story is far from a simple
0:59
historical footnote. Yeah, it's been more like a
1:00
blueprint. It shows us the persistence of
1:02
human failure even after a global reset.
1:05
And it details the unfolding program for the nations.
1:09
It sets the stage for everything comes next in Genesis and really
1:13
the rest of the Bible. That's a good way to put it.
1:15
Structurally, it's a hinge. It is a hinge.
1:18
You've just come through the flood, this massive cataclysmic
1:22
act of divine judgement and renewal.
1:24
If you're reading the story for the first time, you might have
1:27
this this naive expectation A. Hope, maybe that this new clean
1:33
world with just eight people, that maybe the problem of sin
1:38
has finally been dealt with. Like hitting the cosmic reset
1:40
button should have fixed the corrupted operating system,
1:43
right? But Genesis 9 just shatters that
1:45
hope instantly. By recording Noah's fall, the
1:48
narrative shows that sin was never just an external pollution
1:51
that could be washed away by water.
1:52
No, it's inside. It's in the human heart.
1:54
Sin resides within the human heart.
1:56
The old heart survived the flood.
1:58
It proves the divine diagnosis we were given back in Genesis 6,
2:01
that the inclination of man's heart is evil from his youth.
2:04
So, looking backward, the story confirms the the terrible
2:08
continuity of human depravity. And then looking forward, it
2:12
establishes the whole program, geopolitical and spiritual, that
2:16
will govern the post flood world.
2:18
The destinies of Noah's three sons, Shem, Ham and Japheth, are
2:22
laid out right here. This family drama in a tent
2:25
becomes the outline for the table of nations in Genesis 10.
2:28
It does. It explains the distribution of
2:30
humanity across the globe. We go from inside a family tent
2:33
to a map of world history. It's an incredible scope shift.
2:37
OK, so let's unpack this, this crucial first moment of failure
2:40
in the brand new world. Let's do it.
2:42
So Noah begins his life after stepping off the ark.
2:45
He's no longer a shipbuilder, an arc builder.
2:47
He shifts his vocation. Verse 20 tells us he became a
2:51
Ish Hadama, a man of the soil. Why is that specific title Man
2:56
of the Soil, so significant here?
2:57
The language is so deliberate, it's meant to echo.
3:00
It resonates so strongly with the Garden of Eden.
3:02
Adam, the first man. He was formed from the Adama,
3:05
the dust of the ground, and his original job was agriculture to
3:09
cultivate and keep the garden. So by calling Noah and Ishadama,
3:12
the text is explicitly presenting him as a new atom.
3:16
A new atom in this freshly cleansed creation.
3:18
Yes, he is stepping back into that role of mankind's Stewart
3:22
over the new Earth. He's picking up the task that
3:25
was given to the first father of humanity, reaffirming that
3:29
mandate to work the land. That's the signal.
3:32
And what's the specific thing this new atom does?
3:35
He planted a vineyard, and this activity is what sets the entire
3:38
crisis in motion. Now a vineyard itself is a sign
3:42
of blessing in Scripture. It shows the land is fruitful
3:44
again. It's productive.
3:46
It shows the Noahek covenant. The promise of stability is
3:49
working. And the product of the vineyard
3:51
wine is also described in Scripture as something good,
3:55
something that gladdens the heart, a sign of celebration.
3:58
It is, by its nature a good gift from God.
4:01
The failure isn't in the gift itself, it's in the misuse of
4:03
it. Noah drank to excess.
4:06
You became drunk. And notice the kind of failure
4:08
is It wasn't some huge external disaster.
4:10
It wasn't a grand public rebellion like the things that
4:12
happened before the flood. No, it was quiet, private,
4:15
internal, a lack of self-control with a lawful appetite.
4:19
And that's arguably more instructive for you listening
4:22
right now than some grand, defiant act of rebellion would
4:26
be. Because most of us don't fail by
4:28
building towers to heaven. We fail in the small repeated
4:31
uses of good things without being watchful.
4:34
That's it. This heroic figure, the one who
4:37
managed to walk with God and secure the future of humanity,
4:40
he stumbles right where so many of us stumble, in the common
4:44
arena of self mastery, in the quiet of his own home.
4:47
It shows that even the most righteous of men are not
4:49
perfected in this life. His spiritual strength didn't
4:52
make him immune to the pull of his own desires.
4:54
Not at all. And the immediate result, the
4:56
visible result of this loss of control, is shame.
4:59
It's exposure. The text says he lay uncovered
5:03
in his tent. Uncovered that word nakedness
5:06
erva in Hebrew is a recurring theological signpost in Genesis.
5:10
You have to think back to Adam and Eve in Genesis 3.
5:13
Their innocence was marked by being naked and feeling no
5:16
shame. Right, and their sin resulted in
5:19
an overwhelming sense of exposure and the need to cover
5:22
themselves. So here's Noah.
5:24
Through his own foolishness, he's reverted to that post fall
5:27
state of shame and vulnerability.
5:29
Yes, nakedness symbolizes humiliation, disgrace,
5:33
powerlessness. Because he was intoxicated, Noah
5:37
was unable to protect his own dignity, his own honor.
5:40
And the location matters too. The tent should have been a
5:42
sanctuary. A place of safety and modesty
5:45
for the patriarch, but it became the stage for his ridicule.
5:49
The safe space became the space of disgrace.
5:51
Which brings us to the main theological take away, the real
5:54
reason this uncomfortable story is right here in the
5:57
foundational book of the Bible. It's here to prove a very
6:00
sobering point about sin. It's proof that sin survived the
6:03
flood. The flood was a judgement on the
6:05
corruption of the Earth, but that judgement didn't purge the
6:08
corrupted heart of mankind. The sin principle is still
6:11
there. It lives on inside the very
6:13
people God saved. So this incident is a narrative
6:16
confirmation of that deep seated truth about inherited
6:19
corruption. The new world still has the old,
6:21
flawed heart beating at its center.
6:23
It's a powerful dose of realism. The Bible just refuses to
6:27
whitewash human nature. It presents this as a practical
6:31
example of the divine verdict that the inclination of man's
6:34
heart is evil from his youth. And if Noah, the man who walked
6:38
with God in the last generation, if he still carries the seeds of
6:42
such a blatant dishonouring failure, what hope is there for
6:46
his kids? For us, well, it reorients where
6:49
our hope should be, and it offers a very practical lesson
6:52
about how we view leaders, especially spiritual leaders.
6:56
That's a vital point. It is.
6:57
We are so prone to idolize people whom God uses in mighty
7:01
ways. Noah's fall prevents us from
7:03
doing that. It shows that even the most
7:05
honored servants of God are still saved sinners.
7:08
They aren't the saviors. They are not the saviors.
7:09
So when we see the failure of a prominent Christian, this text
7:12
should come to mind. Our confidence doesn't belong in
7:15
the human vessel, but in the Lord Himself, who keeps His
7:18
covenant despite our weakness. It guards US against the
7:21
idolatry of personality. It should.
7:23
OK, that sets the stage perfectly.
7:25
The fall of the patriarch redirects our trust away from
7:28
man. So now let's see how that
7:31
failing heart shows up in the next generation, and how the
7:34
sons respond to their father's disgrace.
7:36
Yes, the family crisis, it begins with Ham, and he's
7:40
immediately identified in a very specific way.
7:42
Ham, the father of Canaan. That connection is key from the
7:46
start. Why?
7:47
Why link his personal failure here directly to his descendants
7:51
right away? Because it signals that Ham's
7:53
action is not just a one off family squabble, it's defining A
7:57
trajectory for a whole line of people.
7:59
Ham demonstrates what we could call the ethics of exposure.
8:02
And his actions are detailed in two parts that really compound
8:05
his sin. They do.
8:06
First, he saw the nakedness of his father.
8:09
Let's pause on that phrase. It's a very specific biblical
8:11
phrase, and it's often used symbolically.
8:13
Was this just an accident, a glance, or was it something
8:16
more? Scholars have debated this for a
8:18
long, long time. In Levitical law, uncovering the
8:21
nakedness is often a euphemism for sexual violation.
8:24
But in this narrative context, the consensus is that while it
8:27
probably wasn't a sexual crime against Noah, it certainly
8:30
wasn't an accidental glance. Pam's sin was that his gaze
8:34
lingered. He didn't just see, he looked.
8:37
He looked. He viewed his father's shame
8:40
with contempt, maybe even a kind of satisfaction.
8:43
It was an act of deep dishonor toward the figure he was
8:46
commanded to Revere. So he treated his father's
8:49
vulnerability not with pity or concern, but as an object of
8:53
scorn. He took pleasure in seeing the
8:56
great man reduced. I think that's right, and his
8:58
second action just solidifies that interpretation, he told his
9:01
two brothers outside. He could have just quietly
9:04
covered his father. He could have.
9:05
He could have acted immediately to provide clothing or privacy.
9:08
Instead, he circulated the shame.
9:10
He turned his father's humiliation into a story to
9:13
share. A piece of gossip, A scandalous
9:15
bit of news. And that is why his sin is open
9:17
dishonor. He actively magnified the
9:20
disgrace through exposure and through speech.
9:22
He violated the whole spirit of the 5th Commandment, which calls
9:25
us to honor and respect our parents.
9:27
Ham's actions reflect A disturbing but very common human
9:31
impulse. Oh, it is the ugly delight the
9:34
flesh takes in the failures of others when someone we respect,
9:38
or maybe even secretly resent falls.
9:41
There is a crooked pleasure in gossip, in mockery, in scorning
9:45
their laps. Ham chose exposure over grace.
9:48
He chose to spread the news instead of fixing the situation.
9:51
He did. And if you think about the
9:53
contemporary relevance, this instinct is everywhere.
9:57
We live in a digital culture where exposure is the currency.
10:01
Our devices almost train us to be like ham, to see a scandal,
10:04
capture it, and instantly share it or amplify it.
10:07
We've created a culture of constant public shaming.
10:10
The passage confronts that instinct head on, and it gives
10:13
us the counterexample immediately with Shem and
10:15
Japheth. They demonstrate the ethics of
10:17
covering. Their response is just it's
10:20
marked by reverence and this radical restraint.
10:22
It's a deliberate shared action. They took a garment and laid it
10:25
on both their shoulders. The detail about both their
10:28
shoulders seems so specific. It signifies their shared
10:31
purpose, their unity in protecting their father's
10:33
dignity. They understood that honoring
10:35
their father was a joint responsibility.
10:37
But the way they approached him, yeah, that's the real lesson in
10:41
righteousness, yes. They walked backward into the
10:44
tent. They purposefully turned their
10:46
faces backward so that they physically did not see their
10:49
father's nakedness. This wasn't just about modesty,
10:53
it was an active rejection of Ham's spirit of scorn.
10:56
They refused to stare. They refused to feast on his
10:59
shame. They refused to let their eyes
11:01
dwell on his disgrace. That action just speaks volumes.
11:05
They saw the problem, they knew about the shame, but they chose
11:08
to mitigate the disgrace and restore dignity through this
11:12
deliberate act of honor. Their conduct really embodies
11:15
that principle. We see later in Scripture that
11:17
love covers a multitude of offenses.
11:19
They weren't ignoring the sin or pretending it didn't happen.
11:22
No, but they were refusing to participate in its
11:24
magnification, refusing to circulate it.
11:27
And this challenges you, the listener, directly when you're
11:30
confronted with another person's failing, especially someone of
11:33
standing or a family member. Are we instinctively, like Ham,
11:38
eager to broadcast and judge? Or are we, like Shem and
11:41
Japheth, careful, grieved, and eager to cover and restore?
11:44
Our character is often revealed less by our own successes and
11:48
more by how we respond to the shame of others.
11:51
And the immediate consequence of their action versus Ham's
11:53
irreverence is what takes us from a family story to a world
11:57
shaping Oracle. Yes, Noah wakes up and the
12:01
family drama instantly becomes a program for global history.
12:04
So when Noah awoke from his wine, the narrative says, he
12:07
knew what his youngest son had done.
12:09
And the words that follow are not the the rant of an angry,
12:13
hungover father. No, that distinction is
12:15
critical. This is a prophetic Oracle
12:18
inspired by God. It's a judicial decree that's
12:20
going to shape the spiritual and political geography of the
12:23
world. And what's so striking right
12:25
away is that the curse doesn't fall on Ham.
12:27
The one who did the dishonoring, though, falls on Ham's son
12:30
Canaan. The pronouncement is cursed to
12:32
be Canaan, a servant of servants.
12:34
Shall he be to his brothers? Why?
12:37
Why transfer the judgement to the grandson Canaan?
12:39
The focus shifts to Canaan to give the curves A programmatic
12:42
significance. It's not about personal
12:45
vengeance against Ham, It's about defining the trajectory of
12:48
a lineage that springs from the root of Ham's irreverence.
12:51
So this prophecy is looking ahead, centuries ahead, to the
12:54
peoples who will bear the name Canaan.
12:56
The tribes occupying the land of Promise who were destined for
12:59
judgement. The incident in the tent
13:01
revealed Hams heart of irreverence and scorn, and the
13:05
curse seals the fate of his most morally corrupt line.
13:09
And that phrase servant of servants, what does that mean?
13:12
Abed Avadim. It's a superlative structure.
13:15
In Hebrew. It signifies the deepest
13:17
possible state of subjugation and humiliation.
13:20
It means the lowest of servants. So this isn't a temporary state,
13:25
it's a long term national humiliation under God's
13:28
judgement. That's the idea.
13:30
Historically, this prophecy sets the stage for the moral
13:33
corruption of the Canaanite nations.
13:35
Because of their entrenched idolatry and wickedness, they
13:38
would eventually be displaced by Israel, who are the descendants
13:41
of Shem. The Oracle's very specific
13:44
Canaan is destined to be the servant of both Shem and
13:47
Japheth. He's placed beneath both the
13:49
spiritual line and the expansive line.
13:51
Now we have to address a very difficult but vital point here.
13:54
Historically, this text has been wickedly amused.
13:57
Yes, it's been misinterpreted as a curse of Ham to justify the
14:01
oppression and racial subjugation of people of African
14:04
descent. And we have to be crystal clear
14:06
as students of Scripture. The text itself provides
14:09
absolutely no grounds for that interpretation.
14:12
None. None whatsoever.
14:14
The curse is explicitly and repeatedly named on Canaan, a
14:17
specific group of people who occupied the land later called
14:21
Palestine. The curse is moral and
14:24
covenantal. It's addressing a line destined
14:27
for wickedness and judgement. It is.
14:28
It does not curse all of Ham's descendants, which included
14:31
peoples in Egypt, Kush and Put, and it has zero connection to
14:35
skin color or race. We have to insist on the
14:38
specificity of the text to guard against its historical misuse.
14:41
OK so if the curse defines the line of judgement, the blessing
14:45
defines the line of preservation, the covenant line.
14:48
Yes. Noah turns to Shem the Co actor
14:50
of grace and he says blessed be the Lord the God of Shem and
14:54
notice where the blessing centers.
14:55
It doesn't just say Shem will be blessed, as if the blessing
14:58
comes from Shem himself. No, it says blessed be the Lord,
15:01
the God of Shem. The focus falls entirely on
15:04
Yahweh himself, who is identified specifically as
15:07
Shem's God. So Shem's highest privilege is
15:10
defined as having a covenant relationship with the one true
15:13
God. That's what distinguishes his
15:15
line spiritually from all the others, and this establishes the
15:18
spiritual mandate for his descendants.
15:21
They are the chosen line through which the knowledge of God will
15:24
be preserved in a world that is rapidly falling into idolatry.
15:27
This is the single most defining characteristic of Shem's line.
15:30
It's the beginning of the whole structure of redemptive history.
15:34
From Shem comes Abram, who becomes the father of Israel,
15:37
who is entrusted with God's promises.
15:39
And through that line comes Christ the Messiah, the greater
15:42
son of Shem. Yes.
15:43
When Noah speaks this blessing, he is setting the course for the
15:46
advent of the Savior. So Shem is the covenant line.
15:50
Canaan is the line of judgement. How does Japheth, the other
15:54
covering sun, fit into this big picture?
15:57
Japheth represents the inclusive line.
16:00
The blessing on him is twofold. May God enlarge Japheth and let
16:04
him dwell in the tents of Shem. The first part seems pretty
16:07
straightforward. Enlarge Japheth.
16:09
There's even a play on words there in the Hebrew.
16:11
There is YAF sounds like Yaft. To enlarge.
16:14
His descendants will spread out. They will be extended in
16:17
territory, in numbers and influence geographically,
16:20
covering vast areas of the earth often identified with the
16:23
peoples of Europe and Asia Minor.
16:25
But the second part let him dwell in the tents of Shem.
16:28
That's the spiritual climax. It is Japheth's descendants who
16:31
represent the distant nations are welcome to share in Shem
16:34
spiritual privileges. They are invited to take refuge
16:37
and to participate in the covenant blessings that flow
16:39
through Shem. So this is basically a prophecy
16:41
of Gentile inclusion. Centuries and centuries before
16:44
it happens, the physical descendants of Japheth will one
16:47
day worship the God of Shem. It's a magnificent theological
16:50
sketch of the global scope of God's plan.
16:53
The blessing given to Shem which leads to the Messiah was never
16:56
meant to be exclusive. It's designed to be shared.
16:58
It's designed to be shared. Japhak's peoples are welcomed
17:01
into the family. The global multiethnic church
17:04
that we see today, made-up of believers from every tribe and
17:08
tongue, is the astonishing fulfillment of this ancient
17:11
Oracle spoken by Noah. So God's Word, through the
17:14
patriarch, maps out justice for Canaan, the source of promise
17:17
and Shem, and the expansive inclusion of Japheth.
17:20
The whole program is there in seed form.
17:22
And this whole narrative, the persistence of sin in Noah, the
17:25
choice between exposure and covering the prophecy, it all
17:29
drives us to 1 essential conclusion.
17:32
The necessity of an ultimate perfect solution.
17:35
The inadequacy of Noah as a righteous leader forces our gaze
17:39
toward the greater Noah. Yes, it has to.
17:41
So let's transition to that final point, the purpose of all
17:43
this typology. Noah the hero failed in the
17:46
quiet of his tent. He was a righteous man saved
17:48
from the water, but he couldn't save himself from wine.
17:52
Why does his failure make Christ's role so essential?
17:55
Because Noah represents the limit of human righteousness,
17:58
even at its biblical best. He's the type, the shadow.
18:02
But he was inherently flawed. He could preserve his family
18:05
from an external judgement. But he was helpless against the
18:08
internal corruption of his own heart.
18:10
The man who sailed the ark still ended up laid bare by his own
18:13
appetite. And that sharp contrast drives
18:16
us right to Christ, who is the true and greater Noah.
18:19
Christ is the unflawed new Adam, the righteous one who doesn't
18:23
need to be covered, but who perfectly covers others.
18:26
His obedience just stands in stark relief against Noah's
18:29
fall. Noah was enclosed in the ark to
18:31
escape the waters of judgement. Christ, on the other hand, bore
18:34
the deeper waters of God's wrath.
18:36
He experienced the final judgement on the cross, not
18:40
because of a private slip up, but because of his active,
18:43
perfect public obedience. And that whole theme of exposure
18:46
and covering is dramatically inverted in Christ's work.
18:49
Noah was exposed because of his own shame.
18:52
Christ embraced shame willingly. You just have to think of the
18:55
cross seen. The entire process of
18:57
crucifixion was designed to maximize public disgrace.
19:00
He was stripped of his garments, nailed naked in public view, a
19:04
spectacle of the greatest humiliation.
19:07
He was despised, rejected, mocked.
19:09
He embraced this radical exposure not for his own sin,
19:13
but to bear the guilt and the public disgrace that belonged to
19:16
his people. He didn't just passively receive
19:18
shame, he chose it. He was willing to be treated
19:21
like the lawbreaker who deserved the curse.
19:24
The curse that was prefigured by Canaan's subjugation.
19:27
Scripture says he became a curse for us.
19:29
Yes, he deliberately stepped into the place of the eternally
19:33
cursed. He endured the separation and
19:35
the penalty that all lawbreakers, everyone acting in
19:38
hands irreverent spirits deserved.
19:40
By being exposed on the cross, He ensured that those who
19:43
believe in Him will never face ultimate eternal exposure before
19:46
a holy God. Noah, Adam, all of us.
19:50
We're helpless to clothe our own shame.
19:52
No one needed his sons to provide a temporary garment.
19:54
We need something infinitely greater.
19:56
The covering has to come from outside ourselves.
19:59
We need the Son of God to cover a lifetime of sin, a lifetime of
20:02
failures that go far beyond Noah's single incident.
20:04
And Christ supplies that final covering, a covering that is
20:08
eternal and fully satisfies divine justice.
20:11
It's not just a momentary drape over a single failure, it's a
20:14
permanent transformation. The great exchange.
20:16
It is Christ who knew no sin was made to be sin for us, so that
20:23
in Him believers might become the very righteousness of God.
20:27
By faith we put on Christ, you could say, as our eternal
20:31
garment. So we stand before God, not
20:33
naked and exposed by our ham like tendencies.
20:36
But wrapped in the spotless robe of Christ's perfect obedience,
20:40
this is the eternal refuge that was promised to those who would
20:43
dwell in the tents of Shem. And that covenant fulfillment
20:46
promised through Shem flows freely to everyone who believes.
20:49
Because Christ absorbed the full weight of the curse.
20:52
The prophecy of inclusion for Japheth is unlocked by the
20:55
sacrifice of the Son of Shep. That's the heart of.
20:57
It as Genesis 9 concludes, we get this quiet note of
21:00
chronology. Noah lived a total of 950 years,
21:03
including 350 years after the flood.
21:06
This can seem like just a simple footnote, but why is this
21:08
longevity recorded, especially after his very public failure?
21:12
That long post flood life, 3 1/2 centuries, it serves as a
21:16
narrative testimony to the stability of the post flood
21:19
world. God's promise in the Noahic
21:21
Covenant. God had promised that while the
21:23
earth remains seed, time and harvest, cold and heat, summer
21:26
and winter, day and night, shall not cease.
21:29
Noah's extended life shows God's faithfulness and sustaining a
21:32
stable cosmic order, a secure stage on which the long program
21:36
of redemptive history can unfold.
21:38
And recording his stability and longevity after his embarrassing
21:42
fall? That underscores a huge truth
21:45
about Covenant theology. It confirms that Noah's
21:48
spectacular lapse and moral integrity did not cancel or even
21:51
pause God's covenant commitment. The Noah covenant wasn't
21:54
conditioned on Noah's perfect behavior.
21:56
Not at all. God swore by his own intention
21:59
and his own character. The stability of God's purposes
22:01
rests entirely upon God Himself, not on the unreliable integrity
22:05
of any human person. So as we bring this deep dive to
22:08
a close, what does this strange ancient narrative from a drunken
22:12
patriarch to a world map of blessing and curse?
22:15
What does it call us, the listener, to do today?
22:19
Well, first there's the personal application, humility and
22:22
watchfulness. If Noah, the man who saw God's
22:25
judgement first hand and walked with him, could still stumble in
22:28
the quiet arena of appetite than any of us can.
22:31
It calls us away from any kind of spiritual pride or
22:34
presumption. We have to be watchful over the
22:36
smallest details of our lives, recognizing that our only
22:39
confidence rests in the perfect sufficiency of Christ.
22:42
And second, there's the relational application, that
22:45
crucial contrast between Ham and his brothers.
22:47
It demands A countercultural response in our digital age.
22:50
We are soaked in a culture that monetizes exposure.
22:53
It thrives on scandal and runs on public shaming.
22:56
And the contrast in the text forces us to look inward.
22:59
Before we speak or share or comment, we need to pause and
23:02
ask ourselves, am I acting like Ham, eager to spread the
23:06
disgrace and satisfy some ugly interest and failure?
23:09
Or am I acting like Shem and Japheth, concerned with
23:11
preserving dignity, providing, covering, and leaning toward
23:14
restoration and grace That is so practical If someone we know, or
23:19
even someone we just read about has fallen, The ham instinct is
23:22
to analyze and broadcast the failure.
23:25
The Shem and Japheth instinct is to turn our face away from the
23:28
shame and seek to cover it with compassion.
23:30
Yes. We are called to embody that
23:32
spirit of covering even when sin has to be addressed publicly.
23:36
The spirit with which we approach the exposed person
23:38
should be 1 of profound grief, not ugly delight.
23:41
The ethics of covering modeled by Noah's righteous sons should
23:44
characterize how we deal with the flaws and disgrace of
23:46
others. This ancient story turns out to
23:48
be a key text for modern digital ethics.
23:51
It really does. It takes us from the inevitable
23:53
failure of the new Adam to the necessity of the perfect Savior,
23:56
establishing the lines of God's promise and justice.
23:59
Along the way we see that the program of God's history is
24:02
designed around the central necessity of Christ.
24:05
The focus shifted so dramatically from the individual
24:08
Noah to his three sons and then to the entire map of nations.
24:12
The final question the passage leaves us with is this.
24:16
The descendants of Japheth were graciously welcome to dwell in
24:19
the tents of Shem, finding spiritual refuge under the
24:21
promised Messiah. So what does it mean for us, as
24:24
those drawn from every tribe and tongue today, to be invited to
24:27
dwell forever under that expansive, gracious covering
24:30
provided by the true and flawless Son of Shem, our Lord
24:33
Jesus Christ? The story of shame and covering
24:36
points us away from the failures of man and straight toward the
24:38
perfection and sufficient provision of the Savior.
24:41
Thank you for joining us on this deep dive into Genesis 9.
24:44
We'll see you next time.