Latest / Honey Badger Radio / The "P" Pass Saves Allison Mack, Sound of Freedom Get's the Media in a Frenzy | HBR News 413

Transcript

The "P" Pass Saves Allison Mack, Sound of Freedom Get's the Media in a Frenzy | HBR News 413 · Honey Badger Radio

• 0:01
  This is HBr News number four thirteen. The p Pass saves Alison Mac Sounder
• 0:07
  Freedom gets the media in a frenzy where we discussed the stories of the week
• 0:10
  and give it the Badger treatment. Hello everybody, and welcome to Honey Badger
• 0:18
  Radio. My name is Brian, and this is HBr News where we discuss
• 0:22
  the news of the week. I hope you guys are doing well this week
• 0:25
  and that you are sort of finding a way to cope with all the insanity
• 0:29
  going on and all of the well the cope to, you know, to
• 0:34
  go along with it. I'm your host, Brian Martinez, and I'm joined
• 0:38
  by, as always, my lovely co host, doctor Rand mccam, Hannah
• 0:41
  Wallen, and Mike j On today's HBr News show, We're going to be
• 0:45
  talking about the recent I guess you could say the recent release of former Smallville
• 0:51
  actress Alison Max Alison Mack after serving some prison time for her involvement with a
• 0:56
  sex cult. Sounder Freedom, which is an in dependent film from Angel Studios,
• 1:03
  is getting a whole bunch of weird pushback from movie reviewers and sort of
• 1:08
  mainstream website. So I thought we would look at apparently, you know,
• 1:11
  it's not cool to have a problem with child sex trafficking and Ben and Jerry's
• 1:19
  suffers immense losses after commissay made on Independence Day and more so, stick around,
• 1:25
  it's going to be a good time and be sure to join us afterwards
• 1:27
  or the Patron Only Show. So I have this article from the Guardian.
• 1:33
  I don't know if you guys heard about this, but the headline got my
• 1:37
  attention. It's women who kill their newborns are deeply unwell. So why are
• 1:42
  they being tried for murder? Where the Guardian is going to somehow I don't
• 1:48
  know, like justify the murdering of newborns. I mean, might as well
• 1:52
  go, you know, past birth and find new ways to justify I guess
• 1:57
  killing babies. So join us on the Patron Show for that. I'm sure
• 2:01
  that this will be an extremely well thought out and nuanced discussion from Julie Wheelwright
• 2:09
  and yeah, please consider doing that. Also, a couple things before we
• 2:15
  get started. One, Jojo is sleeping here on his little dog accouch.
• 2:20
  So he's not dead and this is not a photograph. That's just how still
• 2:23
  he can be when he's tired. We went out for a walk and he
• 2:28
  chased the motorcycles and he's bushed, so he's he's all puppered out, but
• 2:31
  he will be with us today. And in addition, if you guys want
• 2:37
  to send us a message, you can do so through super chats on YouTube,
• 2:44
  super chows on our own website at Feedabadger dot com forward last, just
• 2:49
  the tip, or you can send a rumble rant. I tend to give
• 2:52
  priority to the super chow's first, the rumble rants next, and the the
• 2:57
  YouTube last. So please send us a donation, and just to make sure
• 3:02
  that we get like most of the money and you don't give anything to YouTube,
• 3:06
  I would suggest sending a super chow, but rumble works as well.
• 3:09
  Okay, so Rumble gang, say what's up and thank you for joining us,
• 3:15
  and I think, oh yeah, one more thing I was going to
• 3:16
  say, um before we get started. One other thing I was going to
• 3:23
  mention is that if you discover one day that we're no longer around, go
• 3:28
  to feed I'm sorry, not Badger feed dot com or honey Badger radio dot
• 3:32
  com. That's where we archive all of our video content and usually in podcast
• 3:38
  form or in other videos, and be sure to go over to Rumble you
• 3:42
  know, give us a follow over there so that you can support rumble chan.
• 3:47
  I understand that Rumble is growing as a platform. It's it's blowing up,
• 3:52
  and more and more people are going over there, so we may as
• 3:53
  well get on board as YouTube continues to censor and shadow bay and otherwise minimize
• 4:00
  content that I would assume you guys would find really important. One last thing
• 4:05
  is I'm gonna try this. I don't know if this is gonna work,
• 4:08
  but I set up poles. One pole will appear should appear in the live
• 4:13
  chat. I don't think it's going to appear on Rumble, I'm afraid,
• 4:15
  but it will be on YouTube and probably a Twitch and the other places where
• 4:20
  we are, So if you see it, I'm going to test it out
• 4:24
  after the first story. So if you see it, then please participate in
• 4:29
  the poll. I think it'll appear in the live chat. So anyway,
• 4:32
  with all that out of the way, I guess we can get into today's
• 4:36
  stories, right, So let's go ahead and do it all right, We're
• 4:41
  gonna start with well, Alison Mack, so let me just get this ready.
• 4:46
  Alison Mack, the television actor, is known for her role as a
• 4:48
  close friend of young Superman in the series Small Bills, an old show I
• 4:53
  Think It's from Like the two thousands has been released from federal custody after serving
• 4:58
  a three year sentence or her role in the infamous an x IVM sex trafficking
• 5:02
  scandal. According to a report from the Associated Press, the Federal Bureau of
• 5:08
  Prisons records indicated that Mack, now forty years old, was recently released from
• 5:13
  a federal prison facility located in Dublin, California, near San Francisco. Max's
• 5:17
  legal journey commenced in twenty nineteen and continued when she pleaded guilty to charges related
• 5:24
  to manipulating women into becoming sex slaves for the group's spiritual leader, Keith Renier
• 5:29
  in twenty twenty one. As a result of her cooperation with federal authorities,
• 5:32
  Mac played a crucial role in providing evidence against Radier and assisting in unraveling the
• 5:38
  inner workings of the secretive organization. Her cooperation led to renier subsequent conviction and
• 5:43
  sentencing to one hundred and twenty years in prison for his involvement in sex trafficking.
• 5:48
  During her sentencing at a federal court in Brooklyn, New York, Mac
• 5:51
  expressed remorse and guilt for her actions because you know she worked with him.
• 5:57
  In a later submitted to a letter Sorry submitted to the court, she apologized
• 6:01
  to those she had brought into Annex ivm acknowledging the nefarious and emotionally abusive schemes
• 6:08
  orchestrated by Renier. Max apology continued in the courtroom, where she addressed the
• 6:14
  victims directly, saying from the deepest part of my heart and soul, I
• 6:17
  am sorry. The ap reported. Despite Judge Nicholas Garrowfees acknowledging the sincerity of
• 6:25
  max apology, he emphasized the severity of her actions. He described her as
• 6:30
  a willing and proactive ally, an essential accomplice to Renier's monstrous crimes. Garrowfees
• 6:36
  emphasized that mack leveraging her leveraging her celebrity status had groomed victims for the organization.
• 6:44
  The judge noted that max sentence should reflect her active participation in the manipulation
• 6:49
  and abuse inflicted upon the victims. Max's defense team had argued for a more
• 6:55
  lenient sentence, suggesting probation or home confinement as appropriate alternatives. They asserted that
• 7:01
  her cooperation with the prosecutors, and her renouncement of Rahneer demonstrated her commitment to
• 7:06
  change. In court documents, they stated, quote the nx IVM saga and
• 7:12
  the story of Missus Max's descent have been a tragedy for everybody involved, but
• 7:16
  that need not and should not be the end of the story for Alison Mack
• 7:20
  end quote. However, not all individuals involved in the case we're willing to
• 7:25
  accept max apology. One victim, Jessica Joan, vehemently rejected max expression of
• 7:30
  remorse, describing her as a monster cut from the same cloth as Nier.
• 7:34
  Joan addressed the court stating quote, Alison Mack is a predator and an evil
• 7:39
  human being end quote. Max association with nx IVM and her subsequent conviction shed
• 7:45
  light on the dark underbelly of the organization, revealing the extent of manipulation abuse
• 7:49
  inflicted upon its members. Sounds like q QAnon, but we'll get to that
• 7:54
  later. It was revealed that the organization would conduct rituals in which their victims
• 7:58
  would be tied down branded with a hot iron. It was further explained that
• 8:03
  the cult leaders actively encourage the use of demeaning and derogatory language, including racial
• 8:07
  slurs, to further humiliate the individuals they considered their slaves in quotes. According
• 8:13
  to The Western Journal, despite max release, the repercussions of her involvement with
• 8:18
  nx IVM will continue to supposedly ripple through society. So pussy past strikes again.
• 8:26
  It's basically what we have here. But anybody you know, this goes
• 8:31
  right along with what Sonia Starr found in her research on the way that men
• 8:39
  are sentenced versus the way that women are sentenced and so on in regard to
• 8:43
  how the criminal justice system creates a huge gap and accountability between accused men and
• 8:52
  accused women depending on the crime, and when it comes to violent crimes and
• 8:58
  sex crimes that the gap is more profound, more dramatic than it is with
• 9:05
  more minor crimes and a lot of um. The reason is because the when
• 9:11
  there's a partnership between a male perpetrator and a female perpetrator, the female perpetrator
• 9:18
  uses the act of throwing the male perpetrator to the wolves in the justice system
• 9:26
  to bargain for less time and to make herself look less guilty, And she'll
• 9:33
  express remorse like that but basically claim to have been manipulated. Everything that a
• 9:39
  woman does is under some some poor schlub's thrall right, No women are in
• 9:46
  control of their own actions. When they're in the courtroom pleading for mercy for
• 9:52
  for whatever crime they've committed, it's always the guy's fault. And this,
• 9:56
  this looks like the same exact kind of behavior where she tried pretty much to
• 10:05
  pretend and was very successful with the court apparently that she is not as responsible
• 10:13
  for her actions, and that her decisions were not made on her own agency
• 10:20
  as much as his were on his own agency. She was as brainwashed as
• 10:26
  everybody else. And it's just I don't buy it. I just don't buy
• 10:31
  it. I don't. I don't think that every woman who does cruel things
• 10:37
  to other women in conjunction with a man's crimes is doing it because he made
• 10:45
  her do it, or because he brainwashed her into it, or anything like
• 10:50
  that. I think I think she uh is independent. I think she's fully
• 10:54
  capable of making her own decisions and fully capable of determining the wrongness of her
• 11:05
  actions, of praising her actions. And there is no excuse for what she
• 11:09
  did. But she's so sorry, Hannah, she said, she your tears
• 11:16
  are you what is the thing from the Simpson Your tears are better evidence than
• 11:20
  any like than any real evidence could ever you know, never be Yeah,
• 11:28
  well, I mean it's a lot like you in the South Park episode with
• 11:31
  with BP saying they're sorry over and over again like that. Women can get
• 11:37
  away with that, and it's unfortunate because this is a situation where the people
• 11:43
  that that she abused, they're never going to forget that abuse. They're never
• 11:48
  going to forget what they went through. Significant pain like that, suffering like
• 11:52
  that, and humiliation like that sticks with you for the rest of your life.
• 11:56
  And it's not you know, they're not gonna necessarily be broken for life,
• 12:01
  but they will be. They will have pain from that for the rest
• 12:07
  of their life. When you remember something like that, it hurts to remember
• 12:11
  it. You know, it's not like physical pain, but the symptoms and
• 12:18
  there there are things that happen to your body that remain with you for the
• 12:22
  rest of your life. It ages you to go through that kind of a
• 12:26
  trauma. So the damage doesn't like she could say she was sorry in every
• 12:31
  way, humans have to say they're sorry, and it's never going to get
• 12:35
  rid of that damage. It's never going to get rid of that pain and
• 12:39
  suffering. And I don't disagree with the person who said, you know,
• 12:46
  she's she's a predator in an evil human being. That person was face to
• 12:50
  face with her, right, that's that's not the public might want to forgive.
• 12:56
  And the people that were not involved, the rest of us, you
• 13:01
  know, we might we might not know, you know, what she was
• 13:03
  really like, but you know, Jessica Jones was face to face with her.
• 13:11
  And you know, when someone is abusing you and you look into their
• 13:16
  face, you can tell if they're enjoying what they're doing to you. You
• 13:22
  can see it in their face. It's a horribly ugly look. You can
• 13:28
  see you can see whether it's entrenched in their character. And that's a horribly
• 13:35
  ugly look. So I tend to believe the victim in the case describing her,
• 13:43
  rather than a judge who wasn't there during the incident. She probably looked
• 13:50
  remorseful, you know, she probably looked and sounded yeah, I mean,
• 13:58
  she probably looked and sounded like a changed woman. But it's it's really,
• 14:05
  it's really weird that the judge even said that, um, you know,
• 14:11
  like that that her actions were he emphasized the severity of her actions and described
• 14:18
  as a willing and proactive ally. And yet she got a slap on the
• 14:22
  wrist comparatively, I mean, yeah, and the other the other guy,
• 14:26
  who I guess was the leader of the cult, he got like one hundred
• 14:28
  and twenty years, Like you couldn't have given her fifty. I mean maybe
• 14:31
  not as many. But like, the thing that hits me really is the
• 14:37
  willingness to to assume that a woman can change, Yeah, but not a
• 14:41
  man of course. And and that's the thing. Um to to do things
• 14:48
  like that, you have to have something within yourself where you enjoy being the
• 14:52
  cause of somebody else's suffering, Right, you have to have a sadistic streak.
• 14:58
  You can't nobody is going to get involved in something like that where they
• 15:05
  they make torturing and branding and m brainwashing people a part of their their whole
• 15:18
  being, like their whole lifestyle and their um, not just their sex and
• 15:22
  their sexuality, but everyday lives. Like you don't do that if you don't
• 15:28
  have attic statistic streak, right, you don't do that if you're not that
• 15:35
  kind of person. So it just I just can't believe um, and I
• 15:41
  can believe that a person can change. I can believe that a person can
• 15:45
  be rehabilitated, maybe not to the degree where they don't have that in themselves,
• 15:50
  but to the degree where they don't let it rule them and they don't
• 15:52
  let it become the way they engage with the world. But here we are,
• 15:58
  we're looking at um. It's being treated like a woman can change,
• 16:06
  so that that's not the way she engages with the world. But you know,
• 16:11
  the man can't, Rainier can't. So either her sentence should have been
• 16:17
  much longer or his sentence should have been much shorter. But the idea of
• 16:22
  her having a super short sentence and his being more than a lifetime, at
• 16:30
  least by today's scientific standards, not you know, people listening to this in
• 16:33
  the future when we figured out a way to extend human life to like two
• 16:37
  hundred years or something, or being like, that's not more than a lifetime,
• 16:41
  but it is now right, Um, that's insane. It's just flat
• 16:48
  out insane. There's the accountability gap for you right there. I'm sorry,
• 16:56
  I was muted to work. No, it's okay, Mike or Mike,
• 17:03
  do either you Mike, So I want to say something. Yeah, it's
• 17:07
  in noticeably in stark contrast to what happens to enemies of the state in the
• 17:14
  event of them apologizing to whoever, whoever quote unquote cancels them into apologizing.
• 17:22
  If the work mob forces you to apologize, did then that's just evidence of
• 17:30
  your guilt, and it makes concrete the guilt with which you were charged in
• 17:33
  the first place. But if you're a friend of the party, the UNI
• 17:38
  party where then your apology counts. That's all you ever need to do.
• 17:45
  I'm sorry, I'm nonst a thousand children. The patriarchy made me do it.
• 17:51
  Oh well, what are you complaining about? Should she apologized? So
• 17:56
  let's just let her go on her way and and do whatever she's going to
• 18:02
  do. It is like they pretend to give a shit about women, but
• 18:07
  they don't. They give a shit about the women who uphold the party.
• 18:14
  And they I mean they even pretend you pretend to give a shit about men,
• 18:21
  but they're they're they're they're just many shades more likely to drop the kibosh
• 18:26
  on on them for that. Yeah. Yeah, none of this is about
• 18:32
  the actual identities that's are sensibly about. It's about the party. It's about
• 18:36
  the politics, and the politics is We're going to go ahead and non's children
• 18:41
  until they all believe in Marxism, and if you stand in the way,
• 18:45
  then we'll accuse you of being nonsense. No, we don't see any inconsistencies
• 18:48
  with this. Fuck you. You know, as a child, I always
• 18:57
  wanted to or out what the secret world of Alex mac was all about.
• 19:02
  And I didn't want to find out like this. Yeah, right, so
• 19:08
  don't even remember that show. It's not just people turning it it's not just
• 19:12
  people turning into balloons. It's a secret network of fucking pedophilest No, that's
• 19:21
  conspiracy talking QAnon madness. It's not happening. It was. It was just
• 19:30
  girls had the ability to turn into a weird balloon of cgi matter every now
• 19:34
  and again, and that was that was good enough for us. Yes,
• 19:38
  I remember Alex Mack. Remember the show kind of scared me because it had
• 19:42
  like the same effect as like Terminator two did, and that movie kind of
• 19:48
  scared because, I mean the tea with Cosm was just fucking horrifying. Yeah,
• 19:55
  and so I thought the two were like related. Yeah, well,
• 20:02
  anyway, not surprising that Alison Mack. I mean, I mean essentially walked
• 20:08
  away like she got some jail time, but like the other guy, I
• 20:12
  got one hundred and twenty years and they were pretty chummy. There's a video
• 20:15
  I didn't I don't have it here, but I can. I can leak
• 20:18
  you guys to it where she interviews Rainier and they clearly like got stuff going
• 20:26
  on. But you know, again, wouldn't want to be a conspiracy theorist,
• 20:30
  like the most overused insult ever. So I don't know, guys,
• 20:34
  let us know what you guys think. Are you surprised by this? I
• 20:37
  did put a poll through number one. If you if you say vote,
• 20:45
  I think it's like exclamation mark. Vote one is for yes, you are
• 20:51
  surprised, exclamation mark vote two is you're not surprised, and three is hell
• 20:56
  no, you're not surprised. So if you can send vote, I'm gonna
• 21:00
  try and get these to work. I'm sorry that they're kind of clunky.
• 21:03
  We'll see if, if if you can get it to work. So all
• 21:07
  right, anyway, with that said, I guess if there's nothing else,
• 21:11
  I got some super chows and then we'll move on to the next story.
• 21:15
  Plaine Dane gives us five bucks and says Smallville has one of the worst endings
• 21:19
  in TV show history. She's just as evil and should never leave herself.
• 21:23
  She should live and die in the hole. Thank you for that. Appreciated
• 21:30
  and noted, is all I will say. Zeppierre gives our that's Anonymous gives
• 21:36
  us five bucks and says, I know a guy that went to prison to
• 21:37
  save his mom from going to prison because she was selling cocaine. So he
• 21:42
  went to prison in place of his mother. He unfortunately was living with her
• 21:48
  at the time and took the blame for her despite him warning her. He
• 21:52
  told the cops and prosecutors that he was forcing her to help him sell.
• 21:56
  He was completely innocent, and she let him throw himself under the bus for
• 22:00
  her. Wow. I mean, I love my mother, but that's nuts.
• 22:07
  That is well. If a mother loves her son, she wouldn't let
• 22:11
  him do that. No, That's what I'm saying. Yeah, um yeah,
• 22:15
  thanks. A good anecdote from Mitch Hedberg. He wants to try to
• 22:22
  go through an airport with I think heroin in his pocket, and when when
• 22:26
  it became apparent that he was going to get searched, he gave it to
• 22:29
  his girlfriend. An apparently quite attractive woman. And then and they let her
• 22:37
  off with the warning and a strap and a slap on the wrist, which
• 22:41
  would definitely not have happened if mitchad Burg himself has been had been caught with
• 22:45
  a So you know what of advice if you if you're trying to smuggle drugs
• 22:49
  through an airport, give it to your girlfriend. Okay, yeah, and
• 22:55
  that's maybe I'm being mostly sarcastic, but only mostly. All right, Uh
• 23:08
  so I guess okay, we'll move on to the next story. I'll let
• 23:11
  us what you guys think about this one in the comments. I look forward
• 23:15
  to seeing your thoughts. We'll see how these vote this voting thing worked out
• 23:18
  at the end of the show. All right, and I think, yeah,
• 23:21
  that's it for the super Challenge. Thank you Zappierre. That is anonymous
• 23:25
  and h and plain damee. So moving on to the next story. I'm
• 23:30
  going to hand it over to Mike. This is related, in my opinion,
• 23:33
  to the one we just did. Oh, Mike's not here. Oh
• 23:36
  he's back. He's back. Okay, hey, Mike, Yeah, Discord
• 23:38
  just dirped on me. Oh yeah, I know it did on me earlier
• 23:42
  today. All Right, we're on the We're on the next story, so
• 23:45
  I'm gonna give it to you then, all right than in related news,
• 23:51
  very related games, there's there's gonna be a tiny bit of a thread on
• 23:53
  the show to day here, as I'm sure some of you will figure out.
• 23:57
  Jim Caviezels Sound of Freedom has hit theaters with a bang. The anti
• 24:06
  child of trafficking movie, which is based on a true story, focuses around
• 24:11
  Tim Ballard. Ballard, a homeland security agent, resigns when his superiors refused
• 24:18
  to fund operations that would help rescue children from human traffickers. Angered by the
• 24:23
  lack of direct action, Ballard strikes out by himself to rescue as many children
• 24:29
  as he can, pound for pound. The film has been a massive success,
• 24:33
  outperforming Indiana Jones five in pre cells and already earning back its initial budgets
• 24:41
  and then sum But naturally, such a pure movie with a noble message isn't
• 24:47
  without its detractors. CNN, for example, the same CNN where a former
• 24:53
  producer was caught soliciting miners, called the movie q and A by qan On
• 25:00
  supporters for QAnon supporters. The Guardian labeled the movie paranoid and QAnon adjacent should
• 25:07
  be noted the Guardian also signing the praises of Netflix's cutei's calling the movie bold
• 25:14
  and misunderstood. The Washington Post parrots the same points as others, going so
• 25:19
  far as to link caviesl to QAnon, and the Washington Post also kind of
• 25:26
  gave quts glowing review. First of all, calling a like sort of espionage
• 25:34
  thriller movie paranoid, it's like calling a horror movie scared. It's like it's
• 25:44
  like calling a love story sentimental. It's like calling a film noir, you
• 25:49
  know, sparsely lit like you haven't. You haven't actually reviewed anything there.
• 25:56
  You just don't appear to have understood what the genre is or what a genre
• 26:02
  is. Secondly, there's this trendy new objective QAnon adjacent. Of course,
• 26:11
  QAnon has nothing to do with anything, certainly not with the gods to this
• 26:15
  movie. It's barely even a thing. It's it's not like Antifa or BLM,
• 26:21
  where you can actually see people amassing all over the world with the same
• 26:25
  signs, the same flags, the same insignia, But Q and on it's
• 26:30
  basically a phantom that the mainstream media summons upon itself whenever they need to really
• 26:38
  take the nuclear option on something. It's like that. It's like the Defcon
• 26:45
  system of I guess identitarian name calling. Defcon five is call them far right
• 26:52
  or old right, depending depending on Defcon four is calling them white suppress emesis,
• 27:00
  Defcon three is calling the misogynists, Defcon two is calling them Russian disinformation,
• 27:08
  and Defcon three is call them q and on. These are all subject
• 27:15
  to change, obviously, depending on what the current thing is. But q
• 27:22
  and on adjacent has only ever been used twice to my knowledge, for January
• 27:29
  the sixth, and for this. This is a weapon they only break out
• 27:34
  when they really need to break it out. Nobody knows what qan on is.
• 27:38
  They've never seen it. They don't know what it's made of or how
• 27:41
  it works. They don't know anything except that it's this very bad thing,
• 27:45
  something something insurrection. They have weapons of earth, fire, air, and
• 27:52
  water, but but this is their ethereal weapon. It doesn't mean anything.
• 27:56
  It doesn't it doesn't. It doesn't mean snake, it does mean hawk.
• 28:00
  It doesn't even mean enemy tribe. It just means panic. It just means
• 28:07
  fear. Funnily enough, it just means paranoia. So you can tell from
• 28:14
  the reactions of the communist ship bag mainstream media just how important something is,
• 28:21
  but simply observing which death con level to which they've escalated. If they go
• 28:27
  full Q and on, they've gotten desperate. Yeah, this wasn't a protest
• 28:33
  against election interference. It's uga booger dirka derka this was This wasn't a protest
• 28:41
  against child trafficking. It's uga booger dorka derker. Okay, we can attack
• 28:45
  it now. That's all any of this is. They're not even pretending to
• 28:49
  be journalists anymore. They only they only tell the narratives they're told to tell,
• 28:56
  using the specific buzzwords they're told to use. And all they're doing is
• 29:02
  indicating exactly how nervous they are about this particular thing. And they're just pointing
• 29:10
  at their own weaknesses. It's like they openly giving us the codes to the
• 29:15
  Enigma machine that they're using. They can't help themselves because they've never even been
• 29:22
  challenged, like the Nazis put Joseph Gebel's in charge of propaganda. The Fourth
• 29:32
  Reich in which we're dealing appears to have put a gym hole full of monkeys
• 29:40
  with typewriters in in charge of their propaganda, they just go Chombawember means bad.
• 29:48
  I hereby declared Chombawember to be bad red and then then everyone and then
• 29:53
  everyone just goes read. And they keep getting away with it because they're effectively
• 29:59
  to the to fail because some fat cunt keeps pumping stolen money into that whole
• 30:06
  industry. Well, I mean when they get knocked down, they get up
• 30:10
  again, and they never let me down. That's what that band got in
• 30:17
  secretly, secretly, they are just we both away, seeing my life away.
• 30:26
  I usually I usually conclude these stories with fuck the mainstream media, but
• 30:32
  honestly, sometimes it acts as a useful beacon. They tell us exactly what
• 30:38
  what the government wants and what the government is telling them to tell us,
• 30:42
  and that's some very useful information as to exactly what should not be done.
• 30:49
  So so they don't don't feel too bad, don't be too paranoid that the
• 30:56
  government is spying on you. You can. You can spy on the government
• 31:00
  anytime you want, because that's spewing their agenda all over you, every time
• 31:06
  you opened a newspaper, hooton on the TV. Knowledge is power, people,
• 31:11
  and mostly our enemies. No, absolutely nothing. So I watched.
• 31:18
  I just want to mention that if you're interested in the story behind it,
• 31:22
  First of all, it's been covered on mainstream media like years ago by CBS,
• 31:26
  so like if it's not, it's not. It's not pulled out of
• 31:30
  anybody's ass, Like the mainstream media actually reported on it, like in twenty
• 31:34
  fifteen, twenty fourteen or something like that. And it's it was, and
• 31:37
  Tim Ballot is a real man that this movie is a dramatization of Yes,
• 31:41
  it's a film. Movie is also very old. It was already in the
• 31:47
  can like yeah eight no, not not ape close, I think five years
• 31:52
  ago. Yeah, and when Disney bought Fox, they kind of shit canned
• 31:59
  the movie. Yeah, they had to wait for someone else to come along,
• 32:02
  and I guess it was this studios. Ye, so well, and
• 32:07
  then there's also a documentary um. But the media was doing hit pieces on
• 32:14
  this guy prior, Like there was one yeah on Ballard um Sleep where a
• 32:21
  reporter went with him on a raid and kids were rescued. He rescued children,
• 32:28
  and the reporter tried to find a way to make that look bad and
• 32:31
  the worst she was able to do was paint him as an amateur who was
• 32:38
  doing it without the kind of um flair and precision and stuff that that the
• 32:46
  the government would do if they did it. So the whole thing was HiT's
• 32:51
  bad because he's not doing it as a part of the government something. This
• 32:58
  isn't like a Tom Clancy, No, this is more infuriating. In that
• 33:02
  Slate article, they said that that his actions likely traumatized the children being molested
• 33:10
  and photographed, well, while being molested totally doesn't, right, Yeah,
• 33:15
  yeah, yeah. The real the real scary thing is seeing military guys show
• 33:20
  up to rescue you because they have guns and other weapons of mass destruction,
• 33:24
  not the rapes of children. And just another point about the Slate article.
• 33:31
  All right, Slate is the publication that allowed a pedophile to write an article
• 33:38
  about what a victim he was because he has these urges and can't act on
• 33:45
  them because acting on him is bad. Like literally, oh pity me,
• 33:50
  I have this this uh and and it's It pretty much set the stage for
• 33:54
  pedophiles all over arguing that they're their illness is a sexuality that's just misunderstood,
• 34:05
  and that they're all non offending and should should be treated as victims of a
• 34:13
  sexuality, a natural sexuality that is a handicap for them, a social handicap
• 34:20
  for them, rather than being recognized as people with an illness that needs treatment
• 34:30
  in order to protect the public from them acting on their symptoms, and in
• 34:37
  order to protect them from being becoming criminals when they act on their symptoms.
• 34:42
  And it really so like Slate has been trying to normalize pedophilia for quite some
• 34:49
  time. And that's the thing. The more hysterical a particular media personality is
• 34:57
  over this video, the your degrees of separation you can presume them to have
• 35:05
  from an actual pedophile ring. That's the only reason for them to get hysterical
• 35:12
  over this, because the film and the story do not create any kind of
• 35:19
  likelihood of any people going out and taking actions against media personalities or the general
• 35:28
  public, or trying to go on missions to South America or anything like that.
• 35:31
  It's it's very obvious it is not your average normal person that's going to
• 35:37
  undertake such a mission, right, But these people who are hysterical over this
• 35:44
  and who are hysterically trying to tank it, who are trying to undermine it,
• 35:50
  have to have some sort of motive for that. And if it's not
• 35:53
  to prevent some sort of actions by people that might be inspired by the film,
• 35:59
  because this isn't the type of thing that people can just do because they're
• 36:02
  inspired, Um, then it must be because they they don't want to see
• 36:07
  this kind of behavior exposed, and they don't want to see this kind of
• 36:09
  baby behavior condemned. And so obviously either they are working for somebody who has
• 36:16
  said, you know, you gotta kill this, you gotta emphasize that this
• 36:20
  is bad, or they themselves are part of an organization and don't don't kid
• 36:25
  yourselves. Just because there was a false flag, and I mean QAnon was
• 36:34
  in obvious false flag. If you read the tweets and the posts on on
• 36:43
  four Chan and thought QAnon was real, you're the most one of the most
• 36:46
  gullible people out there. I'm sorry. Like the obviousness was just undeniable the
• 36:58
  first thing I saw. It was an obvious false flag. Right, But
• 37:01
  just because QAnon was a false flag does not mean that the crime now suddenly
• 37:07
  no longer exists and didn't ever right. It still is like there's been organizations
• 37:14
  for for decades to try to um take down big pedophile rings worldwide and human
• 37:24
  trafficking has been a problem worldwide for decades, for well forever, honestly,
• 37:35
  and so this this idea that, uh, it's suddenly not something that can
• 37:38
  be talked about without referencing QAnon. There's no basis for it. There's no
• 37:45
  basis for making that comparison. Yeah, right, then there's no basis for
• 37:49
  hysteria to try to get rid of or um demonize a guy who's trying and
• 37:58
  in the story of a guy who's trying to rescue children from from traffickers,
• 38:02
  it's just evidence that these people, like I said, are our predators themselves
• 38:08
  or are working for predators who have told them go out and do everything you
• 38:13
  can to destroy this film. And and if you know somebody is the latter
• 38:17
  and they're actually doing what they're told, then they might as well be predators
• 38:22
  themselves, even if they've never touched a kid. So I was just gonna
• 38:25
  I wanted to say a couple of things about this. If you want to
• 38:30
  hear more, there is a really great interview that Jordan Peterson did with Tim
• 38:36
  Ballard and Jim Caviezel on his channel. I think it's like from the week
• 38:40
  before the movie came out, which is Independence Day. I wasn't going to
• 38:45
  cover this originally, Like, I mean, I'm interested in watching the movie.
• 38:49
  I thought, you know, I saw the interview, I thought it
• 38:51
  was really great and I got some you know, I was sort of like,
• 38:54
  well, you know, is this Amend's issue? But I think it
• 38:57
  is, and I'm gonna tell you why. At least it's adjacent, not
• 39:00
  pan On adjacent, but men's issues adjacent. So in that Tim Ballard is
• 39:06
  a father, he has two sons, and he in his anecdote about like
• 39:10
  his first experience with this it actually involved a boy. And one of the
• 39:15
  things that no one talks about is how many boys are sex trafficed. Now,
• 39:21
  of course girls are too, but everybody talks about that. Where do
• 39:23
  you know that? But what is left out of the conversation is that there
• 39:27
  are also boy victims, and in the story you have a man. And
• 39:32
  I think this is one of the reasons why the mainstream hates this movie.
• 39:37
  They just hate this movie for partly because the Tim Ballard is a Christian and
• 39:43
  the studio that's producing the film is also like a religious studio. Jim Caviezel
• 39:47
  is a well known, very religious man. He played Christ in the Passion
• 39:51
  of the Christ with Mel Gibson. He was also in The Count of Monte
• 39:54
  Cristo, which is really great. I love that movie and if you haven't
• 39:57
  seen it, I would check it out with him and Guy p Years it's
• 40:00
  awesome. But anyway, and so there's that, but there's also the fact
• 40:05
  that the main character is a man, is a white man, is a
• 40:07
  religious white man, is an American religious white man that wants to go and
• 40:12
  save children from sex traffickers. And this is based on real you know,
• 40:16
  it's a it's a real story of a real man who actually did these things.
• 40:21
  But the movie is not a documentary. It's presented as a kind of,
• 40:24
  you know, thriller type of story with a lot of dramatic dramatic elements.
• 40:30
  So some people, even Tim Ballard and Jim Caviezel said, you could
• 40:35
  kind of compare it to the movie Taken with Liam Neeson, except that Taken's
• 40:38
  not based on anything real. And I think that the funny thing is is
• 40:43
  that when Taken came out, the response wasn't like this because it wasn't quite
• 40:47
  hitting as close to home. And I think it's because this film is talking
• 40:52
  about a man's real experience in a thing that is a big problem and in
• 40:57
  particular, and I think this is another thing that people minimize. They don't
• 41:00
  think that shit happens in the United States, but it does. In fact,
• 41:04
  of people who buy trafficked sex slaves or whatever you want to call it,
• 41:08
  a lot of them are in the States. And so this is the
• 41:12
  reason why they are trying to dismiss it. This is why they are attacking
• 41:15
  it. This is why they're mad that it made more money than Indiana Jones
• 41:19
  and the feminist cringe Fest, because people are interested in these kinds of stories.
• 41:27
  So I think that that is a very important thing. But I would
• 41:30
  check out the interview with Tim Ballard and Jordan Peterson. It's about two hours.
• 41:37
  Jim Caviezel's there, but he doesn't say that much. It's mostly Tim
• 41:39
  Ballard talking about his experiences. It's very worthwhile to watch, and that is
• 41:45
  a man that people should look at as someone to look up to and maybe
• 41:51
  even model themselves after. He seems like a good man that's trying to do
• 41:53
  something really good and really important that the elites do not want us involved in.
• 42:00
  And that's more more reason to support it. So originally I wasn't going
• 42:02
  to talk about it, and I got like a bit of pushback. Oh
• 42:06
  the guy as a Christian, you know, we don't want to piss off
• 42:07
  the subscribers. I don't care. Okay, what's right is right. So
• 42:10
  when the when the mainstream media essentially runs cover for groomers, there is a
• 42:16
  problem. I don't know that that's a partisan issue, but it shouldn't be.
• 42:22
  So that's one thing. The second thing is, um, I see
• 42:24
  that there's only twenty one votes and there's like fifty over fifty people watching.
• 42:29
  Give me a vote of the poll. So why do you think the mainstream
• 42:31
  media is so critical of Sounder Freedom? Is it because it's a taken rip
• 42:35
  off? Is because Jim Caviezel is the CEO of QAnon? Or is it
• 42:37
  because they're groomers? Let me know in the poll what you think. Why
• 42:42
  why else would they be so critical of this film? Why because if they
• 42:45
  just ignored it, it probably wouldn't have made that much money. But because
• 42:50
  they came out after it so aggressively, I think that's why people are interested.
• 42:53
  The other thing is about QAnon. So I don't know if you know,
• 42:58
  if you've noticed but I've noticed when you're dealing with the mainstream media,
• 43:00
  when you're dealing with academics, when you're dealing with the intellectuals and the politicians,
• 43:05
  they're not talking to you. They're playing magic the gathering and you're trying
• 43:08
  to have a conversation. And when you and when you say, oh,
• 43:12
  what about this thing, they just play the the Andrew take card. They
• 43:15
  play the Harvey Weinstein card, they play the me too card, they play
• 43:19
  the woman card, which is probably like Trump's all the other cards. They
• 43:22
  play the QAnon card, they play the far right mega extremist card, they
• 43:27
  play whatever works. And what you gotta do is you just gotta ignore it
• 43:30
  because it's not an argument and it doesn't have any value. Like so if
• 43:35
  they say QAnon, you say, shut up. We're having a real conversation
• 43:37
  with adults here. Do you care about children being trafficked or not? Because
• 43:43
  if you don't, that that says everything I need to know. So if
• 43:45
  that's you don't even entertain those ideas, don't don't make the argument, you
• 43:52
  know, in favor of Andrew taate. If they're just using it to silence
• 43:55
  you and to throw you in with with whatever they've dreamed up in their head
• 44:00
  and don't let them. It's it's not They're not to be taken seriously,
• 44:04
  is what I'm saying. They're just using the cards to silence people. That's
• 44:08
  all it is. It's not about the truth, it's not about trying to
• 44:12
  find a solution. It's not even about identifying the problem. It's about silencing
• 44:16
  opposition. So I hope this movie kicks ass. I want to watch it
• 44:21
  at some point, and I hope that you know, if you're interested,
• 44:25
  you check it out. I will say that this film is PG. Thirteen.
• 44:29
  There isn't anything like really explicit that's being shown, partly because they wanted
• 44:35
  to make sure they can get, you know, as many people to watch
• 44:37
  it as possible. They also didn't want in any way to sort of glamorize
• 44:42
  or create something that's kind of like a grindhousy thing just for the shock value.
• 44:46
  They wanted to really touch on the how important it is without showing you.
• 44:52
  And Tim Bowles says, the stuff that he saw, you couldn't you
• 44:55
  couldn't even dream of reproducing it on film, So I I dread to think
• 45:00
  about it. I mean, I don't know how the guy maintains insanity.
• 45:02
  But anyway, those are my thoughts on that. So I don't know if
• 45:05
  anybody, yeah, what was that? I have to wonder what kind of
• 45:15
  mike you're breaking up? Are you? Is he breaking up for you?
• 45:17
  Guys? Yeah? Yeah, okay, I'm gonna kid talking until I'm not.
• 45:22
  Yeah, you're good, okay. I have to wonder what kind of
• 45:30
  rating was given to cuties. I hate to bring up this movie. I
• 45:36
  I I didn't. I didn't allude to it during that time when it was
• 45:40
  famous. If there's a rating you can get on if there's a rating you
• 45:45
  can get on Netflix. This in any way related to the year SRB thing?
• 45:51
  Then how did they were they? Was it like, yeah, there's
• 45:55
  some sexual content, but it's children, so it doesn't counter sexual content,
• 46:00
  so you you know, universal everyone could watch this. It's inspirational for for
• 46:07
  little girls everywhere. But this was Yeah, there's there's a reason lots of
• 46:12
  people aren't much in this because they don't know what they're going to see,
• 46:15
  and they don't they don't like the idea. I'm I'm reluctant to watch it,
• 46:19
  to be honest, because it's I don't know what I'm going to see
• 46:22
  and I'd rather not even see it. But at the same time, I'm
• 46:27
  like, I have to see what the fuss is about. But yeah,
• 46:32
  it's it's this. How much worse is this than cuties? I don't imagine
• 46:38
  they're actually the first thirty minutes of Sound of Freedom is pretty fucking visceral.
• 46:44
  M Okay, well, I mean it's more about it's more about the performances
• 46:52
  of the people reacting to things, though I don't think it's You can't do
• 46:55
  a documentary on people being rescued for something terrible without showing how terrible the thing
• 47:04
  is. I like, you may not be able to be um explicit because
• 47:10
  obviously you want to be able to show it in theaters. And even if
• 47:15
  this was adults, UM, you wouldn't be able to show that in theaters,
• 47:21
  but you would still be able to show the child being in fear.
• 47:27
  You would still be able to show, uh, you know, how how
• 47:30
  cruel and heartless and frightening the perpetrators are. But I mean, it's it's
• 47:38
  not going to be It's it's probably not made to be easy to watch.
• 47:44
  It's made to be to get people to understand why he's doing what he's doing
• 47:49
  and why it needs to be done. So this is I haven't seen it
• 47:54
  yet. I intend to, and it's probably going to be hard for me
• 47:59
  to watch it, but I'm going to do it anyway, just to see,
• 48:04
  you know, what this guy did and what he's been doing, just
• 48:07
  just from what I've read. It's it's not going to be an easy thing
• 48:12
  to watch, but I will say this, it's something. It's really something
• 48:17
  to understand. The people who are involved in this type of work are almost
• 48:23
  all men. Yep. Right. There are women who are involved in the
• 48:28
  part where you know the child is now rescued and go for the recovery and
• 48:35
  the child needs nurturing and care and psychological assistance and so on, But there
• 48:40
  are not so many women involved in the gritty, painful, dangerous and scary
• 48:49
  part of going into the environments where children are being victimized and extracting the children
• 48:55
  from those environments. That is men's work. M h. And it's not
• 49:01
  because women shouldn't do it. It's not because women aren't aren't capable. It's
• 49:09
  because women won't do it. Yeah, you'll, you'll, you'll will have
• 49:15
  seen taken right at least at least you'll will be pypefully familiar with the memes
• 49:23
  that have come from Taken. I have a particular set of skills you we'llhout
• 49:29
  you down. For the particular set of skills that Liam Neeson was talking about
• 49:32
  is I'm very good at hunting down child traffickers. That's what that That's what
• 49:36
  that means about this this secret agent guy is his daughter was taken in Paris,
• 49:44
  but by this shadowy human human trafficking, and everyone, like from every
• 49:53
  like the political avenue was like, yeah, go Liam Neeson, we fucking
• 49:58
  hate the child traffickers in Paris and we want to watch you kill as many
• 50:02
  people as possible with the butt of your gun. That's so go ahead and
• 50:07
  do. And no nobody seem to care. I guess it was because it
• 50:12
  was a European human trafficking thing they were talking about, and you give us
• 50:16
  a fik about that, and also that it was a woman trafficking, yes,
• 50:24
  cartel and yeah, Hollywood is its all is in all sorts of panties
• 50:31
  in a bunch about women getting trafficked. That they will they will watch Taken
• 50:37
  and give Taken a sequel, and give Taken a third sequel, and they'll
• 50:42
  be like, yeah, yeah, fucking fucking stick it to those woman traffickers,
• 50:49
  Liam Neeson. But this is what happens the first time you see any
• 50:53
  kind of movie about child traffickers. It's so weird, isn't it so weird?
• 51:00
  I don't leave a couple of ye unless you count Peter pan I want
• 51:07
  to hear Mike Ja's thoughts. Go ahead, Mike a couple of a couple
• 51:10
  of last things. If you find yourself a little bit short on disposed blood
• 51:15
  income which you want to see this movie anyway, just google Sound of Freedom,
• 51:23
  pay it Forward, and you should get the angel dot com website where
• 51:28
  you have people that are basically group funding tickets for people for the sole purpose
• 51:35
  of people that you know want to see the movie but may not have the
• 51:37
  funding together to come and claim absolutely no strings attached to be able to go
• 51:45
  see the movie. Yep. And another way is I do believe they are
• 51:51
  working with Elon Musk. They want to get this much like um oh,
• 51:54
  like what they did? What is a woman? They want to get this
• 51:59
  later in July on Twitter. They want to they want to get this on
• 52:01
  Twitter. So look, look looking forward to the fuckery that's going to be
• 52:07
  surrounding that when that happens. Yeah, I have Angel Studios on my Uh
• 52:10
  we have the Amazon what is that little thing with the remote? I forget
• 52:14
  firestick and you can download Rumble there. So you know, guys, if
• 52:20
  you if you don't mind support Rumble Chan. She she wants to you know,
• 52:24
  you to help her train for her fight against She is ready to rumble
• 52:30
  and um. But you can get Rumble on your firestick and you can also
• 52:34
  get Angel Studios. And there's a lot of content there. Uh. They
• 52:37
  are really growing and and before you you you're worried that it's all going to
• 52:42
  be very like preachy Bible stuff, it's not. I mean, yes,
• 52:45
  a lot of it is because people who put it together are are Christians.
• 52:49
  But there's a lot of other kinds of content. I don't know if you
• 52:51
  remember Julie Barowski. Do you guys remember Julie Barroowski. Yah, she had
• 52:54
  a big YouTube channel Libertarian. I had her on the show once like early
• 52:58
  on. Well, she put together this project called the Tuttle Twins, which
• 53:01
  are these children's books about libertarianism, and they have a cartoon show and it's
• 53:06
  on Angel Studios and they're pretty good they're they're actually pretty good and they're they're
• 53:09
  good for kids, so check check that out as well. I would suggest
• 53:15
  it. I mean, if you're looking for something that isn't like groomer oriented,
• 53:19
  woke, trash, and then I mean Angel Studios is pretty much you
• 53:22
  know there. And I know that some people don't like they don't want,
• 53:25
  you know, anything to be political. The problem is is that what we're
• 53:30
  dealing with is those people, the people we're dealing with, they make everything
• 53:32
  political. So any act that isn't under their jurisdiction is a political act if
• 53:39
  you you know, whether you like it or not. So just don't worry
• 53:43
  about that, just do it. Okay. So I got thirty six votes.
• 53:45
  I'm gonna end this poll. Looks like everyone has agreed that they are
• 53:49
  groomers the mainstream media because they are protecting or they're well, they're they're against
• 53:55
  I guess the movies that are anti child sex trafficking for some reason. So
• 54:02
  I don't know, clear that up all right? Anyway, with all let's
• 54:07
  said, I got some super chaws and I think that's it. So let's
• 54:12
  take a look at those. Meredith g gives us five bucks. Thank you,
• 54:14
  Meredith and says HBr News four thirteen, Honey for the Badgers. Keep
• 54:19
  in that the story dramatized in Sound of Freedom was reported by CBS in twenty
• 54:24
  fourteen. See that's what I was saying, And it isn't interesting that one
• 54:29
  of the key players in that story was a woman high up in the trafficking
• 54:31
  organization. The Qan connection is a false equivalency. Well, yeah, so
• 54:37
  that's right. I shared the story with Alison and she was initially doubtful that
• 54:44
  it would be good for a story for the news show, but she looked
• 54:46
  at the elements and which she was like, oh, the main I guess
• 54:50
  the big bad at least what she said. I haven't seen the movie myself.
• 54:53
  If you guys have seen it, let us know what you guys think.
• 54:55
  Is apparently a woman not just a woman, but a woman of color,
• 55:00
  so you know, whoa whoa? Shouldn't she be a Jedi instead?
• 55:05
  I mean representation, guys, but not that kind. So anyway, thank
• 55:10
  you for that. And then it got a super chow from playing Dane for
• 55:15
  five bucks? Thank you playing Dane and says was there a pizza Gate reference?
• 55:17
  I hate when people don't take an issue seriously, just because the film
• 55:22
  was made out of it. It reminds me the Teflon and DuPont scandal that
• 55:25
  resulted in an entire poisoning of a town and the entire planet. That's why
• 55:30
  we all have forever chemicals in US. People try to poop poo it by
• 55:34
  saying it's loosely based on a true story. Well, I don't know if
• 55:37
  there's any Pizza Gate references in there, but again, so what like,
• 55:40
  what is Pizza Gate? Is it? Is it really illegitimate? I mean,
• 55:44
  I haven't followed it super closely, but let's be real, is it
• 55:47
  really illegitimate? Do you guys remember a YouTuber named Mouthy I watched and read
• 55:53
  a bunch of stuff in regard to Pizza Gate. And what happened was people
• 55:58
  got wind of some information that legitimately was about child trafficking, and they went
• 56:06
  all kinds of places with it that were not legitimate, and you ended up
• 56:09
  with this this humongous conspiracy theory. And I think what ended up, the
• 56:15
  reason that it happened that ended up that way was partly because of people buying
• 56:21
  into the um the QAnon false flag, and and so it took them off
• 56:28
  of the trail of things that were really happening and created this um sort of
• 56:36
  conspiracy theory outlook that they really they were no longer focused enough to to um
• 56:46
  figure anything out at all, and started just randomly accusing or accusing everybody that
• 56:52
  they disliked politically and and ignoring any potential leads that went to people that they
• 57:00
  they you know, we're on the same side of the political fence as and
• 57:04
  and it it got really stupid, and then somebody actually showed up at a
• 57:08
  pizza parlor with a with a gun. Um, it just it went really
• 57:15
  weird after that. So it's the conspiracy theory had some grains of truth and
• 57:23
  then just went on the deep end um in the end. Well because and
• 57:30
  I there's a there's a reason for that, right, Somebody came along and
• 57:36
  was like, oh, these people are onto something. We got to mislead
• 57:37
  them and get them down the wrong path, make them all look crazy,
• 57:42
  and unfortunately it worked. Yeah. Well I I I mean I think that
• 57:47
  because the media is not helping anyone with the truth, you're just gonna have
• 57:52
  people kind of stumbling around the dark trying to put things together, and they're
• 57:57
  gonna they're gonna make mistakes, but like, I'm not gonna blame them for
• 58:00
  it, because you know, we shouldn't, like normal people shouldn't be doing
• 58:06
  the job that the media is supposed to be doing, and they're not doing
• 58:07
  it and they have no interest in doing it. So you're gonna get people
• 58:12
  that are scrambling to figure it out themselves, and they're gonna make mistakes,
• 58:15
  but I don't blame them because at least they're trying, is how I see
• 58:17
  normal people or who should be the media. Yeah, but in terms of
• 58:22
  the whole pizza gate thing, not everybody is cut out to be a detective,
• 58:29
  right, Yeah, but the people who are who would appear to be
• 58:35
  qualified don't want to do it because they're protecting these people. So anyway,
• 58:40
  um, thanks for the super chow plane Dane. We're gonna move on to
• 58:45
  that story. Let us know what you guys think about this one in the
• 58:46
  comments, and we're going to now look at well Ben and Jerry's, which
• 58:52
  I don't. I don't have Ben and Jerry's anyway, so it doesn't bother
• 58:57
  me. But all right, uh, Mike, this is yours again.
• 59:01
  You don't mind. I never do. I never do so. Boy howdy,
• 59:07
  Ben and Jerry's really took a good hard look at what was going on
• 59:13
  with with with Anheuser Bush and Target, and they decided they needed the step
• 59:20
  right in it, right next to them. Hold hold my cherry Garcia so
• 59:27
  sugary dessert diabetes company. Ben and Jerry's just can't help themselves. Despite the
• 59:34
  utter failures of companies like its, Target and Anaheuser Bush, who decided to
• 59:37
  embrace the woke progressive marketing, they too decided to give it a try,
• 59:45
  and on the fourth of July, no less, Ben and Jerry has decided
• 59:49
  to post the following on social media quotes this fourth of July, It's high
• 59:53
  time we recognize that the US exists on stolen Indigenous land and to commit to
• 1:00:00
  returning it. Learn more and take action now, which was followed by a
• 1:00:06
  link to their website. The link brought users to their website, which expanded
• 1:00:09
  upon the tweet calling for the return of Mount Rushmore to the Lakota people and
• 1:00:15
  linked to a patition. Social media users and even normal non political people were
• 1:00:23
  not having the message. The company was trashed online, with some calling the
• 1:00:29
  ice cream brand the next blood Light and asking when they planned on returning the
• 1:00:34
  land their factory exists on and the Native Americans that must have lived there three
• 1:00:39
  hundred years ago or something. Furthermore, the brand's parent company, a Uni
• 1:00:45
  Leader, took a dip of around two billion amid a loose Boycott's all right,
• 1:00:51
  before people speak up on this, I just want to say, this
• 1:00:54
  is the poll, all right, And I think this is important because I've
• 1:00:58
  heard Michael Knowles, for example, say that he's okay with cancel culture in
• 1:01:01
  this instance. But I would argue that boycotts are not cancel culture. Those
• 1:01:07
  are different things. So vote on that what you think. Um. Meanwhile,
• 1:01:10
  I'm gonna let god rand mccam because I think he was going to say
• 1:01:14
  something, So go ahead. Yeah, it's kind of say a bunch of
• 1:01:19
  things and then and then you'll coming throwing a bunch of things into But I
• 1:01:24
  think I can juggle I can juggle them all. Um. First of all,
• 1:01:30
  it reminds me of that stunt cost comic. Um, the Indians,
• 1:01:37
  what are you leaving? Yeah? No, no, no, there's a
• 1:01:39
  bunch of stant costs coming in the first panel. Is um uh, something
• 1:01:46
  like, Um, I'm a religious person and therefore I pay to charity because
• 1:01:52
  I believe charity is the right thing to do. And then there was another
• 1:01:55
  religious person saying something about those lines, and then there was a socialist saying,
• 1:02:00
  I believe that people's money should should be given to everyone else. And
• 1:02:09
  then there's no following panel saying and that's why I are. People who believe
• 1:02:17
  in charity give to charity. People who believe in socialism believe in everyone else
• 1:02:23
  giving their money to everyone else, but not me. I believe everyone else's
• 1:02:30
  well, this should be redistributed, but mine. No, that's and this
• 1:02:37
  and this is why fucking socialism is like the flat earthism of economics, because
• 1:02:44
  you just assume everything is just going to happen without you, and it doesn't
• 1:02:49
  matter what you're what you're doing, every everything, And like, if you're
• 1:02:53
  going to take this, there are many many places you can take this.
• 1:02:58
  Absolutely foalsy Lodge logic. Excuse me while I you have allergies. No,
• 1:03:07
  I just smoked too much. If I if the entire USA is stolen land,
• 1:03:15
  and a lot of these people will say the entire USA is stolen land,
• 1:03:20
  then then all you Americans need to go back back to where you came
• 1:03:24
  from, which in most cases would be Europe, you know, Britain,
• 1:03:30
  Ireland, France, Spain, Germany, Scandinavia. And sure, come on,
• 1:03:35
  in all three hundred million of you, we're not even remotely for there's
• 1:03:38
  plenty of room over here. Things are going swimmingly. We need more immigrants,
• 1:03:45
  yes, yeah, and and but once, once you're here in Europe,
• 1:03:51
  my good American friends, you'll be informed, as we are that you
• 1:03:54
  are not indigenous in Europe either, unless you are the Sami people of Finland,
• 1:04:01
  as are as I am reliably import everyone else in Europe came from some
• 1:04:10
  Indo European tribes of apparently ghosts in the Caucasus who apparently originally came from Africa.
• 1:04:18
  So we should all just bog off to Africa and leave Europe to be
• 1:04:24
  ruled by the Neanderthals. Oh way, they're all dead. Meanwhile, as
• 1:04:30
  for what we call the natives of North America, I'm afraid you, Dennis
• 1:04:36
  over and throwbacks aren't quite off the hook either, having already displaced the even
• 1:04:41
  more ancient peoples who got there first. Needless to say, you came through
• 1:04:45
  Asia from the African continent, so you Doo can blog off back to Africa
• 1:04:51
  and leave America to the original original natives. Oh wait, they're all dead.
• 1:04:58
  Yeah. If if we were really taking this shit seriously, then all
• 1:05:03
  eight billion humans would have to make one great pilgrimage back to a lonely desert
• 1:05:10
  plain in the African savannah, surrounded by zebra and lion, somewhere at the
• 1:05:17
  at the estimated site of what we call mitochondrial eve, and we'd all have
• 1:05:24
  to stay there, all eight billion of us, crammed together shoulders shoulders,
• 1:05:28
  you shoulder in a small serengetti field, like some kind of infographic about overpopulation.
• 1:05:34
  But we're not going to do that, are we No, Because because
• 1:05:38
  to some extent we know it is okay to some extent for a species or
• 1:05:44
  a subspecies to migrate from one place to another. It can be an invasive
• 1:05:48
  migration, it can be a symbiotic migration. The question is Ben and indeed
• 1:05:57
  Jerry, if those are indeedy or real names. Does your presence in the
• 1:06:00
  good State of Vermont improve the good State of Vermont in terms of some kind
• 1:06:08
  of infrastructure? I mean, is it creating more wealth and happiness than the
• 1:06:17
  largely empty rolling glass plains that used to be in its place, I'd say
• 1:06:24
  it is. I'd say most things Europeans built in America are doing just that,
• 1:06:30
  improving some kind of infrastructure. I'm not sure I like you as a
• 1:06:35
  company, Ben and Jerry. Your marketing department is certainly operated by some embarrassing
• 1:06:43
  fucking clowns. But I would sooner have my shows invaded by ten of you,
• 1:06:48
  by ten pretentious white sugar howking conglomerates than the hundreds of thousands of dead
• 1:06:56
  weights on our infrastructure that we're really have culturally enriching our shores. It's something
• 1:07:02
  I've ensure you can relate to America. You see the difference. You need
• 1:07:09
  You need a policy to decide what to what extent migration is indeed, okay,
• 1:07:17
  like, just come up with a policy. I was here first.
• 1:07:23
  Is a policy findest keepers is a policy? Might makes right? Is a
• 1:07:30
  policy like the esto fable fine argument a little one, but it lacks teeth
• 1:07:35
  and claws such as we and so on. But like I said, maybe
• 1:07:40
  it should simply come down to who is making the most of the land.
• 1:07:45
  The landing question. Those who plant, those who plant orchards have a better
• 1:07:50
  case on the land than those who raise armies of feral hogs and just at
• 1:07:58
  least them on the on the eco system. Whatever the fuck happened. And
• 1:08:01
  yes, I suppose the jury is still out on which of these analogies best
• 1:08:06
  describes Ben and Jerry's with their white sugar factories and whatnot. Hey, I
• 1:08:12
  tried to defend you Ben and Jerry's. I really did, despite your determination
• 1:08:17
  to shoot yourselves in the foot. But you do this a lot. The
• 1:08:21
  only reason you get away with it is because people are addicted to you and
• 1:08:26
  the chemicals you sell consider considerably more than they're addicted to bad light. Anyway,
• 1:08:34
  just to close up, white sugar is worse for you than alcohol,
• 1:08:38
  and I mean it, fight me, fight me, right, I put
• 1:08:41
  you to so much right though. It is really bad. But you know,
• 1:08:47
  people do eat ice cream, and people do like ice cream, and
• 1:08:50
  people are gonna buy. So I just want to point out. If you
• 1:08:57
  really really like Cherry Arca and you're trying to boycott Ben and Jerry's and you
• 1:09:02
  just hate giving that that particular flavor up, look for a brand name called
• 1:09:10
  homemade. Um it's the United Dairy Farmer's brand, and buy that for a
• 1:09:16
  while. You might just find that you like it better than the other,
• 1:09:24
  but even if you don't, it's a pretty good substitute. Um, I
• 1:09:28
  happen to like it better. Although technically I'm boycotting all of the ice cream
• 1:09:32
  companies right now because I am on a diet same So yeah, I mean,
• 1:09:41
  like, this isn't really about ice cream. I'm I mean I think
• 1:09:44
  that if you're in the business of creating luxury, which an ice cream,
• 1:09:47
  ice cream is a luxury, it's not something people it is, you probably
• 1:09:50
  shouldn't be virtue signaling and going against the country that you know you make the
• 1:09:56
  most money from. So it's just not a good idea. But I think
• 1:09:59
  the purpose of me mentioning this firstly, uh, you know, I think
• 1:10:02
  that Ben and Jerry's made with high fructose corn syrup and not even sugar,
• 1:10:08
  but which is way worse. Oh yeah, it's way it's way worse.
• 1:10:11
  And that's why I say, if if you're gonna have ice cream, Hagandahs
• 1:10:15
  is probably like the most natural that I can think of off the top of
• 1:10:18
  my head. But again, if you don't need ice cream at all,
• 1:10:21
  then you're probably better off than everybody. Um. But my point was to
• 1:10:26
  say something about cancel culture because I've heard that people like not buying a product,
• 1:10:31
  like not going to Target, not buying bud Light, not buying you
• 1:10:35
  know, Ben and Jerry's now not going to see the new Indiana Jones movie,
• 1:10:41
  not buying the woke comic books like that. That's somehow cancel culture,
• 1:10:45
  and I I despise that comparison. Despise it because the choice to not spend
• 1:10:51
  your money on something is something we do every day all the time. Everybody
• 1:10:57
  discriminates. There's no such thing as people who don't because whenever you make a
• 1:11:00
  choice, you discriminate against something else every time. So cancel culture is different.
• 1:11:04
  Cancel culture is when you say, I don't like your message, and
• 1:11:10
  so I'm going to ruin your life. I'm gonna call your employers, I'm
• 1:11:14
  gonna call politicians, I'm gonna get your removed from social media, I'm gonna
• 1:11:18
  ban you from this or that thing, right, And it's not because I'm
• 1:11:23
  making the choice for myself. It's because I'm making the choice for everyone else
• 1:11:27
  about you. And so that's the important difference. So not giving people who
• 1:11:30
  hate you your money is not cancel culture. It's just boycott's. It's just
• 1:11:36
  a refusal to participate. Like when I learned that, oh, bud Light,
• 1:11:41
  you know, did this thing, and I was like, well,
• 1:11:44
  it literally doesn't affect me at all because I never bought the product to begin
• 1:11:46
  with. And if you already aren't buying it, then who cares. But
• 1:11:50
  I think it's important to make the make it make clear the distinction between boycotts,
• 1:12:00
  which are everybody has the choice to do at any time for any reason,
• 1:12:04
  and cancel culture, which requires you to go out and destroy somebody's life.
• 1:12:10
  Because you can't destroy them directly, You're just gonna destroy their social life,
• 1:12:14
  destroy their social media, destroy their job, destroy their prospects, whatever.
• 1:12:17
  That's a different animal completely. So that's the main reason why I brought
• 1:12:21
  the story up. Don't care about Ben and Jerry's don't eat them anyways,
• 1:12:26
  and I wouldn't if I were you because it's not good for you. So
• 1:12:29
  we could probably use for less ice cream. You have to also consider the
• 1:12:32
  difference between legitimate outrage and outrage porn. Yeah, and like legitimate or outrage
• 1:12:39
  you hear about something, you find out about something, you're like, well,
• 1:12:41
  that's that's shit. You know, it's outrageous. This person behaved this
• 1:12:45
  way or did this thing or whatever. But outrage porn is when you look
• 1:12:51
  for every little thing to be outraged by, and then you highlight every little
• 1:12:58
  example of every little outrage you can find, and you exaggerate how bad a
• 1:13:03
  particular instance is individually, making it out to be part of a pattern,
• 1:13:12
  or trying to connect it to things that it's not connected to in order to
• 1:13:16
  maintain an attitude of anger and outrage, but without any other purpose, Like
• 1:13:25
  you're not trying to fix any problems, you're not trying to help anybody.
• 1:13:30
  You're just looking for a good mad and that that's not it's not helpful,
• 1:13:39
  and it doesn't have any real purpose in your life. And cancel culture goes
• 1:13:45
  along with outrage porn in that it involves people looking for small mistakes, tracing
• 1:13:54
  back, you know, ten years of somebody's social media posts, looking for
• 1:13:58
  something that might be remotely politically incorrect. Oh, this person told an off
• 1:14:02
  color joke. Oh this person used to think X y Z. But now
• 1:14:08
  they've talked about how they've changed their mind. Let's cancel them for what they
• 1:14:11
  used to think, instead of celebrating the fact that they figured it out,
• 1:14:17
  you know, and that's whereas boycotting a company because the company is attempting to
• 1:14:25
  use if they're not just expressing a political opinion, they're trying to use a
• 1:14:30
  their financial supremacy and their popularity and so on, as a means of controlling
• 1:14:40
  the way that you think, and that you know they participate in cancel culture.
• 1:14:46
  And you know that's if you want to boycott somebody because they're participating in
• 1:14:50
  cancel culture, that isn't the same as digging through ten years of somebody's tweets
• 1:14:57
  and finding something they said that don't like, or purity testing. You know,
• 1:15:02
  somebody, somebody has in the past believed in the death penalty and now
• 1:15:09
  they don't. Well, but they used to, so obviously they have flawed
• 1:15:13
  thinking, well, no, they didn't have all the information right, or
• 1:15:16
  maybe they weren't very mature at that time. Like when I used to believe
• 1:15:20
  in the death penalty, it was because I was more of a black and
• 1:15:24
  white thinker, didn't have the nuance that I developed further into adulthood. And
• 1:15:30
  I think a lot of people in their youth are like that, where they
• 1:15:34
  they either they're too lenient on the idea of crime and criminals or they're too
• 1:15:43
  harsh, and then as they get into adulthood, they're more interesting in are
• 1:15:48
  more interested in reformation and recovery of human beings rather than either thinking in terms
• 1:15:57
  of you know, black and white, good or add or presuming everybody,
• 1:16:02
  um, you know, well meaning and just oh they just made a mistake.
• 1:16:08
  So all of that like calling calling something cancel culture to get rid of
• 1:16:14
  it or to counter it, doesn't get rid of it, doesn't counter it,
• 1:16:18
  doesn't convince anybody. Yeah, you can spread the word on it,
• 1:16:25
  and then you know, if you don't agree with it, don't give them
• 1:16:28
  your money. Fortunately, most of the companies that are doing this are selling
• 1:16:31
  something you don't need, so you're not gonna miss anything. You can shop
• 1:16:36
  for clothes at Old Navy or something, or you know, you don't think
• 1:16:40
  a target if you don't, if you don't like what they're doing. You
• 1:16:43
  don't have to drink beer. It's probably better if you don't. You don't
• 1:16:45
  have to eat candy bars or skittles or um, you know, or any
• 1:16:50
  of that stuff. So yeah, I mean, speaking of the companies selling
• 1:16:55
  things, it's very interesting because you know, you have such a you have
• 1:16:59
  a company making such a strong statement about the America, the US. Yeah,
• 1:17:02
  and then you look at who owns them, unial Leaver, and care
• 1:17:09
  to guess where unial Leaver is located. H No, I'm afraid the United
• 1:17:15
  States. London? Oh okay, well, yeah, that's interesting. I
• 1:17:20
  would I would have thought they were an American company, but um, nope,
• 1:17:25
  Well there you go. I mean we can just the UK is not
• 1:17:28
  doing so great either, so they got their own problems. I mean,
• 1:17:30
  but you know what, at least we're not France, especially now. So
• 1:17:38
  yeah, that that's actually something I was just talking about to somebody today when
• 1:17:42
  when we talk about that, it's it's important to sort of differentiate between,
• 1:17:48
  you know, historically the aristocracy and the peasants, or in modern times the
• 1:17:54
  modern aristocracy the establishment versus the general public, because they have never been on
• 1:18:00
  the same page, right, The government in France has never, it's very
• 1:18:05
  rarely been on the same page as the people of France. Of course,
• 1:18:10
  even even to the point of, you know, the reputation France has of
• 1:18:15
  surrendering all the time when some of the most courageous people were part of the
• 1:18:20
  resistance. Yeah, during during World War Two. So it's just I hate
• 1:18:28
  making fun of um that particular nation just because of that. And it's not
• 1:18:31
  because I have some French ancestry, although I do UM, but it is
• 1:18:36
  it is just that the reputation that they have in the United States is not
• 1:18:44
  deserved. Um. I know full pound people pun at them all the time,
• 1:18:50
  but I'm I'm kind of pulling for the the everyman you knowsment there right
• 1:18:57
  now. Yeah. It um, it perturbs me to have to defend the
• 1:19:03
  French, but I must because people keep saying, well, the French deserved
• 1:19:10
  this because of what they did to the Algerias. And this is the mistake
• 1:19:15
  people make. They can't differentiate between the French government and the French people.
• 1:19:19
  And it's the same with every country. They can't differentiate between the UK people
• 1:19:25
  and the UK government of the UK, of the American government and the American
• 1:19:29
  people. And what you're talking about with regard to Algeria is what the French
• 1:19:34
  government did to Algeria. Yeah, when you when you talk about in terms
• 1:19:41
  of the British Empire, that's what the British government did to the world.
• 1:19:47
  I mean, it's it's it's it's just it's pretty much the world. And
• 1:19:51
  yeah, fair enough. If I was in charge, I would be like,
• 1:19:56
  don't do that. If most British people we were in charge, we'll
• 1:20:00
  be like, yeah, don't, don't colonize the world. We're kind of
• 1:20:04
  happy as we are, well we're not. We're going through the French going
• 1:20:08
  through the Industrial Revolution, and we're all having a very hard time. But
• 1:20:12
  as we understand it are great great grandchildren again to benefit from from from all
• 1:20:18
  this. But the point is um, when when countries get too big,
• 1:20:29
  their governments start doing shady shit m And it's the governments that do this shady
• 1:20:35
  shit. The average citizen of any given country doesn't want to wage war on
• 1:20:44
  any other country, but the government does, and so the government wegs war
• 1:20:47
  on another country, and then that other country wages war on on on that
• 1:20:55
  country. But the people who lose out every time are the people the government's
• 1:21:00
  done. Like the French government annexed Algeria. They didn't even colonize it,
• 1:21:08
  they fall on annexed it and yeah, that was that was some bullshit,
• 1:21:12
  and the French government deserves everything it gets for that. But the French government
• 1:21:16
  isn't being punished for that. The French people are being punished for that,
• 1:21:21
  and yeah, and yes, the British government did some fucking horrific things for
• 1:21:28
  the last couple of hundreds of years of history, but the British people didn't
• 1:21:31
  know anything about that. They were just tending to their farms, tending to
• 1:21:35
  their jobs, going about their business. If anyone asked them about the British
• 1:21:43
  Empire's geopolitical state, they go, I don't I given, I just want
• 1:21:47
  to grill. Yeah, well the fuck. And this is always the case.
• 1:21:53
  The government of a country fucks up and the people get punished. M
• 1:22:00
  It's always the way, every single fucking time that the government fucks over some
• 1:22:05
  far away people, and then those far away people and perhaps their government kind
• 1:22:12
  of go, ah, we want retribution, and so they take retribution,
• 1:22:15
  and you know, you can sort of see how they're justified in that,
• 1:22:18
  but they take retribution against the people of that country, not the government.
• 1:22:25
  And it's the same every time the government sucks up and the people get punished.
• 1:22:30
  Every time the government sucks up, that people get punished. Yeah.
• 1:22:34
  We can either go through this endless series of circles of governments fucking each other
• 1:22:42
  over and the people paying for all their states, or we could just I
• 1:22:47
  don't know. Maybe the government could be smaller. Maybe I don't want to.
• 1:22:53
  I don't I don't want to completely dissolve the government. I'm not.
• 1:22:57
  I'm not the kind of anarchist that you create in your strong end. I'm
• 1:23:00
  just like, maybe if we never gave the government this much power in the
• 1:23:03
  first place, then then maybe various peoples wouldn't be wouldn't be fucking each other
• 1:23:12
  each other over forever, never holding the governments who did all this heinous ship
• 1:23:19
  accountable for what they did. Yeah, this is this is the problem with
• 1:23:24
  government. They fuck up, we get punished, Like, how do we
• 1:23:29
  how do we how do we break out of that cycle? We don't know?
• 1:23:32
  Well we do we fucking shrink these governments, vote for parties that will
• 1:23:40
  shrink for the government. But there's not going to happen because it's it's like
• 1:23:44
  appealing to a lion to be smaller. Well, it's worse than that,
• 1:23:49
  because it's a lion we created. It's like appealing to to some monstrous,
• 1:23:57
  genetically modified basilisk designed to fuck everyone's lives up, and appealing to that thing
• 1:24:04
  not to fuck everyone's lives up. Yeah, this is why it's so confusing.
• 1:24:10
  We created this thing in the first place to protect us, but for
• 1:24:16
  whatever reason or another, it figures out sooner or later the most expedient things
• 1:24:21
  to do is to fuck us over. We'll get into that in the next
• 1:24:26
  story. Yeah, safety net the most dangerous thing in existence. Yeah,
• 1:24:32
  just so that we don't get in the weeds again. This is more about
• 1:24:36
  the conversation around cancel culture in general, and we ended up going to France,
• 1:24:41
  but we're gonna come back to the West here, the part that's still
• 1:24:45
  not on fire. Um, and we'll go from there. But the West,
• 1:24:50
  Yeah, I know, I know, but it's the burning. It's
• 1:24:53
  the burning part right now. Um. But yeah, well, uh,
• 1:24:58
  we will probably come back to that another time because I know that Alison and
• 1:25:02
  I are planning on responding to a video from a French feminist and it's kind
• 1:25:08
  of old, but we're going to see how well her talking points have aged
• 1:25:12
  in the last couple of months. So anyway, we're gonna move on to
• 1:25:15
  the next story. Let's know what you guys think about this one in the
• 1:25:16
  comments. I am closing the poll, but it appears that is a boycott
• 1:25:21
  the same as cancel culture. Eighty five percent voted no, eight percent voted
• 1:25:26
  yes, and eight percent voted hagandas So I guess that that makes sense.
• 1:25:30
  And all right, so thank you guys so much. Let's move on to
• 1:25:34
  the last story. So I have I want to say something after I'm done
• 1:25:41
  reading this because I have a something that I want to ask that's a bit
• 1:25:44
  personal considering that I almost went to Washington, d C. On January sixth.
• 1:25:49
  I was very close to going. So. Comedian and actor YouTube commentator
• 1:25:54
  Russell Brand interviewed Tucker Carlson where they addressed the accusation. Tucker quote Cherry Pick
• 1:26:00
  and quote the forty thousand hours of footage from January sixth, before Tucker was
• 1:26:05
  let go from Fox News. He showed footage of the QAnon shaman Jacob Chansley
• 1:26:10
  being escorted into the Senate chamber by Capitol police. Chansley was convicted of family
• 1:26:15
  charges and sentenced to forty one months in prison prison. In the interview,
• 1:26:20
  Tucker asked, I played that footage and now I'm the bad guy. Tucker
• 1:26:25
  says one of his children was in the building and called him that day.
• 1:26:29
  When he says children and one of his sons, because they're coronass men and
• 1:26:32
  called him that day about what was happening. He said, any violence on
• 1:26:36
  January six I oppose and initially simply thought this got completely out of hand,
• 1:26:42
  and says he would have left it at that. However, it was the
• 1:26:45
  media lying with maximum aggression, calling the event a racist, white supremacist insurrection
• 1:26:51
  and recoiling at any form of questioning that tipped off and ticked off Tucker.
• 1:26:58
  Tucker says he has interviewed even Sunned, the chief of Capitol Police at the
• 1:27:01
  time of January six according to Tucker's son, said that the crowd at the
• 1:27:05
  Capitol was filled with federal agents, something we already knew Fox. Although this
• 1:27:12
  interview happened while Tucker was still with Fox, it was never aired. Tucker
• 1:27:16
  accuses Fox News of covering for the lies around January sixth, and that American
• 1:27:21
  news media should be ashamed of themselves. Hopefully sun will speak for himself give
• 1:27:28
  and give us more clarity on the controversy. Now, this is what I
• 1:27:30
  wanted to add to this because Lindsay wrote this, and then Lindsay and I
• 1:27:33
  went out to sit on the We have some hilly, grassy areas and it
• 1:27:38
  gets pretty sunny, and sometimes we go and sit there and just sort of
• 1:27:41
  talk. And I was thinking about something. I almost went to January sixth.
• 1:27:45
  I wanted to go just to like see what was going on, maybe
• 1:27:48
  get some interviews. I didn't think anything of it at the time, you
• 1:27:51
  know, the the protest getting out of hand. It didn't happen yet,
• 1:27:59
  It wasn't like, it wasn't even on the radar, although I thought there
• 1:28:01
  was a chance that things could get a little bit crazy. But I didn't
• 1:28:05
  end up going. And I know that like this, this is something,
• 1:28:12
  this particular incident, the January sixth thing, I think it's a bit of
• 1:28:16
  a divisive thing because there are people that believe that that was you know,
• 1:28:20
  completely wrong, it shouldn't have happened, and then there were people who believe
• 1:28:25
  it was righteous. And there are people like me, which I think is
• 1:28:27
  the majority, which is like, well, you know, if you if
• 1:28:30
  you should be able to protest, and yes, sometimes you'll get bad actors,
• 1:28:34
  Sometimes people go a little crazy, and sometimes it's bait for you know,
• 1:28:38
  the Feds, right, And that's just the reality of it. There's
• 1:28:41
  no need to go into it. That's just the way it is. But
• 1:28:44
  that's not the issue how people acted. There's nothing we can do about it.
• 1:28:46
  It's done right. Whatever it is, it is right. The issue
• 1:28:51
  is that a bunch of people who some people who didn't even go into the
• 1:28:56
  building, some people who weren't even there but knew people who were there,
• 1:29:00
  were arrested and taken into custody, and some of those people were thrown into
• 1:29:05
  solitary confinement, none of which got a trial. So this is the thing
• 1:29:12
  that I'm thinking about. Because I was asking Lindsay about this, and I
• 1:29:14
  was like, Okay, so I know that the people who were there are
• 1:29:15
  Trump supporters, and I know the majority of them, or at the very
• 1:29:19
  least there are people who care about election integrity. But I think that it's
• 1:29:23
  safe to say that most of them were Trump supporters. And I said to
• 1:29:27
  Lindsay, do you think that that makes this a partisan issue? And what
• 1:29:30
  I mean is because like people are always worried that, you know, I'm
• 1:29:34
  going to come across as partisan. I get criticized for this all the time,
• 1:29:38
  Okay, all the time, And the truth is I have views,
• 1:29:41
  and I have them, and that's all. I'm not going to apologize for
• 1:29:43
  that. But this is the thing I'm wondering about if I did go and
• 1:29:46
  I got arrested, and I'm not here doing this show right now, and
• 1:29:50
  I was in solitary confinement or something, even if I didn't enter the building,
• 1:29:54
  even if I didn't lay a finger on anybody, but I was just
• 1:29:57
  there and they tracked my phone and they went to my house and they picked
• 1:30:00
  me up, and they threw me in a hole for months. Okay,
• 1:30:04
  if that happened, would anyone come to my defense? I asked lindsay that,
• 1:30:10
  I said, what would you do if if I got thrown in jail,
• 1:30:12
  if they threw me in a hole, you know, just because I
• 1:30:15
  was in the wrong place at the wrong time, and I had no intention
• 1:30:17
  of causing any problems. I just wanted to talk to people. What would
• 1:30:20
  you do? And she said that she would have like gone crazy and thought
• 1:30:25
  to get my release and try to get as much attention as possible. But
• 1:30:29
  would there be people? This is the thing that worries me because I don't
• 1:30:33
  think this should be a part is an issue. Okay, despite what you
• 1:30:38
  think about Trump, that's that is not at all relevant. You guys have
• 1:30:41
  to like just get that out of your head. For a second, people
• 1:30:44
  got arrested because they protested, and they only got arrested at that protest.
• 1:30:48
  Meanwhile, there were other protests in the Capitol in twenty twenty during the Summer
• 1:30:53
  of Love where they set fire to shit and Nope, that none of this
• 1:30:56
  happened. It did not happen at this scale at all. Okay, were
• 1:31:00
  other police stations that were set on fire in other cities. All kinds of
• 1:31:03
  ship was going on, and nothing happened at this scale. In terms of
• 1:31:06
  the response. The media didn't even report on it, you know, like
• 1:31:10
  it was. It was treated completely different. And I know you guys know
• 1:31:15
  that that's sketchy. If I was thrown in jail, would you guys defend
• 1:31:18
  me or would you say that, oh, well, it's because he's partisan
• 1:31:21
  and we got to look at him on both sides. What would you say
• 1:31:24
  to that. I'm being serious because what it like what Tucker is saying is
• 1:31:29
  obvious. Yes, there were fens there. Yes people are gonna get bait
• 1:31:31
  it. But you know what, Americans and anybody in any country should have
• 1:31:35
  the right to protest if they think something sketchy is going on, and the
• 1:31:40
  fact that they shut it down, they shut it down so severely, and
• 1:31:43
  they made it in such a fucking circus. They've put fences around the buildings.
• 1:31:46
  There were grandmas that were thrown in jail, no trial, no nothing,
• 1:31:50
  and then the media just reports on it like it's white supremacists. You
• 1:31:54
  know that that's ridiculous, right, This is another one of their magic cards,
• 1:31:57
  white supremacy, patriarchy. You know, Trump like that, it's stop
• 1:32:02
  falling for this ship because something could happen to someone you know, and you
• 1:32:08
  will know it's not fair and you'll know it's not just. And you can't
• 1:32:11
  play this middle ground shit. You just can't, like it's either right or
• 1:32:15
  it's wrong to throw someone in jail without trial. So that's why I picked
• 1:32:19
  the story because that could have been me. I could have been in jail
• 1:32:23
  right now. I might. I'm lindsay, I don't know what she would
• 1:32:26
  do. She doesn't have a car, she doesn't a driver's license. I
• 1:32:30
  mean, what would what would happen to us? So I think this is
• 1:32:32
  really important for you guys to understand that I don't hold positions because I like
• 1:32:38
  to be partisan. IM it's not partisan to know what's right. It's like,
• 1:32:43
  I'm sorry, it's just not so anyway that those are my thoughts.
• 1:32:46
  I decided to get off my get off my chest. That enshrined in our
• 1:32:51
  constitution in the United States is the right of peaceful assembly, and that right
• 1:32:59
  doesn't get taken away from person A because person B decided to be an asshole
• 1:33:06
  or person C got tricked by and entrapped by federal agents. So in this
• 1:33:15
  situation, I think what's happening right now is going to in the future,
• 1:33:21
  depending on which side of the conflict that we're in right now, the cold
• 1:33:27
  civil war that we're in right now that people aren't really acknowledging as a civil
• 1:33:31
  war and probably won't for a hundred years. Whichever side wins, they're either
• 1:33:38
  going to decide that the right of peaceful assembly is illegitimate, or they're going
• 1:33:44
  to decide this is one of the darkest times in modern history in the United
• 1:33:47
  States because our constitutional right of peaceful assembly was completely ignored in regard to everyone
• 1:33:58
  that was at that location that didn't commit any kind of crime and still got
• 1:34:04
  arrested, thrown in jail, and is being treated more harshly than rapists,
• 1:34:11
  murderers, baby killers, um and and and pedophiles even don't get treated this
• 1:34:18
  harshally in the system. So that's one thing. The other thing is about
• 1:34:25
  about Tucker Carlson and cherry picking. Like I don't know if if you've ever
• 1:34:30
  had a cherry tree out there on your property, but um, cherry picking
• 1:34:36
  is very very specific in the way that it works. You have to you
• 1:34:41
  you go up on something tall, whether it's a big ladder or or a
• 1:34:44
  cherry picker, um, a big, big machine and uh and you uh,
• 1:34:51
  you you reach in among all kinds of you know, foliage and and
• 1:34:57
  so on to get the ones haven't been pecked on by birds. So you'll
• 1:35:02
  see there's there's lots and lots of cherries, but a large number of them
• 1:35:08
  have been partially eaten by the time you get to them. So cherry picking,
• 1:35:13
  he's always is getting the good parts for your goal, which is to
• 1:35:18
  be able to eat the cherries yourself. Right. But what you can't do,
• 1:35:24
  what you absolutely, under no circumstances can you do this is pick cherries
• 1:35:30
  from a banana tree. Right. You can't from a banana plant. You
• 1:35:34
  can't pick cherries from an apple tree, can't pick cherries from a blueberry bush.
• 1:35:41
  Doesn't work. You can't pick cherries from cornstalks, right, Tucker Carlson
• 1:35:47
  could not show footage of things that didn't happen. He doesn't have that.
• 1:35:53
  And the other thing is you really can't hide the arrest of the tree very
• 1:36:00
  easily. Cherry trees get pretty big. So if if they really wanted to
• 1:36:08
  accuse him of cherry picking, all you have to do to undermine somebody who
• 1:36:14
  is using cherry picking to present a false picture is to show the context that
• 1:36:20
  they left out. Left out well, the mainstream press, the establishment media,
• 1:36:27
  they have not shown that context. That context has never been seen,
• 1:36:33
  like there's been some video that's come out. Carlson himself showed some of the
• 1:36:40
  violent aspects of the protest, which pale in comparison to the Antipa protests that
• 1:36:46
  burned down whole cities, whole neighborhoods, caused you know, death, where
• 1:36:53
  they broke into people's houses and took their pets and killed them and everything like
• 1:36:59
  that. All of that stuff. You know that that that's very different from
• 1:37:02
  what happened on January sixth, and uh, if if it's not, you
• 1:37:09
  know, if it's not that big of a difference, then By god,
• 1:37:13
  they should just show us. It'd be very easy to convince the American public
• 1:37:19
  if they just pulled out the footage of Washington burning that day. You know,
• 1:37:25
  if there's if there's just something showing that they set the capital on fire,
• 1:37:31
  then then I'll take it back. But I haven't seen any such thing,
• 1:37:38
  right, I haven't seen pictures of a news reporter with a wall of
• 1:37:43
  fire encompassing multiple buildings behind them going mostly peaceful, fiery, but mostly peaceful
• 1:37:50
  protests about January sixth. You know, the most I've seen was some dipshit
• 1:37:58
  yelling silly thing after being let around the Capitol. And and you know,
• 1:38:04
  I'm not even sure the guy is entirely a dip shit. Now, he
• 1:38:08
  might have just been caught up in the moment, but um, well,
• 1:38:15
  I don't know. Well, it seems like it was a very emotional moment.
• 1:38:20
  Yeah, he was probably just putting on a performance, you know,
• 1:38:24
  Like I mean, do you see the pride parades going on? Like God,
• 1:38:29
  I'm just saying it's not even at that level. But I'm saying I've
• 1:38:32
  never I've never gone to Pride parades because Pride parades or not, I'm not,
• 1:38:39
  um, inactive when it comes to to around around being gay, or
• 1:38:46
  or being trans or anything. It's just pride parades don't do anything to further
• 1:38:53
  gay rights. They are intended to provoke, and yeah, I don't think
• 1:38:58
  being provocative UM is the way to go with with that particular situation being being
• 1:39:09
  that we're trying to demonstrate to the public that we are not a threat,
• 1:39:13
  that we are just ordinary people with different lifestyle between adults. UM. That
• 1:39:21
  is private and should be ignored and and not be treated as if it is
• 1:39:30
  the main thing about us, UM in regard to like our employment and our
• 1:39:34
  our engagement with our communities. Pride parades are counterproductive in my opinion. You
• 1:39:42
  know, and once upon a time when there were parades to show, you
• 1:39:48
  know, people showed up in their professional attire to show, you know,
• 1:39:53
  hey, yes, I am an office worker and I'm gay or bisexual or
• 1:39:58
  whatever. I am a nurse and I'm gay or bisexual or whatever. You
• 1:40:03
  know that that's different. That tells people that there is nothing out of the
• 1:40:11
  ordinary about not being straight, aside from the fact that you know, in
• 1:40:16
  and of itself, there's a difference, obviously, but it's it doesn't make
• 1:40:20
  you all around weird and scary. Well, Pride parades today, what do
• 1:40:28
  they do. They bring out every bit of kink they can find, They
• 1:40:31
  get in people's faces, they pull out the BDSM gear, They get as
• 1:40:39
  weird as humanly possible, and then turn around and wonder why people think that
• 1:40:45
  that makes them scary, Like what the hell? Right? And I think
• 1:40:53
  in terms of the January sixth thing, if you look at the difference between
• 1:40:59
  left and right in America today, it's to the left not being any of
• 1:41:05
  those things right, not being glittery, not being half naked, not being
• 1:41:12
  weird. That's the thing that makes you scary. They're probably focused on QAnon
• 1:41:16
  because he was the closest thing to something unusual or odd in the group,
• 1:41:25
  and they think that that would make everybody else afraid of the January six protesters.
• 1:41:30
  Look, they think this guy is weird, so you know they obviously
• 1:41:35
  they won't like this. If we just show him, they'll they'll make people.
• 1:41:40
  Everybody will be scared of the whole January sixth protest. And we can
• 1:41:43
  make it, we can make it anti American and whatnot. Right, I
• 1:41:49
  don't think people realized that it's not the differences that make people upset and afraid
• 1:42:00
  and strange. Um, it's it's the it's the politics. You know.
• 1:42:09
  They weren't trying to get in your face. They were they were trying to
• 1:42:12
  show their patriotism. Whereas, like I said, Pride parades. Pride parades
• 1:42:17
  go back years and years and they were not these affairs historically, they were
• 1:42:24
  not these affairs of look as weird as humanly possible in public. The whole
• 1:42:28
  point was getting people to see, guess what we are as human as you
• 1:42:31
  are, and you know, like I don't know, well, I mean
• 1:42:39
  it's almost like porn in public now I hate it. Yeah. My point
• 1:42:44
  was that, you know what qan On Shaman did, isn't that crazy?
• 1:42:46
  When you look at all of the it's not just Pride parades. It's like
• 1:42:49
  every protest has somebody in costume doing something to get attention. So I don't
• 1:42:56
  think that that's any different. I mean, look at the environmental activists and
• 1:43:00
  the crazy shit they do, Look at PETA and all of the edgy shit
• 1:43:02
  that they do. It's it's everywhere. I think. Actually, Quanon Shaman
• 1:43:05
  is pretty tame by comparison. The guy wasn't wearing a shirt basically, and
• 1:43:10
  he looked like he was part of the water Buffalo lodge from the Flintstones,
• 1:43:13
  and that was basically he yelled a couple of times sky before the doors,
• 1:43:16
  very excited to be Yeah, yeah, sure, I'm saying it was like
• 1:43:20
  I didn't damage anything. He's not even the guy that's you know, there
• 1:43:25
  were some people that stole one of Nancy Pelosi's laptop computers. Yeah, which
• 1:43:30
  you know, well you know if that was again and hopefully you know that
• 1:43:35
  person has tried. But like but again, like the biggest, the worst
• 1:43:40
  thing that happened in the whole thing was that they they walked some places that
• 1:43:44
  they weren't supposed to walk. There was some proper damage, and yeah,
• 1:43:47
  there was some minor theft and that, but like what's going on right now,
• 1:43:51
  it's not even it's it's not even close. Like like there are hordes
• 1:43:55
  of people going into walmarts and targets and private businesses and jewelry stores and they're
• 1:44:01
  just you know, stripping it of everything they can get away with, and
• 1:44:05
  they leave a giant mess and they destroy property and they leave. Yeah.
• 1:44:14
  Yeah, so like I'm saying, it's not about what happened because we can
• 1:44:18
  go back and forth forever on that. It's about the response, and the
• 1:44:23
  response to the government had is completely inappropriate, and I you know, I'm
• 1:44:28
  almost tempted to say that no one should be arrested just because they overreacted so
• 1:44:33
  much. But if there's a way to like do a fair investigation and only
• 1:44:39
  convict those of the crimes that are proportionate to whatever they did, if they
• 1:44:43
  can prove it, then that would be great. I just don't think that's
• 1:44:45
  what's gonna happen. I think that, in all honesty, I think the
• 1:44:48
  presence of police in the crowd that we're getting people riled up, like the
• 1:44:55
  Yeah, the effort at entrapment undermine even the legitimacy of prosecuting. Like the
• 1:45:02
  guys that stole the laptop. Did they do that because it was their idea
• 1:45:06
  or did they do it because it was suggested? Yeah, and we don't
• 1:45:10
  know. Did a fed hand in the laptop and say take this? I
• 1:45:13
  mean, who knows? That's what I'm saying, Like there was clearly other
• 1:45:15
  shit going on. But Okay, I got we gotta move on because I
• 1:45:18
  gotta do the patrons up. I gotta pick up lids. But go ahead,
• 1:45:23
  Mike, all right, I'll be as quick as possible. That's okay,
• 1:45:27
  as far as I understand it, the CIA is meant to deal with
• 1:45:30
  foreign threats and dangers and interference, while the FBI is supposed to deal with
• 1:45:35
  domestic threats and dangers and interference. I realized that's not the best set of
• 1:45:42
  descriptis since the CIA, as they have now admitted, killed Jka, and
• 1:45:49
  I would go ahead and classify the affairs of the setting president to be a
• 1:45:54
  very much a domestic affair. It wasn't being trolled by Cubans, as it
• 1:46:00
  turns out, he was in fact being controlled by Americans, as is traditional
• 1:46:04
  in an American leader. But the CIA went ahead and took him out anyway,
• 1:46:10
  because because he wanted to dismantle the CIA and scatter its contents to the
• 1:46:17
  corner of the earth. So really the FBI, the FBI, and the
• 1:46:21
  CIA are interchangeable. They're really only in the business of defeating the enemies of
• 1:46:30
  the FBI and the CIA, not the enemies of America. Yet, the
• 1:46:33
  enemies of the FBI and the CIA in with disoever forms they might take.
• 1:46:39
  This is this is a consistent problem with government entities. They're supposed to exist
• 1:46:45
  to be you know, use social enterprises that exist for the greater good,
• 1:46:51
  but they always they always resort to the greater good. We we these agencies
• 1:47:00
  need to stay alive. So it's not new social or pro social at all.
• 1:47:04
  It is sort of this calmerit monster that stays alive by sucking on the
• 1:47:10
  teeth of the pro social nature of human beings. But the subjects of xenophobia
• 1:47:17
  and hycophobia things have attempted to discuss in the past. They're both very real,
• 1:47:24
  very clear, and very present dangers to any semblance of harmonious living in
• 1:47:31
  humans. But there's been some asymmetry lately. We're here in the West,
• 1:47:39
  are at a point in history in which we are irrationally witch hunting any crumb
• 1:47:45
  of proposed xenophobia we can find. Even if we have to perform exploratory surgery
• 1:47:50
  on the genitals of a five year old, we will find that gosh darn
• 1:47:56
  xenophobia, and we will eradicated. Meanwhile, almost nobody has even heard of
• 1:48:01
  the word microphobia, let alone the concept it describes. I hate my dad,
• 1:48:11
  of course, of course you hate your dad. I mean, who
• 1:48:13
  wouldn't hate their dad. That's not a problem at all. You're supposed to
• 1:48:15
  hate your dad. It's just the way we do things around here. But
• 1:48:20
  something like I disapprove of the geopolitical affairs of the Chinese Communist Party. No,
• 1:48:28
  no, no, no notice? Does the racism junior d You see,
• 1:48:33
  disapproving of communism is the stuff of what is it now? Q?
• 1:48:39
  And on adjacent c. Yeah, this is a this is a baseless conspiracy
• 1:48:44
  theory. But your dad, yeah, he hates you. All men do
• 1:48:48
  because the patriarchy, and it's all men's fault. Yes, all men,
• 1:48:53
  Which brings me to that apparently all important difference between the FBI and the CI,
• 1:49:00
  if you were to paint such things in the colors of their extremes,
• 1:49:04
  that is, the CIA is in charge of xenophobia and the FBI is in
• 1:49:12
  charge of aphobia. That's not supposed to be the case, obviously, because
• 1:49:17
  such is the nature of government agencies. They inexorably stray from what is good
• 1:49:24
  for the nation to what is good for the programmed nature of the agency in
• 1:49:30
  question, the FBI, whoever is in charge of the FBI, they forgot
• 1:49:36
  that their priorities lie with cracking down on what's happening on American style, and
• 1:49:42
  they got into their heads that they need to be cracking down on the American
• 1:49:46
  people themselves. I don't know how they got this into their heads. I
• 1:49:51
  suspect it might perhaps have something to do with President Barack Obama. But fundamentally,
• 1:49:59
  if you're having an micophobia problem, then you need to focus on those
• 1:50:03
  who wish to destroy America. Surely that's the point, right of every American
• 1:50:12
  government institution. The point is to serve America and the American people. But
• 1:50:15
  there's a rule I've discovered regarding states and governments. I haven't come up with
• 1:50:23
  a name for it yet, answers on a postcard, something among the lines
• 1:50:28
  of any given government whose job it is to serve the majority will eventually realize
• 1:50:36
  that all it really needs to do is pretend to serve the majority. And
• 1:50:43
  then eventually it will eventually realize that it doesn't even need to pretend to serve
• 1:50:50
  the majority. If they instend pretend to care about the minority, then they
• 1:50:59
  don't even have to bother caring about the majority. Why why enslave a minority
• 1:51:06
  when you can enslave the majority and care so much more? Work out of
• 1:51:14
  them, and then the only thing you need to even pretend to care about
• 1:51:17
  is the minority. And it's really easy caring about the minority or pretending to
• 1:51:23
  care about the minority. You don't have to do ship for them. You
• 1:51:25
  just say, oh, I love these people, so let's go ahead and
• 1:51:30
  enslave the non other other people. Power follows the path of police resistance always
• 1:51:40
  the only solution to corrupted power, or and he's absolutely corrupted power. You
• 1:51:46
  need to notice that that that power follows the part of the last resistance,
• 1:51:53
  and that the only solution to reduce the power of the aforementioned government, in
• 1:51:58
  my humble opinions, is start with the likes of the FBI. Because the
• 1:52:02
  FBI is a government institution, there's tasked with basically okaphobia, basically the exact
• 1:52:09
  opposite of what the government institution is supposed to do. Right, you can,
• 1:52:13
  you can, you can keep the CIA. I don't know, but
• 1:52:16
  by all means, and please don't kill me. I may be a foreigner
• 1:52:21
  to America, but I happen to love it here, and yes I am
• 1:52:26
  here right now, and I happen to love Americans unless I am not an
• 1:52:31
  American, but I would appreciate it if the American government would stop institution the
• 1:52:35
  oppressing Americans. Yeah, I know. Well whatever, So that wasn't as
• 1:52:42
  short a sorry, No, it's fine when you when you come here to
• 1:52:46
  Virginia next not this coming weekend, the next weekend. I want to talk
• 1:52:51
  to you about okaphobia because I've been talking about it a lot with lindsay so
• 1:52:56
  and but I don't want to get you said, is the tool that communism
• 1:53:00
  is the audiology? Yeah? I think I think the other way around.
• 1:53:04
  Well, yes we can. We can talk about Yes, I have some
• 1:53:12
  I have some herb and we will do that and then talk about it.
• 1:53:15
  So Allia, Well, anyway, you will just track that statement right now.
• 1:53:28
  I'm sorry. Yes, I do obey the law. Um, but
• 1:53:31
  anyway, I have a card for that. Um. All right. So
• 1:53:36
  that's it for the show. So we're gonna go into the Patron show now
• 1:53:40
  and we're gonna be looking at this article from the Guardian. Women who kill
• 1:53:44
  newborns. Newborns are deeply unwell, so why are they being tried for murder?
• 1:53:48
  By Julie Wheelwright. We will find out what it is she has to
• 1:53:53
  say, mind boggles, Yes, what could it? Possibly mean umho life
• 1:54:00
  buggles in the wound. We will see how this is the fault of men
• 1:54:05
  in patriarchy as soon as we get to it. So, if you guys
• 1:54:10
  want to join us, you have to become a Badger by going to feed
• 1:54:13
  the Badger dot com and sending up a monthly subscription five bucks a month.
• 1:54:15
  We'll get you into our discord where you'll be able to participate in like watching
• 1:54:20
  the additional content and a lot of other things that you can get like a
• 1:54:24
  first look at before we release it. But you can also if you give
• 1:54:27
  a higher levels, be a part of the actual panel discussion like we are
• 1:54:30
  doing right now. So that's feed the Badger dot com and you can sign
• 1:54:34
  up five bucks a month and hopefully we'll see you there if you want to
• 1:54:39
  try it out our little community for free. You have access to some of
• 1:54:42
  the rooms by going to Badger Nation dot online and you'll should be able to
• 1:54:45
  get into the discord. It's the same discord, but it's just like a
• 1:54:48
  little bit it's reduced access, I would say. So that's a Badger Nation
• 1:54:54
  dot online. Somebody people are pointing out to remember the super chouse. I'm
• 1:54:58
  gonna yeah, I'm gonna read the I'm not I'm not client canceling yet.
• 1:55:01
  I also have a super chat and the poll is finished, but I just
• 1:55:04
  wanted to throw those out there. So, first of all, Luga Pole,
• 1:55:08
  so is the view that the government's handling of January six protesters is a
• 1:55:12
  partisan issue? Is it the view? Is this a partisan issue? Eighty
• 1:55:16
  six percent said yes, fourteen percent said no. Maybe you guys, missenters
• 1:55:20
  to the question or I didn't frame it very well as possible. So but
• 1:55:24
  let me know what, you guys. It's a partisan issue in that there's
• 1:55:30
  there's two schools of thought in regard to that handling, and one school of
• 1:55:35
  thought is big government and government power and anything that questions that big government and
• 1:55:41
  that government power is criminal and should be smashed. And of course the other
• 1:55:45
  school of thought holds with the Constitution of the United States. Yeah, and
• 1:55:50
  so it's partisan between those two groups. You're either going to be on one
• 1:55:58
  side of that or the other. Yeah. Yeah, Well it shouldn't be
• 1:56:02
  that way, but that's what it is. So repeal the nineteenth. Okay,
• 1:56:06
  so thank you for voting in the poll. Now we got some super
• 1:56:11
  childs. I got three of them. So Anonymous gave us five bucks and
• 1:56:14
  said, Gilain Maxwell's technically a person of color according to our fellow Jews.
• 1:56:17
  You know, being Jewish is a weird thing because you can be a white
• 1:56:20
  or a personal color. It's sort of flip flops. I know that,
• 1:56:24
  Like, um, black activists think think of Jews as just white. They
• 1:56:29
  call him spicy white. You remember what happened to uh Brett Weinstein and he
• 1:56:34
  entered this chat and they were attacking him and he was like, hey,
• 1:56:36
  I'm Jewish, I'm not white. Um and then okay, so that's that,
• 1:56:42
  Thank you, Anonymous. Then he's John Cena. You know what,
• 1:56:46
  I think I have something for that in here somewhere. I don't know if
• 1:56:51
  I can not now that I need it, I don't know if I can
• 1:56:54
  find it, but um, oh yeah, here it is. His name
• 1:56:59
  is johns all right, Richard Bierre gives us five bucks. That's he's John
• 1:57:06
  Cena and says I have heard that there are reports of child labor in some
• 1:57:11
  of Ben and Jerry's facilities. I wouldn't be surprised. It's like the people
• 1:57:14
  who virtuasing of the most in their corporations are usually like you know, guilty
• 1:57:18
  of what they're accusing America. And I put that in quotes of doing like
• 1:57:24
  Nike and and well just pick your poison apple like all these woke gas companies.
• 1:57:30
  Thank you for that. And then lastly, thank you for the show.
• 1:57:33
  Gives us five dollars and says just the tip, So thank you for
• 1:57:38
  that. Thank you come again. And then we got a super chant from
• 1:57:42
  land Ree Ray who gives us five bucks and says, I remember an LA
• 1:57:46
  Pride parade in the late nineteen seventies, some dude tossing a baton in the
• 1:57:49
  air with the butt cut out of his spandex adults rushman. It was scandalousts
• 1:57:56
  at the time. Yeah, it seems kind of normal now. But thank
• 1:58:00
  you, thank you for that. And yeah, so now we're going to
• 1:58:03
  head into the Patron Show and talk about that other article. So thanks guys
• 1:58:09
  so much. I look forward to see your comments. If you guys liked
• 1:58:11
  this video, please hit like subscribe. If you're not already subscribed, hit
• 1:58:15
  the bell for notifications, leave us a comment, let us know what you
• 1:58:17
  usdays think about what we discussed, and please please please share this video because
• 1:58:21
  sharing is caring. Thank you guys so much for coming on today's episode of
• 1:58:26
  HBr News and we will talk to you all in the next video.